OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Winter Park, Florida/City Commission
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

City Commission Work Session: Department Budget Presentations - July 9, 2026

City Commission — Thursday, July 9, 2026
BodyWinter Park, Florida
SessionCity Commission
DateThursday, July 9, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 1:59:29

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it

Speaker numbers apply only to this recording.

Speaker 1

0:08

So this is a continuation of what we started last night with the public works presentation.

0:12

You're gonna hear from Jason Seely, Parks and Recreation, and his departmental budget.

Speaker 2

0:28

Colorblind too.

Speaker 3

0:29

All right, there we go.

0:31

So before we begin, I'm gonna, it's a little bit different format from yesterday's with mine.

0:35

I'm gonna be sticking mainly to the presenting you guys with the 90% budget and what that 10% reduction would look

Unassigned speaker

0:40

like.

Speaker 3

0:41

Um each slide's pretty much the same.

0:42

We're gonna go through division through division.

0:45

Um in those, I included um expenditures for the last four fiscal years, or so you kind of see historically where we've been as far as our budgets for each division, and then where it's appropriate for the budget for the divisions where we have revenue.

0:58

I also included those figures for last year, the last full fiscal year, and then where we're at year to date for this year, so that way you kind of have that information as we go.

1:07

Parks and rec's a little different than some of our other departments where in some instances we can save a dollar

Unassigned speaker

1:12

and

Speaker 3

1:12

expenditures, but it'll cost us two dollars in revenue.

1:15

Um, so we kind of have to look at those when we're going to kind of keep that in mind when we're looking at budget cuts.

1:19

Uh right.

1:21

Um, so just a quick one here is this summary of the department.

1:24

So what that provides you there is a potential reduction for each of those divisions.

1:29

You'll see there comes to about 1.54 million.

1:32

Um, the total department budgets around 14.8, and then we have approximately seven million, seven million in revenues that uh go that offsets that expenditure.

Unassigned speaker

1:44

All

Speaker 3

1:44

right, so the first department we're gonna look at is park maintenance.

1:47

Um I'm not gonna go through the primary role unless you guys want me to, but it's park maintenance is basically your right-aways and park maintenance uh functions.

1:55

And so in this department, we you know we we looked at we could um take uh uh eliminate the use of the con of our right now.

2:07

We have a private contractor that does 330,000 dollars worth the of work in the city each year in our department.

2:14

That is the cemeteries and then the library and event center coming to a total of

Speaker 2

2:18

$90,000.

Speaker 3

2:20

Um

Speaker 2

2:21

so

Speaker 3

2:22

what we could do there is where these the the impact would be that in order for us to take that in-house and do it and save that money, we would have to look at probably cutting not cutting back, but reducing the number of uh the frequency of visits to say our mini parks and those sorts of things.

2:38

So something that gets done maybe twice a month might only get done once a month.

2:42

Something that gets done um once a week might get done every other week, and that the trade-off would be that we could be able to take that $90,000 worth of contractor work back in house and save that money.

2:53

Um the other um the other item we know we have is that we have um about $189,000, $190,000 that is uh contractor pay that's paid to the contractors for the maintenance

Unassigned speaker

3:07

of

Speaker 3

3:07

uh of non-park sites.

3:09

So these are stormwater ponds.

3:11

Um

Unassigned speaker

3:12

so

Speaker 3

3:12

it's not really a parks and rec function, it's not really a parks and rec property.

3:16

And so that's one thing where we might want to look at re uh reallocating that fee that cost, and then the same thing with um the wastewater facilities, water and wastewater facilities.

3:27

So we each one of those treatment plants we maintain those as well through the contractor, and so that has a cost to the city of 51,000.

3:34

Um so really the only impact there, you know, the two that I just mentioned um with the treatment centers and the stormwater ponds.

3:41

It's not for me and for the department, it's a reduction, but it's still gonna have to be paid in the city.

3:46

So it's kind of it doesn't have as much value as a straight reduction, but I think it you know, when we're looking at budgets by department, we kind of have to look at that.

3:54

And then so

Speaker 1

3:54

what you're you're basically saying that would get shifted to the utility and and to the stormwater utility and be paid for out of those cracks.

4:03

User fees.

4:03

Yeah, might have to go up.

Speaker 3

4:06

Correct.

4:07

Um and then, like I said, the only service in the the thing that you would see is that as far as a level of impact on level of service impact would just be in order to get this to do the cemeteries in order to do the um event center, you know, you'd have to.

4:19

I think during the winter months when this growth season's relatively slow, it wouldn't be that big of a deal.

4:23

During the summer months, like right now, from say June, July through September, October.

4:28

You might have a little more frequency of you know, some mini park you're getting a phone call about the grass being a little too high, things like

Unassigned speaker

4:34

that.

Speaker 3

4:35

Um kind of keep on moving along.

4:38

Landscape maintenance.

4:39

Um, so this is a lot of a majority of their work you see on Park Avenue in Central Park, um, but they also do landscaping throughout the city, but that'd be the heaviest area.

4:48

Um here we um you know we have we have it we have an option later on when we look at the community center to look at funding that we get from the CRA.

Unassigned speaker

5:00

And so we have if we want to look at we could we could look at reducing some of that CRA money that goes towards community programming and events and redirect that towards maybe upgrade up uh a higher level of service on the avenue as far as those uh pot flower pots and those beds, and or that to help offset that reduction.

Speaker 3

5:15

So you still be able to have the same level of service, but you'd have to take it from somewhere else.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Parks and Recreation██████████████████████████████████████████42%
Public Safety██████████████████████████26%
Budget Equity Analysis█████████████████17%
Fiscal Sustainability█████5%
Election Procedures███3%
Traffic Safety███3%
Community Engagement█1%
Procedural█1%
Engineering And Infrastructure█1%
Summary of Proceedings

City Commission Work Session: Department Budget Presentations - July 9, 2026

The City Commission of Winter Park held a work session on July 9, 2026, to review departmental budget presentations focusing on 90% budget scenarios and potential 10% reductions. The meeting featured detailed presentations from Parks and Recreation, Police, and Fire departments, each outlining cost-cutting measures and revenue enhancement options. Discussions also included operational changes, service level impacts, and the timeline for decisions pending potential state tax reform.

Discussion Items

  • Parks and Recreation Department Budget (Jason Seely):

    • The department's total budget is approximately $14.8 million, with about $7 million in revenues offsetting expenditures. A potential reduction of $1.54 million was outlined.
    • Park Maintenance: Savings of $330,000 by eliminating a private contractor for cemetery, library, and event center maintenance, with in-house work reduced frequency at mini parks.
    • Landscape Maintenance: Options include reducing annual plantings ($30,000 savings), swapping annuals for perennials, and using CRA funds to offset costs. A superintendent position was already downgraded, saving $20,000.
    • Urban Forestry: Proposals include eliminating tree planting ($345,000 savings), stopping zonal canopy lifting ($150,000 savings), and ending residential tree permitting ($75,000–$125,000 savings with staff reductions).
    • Recreation and Golf: Revenue-based divisions; potential increases from eliminating resident/nonprofit discounts, passing credit card fees to customers, and annual fee adjustments. No major cuts proposed for tennis, athletics, or event center, though early voting at the library was noted to cost $75,000–$100,000 in lost rental revenue.
    • Events: Proposed cutting three city-funded events ($18,000 operating, $15,000 staffing) and reducing CRA-funded events by 50%.
    • Aquatics: Reducing hours at Katie Way and community center pools during winter months ($150,000 savings); longer-term possibility of contracting out Katie Way pool ($500,000 savings).
    • Golf Courses: Winter Park 9 contract maintenance will save $150,000. Pines golf course can reduce part-time staff by two positions ($40,000). Covered driving range planned without computer system.
    • Commissioner Lindsay praised youth programs and emphasized avoiding staff cuts that would burn out employees. Commissioner Russell suggested field sponsorships to generate revenue.
  • Police Department Budget (Chief Olkerson):

    • The department has 123 full-time employees (85 sworn). Key performance indicators: 96% of 911 calls answered in under 10 seconds; average response time to priority calls improved to 138 seconds year-to-date.
    • Crime saw a 20% reduction in 2025 (calendar year), but year-to-date 2026 shows an increase.
    • For a 10% reduction ($1.1 million), the chief proposed cutting four detective positions, sunsetting the HART team (homeless advocacy), eliminating one traffic officer, one community service officer, and contracting legal services.
    • Service reductions: reducing lakes patrol overtime ($20,000–$25,000) and cutting city event overtime ($100,000).
    • Operational changes: maintaining body cameras (critical for trust and protection), but potentially trimming software costs.
    • Revenue enhancements: expanding red light cameras (ordinance process required); increasing the city's fee for off-duty police details from $5 to $6 per hour.
    • Commission discussion: expressed support for body cameras and red light camera expansion. Chief noted that school zone cameras are not feasible due to low violation volume.
  • Fire Department Budget (Chief Haggard):

    • Operating budget of $18.7 million; all increases in costs were absorbed to keep budget flat except salaries.
    • Key performance indicators: 641 calls year-to-date, with 90% arrival on suppression units within target (noted low number of incidents makes statistics volatile).
    • For a 10% reduction ($1.87 million), the chief outlined three options:
      • Option 1 (Quick cuts): Eliminate medical education specialist, emergency management coordinator, two fire inspector positions, roll back four net-new fire positions added in FY24-25, and close Station 64 (saving $1.875 million).
      • Option 2: Reduce daily minimum staffing from 19 to 16 (eliminating overtime; $575,000–$600,000 savings).
      • Option 3 (Combination): Mix of reduced staffing, increased fees (fire false alarm fees, fire inspector training fees), and a potential fire service assessment fee (target $315,000).
    • Discussion on fire service fee: Many cities have adopted separate fire assessment fees. Chief noted that 30% of call volume comes from 10 assisted living addresses, and a user fee is being explored regionally.
    • Commissioner Russell asked about maximizing Medicare/Medicaid reimbursement for ambulance transports; chief confirmed aggressive third-party billing and high recovery rates.
  • Other Items:

    • Commissioner Lindsay raised the possibility of transferring the small pocket park at Holt and Lakeview (owned by city) to Rollins College for maintenance. Staff agreed to bring a workshop on this and other small parcels, possibly at the September 10th meeting.
    • City Manager summarized next steps: staff will compile a list of cost-cutting concepts and revenue enhancements with recommendations and timing options (immediate, after tax reform vote in November, or future fiscal year). The budget can be amended after adoption if tax reform passes.

Key Outcomes

  • The Commission directed staff to bring back a detailed list of all proposed reductions and revenue enhancements with staff recommendations, including timing (immediate, conditional on tax reform, or later).
  • Staff will prepare a workshop for September 10th to discuss transferring small parks and right-of-way parcels to other entities.
  • The Police Chief will draft a red light camera ordinance for Commission consideration.
  • The Fire Chief will continue to study a fire service assessment fee and bring it forward.
  • The Commission noted that the budget is currently balanced at the existing millage rate; any reductions would free up funds for reserves or other priorities (e.g., paving). The final decision on reductions will be made after the November election results on the proposed homestead exemption tax reduction.

Meeting Transcript

So this is a continuation of what we started last night with the public works presentation. You're gonna hear from Jason Seely, Parks and Recreation, and his departmental budget. Colorblind too. All right, there we go. So before we begin, I'm gonna, it's a little bit different format from yesterday's with mine. I'm gonna be sticking mainly to the presenting you guys with the 90% budget and what that 10% reduction would look like. Um each slide's pretty much the same. We're gonna go through division through division. Um in those, I included um expenditures for the last four fiscal years, or so you kind of see historically where we've been as far as our budgets for each division, and then where it's appropriate for the budget for the divisions where we have revenue. I also included those figures for last year, the last full fiscal year, and then where we're at year to date for this year, so that way you kind of have that information as we go. Parks and rec's a little different than some of our other departments where in some instances we can save a dollar and expenditures, but it'll cost us two dollars in revenue. Um, so we kind of have to look at those when we're going to kind of keep that in mind when we're looking at budget cuts. Uh right. Um, so just a quick one here is this summary of the department. So what that provides you there is a potential reduction for each of those divisions. You'll see there comes to about 1.54 million. Um, the total department budgets around 14.8, and then we have approximately seven million, seven million in revenues that uh go that offsets that expenditure. All right, so the first department we're gonna look at is park maintenance. Um I'm not gonna go through the primary role unless you guys want me to, but it's park maintenance is basically your right-aways and park maintenance uh functions. And so in this department, we you know we we looked at we could um take uh uh eliminate the use of the con of our right now. We have a private contractor that does 330,000 dollars worth the of work in the city each year in our department. That is the cemeteries and then the library and event center coming to a total of $90,000. Um so what we could do there is where these the the impact would be that in order for us to take that in-house and do it and save that money, we would have to look at probably cutting not cutting back, but reducing the number of uh the frequency of visits to say our mini parks and those sorts of things. So something that gets done maybe twice a month might only get done once a month. Something that gets done um once a week might get done every other week, and that the trade-off would be that we could be able to take that $90,000 worth of contractor work back in house and save that money. Um the other um the other item we know we have is that we have um about $189,000, $190,000 that is uh contractor pay that's paid to the contractors for the maintenance of uh of non-park sites. So these are stormwater ponds. Um so it's not really a parks and rec function, it's not really a parks and rec property. And so that's one thing where we might want to look at re uh reallocating that fee that cost, and then the same thing with um the wastewater facilities, water and wastewater facilities. So we each one of those treatment plants we maintain those as well through the contractor, and so that has a cost to the city of 51,000. Um so really the only impact there, you know, the two that I just mentioned um with the treatment centers and the stormwater ponds. It's not for me and for the department, it's a reduction, but it's still gonna have to be paid in the city. So it's kind of it doesn't have as much value as a straight reduction, but I think it you know, when we're looking at budgets by department, we kind of have to look at that. And then so what you're you're basically saying that would get shifted to the utility and and to the stormwater utility and be paid for out of those cracks. User fees. Yeah, might have to go up. Correct. Um and then, like I said, the only service in the the thing that you would see is that as far as a level of impact on level of service impact would just be in order to get this to do the cemeteries in order to do the um event center, you know, you'd have to.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com