Speaker numbers apply only to this recording.
The City Commission of Winter Park held a work session on July 9, 2026, to review departmental budget presentations focusing on 90% budget scenarios and potential 10% reductions. The meeting featured detailed presentations from Parks and Recreation, Police, and Fire departments, each outlining cost-cutting measures and revenue enhancement options. Discussions also included operational changes, service level impacts, and the timeline for decisions pending potential state tax reform.
Parks and Recreation Department Budget (Jason Seely):
Police Department Budget (Chief Olkerson):
Fire Department Budget (Chief Haggard):
Other Items:
So this is a continuation of what we started last night with the public works presentation. You're gonna hear from Jason Seely, Parks and Recreation, and his departmental budget. Colorblind too. All right, there we go. So before we begin, I'm gonna, it's a little bit different format from yesterday's with mine. I'm gonna be sticking mainly to the presenting you guys with the 90% budget and what that 10% reduction would look like. Um each slide's pretty much the same. We're gonna go through division through division. Um in those, I included um expenditures for the last four fiscal years, or so you kind of see historically where we've been as far as our budgets for each division, and then where it's appropriate for the budget for the divisions where we have revenue. I also included those figures for last year, the last full fiscal year, and then where we're at year to date for this year, so that way you kind of have that information as we go. Parks and rec's a little different than some of our other departments where in some instances we can save a dollar and expenditures, but it'll cost us two dollars in revenue. Um, so we kind of have to look at those when we're going to kind of keep that in mind when we're looking at budget cuts. Uh right. Um, so just a quick one here is this summary of the department. So what that provides you there is a potential reduction for each of those divisions. You'll see there comes to about 1.54 million. Um, the total department budgets around 14.8, and then we have approximately seven million, seven million in revenues that uh go that offsets that expenditure. All right, so the first department we're gonna look at is park maintenance. Um I'm not gonna go through the primary role unless you guys want me to, but it's park maintenance is basically your right-aways and park maintenance uh functions. And so in this department, we you know we we looked at we could um take uh uh eliminate the use of the con of our right now. We have a private contractor that does 330,000 dollars worth the of work in the city each year in our department. That is the cemeteries and then the library and event center coming to a total of $90,000. Um so what we could do there is where these the the impact would be that in order for us to take that in-house and do it and save that money, we would have to look at probably cutting not cutting back, but reducing the number of uh the frequency of visits to say our mini parks and those sorts of things. So something that gets done maybe twice a month might only get done once a month. Something that gets done um once a week might get done every other week, and that the trade-off would be that we could be able to take that $90,000 worth of contractor work back in house and save that money. Um the other um the other item we know we have is that we have um about $189,000, $190,000 that is uh contractor pay that's paid to the contractors for the maintenance of uh of non-park sites. So these are stormwater ponds. Um so it's not really a parks and rec function, it's not really a parks and rec property. And so that's one thing where we might want to look at re uh reallocating that fee that cost, and then the same thing with um the wastewater facilities, water and wastewater facilities. So we each one of those treatment plants we maintain those as well through the contractor, and so that has a cost to the city of 51,000. Um so really the only impact there, you know, the two that I just mentioned um with the treatment centers and the stormwater ponds. It's not for me and for the department, it's a reduction, but it's still gonna have to be paid in the city. So it's kind of it doesn't have as much value as a straight reduction, but I think it you know, when we're looking at budgets by department, we kind of have to look at that. And then so what you're you're basically saying that would get shifted to the utility and and to the stormwater utility and be paid for out of those cracks. User fees. Yeah, might have to go up. Correct. Um and then, like I said, the only service in the the thing that you would see is that as far as a level of impact on level of service impact would just be in order to get this to do the cemeteries in order to do the um event center, you know, you'd have to.