Speaker numbers apply only to this recording.
On August 27, 2026, the Winter Park City Commission met at City Hall Commission Chambers for a work session to review FY27 budget amendment recommendations. The agenda listed one discussion item; no minutes were available. Staff presented revised state revenue estimates, results of a 10% departmental budget exercise, and a menu of possible reductions, studies, and revenue enhancements. Commissioners tested consensus on immediate cuts, items tied to the November Amendment 3 vote, and mid-year actions.
Exciting. All right. Thank you, everyone. Mayor Commissioners. So today's goals are to give you an update of the state revenue estimates that we've received so far. They often come out way later than we would like to see them. And that they had an apology on the website this year, which was great. So they're they're still working on a local option gas task. We have the others. So we'll address that. I want to go over how the millage voting thresholds have changed and how that might impact no worries. Might impact how we want to go through the budget process at your two readings in September. And then the real meat of today is to go through these sheets that we've compiled and sent to you guys as part of the agenda. And really the goal there is we're we're attempting to go through that, you know, we went through this 10% exercise where we were like, hey, let's practice what that will look like. So all our departments participated, you're seeing the collection of that work. But then we said for the purpose of the FY27 budget and our conversation today, there's a more isolated list of things that came up through the exercise. We were like, maybe these are things we want to try implementing and talking to the commission about. So my my general thought process is unless there's something on one of these no sheets, the November review sheets or the study required sheets, we could probably blast through those pretty quick to try to focus on those items that we might have consensus. But certainly we want to give you all an opportunity as commission that where we have a majority interest. If there's anything on any of these that you want to have considered to be implemented in the FY27 budget, let's do that. Or any or anything that is not on here at all that you want to talk about. Yes, sir. Thank you. Does that include the things like um earning revenue like red light? Yes, that's all in here. Proposal for the we can include that. Yes, and then we already have that in here, and we will definitely hit all that with you guys. Absolutely. Uh if that's okay, I will go ahead and try to rush us through as fast as possible and yell at me when you're ready for me to stop. So uh the first sheet up front is state revenue estimates and some slight tweaks to property taxes. So when we prepare your budget revenues each year, we guess uh at what we think things like half cent sales tax are going to be or the revenue share funding that we get from the state, communication services tax, et cetera. Um every year we're gonna have some sort of adjustment. Unfortunately, my bad news for you this year is we guess too high, and this is a downward adjustment to revenues, which is never fun. Um so the net effect of the changes in ad valorum estimates as well as all of the state revenue estimates that we've received so far, is a downward revision of about 350,000. Um, kind of want you to hold that in your mind as we get to talking about some of the things we could implement now for the FY27 budget because there may be things we find we have agreement on that will allow us to go, you know what, let's recognize this downward revision in revenue, and we can also recognize this downward revision expenses. Your other option is to say, let's wait and see. Um we're going to have by saying that I mean there's a lot of variability in where these end up. So the state is guessing as well. It's always safer for us to take the state numbers than to take you know our budget shop numbers. There's more of them working and figuring all this out, but they're not necessarily always correct. And this is not a very large number in your overall revenues for your general fund, it's about 0.6%. Um you could choose to, yes, let's implement it now or not. Um and that's also going to be some of our commentary as we go through some of the the ones where we might have consensus for implementation. Is there are things that you will tell us, yes, we would like to do this and start this for FY27 budget, but they may be things that are gonna have to be phased in over the year. So we might not be ready to recognize that number in a formal amendment starting at your September meeting. Um, but we will certainly start implementing that item, and then our plan is to come back mid-year and make and recognize any formal change that we've made in your budget, and you can determine what to do with those those funds at that time. Um so that is why those numbers are down. Do you have any questions for me on state revenue estimates or any of that before we move on? Real quick