OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Woodstock City Council Meeting - July 15, 2025

City CouncilTuesday, July 15, 2025
BodyWoodstock, Illinois
SessionCity Council
DateTuesday, July 15, 2025
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 2:52:28

Transcript — Verbatim
0:01

Well, good evening, ladies and gentlemen.

0:03

I'd like to welcome you to this evening's meeting of the uh Woodstock City Council.

0:07

A few brief announcements before we get started this evening.

0:11

The agenda this evening will be shown on the monitors in the room.

0:15

The City of Woodstock operates under what's called a consent format.

0:19

Consent format means that all items for action are considered in a single motion and a single vote on the consent calendar.

0:27

This evening uh there is one item for action that is part of the public hearing at the beginning of the meeting as well.

0:34

There are two opportunities for public comment.

0:36

Uh the first being at the under floor discussion uh near the start of the meeting.

0:42

Members of the public can come forward to the podium in the middle of the room.

0:45

If you're willing to do so, make uh state your name and address for purpose of the record.

0:50

Feel free to make comments to the Woodstock City Council on any items not on this evening's agenda.

0:54

Second opportunity is that when there's items for action, there'll be an opportunity for members of the public to come forward and provide input and comments to the City Council on those items.

1:03

And in the public hearing, there'll be an opportunity for members of the public to come forward to the podium in the middle of the room as well and provide their input under the public hearing.

1:12

Any questions on those brief announcements before we get started?

1:17

All right.

1:17

Hearing none, I'll go ahead and officially call to order this July 15th, 2025 meeting of the Woodstock City Council to order and ask the clerk to please call the roll.

1:27

Councilman Flynn.

1:28

Here.

1:28

Councilman Hansen.

1:30

Here.

1:30

Councilwoman McMahon.

1:31

Here.

1:32

Councilman Nearman.

1:33

Here.

1:33

Councilman Seegers.

1:34

Here.

1:34

Councilwoman Ziembah?

1:36

Here.

1:36

Mayor Turner.

1:37

Here.

1:38

The record reflect that all members of the Woodstock City Council are present in the chambers this evening.

1:42

Jane, would you please confirm that the agenda this evening is the same as the true and published agenda?

1:48

Yes, it is.

1:48

Thank you, Jane.

1:49

Ladies and gentlemen of the council, that being the case, the people's business is duly and appropriately before us.

1:54

The first item on the agenda this evening is under floor discussion a public hearing.

2:00

It's a public hearing on the proposed home rule sales tax, which is a proposal that we are considering this evening for a.25 percent increase to the Woodstock uh home rule sales tax on goods goods in the in the uh city of Woodstock.

2:18

Uh the first item under this uh consideration this evening is a public hearing.

2:25

Uh so at this time I will go ahead and formally open the public hearing uh so that members of the public may come forward to the podium in the in the middle of the room and feel free to make comments uh on this item.

2:37

I will provide some background and a little bit of introduction on this item before we get started this evening.

2:43

So the consideration that uh the City of Woodstock has this evening, and that many of you may be here to provide comments on, is to um is to increase uh the Woodstock uh sales tax.

2:56

Uh currently our portion of the sales tax is one percent that is the same for all municipalities of the City of Woodstock that is that passes through the state.

3:07

Then Woodstock also has a 1 percent uh current home rule home rule sales tax that was added uh on top of that back in 2017.

3:17

It was passed by the council at that time and that provides revenue to the City of Woodstock and a substantial portion of that is has been used traditionally for road improvements.

3:27

Um at the same time, I'll make the comment that when the City Council back in 2017 passed the home rule, the initial home rule sales tax of one percent, uh the city also reduced its portion of the property taxes by 10 percent.

3:42

Um, that doesn't always mean everybody's taxes went down because lots of things go into property tax calculation, but I can assure you that the portion that belongs to the city uh back then for property taxes, which is about 15, 16 percent of the typical tax bill, property tax bill, did go down 10 percent.

4:03

So we did uh we did use portion of the sales tax in order to help fund the revenue loss by lowering property taxes.

4:11

Um what's on the table this evening and that has been under consideration uh by both staff and the city council is looking at um some needs that we have in the community.

4:21

Um those needs are uh some infrastructure uh improvements uh that I'm gonna ask Roscoe to go over uh in just a moment.

4:29

But the other item as well is looking at our recreation center.

4:33

Uh the recurrent recreation center is um I want to remain positive, but it is in sad state as far as uh infrastructure and needing some serious serious repairs.

4:46

Um actually are mandated uh by some uh regulations, right, Mark, around um the the quality of the air and things like that.

4:54

So there's actually some things that are requirements that are that we have to look at and make repairs on.

5:00

But the other element is to is to take uh and to um improve what is a very old and aged uh facility.

5:08

Uh the city of city uh the city council has looked at options, I think, for better part of you know uh my first term as mayor, but especially very actively the last two to three years.

5:19

And we've looked at you know what we could do uh to improve the um the rec center to fix the things that need to be fixed and to make it a much better facility for our residents.

5:30

We considered options such as tearing the thing down and rebuilding.

5:35

We considered whether to start completely from scratch and build it somewhere somewhere else.

5:40

And the cost of a brand new facility at a minimum would be about 20 million dollars and probably upwards of 25 million to uh to replicate the uh what's there.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Public Engagement███████████████████████████27%
Taxation Policy███████████████████19%
Parks and Recreation███████████11%
Procedural█████████9%
Personnel Matters██████6%
Downtown Planning█████5%
Budget Equity Analysis█████5%
Affordable Housing█████5%
Public Works████4%
Summary of Proceedings

Woodstock City Council Meeting - July 15, 2025

The Woodstock City Council met on Tuesday, July 15, 2025, at 7:00 p.m. in City Council Chambers. All council members were present. The main item was a public hearing and ordinance to increase the city's home-rule sales tax from 1.0% to 1.25% to help fund a major rehabilitation of the Woodstock Recreation Center and other capital projects. The Council also approved a $22.5 million general obligation bond ordinance, the consent calendar, and an organizational restructuring.

Consent Calendar

  • The consent calendar was approved unanimously (7-0), with item D8 removed for separate consideration.
  • Accepted June 17, 2025 City Council minutes and minutes from the Arts Commission, Environmental Commission, Historic Preservation Commission, and Plan Commission; accepted the June 2025 Human Resources monthly report and warrants #4154, #4155, and #4156.
  • Approved Manager's Report No. 274 items including: Special Service Area No. 17 (Riverwoods Subdivision backup SSA); an ordinance reaffirming the existing 1% grocery sales tax; the 2025 operating budget for Woodstock Courthouse MM, LLC; crack sealing maintenance with SKC Construction, Inc. (not to exceed $80,000); the Gould Street watermain/street replacement contract with Mauro Sewer Construction, Inc. (not to exceed $1,298,811.75); Addendum #2 with Trotter and Associates, Inc. for construction engineering (not to exceed $178,300); the Woodstock Recreation Center Renovation (PARC) contract with Pacific Construction Services, LLC (base price $8,535,231 plus 10% contingency of $853,523.10, total not to exceed $9,388,754.10); and the School Resource Officer/Police Liaison agreement with Woodstock Community Unit School District 200 for the 2025-26 school year.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • Chad Lezowitz, a 16-year resident, criticized city spending on trucks, the bag fee, and the rebrand, and said the city should 'stay in its own lane' rather than trying to imitate neighboring communities.
  • Sarah McLaren, a new homeowner, said the roughly $92,000 rebrand/logo project seemed inconsistent with modern low-cost options, and said online commenters perceive the Council as out of touch. She asked whether public testimony had ever changed Council decisions; Councilman Flynn cited the decision to add an inclusive bathroom at the intergenerational playground.
  • Ryan Gary, a 10-year resident, strongly supported improving the rec center but opposed the sales tax as regressive, saying he would rather pay higher property taxes; he also asked whether vehicle sales would be taxed.
  • A resident addressed as Maurice said he did not use the rec center, noted membership was about 1,500, and questioned spending public money on a facility used by a small share of residents; Council responded that the center supports broad programming and is the city's equivalent of a park district.
  • Dion Bornell, a 19-year resident, said the city's spending priorities were 'all over the place,' called a $60,000 roundabout sculpture 'ridiculous,' and said Route 47 roads and buildings should be priorities.
  • Sandy Wassniky (nearly 50 years), Don Iverson (25-26 years, rec center member), Andrea Brennan (87, pool user for 20 years), and John Puzo (71 of his 73 years in Woodstock) spoke in favor of the rec center work and the tax; Andrea urged limiting costly extras such as a new entrance and lounge.
  • Harry Harmon, a retiree on a fixed income, said he could accept the tax if it excluded groceries and cars, criticized deferred maintenance, and suggested phased repairs before a full 12-to-18-month shutdown.
  • Jennifer Haberstock asked whether the $2.8 million grant required a local match and requested more accessible information before votes; she also expressed concern about prior economic-development expenditures, including forgiveness to Public House and Mobcraft.
  • Randy Tips asked detailed questions about the bond package, the rec center footprint (same footprint plus a 3,000-square-foot second-level addition), membership growth, and the grant deadline. Staff said construction would need to start around September 2025 and the grant runs to March 2027, with a six-month extension requested.
  • Several speakers praised the actual meeting tone and said the city's Facebook page did not explain the tax package well; staff and council acknowledged communications challenges and limited resources.

Discussion Items

  • Home Rule Sales Tax and Public Hearing
    • Mayor Turner explained the current 1% home-rule sales tax was adopted in 2017 alongside a 10% reduction in the city's property tax levy; the proposed additional quarter-point would raise revenue for the rec center and other unfunded projects.
    • City Manager Roscoe Stelford III said there were over $34 million in unfunded general fund capital improvement costs; the $2.8 million park grant is restricted to the existing rec center site; and 1.25% would match Crystal Lake's rate.
    • The proposed rec center funding plan included about $2 million in ARP funds, about $2.5 million previously set aside for the Prairie View alternative, the $2.8 million grant, and debt repaid by the sales tax increase. A quarter-point increase was required because state law allows sales tax changes only in quarter-point increments.
    • Mayor Turner gave cost examples: five cents on a $20 taxable purchase, 25 cents on $100, and about $25 per year if a household spent $10,000 on taxable goods. Average household income was cited as $83,000.
    • Additional unfunded needs cited included a $14-$15 million public works center, more than $2 million in Opera House projects, a $500,000 sidewalk cost-share program, $775,000 for Dean Street sidewalks, $110,000 for Emerson Park pond dredging, and a federally mandated phosphorus-reduction project at the southside wastewater plant estimated at more than $4 million.
    • Council discussed whether to include a sunset clause. The final motion included a sunset: the tax remains until the rec center debt is fully repaid, not to exceed 20 years, and then the Council must review whether to continue it.
  • 2025 Parameters Bond Ordinance
    • The ordinance authorizes not to exceed $22,500,000 General Obligation Bonds, Series 2025, for road improvements, waterworks and sewerage system improvements, and the Rec Center renovation, and levies a direct annual tax for debt service.
    • Staff explained that the bond package combined separate funding sources: previously approved property taxes for streets, already-adjusted water/sewer rates for the water main and phosphorus removal, and the new sales tax for the rec center portion. Packaging them into one issuance reduces borrowing costs.
    • A council member noted a discrepancy in the documents: a 10% project contingency versus a 20% financing contingency. Staff said the recommendation is a 10% contingency for the project budget and a 20% debt-financing contingency, with any unused funds available for other council-approved projects; change orders above about $7,500 would return to Council.
  • Organizational Restructuring (Consent Item D8)
    • Councilman Hansen removed D8 for separate discussion. The proposal eliminates the Executive Director-Operations position and creates Operations Manager - Public Works and Events & Administrative Coordinator - Marketing, while amending the FY25/26 salary structure and authorized positions/FTEs.
    • Staff said the vacant utilities manager position, funded from the utility fund, would remain unfilled while the new operations manager, funded from the general fund, would oversee parks, facilities, fleet, and streets. The events/admin coordinator would support marketing, events, FOIA, and executive assistants. The net annual budget impact was stated as approximately $5,600 to be absorbed.
    • Some council members questioned the need for the new coordinator position; others said it was a redeployment of resources and would improve efficiency and public communication. It passed unanimously after discussion.

Council Comments

  • Council members thanked the volunteer fireworks committee for a successful July 4 holiday.
  • Mayor Turner introduced new Human Resources Director Joe Simpson, who was present with his wife Kristen.

Key Outcomes

  • Closed the public hearing 7-0.
  • Approved the Home Rule Sales Tax ordinance 7-0: adds 0.25% to the home-rule municipal retailers and service occupation taxes, from 1.0% to 1.25%, effective January 1, 2026, with the sunset described above.
  • Approved the 2025 Parameters Bond Ordinance 7-0: up to $22,500,000 in General Obligation Bonds, Series 2025.
  • Approved the consent calendar 7-0, except D8.
  • Approved the D8 organizational restructuring 7-0.
  • Noted future agenda items for August 5 and August 19, 2025; the next regular meeting is August 5 at 7:00 p.m., and Mayor Turner said he would be unavailable on August 19.
  • The meeting adjourned to the next regular meeting.

Meeting Transcript

Well, good evening, ladies and gentlemen. I'd like to welcome you to this evening's meeting of the uh Woodstock City Council. A few brief announcements before we get started this evening. The agenda this evening will be shown on the monitors in the room. The City of Woodstock operates under what's called a consent format. Consent format means that all items for action are considered in a single motion and a single vote on the consent calendar. This evening uh there is one item for action that is part of the public hearing at the beginning of the meeting as well. There are two opportunities for public comment. Uh the first being at the under floor discussion uh near the start of the meeting. Members of the public can come forward to the podium in the middle of the room. If you're willing to do so, make uh state your name and address for purpose of the record. Feel free to make comments to the Woodstock City Council on any items not on this evening's agenda. Second opportunity is that when there's items for action, there'll be an opportunity for members of the public to come forward and provide input and comments to the City Council on those items. And in the public hearing, there'll be an opportunity for members of the public to come forward to the podium in the middle of the room as well and provide their input under the public hearing. Any questions on those brief announcements before we get started? All right. Hearing none, I'll go ahead and officially call to order this July 15th, 2025 meeting of the Woodstock City Council to order and ask the clerk to please call the roll. Councilman Flynn. Here. Councilman Hansen. Here. Councilwoman McMahon. Here. Councilman Nearman. Here. Councilman Seegers. Here. Councilwoman Ziembah? Here. Mayor Turner. Here. The record reflect that all members of the Woodstock City Council are present in the chambers this evening. Jane, would you please confirm that the agenda this evening is the same as the true and published agenda? Yes, it is. Thank you, Jane. Ladies and gentlemen of the council, that being the case, the people's business is duly and appropriately before us. The first item on the agenda this evening is under floor discussion a public hearing. It's a public hearing on the proposed home rule sales tax, which is a proposal that we are considering this evening for a.25 percent increase to the Woodstock uh home rule sales tax on goods goods in the in the uh city of Woodstock. Uh the first item under this uh consideration this evening is a public hearing. Uh so at this time I will go ahead and formally open the public hearing uh so that members of the public may come forward to the podium in the in the middle of the room and feel free to make comments uh on this item. I will provide some background and a little bit of introduction on this item before we get started this evening. So the consideration that uh the City of Woodstock has this evening, and that many of you may be here to provide comments on, is to um is to increase uh the Woodstock uh sales tax. Uh currently our portion of the sales tax is one percent that is the same for all municipalities of the City of Woodstock that is that passes through the state. Then Woodstock also has a 1 percent uh current home rule home rule sales tax that was added uh on top of that back in 2017. It was passed by the council at that time and that provides revenue to the City of Woodstock and a substantial portion of that is has been used traditionally for road improvements. Um at the same time, I'll make the comment that when the City Council back in 2017 passed the home rule, the initial home rule sales tax of one percent, uh the city also reduced its portion of the property taxes by 10 percent. Um, that doesn't always mean everybody's taxes went down because lots of things go into property tax calculation, but I can assure you that the portion that belongs to the city uh back then for property taxes, which is about 15, 16 percent of the typical tax bill, property tax bill, did go down 10 percent. So we did uh we did use portion of the sales tax in order to help fund the revenue loss by lowering property taxes. Um what's on the table this evening and that has been under consideration uh by both staff and the city council is looking at um some needs that we have in the community. Um those needs are uh some infrastructure uh improvements uh that I'm gonna ask Roscoe to go over uh in just a moment.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com