Public Meetings - Merced, California

The Merced City Council convened on January 20, 2026, at 6:00 PM in the City Council Chamber. The meeting included a study session on solid waste collection rates, a public hearing on maintenance district assessments, action on several contracts and grants, and a report on council goals and priorities. Key actions included the acceptance of a $28.2 million Homekey+ grant for affordable housing, general support for a preliminary annexation, and approval of funding for community engagement services. The council also continued a tree removal contract item after a bid protest and directed staff to proceed with a 45-day Proposition 218 notice for solid waste rate adjustments. Study Session – Solid Waste Collection Rate Study - The council reviewed a rate study for solid waste services, presented by consultant Garth Schultz of R3 Consulting Group. Current annual revenues ($24.35M) are below annual expenses ($26.4M), and without adjustments, the fund balance would be depleted by fiscal year 2030–2031. Two options were presented: Option 1 – annual 5.3% increases for five years; Option 2 – annual 4.5% increases for five years followed by higher increases (up to 7.2%) in years six through ten. The study noted that capital costs for zero-emission refuse trucks (estimated to double post-2030) are not forecasted in this five-year window. Councilmembers discussed the options, with some favoring a constant 5.3% increase to avoid a future spike. No formal direction was given; staff was asked to bring the item back to a future meeting to launch the Proposition 218 process. Consent Calendar - K.1–K.12: Ordinances, minutes, and routine approvals were adopted by a single motion, except items K.3, K.8, and K.12 which were pulled for separate consideration. - K.3 (OTS Grant): Authorized the police department to apply for up to $427,500 from the California Office of Traffic Safety for DUI enforcement, traffic safety, and related activities. Passed 6–1 (Councilmember Zhang voted no). - K.8 (Tree Pruning Service Agreement): A service agreement with West Coast Arborists in an amount not to exceed $413,000 was continued to the next meeting after a bid protest from United Pacific Services alleged it was the lowest bidder. The motion to continue passed unanimously. - K.12 (Speed Limits Ordinance): Second reading and adoption of Ordinance 2584 was approved unanimously, with three street segments (Bear Creek Drive, Mansionette Drive, Olive Avenue) referred for further study. Public Comments & Testimony - Mike Weber (Superintendent, Weaver Union School District) and Zachary Kaikendall (community member) spoke during the public comment period, urging the council to plan for school impacts from new development. They noted that developer fees only cover a fraction of school construction costs and that Weaver District is already over capacity. Both asked for mitigation measures as growth proceeds. - During the maintenance district public hearing, several residents expressed opposition to proposed assessment increases, particularly in Fahrens Park (a jump from $31 to $414 per year). Speakers Richard Garcia, Ted Woods, and Shannon questioned the magnitude of the increases, the inclusion of major road maintenance, and the quality of tree trimming. The public hearing was closed, and ballots will be counted on January 21, with results reported on February 2, 2026. Discussion Items - M.1 – Homekey+ Grant for Mercy Village: The council accepted a $28,257,013 conditional grant for a 65-unit permanent supportive housing project at 3015 Park Avenue, in partnership with UPholdings and Self-Help Enterprises. Approved unanimously. - M.2 – Preliminary Annexation Support (Mission West): The council expressed general support for a pre-annexation application covering 133+ acres at the southeast corner of Mission Avenue and State Highway 59. The project proposes 618 dwelling units, commercial, and business park space. Passed 6–1 (Councilmember Zhang voted no), with some members noting the need for a community plan and school mitigation. - M.3 – Environmental Document for Ardison and Baxter Annexations: The council approved a professional services agreement ($45,068) and a reimbursement agreement ($49,574.80) for environmental review of two adjacent annexations totaling 208 acres, expected to yield about 786 housing units. Councilmembers Smith and DuPont recused themselves; passed unanimously. - M.4 – Community Engagement Contract with Lew Edwards Group: The council approved a $104,375 appropriation and contract for community outreach and communications consulting, to support potential future ballot measures. The discussion included polling results showing 63% support for a general-purpose tax. Passed 6–1 (Councilmember Zhang voted no). - M.5 – Gateway to Yosemite Run Proceeds: Accepted $9,178 in race registration fees and a $2,000 sponsorship from CVOF, appropriating some funds to the Aletha June All-Inclusive Playground at General Vang Pao Park. Approved unanimously. Key Outcomes - Solid Waste Rates: Staff was directed to schedule a future meeting to formally launch the Proposition 218 process, with council feedback favoring a constant rate adjustment (likely 5.3% annually). - Tree Pruning Contract: Continued to the next regular meeting to allow staff to address the bid protest from United Pacific Services. - Speed Limits: Ordinance 2584 adopted; three street segments referred for further speed study. - Maintenance District Assessments: Public hearing closed; ballot counting on January 21, results to be reported February 2. - High-Speed Rail Letter: Councilmember Harris successfully requested adding an item to the January 27, 2026 study session agenda to discuss a letter of support for a Southeast Merced high-speed rail station (passed 6–1). - Goals and Priorities: The council received an update on 2025 goals and draft 2026/27 department mission goals and CIP requests; a goal-setting session is scheduled for January 31.

The City of Merced held its third and final town hall of 2026 on January 14, 2026, from 6:00 PM to approximately 8:00 PM at El Capitan High School Theater. The meeting featured public comments on a range of issues including graffiti, high-speed rail, pedestrian safety, infrastructure, and development. Council members and department heads provided responses and updates. Call to Order & Opening Comments - Mayor Matthew Serratto welcomed attendees and described the town hall as an important outreach tool to hear from the community. - Each council member introduced themselves: Mayor Pro Tem Tim Boyle, Councilmembers Darren DuPont, Kevin Fujioka, Mike Harris, Shane Smith, and Ying Pao Tao. - City Manager Scott McBride introduced city staff present (police, public works, engineering, planning, finance, parks, housing, city attorney, city clerk, IT), noting they outnumbered the public about three to one. Public Comments & Testimony - Julie (first speaker): Raised concerns about graffiti on the back side of a sound wall along Bear Creek near Walmart, noting the area is city property but difficult to access due to homeless encampments and height. Police Chief Wilson committed to addressing the issue with the graffiti abatement contractor and mentioned exploring a "Welcome to Merced" mural at that location (a suggestion echoed by Mayor Serratto). - Dan Holmes (retired transportation engineer, county resident for 52 years): Expressed support for moving the high-speed rail station to a location near Highway 99 and Campus Parkway, cheaper and less disruptive than downtown. Councilmembers Smith, Boyle, and Harris voiced support for further studying a Southeast Merced station. - Madeline Zhang (District 6, Bellevue Ranch resident): Called for immediate safety improvements on Bellevue Road between G Street and Lake Road, citing dangerous conditions for drivers, pedestrians, and cyclists. She noted a fatal incident in 2021 and urged action before planned UC Merced bike path improvements (slated for 2027-2028). City Manager McBride explained constraints: limited right-of-way, funding from a $3.2 million UC Merced grant requiring local match, and long-term solutions dependent on development. Councilmembers encouraged making the Bellevue bike path a regional priority. - Umberto Sandoval (Bellevue Ranch resident): Raised two issues: (1) sidewalk damage caused by new home developers – called for holding builders accountable, possibly through bonds; (2) enforcement of an ordinance against semi-trucks parking in residential neighborhoods (ordinance 10.28.290), requesting a time limit for repairs. Police Chief Wilson offered to enforce citations; City Manager said sidewalk damage after city acceptance is harder to address but the city can work with builders. Staff noted upcoming city standard updates (thickening sidewalks) to prevent future cracking. - Ron Cook (Merced Garden Club member): Asked if the city could help remove green waste after club pruning at the zoo parking lot. Also inquired about city tree removal/planting statistics. Juan (parks staff) confirmed statistics are tracked and offered to assist with waste removal. - Rick Wendling (District 6): Recommended dry ice for graffiti removal to avoid off-color paint patches. Expressed opposition to high-speed rail, called it a "boondoggle," and urged council to push back on state/federal spending priorities. He also noted sidewalk damage from maintenance trucks, not just new construction. Councilmembers responded that road funding is limited – full reconstruction costs $2.7 million per mile – and the city is prioritizing maintenance with new equipment (asphalt zipper, crackfill machine). - Keith Ensbinger (Citizens Advisory Committee, District 2): Encouraged council to engage with UC Merced surveys on high-speed rail station preferences and align timelines for community input. - Unnamed speaker (question on new construction near Target/Five Below): Frank (economic development) identified as Aspen Dental, with Pollo Campero, In-N-Out, Raising Cane's, and other tenants coming to the mall area. - Unnamed speaker (question on emergency services and train tracks): Voiced concern about ambulances stuck at G Street train tracks, especially with south Merced growth. Police and fire chiefs explained alternate routes, paramedic program expansion, and that current general plan does not include an undercrossing. Fire Chief reported that as of January 1, 2026, paramedics are at three stations (53, 51, 55), with plans for all stations by Q2 2026. - Unnamed speaker (request for central development website): Asked for a single online source to track all developments (Aspen Dental, Sears project, new fire station, parks). PIO Jen Flackman said Engage site is being updated; Frank (economic development) mentioned MercedFirst.com with QR code materials updated by late February/early March. Discussion Items - Graffiti Abatement: Police Chief noted a $250,000 annual contract and successful use of blue light cameras; solar cameras have limitations due to weather. Councilmember Tao suggested a mural to deter tagging. - High-Speed Rail Station Location: Council discussed potential benefits of a Southeast Merced station (cheaper, faster, preserves downtown, connectivity to Yarts/UC Merced). Some speakers opposed high-speed rail altogether. - Bellevue Road Safety: Multiple speakers and council acknowledged the road's dangerous conditions. Staff noted it was a county road until annexed via AB 3312, and lacks right-of-way for a separated path. A $3.2 million grant secured by UC Merced plus $300,000 from Merced County Association of Governments is designated for temporary improvements; long-term solution requires development. - Sidewalk and Road Conditions: Council discussed lack of dedicated road funding, $20 million annual needs just to tread water, and progress on projects like Yosemite Avenue (expected completion within a week, weather permitting). Councilmember Tao emphasized reducing single-occupancy vehicles through transit investment. - Tree Canopy and Environmental Greenery: Parks staff confirmed tree inventory data is available; Ron Cook's garden club will be assisted with waste removal. Key Outcomes - Graffiti on Bear Creek wall: Police Chief agreed to contact the graffiti abatement contractor (Adam Reed) the next day. City will explore a mural at that location. - Bellevue Road bike/pedestrian safety: Staff will continue seeking local match for the $3.2 million grant; council committed to pushing for regional priority designation. A temporary separated path is anticipated, with long-term path dependent on development. - Sidewalk damage enforcement: Staff will update city standards to require thicker sidewalks; will work with builders to repair damage. Ordinance update for semi-truck parking will be reviewed with city attorney. - Tree statistics: Parks staff will provide data to Ron Cook and council; Arbor Day proclamation will include tree canopy numbers. - Yosemite Avenue reconstruction: Asphalt paving expected to finish by end of next week (weather permitting); lanes will reopen. - Emergency services and train tracks: Chief Wilson noted alternate routes; paramedic expansion continues with goal of paramedics at all stations by Q2 2026. - Development website: City will enhance Engage page and update MercedFirst.com materials by late February. - Budget and strategic planning: Next step is council goals and priorities session on January 31, 2026 (public meeting), leading into budget discussions. The meeting adjourned at approximately 8:00 PM.

This town hall was held at Luther Burbank Elementary School Gym from 6:00 PM to 8:00 PM. It was the second in a series of three town halls. Mayor Cerrado presided, with all council members present (DuPont, Tao, Harris, Smith, Zhang, Boyle). City staff including the city manager, police chief, and deputy city attorney attended. The meeting featured public comments on blighted properties, a PG&E rate reduction update, and discussion of the proposed relocation of the high-speed rail station. No formal votes were taken. Public Comments & Testimony - Blighted Properties (Beautify the Block Coalition): Several residents (Danielle Modinsky, Scott Moore, Mary Newman, Esther, Jamie Ellison, Lupe Gonzalez) spoke about three properties at 409 and 415 West 25th Street and 2521 K Street. They described broken windows, four fires at 415 in just over a year, garbage accumulation, trespassing, and children entering the structures. They requested the city escalate enforcement, potentially through the city attorney, and ultimately create community amenities like a playground or community garden. Scott Moore noted increased alley traffic since December 2024, including theft and discarded bedding. Mary Newman also raised concerns about trees along K Street planted by the city that died due to lack of watering by the school. Speakers provided QR codes with photos of the properties' deterioration. - PG&E Rate Reduction: Nathan Alonso, PG&E's local government affairs representative, announced that for the fourth time in two years customer rates were being reduced by 3-5%, part of broader efforts to improve affordability. - Transit and Sprawl Concerns: Curtis Thomas argued the city cannot sprawl its way out of deficits and recommended using community facilities districts and maintenance districts to fund transit. He urged the city to establish its own transit authority to plan for the future, noting that UC Merced students often feel "sent into exile" due to limited connectivity. He also mentioned that Merced transit is currently handled by the county at low cost to the city. - High-Speed Rail Station Relocation: Councilmember Harris summarized the proposal to move the planned high-speed rail station from downtown to Southeast Merced (near Mission Avenue west of Highway 99), citing lower cost and faster timeline. He invited public feedback. Curtis Thomas later added that while the new site is closer to his home, there are concerns about the MITSI rail connector and the need to manage three city centers (downtown, UC Merced, and the station). - Law Enforcement Operations: Laura Sandoval asked about dark-tinted windows on vehicles seen during a law enforcement operation earlier that day. Chief Stanfield clarified the Merced Police Department does not use front-tinted windows, and the operation involved CDCR and county partners, not the city police. - First-Time Attendee: Rosie Company expressed gratitude for the council's commitment and the community turnout. Discussion Items - Code Enforcement Response: Chief Stanfield and Deputy City Attorney Rhonda Lucas acknowledged the blighted properties and outlined the process: code enforcement complaints lead to voluntary compliance, then escalation to the city attorney for court-ordered cleanup or receivership. Lucas confirmed these properties have been discussed in monthly meetings with code enforcement and that a revised nuisance ordinance and an anti-slumlord ordinance are in development to give stronger tools. - City Manager Scott McBride cited past successes (e.g., St. Vincent de Paul site, Northwood Drive, 21st and G Street) and pledged diligence on the three properties. - Councilmember Tao noted similar issues arise across districts and called code enforcement an urgent priority. - Councilmember Harris raised the high-speed rail station relocation proposal and urged public comment. Key Outcomes - No votes were taken. The council and staff committed to follow up on the three blighted properties, with Deputy City Attorney Lucas taking notes and pledging continued coordination. - The city manager and police chief promised to identify owners and develop a plan of action. - Residents were encouraged to contact council members directly throughout the year. - The next town hall was announced for January 14, 2026, at 6:00 PM at L Cap.

The Traffic Committee met on Tuesday, January 13, 2026, at 2:00 PM in the City Council Chamber. The committee reviewed three action items: a request for red curbing at a sewer lift station, and two requests for four-way stop signs at intersections near schools and residential areas. Decisions included approval of red curbing, denial of one stop sign request, and approval of another. Committee Reports - Police Department announced that Sergeant Fister is the new Traffic Sergeant, replacing the retiring Sergeant McKinnon. - Planning Department announced a General Plan Update open house on January 28, 2026, from 2:00 to 6:00 PM at City Hall. - Engineering Department announced that future meeting requests will be submitted through an online form. Discussion Items F1: Request 26-01 – Red Curbing at Rancho Camino Drive at Granada Ct. - Public Works Supervisor AJ D’Stasio explained that parked vehicles, including tow trucks, block access to the city sewer lift station. Despite existing "No Parking" signs and previous outreach to residents, the problem persists. Red curbing would allow police to enforce towing. - Committee discussed alternatives (e.g., moving the gate, adding chains) but agreed that red curbing is an appropriate first step. A motion to approve was made and seconded. - Vote: Unanimously approved (all ayes). F2: Request 26-02 – Four-Way Stop Signs at 20th St and S St. - A citizen requested stop signs on 20th Street due to multiple accidents and blocked views near Fremont Elementary School. Current stop signs are only on S Street. - Committee reviewed accident data: 2 crashes in the last 12 months, and 5 over the last several years. Police noted 3 crashes in the last year, but later clarified 2. The number did not meet state warrants (typically 5 in 12 months). School district had not identified this intersection as a priority. - Planning member supported the request due to school proximity, but Public Works and other members opposed because it did not meet warrants and could create liability. - Motion: To deny the request as presented. - Vote: Unanimously approved (all ayes) to deny. F3: Request 26-03 – Four-Way Stop Signs at 12th St and Canal St. - A citizen requested stop signs on Canal Street due to multiple accidents. Stop signs currently exist on 12th Street only. - Committee noted a significant number of accidents (specific count not read, but agreed it meets warrants). Fire Chief confirmed it meets multi-way stop warrants. - Public Works suggested that vehicles parking too close to the intersection may contribute to accidents. - Motion: To approve the request. - Vote: Unanimously approved (all ayes). Key Outcomes - Approved red curbing on both sides of the end of Rancho Camino Drive at Granada Ct. (Request 26-01) - Denied the request for four-way stop signs at 20th St and S St. (Request 26-02) - Approved the request for four-way stop signs at 12th St and Canal St. (Request 26-03) - The committee will continue coordination with the school district regarding safety improvements.

The Merced City Council held a special meeting on January 12, 2026, at 6:00 PM in the Council Chamber to consider agenda item D.1, an update from the California High Speed Rail Authority on a proposed conceptual relocation of the Merced station from Downtown Merced to Southeast Merced. After the presentation, public comment, and council deliberation, the council did not vote to support or oppose the relocation. Instead, it directed the Council Transportation/High Speed Rail Subcommittee to continue working with staff, county partners, and the authority and to return with a summary proposal for further council consideration. Presentation and Staff Report - Deputy City Manager Quintero introduced the item and said the authority's August 2025 supplemental project update had suggested re-sequencing the Merced station without specifying when it would be built and had proposed rerouting the high-speed rail line from Madera to Gilroy. He noted that Proposition 1A (2008) required a Merced stop on the Los Angeles-San Francisco system and that SB 198 (2022) specifically called for a downtown Merced station. - Peter Whippy, Chief of External Affairs for the California High Speed Rail Authority, said the authority is proposing a site fewer than four miles southeast of downtown, generally west of Highway 99 and south of Mission Boulevard. He said a downtown station would require acquisition and relocation of the McCombs Youth Center leased by the Boys & Girls Club, the Merced Senior Community Center, and businesses including In-N-Out Burger, Pazin and Myers, and El Bahio Market, and would bring years of severe disruption. - Whippy said the Southeast Merced location is along the already environmentally cleared alignment, provides more certainty and a clear, fundable path, avoids years of downtown construction, and supports future growth and a UC Merced connection via Campus Parkway. He highlighted authority milestones: 119 miles of civil work from Kern to Madera County, a track and systems contractor expected this summer, a private-delivery-partner procurement, and a clean-power RFEI issued the previous week. - In response to council questions, authority representatives said no renderings or designs exist yet for a Southeast Merced station; there had been no discussions with UC Merced; changing the station location would require amending SB 198; and some environmental re-examination would be required. They also said the downtown station would cost billions more and add roughly two to three years of heavy construction. Construction in downtown Fresno began in 2015 and is projected to finish in December 2026. - The authority's draft business plan is expected around February 13, with the final plan due in May. Authority staff said an indication by about the end of January would be needed to remove ambiguity about Merced from the draft business plan. Public Comments & Testimony - The City Clerk noted that emails from Strong Towns Merced and Rosie Campania regarding item D.1 were received by the 1 p.m. deadline and posted to the city's website. - Ron Radney, President of Merced Senior Citizens Inc., supported relocation to Southeast Merced, saying it could prevent demolition of the Senior Center his nonprofit helped fund in 1994 and has managed for 31 years, and preserve businesses that generate significant tax revenue. - Curtis Thomas, a District 1 resident, supported option B, which would direct staff to provide analysis. He urged the city to obtain written authority commitments that Merced will remain in the initial operating segment, secure commitments from state legislators, and pursue revival of Valley Rail/ACE. He said if those commitments cannot be secured, the city should not agree to relocation. - John Carcos supported option B and urged 'trust but verify,' including questioning the authority's travel-time claims. He said a station that is just a platform with a pergola would not be acceptable. - Keith Ensminger, District 2 representative on the HSR station advisory committee, emphasized coordinated transit and last-mile connections, including buses timed to arrive within about 10 minutes of trains, and referenced UC Merced Community and Labor Center surveys. - Robert Delina, a Southeast Merced landowner/developer, said about 300 to 400 homes could be built in the corridor. He supported relocation only if done correctly, with impacts mitigated, housing kept affordable, and infrastructure such as water, sewer, and Campus Parkway connections provided. He wanted the Merced section built promptly. - Eric Serrato, president of the Downtown Neighborhood Association, expressed support for moving the station to Campus Parkway, citing preservation of the Senior Center and Boys & Girls Club facilities, the possibility of releasing land-banked downtown property, and stronger connections to UC Merced. - Marilyn Sobel, a North Merced resident, supported option B. She cited unanswered questions about transit access, pollution, UC Merced's opinion, and the long-term consequences of a station meant to last 50 to 100 years. - Eric Ham presented property tax data: downtown Merced generates about $274,000 in property tax on 1.4 acres, or about $195,000 per acre; Campus Parkway generates about $292,000 on 8.3 acres, or about $35,000 per acre; and the Merced Mall generates about $322,000 on 27.43 acres, or about $12,000 per acre. He warned that a southeast station could shift infrastructure costs to the city and asked whether the authority would compensate for lost downtown value. - Livingston City Councilmember Jubjeet Singhupal, a UC Merced alum, strongly supported high-speed rail and moving forward with a faster, more efficient plan, and offered lobbying assistance. - Sandra Uribe, a land use and policy advocate for Leadership Counsel, supported option B and said South Merced is a disadvantaged environmental justice community. She asked for more information on vehicle miles traveled, air quality, noise, economic vitality, and how funding would be shifted. - Gene O'Kouy, a farmer and former Merced County Farm Bureau president, supported option B and raised concerns about Pacheco Pass costs, floodplain development, and building away from existing city services. - Edward Flores, a North Merced resident, cited a UC Merced Community and Labor Center survey of 407 residents in four disadvantaged census tracts conducted October-December 2024. He said residents were largely supportive of downtown high-speed rail development, 60% felt it would provide enhanced transportation options, and 90% favored extensive community engagement. - Rin Shields, a South Merced resident, asked to see actual images of the proposed site, noted existing noise and air pollution and limited transit in South Merced, and said relocation plans for displaced facilities should be addressed. - UC Merced Chancellor Munoz said the university has always supported high-speed rail in Merced and is willing to be engaged; he cited more than 9,000 students, thousands of faculty and staff, and a growing medical enterprise. - Patty Vasquez supported moving the station to South Merced but asked that downtown Merced still receive infrastructure investment such as roads, sewer, and water. - Rosie Campania, a Merced resident, supported option B and asked for deeper analysis, including studying a State Route 140 alignment and bringing Caltrans into the conversation early. - Gloria Valdovinos, Executive Director of the Downtown Merced Partnership and Visit Merced, argued against moving the station away from downtown, saying downtown is an economic engine with existing businesses, housing, culture, and walkability, and that a southeast station would separate visitors from the city center. Council Discussion and Direction - Councilmember Harris supported option B, saying there were too many unanswered questions for a vote to support or oppose the relocation. - Mayor Pro Tem Boyle supported relocation and supported conducting staff analysis together with subcommittee work. She said giving the authority a green light would allow it to begin providing answers and that the southeast site is a major economic development opportunity. - Councilmember Smith said the council did not need city staff to analyze the issue; the authority should do that work. He signaled openness to a Southeast Merced station if it comes with substantial benefits for the city, including a new southeast fire station, police resources, Mission Boulevard improvements, and completion of Campus Parkway to UC Merced. He said a formal up-or-down vote was not appropriate, but the council needed to move quickly because of the state's February and May deadlines. - Councilmember DuPont said he liked the southeast location for his district but had many unanswered questions about infrastructure, compensation, Mission Boulevard, Campus Parkway, annexation, and SB 198 amendment language. He said he could signal support informally but would not support a formal vote that night. - Councilmember Zhang criticized the lack of community engagement and said faster and cheaper does not always mean better. He wanted town halls, visuals for residents, and more analysis before a decision. - Councilmember Harris expressed frustration that subcommittee discussions since September left other councilmembers and the public catching up, with only a 30- to 40-minute authority briefing before the meeting. - Mayor Serrado supported voting to signal support for relocation that night while continuing analysis. He noted roughly $232,000 remained from a $500,000 authority grant for station planning, cited a $250 million state support precedent for downtown Fresno, and said the downtown plan endangered 10 to 12 of the city's top 20 sales-tax producers. - Authority staff said an answer by the end of January would be needed to include the Merced station in the draft business plan. Key Outcomes - A motion by Councilmember Smith, seconded by Councilmember DuPont, passed 5-2, directing the Council Transportation/High Speed Rail Subcommittee to meet further with county partners, the High Speed Rail Authority, and staff; consider the issues raised at the meeting; and return with a more crystallized summary proposal so the council can decide whether to support moving the station from downtown Merced. Mayor Pro Tem Boyle and Councilmember Zhang voted no. - The council did not take a formal vote to support or oppose the relocation, and it did not order a standalone staff analysis alone. The adopted direction effectively combined further analysis with subcommittee work. - The council planned to aim for the second council meeting in February, roughly 30 to 35 days away, rather than the full 45 days, if the work could be completed. - Issues the subcommittee was asked to address include Mission Boulevard improvements, a southeast fire station, annexation procedures, Campus Parkway completion, transit and last-mile connections, SB 198 amendment language, station design, infrastructure to support development, downtown mitigation, power generation, and community outreach. - The council then adjourned unanimously in honor of Violet Walker, daughter of Merced Fire Captain Mark Walker, and Norman Rolfe, founder of Rolfe Construction.

The Merced City Council held the first of three 2026 town halls on January 8, 2026, from 6:00 PM to 8:00 PM at the Stephen Leonard Community Center. The meeting focused on community input for the upcoming budget, with residents raising concerns about housing affordability and tenant protections, park maintenance and the Merced Connect app, and infrastructure gaps such as sidewalks and street lighting. Public Comments & Testimony - Latina Richard expressed that the city budget prioritizes policing over housing, calling for an anti-slumlord ordinance, a housing quality database, and mandatory fees for bad actors. She shared a personal experience of being forced into unsafe housing despite approval for a safe house. - Robin Ponisevic, a legally blind resident of 41 years, described personal struggles with housing subsidies and urged strict guidelines for landlords, a no-fear eviction reporting database, and dedicated code enforcement staff. - Andrea Uribe (Leadership Council) highlighted the lack of sidewalks and street lighting in South Merced, citing data that 93% of injury collisions and 90% of KSIs occur in disadvantaged areas. She requested a street light capital improvement project agendized this quarter and priority sidewalk rehabilitation on Canal, Child, and South M Streets. - Ashley Marie (Leadership Council) advocated for a housing equality database, an eviction protection program with free legal assistance, and better infrastructure to attract grocery stores to South Merced, noting over 800 unlawful detainer filings in Merced County in 2025. - Crystal Ramos, Agent Tehether, and Quentin (Youth United) presented findings on the Merced Connect app: only 100 downloads on Google Play for a population of 100,000, app glitches, and work orders (e.g., at Joe Herb Park and Gilbert Mercado Park) being closed without actual repairs. They asked for routine park inspections and photo updates in notifications. - Lavon Phillips reported a police incident at her home at 4 AM with no explanation, requested sidewalk and lighting for Greater New Hope Church, noted lack of trash cans at parks, and cited dangerous speeding on Northwood Drive. - Mr. Gray raised concerns about the proposed roundabout at Highway 59 and Girard (June 2026 target) redirecting traffic onto Mission Avenue, which lacks sidewalks and lighting, with safety risks for residents and Farmdale Elementary. - Gloria Sandoval requested enforcement against tinted windows and loud mufflers, tenant protections (e.g., right to repair), and urged council members to observe eviction court. She noted a memorial for 51 unhoused people who died in Merced County. - Navora asked that the draft slumlord ordinance be made public and include input from tenants and owners via a web-based comment portal. - Latanya criticized the city for not attending the memorial for unhoused individuals (51 deaths), described being called by code enforcement after reporting unsafe conditions, and called for removal of income-to-rent requirements. - Additional speakers followed up on street light study sessions and affordable housing policies. Discussion Items - Housing & Tenant Rights: Councilmember Smith confirmed he received a draft anti-slumlord ordinance from the City Attorney over the holidays and will return comments by January 12. He committed to a focus group with tenant advocates and landlords before council consideration. City Attorney Cornwell stated the draft includes severe penalties for repeat offenders, tenant rights knowledge, relocation protections, and protection against retaliation. Chief Stanfield reported code enforcement has increased from four to five staff (still overwhelmed), and is working with the California Attorney General’s office for best practices. Councilmember Zhang advocated for increasing the housing division and noted the RHNA policy was reduced from 12% to 5% and to 0% in some areas. - Parks & Merced Connect App: IT Director Benny Hoff acknowledged app glitches since the March 2025 launch and agreed to investigate specific work order cases. Councilmember DuPont supported adding photos of completed work to the app. Councilmember Harris praised Youth United’s specific reports and committed to prompt follow-up. Councilmember Boyle noted the parks budget has been repeatedly cut and called for real investment. Mayor Serratto listed recent park investments (Joe Herb Park $700k renovation, CP 42 soccer fields over $10M, new playgrounds, restrooms at McNamara and Applegate, zoo/Kitty Land upgrades). Parks Director Jensen emphasized ongoing challenges from routine maintenance, deferred maintenance, and vandalism, and thanked the council for support. - Infrastructure & Street Lights: Councilmember Smith proposed a citywide community facilities district (CFD) to pool resources for street lights, but City Manager McBride clarified the CFD conversation is about rate adjustments for maintenance, not capital installation. Councilmember Smith noted a study session on the CFD is planned within the next quarter. Mayor Serratto highlighted the LED street light retrofit (multi-million dollar project) and sidewalk projects (Childs Avenue multi-use path connecting Golden Valley to Weaver). Councilmember DuPont set aside funding for Mission Avenue from Tyler to 59. Officer Stanfield reported traffic citations up 106% in 2025, collisions down 25%, but the speed survey has expired and no speeding tickets can be issued until the next council meeting. - Public Comments on Unhoused: Several speakers expressed disappointment that no council member attended the memorial for 51 unhoused individuals. Councilmember Smith noted he was out of town but committed to accountability. Chief Stanfield addressed fear of reporting code violations, stating residents can communicate via phone or video to avoid uniform presence. Key Outcomes - No formal votes were taken; the meeting was a public input session. - Councilmember Smith committed to returning a draft anti-slumlord ordinance to the City Attorney by January 12. - City Attorney Cornwell will incorporate public comments into the ordinance draft and bring it to council for multiple hearings. - City Manager McBride will schedule a study session on the community facilities district (CFD) for street light maintenance within the next quarter. - IT staff will follow up with Youth United on specific Merced Connect app work orders and consider adding photo documentation. - Police Chief Stanfield will discuss traffic enforcement on Northwood Drive with Ms. Phillips. - Council will continue to pursue grant funding for affordable housing (e.g., $28 million Home Key project on Park Avenue) and infrastructure projects. - Upcoming meetings: Special high-speed rail meeting on January 12; town halls at Burbank (January 13) and LCAP (January 14); General Plan advisory focus group on January 28. - Councilmembers affirmed that resident input will inform goal-setting and budget decisions in June 2026.

The Merced City Council held its regular meeting at 6:01 PM on January 5, 2026, following a closed session (5:05-5:54 PM) concerning litigation in City of Merced v. California Department of Fish and Wildlife (Case No. 23CV03845). The meeting adjourned at 7:38 PM. Key actions included approval of an ordinance on pedestrian crossings, adoption of a revised awards policy, and discussion of a new subcommittee structure. Consent Calendar - Approved unanimously (6-0, with Mayor Pro Tempore Boyle absent) the following items: - Waiver of reading of ordinances/resolutions (H.1) - Information only contracts for December 2025 (H.2) - Introduction of Ordinance 2586 amending backflow protection regulations (H.3) - Transition of public meeting livestreams from Facebook to YouTube (H.4) - Adoption of Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule ROPS 26-27 (H.6) - Amended Joint Powers Agreement with Central San Joaquin Valley Risk Management Authority (H.7) - Resolution 2026-02 adjusting pay ranges for temporary classifications to comply with state minimum wage (H.8) - Street closure and use of parking lot for Martin Luther King Jr. celebration on January 19, 2026 (H.9) - Approval of Finance Officer Employment Agreement extension for five years (H.12) - Four items were pulled for separate consideration: H.5, H.10, H.11, H.13. Public Comments & Testimony - Tamara Cobb (Merced resident) formally invited the Council and community to the 29th annual Martin Luther King Unity March on January 19, 2026. She reflected on Merced’s progress since the era of segregation. - Jennifer Flachman (Senior Management Analyst) announced the final town hall meeting on maintenance district assessment ballots (Wednesday at Golden Valley High School) and upcoming City Council Town Hall meetings (Thursday at Stephen Leonard Park Community Center, and additional dates). - Mike Webber (Superintendent, Weaver Union School District) expressed support for city growth but raised concerns about 4,500 new homes planned in the Weaver district. He noted that developer fees cover less than 25% of school construction costs and that Weaver’s three schools are already at 1,000 students each (county average 550-580). He called for continued dialogue on infrastructure and school funding. - Glen Camarda (photographer) presented his fifth annual Merced calendar and encouraged support for local artists. - Karthik Prasad (representing Congressman Adam Gray) outlined federal legislative priorities including lowering healthcare, grocery, and energy costs. He offered assistance with federal agencies (Social Security, IRS, VA) and noted the district office at 602 West 20th Street. Discussion Items - H.5 – Transfer of Strip of Land at 626 West Main Street - Councilmember Smith questioned whether a decision had been made to give the strip to an adjacent landowner. City Surveyor Joe Cardoso clarified that no decision had been made; the property will be transferred from the Successor Agency to the City and will follow the Surplus Land Act before any disposition. Approved unanimously (6-0). - H.10 – Acceptance of $112,026 Proposition 56 Grant for Police Tobacco Enforcement - Councilmember Smith noted the item required five votes. He expressed support. Discrepancy: The minutes record a unanimous 6-0 vote, but the transcript indicates Council Member Xiong voted “no.” The motion carried with six ayes (Serratto, Dupont, Thao, Harris, Smith, Xiong) and zero noes per minutes; transcript states “motion passes with Councilmember Zhang voting no.” The grant will fund overtime for shoulder tap operations, minor decoy operations, retail inspections, and officer education. - H.11 – First Reading of Ordinance 2587 Prohibiting Pedestrian Crossings Outside Crosswalks - City Attorney Craig Cornwell explained that state law (2022) decriminalized jaywalking except when there is “imminent danger.” The ordinance retains the prohibition but limits enforcement to imminent danger situations, serving primarily as an educational tool. Discussion clarified that controlled crosswalks (with flashing lights) remain distinct and that the ordinance aligns municipal code with state law. Approved unanimously (6-0). - H.13 – Resolution Authorizing Sale of Merced Federal Building to Merced County Office of Education - Councilmember Dupont recused himself because MCOE is a client of his law firm. Councilmember Smith had pulled the item to allow Dupont to recuse. Approved 5-0 (Dupont recused, Boyle absent). - I.1 – Council Policy C-8 Regarding Council Subcommittees - Councilmember Smith presented a draft policy establishing standing and ad hoc committees, with two-year terms (aligned with council terms), Brown Act compliance, and advisory roles. Discussion covered appointment of chairs, agenda-setting authority, and the distinction between advisory and decision-making committees. City Manager Scott McBride and City Attorney Cornwell offered suggestions, including reaffirming existing ad hoc committees via resolution. No formal vote was taken; the item will return in 30 days (first meeting in February). - I.2 – Adoption of Revised Council Policy C-2 for Distribution of City Awards - City Manager McBride presented the revision, which limits ceremonial items to two per meeting to streamline proceedings. Councilmember Dupont proposed changing “should” to “shall” for the limit. Councilmember Smith suggested allowing “mayor or council member signature” on certificates. Staff clarified contact information requirements. The motion passed unanimously (6-0) with those amendments. - I.3 – Request to Add Future Agenda Item (Comprehensive Roadway Assessment) - Councilmember Harris requested a master list of road conditions, remediation needs, and estimated costs, with possible citizen involvement. City Engineer Daryl Jordan noted that a Pavement Condition Index (PCI) study is underway through MCAG, expected within 6–12 months, covering all roads including residential. Council discussed the priority of arterials over residential roads and the need for reliable data. It was agreed to address the topic during the Strategic Planning Session on January 31, 2026. - I.4 – City Council Comments - Councilmember Smith welcomed everyone back after the holidays. Councilmember Dupont reminded the public about upcoming town halls. Mayor Serratto wished a Merry Christmas and Happy New Year, noting successes in 2025 and optimism for 2026. Key Outcomes - Consent Calendar approved (items H.1–H.4, H.6–H.9, H.12) unanimously. - H.5 (land transfer) approved unanimously. - H.10 (Proposition 56 grant) approved; vote discrepancy noted between minutes (unanimous) and transcript (one no vote). - H.11 (jaywalking ordinance first reading) approved unanimously. - H.13 (Federal Building sale) approved 5-0 with one recusal. - I.1 (subcommittee policy) continued to the next meeting (early February 2026) for further refinement. - I.2 (awards policy) adopted with amendments. - I.3 (roadway assessment) deferred to the January 31 Strategic Planning Session. - Meeting adjourned at 7:38 PM.

The Merced Planning Commission held a regular meeting on December 17, 2025, starting at 6:00 PM. The meeting included the introduction of a new planning manager, approval of consent calendar items, a public hearing on a food truck conditional use permit, a public hearing on a 160-unit apartment complex, and an informational workshop on the Virginia Smith Trust Specific Plan. Commissioners also discussed future agenda items and attended community events. Consent Calendar - Planning Commission Minutes of November 5, 2025: Approved and filed unanimously. Public Comments & Testimony - No members of the public spoke during the general public comment period (Section C). Discussion Items Item E1: Conditional Use Permit 25-0017 – Two Food Trucks at 61 West 16th Street - Proposal: Osvaldo Reyes, on behalf of property owner Arshvir Singh, requested a conditional use permit to operate two food trucks in the parking lot at 61 West 16th Street, within a Central Commercial (C-C) zone. - Staff Presentation: Planner Matt presented the site plan, noting conditions such as two trash receptacles per truck, hours limited to 7 a.m. to 9 p.m., prohibition of alcohol sales, and requirement for indoor restroom access for employees. The site includes an existing boarded-up building formerly used as a car lot. - Commissioner Questions: Commissioner Ochoa expressed concern about the proliferation of food truck parks along the 16th Street corridor, noting that multiple approvals could lead to 30 food trucks on a single block. He requested a map of all approved food truck locations and a review of the ordinance. The applicant clarified that the building will remain a car lot and food trucks would be temporary, though the owner plans to operate both simultaneously. Staff noted the car lot is a by-right use. - Public Testimony: None. - Outcome: Motion to approve the categorical exemption and conditional use permit with conditions passed 4-1. (Commissioner Ochoa requested future data on food truck approvals before similar items.) Item E2: Conditional Use Permit 25-0018, Site Plan Review 25-0010, Minor Use Permit 25-0017 – 160-Unit Apartment Complex at 1250 W Cardella Rd - Proposal: Cesar Perez, on behalf of ISEA International LLC, requested approvals to construct a 160-unit apartment complex on approximately 10.7 acres. Two acres will be reserved for future commercial use. The site is zoned Planned Development 50 with commercial designations, requiring conditional use and design standard deviations. - Staff Presentation: Associate Planner Valeria Benturia presented the site plan: 13 buildings (two- and three-story), 73 open-air parking spaces, entrance from El Redondo Drive, and emergency access from Cardella Road. Conditions include traffic signal contributions at Cardella/El Redondo and Cardella/Horizon, frontage improvements, and a storm drain analysis modification (Condition 25). - Commissioner Questions: Commissioner Ochoa inquired about road connections (El Redondo Drive and West Cardella Road), noting poor road conditions and multiple jurisdictions. The developer will be responsible for frontage improvements. Commissioner Gregens noted the parking layout backs up to existing homes, reducing privacy concerns. Commissioner Smith supported the project as beneficial for UC Merced students. - Public Testimony: None. - Outcome: Motion to approve all permits and the categorical exemption with staff conditions passed unanimously. Item F1: Workshop – Virginia Smith Trust Specific Plan Update - Presentation: Senior Planner Francisco Mendoza provided an overview of the 655-acre Virginia Smith Trust (VST) Specific Plan, located south of UC Merced. Key points: - History: Established in 1975 to fund scholarships; annexed into the city in 2024 after AB 3312; specific plan and development agreement approved by City Council in 2024. - Land Uses: Over 400 acres residential, 44 commercial, 115 acres parks/open space, 20 acres for schools. Includes a town center, regional sports complex, and trail network. - Affordable Housing: Two options in the development agreement: (1) a multi-prong approach including a UC workers-first program and partnership with Self-Help Enterprises, or (2) an in-lieu fee projected to generate $6.5–$8 million. The specific plan originally called for 400 enforceable affordable units (100 extremely low, 100 very low, 100 low, 75 moderate, plus 25 very low in mixed housing). - Infrastructure: Improvements to Lake Road (sidewalks, cycle track, lighting), Campus Parkway road diet, and dedicated bike lanes. - Upcoming Applications: Six tentative maps (one large-lot and five small-lot) expected for Planning Commission review in January 2026. - Public Testimony: Ashley Marie Suarez, policy advocate with Leadership Counsel for Justice and Accountability, spoke in favor of ensuring true affordability. She noted that if the developer chooses the in-lieu fee, it could yield only about 150 units instead of the 400 enforceable units, and urged the commission to require on-site affordable housing rather than fees. - Commissioner Discussion: Commissioners expressed support for the project and noted its importance for UC Merced growth. No action was taken as this was an informational workshop. Key Outcomes - Food Truck CUP (Item E1): Approved 4-1, with a directive for staff to provide a map of all approved food truck locations and consider ordinance review. - Apartment Complex (Item E2): Approved unanimously, with conditions including road improvements and modified storm drain analysis. - VST Workshop: No action; staff will present tentative maps in January 2026. Public testimony highlighted concerns about affordable housing implementation. - Upcoming Meetings: Next Planning Commission meeting scheduled for January 7, 2026 (possible cancellation). Training for commissioners anticipated after February. - Commissioner Announcements: Commissioner Gregens reported attending the ribbon-cutting for the R Street tiny home project (20 units for unhoused veterans and individuals).

The Merced City Council held a special meeting on December 16, 2025, at 5:30 PM in the City Council Chamber to honor local high school sports teams that won section and NorCal championships, as well as community organizations that supported the Police Athletic League (PAL) program. The meeting lasted approximately one hour and was entirely ceremonial, with no public comments or other business. Public Comments & Testimony - No members of the public spoke during the public comment period. Ceremonial Matters - Certificate of Recognition to Merced High Girls Flag Football Team: Coach Victor described a tough schedule that included games in Los Angeles and the Bay Area. The team won the section championship in only the third season of the program. Several players were recognized as statewide standouts. Mayor Serratto noted that this was the first time in Merced history that four teams won section championships in one year (the closest comparable season was 1996-1997). - Certificate of Recognition to El Capitan High School Girls Varsity Tennis: Head coach highlighted the team's historic accomplishment: first girls tennis section championship in school history and the first in the Merced Union High School District. The team finished 24–1 overall and 10–0 in the Central California Conference (CCC). Individual standouts included Leah Garcia (16–2, CCC singles champion and MVP) and Emma Weber (18–3, doubles MVP). - Certificate of Recognition to Merced High Boys Waterpolo Team: Head coach Eric Larson stated the team lost only three games by a combined six goals and won the CCC championship and the Division II section championship. Several players earned CCC and section honors, including Ree McCall (CCC and D2 section MVP). The team is young (three seniors, two juniors, rest freshmen and sophomores) and demonstrated strong veteran leadership. - Certificate of Recognition to Merced High Girls Waterpolo Team: Head coach reported a 31–2 season and the first NorCal championship in school history. The team won back-to-back CCC titles and back-to-back Division II section titles. Key players included Dottie Drury (CCC defensive player of the year) and Sarah Slocum (CCC and section MVP). The coach thanked the City of Merced for a special send-off by police and fire departments before the section championships. - Certificate of Recognition to Organizations Helping the PAL Program: Councilmember Michael Harris and Detective Shaw of the Merced Police Department described the origin of the Police Athletic League (PAL) program, which started in November 2023 after a student sought boxing opportunities. Detective Shaw secured a building with help from community partners. As of December 2025, PAL serves approximately 130 children, with about 80 attending weekly boxing sessions. Recognized organizations included the Barber Club Merced, Gutierrez Maintenance and Repairs, Dr. Johnson and Associates, and Cardoza Construction. Detective Shaw was also nominated for the Attorney General's Award for Outstanding Contributions to Community Partnerships for Public Safety. Key Outcomes - All certificates of recognition were presented without objection. - Mayor Pro Tem Boyle moved to adjourn; Councilmember Harris seconded. The motion carried unanimously, and the meeting adjourned.