Public Meetings - Omaha, Nebraska

The Omaha City Council met on September 15, 2026, to consider a range of items including liquor licenses, land development plats, a settlement agreement related to streetcar construction, and bid appeals. All votes were unanimous (7-0) across all action items. Proclamation - Councilmember Brinker Harding proclaimed September as Prostate Cancer Awareness Month and highlighted the Cruising for a Cure event on September 20th, offering free prostate cancer screenings (blood test) at 132nd and Pacific. He noted one in eight men will be diagnosed with prostate cancer and stressed early detection. Consent Calendar - Items 20–26 (public hearing held September 1, 2026) were approved unanimously without discussion. Public Comments & Testimony - David Molota (5225 North 168th Street, adjacent property owner) spoke as a proponent of the Cedarhurst development (items 13–18) but requested that the applicant clean up overgrown scrub, trees, and trash on the property before the next growing season to prevent thistles from blowing into his yard. Council suggested he meet with the applicant after the meeting. - Larry (Lafayette Avenue) opposed item 39 (speed limit reduction on Leavenworth Street from 35 to 30 mph under Vision Zero), calling it unnecessary and comparing Vision Zero to a “Marxist, totalitarian society.” - Doug Lane (7325 Pinkney Street) opposed item 42, questioning the $700,000 settlement for property damage caused by a streetcar contractor. He asked whether an engineer had assessed the damage, who was at fault, and urged the council to hold the contractor responsible rather than taxpayers. - Tony Driscoll (City of Omaha Golf Manager) appeared as a proponent on items 27–40. Discussion Items - Items 6–8 (Liquor Licenses): Class I license for Stephanie Moss Salon (16811 Burke Street), Class SI license for Maru Sushi Korean Grill (5036 South 108th Street), and Class D license for ExpressMart (5825 North 30th Street) were approved after public hearings. Councilmember Goodwin noted he supports the ExpressMart license but wants the council to develop a framework for evaluating liquor licenses in areas with community concerns. - Items 9–18 (Land Development): Preliminary and final plats, rezoning, and subdivision agreements were approved for Woodbrook Valley South (185th and Kansas), North Streams (202nd and N Street), and Cedarhurst of Omaha (168th and Grand). Cedarhurst items included rezoning to R5, an MCC district boundary amendment, a special use permit for assisted living, and subdivision agreements. - Item 19 (PUD Overlay Amendment): A major amendment for a PUD overlay at 1999 Veterans Drive was approved. - Items 27–40 (Various): Approved en bloc after a public hearing that included opposition to item 39 (speed limit reduction). - Item 41: Contract with West Side Community Schools for uniformed police officers and cruisers at West Side High School and Middle School was approved. - Item 42 (Settlement – $700,000): The council approved a settlement of claims related to property damage from the streetcar project. Councilmember Melton stated that the city will acquire and demolish the property, then resell it to recoup taxpayer money. The Law Department noted that the settlement also avoids litigation delays and gets the streetcar project back on track. - Item 43 (Real Estate Purchase): The council approved a $7.82 million purchase agreement with Nebraska Builders District 3 LLC for property between 16th/17th and Mike Fahey/Cass Streets, the next major phase of the Builders District. Development expected to begin mid-2027. - Items 44–48 (Ordinances): Approved: major amendment to Cattail Creek Commercial mixed-use district agreement; rubbish/recycle container pickup for Omaha Public Library (bid to Papillion Sanitation); drug trafficking grant agreement with Jennifer Bongdenov; Class A flammable liquid storage district at 146 South 243rd Street; three-year animal control agreement with Nebraska Humane Society. - Items 49–54 (Bid Appeals): - Item 49: 10-4 Golf appealed rejection of their bid for point-of-sale enterprise replacement for golf. CEO Jonathan Ride explained that FedEx failed to deliver the required bid security (cash) by the August 19 deadline despite shipping six days early. City attorney Jeffrey Bloom stated the city code requires receipt within seven calendar days and provides no discretion for late arrival. Council denied the appeal 7-0. - Item 50: Sean Nagus Construction appeal (residential street plowing) – appellant not present; denied 7-0. - Items 51–54: OHMS NE LLC appealed rejection of four bids for sidewalk snow/ice removal (Northwest, Southeast, Northwest, Southwest quadrants) because they did not include the required $100 bid security, mistakenly believing the $50,000 threshold exempted them. City attorney stated the bid specs explicitly required the security. Appellant Faust acknowledged the misunderstanding but the council denied all four appeals 7-0. Key Outcomes - All action items on the agenda were approved unanimously (7-0). - Bid appeals (items 49–54) were all denied 7-0. - Item 65 was postponed to the October 27, 2026 meeting. - Meeting adjourned at 2:52 PM.

The Omaha City Council met on September 2, 2026, to consider a range of items including liquor licenses, zoning changes, a major affordable housing policy for TIFF projects, school resource officer agreements, and the acceptance of the new central library as a gift. The meeting featured extensive public testimony and council debate on the TIFF affordable housing resolution (Item 43), which ultimately passed 5-2 after a failed layover motion. Consent Calendar - Items 24 through 31, which had public hearings on August 25, 2026, were approved unanimously (7-0) as part of the consent agenda. Public Comments & Testimony - Item 43 (TIFF Affordable Housing Policy): - Planning staff (Dave Fanslaw, Kelly Dorsey, Bridget Hadley) presented the recommendations, emphasizing that TIFF is not designed to produce affordable housing but can be leveraged. They outlined part one (immediate administrative changes) and part two (longer-term state law changes). - Tracy McPherson (Habitat for Humanity of Omaha) supported the recommendations as a starting point but urged greater focus on affordable homeownership and clear timelines for part two. - Cheryl Garst (Common Housing Development Corporation) called the policy a good start but noted the math does not work for deep affordability; she suggested additional tools like a waiting period for selling affordable units. - Steven Osberg (PGSA / Miller Commons Capital District) supported the measured approach and urged the council to avoid discouraging new development. - A representative from Front Porch supported part one and urged the city to explore district-wide TIFF and a dedicated funding source. - Kevin Meyer (architect and community member) commended the collaborative spirit and stressed incremental change. - Opponents: Stephen Houston argued TIFF creates a dependency that harms taxpayers and called for a full financial audit and pause on TIFF. Larry Store criticized the lack of transparency, stating that TIFF gives special breaks to developers while regular property taxes rise. - Items 44-50 (School Resource Officer Agreements): - Jason Whitmer (ACLU of Nebraska) opposed permanent SRO presence, citing studies showing no improvement in safety and negative impacts on students of color and students with disabilities. - Larry Store spoke in favor of SROs, arguing that parents and schools need to be more responsible. - Item 51 (Central Library Gift): - Renee Kekison (Heritage Omaha / Community Information Trust) expressed gratitude and noted that in the first three months, the library had 172,000 visitors, 96,000 items borrowed, and 8,761 new library cards issued. Discussion Items - Item 43 – TIFF and Affordable Housing Policy: - Councilmember Festerson (sponsor) supported the policy but wished it went further in requiring affordable units and urgency on part two. He highlighted the no-net-loss policy and reporting requirements as key. - Councilmember Goodwin framed this as a first step, noting the need for additional tools beyond TIFF and cautioning about concentrating poverty in disinvested areas. - Councilmember Rowe expressed respect for the process and supported the layover to allow more time for colleagues to review. - Councilmember Harding raised questions about part one details: the scope of existing housing data, the in-lieu payment amount, control of the affordable housing fund, and whether part two would become binding policy. He argued the policy needs more clarity before adoption. - Councilmember Melton echoed concerns about missing details on the in-lieu payment and fund governance. She proposed separating part one from part two and adding exceptions (e.g., grocery stores in food deserts). She also urged that the council avoid passing codes that increase housing costs. - Councilmember Hug praised the staff work but raised a concern that the one-for-one replacement rule might discourage beneficial redevelopment (e.g., reducing density from illegal conversions). - A motion to lay over the item to October 6 failed 3-4 (Festerson, Goodwin, Hug voted no; Harding, Melton, Rowe voted yes; Mr. President (Bagley) voted no). The main motion to approve then passed 5-2 (Festerson, Goodwin, Hug, Rowe, Mr. President in favor; Harding and Melton opposed). - Items 44-50 – School Resource Officer Agreements: - Lieutenant Charles Ott (OPD) explained the SRO role using the NASRO triad model (teacher, counselor, law enforcement). He emphasized that SROs are not school disciplinarians and only intervene in criminal matters or threats. He highlighted the importance of relationships and threat assessment. - Councilmember Goodwin noted the 31-year history and the need to balance community concerns with the comfort that SROs provide. She asked about governance; MacCouzie (Law Department) clarified that SROs remain under OPD control, not school district control. - Councilmember Festerson reminded that the agreements are annual renewals requested by all four school districts. No recorded vote was taken on these items in the transcript; the meeting proceeded to item 51. - Item 51 – Gift of Central Library: - MacCouzie presented the gift agreement from the Community Information Trust to the city. The library board had unanimously approved the gift on August 19. The council accepted the gift without objection; public hearing was closed and the item approved by a roll call vote of 7-0. Key Outcomes - Item 43: The resolution approving part one recommendations to incentivize/require affordable housing in TIFF projects passed 5-2. A motion to lay over to October 6 failed. The policy includes no-net-loss of housing units, rent roll and sale price documentation, and a development concierge for projects with income-restricted units. Part two recommendations (state law changes, area-wide TIFF) were noted but not adopted as policy. - Items 44-50: The SRO agreements with four school districts were discussed; no roll call vote is recorded in the transcript, but the council moved on to the next item, indicating likely approval. - Item 51: The gift of the new central library from the Community Information Trust was accepted unanimously (7-0). - The meeting adjourned at 4:23 PM.

The Omaha City Council met on September 1, 2026, at 6:40 PM to consider a range of agenda items, including a major policy on affordable housing and Tax Increment Financing (TIFF), renewal of School Resource Officer (SRO) agreements with four school districts, and acceptance of the new Central Library as a gift. The meeting included public testimony, extensive council discussion, and multiple votes. Consent Calendar - Items 24–31 (ordinances and resolutions held over from August 25, 2026) were approved 7–0. - Items 32–42 (liquor license manager applications and other routine matters) were approved 7–0 after a public hearing. Public Comments & Testimony - Item 43 (Affordable Housing TIFF Policy): - Proponents: Dave Fanslaw (City Planning) and Kelly Johnston Dorsey (Planning) presented the proposed policy, citing 15 meetings with 18 developers, a review of 22 comparable cities, and ongoing collaboration with Front Porch. Tracy McPherson (Habitat for Humanity) emphasized the need to include homeownership and urged a timeline for part two. Cheryl Garst (Common Housing) noted the math of building affordable units and suggested a waiting period before selling affordable units to market. Steven Osberg (PGSA) supported the measured approach. A representative from Front Porch supported part one and urged focus on area-wide TIFF districts and a dedicated funding source. A community member (Mr. Meyer) praised the collaborative atmosphere and the no-net-loss policy. - Opponents: Stephen Houston (4562 Walnut Street) argued the policy only treats symptoms, called for a full audit of TIFF cash flows, and claimed $49 million in excess TIFF reserves. Larry Sur (5015 Lafayette Avenue) criticized TIFF as a lack of transparency and a subsidy for developers, stating it raises property taxes for residents. - Items 44–50 (SRO Agreements): - Opponent: Mindy Rush (ACLU of Nebraska) opposed permanent police presence in schools, citing a 2026 report that removing police did not increase violence, and noting disproportionate discipline of students of color and disabilities. Larry Sur also opposed expansion, arguing police are needed on streets and parents should be responsible. - Proponents: Councilmember Goodwin noted the 31-year program and called Officer Ott to explain the SRO role. Lieutenant Charles Ott (OPD) described the NASRO triad model (teacher, counselor, law enforcement), emphasized relationship-building, and noted that SROs are not school disciplinarians. He highlighted recent incidents at Central High School and Westview that proved the value of SROs. - Item 51 (Central Library Gift): - Proponent: Renee Kekaison (Heritage Omaha) thanked the city and donors, noting the $138 million in donations and $20 million city contribution, and expressed gratitude for the partnership. Discussion Items - Item 43 (TIFF Affordable Housing Policy): The planning department presented part one (immediate) and part two (future) recommendations. Part one includes: requiring TIFF applicants to submit existing housing data, a no-net-loss policy (one-to-one replacement of affordable units or payment in lieu), annual rent rolls and sale price documentation, and a development concierge for income-restricted projects. Part two includes state law changes, area-wide TIFF districts, and exploring other funding sources. Councilmembers debated the clarity of part two, the need for details on the in-lieu payment amount and fund administration, and exceptions (e.g., for grocery stores). Councilmember Harding requested a layover for more information; Councilmember Melton sought to separate part one and part two and add specifics. After the layover motion failed 3–4, the resolution passed 5–2. - Items 44–50 (SRO Agreements): Councilmembers expressed support for the program, citing its 31-year history and recent safety incidents. Officer Ott answered questions about oversight (OPD retains control) and the roles of SROs. The agreements were approved without a recorded vote, moving directly to the next item. - Item 51 (Central Library Gift): The council accepted the gift of the new Central Library at 72nd and Dodge Streets from the Community Information Trust. The library board had unanimously approved the gift on August 19. The council held a public hearing and proceeded to approval. Key Outcomes - Item 43 (TIFF Policy): Approved 5–2 (Festerson, Hug, Rowe, Mr. President in favor; Goodwin, Harding, Melton opposed). The policy adopts part one recommendations immediately and directs the planning department to develop procedures. Part two remains aspirational, requiring further study and state law changes. - Items 44–50 (SRO Agreements): Approved without formal vote; the council proceeded to the next agenda item after discussion, indicating unanimous consent. The agreements renew the SRO program with Omaha Public Schools, Elkhorn Public Schools, Millard School District, and Westside Community Schools. - Item 51 (Central Library Gift): Approved unanimously. The city accepts the building and facilities from the Community Information Trust, with operational and maintenance responsibility assumed by the city. - Other items: All liquor license applications (items 6–9) and development projects (items 10–23) were approved 7–0. Note: The transcript does not include a recorded vote for items 44–50, but the council proceeded to the next item after discussion, implying approval. The majority of public testimony on SROs was in opposition, but council members expressed strong support.

The Omaha City Council met on August 26, 2026, to consider a $4.4 million property tax levy reduction amendment, approve the 2027 budget with numerous community service revisions, and decide on a $7.55 million hotel incentive. The meeting featured extensive public comment, debate on policy vs. statute, and a split vote on the levy reduction. The council also handled routine liquor licenses, TIF projects, and consent agenda items. Consent Calendar - Items 23–25 were on the consent agenda; item 24 was removed and considered separately. Items 23 and 25 were approved unanimously (7-0). Item 24 (not specified in transcript) passed 6-0 with one abstention (Councilmember Festerson). - Items 26–36 (a block of public hearings) were approved unanimously (7-0). - Items 37–44 (ordinances for contracts, grants, and interlocal agreements) were approved without opposition. Public Comments & Testimony - Item 14 (Tax Levy Reduction): Mayor Ewing opposed the 0.75-cent levy decrease, calling it a “switch out concrete for sand” that could create a structural deficit, risk nine firefighter positions, police hiring, and park matching funds. Residents Larry Store and Alan Seibert supported reduction; Cheryl Weston criticized the mayor’s interruption. - Item 13 (One Omaha → Food Bank Shift): Over a dozen speakers opposed redirecting $40,000 from One Omaha to the Food Bank of the Heartland, arguing both organizations need funding and that the move was “egregious” and “personal.” Supporters of the shift cited the food bank’s ability to provide 120,000–160,000 meals per $40,000. Councilmember Goodwin defended the change, stating the funds were never allocated and that food security is a priority. - Item 10 (Business Improvement District Funding): Cheryl Weston opposed approving funding without specifying which BIDs and events would benefit, citing potential conflict of interest with Councilmember Goodwin’s role at the North 24th Street BID. - Item 6 (Curling Club & Parks): Nick Swersek (president of Exarbon Curling Association) supported $25,000 for a new curling facility. - Item 7 (Heartland Hope Mission): Chelsea Salafi thanked the council for $50,000 to support their food pantry and intervention services. - Item 8 (Nebraska State Historical, Youth Emergency Services, Irish Cultural Center): Calisha Reid (YES executive director) noted $15,000 would cover a year of hot meals and pantry bags. - Item 9 (Workforce development, park maintenance, signs): No public testimony. - Item 10 (BIDs, parks, North Omaha organizations): Holly Barrett (Downtown Improvement District) supported BID funding; Dana Murray (North Omaha Music & Arts) thanked for $10,000; Vicky Quaits Ferris (Native Omaha Days) requested cleanup funds. Cheryl Weston opposed without clear allocation. - Item 11 (Self-Help Legal Center & Ramble Ridge study): Councilmember Melton explained the $40,000 study for pond dredging and $10,000 for legal self-help. - Item 12 (Madonna Rehab & Wolf Pack Sports): Nick Brozzel (Madonna) requested $30,000 for recreation therapy; Councilmember Harding supported both. - Item 20 (879 Bar Expansion): Holly Barrett opposed expansion citing ongoing violations. Attorney Michael Polk argued alleged tavern reports were not adjudicated. - Item 22 (Drury Plaza Hotel EEA): Proponents included attorney Brent Bellar (project meets all codes, policy never adopted), Holly Barrett (design quality), and Cheryl Weston (no taxpayer cost). No opponents spoke. - Item 21 (2501 Center TIF): Proponent Rahul Legerwall thanked council for 198 affordable housing units on a blighted site. Discussion Items - Item 14 – Tax Levy Reduction Amendment (Failed 3-4): Councilmembers Harding, Melton, and Roe proposed a 75-cent reduction in the property tax mill levy, shifting $4.4 million from property to sales tax revenue. Mayor Ewing testified that the change would risk public safety and park funding. Councilmember Festerson opposed, noting the amendment did not identify corresponding cuts; prior levy reductions were real with offsets. The motion failed (3-4: Harding, Roe, Melton yes; Festerson, Goodwin, Hug, Begley no). - Item 13 – Redirect $40,000 from One Omaha to Food Bank (Passed 7-0): Councilmember Goodwin moved to reallocate $40,000 originally recommended for One Omaha to the Food Bank of the Heartland, citing impact (120,000–160,000 meals). Opponents argued One Omaha provides critical neighborhood capacity-building; Goodwin countered that funds were never allocated and food security is urgent. - Item 22 – Drury Plaza Hotel EEA Incentive (Passed 7-0): Extensive debate over the city’s “downtown hotel policy” which the planning department and committees cited as grounds for denial. Attorney Bellar argued the policy was never adopted by council, was advisory, and that Drury would commit in writing to upper upscale amenities (brand, finishes, convention cooperation). Councilmembers noted fairness and potential to codify policy later. The redevelopment plan (Stage 1) was approved; a subsequent agreement will spell out requirements. - Item 20 – 879 Bar Expansion (Denied 7-0): The council denied expansion of the outdoor area due to 17 tavern reports since December 2025, probation by the liquor commission, and unpermitted work. - Item 21 – 2501 Center TIF (Passed 7-0): $3.6 million TIF for 180 affordable housing units (including row houses) at 25th and Center, replacing old Salvation Army buildings. - Item 15 – 2027 Budget Adoption (Passed 7-0): Council approved the mayor’s $5 million parks investment (with $5 million philanthropic match), police/fire staffing increases, and a 6.9% general fund spending increase. Councilmembers noted the budget is fiscally sound but some wanted further tax relief. - Item 16 – 2027–2032 Capital Improvement Program (Passed 7-0): Approved as recommended. Key Outcomes - Property tax mill levy reduction (Item 14): REJECTED (3-4). The resolution to cut the levy by 0.75 cents and increase sales tax revenue failed. - Various community service budget revisions (Items 6–13): All APPROVED unanimously (7-0) except Item 13, which passed 7-0 after amendment. Total allocations exceeded $250,000 for parks, curling, food bank, youth services, legal aid, parks study, and more. - Liquor licenses (Items 17–19): APPROVED 7-0 for Kid Lobby, Frozen Vines, and Crystal Jade. - 879 Bar expansion (Item 20): DENIED 7-0. - 2501 Center TIF (Item 21): APPROVED 7-0. - Drury Plaza Hotel redevelopment plan (Item 22): APPROVED 7-0, with conditions to be codified in the future redevelopment agreement. - 2027 budget (Item 15): APPROVED 7-0. - Capital Improvements (Item 16): APPROVED 7-0. - Consent agenda and remaining ordinances (Items 23–44): APPROVED as noted. - Non-action items (45–77): Moved to future agendas; item 77 rescheduled per applicant request (7-0). - Meeting adjourned at 5:48 p.m.

The Omaha City Council met on August 25, 2026, to consider a series of budget amendments for the 2027 fiscal year, approve the final budget, and act on several liquor license applications and redevelopment plans. The most contentious items included a proposed property tax levy reduction amendment (Item 14), a debate over shifting $40,000 from One Omaha to the Food Bank of the Heartland (Item 13), and approval of an Enhanced Employment Area (EEA) incentive for a new Drury Plaza Hotel (Item 22). All votes were taken after public hearings. Consent Calendar - Items 23–25 (public hearings held August 18, 2026) were approved en bloc, with Item 24 passed 6–0 (Councilmember Festerson abstaining). - Items 26–36 (public hearings on August 25, 2026) were approved 7–0. - Items 37–44 (ordinances) were each passed 7–0 after separate public hearings. Public Comments & Testimony - Item 14 (Property Tax Levy Decrease): Mayor Ewing spoke in opposition, arguing the $4.4 million reduction would risk funding for nine firefighter positions, police hiring commitments, and a $5 million park matching grant. Several residents, including Larry Store and Alan Seiber, expressed support for the levy cut, while Cheryl Weston criticized the council for interrupting the mayor. Councilmember Harding and Melton defended the amendment as modest property tax relief. - Item 13 (One Omaha vs. Food Bank): Numerous residents testified against the amendment to redirect $40,000 from One Omaha to the Food Bank of the Heartland. Speakers including Kimara Snipes (One Omaha), Leo Lewis, Cheryl Weston, and others argued that both organizations should be funded and that the move pitted two important causes against each other. Proponents of the transfer, including Deshaun Lavelle and Councilmember Goodwin, emphasized the food bank's purchasing power (120,000–160,000 meals per $40,000) and the urgency of food insecurity. The public hearing lasted over an hour. - Item 20 (879 Bar Expansion): Multiple opponents, including the Downtown Improvement District and police Captain Paul Hanson, cited 17 tavern reports since the bar opened in December 2025 (assaults, disorderly conduct, overcrowding, open containers). The applicant’s attorney argued many incidents were not the bar’s fault. Councilmembers expressed disappointment over ongoing safety issues. - Item 22 (Drury Plaza Hotel EEA): Attorney Brent Bellar argued the city’s “hotel policy” was never formally adopted by the council, and that Drury meets all statutory EEA criteria. Supporters included Downtown Improvement District executive Holly Barrett and resident Cheryl Weston. The planning department and planning board had recommended denial based on the policy. CVB representative Jasmine Goodwin and city attorney Jennifer Taylor clarified the policy’s advisory nature. Discussion Items - Item 14 (Levy Reduction): Councilmembers Harding, Melton, and Roe proposed cutting the property tax levy by 0.75 cents (saving median homeowner $19/year), funded by higher-than-expected sales tax revenue. The mayor warned of cuts to public safety and parks. Councilmember Festerson noted past levy reductions were paired with corresponding spending cuts; this amendment lacked them. The motion failed 3–4. - Item 13 (One Omaha Defunding): Councilmember Goodwin moved to transfer $40,000 from One Omaha to the Food Bank of the Heartland. She argued the food bank can leverage the money for 120,000+ meals, while One Omaha’s budget is smaller but supports neighborhood capacity. Opponents called the move “egregious” and “pitting organizations against each other.” The motion passed 7–0. - Item 20 (879 Bar Expansion): The council denied the application to expand the bar’s footprint and add an outdoor area, citing 17 police reports, unpermitted work, and ongoing disturbances. The applicant was on probation with the Nebraska Liquor Control Commission. Motion to deny passed 7–0. - Item 22 (Drury Plaza Hotel EEA): The council debated whether the city’s downtown hotel policy (not formally adopted) should block an EEA for Drury. Drury committed in writing to build an upper-upscale hotel with a pool, fitness center, restaurant, bar, and meeting space, and to hire a convention liaison. After extensive questioning, the council approved the redevelopment plan 7–0, with the understanding that a detailed redevelopment agreement would follow. Key Outcomes - Item 14: Amendment to decrease general fund property tax levy by 0.75 cents FAILED (3–4). - Item 6 (Omaha Parks Foundation & Curling Club): Passed 7–0. - Item 7 (Heartland Hope Mission $50,000): Passed 7–0. - Item 8 (Nebraska State Historical Society Foundation, Youth Emergency Services, Omaha Irish Cultural Center): Passed 7–0. - Item 9 (Workforce Development, Park Maintenance, Sign Maintenance): Passed 7–0. - Item 10 (Parks, North Omaha Music and Arts, Native Omaha Days, etc.): Passed 7–0. - Item 11 (Nebraska Lawyers Foundation & Ramble Ridge Pond Study): Passed 7–0. - Item 12 (Madonna Rehabilitation Hospital & Wolfpack Sports Foundation): Passed 7–0. - Item 13 (Food Bank of the Heartland $40,000, defunding One Omaha): Passed 7–0. - Item 15 (2027 Budget as amended): Passed 7–0. - Item 16 (2027-2032 Capital Improvement Program): Passed 7–0. - Item 17 (C liquor license Kid Lobby): Passed 7–0. - Item 18 (C liquor license Frozen Vines): Passed 7–0. - Item 19 (A liquor license Crystal Jade): Passed 7–0. - Item 20 (879 Bar expansion): Denied 7–0. - Item 21 (2501 Center TIF Affordable Housing): Passed 7–0. - Item 22 (Drury Plaza Hotel EEA Redevelopment Plan): Passed 7–0. - Item 24 (consent agenda): Passed 6–0 (Festerson abstained). - Item 77 (public hearing rescheduled): Passed 7–0. - Meeting adjourned at 5:48 PM.

The Omaha City Council met on August 18, 2026, to consider a variety of agenda items including liquor licenses, preliminary and final plats for residential developments, tax increment financing (TIF) projects, an ordinance on unauthorized towing, and a lease agreement. All votes were 6-0 unless otherwise noted. The meeting adjourned at 3:00 p.m. Consent Calendar - Items 23–27 (public hearings held on August 4, 2026) were approved unanimously. - Items 28–45 (public hearing held today) were approved unanimously. One opponent, Harry Store, spoke against Item 44, objecting to the use of city funds for the League of Cities. Public Comments & Testimony - Item 6 (Liquor License – Chinese Restaurant): No opponents. Councilmember Goodwin asked the applicant, Jin Don Pan, about hours and menu. The restaurant opened on April 7, 2026. - Item 7 (Liquor License – Tasty Pizza): No opponents. Councilmember Hugg expressed strong support. Councilmember Fesserson inquired about a second location on North Saddle Creek; the applicant, Mary Joseph, said it is on hold. - Item 8 (Liquor License – Abarotos Grocery): No opponents. Councilmember Hugg noted a letter of protest from a respected community member but supported the license because the business has operated successfully for seven years. The applicant, Otonil Ridal Álvarez, confirmed the license is for beer sales only. - Item 9 (Preliminary Plat – Cunningham View): No opponents. The applicant, Brent Bellard, described the 72-acre plat with 155 single-family lots, 73 townhome lots, and 110–130 multifamily units, emphasizing entry-level home affordability. - Items 10–12 (Walnut Hill Replat 10 – Affordable Housing): Opponent Larry Store questioned why the lot was already cleared, suggesting the decision was predetermined. The applicant, Scott Loes, explained the five-lot PUD development with homes priced around $150,000–$200,000. - Items 13–16 (Serenity Estates Villas): Multiple opponents: Larry Store again questioned lack of discussion. Mark Dawkins (2210 Skyline Drive) showed photos of severe erosion along the Elkhorn River and expressed concern about adding 11–12 lots on a steep slope. William Beerman, attorney for homeowner Heidi Donner, cited written opposition and emphasized the erosion risk, asking the council to vote no. - Item 22 (Workforce Housing III – Fort Circle TIF): No opponents. Proponent Bridget Hadley (City Planning) described six single-family homes (3-bed, 2-bath, 1,600 sq ft, $245,000 price) with $257,093 in TIF support. Laysha Goodwin (Holy Name Housing) answered questions about timeline (construction to start mid- to late-September 2026, completion spring/summer 2027). - Item 48 (2211 Douglas Street Senior Housing TIF): Proponents Danielle Price (Spark), Donnell Brown (emerging developer), and Alicia Goodwin spoke in support. The project is a 73-unit senior housing community with more than half of units affordable at or below 60% AMI. Partners include Common Spirit and No More Empty Pots. Discussion Items - Item 6 (Liquor License – Chinese Restaurant): Councilmember Goodwin asked about the restaurant’s specialty (handmade dumplings, noodles, pan-fried buns) and opening date (already open). - Item 7 (Liquor License – Tasty Pizza): Councilmember Fesserson noted the site is the former La Sola Mio and asked about the timeline for a second location; the applicant said it is on hold. - Item 8 (Liquor License – Abarotos): Councilmember Hugg clarified the license is for beer sales only and reminded the applicant that the state can revoke the permit. - Items 13–16 (Serenity Estates): Councilmember Harding questioned the applicant, Doug Streeson, about erosion mitigation. Streeson explained that the subdivision was reduced from 12 to 11 lots, drainage is directed toward Skyline Drive rather than the river, and that the change helps avoid erosion. Ryan Haas from Public Works addressed traffic concerns: 11 single-family lots generate only 13 peak-hour trips, and traffic calming measures are being deployed on Skyline Drive. Sidewalks will be required along the frontage. - Item 46 (Unauthorized Towing Fees): Councilmember Hugg explained that he placed the ordinance on file because he believes the current ordinance is poorly drafted. He intends to work with legal counsel on a comprehensive restructuring of non-consensual towing regulations, including a possible licensing requirement for tow truck companies. - Item 48 (Senior Housing TIF): Councilmember Goodwin asked about the developer partnership (Donnell Brown with Hobby Development), the demolition of the former Together Inc. shelter, and the provision of wraparound services via CHI, Common Spirit, and other organizations. Construction is expected to start in Q4 2026, with completion by end of 2027 and leasing in 2028. Key Outcomes - Item 6 (Liquor License – Chinese Restaurant): Approved 6-0. - Item 7 (Liquor License – Tasty Pizza): Approved 6-0. - Item 8 (Liquor License – Abarotos): Approved 6-0. - Item 9 (Preliminary Plat – Cunningham View): Approved 6-0. - Items 10–12 (Walnut Hill Replat 10): Approved 6-0. - Items 13–16 (Serenity Estates Villas): Approved 6-0. - Items 17–21 (Iron Bluff Replat 4): Approved 6-0. - Item 22 (Workforce Housing III – Fort Circle TIF): Approved 6-0. - Consent Agenda (Items 23–27 and 28–45): Approved 6-0. - Item 46 (Unauthorized Towing Fees): Placed on file by Councilmember Hugg; will be revisited with a new ordinance. Approved 6-0. - Item 47 (Purchase Order – Summit Fire Protection): Approved without discussion. - Item 48 (2211 Douglas Street Senior Housing TIF): Approved 6-0. - Item 49 (Lease with Army Corps – Standing Bear Lake): Approved without discussion. Non-Action Items - Items 50–72 were noted for future agendas and did not require a vote at this meeting.

The Omaha City Council met on August 18, 2026, to consider a variety of items including liquor licenses, plat approvals, rezoning, tax increment financing (TIF), an ordinance related to towing fees, and a lease agreement. All votes were unanimous (6-0) except as noted. Public testimony addressed concerns about affordable housing, erosion, and government membership. Consent Calendar - Items 23–27 (public hearings held August 4, 2026) were approved. - Items 28–45 were approved; one opponent spoke against Item 44. Public Comments & Testimony - Larry Store (5015 Lafayette Ave) opposed Items 10–12 and 13–16, arguing that public hearings lack meaningful discussion before votes. He also opposed Item 44, objecting to taxpayer funding for the League of Cities. - Mark Dockin (2210 Skyline Dr) opposed Items 13–16, presenting photographs of severe erosion along the Elkhorn River bluff and expressing concern about future erosion risks from new construction. - William Beerman (attorney, 10250 Regency Circle) opposed Items 13–16 on behalf of neighboring homeowner Heidi Donner, citing erosion and soil stability threats from adding 11–12 structures near the river. - Brent Bellard (engineer, 1140 West Center Rd) spoke in favor of Item 9 (Cunningham View preliminary plat), noting plans for entry-level homes. - Scott Lowes (engineer, 10836 Old Mill Rd) spoke in favor of Items 10–12 (Walnut Hill affordable housing PUD), describing a five-lot development with 1,500 sq ft homes priced $150,000–$200,000. - Doug Street (engineer, 10836 Old Mill Rd) spoke for Items 13–16, explaining that the layout was adjusted from 12 to 11 lots and drainage directed away from the bluff to reduce erosion. - Bridget Hadley (City Planning) presented Item 22 (Workforce Housing TIF) and Item 48 (senior housing TIF). - Danielle Price (Spark, 1111 N 13th St) and Donnell Brown (developer, 4227 Wyoming St) and Alicia Goodwin (4113 N 18th St) supported Item 48. - Several applicants appeared via Zoom for liquor licenses. Discussion Items - Liquor Licenses (Items 6–8): All approved after brief questions. Item 6: Bobo's Noodles and Dumplings (new Chinese restaurant, already open since April 7). Item 7: Tasty Pizza (taking over former La Sola Mio; another location on hold). Item 8: Alvarado's (existing Latino grocery, seven years in business, adding beer sales). - Cunningham View Preliminary Plat (Item 9): 72 acres at 78th and State Streets, outside city limits. Plan includes 155 single-family lots, 73 townhome lots, and 100–130 multifamily units. Developer noted creative solutions for entry-level homeownership. - Walnut Hill Replat 10 (Items 10–12): Five-lot PUD at 40th and Williams Street, affordable homes with garages, basements, and two stories. Councilmember Goodwin asked about financing and price; the applicant confirmed price point $150,000–$200,000, well below current market rates. Project had been in development for nearly two years. - Serenity Estates Villas (Items 13–16): 11 lots on Skyline Drive, homes valued $1.2–$1.4 million. Developer reduced from 12 lots and rerouted drainage to mitigate erosion. Public Works confirmed traffic impact of 13 peak-hour trips. Council discussed previous planning and erosion concerns. - Iron Bluff Replat 4 (Items 17–21): Rezone and mixed-use amendment; no public testimony. - Workforce Housing TIF (Item 22): Six single-family homes (3BR/2BA, 1,600 sq ft) at Fort and 24th Street, priced $245,000. $257,093 in TIF support. Construction expected to start September 2026 and finish spring/summer 2027. - Towing Ordinance (Item 46): Councilman Hug placed proposed fee changes on file to develop a new comprehensive ordinance targeting non-consensual towing. He expressed dissatisfaction with the existing ordinance and noted an external draft that could serve as a model. - Senior Housing TIF (Item 48): 73-unit senior housing at 2211 Douglas Street, with at least half of units affordable at or below 60% Area Median Income. Developer Donnell Brown (Spark Academy graduate) partnered with Hoppy Development. Wraparound services from CommonSpirit and other partners. Construction Q4 2026, completion 2027, rent-up 2028. - Other Items: Item 47 (purchase order for fire prevention services) and Item 49 (25-year lease with Army Corps for dam site 16 at Standing Bear Lake) approved without discussion. Key Outcomes - All votes were 6-0 in favor, except Item 46 (placed on file with no vote on the merits). - Item 46 will be replaced by a future comprehensive towing ordinance. - Items 50–72 were placed on a future agenda for public hearing and vote. - Meeting adjourned at 3:00 PM.

The Omaha City Council held a public hearing on August 12, 2026, to receive public input on the proposed 2027 city budget and capital improvement program. The meeting began with procedural remarks, followed by testimonies from over 30 speakers. Speakers expressed support for various programs funded in the budget, while others opposed specific allocations, particularly the high proportion of spending on policing. The hearing concluded at 8:22 PM with a motion to adjourn passed 6-0. Public Comments & Testimony Support for the Budget: - A representative from a youth sports organization (South Omaha) advocated for the mayor's 2027 budget, citing increased participation from 3,000 in 2025 to 3,500 in 2026 and dedication to police force strengthening. - Martisse Ivy (Ivy Leagues Youth Sports Academy) thanked the city for adding Ivy League to the budget, highlighting eight years of partnership and expansion into girls' sports. - Helena Deddish (Students for Sustainability) supported the budget, noting a 0.624% increase in parks funding from 5.143% to 5.767% of departmental appropriations, and an increase in full-time park staff from 178 to 192 positions. She expressed concern about reliance on private donor matching funds for parks. - Richard Webb (Boys and Girls Club) advocated for the budget, mentioning 63 years of service, 6,200 kids served last year, and 1,750 per day across 12 locations. - Marilyn Sims (Urban League of Nebraska) supported the budget, highlighting partnerships with Omaha Public Schools in eight schools, and 85% of students missing fewer than 20 school days. - Tim Noonan (Santa Francis House) thanked for community service fund support serving hundreds through street outreach and over 1,000 people each year. - Mark Clark (Together) expressed gratitude for support, citing 3,307 participants in Horizons housing programs, 2,745 obtaining/retaining housing, and food pantries serving 29,760 unique participants (2.8 million meals) last year, with a 24% increase in 2026. - Kimberly Sherrod Barnes (CASA for Douglas County) supported the budget, noting 247 volunteers supporting children in child welfare, in partnership with six juvenile court judges. - Damian Ryan (Heart Ministry Center) advocated for the budget, reporting 3.2 million pounds of food distributed, over 160,000 pantry visits, and 6,000 health clinic visits, saving area hospitals over $5 million. - Nancy Gardner (Miller Park Miniloosa Neighborhood Association) thanked for parks investment, noting a 20% increase in operating money and 14 new employees, and $5 million in capital projects. She highlighted prior underfunding. - Andrew Norman (The Bay) supported the budget, citing youth development in Benson, with programs for 4-24 year olds, and construction of a new facility expected in Q2 2027. - Rita Heston Clark (Saving Grace) supported continued funding, rescuing surplus food from 160+ donors to 60 agencies, diverting nearly a million pounds of food from waste. - Deborah McKnight (Urban Abbey) celebrated parks and youth programming funding but urged additional housing and shelter funding. - Jason Feldhouse (Threshold COO) supported the budget, focusing on unsheltered homeless and crisis response. - Kimara Snipes (One Omaha) supported neighborhood livability and engagement, but encouraged more resources for neighborhood engagement and measuring success beyond traditional metrics. Opposition to the Budget: - Margo Warez criticized lack of transit investment, urging millions annually for public transit. - Andrew Sullivan argued spending far exceeds population growth, property taxes should fall, and criticized TIF and police budget. - Alan Seibert questioned property tax revenue estimates and urged lowering levy if revenues come in higher. - Gina Morong criticized police budget at almost 40% of general fund, requesting funds for roads, ADA compliance, transit, and affordable housing instead. - Theodore Blaylock opposed police budget, noting lack of mental health co-responders, and criticized funding for a gun range and new police headquarters. - Noah Malberg advocated for protected bikeways and bike infrastructure, citing record bike share ridership. - Doug Kagan (Nebraska Taxpayers for Freedom) urged lowering levy, criticized parking garages and streetcar costs, and suggested privatizing parking. - Alison Foy advocated for a complete streets mandate and separated bike lanes, citing safety concerns and example from Des Moines. - Larry Storr argued for more police funding to address homelessness and property damage, sharing personal safety incidents. - Joyce Von Drasek asked for increased funding for housing inspectors, protected bike lanes, and opposed the PACE program as police propaganda. - Hannah Miller opposed budget due to poor pedestrian/cyclist infrastructure, citing only 26 miles of bike lanes and 23 deaths since 2024 involving cyclists/pedestrians. - Gab Rima opposed overemphasis on policing, noted 289 life-altering crashes in 2025, and asked for investment in Vision Zero, protected bike lanes, and transit. - Anthony Rogers Wright criticized budget for not addressing material needs, high police spending, lack of affordable housing, and reliance on philanthropy. - Matthew Heller noted police and fire make up 63.5% of budget, asked for climate action funding and transit investment (Metro Next). - Clarice Domback (Redress Movement) asked for more housing inspectors to prevent situations like City View Apartments closure. - Kira Britt advocated for holistic public safety: climate, mental health co-responders, housing, accessible sidewalks, and reducing police budget. - Jane McGill (Urban Abbey) asked for protected bike lanes and better transit, noting Omaha ranks 48th in bike infrastructure. - Sydney McNeil opposed 12% police spending increase, asked for affordable housing, mental health, housing inspectors, and a more participatory budget process. - Maureen Piper opposed budget for maintaining status quo on police spending, asked for investment in housing inspectors, transit, and bike lanes. - Ryan Wishart (served on Vision Zero and Climate Action advisory committees) noted improvements but asked for more resources for climate plan, efficiency standards in TIF, and better bike infrastructure. - Katie Suarez called for a more transparent and participatory budget process, department-level commitments to climate goals, and transit funding. - Tim Carter opposed police budget increase ($28 million) without adding officer positions, and noted worsening response times. He asked for more mental health co-responders and streets funding. - Alexander Lou opposed police budget increase, cited flock camera inaccuracy (71% misreads), and asked for better training on interactions with disabled individuals. - Rob Sembrat advocated for pedestrian-first funding, bike lanes, and transit to attract and retain residents. - Shelby Anderson Holt shared a personal story of a bike crash due to lack of infrastructure, and argued for bike and pedestrian safety investments. - Jonathan Renderia asked for investment in budget process transparency and better breakdowns of CIP and bonds. Key Outcomes - The public hearing was held and closed at 8:22 PM. - A motion to adjourn passed 6-0. - No other votes or decisions were taken; the council will continue the budget review process following this hearing.

The Omaha City Council convened on August 11, 2026, to review the proposed 2027 budget. Presentations were delivered by the Finance, Planning, Police, Fire, Public Works, Parks and Recreation, Public Library, and Convention and Visitors Bureau departments. The hearing included detailed discussions on revenue projections, staffing increases, capital improvements, and operational priorities. The council recessed at 6:30 PM; no votes were taken, with formal adoption scheduled for a future meeting. Discussion Items - Finance Department (Steve Curtis): The all-funds budget decreased from $1.8 billion to $1.7 billion, primarily due to lower bond proceeds. Sales tax revenue is projected to grow 8.5% over the prior year’s budget (approximately 4% over the actual 2026 trend), while property taxes are expected to increase 4.3% from valuation growth. The city’s property tax levy remains unchanged at 43.99 cents per $100 valuation. General fund revenues include $128.7 million in property taxes, $288 million in sales tax, and $46 million in restaurant taxes. Department budgets: Police up 12% to $261 million; Fire (general fund) up 4.25% to $147 million; Parks up $5 million (plus $5 million in philanthropy). The city added 43 positions across departments. Curtis noted ongoing difficulty forecasting sales tax due to limited data from the state; the city is working with the Nebraska Department of Revenue to obtain more detailed information. - Planning Department (Dave Fanslow): The department’s budget is $16 million from general funds, $3.8 million from federal dollars, and $780,000 for technology and training, with a total workforce of 136 (down one position). Housing and Community Development oversees $141 million in grants and programs. The Capital Improvement Program (CIP) includes $647 million in general obligation bonds. Key projects: $881 million for a new police and fire training headquarters, $40 million/year for street preservation (800 lane miles improved in five years), $45 million Levi Carter Sports Complex (opens October 2026), $200 million CHI Center investment, and streetcar funding. No annexation is planned this year; residential SIDs were not financially beneficial. - Police Department (Chief Schmider): The proposed budget is $235 million, an 8.5% increase over 2026. Year-to-date overall crime is down 10% from historic lows, with homicide down 36%, sexual assault down 25%, and robbery down 34%. Staffing is at 844 of 906 budgeted positions, with 35 in the academy; full strength is expected by June 2027. The budget includes 93 new officers, 35 new police vehicles, $9.9 million for IT infrastructure, and $1.3 million for towing. The Real-Time Operations Center and drone first responder program have handled 4,675 incidents, with drones clearing officers before arrival in 5% of calls. Councilmember Melton inquired about automated license plate readers (Flock cameras); Chief Schmider confirmed the department uses Axon cameras, data is purged every 180 days, and usage complies with ACLU recommendations and state statute. No standalone council vote was held on the cameras. Councilmember Cucsi added that state law regulates permissible use and retention. Councilmember Harding asked about a discrepancy in co-responder call numbers (15,000 vs 1,600); the chief suggested it may be a typo or year-to-date figure. The 8.5% increase partly reflects a pay guarantee; exact amount to be provided by finance. - Fire Department (Chief Botsman): The general fund budget grows 4.65%, including nine additional sworn positions to reduce overtime. Fleet replacement ($3.5 million) will cover three engines, three medic units, and remounting three medic units. Capital projects: Fire Station 70 (180th & Maple) construction begins spring 2027, opening early 2028; Fire Station 53 (72nd & Cass) under feasibility review; a new headquarters near 76th & Cass will appear on the November ballot. Training center improvements include replacing 17-year-old live fire containers and a $160,000 smoke simulation system. Councilmember Melton noted a decrease in the Fire Investigation Bureau budget (from $1.5 million to $1.2 million) due to reallocation of one unfilled position. The Fire Safety Bureau budget dropped from $3.2 million to $1.8 million; Chief Botsman will provide details. Councilmember Hugg asked about firefighter staffing: 311 authorized in 2026, 370 proposed for 2027 (plus 18 probationary); two recruit classes are anticipated. The crisis support specialist position (funded by opioid settlement funds) remains on hold pending legal review. The department applied for a SAFER grant; award decisions expected late September. - Public Works Department (Bob Stuby): The budget totals $820 million, with over two-thirds for capital. Personnel accounts for 10.5% of the budget; non-personnel costs (contracts, materials) are 21.5%. Funding sources include bonds, gas tax allocation, sewer revenue, parking fees, and $40.5 million from the general fund. Six new positions are proposed: two for vehicle maintenance, two for parking and mobility, and two for water resource recovery facilities. Stuby noted this is his last budget; councilmember commended progress in filling AEO positions. - Parks, Recreation, and Public Property (Dan Cedar): The budget increases $6 million to address a $5 million operating deficit identified in the 2025 master plan. Fourteen positions are added (11 in maintenance, one admin, two for Tranquility Park). Part-time/seasonal pay for lifeguards rises to $16.50/hour, with a $0.25 raise for returning staff. Non-compensation increases cover chemicals, repairs for buildings, pools, playgrounds, and restrooms. Key projects: Levi Carter Sports Complex opens October 3, 2026; Tranquility Park scheduled for fall 2027; Jerry Park renovation and Gallagher Park ball field improvements (donor-funded); Upland playground completion; Lake James trail connections; Camelot pool repair. Councilmember Harding asked about a $11 million decrease in enterprise division funding (from $31 million to $20 million); Cedar explained the difference reflects phased capital spending for Tranquility Park (all bonded, not general fund). - Public Library (Ms. Marlane and Teresa Jellick): The materials collection budget receives a 7% increase as the first step in a nine-year plan to address underfunding. Library spending per capita ($3.69) lags behind peers such as Lincoln ($5.85) and many peer cities (e.g., Milwaukee $5.90). Since 2004, purchasing power dropped 11% while county population grew 26%. Reciprocal agreements with Ralston and Lincoln ended in October 2025. The new Central Library (opened 2026) has had 172,000 visitors in its first 90 days, with collection turnover exceeding twice. The CIP allocates $1 million in 2027 for Southwest Branch design and $14 million for construction in 2028. Councilmember Melton asked about sustainable funding for materials; the foundation is exploring options. Councilmember Rowe confirmed the branch will reduce pressure on the Elkhorn/Millard locations. - Convention and Visitors Bureau (Jasmine Goodwin): The 2027 budget increases 1.68% to $12 million, with 75% from hotel taxes. A 6.6% decline in lodging tax revenue is projected, offset by using $500,000 more from reserves. General fund contribution rises $100,000 to $2.6 million. In 2025, 3 million visitors came from target markets (up 9%). To date in 2026, 7 million out-of-town visitors have been recorded (8.8% increase). The sales team will promote Tranquility Park, Levi Carter, and the CHI Center expansion. Sixty-six events are booked for 2027, generating 71,000 room nights and $110 million in economic impact. Councilmember Hugg raised concerns about short-term rental platforms not collecting hotel taxes; Goodwin said the bureau can track data if needed. - Other Budgetary Accounts (Steve Curtis): Retiree health costs are flat at $21 million. Community service programs increase 6.75% to $3.6 million. The Nebraska Humane Society contract is up 8% (under negotiation). Funding for the University of Nebraska Medical Center ($4.5 million) comes from tobacco tax, not general fund—Councilmember Melton requested clearer notation of funding sources. The county jail agreement will cost approximately 37% more (not yet finalized). General expense grew 7%, partly due to new purchasing costs from Douglas County. The contingency fund is $350,000. Riverfront development receives $3 million per year. Councilmember Hugg suggested including a provision in the Humane Society contract to waive pet licensing fees for seniors and disabled veterans. Key Outcomes - No formal votes were taken; the hearing concluded with a recess at 6:30 PM. The council is expected to continue budget discussions and adopt the 2027 budget at a subsequent meeting. Several councilmembers requested follow-up information on specific budget line items, including the source of funds for UNMC, police pay guarantee impacts, fire safety bureau details, and improved sales tax data from the state.