Public Meetings - Stamford, Connecticut

The Board of Representatives convened at 7:35 p.m. on Monday, June 1, 2026, in the Legislative Chambers at the Government Center and via Zoom. The meeting included an invocation by Rabbi Moshe Shemtov, the Pledge of Allegiance, and a roll call with 36 members present initially (later 3 more arrived). The board observed moments of silence for former Representative Dr. Mary Savage, former Board of Education member Nicola Tarzia, and Dylan Thomas Graham. The meeting adjourned at 10:38 p.m. The board acted on 28 items from seven standing committees, including several controversial items. Three honorary resolutions were passed unanimously. Consent Calendar - Appointments Committee (Consent): Approved unanimously by voice vote: A32.029 (Ira Stechel, Board of Ethics reappointment), A32.035 (Drew McKay, Planning Board), A32.038 (Stefania Payares Arteaga, Environmental Protection Board alternate), A32.040 (Joe Miller, Urban Redevelopment Commission), A32.041 (Anthony Stark, School Building Committee), A32.043 (Ellen Bromley, Board of Ethics), A32.044 (Christopher Smyth, Parks and Recreation Commission). - Fiscal Committee (Consent): Approved unanimously by voice vote: F32.071 ($398,695 for emergency asbestos abatement at Yerwood Community Center); F32.073 ($3,437,000 capital appropriation for Transfer Station Canal Wall Replacement); F32.074 (resolution amending capital budget and authorizing $2,762,000 in bonds); F32.075 ($25,000 Project Champion Grant for youth substance use prevention); F32.076 (resolution authorizing agreements for Project Champion); F32.077 ($62,500 for Cummings Marina dredging); F32.078 (resolution re Connecticut Port Authority for Cummings Marina testing); F32.079 (resolution re Emergency Management Performance Grant); F32.080 (resolution re Office of Early Childhood Quality Enhancement Funding); F32.081 ($9,925,945 for Stamford High School improvements); F32.084 ($85,000 Supplemental Revenue Sharing Grant for Project Music and ROSCCO); F32.085 (resolution for Stamford High School science lab/energy grant application); F32.086 (resolution re U.S. Economic Development Administration for East Harbor canal wall). Rep. Pavia abstained from F32.084. - Personnel Committee (Consent): Approved unanimously: P32.010 (Clerk of the Works II contract with Allan Hoyt). - Operations, Parks and Recreation Committee (Consent): Approved unanimously: OPR32.011 (modification of agreement with Gabrielli Truck Sales for Mack OEM parts and service). - Community Development, Housing, Education, Social Services, State & Commerce (C.H.E.S.S.) Committee (Consent): Approved unanimously: CHESS32.011 (Neighborhood Assistance Act programs list); CHESS32.017 (CDBG Program Year 52 budget); CHESS32.018 (authorizing mayor to submit Year 52 Annual Action Plan). - Transportation Committee (Consent): Approved unanimously: T32.004 (1st Amendment to Desman Contract for on-call engineering services for city parking facilities). - Minutes: Approved unanimously: May 4, 2026 regular meeting minutes; May 7, 2026 special budget meeting minutes; May 20, 2026 special board meeting minutes. Public Comments & Testimony Four speakers addressed the board: - Kieran Edmondson (remote, Waterside resident) – Expressed full support for F32.075, urging funding for substance use prevention initiatives targeting youth, citing the need to protect young people from drug abuse. - Sue Halpern (remote, South End resident) – Opposed the $125,000 boat launch feasibility study (F32.082), arguing that the park is in dire need of remediation and that a public boat launch would be dismissive of long-standing maintenance concerns. Suggested negotiating with developers for a boat launch elsewhere. - David Berman (in person, District 12) – Raised broader questions about the city’s development strategy, asking whether the city is building lasting value for residents and creating pathways to ownership. Referenced the Cortland Avenue lease and Midas redevelopment as examples. - Dave Adams (in person) – Criticized the handling of the Cortland Park deed restrictions and urged transparency. Also praised LR32.017 (ordinance on reporting requirements for appointments) as a long-overdue transparency measure. Discussion Items - Appointments Committee – A32.042 (Jackie Heftman, School Building Committee reappointment): Removed from consent by Rep. Walston, who opposed due to perceived lack of seriousness during the committee meeting. After brief discussion, approved by roll call vote 36-2-1 (Reps. Blank and Walston opposed; Rep. Bouchard abstained). - Fiscal Committee – F32.082 ($125,000 for Stamford Harbor Boat Launch Feasibility Study): Removed from consent by Rep. Camporeale. Debate centered on whether the study is appropriate given budget constraints, park conditions, and traffic/safety concerns. Supporters noted funding comes from grants and a restricted donation, not city tax dollars. Opponents argued the money could be used for other priorities and that the park needs investment. Failed 10-26-3 (Reps. Didelot, Gardner, Gilbride, Johnson, Morson, Price, Sandford, Shaw, Weinberg, Wirz in favor; 26 opposed; Reps. Bradford, Pollack, Zachary abstained). - Fiscal Committee – F32.083 (Resolution authorizing agreements with Connecticut Port Authority for the same project): Failed 2-36-1 (only Reps. Gardner and Gilbride in favor; Rep. Bradford abstained). - Fiscal Committee – F32.072 (Rejection of capital project closeout for Transfer Station Canal Wall Replacement): No action taken (committee recommended no action, and no motion was made to take it up). - Legislative & Rules Committee – LR32.018 (City Lease of 0 & 338 Courtland Avenue for School Bus Parking): Removed from consent by Rep. Gross due to traffic concerns. Debate included points about traffic impacts (pre-peak hours vs. return at rush hour), the need to break First Student’s monopoly, and the condition of the current bus parking on the West Side. Approved 35-4 (Reps. Gross, Hughes, Price, Yeager opposed). - Legislative & Rules Committee – LR32.017 (Ordinance establishing information reporting requirements of the Mayor’s Office on appointments): Approved for publication/public hearing by roll call 37-2 (Reps. Gilbride and Weinberg opposed). - Legislative & Rules Committee – LR32.016 (Ordinance to repeal the Appointments Commission): Approved for publication/public hearing by unanimous voice vote. - Legislative & Rules Committee – LR32.019 (Ordinance establishing a Conservation Commission): Recommitted to Steering by committee; no action by full board. - Land Use/Urban Redevelopment Committee – LU32.008 (Sale and Development of 41 Main Street – Former Midas Site): Removed from consent by Rep. Beckham, who argued for a second public hearing due to lack of community awareness. A motion to recommit to Steering failed 16-21-1. After extensive debate, the sale was approved 27-5-6 (Reps. Beckham, Dorsey, Graham, Hyatt, Walston opposed; Reps. Adams, Camporeale, de la Cruz, Hill, Sylvestre, Weathers abstained). - Personnel Committee – P32.009 (Employment contract for Diversity, Equity and Inclusion Officer Janeene Freeman): Held by Board of Finance; no action taken by committee. - Operations, Parks and Recreation Committee – OPR32.008 (Review of snow removal process): Report made; no vote. - Public Safety & Health Committee – PS32.007 (Overview of restaurant inspection and rating system): Report made; no vote. - C.H.E.S.S. Committee – CHESS32.014 (Rejection of $2,100,000 allocation to Heritage Housing for St. John Towers affordable housing redevelopment): The rejection failed (meaning the allocation is not rejected) by unanimous voice vote; the item was not put on consent. Key Outcomes - Appointments approved: 9 appointments confirmed on consent; Heftman approved 36-2-1. - Fiscal items: 11 consent fiscal items approved; two related to boat launch feasibility (F32.082 and F32.083) failed. - Cortland Avenue lease approved 35-4. - Transparency ordinance (appointment reporting) approved for public hearing 37-2. - Repeal of Appointments Commission approved for public hearing unanimously. - 41 Main Street sale approved 27-5-6. - St. John Towers funding not rejected (rejection motion failed). - Restaurant inspection report received; no action. - Minutes approved. The board rejected a motion to recommit the 41 Main Street sale back to committee. The meeting concluded with a motion to adjourn passed unanimously.

The Public Safety & Health Committee of the Stamford Board of Representatives met on Thursday, May 28, 2026, at 6:32 p.m. to review the city's restaurant inspection and rating system and public notification process. The meeting was chaired by Representative Tom Bouchard and featured presentations from Jody Bishop-Pullan (Director of Health and Human Services), Raquel Early (Administrative Supervisor), and Ibrahima Jobe (Director of Environmental Health and Inspections). The committee discussed the lack of publicly accessible inspection results since 2020, the transition to a new software system, and the impact of Connecticut's adoption of the FDA Food Code on the previous rating system. Discussion Items - System Barriers to Public Access: Since the city switched to a new licensing and permitting system (VPC Viewpoint Cloud) in 2020, restaurant inspection results have not been publicly posted online. The previous internally-developed system allowed for public display (including chef‑hat ratings), but the current vendor system lacks compatibility for automated public posting. Manually uploading each inspection is time‑intensive. - FDA Food Code Adoption: Connecticut adopted the FDA Food Code, which changed inspection criteria from a pass/fail/rating system to a compliance‑based system with priority, core, and foundation violations. Under the new code, violations that can be corrected on‑site do not result in a failure, making a simple letter‑grade rating system (A, B, C) no longer directly applicable. - Current Public Access: The public can request inspection reports via a Freedom of Information Act form on the Health and Human Services Department website, with responses typically within three to five days. The city's “Advocate” media outlet regularly obtains and publishes lists of restaurants with priority violations. - Resource Constraints: There are approximately 900 food establishments (including restaurants, grocery stores, bodegas, food trucks, and pushcarts) and about 135 registered food trucks. Out of 12 total inspectors, only eight are currently certified for food inspections. Certification takes up to two years. Inspectors also handle housing and environmental health complaints. - Timeline for Public Posting: The department aims to launch a public inspection search tool on its website by mid‑summer (July 2026). The new system being implemented will require the vendor to demonstrate automated public posting capabilities. - Committee Member Suggestions: - Representative David Blank suggested a board resolution urging the state to reinstate a restaurant rating system like the previous letter‑grade model used by New York City and Los Angeles. - Representative Terry Adams supported a resolution to request the state allow local adoption of a rating system. - Representative Kendra Walston expressed concern about food trucks during summer months and questioned whether the city has enough inspectors. - Representative Michael Field noted that a simple letter grade posted at restaurants is more consumer‑friendly than requiring customers to search a website. - Representative Stone proposed an interim step: flagging restaurants with priority violations and manually posting those inspection reports online as PDFs, even if full automation is not yet available. Key Outcomes - No formal votes or resolutions were passed during this informational meeting. - The committee indicated it will continue to monitor progress and may consider drafting a resolution to request the state or the city to implement a more transparent rating or grading system. - The Health Department committed to exploring manual flagging of priority violations for interim public posting, as suggested by Representative Stone. - The next update from the department is expected when the public inspection tool goes live, anticipated in July 2026.

The Appointments Committee of the Stamford Board of Representatives met on Wednesday, May 27, 2026 (note: the agenda and minutes list this date as May 27, 2025; the summary follows the provided meeting timestamp). The meeting was called to order at 6:31 p.m. and adjourned at 8:22 p.m. Co-Chairs Felix Gardner and Steven Shore led the meeting, with Committee Members Reps. Bradford, Camporeale, Hill, Hyatt, Pavia, Weathers, Weinberg, and others in attendance. The committee reviewed nine appointments; one item (Patrick Blessinger) was withdrawn and one candidate (Jason Kinard) did not appear. All other candidates were interviewed and approved unanimously (9-0-0). Discussion & Interview Highlights - Ira Stechel (Board of Ethics Reappointment) – Stechel, a 55-year legal veteran, discussed his service on the board and highlighted an ambiguity in the city’s ethics code regarding whether a not-for-profit can confer an economic interest. He expressed a desire to help clarify that definition. He also noted that the board has been responsive to advisory opinion requests and that delays may stem from improperly submitted forms or jurisdictional issues. - Stefania Payares Arteaga (Environmental Protection Board Alternate Reappointment) – Arteaga stated that the EPB is overwhelmed by inland wetlands and watercourse permit applications, leaving little capacity for proactive conservation issues such as invasive species or floodplain management. She supported the proposed creation of a separate conservation commission to address broader environmental concerns, echoing a proposal before the Board of Representatives. - Joe Miller (Urban Redevelopment Commission) – Miller, a real estate investment professional, expressed interest in applying his experience to help the commission sell excess parcels, attract affordable housing development, and deploy a $4 million fund for city enhancements. He noted he was recruited by the Mayor’s office after originally seeking a Planning Board seat. - Anthony Stark (School Building Committee) – Stark, an architect, described the committee’s role as reviewing final plans and budgets to ensure no major gaps in scope. He discussed the importance of durable materials, sustainability (e.g., air-source heat pumps), and security features such as ballistic glazing. In response to a question, he acknowledged a prior professional relationship with Catherine Lobalba, the city’s long-term facilities director, but asserted his ability to remain objective. He also noted that teacher input on design is ideally gathered earlier in the process, not at the committee stage. - Jackie Heftman (School Building Committee Reappointment) – Heftman, a former Board of Education member, emphasized her role as a community representative focused on protecting students and taxpayer value. She declined to take a position on the project labor agreement versus non-PLA construction methods, deferring to city decisions. - Ellen Bromley (Board of Ethics) – Bromley, an attorney and former city official who helped draft Stamford’s first ethics code, described her experience hearing cases for the state human rights commission. She noted the ethics code has become more complex over time and that modern ethics issues differ from the small-town dynamics of the past. - Christopher Smyth (Parks and Recreation Commission) – Smyth, a frequent park user and youth sports parent, advocated for better activation of parks through modest revenue-generating amenities (e.g., a coffee shop at Scalzi Park) and creative programming. He identified underutilized areas like the former Coast Guard station at Cummings Park and the lack of trails at Hartman Park. He expressed a balanced view on artificial turf fields, citing both maintenance benefits and health/temperature concerns. - Drew McKay (Planning Board) – McKay was not re-interviewed as he had recently appeared before the committee; his appointment was approved unanimously without additional discussion. Key Outcomes All appointments were approved by the committee with a vote of 9-0-0, as follows: - A32.029 – Ira Stechel (R) to the Board of Ethics, term expiring 12/1/2028. - A32.035 – Drew McKay (I) to the Planning Board, term expiring 12/1/2028. - A32.038 – Stefania Payares Arteaga (D) to the Environmental Protection Board (Alternate), reappointment, term expiring 12/1/2028. - A32.040 – Joe Miller (D) to the Urban Redevelopment Commission, term expiring 12/1/2028. - A32.041 – Anthony Stark (D) to the School Building Committee, term expiring 12/1/2028. - A32.042 – Jackie Heftman (D) to the School Building Committee, reappointment, term expiring 12/1/2026. - A32.043 – Ellen Bromley (D) to the Board of Ethics, term expiring 12/1/2027. - A32.044 – Christopher Smyth (U) to the Parks and Recreation Commission, term expiring 12/1/2028. Item A32.033 (Jason Kinard to Zoning Board of Appeals) was reported as “no show” and no action was taken. Item A32.039 (Patrick Blessinger to Environmental Protection Board) was withdrawn. The committee’s recommendations will be forwarded to the full Board of Representatives for final approval.

The Legislative & Rules Committee of the Board of Representatives met on Tuesday, May 27, 2026, at 7:04 p.m. in the Democratic Caucus Room and remotely. Chair Michael McKeown presided. Committee members present included Vice Chair Karen Camporeale, and Reps. Blank, Boudreau, Hughes, Hyatt, Lapine, Stone, and Weinberg. Ex-officio members Reps. Morson, Shaw, and Walston also attended. City staff and guests included Assistant Corporation Counsel Chris Dellaselva, CFO Ryan Fealey, Senior Transportation Planner Luke Buttenwieser, Director of Operations Matt Quiñones, Executive Director of Environmental Protection Robert Clausi, and real estate broker Tim Rorick. The meeting adjourned at 9:56 p.m. Public Comments & Testimony - On the Courtland Avenue bus parking lease (Item LR32.018): Gina Calabries (Cove resident) expressed concerns about noise, pollution, traffic, and the perception that the East Side neighborhood’s concerns are dismissed. She questioned why the city is the lessee if a private bus company exists and urged mitigation measures. Dave Adams (Glenbrook resident) raised procedural questions about the timing of the public hearing (noting the Board of Finance had previously held the item) and transparency regarding the property map, redacted lease terms, and cost to taxpayers. - On the Conservation Commission ordinance (Item LR32.019): Jeanette Bilicznianski, a lifelong Stamford resident, spoke in full support of a standalone conservation commission. She cited the Comprehensive Plan’s public engagement, the decline of monarch butterflies (80% decline in eastern population, 95% in western), and the need for a dedicated body to protect natural resources, especially amid federal rollbacks. She suggested funding sources and partnerships with local organizations. Discussion Items - LR32.018 – City Lease of 0 & 338 Courtland Avenue for School Bus Parking: Attorney Dellaselva read the lease terms: two parcels totaling 2.93 acres; 15-year initial term with two five-year renewal options (total possible 25 years); initial rent $600,000/year with 2.5% annual increases; triple-net lease with the city paying utilities, costs, and taxes; site improvements by owners before possession; city’s right of first refusal to purchase. Directors Quiñones and Clausi explained that the lease enables the Board of Education to competitively bid bus services and that the site is in a manufacturing zone, buffered from residences, near transit options. After executive session (7:26–8:25 p.m.) to discuss terms, the committee discussed traffic, road safety (Cortland Ave is a state highway, recently rebuilt), driver parking on site, and potential for future electric buses. The resolution was approved 9-0. - LR32.019 – Ordinance Establishing a Conservation Commission: Vice Chair Camporeale presented the ordinance as a best practice to separate conservation duties from the Environmental Protection Board, which is consumed by wetland and flood responsibilities. Mr. Clausi and Ms. Bilicznianski spoke in support. Rep. Hughes moved to recommit the item to the Land Use/Urban Redevelopment Committee, arguing it is a land-use issue. After debate, the motion was amended to recommit to Steering (voice vote 8-0-1), then the amended motion passed 5-3-1 (Reps. Hughes, Hyatt, Lapine, Stone, Weinberg in favor; Chair McKeown, Vice Chair Camporeale, Rep. Blank opposed; Rep. Boudreau abstained). The ordinance was thus recommitted to Steering for further assignment. - LR32.017 – Information Reporting Requirements for Mayor’s Office on Appointments: The committee suspended the rules to take this item before Item 3. Extensive debate occurred. Rep. Weinberg and Majority Leader Morrison argued that collecting data on applicants (not just appointees) could yield misleading information and be weaponized; they preferred focusing on appointees, vacancies, and holdovers. Vice Chair Camporeale, Rep. Blank, and Rep. Lapine countered that applicant data is already collected, is vital for transparency, and helps identify pipeline issues (e.g., attracting youth or women). The ordinance was approved 7-2 (Reps. Hughes and Weinberg dissenting). - LR32.016 – Ordinance to Repeal the Appointments Commission: No discussion; the committee voted 9-0 to approve the ordinance for publication, sending it to public hearing. Key Outcomes - LR32.018 (Courtland Ave bus parking lease): Approved by committee 9-0. The resolution moves to the full Board of Representatives. - LR32.019 (Conservation Commission ordinance): Recommitted to Steering 5-3-1. The Steering Committee will determine whether to assign it to a primary committee or add a secondary committee. - LR32.016 (Repeal of Appointments Commission): Approved 9-0 for publication; proceeds to public hearing and full board consideration. - LR32.017 (Reporting requirements for mayor’s office): Approved 7-2. The ordinance will go to public hearing and then to the full board. - Other: The committee also suspended the rules (voice vote) to take up Item 4 before Item 3.

The Operations, Parks and Recreation Committee of the Stamford Board of Representatives met remotely on May 21, 2026, at 6:32 p.m. and adjourned at 7:42 p.m. The meeting covered two agenda items: a contract modification for Mack truck parts and a review of the city's snow removal process. Committee members present included Chair Sandford, Vice Chair Pelliccia, and Reps. Beckham, Didelot, Finkel, Gardner, Salas, and Zachary. Rep. Bradford was excused. City staff included Dennis LoDolce and Jason Timmerman (Fleet Management), and Tom Turk (Director of Transportation). One member of the public attended. Discussion Items Item 1: OPR32.011 – Approval of Contract Modification with Gabrielli Truck Sales - The committee considered a request to increase a contract with Gabrielli Truck Sales of Milford, the sole source provider of Mack OEM parts and service, from $99,999 to $185,000 to cover all outstanding invoices for fiscal year 2025-26. The Board of Finance had previously approved the request 5-0-0. - Fleet Management explained that the city is phasing out Mack trucks to diversify the fleet and avoid sole-source dependency. They are moving to Freightliner trucks with Cummins engines, Allison transmissions, and Eaton rear ends, plus a Heil body. 15 trucks have already been converted. - A pilot program with a wash bay, attendants, and an exercise program has significantly reduced fleet maintenance costs; the department hopes to make it permanent. - Committee members asked about transition plans, budget implications (current vs. future), whether the contract would need renewal, and the ability to use aftermarket parts for the new trucks. Staff confirmed the increase covers this year’s outstanding invoices, and they will follow up on contract renewal status. - Motion to approve passed 8-0-0 (all present in favor). Item 2: OPR32.008 – Review of City Snow Removal Process and Snow Emergency Preparedness - Director Tom Turk presented a detailed overview of snow operations, including a slide deck intended as a reference for representatives. - Key facts shared: 320 miles of road (650 lane miles), 39 drivers for 34 plow routes, 50 trucks (with spares), and 7 workers in Signs and Lines for sidewalks. Plowing a single route takes 5-6 hours; salting takes 2-3 hours. Cleanup after a storm can take 4-10 hours depending on snowfall. - The city experienced 16 snow/ice events in the past season, totaling 68 inches of snow and over $1 million in salt costs. A supply chain issue (frozen barges) nearly caused a salt shortage; domes are now being refilled. - During declared emergencies (snowfall over 10 inches), the focus is on main arteries and collectors; side streets and cul-de-sacs are plowed later. No legal maximum on CDL driver hours for municipal emergencies; drivers take a planned break (e.g., 11 p.m. to 3 a.m.) if mobilization starts before 6 p.m. - The committee discussed complaint procedures (recommending FixIt system), sidewalk ordinances (property owners responsible within 12 hours/daytime, or by 10 a.m. the next day for nighttime), and the challenge of contractors pushing snow into streets. - Director Turk emphasized resident patience and planning (stay off roads during storms) and noted the city is improving public communication via Instagram. - No vote was taken; the item concluded as a report made. Key Outcomes - Approval granted for Item 1 (OPR32.011) – contract modification increased to $185,000, approved unanimously 8-0-0. - Report received for Item 2 (OPR32.008) – the snow removal review was presented and discussed; no action required. - Director Turk’s presentation will be shared with all Board of Representatives members as a reference guide.

The Land Use-Urban Redevelopment Committee of the Stamford Board of Representatives met on Thursday, May 21, 2026, at 7:02 PM. Co-Chair Glenn Price presided. Committee members present: Co-Chairs Price and Hughes, Representatives Adams, Beckham, Boudreau, Field, Finkel, and Gardner. Rep. Pelliccia was absent. Also present were ex-officio Reps. Walston and Weathers, City Engineer Lou Casolo, Director of Operations Matt Quiñones, and Assistant Corporation Counsel Chris Dellaselva and Mike Toma. Two agenda items were considered. The committee held a public hearing for Item 1, then entered executive session to discuss a real estate transaction. No votes were taken in executive session. After reconvening, they approved the sale and development resolution. The second item was recommitted to Steering due to incomplete documentation. Public Comments & Testimony - No members of the public spoke during the public hearing for Item 1 (LU32.008). Co-Chair Price opened the hearing at 7:07 PM, made three calls for speakers, and closed it at 7:07 PM after no one came forward. Discussion Items - Item 1 – LU32.008: Resolution and Public Hearing – Sale and Development of 41 Main Street (Former Midas Site) This item was submitted by Mayor Simmons and approved by the Board of Finance 6-0-0 on May 14, 2026. After the public hearing, the committee entered executive session from 7:07 PM to 7:57 PM to discuss the real estate transaction. No votes were taken. Upon reconvening, Assistant Corporation Counsel Chris Dellaselva provided a summary for the public record. The city issued an RFP for student, elderly, and low/moderate income housing and selected a proposal. The total purchase price is $7,855,600, comprising a $250,000 cash payment and $7,605,600 in "cash equivalency consideration" based on the value of affordable housing units to be provided. The buyer will pay a $15,000 deposit upon approval. The property is sold as-is with no warranties from the city. The deal is contingent on zoning, planning, and building approvals and buyer financing. The deed will be quitclaim, encumbered by a perpetual affordability covenant; if the affordability requirement is violated, the property reverts to the city. No broker fees or city easements are involved. Project completion is estimated at one to one-and-a-half years after closing. The vote is to recommend the resolution to the full Board of Representatives. - Item 2 – LU32.006: Resolution Accepting Pembroke Drive as a City Street Submitted by Rep. Weinberg. Co-Chair Price stated that the necessary documentation and information were not yet ready to proceed. He called for a motion to recommit the item to the Steering Committee. Key Outcomes - Item 1 – LU32.008: Approved by committee via roll call vote of 7-0-1 (Rep. Beckham abstained; Rep. Pelliccia absent). The resolution will go to the full Board of Representatives for final action. - Item 2 – LU32.006: Recommitted to the Steering Committee by unanimous voice vote of 8-0-0 (all present members approved). The meeting was adjourned at 8:09 PM.

The 32nd Board of Representatives of Stamford, Connecticut, held a special remote meeting on Wednesday, May 20, 2026, from 7:01 p.m. to 7:53 p.m. The sole agenda item was Resolution F32.088 (Resolution No. 4444), approving an additional tax rate to provide $7 million to the capital non-recurring reserve fund (Fund 57) for future school capital projects under Connecticut General Statutes §7-361, as recommended by the Board of Finance for fiscal year 2026-2027. A quorum was declared with 31 members present at roll call; 34 members were present at the time of the vote. The resolution passed by a roll-call vote of 32-1-0. Discussion Items - Board of Finance Chair Mary Lou Rinaldi opened the presentation, stating that the Board of Finance has used Fund 57 for many years to accumulate funds — currently about $74 million — to offset school construction expenses and avoid bonding costs. She noted that with $3 million previously approved from last year's surplus plus the proposed $7 million, the fund would reach about $85 million, and she strongly encouraged the Board of Representatives to support the appropriation. - Richard Freedman (Board of Finance) presented slides explaining that Fund 57 is a capital reserve fund supporting the Board of Education's long-term facilities plan, authorized under state law with the additional tax levy not to exceed 4 mills. The city faces roughly $253 million in local share for school projects through 2032 (about $36 million per year), including West Hill (about $400 million) and Roxbury and South School (about $150–160 million each), with the state reimbursing a substantial portion. - Freedman explained that paying with cash is cheaper than bonding over the long term, and that Fund 57 also provides cash-flow float while waiting 60–90 days for state reimbursements; West Hill construction billings could reach $20–25 million per month. He noted the fund has been built through $45 million from mill rates, $27.7 million from surpluses, and over $5 million in interest, earning roughly 3.5–4.5% interest. - Freedman recounted that Fund 57 contributions were $20 million in 2022-23, then $15 million, $10 million, and zero last year, when the contribution was cut to hold down the tax rate. The Board of Finance recommends $7 million this year (the mayor recommended $10 million), approved on a 6-0 vote; the overall mill rate increase for 2026-27 is 4.8%, down from an original estimate of nearly 8% after Board of Finance cuts. - Freedman attributed the higher-than-usual increase to slow grand list growth — about 35 basis points, the lowest in his 13 years on the Board of Finance — plus a 12.5% increase in health care costs and a $25 million year-over-year increase in the Board of Education budget. Surpluses, once $20–30 million annually, are now back to roughly $4–6 million and are needed for the rainy day fund, the heart and hypertension reserve, and capital non-recurring expenses. - Representative Finkel asked whether Fund 57 can be used for expenditures before state reimbursement; Freedman confirmed this is one of its key purposes. - Representative Goldberg noted that construction at West Hill has begun and that the project came in about $40 million under its $440 million authorization. He expressed full support for the $7 million, saying he wished the Board of Finance had recommended $10 million, and described last year's zero contribution as pennywise and pound foolish. - Representative Pavia asked about the city's FY2024 audit (President Shaw ruled the question out of scope) and the current surplus (estimated at about $6 million). Freedman explained that surpluses are never spent on operations; they fund the rainy day fund, the heart and hypertension reserve, and capital non-recurring projects. Pavia expressed concern that residents are feeling squeezed by rising costs and asked the tax impact; he ultimately voted against the resolution. - Representative Graham asked about fund management; Freedman confirmed the money is already appropriated and the administration handles sourcing, and noted the city hired an accountant dedicated to managing construction bills and timely state reimbursement submissions. - Representative Weinberg calculated that the 0.22-mill addition is a little less than 1% of the mill rate, adding roughly $100 per $10,000 of property tax — for a typical home assessed near $500,000 with taxes around $13,000, about $130 more. - Representative Adams asked why the tax rate is rising despite grand list growth; Freedman cited the low 35-basis-point grand list growth this year and rising costs. Adams also noted that about $13 million from surplus went into Fund 57 this fiscal year even though the mill rate contribution was zero last year. - Representative Goldberg asked how Stamford compares to neighboring towns; Rinaldi said Norwalk's Board of Taxation called to ask how Stamford keeps its mill rate so low, as Norwalk was facing a 6–7% increase. - Representative Pelliccia asked for clarification on the District CS rate; Freedman confirmed the apparent 24.71 vs. 24.72 difference was due to rounding to two decimal places. Key Outcomes - The Board of Representatives approved Resolution No. 4444 by a roll-call vote of 32-1-0 (Rep. Pavia voted no; Rep. Gross left before the vote; no abstentions). - The resolution approved an additional tax levy of 0.22 mills in most tax districts (0.23 mills in District CS) for FY 2026-27, with proceeds directed to the capital non-recurring fund to support the long-term facilities plan for public schools. The resulting approved mill rates are: District A 25.14, District B 24.66, District C 24.31, District CS 24.72, personal property 28.47, and motor vehicles 24.31. - The $7 million contribution, combined with $3 million previously approved from surplus, brings the total Fund 57 appropriation for the year to $10 million and is expected to bring the fund balance to about $85 million. - The administration has recommended $10 million per year into Fund 57 for the next three years; Board of Finance members stated their goal is to increase next year's contribution from $7 million to $10 million. - Fiscal Co-Chair Morson thanked the Fiscal Committee for its work this budget season before adjournment at 7:53 p.m.

Note: The meeting was originally recorded as taking place on Tuesday, May 19, 2026, at 6:37 PM. This summary adheres to the instruction to use the date of May 20, 2026, for the title and summary. The Stamford Planning Board convened on May 20, 2026, at 6:37 PM. Members present included Vice Chair Jeremy Linder, Members Chet Sallett, Ravi, Subverminier, and Alternates Lay and Drew McKay. Jennifer Godzano joined at 6:50 PM. The board approved the minutes from the May 5, 2026 meeting, a subdivision extension, and reviewed three Zoning Board of Appeals (ZBA) referrals. The first two referrals received unanimous recommendations for approval; the third was recommended for denial without prejudice to allow redesign. Consent Calendar - Approval of the meeting minutes from May 5, 2026: Moved by Chet Sallett, seconded by Jeremy Linder. Passed unanimously. - Subdivision No. 4056 (Sanford Lane): Request for a 90-day extension to file the final map, with a new expiration date of August 19, 2026. Moved by Chet Sallett, seconded by Ravi. Passed unanimously. Discussion Items ZBA Referral 028-26 – Cliff and Anna Blaze – 75 C Beach Drive - Request: Variance from Section 5.X.4 development standards for lot coverage allowance of 51.6% (existing 49.5%) in lieu of the 40% maximum in an R10 zone, to construct a 374 sq ft first-floor addition for an accessible bedroom and bathroom for the applicant's parents. - Background: The Planning Board had previously recommended approval on February 24, 2026, but the ZBA denied without prejudice, citing insufficient hardship justification. The applicant revised plans (removed a secondary door, provided additional photos showing slope constraints) and engaged engineers for coastal area management and stormwater remediation. - Board discussion: Members noted the balance between aging-in-place goals (Comprehensive Plan) and flood resilience concerns from increased lot coverage. The existing lot coverage (49.5%) already exceeds the 40% maximum, and the new lot coverage regulation was added about two years ago. The applicant argued the hardship stems from the need for a single-level addition due to the property's slope and the parents' mobility needs. - Outcome: Moved by Jeremy Linder to reaffirm approval; seconded by Ashley (alternate). Vote: passes unanimously. ZBA Referral 029-26 – George P. Abbot – 21 Nichols Avenue - Request: Variance from Section 5.X.4 for lot coverage of 43.1% (existing 22.4%) vs. 40% max, and building coverage of 31.2% vs. 20% max in an R10 zone, to construct a 310 sq ft rear addition (bathroom and mechanical room access). - Applicant statement: Purchased property without knowledge of restrictions; discovered rot and leakage; house is undersized (6,000+ sq ft lot vs. 10,000 sq ft required in zone). Wants to correct a previous unpermitted conversion and make the home functional for aging. - Board discussion: Members noted the lot is undersized and the addition is in the rear, not visible from the street. The variances were deemed consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and unlikely to negatively impact neighborhood character. Hardship acknowledged due to undersized lot. - Outcome: Moved by Chet Sallett for approval; seconded by Jeremy Linder. Vote: passes unanimously. ZBA Referral 030-26 – Christian Fry (Architect) for Kamud V. Desai – 144 Shadow Ridge Road - Request: Variances for front yard setback (36.5 ft vs. 40 ft required), combined side yard setback (16.5 ft vs. 30 ft), center line setback (63 ft vs. 65 ft), rear yard setback (20.8 ft vs. 30 ft), and parking in front of the house (prohibited in R10 zone). Proposed: 468 sq ft two-story garage with living space above and a 53 sq ft entry portico. - Background: Similar variances were approved in 2005 but expired. The property has wetlands in the rear, so the addition is placed forward to avoid the upland review area. - Board discussion: Members expressed concerns about the side yard setback (neighbor's house close) and the front yard setback encroachment. Suggested the addition could be pulled back four feet to eliminate one variance, or narrowed to reduce side yard impact. The portico may qualify as a permitted obstruction (one-story, open, projecting 4 ft). A motion was made for denial without prejudice to allow the applicant to redesign and address the side yard and front yard concerns. - Outcome: Moved by Robbie for denial without prejudice; seconded by Ashley (alternate). Vote: passes unanimously. Key Outcomes - All votes were unanimous. The board approved the consent calendar items and the first two ZBA referrals. The third referral was denied without prejudice, giving the applicant an opportunity to revise the design to reduce variances, particularly the side yard setback. - The next regular meetings are scheduled for June 9, 2026, and June 23, 2026, followed by a July hiatus, with return on August 11, 2026. The meeting adjourned at 7:18 PM.

The CHESS (Community Development, Housing, Education, Social Services, State & Commerce) Committee met on Tuesday, May 19, 2026 at 6:31 p.m. in the Republican Caucus Room and via Zoom. Co-Chairs Maureen Pollack and Stephanie Sylvestre led the meeting, which included review of the Neighborhood Assistance Act (NAA) tax credit program, a resolution to reject $2.1 million in Affordable Housing Trust Fund allocation for the St. John Towers redevelopment, and finalization of the CDBG Program Year 52 budget and Annual Action Plan. The meeting adjourned at 10:33 p.m. Public Comments & Testimony (NAA Public Hearing) - Mill River Collaborative (Nettie Compton) – Requested continued NAA funding for Phase 2 of an energy-efficient kitchen at the Whittingham Discovery Center, replacing gas with electric cooking and using solar power. - Children in Placement Connecticut (Janet Primo) – Requested $20,000 for the Guardian ad Litem program providing court-appointed volunteer advocates for abused/neglected children; 450 children served statewide last year, 90% of cases closed with safe permanent home. - Pacific House (Jennifer Broadbyn) – Requested $150,000 for rooftop solar panels at Rotary Commons, a 39-unit permanent supportive housing project for individuals and families experiencing homelessness; total project cost $179,000. - Junior Achievement of Greater Fairfield County (Laura Stern) – Requested support for financial literacy, work readiness, and entrepreneurship programs serving over 2,300 students in Stamford last year. - Connecticut Financial Scholars (Betsy McNeil) – Requested $20,000 to expand financial education implementation support in Stamford high schools, leveraging $51,000 total program cost. - Soundwaters (Bob Mazzoni) – Requested $150,000 to finish replacing the HVAC system at the Coastal Education Center at Cove Island Park, serving 30,000 students annually. - Pilgrim Towers/Kingsley Group (Nile Hutchinson) – Requested $90,000 to replace AC units in all 72 senior apartments and upgrade common area lighting to LED with occupancy sensors; expected 21% reduction in power consumption. - St. Joseph's Parenting Center (Ryan Drenzik) – Requested $100,000 for the Dads Are the Difference program, providing evidence-based parenting education to fathers; lost $650,000 in federal funding last fall. - Health for Kids/Exchange Club (Kristen Matte) – Requested support for home visiting and basic needs (diapers, grocery assistance, childcare) for struggling families; serves 350 families per month through diaper distribution. - Inspirica (Sydney Delago) – Requested funds for window/exterior trim restoration at two facilities and new washer/dryers; serves 500+ individuals and families daily. - Stamford Center for the Arts (Mike Moran) – Requested $150,000 to replace incandescent stage lighting with LED at the Palace Theatre; supports education programs and economic impact of 80,000 visitors annually. - Optimus Healthcare (Catherine Burns) – Requested $83,490 to replace rooftop HVAC unit at the 805 Atlantic Street clinic; serves 35,000 patients annually, many low-income. - Stamford Museum & Nature Center (Karen Mizells) – Requested $104,000 for window/door and LED lighting upgrades across campus (100% tax credit) and $20,000 to provide bus transportation for Title I school field trips (60% tax credit). - Mutual Housing Association/CT Housing Partners (Kathleen Williams) – Requested continued NAA support for energy efficiency upgrades at Trinity Park, a 48-family affordable housing property. - New Neighborhoods (Gemma Fernandez) – Requested $150,000 for brick and window repair at Belltown Manor (27 senior units in Stamford) and $150,000 for roof replacement at Pember Commons (25 units in Bridgeport). - Domestic Violence Crisis Center (Stella Clark) – Requested $24,999 to support operating costs of the Stamford Safe House; services include 24/7 helpline, emergency shelter, and legal advocacy. Discussion Items - NAA Program (Item CHESS32.011) – Grants Coordinator Joe Hickey explained the Connecticut Neighborhood Assistance Act tax credit process: nonprofits apply through the city, businesses receive tax credits for cash donations. The public hearing was held for 16 agencies with 18 projects. The committee discussed that disapproving an applicant would require revised paperwork. The motion to approve the resolution passed 7-0-1 (Rep. Pollack abstained). - Rejection of $2.1M Allocation to St. John Towers (Item CHESS32.014) – Land Use Bureau Chief Ralph Blessing presented the St. John Towers redevelopment plan: replace two 50-year-old towers (240 units, 50% vacant) with a single 305-unit affordable building at 30-80% AMI. Total project cost $180M, with $2.1M from the city’s Affordable Housing Trust Fund. The trust fund had approximately $845,859 remaining after this allocation. The committee clarified that the motion was to reject the allocation. The motion to reject failed 0-8-0, meaning the allocation stands. - CDBG Program Year 52 (Items CHESS32.015-018) – Moira Sawch (CDBG Administrator) and Janeene Freeman (Mayor’s Office) presented the Mayor’s recommendations for public improvement, public service, and administrative funding. The committee reviewed scores and finalized allocations: for public improvement ($614,657 available), they adopted the Mayor’s recommendations with minor adjustments, fully funding highest-ranked projects. For public service ($141,843 available), they agreed to allocate $1,000 to nine organizations that qualify for a separate Food, Housing and Supportive Services Grant, allowing more funds for other applicants. The committee then approved the CDBG Year 52 budget (Item 5) 8-0-0 and the resolution authorizing the Mayor to submit the Annual Action Plan to HUD (Item 6) 8-0-0. Key Outcomes - NAA Program Resolution – Approved 7-0-1 (Pollack abstained). The list of 16 agencies and 18 projects will be forwarded to the full Board of Representatives for a certified resolution to submit to the State Department of Revenue Services. - St. John Towers Allocation – Motion to reject the $2.1 million Affordable Housing Trust Fund allocation failed 0-8-0. The allocation is approved; funds will be used mid-construction for the 305-unit affordable housing redevelopment. - CDBG Public Improvement Funding – Committee finalized allocations totaling $614,657, prioritizing full funding for smaller, higher-scored projects and aligning with the Mayor’s recommendations (reducing InSpirica and Children’s Learning Centers). - CDBG Public Service Funding – Committee agreed to give $1,000 each to nine organizations eligible for the Supportive Services Grant, freeing up $18,000 to distribute among the remaining nine applicants (top three get $3,000 extra, middle three $2,000, bottom three $1,000). - CDBG Year 52 Budget – Approved unanimously (8-0-0). - Annual Action Plan Resolution – Approved unanimously (8-0-0), authorizing the Mayor to submit the plan to HUD to secure the city’s CDBG allocation.