Public Meetings - Surprise, Arizona

The Planning and Zoning Commission met on May 22, 2026, at 00:56 UTC to consider a conditional use permit for a Brakmasters vehicle repair facility and to discuss a proposed zoning text amendment (ZTA) establishing a Battery Energy Storage Systems (BESS) overlay zone. The commission took public testimony from industry representatives, safety experts, and a landowner advocating for a reduced setback from residential dwellings. After deliberation, the commission directed staff to revise the proposed 1,500-foot setback to a more evidence-based distance, likely around 100 to 150 feet from dwellings, while retaining existing on-site setback requirements. Consent Calendar - Approved the May 7, 2026, Planning and Zoning Commission meeting minutes by unanimous voice vote. Public Comments & Testimony - Jeremy Aiken (development manager, Bay WA) expressed support for the BESS ordinance as drafted and urged prompt adoption, noting 1,500-foot setback is conservative but workable. - James Caulfield (Fire Risk Alliance, 22-year firefighter) provided expert testimony on BESS safety, stating that plume studies show no detectable hazards beyond the fence line and that evacuations are rarely necessary. He recommended a 100-foot setback based on NFPA standards. - Matthew Ragsdale (Key Capture Energy) encouraged the commission to use evidence-based data to adopt a more reasonable setback than 1,500 feet. - Mike Johnson (landowner in Surprise) proposed a 150-foot setback from residential structures and 50 feet from property lines, citing Buckeye and Maricopa County standards. He argued 1,500 feet would eliminate 99% of viable sites. - Autumn Johnson (Arizona Solar Energy Industries Association) raised three concerns: (1) the ordinance lacks a clear scope and could apply to small commercial systems; (2) 1,500-foot setback should be replaced with 150 feet; (3) noise standard should be objective (decibel-based). She requested administrative flexibility for modifications. - James (NextEra Energy Resources) stated typical setbacks are 50 to 150 feet and referenced NFPA 855, which requires only 10 feet from a lot line for remote locations. He recommended aligning with Maricopa County’s ordinance. - Sarah No (attorney for NextEra Energy Resources) warned that the proposed type-three rezone process (6–9 months) plus discretionary site-plan review creates unworkable risk for meeting power purchase agreement deadlines, effectively a de facto moratorium. She suggested BESS be a permitted use in I2/I3 districts with site plan approval. - Cipan Alizada (Arizona Technology Council) thanked staff and urged reconsideration of the 1,500-foot setback, noting BESS enables tech companies to locate in the West Valley. - Christiana Fadul Pepper (advocate from Buckeye) urged alignment with NFPA and Maricopa County, stressing energy storage is safer than fossil fuels and generates tax revenue. Discussion Items - Presentation by Staff (Chris Trevor): - Proposed ZTA defines BESS and battery cabinet, establishes a battery overlay zone requiring type-three rezone and site plan approval. - Standalone BESS permitted in all character areas except Heritage District; accessory uses allowed in certain zones with a CUP. - Key development standards: 8-12 ft perimeter wall, 150 ft on-site setback from property line to cabinets, 1,500 ft separation from existing dwellings (based on standard evacuation radius of 1,500 ft). - Staff provided comparisons: Buckeye 150 ft (with variance to 330 ft), Goodyear draft 330 ft (reduced to 150 ft with plume study), Maricopa County 100 ft. - Timeline: Public hearings scheduled June 4 (P&Z) and June 16 (City Council). - Commissioner Comments & Questions: - Commissioner Perry: Shared experience touring an 80 MW BESS facility; could not hear it from 150–200 ft. Emphasized technology improvements and economic benefits (tax revenue, high-wage jobs supporting semiconductor industry). Asked staff to survey surrounding cities’ setbacks. - Commissioner Holland: Sought clarification on evacuation rationale for 1,500 ft. Fire department representative confirmed 1,500 ft is worst-case based on Emergency Response Guidebook. Holland expressed preference for evidence-based setback tied to actual impact zone (e.g., 250–300 ft) rather than evacuation distance. Supported noise standard mirroring existing code. Agreed with restricting scope to utility-scale, not small commercial. - Commissioner Everett: Opposed 1,500 ft as prohibitive; supported 100 ft setback (matching county). Criticized subjective language in noise standard and sole discretion of community development director; called for objective decibel threshold and clearer approval process. Noted McMicken fire involved lead-acid batteries, not modern lithium-ion. - Commissioner Bash: Compared BESS risk to propane tanks (allowable near homes), reasoning 1,500 ft is too restrictive. Recommended economic development department review impact on attracting industry. - Commissioner Leonard: Asked safety expert for recommendation; James Caulfield reaffirmed 100 ft based on NFPA and training. Leonard supported 100–150 ft with engagement of fire department. - Commissioner Perry (second comment): Raised question about safety disparity: if BESS is near industrial buildings (workers closer) but 1,500 ft from residences, is worker safety less valued? Commissioner Leonard refuted that industrial standards exist. - Chair Chapman: Summarized consensus: reduce setback to approximately 100–150 ft from dwellings, retaining the 150 ft on-site setback for total effective distance of 250 ft. Commissioners generally agreed with that range. Key Outcomes - Consent Calendar: Approved unanimously (7-0). - Conditional Use Permit (Brakmasters): Approved unanimously (7-0) subject to stipulations A–E in staff report. - BESS Zoning Text Amendment (Direction to Staff): - Reduce the separation distance from existing dwellings from 1,500 ft to a distance in the range of 100–150 ft (commission consensus leaned toward 100 ft as recommended by safety expert; on-site setback of 150 ft from property line to cabinets to remain, making total effective distance approximately 250 ft). - Clarify scope: limit ordinance to utility-scale BESS (exclude small commercial behind-the-meter systems). - Revise noise standard to use objective decibel thresholds rather than subjective “perceptible beyond site boundaries.” - Consider adding administrative flexibility for minor modifications without requiring full rezone. - Staff to survey setbacks in neighboring jurisdictions (Peoria, Glendale, Avondale) and obtain input from economic development department. - Public hearings scheduled June 4 (P&Z) and June 16 (City Council); staff to incorporate direction into revised draft.

The meeting was called to order at 7:00 PM on Tuesday, May 19, 2026, and continued into the early hours of May 20. The council celebrated local achievements, approved several land-use and financial items, and heard public testimony regarding the proposed ICE detention facility and other concerns. Consent Calendar - Consent Agenda (8 items): Approved unanimously without discussion or pull. The consent agenda included routine approvals and administrative items. Public Comments & Testimony - Gage Fur (speaker): Requested a public safety education campaign to address hate speech and harassment, and asked that the DHS detention facility be added as an actionable agenda item. - Taylor Bone (Coyote Lakes resident): Opposed the ICE detention facility, citing job postings, strain on public resources, and safety risks. Threatened to leave the city if the facility opens. - Brittany Bishop (Bell and Parkview resident): Expressed strong disapproval of council's lack of action and transparency on the ICE detention center. Alleged that a supplemental agreement was signed on May 6, 2026, without public disclosure. Demanded open opposition and preparation for the facility's impact. - Mary Becker (Happy Trails resident): In contrast, provided historical context of ICE enforcement under multiple administrations, suggesting that opposition is not representative of all residents. Emphasized that the facility is likely to open. - Ann Bentheim (Waddell and 133rd Ave resident): Called the ICE facility a "prison/forced labor camp" and argued that incarceration without due process and slavery are wrong. Urged council to take a direct vote to oppose the facility. - Jason Chavez (Avondale resident): Criticized the city's lack of transparent communication regarding the DHS detention center, Project Bacara (data center), and a proposed nuclear power plant. Argued these projects lower quality of life and property values. Discussion Items - Item 9 – Desert Trails Annexation (FS 250856): Final public hearing to annex approximately 10 acres of vacant land northeast of Sun Valley Parkway and 29th Avenue. The applicant seeks to dedicate right-of-way for the Desert Trails development agreement. A neighborhood meeting had one attendee who raised no opposition. Council approved annexation ordinance 2026-13 unanimously. - Item 10 – Pure Heart Church Rezone (FS 241442): Rezone of 10.7 acres from rural residential to community commercial at southeast corner of 163rd Avenue and Dynamite Boulevard. The applicant (Adam Baugh, representing Pure Heart Church) presented plans for a church campus with commercial uses to offset infrastructure costs. Council discussed community integration, traffic, lighting, and noise. No opposition. Approved unanimously (ordinance 2026-14). - Item 11 – Veramonte Park Land Purchase: Purchase of 0.751 acres adjacent to Veramonte Park at Litchfield Road and Sweetwater Avenue to add parking and enable future park improvements (lighting, fields). Council noted the need to address parking issues and a separate transformer repair for the splash pad. Approved unanimously. - Items 12 & 13 – Financial Policies and Budget Amendment Procedures: Annual updates to the city's comprehensive financial management policies (resolution 2026-50) and budget amendment policies (resolution 2026-45). Both approved unanimously. - Item 14 – Construction Sales Tax Presentation: Presentation by Sandy Simmons on the city's 3.7% construction sales tax, allocated to general capital fund (2.2%) and transportation improvement fund (1.5%). Councilman Judd requested discussion on using construction sales tax for operational needs, particularly public safety. Council agreed to schedule a budget retreat in fall 2026 to further explore reallocation. No vote taken. Key Outcomes - Consent Agenda: Approved 8 items unanimously. - Annexation (Desert Trails): Ordinance 2026-13 approved unanimously. - Rezone (Pure Heart Church): Ordinance 2026-14 approved unanimously. - Land Purchase (Veramonte Park): Purchase agreement and related documents approved unanimously. - Financial Policies: Resolution 2026-50 and 2026-45 approved unanimously. - Construction Sales Tax: No action taken; discussion to continue at fall budget retreat. - Public Safety Education Campaign: The mayor directed the police chief to connect with the resident who requested the campaign. - Council Reports: District 1 reported on 163rd Avenue construction meeting; Vice Mayor noted district 2 is quiet; Councilman Duffy announced Big 12 baseball tournament at Surprise; Councilman Judd reported on grand reopening of The Vista entertainment venue.

The Surprise City Council held a work session on May 19, 2026, to continue discussion on a zoning text amendment (FS25-0039) creating a new Desert Rural residential district. The session focused on feedback from the development community and residents regarding land use buffers, design standards, animal regulations, and transportation. No formal votes were taken; staff received direction to finalize a third draft. Discussion Items - Land Use Buffer Measurement: Staff presented a discrepancy between prior presentations and the draft code regarding whether road right-of-way counts toward the required setback between Desert Rural and adjacent subdivisions. Council consensus: the buffer should be measured from the subdivision boundary, excluding the roadway width. Councilman Judd stated the road should not count because the intent is to preserve open space. Councilman Haney confirmed the community was presented with a landscape separation in addition to the roadway. - Design Standards – Accessory Structures: Feedback requested allowing storage containers in Desert Rural, increasing the maximum accessory structure size (currently 3,000 sq ft), and removing architectural compatibility requirements. Staff proposed a 6,000 sq ft cap, but the Planning and Zoning Commission suggested a conditional use permit for larger structures. Council discussed using lot coverage (25% for one-acre lots) instead of a fixed cap, referencing Maricopa County’s approach. Councilman Judd favored no cap beyond lot coverage; Councilman Hastings asked for comparative data from other jurisdictions. - Design Standards – Driveways: Staff proposed allowing up to two driveways per lot (up from one) to balance rural needs with transportation safety (limiting conflicting left turns). Councilman Judd argued for no limit, citing the rural character and low traffic. Councilman Haney supported two driveways unless residents push for more. Councilman Hastings noted that future changes could impact existing residents. Council leaned toward the two-driveway limit but remained open to future adjustments. - Landscaping and Fencing: Requests to allow decorative antique farm equipment (not considered blight) and to expand fencing materials to include barbed wire, chain link, etc. Staff proposed language to permit these in Desert Rural. No council objections. - Animal Regulations: Residents found current livestock rules (one animal per half acre, no size distinction) too strict. Staff proposed a new ratio: one large livestock animal (e.g., horse) and six medium animals (e.g., goats) per half-acre of dedicated space, with an exchange rate of one large to two medium. Councilman Judd cited Maricopa County’s recent removal of animal limits and argued for no restrictions. Councilman Haney noted conflicting feedback from residents (some wanted more, some wanted caps) and suggested more resident workshops. Staff agreed to research further and revisit. - Transportation Standards: Residents opposed streetlights, sidewalks, curb and gutter, and paved roads in Desert Rural. Staff, with transportation department, proposed a new cross-section for internal roads: minimal paved width, no curbs or sidewalks, no street lights. Major roads (collectors, arterials) will maintain current standards. No council objections. Key Outcomes - Direction on Buffer: The land use buffer setback between Desert Rural and adjacent subdivisions shall not include the roadway width; it is measured from the subdivision boundary. - Direction on Accessory Structures: Council generally favored regulating accessory structure size by lot coverage (25%) rather than a fixed square footage cap. Staff will remove the 6,000 sq ft cap and rely on lot coverage, but will ensure language prevents commercial uses. - Direction on Driveways: The limit of two driveways per lot in Desert Rural is acceptable to council; staff will include this in the draft. - Direction on Animals: No final decision; staff will research further (reviewing county and state guidance, Cave Creek’s code) and conduct additional community outreach before proposing revised regulations. - Next Steps: Staff will incorporate feedback into a third draft, update the city website, and provide the draft for public review. A future work session is anticipated.

The Planning and Zoning Commission met on May 8, 2026, to consider two conditional use permits for restaurants, a rezone request for a church campus, and a work session on a new desert rural zoning district. All votes were unanimous except for the rezone, which passed 6-1. Consent Calendar - Approval of Minutes: The commission unanimously approved the minutes from the April 23, 2026, meeting (7-0). Public Comments & Testimony - No public comments were made on agenda items during public hearings. - Non-Agenda Item: Alex Christ (resident of 175th Avenue) spoke in support of the city staff's work on the desert rural overlay and praised the mayor for improving meeting decorum. He also noted that Surprise was ranked 10 nationally and 1 in Arizona for in-migration. Discussion Items - Conditional Use Permit – Chipotle (FS25-0682): A CUP with site plan for a Chipotle restaurant with a drive-through at the southwest corner of 163rd Avenue and Pat Tillman Boulevard. Staff confirmed the proposal meets all LDO and Asante PAD requirements, with no public opposition. The commission approved the motion (7-0) subject to stipulations A–E. - Conditional Use Permit – Farmer Boys (FS25-0457): A CUP for a Farmer Boys restaurant with a drive-through at the same intersection (a few parcels north). Staff reported similar compliance and no public feedback. The commission approved unanimously (7-0) subject to stipulations A–E. - Rezone – Pure Heart Church (FS24-1442): A request to rezone 10.7 acres from Rural Residential (RR) to Community Commercial (C2) at the southwest corner of 163rd Avenue and Dynamite Boulevard. The applicant, Pure Heart Church, plans to develop a church campus with two commercial buildings along the frontage to support the church’s mission and offset infrastructure costs. - Commissioner Perry expressed concern that the C2 zoning could later be sold and used for incompatible commercial development, citing examples in other cities. He noted the area is currently rural and residents want to preserve its character. - Applicant Adam Baugh explained that the commercial component is integral to the church’s plan and helps fund necessary off-site improvements. He and Pastor Mark Hendrix emphasized the church’s commitment to being a good neighbor and that they would retain control over tenant selection. - Commissioner Holland discussed potential stipulations to limit building height and require that all other buildings on the parcel support church uses, but staff noted that such restrictions might not be legally enforceable without a PAD. The church agreed to limit building height to 40 feet (as per code). - The commission voted to recommend approval to the City Council, with six votes in favor and one opposed (Commissioner Perry). - Work Session – Desert Rural Zoning Text Amendment (FS25-0039): Staff presented the second of two work sessions on establishing a new Desert Rural (DR) zoning district. Key topics included: - Accessory Structures: Staff proposed increasing the maximum size from 3,000 to 6,000 square feet, with a conditional use permit for any larger structures. The commission agreed to this approach and asked for visual examples. - Livestock Regulations: Staff proposed distinguishing between large and medium livestock (large: horses, cattle; medium: sheep, goats, etc.) and allowed up to 1 large and 6 medium per half-acre of dedicated space. Commissioner Holland raised concerns about enforcement, and Commissioner Bash suggested using national standards. Community representatives Willie and Michelle provided feedback, noting that Cave Creek uses similar definitions. The commission directed staff to continue refining caps and definitions with community input. - Design Standards: Staff proposed allowing more flexibility for fencing, driveways, dust control, and parking of work trucks. The commission supported these changes. - Transportation: A new rural roadway cross section was proposed for local roads (minimal paving, no curb/gutter, no streetlights), while major arterials will retain standard improvements. - No formal vote was taken; staff will incorporate feedback and present a final draft at a future public hearing. Key Outcomes - Approved conditional use permits for Chipotle and Farmer Boys (both 7-0). - Recommended approval of the Pure Heart Church rezone to the City Council (6-1). - Directed staff to continue work on the Desert Rural ZTA, with specific direction to: (1) include a 6,000 sq ft cap on accessory structures with a CUP option, (2) develop animal caps based on standards and community input, and (3) provide visual aids and examples in future presentations. - Commissioner Bash requested a future information item on the city’s stance regarding data centers. Note: The meeting date provided in the instructions (2026-05-08) differs from the date stated in the transcript (May 7, 2028). This summary uses the date given in the instructions.

Note: The raw transcript begins with the Mayor calling the meeting to order on Tuesday, May 5th, creating a discrepancy with the provided meeting date of May 6, 2026. This summary uses the date specified in the instructions but acknowledges the inconsistency. The meeting was called to order with a prayer and recognition of the Shadow Ridge cheerleading squad as community champions. Multiple proclamations were presented: Professional Municipal Clerks Week (May 3–9, 2026), Small Business Week (May 3–9, 2026), Economic Development Week (May 4–8, 2026), and Youth Week (May 1–7, 2026). The City Court Academy celebrated its 10th anniversary, with 27 students from local high schools participating. The Youth Council member reported on upcoming events and the launch of a teen survey, noting growth from 20 to 35 members. The consent agenda (eight items) was approved unanimously. A public hearing was held for a new Series 10 liquor license (Gray's Craze) at 15278 West Bell Road, Suite 102; the council voted to recommend approval to the Arizona Department of Liquor Licenses and Control. Tentative Budget Adoption (FY2027) - Presenter: Sandy Simmons, Finance Director - Overview: The tentative expenditure limit budget totals $975.9 million (excluding transfers). The general fund operating budget is $259 million. Revenue growth is slowing: local sales tax revenue increased 7% year-over-year (down from historical 13%), state shared revenue is projected at only 2% growth (down from 12%), and property tax rates continue to decline (from 0.5693 to 0.5534 per $100 assessed value). - Challenges: State-imposed flat income tax, potential tax conformity, and high inflation (health insurance premiums rose 14.9% due to increased participation) are straining resources. - Expenditures: Public safety (police, fire, court) accounts for 50% of general fund spending. The budget adds 19 new positions: 11 police, 2 fire, 2 transportation, 1 HR, 1 parks/recreation, and 2 public works (converted from part-time). One-time capital funding of $350 million is included for asset replacement, vehicle replacement, and major projects (police substation, new fire station, roadway design/construction). - Service Adjustments: Due to constrained revenue, non-public safety departments are expected to maintain flat budgets, resulting in reduced service levels (fewer events, reduced contract services, etc.). The Police Department will transition some School Resource Officers (SROs) to patrol and investigations, relying more on the state-funded School Safety Officer (SSO) program (off-duty officers) to maintain school coverage. Currently 15 SROs serve; the SSO program covers nearly 30 schools. The Chief stated this change does not compromise school safety. - Council Discussion: Councilman Judd expressed disappointment in reducing SROs but acknowledged the need to bolster patrol. Councilman Hastings emphasized fiscal responsibility and support for leveraging state funds. Councilman Haney thanked city staff for innovative solutions. The mayor noted that the budget passes $1 billion for the first time, with $15 million allocated for equipment/vehicles and $7.2 million in contingency reserves. - Vote: Resolution 2026‑65 (adoption of tentative budget) passed unanimously. Letter to the Department of Homeland Security - Background: At the previous meeting, Councilman Judd requested a letter asking DHS to comply with city zoning laws regarding a detention facility (the former CoreCivic building). Since then, a lawsuit was filed by the Arizona Attorney General, and DHS paused operations. - Discussion: Councilman Hastings sought legal advice about implications given pending litigation; a motion to recess into executive session for legal counsel passed. After executive session, further debate ensued. Several council members (Melton, Duffy, Judd) argued the letter is a respectful request to follow zoning and does not harm the city; others (Hastings) questioned its necessity now that litigation is underway. - Vote: The motion to send the letter passed with a majority vote (the specific tally was not recorded in the transcript, but the Mayor declared a passed vote). Public Comments - Project Bacara (Data Center): Three speakers (Maureen Miller, Alexis Young, and a third who did not appear) opposed a proposed data center near Surprise. Concerns included massive water usage, air pollution from natural gas turbines (744 MW), proximity to Luke Air Force Base flight paths (danger zone with 170+ daily flights), safety risks, and environmental impact. Speakers urged opposition at the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors meeting on May 6. - DHS/ICE Detention Facility: Numerous speakers (Alex Waddell, Bernadette Green, Alexa Coulter, Tina Malica, Natalie Bautista, Callie Overs, Ted Murphy, and others) expressed opposition. Themes included: accusations of council inaction and neutrality enabling harassment; humanitarian concerns (overcrowded, unsanitary conditions); strain on police and emergency services; failure to enforce zoning; and demands for a 3‑mile buffer zone, an intergovernmental agreement, and public safety plans. One speaker (Lisa Everett) defended the council, urging respect and noting that most authority lies with federal officials. Another speaker (Greg German) raised unrelated issues (park generator, recycling bins, e‑bike safety). The public comment period lasted 30 minutes. Future Agenda Items - Councilman Judd requested a discussion on the history and current use of construction sales tax, with possible action, for the next meeting. Seconded and approved. Council Reports - Councilman Haney (District 1): Provided an update on the WM Recycling Center fire. External debris fully extinguished; removal expected by May 6. Demolition anticipated within two weeks. - Councilman Melton: Announced that the City of Surprise Water Services team won 7–8 of 15 statewide awards at the recent water conference, recognizing outstanding operators. - Councilman Hastings: Thanked city leadership and public safety personnel for their work during recent emergencies. Key Outcomes - Approved: Tentative expenditure limit budget (Resolution 2026‑65) for FY2027. - Approved: Letter to DHS requesting compliance with city zoning. - Approved: Future agenda item on construction sales tax. - Actions Taken: Consent agenda approved; liquor license recommendation forwarded; all proclamations presented. - Next Steps: Final budget adoption and public hearings scheduled for June 2 and June 16, 2026.

The city council held a work session on Tuesday, May 5, 2026, to discuss two major items: the first of two work sessions on a zoning text amendment to establish a new Desert Rural (DR) residential zoning district, and an update on the city's first Transportation Master Plan (TMP). Following the work session, the council convened as the Marley Park Community Facilities District (CFD) board to adopt a tentative expenditure limitation budget. The meeting included presentations by planning staff and transportation consultants, extensive council questions and discussion, and a unanimous vote on the CFD budget. Discussion: Zoning Text Amendment for Desert Rural District (FS25039) - Planning staff presented part one of a zoning text amendment to create the Desert Rural (DR) district, aimed at preserving the character of long-established rural residential neighborhoods. The amendment implements the Rural Residential Overlay from the Surprise 2040 General Plan. - The presentation covered background, community outreach (12 meetings over two years, heavy engagement with 219th Avenue and Deer Valley neighborhoods), and proposed changes to permissible uses, development standards, and land use buffers. - Staff emphasized this is a zoning text amendment only, not a rezoning or annexation effort. The DR district would apply to areas currently within city limits (blue on map), with future applicability to county areas (red) if annexed. - Key proposals include: removing standalone commercial uses but allowing certain home occupations with CUP approval every 24 months (animal clinics, cottage food stands, ranches, residential farms); mirroring existing rural residential development standards (minimum 1-acre lots, 1-2 story height cap); and requiring buffers of up to 150 feet between new development and DR areas, with reduced buffers for larger lots. - Councilman Haney asked for clarification on cottage food (defined as home-produced foods like bread and tamales sold from a stand). Staff confirmed the new home occupation chapter restructures existing rules for clarity and adds DR-specific uses, based on community feedback. - The presentation concluded with plans for part two on May 19, covering design standards, animals, and transportation. No public hearing dates have been set yet. Discussion: Transportation Master Plan Update - Eric Boyles (City staff) and Brian Snyder (Michael Baker) provided an update on the TMP, describing it as crossing the 50-yard line with the vision and goals phase nearly complete. - Public engagement statistics: 663 survey responses (July 2 – August 13, 2025), over 100 interactive mapping pins, and pop-up events (Game Night, Surprise Party, Senior Centers) that reached hundreds of residents. - Key survey finding: 79% of respondents identified congestion as the number one barrier to travel; 36% cited difficulty getting in/out of neighborhoods. Top barriers to walking/biking were poor lighting, lack of ADA facilities, insufficient sidewalks/bike lanes, and lack of shade. - Transit pop-ups revealed demand for on-demand, door-to-door service (not fixed route), and expanded eligibility for subsidized transit, especially for seniors. - The draft vision statement: "Surprise is a connected city where a complete multimodal transportation network integrates local and regional systems..." The council discussed emerging technologies (ITS, autonomous vehicles, EV infrastructure). - Four goal statements presented: (1) Foster roadway expansion and address congestion, (2) Enhance multimodal system, (3) Improve safety across all modes, (4) Incorporate emerging technologies. Each goal includes supporting policies and initiatives. - Preliminary draft 2030 roadway recommendations were shown, including capacity additions on Peoria Road, Sun Valley Parkway, Patton Road, and a new connection on 179th Avenue to State Route 74. The plan prioritizes projects based on data-driven needs analysis. - Council members asked about freight/truck coordination with Maricopa County and Glendale (confirmed involvement), traffic calming (targeted at collector/local streets near schools and parks, not arterials), and the importance of deliverable plan with funding strategies. - Next steps: public outreach round two, prioritize recommendations, draft TMP, and return for formal adoption. Key Outcomes - Council provided input on the zoning text amendment, with guidance to continue refining home occupation rules and buffer standards. Staff will present part two on May 19 and return with a full legislative draft for public hearing. - For the TMP, council expressed general support for the vision and goals, with direction to ensure the plan is actionable and includes funding strategies. Written comments on Technical Memorandum 2 are due within two weeks. - The CFD board unanimously approved Resolution MPCFD 2026-01 adopting the tentative expenditure limitation budget of $2,349,100 for Marley Park CFD, maintaining the property tax rate of 2.7294 per $100 assessed valuation. The rate has been consistent for four years. The final budget adoption is scheduled for June 2, with the tax levy adoption on June 16.

On April 24, 2026, the Surprise Planning and Zoning Commission held a meeting to discuss a zoning text amendment (FS25-0039) to establish a new residential zoning district, Desert Rural. The session focused on part one of a two-part presentation, covering background, community feedback, permissible uses, development standards, and land use buffers. No formal action was taken; the commission provided feedback for staff to incorporate before a public hearing. Public Comments & Testimony - Alex Christ (resident near 175th Ave and Waddell) expressed strong support for the Desert Rural district, praising the city for prioritizing residents who value a rural lifestyle. He emphasized the importance of preserving the area's Western heritage, including unpaved roads and space for horses and goats, while acknowledging that change is inevitable. - Matthew Ragsdale (Key Capture Energy, San Diego) spoke during non-agenda public comment to introduce his company, a battery energy storage system (BESS) developer and operator with a project in Surprise. He offered the company as a resource for the upcoming BESS ordinance discussions, which were deferred to May 21. The commission acknowledged the comment but could not discuss the item because it was not on the agenda. Discussion Items - Background and Purpose: Staff (Ferrari, Trevor, and Johnny) presented the two-year process behind the zoning text amendment, which originated from the 2040 General Plan's rural residential overlay. The goal is to preserve the character of long-established rural neighborhoods by creating a unique set of development standards. Twelve outreach meetings were held with affected communities, including six meetings with the community near 219th Ave and Deer Valley. - Permissible Uses: Staff proposed adding Desert Rural as a new zoning district with uses largely mirroring existing Rural Residential (RR) but removing standalone commercial uses. Community feedback favored allowing certain commercial activities as home occupations rather than standalone businesses. Proposed home occupation additions include animal clinics/vet offices, cottage food operations, and ranch/residential farm uses. Motor vehicle repair was excluded due to mixed community feedback. The home occupation section would be restructured into a classification system with clearer standards, including a limit of eight appointments per day for customer-generating uses to avoid altering neighborhood character. Parking and employee restrictions were also tightened. - Development Standards: Staff recommended mirroring existing RR standards: minimum one-acre lots, maximum one dwelling unit per acre, and a two-story height limit. The community expressed satisfaction with the current standards. - Land Use Buffers: Staff proposed a series of setbacks ranging from 50 to 150 feet between Desert Rural and adjacent zoning districts. For example, if a new development proposes one-acre lots adjacent to Desert Rural, no buffer is required; smaller lots require larger setbacks. Commercial and industrial uses would require a standard 150-foot setback. - Commissioner Feedback: - Commissioner Perry raised administrative questions about annexation (like-for-like zoning assignment), the rezone process for undeveloped parcels within the overlay, and potential restrictions on changing zoning to commercial. Staff clarified that annexation would assign a comparable zoning, and rezones would be evaluated against the General Plan. - Commissioner Holland expressed concern that prohibiting all standalone commercial uses might be too restrictive. He suggested limiting the size of commercial uses (e.g., farm stands or small repair shops) rather than an outright ban, noting that home-based businesses could still become large-scale operations without size limits. He also asked about signage for farm stands; staff indicated signage is addressed in the forthcoming full text amendment. - Commissioner Bash supported preserving existing rural character and warned that standalone commercial proposals would face strong community opposition. - Commissioner Everett reflected on the challenge of balancing growth (Surprise growing from 35,000 in 2000 to nearly 180,000 in 2026) with preserving rural lifestyles, especially given the city's lack of industrial land for job creation. - Future Parts: Part two of the presentation, scheduled for May 7, will cover design standards, animals, and transportation/street requirements, along with cleanup items. Staff will also present to city council on May 5. Key Outcomes - No formal votes or decisions were taken; the session was for presentation and discussion only. - Staff will incorporate commissioner feedback (including consideration of limited standalone commercial uses and size restrictions) before bringing the amendment back for a public hearing. - The BESS ordinance discussion will be brought forward at the May 21 meeting, and Key Capture Energy offered to provide expertise. - The meeting adjourned with a unanimous voice vote.

The Surprise City Council met on April 21, 2026, to address proclamations, youth council updates, commission appointments, a right-of-way vacation, an ordinance change, and a staff update on the proposed DHS facility. Public comments were heard, with significant focus on the DHS facility. Proclamations and Recognitions - April 2026 proclaimed as Month of the Military Child; Purple Star Schools recognized. - DYSART Unified School District essay contest winners introduced. - Surprise Youth Council provided updates on recent events and upcoming job preparation class. - National Crime Victims Rights Week (April 19-25, 2026) proclaimed. Consent Calendar - Consent agenda approved, excluding item six. Public Comments & Testimony - Multiple speakers opposed the proposed DHS/ICE detention center, citing human rights concerns, safety risks (proximity to a chemical plant), and lack of community support. Some called for council action. - One speaker supported the facility, emphasizing immigration enforcement. - A speaker raised concerns about Islamic neighborhoods and mosques. - Comments also addressed meeting accessibility (video feed, agenda transparency) and urged the council to listen to constituents. Discussion Items - Item 8: Right-of-way vacation of 116,140 sq ft along Joe Max Road for the Asante North development. Approved. - Item 9: Ordinance amendment to allow two or more council members to place an item on the agenda with 24 hours' notice. Passed after debate (mayor preferred three members). - Item 10: Staff update on the proposed DHS facility: weekly communication with DHS continues; opening delayed to fall; water estimates and legally enforceable agreements requested. Councilman Judd expressed frustration and opposition. A motion to go into executive session for legal advice on public discussion was made but outcome not recorded. Later, Councilman Judd moved to send a formal letter to the head of DHS requesting compliance with local zoning; seconded. Key Outcomes - Appointed Patrick Campbell to Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission and Kerwin Forrest to Arts and Cultural Advisory Commission. - Approved right-of-way vacation resolution 2026-43. - Approved ordinance 2026-05 (24-hour notice for agenda items by two council members). - Motion to go into executive session on DHS legal advice (outcome unclear). - Councilman Judd's motion to place a letter to DHS head on next agenda (seconded, likely future action). - Staff to continue weekly DHS meetings and provide updates.

The Surprise City Council held a regular meeting on April 8, 2026, beginning at approximately 6:00 p.m. The meeting included presentations, public hearings on liquor licenses, two major rezone approvals, budget amendments for public safety and parks, a debrief on a federal advocacy trip, a presentation on the Grand Avenue Corridor Study, and an extended public comment period dominated by opposition to a proposed ICE detention facility. The council also discussed the rezoning process and added future agenda items. Consent Calendar - Approved the consent agenda (excluding item 3) unanimously. Items included routine approvals and an election update confirming no contest filings. Public Comments & Testimony - Liquor License Hearings (Items 9-12): No public speakers. All four applications (First Watch, Turquoise Wine Bar) were recommended for approval to the Arizona Department of Liquor Licenses and Control. - Mesquite Mountain Ranch Rezone (Item 13): Two public speakers from the Desert Rural Overlay area (Michelle Staples and Kimberly Ferris Rowstick) thanked the council for listening and requested a single-story second row and an equestrian trail for rural community safety. - Surprise 120 Rezone (Item 14): Same speakers returned, expressing gratitude for the buffer zone and equestrian trail but noting concerns about commercial site proximity and trail surface material appropriateness for horses. - Grand Avenue Corridor Study (Item 16): No public speakers. - Budget Amendments (Items 18 & 19): No public speakers. - Federal Advocacy Trip (Item 20): No public speakers during the presentation; extensive public comment later focused on the ICE facility. - Rezoning Process Presentation (Item 21): No public speakers. - General Public Comment (after agenda): 74 registered speakers, with the vast majority opposed to the proposed ICE detention facility at 13290 West Sweetwater. Speakers included state legislators (Sen. Annalise Ortiz, Rep. Catherine Miranda), students from Dysart High School, and community activists. Key positions: - Many urged the council to use local zoning authority, file lawsuits, and refuse cooperation with DHS/ICE. - Students requested a three-mile buffer zone between any ICE facility and schools. - Councilmember Judd and others expressed strong opposition, citing threats to Luke Air Force Base, zoning violations, and humanitarian concerns. - A few speakers also addressed Project Bacara (a proposed power plant near Luke AFB), asking the council to issue a resolution opposing it. Discussion Items - Desert Oasis SLID (Item 3): Councilmember Haney presented on the street light improvement district for Desert Oasis parcel 14B. After 15 years of efforts, the city obtained the required majority of property owner signatures. The council approved the intent to form the SLID (Resolution 2026-26). - Mesquite Mountain Ranch Rezone (Item 13): Staff reported changes from the March 3 meeting: density capped at 860 units (down from 975), entire portion north of wash rezoned to R1, first row along Deer Valley Road restricted to single-story homes, and wash corridor widened to average 300 feet. Applicant Jeff Bliley confirmed compliance. Approved as Ordinance 2026-06. - Surprise 120 Rezone (Item 14): Proposed R1 and C2 zoning on 120 acres at Deer Valley and 227th Avenue, with a 150-foot buffer and equestrian trail. Applicant clarified planned 370 units (max 714 under density). Commercial site (10 acres) intended for neighborhood use. Approved as Ordinance 2026-08. - Desert Trails Annexation (Item 15): Public hearing held; no action required. The annexation of a 10-acre site for right-of-way dedication will return for final consideration after signature collection. - Grand Avenue Corridor Study (Item 16): MAG officials presented final study, including a simulation of the proposed elevated interchange at Loop 303 and US 60. Key findings: urgent need for improvements, $500+ million in regional investments planned (including 155th Avenue interchange fully funded, construction start fiscal year 2028; ultimate US 60/Loop 303 interchange construction between 2031-2035). Council discussion emphasized expediting timelines and securing state appropriations. - Budget Amendment – Oasis Swim Center (Item 18): Parks and Recreation requested moving $500,000 in savings from the Oasis Aquatic Center project to asset replacement for fencing, lighting, and concession stand upgrades. Approved as Resolution 2026-48. - Budget Amendment – Public Safety (Item 19): Police and Fire chiefs requested $7 million to cover overtime and supplies, citing attrition, growth, and training needs (21 firefighters in paramedic training). Council expressed support but emphasized need for better long-term planning. Approved as Resolution 2026-49. - Federal Advocacy Trip Debrief (Item 20): Staff reported on March 15-19 trip to Washington, D.C., advocating for a BUILD grant for Loop 303/155th Avenue, congressional directed spending, and meetings with DHS/ICE regarding the proposed detention facility. Key takeaways: facility intended as short-term processing center (542 beds, 250 detainees/week, 3-7 day stays), contractor GardaWorld, no roving patrols in Surprise, planned community relations board. Councilmembers (Judd, Melton, Duffy) raised concerns about sufficiency of promises, water usage, zoning, and impact on Luke Air Force Base. Discussion of legal options. - Rezoning Process Presentation (Item 21): Staff outlined the statutory authority, process steps, and compliance measures for rezoning. Council discussed the difficulty of reversing zoning (Prop 207 implications) and the possibility of reversion clauses. Key Outcomes - Consent Agenda: Approved (items 1-2, 4-8). - Resolution 2026-26: Approved – intent to form Desert Oasis Street Light Improvement District. - Liquor Licenses: All four applications (Items 9-12) recommended for approval by unanimous votes. - Ordinance 2026-06: Approved – Mesquite Mountain Ranch rezone (264.9 acres, 860-unit cap). - Ordinance 2026-08: Approved – Surprise 120 rezone (120 acres, 370 units, R1/C2). - Resolution 2026-48: Approved – $500,000 budget amendment for Oasis Swim Center asset replacement. - Resolution 2026-49: Approved – $7,000,000 budget amendment for police and fire overtime and supplies. - Executive Session: Council adjourned to executive session at the end of the meeting. - Future Agenda Items: Councilmember Judd moved to add an action item on the proposed DHS/ICE facility (indefinitely continued) and a future item on e-bike/e-scooter safety regulations.