Public Meetings - Venice, Florida

The Venice Planning Commission met on Tuesday, April 7, 2026, at 1:30 PM in Council Chambers. The commission approved the previous meeting's minutes, elected a new chair and vice chair, conducted a public hearing on a variance for a fence at 1205 Tarpon Center Drive, and adopted updated rules of procedure. Consent Calendar - Approved the minutes of the March 17, 2026 meeting unanimously. Election of Chair and Vice Chair - Bill Wilson was nominated and unanimously elected as Chair. - Kit McEwen was nominated and unanimously elected as Vice Chair. Public Hearing: Variance 26-06VZ – 1205 Tarpon Center Drive - Staff Presentation: Senior Planner Nicole Tremblay presented the variance request from Sea Villas LLC (agent Luke Beerman, Freedom Fence Builders) to construct a fence seaward of the Gulf Beach setback line. The existing fence was destroyed by hurricanes. The proposed fence is intended for safety and security, enclosing the beachside area of the condominium property. Staff analysis found the request met all seven variance criteria. - Applicant/Agent: Luke Beerman provided clarifying photos and a corrected site plan, confirming the fence would be six feet total height (including on top of an existing wall) and not extend beyond the property's historical footprint. - Public Testimony: Kim Hearing, a year-round owner and resident at Sea Villas, spoke in support, describing the community's history, hurricane damage, unanimous owner approval, and significant trespassing problems (74 trespassers counted from March 1–17, 2026, including verbal abuse and threats to elderly residents). Stephen Herring, a resident, corroborated the trespassing issues and noted that police had been called multiple times. - No opposition was voiced during the hearing. New Business: Rules and Procedures for Planning Commission - Planning and Zoning Director Roger Clark presented proposed updates to the commission's rules of procedure, last revised in 2022. Key changes included: requiring the chair to be physically present to preside, aligning quasi-judicial time limits with city council procedures, and adopting gender-neutral language (e.g., "chair" instead of "chairman"). The commission discussed the flexibility to adjust time limits if needed. The motion to adopt the revised rules passed unanimously. Comments by Planning and Zoning Department - Staff noted the next meeting is April 21, 2026, with four applications (preliminary plat, site plan, and a site plan with design alternative). - An update on the CBO (Seaboard) master plan is tentatively scheduled for the first meeting in June. - Legislative updates: some state bills may be easing; staff will continue monitoring. - Welcomed new members Nick Flairloggy and Anna Fresca to the board. Key Outcomes - Variance 26-06VZ: Approved unanimously (7-0) to allow a fence seaward of the Gulf Beach setback line at 1205 Tarpon Center Drive. - Rules of Procedure: Adopted unanimously as presented with edits. - The meeting adjourned after commissioner comments and a brief discussion about the Laurel Road development (no active application filed).

On March 24, 2026, the Venice City Council held a regular meeting addressing several agenda items including recognitions, public comments, consent items, pension board reports, four ordinances on first reading, a resolution, and charter officer reports. The meeting lasted from 9:00 AM to approximately 5:00 PM, with a brief recess. Consent Calendar - Approved minutes of the March 10, 2026 regular meeting (Item 26-0549). - Authorized the Mayor to execute the Clean Water State Revolving Fund Construction Loan Agreement for the Utilities Water Reclamation Flow Equalization Tank Project (Item 26-0550). Public Comments & Testimony - Madeline Zubeck (Gulf Shores resident) expressed strong opposition to the proposed pipeline from Flamingo Ditch to Deertown Gully, citing flood risks from Hurricane Milton and lack of resident consultation. She requested the city pause and evaluate the option, and criticized the CIP meeting format for not allowing public questions. The City Manager later clarified the pipeline was only a recommendation and not on the April 8th CIP agenda. - Charlie Thorpe (Venice Area Chamber of Commerce) thanked the city's communications team for their support of the Teen Leadership Program, presenting certificates of appreciation. He invited council to the graduation on April 7th. Discussion Items - Police Pension Board Annual Report (Item 26-0551): Chair Kevin McGrath and Actuary Doug Lozen reported the plan remains over 100% funded for the second consecutive year, with a 6.75% investment return assumption. They are working on options to keep premium tax monies flowing while maintaining funded status. - Fire Pension Board Annual Report (Item 26-0552): Plan Administrator Chrissy Stoker noted the plan received $371,293 in state monies (up from 2024). Funded status improved from 72.6% to 76.5% (a high watermark). Net return was 10.07% vs. 6.25% assumption. A deferred retirement option plan (DROP) is being developed and will come to council soon. Ordinances - First Reading - Ordinance 2026-08 (Annexation – 282 N. Auburn Road): Unanimously approved (6-0). The 10.12-acre parcel (iHeartMedia) will be annexed into the city, consistent with JPA Area 7. The applicant plans 43 single-family lots at 4.25 units/acre. - Ordinance 2026-09 (Comprehensive Plan Amendment – Future Land Use Map): Unanimously approved (6-0). Changes the designation from Sarasota County Moderate Density Residential to City of Venice Mixed Use Residential (MUR) for the same property. - Ordinance 2026-10 (Zoning Map Amendment – PUD): Approved 5-1. Changes zoning from Open Use Estate 1 (OUE-1) to Planned Unit Development (PUD) with a binding master plan. The plan includes 43 single-family detached lots, 50% open space, 25-foot buffer, and no commercial use. Councilmember Smith voted against, citing concerns about future commercial potential despite the JPA prohibition and binding plan. The ordinance was amended to incorporate the binding master plan as an exhibit. - Ordinance 2026-12 (Nokomis Groves Community Development District): Unanimously approved (6-0). Establishes a CDD on 60.4 acres for 341 residential units. The district will finance $13.1 million in public improvements via tax-exempt bonds, with no cost to the city. The CDD is the sixth such district in the city. New Business - Ordinance 2026-15 (Travel Expense Policy Amendments): Approved 5-1 after amendment. The ordinance changes signing authority for travel authorization forms from the Finance Director and City Clerk to the Mayor (or Vice Mayor for the Mayor's travel). The City Manager supported the change but noted the council as a whole approves the travel budget. Councilmember Engelke initially preferred the City Manager, but later supported the amendment. The dissenting vote was not specified. - Resolution 2026-06 (Amendment to Public Transportation Grant Agreement): Unanimously approved. Authorizes an amendment to the grant agreement for the design and construction of the general aviation terminal building at Venice Airport. Key Outcomes - Police Pension: Council acknowledged the plan's strong funded status and ongoing work to maintain premium tax monies. No formal action required. - Fire Pension: Council noted the improved funded status and upcoming DROP proposal. No formal action. - Annexation (2026-08): Approved on first reading, final reading scheduled. - Comprehensive Plan Amendment (2026-09): Approved on first reading, final reading scheduled. - Zoning Map Amendment (2026-10): Approved on first reading (5-1), final reading scheduled. Binding master plan incorporated into ordinance. - CDD (2026-12): Approved on first reading, final reading scheduled. - Travel Policy (2026-15): Approved (5-1) with amendment specifying Mayor or Vice Mayor as signatory. - Resolution 2026-06: Adopted unanimously. - Future Meetings: Council noted the April 8th CIP meeting (public can attend) and the April 18th Public Safety Day. The Mayor and City Manager will travel to Washington, D.C. to advocate for Humphreys Park South Jetty Reconstruction, Flamingo Ditch, and beach renourishment.

The Venice Planning Commission met on March 17, 2026, at 1:30 PM in Council Chambers. The meeting included approval of previous minutes, a public hearing on a text amendment to clarify decision criteria, and comments from staff and commissioners. A new commissioner, Ms. Fresca, was welcomed by staff. Consent Calendar - The minutes of the March 3, 2026 regular meeting were approved unanimously (motion by Mr. Chair, second by Jerry). Public Comments & Testimony - Jim Collins, representing Boone Law Firm, spoke during the public hearing. He identified several issues with the proposed text amendment (Petition 26-08AM): - Suggested that drainage/flooding and ingress/egress criteria for zoning map amendments should be explicitly stated as applicable only to planned developments to avoid confusion. - Noted inconsistency: the change from "all applicable elements of the comprehensive plan" was not carried through all sections. - Recommended using the same compatibility language from section 4 and LDR section 2.1.2.C8 in criteria 1.83, instead of the current vague phrasing. - Argued that requiring compliance with Swift MUD requirements (in 1.94) may conflict with state law, as permits are not required at the application stage. - Criticized the term "adequate" in criteria 1.10.1.6 as too vague and contrary to the amendment's goal of clarity. - Mr. Collins noted these comments were provided directly due to short notice, and he had not had prior chance to share them with staff. Discussion Items - Senior Planner Nicole Tremblay presented the text amendment, explaining that the changes aim to make decision criteria clearer, more connected to the code, and more defensible for denials. Key changes include: - Adding explicit references to wildlife/habitat protection assessments and stormwater management (city and Swift MUD requirements). - Rewording traffic criteria to focus on ingress/egress, internal circulation, and traffic safety/compatibility. - Removing overly general language such as "satisfactory provision and arrangement" and replacing with more specific criteria. - Adding a catch-all criteria for health, safety, and welfare. - Commissioner Jasper raised a question about the difference between drainage/flooding criteria in 1.74 (zoning map amendment) and stormwater criteria in 1.94 (site plan). Staff clarified they apply to different petition types. - Staff agreed with Mr. Collins' suggestions, noting they were reasonable, and indicated they would work with the city attorney to consider revisions before the item goes to city council. Key Outcomes - The Planning Commission voted unanimously (6-0; Mr. Ferlaghi absent) to recommend approval of Text Amendment 26-08AM to the City Council, with the understanding that staff would incorporate the discussed revisions prior to council consideration. The motion found the petition consistent with the comprehensive plan and in compliance with Florida Statute Chapter 163, Part II. - The next meeting is scheduled for April 7, 2026, which will include election of officers, a possible presentation by the mayor, and a review of planning commission rules and procedures. - Staff noted upcoming state legislation that may affect local planning and zoning, and welcomed Helen Moore as a new member of the Historic and Architectural Preservation Board.

The Historic and Architectural Preservation Board (HAPB) met in the Venice City Hall Council Chambers at 9:00 a.m. on Thursday, March 12, 2026. The board approved the prior month's minutes, acted on two Certificate of Architectural Compliance (CAC) applications, set direction for the Local Register Forum, and selected a historic-resources survey project for the next state small matching grant cycle. Consent Calendar - The February 12, 2026 meeting minutes were approved without corrections by voice vote. Public Comments & Testimony - No general audience participation was offered. One speaker signed up during the carport hearing but indicated he had nothing to add; no public comment was made on the new-residence application. Public Hearing – 326 Pedro Street Carport (PLAR26-0001) - This continued quasi-judicial hearing was advertised on January 24, 2026. The board confirmed no ex parte communications and no conflicts of interest. - Staff showed a new site plan for an approximately 18-foot by 18-foot open carport, nearly the same size as the existing detached garage, plus revised elevations with stucco-finished posts. - The applicant, for the Charlotte Melcher and Tooger Smith Revocable Trust, said the carport would help preserve the house and provide sheltered vehicle entry for his wife, who has mobility limitations; he noted they stay in Florida about seven months a year. He cited early covered-entry structures from 1926 on nearby properties; board members responded that those examples were port cocheres, a different building type from a carport. - A board member noted several carports already exist on the block. Discussion also covered the lack of specific carport design guidelines; staff said the code does not prohibit carports and the board could consider future guidance outside this hearing. - Board members objected to visible structural framing, beams, and diagonal bracing from the street. They suggested stuccoing the entire front gable end to match the house, in addition to the posts, while retaining the tile roof trim. The applicant agreed. Staff said the revised condition could be approved administratively. - The Historical Resources Manager gave recommendations, not requirements, under the Secretary of the Interior Standards, advising that the addition should be distinguishable from the original house and should be removable without damaging the original structure. - Motion to approve PLAR26-0001 with the stipulation that the front facade be stuccoed to match the house, and that staff may administratively approve that revised plan, carried by roll call vote. Mr. Barrick voted no. Public Hearing – 249 S Harbor Blvd New Residence (PLAR26-0002) - This quasi-judicial hearing was advertised on February 21, 2026. The board again confirmed no ex parte communications and no conflicts. - Staff summarized a proposal for a one-story, 1,948-square-foot single-family home on a vacant, irregular 7,700-square-foot lot. The VHP-style design uses terracotta S-profile roof tile, stucco walls, an approved Sherwin-Williams Crescent Moon body color, wood front door/garage door/privacy fence, and single-hung windows with arched transoms. - Agent Jeff Gates of Beechwood Builders, with designer Zeke Lee, presented the design and explained that lot constraints led to a front-facing garage/cart-storage door. They said materials and colors were drawn from the ARB handbook and described a custom black ironwork vent feature. - Board concerns included the prominent front-facing garage door on the 80-foot street frontage, compliance with the 75% primary/20% secondary approved-color rule, the need for an ironwork detail cut sheet, the proposed front door style, and adding more substantial landscaping. - Staff acknowledged an ambiguity in the code language about garages on lots wider than 50 feet; the lot has an 80-foot street frontage and 50-foot rear line, and the garage was not required to be side- or rear-loaded. Staff offered to revisit the interpretation. - Motion to approve PLAR26-0002 without stipulations carried by roll call vote. Mr. Barrick voted no. New Business – Local Register Forum - Staff set the Local Register Forum for Thursday, May 14, 2026, from about 5:30 to 7:00 p.m., and proposed inviting the historical society and other preservation groups. - Board members suggested the forum should help the public understand which bodies have jurisdiction over design decisions and that city guidelines and limitations exist. They also asked that the forum address how historic preservation supports economic development. - The board deferred designation of an HAPB representative to the forum until its April meeting because a member who had shown interest was absent. New Business – Florida Small Matching Grants - Historical Resources Manager Harry Klinkhamer described the state small matching grant program. As a certified local government, Venice's match would be waived. Grants are capped at about $50,000 and surveys typically cost no more than about $200 per resource. - Staff noted the next application cycle opens April 1 and closes in early June; a successful application would fund a fiscal year 2027 project. Existing survey work in Seaboard/Edgewood is underway, and a Gulf Shores/Golden Beach survey has been ranked and is awaiting state funding. - The board reached consensus to direct staff to prepare an application for a resurvey of Venetia Park, which had last been surveyed in the 1980s and could benefit from updated documentation and photos. Board members said the survey could provide evidence if district boundaries need future review. Board Discussion and Staff Comments - Staff reported that Venice City Council had decided to continue the Legacy Award program. The program is annual but need not be awarded in a year with no qualifying nomination. Because the normal nomination timetable had slipped, board discussion leaned toward waiting for the next full cycle rather than holding a late 2026 award; the normal cycle would open public nominations in December or January, close in March, and award in May. - Staff previewed two applications that may come before the board in April: 205 Harbor, a Catholic Foundation administration building, and 417 Nassau Street, a family-compound single-family residence. Key Outcomes - Approved the February 12, 2026 minutes. - Approved PLAR26-0001 for a new carport at 326 Pedro Street with a condition that the front facade be stuccoed to match the house; Mr. Barrick dissented. - Approved PLAR26-0002 for a new residence at 249 S Harbor Blvd without conditions; Mr. Barrick dissented. - Scheduled the Local Register Forum for May 14, 2026, and requested staff to prepare public-education content. - Directed staff to pursue a state small matching grant for a Venetia Park historic-resources resurvey. - Board discussion leaned toward deferring the Legacy Award to the normal cycle; a board representative to the Local Register Forum will be taken up in April. Note: The raw transcript contains minor application-number variants, but this summary uses the printed agenda numbers PLAR26-0001 and PLAR26-0002.

The Venice City Council met on March 10, 2026, to consider a revised mediated settlement agreement for the GCCF Planned Unit Development (PUD), an impasse hearing regarding AFSCME work schedule changes, annual financial report, and appointments. The council voted 5-2 to approve the settlement and 6-1 to uphold the city administration's work schedule decision. All other agenda items passed unanimously. Consent Calendar - Approved the minutes of the February 24, 2026 regular meeting unanimously. Recognition - Proclaimed March 20, 2026 as "The 100-Year Anniversary of Venice-Nokomis Woman's Club," presented to Joan Brinton. Public Comments & Testimony - 26-0532 (Settlement Agreement): Nine residents spoke. Most opposed the settlement, citing incompatibility, density (307 additional units), height (55 feet), traffic congestion, and inadequate disclosure. Speakers included Mary Sue Bunting (Willow Chase), Olin Thomas (Milano), Joan Farrell, Dr. George Davis (Venice Thrives), Joan Iacono (Venice Thrives), Robin Bruges (Willow Chase), Diane Waters, Jane Caveney (Willow Chase), and Sue Perry. Sue Perry expressed support, citing the need for aging-in-place options. No public comment was offered for the impasse hearing or other items. Discussion Items - 26-0532 – Revised Mediated Settlement Agreement (GCCF PUD): Special Magistrate Mark Bentley reviewed the FLUDRA process and recommended approval. City staff presented changes from the prior settlement: reduction from 370 to 360 units limited to a 17.46-acre parcel, height reduction from 65 to 55 feet for assisted living, independent living, and memory care, and withdrawal of height exception request. Applicant Pat Neal and John Neal argued for approval, citing disclosures and concessions. Council debate focused on compatibility, density, height, and traffic. Councilmember Smith opposed, stating the 307-unit increase was not a meaningful compromise and that the proposal was incompatible with surrounding densities (e.g., Willow Chase 2.3 units/acre, Milano 1.7). Councilmember Howard expressed concerns about intensity but noted the assisted living need. Councilmembers Engelke, Weed, Frank, Vice Mayor Boldt, and Mayor Pachota supported approval, citing alignment with surrounding heights (existing buildings at 54 ft 7 in), the importance of assisted living, and the risk of costly litigation. Vote: 5-2 in favor. - 26-0533 – Impasse Hearing (AFSCME Shift Schedule Change): The union argued for a return to a 4/10 work schedule, citing employee hardship (childcare, elderly care, second jobs) and studies showing higher efficiency and retention. Union representative presented a compromise schedule splitting crews Monday–Thursday and Tuesday–Friday. City Administration, represented by attorney Mark Levitt and Public Works Director Ricky Simpson, defended the change to a 5/8 schedule, citing management rights, improved service coverage across five days, reduced overtime costs ($74,000 saved), and positive employee feedback after one year. They noted the union rejected a $140,000 raise offer tied to the schedule change. Council debate: Councilmember Smith criticized the lack of mediation and suggested considering a raise for affected employees. Councilmember Engelke opposed a raise, emphasizing fiscal management and the management right to set schedules. Vice Mayor Boldt and Mayor Pachota supported the administration. Vote: 6-1 to accept the city administration's decision. - Ordinance 2026-06 (First Reading): Comprehensive plan amendment updating mixed-use land use data for each neighborhood area through November 1, 2025. Staff noted some areas are over 100% of maximum residential units (e.g., East Venice Avenue at 152%) and that market-driven changes are likely. Approved unanimously for transmittal to the Florida Department of Commerce. - Ordinance 2026-11 (Final Reading): Budget amendment increasing total revenue by $265,015 and total expenditures by $67,500 for fiscal year 2025-26. Adopted unanimously. - 26-0534 – ACFR and External Audit: Finance Director Linda Senne and Jeff Wolfe (Forvis Mazars) presented a clean audit with an unmodified opinion, no internal control findings, and strong financial position. Highlights: general fund unassigned fund balance at 63.4% of expenditures, police pension fully funded, fire pension 82% funded. Council expressed appreciation. - 26-0535 & 26-0536 – Appointments: Marty Dover and Atticus Frank appointed to the Citizen Tax Oversight Committee; Nick Fleur Laghi and Anna Fresca appointed to the Planning Commission. All approved unanimously. Key Outcomes - Approved revised mediated settlement agreement for GCCF PUD (5-2). - Upheld city administration's decision to change AFSCME work schedules to 5/8 (6-1). - Approved comprehensive plan amendment on first reading (unanimous). - Adopted budget amendment (unanimous). - Appointed two members to the Citizen Tax Oversight Committee and two to the Planning Commission (unanimous). - Accepted the 2025 Annual Comprehensive Financial Report and external audit (unanimous).

The Venice Planning Commission met on Tuesday, March 3, 2026 at 1:30 PM in the Council Chambers. Chair Snyder presided, with members Wilson, Harrell, Sherberg, McKeon, Young, and Jasper (absent excused) present. The commission unanimously approved the minutes from the February 17, 2026 meeting and then conducted two major public hearings: the Ajax Site Improvements (combined design alternative and site plan) and the Triton Industrial comprehensive plan and zoning amendments. No general audience participation occurred. Consent Calendar - Approval of Minutes: The minutes of the February 17, 2026 regular meeting were approved unanimously by a 6-0 voice vote. Public Comments & Testimony - Triton Industrial Rezoning: Three residents of the Substation Road corridor spoke in opposition: - Jamie Nakkowsky argued the property is being used without permission for light industrial (not zoned for it) and that Substation Road is already deteriorated, unsafe for children, and cannot support more heavy truck traffic. - William Apel stated the road is not maintained by the city or business owners, and that increased commercial traffic is incompatible with the existing residential community. - Susan Armellini noted that four residential areas exist along the road, residents pay for road maintenance themselves, and the road is unsafe for pedestrians, cyclists, and children. She asked the commission to deny the application to preserve a vibrant, charming community. Discussion Items Ajax Site Improvements (Petitions 25-61DA and 25-40SP) - Overview: The commission considered two quasi-judicial petitions together for Ajax, a local asphalt company established in 1998. The site (500 and 504 Gene Green Road, 94 total acres, 10.3-acre project area) currently operates as headquarters and manufacturing. Proposed improvements include: expanding building 1 (office), constructing a new laboratory (building 2), replacing modular structures with permanent buildings 3-5, relocating the access drive for safer traffic flow, paving and striping parking areas, and adding stormwater retention. - Design Alternative Request: - Wildlife fence breaks: The applicant requested no breaks in perimeter fencing for security and insurance compliance. Staff found no adverse impact. - Lighting fixture heights: The applicant requested 20-foot and 30-foot perimeter fixtures instead of the code-required 12-15 feet, due to the large (average 12-foot tall) vehicles on site. The photometric plan showed compliant foot-candle levels, and all perimeter fixtures would include glare shields. - Alternative Parking Plan: 45 parking spaces for fleet/vehicle storage in the eastern industrial area, exceeding standard code limits but deemed acceptable. - Easement Stipulation: The applicant is negotiating with Sarasota County and other easement holders to maintain access. A draft stipulation was presented and accepted by the agent. - Staff Findings: Staff reported the site plan complies with comprehensive plan strategies (FAR 0.04, well below 2.0 max), Land Development Code, and concurrency (de minimis traffic: 18 PM peak hour trips). No public speakers testified. Triton Industrial Comprehensive Plan Amendment (25-63CP, Legislative) - Proposal: Change the future land use designation of 490 Substation Road (2 acres) from High Density Residential to Industrial. The property currently has a single-family residence but is used by the owner for a contracting business (light industrial). The applicant intends to redevelop with multi-tenant light industrial buildings. - Planning Analysis: Staff noted the site is in the Gateway Neighborhood, which allows industrial uses. A compatibility matrix showed "potentially incompatible" with adjacent residential, but existing industrial users (Turbine Weld, Southern Spring & Stamping) coexist. The maximum development potential under Industrial FAR 2.0 (173,000 sq ft) is unlikely; transportation analysis assumed a more realistic 16,000 sq ft, yielding 8 PM peak hour trips compared to 19 trips if developed as high-density residential. The change was found consistent with the comp plan and Florida Statute 163. - Discussion: Chair Snyder expressed being torn between the need for affordable housing (high-density residential potential) and preserving scarce industrial land. Member Harrell noted the road maintenance issue but stated the city council will have final decision. Member Sherberg highlighted the tension between the two competing city desires. The vote to recommend approval was 6-0. Triton Industrial Zoning Map Amendment (25-64RZ, Quasi-Judicial) - Proposal: Rezone the same property from RMF-1 (Residential Multifamily) to Industrial, the implementing district for the industrial future land use. The agent clarified the current use is a contracting business (dock and pier work) and that the owner intends to redevelop with similar light industrial uses, possibly multi-tenant, but not necessarily limiting to that. - Public Opposition: All three public speakers (see Public Comments) focused on the poor condition of private Substation Road, safety hazards, increased truck traffic, and incompatibility with existing residential neighborhoods. - Commission Deliberation: - Member Wilson (moved approval) stated he was not convinced to change from the original zoning decision. - Member Harrell opposed because industrial zoning permits a wide range of uses (tattoo parlors, taxidermists, etc.) unless limited by stipulation, and the applicant declined to stipulate. - Member McKeon favored approval, noting the adjacent Turbine Weld was recently approved and the current use is already light industrial. - Member Young supported, arguing residential would bring more people and traffic than industrial. - Chair Snyder noted the multi-tenant aspect broadens potential uses and that the road issue is a private matter. The vote was 4-2 in favor (members Wilson and Harrell voting no), recommending approval to City Council. Key Outcomes - Ajax Design Alternative (25-61DA): Approved unanimously (6-0) – allows no wildlife fence breaks and taller perimeter lighting. - Ajax Site and Development Plan (25-40SP): Approved unanimously (6-0) with the inclusion of the easement stipulation. - Triton Comprehensive Plan Amendment (25-63CP): Recommended for approval to City Council unanimously (6-0). - Triton Zoning Map Amendment (25-64RZ): Recommended for approval to City Council by a vote of 4-2 (Wilson and Harrell opposed). - Next Meeting: Scheduled for March 17, 2026, which will include a text amendment. Chair Snyder noted this may be his last meeting; the commission and staff thanked him for his service.

The Venice City Council held its regular meeting on Tuesday, February 24, 2026, at 9:00 AM in Council Chambers. The meeting included recognitions, public comments, consent agenda, several public hearings on final reading ordinances, a presentation from the Historic and Architectural Preservation Board (HAPB), annual updates from the Venice Pier Group and staff reports on Humphris Park, and other new business. All votes were unanimous unless noted. Consent Calendar - Approved the minutes of the February 2, 2026 Strategic Planning Workshop and February 10, 2026 Regular Meeting. - Approved a Workers' Compensation Claim Settlement Agreement for ex-employee Jasmine Diaz. Public Comments & Testimony - Katie Cecabelli (snowbird resident) expressed concern about downtown blight, specifically the fenced post office at Venetian Plaza and a boarded-up building at 219/221 Venice Avenue. She noted that the historical society blocked the owner from demolishing the building, which has degraded over eight years. She requested city action to address the safety and appearance issues. Discussion Items - HAPB Annual Report & 2026 Priorities – Mark Beebe, HAPB Chair, reported that the board added two properties to the local register in 2025, bringing the total from 7 in 2017 to 14. The board approved five Certificates of Architectural Compliance and recommended one ad valorem tax exemption. Priorities for 2026 include continuing education seminars, updating the color palette, and finishing historic resource surveys for the Gulf Shores and Golden Beach areas. Council accepted the report and approved the proposed agenda priorities unanimously. - Humphris Park Reconstruction Options – City Engineer Jon Kramer and Public Works Director Ricky Simpson presented the status of the South Jetty and Humphris Park after Hurricanes Helene and Milton. The jetty and bulkhead (owned by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers) suffered catastrophic damage, and staff recommended against temporary reconstruction due to high costs (estimated over $10 million for the South Bulkhead alone, with overall project possibly $100 million) and long permitting timeline (1–2 years for a Section 408 permit). The Army Corps acknowledged responsibility and is prioritizing the South Bulkhead repair. Council unanimously authorized the mayor to communicate support for federal and state funding for the project. - Centennial Park Rededication Plaque – The council approved a plaque and paver area with benches to mark the city's centennial, with a rededication ceremony scheduled for April 15, 2026. A time capsule will also be included. - Joint Meeting with Sarasota County Commissioners – The council voted unanimously to schedule a joint meeting with the Sarasota County Board of County Commissioners, last held May 16, 2025, with a focus on regional topics. - Citizens Advisory Board Appointments – Caitlin Panfill and Philip Ellis were appointed to three-year terms from March 1, 2026, to February 28, 2029. - Property Signage for Public Notice Requirements – Councilmember Frank proposed aligning the city's posting sign size with Sarasota County's 3-foot by 2-foot standard. After discussion, the council unanimously directed staff to research bringing posting requirements in line with the county, considering costs and SB 180 limitations. Key Outcomes - All consent items and ordinances passed unanimously: - Ordinance 2025-37 (Annexation – Abdelrahman and Sara Ayyad) - Ordinance 2025-38 (Comprehensive Plan Amendment – 2805 Curry Lane to Institutional Professional) - Ordinance 2025-39 (Zoning Amendment – 2805 Curry Lane to Office, Professional and Institutional) - Ordinance 2026-01 (Zoning Amendment – Auburn and Border Road to RSF-3, with stipulation on optional density) - Ordinance 2026-11 (Budget Amendment – increased revenues by $265,015 and expenditures by $67,500; first reading, final reading to be scheduled) - Resolution 2026-03 (Adopted 2026 Sarasota County Unified Local Mitigation Strategy Plan, approved Floodplain Management Plan annual report, and adopted Unified Program for Public Information including Flood Insurance Promotion Plan; the city's CRS rating of 5 gives residents a 25% flood insurance discount) - Venice Pier Group – Justin Pachota presented $1,184,367 in percentage-of-sales rent (up from $1 million in 2025), plus $155,000+ base rent, totaling $1.34 million. He noted increased infrastructure strain since Caspersen Beach (county property) closed. - Flood Awareness & Procurement Proclamations – The council proclaimed March 9–15, 2026 as Flood Awareness Week and March as Procurement Month. - Engineers Week Proclamation – Recognized the week of February 22–28, 2026. - 10-Year Service Award – Lorraine Anderson, Public Information Officer, was recognized. - City Attorney – Noted the Florida legislative session is in its home stretch, with bills that could affect local land use authority. - City Clerk – Presented the Legislative Referral Tracking Report, as required every six months. - City Manager – Announced a new shared city calendar for council members and staff to consolidate meetings and events. Council members also thanked staff for individual tours of city projects (Humphris Park, new fire station, solid waste facility).

The Citizen Advisory Board met on February 18, 2026, at 2:00 PM in Council Chambers. The board approved a recommendation for a Centennial Park rededication plaque and received updates on the city website redesign and other city initiatives. No public comments were made. New Business: Centennial Park Rededication Plaque - Staff presented a proposal to install a commemorative plaque in Centennial Park to mark the city's centennial. The plaque will be placed east of the kiosk, near the veterans memorial, with added pavers and benches. The project is scheduled for a rededication ceremony on April 15, 2026. - Staff reported no negative public feedback, only positive responses. The idea originated from community members. - The board unanimously voted (9-0) to recommend city council approval. Unfinished Business: City Website Redesign - Mr. DeFallis reported that an RFI was issued to vendors, amended to include an AI chatbot as previously recommended. Staff have narrowed down to two vendors, with demos scheduled for the following week. A contract is expected by March. - Mr. Carr confirmed that the board's specific recommendations were included in the redesign project document. - Staff will coordinate with the board for future presentations and demos. Board Discussion - Chair provided an update on the board's presentation to city council regarding the annual report, hurricane after-action plan, and bicycle master plan. Council expressed gratitude for the board's work. - Mayor Pachota thanked the board for its contributions, noting that the board helps the council address important community needs such as bicycle and pedestrian planning. - Discussion on hurricane preparedness: Staff are implementing recommendations from the board's after-action report, including adding a deputy public information officer. The board requested a formal implementation update at the April meeting. - Board member Panfill suggested incorporating environmental guidelines (native plants, live oak protection, butterfly habitats) into the upcoming parks master plan update. Staff Comments - City Manager Clinch noted that the parks master plan consultant selection process is underway; eight proposals were received, narrowed to three for in-person interviews. - Public Works Director Rick Simpson was introduced. Key Outcomes - The board recommended city council approval of the Centennial Park rededication plaque (unanimous vote). - Website redesign vendor selection is progressing; board will be involved in future presentations. - A hurricane implementation update will be provided at the April 15, 2026 meeting. - Next regular meeting scheduled for April 15, 2026 at 2:00 PM.

The Venice Planning Commission met on Tuesday, February 17, 2026, at 1:30 PM in Council Chambers. The commission approved prior minutes, conducted four public hearings, and made recommendations to City Council on the Chalets at Venice annexation, future land use map amendment, and zoning map amendment. Two Venice Isle petitions and one Panda Express site plan were also approved. Call to Order, Roll Call, and Minutes - Chair Snyder called the meeting to order. Roll call showed Chair Snyder and members Wilson, Hale, Sherberg, McKeon, Young, and Jasper present. Member Kit was excused. - The February 3, 2026, regular meeting minutes were approved unanimously as presented. - No members of the public signed up for general audience participation. Venice Isle - Design Alternative 25-55DA and Site and Development Plan 25-13SP - The certified public hearing for both petitions was advertised on January 17, 2026. - Staff planner Brittany Smith presented a proposal for a new three-story mixed-use building on a 0.379-acre parcel. The ground floor would contain two commercial retail spaces of 2,152 and 1,116 square feet plus residential garage parking, and the second and third floors would contain seven residential units totaling 12,361 square feet. - The project would be at the maximum residential density of 18 dwelling units per acre and have a floor area ratio of 0.40, below the 0.65 maximum. - The design alternative request included relief from perimeter buffer and setback standards. Staff noted the driveway setback alternative was not actually needed because the proposed 17-foot setback exceeded the code minimum. The requested rear and side setbacks were 45 feet and 29 feet, compared with code standards of 20 feet and 15 feet. - Staff found both petitions consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and compliant with the Land Development Code. The applicant owner spoke in support; no public speakers testified. - The commission approved the design alternative 6-0 and the site and development plan 6-0. Panda Express Site and Development Plan 24-62SP - The certified public hearing was advertised on January 31, 2026. - The applicant sought approval to construct a 2,700-square-foot Panda Express restaurant at 2001 Laurel Road on an approximately 1.066-acre parcel. The property retains Commercial General zoning and has a mixed-use corridor future land use designation. - An alternative parking plan requested 38 parking spaces, exceeding the maximum of 27 by about 33%; the minimum required was 11 spaces. The applicant's traffic impact statement showed 35 PM peak-hour trips, which was deemed de minimis. - The applicant's agent, Garrett George of CESO, explained that a temporary barrier on the west side would remain until the adjacent parcel is developed, and that delivery truck turning movements on the site plan reflect bumper overhang rather than wheel paths. - Staff found the petition compliant. No public speakers testified. The commission approved the site and development plan 6-0. Chalets at Venice - Annexation 25-19AN - The certified public hearing was advertised on January 31, 2026. - This legislative petition sought annexation of 10.1209 acres at 282 North Auburn Road into the city. The property is in Joint Planning Agreement Area 7, has a proposed future land use of mixed-use residential, and is proposed to be zoned Planned Unit Development in the Pinebrook neighborhood. - Staff reported that the pre-annexation agreement was approved by City Council on February 10, 2026. - Public speaker Susan Carrow, a Sawgrass resident, expressed concerns about added traffic on Auburn Road and strain on the city's finite water supply. - Commissioner Wilson said failing to annex does not prevent development; county development would still use city roads and facilities without providing city tax revenue, while city annexation allows the city to impose standards. Planning and Zoning Director Roger Clark added that JPA Area 7 identifies this property for city water and sewer service. - The commission voted 6-0 to recommend City Council approval of the annexation. Chalets at Venice - Future Land Use Map Amendment 25-20CP - The certified public hearing was advertised on January 31, 2026. - The petition requested a change from Sarasota County moderate density residential to City of Venice mixed-use residential. JPA Area 7 limits density to five dwelling units per acre; the applicant proposed 4.25 dwelling units per acre. - Staff found the petition consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and with Florida Statutes Chapter 163, Part II. - Public speaker Julie Valo raised concerns about drainage for raised homes, the drain pipe across North Auburn Road, Blackburn Canal overflowing during heavy rains, and the proposed two-story homes abutting Venice Palms. - During discussion, commissioners noted that the JPA limits the density to five units per acre, which restricted the board's ability to impose lower densities similar to other Auburn Road projects. Staff and the applicant noted that the existing county moderate density residential designation already allows two to five units per acre. - The commission voted 6-0 to recommend City Council approval of the future land use map amendment. Chalets at Venice - Zoning Map Amendment 25-21RZ - The certified public hearing was advertised on January 31, 2026. This was a quasi-judicial hearing. - The petition requested a change from Sarasota County OUE1 zoning to City of Venice Planned Unit Development zoning. Under OUE1, the 10.12-acre parcel would yield only about two potential units; the proposed PUD would allow up to 51 units, but the applicant proposed 43 single-family detached homes at 4.25 dwelling units per acre. - The binding master plan includes a minimum 50% open space, a 25-foot landscape buffer, a private right-of-way with sidewalks, a hammerhead turn at the dead-end street, two stormwater lakes, and limits building height to 35 feet or two stories. Minimum lot size would be 3,600 square feet, with 20-foot front yards, five-foot side yards, and 20-foot rear yards. - The project's estimated impact was 48 PM peak-hour trips, considered de minimis. Staff found no concurrency issues. - Public speaker Susan Heisen, a Sawgrass resident, raised concerns about density, Auburn Road traffic, Blackburn Canal water flow and maintenance, downstream Curry Creek flooding, and the undeveloped radio tower parcel to the south. - Public speaker Richard Clapp, also from Sawgrass, urged the commission to prioritize community home values over the applicant's presentation, argued that traffic and water impacts are understated, and said Curry Creek is under severe stress. He asked for lower density. - Director Roger Clark explained that the JPA has been in place since 2007, identified this property for up to five units per acre, and requires city water and sewer, so the property would need to be in the city. He also noted that stormwater permitting through SwiftMUD generally requires post-development runoff to match pre-development conditions, and that the city understands Sawgrass is responsible for maintaining part of Curry Creek, though that issue is not totally resolved. - Commissioner Young offered an amendment to add a stipulation limiting density to 2.5 dwelling units per acre. The amendment lacked a second and failed. The commission then voted 5-1 to recommend City Council approval of the zoning map amendment. Planning and Zoning Department Comments - Roger Clark announced the next Planning Commission meeting on March 3, 2026, and clarified that the Venice Isle property would not need a certificate of demolition from the Historic and Architectural Preservation Board because it is not a 1926 building or on the register. - He also recognized outgoing Chair Snyder with a token of appreciation. Comments by Planning Commission Members - One commissioner emphasized that board decisions must be based on the evidence presented rather than personal opinions, particularly as the city recruits new planning commissioners. Key Outcomes - Approved February 3, 2026, minutes unanimously. - Approved Venice Isle Design Alternative 25-55DA, 6-0. - Approved Venice Isle Site and Development Plan 25-13SP, 6-0. - Approved Panda Express Site and Development Plan 24-62SP, 6-0. - Recommended City Council approval of Chalets at Venice Annexation 25-19AN, 6-0. - Recommended City Council approval of Chalets at Venice Future Land Use Map Amendment 25-20CP, 6-0. - Recommended City Council approval of Chalets at Venice Zoning Map Amendment 25-21RZ, 5-1; a proposed 2.5-du/ac stipulation amendment failed for lack of a second.