OpenPublica
WASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA · AREA ELEMENT LOWER ANACOSTIA WATERFRONT

Chapter 19, Lower Anacostia Waterfront/Near Southwest Area Element

38 pages
Government
Washington, District Of Columbia
Covers
area element lower anacostia waterfront
Pages
38
Verified
2026-08-21
Pages 1–38

Chapter 19

Lower Anacostia Waterfront/Near Southwest Area Element

CHAPTER 19: LOWER ANACOSTIA WATERFRONT/NEAR SOUTHWEST

⬚ figure

Lower Anacostia Waterfront/Near Southwest Area Element

Overview 1900

THE LOWER ANACOSTIA WATERFRONT/NEAR SOUTHWEST PLANNING Area encompasses three square miles of land located along both sides of the Anacostia River in the southwest and southeast quadrants of Washington, DC. The boundaries include the I-395 Freeway to the north, Anacostia Park and portions of South Capitol Street SE to the east and south, and the Washington Channel to the west. Its boundaries are shown in the map to the left. This Planning Area includes parts of Wards 6, 7, and 8. 1900.1

The Anacostia waterfront is home to many of Washington, DC’s vibrant neighborhoods. Much of its shoreline has been experiencing a transformation initiated by the 2003 Anacostia Waterfront Framework Plan, which set a visionary and ambitious plan for the revitalization of the waterfront into a world-class destination. The former landscape of industrial, transportation, and government uses continues to transform into one of new mixed-use neighborhoods, workplaces, civic spaces, parks, and restored natural areas. Established waterfront neighborhoods stand to benefit greatly. This transformation is delivering improved access to the shoreline, new recreational amenities, new housing and transportation choices, and a cleaner natural environment, along with new opportunities to enhance the resilience of the Anacostia waterfront. 1900.2

The Lower Anacostia Waterfront/Near Southwest Planning Area includes a diverse mix of neighborhoods and architecture. New high-rise multi-family buildings dominate the Capitol Riverfront and the Wharf. The Southwest neighborhood is known for its mix of low- and high-density modernist buildings, and other areas closer to Capitol Hill maintain the historic row house blocks amid new construction. Throughout the area is a mix of high-rise and affordable housing. 1900.3

Residents of the Lower Anacostia Waterfront/Near Southwest Planning Area have multiple transit options, including seven Metro stations, many bikeshare stations, and multiple bus lines. Land uses along the Anacostia waterfront are diverse. These uses currently include wetlands and large open spaces, Nationals Park, Audi Field (home to the DC United professional soccer team), marinas, a retired power plant, housing, commercial centers, and Fort McNair. The Lower Anacostia Waterfront/Near Southwest Planning Area includes the residential neighborhoods of Southwest and Capitol Riverfront/ Navy Yard, including the former Arthur Capper Carrollsburg public housing community that was redeveloped beginning in 2007. The Planning Area’s parks and open spaces include Anacostia Park, Poplar Point, Yards Park, Canal Park, Diamond Teague Park, the Wharf, East Potomac Park, and Hains Point, as well as historic squares and playgrounds in the residential areas. The Planning Area also includes federal military installations, such as Fort McNair

⬚ figure

View Down River, PA Avenue (Sousa bridge in foreground)

AREA ELEMENTS

and the Washington Navy Yard, and local public facilities, such as schools and recreation centers. 1900.41

Significant environmental improvements are coming to the Anacostia River after years of neglect as Washington’s second river, lagging behind the Potomac River in visibility, image, and public investment. The District is building, legislating, and educating for a cleaner Anacostia River that is fishable and swimmable over the coming decades. With the completion of the Clean Rivers tunnel in 2018, DC Water is on target to reduce untreated raw sewage going into the Anacostia River by 98 percent. Meanwhile, the 2016 Anacostia River Accord is a renewed commitment on the part of the District, Montgomery County, and Prince George’s County to work collaboratively toward removing trash from the Anacostia River, its tributaries, and watershed. 1900.52

The 2003 Anacostia Waterfront Framework Plan lays out a strategy for improving water quality, restoring habitat, and improving shoreline parks so that the waterfront becomes the centerpiece for new and revitalized communities. A network of trails and paths, including part of the Anacostia Riverwalk Trail, and bridges, such as the completed 11th Street Bridge replacement (together with the future 11th Street Bridge Park) and future new Frederick Douglass Memorial Bridge, connect the east and west sides of the river. The objective is to connect not only the east and west shorelines but also the District itself through great parks, public places, and new neighborhoods along a restored river. 1900.63

A diverse coalition of public and private sector entities is leading the revitalization of lands along the river and coordinating environmental and programming initiatives that promote river cleanup, public awareness, and waterfront recreation. Restoring the river’s natural environment is a central part of the revitalization of the Anacostia waterfront neighborhoods. 1900.74

The waterfront area is experiencing substantial change. Since 2000, over four million square feet of office space has been constructed in the Capitol Riverfront/Navy Yard area, and more than 6,000 new residential units have been built, with over 800 set aside as affordable units. Over 6,000 residents now live in the Capitol Riverfront/Navy Yard area, with that number expected to grow to 16,000 by 2020, making this the fastest-growing neighborhood in the District. Former public housing at Arthur Capper Carrollsburg is being transformed into Capitol Quarter, a mixed-income community with planned one-for-one replacement of every public housing unit removed. Redevelopment includes a new community recreation center and affordable housing for older adults. The continued growth of families with young children in the area has necessitated the reopening and renovation of Van Ness Elementary school on M Street SE. One residential building is currently under construction, and two additional residential buildings are planned for the sites adjacent to Canal Park (Canal Park is a three-block park bounded by M Street, 2nd Street, 2nd Place, and I Street

Footnotes

  1. 1900.4

  2. 1900.5

  3. 1900.6

  4. 1900.7

AREA ELEMENTS

SE). All three buildings will include both new and replacement affordable housing units. The Nationals Park continues to draw crowds from across the Washington, DC region to games, concerts, and other events. Overall, the ballpark hosts about 2.5 million visitors annually. Audi Field, a professional soccer stadium with a seating capacity of 20,000, opened in July 2018 in Buzzard Point. Sellout games are bringing thousands of people to this area of the waterfront. The opening of Yards Park and Canal Park have added over eight acres of passive and active recreation space to the neighborhood. Phase 1 of the Wharf in Southwest opened in late 2017, with over 1,000 residential units, office space, and multiple recreation and cultural amenities, transforming the Southwest Waterfront Area into a regional draw. Projects on surrounding sites and at Buzzard Point will continue to transform this area into a waterfront destination for visitors and residents from all parts of the region, nation, and world. 1900.8

Other planned improvements include a 70-acre public park at Poplar Point, an Interpretive Nature Center at Kingman Island, and mixed-use development in Buzzard Point. Plans for these areas have been prepared in a broader context, taking into consideration upriver sites, such as Reservation 13 and Parkside. Throughout the Planning Area and in the adjacent areas of Capitol Hill, Upper Northeast, and Far Northeast/Southeast, neighborhoods will be better connected to the river by extending streets to the waterfront, adding waterfront promenades, and providing new forms of transportation, such as water taxis. The completion of the new 11th Street Bridge (and the future opening of the 11th Street Bridge Park) and the rebuilding of the South Capitol Street/Frederick Douglass Bridge will change the visual profile of the waterfront and make pedestrian and bicycle crossings safer and easier. As the Planning Area’s population and development continues to grow, including within flood zones near and along the waterfront, resilient design is critical to mitigating riverine and storm surge flooding and projected sea level rise. 1900.9

History 1

The Anacostia watershed contains lush habitat and diverse ecosystems, which in pre- colonial times supported the Nacotchtank Native Americans, whose name, when Anglicized, eventually became Anacostia. In the early years of European settlement, the river was known as the Eastern Branch of the Potomac. It formed the edge of the Washington, DC and was the terminus of important radial avenues extending out from the U.S. Capitol in the 1791 L’Enfant Plan. 1901.1

In 1799, the Washington Navy Yard was established about a mile south of the U.S. Capitol. It became the main port for receiving materials to construct Washington, DC’s monumental buildings. Wharves and fisheries were established along the shoreline, and ocean-going vessels enjoyed a navigable channel up to the port of Bladensburg, Maryland. By the mid-

⬚ figure

Nats Park

Footnotes

  1. 1901

AREA ELEMENTS

By the time of the Civil War, tobacco farming, clear-cutting of forests, and industrial activities had silted and polluted the Anacostia River. The river shrank from depths of 40 feet to barely eight feet, making it too shallow for navigation by sea-bound vessels. The Navy Yard built its last large ship in 1876.

1800s, development around the Navy Yard extended across the river via the 11th Street Bridge to Historic Anacostia (then called Uniontown). Moderate-income housing for Navy workers and others employed at the docks and nearby industrial areas was developed. 1901.21

By the time of the Civil War, tobacco farming, clear-cutting of forests, and industrial activities had silted and polluted the Anacostia River. The river shrank from depths of 40 feet to barely eight feet, making it too shallow for navigation by sea-bound vessels. The Navy Yard built its last large ship in 1876. After the war, the large tobacco plantations that had dominated the landscape along the Anacostia River were broken up into smaller farms or abandoned. The manufacturing and farming communities around the Navy Yard included a large population of newly emancipated residents, beginning a long history of African- American neighborhoods along the river. 1901.32

With the construction of Washington’s sewer system in the 1880s, water quality in the Anacostia River continued to deteriorate. The tidal wetlands were the source of mosquito-borne malaria outbreaks and prone to periodic flooding. In 1901, the Senate Parks Commission suggested (through the McMillan Plan) that riverfront open space be constructed to improve public health conditions and create parkland. Between 1902 and 1926, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) filled in wetlands and mudflats, and constructed seawalls along the riverbanks to create Anacostia Park. Tons of dredged river bottom were used to create Kingman and Heritage Islands. However, the McMillan Plan vision of a grand interconnected public park system was never realized. 1901.43

For most of the 20th century, the Anacostia waterfront continued to be the location for unwanted land uses and neglectful land management practices. Landfilling of the marshes and wetlands continued through the 1930s and 1940s. Most of the tributaries were rerouted into storm drains, further compromising the ecosystem and health of the river. 1901.54

After World War II, significant population growth in the watershed affected both the river and the waterfront neighborhoods. While direct dumping into the river was curbed, highway building and development in the 176-square mile watershed led to continued pollution from stormwater runoff. Neighborhoods near the Southwest waterfront deteriorated and finally were declared obsolete by planning documents of the early 1950s. Plans to rehabilitate the housing in an incremental manner were passed over in favor of more dramatic plans to clear and rebuild the entire community. These plans ultimately resulted in the largest urban renewal project in the United States. Thousands of mostly lower-income Black families were displaced, and the new Southeast/Southwest Freeway further eroded connections to the waterfront. 1901.65

By the 1970s, a grass roots movement to save the Anacostia River was gaining momentum. This movement grew during the 1980s and 1990s, as

Footnotes

  1. 1901.2

  2. 1901.3

  3. 1901.4

  4. 1901.5

  5. 1901.6

A R E A E L E M E N T S

groups like the Chesapeake Bay Foundation and the Anacostia Watershed Society advocated for the restoration of the District’s forgotten river and improvements to its watershed to reduce pollution. Initiatives and mandates to clean the Chesapeake Bay and implement federal water quality programs provided further impetus for action. In March 2000, Mayor Anthony Williams and 20 different agencies controlling land or having jurisdiction over the Anacostia shoreline signed the Anacostia Waterfront Initiative (AWI) Memorandum of Understanding (MOU). The MOU led to the production and completion of the Anacostia Waterfront Framework Plan in November 2003. The Framework Plan has guided the revitalization of the waterfront and its shoreline communities for well over a decade, with many actions already realized or underway, such as improvement to water and environmental quality and the ongoing development of Capitol Riverfront, the Wharf, Buzzard Point, and Hill East. 1

Land Use 2

Land use statistics for the Anacostia Waterfront Planning Area appear in Figure 19.1. The area includes 1,884 acres of land and 1,295 acres of water. The Planning Area represents about five percent of the District’s land area. Statistics on existing land use are estimated from current lot-by-lot property tax data together with additional information on housing units, employment, District and federal land ownership, parks, roads, and water bodies. They are not comparable to the statistics originally included in the 2006 Comprehensive Plan, which were based on a much simpler method. Even large differences between the older and newer statistics may reflect differences in the modeling approaches used a decade apart and not to actual changes in land use. 3

About 25 percent of the Planning Area is in federal ownership. A little over 30 percent of the Planning Area consists of parks and open space. Much of this land is adjacent to the waterfront and is under the jurisdiction of the National Park Service (NPS). Non-park federal uses include Fort McNair and the Navy Yard. 4

⬚ figure

Footnotes

  1. 1901.7

  2. 1902

  3. 1902.1

  4. 1902.2

AREA ELEMENTS

In 2015, residential uses accounted for just eight percent of the land area and were concentrated in Southwest Washington, DC and Capitol Riverfront. Commercial and mixed-uses constitute about 4.6 percent of the Planning Area. The industrial zones, primarily located at Buzzard Point, have begun to transition into higher-density, mixed-use neighborhood development, fulfilling the vision of the Anacostia Waterfront Framework. It is anticipated that residential land uses will continue to increase as more sites in Capitol Riverfront, Buzzard Point, and the Wharf are developed. 1902.4

Public facilities comprise three percent of the area. Institutional uses comprise about two percent of the area. 1902.5

Demographics 1903

Basic demographic data for the Lower Anacostia Waterfront/Near Southwest Planning Area is shown in Figure 19.2. In 2017, the area had a population of 18,125. Between 2000 and 2017, the population increased by about 3,996. 1903.1

As of 2017, just under 52 percent of the Lower Anacostia Waterfront/Near Southwest Planning Area’s residents were white, which is a significant increase from 24 percent in 2000. In 2017 just under 40 percent of the Planning Area’s residents were Black, which is a decrease from 67 percent in 2000. Some of this change in demographics can be attributed to the net gain in developable land and subsequent new construction of residential units attracting residents to the area. Additionally, most of the new residential buildings have primarily consisted of market rate one-bedroom units, attracting more young professionals to the area for the first time. Approximately six percent of the area’s residents are of Hispanic/Latino origin, and 10 percent are foreign-born. 1903.2

A notable demographic shift is the reduction in the percentage of the population under the age of 18. In 2017 10.4 percent of the population was under age 18, compared to 18.4 percent in 2000. These trends reflect the increase in the working-age population moving into the area. The area’s percentage of older adults over the age of 65 remained generally constant at about 13 percent between 2000 and 2015. 1903.3

Based on land availability, planning policies, and regional growth and development trends, the Lower Anacostia Waterfront/Near Southwest Planning Area will experience significant growth in population, households, and jobs over the coming decades. The population, which was 18,125 in 2017, is expected to grow to 40,200 in 2025, 48,997 in 2035, and 58,789 in 2045. The number of households is expected to increase from 10,083 to 33,915 in 2045. 1903.4

AREA ELEMENTS

Figure 19.2:

Lower Anacostia Waterfront/Near Southwest at a Glance 1903.61

Basic Statistics
200020102017*202520352045
Population14,12914,63518,12540,20048,97758,789
Households7,8488,67810,08324,20528,91533,915
Household Population13,80714,48717,88439,92448,69658,508
Persons Per Household1.761.671.771.651.681.73
Jobs29,64543,21652,97965,69879,39792,314
Density (persons per sq mile)4,7104,8786,04213,40016,32519,596
Land Area (square miles)3.03.03.03.03.03.0
2000 and 2017 Census Data Profile
20002017*Citywide 2017*
TotalPercentageTotalPercentagePercentage
Age
Under 182,60218.4%1,88810.4%17.6%
18-649,50367.3%13,77476.0%70.6%
18-343,31523.5%7,40340.8%34.6%
35-646,18843.8%6,37035.1%35.9%
65 and over2,02514.3%2,46313.6%11.9%
Residents Below Poverty Level4,38027.7%2,99716.8%17.4%
Race Composition
White3,85324.4%9,37251.7%40.7%
Black10,69067.6%7,15539.5%47.7%
Native American390.3%860.5%0.3%
Asian/Pacific Islander3192.0%7013.9%3.8%
Other3402.2%1520.8%4.6%
Multi-Racial5813.7%6593.6%2.9%
Hispanic Origin6374.0%1,0826.0%10.7%
Foreign-Born Residents1,3388.5%1,90210.5%14.0%
Tenure
Owner Households2,40928.2%3,43834.1%41.7%
Renter Households6,11471.8%6,64565.9%58.3%
Housing Occupancy
Occupied Units8,52392.5%10,08392.5%90.2%
Vacant Units6867.5%8207.5%9.8%
Housing by Unit Type
1-unit detached1431.6%1281.2%11.9%
1-unit attached2,00921.8%2,12519.5%25.1%
2-4 units4675.1%4424.1%10.3%
5-9 units7847.2%4113.8%6.8%
10-19 units1234.9600.5%10.5%
20 or more5,58760.7%7,73971.0%35.4%
Mobile/other2192.4%00.0%0.1%

* Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2013-2017 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates.

Footnotes

  1. 1903.6

AREA ELEMENTS

According to the U.S. Census Bureau 2017 data, the median household income in 2017 for the Planning Area was $72,904, a 117 percent increase from $35,516 in 2000.

Diversity is one of the strengths of the Lower Anacostia Waterfront/Near Southwest Planning Area. The Southwest neighborhood, in particular, is one of the most racially and economically diverse areas in the District. The neighborhood is a microcosm of Washington, DC; this is one of the defining characteristics of the community and one that residents value highly. 1

Housing Characteristics 2

A majority of the housing stock in the Lower Anacostia Waterfront/Near Southwest Planning Area is contained in multi-family buildings. In 2017, about 71 percent of the housing stock was located in buildings with 20 or more units, which is more than twice the District-wide proportion of 35.4 percent. The housing stock is a mix of buildings built in the 1960s and 1970s through urban renewal and buildings built in the last five years. About 25 percent of the area’s housing stock consists of row houses and townhomes, which is similar to the District-wide level of 26 percent. However, the proportion of single-family detached homes in the Lower Anacostia Waterfront/Near Southwest Planning Area is less than two percent, which is substantially less than the District-wide total of 11.9 percent. 3

The Southwest Waterfront Gangplank Marina currently has 87 spaces for live-aboard vessels and houseboats. Once Phase 2 of the Wharf is completed, that number is expected to increase to 94 spaces. 4

n 2017 7.5 percent of the residential units in the Lower Anacostia Waterfront/Near Southwest Planning Area were vacant, which is the same as the vacancy rate in 2000. The percentage of vacant units is slightly lower than the District as a whole. Between 2000 and 2017, homeownership rates in the area increased from 28.2 percent to 34.1 percent, while the portion of renter-occupied units decreased. 5

Income and Employment 6

According to the U.S. Census Bureau 2017 data, the median household income in 2017 for the Planning Area was $72,904, a 117 percent increase from $35,516 in 2000. Data from the District Department of Employment Services (DOES) and the Office of Planning (OP) indicates approximately 49,511 jobs were in the Lower Anacostia Waterfront/Near Southwest Planning Area in 2015. This represents 6.2 percent of the District’s job base. Job growth is expected to increase significantly to 65,698 jobs in 2025, 79,397 jobs in 2035, and 92,314 jobs in 2045. 7

Footnotes

  1. 1903.5

  2. 1904

  3. 1904.1

  4. 1904.2

  5. 1904.3

  6. 1905

  7. 1905.1

AREA ELEMENTS

Planning and Development Priorities 1

This section summarizes the opportunities and challenges residents and stakeholders prioritized during the 2006 Comprehensive Plan revision. During large community workshops, residents shared their feedback on District-wide and neighborhood specific issues. Since the 2006 community workshops, however, some of the challenges and opportunities facing the community have evolved. The following summary does not reflect new community priorities or feedback from either amendment cycle but summarizes the most important issues during the 2006 Comprehensive Plan revision. 2

Planning issues along the Anacostia Waterfront were discussed at many of the Comprehensive Plan workshops held in 2005 and 2006, particularly at meetings conducted on Capitol Hill and in Southwest DC. Priorities for this area were more explicitly stated during the previous three-year process that led to the development of the Anacostia Waterfront Framework plan. Concurrent planning programs for the Southwest Waterfront, Reservation 13, and the Near Southeast in the early 2000s involved hundreds of District residents. Since 2000, several citizens advisory groups, focus groups, and design charrettes have been convened, providing additional opportunities to identify key issues and goals. 3

The Comprehensive Plan responds to the key messages provided by the community at these meetings. These are summarized below:

The river has come to symbolize the social and economic divide in Washington, DC, separating east from west and presenting a challenge to the District’s goal of growing more inclusively. It should instead become a unifier and a source of economic opportunity for the neighborhoods on its shores. The waterfront should unite the District physically, economically, and socially. This will require redefining its image and identity, and fundamentally redirecting growth patterns in Washington, DC toward emerging waterfront areas.

  • Revitalizing the waterfront must not be done at the expense of the established communities that exist near its shoreline. Existing neighborhoods and important community institutions should be conserved and should be the focus of reinvestment during the coming years. Residents should have a say in the future of the waterfront and should be protected from displacement as change occurs. Within new neighborhoods, diverse housing choices should be provided so that a mix of household types and incomes are accommodated. Affordable housing for moderate-income families and for the District’s lowest-income residents should be part of this equation. Social and economic diversity should be respected.

The waterfront should unite the District physically, economically, and socially. This will require redefining its image and identity, and fundamentally redirecting growth patterns in Washington, DC toward emerging waterfront areas.

Footnotes

  1. 1906

  2. 1906.1

  3. 1906.2

AREA ELEMENTS

Urban development and natural resource conservation should not be mutually exclusive, but should go hand in hand. Development on the waterfront—and throughout the watershed—should be environmentally sustainable and designed to minimize negative effects on water quality and ecological resources.

  • The river provides a unique setting for monuments, memorials, and signature features that can potentially shape and redefine Washington, DC’s identity in the 21st century. This potential should not be squandered. The Potomac River is already a celebrated waterfront, but its character is distinctive in its own way. The Anacostia River should be unique, with activities that invigorate urban life. New destinations should celebrate the cultural heritage of the District and the nation. As cultural facilities are developed, the extraordinary and unheralded stories of the neighborhoods along the river should be told.

  • Many of the great open spaces and parks of the Anacostia waterfront are hard to find, underused, and neglected. These areas should be better connected to one another, and to the neighborhoods they adjoin. A variety of park environments should be created, from lively urban waterfront plazas to serene natural settings. Trails and promenades are needed to provide better access along the shoreline, and to make the waterfront more accessible to surrounding communities. New parks, recreational areas, and cultural facilities should be developed.

  • Urban development and natural resource conservation should not be mutually exclusive, but should go hand in hand. Development on the waterfront—and throughout the watershed—should be environmentally sustainable and designed to minimize negative effects on water quality and ecological resources. In some cases, plans to reduce sewage overflows into the river should be accompanied by restoration of wetlands and buried streams, and conservation of natural habitat. From a regional perspective, additional density along the waterfront is one of the best examples of smart growth. It can curb urban sprawl by channeling more housing demand back toward the District’s center. More density near the waterfront can also be used to leverage the creation of additional waterfront parks and open spaces.

  • Access between the east and west sides of the river should be improved. Human-scale crossings should be emphasized, rather than the existing freeway bridges that are almost exclusively oriented toward cars and trucks. The design of transportation infrastructure should be rethought to better serve waterfront neighborhoods, reduce barriers to waterfront access, and create gateways to waterfront parks. Bridges should be regarded as opportunities for great civic architecture. In general, transportation design should strive for a better balance between the needs of cars, and the needs of pedestrians, bicyclists, and transit users. The river itself should be seen as a transit opportunity, with water taxis and ferries providing

AREA ELEMENTS

easy access across the river and to riverfront designations like Georgetown and Alexandria, Virginia.

  • Development along the waterfront should be designed to respect the scale and integrity adjacent neighborhoods. As the District works to create distinct waterfront destinations, it should also restore and rehabilitate historic structures, protect views and sunlight, reinforce neighborhood commercial centers, and enhance the quality of life for existing residents. While densities in new waterfront communities are likely to be higher than those in adjacent communities, they should not be visually overwhelming. This is particularly true where new development sites abut fine-grained row house neighborhoods that have existed for more than a century. Planning for large-scale development should be responsive to local concerns about traffic, crowd-control, displacement, community service impacts, and changing neighborhood character. 1

Policies and Actions

AW-1 General Policies

AW-1.1 Guiding Growth and Neighborhood Conservation 2

The following general policies and actions should guide growth and neighborhood conservation decisions in the Lower Anacostia Waterfront/ Near Southwest Planning Area. These policies and actions should be considered in tandem with those in the Citywide Elements of the Comprehensive Plan. 3

Policy AW-1.1.1: Conservation of Established Waterfront Neighborhoods

Revitalize and preserve established neighborhoods in the Waterfront Planning Area while promoting infill development to provide new housing opportunities, including accessory dwelling units, to meet a range of affordability levels and housing needs. Continued investment in the existing housing stock and in established local commercial areas should be strongly encouraged. 4

Policy AW-1.1.2: New Waterfront Neighborhoods

Create new mixed-use, mixed-income neighborhoods on vacant or underused waterfront lands, particularly on large contiguous publicly owned waterfront sites. Within the Lower Anacostia Waterfront/Near Southwest Planning Area, new neighborhoods should continue to be developed at the Southwest Waterfront, Buzzard Point, Poplar Point, and Navy Yard/Capitol Riverfront. These neighborhoods should be linked to

⬚ figure District Wharf

Footnotes

  1. 1906.3

  2. 1907

  3. 1907.1

  4. 1907.2

AREA ELEMENTS

new neighborhoods upriver at Reservation 13, and Kenilworth-Parkside via trails, additional water recreation opportunities, and improved park access points along the Anacostia shoreline. A substantial amount of new housing and commercial space should be developed in these areas, reaching households of all incomes, types, sizes, and needs. Opportunities for grid interconnected neighborhood-scale energy utilities systems as part of the development of these areas should be evaluated, using renewable energy sources to provide greater environmental benefits for the community. The new waterfront neighborhoods should integrate new parks and amenities, enhance public access to the waterfront, and incorporate resilient design to mitigate flooding. 1907.31

Policy AW-1.1.3: Lower Anacostia Waterfront Infrastructure for Flood Mitigation

Identify locations of future development that are at risk of flooding to help prioritize infrastructure improvements to mitigate flooding. Encourage the inclusion of parks, open space, and other improvements around denser development that preserve or enhance the natural function of floodplains. 1907.42

Policy AW-1.1.4: Lower Anacostia Waterfront Flood Modeling

Prioritize the Lower Anacostia Waterfront area for comprehensive flood modeling of projected sea level rise and future flood hazard conditions because the area’s flooding potential s not accounted for in the current Flood Insurance Rate Maps. Local studies that are not currently accounted for in the District’s currently effective Flood Insurance Rate Maps should be used in tandem with Policy AW-R.3 (below) for encouraging climate-adaptive development. 1907.53

Policy AW-1.1.5: Flood-Resilient and Climate-Adaptive Development

Provide guidelines and promote the planning, design, construction, and management of resilient buildings in flood hazard areas within the Lower Anacostia Waterfront/Near Southwest Planning Area. Design and construct developments to be adaptive to future flood hazard conditions due to storm surge and sea level rise. 1907.64

See the Urban Design Element for additional guidance on flood resilience.

Policy AW-1.1.6: Resilient Affordable Housing

Incorporate climate resilience measures into the rehabilitation of existing and creation of new affordable housing located in the Lower Anacostia

Footnotes

  1. 1907.3

  2. 1907.4

  3. 1907.5

  4. 1907.6

A R E A E L E M E N T S

Waterfront/Near Southwest Planning Area to protect these units against current and projected future flood conditions. 1907[^.7]

Policy AW-1.1.7: Waterfront Area Commercial Development

Encourage commercial development in the waterfront area in a manner that is consistent with the Future Land Use Map. Such development should bring more retail services and choices to the Anacostia waterfront, as well as space for government and private sector activities, such as offices and hotels. A mix of high-density commercial and residential development should be focused along key corridors, particularly along Maine Avenue and M Street SE and SW, along South Capitol Street, and near the Waterfront and Navy Yard Metro stations. Maritime activities, such as cruise ship operations, should be maintained and supported as the waterfront redevelops. 1907[^.8]

Policy AW-1.1.8: Waterfront Development Amenities

Leverage new development in the Waterfront Planning Area to create amenities and benefits that serve existing and new residents. These amenities should include parks, job training and educational opportunities, new community services, and transportation and infrastructure improvements. 1907[^.9]

Policy AW-1.1.9: River Basins as a Planning Guide

Recognize and be responsive to the distinct settings and environments created by varying conditions along the shoreline. Consistent with the Anacostia Framework Plan, the river should be viewed as a series of basins, each defined by its unique physical and visual characteristics. In general, there should be a progression from a more urban environment on the lower basins (Washington Channel and the river gateway) to a more natural environment on the upper basins, such as Kingman and Heritage Islands, and the Arboretum. 1907[^.10]

Policy AW-1.1.10: Pedestrian Orientation of Waterfront Uses

Provide a high level of pedestrian and cyclist amenities along the shoreline, including informational and interpretive signs, benches and street furniture, and public art. Pedestrian and cyclist facilities should be designed to accommodate the greatest number of users with varying abilities. Where possible, trail design should support the safe use of the trail in the evenings. Continue to coordinate with federal agencies to ensure the continuity of character and wayfinding and explore additional opportunities for public access on federally owned waterfront properties. 1907[^.11]

⬚ figure

Public amenities at District Wharf

AREA ELEMENTS

Policy AW-1.1.11: Multimodal Waterfront Streets

Design streets along the waterfront to be truly multimodal, meeting the needs of pedestrians, bicyclists, and transit users, as well as motor vehicles. Safe pedestrian crossings, including overpasses and underpasses, should be provided to improve waterfront access. 1907.121

Policy AW-1.1.12: Barriers to Shoreline Access

Minimize the visual and accessibility impacts of railroad and highway infrastructure, surface parking, access roads, and industrial uses along the Anacostia River shoreline. In particular, the impacts of freeways on waterfront access should be mitigated by supporting the redesign of these facilities as tunnels or landscaped boulevards. Explore ways to mitigate the impacts of highway infrastructure on shoreline access for neighborhoods in Wards 7 and 8. Continue to increase the number of boat slips, waterside amenities, and water recreation options, such as kayaking and paddle boarding along the Anacostia shoreline. 1907.132

Policy AW 1.1.13: Southwest Ecodistrict Plan Implementation

Explore ways to jointly fund the implementation of recommendations of the Southwest Ecodistrict Plan in coordination with the National Capital Planning Commission (NCPC) to improve the aesthetic quality, identity, and pedestrian character of Near Southwest and strengthen connections between the Wharf and the National Mall. Identify and implement design guidelines for new or renovated buildings, streetscape and signage improvements, pedestrian circulation changes, and measures to mitigate the scale of the area’s monolithic buildings. Promote new residential, cultural and/or retail uses if federal properties transfer from federal use, or pursuant to any new arrangements with the NCPC, such as 99-year ground leases. 1907.143

Policy AW-1.1.14: Upgrading the Bridges

Upgrade the bridges across the Anacostia River to better manage transportation flows, ensure their safety for decades to come, facilitate pedestrian and bicycle travel across the river, and provide attractive and distinctive civic landmarks. 1907.154

Action AW-1.1.A: Anacostia Waterfront Framework Plan

Implement the recommendations of the Anacostia Waterfront Framework Plan through coordination among District and federal agencies, community stakeholders, business improvement districts (BIDs), private property

Footnotes

  1. 1907.12

  2. 1907.13

  3. 1907.14

  4. 1907.15

AREA ELEMENTS

owners, and environmental, philanthropic, and community-based organizations. 1907.161

Action AW-1.1.B: River Crossing Improvements

Implement the recommendations of the Middle Anacostia River Transportation Crossings Study that seek to improve local and regional traffic mobility. 1907.172

AW-1.2 Conserving and Enhancing Community Resources 19083

Policy AW-1.2.1: Historic and Cultural Waterfront Assets

Capitalize on the historic and cultural assets located near the Lower Waterfront, such as the Washington Navy Yard and Fort McNair. Public education about these assets should be expanded, the physical trail connections and wayfinding signage between them should be enhanced, and greater recognition of their value and importance should be achieved. 1908.14

Policy AW-1.2.2: Waterfront Cultural and Commemorative Sites

Encourage the siting of new museums, memorials, civic gathering places, and cultural attractions on or near the Anacostia River as a way to catalyze revitalization and meet the demand for additional commemorative works without further crowding the National Mall and monumental core of the District. Such acilities should make the most of their waterfront locations and create an integrated system of gracious, beautiful, and vibrant places. 1908.25

Policy AW-1.2.3: Waterfront Sports and Recreation Destinations

Continue to develop new destinations for sports, recreation, and celebration on or near the Anacostia waterfront, including as part of future development at Buzzard Point, Poplar Point, and the 11th Street Bridge Park. These destinations should be served by adequate and efficient transportation systems and infrastructure. 1908.36

Policy AW-1.2.4: Anacostia River Parks

Create a connected network of waterfront parks from Hains Point to the Sousa Bridge, and continuing through adjacent upriver Planning Areas to the Maryland border. These parks should be easily accessible to surrounding neighborhoods and accommodate the need for more local and regional recreational activities in Washington, DC. New parks should be an integral part of any new waterfront neighborhood and should showcase the remarkably diverse landscape along the Anacostia River. A variety of active and passive recreational settings should be provided. Parks should

⬚ figure

Water and Sewer Authority Building Adjacent to the SE Federal Center

⬚ figure

New parks space at the Navy Yard

Footnotes

  1. 1907.16

  2. 1907.17

  3. 1908

  4. 1908.1

  5. 1908.2

  6. 1908.3

AREA ELEMENTS

be designed to enhance resilience to flooding and incorporate natural shorelines where feasible. 1

Policy AW-1.2.5: African American Heritage

Recognize and highlight the role of Lower Anacostia Waterfront neighborhoods in the history of the District’s African-American community. Acknowledge the impact of the African American community through markers, heritage trails, and cultural facilities. 2

AW-2 Policy Focus Areas 3

The Comprehensive Plan has identified six areas in the Lower Anacostia Waterfront/Near Southwest Planning Area as Policy Focus Areas, meaning that they require a level of direction and guidance above that in the prior section of this Area Element and in the Citywide Elements (see Map 19.1 and Figure 19.3). These six areas are:

Figure 19.3:

Policy Focus Areas Within and Adjacent to Lower Anacostia Waterfront/Near Southwest 4

Within Lower Anacostia Waterfront/Near Southwest
2.1Southwest Waterfront
2.2South Capitol Street
2.3Near Southeast/Capitol Riverfront
2.4Poplar Point
2.5Southwest Neighborhood
2.6Buzzard Point
Adjacent to Anacostia Waterfront
1Pennsylvania Avenue Corridor/Capitol Hill
2Historic Anacostia
3Barry Farm/Hillsdale/Stanton
4St. Elizabeths Hospital
5Pennsylvania Ave SE Corridor (east of the River)
  • Southwest Waterfront, home of the Wharf development and the historic Washington Fish Market; South Capitol Street, a major axis to the U.S. Capitol and Anacostia River; Near Southeast/Capitol Riverfront, home of the Navy Yard, Nationals Park, acres of waterfront parks, and thousands of new residential units; Poplar Point, a large and prominent site adjacent to Anacostia Park on the river’s eastern edge that is currently under federal ownership;

  • Southwest neighborhood, an established and diverse residential community located in between the Wharf and Buzzard Point; and

  • Buzzard Point, a traditionally industrial area that is currently emerging as a mixed-use waterfront neighborhood and the home of the Audi Field soccer stadium. 5

Footnotes

  1. 1908.4

  2. 1908.5

  3. 1909

  4. 1909.2

  5. 1909.1

AREA ELEMENTS

Map 19.1:

Lower Anacostia Waterfront/Near Southwest Policy Focus Areas 1

⬚ figure

Footnotes

  1. 1909.3

AREA ELEMENTS

⬚ figure

⬚ figure

New development and recreation space at the Wharf

AW-2.1 Southwest Waterfront 1

The The Southwest Waterfront is a 45-acre area along the Washington Channel, stretching three-quarters of a mile along Maine Avenue from the Tidal Basin to Fort McNair. The area includes the Washington Fish Market, portions of East Potomac Park, a boating/residential community at Gangplank Marina, and the Wharf, a mixed-use development on the Southwest Waterfront. Nearby uses include the Arena Stage, several churches, office buildings, and apartments. Major points of access include 4th, 6th, 7th, and 9th Streets SW, M Street SW, and the L’Enfant Plaza and Waterfront Metro stations. 2

Although it is relatively accessible and familiar to residents of Southwest, the Southwest Waterfront had not been the active, public, civic space it could be. Historically, roads and parking lots accounted for over 40 percent of the area, with multiple lanes of traffic between the shoreline and adjacent residential areas. L’Enfant Plaza and the National Mall are just a few blocks away. Until recently, there were no clear means of pedestrian access from these heavily visited areas to the shoreline. With much of the Southwest Waterfront in public ownership, the District had a unique opportunity to create a place that served both as an extension of the adjacent neighborhood and a new regional destination. 3

The District completed the Southwest Waterfront Development Plan in 2003, adopting short- and mid-term actions to transform the area. The Southwest Waterfront Development Plan called for eliminating Water Street and improving Maine Avenue as a pedestrian-friendly urban street. The elimination of Water Street and replacement of surface parking with structured parking has increased available public space and developable land and has allowed for the creation of new parks, plazas, and mixed-use development. Active ground floor uses, such as retail stores, restaurants, and performance venues, are now making this area an active and animated urban waterfront. 4

Construction of the Wharf at the Southwest Waterfront began in 2014. The first phase of development was delivered in 2017 and includes a mix of housing, office, retail, hotel, and concert venues, as well as improved public waterfront access, recreational piers, and green space. Following the recommendations from the previous planning effort and extensive community input, the Wharf will include over three million square feet of mixed-use development at full build-out. The mix of market rate and affordable residential units and commercial development, with retail, restaurants, and entertainment offerings, has created a vibrant new waterfront destination and regional attraction. 5

The existing fish market has been retained in its present location and refurbished, with its low-scale character maintained. In addition, the

Footnotes

  1. 1910

  2. 1910.1

  3. 1910.2

  4. 1910.3

  5. 1910.4

AREA ELEMENTS

Wharf includes expanded piers, additional boat slips, and several acres of waterfront parks and a promenade. 1910.51

The District has worked with federal and local partners to improve pedestrian access to the waterfront via the Banneker Overlook at 10th Street SW. The area also has seen the development of new museums in this vicinity further north, close to L’Enfant Plaza, and is benefitting from new water taxi service, transit improvements, and landscaping. 1910.62

Ongoing plans for the Southwest Waterfront should be implemented in a way that continues to recognize the broader context of the Southwest neighborhood and its connection to the National Mall. 1910.73

Policy AW-2.1.1: Mixed Use Development

Support the redevelopment of the Southwest Waterfront with medium- to high-density housing, commercial and cultural uses, and improved open space and parking. The development should be designed to make the most of the waterfront location, preserving views and enhancing access to and along the shoreline. 1910.84

Policy AW-2.1.2: New Public Spaces and Open Space

Create new public spaces and plazas at the Southwest waterfront, including an expanded public promenade at the water’s edge. Public piers should extend from each of the major terminating streets, providing views and public access to the water. 1910.95

Policy AW-2.1.3: Connecting to the Southwest Waterfront

Continue to enhance pedestrian connections from the Southwest neighborhood, Waterfront Metro station, and L’Enfant Plaza area to the Wharf by creating new public spaces and trails, and providing safer pedestrian crossings across Maine Avenue SW. 1910.106

Policy AW-2.1.4: Maine Avenue SW

Continue to transform Maine Avenue SW into a landscaped urban street that has direct access to waterfront uses, provides a pedestrian-friendly street environment, and accommodates multiple modes of travel (including bicycles). Future developments on the north side of Maine Avenue should be designed to support a pedestrian-friendly environment. 1910.117

Policy AW-2.1.5: Washington Channel Maritime Activities

Reorganize the Washington Channel’s maritime activities, including cruise ship berths and marinas, to provide more appropriate relationships to landside uses and opportunities for water taxis, ferries, and other forms of water transportation. In implementing this policy, cruise ship operations should be retained and supported, recognizing their economic benefits to the District and their recreational and cultural value for residents and visitors. 1910.128

Footnotes

  1. 1910.5

  2. 1910.6

  3. 1910.7

  4. 1910.8

  5. 1910.9

  6. 1910.10

  7. 1910.11

  8. 1910.12

AREA ELEMENTS

⬚ figure South Capitol Street Bridge

Action AW-2.1.A: Southwest Waterfront Development Plan

Implement the 2003 Southwest Waterfront Development Plan. 1

Action AW-2.1.B: Long-Term Improvements

Study the feasibility of the long-term improvements identified in the Southwest Waterfront Plan, such as a Hains Point Canal (in East Potomac Park), relocation of cruise lines and their infrastructure, a new Yellow Line Metro station at the waterfront, and construction of a pedestrian/bicycle bridge across the channel near the Case Bridge. 2

AW-2.2: South Capitol Street 3

South Capitol Street is one of the District’s four principal axes and marks the division between the District’s southeast and southwest quadrants. It is an important part of the regional highway system, with traffic volumes of approximately 52,0004 cars per day. The street provides many residents and visitors with their first view of the U.S. Capitol building and is an important gateway into Central Washington, DC. 5

This symbolic role contrasts with the current state of the corridor. Awkwardly shaped properties, some vacant and others barricaded from public access, front the street between the U.S. Capitol and I-395. Elevated railroad tracks and freeway ramps obstruct vistas and the Capitol Power Plant is an additional presence. South of I-395, the street enters into a mix of new residential high-rise buildings, historic single-family homes, commercial uses, Nationals Park, and parking lots. South of the Frederick Douglass Bridge, these give way to an eclectic mix of industrial and utility uses along the shoreline, including a power plant. 6

The transportation infrastructure in the area also creates a significant barrier to connectivity to surrounding areas. Both South Capitol Street and the Frederick Douglass Bridge need repair. South Capitol Street has no bike lanes, and sidewalks are minimal and unshaded. High-speed traffic and the lack of signalized intersections have been a deterrent to increasing active and safe bike and pedestrian access These issues will be addressed as part of the South Capitol Street Corridor Project currently underway. This major capital project, extending across the Anacostia River, will make major streetscape improvements to South Capitol Street and create a new Frederick Douglass Memorial Bridge. This project represents the largest capital project that the District Department of Transportation (DDOT) has ever undertaken. 7

Since the mid-1990s, the District has been working with its federal partners to transform South Capitol Street into a grand urban boulevard with a mix of land uses and commemorative works that are more fitting of its role as a gateway to the national capital. Such a vision was first laid out in the 1997 NCPC Legacy Plan and later refined by the 2003 South Capitol Urban

Footnotes

  1. 1910.13

  2. 1910.14

  3. 1911

  4. 52,000

  5. 1911.1

  6. 1911.2

  7. 1911.3

AREA ELEMENTS

Design Study. A task force including federal and District representatives was convened in 2004 to develop design options and an open space framework for the corridor. 19111

Over the coming years, South Capitol Street will continue to be transformed into a waterfront gateway with new mixed-use development, green space, broad sidewalks, and a beautiful new and realigned Frederick Douglass Memorial Bridge. High-density office, housing, and retail uses are envisioned along the corridor between I-395 and the shoreline. Nationals Park has become the centerpiece of a new entertainment district that includes cultural attractions, retail, restaurants, row houses and high-density housing in the Capitol Riverfront/Navy Yard area. Near the foot of the reconstructed Frederick Douglass Bridge, an oval traffic rotary is planned to create a green commons for a future national memorial. Further south in Buzzard Point, the opening of Audi Field, the new stadium for the District’s professional soccer team, is leading the transformation of this formerly industrial land into a new waterfront neighborhood with multiple mixed-use residential and commercial development planned or under construction. 19112

See the Buzzard Point Policy Focus Area for further guidance.

As the design and construction of the South Capitol Street Corridor Project continues into the coming years, through additional agency coordination this major infrastructure investment can achieve other District goals for the Lower Anacostia Waterfront Area. Plans will need to focus on the Buzzard Point waterfront, addressing issues such as land use compatibility transportation and access, urban design, and opportunities for new park and open space amenities. The Buzzard Point Vision Framework and Design Review Guide, completed by OP in 2017, provides urban design-based guidance to shape future public investments and private mixed-use development as part of Buzzard Point’s transformation into a new waterfront community. The framework supports making South Capitol Street more pedestrian- and bike-friendly to and from Buzzard Point and includes recommendations to inform the design of the new Oval Park being created through the South Capitol Street Corridor Project. Plans for this area should improve connections between Southwest and the waterfront and retain and improve the established low-scale residential areas on the west side of South Capitol Street. 19113

Policy AW-2.2.1: South Capitol Street Urban Boulevard

Transform South Capitol Street into a great urban boulevard and walking street, befitting its role as a gateway to the U.S. Capitol and a major Anacostia River crossing. Development along the street should include a mix of federal, District, and private uses. 19114

Over the coming years, South Capitol Street will continue to be transformed into a waterfront gateway with new mixed-use development, green space, broad sidewalks, and a beautiful new and realigned Frederick Douglass Memorial Bridge.

Footnotes

  1. 1911.4

  2. 1911.5

  3. 1911.6

  4. 1911.7

A R E A E L E M E N T S

⬚ figure

Ballpark Entertainment District

Policy AW-2.2.2: Ballpark Entertainment District and Capitol Riverfront

Leverage the success of Nationals Park and Audi Field (the new professional soccer stadium), drawing residents, workers, and visitors to the Capitol Riverfront/Navy Yard area to catalyze additional development of the South Capitol Street corridor with retail, high-density residential, entertainment, and commercial uses. 1911.81

Policy AW-2.2.3: South Capitol Commemorative and Civic Uses

Incorporate ceremonial uses, such as memorials, plazas, monuments, museums, and other commemorative works, along the South Capitol Street corridor. The revitalized street provides a significant opportunity to expand civic and cultural facilities beyond the confines of the monumental core. 1911.92

Policy AW-2.2.4: South Capitol Street Transit Improvements

Promote multimodal transportation improvements along the South Capitol Corridor, including transit options like streetcar or bus rapid transit, and improve pedestrian connections to the Navy Yard and Waterfront Metro stations. 1911.103

Policy AW-2.2.5: South Capitol Open Space

Create additional open space in the South Capitol Street corridor, including an oval traffic rotary and South Capitol commons, as well as new waterfront parks and plazas along the Anacostia shoreline. 1911.114

Policy AW-2.2.6: South Capitol Neighborhood Buffers

The established communities adjacent to the South Capitol Street corridor, including the James Creek, Syphax Gardens, and Greenleaf Gardens housing developments and adjacent residential areas, shall be buffered from adverse impacts associated with increased development capacity and traffic relating to stadium area development. Avoid displacing these communities because they are an important part of Washington, DC’s fabric and provide affordable housing resources for the Southwest community. 1911.125

Action AW-2.2.A: Coordination with Federal Agencies

Continue to coordinate with the NCPC, the NPS, and other federal agencies on implementing the South Capitol Street Corridor Project. 1911.136

Action AW-2.2.B: South Capitol Gateway

Create a civic or commemorative feature of national significance at the north end of the Frederick Douglass Bridge to celebrate this location as a riverfront and District gateway. 1911.147

Action AW-2.2.C: South Capitol Transportation Improvements

Continue efforts to improve traffic flows and accommodate additional travel modes along South Capitol Street, including completion of the South Capitol

Footnotes

  1. 1911.8

  2. 1911.9

  3. 1911.10

  4. 1911.11

  5. 1911.12

  6. 1911.13

  7. 1911.14

AREA ELEMENTS

Environmental Impact Statement and the reconstruction of the Frederick Douglass Memorial Bridge and related access points. 1911.151

AW-2.3 Near Southeast/Capitol Riverfront 2

Near Southeast/Capitol Riverfront includes the triangular area between I-695 and the Southeast Boulevard SE, South Capitol Street, and the Anacostia River. This 350-acre area has played an important role in the history of Washington, DC; itsnitial settlement even predates the creation of the District. In the 19th century, this was a community where residential streets came down to the river’s edge, a place teeming with life and maritime activity. Near Southeast/Capitol Riverfront experienced substantial disinvestment during the second half of the 20th century, which led to social and economic challenges. 1912.13

Over the last 15 years, District and federal initiatives have transformed Near Southeast/Capitol Riverfront into a dynamic waterfront neighborhood and workplace. These initiatives have included the relocation of 5,000 federal employees back to the Washington Navy Yard, the redevelopment of the Arthur Capper Carrollsburg public housing development through the federal HOPE VI Program, construction of a new headquarters for the U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT), and the reconfiguration of the 55-acre Southeast Federal Center to allow new housing, offices, and waterfront parkland. Significant private and public investment has followed, including the construction of new office buildings, hotels, and housing, as well as Nationals Park. Signature new parks such as Yards Park, an award-winning four-acre waterfront park, are drawing thousands of visitors weekly. 1912.24

Revitalization of the Near Southeast/Capitol Riverfront has been one of the cornerstones of the AWI. A 2003 AWI Urban Design Plan for the area provides a framework for its redevelopment. While many of the recommendations from the 2003 AWI Plan have been completed, future development should continue to create mixed-income housing opportunities, provide pedestrian-friendly streets, enhance neighborhood resilience to flooding and other climate threats, and establish great public spaces both on the waterfront and in the adjacent neighborhood. One of AWI’s most important principles is to preserve existing low-income housing units in the area while adding thousands of units of new market rate and affordable housing. 1912.35

The Near Southeast Urban Design Plan, as part of the AWI, envisioned M Street SE as a great urban boulevard with high-density offices and apartments activated by ground floor retail space, restaurants, and civic uses. It calls for the extension of New Jersey Avenue and other streets in the District grid to the waterfront, terminating at a new shoreline park and waterfront promenade, which has been completed as Yards Park. The Near

⬚ figure

Capitol Riverfront

Footnotes

  1. 1911.15

  2. 1912

  3. 1912.1

  4. 1912.2

  5. 1912.3

AREA ELEMENTS

As of 2017, Capitol Riverfront is now home to over 6,000 new residential units, 6.2 million square feet of office space, and 34,000 daytime employees. Over 10 acres of parks and 400,000 square feet of retail space have also been developed.

Southeast Urban Design Plan calls for the preservation of important historic resources and the respectful integration of future developments with those of historic resources. These include the majority of the Navy Yard, which is now designated as historic, and the historic street grid and network of park reservations laid out by Pierre L’Enfant. 1912.4

Several subareas were identified by the Near Southeast Urban Design Plan, with land use and urban design goals set forth for each. These areas are South Capitol Gateway, Canal Blocks, Capper Carrollsburg, the Marine Barracks area, the 8th Street SE historic area, East M Street, the Navy Yard, the Southeast Federal Center, and the DC Water pump station area. Strategies to better connect and integrate these areas are provided. The Near Southeast Plan laid out a street and block plan for the entire area, as well as a trail system and open space framework. Guidelines for specific sites, such as Florida Rock (near the foot of South Capitol) and Maritime Plaza (the former Washington Gas site), were provided to ensure that planned development fit into the framework for the overall area. 1912.5

The Near Southeast Urban Design Plan envisioned a net increase of 4,200 housing units, 13.6 million square feet of office space, and 705,000 square feet of retail area within the area’s boundaries. The Near Southeast Urban Design Plan also identified more than 40 acres of new parks and open space. Since the launch of the AWI and completion of the Near Southeast Urban Design Plan, the Capitol Riverfront area largely fulfilled the vision of these plans. As of 2017, Capitol Riverfront is now home to over 6,000 new residential units, 6.2 million square feet of office space, and 34,000 daytime employees. Over 10 acres of parks and 400,000 square feet of retail space have also been developed. Additional residential buildings, retail, and other amenities are currently planned or under construction. Collaborative planning between the District, the federal government, and the private sector has been ongoing since the Near Southeast Plan was completed and will continue during the years ahead. 1912.6

Policy AW-2.3.1: Restoring the Urban Pattern of the Near Southeast/Capitol Riverfront

Facilitate redevelopment of Near Southeast/Capitol Riverfront by breaking down large contiguously owned government properties into individual development parcels in scale with the traditional urban street grid. Encourage high-density mixed-use development and open space on newly configured parcels, with new buildings designed and oriented to make the most of their waterfront or near-waterfront settings. 1912.7

Policy AW-2.3.2: Near Southeast/Capitol Riverfront Shoreline Access

Improve shoreline access and movement to and through Near Southeast/ Capitol Riverfront by eliminating real and perceived barriers, improving public space and street corridors, reducing the amount of land occupied by

surface parking and industrial uses, and encouraging new land uses that maximize public activity near the waterfront. Encourage resilient shoreline design that is adaptive to flooding from storm surge and sea level rise and implement natural shorelines where possible. 1

Policy AW-2.3.3: Near Southeast/Capitol Riverfront Housing Opportunities

Significantly increase residential land uses in Near Southeast/Capitol Riverfront, particularly in the Southeast Federal Center, Capper Carrollsburg, Canal Blocks, and South Capitol Gateway areas. Consistent with the existing zoning for these areas, mixed-use development that includes housing and commercial uses should be strongly encouraged. The mix of housing should accommodate residents of all incomes and household types. 2

Policy AW-2.3.4: M Street SE

Transform M Street SE into an attractive pedestrian-oriented thoroughfare, lined with retail shops and services, with upper-story office, hotels, and residential uses. The street itself should be designed as a multimodal boulevard, accommodating pedestrians, bicycles, and transit vehicles as well as cars. It should strengthen connections between Near Southeast/Capitol Riverfront, Southwest, and Capitol Hill. 3

Policy AW-2.3.5: Restoration of the L’Enfant Plan in Near Southeast/ Capitol Riverfront

Restore key elements of the original L’Enfant Plan within Near Southeast/ Capitol Riverfront, including the District street grid, the extension of New Jersey Avenue SE and 3rd and 4th Streets SE to the waterfront, and the possible replacement of the Southeast/Southwest Freeway with an at-grade boulevard (Virginia Avenue SE). Amend the L’Enfant Plan designation as needed to prevent further intrusion into the New Jersey Avenue vista of the Capitol Dome or other intended street views. 4

Policy AW-2.3.6: Near Southeast/Capitol Riverfront Urban Amenities

Leverage new and existing developments in the Near Southeast/Capitol Riverfront area to create amenities, such as parks, trails, child-care facilities, civic uses, and retail space, that serve the area’s residents and workforce. Encourage the redesign of Virginia Avenue Park into a more inviting park and green space that supports a wide range of users of all ages and abilities. 5

Policy AW-2.3.7: Near Southeast/Capitol Riverfront Historic Identity

Celebrate the Near Southeast/Capitol Riverfront’s history and integrate important historic and cultural resources. These resources include the Navy Yard; the future 11th Street Bridge Park; local educational, religious, and

⬚ figure

Mixed income housing at Capitol Quarters

Footnotes

  1. 1912.8

  2. 1912.9

  3. 1912.10

  4. 1912.11

  5. 1912.12

A R E A E L E M E N T S

cultural institutions; and historic landmarks, including industrial and utility buildings like the District Pumping Station. 1912.131

Policy AW-2.3.8: Revitalization of Lower 8th Street SE

Support new development and active ground floor uses in the area around 8th Street SE, south of Virginia Avenue SE, to create greater retail and residential opportunities that reinvigorate the area. Increased development will improve linkages with areas north and west, benefit workers at the Navy Yard and existing businesses along Barracks Row and support the redesign of Virginia Avenue Park. The Planned Unit Development (PUD) process should be used to allow for additional building heights on portions of the lower 8th Street SE corridor while not encroaching on the existing viewshed of the historic Latrobe Gate of the Navy Yard. Prioritize supporting ways to allow existing businesses to remain at potential ground floor uses in new developments. 1912.142

Policy AW-2.3.9: Development of Boathouse Row

Study ways to enhance Boathouse Row, a historic Black boating area located between the 11th Street Bridge and the CSX freight rail bridge per the guiding principles outlined in the 2009 Boathouse Row Planning Study. Increase access to water recreation and use resilient design features to mitigate flooding and sea level rise. This area has the potential to be further developed as a recreational area with facilities and amenities to support wider community use. Support direct pedestrian and bike connections between nearby neighborhoods and the waterfront, as included in the Southeast Boulevard Project plans. 1912.153

Action AW-2.3.A: Zoning Incentives

Continue to incentivize residential uses within Near Southeast areas, such as the Capitol Gateway, the former Southeast Federal Center, and downtown zones within the Lower Anacostia/Near Southeast Planning Area. Expand and intensify zoning incentives that promote affordable housing in these areas. 1912.164

Action AW-2.3.B: Boathouse Row Recreational Uses

Ensure that zoning and land use guidance are adopted to facilitate the use of Boathouse Row as a recreational and community resource. Recreational improvements also should include equipment or design features that are appropriate for persons of all ages and physical abilities. 1912.175

AW-2.4 Poplar Point 19136

Poplar Point encompasses the area on the east side of the Anacostia River bounded by South Capitol Street SW, I-295, and the 11th Street Bridge. The area contains U.S. Park Police and NPS facilities, the former Architect of the Capitol (AOC) nurseries, a 700-space Metro parking garage, private

Footnotes

  1. 1912.13

  2. 1912.14

  3. 1912.15

  4. 1912.16

  5. 1912.17

  6. 1913

A R E A E L E M E N T S

land along Howard Road, a DC Water pump station, and more than 60 acres of managed meadows. The point was created through the filling of tidal mudflats in the 1910s and has been used for tree nurseries and federal and District maintenance activities for almost a century. Construction of freeways in the 1950s and 1960s left Poplar Point disconnected from the neighborhoods around it. 1913.11

Poplar Point remains isolated today and is underused as a great waterfront open space. It is completely unknown to visitors and even most District residents. Nearly half the site is fenced off from public access, and much of the remainder is covered by freeway ramps and bridge approaches. 1913.22

In 2003, the AWI called for the site’s improvement as a green gateway to the Anacostia River Park network. Today, Poplar Point has the potential to be the future crown jewel in a necklace of great parks extending from Kenilworth Aquatic Gardens on the north to the mouth of the Anacostia River on the south. Key features of the vision for this park include restored wetlands, a daylighted Stickfoot Creek, and new cultural and entertainment facilities. Poplar Point has also been identified by the NCPC as a potential site for new monuments, commemorative works, and museums 1913.33

The Poplar Point Target Area Plan recommended creating a new roadway and circulation pattern and developing a mixed-use neighborhood and a 70-acre waterfront park. Medium- to high-density housing should be provided within this neighborhood, with new development used to leverage the recreational and environmental improvements that will make this a great public place for all Washingtonians in the future. In the years since the AWI Plan, there has been increased understanding of the site’s flood risk. Anticipated sea level rise and loodplain effects will inform development alternatives and the ultimate design of Poplar Point. 1913.44

The new Poplar Point Park and neighborhood will be well connected to the nearby Anacostia Metro station, multiple Metrobus lines, and new modes of transit, including water taxis, shuttles, and the DC Circulators. Connections to the historic neighborhoods east of I-295 will be strengthened by upgrading Howard Road SE, W Street SE, and Good Hope Road SE and improving pedestrian and bicycle access along these gateways. Redevelopment of Poplar Point is intended to coincide with and bolster parallel initiatives to revitalize Historic Anacostia, redevelop the St. Elizabeths Hospital Campus, and rebuild Barry Farm. 1913.55

Notable skyline features such as the Washington Monument and U.S. Capitol are visible from much of Poplar Point. The site also affords views of the tree-lined ridge above Historic Anacostia. Future structures on the site should preserve these important views and make the most of the point’s spectacular physical setting. Development should include a mix of uses and densities that is compatible with and complementary to adjacent

Footnotes

  1. 1913.1

  2. 1913.2

  3. 1913.3

  4. 1913.4

  5. 1913.5

AREA ELEMENTS

neighborhoods, breaking development into identifiable, distinctive parts rather than creating superblocks. 1913.61

Policy AW-2.4.1: Poplar Point Park

Create a great urban park at Poplar Point that serves neighborhoods across Washington, DC and includes a variety of active and passive recreation areas. The park should be designed to serve users of all abilities, including children, youth, families, and older adults. 1913.72

Policy AW-2.4.2: Environmental Restoration at Poplar Point

Restore portions of the natural environment at Poplar Point, especially the wetlands and Stickfoot Creek. The creek should be daylighted and restored as a natural habitat area. 1913.83

Policy AW-2.4.3: Poplar Point Mixed Use Neighborhood

CCreate a new transit-oriented mixed-use neighborhood oriented around the Poplar Point Park and linked to the Anacostia and Congress Heights Metro stations. The neighborhood should include a significant component of affordable housing, as well as retail and civic uses that benefit the adjacent communities east of I-295. To minimize the loss of useable open space, development should use the land recovered after the realignment and reconstruction of the Frederick Douglass Bridge. 1913.94

Policy AW-2.4.4: Poplar Point Cultural Facilities

Support the development of regional cultural facilities at Poplar Point, such as museums, memorial sites, gardens, nature centers, amphitheaters, and public gathering places. 1913.105

Policy AW-2.4.5: Scale of Development at Poplar Point

Provide a scale and pattern of development at Poplar Point that recognizes the area’s proximity to a Metro station and other major surface arterials. The area is physically separated from surrounding neighborhoods and, therefore, may accommodate buildings and site plans that are unlike but compatible with the fine-grained pattern found in nearby Historic Anacostia. Development should be pedestrian-oriented and include active ground floor uses. The massing, height, and bulk of buildings and related features, such as parking, also should respect adjacent park uses and environmentally sensitive areas. 1913.116

Policy AW-2.4.6: Poplar Point Vista and View Preservation

Ensure that the design of Poplar Point capitalizes on significant views to the river and U.S. Capitol. The New Jersey Avenue SE axis is particularly important because it provides a clear line of sight to the Capitol dome from Poplar Point’s prominent river bend. 1913.127

Footnotes

  1. 1913.6

  2. 1913.7

  3. 1913.8

  4. 1913.9

  5. 1913.10

  6. 1913.11

  7. 1913.12

AREA ELEMENTS

Policy AW-2.4.7: Poplar Point as an Economic Catalyst

Use development at Poplar Point to bring economic development opportunities to adjacent neighborhoods, particularly Barry Farm and Historic Anacostia. Activities at Poplar Point should foster the success of existing businesses in Historic Anacostia, provide job opportunities, and create cultural, educational, and institutional uses that benefit communities in Wards 7 and 8. 1913.13

Policy AW-2.4.8: Access Improvements to Poplar Point

Improve access to Poplar Point by redesigning the road system on the site’s perimeter; rebuilding the Frederick Douglass (South Capitol) Bridge; converting the Anacostia Metro station to a multimodal terminal; adding provisions for pedestrians and bicycles along Howard Road SE, W Street SE, and Good Hope Road SE; and providing water taxi service on the Anacostia River. 1913.14

Action AW-2.4.A: Poplar Point Planning Complete a future analysis for Poplar Point to define the site design, circulation, infrastructure, land use program, park, and urban design to guide future development and to facilitate the land transfer from the federal government to the District. 1913.15

AW-2.5 Southwest Neighborhood 1

For nearly 50 years, the Southwest neighborhood has been a quiet, tucked away neighborhood of almost 12,000 residents. The product of urban renewal interventions of the 1950s and 1960s, the predominantly residential enclave is unlike any other in Washington, DC. Its modernist architecture, large swaths of green open space, and variety of residential development are sources of pride for many Southwest residents. Major changes have taken shape in Southwest, such as the removal of Waterside Mall to allow for the reopening of 4th Street SW between I and M Streets SW and the addition of new offices, retail, and residential developments to form a town center. As the surrounding waterfront areas around Southwest continue to grow, the established core of the Southwest neighborhood continues to experience mounting development pressure. 1914.1

Population projections for Southwest indicate that the population will increase by almost 3,000 residents, bringing the total closer to 15,000 residents in Southwest by 2023. Southwest residents have indicated a desire to maintain the area’s historic integrity of inclusion for all kinds of families and household incomes. The neighborhood contains an abundance of District and federally owned parcels, many of which are currently underused or underdeveloped with low-scale buildings and surface parking lots clustered on M Street near South Capitol Street. As technology changes

Footnotes

  1. 1914

AREA ELEMENTS

⬚ figure Southwest Commercial District

⬚ figure Southwest Farmers Market

The Southwest Neighborhood Plan is a community-based strategy developed for the purpose of creating an urban design, land use, and neighborhood preservation framework to enhance parks and pedestrian and street connections, integrate community amenities, enhance transportation choices, and guide the future growth of the Southwest neighborhood.

and service needs grow and evolve, the District is interested in optimizing its properties, as well as finding opportunities to use these assets to best serve residents and contribute to the community through improved design and function. Additionally, the District of Columbia Housing Authority (DCHA) intends to redevelop the Greenleaf public housing complex, located on four large parcels straddling both sides of M Street SW near the Waterfront Metro station, into a mixed-income housing development. 1914.21

All of these changes and existing opportunity areas served as a catalyst for studying and analyzing the Southwest neighborhood through a Small Area Plan, which was initiated in 2013 and approved by the D.C. Council in 2015. The Southwest Neighborhood Plan supplements the Comprehensive Plan by providing more detailed planning and land use guidance at the block level. The Southwest Neighborhood Plan focused on a study area that extended from South Capitol Street to the east, Maine Avenue SW to the west, P Street SW to the south, and the I-395 Freeway to the north. The Southwest Neighborhood Plan is a community-based strategy developed for the purpose of creating an urban design, land use, and neighborhood preservation framework to enhance parks and pedestrian and street connections, integrate community amenities, enhance transportation choices, and guide the future growth of the Southwest neighborhood. In addition, the Southwest Neighborhood Plan provides land use guidance for the Future Land Use Map. The Southwest Neighborhood Plan aims to provide Southwest residents and property owners with assurances of what future development may look like, including recommendations to preserve and enhance existing assets and ensure that Southwest retains social, economic, and racial diversity. The following policies have been developed to reinforce the outcomes of the Southwest Neighborhood Plan. 1914.32

Policy AW-2.5.1: 4th Street SW as a Thriving Town Center

Develop 4th Street SW as a thriving town center and commercial heart of the community with a range of neighborhood-serving retail options, an active street atmosphere, high-quality public realm, new development, and accessible transit options. Support the redevelopment of the remaining parcels of land at the Waterfront Metro station (formally the Waterside Mall site) with residential, office, and local-serving retail uses. 4th Street SW should serve as a retail anchor for the surrounding Southwest community and improve aesthetics, circulation, and connectivity. 1914.43

Policy AW-2.5.2: Southwest Neighborhood Plan

Implement the policies and recommendations of the Southwest Neighborhood Plan. Use the Southwest Neighborhood Plan as a framework for guiding public investment and evaluating new development per plan recommendations and design guidelines. 1914.54

Footnotes

  1. 1914.2

  2. 1914.3

  3. 1914.4

  4. 1914.5

A R E A E L E M E N T S

Policy AW-2.5.3: Greenleaf Public Housing Redevelopment

Promote the redevelopment of the Greenleaf public housing complex, composed of four sites on both the north and south sides of M Street SW between 3rd and Delaware Streets SW, to benefit existing Greenleaf residents and realize a well-designed mixed-income community. Explore the potential for District-controlled properties in the vicinity to support a build-first strategy to keep Greenleaf residents within the Southwest neighborhood. Support one-for-one replacement of all existing public housing units on site. 1914.6

Policy AW-2.5.4: An Equitable and Inclusive Southwest Neighborhood

Ensure that Southwest remains an exemplary model of equity and inclusion for all races, ages, abilities, and income levels and enhances all residents’ well-being. Support and encourage affordable and equitable access to housing with a range of housing types to support families, older adults, single persons, persons with disabilities, and artists. Encourage more inclusive options for transit and more accessible public realm design. 1914.7

Policy AW-2.5.5: Southwest Historic Preservation

Support and promote Southwest’s unique legacy of modernist mid-20thcentury architecture, landscape architecture, and urban design. Continue the community-led process to garner support for preserving modernist properties through a variety of ways, such as individual landmarks. 1914.8

Policy AW-2.5.6 Southwest Greenspaces and Parks

Strike a balance between nature and the built environment and retain the green character of Southwest as it continues to grow. Encourage additional capital investments, resilient design enhancements, and outstanding programming at Southwest parks: Lansburgh, Randall, King Greenleaf, Southwest Duck Pond, and Library Park. The needs of both school-age children and older adults aging in place should be considered in future designs for all parks, green spaces, and recreational programming. Parks and green spaces should be beautiful and functional while contributing to stormwater management and flood mitigation. 1914.9

Policy AW-2.5.7: Southwest Sustainability and Resilience

Encourage the adoption of sustainability measures to support outstanding environmental performance, energy efficiency, stormwater management, and healthy living. New developments in Southwest that are vulnerable to flooding and future sea level rise should incorporate flood protection in building and site designs. 1914.10

AREA ELEMENTS

Policy AW-2.5.8: Southwest Arts and Culture

Grow and support Southwest as a premier arts and cultural destination, leveraging existing institutions, such as Arena Stage and the Anthem concert venue to attract new creative uses in both temporary and permanent locations and to reinforce I Street SW as a cultural corridor. 1914.111

Policy AW-2.5.9: Southwest District-Owned Parcels

Redevelop outdated public facilities and underused publicly owned land for development that delivers high-quality design and community benefits. These District properties include key sites adjacent to M Street SW and Half Street SW and are the current locations of the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV), Fire and Emergency Medical Services (FEMS), and the Metropolitan Police Department (MPD). Future developments at these sites should consider public-private opportunities for joint development and co-location of District government uses. Land use changes recommended in the Small Area Plan should be achieved through the PUD process and conform to the design guidelines, affordable housing goals, and broader recommendations of the Small Area Plan. 1914.122

Policy AW-2.5.10: Southwest Multimodal Transportation Options

Support an active and growing Southwest community by accommodating multiple transportation modes, increasing mobility and safety within the community, and providing ease of access to adjacent neighborhoods and the waterfront. Improve pedestrian and bike crossings through enhanced signage and redesigned crosswalks. Continue to expand and link bicycle routes. Where feasible (as detailed in the Small Area Plan), reinstate lost connections of the L'Enfant Plan. 1914.133

Policy AW-2.5.11: Affordable and Family-Sized Housing in Southwest

Promote a mix of affordable and market rate residential units that better serve community needs in Southwest. Prioritize the creation of a greater number of affordable units than the Inclusionary Zoning requirement or more family-sized units as part of a community benefits agreement for any PUDs and by targets on District-controlled sites that exceed overarching affordable housing requirements. 1914.144

Action AW-2.5.A: Greenleaf PUD

Support the redevelopment of DCHA-controlled Greenleaf public housing parcels consistent with the increased density of Future Land Use Map designations as outlined in the Southwest Neighborhood Plan if development is achieved through a PUD that meets the following criteria:

  • Conforms to the design guidelines for each parcel as outlined in the Small Area Plan;

Footnotes

  1. 1914.11

  2. 1914.12

  3. 1914.13

  4. 1914.14

AREA ELEMENTS

  • Provides replacement housing for all the existing public units within the development or the immediate Southwest neighborhood;
  • Encourages a mixed-income community through the inclusion of market rate units and, to the extent practicable, moderate-income housing; and
  • Achieves a significant level of green design in terms of both site and building design to contribute to healthy living and improved environmental performance. 1914.151

Action AW- 2.5.B: Lansburgh Park

Redesign Lansburgh Park to become a safer, more accessible central park for the Southwest community. Create a signature design and beautiful park space that serves as a centerpiece for redevelopment of surrounding properties like the Greenleaf complex and the Southwest government cluster. Any future design also should enhance community resilience by helping to address and manage flooding issues. 1914.162

Action AW-2.5.C: Storage Facility at Jefferson Middle School Academy

Complete a feasibility study to determine the need for the existing storage facility located adjacent to the Jefferson Middle School Academy. Study the option of removing the storage facility to expand the recreation space or repurposing the building to better serve the community. 1914.173

AW-2.6 Buzzard Point 4

Buzzard Point is located at the confluence of the Potomac and the Anacostia rivers, roughly one mile south of the U.S. Capitol building. Buzzard Point is bounded by the existing Southwest residential area to the north, the Anacostia River to the south and east, and Fort McNair to the west. Fort McNair, housing the National Defense University, is the oldest use on the Buzzard Point peninsula, with historic buildings dating to the 18th century. Buzzard Point is currently transitioning from primarily heavy industrial sites used for much of the 20th century to a new mixed-use neighborhood anchored by the D.C. United soccer stadium, Audi Field, which opened in 2018. The District’s South Capitol Street corridor and Frederick Douglass Memorial Bridge Project will better connect the Buzzard Point neighborhood with Downtown Washington, DC and neighborhoods across the Anacostia River. 1915.15

Following the selection of the Buzzard Point site for a new D.C. United soccer stadium in July 2013, planning for the larger Buzzard Point neighborhood began. This planning effort built upon earlier planning through the AWI in 2002, Comprehensive Plan guidance, and previously adopted medium- to high-density zoning, with the goal of coordinating investments in public infrastructure and private redevelopment. OP

Footnotes

  1. 1914.15

  2. 1914.16

  3. 1914.17

  4. 1915

  5. 1915.1

AREA ELEMENTS

This urban design-driven plan for Buzzard Point provides additional guidance for the transformation of a former industrial area into an environmentally sustainable, mixed-use waterfront neighborhood that leverages its location as a regional destination for spectator sports along the Anacostia River.

completed the Buzzard Point Vision Framework and Design Review Guide in 2017, with the collaboration and input of multiple stakeholders, including area residents, private property owners, the Capitol Riverfront BID, Fort McNair, and NPS. 1915.21

This urban design-driven plan for Buzzard Point provides additional guidance for the transformation of a former industrial area into an environmentally sustainable, mixed-use waterfront neighborhood that leverages its location as a regional destination for spectator sports along the Anacostia River. The Vision Framework articulates a vision for Buzzard Point as a well-designed waterfront neighborhood with dynamic parks and public spaces and a well-connected transportation network. Given Buzzard Point’s location along the waterfront, multiple properties are within the current floodplain, and the area is vulnerable to future flooding from riverine flooding, storm surge, and sea level rise. Strategies for ensuring resilience against these climate hazards are central to the Vision Framework’s successful implementation and to Buzzard Point’s transformation into a new, vibrant waterfront neighborhood. 1915.32

Policy AW-2.6.1: Buzzard Point Vision Framework

Implement the policies and recommendations of the Buzzard Point Vision Framework and Design Guidance. Use the framework to guide public and private investment and evaluate new development. 1915.43

Policy AW-2.6.2: Buzzard Point Development

New residential development in Buzzard Point should be concentrated near the waterfront, between Potomac Avenue SW and P Street SW. Commercial, cultural, and retail uses should be concentrated around the traffic oval along Half Street SW, Audi Field, and the waterfront park and plaza. Support the long-term redevelopment of Buzzard Point with mixed-use medium- to high-density development. 1915.54

Policy AW-2.6.3: Buzzard Point Design and Architecture

Promote innovative design and architecture for new development in this area and for the creation of a unique urban waterfront. Encourage water-oriented uses near the river, and through site planning and design, facilitate public access to the water and marine transportation. 1915.65

Policy AW-2.6.4: Buzzard Point Resilience

Design public and private infrastructure, buildings, streets, and park spaces for climate adaptation and flood risk reduction. Buffer the Buzzard Point neighborhood against current and future climate threats through model resilient development. 1915.76

Footnotes

  1. 1915.2

  2. 1915.3

  3. 1915.4

  4. 1915.5

  5. 1915.6

  6. 1915.7

AREA ELEMENTS

Policy AW-2.6.5: Buzzard Point Public Spaces

Following the guidance of the Buzzard Point Vision Framework, identify and implement a set of interconnected parks and playgrounds designed for a variety of users. Develop Half Street SW with green features that link to the stadium plaza, other parks, and the Anacostia River. 1915.81

Policy AW-2.6.6: National Park Service Properties in Buzzard Point

Coordinate with NPS to plan and design their waterfront properties in Buzzard Point, including Buzzard Point Park and the James Creek Marina. 1915.92

Action AW-2.6.A: Buzzard Point Transportation/Riverwalk Connections

Implement a well-connected street grid for all transportation modes that supports future transit expansion and comfortable walking and biking. Reconnect streets, where possible, and redesign Second Street SW as the inland extension of the Anacostia Riverwalk. Complete new sections of the Anacostia Riverwalk as each new development in Buzzard Point is constructed, extending a 75-foot waterfront esplanade. Use aquatic vegetation along the shoreline as part of the riverwalk design to mitigate flooding, soften the river’s edge, and clean the water. Initiate a workshop with Fort McNair to explore extending the Anacostia Riverwalk around the point. 1915.103

Footnotes

  1. 1915.8

  2. 1915.9

  3. 1915.10

OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC PLANNING RECORDopenpublica.com