The Public Meeting Index

The Golden City Council held a special business meeting on September 15, 2026, at 6:30 p.m. in the City Hall Council Chambers, 911 10th Street, Golden, Colorado. All seven councilors were present, and Mayor Weinberg declared a quorum. The primary action was adoption of Resolution No. 3357, authorizing a contract with Hoffmann Parker Wilson & Carberry, P.C. for outside legal counsel to advise on a third-party investigation. The meeting adjourned at 6:57 p.m. Consent Calendar - The minutes of the September 8, 2026 City Council meeting were approved unanimously (7-0) via a motion by Councilor Cameron, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Vitry. Public Comments & Testimony - No in-person public commenters attended. Emailed comments received before 3 p.m. on the day of the meeting were acknowledged and had been published on the city website. The public comment period was opened and closed at 6:31 p.m.; no council/staff response was given. Council/Staff Comments & New Business - Councilor Kurzinski reported that Ward 1, District 1, and District 2 meet-and-greet locations were still being confirmed. - Councilor Pfau provided the subcommittee update: all interviewed firms had been informed of the council's decision regarding outside counsel; city staff advised that the City Clerk is the best point of contact for sharing information with outside counsel, and this was communicated to Corey Hoffman; City Attorney Sandra Llanes completed negotiating the contract with Hoffmann Parker Wilson & Carberry, P.C.; the subcommittee recommends an executive session at the September 22, 2026, City Council meeting for Hoffman to provide legal advice. - Councilor Cameron reported that an unhoused individual who had resided in Golden for 16 years found permanent supportive housing, crediting the persistence of city co-responders and the homeless navigator. He also expressed strong frustration over vandalism, stating that e-moto riders tore apart a demonstration crevice garden at White Ash Park and turned it into ramps, and that Ulysses Park sustained tens of thousands of dollars in damage shortly after reopening. He said this affects the city budget and urged parents to talk to their children about appropriate behavior. - Councilor Evans requested an update on e-moto enforcement. Acting City Manager Carly Lorentz said an internal working group met that day and will present the issues and potential options to the MTAB in the next month or two, followed by a City Council study session (currently scheduled for December 8). In response to Councilor Evans' question, Lorentz confirmed increased enforcement presence, including at White Ash Park, with new signage. - Mayor Weinberg noted that September 15 is National Voter Registration Day and encouraged residents to check their JeffCo voter registration status and sign up for ballot notifications (ballots begin mailing October 5). Discussion Items - Resolution No. 3357 — Contract with Hoffmann Parker Wilson & Carberry, P.C. for Third-Party Investigation Support - The subcommittee explained that outside legal counsel will advise the council on proceeding with a third-party investigation. The firm was selected from several strong contenders based on references, subject-matter expertise, live experience within the firm, and cost management. Councilor Vitry noted for the record that Kendra Carberry is a partner in the firm and that the city already contracts with her as hearing officer, with her performance and compensation determined solely by City Council. - Contract terms: hourly billing with a $20,000 cap for legal counsel and a $35,000 cap for the third-party investigation (referred to in the transcript as the "ILG" investigation); if the caps are reached, the parties must return to council for reauthorization of an extension. Councilor Cameron calculated that $20,000 equals roughly 82 hours at a blended rate. The cost estimates were derived from HR guidance on prior investigations and expected interview hours multiplied by hourly rates. - Positions: Councilor Vitry expressed support for a neutral third-party legal team but voiced concern that the resolution's language could introduce confirmation bias and promote anxiety in the workplace, citing the word "consequences." Councilor Cameron moved to strike the 4th and 5th whereas clauses from the resolution, with Councilor Knecht seconding; Cameron then amended his motion to also strike the word "consequences" from the 6th whereas clause, with Knecht seconding. Key Outcomes - The motion to amend the resolution (striking the 4th and 5th whereas clauses and removing the word "consequences" from the 6th whereas clause) passed unanimously (7-0). - Resolution No. 3357, as amended, was adopted unanimously (7-0), authorizing the contract with Hoffmann Parker Wilson & Carberry, P.C. to assist in conducting a third-party investigation. - Next steps: the council subcommittee will remain the single point of contact with outside counsel, and an executive session with Corey Hoffman is planned for the September 22, 2026, City Council meeting to discuss the contract and the scope of the investigation. - Note on discrepancies: the agenda spells the firm name "Hoffmann Parker Wilson & Carberry, P.C." while the minutes use "Hoffman Parker Wilson & Carberry"; this summary uses the agenda spelling. The agenda also lists item 8 (Resolution No. 3357) twice, while the minutes reflect a single consideration of the resolution.

Note: The agenda listed the meeting as September 14, 2026, but the provided date for this summary is September 15, 2026. The meeting took place in-person at Kihei Community Center from approximately 5:07 p.m. to 7:32 p.m. (HST). The committee heard a presentation from the Planning Department and received public testimony on Bill 108 (2026) to adopt the updated South Maui Community Plan. No legislative action was taken; the meeting was for discussion and community input only. Public Comments & Testimony - Kay Anderson (resident): Expressed concern that the plan projects 3,700–6,100 new residents but identifies over 8,000 new units, potentially doubling the population. She questioned infrastructure, water (citing 98% sustainable yield of Central Maui system), and the lack of a financial plan. She also noted inconsistencies with the Wailea Golf Plan. - Nick Drance (resident): Criticized the plan for lacking specific infrastructure costs and benefits, called for detailed financial accountability, and highlighted erosion and evacuation risks. He stated the plan contradicts countywide policy and felt the process moves too fast. - MJ Duberstein (resident): Opposed the “rush to judgment,” cited conflicts of interest, and asked for detailed plans for affordable housing and policies for the unhoused. He referenced the 2012 Maui Island Plan. - Charlotte Chandrika McLaughlin (resident): Opposed additional development, citing traffic gridlock, flood risks, water shortages (Kamaole aquifer overdraft), and desalination harm to reefs. She urged preserving open space and requiring infrastructure upgrades before growth. - Stephanie Musbach (resident): Accused the council of ignoring community input, demanded infrastructure be completed before new housing, and referenced the county’s forecast of only 1,700 needed housing units. - Kelly King (former councilmember): Advocated returning to the CPAC version of the plan, noting that the Planning Commission removed strong infrastructure-first policies. She stated the Planning Commission lacked South Maui representation and urged slowing the process. - Eve Hogan (Ma'alaea condominium owner): Requested that South Maui’s updated plan recognize Ma'alaea as a mixed-use harbor area, not as conventional residential, noting sea-level rise exposure and lack of infrastructure. - Autumn Ness (resident): Shared personal experiences of flooding, wetland failure, and reef degradation. She urged mandatory language requiring water, wastewater, and stormwater upgrades before any development. - Robin Knox (resident, KCA member): Emphasized the need for infrastructure before growth, called transportation and evacuation routes inadequate, and supported the CPAC version. She noted the North-South Collector Road is not a full solution. - Brad Anderson (representing Makena Golf & Beach Club): Raised four technical points: stormwater retention basin conflicts, map alignment issues with gulches, affordable housing policy inconsistency with HUD rules, and a map mislabeling a private park as government facility. He said he would submit written details. - Randy Wagner (resident, design review): Urged returning to CPAC language, especially concurrent infrastructure requirements. Noted that the Kīhei Māʻalaea development’s occupancy should be tied to road completion. - George Rixie (architect, former KCA president): Stressed that the 1996 plan’s vision was good but implementation failed. He advocated using “shall” language for critical policies, especially drainage and traffic. - Lucien DeNay (historian): Advocated stronger cultural site protections and not rushing the process. Recommended prior due diligence on archaeological sites before zoning. - Sheila Walker (resident): Requested tsunami zone overlay be added to planning maps. - Anita Schmidt (resident, business owner): Called the development plan a “death trap” due to lack of evacuation routes, shared personal experience of traffic gridlock during tsunami warning, and urged stopping all new housing until infrastructure is in place. - Suzanne Lall (resident, facilitator): Asked to slow down and foster more community dialogue, noting climate change impacts and insurance concerns. - Keawe A. (kupuna) : Shared generational perspective, echoed need to slow growth, cited loss of cultural sites, and supported affordable housing only with infrastructure first. - ʻAlohalani Hill (former planning commissioner, cultural advisor): Emphasized listening to the earth and community, called South Maui a death trap in emergencies, and urged a slower, more deliberate process. - Anonymous (resident): Noted land use outpacing infrastructure, high cost of living, fire risk, and requested that the vision statement be read at each meeting and that council members “walk the land.” - Lexi Sawaki (resident): Highlighted lack of preparation for emergencies, referenced the Lahaina fire, and urged long-term planning starting with worst-case scenarios. - Kahea Lani Silva (resident): Expressed support for Bill 108, trusting the council to refine the plan. She hoped her grandkids could afford to live in South Maui. - Michelle Del Rosario (resident): Supported a moratorium on new construction until more than one evacuation route exists, paralleling Lahaina’s experience. - John Kukahiko Plunkett (kamaʻāina): Recalled childhood memories of healthy wetlands, expressed pain over cultural loss, and prayed for compromise. - Wendy Makahele (resident): Called for coastal retreat, wetland restoration, and a comprehensive water management approach; suggested condemnation of at-risk areas. Discussion Items - Planning Department Presentation: Long-Range Planner Karen Konkovich presented an overview of the Maui County General Plan structure, the update process (six phases from 2020 to 2026), and key challenges: flooding, road network deficiencies, and housing needs. The presentation highlighted that the draft plan accommodates projected growth and includes policies for multi-modal transportation and resilient systems. - Committee Discussion on Process: Chair Tamara Paltin outlined the review schedule: Section 2 (policy framework) first, then Section 4 (implementation), Section 3 (growth framework), Section 1, and Section 5 (appendices). The committee will meet daily through October 8, 2026, in hybrid format starting the next day. No legislative action was taken at this meeting. Key Outcomes - No votes or decisions: The meeting was informational only; no motions were made. - Next Steps: The committee will reconvene on September 16, 2026, in the council chambers in hybrid format. Public testimony will continue. The committee will proceed with line-by-line review of the plan using cross-referencing documents (Attachment 3, 4, and 10). The deadline for focused committee review is October 8, 2026. - Public Input: The majority of testifiers urged slowing the process, strengthening infrastructure requirements, returning to the CPAC version, and addressing evacuation, water, and erosion issues. A minority expressed support for the plan with trust in council refinements. - Discrepancy noted: Agenda listed meeting as September 14, 2026; summary date provided as September 15, 2026.

The Lafayette City Council met on September 15, 2026, at 5:30 PM (as per the agenda) to discuss a range of items including a property acquisition (closed session), a settlement agreement in a litigation, pre-approved ADU designs, a contested mural, a public art installation, parking ordinance amendments, and various appointments and proclamations. The meeting also included presentations from Berkeley Chamber Performances and the Creeks Committee, as well as public comments on several topics. Consent Calendar - Approved minutes from August 10 and August 20, 2026. - Adopted Resolution 2026-51 establishing metering and enforcement hours for designated on-street and off-street parking locations. - Authorized the City Manager to execute a Second Amendment to the Purchase and Sale Agreement for 986-980 Moraga Road (Campana). Public Comments & Testimony - Pamela West (running for Contra Costa County Office of Education governing board) spoke about her background and priorities for education, including AI, special education, and counseling services. - Amy Peterson (Glen Road resident, 47-year Lafayette resident) expressed disappointment with the handling of the Vesce litigation and urged the council to condition settlement on dismissal of all persons unknown (the public). - Kathleen Burke (Glen Road resident since 1989) stressed the safety concerns for children using the "dips" easement and asked for a commitment from the Vesees. - Ben Douglas (Glen Road resident for 20 years) called the Vesees' actions disingenuous and urged the council not to settle without dismissing the public from the lawsuit. - Libby Henry supported previous speakers and criticized what she saw as a YIMBY/billionaire takeover of property rights. - Jeff Peacock (speaking for himself and Janice Peacock) read a statement from Janice, a Public Art Committee member who dissented, objecting to the mural's central focus on General Lafayette as a wealthy white male military figure, and also gave his own critical interpretation of the mural's imagery. - Susan Dannen Felser (artist, 55-year Lafayette resident, founding member of public art committees) praised the artist's talent but objected to the timing and placement of the mural, citing current political and environmental crises; she suggested depicting Lafayette as a statesman rather than a military figure. Presentations - Berkeley Chamber Performances: Founding Director Joanne DePhillips and board member Mark Hodgson presented the organization's history and upcoming season (three concerts in Lafayette starting October 17, 2026). They expressed a desire to increase audience size and noted that students and youth attend free. Council members expressed appreciation and offered to help promote to schools. - Creeks Committee Annual Update: Members Ron Huft, Mary Jo Cass, and Blakley provided an update on the Lee Creekside Park restoration project. They detailed historical efforts from 2003 to present, current work on Zone 3 (blackberry removal and replanting), and plans for bank stabilization requiring permits. The committee received a $10,000 grant from Lamorinda Sunrise Rotary. They also discussed the West Reach project, youth outreach, and the need for clearing culverts before anticipated heavy rains. Council members commended their work and noted the importance of ongoing maintenance. Discussion Items - Item 5A: Potential Acquisition of 3483 Mt. Diablo Blvd. – Council discussed in closed session; no reportable action. - Item 13A: Successor Agency Refunding Bonds – Staff presented a resolution to authorize issuance of refunding bonds to refinance existing 2014 and 2015 bonds. The presentation noted that net present value (NPV) savings had fallen below the 5% threshold due to recent market volatility (oil price increases from geopolitical events). Despite this, staff asked for approval to proceed with the process (including oversight board and DOF approval) so the city could act quickly if market conditions improve. Council adopted the resolution unanimously. - Item 13B: Settlement Agreement with Brian and Allyson Vesce – City Attorney Mala Subramanian explained that the council had previously asked the Vesees to dismiss the public from the lawsuit, but the Vesees declined. Public commenters urged the council not to settle unless the Vesees also dismissed the public. Council members clarified that the city can only represent its own interests (the S3 access condition), not the public's separate prescriptive easement claim. The council voted 5-0 to authorize the settlement. - Item 14A: Pre-Approved ADU (PADU) Designs – Staff presented four floor plans in two architectural styles (Craftsman and Ranch/Mediterranean) developed with Moraga and Orinda. Planning Commission feedback had been incorporated. Council members asked about cost savings, fire-safe landscaping, roof pitch flexibility, HVAC placement, and streamlined permitting. Staff noted that further fire district review will occur. Council adopted Resolution 2026-54 unanimously. - Item 14B1: Robert Minervini's Mural Design – The proposed mural for 286 Lafayette Circle features General Lafayette as a central figure in an idyllic landscape. Public Art Committee forwarded it with a 5-1 vote (one dissent). Public comment revealed strong opposition over the prominent military figure and perceived insensitivity to indigenous history. Council debated: some supported the artist's vision and the debate it creates; others felt it was redundant with the existing statue and an opportunity cost for other stories. Council voted 4-1 to approve the mural as designed (Councilmember Wotherspoon dissenting). No specific changes were directed, though some members suggested the artist might adjust details. - Item 14B2: Lafayette Point Public Art – Scott Haycock's proposed kinetic suspended sculpture (over 100 frosted acrylic shapes) for the atrium at 3525 Mt. Diablo Blvd. received unanimous support from the Public Art Committee and council. Council applauded the project and approved it unanimously. - Item 15A: Ordinance 704 (Parking Meter Zones and Fees) – Introduced amendments to implement downtown parking management study recommendations, including longer-duration paid parking at several locations and removal of First Street from metered zones per Caltrans. Council introduced the ordinance, waived first reading, and continued it to September 28 for second reading. Key Outcomes - Successor Agency Refunding Bonds: Adopted Resolution SA2026-02 authorizing staff to initiate bond issuance, contingent on market conditions achieving at least 5% NPV savings. - Vesce Settlement: Authorized City Manager to execute the settlement agreement (5-0). - Pre-Approved ADU Designs: Adopted Resolution 2026-54 approving the PADU prototype designs (5-0). - Downtown Mural: Approved Robert Minervini's mural design for 286 Lafayette Circle (4-1). - Lafayette Point Public Art: Approved Scott Haycock's kinetic sculpture proposal (5-0). - Parking Ordinance: Introduced Ordinance 704 and continued to September 28, 2026. - Appointments: - Jeff Langner to Emergency Preparedness Commission (5-0). - Lee Thompson to Capital Projects Assessment Committee (5-0). - Noah Corter and Olivia Kemp to Youth Commission (5-0). - Proclamations: - Recognized September as Ovarian Cancer Awareness Month. - Recognized September as Childhood Cancer Awareness Month. - Resignation: Accepted Grace Dixon's resignation from Parks, Trails and Recreation Commission with thanks. - League of California Cities Conference: Delegated voting authority to Councilmember Kendall with direction to represent Lafayette's policy interests on housing and land use. - Measure W Support: Adopted Resolution 2026-56 supporting Acalanes Union High School District's parcel tax measure W on the November 3, 2026 ballot (5-0).

The Committee on Development, Planning, and Sustainability met on the morning of Tuesday, September 15, 2026, to consider Ordinance 456-2026, authorizing a 10-year lease and an option to purchase a city-owned parking lot at East 13th and Chester, adjacent to the former Greyhound bus station, with the Playhouse Square Foundation. The meeting lasted approximately 20 minutes and concluded with unanimous approval. Discussion Items - Presentation by Director Green (Nate): The director outlined the request, noting that the city-owned lot had been previously leased for nine years to another entity with hopes of development, ending May 31, 2026. Playhouse Square Foundation, which recently acquired the adjacent Greyhound station and other real estate, is now the intended lessee. The lease term is 10 years at $25,000 per year, with the lessee responsible for maintenance, security, insurance, property taxes, and an option to purchase the lot for a fixed price of $1.6 million (based on a fair market appraisal). The city has already begun a license agreement with Playhouse Square to operate the lot pending the lease. Director Green emphasized the long-term goal of eventual vertical development on the site, with Playhouse Square as a proven developer of complex projects. - Councilman Starr’s Questions: Councilman Starr, representing the ward, raised concerns about the 10-year lease term without inflation adjustments, contrasting it with the previous shorter-term lease. He asked about the rationale for a fixed 10-year term and whether the city could renegotiate if market conditions change. Director Green explained that the 10-year term provides stability and encourages investment in the lot, and that the $25,000 rent is competitive given the costs the lessee must cover (taxes, maintenance, etc.). Councilman Starr also inquired about future development and the inclusion of a community benefits agreement (CBA). He expressed support for Playhouse Square’s work in the area but stressed the importance of leveraging the property for job creation and community benefits when vertical development occurs. The director confirmed that a CBA would be required. - Committee Support: Other committee members voiced support, noting that the current property valuation of $1.2 million would appreciate 33% to the $1.6 million purchase price, and that the cumulative lease payments and taxes over 10 years represent a good deal for the city. The committee also highlighted Playhouse Square’s role as a major economic engine for Cleveland’s arts and culture sector. Key Outcomes - Ordinance 456-2026 was approved without objection, authorizing the lease and option to purchase with Playhouse Square Foundation. - The lease will commence upon finalization (currently under a license); the agreement includes a 10-year term, $25,000 annual rent, and a fixed purchase option of $1.6 million. - The city will require a community benefits agreement for any future vertical development on the site. - The meeting was adjourned at the call of the chair, with committee members signing the approval document.

The New Braunfels Economic Development Corporation (NBEDC) held a regular meeting on September 15, 2026, at City Hall. Key topics included a proposed Comal River Master Plan, an update on the Mayfair community development, a proposed contract extension for the 210 S. Castell project, approval of a lease for public park access, and an extension of a feasibility period for a land purchase. The board also heard public comments and entered executive session for economic development negotiations. Public Comments & Testimony - David Warmke (District 5 resident) criticized the EDC's transparency and reporting, stating that the annual report was "sloppy" and that the diversion of sales and property taxes to the EDC represents 50% of property tax collections. He questioned the justification for the EDC's budget and suggested reducing the sales tax allocation. - Julie King (resident) commented on the 210 S. Castell project amendment, questioning the need for additional consideration for a five-year extension and referencing the Coal Street drainage project. - Tiffany Kelly (resident, Green Courtyard) expressed opposition to exercising the feasibility period extension for the Bartels/Voges property, arguing the purchase price is overvalued and recommending the EDC sell both the original 16 acres and the additional 6.7 acres. - David Warmke (resident) again spoke during Item E, urging the board to "pull the plug" on the property and sell it to return funds to the general fund and put the land back on tax rolls. Discussion Items - Comal River Master Plan (Item 6.A): Scott McClelland, Assistant Director of Transportation & Construction Services, presented a proposal to develop a comprehensive master plan for the Comal River. The plan would address five priorities: continuous public realm improvements (parks, restrooms, accessibility), in-river improvements (modifying dams, accessible entry/exit, river walls), stronger connections to downtown and adjacent districts, making the river a year-round attraction, and reinforcing the river's identity and branding. No action was taken; staff will proceed to develop a request for qualifications and return for funding approval. - Mayfair Community Development Update (Item 6.B): BJ Jones, CFO of Southstar at Mayfair Developer, LLC, provided an update on the 1,900-acre master-planned development. Key points: Costco opened spring 2026; Mayfair Elementary is in year two; major middle school under construction; over 1,400 lots developed; 35+ miles of trails and 300 acres of parks planned; sales tax projections from Costco and future commercial tenants. Future park concepts include Fairway Park Phase II, a dog park, pocket parks, and a community park with pickleball, basketball, and accessible playgrounds. No action taken. - Proposed Amendment to Contract with 210 S. Castell, LLC (Item 6.C): Jeff Jewell, Economic & Community Development Director, presented a request to extend the performance deadlines for the redevelopment of the former Producers Co-op site by five years (to 2031). The project, which received a $4.5 million incentive tied to construction completion, has been delayed due to the loss of a potential anchor tenant, softening tenant demand, rising construction costs, and redesign of the public market space. No incentives have been paid. Mike Myers, project sponsor, confirmed delays and requested the extension. The board discussed the need for an update on the consideration and possible increased valuation. No action taken; staff will bring back a formal amendment at a future meeting. - Five-Year Lease for Trail and Park Access (Item 6.D): Jeff Bransford, Parks & Recreation Assistant Director, presented a five-year, no-cost lease agreement between the City and EDC to allow primitive public access to the 130-acre Northwest Park property (purchased in 2024 with EDC assistance) before full development. The lease will connect to the Alligator Creek Corridor trail network. The board approved the lease unanimously after opening and closing public comment (none offered). - Exercise of Third and Final Feasibility Period Extension (Item 6.E): Jeff Jewell presented three options: cancel, extend, or initiate purchase of 6.688 acres adjacent to 16 acres already owned by the EDC. The board discussed the need for public input and direction from City Council. After public comments opposing the extension, Director Hammonds moved to extend the feasibility period while pursuing a public process, seconded by Director Austin. The motion passed unanimously. - Proposed Land Purchase (Item 6.F): This item was not discussed because the subject matter was addressed in the previous item (6.E). No action was taken. Key Outcomes - Approval of August 13, 2026, minutes (Item 3): Unanimous approval. - Approval of five-year lease with City of New Braunfels for Northwest Park trail access (Item 6.D): Motion by Director Carden, second by Director Campos; passed unanimously. - Exercise of third and final feasibility period extension for Bartels/Voges purchase contract (Item 6.E): Motion by Director Hammonds, second by Director Austin; passed unanimously. - No action on Comal River Master Plan; staff to develop RFQ and return for funding. - No action on 210 S. Castell amendment; staff to prepare formal amendment for future meeting. - No action on Mayfair update; informational only. Executive Session The board convened in executive session at 6:17 PM to discuss economic development negotiations for eight named projects per Texas Government Code Section 551.087. The board returned to open session at 6:36 PM with no action taken.

The Oswego Village Board met on September 15, 2026, at 7:00 p.m. at Oswego Village Hall. Trustees recognized local recipients, adopted a resolution supporting the Child Abuse Notice Act, issued two proclamations, approved the consent agenda, and approved two economic incentive agreements for properties on West Washington Street. Consent Calendar - Approved the September 1, 2026, Committee of the Whole minutes, Regular Village Board minutes, and Closed Session minutes (approved but not released). - Approved the September 15, 2026, bill list in the amount of $1,823,330.57. - Approved final acceptance for Bell Tire and release of project surety, effective September 15, 2026. - Approved amendment 3 to the local public agency engineering services agreement with Thomas Engineering Group LLC for the Wolf's Crossing Road at Harvey Road Improvements Project. Recognitions & Proclamations - Recognized Oswego Family Restaurant as the Economic Development Commission's Business of the Month for September for its significant community involvement. - Adopted a resolution supporting the Child Abuse Notice Act. Resident Colleen Murphy, who said she brought the proposal forward, urged the board to support it and described the importance of educating adults to recognize abuse, grooming, and how to respond when a child discloses abuse. Trustees thanked her for raising the issue. - Proclaimed September 17-23, 2026, as Constitution Week, marking the 239th anniversary of the drafting of the U.S. Constitution. - Proclaimed National Breast Cancer Awareness Month, noting that breast cancer is the most common cancer among U.S. women and that one in eight women will develop breast cancer in their lifetime. Public Comments & Testimony - One resident expressed concern about the timeline of a public works project, saying a village official had stated in April 2021 that the project could take up to two years, while the current public works engineer said the project had been on his desk for only two weeks. - No other public comments were received, and the public forum was closed. Staff and Trustee Reports - Trustees recognized Public Works Director Kurt Cassidy on his last board meeting, thanking him for his work on the Wolf and Douglas project, Wolf's Crossing improvements, and for renewing the department's focus on employee safety. - Trustees also recognized the anniversary of September 11, 2001, recalled Todd Beamer's last words, and noted the IML conference occurring that week. Discussion: Economic Incentive Agreements for 8 and 12 West Washington Street - Staff recommended approval of both applications, saying they met the revised grant program eligibility criteria; Craig Dady from the applicant team was present for questions. - Staff explained that the two properties are being treated as separate projects and that previous owners never applied for or received grant funding for these sites. - One trustee expressed concern that the same owner could receive grants for two properties, reducing money available to other applicants. Staff responded that a per-owner limit would require a future board rule change. No other official applications have been received yet, but several groups have expressed interest in applying. Key Outcomes - Approved the consent agenda as read. - Adopted the resolution supporting the Child Abuse Notice Act. - Issued proclamations recognizing Constitution Week and National Breast Cancer Awareness Month. - Approved economic incentive agreements with DTG Investments, LLC for 8 West Washington Street and 12 West Washington Street. - Did not adopt any rule change limiting grants per owner; such a limit would need to be brought back as a future board rule change.

The Sacramento City Council held a regular meeting on September 15, 2026, at 5:05 PM, with seven members present (Councilmembers Caity Maple and Phil Pluckebaum absent). The meeting included special presentations for Food Literacy Month and Hispanic Heritage Month, a public hearing for the Centerpointe at Natomas Crossing Commercial Development project, council comments, a city manager's report, public comments on non-agenda matters, and adjournment in memory of Dr. Ronald Lane Tom. Special Presentations A. Food Literacy Month – Presented by Vice Mayor Talamantes and Councilmember Dickinson. Amber (founder and CEO of Food Literacy Center) reported that childhood obesity affects 40% of children in Sacramento and the number of hungry children has tripled since the pandemic. The month was established by a state resolution in 2012. B. Hispanic Heritage Month – Presented by Mayor McCarty, Vice Mayor Talamantes, Mayor Pro Tem Guerra, and Councilmember Vang. Speakers highlighted Latino contributions and announced the creation of the city's first Latino Employee Resource Group (ERG). Data: Latinos make up 30% of Sacramento residents and 24% of city employees. Public Hearing 1. Centerpointe at Natomas Crossing Commercial Development (P25‑015) – Associate Planner Deja Harris presented the proposal to rezone 10.18 acres and develop two retail buildings (6,300 sq ft each) and one office building (9,000 sq ft) on 8.66 acres, along with a tree permit for one protected tree. The project was found to be exempt from CEQA under Section 15183. Councilmember Kaplan moved approval, seconded by Vice Mayor Talamantes. The item passed unanimously (7‑0) with two members absent. Public Comments – Matters Not on the Agenda - David Wright (350 Sacramento) expressed concern about a proposed large data center, urging a moratorium and greater transparency, citing impacts on SMUD’s zero‑carbon plan. - Pam Sacreese and Nika Flores (Sky River Casino employees) spoke about their four‑year effort to unionize, noting favorable rulings from two arbitrators, a district judge, and the Ninth Circuit, and inviting support for a picket line on September 30. - Val Bracey (resident at 1125 9th Street) complained about safety threats and lack of police response to a stalker and daughter‑trafficking concerns. Council Comments and City Manager's Report Councilmembers announced upcoming community events (District 8 career fair and Mid‑Autumn Moon Festival; District 1 electric drive and bike event). Assistant City Manager Ryan Moore reported on fall soccer camps, a small business permitting workshop, and Stockton Boulevard grants (approximately $80,000, due October 2). Key Outcomes - Adopted four resolutions and one ordinance for the Centerpointe development: CEQA exemption (Reslution 2026‑0243), rezone (Ordiance 2026‑0022), PUD amendment (Reslution 2026‑0244), and findings/conditions of approval including tentative subdivision map, site plan/design review, and tree permit (Reslution 2026‑0245). - Recognized Food Literacy Month and Hispanic Heritage Month via verbal proclamations. - Announced the establishment of the first Latino Employee Resource Group. - Adjourned in memory of Dr. Ronald Lane Tom (May 15, 1938 – September 8, 2026).

The Torrance City Council met on September 15, 2026, convening for closed session at 5:00 PM and open session at 6:30 PM in the Council Chamber. The meeting included a flag salute, invocation, community recognitions, public comments, a consent calendar, and several administrative matters. Notably, the Council addressed a controversial mixed-use housing development, the city's coyote management program, World War II Japanese American incarceration monument funding, and a special event permit for the Nike After Dark Tour. The Council also approved resolutions honoring retiring police personnel and recognized a centenarian resident. Recognitions & Proclamations - Adopted Resolutions 2026-82 and 2026-83 honoring Police Services Supervisor Kristine Kiesling (35 years) and Police Sergeant Ron Salary (27 years). - Presented a centenarian proclamation to Lydia Sidio, who turned 100 on September 14, 2026. - Recognized California Water Service’s 100 years of service and Jons Market’s 10th anniversary. Public Comments & Testimony Oral Communications 1: - Chris Truman (South Bay Forward) invited council to a transit summit and advocated for the K-Line extension and protected bike lanes on Redondo Beach Boulevard. - A resident (self-identified as a private citizen) urged the council to schedule a hearing on a proposed ordinance. - Charlie Salinas shared reflections on 9/11 and gratitude for avoiding alcohol. - Danielle Johnson (Torrance Art Museum Advocates) promoted upcoming exhibitions. - Dean Mochinaga (Torrance Tennis Players) and other speakers opposed converting tennis courts to pickleball courts, citing maintenance issues and reduced tennis access. - Elizabeth Yi, a Torrance parent and educator, described dangerously hot classrooms in Torrance Unified School District and urged council support for school facility bonds. - Several speakers supported the tennis players’ concerns. - Deborah Corwin called for mandatory spay/neuter ordinances and criticized city inaction on stray cats. On Item 10A (Coyote Management): - Kathleen Mueller, Jennifer King, Suzanne Hubert (Friends of Madrona Marsh), Danny Touche, Cecilia Bracamontes, Marco Garcia, and multiple remote callers opposed trapping, arguing it is ineffective, cruel, and wasteful. They urged redirecting resources to education and coexistence programs. Speakers cited scientific literature and examples from other cities (Pasadena, Calabasas, Lomita). One caller questioned whether the contract requires confirmation that trapped coyotes are linked to specific conflicts. On Item 10B (Japanese American Incarceration Monument): - Nicole Tang, granddaughter of project originator Kanji Sahara, urged rapid completion so surviving camp survivors could see their names on the wall. - Assemblymember Al Muratsuchi pledged continued state support and emphasized urgency. - Stacey Today (Advisory Group) and other community members (Alvin Takamori, Jenny Chimori, Nancy Hayata) testified in favor of Option 1 (proceed as designed) to avoid further delays and honor survivors. - Kay Oda (representing WWII Camp Wall) stressed the monument's role as a symbol against all injustices. On Item 10D (Airport Logo): - One speaker questioned whether the public survey explained the significance of the arches (concept two). Oral Communications 2: - A resident congratulated new Council members. Discussion Items Item 8O – Mixed-Use Development Appeal (Hawthorne Blvd): The Council considered whether to uphold an appeal and deny a 20-unit senior apartment project with 1,608 sq ft of commercial space, or to deny the appeal and allow the project. Councilmembers expressed strong personal opposition to the project but noted the city’s hands are tied under state housing law (Housing Accountability Act). Mayor Kalani cited legal risks, including fines and potential loss of local control. Councilmember Liu voted no; Councilmember Kartsonis recused due to a financial conflict. The motion to approve the project (deny the appeal) passed 6-1-1. Item 8P – Employee Compensation Resolution: Staff corrected a scrivener’s error noting a $710 expenditure (previously listed as $0). The resolution amends hours, wages, and working conditions for executive/management and certain full-time employees. Approved unanimously. Item 10A – Coyote Management Program Update: Community Services Director Ted Stevens presented data showing declining sightings (from 436 to 387) but at a cost of $150,000/year ($80,000 for trapping). Public testimony overwhelmingly opposed lethal trapping. Mayor Kalani shared a personal story of a coyote attack on her family’s dog but advocated for a shift to education-based coexistence, including an ordinance prohibiting wildlife feeding, reserving funds for case-by-case trapping, and enhanced public outreach. Councilmember Kartsonis asked about legal trapping locations and the science of population rebound. Councilmember Sheikh questioned trapping cost-effectiveness ($5,000–$6,000 per coyote). The Council unanimously approved the motion to: (1) accept the report; (2) not renew the current trapping contract; (3) explore an ordinance to ban wildlife feeding; (4) reserve funding for targeted trapping; (5) significantly expand education, possibly hiring an expert; (6) include a citywide mailer and online resources; and (7) reevaluate in one year. Item 10B – WWII Japanese American Incarceration Monument: Staff presented three options after bids exceeded the $10M budget by $7–8M. Public testimony uniformly supported Option 1 (proceed with current design). Advisory group members and community leaders stressed that survivors are dying and delay is unacceptable. Councilmember Kartsonis expressed disappointment the project was not completed earlier but committed to doing so. The Council unanimously approved Option 1, authorized a grant performance extension to February 1, 2029, and adopted the Donation and Donor Recognition Policy. Item 10C – 2027 Armed Forces Day Parade: Staff reported declining attendance across events and recommended adjustments (e.g., shifting Friday exhibit hours to 3–8 PM). The Council approved the committee’s recommendation to proceed with planning and directed staff to explore cost-saving measures. Item 10D – Torrance Municipal Airport Logo: Staff presented two concepts: Concept 1 (airport-focused with a P-38 and flight path) and Concept 2 (incorporating Torrance’s iconic arches). An online survey showed 80% preference for Concept 1. Some councilmembers wanted input from the Airport Commission, but Mayor Kalani noted past issues with the commission’s conduct. The Council approved acceptance of the committee minutes (as corrected) and direction to adopt Concept 1, with Councilmembers Lewis, Lou, and Sheikh voting no. Item 10E – Nike After Dark Tour LA 2026: Nike presented an updated half-marathon route through Torrance, Redondo Beach, and Hermosa Beach on October 24, 2026. The proposal included a $25,000 community impact contribution, $25,000 in-kind donation (Nike's Friends of the Park), 100 race bibs for Torrance residents, and 16 bibs for North High School students. Staff recommended acceptance. The Council approved the special event and the proposed fees and contributions unanimously. Key Outcomes - 8O (Mixed-Use Development): Appeal denied; project approved (6-1-1; Liu opposed, Kartsonis recused). Staff directed to adopt resolutions to allow the project. - 8P (Employee Compensation): Resolution adopted unanimously. - 10A (Coyote Management): Report accepted; contract with current trapper not renewed; staff to explore wildlife feeding ordinance, reserve funds for targeted trapping, enhance education, and reevaluate in one year. Unanimous. - 10B (Monument): Option 1 selected; grant extension authorized; donation policy approved. Unanimous. - 10C (Armed Forces Day): Committee recommendation approved; staff to seek efficiencies. Unanimous. - 10D (Airport Logo): Concept 1 adopted; committee minutes accepted as amended (5-3 vote). - 10E (Nike After Dark Tour): Special event permit approved with fees and contributions. Unanimous. The meeting adjourned at approximately 11:16 PM after reconvening from closed session, with a report that the Council had amended a disciplinary order by a 7-0 vote.

Note: The transcript and agenda indicate the meeting occurred on Monday, September 14, 2026, but the instruction requires using September 15, 2026 as the meeting date. This summary uses the required date but notes the discrepancy. This meeting featured a major presentation by US Home, LLC (Lennar) on a revised plan for 102 townhouses at 1 & 3 Campus Drive and 8 Carey Court, including a zoning amendment request and a proposed SEQRA exemption under the state's "Let Them Build" reforms. A public hearing was held on Introductory Local Law No. 5 of 2026 concerning landscaping, tree removal, and site plan requirements. The board also approved 20 consent agenda resolutions, including budget amendments, personnel actions, bid awards, and other administrative items. Consent Calendar - Res. No. 2026-300: Approved minutes of the August 24, 2026 meeting. - Res. No. 2026-301: Approved budget amendments for FYE 2026 transferring $11,051.97 from Medical Insurance to Filtration Consumption in the Water Fund. - Res. No. 2026-302: Approved budget amendments for FYE 2027 appropriating $42,000 from Fund Balance for emergency water main repair on Marble Avenue. - Res. No. 2026-303: Approved payment of claims for FYE 2027 totaling $1,010,756.99. - Res. No. 2026-304: Accepted the resignation of Luis Borrero, Jr., School Crossing Guard, effective December 17, 2025. - Res. No. 2026-305: Approved hiring Aiden McGinley as Recreation Assistant (Panther Club) at $22.00 per hour, effective September 15, 2026. - Res. No. 2026-306: Approved 13 small claims assessment reduction settlements for Assessment Year 2026-2027, with a total tax reduction of $6,574.54. - Res. No. 2026-307: Approved a correction to tax exemption for Parcel 99.15-1-1./145 (21-6 Foxwood Drive), reducing taxes by $194.64. - Res. No. 2026-308: Authorized advertisement for Bid 2026-02 (Nannahagan Brook Retaining Wall Improvements). - Res. No. 2026-309: Authorized advertisement for Bid 2026-07 (Electrification of Recreation Building HVAC System). - Res. No. 2026-310: Approved return of petty cash ($100) from the pool front gate. - Res. No. 2026-311: Confirmed intent to finance water storage tank replacement through bonds or bond anticipation notes. - Res. No. 2026-312: Scheduled a public hearing for September 28, 2026 on Local Law 6 of 2026 (changing elected officials' term start date to January 1). - Res. No. 2026-313: Approved a revocable license agreement with TM Tompkins LLC for a fence in the right-of-way at 220 Tompkins Avenue. - Res. No. 2026-314: Approved Troop 12 5K/Fun Run on October 25, 2026 with road closures on Washington Avenue and related streets. - Res. No. 2026-315: Accepted resignation of Ronald Wood, School Crossing Guard, effective September 25, 2026. - Res. No. 2026-316: Awarded Bid 2026-03 (Roadway Pavement Management Program) to ELQ Industries, Inc. for $368,672.00. - Res. No. 2026-317: Authorized creation of a capital account and appropriation of $382,000 from General Fund balance for the FY2027 Roadway Pavement Management Program. - Res. No. 2026-318: Approved surplusing a 2008 Ford Escape (Parks & Recreation) with estimated salvage value of $1,500. - Res. No. 2026-319: Approved hiring Kathiann Mead as School Crossing Guard at $22.50 per hour, effective September 15, 2026. Public Comments & Testimony - Noelle Nicolet (44 Hayes Hill Road): Expressed concerns that traffic studies underestimate cumulative impacts of development and that village traffic management is inadequate. Also raised concerns about Lennar's past environmental violations (asbestos, toxic soil) and argued that the $325,000 tennis court contribution is insufficient given the project's potential profit. She argued against a "false choice" that rejecting this project means losing all development opportunities. - Connor Anderson (54 Bedford Road): Requested the board delay the SEQRA exemption decision until additional traffic data (24-hour/7-day count) is available. He argued that Lennar's Environmental Assessment Form understated traffic generation (claimed 900 trips/day on weekends) and omitted daily trip estimates. He also noted that approx. 20% of village accidents occur on Bedford Road/Manville Road. - Jackie Burton (116 Pierce Drive): Emphasized qualitative data—community sentiment is overwhelmingly opposed (she cited a survey she conducted with 413 respondents: 89% opposed, 2.4% in favor). She described deteriorating quality of life, pedestrian safety fears, and traffic congestion spilling onto side streets. Urged board to consider holistic impacts. - Survey Representative (name not given): Presented results of a 26-hour Google survey: 368 opposed out of 413 respondents (89%), 10 in favor. Stated that trust in the developer is a major concern, citing environmental and code violations. - Loretta Chinavetta (142 Washington Avenue): Opposed the project primarily due to traffic. Noted that existing traffic from recent developments (e.g., Memorial Plaza) is already problematic. Expressed concern that board has had 11 meetings with Lennar, leaving the public feeling late to the process. - Claire Shipman (197 Broadway): Spoke in favor of the tree ordinance (Local Law 5), arguing it is a small ask to preserve the tree canopy for future generations, especially compared to the large development proposal. - Tom Rooney (2600 Hillview Drive): Voiced opposition to the tree fund provision requiring payment in lieu of replanting, calling it an additional "tax." He preferred replanting on one's own property and argued the fund is unnecessary. Discussion Items - Lennar Presentation and Board Questions: Lennar representatives (attorney Tony Joffrey, engineer Diego Villarreal, planner Ashley, and others) presented a revised plan for 102 townhouses on the 20-acre site. Key changes included reducing impervious area by 20%, removing a stormwater basin from the southern portion, preserving more than 4 acres of wooded open space, increasing smaller "Chase" units (from 11 to 19 market-rate smaller units plus 11 affordable units), and committing to potential removal of two units closest to Foxwood homes during site plan review. The project would generate annual revenue of $722,000 to the village and $1.7 million to the school district. A traffic study (AM/PM peak, Saturday, school hour) concluded no significant adverse impacts; additional 7-day counts were underway. Recreation fees were set at $1.275 million plus $325,000 for tennis court rehabilitation. The applicant committed to all-electric building feasibility and green features (tankless water heaters, EV chargers, LED lighting). - Board Questions: Trustee David noted the need for trust and asked village consultants (Susan Favate of BFJ Planning and Jennifer Gray, village attorney) to provide their professional assessments on traffic study reliability, school enrollment trends, and the economic context. Village Administrator Eric Marcy explained that the village's tax cap (2% or inflation) combined with rising costs (healthcare 7-8%, labor 3%) necessitates development to maintain services. Susan Favate described declining school enrollment in Westchester (including Pleasantville, down over 300 students since 2009) and noted the traffic study showed no material change in intersection level of service. The attorney explained that the SEQRA exemption under the state's "Let Them Build" law is mandatory if the criteria are met—it does not waive local zoning or other approvals. - Public Hearing on Local Law 5 (Tree Ordinance): Building Inspector Robert Hughes presented the ordinance, which aims to regulate tree removal and site plan review for single- and two-family homes that currently have no board oversight. The ordinance would require a permit for removal of significant trees, with replanting or payment into a tree fund ($500 per tree suggested). He emphasized the intent is to preserve the village's tree canopy and engage homeowners proactively. Key Outcomes - SEQRA Exemption Resolution (Res. No. 2026-299): The board voted 4-1 to declare the proposed Lennar action a "qualified action" exempt from SEQRA under ECL § 8-0111(5-a). Trustee Yemi voted no, citing insufficient information on proposed unit relocations and potential plan changes. The remaining trustees (Paul, David, Nicole, and Mayor) voted aye, stating the decision was non-discretionary per the law and legal advice. - Public Hearing Set for Lennar Application: Scheduled for Monday, October 26, 2026 at 7:00 PM at Village Hall (80 Wheeler Avenue). Venue may change; notice will be provided via legal publication. - Tree Ordinance Public Hearing Closed: The public hearing on Local Law 5 was closed; a resolution to adopt the ordinance will be brought at the next meeting (September 28, 2026). The board noted the $500/tree in-lieu fee is subject to further discussion. - All consent agenda items (Res. 2026-300 through 2026-319) were approved unanimously without discussion.}