Public Meetings - Allentown, Pennsylvania

The Community and Economic Development (CED) Committee met on May 14, 2026, at 11:00 AM to discuss three agenda items: a proposed data center zoning ordinance (Bill 20), a vacant and at-risk property registry (Bill 33), and a budget amendment for grant fund distribution (Bill 34). The meeting included presentations from city staff, public comments, and committee deliberation. Consent Calendar - No items designated as consent calendar; all items were discussed individually. Public Comments & Testimony - Data Center Ordinance (Bill 20): Kyle Rowski, Chair of the Allentown Environmental Advisory Council (EAC), expressed support for the ordinance, noting that EAC provided a detailed letter attached to the agenda. He urged advancement of the bill, emphasizing that environmental protection is integral to community well-being. He praised the collaborative process with the planning bureau. A member of the public, Samuel, raised concerns about noise levels from 24/7 operations and asked about noise limits. Vicky Hillman responded that noise levels default to industrial standards, with additional provisions for low-frequency sounds and pre- and post-sound analysis. Samuel also inquired about the urgency of passing the ordinance. Council member Bender clarified that if not passed now, the process would restart, and that amendments could be made later. - Vacant Property Registry (Bill 33): Asher Shabone, representing the Greater Lehigh Valley Realtor Association, expressed concerns about the broad definition of "vacant property," the 10-day appeal process, and potential unintended consequences. He requested objective criteria for determining vacancy, a longer appeal period (15-30 days), and a hardship provision. He acknowledged the city's intent but stressed the need for clarity. Vice Chair Hillman responded that the ordinance is amendable, and the registry is a tool to identify contacts for first responders and to prevent blight. Discussion Items - Bill 20 – Data Center Zoning Amendment: Planning Director Jennifer Gomez presented the ordinance, which defines data centers and data center accessory uses, permits them as special exceptions in two industrial zoning districts (IG and IM), and establishes site standards including minimum acreage (5-8 acres), setbacks (75 ft from streets, 200 ft from sensitive uses, 50 ft from property lines), building design, and required studies (environmental impact, noise/vibration, water/sewer, power, e-waste, heat mitigation, emergency response). The ordinance received positive feedback from the EAC, Lehigh Valley Planning Commission, and Allentown Planning Commission. Council members Bender and Garlock raised questions about penalties for violations, water protections, community benefits agreements, and perimeter security (robotic systems). Bender noted that the city cannot impose penalties beyond typical zoning violations and cannot require renewable energy. Garlock compared the ordinance to PennFuture's model, highlighting areas where Allentown's version is stronger (EAC review, greenhouse gas review) and areas where it could be strengthened (sensitive receptor definition, water protections, mandatory water-efficient cooling). Hillman and Gomez noted that the fee structure and enforcement rely on existing zoning processes. - Bill 33 – Vacant and At-Risk Property Registry: Ms. Kissler presented the ordinance, which repeals the abandoned property blight chapter and adopts a new chapter creating a registry for vacant and at-risk properties. The registry requires owners to register properties vacant for 90+ continuous days, pay a fee (intended to cover enforcement costs), maintain lighting, and allow an annual inspection. It differentiates between residential and commercial. Council members discussed triggers for identification (neighbor complaints, tax delinquency, forwarded mail), the definition of vacant (furnished, utilities connected, no evidence of vacancy), and the appeals process through the Blighted Property Review Committee. Bender and Garlock raised concerns about unintended consequences for property owners in hardship (medical treatment, incarceration, military service). The administration agreed to work on amendments, including a hardship provision and clarifying criteria. Napoli stressed the need to hold commercial property owners accountable, especially in the Central Business District. The committee voted to table the bill for revisions. - Bill 34 – General Fund Budget Amendment: Ms. Kissler explained that the amendment adjusts the cost distribution for two employees (senior planner and assistant planner) under the Recompete grant, shifting a larger percentage of the senior planner's salary to grant funds to save $3,000-$4,000 from the general fund. The change reflects actual time spent on grant activities. Council member Bender asked if the shift would reduce other grant-funded services; Kissler confirmed the grant has a fixed salary pool and the adjustment reallocates within it. The committee voted to forward the bill favorably to full council. Key Outcomes - Bill 20 (Data Center Zoning): Committee voted to move the bill forward favorably to the regular council meeting. (Motion by Bender, all in favor.) - Bill 33 (Vacant Property Registry): Committee voted to table the bill for further revisions, with a goal to bring proposed amendments to a future CED meeting in early June, skipping the May 20 council meeting. (Motion by Napoli, seconded by Garlock, all in favor.) - Bill 34 (Budget Amendment): Committee voted to forward the bill favorably to full council. (Motion by Bender, seconded by ? all in favor.) - The administration indicated it would return with a reclassification request for a grants management position in the future.

The Redevelopment Authority of the City of Allentown held its regular monthly meeting on May 13, 2026, at 2:01 PM. The board approved minutes from April 8, 2026, accepted financial reports, approved invoices, and discussed inventory and RFP updates. An executive session was held to discuss real estate transactions. Consent Calendar - Approval of Minutes (April 8, 2026): Motion moved and seconded; all members voted aye, none opposed. Minutes approved. - Public Comments: None offered. Discussion Items - Financial Reports (Staff Report by Alan): The annual audit is in process and expected to be presented at the June 10, 2026 meeting. A $21,000 invoice for audit work received but not yet reflected in the current report. Budget-to-actual highlights: $312 in miscellaneous income from escrow return at 1240 North 19th Street; $30,311.86 for city staff salaries and benefits (Jan 3 – Mar 13); $3,148.20 annual QuickBooks fee. CDBG reimbursement of $159,463.70 deposited, including $82,533 for 725 North 10th Street and $76,930.04 for 802 West Walnut. The CDBG operating account is now zero; 2026 CDBG contract is pending approval in electronic routing. The current net operating income loss of $57,000 is expected to be fully reimbursed once the contract is approved. Financial reports accepted unanimously as presented subject to audit. - Invoices for Payment (13 invoices totaling $13,365.49): Items included grass/snow removal, legal fees, HVAC repair at 9th Street, QuickBooks fee, Keystone property management for TARP on North 19th Street, and utilities. A $599 charge from Truist Bank was an error due to delayed payment review; staff noted it will not recur. All invoices approved unanimously. - Inventory Update: Quiet month; five inspections conducted by Anthony, no issues requiring attention. Good conditions noted. - RFP Updates: RFPs for 725 North 10th Street and 540 Hamilton Street were submitted; a committee met last week and will be discussed in executive session. RFP for 802 Walnut Street released; walkthrough scheduled for next Wednesday (May 20, 2026). Technical assistance webinar to follow; submissions due July 10, 2026. - Board Membership: A prospective fifth board member expressed interest; mayor's approval is pending as a formality, expected appointment next month. Key Outcomes - Approved minutes of April 8, 2026. - Approved and accepted staff financial reports as presented, subject to audit. - Approved payment of 13 invoices totaling $13,365.49. - Executive session held to review real estate transactions. - Next regular meeting scheduled for June 10, 2026.

The Allentown Planning Commission met on May 12, 2026, from 12:15 PM to 3:04 PM to consider multiple land development applications, a sidewalk postponement request, and a discussion item on zoning and SALDO text amendments. The meeting included three major development proposals: a mixed-use apartment building at 51 N Front Street, affordable housing at 246 Lehigh Street, and a storage building at 560 Business Park Lane. All actions were taken with specific conditions. Consent Calendar - Item 1 - Approval of Minutes: The minutes of the April 14, 2026 meeting were unanimously approved as written with no comments or corrections. Public Comments & Testimony - 560 Business Park Lane: Shauna Cosover, owner of three properties on Allentown Drive and one on Business Park Lane, expressed major concerns about large truck parking permitted by the city on Business Park Lane and Allentown Drive. She described a dangerous situation with blind spots, long-term parking, repairs, and trash. She noted the proximity to medical buildings and a daycare facility and requested restrictions. The applicant stated only a work van would be used on site and agreed to a no-parking restriction along their frontage. The city indicated truck parking restrictions are under review. Discussion Items Item 2 - 51 N Front Street (RS Residences) The applicant proposes a 7-story, 210-unit apartment building with 4,500 SF of retail space. The plan was tabled in March 2026 for revisions. Key changes include: 43 studios, 115 one-bedrooms, 47 two-bedrooms, and 5 three-bedrooms (previously 47 studios, 110 one-bedrooms, 48 two-bedrooms, 5 three-bedrooms); parking reduced from 286 to 271 spaces; updated floor plans for improved traffic flow; and revised façade materials removing decorative metal paneling used to screen the parking garage. Staff inquired about affordable housing (up to 80% AMI), but the applicant declined, stating studios are more attainable. Discussion covered headlight glare screening, retail parking (10 spaces on ground floor), trail connections to the D&L Trail, traffic impact study (including the intersection of Jordan Drive and Front Street), and a triangular city-owned right-of-way at the front. The applicant agreed to work with the city on landscaping that triangle and to evaluate a trail connection as feasible. The motion to approve was conditioned on compliance with staff report and city comment letter, evaluating trail connections and waterfront access, restriping Riverside Drive for on-street parking, coordinating with LANTA, adhering to building elevations, evaluating the Jordan Drive/Front Street intersection, identifying public parking on ground floor, and revising plans for planting in the triangle area. The motion passed 4-0 with one abstention (Commissioner Leslie Hartzell recused herself at the start of this item). Item 3 - 246 Lehigh Street (Little Lehigh Phase 2) The applicant proposes 35 affordable housing units (4 one-bedroom, 10 two-bedroom, 17 three-bedroom, 4 four-bedroom) in two multi-family buildings with 27 parking spaces, restricted to households earning ≤80% AMI. The project is phase two of a three-phase development. Discussion focused on architectural design (first major project under new zoning code), setback from Lehigh Street, blank retaining walls, streetscape requirements, and parkland dedication. The commission granted a waiver from minimum and enhanced streetscape requirements (Sections 350-13.G and 350-13.H) contingent on resubmitting a streetscape section for staff approval. They also granted a waiver from parkland dedication requirements due to the affordable housing commitment (80% AMI for at least 20 years). Approval was conditioned on compliance with staff report and city comment letter, exploring increased setback from Lehigh Street, exploring future development setbacks consistent with Phase 1, and obtaining Zoning Hearing Board variances for roof type and floor heights. All motions passed unanimously 5-0. Items 4 & 5 - 560 Business Park Lane (Storage Building & Sidewalk Postponement) The applicant proposes a 9,000 SF, one-story storage building with 8 parking spaces, primarily for small parts and materials with one employee on site. A separate request sought a 10-year postponement of sidewalk installation along Business Park Lane and American Parkway NE. Staff recommended against postponement for Business Park Lane due to pedestrian safety and future connectivity, but did not oppose postponement along American Parkway NE. The commission denied the postponement for Business Park Lane (motion passed 5-0) and granted a 10-year postponement for American Parkway (passed 5-0). Land development approval was conditioned on compliance with the staff report and city comment letter dated May 7, 2026 (passed 5-0). Item 6 - Zoning and SALDO Text Amendments (Discussion) Staff presented a draft of amendments focused on items called out during adoption, clarifying regulations, addressing implementation issues, and fixing errors. Key changes include: revisions to general building type requirements (e.g., allowing pitched roofs on low-scale general buildings), special exception language for small general buildings, requirement that affordable housing units be built concurrently with market-rate units, stronger nonconformity language, and modified park and recreation fee calculations for apartment buildings (7+ units) using a per-bedroom rate instead of a flat fee based on 2.6 people per unit. The commission expressed support and noted the changes will be formally introduced to City Council. Key Outcomes - Minutes Approved: Unanimous (5-0). - Item 2 (51 N Front Street): Approved with conditions (4-0, one abstention). - Item 3 (246 Lehigh Street): Streetscape waiver approved (5-0); parkland dedication waiver approved (5-0); preliminary/final plan approved with conditions (5-0). - Items 4 & 5 (560 Business Park Lane): Sidewalk postponement denied for Business Park Lane (5-0); sidewalk postponement granted for American Parkway (5-0); land development approved (5-0). - Item 6: No action taken; discussion only. - Meeting adjourned at 3:04 PM.

The Allentown Zoning Hearing Board convened on May 11, 2026, at 12:15 PM to hear three matters: a dimensional variance appeal for a proposed apartment building, a special exception application for a residential conversion, and a special use application for a hair salon. The board granted relief for the first two cases and continued the third pending further investigation. Consent Calendar - No consent calendar items were noted. Public Comments & Testimony - For case number one (405 Walnut Street), one interested party was present but did not speak. For case number two (436 North Second Street), the city objected, and the city zoning supervisor provided testimony about observed non-conforming uses. No public comments were offered for case number three (1453 Linden Street). Discussion Items - Case 1: Northport Properties, LLC (405 Walnut Street) – The applicant sought two dimensional variances for a 44-unit apartment building with 30 parking spaces: a 17.2% disturbance on slopes of 35% or greater and zero clearance at the intersection of South Fourth and Walnut Street. The board granted a favorable interpretation that the steep slopes (created when South Fourth Street was built in 1957) are not regulated under the old ordinance, based on a prior board determination that the steep slope provisions were defective. For the clear sight triangle variance, the applicant explained that a support pillar (size unknown) was needed inside the triangle due to elevator and stairwell requirements. The board approved the variance, noting the intersection is signalized, West Walnut is one-way, and the project includes pedestrian safety upgrades. - Case 3: Ram Das Agra (1453 Linden Street) – The applicant requested a special exception to convert a vacant first-floor commercial space (922 square feet) into a dwelling unit, creating a two-unit residential building. The property has been vacant for six years, and the owner testified he could not lease it commercially due to the residential character of the neighborhood. The zoning supervisor noted the last commercial use was a medical office in 2006. The board approved the special exception, finding the conversion met all ordinance requirements (parking, floor area) and would not negatively impact the neighborhood. - Case 2: Judith McKitz (436 North Second Street) – The applicant sought a special use to convert a former auto repair garage into a hair salon (356 square feet). The zoning supervisor reported that a site visit on April 29, 2026, showed evidence of active auto repair and possible dwelling units, conflicting with the application's representation of a vacant garage. The owner and tenant testified that the property is used for graphic design and truck storage. The board found the information insufficient and moved to continue the hearing at the applicant's expense to allow a site inspection and clarify the property's uses. The motion passed unanimously. Key Outcomes - Case 1 (405 Walnut Street): The board approved the dimensional variance for the clear sight triangle (unanimous) and granted a favorable interpretation that the steep slopes are not regulated (unanimous). Exhibits A1–A7 were admitted. - Case 3 (1453 Linden Street): The board approved the special exception use for the residential conversion (motion made, seconded, passed). Exhibit A1 (drawing) was admitted. The written decision will be issued within 45 days. - Case 2 (436 North Second Street): The board voted unanimously to continue the hearing to allow the zoning office to inspect the property and obtain accurate information about existing and proposed uses. The applicant was advised to coordinate with the zoning supervisor.

The Allentown City Council met on Wednesday, May 6, 2026, at 6:30 PM in Council Chambers. The meeting included approval of consent items, a prolonged debate on a resolution (R64) to audit the mayor's travel expenses, and the introduction of 11 ordinances. The meeting adjourned at 7:24 PM. Consent Calendar - R58 – Certificate of Appropriateness for masonry work at 334 N 9th Street (Historic District). Passed 7-0. - R59 – Sewer Planning Module for 1935 S 5th Street (Abdouche Properties). Passed 7-0. - R60 – Sewage Planning Module for S Hall Street Apartments (Cox Management Group). Passed 7-0. - R61 – Sewage Planning Module for 728 Union Boulevard (Bears Steps Management LLC). Passed 7-0. Resolutions for Final Passage - R62 – Resolution to close out DCNR community grant project BRC-TAG-28-280. Passed 7-0. - R63 – Budget transfers: $31,803.85 from Parks & Rec Special Events account 46 to 68 for materials and supplies; and $13,000 for water/sewer rebates to citizens (Compliance). Two other transfers (stormwater sewer cleaning truck and EV charger prevailing wages) were removed from the agenda. Passed 7-0. - R64 – Resolution requiring an audit and review of the mayor's traveling expenses, including an independent audit. This item generated extensive discussion (see below). Public Comments & Testimony - Betty Cauler (Tilghman Street) – Speaking on R64, she questioned the administration's disclosure of $72,000 for memberships and fees, and expressed skepticism about the claimed return on travel. She requested a full accounting beyond just receipts, including reports on what was learned and how it benefits the city. Discussion Items - R64 – Travel Expense Audit Resolution - Sponsors: Councilmembers Affa, Mota, Gerlach, and Napoli. - Council positions: - Cynthia Mota: Stated the resolution is straightforward—calls for complete accounting of mayor's travel expenses. Emphasized council's oversight duty and that transparency is not optional. - Candida Affa: Cited lack of prior reports from the mayor on travel outcomes. Asked for a written report after each trip to see what was brought back to Allentown. - Ce-Ce Gerlach: Supported the resolution as a communication and optics issue, especially after a tax increase. Wanted to highlight positive results if trips are paid by third parties. - Jeremy Binder: Expressed concerns that the independent audit requirement would duplicate the controller's work and cost $40,000–$100,000. Suggested a semi-annual presentation instead. - Cristian Pungo: Agreed with Binder on the independent audit point, but supported asking for regular reports. Wanted to drop the fourth point (independent audit). - Santo Napoli: Noted the mayor's lack of communication about trips; called for more timely sharing of information. - Administration response (Managing Director Frank Kane): - Defended the mayor's travel as essential for networking and grant acquisition. Provided examples: $5,748.22 spent in 2022 led to $1.1 million for traffic safety planning, $312,000 for Safe Streets, $384,000 demonstration grant, $50,000 Move with the Mayor grant, and helped secure a $20 million ReCompete grant. - Noted that many trips are paid by third parties (e.g., Bloomberg, Harvard). - Argued the controller already audits travel expenses routinely; an independent audit would be wasteful. - Offered to provide receipts after coordinating with the controller (who was absent due to illness). - Acknowledged the need for better communication and promised to prepare reports going forward. - Public comment: Betty Cauler pressed for more than just numbers, wanting descriptions of what was learned and value. Key Outcomes - R64 was referred to the Human Resources, Administration and Appointments Committee (Chair Binder) for further review. Council President Napoli said he would check on the controller's availability and provide an update by Friday, May 8. - All 11 ordinances introduced (Bills 32–42) were referred to the appropriate committees: - Bill 32 (Tobacco-free buffer zones in parks) → Parks and Recreation - Bill 33 (Vacant and at-risk property) → Community and Economic Development - Bill 34 (Recompete personnel budget) → Community and Economic Development - Bill 35 (Position upgrades in Public Works) → Public Works - Bill 36 (Lehigh and Union Street reconstruction) → Public Works - Bill 37 (Ithaca Park improvements) → Parks and Recreation - Bill 38 (Bogert's Bridge rehabilitation) → Parks and Recreation - Bill 39 (Dixon Street sidewalks) → Parks and Recreation - Bill 40 (MLK Trail Extension Phase 1) → Parks and Recreation - Bill 41 (Parks capital projects) → Parks and Recreation - Bill 42 (Second Fire Academy funding) → Public Safety Committee Reports - Budget and Finance: Met; future Committee of the Whole to review budget priorities. - Community and Economic Development: Next meeting May 14. - Human Resources, Administration and Appointments: No meeting scheduled. - Parks and Recreation: Next meeting May 20. - Public Safety: Next meeting May 20 at 5:45 PM. - Public Works: Next meeting May 20 at 5:30 PM. - Rules, Chambers, Intergovernmental Relations, and Strategy: No meeting scheduled. Mayor's Report & Controller's Report - No mayor's report was submitted. - Controller Glazier was absent due to recuperation from a medical issue. Good and Welfare - None. Adjournment - The meeting was adjourned at 7:24 PM.

The City Council held a hearing on the evening of May 6, 2026, to gather testimony on past snow removal assistance programs in Allentown. The meeting focused on the historical 'Snow Angels' program and similar initiatives, aiming to inform potential revival efforts. Former Councilwoman Pam Barconi and Rick Doherty from Lehigh Valley Active Life provided key testimony, and council members discussed logistics, volunteer recruitment, and collaboration with the school district. Testimony of Former Councilwoman Pam Barconi - Pam Barconi described the original snow removal program she helped create during her tenure, which was a cooperative effort between the city and Lehigh County. The program used nonviolent juvenile offenders on probation from the county as laborers to fulfill community service hours. - The program was largely funded through donations: a pickup truck valued at $15,000 from Out in Chevrolet and shovels, salt, and equipment from Home Depot, minimizing taxpayer expense. - Residents called City Hall, which coordinated with the police department and the county to deploy crews. Barconi emphasized the program was a 'win-win,' providing needed service to residents and positive affirmation to the youth, who often received thanks and hugs from homeowners. - The only drawback was that the number of calls overwhelmed available labor—there were not enough juveniles on probation to meet demand. The program ran for several years after she left council. Testimony of Rick Doherty (Lehigh Valley Active Life) - Rick Doherty recalled that former Mayor Palawski revived a similar program, which ran for about four to six years until approximately 2018. At that time, the Allentown School District had a 40-hour community service requirement for graduation, providing student volunteers. When that requirement ended, volunteer numbers dropped, and the program ceased. - Doherty stated that Lehigh Valley Active Life handled coordination: they would collect lists of seniors and students, match them, and follow up. The organization is willing to resume that coordinating role if a solid core of volunteers is identified first. - He noted practical challenges: the program focused on sidewalk compliance with code, but sometimes requests expanded to clearing around cars, which he considered dangerous. He recommended limiting the scope to public sidewalks. - There were no income requirements; the program also assisted residents with disabilities. It was citywide, but landlords could not request service—only tenants or homeowners. Coordination with the city's code enforcement (Sweep) to avoid ticketing before service was not done previously but was suggested. Discussion Items - Council members asked about the juvenile offender program and whether it could be restarted. The distinction was made between the county–city program using probationary youth and the school-based student volunteer program. The student community service requirement for graduation no longer exists, but council members expressed interest in partnering with school clubs or teams (e.g., wrestling, soccer) for volunteer labor. - Council President mentioned that a workshop with the Allentown School District is already scheduled for June 23, 2026 (a Tuesday), and the snow program revival will be added to that agenda. He cited a comment from Ms. Ortega about the potential for football teams to adopt blocks for elderly residents. - The Director of Public Works, Mr. Shatter, voiced full support and noted the department's willingness to assist, but stressed that committed volunteers are critical for long-term success. Key Outcomes - No formal votes were taken. - A workshop with the Allentown School District is scheduled for June 23, 2026, and the snow program revival will be discussed. - Lehigh Valley Active Life offered to handle coordination of volunteers and homeowners if a stable volunteer base is established. - Council members and staff expressed enthusiasm for reviving the program, with an emphasis on finding reliable volunteers and defining clear scope (sidewalk clearing only, not driveways or cars). Note: No agenda or minutes were available for this meeting; the summary is based solely on the raw transcript.

The Budget and Finance Committee of Allentown City Council met on May 6, 2026, at 10:45 AM UTC. The meeting focused on recognizing the city's improved bond rating, reviewing the first quarter financial report, and discussing several recommendations from a comprehensive review of the budget process conducted in response to a resolution by Councilperson Binder. The committee deliberated on ways to improve communication between council and the finance department, streamline amendment procedures, enhance the five-year capital planning process, and establish earlier council budget priorities and approval deadlines. Consent Calendar - [No consent calendar items were discussed.] Public Comments & Testimony - [No public comments or testimony were presented at this meeting.] Discussion Items - Bond Rating Improvement: Council President (unidentified) opened the meeting by thanking Finance Director Patel for the recent update on the city's bond rating. The rating was described as an extremely positive indicator of the city's financial management, allowing the city to borrow at lower rates and invest back into the community. Director Patel attributed the success to collaboration among the finance team, department heads, and council, emphasizing the importance of working within approved budgets and maintaining transparency. - First Quarter Financial Report: Finance Director Patel provided a brief first quarter financial report, noting the city is in good standing with minimal variance from previous years. The cash balance stands at approximately $58 million due to the receipt of property tax revenues, which will sustain operations for the remainder of the year. Director Patel also provided an update on the migration from Tyler Eden to Tyler Munis, which began in November 2023; the finance department has implemented the purchasing and general ledger modules, and the budget, payroll, and HR modules are being worked on, with full go-live expected by September. - Budget Process Review Recommendations: The committee discussed several findings from the budget process review initiated by Councilperson Binder. The recommendations were presented as actionable items for the near future: - Collaborative Communication Vehicle: The committee discussed creating a shared platform (e.g., a Microsoft Teams channel) for council and the finance department to exchange questions and answers during budget season, ensuring transparency and avoiding last-minute emails. Councilperson Gerlock raised a potential concern about the Pennsylvania Sunshine Law, which may restrict communications among three or more elected officials outside of public meetings. The committee agreed to develop a proposal and request a legal sufficiency review (LSR) from the city solicitor, Maria, to ensure compliance before implementing any system. - Amendment Standards: It was proposed that any budget amendment that adds expenditures must identify a corresponding revenue source (e.g., tax increases or line-item transfers). The committee expressed general agreement that this practice would ensure fiscal responsibility. - Five-Year Financial Plan Review: The committee discussed holding a regular meeting (potentially in the first or second quarter) to review the five-year capital plan and, to a lesser extent, the five-year operating plan. Councilperson Moda emphasized the need to understand the cost implications of major capital projects, especially with rising inflation. Director Patel agreed to develop a more detailed five-year capital plan and present it to council for input. It was clarified that initial internal conversations would occur first, followed by a public meeting where council would have the opportunity to approve or reject specific projects. - Council Budget Priorities: A proposal was made for council to hold a special Committee of the Whole meeting (preferably on a weekday, not a Saturday) in late May or early June to collectively identify and document council's budget priorities for the upcoming fiscal year. This document would be shared with department heads before the budget season starts (by June), allowing them to incorporate council's desires into their budget proposals. Councilperson Binder expressed strong support, noting this would reduce last-minute political maneuvering in November. - Budget Approval Timeline: Councilperson Bender suggested that the city charter be amended to set an earlier budget approval deadline than December 31 (the state-mandated last day). The goal is to give the finance department adequate time to implement the budget. Councilperson Gerlock asked about the timeline for a ballot referendum; it was noted that to appear on the November ballot, council would need to approve the referendum around August. Councilperson Bender said he would only propose changing the approval date, not other charter provisions related to the budget. - Additional Recommendations: The committee acknowledged there are other recommendations from the budget process review that remain under consideration, such as improving the budget narrative and deliverable format (making it more concise and useful). These will be addressed in future discussions. Key Outcomes - Finance Department Update: Received and acknowledged the bond rating improvement and first quarter financial report. The migration to Tyler Munis is on track for a full go-live by September. - Communication Platform: The committee will develop a proposal for a collaborative platform (e.g., Teams channel) and request a legal sufficiency review from the city solicitor to ensure compliance with the Sunshine Law. - Five-Year Capital Plan: Director Patel will work with department heads to create a more detailed five-year capital plan and schedule a meeting with council for input, with initial internal discussions to occur within the next few weeks. - Council Budget Priorities: A special Committee of the Whole meeting will be scheduled in late May or early June (on a weekday) for council to identify and document its budget priorities. The process for reaching consensus will be determined later. - Budget Approval Timeline: Councilperson Bender will pursue a charter amendment to move the budget approval deadline earlier than December 31. To have a referendum on the November 2026 ballot, council approval would be needed around August. - Adjournment: The meeting was adjourned without further business.

The Allentown Zoning Hearing Board convened on April 27, 2026, to consider two special exception applications under the Historic Building Demolition Overlay (HBDL) district. Both applications sought permission to demolish existing buildings to make way for new multifamily residential projects. The first application (112-114 N. 8th St.) was approved with conditions; the second (138-142 N. 9th St.) was denied. Discussion Items - Case 1: 112-114 N. 8th Street - Applicant: 112-114 N. 8th St. LLC. Proposed demolition of two existing buildings (commercial ground floor with residential above) to construct a 7-story, 23-unit studio apartment building. The applicant argued the existing buildings were in poor condition, difficult to rent, and beyond economic repair. The architect testified the new design would relate to the neighborhood's historic scale through materials and massing. The building would not have on-site parking but the applicant stated they had a contract with the parking authority. - Case 2: 138-142 N. 9th Street - Applicant: 138 N. 9th St. LLC (and related entities). Proposed demolition of three structures (including two brownstones) to construct a 7-story, 40-unit mixed-use building with ground-floor retail. The applicant argued the buildings were in poor condition, had low-density uses (currently 7 families across the three buildings), and required significant investment (estimated $150,000-$300,000 total) to renovate, which would not be economically feasible. The church next door is vacant. The architect presented a more modern design, but stated willingness to modify the facade based on HARB feedback. Public Comments & Testimony - Charlie Versagi (objector, 338 N. 8th St.): Opposed the 8th Street project, citing concerns about increased density, parking, and the 7-story height being out of character. He argued the historic character of the neighborhood needs preservation, not further dilution. - Ruth Rachel Green (co-owner & manager): Testified for both applications. She stated the buildings are difficult to maintain and rent; the 8th Street block has issues with safety and loitering; new construction would benefit the community. - Peter Spasato (interested party, 118 N. 8th St.): Strongly supported the 8th Street project, describing the block as dangerous (shootings, drug activity) and stating new construction would improve safety and walkability. - Philip Hart (HARB representative): Supported the 8th Street project, calling it architecturally appropriate and beneficial for pedestrian activity. For the 9th Street project, he voiced unanimous opposition from HARB, calling the proposed design a "highly stylized box" and arguing the three existing brownstones are architecturally significant and character-defining for the block. Key Outcomes - Case 1 (112-114 N. 8th St.): Approved (motion by Board member Scott, seconded). The board found the buildings are not historically or architecturally significant (satisfying special exception criteria). A condition was added: the building must be constructed as designed/presented, unless changes are required by other city departments with jurisdiction. The applicant also agreed to allow an architectural salvager access to the buildings before demolition. - Case 2 (138-142 N. 9th St.): Denied (vote 3-0). The board found the applicant failed to provide sufficient credible evidence (e.g., written contractor estimates, engineer reports) to demonstrate the buildings cannot feasibly or reasonably be reused, as required by the ordinance. The board also noted concerns about the lack of contextual evidence regarding the surrounding block and the inherent bias of owner testimony. The denial was without prejudice, allowing the applicant to reapply with a materially different application.

The Allentown City Council held a special meeting on the evening of April 22, 2026, to hear a presentation from Steve Bamford, Executive Director of the Allentown Neighborhood Improvement Zone Development Authority (ANISDA). The meeting focused on ANISDA's mission, current and future initiatives, and their impact on the city. Council members, city staff, and members of the public participated in a detailed question-and-answer session. Public Comments & Testimony - Alan Jennings (retired executive director of Community Action Committee, board member of redevelopment authority): Expressed strong support for the NIS, calling it an outstanding resource. He recommended the city council capture a portion of the increased tax base from the NIS for affordable housing and improving housing stock around the collar of the NIS, and set a 10% affordable unit requirement. He also urged term limits for board leadership and proposed adding a $1 fee to arena box office transactions to fund the arts. He noted disappointment that riverfront development has not taken hold better and that suburbanites still avoid downtown. Discussion Items - ANISDA Presentation (Steve Bamford): - Provided a history: NIS legislation passed in 2019, zone of 130 acres (center city and western banks of Lehigh River), over $1.2 billion in investment. Taxes generated (state and local) are applied to debt service; real estate taxes are not used. In 2025, $112.7 million in state taxes and $5.1 million in local taxes were generated; 96% were state taxes. - Explained the certification process: businesses file reports, state and city certify, funds go to Bank of New York Mellon escrow. - Showed real estate tax benefit examples: Three City Center (cumulative benefit of over $6.3 million), Strata West (over $4.7 million), Moxie Hotel (net benefit $162,000). - Described public improvement program: ANISDA funds construction and design via a $10 million revolving line of credit from People's Security Bank. Examples include sidewalks, Da Vinci Science Center plaza, wayfinding signage. - Highlighted the Lehigh Valley Planning Commission 2024 assessment that documented progress over 10 years. The program expires in 2042; long-term benefit expected. - Council Questions and Discussion: - Displacement: Steve Bamford noted only 127 rental units were in the NIS boundary at inception, many uninhabitable. Cy Traub confirmed that figure and added that the units were in poor condition. - Developer process: Bamford outlined steps from application to closure, including review by city planning and design consultant Goody Clancy, public review committee, and full board. Funds are allocated annually up to debt service. ANISDA retains 20% of tax revenue for arena bond debt service; operations funded by rent from PPL Center, not tax dollars. - Time horizon: With the NIS ending in 2042, developers have less time to amortize debt. Market forces are expected to sustain development after the program ends. Example: City Center's "Standard" residential project (no NIS funding). - Public improvements: City prioritizes projects. Vicky Kissler and Mark Hartney described focus on sidewalks, accessibility, and Center Square. Future plans include a walking path for Central Elementary School students. Challenges include limited maintenance resources and lack of a downtown master plan (removed from budget). - Board composition: 9-member board, 7 serving (2 vacancies). Members appointed by mayor and state legislators. Current members include attorneys, educators, business leaders. Terms are 5 years; all are expired. Councilmember Bender suggested adding a resident from the center city or First/Sixth wards. - Audits: ANISDA is audited annually. A separate audit of the city's certification process is hindered by confidentiality restrictions on taxpayer information; state legislation to address this has not passed. - Small business: Discussion on whether NIS benefits small businesses. Indirect benefits include improved infrastructure, foot traffic, and captive audience. Councilmembers requested data on business turnover, minority ownership, job creation (who gets jobs, pay levels). Vicky Kissler noted challenges in data collection due to LLC anonymity and tax confidentiality. The Downtown Allentown Alliance (DAA) is planning data collection; ANISDA and city will pass on council's requests. - Affordable housing: Councilmember Garlock asked about goals from the 2014 Goody Clancy study for 235-285 affordable/workforce units. Vicky Kissler explained that affordable units are being built just outside the NIS (e.g., Jonathan Strauss projects) but high land prices and prevailing wage requirements hinder development within the NIS. Zoning changes and a pending developer using 20% affordable units on Hamilton offer hope. Key Outcomes - No formal votes were taken; the meeting was informational. - Councilmembers emphasized the need for better communication of NIS successes (job creation, school district tax revenue, community benefits) and requested that ANISDA update its website with committee membership and bios, and coordinate meeting scheduling to appear on the city's calendar. - Steve Bamford acknowledged the staffing limitation (two people) but committed to improving outreach. Cy Traub invited council to help tell the NIS story. - Council will relay data requests to the Downtown Allentown Alliance for future collection on business turnover, minority ownership, and job demographics. - The meeting concluded with thanks to ANISDA for the presentation, and council noted the importance of continued partnership.