Public Meetings - Edison, New Jersey

The Edison Township Council held its regular meeting on Wednesday, June 24, 2026, at 7:00 PM. The meeting began with the Pledge of Allegiance and roll call, and ran until 9:50 PM. The council recognized first responders for heroic rescues, honored retiring Township Clerk Cheryl Rosimano, introduced an ordinance to rescind the bamboo ordinance, and heard extensive public opposition to a planned renovation of Polanski Park. Consent Calendar - Resolution 351-2026: Authorizing the tax collector to mail estimated tax bills after the June 30 statutory deadline. The council adopted the consent agenda, including this resolution, unanimously. Public Comments & Testimony First Responder Recognitions: - Multiple residents expressed gratitude and praise for the Edison Fire and Police Departments for their actions during the May 16, 2026 tanker fire on Interstate 287 (involving an 8,800-gallon gasoline tanker) and the May 20, 2026 apartment fire at 149 Marina Drive. Speakers included Elizabeth Conway, Joey Sheb, Amresh Patel, former Councilman Tony Massaro, and James Walsh of the Edison Firefighters Association. Retirement of Township Clerk Cheryl Rosimano: - Residents, including Margo Harris, Tony Massaro (representing the Cultural Arts Commission), Lois Tar, Don Tar, Walter Stoshel, Joyce Freeman, and Elizabeth Conway, praised Cheryl Rosimano's professionalism, non-partisanship, and decades of service. The Cultural Arts Commission presented a token of appreciation. Pilot Fiber Ordinance: - Elizabeth Conway and Joyce Freeman asked whether Pilot Fiber NJ LLC was a new company and whether the fiber was for residential use. The Town Attorney clarified Pilot Fiber is a competitive local exchange carrier providing data connectivity for commercial/enterprise use, not related to Comcast or Optimum. Polanski Park Renovations: - Dozens of residents from Greenwich Road, Nicholas Court, Keene Lane, and surrounding streets voiced strong opposition to what they described as a sudden, unannounced transformation of the passive Polanski Park into an event space with a sand beach, amplified music, food trucks, and temporary electrical wiring. Speakers included Patrick Durick, Steve Rosen, Robert Shearer, Karthika Mal Swami, Dr. Isha Takar, Lucia Murphy, Mike Vidansky, Kamlesh Patel, Dr. Nima, Parthi, and Joyce Ship. Concerns included: - Noise from amplified music and crowds, up to four evenings per week (Thursday-Sunday), disturbing the quiet neighborhood. - Increased traffic, parking overflow into residential streets, and potential crime. - Environmental impacts: sand acting as a disease vector, risk to wetlands, and interference with deer and other wildlife. - Safety hazards from exposed electrical wiring and lack of inspections. - Betrayal of trust: residents claimed they were not consulted despite a petition of over 90 signatures. - The park's active baseball field was filled with sand, displacing youth sports. - Residents demanded the project be halted and the park restored to its former passive condition. Discussion Items Ordinance 2284-2026 (Introduction): Rescinding the Bamboo Ordinance - Councilmember Ajay Petil moved to introduce an ordinance to rescind Chapter 25, Section 17 (bamboo) of the township code. He stated the intent is not to eliminate bamboo regulation but to rework the ordinance so that enforcement is equal and disputes between neighbors are handled civically. Councilmember Brescher and Council Vice President Kentos supported reworking the ordinance, noting enforcement challenges. Council President Coyle voted no, preferring to wait until the July 20th meeting for further review. The motion to introduce passed 6-1 (Council President Coyle dissenting). Public hearing set for July 20. Pilot Fiber NJ LLC Right-of-Way Use Agreement - The council debated an ordinance authorizing a right-of-way use agreement with Pilot Fiber NJ LLC to install fiber optic facilities within public rights-of-way. Councilmember Patel and Council Vice President Kentos opposed, citing concerns that the fiber could facilitate data centers and AI, which they believe will lead to job losses. Councilmember Schmuel expressed similar concerns but noted the ordinance is a BPU-formality. The ordinance was voted down 4-3 (Yes: Dima, Schmuel, Coyle; No: Brescher, Kentos, Patel, Petil). Council President Coyle indicated the issue would return. Ordinance for Easement at 2193-2195 Lincoln Highway (Route 27) - The council unanimously approved an ordinance accepting a maintenance easement on a portion of Block 124, Lot 20.04. Polanski Park Renovations - During oral petitions, council members acknowledged the residents' concerns. Council Vice President Kentos noted the park was historically passive and that the lack of neighborhood consultation was problematic. Councilman Petil stated the council would investigate and visit the park. The Business Administrator announced that two dead trees had been removed and that Mayor Joshi would hold a public meeting on July 1, 2026, at the park. Council President Coyle reminded residents that any park can be rented for events, but agreed to discuss the issue with the mayor. Key Outcomes - Resolutions Recognizing First Responders: Two resolutions honoring firefighters and police officers for the I-287 tanker fire and Marina Drive apartment fire were adopted unanimously. - Retirement of Township Clerk: The council presented a plaque and recognized Cheryl Rosimano's 35+ years of service; her retirement was effective June 2026. - Bamboo Ordinance Rescission: Ordinance 2284-2026 was introduced (6-1), with a public hearing and final vote scheduled for July 20, 2026. - Pilot Fiber Agreement: Ordinance 2285-2026 failed to pass (3-4); the council indicated the matter may return. - Easement Ordinance: Approved unanimously. - Consent Agenda (including Resolution 351-2026 on tax bills): Adopted unanimously. - Polanski Park: The council committed to visiting the park, facilitating a public meeting with the mayor on July 1, and re-evaluating the pilot program based on resident feedback.

On June 23, 2026, the Edison Township Zoning Board of Adjustment held a regular meeting primarily focused on a remand hearing for case Z 53-2019, American Outdoor Advertising, concerning a proposed two-sided digital billboard at 737 New Durham Road. The meeting began at 7:00 PM in the council chambers. The board voted unanimously to deny the application after considering testimony and public comments limited to the negative criteria as directed by the Appellate Division. Consent Calendar - Minutes Approval: The board approved the minutes of May 19, 2026 (motion by Mr. Chabra, second by Mr. Johnny, unanimous). - Resolutions Adopted: The board adopted four resolutions for prior approvals: Z 25-2025 (Vivian Pierra), Z 33-2025 (NHDP LLC), Z 7-2026 (Michelle Campbell), and Z 8-2026 (Harish Gauda). Each was approved unanimously. Announcements & Administrative Items - Case KZ3-2026 (Suresh Mandanka, 97 Garden Terrace) was withdrawn by the applicant. The applicant (owner) appeared to request reinstatement due to a miscommunication with his attorney; the board explained he could resubmit the application at a later date. - Case KZ2-2020 (Lamar Advertising, 81 and 101 U.S. Highway 1) was carried to September 29, 2026, with no re-notice required. - Case KZ31-2025 (Tanujia Adiani, 110 Calvert Avenue East) was carried to August 25, 2026, with no re-notice required. - Case KZ8-2025 (Sacred Foundation, 3880 Park Avenue) was improperly noticed and requires re-notice; no hearing occurred. Public Comments & Testimony - Donald Tar (52 Reader Road): Spoke against the variances, citing the extreme deviations from code (733% height increase, 270% sign area increase, 800% setback reduction). He argued the billboard would be a blight and diminish quality of life. Board members repeatedly reminded him to focus on the negative criteria (substantial detriment to public good or impairment of zoning plan). - Lois Tar (52 Reader Road): Echoed her husband’s concerns, stating the variances make a mockery of township codes and would destroy neighborhood quality of life. - Bill Armstrong (54 Reader Road): Expressed concern about light pollution from the sign being visible from every room in his house and raised safety concerns about driver distraction on Route 287. Board members accepted the safety comment as relevant to public good but noted lack of statistical evidence. - Resident (62 Reader Road): Objected due to his son’s sensitivity to bright light; the board attorney clarified the limitation to negative criteria regarding substantial detriment or impairment. Discussion Items - Remand Background: Board Attorney Scott Salmon explained the Appellate Division remanded the case for the board to decide only the negative criteria (prong two) – i.e., whether the proposal would cause substantial detriment to the public good or substantially impair the township’s zoning plan. The positive criteria (special reasons) had been deemed satisfied by the court. - Applicant’s Presentation: Attorney Jeff Lehrer (representing American Outdoor Advertising) confirmed the variances sought (height 110 ft vs. 15 ft allowed, sign area 672 sq ft vs. 250 sq ft, front yard setback 5 ft vs. 15 ft, etc.). He argued that the board’s burden was limited to determining if the negative criteria were met and that the applicant had no further burden. He also submitted a draft 2021 master plan re-examination report (marked A1) to address Judge McCluskey’s sua sponte ruling on ordinance invalidity, but noted the Appellate Division had vacated that portion. - Board Questions: Members questioned the structure’s diameter (approx. 4–4.5 ft) and height. Tim Stonning (applicant’s representative) explained the unipole structure and that the height was necessary to be visible above I-287’s elevated roadway and sound barrier. - Board Deliberation: Vice Chair O’Gorman made a motion to deny, stating the applicant failed to meet the negative criteria. Specific grounds included: the light-blocking technology was unproven and not patented; the 110-ft steel monopole with two 672 sq ft digital signs located 266 ft from homes would cause a detriment to quality of life regardless of the display’s visibility; the applicant did not show the sign’s appearance from residential areas; the proposed static billboard alternative was not comparable; and the proposal did not improve neighborhood aesthetics. Additional concerns about parking and tree removal were noted from the engineer’s report. Mr. Chabra added that the height was a compromise for the location and directly impacted residents’ quality of life and light pollution. Key Outcomes - Motion to Deny: Passed unanimously (7-0). The board denied the application for the requested variances, concluding that the applicant had not satisfied the negative criteria under the Municipal Land Use Law. The board will adopt a resolution with detailed findings. - Meeting Adjourned: The meeting concluded shortly after the vote.

The Edison Township Council held a work session on Monday, June 22, 2026, from 6:09 PM to 7:24 PM. The meeting focused on reviewing several ordinances and resolutions ahead of the upcoming legislative meeting, with significant discussion on budget approvals, a fiber optic right-of-way ordinance, and a contested bamboo ordinance raised during public comments. Council members raised concerns about spending, data center usage, and procedural transparency. Public Comments & Testimony - Thomas Lucky (Resident): Criticized the meeting starting nine minutes late; suggested the township website should have an events page instead of relying on social media; requested hyperlinks in the agenda PDF for each line item to improve transparency; reported unsafe roads, speeding, and lack of construction fencing; asked for a definition of "safe roads." Council noted his concerns and promised follow-up on specific addresses. - Brenda Eagle (Resident): Questioned the enforcement of the bamboo ordinance, noting it is missing from the current agenda after a proposed repeal; shared photos showing historical absence of bamboo on her property and argued the ordinance is not being enforced against a neighbor whose bamboo has spread. Council members engaged in a lengthy discussion about the ordinance's grandfather clause, civil liability, and the township's role; Council President indicated a possible repeal effort and asked for patience. Discussion Items - Fiber Optic Right-of-Way Ordinance (2280-2026): Council President Coyle expressed concern that the company involved may be connecting data centers, which he opposes due to negative economic impacts. The Business Administrator clarified the ordinance only authorizes fiber optic infrastructure for residential/commercial use, not data centers. Councilman Patel requested a written statement that the fiber will not be used for data centers or high-volume traffic. The item may be tabled if answers are not provided by Wednesday's meeting. - Printing Services Contract (2283-2026): Councilman Patel questioned the need for a $175,000 contract when the township has printers. The Business Administrator explained it is a "not to exceed" amount covering multiple vendors for items like tax bills. Council asked for a breakdown of last year's spending and a list of documents to be printed. The item may be held over if information is not ready by Wednesday. - Budget and Finance Resolutions: Council discussed the percentage of budget authorized (66.71% general, 68.78% water) and the delayed budget passage. Councilman Bresher moved to pull items D and E from Finance to July 20th, citing lack of a final budget. Council also discussed estimated tax bills (temporary) with a 5% overall increase limit; the county increase was noted at 12%. Councilman Patel requested the finance committee share its report with the whole council. - Engineering Firm Contract (Item 8A): Council President Coyle proposed pulling the $300,000 contract with a firm he said has been involved in pay-to-play and litigation issues. The Business Administrator agreed to seek quotes from other pre-approved engineering firms to avoid stalling the Safe Streets program. Council supported the pull. - Bamboo Ordinance: Following public comments, Council members debated the current ordinance's enforcement and fairness. The Township Attorney explained the grandfather clause only applies if bamboo is contained; if it spreads, enforcement actions (fines) can be taken. Councilman Bresher and Councilwoman Kentos expressed concerns about the township acting as judge and jury. Councilman Coyle noted the complexity and asked for more time to educate members; the repeal discussion may continue on Wednesday. - Councilman Patel's Discussion Items: - MRAP Vehicle: Requested specific costs for shipping (none, from East Brunswick), training, maintenance life (15-year-old vehicle), and maintenance history. The Police Captain could not provide dollar figures; Patel asked for answers by Wednesday. - Road Paving & Potholes: Asked for a paving schedule and a better pothole reporting mechanism; noted specific roads like Baltic Avenue have not been addressed for years. The Business Administrator asked for specific locations via email. - Data Centers: Called for a full prohibition of data centers in Edison. - Oak Tree Road Police Substation: Temporarily closed due to officer redeployment; Patel requested at least a police vehicle parked there. The Captain agreed to discuss with the chief. - Stormwater Lines: Requested a closed session to discuss cleanup issues on Stevenville Parkway. - Polanski Park: Asked whether resident feedback was taken into account for new improvements; Business Administrator said meetings with residents are ongoing. - Airbnb Ordinance: Noted the township lacks a specific ordinance; asked the attorney to develop one. Key Outcomes - Ordinance 2280-2026 (Fiber Optic): May be tabled if Council does not receive written assurance about data center exclusion by the Wednesday meeting. - Ordinance 2283-2026 (Printing): May be held over pending detailed spending and document list. - Finance Resolutions D & E: Pulled from the current agenda and moved to the July 20, 2026 meeting. - Engineering Firm Contract (Item 8A): Pulled; Business Administrator directed to solicit quotes from other pre-approved firms. - MRAP Vehicle: Answers on training costs and maintenance costs to be provided by Wednesday. - Bamboo Ordinance: No action taken; Council President aims to continue discussion and possibly defer repeal until the July 20 meeting. - General: Several information requests were made (budget spending comparisons, road schedules, stormwater closed session) to be addressed at Wednesday's work session or via email.

The Edison Township Council held a combined meeting on June 10, 2026, at 6:00 p.m., presided over by Council President Coyle. The meeting addressed unfinished business, public hearings, adoption of ordinances, departmental reports, public comments, and council discussions. Key topics included a budget cap ordinance, leasing of municipal property, acceptance of an easement, a controversial resolution to accept a free MRAP armored vehicle for the police department, enforcement of the bamboo ordinance, and multiple community concerns. Consent Calendar - Routine approvals from departments (Finance, Planning & Engineering, Recreation, Fire, Police, Clerk) were approved, with two items pulled for separate consideration: Resolution 289 (engineering services) and Resolution 299 (MRAP vehicle). Public Comments & Testimony - Joy Ship questioned the need for a budget cap ordinance before the budget is known and later raised concerns about disbursements covering tolls, gas, and vehicles for high-salaried employees. - Don Tarr urged approval of the MRAP vehicle, arguing minimal maintenance costs justify the safety benefit for SWAT officers. - Elizabeth Conway asked about upfront costs of the MRAP, noting that free items may require significant initial investment. She later expressed dismay that Councilmember Petil's request for a two-week delay was not granted. - Walt Stoshel inquired about liquor license renewals, supported the Clara Barton neighborhood event space, and announced historic trolley tours in August. - All Ta Sheikh opposed the MRAP, citing over-militarization concerns, questioned the choice of MRAP over BearCat, and urged a separate vote with more community input. - Rahul Raholdaven and others (Ragura Am Ryasam, Vijay Achinta) strongly opposed a convenience store proposal at 764 New Durham Road, citing traffic, safety, and zoning concerns. They asked the council for support, but legal counsel advised the council must remain neutral. - Don Tarr (second appearance) and Walt Stoshel (second appearance) continued MRAP discussion; Stoshel also criticized the county's sports facility management contract. - Sergio Mansuri asked about the purpose and data-sharing of Flock license plate readers; the police captain explained they are used for investigations and shared only with other law enforcement. - Alok Soot detailed ongoing harassment from bamboo ordinance summons despite being supposedly grandfathered; he requested a pause on enforcement. Council President Coyle committed to site visits and future meetings on the matter. - Tessie Yakimovich requested a traffic study for the uncontrolled intersection of Old Post Road and Boulevard of the Eagles, citing 18 crashes since 2019 (including one fatality) near Edison High School. - Additional comments addressed the Stelton Community Center, Toad Center, and general frustration with traffic and development. Discussion Items - Ordinance 2280-2026 (item postponed from earlier) was moved to the June 24 meeting without objection. - Ordinance 2281-2026 (budget cap) and Ordinance 2282-2026 (lease at 922 Amboy Avenue for $2,500/month) received public comment and were adopted with unanimous votes (7-0). - Ordinance 2283-2026 (easement acceptance) was introduced on first reading and set for public hearing on June 24. - Resolution 289-06-2026 (engineering services from Remington & Vernon) was pulled by Councilmember Patel due to concerns about vendor vetting; it was later tabled by a roll call vote and moved to the next meeting. - Resolution 299-06-2026 (acceptance of a free MRAP armored vehicle from the federal 1033 program) was the most debated item. Councilmember Patel requested a two-week delay to obtain maintenance, training, and lifecycle cost information. The motion to table failed 3-3 (Brescher, Patel, Petil [abstain] vs. Dima, Schmuel, Coyle). The resolution was then voted on separately: Dima (yes), Schmuel (yes), Coyle (yes), Brescher (no), Patel (no), Petil (abstain). With three yes votes, two no, and one abstention, the resolution passed. - Bamboo Ordinance enforcement was discussed extensively. Council President Coyle pledged to hold four Tuesday meetings with council members and site visits to assess the problem, with a goal of presenting amendments by July 20. - Flock cameras were defended by police as an investigative tool with strict data-sharing policies. Key Outcomes - Adopted Ordinances: - Ord. 2281-2026 (budget cap) – unanimous (7-0). - Ord. 2282-2026 (lease at 922 Amboy Ave) – unanimous (7-0). - First Reading Approved: Ord. 2283-2026 (easement) – set for June 24 public hearing. - Resolution 299 Approved: MRAP vehicle accepted (vote 3-2-1; passed). - Resolution 289 Tabled: Engineering services contract deferred to next meeting. - Traffic Study Promised: Police traffic unit will examine Old Post Road and Boulevard of the Eagles intersection following resident data. - Bamboo Ordinance Review: Council President will organize site visits and meetings; enforcement continues in the interim. - New Durham Road Convenience Store: Council remained neutral, but residents were advised of the appeal process through the zoning board and courts. - Budget Hearing Set: Public hearing for the FY2026-2027 budget scheduled for July 20.

The Edison Township Council met on May 20, 2026, at 6 p.m. The meeting included a proclamation for Emergency Medical Services (EMS) Week, introduction of the 2026 municipal budget and sanitation budget, public comments, and discussions on various township issues. The budget introduction was controversial due to timing and transparency concerns, leading to a delayed public hearing date. Public Comments & Testimony - Dawn Tar (52 Reader Road) spoke in favor of passing the budget as developed, opposing reductions in police and fire services, citing potential loss of 11 officers and increased overtime. - Steven Zetterbaum (Oliver Avenue), representing Edison EMS (volunteer ambulance squad), thanked the council for the EMS Week proclamation, shared the squad’s history (since 1935), noted they responded to over 1,000 calls last year, and asked for continued township support. - Tom Lucky (Netherwood Circle) raised concerns about: metal detector requirements at council meetings vs. board of education meetings; lack of safety fencing and silt fences at construction sites (e.g., 1125 New Dover Road); speeding on Netherwood Circle and missing stop signs; cricket playing at John Adams Park (adults playing instead of children). - Patty Savilich (Woodger Wilson Drive), representing pickleball players (mostly seniors), reported a tentative agreement with the Edison Jets and recreation director to use the Papiani youth center when turf panels are up, giving pickleball players time before football season. - Alan Willenta (53 Hickory Street) thanked council for responding to emails and urged continued funding for youth sports, noting his program expected about $20,000 in support (0.04% of the municipal budget). - Savannah Willenta (student at Thomas Jefferson Middle School) asked why cuts might be needed and urged council to consider youth as the future. - Michael Piparado, president of Edison PBA Local 75, supported the budget increase, stating it is below the state average and fully funds public safety; any further cuts would harm services. - Dan Boslett (5B Center Street), sergeant and president of SOA and president emeritus of Edison Jets, supported the budget as proposed (4.4% increase), noting it keeps everyone employed and avoids layoffs; estimated cost to average homeowner is $11–13 per month. - Kulbindar Dhamija (Tension of this Road) complained about poor service at the construction permit office, lack of drawings on file, and high costs of licensed contractors; also questioned a $25,000 line item for a recreation department printer (vs. $5,000 actual cost). - Lois Tar (52 Reader Road), Vice Chair of Cultural Arts Commission, thanked council for reappointments and warned against using attrition to balance the budget. - Elizabeth Conway (20 Netherwood Circle) urged council not to cut public safety or youth services, and asked about Nixel/Everbridge alerts for a train gate malfunction on Inman Avenue. - Joel Bassoff (Beach Lane) requested a commitment to transparency and adherence to statutory budget deadlines, criticized the lack of public access to the full budget, and argued that the closed session was unjustified under the Open Public Meetings Act. - Sergio Mansy (Waldman Avenue) emphasized the importance of police, fire, and EMS in light of a recent shooting at a San Diego Islamic Center. Discussion Items - Budget Introduction and Timeline - Councilmember Brescher proposed tabling the budget introduction, arguing the council received the full budget binder only on May 14–18, leaving insufficient time for review. He noted concerns about potential cuts to 911 operators, police, fire, and youth sports, and questioned the process of the council making cuts without departmental input. - Business Administrator Sonia stated the administration prepared the budget in March, met with several council members, and provided the binder last week; she called the budget fiscally responsible. - Council Vice President Kentos confirmed he received the binder on May 18 but needed time to review all line items. - Council President Coyle clarified that once introduced, the council cannot adopt for 30 days; amendments would require reintroduction and another 30-day period. The council agreed to introduce the budget with a public hearing set for July 22, 2026 (giving 63 days for review). - Councilmember Dima asked if the budget (4.4% increase) maintains the status quo; Council President Coyle confirmed no layoffs or service cuts are proposed. - Closed Session - The council entered closed session for approximately 14 minutes to seek legal advice on a procedural issue related to the budget vote. Attorney Joel Bassoff later criticized this as a violation of the Open Public Meetings Act. - Other Discussion Items - Councilmember Patel raised: a shared services resolution for Woodrow Wilson turf field; potential council support for a long-term debt resolution to help the board of education finance a property purchase; bomb ordinance concerns (requested to pull from agenda); survey ordinance for small decks/pathways; road paving on Baltic Avenue; pedestrian crossings on Oak Tree Road; cricket field permits; and engineering inspection of recently paved roads. - Councilmember Brescher suggested investigating whether removable turf plugs could allow multi-use of the Jets field (tennis/pickleball) without removing turf. - Councilmember Patel requested administration follow up on these items via email. Key Outcomes - Proclamation Declaring EMS Week (May 18–24, 2026) — Adopted unanimously (7-0). - Introduction of 2026 Municipal Budget (Ordinance/Resolution) — Introduced by roll call vote (7-0 in favor); public hearing set for July 22, 2026 at 7 p.m. - Introduction of 2026 Sanitation Budget — Introduced by roll call vote (7-0 in favor); public hearing set for July 22, 2026 at 7 p.m. - Approval of Minutes (May 6, 2026) — Approved unanimously. - Consent Agenda (Resolutions R247–R280) — Adopted with no items pulled for separate vote. - Closed Session — Motion to enter passed; reconvened after 14 minutes.

The Edison Township Zoning Board of Adjustment held a special meeting on May 19, 2026, at 7:00 PM in council chambers. The board considered four cases: one continued from a prior hearing, two new applications for bulk variances, and one for bulk and use variances. Two cases were carried to future dates, and two were approved unanimously. Consent Calendar - Minutes of May 12, 2026 – Approved unanimously (motion by Vice Chairman Gorman, second by Mr. Schneider; roll call: all yes). - Resolution Z36-2025 (PSE&G) – Approved unanimously (motion by Vice Chairman O'Gorman, second by Mr. Schneider; roll call: all yes). Announcements - Case Z31-2025 (Tanujah Adiani at 110 Calvert Avenue East) carried to June 23, 2026, at 7:00 PM. - Case Z9-2026 (Srion's Patel at 20 Deborah Drive) carried to June 30, 2026, at 7:00 PM. Notices will not be re-sent. Discussion Items - Case Z6-2026: Rajesh Kumar Patel – 96 Overbrook Avenue - Applicant sought bulk and use variances for a second-story addition to an existing single-family dwelling. Variances requested: FAR (max 44%, proposed 59.4%), lot coverage (max 40%, proposed 46.9%), building coverage (max 23%, proposed 38.6%), front yard setback (required 25 ft, proposed 7.2 ft and 2.3 ft). - Applicant testified that the extended family of seven (including elderly parents and in-laws) requires additional space, especially after his father-in-law’s fall in November 2025. The family wishes to remain in the community. - Planner Paul Fletcher testified that the lot is undersized (50 ft x 100 ft vs. conforming 75 ft x 100 ft), and that the same house on a conforming lot would meet most standards. He argued the FAR variance is not a true use variance and the proposal is consistent with the zone. - Architect Venu Patel described the design and noted that the house would be improved with new materials. - Board members expressed concerns about the lack of a site plan, grading plan, and neighborhood comparison. Chairman criticized the presentation as lacking specifics. The board decided not to vote and instead carry the case to allow the applicant to prepare a more complete submission. - The applicant agreed to extend the board’s time to act until August 2026. The case was carried to July 28, 2026 (the next available meeting, with summer schedule noted). - Case Z3-2026: Suresh Mandenka – 97 Garden Terrace - Applicant sought bulk and use variances for a second-story addition to a single-family home. Variances: FAR (max 44%, proposed 64%), lot coverage (max 40%, proposed 43%), side yard setbacks (combined min 18 ft, proposed 9.54 ft; one side min 6 ft, proposed 4.77 ft), lot width (min 75 ft, proposed 50 ft), lot area (min 7,500 sq ft, proposed 5,000 sq ft). - Applicant testified that he and his wife and two daughters have lived in the small one-bedroom home since 2008, and that his in-laws are planning to move in next year. He is a longtime resident and active in the local BAPS temple. - Architect Venu Patel described the cramped existing conditions and the proposed improvements. - Planner John DuPont testified that the lot is historically undersized, that most neighboring lots are also 50 ft x 100 ft, and that the proposed FAR is largely due to the lot size. He presented exhibits showing that many nearby homes have been expanded similarly. He argued the variances meet C1 (hardship) and C2 (flexible) criteria. - Board members questioned the size of an adjacent property (93 Garden Terrace) and requested more information. The applicant agreed to carry the case for a vote only on June 23, 2026, with no extension needed. Key Outcomes - Case Z8-2026: Harish Gauda – 52 Alexander Street – Approved unanimously (motion by Mr. Chabra, second by Vice Chairman O’Gorman). The applicant received a 10-foot rear yard setback variance to extend an existing deck from 5 ft x 21 ft to 15 ft x 21 ft (open, uncovered). The board found the request minimal with no detrimental impact; no public opposition. - Case Z7-2026: Michelle Campbell – 4 Fielding Avenue – Approved unanimously (motion by Mr. Chabra, second by Vice Chairman O’Gorman). The applicant received variances for a front yard setback of 28.5 ft (required 35 ft) and a rear yard setback of 43.69 ft (required 60 ft) to construct a new single-family dwelling. The applicant had revised the facade from a prior approval, and the board noted that the existing wood deck would be removed (as per the submitted site plan) and that the rear terrace would not be covered. No public opposition. - Case Z6-2026 – Continued to July 28, 2026, to allow the applicant to submit a site plan, grading plan, and neighborhood comparison. Board’s time to act extended to August 2026. - Case Z3-2026 – Continued to June 23, 2026, for a vote only. No extension needed.

Date: May 18, 2026 The Edison Planning Board convened on May 18, 2026, at 4:00 PM to address routine approvals, a DPW maintenance facility presentation, and two major applications: a medical office conversion by Hackensack Meridian Health and a proposed community residence for emotionally disturbed women. The meeting included public testimony and unanimous votes on most items, with one application continued to June 15, 2026. Consent Calendar - Minutes of April 27, 2026: Approved unanimously by roll call (all present members voted yes). - Resolution P08-2025 (Arma Contracting LLC): 90-day extension for minor subdivision – approved unanimously. - Resolution P14-2025 (Federal Business Center): Minor Site Plan Approval with Conditional Use – approved unanimously. - Resolution P01-2026 (Fairway Country Club Urban Renewal LLC): Preliminary and final site plan approval – approved unanimously. - Miscellaneous Item P10-2025 (1125 New Dover Road): 90-day extension of subdivision approvals due to late exemption from Middlesex County – approved unanimously. Public Comments & Testimony For the Tour CL Organization application (Case P04-2026): - Shivam Chabra (resident): Expressed safety and congestion concerns about the proposed community residence at 44 Lincoln Highway. Noted heavy traffic from nearby educational centers, a one-way street used for parent pick-up, and risk of jaywalking. Asked about visitor and operational guidelines. - Srinivas Bontu (resident): Questioned safety for the community given that proposed residents have psychiatric issues. Note: The applicant clarified that residents are not violent and are high-functioning adults. No public comments were made for the Hackensack Meridian Health application (Case P03-2026) or the DPW presentation. Discussion Items 1. DPW Maintenance Yard and Fueling Station Improvement (745 New Dorham) - Presented by LIRO Engineering on behalf of the Department of Public Works. - Proposal: Rebuild a garage that burned down several years ago; construct a new 15-bay maintenance facility with offices, relocate and upgrade the fueling station, and improve site circulation. The new building will have greater capacity than the old one. - The board confirmed the presentation was advisory only; after public none, the board voted unanimously that the project complies with the master plan and requires no further approvals. 2. Hackensack Meridian Health JFK Medical Office (Case P03-2026) – 10 Lincoln Highway - Applicant: Hackensack Meridian Health (represented by attorney Carl Rizolve Cole). - Proposal: Convert a vacant Rite Aid pharmacy into a medical office for urology and urogynecology. Use is permitted in GB zone; minor variances sought for parking (62 spaces proposed vs. 104 required by ordinance) and signage (a directional sign referring to JFK hospital, and a pylon sign height of 21 feet vs. 20 feet allowed). - Testimony: - Edward Christian Jr. (VP of Master Planning, HMH): Described interior fit-out (exam rooms, treatment rooms, labs, staff areas); operational hours 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. Monday-Friday; 4 providers, 9 support staff (13 total); no weekend or evening hours; deliveries via box truck off-peak. - Mario Ianelli (PE, Dewsbury Engineering): Provided site plan details: removal of drive-through canopy, ADA improvements (regrading for 10% handicap spaces), new striping, EV charging stations, improved landscaping, and a hot box for fire suppression – to be screened by shrubs. Signage: existing pylon sign reduced from two‑sided to one‑sided; square footage reduced; directional sign relocated to avoid confusion with JFK hospital. - Justine Fox (PE, Stonefield Engineering – Traffic): Presented traffic/parking study: comparison to former Rite Aid shows reduction of 90 vehicle trips during weekday PM peak; medical office generates fewer trips than retail. Parking demand per ITE is 48 spaces; proposed 60 spaces (including 6 ADA) provides 25% buffer. Circulation improved by removing drive-through. Letter of No Interest from NJDOT expected. - Board deliberation: Professionals testified that the variance criteria were met – adaptive reuse, reduced activity, improved aesthetics, and no detriment to neighborhood. The board noted that much of the building is dedicated to support spaces (9 restrooms, labs, storage), so parking demand is less than square footage suggests. - Vote: Motion to approve with variances for parking and signage, conditioned on compliance with board professionals’ suggestions and no further changes without board approval. Unanimous roll call vote (8 yes, 0 no). 3. Tour CL Organization – Community Residence (Case P04-2026) – 44 Lincoln Highway - Applicant: Linda Kang Barada (Barada Wellness Residence LLC). - Proposal: Convert a vacant medical office into a community residence for up to 12 emotionally disturbed adult women (ages 20-50). The facility would provide a structured living environment with a live‑in caretaker, 24/7 supervision, and programs for eventual independent living. No variances sought beyond pre‑existing nonconforming bulk (side yard, FAR). Conditional use permitted under Edison ordinance 37-4.22 for community residences for developmentally disabled (applicant’s interpretation includes emotionally disturbed). - Testimony: - Linda Barada: Described her personal motivation (caring for a friend’s daughter) and business experience (surgery centers). Residents would have trust fund support; no state licensing required if fewer than 12 residents and no Medicaid/DDD funding. Planned staffing: one live‑in caretaker; social workers and psychiatrists visit. All residents are non‑violent; most cannot hold a job or live with parents. Building has 12 bedrooms, two kitchens, recreation area. - Board concerns: - Use classification: Board member (social work background) distinguished “developmentally disabled” from “emotionally disturbed.” Attorney argued the ordinance definition is broad enough, but board requested clarification. - Safety and management: Board asked about resident screening, rules, security cameras, and the adequacy of a single live‑in caretaker for high‑needs individuals. Applicant assured strict house rules and a structured program. - State regulation: Board professional Mr. Pouyeci cited New Jersey Administrative Code 10:44 (standards for community residences). Applicant believed her facility is exempt under 12 residents, but board requested documentation from NJ Department of Community Affairs. - Decision: The board voted to carry the application to June 15, 2026, to allow the applicant to provide evidence of state regulatory exemption or compliance. Applicant agreed. Key Outcomes - Consent items: All five resolutions and minutes approved unanimously. - DPW Maintenance Facility: Presentation approved as compliant with master plan; no further action needed. - Hackensack Meridian Health (P03-2026): Application approved with parking and sign variances; conditions include compliance with board professionals’ reports and no future changes without board approval. Board directed that the applicant must return for any modifications. - Tour CL Organization (P04-2026): Application continued to June 15, 2026 (no further notice required due to date certain set during meeting). Applicant must provide state regulatory documentation demonstrating exemption or compliance with NJAC 10:44. - Next Meeting: Scheduled for June 15, 2026, to continue the Tour CL application and any other business.

The Edison Township Zoning Board of Adjustment held a regular meeting on May 12, 2026, at 4:00 PM. The board considered three major applications: PSE&G's proposed electrical substation, a second-story addition on Floyd Street, and a new single-family dwelling on Woodland Avenue. All applications were approved, with conditions, after testimony from applicants, professionals, and public comment. Consent Calendar - April 28, 2026 minutes approved unanimously. - Resolution Z 28 2025 (Vicus Sharma) approved unanimously. - Resolution Z 1 2026 (Roanoke Park) approved unanimously. - Resolution Z 4 2026 (Solomon Afhua) approved unanimously. Public Comments & Testimony - For the PSE&G substation (Z 36 2025): No public speakers appeared within or outside 200 feet. - For the NHDP LLC addition (Z 33 2025): No public speakers appeared. - For the Vivian Pierre home (Z 24 2025): Two speakers addressed the board: - Rita Meta (representing the Out of Bounds Homeowners Association) confirmed the association had received notice and had no objection to approval, but requested that conditions in the previous settlement agreement regarding road and stormwater improvements be met. She asked for confirmation that the board was aware of the notice. - Harry Scott (1643 Woodland Ave) raised questions about the proposed stormwater detention system and the road design submitted to the township. He requested clarity on whether the stormwater would drain toward Woodland Avenue and whether the road would be dedicated as public. The applicant's attorney responded that the road plans had been approved by the township engineer, but the township had not accepted the road as a public street; the applicant would revisit the dedication discussion. The stormwater basin would connect to the existing conveyance system and drain down the hill to Woodland Avenue. Discussion Items Case Z 36 2025 – PSE&G Electrical Substation - Applicant: PSE&G proposed a 230/13 kV electrical substation at 19-21 Meridian Road and 1750 Oak Tree Road, including a 35 ft × 34.5 ft control house, two 181 ft monopoles, a 20 ft security wall, and a 10 ft fence. The use is not permitted in the RI (restricted industrial) or RA (residential) zones, requiring a D1 use variance plus numerous bulk variances. - Key testimony: - Richard Strauss (PSE&G project manager) described the substation as an unmanned facility serving 6,000 customers, with weekly maintenance visits. The site is along an existing transmission right-of-way owned by PSE&G for nearly 100 years. The existing 142 ft lattice tower would be removed, and two 181 ft monopoles erected. The substation would be enclosed by a 25 ft precast concrete wall with faux windows and architectural columns to resemble a commercial building, blending with the area as requested by the mayor's office. Stormwater management would improve the site by repairing a collapsed pipe. - Jerry Sanseverino (PSE&G security manager) testified that the 25 ft wall and 10 ft anti-climb fence are part of a layered security approach. The substation is classified as NERC low-impact, not CIP-14, and the company is building above minimum regulatory standards. - Michael Blake (Burns & McDonnell engineer) detailed the site plan, setbacks, and variances. The front yard setback for lot 22 is 3.7 ft (required 50 ft), and for lot 28 it is 34.7 ft (required 35 ft). The rear yard setback is 0 ft (required 60 ft). The board engineer's third report listed conditions, which the applicant accepted. - Lisa DeFranza (landscape architect) presented a plan to remove 49 trees and plant 23 new trees and 49 shrubs, with a 91-tree deficiency to be contributed to the township tree fund. Landscaping would focus on the Elmire Road side to buffer the substation. - Noreen Merainer (PSE&G planner) argued that the substation is an inherently beneficial use, citing case law (e.g., Bell Telephone substation). She outlined the SECA test: the public interest in reliable electricity, minimal detrimental effects (noise, traffic, dust, etc.), reasonable conditions, and balance favoring approval. The board's planner confirmed that the application meets the positive criteria, and the negative criteria are satisfied because the site is particularly suitable for a public utility use. - Board questions: Members asked about setbacks from homes (approx. 90 ft to the fence), lighting (motion-sensor, emergency only, 11 ft high fixtures), and potential noise from diesel trucks (three-minute idling policy, no overnight heavy equipment). - Outcome: Motion to approve by Mr. DeVay, seconded by Mr. Sidato. Approved unanimously (7-0). Conditions include compliance with the board engineer's reports (February 24, April 27, and May 12, 2026), coordination with Edison Police and Fire, and a tree/landscaping maintenance plan. Case Z 33 2025 – NHDP LLC Second Story Addition - Applicant: NHDP LLC sought a D4 FAR variance (from 0.25 to 0.35) to add a second story to a one-story home at 136 Floyd Street, on a significantly undersized lot. The application was a continuation from March 24, 2026, where the board suggested reducing the FAR to 0.35. - Key testimony: - Attorney David Prasad noted that the revised plans reduced the FAR from 0.41 to 0.35 by removing a sunroom, a bedroom, and other rooms. Two nearby homes (5 Hollywood Street and 903 New Dover Street) were approved at 0.35 FAR. - Architect David Dugas explained that the second floor (approx. 42 ft × 31 ft) contains three bedrooms, and the first floor retains a living room, family room, dining room, kitchen, and garage. The existing basement is unaffected. - Board members questioned the purpose of the addition (resale, modernizing the home) and whether the hardship was self-created. The applicant argued the home is currently non-compliant and undersized relative to the neighborhood. - Outcome: Motion to approve by Mr. DeVay, with the condition that FAR not exceed 32% (0.32), and compliance with the board engineer's report. The motion was seconded by Mr. Sidato. Vote: 5-3 (Mr. Schneider and Vice Chair O'Gorman voted no; others yes). The board's approval included a requirement for revised plans reflecting the 0.32 FAR. Case Z 24 2025 – Vivian Pierre Single-Family Dwelling - Applicant: Vivian Pierre sought a D4 FAR variance (0.16, where 0.15 is permitted) for a new single-family home at 1651 Woodland Avenue. The application was revised from an earlier hearing where the board found the original proposal (19.6% building coverage, 0.41 FAR) too large. - Key testimony: - Civil engineer Olivia Kononiuk testified that the revised plans reduced building coverage to 10% (compliant), lot coverage to 23.6% (under 25% maximum), and all setbacks comply. The stormwater management system exceeds NJDEP requirements, reducing peak flows by 77% for the 2-year storm, 77% for the 10-year storm, and 58% for the 100-year storm (vs. required 50%, 25%, and 20% respectively). - Architect Nehal Zaveri confirmed the house was reduced from 10,060 sq ft to 5,110 sq ft building coverage, with a three-car garage changed to two-car, and removal of an outdoor kitchen and office. - Planner Thomas Ricci testified that the FAR variance meets the Randolph Town Center standard: the site accommodates the increased floor area with no adverse impacts. All other metrics (setbacks, height, parking, stormwater) are compliant or over-compliant. The home is consistent with the neighborhood character and the master plan. - Public comments: Rita Meta (Homeowners Association) and Harry Scott raised concerns about the road and stormwater compliance per the prior settlement agreement. The applicant's attorney confirmed that the road would be built to township standards and that the stormwater system would be improved. The board acknowledged that the road and stormwater obligations are separate from the variance request. - Board questions: Members questioned the discrepancy between the planning board's subdivision approval (which required a compliant building envelope) and the current variance. The planner argued that the application is a better planning alternative with less impervious coverage and improved stormwater management. - Outcome: Motion to approve by Mr. DeVay, seconded by Mr. Schneider. Vote: 6-1 (Vice Chair O'Gorman voted no; others yes). Conditions include compliance with the board engineer's report dated May 12, 2026, and all testimony. Key Outcomes - PSE&G Substation (Z 36 2025): Approved unanimously. D1 use variance and bulk variances granted. Applicant to accept conditions from board engineer's reports, coordinate with emergency services, and implement a landscaping maintenance plan. - NHDP LLC Second Story (Z 33 2025): Approved 5-3. FAR variance granted, but conditioned on a maximum FAR of 32% (0.32), not the 0.35 proposed. Applicant to submit revised plans reflecting the lower FAR. - Vivian Pierre Home (Z 24 2025): Approved 6-1. FAR variance of 0.16 (0.01 over 0.15) granted. All other bulk requirements are compliant. Applicant to comply with board engineer's conditions. Adjournment The meeting was adjourned at approximately 10:00 PM after a five-minute recess.

The Edison Municipal Combined Council meeting was called to order at 6 p.m. on May 6, 2026, with the Pledge of Allegiance and roll call (all seven council members present: Brusher, Coyle, Dima, Kentos, Patel, Batil, Schmuel). The meeting included recognitions, a work session reviewing departmental items, a regular meeting for voting on resolutions, multiple public comment periods, and council reports. The council adopted resolutions honoring two filmmakers and passed the consent agenda. Significant discussion centered on pickleball court access, budget timing, and community events. Consent Calendar - Resolutions of Recognition (Unanimously Adopted): The council recognized Heman Pandya for his filmmaking and community engagement, and Nita Pentacar for her artistic achievements and cultural contributions. Both resolutions passed unanimously after brief public comments and council remarks. - Consent Agenda (R26 through R243): The council voted to adopt the entire consent agenda without any resolutions pulled for separate vote. The agenda included spending approvals, tax refunds, change orders (R235, R236, R237 for HANA Mechanical and Lero Engineering), Flock safety camera renewal (R243), and flashing crosswalk signage (R239). The motion passed unanimously (7-0). Public Comments & Testimony - Comments on Resolutions (Section 14): - Ben (Edison resident) expressed privacy concerns about Flock license plate reader cameras (R243) and requested a list of locations. Councilmember Kentos responded that locations are not disclosed for security reasons and that the cameras have helped reduce crime. Council President Coyle noted data is not shared with third parties. - Elizabeth Conway (20 Netherwood Circle) questioned change orders (R236, R237) on oversight costs and asked about flashing crosswalk locations (R239). Administration explained the change orders resulted from architectural design changes. The engineering department provided a list of crosswalk sign locations. - Joel Bassoff (Beach Lane) questioned change order justifications for HANA Mechanical (load-bearing wall modification) and Lero Engineering (additional structural design). He also raised concerns about the absence of a municipal budget, noting state law deadlines. Council President Coyle took responsibility for the delay, stating he is holding the budget for line-by-line review. Administration noted that disbursements are operating under a temporary budget at 26.25% of the prior year. - Open Public Comments (Section 16): - Pam Smith (Montview Road, 34-year resident) represented the Edison senior pickleball group, requesting indoor court space. She noted other towns have multiple indoor courts and that the new Papiani Park Sports Center has three lined courts under turf but they are inaccessible. She asked for use of school gyms or more time at Mini B. Veal. Council discussed options including shared services with the Board of Education and short-term warehouse rentals. - Joyce Ship (Edison) supported pickleball and also requested indoor tennis courts for seniors. She urged the council to keep youth programming in mind. - Kulbinder Dhamija (Edison, second meeting) praised the senior center meal program and suggested automating permit applications. He also questioned township overtime spending. Council President Coyle noted overtime is managed by departments but acknowledged challenges during storms and union rules. - Elizabeth Conway reported on the successful first Kite Flying Festival organized by the Human Relations Commission (300-400 attendees). She asked about the status of a supermarket at Man Grove shopping center and requested that planning board TVs be functional for public viewing. Discussion Items - Pickleball Court Access: Council members discussed solutions for senior pickleball players. Options included: using school gyms through shared services (Councilmember Brusher), leasing vacant warehouses (Councilmember Patel), and scheduling at the Papiani Park Sports Center. Administration noted the center’s turf cannot be easily moved and that the rec center has a full schedule, including summer camp. The council agreed to explore these options further. - Commission Funding: Councilmember Patel requested that township commissions (e.g., Human Relations, Historic, Environment) receive modest funding to support their events and outreach, noting the Human Relations Commission raised its own funds for the kite festival. Council President Coyle called this a great idea for future discussion. Key Outcomes - Resolutions of recognition for Heman Pandya and Nita Pentacar were adopted unanimously. - The consent agenda (R26-R243) was adopted unanimously. - The council will investigate temporary pickleball court options, including school partnerships and warehouse spaces. - Councilmember Patel’s proposal to allocate funds to commissions will be considered for future agenda items. - The meeting was adjourned after council reports and announcements (Firefighters Week, Teachers Week, Police Unity Tour, Mother’s Day, Mayor’s Bike Tour, Memorial Day Parade).