Public Meetings - Forest Grove, Oregon

The Forest Grove Urban Renewal Agency (URA) Board held a work session on March 9, 2026, to discuss proposed changes to the Building Improvement Grant program. Staff presented a revised framework linking program objectives to the URA plan and Vision 2040, a weighted scoring rubric, a minimum scoring threshold, and updated eligibility requirements. Council provided direction on several items, including adopting seven program objectives, setting a minimum score of 60 points, and establishing new eligibility criteria. Discussion Items - Program Objectives and Scoring Rubric: Staff presented seven proposed program objectives tied to the URA plan and Vision 2040: encouraging housing/mixed-use development, retaining/expanding businesses, increasing taxable assessed value, stimulating private investment, eliminating blight, encouraging public amenities, and preserving historic resources. Council discussed each objective and its metrics. Councilor Falconer suggested adding “reduces vacancy” or “increases activation” to the blight elimination objective, which received consensus. Councilor Gustafson raised the possibility of including affordable housing requirements (e.g., 10% low-income units), but after discussion, council agreed not to include such a requirement at this time, citing the need for a broader conversation and potential negative impacts based on other cities' experiences. A weighted scoring rubric was presented with 100 total points: 25 for housing/mixed-use, 20 for business retention/expansion, 15 each for increasing assessed value, stimulating private investment, and eliminating blight, and 5 each for public amenities and historic preservation. Council expressed general approval and requested clearer metrics for each category. - Minimum Scoring Threshold: Staff recommended setting a minimum score of 50 points for a project to be considered. Council debated between 50, 60, and 70 points. Councilor Gustafson noted that adjusting downward might be easier than upward, while Councilor Marshall favored 60 as a middle ground. Council ultimately reached consensus on a minimum threshold of 60 points. - Eligibility Requirements: Staff reviewed existing eligibility requirements and proposed four additions: (1) a minimum project cost threshold (staff suggested $20,000 as an example); (2) restricting funding from portable assets; (3) requiring funds be used for building improvements; and (4) demonstrating financial feasibility through a letter of credit or other confirmation. Council discussed the minimum cost threshold: Councilor Gustafson advocated for $10,000 total project cost based on feedback from downtown businesses, but other councilors noted that smaller projects often involve portable assets and that a $20,000 threshold would align with the 60-point minimum. Council agreed on $20,000. For financial feasibility, Councilor Schummel and Councilor Gustafson raised concerns about applicants stacking grants from different cycles, and staff committed to addressing this in the final application. Council approved the other three additions. Key Outcomes - Council directed staff to: (1) change the “eliminate blight and blighting influences” objective to a more positive statement and add “reduces vacancy/increases activation” as a metric; (2) proceed with the seven program objectives as presented; (3) adopt a weighted scoring rubric with 100 total points (specific weights as noted above); (4) set a minimum scoring threshold of 60 points; (5) establish a minimum total project cost of $20,000; (6) restrict funding from portable assets; (7) require funds be used for building improvements; and (8) include a financial feasibility requirement with flexibility for applicants stacking grants. Staff will bring a formal resolution to the URA board based on this direction. The grant application will open July 1, 2026, and close December 31, 2026, with EDC review in January 2027 and URA board consideration in February 2027.

The Forest Grove Planning Commission met on March 2, 2026, at 7:02 p.m. to elect new officers, hold a public hearing on an update to the Washington County Forest Grove Urban Planning Area Agreement (UPAA), and discuss other business. The commission elected Nicole Ellis as Chair and Commissioner Riviera as Vice Chair. After a staff presentation and deliberation, the commission unanimously voted to recommend that the city council accept the updated UPAA and authorize the city manager to sign it. The meeting also included approval of prior meeting minutes and a director's report on upcoming projects. Public Comments & Testimony - No members of the public offered testimony either in person or via Zoom during the public comment period or the public hearing. Discussion Items - Election of Officers: Commissioner David Anderson, acting as interim chair, opened nominations. Commissioner Nicole Ellis was nominated and accepted the nomination for Chair. Commissioner Riviera was nominated for Vice Chair. A motion to elect both was made, seconded, and passed unanimously by voice vote (all ayes). Chair Ellis then presided over the remainder of the meeting. - Public Hearing on UPAA Update: Senior Planner Dan Rodin presented a staff report and PowerPoint covering background on the Urban Planning Area Agreement, terminology (urban reserve, comprehensive planning, concept planning), map amendments, and text amendments. He explained the David Hill Urban Reserve Area, the process for expanding the urban growth boundary, and coordination with Washington County. Commissioners asked questions about the feasibility of developing the hilly terrain, the history of the urban reserve designation, and the process for modifying the agreement. Staff provided detailed answers, including discussion of the "grand bargain" of 2014, challenges with topography and insurance costs, and the possibility of reassigning undesignated areas. Two scenarios for modifying the UPAA were presented: a city-initiated land use change affecting a county road (review body: city planning commission and city council) and a county-initiated change to a road classification (review body: county planning commission and board of commissioners). - Director's Report: Planning Director Brian gave an update on: - Comprehensive Plan Update: A full-scale update of the Forest Grove Comprehensive Plan is planned, with a presentation to the city council on March 9, 2026. Future work sessions may involve the planning commission. - Development Code Updates: The first public hearing on code updates occurred February 23, 2026. Industrial setbacks when abutting residential were upheld; setbacks between industrial properties were not. The second reading is March 9, 2026, with changes effective 30 days after passage. - Historic Landmarks Board/Downtown Design Guidelines: A consultant from Astoria has been selected to develop downtown-specific design guidelines. A work session with city council is scheduled for April 13, 2026. The planning commission will review later in the year. - New Assistant City Manager: Kim (last name unclear) started at the end of December, overseeing community development. - Planning Commission Vacancy: One seat remains unfilled; interviews are pending. The director emphasized the importance of attendance after a recent meeting lacked quorum. Key Outcomes - Election of Officers: Nicole Ellis was elected Chair; Commissioner Riviera was elected Vice Chair. (Both positions filled by acclamation/unanimous vote.) - UPAA Recommendation: A motion was made and seconded to recommend that the city council approve the updated Washington County Forest Grove Urban Planning Area Agreement and authorize the city manager to sign it. The motion passed unanimously (all ayes). - Minutes Approval: The minutes of the previous meeting were approved as written by voice vote (all ayes). - Next Meeting: Not yet scheduled.

The Forest Grove City Council met on February 23, 2026, at 7:10 PM. The meeting included a recognition of a fire captain for 20 years of service, a proclamation for International Women's Day, public comments on federal election integrity and community events, presentations on the 2025 audit, Pacific University updates, and the Parks, Recreation, Open Space, and Trails (PROST) Master Plan. The council held a public hearing and approved the first reading of Ordinance 2026-02, amending the development code. Council communications and the city manager’s report highlighted library updates, housing capacity analysis grant reductions, wildfire mitigation projects, and upcoming events. Recognition - Mayor Wenzel and the council recognized Fire Captain Will Murphy for 20 years of service with the Forest Grove Fire Department. Captain Murphy, who joined the department in 2006, was praised for his expertise in emergency medical services, collaborative labor representation, and dedication as a public servant. Proclamations - Council President Valenzuela read a proclamation declaring March 8, 2026, as International Women's Day in Forest Grove. The proclamation emphasized gender equity, the achievements of women, and the need to dismantle structural barriers to equality. Public Comments & Testimony - David Dion spoke about the threat of voter suppression efforts by the Trump administration, urging the council to support enfranchisement of Forest Grove citizens, particularly women, transgender people, and mail-in voting. - Dale Feek read a statement from Heather Cox Richardson criticizing the Trump regime, quoted President Trump’s calls for voter ID and restrictions on mail-in ballots, and encouraged the council to resist the administration’s actions. He also urged attendance at the high school play "The Diary of Anne Frank." - Christy Kocki (School Board Chair) invited council members to school budget meetings and highlighted the need to support schools during deficit spending. She also promoted the play "The Diary of Anne Frank" as a testament to fighting hate. - Carol Allery shared a religious message about love and fear, stating that love is the answer to fear, and quoted John 3:16. - Chaz Hundley (editor/publisher of News in the Grove) invited the council to an open house before the State of the City address on March 12, 2026. - During the public hearing on Ordinance 2026-02, Dale Feek testified neutrally, expressing concerns about enterprise zones (citing Crane Data Center) and zoning for a cannabis facility near a school, and noting that the proposed building height changes would not retroactively apply to Crane’s seven-story structure. Presentations 1. Annual Audit (Clear Trail CPAs) - Chris Odell presented the 2025 audit results for the city and the Urban Renewal Agency (URA). Both received unmodified (clean) opinions with no material weaknesses or significant deficiencies. No separate management letter was issued. Council thanked staff for their work. 2. Pacific University Update - President Dr. Jenny Coyle highlighted the university’s 176-year history, current enrollment of 3,000 students, and designation as Oregon’s opportunity university (emphasizing access and outcomes). She noted that 27% of students are first-generation, 32% of undergraduates are Pell-eligible, and 44% of alumni live in Oregon. - Dr. Coyle acknowledged headwinds in higher education (demographic cliff, devaluation of education, changing federal policies) but stated Pacific is not in a financial crisis. She discussed restructuring, three-year degree pathways, and a potential merger with Willamette University (maintaining Pacific’s identity and location). She appealed to the council to champion higher education and maintain Forest Grove as an inclusive community. - Councilor Falconer thanked Dr. Coyle for her engagement. Council President Valenzuela asked about the impact of federal policy changes (OB3) on health professions programs and funding. Dr. Coyle replied that details are uncertain but private lending may fill gaps. Councilor Schimmel suggested cross-promotion of Pacific and community events. 3. Parks, Recreation, Open Space, and Trails (PROST) Master Plan - Recreation Director Ann Lane and Recreation Coordinator Cody Jeffers presented the draft scope of work for the RFP. The plan will guide 10-year development, redevelopment, and equitable distribution of parks, trails, and recreation facilities. Key components include: - Section 1: Foundation (asset review, staffing analysis, demographic study, barrier assessment). - Section 2: Community engagement (public outreach, partnership assessment, gap analysis, service evaluation). - Section 3: Infrastructure forecast (assessment of parks/trails, aquatic center, senior center, feasibility of multi-use recreation facility). - Section 4: Implementation plan and adoption-ready document by June 2027. - Councilor Schimmel praised the staff professional development opportunity and noted the inclusion of asset management. Council President Valenzuela emphasized supporting local youth sports clubs. Councilor Falconer urged outreach to renters and transit-dependent populations. Councilor Martinez stressed the need for comprehensive engagement to avoid past oversights (e.g., East Side Park). Councilor Martinez also asked about bringing preferred partner agreements and shared use agreements to council before the master plan is final; staff acknowledged that discussions on those agreements are ongoing. Discussion Items - The council discussed the annual audit and Pacific University update, with no further debate beyond questions. - Development Code Amendments (Ordinance 2026-02): The council heard staff presentation on proposed amendments to Articles 8 and 12. Key changes include clarifying industrial building heights (45 feet when 50 feet from residential zones), adjusting residential standards (target densities, building height measurement, increased ADU square footage), allowing office uses in neighborhood mixed-use zones, and adding landscape buffer footnotes. The council debated the wording of the height table and confirmed the staff amendment to read “none, 45 feet maximum height when 50 feet set back from a residential zone.” There was no further discussion from the council after the hearing. Key Outcomes - First Reading of Ordinance 2026-02: Approved 7-0, with an amendment to clarify the building height language. The second reading is scheduled for March 9, 2026. - Council Communications: Council President Valenzuela reported on library fundraising event (March 17, 5-8 PM), library renovation updates, and shared concerns about the centralization of library purchasing under the county’s new system, emphasizing the need for transparency in the intergovernmental agreement review. Councilor Falconer highlighted chamber information (student marketing group, small business incubator, Know Your Rights training on March 7, and ribbon cutting at Forge Grove Food Hall on March 7). Councilor Gustafson reminded of the 250th U.S. anniversary and downtown association involvement. Councilor Schimmel commended the city manager for professional development opportunities. - City Manager’s Report: - Housing Capacity Analysis grant from DLCD reduced from $160,000 to $11,000; staff may seek mid-biennium budget adjustments. - Light and Power completed three planned wildfire mitigation projects (undergrounding lines) and applied for a $500,000 grid resilience grant. - Pre-diagnostic meeting with railroad for Mountain View Safe Routes to School project was positive. - Library hosts AARP tax assistance every Wednesday (10 AM-3 PM). - City Manager appointed to League of Oregon Cities Energy and Environmental Policy Committee. - Upcoming Events: - State of the City address: March 12, 2026. - Forge Grove Food Hall and Tap Room grand opening: March 7, 2026 (noon-9 PM). - International Women’s Day: March 8, 2026. The meeting adjourned to executive session for labor negotiations (ORS 192.660(2)(d)).

The Forest Grove City Council held a work session on February 23, 2026, to discuss and prioritize action items for the 2026-2028 Council Action Plan, building on the Vision 2040 framework. The session aimed to reach consensus on top priorities to guide staff resource allocation and budget planning. Discussion Items - Staff presented a framework for the Council Action Plan, combining Vision 2040 action items, past goals (continuing work), and new council priorities. The plan would be reviewed annually over a three-year cycle. - Council had previously identified four Vision 2040 action items at a December retreat. Staff added 22 past goals (from 2025 and prior council actions) to create a total of 26 items. Council reached consensus to include all 26 items in the action plan. - Council then discussed 21 items submitted by councilors for potential addition, with a limit of up to four new priorities. Topics included: - Pedestrian safety and bike/pedestrian gap improvements (supported by Councilor Schimmel, who emphasized interim safety measures for corridors like Highway 47 and U Street) - Climate action plan (supported by Councilor Falconer, who noted alignment with the comprehensive plan update and Mayor's Innovation Project) - Construction excise tax for affordable housing (Councilor Falconer) - SDC rate study for tiered rates to lower costs for smaller units (Councilor Falconer) - Urban forest program and bird-safe dark sky development (Councilor Falconer) - Emergency preparedness and CERT program (Councilor Schimmel) - Staff noted that many of these items could be incorporated into the scope of the comprehensive plan update, which was already one of the 26 prioritized items. Council agreed to "star" those items (climate action plan, 15-minute neighborhoods, urban forest program) for consideration during comprehensive plan scoping. - Councilor Schimmel expressed concern about immediate pedestrian safety hazards, but staff clarified that existing projects (mid-block crossing, safe routes to school) address some gaps. Council agreed to refer specific gap requests to staff for interim solutions. - Councilor Falconer and Councilor Schimmel had a brief exchange regarding language used in prioritizing safety versus other issues, but the discussion moved forward. Key Outcomes - Consensus to include 26 action items in the 2026-2028 Council Action Plan: the four Vision 2040 priorities identified in December plus 22 staff-recommended past goals. - No new items added from the council-submitted list at this session. Council decided to retain the current 26 items and not add additional priorities. - Staff to bring back comprehensive plan work sessions to calibrate council on scope, costs, and integration of related items (climate action, urban forest, etc.) into the comprehensive plan update. - Specific pedestrian safety gaps to be referred to staff for potential interim solutions. - The council will revisit the action plan annually, with the next review in January 2027. Note: No public comments or consent calendar items were present in this work session.

This work session focused on the city's response to federal immigration activities, state legislation, and administrative protocols. The council reached consensus to send a letter supporting a legislative package addressing federal actions, discussed administrative versus judicial warrants, and planned future work session topics. Discussion Items - State Legislative Session Update: City Manager Jesse Vandersanen briefed the council on key dates for the Oregon short session (February 2 – March 8, 2026). Critical deadlines include February 9 (bills must be on committee agenda), February 16, and February 20 (bills must be placed on opposite chamber's committee agenda). A list of House and Senate bills (part of a federal response package) was presented, with most now having scheduled hearings. - Letter to State Legislature: Councilor Schimmel submitted a draft letter expressing support for state legislation responding to federal immigration actions but also raising concerns that bills focus on litigation rather than immediate protection. He called for enforceable protections and criticized state leaders for “dishonesty” in labeling bills as protective. Councilor Falconer proposed sending a succinct letter of support for the package given time constraints. The council agreed by consensus (six thumbs up) to have staff draft a letter supporting the federal response package, to be sent to local representatives, state senators, and relevant committee chairs. - Administrative vs. Judicial Warrants: Councillor Funk requested clarification on protocol if federal agents present an administrative warrant. Staff confirmed that the city does not consent to administrative warrants (signed by agency officials, not judges) but will document the encounter. Staff training includes not consenting and allowing filming. - Possible Letter to District Attorney: The council discussed sending a letter to District Attorney Barton urging finalization of law enforcement protocols and encouraging his participation in a regional coalition. Councilor Schimmel emphasized that protocols have been pending for months. - Response from Attorney General: A prior letter to the Attorney General had been drafted and sent, and a response was received. The council noted the Attorney General's mention of district attorney collaboration. - Next Meeting Topics: Councillors identified priorities for the next work session (scheduled for February 23), including a visit from the city attorney, data collection/reporting, operationalizing emergency planning and activation standards, updates on federal legislation, and review of pending litigation from other municipalities. Key Outcomes - Consensus to send a succinct letter of support for the state legislative package responding to federal immigration activities (the “federal response package”). Staff will draft and send the letter by February 10. - Staff confirmed that the city will not consent to administrative warrants but will document interactions with federal agents. - The council will continue discussion on a letter to the district attorney regarding law enforcement protocols. - The next work session will include the city attorney and address multiple follow-up topics.

The Forest Grove City Council met on February 9, 2026, at 7:11 PM. The meeting included a proclamation for Black History Month, public comments on immigration enforcement and other topics, several transportation and trail project presentations, approval of a business license ordinance, and various council and staff reports. The consent agenda was approved 7-0. Proclamation - The council proclaimed February 2026 as Black History Month in Forest Grove, recognizing the contributions of Black Americans and the theme "A Century of Black History Commemorations." The proclamation was read and adopted. Public Comments & Testimony - Mr. Dean expressed fear about ICE enforcement, urged the city to seek mutual aid from neighboring police forces to protect residents from illegal violence, and stressed that officers have a duty to prevent violence. - Michael Johnson (Indivisible Forest Grove) spoke about the desperation felt by some community members, supported symbolic legislation and litigation as a deterrent, and urged resistance to protect democracy. - Mr. Fake (spoke after Johnson) referenced a town hall with Congresswoman Bonamici, supported the mayor's call for mayoral collaboration, and commented on clean water services (noting a $31,603 fine for failure to test an engine generator) and energy crisis reports. - Carol Allery offered a religious message about truth and fear, quoting Proverbs and Corinthians. Consent Calendar - The consent agenda was approved unanimously with a single motion (7-0). The agenda item list was not provided in the transcript, but it was adopted without discussion. Discussion Items - Postponement of Police Facility Work Session: City Manager requested to postpone the police facility work session from February 23 to March 9, 2026, to await grant outcome from the state legislature. Council gave consensus via thumbs up. - ODOT Presentation – East TV Highway Updates: Stephanie Turner (ODOT Area Manager) presented on: - A new pedestrian crossing at AMB Row (Rose Grove Mobile Home Park) on OR 8, delayed due to federal rule changes, construction spring/summer 2026. - New traffic signal at OR 8 and Aira Av/U Street, with lighting and curb ramps, coordinating with Forest Grove's safe routes to school project and TriMet's BRT. Design underway, construction expected 2028-2029. - Recent curb ramp replacements on Highway 47 and planned work at Pacific Avenue and Mountain View in 2027. - Councilor Schimmel raised concerns about ponding and safety at the Quince and Highway 8 slip lane. Councilor Falconer asked about sidewalk gaps on TV Highway; City Engineer Greg Robertson confirmed the gap (U Street to Rose Grove) will be filled by the safe routes to school project. - Council Creek Regional Trail Presentation: Renith Kalfkins (Washington County Senior Project Engineer) presented: - Trail from Hillsboro to Forest Grove, funded by RAISE and regional grants. Design completed in 2024, permits obtained, but federal grant review task force is reviewing the grant. Construction timeline hinges on approval. - Enhanced crossings project (U Street, etc.) design started in January 2026; open house expected in April 2026, translated into Spanish. Construction contingent on trail approval. - Discussion on community engagement, accessibility, and outreach to Latino communities. Councilor Falconer suggested partnering with Centro Cultural and Adelante Mujeres, and using Grove Link for transportation to open houses. - Fernhill Maple Intersection Presentation: Renith Kalfkins presented on the intersection of OR 47, Fernhill, and Maple: - Complex coordination with railroad, multiple utilities (BPA, Forest Grove Light & Power, PGE, etc.), and property owners. BPA relocation starting in May 2026, which will set off utility relocations. - Design final submission expected August 2026, advertising November 2026, construction March 2027 (pending rail order and utility work). - Councilor Falconer asked about stop bar placement and crosswalk markings; the design will bring stop bars back behind crosswalks to improve safety for pedestrians and cyclists. - Mayor Wenzel expressed frustration over delays and asked if the city could expedite; the county engineer said they will share fatality and accident data with the railroad to push for permits. - Ordinance 2026-01 (Second Reading): Amending business licensing regulations (Title 11, Chapter 110) and repealing ordinance 201-05. No public testimony received at January 26 hearing. Council approved 7-0. Key Outcomes - Consent Agenda approved 7-0. - Police facility work session postponed from February 23 to March 9, 2026, by council consensus. - Ordinance 2026-01 approved 7-0 (second reading, no further public hearing). - Council Communications: - Council President Valenzuela reported on library commission retreat and CDBG presentations (13 organizations, results due Thursday). - Councilor Falconer reported on Historic Landmarks Board (draft downtown design in June, new chair, art receptacle project). - Councilor Martinez reported on Gills Creek Station (community deciding between manual vs. electronic reader board). - Councilor Schimmel reported on CCI interest in boards/commissions sanctuary training, and attended a housing opportunity day in Salem. - City Manager Report: - Oak Leaves trademark renewed. - Storefront remodels: Wild Willow Studio complete; Fry's Action Athletics and Casa Kiev (by Adelante Mujeres) in progress. - 21st and Main intersection: warrants analysis approved, will become a four-way stop with phased implementation and pre-warning signs. - Police facility grant application: $3 million capital grant, chief to testify next week. - Fire department staffing: 7 career firefighters per day now, two units staffed 22 out of 23 days in January. - Public works administration remodel going vertical; library renovations (reading tree, fireplace area) funded by library foundation. - Mayor's Report: - Attended town halls with Bonamici and Attorney General. - Region One ACT recommended five projects for SIP priorities (including I-5 Rose Quarter, TV Highway BRT, Sunrise Corridor, Columbia River trail). - Washington County may consider increasing vehicle registration fees from $30 to $60 (reading in May, adoption January 2027). - CPOs (Community Partnership Organizations) being replaced by district-based committees. - A council letter about Flock contract was not received by county commissioners; work session upcoming. - WCCC approved $1.3 million for TV Highway U Street intersection and Highway 47/Martin Road projects in Forest Grove.

The Forest Grove Urban Renewal Agency held a work session on February 9, 2026, to discuss the Building Improvement Grant program. The board reviewed seven qualified applications, scored them based on recommendations from the Economic Development Commission (EDC), and approved full funding for all projects. The session also included robust discussions on future program improvements, including potential minimum score thresholds, weighted scoring rubrics, and aligning the program more closely with the Vision 2040 plan. Discussion Items - Program Overview: Economic Development Coordinator Miles Glowacke presented the Building Improvement Grant program, which is part of the Vision 2040 plan actions 1.2 (increase commercial business development) and 1.10 (city incentive programs for small businesses). The program has $350,000 budgeted for this cycle, with $337,000 in grant requests and $342,000 in applicant matching funds, representing over half a million dollars in potential URA investment. - Seven Applications: All applications were within the urban renewal area and met eligibility requirements. Projects included: - Bakery (Main Street): $34,000 for a walk-in cooler and electrical upgrades. EDC scored this lowest but noted it would help the business expand and stay in Forest Grove, and improvements would trigger a tax assessment increase. - Panaderia Corona (HVAC system): Request for new HVAC for restaurant space; tenant-operated. - RISE (2038 Pacific): $46,000 for interior/exterior improvements, including uncovering windows and adding skylights. - Picasso’s (electrical): Replacement of outdated wiring and breaker box for safety and functionality. - Me Time Spa: Full interior remodel to expand capacity and add employees. - La Pandora (2018): Construction of four studio apartments and a coffee/bakery shop. - One additional project (North of Dare Street) was ineligible as it was outside the URA boundary. - Minimum Score Discussion: Staff asked whether the board wanted to establish a minimum score for applications. Mayor and Councilor Shimmel suggested deferring to the next cycle, and the board agreed to not set a minimum for this round. - Scoring Rubric and Program Improvements: Council members discussed the need for a weighted scoring rubric to better align with URA goals (increasing tax base, job creation, assessed value). Councilor Falconer emphasized adding housing units as a high-priority criterion, referencing action 2.5 of the urban renewal plan. Councilor Shimmel advocated for a matrix that describes what different scores look like to calibrate scoring. Councilor Govson noted that while diverse goals exist (jobs vs. tax value), a rigid checklist might limit board flexibility. Mayor expressed interest in revisiting the plan to build the program from the ground up. Director Shimmel added that expanding or contracting the URA district map could be considered. - EDC Recommendations: The EDC found all seven projects worthwhile and recommended full funding. Staff also raised questions about project feasibility, job creation types, and potential program changes (e.g., minimum project cost, prohibition on furniture/equipment, focus on capital improvements). Key Outcomes - Approval of All Seven Grants: Council reached consensus (thumbs up from all members) to fund all seven applications fully, totaling $337,000 in grant requests. No formal vote was taken as this was a work session, but direction was clear. - Future Program Changes: Staff will bring back recommendations for: - A minimum score threshold for future cycles. - A weighted scoring rubric with clearer descriptors (e.g., a matrix showing what a 5, 4, 3, etc., looks like). - Explicit criteria for housing units, job creation, and alignment with the urban renewal plan. - Review of URA district boundaries and potential plan amendments. - Next Steps: Staff will research plan amendment requirements and present findings to the EDC. A follow-up work session will further refine the program based on council feedback.

The Forest Grove City Council convened on January 26, 2026, for three work sessions addressing federal immigration enforcement and sanctuary city implementation, updates to the city's development code, and a review of polling results for a proposed police facility bond. No public comments were heard and no formal actions were taken during any of the work sessions, consistent with the nature of work sessions. Work Session I: Federal Immigration Enforcement and Sanctuary City Implementation City staff presented an update on the city's sanctuary city status, including the declaration of a state of emergency on November 10, 2025, with $50,000 appropriated to community nonprofits, the resolution declaring Forest Grove a sanctuary city on November 24, 2025, and the passage of a sanctuary city ordinance effective December 8 and January 2, 2026. The ordinance codifies the Oregon Sanctuary Promise Act into city code, prohibits assisting federal agencies without a judicial warrant, and bans the use of city resources for immigration enforcement. Staff conducted training and are updating materials; community partnerships with Adelante, Central, ACLU, and other organizations continue. Council members discussed the treatment of administrative warrants issued by ICE, particularly following a leaked internal memo. Chief Earing stated that local police would ask for a warrant and object if lacking, but would not physically interfere; they would document and potentially join lawsuits. Councilors expressed concerns about data tracking, including creating a specific code for ICE interactions and submitting public records requests to federal agencies. Councilor Falkner requested a review of city contracts to ensure no funds support companies aiding ICE activities. Councilor Gussen raised mental health concerns for the community. Key Outcomes: - Consensus to fill in the framework of the emergency management system (EOP/EOC) for activation. - Consensus to track Oregon state legislation aligned with the sanctuary code and be prepared to support it. - Consensus to send a letter to the Oregon Attorney General seeking guidance on local law enforcement authority during federal immigration enforcement, the role of the Oregon National Guard, evidence preservation, and protection of municipal resources. - Consensus to send a support letter to the Minneapolis mayor, as suggested by Councilor Martinez. - Future work sessions on this topic were planned, with staff directed to provide updates. Work Session II: Development Code Updates Senior Planner Matthew Johnson reviewed consensus items from the previous work session on January 12, including additions to comprehensive plan target densities, revisions to ADU standards (allowing larger attached ADUs and matching allowances for non-habitable structures), clarification of townhome setbacks, and updates to sidewalk construction delay provisions. The major discussion focused on incorporating mandatory adjustments as required by Senate Bill 1537 (2024). Staff proposed allowing housing development projects with a minimum density of six units per acre to request up to ten adjustments to specific development standards (e.g., height, setbacks) if the developer can demonstrate the adjustment will increase housing production or affordability. The process would be a Type I procedure (administrative, not appealable by neighbors but appealable by the applicant). Council discussed the criteria and agreed with the approach. Additionally, staff presented changes to landscape buffer and screening tables, proposing that buffers are not required when an industrial use abuts a non-conforming use within an industrial zone. Industrial standards were also updated to remove setbacks except when abutting residential zones, where a minimum 50-foot setback is required, with a maximum building height of 45 feet at that point and a ratio allowing additional height for increased setbacks. Key Outcomes: - Consensus on the mandatory adjustment provisions as presented. - Consensus on the landscape buffer revisions. - Consensus on the revised industrial standards. - Staff will finalize code language for adoption at a future regular meeting. Work Session III: Police Facility Bond Polling and Next Steps Consultant Ben Patinkin presented results of a telephone survey of 400 likely voters conducted January 5–8, 2026, with a margin of error of ±4.9%. Key findings included: - 45% initially supported a $29.5 million bond to construct a police facility (in a modeled May electorate), 38% opposed, 17% undecided. - After a summary statement, support nudged to 47%. - After full information, support reached 51% in a modeled November electorate (with the same 38% no, 11% undecided). - The most convincing message was accountability ("structured with the cost of taxpayers in mind," selling old station), with 41% of all voters finding it "very convincing." - Top reasons for opposition centered on taxes being too high and inability to afford the bond. - Subgroup analysis revealed a gender gap (women more supportive) and a partisan reversal (Republicans more supportive than Democrats, 57% vs. 37%). - Councilors raised concerns about promising to sell the old facility; staff noted they are exploring capital grants from the Oregon legislature. Council debated the timing of placing the measure on the ballot, considering May or November 2026, or May 2027. Most councilors felt May 2026 was too soon to mount a successful campaign, but there was urgency to start organizing a political action committee (PAC). The mayor proposed, and council agreed, to not place the measure on the May 2026 ballot, but to begin PAC formation. A final decision on whether to proceed in November 2026 will be made at the next work session on February 23, 2026. Staff will also provide updates on potential state capital grants. Key Outcomes: - Consensus to put the police facility bond on a future ballot (tentatively November 2026, to be confirmed in February). - Staff directed to prepare a timeline, coordinate PAC formation, and research potential state funding. - A dedicated work session on February 23 will include a decision on the ballot date after assessing PAC viability.

The Forest Grove City Council met on January 26, 2026, at 8:00 AM. The meeting included public comments on immigration enforcement, presentations from Metro and Washington County, a discussion on the TV Highway Access Management Strategy, and approval of an ordinance streamlining liquor licensing. The council also added a Black History Month proclamation to the February agenda. Public Comments & Testimony - David Dionney expressed strong opposition to ICE, describing it as a "rogue agency" and a "paramilitary force" that has moved beyond immigration enforcement. He urged the council to plan for protecting citizens if ICE arrives in force, calling the potential for harm "an invasion." - Carol Allery discussed national debt and gold standard concerns, urging the council to consider biblical teachings on economic collapse. She distributed information via email. - Thell Feek spoke on two topics: a candlelight vigil at Forest Grove Library mourning recent killings and immigration crackdowns, and a panel of five attorneys general in Portland. He played a video clip about the vigil, which included a reference to community outrage against ICE. - Michael Johnson (Indivisible Forest Grove) expressed frustration with federal actions, stating the administration is destroying faith in the legal system. He thanked the council for taking legal steps to defend laws and values, and urged remembrance of victims (e.g., Renee Goode, Alex Brady). - Beth Jenley thanked the mayor and councilors for acknowledging community anxiety. She asked for clarification on the police chief's obligation to respect a DHS internal memo that she believes sets aside Fourth Amendment protections. She called on the council to affirm constitutional protections against unreasonable search and seizure. Presentations Metro Update (Councilor Juan Carlos Gonzalez) - Gonzalez provided an overview of Metro's role and recent work, including a $500,000 emergency fund for regional food banks and $500,000 for counties impacted by immigration enforcement. - He highlighted the Housing Production Accelerator Fund, a $5M program from construction excise tax to support city planning and code improvements for housing. - On the Supportive Housing Services (SHS) measure, he noted the council is overhauling oversight into a single regional committee with city representation, and decided not to go to the ballot for broader reforms. - Regarding parks, he mentioned a potential parks levy renewal and challenges staffing west-side parks (e.g., Shahalem Ridge) due to ranger logistics. - Councilor Schimmel asked about the accelerator fund accommodating smaller cities; Gonzalez affirmed the program is designed for cities at different scales. County Update (Commissioner Jerry Willey) - Willey reported passage of public safety and library levies in November 2025. - He noted a declaration of emergency for Highway 6 (sliding road) to access federal funds for long-term safety improvements. - Budget season begins with a $5-6M deficit (smaller than prior years), driven by unfunded mandates and inflation. The county is pursuing transparent budget processes. - Legislative priorities include $1.25M for courthouse planning, jail expansion study (county has smallest jail in Oregon per capita), and capital improvements at the current jail. - COPAC (economic development) faces financial challenges after dissolution of Columbia Economic Team; dues may increase from $250 (unchanged since 1990s). - Willey testified to the Board of Forestry against the Habitat Conservation Plan, arguing for a balanced approach to protect species while maintaining timber harvest. He emphasized sustainable forest growth and the "greatest permanent value" principle. - Responding to Councilor Martinez, he stated the county has not suspended its contract with Flock (camera system) and believes cities have paused use; he offered to follow up. TV Highway Access Management Strategy (Dan Rudin) - Rudin presented the project, funded by ODOT and DLCD, focused on safety improvements on TV Highway from Quince Street to east of U Street (0.5 mile corridor with 29 driveways). - The project will gather data on driveway use, develop policy recommendations, and propose development code and Transportation System Plan amendments. - Community engagement includes fact sheets in English/Spanish, a project webpage, business owner meetings, focus groups, and a community open house in May 2026. Adoption is expected by mid-2027. - Councilor Falconer emphasized the need to hear from vulnerable road users (pedestrians, cyclists, transit-dependent) and asked that surveys track vehicle ownership. Council President Valenzuela asked about outreach to Centro Cultural and Adelante; Rudin confirmed they are on the technical advisory committee. - Councilor Schimmel asked to coordinate with the TV Highway transit project and other safety projects; Rudin confirmed coordination with BRT and Safe Routes to School. - Mayor Wenzel expressed excitement and offered to assist with community engagement. Discussion Items - Ordinance 2026-01 (Liquor License Process): City Recorder Mariah Woods presented updates from an October 2025 work session. Changes streamline the process: authorize city manager (or designee) to make favorable recommendations to OLCC (unfavorable still go to council), remove background checks for renewals (police chief reviews annual renewal list), and remove business license requirements for special event licenses. Councilor Martinez noted it helps economic development. The ordinance passed unanimously on first reading (7-0). - Black History Month Proclamation: Councilor Falconer moved to add Black History Month to February proclamations. Motion passed unanimously (7-0). Councilor Communications - Council President Valenzuela reported library staff changes: new reference supervisor Jack Buck, and youth services librarian Carolina accepted a position in Tigard (71 applications received to replace her). She also mentioned a Thursday meeting on funding presentations. - Councilor Falconer reported on TriMet service cuts: Forest Grove not directly impacted, but other communities face tough cuts. She urged support for Safe Routes to School funding. She attended an attorneys general panel noting over 50 lawsuits against the Trump administration. She briefed on a Bureau of Reclamation letter concerning Barney Reservoir dam at Hagg Lake, potentially restricting water allocations, and suggested a future work session on water reserves (consensus reached). - Councilor Gustison reported on PAC 20-year anniversary planning and retreat on March 28. - Councilor Marshall missed Torks and Rec due to illness. - Councilor Martinez reported Sister City committee updates: adult visits only on anniversary years (every five years); student exchange October 28-November 1 this year. The committee is exploring becoming a nonprofit. - Councilor Schimmel reported Urban Renewal Area building grants: upwards of 350,000 in applications. TV Highway transit project resumed with management transition to TriMet; construction targeted for 2028, but funding risks include 82nd Avenue priority and state budget. He asked about municipal funding installment milestones and whether funds would be returned if the project fails. - City Manager Jesse reported: upcoming work session on URA building grants; ODOT update on TV Highway pedestrian crossing; county update on Highway 47/Maple/Fern Hill and Council Creek Trail; police chief recruitment completed interviews; Woodfold property closed (URA now owner); market analysis for boutique hotel and grocery store starting; scoping for economic development strategic plan and communications/branding plan; meeting with Centro and Senior Center about improvements possibly funded by CDBG. - Mayor Wenzel reported on Metropolitan Mayors Consortium meeting discussing Senate Bill 1586 (Oregon Jobs Act). She noted the council needs a way to track state legislation and asked staff to look into advocacy options. She requested all event invitations be sent as calendar invites (e.g., town halls, State of the City). She outlined State of the City (March 12) and assigned topics to councilors: Schimmel (economic development), Falconer (transportation), Martinez (public safety), Gustison (PAC/arts), Valenzuela (library). Key Outcomes - Unanimous approval (7-0) of first reading of Ordinance 2026-01 amending liquor licensing process. - Unanimous approval (7-0) to add Black History Month proclamation to February meeting. - Council consensus to hold a future work session on water reserves (Barney Reservoir/Hagg Lake). - Council directed staff to explore options for tracking state legislation and advocacy. - Council accepted calendar invite request for events. - Next steps: TV Highway Access Management Strategy community engagement begins with property owner meetings on Jan 29; community open house anticipated in May 2026; adoption by mid-2027.