Public Meetings - Frederick, Maryland

The Frederick City Planning Commission met on September 8, 2025, at 6:00 PM at City Hall to consider multiple agenda items including continuances, a master plan for Frederick Health Village, a text amendment on mixed-use phasing, and several site plans and modifications. The meeting included public testimony and resulted in unanimous votes to approve routine items, continue the Frederick Health master plan to November 10, 2025, recommend denial of the text amendment, and approve all other applications. Announcements - The next Planning Commission workshop will be held September 15, 2025, at 2:00 PM, followed by a citywide community outreach meeting at 6:00 PM. Minutes - Unanimously approved the August 11, 2025, Planning Commission meeting minutes. - Unanimously approved the August 18, 2025, Planning Commission workshop minutes. - Unanimously approved the September 5, 2025, pre-Planning Commission meeting minutes. Continuances - PC24-1010ANX (The Sage Way Annexation) – Continued to the October 13, 2025, hearing (unanimous). - PC25-50PSU/FSI (Highland Trail Preliminary Plat and Final Site Plan) and PC25-56PFCP (Highland Trail Preliminary Forest Conservation Plan) – Continued to the October 13, 2025, hearing (unanimous motion covering both). Public Comments & Testimony - Frederick Health Master Plan: Adam Apostoli (NAC 12 coordinator, Ren Quarter resident) urged that more moderately priced dwelling units (MPDUs) be built rather than fee-in-lieu to ensure affordability. John Cassane (Worman Mill resident) supported the health complex but expressed concerns about already failing intersections (Maryland 26, Monocacy Boulevard) and questioned whether the traffic study accounted for commuter employees. Hannah Nickerson (Sherman Avenue) argued the project should not be judged against traffic standards when other projects like Brickworks were exempt, and urged the commission to consider the need for pedestrian and bike infrastructure. - Text Amendment (MU Phasing): Sharon Kemper Cerez (former city staff) recommended against delegating phasing decisions to the planning department and suggested hiring an economic consultant. Adam Apostoli noted 58 pages of public comment and urged denial to keep decision authority with the Planning Commission and preserve public visibility. Rob Thompson (Bond Street, Ren Quarter) opposed bypassing the Planning Commission for significant phasing changes. Hannah Nickerson cautioned against developers setting their own rules and supported keeping authority with the commission. - Worman's Mill Court Apartments: Hannah Nickerson asked about floodplain resilience and stormwater management. Mary Ellen Mitchell (CEO of Housing Frederick) strongly supported the project, citing the housing crisis and the need for 306 affordable units. - Preliminary Forest Conservation Plan (Worman's Mill): Hannah Nickerson noted the city’s 50% tree canopy goal and questioned why developers struggle to find off-site reforestation sites, and specifically regretted the removal of a healthy shagbark hickory for the shared-use path. Discussion Items - Frederick Health Master Plan (PC24-662MU): Staff reported that the applicant revised the traffic analysis, reducing the request for road adequacy findings from seven to four intersections, with two mitigated and one found adequate. The applicant (Bruce Dean, Don Schilling, Joe Calagaro) presented the project as a long-term, phased medical campus with up to 750 residential units and 1,260,394 sq ft of non-residential uses, including conditional uses (senior living, nursing home, medical lab, helistop). Traffic mitigation was estimated at $8 million. Commissioners expressed concerns about existing traffic congestion at intersections on Monocacy Boulevard and Maryland 26, the need for more concrete phasing plans, and desire for MPDUs. Commissioner Valencia moved from a no to a maybe, requesting a detailed phasing schedule and visual plan. After extensive discussion, the commission voted unanimously to continue the case to November 10, 2025, to allow the applicant to provide more detailed phasing and mitigation information. - Text Amendment, Section 417 MU Districts Phasing (PC25-55ZTA): Staff (Gabrielle Collard) explained the proposal to allow applicants to propose individualized phasing schedules, with changes approved administratively. Staff recommended approval, finding it consistent with the comprehensive plan. Commissioner Menelas questioned the lack of citywide data indicating a systemic problem, and commissioners Valencia and Llewellyn expressed concerns about delegating authority away from the commission and reducing public input. After public testimony opposing the change, the commission voted unanimously to recommend denial to the City Council, citing inconsistency with the land management code and the 2020 Comprehensive Plan, and lack of supporting data. - Bloomfield Water Tower (PC25-79PSU/FSI): Staff reported on a 100-foot-tall, million-gallon water tower on a 3.27-acre lot, with a modification for barbed wire on a 9.5-foot fence for security. The applicant (Phil Wagner) stated the tower is designed to bolster the city water system. The commission unanimously approved the modification and the site plan. - Frederick Research Park Lot 8-E (PC25-161FSI): Staff reported on a 9,734 sq ft medical office with outpatient surgery, requesting three modifications: elimination of a loading space, reduction of buffer trees, and reduction of parking lot screening trees. The applicant (John Mazellan) said the building would be compatible with the surrounding medical offices. The commission unanimously approved all three modifications and the site plan. - Worman's Mill Court Apartments (PC24-1008FSI): Staff reported on a final site plan for 306 multifamily units (100% affordable at 60% AMI) and 5,000 sq ft of non-residential space, with four modifications related to lighting, buffers, parking lot screening, and street trees. The applicant (Bruce Dean, Judd Olim, Chris Mariga) emphasized the project’s benefits: affordability, floodplain improvements, and a $1.2 million contribution to the Rails with Trails path. The commission unanimously approved all four modifications and the site plan. - Preliminary Forest Conservation Plan, Worman's Mill Court Apartments (PC24-1009PFCP): Staff reported on a plan to mitigate 2.73 acres through fee-in-lieu ($35,795.10) and a modification to remove nine specimen trees due to site constraints. The applicant (Chris Mariga) noted that only one tree was in good condition but conflicted with the shared-use path. The commission unanimously approved the modification and the forest conservation plan. Key Outcomes - Frederick Health Master Plan: Continued to November 10, 2025, by unanimous vote. The applicant is to provide a detailed phasing schedule and more concrete traffic mitigation plan. - Text Amendment (MU Phasing): Unanimous vote to recommend denial to the City Council. The commission will draft a letter explaining the reasons, including lack of citywide data and the need to retain Planning Commission authority and public input. - Bloomfield Water Tower: Unanimously approved modification to add barbed wire to the fence and approved the combined preliminary plat and final site plan. - Frederick Research Park Lot 8-E: Unanimously approved all three modifications and the final site plan. - Worman's Mill Court Apartments: Unanimously approved all four modifications and the final site plan, with conditions including MTA approval of rail crossings and floodplain permits. - Preliminary Forest Conservation Plan (Worman's Mill): Unanimously approved the modification to remove nine specimen trees and approved the preliminary forest conservation plan.

The Government Operations Committee met on September 4, 2025, at 2:00 PM to discuss the City of Frederick's taxing authority and budget process. The meeting was called to order with the Pledge of Allegiance, followed by approval of minutes and two workshop presentations by Chief Financial Officer Katie Barclay. No public comments were received. Consent Calendar - Approval of Minutes (August 21, 2025): Motion carried 3-0. Discussion Items - Discussion of the City of Frederick's Taxing Authority: CFO Katie Barclay presented an overview of the city's legal authority to levy taxes and provide tax credits, as authorized under state law. Key points included: - Real property tax is the city's most significant levy, set annually by special ordinance. The state deadline is June 20th, but city code states July 1st, requiring an update. - The city can set different tax rates for property classes, but current code applies a single rate except for habitually vacant property. - Tax set-off: The city receives a reduction in county taxes for city residents for duplicate services (police, planning, parks, road maintenance) based on a 1981 agreement. The formula has not been updated since 1981, and city officials expressed concern that city residents overpay compared to county residents. State law requires annual review but lacks enforcement. - Income tax: The city receives a share of county income taxes from city residents (greater of 17% of county income tax liability or 0.37% of Maryland taxable income). Rates are set by state and county. - Admissions and amusement tax: The city collects about $650,000 annually, with a 10% rate on gross receipts and various exemptions. - Tax credits: The city can only offer credits authorized by state law. The mayor requested consideration of two new credits that the county already offers: one for daycare providers making property improvements (lesser of $3,000 or tax bill) and one for surviving spouses of law enforcement or emergency services personnel killed in the line of duty (100% of county tax for five years). Councilmembers expressed interest but cautioned about equity. - Councilmembers advocated for revisiting the 1981 tax set-off agreement and potentially seeking state legislation to address inequities, especially for larger municipalities like Frederick. - Discussion of the City of Frederick's Budget Process and Requirements: CFO Barclay outlined the budget process as defined in the city charter and financial policies. Key points: - The charter requires the mayor to submit a proposed budget by April 1st, with revisions allowed until May 14th. Council has sole power to revise from May 15th, with adoption by June 20th. If council fails to adopt or override a veto, the mayor's proposed budget becomes final. - The charter allows council to require additional budget information by ordinance. - Financial policies (last updated 2013) include: operating costs not funded with debt, one-time revenues for one-time expenditures, enterprise funds self-supporting, department managers accountable, and a rainy day fund of 12% of general fund revenues (about 45 days of operating cash). - Rainy day fund currently at 12% ($16.3 million). Councilmembers questioned whether 45 days is sufficient for a catastrophe like COVID, and CFO noted that best practices might need review. A proposal was made to build regular review into the policies. - Council President requested supplemental departmental memos on goals, performance indicators, equity initiatives, etc., which were provided and considered beneficial. CFO noted that such details are not charter-required and could be mandated by ordinance if needed. - Plans for orientation of new councilmembers in early 2026 were discussed, including workshops on budget and financial policies. Key Outcomes - No formal votes or decisions were taken; the discussions were informational and exploratory. - Councilmembers expressed intent to pursue advocacy at the state level for revising the tax set-off formula and expanding city taxing authority. - The city will consider adding two new tax credits (daycare providers and surviving spouses of fallen first responders), subject to further research and council discussion. - The budget process and financial policies will be reviewed, with potential charter amendments or ordinance changes to be considered in time for the FY27 budget cycle. - An orientation program for incoming councilmembers will be developed to cover budget and financial topics before the next budget process begins.

The Housing, Health, and Education Committee of the City of Frederick met on September 4, 2025, at 10:00 AM in a workshop format to discuss multiple affordable housing strategies, including a presentation from the Frederick Housing Solutions Task Force, an affordable housing overlay zone, the Moderately Priced Dwelling Unit (MPDU) Housing Fund, and Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs). The meeting included public testimony on each item. Consent Calendar - Approval of Minutes (August 21, 2025): The minutes were approved unanimously. Councilmember McShane was absent. Public Comments & Testimony - On Affordable Housing Overlay and MPDU Fund: - Peter Brehm (District 3) urged the committee to learn about the advantages and limitations of not allowing or increasing the fee-in-lieu for MPDUs, and recommended that the Department of Health and Human Services develop a budget and spending plan for anticipated MPDU revenue. - Ann Ryan (Frederick Housing Solutions Task Force) requested that the city invest MPDU funds in a demonstration project, noting a church downtown that wants to renovate into SROs for low-income seniors. - Kevin Sellner (Citizens for Responsible Growth) stated that MPDU money should go solely for construction of housing and that social programs should be funded through the Capital Improvement Program rather than MPDU funds. - On Accessory Dwelling Units: - Peter Brehm strongly encouraged keeping the separate parking requirement for ADUs, as ADUs effectively double density. He also urged that all ADUs be registered with the city, whether or not a fee is attached, to prevent unregulated short-term rentals and address parking and noise concerns. Discussion Items Housing Solutions Task Force Presentation Ann Ryan, representing the Frederick Housing Solutions Task Force (partnering with Coalition for a Healthier Frederick), presented on the urgent need for deeply affordable housing for those earning under 30% Area Median Income (AMI)—$34,000 for an individual, $50,000 for a family of four. The task force has subcommittees on development, community engagement, policy, supportive services, and landlord engagement. Pastor Shannon Sullivan of Trinity United Methodist Church described her congregation’s interest in using underused church land for housing and noted zoning as a key barrier. Bruce Savos (architect) shared a Montgomery County example where a 87-unit senior housing project on church land was permitted by right under existing zoning. Jody Ostrich (Interfaith Housing Alliance) explained that Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) projects target 40–60% AMI, leaving a gap for 30% AMI households. Councilmember O'Connor expressed support for the task force’s work but noted skepticism about tiny homes, though she was open to evidence. Vice President Shackelford stressed the urgency of action before the end of the current council term in December. Affordable Housing Overlay Council President Nash led a discussion on developing an affordable housing overlay or floating zone. Options include citywide application versus limiting to transit-oriented areas or specific zones. Gabrielle (Planning Department) distinguished between overlays (bonus regulations on top of base zone) and floating zones (replacing base zone, requiring council approval). Incentive zoning (by-right performance standards) was also discussed as a way to achieve predictability. Councilmember O'Connor stated her position that affordable housing should be mixed into every neighborhood but emphasized design compatibility—e.g., not placing high-rises in single-family areas. The committee directed Clara (research staff) to return in two weeks with options on maintaining community character and design standards while incentivizing affordable housing at different AMI levels. Consensus emerged for a citywide solution rather than a limited geographic scope. Moderately Priced Dwelling Unit (MPDU) Housing Fund The committee reviewed uses of the MPDU fund (currently $4.6 million). Clara presented a list of authorized uses. Councilmember O'Connor argued that the fund’s origin—from fees on new for-sale homes—should direct spending toward homeownership, not just rental projects. Stuart (Director of Housing and Human Services) noted that several authorized uses (e.g., home buyer education, delinquency prevention) are already covered by state-funded programs, suggesting redundancies. The committee decided to ask staff to identify which uses are duplicative and to prioritize the list. They also agreed to query recent MPDU fund recipients for updates (as requested at the previous meeting). Public comment reinforced different viewpoints on using funds for construction vs. social services. Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs) The committee discussed two main barriers to ADU construction: parking requirements and impact fees. Councilmember O'Connor pointed out that impact fees total roughly $15,000 per ADU (excluding water connection), which may deter homeowners. However, she noted that units under 800 square feet are exempt from school impact fees. Vice President Shackelford suggested surveying the public to understand why ADUs are not being built. The committee agreed to have the Communications Department develop a survey. Regarding parking, Councilmember O'Connor noted that parking is already constrained in some neighborhoods, but split opinions exist. No decision was made; additional information will be gathered. Key Outcomes - Consent Calendar: Minutes of August 21, 2025, approved. - Housing Solutions Task Force: Presentation received; committee expressed appreciation and commitment to consider task force recommendations as policy options develop. - Affordable Housing Overlay: Staff directed to prepare options on community character and design standards for the next meeting in two weeks. The committee reached initial consensus on a citywide approach rather than a limited overlay. - MPDU Fund: Staff will identify redundant authorized uses and provide a prioritized list. The committee will also receive updates from recent fund recipients. Public testimony noted. - ADUs: Staff instructed to gather data on impact fees and to work with Communications on a public survey about barriers to ADU construction. No changes to parking requirements were made pending further information.

The Frederick City Council held a regular public meeting on Thursday, September 4, 2025, at 6:00 PM at City Hall. The meeting included a Labor Day proclamation, approval of appointments, public comments on a range of topics, consent agenda items, and public hearings on several contracts, a school resource officer agreement, and a rezoning. Seven ordinances were introduced for future consideration. All votes were 4-0 unless otherwise noted. Proclamation & Appointments - Labor Day Proclamation: The council proclaimed Monday, September 1st as Labor Day in Frederick, recognizing the contributions of working people. Representatives from the FOP and AFSCME spoke in support. Passed 4-0. - Appointments: Approved appointments to the Planning Commission (Zack Buono, 5-year term), Historic Preservation Committee (Jeri DeYoung, 3-year term), Weinberg Board of Directors (Christine Ando, 3-year term), and Ethics Commission (Neil Fay, 3-year term). All passed 4-0. Public Comments & Testimony - Sam Rosenbloom offered a prayer for the safety of Israeli soldiers and the return of hostages, expressing support for Israel's right to self-defense. - Levi Trumbull criticized City Attorney Michael Fry for alleged delays in responding to public records requests, stating that the city's actions have brought negative attention to Frederick. He introduced a costumed speaker. - Derek Harvey (appearing in an Alf costume) criticized City Attorney Michael Fry's handling of surveillance footage and public records, and also discussed his own pending assault case, alleging political interference. He expressed opposition to the current city legal department. - Tina Meadows O'Rear called on the council to pass a resolution condemning Israeli actions in Gaza, stating that silence is complicity. - Grady O'Rear urged the council to connect local injustices with international atrocities, referencing past council resolutions on racial equity and calling for a resolution on Palestine. - Gwendolyn Stewart (1522 Beverly Court) described a persistent weed problem on city parkland behind her home, alleging inaction by the city. She requested the creation of an Office of Ombudsman for citizen complaints. Consent Calendar (All Passed 4-0) - Release of Surety: Release of $35,806.20 cash surety from Whitehill Holdings, LLC for the B&O Properties, Lot 7 project. - Acceptance of Parkland: Acceptance of Belle Air Farm Park Parcel O (approx. 5 acres) from FredRock Partners, LLC; acceptance of 77.99 acres of parkland from WVS Renn Farm, LLC. - Grants: Acceptance of the FY26 State Aid for Police Protection (SAPP) grant from the Governor's Office of Crime Prevention and Policy. - Special Ordinances: Approval of four special ordinances to amend the FY26 budget for: Internet Crimes Against Children Grant, Police Retention and Recruitment Grant, State Aid for Police Protection Grant, and a Chesapeake Bay Trust Urban Trees Award ($494,500). Public Hearings / Discussion Items - Boat Ramp Construction (Riverside Center Park): Approved a contract with MJ Double K Farm, LLC for $462,058.50 and a purchase order of $500,000 (RFP 25-11). Funded by a $500,000 DNR grant. Passed 4-0. - Carroll Parkway Intersection & Drainage Improvements: Approved a contract with Fox and Associates for $165,314 to design intersection and drainage improvements at Carroll Parkway and West College Terrace. Passed 4-0. - Trinity School Pump Station Upgrades: Approved an agreement with Mid-Atlantic Utilities, Inc. for up to $817,895 (plus $50,000 contingency) for design-build upgrades. Passed 3-1, with Councilmember O'Connor opposed, citing the cost relative to the building's limited use. Also approved a special ordinance to transfer unused funds from the West Patrick Street Pump Station project (CIP 370013) to this project (CIP 370017). Passed 4-0. - Memorandum of Understanding with Maryland School for the Deaf (MSD): Approved an MOU for continuation of a School Resource Officer, with MSD reimbursing the city for costs. Passed 4-0. (Note: A proposed MOU with East Frederick Rising was pulled from the agenda.) - Rezoning – 300 Scotty's Bus Lane: Approved an ordinance to rezone 1.35 acres from General Commercial (GC) to Institutional (IST) to establish a youth center. The council adopted specific findings of fact regarding population, public facilities, transportation, compatibility, and consistency with the comprehensive plan. Passed 4-0. Introductions (No Action Taken) - Ordinance to authorize collective bargaining for non-sworn City of Frederick employees. - Ordinance to amend Chapter 26 (Electrical) to adopt the 2023 National Electrical Code. - Ordinance to amend Chapter 12.5, Article I (Property Maintenance) adopting the 2021 International Property Maintenance Code. - Ordinance to add local amendments to the Property Maintenance Code (Section 12.5-1.2). - Ordinance to amend Chapter 5 (Buildings) to adopt Maryland Building Performance Standards. - Ordinance to amend Chapter 16 (Plumbing and Gas) to adopt the Maryland Plumbing Code. - Ordinance to amend Chapter 9 (Fire Protection) to update code references. Council Business & Comments - Councilmember highlighted a new mobile laundry service, Fresh Step Laundry, started by retired Frederick police officer Wade Milliard, which provides free laundry services to the homeless. - Councilmember noted that September 22 is Car Free Day and encouraged residents to participate. - Councilmember acknowledged September as National Suicide Prevention Month and World Suicide Prevention Day on September 10, emphasizing mental health and kindness. Key Outcomes - All consent agenda items passed unanimously (4-0). - The Trinity School Pump Station contract passed 3-1, with Councilmember O'Connor voting no. - All other public hearing items passed 4-0. - Seven ordinances were introduced and will be considered at a future meeting. - The meeting adjourned without further action.

The Frederick Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) held a public hearing and workshop on August 28, 2025, at 6:00 PM at City Hall, 101 North Court Street. The meeting covered routine approvals, several rehabilitation and demolition cases, and public comments. All votes were unanimous unless otherwise noted. Consent Calendar - HPC-25-207 and HPC-25-209 (358 W. Patrick Street): No action taken; the applicant failed to meet public notice requirements. These items were deferred to the next meeting. - HPC-25-220 (40 S. Carroll Street): Pedestrian marker application approved unanimously. Approval of Minutes - The August 14, 2025, hearing and workshop minutes were approved unanimously. HPC Business Item 2: HPCR-25-56 / HPC21-179 – Request for Extension, 155 W. Patrick Street - Commissioner Paul Fitzgerald recused himself. The Commission granted a six-month extension beyond the initial staff-level extension. The request was approved unanimously with Fitzgerald abstaining. Item 3: HPC25-468DR – Demolition Review, 205 Lindberg Avenue - Staff determined the circa-1938 dwelling was not individually eligible for historic designation. Property owner Elizabeth Cowperthwaite spoke, requesting demolition of a side porch to enclose it for a two-level addition, reusing bricks. The Commission voted unanimously not to pursue a historic preservation overlay designation. Cases to Be Heard HPC-25-69 (111 S. Carroll Street) – Rehabilitation - Proposed replacement of roof, gable siding, and reinstatement of two dormers damaged by fire. Staff recommended approval with conditions: wood windows without cladding, true divided lights on street-facing windows, and clear drawings for dormer windows and roofing. Applicant Jessica Walter confirmed custom wood windows. Approved unanimously. HPC-25-160 (401 N. Market Street) – Addition/Rehabilitation - Replacement plan for a previously approved demolition; raising height of rear garage/warehouse and expanding footprint. Staff recommended approval with conditions: updated product literature for garage door design and drawings identifying repointing work with hand tools and lime-based mortar. Approved unanimously. HPC-25-212 (500 N. Market Street) – Partial Demolition - Request to demolish walls facing North Market and East Fifth Streets due to structural conditions. Staff found the walls beyond repair and recommended approval conditional on a replacement plan. Applicant David Lopez (architect) spoke. Approved unanimously. HPC-25-211 (500 N. Market Street) – Amendment/Replacement Plan - Replacement plan for the above demolition, including rebuilding walls, roof, and storefront. Conditions included: approval needed for any window replacements, wood elements non-pressure treated, smooth cement board siding, and previous conditions from original approval remain. Approved unanimously. HPC-25-234 (108 W. 4th Street) – Rehabilitation - Applicant Jesse Stahr proposed removing second-story wooden shutters, citing maintenance concerns. Staff and commissioners noted 1976 photographic evidence of shutters and guidelines requiring retention/replacement. The Commission modified the application to approve rehabilitation of shutters; if beyond repair, replacement shutters matching historic size, scale, detail, thickness, and hardware required. Approved unanimously. HPC-25-237 (210 E. Fifth Street) – Solar Panels - Applicant Henry Lupari proposed 19 roof-mounted solar panels on the flat roof, with electrical service on the side elevation. Staff found the proposal consistent with guidelines (not visible from street, no historic material damage). Approved unanimously. Public Comments & Testimony - Levi Trumble: Expressed concern about the city attorney’s office (Michael Fry) potentially destroying historical public records. He stated that after a lengthy public records request, the records were released, but Fry later filed a complaint with the Attorney General’s Public Information Compliance Board. Trumble urged the Commission to prevent destruction of city records. - Sam Rosenblum: Spoke about Jewish contributions to American culture and Frederick’s preservation of Jewish heritage. He recited a prayer for the safety of Israeli soldiers and peace in Israel. Key Outcomes - All case votes were unanimous. No commissioners dissented on any item. - The Commission approved all consent items, HPC business items, and cases as described, with conditions where noted. - The meeting adjourned after citizen comments.

The Government Operations Committee of the City of Frederick met on August 21, 2025, at 2:00 PM to consider two major agenda items: the impact of for-profit and nonprofit retail activities in Carroll Creek Park on downtown businesses, and proposed changes to the city's Small, Minority and Women-Owned Business Enterprise (MWBE) programs. After extensive public testimony and discussion, the committee agreed to form a working group to address the Carroll Creek issue and voted to advance the purchasing policy revisions to a public hearing. Consent Calendar - The committee approved the minutes from the July 17, 2025, meeting unanimously (3-0). Public Comments & Testimony Carroll Creek Park Item: - Mindy Collie (owner of Vintage MC): Provided specific sales data showing significant drops on weekends with for-profit markets, including a $14,000 (60%) decrease on the weekend after Thanksgiving 2024 compared to 2023. Her holiday season sales were down 23% overall. - Ann Campbell (Terra Moda): Reported that sales on August 16 (a for-profit market weekend) were $480, compared to $2,390 on the previous weekend. Requested creek use limited to nonprofit and heritage events. - Amira (Chappelle & Co.): Noted that for-profit organizers charge vendors $200+ while paying the city only $145–695 to rent the creek, siphoning money from local brick-and-mortar stores. - Sumner (The Muse): Argued that existing downtown businesses already provide vendor opportunities and that for-profit markets are unnecessary; recommended limiting creek use to nonprofits and heritage events. - Crystal Williams Palmer (Crash and Catharsis Rage Factory): Described how for-profit markets solicited her as a sponsor, asking her to provide services without payment, profiting from local businesses. - Miranda Mossberg (Frederick Maine): Had only one sale on a recent festival Sunday, forcing her to forgo paying herself; noted creek events forced a change to her business model. - Darren Clark (Clark Computer Services): Emphasized broader economic challenges and urged the city to prioritize downtown businesses. - Michael McLaughlin (NL McLaughlin, event organizer): Expressed willingness to compromise, stated his organization is a small family business, and offered to work with the city and downtown businesses. - Natchanan (a vendor): Suggested organizers could promote downtown shopping at events and noted that they provide free booths to nonprofits and young entrepreneurs. - Yuni Sterner (local artist): Said for-profit markets provide crucial income for her small business and allow her to hire local students; expressed difficulty finding affordable retail opportunities downtown. SDVOSB and SBR Program Item: - Darren Clark (Clark Computer Services): Expressed support for the proposed Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business (SDVOSB) program, stating it would help disabled veteran-owned businesses compete more fairly. Discussion Items A. Carroll Creek Park Retail Activities: Councilmember Kelly Russell introduced the item, explaining that for-profit events have negatively impacted downtown businesses and reduced availability for nonprofit organizations. Parks and Recreation Director Bob Smith provided background: a 2024 peak in for-profit requests led to a policy revision creating a November reservation window; for 2025, there were 101 nonprofit event days, 14 for-profit event days, and 8 general public events. Smith raised concerns about definitions and enforceability. Committee members discussed potential solutions. Councilmember Kazimczek cautioned against a simple for-profit/nonprofit distinction and supported forming a working group with legal counsel. Councilmember Russell proposed a working group with stakeholders to develop recommendations by end of 2025. Some members suggested blackout periods during key retail seasons. Kara Norman, Executive Director of Downtown Frederick Partnership, presented data showing foot traffic downtown decreased 5–8% on vendor market days. The committee broadly agreed to form a working group and considered temporarily halting new for-profit reservations pending policy development. B. Changes to MWBE/SDVOSB and SBR Programs: Gerard Bowens, Contract Compliance Administrator, presented two proposals: 1. SDVOSB Program: Add a 2% subcontracting goal for service-disabled veteran-owned small businesses to applicable MWBE contracts. 2. SBR Program Revision: Change the process for purchases over $50,000 from a default reservation to a review-based approach where staff assess small business availability before tagging RFPs as SBR. Bowens noted that of 78 formal solicitations since September 2023, 58 required exemptions, yet many still went to small businesses. The new approach aims to increase transparency and intentional SBR tagging. Committee members expressed support and discussed unbundling larger contracts. Key Outcomes - Carroll Creek Park Policy: The committee agreed to form a working group led by Councilmember Russell to develop policy recommendations by the end of 2025. A temporary pause on new for-profit reservations was considered, pending legal review. - SBR and SDVOSB Program Resolutions: The committee voted unanimously (3-0) to forward the proposed changes (including both the SDVOSB subcontracting goal and SBR revision) to a public hearing for further consideration. Motion by Councilmember Kazimczek, second by Councilmember Russell.

The Housing, Health, and Education Committee met on August 21, 2025, at 10:00 AM to discuss three major housing policy items: the Moderately Priced Dwelling Unit (MPDU) fund utilization, Single Room Occupancy (SRO) ordinances, and updates to the Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) ordinance. The committee reviewed staff memos, heard public testimony, and set priorities for moving forward. Consent Calendar - Approval of Minutes: The minutes from the July 17, 2025 meeting were approved by unanimous consent. Public Comments & Testimony - On MPDU Funds: - Jim Schmersal (resident): Provided spreadsheets showing MPDU fund sources and expenditures since inception. He suggested two uses: giving funds to organizations for rental assistance, or establishing a second mortgage program (e.g., a Community Development Financial Institution) to support homeownership. - Mary Ellen Mitchell (CEO, Housing Frederick): Urged the committee to ask developers why they pay the fee-in-lieu instead of building units, noting that carrying costs (land prep, fees, inflation) have shrunk profit margins. She highlighted that Frederick County has used fee-in-lieu funds to multiply affordable housing units beyond the 12.5% requirement. - Peter Brem (District 3 resident): Suggested investigating whether the fee-in-lieu amount should be increased to better cover actual building costs. - On SRO Ordinances: - Jim Schmersal: Noted that SRO is defined in the Land Management Code (LMC) but not carried into the use matrix. He advocated for putting SRO regulations in the zoning ordinance rather than as a standalone ordinance, and suggested reviewing existing definitions for rooming houses and tourist homes. - Heather Goddard (city resident): Expressed support for legalizing SROs, noting benefits for students, singles, and those seeking cost savings. She emphasized that legalizing informal SRO arrangements would make residents more comfortable calling for emergency services. She suggested requiring an on-site owner/manager and allowing photo documentation for inspections. - On ADU Ordinance: - Jim Schmersal: Recommended the committee survey similar-sized municipalities through the Maryland Municipal League to compare parking requirements and other ADU regulations. Discussion Items - Moderately Priced Dwelling Unit (MPDU) Fund Utilization: - President Nash and Director Stuart Campbell presented a detailed memo outlining the history and current state of the MPDU program. The committee discussed whether to keep the fee-in-lieu option or require developers to build units. Vice President Shaffleford and Chair Krisbnchek expressed support for retaining the fee-in-lieu, noting that the policy change from a flat 16.5% fee to a graduated fee has only been in effect for a short time and data is insufficient to assess its impact. Councilmember McShane agreed, stressing that the fee-in-lieu is only valuable if the funds are effectively spent. The committee consensus was to keep the fee-in-lieu for now and focus on expediting the expenditure of the approximately $4.6 million fund. They requested staff to bring forward presentations from recent fund recipients (e.g., Habitat for Humanity, Westall Saints project) to provide updates and inform future allocation decisions. - Single Room Occupancy (SRO) Ordinances: - President Nash presented a draft policy framework and referenced a Minnesota task force report as a resource. He distinguished between market-rate SROs and supportive housing SROs for those experiencing homelessness. Chair Krisbnchek emphasized the importance of ensuring SROs include amenities like kitchens and are located near services or have mobile service delivery. Councilmember McShane urged the committee to move forward with best-policy proposals without preemptively hedging against opposition. The committee agreed to continue policy discussions at future meetings, focusing on zoning (by-right vs. conditional use), development standards (parking, bathrooms), licensing, inspections, and incentives. - Review of Current ADU Ordinance: - Chair Krisbnchek summarized the current ADU requirements, noting that a text amendment is in preparation. Councilmember McShane advocated for removing the parking requirement, arguing it is a primary deterrent and that ADUs will not overwhelm neighborhoods. Chair Krisbnchek urged a broader conversation considering public transit, permeable surfaces, and landscaping. President Nash suggested moving forward with the ordinance as-is for council discussion while continuing to gather data on parking issues. The committee agreed to bring the ADU text amendment back for review. Key Outcomes - MPDU Program: The committee will keep the fee-in-lieu option and schedule a future meeting to hear from organizations that received MPDU funds, aiming to develop a strategic plan for faster fund expenditure. - SRO Ordinances: Staff will schedule subsequent committee meetings to address specific policy questions (zoning, development standards, licensing, incentives) and will consider issuing an RFI to the development and nonprofit communities. - ADU Ordinance: The committee will continue working with planning staff on a text amendment; the parking requirement will be a key point of discussion. A future meeting will focus on parking data and potential alternatives. - General: The committee committed to maintaining a regular meeting cadence to advance the Housing Policy Work Plan through the end of the current term.

The Frederick City Council held a public meeting on Thursday, August 21, 2025, at 6:00 PM at City Hall. The agenda included routine consent items, major development agreements for the Downtown Hotel and Conference Center, annexation of the High Glen property, a rezoning, and an update to the parking code. A significant portion of the meeting was devoted to public testimony—both during the designated public comment period and following agenda items—concerning a proposed ceasefire resolution that had failed to advance at the previous meeting. Council members approved all agenda items, with one recusal and one abstention. Consent Calendar - Grants: Approved acceptance of FY2026 Internet Crimes Against Children (ICAC) grant, FY2026 Maryland Criminal Intelligence Network (MCIN) grant with interlocal agreements with Frederick County Sheriff, Brunswick, and Thurmont, and FY2026 Police Recruitment and Retention (PRAR) grant from the Governor’s Office of Crime Prevention and Policy. (Vote 5-0) - Special Ordinances: Approved a budget amendment for revenue and expenditures from the Town of New Market speed camera program. Council President Nash recused himself; vote 4-0 (one abstention). Public Comments & Testimony Over 15 residents addressed the council, the majority urging adoption of a ceasefire resolution calling for an end to U.S. complicity in violence in Gaza and elsewhere. - Tina Meadows O'Rear expressed sadness that Councilmember Ksimchak’s motions did not receive a second. - Grady O'Rear praised Councilmember Ksimchak’s courage and recalled past city resolutions on national/international issues; urged the council to endorse the resolution. - Emily Van Norden criticized the council for not allowing discussion, declared the issue local, noted that over 150 municipalities have acted, and pleaded for adoption. - Summer Crenshaw urged the council to add the resolution to the agenda for dialogue. - Natasha Ahmed read poems and asked the council to speak for children in Gaza. - Khalil Shazley played an audio clip of a former Green Beret criticizing the IDF and urged the council not to allow Frederick to be "Israeli occupied." - Patty Clements asked council members directly whether they are for or against genocide and ceasefire. - Zakaria, a Palestinian child, recited a poem calling for action. - Yusuf, a Palestinian, expressed anger at silence and urged support. - Tas Fatima drew parallels to Nazi Germany and other genocides, urging the council to take a stand. - Rafika Turnier stated society is witnessing a "Holocaust" and urged the council to stand on the right side of history. - Robert Sharp, a lifelong resident, shifted focus to public safety: criticized red-light running, traffic congestion on Market Street, and water quality. - Paige Corey apologized for not intervening when a man exposed himself at a prior meeting, and urged the council to condemn genocide. - David of the Golden Mile expressed disappointment at Councilmembers Shackelford and Russell for not seconding the motion, accusing them of supporting colonialism. - Jim Wagner called the failure to second "disgusting" and noted precedents for international resolutions. - Musa described personal grief and detailed bombing dynamics, urging the council to comprehend the horrors. - Anthony Mills stated it is a shame that children must beg for life and criticized council silence. - An additional unnamed speaker said silence is "extremely telling" and criticized the council for not defending their decision. After the parking ordinance, brief additional public comment occurred: - A speaker quoted Nelson Mandela on Palestine. - Another speaker urged a more holistic governance approach. - Paige Corey again spoke, noting children lose limbs without anesthesia. Downtown Hotel and Conference Center Director of Economic Development Richard Griffin presented three related agreements: 1. Second Amendment to MOU with Frederick County: Clarifies that the city’s loan will be made to Carroll Creek Lodging LLC (not Plumont Hospitality Partners). 2. Master Development Agreement: Memorializes final terms for the $103.5 million Marriott Downtown at Carroll Creek Hotel and Conference Center. Project includes 204 guest rooms, 74,500 room nights annually, 26,000 sq. ft. of meeting space, four food and beverage outlets, 2,600 sq. ft. of retail, and 200 on-site parking spaces. Also includes renovation of the historic Frederick Trolley Building and the adjacent Eagles Building. 3. Agreed Material Terms of City Loan: Outlines up to $4.37 million in financing (city portion $2 million less $150,000 previously provided) for refinancing of property acquisition debt, secured by deed of trust, with 10-year repayment term. Councilmember Ksimchak asked for the total city investment in the project (including sunk costs) but was not provided a number; she expressed frustration at not having received an answer before. A public commenter questioned parking adequacy and construction impacts. The council voted 5-0 to approve each of the three items. High Glen Annexation Director of Planning Gabrielle Collard presented the annexation of 71.94 acres on Yellow Springs Road. The property will be zoned R4 (Low Density Residential) with development capped at 256 residential units, to be developed as a Planned Neighborhood Development. Key terms in the annexation agreement include: - Regional infrastructure contribution of $8,000 per unit, with annual escalation not to exceed 15%. - Contribution of $2,000 per EDU toward a new water tank. - Easement for the North Branch Trail; if the trail is not built by the developer, the contribution increases to $8,750 per unit. - Off-site APFO improvements may be deducted from contributions. Bruce Dean, attorney for the applicant, noted the property owner (Marvin Osherman) does not intend to develop soon but wants to negotiate with the current council. Public comment: Aaron McNabb supported the annexation for housing supply and trail funding. The council approved all three components: Annexation Agreement (5-0), Resolution to Adopt Annexation Plan (5-0), and Resolution to Annex (5-0). Faith Reformed Presbyterian Church Rezoning Quasi-judicial hearing to rezone 4.08 acres from R4 to Institutional floating zone to conform with the existing church use. Staff found no population or traffic changes, compatibility with surrounding uses, and consistency with the comprehensive plan. Applicant concurred. Councilmember Ksimchak offered findings. Approved 5-0. Parking Code Amendment Director Griffin presented an ordinance to update Chapter 13, Article II (Stopping, Standing, and Parking). Changes delegate authority to the Parking Manager, enable digital enforcement, and add prohibition on parking in bike lanes. A redline version was not readily available; Council President Nash recused himself as he had not been able to review the final changes. Vote: 4 in favor, 0 opposed, 1 abstention (Nash abstained). Other Actions - Approval of August 7, 2025 Minutes: Approved 5-0. - Microsoft Office 365 Software Purchase: Approved a three-year purchase order to SHI for $154,072.46 per year. (Vote 5-0) - Grove Hill Parkland Fee in Lieu: Approved resolution establishing a $65,340 fee in lieu of dedicating 0.78 acres of parkland for the Grove Hill Planned Neighborhood Development. (Vote 5-0) Key Outcomes - Ceasefire resolution not brought forward; Councilmember Ksimchak stated she will not move it again unless there is sufficient support. - All consent and hearing items approved as described. - Votes: Minutes, Grants, Special Ordinances (Nash recused): passed. Microsoft 365 purchase, Grove Hill fee, three Hotel agreements, three High Glen annexation items, Church rezoning: 5-0. Parking ordinance: 4-0 (Nash abstaining). - Council will schedule a presentation on construction impacts of the hotel project.

The Frederick Planning Commission held a workshop on August 18, 2025, at 2:00 PM in City Hall to review three development proposals and a draft of the commission's Rules of Procedure. The meeting was a workshop format; no formal votes were taken. The proposals discussed were: Brickworks Lot 1 (combined preliminary plat, final site plan, and forest conservation plan), Frederick Research Park Lot 8-E (final site plan), and AstraZeneca Perfusion Addition (final site plan). The workshop also included a detailed discussion on proposed updates to the Planning Commission's Rules of Procedure, particularly regarding training and commissioner conduct. Brickworks Lot 1 – Preliminary Plat, Final Site Plan, and Forest Conservation Plan (PC24-928PSU/FSI, PC24-929PFCP) - Applicant Presentation (Mike Wiley, Warmall Companies): Presented plans for 91 townhomes on the northwest corner of the Brickworks master plan. Key modifications requested: reduction of rear yard setback from 20 feet to 7 feet (with a 30-foot alley providing 44 feet building-to-building); reduction of side yard setback from 5 feet to 3 feet on end units adjacent to pedestrian passageways; 50% rear yard encroachment for decks (5 feet into 7-foot yard); a 32–34 inch decorative fence along East Street only (not South Street); and a connectivity ratio of 1.75 versus the required 1.8. The applicant stated that forest conservation planting would be doubled from the previous submission, reaching 1.54 acres on site, with a small fee-in-lieu payment. Parkland provided is 0.94 acres against a requirement of 1.04 acres. - Commissioner Questions: Commissioner Valencia asked about the increase in forest conservation area (doubled). Commissioner Menelas raised safety concerns about pedestrian paths crossing busy East Street without crosswalks. Commissioner Ellis noted discrepancies in unit count and parkland calculations between the applicant's presentation and the staff report; the applicant acknowledged numbers would be refined in the next submission. Commissioner Strawson inquired about the connectivity ratio calculation, requesting a clearer explanation of links and nodes for future hearings. - Staff Comments (Pam Reppert): Noted that the applicant must address all comment letters, clean up notes (including unit count), and provide a justification letter for modifications. The connectivity ratio of 1.75 is acceptable. The fence should be below 3 feet; staff referenced previous approvals for front-yard fences on arterial streets. The forest conservation area cannot be counted as parkland unless approved by Parks and Recreation; this requires separate discussion. Staff also emphasized the need for a shared-use path under the Potomac Edison right-of-way, urging the applicant or master developer (Greensburg Gibbons) to obtain a commitment from the utility. Stormwater and APFO certificates are pending. - Outcome: Continued; the applicant will resubmit with corrections and clarifications. The case is expected to be scheduled for an October public hearing. Frederick Research Park Lot 8-E – Final Site Plan (PC25-161FSI) - Applicant Presentation (John Mazellan, Fox & Associates): Proposed a 9,734-square-foot one-story medical office building (oral surgery center) on a one-acre lot. Three modifications requested: elimination of a large loading space (deliveries are small vans); reduction of landscape screening along the north side due to an adjacent stormwater facility and along the east side due to existing utilities; and reduced street tree planting along the frontage due to underground utility conflicts, to be supplemented with ornamental landscaping. The site is within a campus of similar medical uses. - Commissioner Questions: Commissioner Ellis confirmed the three modifications and asked about future use changes; the applicant noted that a change of use would require a new site plan. Commissioner Valencia requested elevation drawings for clarity at the hearing. - Staff Comments: Staff confirmed the modifications are appropriate. APFO certificates are pending and will be issued before the public hearing. - Outcome: To proceed to a public hearing after APFO approval. AstraZeneca Perfusion Addition – Final Site Plan (PC25-193FSI) - Applicant Presentation (Kyle Hughes, MHG; Aaron Pratt, DPR Construction): Proposed a 7,020-square-foot addition to an existing manufacturing building (Building 636) for cell culture and media prep. The addition does not add new water/sewer use, employees, or parking demand (existing parking: 681 spaces, required: 455). All landscaping requirements are met from previous approvals; four dead trees will be replaced. Forest conservation was satisfied under a 2015 plan. The addition is located in an industrial area of the site, not connecting two buildings as some may have inferred. - Commissioner Questions: Commissioners Valencia and Llewellyn requested elevation drawings and a clearer site plan to show the addition's location relative to existing buildings and generators. - Staff Comments: APFO documents are under review and will be issued prior to the public hearing. No other issues. - Outcome: To proceed to a public hearing (likely October) after APFO approval and with additional visual materials. Rules of Procedure – Draft Review - Presentation (Gabrielle Collard, Deputy Director for Planning): Staff presented a marked-up draft of the Rules of Procedure with substantive changes: updating terminology to chairperson/vice chairperson; adding sections for an alternate member (Section 1.3) and a council liaison (Section 1.4); moving the Conduct of Members section to Section 2 (including a provision from city code that members missing more than 50% of meetings in 12 consecutive months are considered resigned and may be removed); and clarifying the purpose of workshops (review of new proposals) and pre-planning commission meetings (briefing on hearing agenda items). A new subsection allows commissioners to request informational items unrelated to specific applications, which must be placed on a workshop agenda with 15 days' notice. - Commissioner Discussion: Extensive debate centered on the need for training on technical topics (e.g., connectivity ratio, forest conservation credits, parkland requirements). Commissioners expressed frustration that training has been repeatedly requested but not provided. They suggested using the Friday pre-planning meetings for scheduled training sessions (e.g., 15–30 minutes) on published topics, with agendas made public. Staff emphasized the importance of transparency and noted that substantive topics should be on workshop agendas, but a compromise was discussed: a schedule of training topics could be set, with topics announced in advance. Commissioners also raised concerns about receiving requested data from staff and about perceived inconsistencies in the scope of information provided. A disagreement emerged regarding whether commissioners may conduct independent research; staff and legal will provide further guidance. The liaison role was also discussed as a potential conduit to the City Council for code change recommendations. - Outcome: The draft will be revised with additional input from the legal department, particularly on Section 9.1 (role of the commission). The revised draft will be brought back for further discussion. Commissioners agreed to compile a list of recommended code changes to present to the new City Council. Key Outcomes - No formal votes were taken on any agenda item; all actions were directional. - Brickworks Lot 1: Applicant to resubmit with corrections and justifications; case expected to go to public hearing in October. - Frederick Research Park Lot 8-E and AstraZeneca Perfusion Addition: To proceed to public hearings pending APFO approvals. - Rules of Procedure: Further revisions will be made, including legal department input on commissioner conduct and independent research. A future workshop will continue the discussion. - Staff committed to developing a training schedule for commissioners on planning-related topics, with topics to be published on meeting agendas.