Public Meetings - Fresno, California

The Fresno City Council held a special meeting on May 12, 2026, at 9:03 AM to consider a closed session item regarding the appointment of a City Clerk. The meeting was called to order with four members present (Esparza, Maxwell, Karbassi, Vang) and three absent (Perea, Arias, Richardson). The agenda was approved unanimously. There were no public comments. The Council then recessed into closed session at 9:05 AM and adjourned at 1:21 PM. No announcements were made in open session following the closed session. Closed Session - Item ID 26-508: Consideration of public employee appointment (City Clerk) under Government Code Section 54957(b). The Council discussed the item in closed session. No action or decision was announced in open session. Key Outcomes - The closed session was held and discussed, but no open session report or decision was provided. The meeting adjourned without further action.

The Fresno Planning Commission met on May 6, 2026, at 6:00 PM in City Hall Council Chambers. The commission considered several planning items, including a major Costco commercial center project. The meeting adjourned at 6:41 PM. Consent Calendar - Approved the minutes from the January 28, 2026, regular meeting. Continued Matters - Item VII-A (ID 26-541): Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 6540 and related permits for a 138-lot single-unit residential development on 26.25 acres west of North Willow Avenue – continued to May 20, 2026. - Item VIII-A (ID 26-568): Plan Amendment, Rezone, Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 6419, and Planned Development Permit for a 53-lot single-unit residential development on 8.47 acres at East Copper Avenue and North Portofino Drive – continued to May 20, 2026. - Item VIII-B (ID 26-569): Plan Amendment, Rezone, and Conditional Use Permit for a ±3,500 sq. ft. automated car wash on ±0.84 acres at East Copper Avenue – continued to May 20, 2026. Discussion Items: Costco Commercial Center Project (Item VIII-C) - Background: The project (originally filed in 2021) was previously approved by the Planning Commission in February 2024 and by the City Council later that year, but the Council rescinded approvals in November 2025. A partially recirculated Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was prepared from November 21, 2025, to January 5, 2026, focusing only on greenhouse gas emissions. The final EIR was completed in early 2026. The revised proposal includes a ±219,216 sq. ft. Costco warehouse with market delivery operations, a 32-dispenser (16-pump) fuel station, a ±4,800 sq. ft. car wash, and numerous off-site improvements. The project requires a rezone to Commercial General, two plan amendments, a conditional use permit for a Type 21 alcohol license, and a planned development permit for taller parking lot light fixtures. - Environmental Analysis: The EIR identified four significant and unavoidable impacts: construction noise, vehicle miles traveled (VMT) inconsistency with CEQA Section 15064, geometric design hazards, and cumulative transportation impacts. The recirculated section on greenhouse gas emissions concluded a less-than-significant impact. A revised Statement of Overriding Considerations and updated Municipal Code findings were presented for adoption. - Commissioner Questions: Commissioner Calandra asked about a traffic signal at Arthur Avenue; staff confirmed none is planned. Commissioner Shergill asked about traffic impacts; the project team stated that Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) is reduced compared to the existing Shaw Avenue store and that a separate transportation study with city engineers led to comprehensive traffic conditions and improvements, including a full connection of Spruce Avenue with traffic calming, and truck routes that keep deliveries off North Riverside Drive. - Public Testimony: - Support: Doug Jensen, representing property owner Jenko Farms, urged approval, citing the need for adequate parking. - Opposition: Daniel Brannick, from the Hearn and Riverside Coalition for Responsible Planning and Development, opposed the project, arguing that the environmental review is flawed and that the market delivery distribution use is inconsistent with the Commercial General zoning without a text amendment. He contended that the VMT mitigation fee program should be applied as feasible mitigation, noting the project's 120,000 VMT compared to the program's 67,429 units. - Applicant Rebuttal: Eric Phillips, attorney for Costco, stated that the integrated uses constitute a large-format retail use permitted in the zone, and that the city's land use consistency findings are thorough. He argued the GHG analysis is conservative and consistent with state law, and that the VMT mitigation fee was expressly made inapplicable to projects already in process with completed transportation analysis. - Commission Discussion: Commissioner Shergill noted the existing Shaw Avenue Costco is very congested and that the west of State Route 99 area is a retail desert, supporting the project's benefits for consumers and competition. Key Outcomes - Motion to Approve the Costco Project Recommendation to City Council: Made by Commissioner Shergill, seconded by Commissioner Lyday. The motion carried 5-0 (Commissioners Bray, Diaz, Lyday, Calandra, Shergill voted aye; Chairman Vang and Commissioner Criner were absent). The recommendation includes: - Certification of the 2026 Final Environmental Impact Report (SCH No. 2021100443). - Adoption of the Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations. - Adoption of the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. - Approval of Plan Amendment Application No. P21-01960 (change to General Commercial and reclassify Herndon Avenue to Super Arterial). - Introduction of a bill for Rezone Application No. P21-01960. - Approval of Conditional Use Permit No. P21-01959 (warehouse, car wash, fuel station), No. P21-03251 (Type 21 alcohol license), and Planned Development Permit No. P21-03252 (taller light fixtures). - Adoption of Fresno Municipal Code Findings. - Three other items (VII-A, VIII-A, VIII-B) were continued to May 20, 2026. Other Reports - Director Jennifer Clark announced that May is Historic Preservation Month. Commissioners were encouraged to attend events, including a kickoff at the Fresno City County Historical Society and the annual pub quiz on May 21st.

The District 1 Project Review Committee met on May 7, 2026, to consider two development projects: a 67-lot single-family subdivision (Track 6557) and a conditional use permit for a new Indian restaurant with alcohol sales. Both items received unanimous recommendations for approval. Consent Calendar - The committee approved the meeting agenda from April 9, 2026, and the draft minutes from February 12, 2026, by unanimous vote. Discussion Items - Item A: Vesting Tentative Track Map No. 6557 (Crown Homes) – A proposal to subdivide 10.85 acres at the southeast corner of North Bryan and West Ashland Avenues into 67 single-family detached homes (density 6.17 lots per acre) in the RS5 zone. The project, by Joseph Crown of Crown Homes, was previously part of Track 6429 and will proceed concurrently with that larger development. Key details: homes 1,500–1,800 sq. ft., no HOA, six-foot wood fences, and stormwater managed via a master plan basin. The applicant noted the West Area Neighborhood Specific Plan rezoned the parcel from multi-family to RS5. A VMT analysis was performed, and CEQA review is ongoing with resubmission expected in May 2026. Committee members asked about park space (included in Track 6429), water/sewer connections, and timing (permits anticipated early 2027). All three committee members recommended approval, though one member expressed concern about the downzoning from multi-family to single-family. - Item B: Conditional Use Permit P25-03574 (Tandoori Grill) – Application by AJ Biswaz of BGV International for a Type 47 ABC license (beer, wine, and distilled spirits for on-site consumption) at an existing 5,427 sq. ft. building at 4113 West Swift Avenue, to operate a family-style Indian restaurant. The proposal includes facade improvements and interior upgrades. The nearest school (John Steinbeck Elementary) is approximately 3,000 feet away, across a freeway, which the applicant argued alleviates any school proximity objections. The committee noted the building is currently vacant and discussed parking lot improvements (restriping, sealing). The applicant confirmed the operators have restaurant experience. All committee members recommended approval. Key Outcomes - Track 6557: Unanimous recommendation for approval by committee members Barry, Gosales, and Alonso. The project will proceed to the Planning Commission once CEQA is resolved. - Tandoori Grill CUP: Unanimous recommendation for approval. The applicant will update building code references and make parking lot improvements. No public comments were received. The meeting adjourned.

The Fresno City Council met on Thursday, May 7, 2026, at 9:00 AM in the Council Chambers. The meeting included eight ceremonial proclamations, three scheduled hearings, a consent calendar of 23 items, one contested consent item, a workshop on the BOLD (Bond Opportunities for Land Development) Program, and a closed session. Councilmember Nick Richardson was absent. The meeting adjourned at 4:03 PM after closed session. Ceremonial Presentations - Proclamations were presented for World Asthma Day (sponsored by Council President Esparza), Darrell Fifield Day (Vice President Maxwell), Mental Health Awareness Month (Councilmember Perea), Tennis Month (Councilmember Arias), National Police Week and Peace Officers Memorial Day (Councilmember Richardson and Mayor/City Manager), AAPI Heritage Month (Councilmember Vang), Fresno Preservation Month (Mayor/City Manager), and Fresno Christian High School’s The Feather Online (Mayor/City Manager). Consent Calendar - The consent calendar, comprising routine approvals and unanimous actions, was approved by a 6-0 vote (Councilmember Richardson absent). Key items included: - Approval of minutes for April 23, 2026. - Final relocation reimbursement claim ($247,000 net proceeds) for Genuine Parts Company (NAPA) related to the Blackstone McKinley BNSF Grade Separation Project. - Easement acquisition for the Ashlan Avenue Widening Project. - Construction contract award ($206,226.87) for Trolley Park Lighting and Shade Structure to Geometric Construction Inc. - Sale of a 14.58± acre property at Herndon and Brawley Avenues for $2,100,000 (increase of $250,000) with net proceeds of $247,000. - Acceptance of $77,250 additional funding from Cal OES for Urban Search and Rescue training (total $324,450). - Emergency dispatch service agreement with Fresno County ($1,713,360) for July 1, 2026 through December 31, 2027. - Grant acceptance of up to $180,000 from Fresno-Madera Area Agency on Aging for Senior Hot Meals Programming. - Successor MOU with IBEW Unit 7 including salary increases. - Brownfields Cleanup Revolving Loan Fund loan of $1,194,000 to Fresno Area Hispanic Foundation for abatement at the Former Berkeley Building. - First Amendment to service agreement with RH Community Builders for Youth Rapid Rehousing ($500,000) for 25 units. - Revolving Loan Fund agreement of up to $8,000,000 with The Park Partners LLC for The Park at South Stadium multifamily project. - Consultant service agreement with Stantec Consulting Services Inc. (up to $144,580) for historic survey of Chinatown. - Initiation of annexation for Copper-Friant No. 3 Reorganization (2.40 acres). - Appropriation of $37,700 for Police Department’s 2023 State Homeland Security Grant Program. - Requirements contract with Kemira Water Solutions for ferric chloride (annual cost $1,874,361.71, total not-to-exceed $9,951,240.88). - Consultant agreement with Carollo Engineers ($408,122) for North Fresno Wastewater Reclamation Facility Improvements. - Addendum and grant application ($5,115,000) for River West Fresno Eaton Trail Extension Project. - Summary vacation of a public utility easement (Lot 38, T-6325). - Final map approval for Tract No. 6475. - Consultant agreement with Alta Planning + Design ($298,000, contingency $15,000) for Mobility Design Guide. - Construction contract award ($487,566) for FAX Bus Stop ADA Upgrades Phase B. - Item 2-M (Publication of Legal Notices) was tabled to June 4, 2026. Public Comments & Testimony - One member of the public, Nikki Real, spoke on consent, contested consent, and closed session items, urging the council to be careful with closed session decisions, stating they are not working in the city’s favor. - During unscheduled communication, Matthew Gillian, a lifelong resident of District 2, accused Councilmember Karbassi of making racially insensitive comments earlier in the meeting (a joke about a black bear sighting and Council President Esparza). Gillian referenced a $15.4 million settlement and criticized representation of black and brown communities. Councilmember Karbassi responded, clarifying that he was told by wildlife officials it was a black bear (not a racial remark), and that Gillian is a campaign manager for an opponent trying to create scandal. - No public comments were made during the scheduled hearings (CFD No. 9 annexation, right-of-way vacation, or the joint meeting for Fulton Street properties). Discussion Items - Scheduled Council Hearings (Timed Items): - 9:10 AM – Community Facilities District No. 9, Annexation No. 71: Approved 6-0. Resolutions and ordinance adopted to annex territory and levy a special tax for the property at Northwest corner of East Copper Avenue and North Portofino Drive. No public comment. - 9:15 AM – Vacation of two portions of City-owned right-of-way at Tuolumne Street and Fulton Street/Van Ness Avenue: Approved 6-0. Staff explained the vacation is related to a pending parking garage and mixed-income development. No public comment. - 9:20 AM – Joint Meeting for properties at 815, 829, and 835 Fulton Street (The Park at South Stadium): Approved 6-0 by the City Council, and also by the Fresno Revitalization Corporation (FRC) with Mayor Dyer and two council members voting. The item approved a first amendment to the Disposition and Development Agreement, extending bond financing and escrow closing dates by two weeks due to temporary uncertainty in the bond market from global military conflicts. The project is an 8-story, $81 million multifamily development with $70 million in bond financing. No public comment. - Contested Consent Calendar (Item 2-H): Resolution establishing new procedures for appeals in the competitive bidding process, rescinding Resolution 2003-129. Council discussed changes: non-responsive bids (incomplete submissions) are no longer appealable; responsibility (contractor capability) remains appealable. Staff stated this aligns with legal requirements and peer cities, and prevents delays. Councilmember Arias asked about error correction; staff noted multiple reviews (purchasing, city attorney, city manager) and council still has authority. The resolution was adopted 5-0 (Councilmembers Karbassi and Richardson absent). - Workshop – BOLD Program Presentation (General Administration 3-A): Assistant City Manager Mascia and Travis Cooper (CMFA) presented the Bond Opportunities for Land Development (BOLD) program, which allows developers to use CFDs to finance public infrastructure and impact fees. Costs are borne by developers; CMFA handles administration and shares 25% of issuance fees with the city. Council discussion: Councilmember Arias questioned the necessity (not aware of developer demand for new financing). Councilmember Perea supported it as a tool to speed up housing and commercial development with no city cost. Councilmember Karbassi agreed but suggested developers should outreach to council. No vote was taken; a public hearing and resolution are scheduled for May 21, 2026. Key Outcomes - All three scheduled hearings were approved unanimously: - CFD No. 9 Annexation No. 71: Resolutions 2026-82, 2026-83, 2026-84 adopted; Bill B-14 introduced/Ordinance 2026-15 adopted. - Right-of-way vacation: Resolution 2026-85 adopted. - Fulton Street property amendments: Resolution 2026-81 (Council), SA-60 (Successor Agency), FRC-28 (Fresno Revitalization Corporation) adopted. - Consent Calendar and Contested Consent adopted as noted. - Closed Session: The council authorized the initiation of a lawsuit by a 6-0 vote (case details to be disclosed after filing). Other closed session items discussed but no open-session announcements made. - Next Steps: The BOLD Program workshop will return for a public hearing and resolution on May 21, 2026. The City Clerk announced a formal workshop on the Transparency Portal for the May 21 meeting. Mayor Dyer will present the balanced budget to the media on May 13 and to the council on May 14.

The City Council Project Review Committee held a meeting on April 29, 2026, from 5:32 PM to 7:00 PM. The meeting covered three agenda items, including a state-mandated housing text amendment, a variance for a fence, and a conditional use permit for a gas station with annexation. No formal votes were taken, but recommendations and discussions occurred. Discussion Items - Text Amendment (P2601326) – Housing Element Compliance: Adrian Azadorian from the Planning and Development Department presented a text amendment required by state law. The amendment would permit housing developments with at least 20% affordable units to be processed ministerially (without discretionary action) on certain sites identified in housing elements. The amendment would not be subject to CEQA and would not be appealable (pending confirmation). Committee members raised concerns about impacts on historic districts and demolition risks. The applicant sought feedback but no action was required. - Variance (P26094) – Fence at 1540 B Street: The applicant, Mr. Bati of GT JF Investments LLC, requested a variance to allow a 6-foot wrought iron fence at a 2-inch setback from the sidewalk (standard is 12 inches). The committee discussed safety concerns at the corner intersection with a school crossing. The applicant agreed to modify the fence by creating a 12-foot visibility triangle on both sides of the corner and removing a palm tree. The committee expressed support for the proposal contingent on those modifications. - Conditional Use Permit & Annexation (P2503983, P260801, P250971) – Maverick Gas Station: Kevin Dice and Farman Shear presented a proposal for a 4-acre gas station and convenience store at the northwest corner of White Bridge and Marks Avenue, within an 118-acre annexation area. The site is pre-zoned Corridor Center Mixed Use (CMX). The committee discussed alcohol sales (expected 7-14% of sales), the requirement to retire a liquor license under the Responsible Neighborhood Market Ordinance, and the need to maintain CMX zoning for future development. No vote was taken, but the committee emphasized that future uses should remain consistent with CMX. Administrative Matters - Concerns raised about an increase in unhoused populations along Highway 180 near the Van Ness interchange, including trash, fires, and blocked streets. The committee requested information on cleanup schedules from Gabriela. - Questions about High Speed Rail street closures on G Street and the timeline for reopening (expected June 2027 but doubted). - Businesses complained about parking meter prices rising to $30 on event days, even far from the event venue. The committee suggested exploring a monthly parking pass for business owners and weekly passes for visitors. Key Outcomes - No formal votes or decisions were made on any agenda items. The committee provided feedback and recommendations, including: - For the text amendment: Address historic district protections and demolition risks. - For the variance: Approve with conditions for a 12-foot visibility triangle and tree removal. - For the annexation/CUP: Maintain CMX zoning for future development; address liquor license retirement. - Administrative matters will be forwarded to staff for follow-up.

The Fresno Historic Preservation Commission met on April 28, 2026, at 6:00 p.m. in City Hall. The agenda included a historic designation request for a church, a parking structure naming proposal, a hearing on the eligibility of the former Fresno Bee building, and updates on Historic Preservation Month. All six present commissioners voted on various items, with one commissioner absent and two abstentions on the Bee building matter. Public Comments & Testimony - LaShell Aldredge (lifelong Mount Pleasant Missionary Baptist Church member) spoke in support of designating 207 E San Joaquin Street. She confirmed that the application relied on church archives and could not clarify the founding pastor's name. She noted that family members were bricklayers who helped construct the building. - Edward Madrano (Huntington Boulevard resident) expressed frustration that the Huntington Boulevard Historic District was not included in the official Historic Preservation Month calendar despite his coordination with staff. He questioned the lack of support from the Commission. - Pat Hunter (Heritage Fresno) announced a May 28 presentation titled "Saving the Past" about the Caglia family and Warnor's Theatre. She also invited the Commission to Gallery II, which she founded 46 years ago, to view local history exhibits. Discussion Items 1. Request to Designate 207 E San Joaquin Street (Mount Pleasant Missionary Baptist Church) - Staff (Ashley Atkinson) presented the application, noting the church celebrates its 100th anniversary in August 2026. The current building (1955) was built by church members and features Mid-Century Modern and Art Deco elements. It is largely unaltered and holds cultural significance for the African American community, including the annual All Saints Day Carnival. Staff recommended designation under Criteria a(1)(i) and a(1)(iii). - Commissioners expressed strong support, highlighting the building's vernacular architecture and community narrative. Vice Chair Hatwig noted possible discrepancy in the founder's name (W.A. vs. W.F. Watkins), which staff said could be corrected. - Public comment from LaShell Aldredge (see above). - Motion by Commissioner Laval in memory of Dr. James Aldredge, seconded by Vice Chair Hatwig, to recommend designation to City Council. Unanimously approved (6-0). 2. Naming of Future North Fulton Parking Structure as "Carnegie Library Garage" - Staff explained that City Council Resolution 2020-272 requires Commission review of proposed names to avoid honoring racist or bigoted figures. The name refers to the former Carnegie Library that stood on the site (built 1904, demolished 1959), not to Andrew Carnegie personally. The garage design includes architectural references to the library. Staff recommended approval. - No public comment. - Commissioners supported the naming as a positive step to integrate history into new buildings. Commissioner Halajian cautioned against superficial architectural references. - Motion by Commissioner Eddings, seconded by Commissioner Johnston, to recommend the name to City Council. Approved (6-0). 3. Hearing to Determine Eligibility of 1626 E Street (Former Fresno Bee Building) - Staff (Atkinson) presented the property, built in 1968 for the McClatchy Company, currently owned by the city and proposed for demolition due to catastrophic system failures. The building is an example of New Formalist architecture. A consultant's report found it potentially eligible under communications history and urban renewal, but staff recommended a finding of not eligible. Staff cited that more representative media buildings exist on the National Register and that recognizing urban renewal as a positive theme is problematic due to the displacement of a vibrant African American neighborhood. - Commissioners debated the building's architectural merit and the significance of historical events, such as the 1970s "Bee Four" case. Director Jennifer Clark clarified that the Commission could find the site historically significant for events but not the building itself, which would guide CEQA analysis. - Motion by Commissioner Halajian, seconded by Commissioner Laval, to reject the eligibility findings and require that any future development include interpretive recognition of the full historical context (journalism history and urban renewal impacts). The motion carried 4-0-2, with Chair Sponsler and Commissioner Johnston abstaining. (Vote: Ayes – Vice Chair Hatwig, Commissioners Halajian, Laval, Eddings; Abstentions – Chair Sponsler, Commissioner Johnston; Absent – Commissioner Federico). 4. Update on Historic Preservation Month - Chair Sponsler outlined events including a kickoff on May 7 at Archive on Kern, tea events, a bike ride focused on labor history, and a presentation on 10,000 years of Fresno history by Commissioners Johnston and Federico. Historic photos will be displayed in City Hall’s second-floor lobby. - Commissioners encouraged attendance at the kickoff and events. 5. Monthly Updates - Jose Garcia Brewer Adobe: Staff reported that the 2022 Conditional Use Permit was never finalized, so the only active entitlement (2018) requires full preservation. The owner has been informed; a code enforcement case remains open. - General: Staff completed Section 106 reviews, one mitigation program application, and sent Mills Act letters to historic property owners with applications due in late May/early June. - Subcommittees: The Architectural Review Subcommittee met and reviewed four buildings. The Historic Preservation Month Subcommittee met weekly and developed a broad range of activities aligned with the America 250 initiative. Key Outcomes - Designation of 207 E San Joaquin Street: Unanimously recommended to City Council for local register listing (6-0). - Carnegie Library Garage Naming: Unanimously recommended to City Council (6-0). - 1626 E Street Eligibility: The Commission voted 4-0-2 to deny eligibility for historic resource listing, but required that any future development include interpretive displays covering both the journalism history (including the Bee Four case) and the impacts of urban renewal on the displaced neighborhood. - Brewer Adobe: The property is subject to the 2018 full preservation entitlement; any alternative requires a new application to the Commission. - Next Meeting: Tentatively scheduled for May 18, 2026, pending agenda conference.

The Expanded Access to Arts and Culture Subcommittee held its first public meeting on April 24, 2026, at 5:30 PM in City Hall Room 2165. The meeting focused on establishing the subcommittee’s calendar, reviewing proposed changes to the Cycle 3 grant guidelines, and receiving public input. Staff presented a detailed draft of the guidelines and a timeline for community listening sessions and public comment. The subcommittee set a follow-up meeting for April 29, 2026. Consent Calendar - The agenda was approved as amended (the calendar attachment under ID 26-483 was moved to be discussed under ID 26-481). - The absence of Vice Chair Ward was excused unanimously. Public Comments & Testimony - Kyle (unscheduled communication) urged the subcommittee to ensure transparency in the application review committee and to clarify definitions of arts and culture, citing past arbitrary definitions by the Fresno Arts Council. - Omeya (unscheduled communication, representing fiscally sponsored projects) warned that limiting fiscal sponsorship would create barriers to access and potentially lead to lawsuits; she noted her organization had fiscally sponsored 90 projects in Cycle 2 and questioned who would fill that role if caps were imposed. - Alicia (Art Collective) echoed concerns about fiscal sponsorship caps and requested more advance notice of meetings to build community trust. - Amy Kitchener (Alliance for California Traditional Arts) urged not limiting fiscal sponsorship, emphasized using local panelists with lived experience, and advocated for a discussion-based review process rather than solely scoring. - During the hearing, Stephen Wilson (Phil Permani) requested exploring asynchronous application deadlines (e.g., general operating first, then project grants) to better align with fiscal years. - Johnny submitted a detailed written edit of the draft and stressed the need to avoid a repeat of past bad faith actions; he called for public and recorded ARC sessions, no fiscal sponsor cap, and an on-ramp for emerging organizations to become nonprofits. - Julia noted the subcommittee lacks working artists and urged including them. - Trisha (Samuel Contrangs) advocated allowing new nonprofits to serve as fiscal sponsors and supported funding projects on university campuses. - Smiley (Cycle 2 grantee) argued that requiring 501(c)(3) status would exclude the very community the grant aims to serve and questioned the “good standing with the city” requirement. - Monica Sarna (former panelist) reported that emerging projects were disadvantaged in previous cycles and urged adding more creatives to decision-making bodies; she did not consider compensation necessary for panelists. - Linda Scambra (Heritage Fresno) promoted a film about preserving local history and encouraged donations for the Warner’s Theater restoration. - Christine Parker noted the online comment portal lacks editing capability and raised concerns about excluding faith-based organizations (e.g., Buddhist temples, mosques) that serve cultural communities. - Aaron Bird (Arts in Richland for All) supported removing the 30/60/90 award model (replacing with 100% funding up to available funds), asked for clarity on training and vetting of fiscal sponsors, and advocated for separating legacy and emerging organizations in funding tracks. - OECR (online) urged creative outreach (physical flyers, not just social media) and called for Commissioner Laura Ward to recuse herself due to past affiliations with the Fresno Arts Council; he opposed requiring 501(c)(3) status and argued that marginalized voices need compensated panel positions. - Amy Kitchener (second comment) recommended applicants choose either general operating or project support, not both, to spread funds more equitably; she strongly discouraged a purely scoring-based review process and asked for at least eight weeks between grant announcement and eligibility deadline. - Yolanda Randall (West Fresno Family Resource Center) noted her Cycle 2 grant had received no communication about next steps and asked whether Cycle 3 projects would be one or two years. - Krista Aronda (K-Paints) called for panelists who understand the experience of struggling artists and reiterated that non-501(c)(3) artists should be eligible to apply. Discussion Items - ID 26-481: Draft Calendar of Subcommittee Meetings – The subcommittee agreed to meet next on Wednesday, April 29, 2026, at 5:30 PM in a larger room (due to a concurrent commission meeting). - ID 26-483: Grant Guideline Update & Outreach Overview – Staff (Sarah Gaytan) presented the timeline for community listening sessions: April 22 (5:30–7:30 PM at Ted C. Wills), April 25 (1–3 PM at Maxie L. Parks Community Center), and April 28 (5:30–7:30 PM at Mosqueda Community Center). A public comment portal opens April 16 and closes April 30 at 3 PM. Listening sessions will include in-person and Zoom options with interpretation and recording. Commissioners questioned whether the timeline is adjustable; staff confirmed the notice of funding opportunity must be released by June 30, 2026, with no flexibility. - ID 26-484: Cycle 3 Grant Guideline Review – Staff (Shelby McNabb) walked through the draft guidelines page by page, highlighting proposed changes: - Centralized guidelines into one document. - Total available funding: $6.4 million. - Proposed to replace the letter of intent with an eligibility screening form. - Discussion points: whether applicants can apply for both project and general operating support; limits on number of proposals per applicant; distinction between emerging and established organizations; fiscal sponsorship caps; eligibility of food expenses, construction for facility upgrades, and technical assistance for forming nonprofits; equipment purchase rules; ineligibility of faith-based and political organizations (legal opinion pending); minimum award thresholds; payment terms (90/10 vs. quarterly vs. risk-based); appeals process; and composition of the Application Review Committee (ARC) – proposed 20–25 members with representation of Fresno’s demographics, including two from outside the city to handle recusals, which drew commissioner concerns about excluding local expertise. - Staff committed to logging all public comments and responding to every one. Key Outcomes - The subcommittee approved the amended agenda and excused the vice chair’s absence. - The next subcommittee meeting was scheduled for April 29, 2026, at 5:30 PM. - Public comment period on the draft guidelines remains open until April 30, 2026, at 3:00 PM via the online portal; written comments may also be submitted to ExpandedArts@fresno.gov (24-hour advance notice required). - No formal decisions were made on the guideline content; staff will incorporate feedback from this meeting, listening sessions, and the portal into a revised draft to be presented to the Parks, Recreation, and Arts Commission (PRAC) on May 18, 2026, with a goal of final council approval by June 25, 2026, and release of the Notice of Funding Opportunity by June 30, 2026. - The meeting was adjourned at 8:06 PM in memory of Dr. Brent Santa Buda, a former PRAC commissioner.

The Fresno City Council met on Thursday, April 23, 2026, starting at 9:00 AM, with roll call at 9:10 AM. Councilmember Nick Richardson attended remotely due to military assignment. The meeting included four ceremonial proclamations, multiple councilmember and mayor reports, five scheduled hearings (four Community Facilities District annexations and a street name change), a consent calendar with 27 items, a contested consent calendar, a workshop on the Vision Zero Action Plan, unscheduled public comment, and a closed session. Key outcomes included unanimous approval of all four CFD annexations, approval of the street name reversion of Cesar Chavez Boulevard to its original names, and discussion of the Vision Zero plan with a target adoption date of May 21, 2026. Consent Calendar - Approved minutes of April 9, 2026 regular meeting. - Approved First Amendment to Consultant Services Agreement with Deol Data Corporation for an additional $817,000 (total not to exceed $1,651,400) for airport security system integration. - Awarded a $5,213,388 construction contract to Floyd Johnston Construction Co., Inc. for Leaky Acres Groundwater Recharge Facility Improvement Project; also approved a $71,000 increase to the consultant services agreement with Provost & Pritchard (revised total $481,512). - Approved First Amendment to Requirements Contract with West Valley Construction Company for polyethylene water service replacements, increasing annual contract by $1,200,000 (revised total $2,853,770). - Awarded a $718,681 construction contract to DCL Technology, Inc. for fiber optic connection from the Fresno-Clovis Regional Wastewater Reclamation Facility to City Hall Data Center. - Awarded a $1,159,574 construction contract to Cal Valley Construction Inc. for the Grantland Water Main Extension between Shaw & Gettysburg. - Awarded a $1,193,060 construction contract to Walsh Montgomery Construction, Inc. for the First Street between Shields and Princeton Water Main Replacement. - Adopted Resolution 2026-68 acknowledging a report from the Fresno Fire Department on state-mandated occupancy inspections (with a correction to effective date from 2029 to 2019). - Adopted Resolution 2026-69 adding ten permanent full-time positions in the Airports Department, four in Public Utilities Water Division, and two permanent plus ten unfunded positions in Transportation/FAX, effective May 4, 2026. - Adopted Resolution 2026-70 and 2026-71 authorizing acceptance of $9,756,900 from the sixth round of Homeless Housing, Assistance, and Prevention (HHAP) program for interim housing. - Adopted Resolution 2026-72 making a technical amendment to Local Housing Trust Fund guidelines to clarify Multifamily New Construction remains eligible. - Approved three Memoranda of Understanding for sustainable transportation infrastructure amenities at The Roos @ Fulton Forum, West Creek Village, and 3374 East Shields. - Approved First Amendment with Akel Engineering Group for hydraulic modeling services ($60,000 increase, revised total $180,000). - Approved Third Amendment with Akel Engineering Group for Sanitary Sewer Master Plan ($100,000 increase, revised total $837,492, term extended to December 31, 2026). - Adopted Resolution 2026-73 approving reimbursement of $1,165,392.08 for Fresno Unified School District Alternative Educational Campus and Administrative Building improvements. - Adopted Resolution 2026-74 declaring an urgent necessity for emergency repair of a sewer trunk main at East Jensen Avenue and South East Avenue, authorizing non-competitive bidding. - Adopted Resolution 2026-75 setting a public hearing for May 21, 2026, for Annexation No. 74 to Community Facilities District No. 9 (Assessor's Parcel No. 427-171-25). - Adopted Resolution 2026-76 setting a public hearing for May 21, 2026, for Annexation No. 73 to Community Facilities District No. 9 (Assessor's Parcel No. 479-050-20). - Adopted Resolution 2026-77 approving summary vacation of a portion of a sewer easement on East Shaw Avenue. - Adopted Resolution 2026-78 approving Final Map of Tract No. 6376. - Adopted Resolution 2026-79 appropriating $3,711,500 for Public Works operating programs and capital improvement projects. - Adopted Resolution 2026-80 authorizing submission of a $1,418,716 funding request to the Low Carbon Transit Operations Program. - Item 2-M (historic survey of Chinatown with Stantec Consulting Services) was tabled to May 7, 2026. Public Comments & Testimony - Ashley Owens (Dawson Molly Construction) spoke during consent calendar public comment, objecting to the award of the Leaky Acres project to another contractor, stating they were the low bidder but were bypassed due to a missing signature on the bid. She requested the council not award the contract until their appeal process was resolved. Staff clarified that the bid was rejected per city ordinance because it lacked a required signature, and the appeal process was concluded. The consent calendar was approved without delay. - Tammy Slaughter (seven-month Fresno resident, housing advocate) spoke during unscheduled communication, urging the city to focus on housing stability prevention strategies rather than only responding after homelessness occurs. She shared her experience in eviction court and called for early intervention and coordination between housing and workforce systems. - Street Name Change Hearing (ID 26-396): Sixteen members of the public addressed the council, with the majority supporting the reversion of Cesar Chavez Boulevard to its original names (California Avenue, Ventura Street, Kings Canyon Road). Key speakers: Hester Hensley asked about timeline; Brunet (Heat for Southwest Fresno) said the community did not ask for the change; Manuel Silva argued for replacing the name with Dolores Huerta Boulevard instead; Clarence Tilmon asked when the change would occur; Aletha Lang supported reversion; Valerie F. Davis (trustee) suggested honoring farm workers on new streets instead; Jackie Grazier (One Community Compact) supported reversion, noting the historical and cultural significance; Nick Kazarian supported reversion; Sarah Pilibos submitted a petition from property owners; Fannie Beard said the change caused confusion; Diane Glenn urged removal of Cesar Chavez's name from Edison High School; Karen Musson highlighted the history of Ventura, California, and Kings Canyon names; Venice Curry supported reversion as restoring community identity; Jose Luis Barazza (Southeast Fresno Economic Development) expressed uncertainty but noted his farm worker background; Nikki Real criticized the lack of due process in the original change; Lisa Flores (via Zoom) argued the name change should happen because of allegations against Cesar Chavez, and criticized the cost to businesses. Discussion Items - Community Facilities District Annexations (IDs 26-444, 26-445, 26-436, 26-435): Four separate hearings for annexations to CFD No. 11 and No. 18 were called and closed without public comment or council discussion. Each was approved unanimously (7-0). - Street Name Change Application (ID 26-396): Planning Manager Trejo presented the request to revert Cesar Chavez Boulevard to California Avenue, Ventura Street, and Kings Canyon Road. The council heard extensive public comment. Councilmembers discussed the legal process, costs, business impact, and timeline. Councilmember Karbassi noted that the original name change followed a public process and that the council listened to the community. Councilmember Perea expressed pride in sponsoring the reversion, noted a new Dolores Huerta Park in West Fresno, and asked for a timeline. Councilmember Richardson (via Zoom) raised concerns about fiscal responsibility and the cost to businesses from a second name change in three years. Councilmember Vang supported reversion but requested data on business impacts and asked staff to separate residential from business addresses among the 1,600 impacted properties. Councilmember Arias said when facts change, minds should change, and supported following the same legal process as before. The motion to approve passed 7-0. - Contested Consent - North Granville Avenue Safety Improvements (ID 26-437): Councilmember Richardson moved to contested consent to discuss community engagement. He thanked Public Works for holding a neighborhood meeting and asked for confirmation that a turn lane curve would be filed down per resident requests. Staff confirmed. The item was approved 7-0. - Contested Consent - Riverside Golf Course Lease Amendment (ID 26-503): Councilmembers Arias and Karbassi moved to contested consent. Discussion focused on the collection of APES fees ($1 per round) that had been ambiguous, the potential for capital improvements (enhanced driving range similar to Valley Oaks), and support for the First Tee youth program. Councilmember Karbassi made a motion with conditions: staff to meet with the operator and present options for capital improvements before the next fiscal year's budget, and to explore support for First Tee facilities. The motion passed 7-0. - Vision Zero Action Plan Workshop (ID 26-442): Presented by Chief Engineering Technician Aguilar. The plan aims for zero fatalities and severe injuries by 2050. Key data: 217 fatal crashes and 629 severe injury crashes (2019-2023); 89% on high injury network (14% of roads); 61% of fatal/severe crashes involve vulnerable road users; 86% at or near intersections. The plan includes policies, systemic treatments, and priority corridors/intersections (Blackstone, Belmont, Fresno Street, Shields, etc.). Councilmember Perea supported revisiting red light cameras and enforcement. Councilmember Arias highlighted potential funding from Measure C. The plan is set for formal adoption on May 21, 2026, to qualify for implementation grants. Key Outcomes - CFD Annexations: All four annexations (IDs 26-444, 26-445, 26-436, 26-435) approved unanimously (7-0) with resolutions and ordinances adopted. - Street Name Reversion: Resolution 2026-61 adopted (7-0) to revert Cesar Chavez Boulevard to California Avenue, Ventura Street, and Kings Canyon Road. Sign installation on city streets to begin May 1-2, 2026, completed over three weekends. Caltrans freeway signs will take longer and require a separate agreement. No funding was set aside for business reimbursement, but Councilmember Karbassi pledged $10,000 from his operating budget for small business support. - Riverside Golf Course Lease Amendment: Approved with conditions that staff meet with operator to explore capital improvement options (enhanced driving range) and work on supporting First Tee before budget presentation. - Vision Zero Action Plan: Presented as a workshop; public comment open until May 2, 2026; formal adoption scheduled for May 21, 2026. - Closed Session: Discussed labor negotiations (continued to May 7), anticipated litigation (City of Fresno v. Brawley 7 LLC, continued; one potential case continued), existing litigation (City of Fresno v. County of Fresno, continued; HAVEN 20 LLC v. City of Fresno, no announcement), potential litigation (one case not discussed). No reportable actions announced.

This meeting was originally called to order on April 21, 2026 per the transcript, but the specified meeting date is April 22, 2026. The committee addressed two agenda items: a city-initiated rezone application and a conditional use permit for an event venue. Roll call showed Vice Chair Seneca present, committee member Soleya absent, and members Padilla, Addington, and Goodman present, with Mary representing District 4 on Zoom. The meeting began at 5:30 PM and adjourned at 5:51 PM. Consent Calendar - Approval of Minutes (March 17, 2026): Motion to approve made, seconded, and passed unanimously. - Approval of Agenda (April 21, 2026): Motion to approve made, seconded, and passed unanimously. (Note: The transcript references April 21, but the user-specified meeting date is April 22, 2026.) Discussion Items - Rezone Application P260729 (City-Initiated): Proposed removal of conditions of zoning on a 3.3-acre property located on the south side of East Barstow, west of North Resident Street. The conditions previously restricted the land to student housing and specified a density limit. The adjacent hotel developer requested the removal to allow future unrestricted housing development. No associated development application. The committee voted to approve the rezone application as submitted. Motion passed unanimously. - Conditional Use Permit P2503188 (Event Venue): Applicant proposed converting a former gym building (18,000 sq ft, capacity approximately 2,500) at Blackstone and Griffin into an event venue for weddings, quinceañeras, and weekday funeral gatherings. The building had been abandoned; applicant described 24/7 security, new lighting, and noise mitigation (concrete construction). Discussion addressed hours of operation (mostly weekends, until 1 AM), security plans, and coordination with police for large crowds (600 people). Applicant agreed to hire on-site police for events exceeding 600 guests. Motion to approve the permit made, seconded, and passed unanimously. Key Outcomes - Rezone application approved (unanimous). - Conditional use permit approved (unanimous). - Next meeting scheduled for May 19, 2026 at 5:30 PM. Note on Date Discrepancy: The transcript states the meeting was held on April 21, 2026, but the user-provided metadata specifies the meeting date as April 22, 2026. This summary uses the user-provided date in the title for consistency.