Public Meetings - Hillsborough County, Florida

The Zoning Hearing Master (ZHM) convened on May 26, 2026, at 6:00 PM at the County Center in Tampa, Florida, to hear 14 zoning and major modification applications. The hearing officer, Steve Lewis, presided over the session, which included public testimony, staff presentations, and recommendations for the Board of County Commissioners (BOCC). Most applications were continued to future dates, and those heard resulted in recommendations pending BOCC approval. Public Comments & Testimony - Item D5 (RZ-PD 26-0338): Teresa Bauer, a 40-year resident of Brandon, expressed support for single-family homes but raised safety and traffic concerns, especially regarding cut-through traffic on Duffield Place and flooding risks from proposed retention ponds. She asked for speed humps and larger tree replacements. Transportation staff directed her to the county's residential traffic calming program. - Item D7 (MM 26-0340): Cynthia Godwin Wilson, whose property faces the proposed development on Buster Bean Drive, strongly opposed the warehouse option (Option 2), describing ongoing noise, light, and privacy issues from the existing RV resort. She demanded a block wall and barrier trees as promised. Thomas Godwin, also a nearby resident, questioned traffic impacts on Sly Avenue and Mango Road, citing existing congestion from the Flying J truck stop. - Item D8 (RZ-PD 26-0426): Jeffrey Berger, co-president of the Tampa JCC and Federation, strongly supported the rezoning, citing thoughtful design by Flournoy Development, reduced traffic impacts compared to the current JCC operations, and benefits to the broader community from sale proceeds. Gary Gould highlighted the Parkinson's program funded by the sale. Lori Metzger, speaking online, opposed the proposal, arguing it would destroy green space, increase flooding, and cause job losses, and submitted a petition with over 100 signatures. - Item D10 (MM 26-0551): Nashad Sufan, Debbie Hines, Ross Pappers, and Barbara Feight opposed the major modification, citing existing flooding, traffic, crime, and unsanitary conditions from the current smoke shop and prior food trucks. They argued the proposed CN uses would worsen these issues and that the site is unsuitable for additional commercial development. - Item D11 (RZ-PD 26-0555): Christina Harrison, a former resident of the area, raised concerns about long-standing flooding problems exacerbated by the church's construction and questioned whether the proposed 325 multifamily units would worsen drainage. Todd Boggus, from Courtney Palms, opposed the density, citing traffic congestion on Causeway and Falkenburg, inadequate parking, and existing flooding. He noted over 800 units already in the corridor. - Item D12 (RZ-PD 26-0560): Approximately 50 residents opposed the rezone for 86 single-family homes on 60-foot lots. Alan Vernick argued it is incompatible with the semi-rural character of Lutz, with lot sizes 4 to 20 times smaller than adjacent properties. Valerie Rebecca and Amy Howe highlighted that the site is in the Lutz Community Plan area, which calls for larger lots (0.5 to 1 acre), and that Livingston Avenue is already a failed two-lane road. They feared emergency access on Curry Road would become a cut-through. Donald Miller noted existing traffic backups on Livingston. Cedriana Jenner, speaking online, formally objected to the reduction of the 150-foot zoning offset and the proposed interconnection to Curry Road. - Item D7 (MM 26-0340): Planning Commission staff stated that Option 2 (light industrial warehouses) is not compatible with adjacent single-family homes, while Option 1 (existing RV resort) is consistent. - Item D12 (RZ-PD 26-0560): Planning Commission staff found the proposal consistent with the comprehensive plan, noting the site is within the Urban Service Area and that clustering is encouraged to preserve wetlands. Discussion Items - Continuances (Section A): 14 applications were continued to future ZHM hearings (June 22 or July 20, 2026) due to administrative or procedural reasons. - C.1 – RZ-STD 26-0728 (Darling Garcia Barreto): Request to rezone 4.66 acres from ASC-1 to CI-R for an enclosed mini-warehouse/self-storage. Staff and Planning Commission found it approvable and consistent. No public testimony. The hearing officer recommended approval. (Note: One person arrived late wishing to speak but was unable as the case had closed.) - C.2 – RZ-STD 26-0740 (Justin T. Wilkerson): Request to rezone 1.21 acres from ASC-1 to RSC-6 to subdivide and build an additional house. Staff found it compatible. No opposition. Recommended approval. - D.1 – MM 26-0045 (United Rentals, Inc.): Major modification to allow open storage and rental of commercial equipment on 3.89 acres. Staff supported with conditions. No public opposition. Recommended approval. - D.2 – RZ-PD 26-0217 (75BB, LLC): Rezone 124.017 acres to Planned Development for a mixed-use village (460 dwelling units) with three villages (single-family, multifamily, and agricultural/storage). The hearing officer questioned access, buffering, and wetland preservation. Staff and Planning Commission found it approvable with conditions. No public opposition. Recommended approval. - D.3 – RZ-PD 26-0303 (Todd Pressman): Rezone 0.46 acres from CG to PD to allow a tow yard with open storage. The applicant argued cross-access was impractical due to security requirements. Transportation staff clarified that the cross-access variance is a separate administrative process. Staff and Planning Commission found it approvable. No public opposition. Recommended approval. - D.4 – RZ-PD 26-0329 (Todd Pressman): Rezone 0.99 acres from CG to PD for a 40-bed professional residential facility adjacent to an existing approved facility. Staff supported with waivers for compatibility setbacks and separation. No public opposition. Recommended approval. - D.5 – RZ-PD 26-0338 (Richmond American Homes): Rezone 11.43 acres to PD for 49 single-family homes (reduced from 130 units, now 4.3 units/acre). The hearing officer noted a reduction from the original 130 lots to 86 larger lots (minimum 60 feet, 6,000 sq ft). A transportation condition was added for a turn lane and right-of-way dedication. The applicant argued the density (1.8 units/acre) is semi-rural and compatible. - D.6 – RZ-PD 26-0339 (Mark Bentley): Rezone 0.71 acres from CG to PD to expand an existing veterinary clinic with a 1,700 sq ft CT building. Staff found it approvable. No public opposition. Recommended approval. - D.7 – MM 26-0340 (Jacob T. Cremer / Barbas Cremer, PLLC): Major modification to allow either continued RV resort (Option 1) or up to 750,000 sq ft of light industrial warehouses (Option 2) on 37.87 acres (Lazy Days site). The companion comprehensive plan amendment (CPA) to change land use to SMU-6 and expand the Urban Service Area was unanimously recommended by the Planning Commission on January 12, 2026. The hearing officer questioned compatibility with nearby single-family homes. Staff supported Option 1 only. Planning Commission staff found Option 2 inconsistent due to scale, lighting, noise, and truck traffic. The applicant provided enhanced buffering conditions (8-foot masonry wall, 15-foot trees). The hearing officer heard testimony and left the record open for the BOCC. Note: This case was continued to the July 16, 2026 Comprehensive Plan Amendment Meeting for the CPA companion, but the zoning recommendation will go to BOCC July 21. - D.8 – RZ-PD 26-0426 (Flournoy Development Group, LLC): Rezone 22.08 acres from AS-1 and PD to allow 346 multifamily units with a flex from R-4 to R-20. The site was formerly a JCC campus. The applicant emphasized gradual building height transition (20 ft to 60 ft away from single-family homes) and preservation of wetlands and lakes north of the site. Supporters included JCC leaders and a neighbor. Opponents cited loss of open space, traffic, and flooding. The hearing officer noted about 15 supporters stood. Staff and Planning Commission found it approvable. Recommended approval. - D.9 – RZ-PD 26-0528 (Florida Home Partnership, Inc.): Rezone 1.98 acres from RMC-6 to PD for seven single-family homes (affordable housing). Staff found it compatible. No public opposition. Recommended approval. - D.10 – MM 26-0551 (Pressman & Assoc., Inc.): Major modification to replace a dry cleaner with 6,000 sq ft of restricted CN commercial uses (professional services, health practitioners) on 0.86 acres. The applicant emphasized reductions from a prior denied application (removal of food trucks, buffering variations). Opponents cited flooding, traffic, and the existing smoke shop's nuisances. The hearing officer noted opposition letters appeared to come from owners of the adjacent PD. Staff and Planning Commission found it approvable with enhanced buffering. Recommended approval. - D.11 – RZ-PD 26-0555 (Royal Palm Multifamily, LLC / Kamil Salame): Rezone 53.66 acres to PD for 325 multifamily units (reduced from potential 536) and recognition of an existing church campus. The site is between Selman Expressway and I-75. The applicant argued it is an infill opportunity with a significant reduction in trips compared to existing zoning entitlements. Opponents raised flooding, traffic congestion on Causeway and Falkenburg, and overdevelopment in the corridor. The engineer testified that the site lies in a volume-sensitive basin, requiring retention of the 100-year storm to a 10-year rate. Staff and Planning Commission found it approvable. Recommended approval. - D.12 – RZ-PD 26-0560 (Meritage Homes): Rezone 45.89 acres to PD for 86 single-family homes (reduced from 130, with minimum 60-foot lots, 6,000 sq ft). The site is south of I-275 in the Lutz area. The applicant argued for compatibility through lower density (1.8 units/acre), clustering to preserve wetlands, and buffering. Planning Commission staff found it consistent with the comprehensive plan. Strong public opposition (approx. 50 speakers) argued it violates the Lutz Community Plan's semi-rural character, would increase traffic on already-failing Livingston Avenue, and that the emergency access on Curry Road could become a cut-through. Transportation staff confirmed Livingston is planned for future four-laning but not in the CIP, and the emergency access is locked with Knox box. The hearing officer recommended approval despite opposition, citing expert testimony on compatibility and the applicant's voluntary reduction. Key Outcomes - All 14 continuances were granted as listed on the agenda. - Items Heard and Pending Recommendation (all to BOCC July 21, 2026, unless noted): - C.1 (RZ-STD 26-0728): Heard and Pending Recommendation. - C.2 (RZ-STD 26-0740): Heard and Pending Recommendation. - D.1 (MM 26-0045): Heard and Pending Recommendation. - D.2 (RZ-PD 26-0217): Heard and Pending Recommendation. - D.3 (RZ-PD 26-0303): Heard and Pending Recommendation. - D.4 (RZ-PD 26-0329): Heard and Pending Recommendation. - D.5 (RZ-PD 26-0338): Heard and Pending Recommendation. - D.6 (RZ-PD 26-0339): Heard and Pending Recommendation. - D.7 (MM 26-0340): Heard and Pending Recommendation for the zoning component; companion CPA continued to July 16, 2026 Comprehensive Plan Amendment Meeting. - D.8 (RZ-PD 26-0426): Heard and Pending Recommendation. - D.9 (RZ-PD 26-0528): Heard and Pending Recommendation. - D.10 (MM 26-0551): Heard and Pending Recommendation. - D.11 (RZ-PD 26-0555): Heard and Pending Recommendation. - D.12 (RZ-PD 26-0560): Heard and Pending Recommendation. - The hearing officer will file recommendations by June 16, 2026. The BOCC will hold a Land Use Meeting on July 21, 2026 to render final decisions.

The Circuit Thirteen Advisory Board (CAB) met on May 22, 2026, to review juvenile justice statistics, subcommittee reports on civil citation and student achievement, and discuss nominations for subcommittee chairs. The meeting included updates from the Department of Juvenile Justice, Prevention Services, Juvenile Diversion Court Administration, and Hillsborough County Children's Services. Consent Calendar - Approval of Minutes: The minutes from the previous meeting were reviewed and approved by a voice vote (moved by a member, seconded). Public Comments & Testimony - No public comments were submitted or offered in person or virtually. Discussion Items - Nominations for Subcommittee Chairs: The board recognized outgoing subcommittee chairs Chrissy Dorian (Student Achievement) and Judy Royston (Data-Driven Decision Making) for their service. No nominations were made during the meeting; the chair will serve as ex-officio until successors are selected. Nominations are deferred to the August 21, 2026, meeting. - Member Updates: - Department of Juvenile Justice (DJJ): Chief Hammersley reported 139 youth on probation-type supervision, 52 in secure detention, and 29 on electronic monitoring. - Prevention Services: Brianne Savillon announced upcoming events: a Fathers and Faith Symposium on June 2–3, a One Mentor One Child Summit moved to September, and a Youth Summit in July. - Delinquency Citation (Judy Royston): In March 2026, 39 pre-arrest delinquency citations were processed (23 community-based, 16 school-based), with affray and disruption of school function as the most common charges (11 each). In April 2026, 57 citations were processed (39 community-based, 18 school-based), with battery domestic violence as the leading charge (17). Comparatively, March 2025 had 57 referrals and April 2025 had 63 referrals. - Hillsborough County Children's Services (Heather Cazola): Current census: 4 youth for SINS (status offenses), 1 for DV (domestic violence), 3 for DVCC (domestic violence civil citation). The facility has a maximum capacity of 24 (two cottages of 12 each). Community counseling will begin at the Feeding Tampa Bay Causeway location in June. - Data-Driven Decision Making Subcommittee (Judy Royston): The subcommittee met on May 15, 2026, and reviewed missed opportunity reports, comparing processes with Polk County (Circuit 10) and Pinellas County. The committee recommended that DJJ Chief Hammersley collaborate with JAC leadership to develop a preliminary framework for processing civil citation youth through the Juvenile Assessment Center (JAC). A June meeting is planned. Discussion noted that teen takeovers are skewing data, with a significant portion of those youth statutorily eligible for civil citation. Vice Chair Parkinson emphasized that each community implements civil citation differently. - Student Achievement Subcommittee (Chief Hammersley on behalf of Chrissy Dorian): The subcommittee met on May 8, 2026. Progress includes a school portal for electronic record submission, expediting enrollment for dual-system youth (implemented January 2026). Issues addressed: detained DV youth and transition to Lake Magdalene Children's Center, graduation rates and coding for youth transferred to county jail, and the Evening Reporting Center's Encore online program (40–50 students enrolled, with laptops and a certified teacher). Future focus includes home education challenges. - Innovation Zone (Vice Chair Parkinson on behalf of Kanti Jones): The subcommittee proposed a Circuit 13 DJJ Workforce Development Pilot Initiative, focusing on high-need youth (on probation or aging out). The initiative aims to increase workforce participation, build career readiness, provide industry-recognized credentials, expand paid work experience, and strengthen employer engagement. An executive summary will be distributed for discussion at the next board meeting. - Ad Hoc Awards Committee: Major Roberts volunteered to chair the committee, and the board approved by a voice vote (moved by a member, seconded by Claire Reynolds). Additional members will be recruited at the August meeting. Key Outcomes - Approved minutes from the previous meeting. - Deferred nominations for subcommittee chairs (Student Achievement and Data-Driven Decision Making) to the August 21, 2026, meeting. - Approved Major Roberts as chair of the ad hoc awards committee by voice vote. - Next meeting scheduled for Friday, August 21, 2026, at 10:00 AM at the County Center, 601 East Kennedy Boulevard, 26th Floor Conference Room, Tampa, FL 33602, with a virtual option.

The Hillsborough County Board of County Commissioners (BOCC) held its regular meeting on May 20, 2026, at 9:00 AM in the County Center, 2nd Floor. The meeting included proclamations, a consent agenda, multiple public hearings, and a major discussion item regarding a non-binding Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the Tampa Bay Rays for a new ballpark and redevelopment. The meeting lasted from 9:00 AM until after 11:45 AM (recess for lunch). The BOCC approved nearly all items, including the contentious B-1 MOU by a 5-2 vote. Proclamations & Recognitions - Problem-Solving Court Month (May 2026): Presented by Commissioner Cohen. The 13th Judicial Circuit’s problem-solving courts served 1,074 participants in 2025, with an average one-year recidivism rate of 9.82%. Chief Judge Chris Sabella thanked the Board for funding and support. - Asian/Pacific American Heritage Month (May 2026): Presented by Commissioner Cameron Cepeda. Hung Mai and representatives from multiple AAPI organizations accepted the proclamation and highlighted the contributions and history of the community. - EMS Week (May 17–23, 2026): Presented by Commissioner Boles. Tim Pearson, president of the EMS professionals, accepted on behalf of Hillsborough County Fire Rescue. Consent Calendar The BOCC approved the consent agenda (motion by Commissioner Myers, second by Commissioner Cohen) with a 7-0 vote. Consent items A-4 (HOME grants) and A-5 (HOME Rescue Plan) were deferred to June 3, 2026. B-5 (emergency debris management services) was also deferred to June 3, 2026. All other consent items were approved, including: - A-8/A-9: Turkey Creek Road improvements change order and budget amendment (including a liquidated damages assessment of $1,658,274). - A-14: Disbursement of $10,553,078 in school impact fees for Aquilla Morgan High School. - A-21: FDOT grant for Big Bend Road widening (up to $12,040,953). - A-22: FDOT grant for Pebble Beach Blvd bridge replacement ($750,000). - A-26: Partner agreement with Feeding Tampa Bay for office space. - A-36: Interlocal agreement with Temple Terrace for a handicap accessible baseball turf field ($450,000). - A-43: Award of yard/wood waste processing contract to Consolidated Resource Recovery ($22,502,358). - A-55: Budget amendment resolution adjusting fund balances (net increase of $999,689). Public Comments & Testimony Morning Public Comments (limit reduced to 2 minutes per speaker): Nearly all speakers focused on the Tampa Bay Rays MOU (Item B-1). Opponents (majority of speakers): - Karen Geroche (Northdale): Argued CIT funds should not be diverted from critical infrastructure. Noted $360 million in CIT would be used in first four years. Urged a no vote. - Laura Lawson (former legislative aide): Recalled that in April 2024 a supermajority of the board did not want CIT used for a stadium. Urged no vote and protection of college assets. - Tom Cobert: Cited the 1995 Buccaneers stadium deal as a bad precedent. Urged board not to let billionaires push them around. - Carmen Edmonds (Chair, Hillsborough County Republican Party): Presented a straw poll showing unanimous opposition from the executive body and 89% of online respondents against using CIT. Stated voters were promised no CIT for a stadium. - Julie McGill (contractor, candidate for mayor): Called for a full independent forensic audit. Noted taxpayers are funding stadium, parking, roads, infrastructure, not just the ballpark. - Michelle Dyson (bartender at Tropicana Field): Supported the MOU, speaking for workers. Asked for commitment to workers and community, and urged signing the MOU to secure Tampa as a top-tier sports city. - Michael Marino (West Shore Alliance): Supported the MOU, citing economic impact, transportation improvements, and public-private investment value. - Ergin Tek: Supported the Rays staying but wanted taxpayer protections and equity in return. Proposed 10% of returns as public equity. - Catherine Corman: Opposed the deal, citing lack of transparency and research showing publicly funded stadiums do not boost local economies. - Melanie Alvarez (Americans for Prosperity): Opposed, arguing public funds should go to roads, safety, storm preparedness, not corporate welfare. - Ron Weaver: Supported the MOU, described it as using existing revenue streams (tourist taxes, CIT, CRA) with no new taxes. Quoted Shakespeare. - Rob Ledford (Tampa Bay Chamber): Supported the MOU, but stressed that CIT allocations must protect long-term capacity and commitments to existing teams. - Elijah Lewen: Shared personal history with the Rays and supported the stadium project. - Jim Davison (New Tampa): Opposed, citing CIT revenue underperformance. Claimed CIT collections were $25 million below last year and $10 million below FY24. Argued there is no surplus. - Kurt Thorson: Supported, argued that 28 cities have figured out how to fund stadiums while addressing other needs. Called the development a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity. - Ray Wong: Supported the proposal, acknowledging valid concerns but emphasizing long-term economic and community impact. - Sherry Reese: Opposed, noted property tax and insurance increases. Stated if Tampa wants the stadium, it should pay more. - Norman Reese: Opposed, cited lack of affordable housing in the MOU and concern about tourist tax being diverted from convention center. - Stephen Gower: Supported, moved from Chicago in 1993 partly due to the NHL franchise. Believed the project is worth it for future generations. - Alejandro Noriega: Supported, citing ownership group’s transparency and comparison to Water Street development. Noted CIT originally funded Raymond James Stadium. - Denise Herndon (multiple public hearings): Spoke about opioid crisis, red-light cameras, school zone cameras, medical examiner fees, and the county seat expansion. Expressed distrust of government spending and called for transparency. Discussion Items B-1 (Time Certain 10:15 AM): Approve non-binding MOU with Tampa Bay Rays - Presentation: County Administrator Bonnie Wise and staff (Greg Horwedel, Tom Fessler) presented the MOU framework. Key points: - The proposed ballpark (31,000 seats) and mixed-use development on 121 acres of Hillsborough College Dale Mabry Campus. - Public subsidy up to $976 million: $360 million CIT (county), $80 million CIT (city), $263 million TDT bonds, $40 million TDT reserves, $103 million county reserves/cash, $30 million CDBG-DR, plus CRA funds. - State of Florida pledged $150 million for college relocation and infrastructure. - MOU is non-binding; allows staff to negotiate definitive agreements. Key unresolved issues: funding backstop, CAPEX maintenance, development mix, minimum valuation, revenue sharing, community benefits agreement. - Board Discussion: - Chair Hagan: Supported moving forward, called it a generational opportunity. Emphasized that this is not a final vote. - Commissioner Miller (mover): Supported, citing similar past investments (Amalie Arena, Raymond James Stadium) that generated billions. Moved approval. - Commissioner Cameron Cepeda (opposed): Opposed using CIT, cash reserves, and general funds. Noted majority of public opposition. Stated it would harm infrastructure and emergency reserves. - Commissioner Myers (second): Supported, highlighted jobs (12,000) and housing. Wanted protections for Visit Tampa Bay funding and tax collector office relocation. - Commissioner Boles: Supported moving forward. Stressed public safety projects are protected (nine fire stations in CIT). Sought assurance of tax base growth and guardrails on public dollars. - Commissioner Cohen: Supported, calling the MOU a vote to continue negotiations. Praised staff work. Referenced Water Street success. Noted that saying no ends the deal. - Commissioner Wostal (opposed): Questioned staff extensively. Argued the deal harms taxpayers, uses general funds/property taxes contrary to earlier board direction. Raised concerns about CIT underperformance, impact on other capital projects, and lack of detail on design costs. Called it a "monumental betrayal." Staff responded that the MOU is a framework and definitive agreements will address details. - Vote: Motion to approve B-1 (MOU) passed 5-2. Commissioners Cameron Cepeda and Wostal voted no. B-6: Funding for Brandon Sports and Aquatic Center septic to sewer conversion - Approved $317,100 in funding (CIP C83713000) for High Five nonprofit. Motion by Commissioner Miller, second by Commissioner Myers. Passed 7-0. F-1: Wade Boggs Athletic Achievement Award - Approved award to Wilson Andersen (Jesuit High School) with honorable mentions to Winston Pennant (Sumner HS) and Mathew Altman (Gaither HS). Presentation scheduled for June 3, 2026. Motion by Commissioner Myers, second by Commissioner Miller. Passed 7-0. Public Hearings (Time Certain 10:00 AM) All public hearings were conducted together. Each had one speaker (Denise Herndon) but no other public testimony. All passed unanimously (7-0). - D-1 (County Seat Expansion): Second of two hearings. Adopted resolution expanding the county seat to all lands within Hillsborough County (not relocating or altering municipal boundaries). Motion by Commissioner Miller. - D-2/B-2 (Red-Light Camera Program): Amended Ordinance 13-19 to update minimum qualifications for local hearing officers and set compensation ($250 first 3 hours, $100/hr thereafter, cap $500/docket; annual impact $3,500). Approved ordinance and corresponding resolution. - D-3/B-3 (School Zone Speed Enforcement Program): Amended Ordinance 23-22 with same hearing officer compensation structure (annual impact $19,000). Approved. - D-4/B-4 (Medical Examiner Fees): Amended Ordinance 91-18 to expand fee schedule; expected to increase FY26 revenue by $480,000. Approved. Key Outcomes - Consent Agenda: Approved with 7-0 vote; items A-4, A-5, B-5 deferred to June 3. - B-1 (Rays MOU): Approved 5-2. Staff authorized to continue negotiations on definitive agreements. Final agreements will require future BOCC approval. - Public Hearings: All four items passed 7-0. - B-6 and F-1: Approved 7-0. - Next Meeting: June 3, 2026, at 9:00 AM (includes award presentation and deferred items).

The Volume Adjustment Board (VAB) met on May 19, 2026, to consider a complaint regarding the VAB process, approve phase two recommended decisions, certify the 2025 real and tangible assessment rules, approve the March meeting minutes, and receive an update on VAB statistics and audit progress. The board also heard public comments and commendations for the clerk's office. Public Comments & Testimony - Rick Rape, director of evaluation for the property appraiser's office, addressed a complaint filed about the VAB process regarding homestead issues. He stated that the clerk and magistrate followed the rules correctly and that the property appraiser's office would have granted homestead if legally possible. - An unidentified representative commended the clerk's office for their hard work during a difficult season, noting that the team is "amazing" compared to other counties. Discussion Items - Complaint Regarding VAB Process: The board discussed a written complaint about the VAB process. The clerk's office confirmed the complaint was filed and reviewed. Mr. Rape assured the board that all procedures were followed correctly. The board was informed that the petitioner could appeal to circuit court. - Phase Two Recommended Decisions: The board received the phase two recommended decisions. No comments or objections were raised. A motion to approve was made, seconded, and passed unanimously. - Certification of 2025 Real and Tangible Assessment Rules: The board considered item number five. No discussion. A motion to accept and certify was made by Ms. Rindon, seconded by Commissioner Sabega, and passed unanimously. - Approval of March Meeting Minutes: The board reviewed the March VAB meeting minutes. No changes. A motion to approve was made, seconded, and passed unanimously. - Other VAB Matters: The clerk's office provided VAB statistics comparing prior years (2019 to present) and a meeting notice showing proper advertisement. They also updated on an ongoing audit, expecting results in late summer. The board noted an increase in petition volume, especially from large representative groups, which is a statewide challenge. Key Outcomes - Approved the phase two recommended decisions (motion carried unanimously). - Certified the 2025 real and tangible assessment rules (motion carried unanimously). - Approved the March 2026 VAB meeting minutes (motion carried unanimously). - The complaint regarding the VAB process was included in the phase two approval; the petitioner retains the right to appeal to circuit court. - The board acknowledged the clerk's office's work and the ongoing audit, with process improvements expected.

Meeting called to order by State Attorney Susie Lopez. The council approved minutes from the January 16th meeting, received an update on the Mobile Ranch Unit (MRU) project funded by Justice Assistance Grant (JAG) funds, and adjourned. No public comment was offered. Consent Calendar - Approval of Minutes: The minutes from the January 16th full council meeting were approved by unanimous voice vote. Motion by Nick Bates, seconded by Mark Proctor. Discussion Items - Mobile Ranch Unit (MRU) Project Update (Presented by Mr. Parkinson): The council had previously voted to support the Florida Department of Corrections MRU project using JAG funds. The project aims to enhance probation compliance rates and reduce recidivism, particularly for technical violations. Status as of the meeting: - Vehicle shell ordered on March 30, 2026. - Diesel platform ordered from Ford on April 1, 2026. The chassis will be sent for marrying to the shell upon completion. - Current completion time frame for the bus is November 15, 2026, with delivery scheduled for January 10, 2027. - Multiple nonprofits (e.g., Abraham Ministries Inspire program) and behavioral health organizations have expressed interest in partnering for MRU deployment. - Plans are underway for a major community event to unveil the bus and inform stakeholders. - The council will present the MRU project to the Behavioral Health Task Force, as many task force members have also sought partnership. - The county's opioid settlement funds may provide additional resources to deploy substance abuse services through the MRU van. Key Outcomes - Minutes Approved: Unanimous approval of January 16 meeting minutes. - MRU Project Support Continued: The council noted the progress and ongoing partnership opportunities. No formal vote was taken, as the project was previously approved. - Next Steps: The MRU project team will continue procurement and outreach; a major launch event is planned; the Behavioral Health Task Force will receive a presentation.

The Board of County Commissioners held a public hearing on May 14, 2026, to consider adoption and transmittal of comprehensive plan amendments and concurrent rezonings. Items included text amendments, map amendments, and a corridor preservation plan update. Two large-scale map amendments (HC/CPA 26-05 and 26-06) were continued to June 11, 2026. A motion to deny a controversial density increase at Dover Road failed on a 3-3 tie, and a motion to continue it also failed, leaving the item unadopted. Continuance Items C.1 and C.2 (HC/CPA 26-05 and 26-06, Dorman Road) – Applicant requested continuance to June 11, 2026. Motion carried 6-0. Discussion Items Item A.1: Renaming SouthShore Areawide Systems Plan Text amendment (HC/CPA 25-26) to rename the plan to "South Hillsborough County Plan." Staff presentation noted no agency objections. No public comment. Approved 6-0. Item A.2: New Rural Light Industrial Future Land Use Category Text amendment (HC/CPA 25-29) to add a Rural Light Industrial category and define "Limited Light Industrial Uses." Staff presented research and protections (0.25 FAR, PD required, no residential). Public comment: Melissa Nordbeck opposed, arguing it conflicts with the county's lawsuit against the Live Local Act and risks exploitation by developers. Commissioner Willstrom discussed the PD requirement. Approved 6-0. Item B.1: Dover Road Map Amendment (RES-4 to RES-20) Privately initiated map amendment on 21.76 acres at 117 North Dover Road. Staff initially found inconsistency; Planning Commission voted 4-3 for consistency. Applicant proposed future mixed-use development, claiming trip neutrality. Public comment: Deborah Holiday, Margaret McDeed, and Penny Martin (virtual) opposed, citing incompatibility with rural character, traffic, infrastructure strain, and wildlife habitat loss. Commissioner Wilson voted no, citing violation of transition policies and calling the trip neutrality claim misleading. A motion to deny failed 3-3 (Commissioners Miller, Cameron, Wolstall in favor; Cohen, Hagen, Bowles against). A motion to continue to hear with a concurrent rezoning also failed 3-3 (same split). Item not adopted. Item B.2: West Lake Drive Map Amendment (WVR2 to RES-4) Publicly initiated map amendment on 15.04 acres to reclassify the last Wimauma Village Residential-2 parcels to Residential-4. Staff noted consistency with prior board direction. No public comment. Approved 6-0. Items B.3 & B.4: Highway 301 & Williams Road – Map Amendment and Rezoning Map amendment (HC/CPA 25-25) on 15.23 acres from RES-4 to Light Industrial Planned, and concurrent rezoning (RZ PD 26-0070) for up to 80,000 sq ft of warehousing/light manufacturing. Staff presentation noted Planning Commission found it consistent despite initial staff inconsistency. Applicant Jake Kramer highlighted community support and area transition. No public testimony. Approved: CPA 25-25 (6-0) and rezoning (6-0). Items B.5 & B.6: East 92 Highway – Map Amendment and Rezoning Map amendment (HC/CPA 25-38) on 4.36 acres from RES-9 to Suburban Mixed-Use-6, and concurrent rezoning (RZ PD 25-0939) for up to 100,000 sq ft of manufacturing uses. Staff noted consistency with community plan goals, decreased density, and buffering. Applicant Celia Carruthers spoke. No other public comment. Approved: CPA 25-38 (7-0) and rezoning (7-0). Item C.3: Corridor Preservation Plan Map Update – Fort Hamer Interchange Text amendment (HC/CPA 26-11) to add the proposed Fort Hamer interchange to the Corridor Preservation Plan Map. Staff presentation noted alignment with long-range transportation plan and no policy changes. Public comment: Amanda Brown opposed, citing lack of public engagement; Deborah Slow Ruguzo opposed, citing environmental harm and misleading lakefront claims. Commissioner Lynch supported as proactive planning. Approved 7-0. Public Comments & Testimony Item A.2: Melissa Nordbeck (opposed new industrial category due to Live Local Act concerns). Item B.1: Deborah Holiday (opposed density increase, incompatibility), Margaret McDeed (opposed traffic and infrastructure strain, loss of rural character), Penny Martin (virtual, opposed, citing staff findings and planning commission skepticism). Item C.3: Amanda Brown (opposed lack of public notice and engagement), Deborah Slow Ruguzo (opposed environmental destruction and misleading lakefront development). Key Outcomes Continuance: Items C.1 and C.2 continued to June 11, 2026 (6-0). Adopted (6-0): A.1, A.2, B.2, B.3 (CPA), B.4 (rezoning). Adopted (7-0): B.5 (CPA), B.6 (rezoning), C.3. Not Adopted: B.1 (Dover Road) – motion to deny failed 3-3; motion to continue failed 3-3; item remains pending without board action.

The Hillsborough Transportation Planning Organization (TPO) Board met on May 13, 2026, at 10:00 a.m. in the 26th Floor Conference Room of the Hillsborough County Center, Tampa, Florida. The meeting covered adoption of the FY27-28 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP), acceptance of the Henderson Blvd/Manhattan Ave Vision Plan, and approval of the FY28-32 TPO Priority List, including a contentious debate over the I-275 widening project. Public comments strongly opposed the widening. The Board voted 12-1 to accept the Priority List after a substitute motion to remove the I-275 widening item failed 2-10. Consent Calendar - Committee Appointments: Approved unanimously. Nominations included Nicholas Leschofs (Citizen at Large), Josh Blackman (City of Tampa Mobility), Tim Horst (alternate), Cindy Penn (City of Plant City) to the Bicycle/Pedestrian Advisory Committee; Abrahm Wilcox (Citizen at Large) to the Citizens Advisory Committee; and Steven Haglich (alternate, Florida Department of Children & Families) to the Transportation Disadvantaged Coordinating Board. Public Comments & Testimony - Chris Vella (Tampa, FL 33605) urged removal of Item 36 (I-275 widening from Hillsborough Ave to Bearss Ave) from the Priority List, citing a decade of public opposition, 2,000-signature petitions, and the project's origin in a 1987 study. He argued that only 9.5% of the population uses I-275 and that widening would not solve mobility needs. - Jason Marlowe opposed the I-275 widening, calling it a "boondoggle" with a cost exceeding $400 million, double the annual funding of HART. He stated that widening would incentivize more traffic and reduce property values, and urged investment in alternative transportation. - Rick Fernandez (President, Tampa Heights Civic Association; CAC Chair) opposed the widening, noting the CAC had recommended striking the project. He stated that the 2021 TPO board had removed the project, but it was reinstated in 2024 without public notice. He argued that the evacuation rationale is unsupported by emergency management doctrine, which advises "run from water, hide from wind." Discussion Items - FY27-28 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP) Adoption: Jonathan Nixon Elder presented the $2,472,186 two-year budget for transportation planning activities (July 1, 2026 – June 30, 2028). Chair Ross expressed frustration with the complexity of planning acronyms (UPWP, LOP, TIP) and the administrative overhead, but the motion to adopt passed unanimously. - Henderson Blvd/Manhattan Ave Vision Plan: Lisa Silva (TPO) and Kathrin Telez (Fehr & Peers) presented a 4-mile corridor vision plan, developed over 15 months with stakeholder workshops and public charrettes. The plan includes roundabouts, median treatments, bike lane buffers, and pedestrian crossing improvements. Board Member Klug noted the corridor's origin as a cattle trail. Commissioner Cohen highlighted the road's dangerous six-way intersections. Commissioner Wostal expressed skepticism about bike lane usage and requested data on usage counts and costs. Councilmember Hurtak praised the plan. The motion to accept the plan passed unanimously. - FY28-32 TPO Priority List: Elizabeth Watkins presented 40 projects seeking federal funds (20-25 million/year) or community support. Key projects: HART bus stop improvements ($2M recommended), bus fleet state-of-good-repair ($5M recommended), Collins Street (Plant City) Phase 3 ($2M for design), Bypass Canal Trail Segment 6 ($2.5M for construction), Gibsonton Drive widening ($750K for design), and Ashley Drive realignment ($15M request, but likely unfunded). The I-275 widening (Item 36) is listed for community support only, seeking $400 million for construction projected in 2035. Public comment opposed the project. A substitute motion by Commissioner Cohen to remove Item 36 from the Priority List was seconded by Commissioner Myers but failed 2-10 (Cohen and Myers in favor, 10 opposed). The original motion to accept the Priority List passed 12-1, with Commissioner Myers dissenting. Key Outcomes - UPWP Adoption: Resolution 26-2 and 26-3 adopted unanimously. The UPWP becomes effective July 1, 2026. - Henderson Blvd/Manhattan Ave Vision Plan: Accepted unanimously. The City of Tampa provided a letter of acceptance, and implementation will be phased. - FY28-32 TPO Priority List: Approved 12-1. The substitute motion to remove the I-275 widening (Item 36) failed 2-10. The priority list will be transmitted to FDOT by August 1, 2026. - Executive Director’s Report: Sun Coast Transportation Planning Alliance meeting set for June 5, 2026 (location changed to Polk County, TBD). Next regular TPO Board meeting and TIP hearing on June 10, 2026, at 6:00 p.m. Dr. Wong reported that the Forward Pinellas board voted 10-3 to accept the revised apportionment (Hillsborough donates one seat to Pasco, keeping Port and Airport members off the top). - Adjournment: The meeting was adjourned after new business.

The Hillsborough County Board of County Commissioners held a Land Use Meeting on May 12, 2026, beginning at 9:00 AM. The meeting covered 8 continuances, a consent agenda with 9 items, 4 right-of-way/easement vacations, 7 minor modifications to planned developments, 6 regular agenda rezoning items, and a status report on Live Local Act projects. The board approved most items with several notable denials after public testimony and debate. Consent Calendar - RZ-PD 25-1338 REMAND (Syed L Ali) – Approved: Rezone 0.91 acres to PD at 7814 E Elm St. - RZ-PD 25-1387 (E Sligh LLC) – Approved: Rezone 4.98 acres to PD at 6214 E Sligh Ave. - RZ-PD 26-0214 (Hill Ward Henderson) – Approved: Rezone 16.62 acres to PD at NW Corner of N US Hwy 301 & Sabal Industrial Blvd. - MM 26-0335 (Mark Bentley) – Approved: Major Modification to PD at 11004 Bloomingdale Ave. - RZ-STD 26-0468 (Arthur Gillette) – Approved: Rezone 0.86 acres to AS-1 SB at 10002 Alafia St. - Airport Logistics West Linebaugh Off-Site PI5687 – Approved: Acceptance of off-site improvements and warranty bond ($16,931.57). - Seffner Self Storage Mini Warehouse Off-Site PI6401 – Approved: Acceptance of off-site improvements and warranty check ($5,310.25). - South Creek Phase 6 P17300 – Approved: Plat approval and performance bonds ($1,190,834.94 construction; $12,000 lot corners). - Southwind Off-Site Roadway Improvements PI6795 – Approved: Acceptance of roads/drainage and warranty check ($48,576.10). Public Comments & Testimony - V23-0011 (Mission Village Phase One vacate) – Applicant’s attorney thanked staff; no public opposition. Approved 7-0. - V25-0005 (Pulitzer Avenue vacate) – Commissioner Wostal noted Live Local Act implications; no public testimony. Approved 7-0. - V25-0014 (Clewis Garden Tracts vacate) – No public testimony. Approved 6-0 (Commissioner Cameron Cepeda absent). - V26-0010 (Sun City Center drainage easement vacate) – No public testimony. Approved 7-0. - E1 (PRS 26-0473, access modification) – Applicant’s attorney gave brief presentation; no public testimony. Approved 7-0. - E2 (PRS 26-0505, accessory structure setback) – Property owners Carlos Borras and Morgan Borris spoke in favor; no opposition. Approved 7-0. - E3 (PRS 26-0545, buffering modification) – Applicant’s representative spoke; no public testimony. Approved 7-0. - E4 (PRS 26-0612, Keel Farms parking/transportation conditions) – Applicant’s attorney, traffic engineer, and farm owner spoke in favor; no public opposition. Approved with amended conditions (removing asphalt requirement) 7-0. - E5 (PRS 26-0616, soccer field layout) – Applicant’s representative spoke; no public testimony. Approved 7-0. - E6 (PRS 26-0617, additional access) – Applicant’s attorney spoke; no public testimony. Approved 7-0. - E7 (PRS 26-0621, design standards) – Applicant’s attorney gave brief remarks; no public testimony. Approved 7-0. - F2 (RZ-PD 25-0882, boutique hotel) – Applicant presented via video; planning commission and hearing master recommended approval; no public testimony. Approved 7-0. - F3 (RZ-PD 26-0213, Almosta Farm Athletics) – Extensive public testimony: 4 supporters (Brendan McCafferty, Rashad Davis, Brian Peters, Ashana Firklof) cited need for youth sports facilities; opposition attorney Eric Smith and several residents (including Catherine Wiggins’ testimony referenced) argued incompatibility with rural/agricultural character, light/noise pollution, and traffic. Approved motion failed 3-4; denial motion passed 6-1. - F4 (MM 26-0346, ACG BBQ restaurant) – Opposition from Shamir Francis (HOA representative) citing traffic, noise, and cost-sharing burdens; applicant and traffic engineer rebutted. Approved 7-0. - F1 (RZ-PD 25-0383, Bassam Dammak townhomes) – Opposition from Susan Dennis, Brian Blair, Eric Flasterstein, and Beverly Keaney (Forest Hills Neighborhood Association) cited flooding, infrastructure, and incompatibility with single-family character. Applicant’s representative responded. Denied 7-0. - F5 (RZ-STD 26-0359, rezoning to RMC-12) – No public testimony. Approved 7-0. - F6 (RZ-STD 26-0457, rezoning to AS-1) – No public testimony. Approved 7-0. - I1 (Live Local Act status report) – Commissioner Wostal noted one applicant proceeding despite lawsuit. Report accepted 6-0. Discussion Items - Withdrawals and Continuances (Items A.1–A.8): All 8 items (various rezoning and PRS applications) were continued to future meetings (June 9 or July 21, 2026) by unanimous votes. - Vacation Hearings (C.1–C.4): All four right-of-way/easement vacation petitions were approved unanimously with minimal discussion. - Public Hearing Land Use (E.1–E.7): Seven minor modification requests were approved, mostly without opposition. Notable: E4 (Keel Farms) was approved with an amended condition to remove asphalt paving requirements for the overflow parking lot, after discussion about rural character and farmer burden. - Regular Agenda (F.1–F.6): - F.1 (Bassam Dammak townhomes): Denied 7-0 after public opposition citing flooding and incompatibility. - F.2 (TSP Companies hotel): Approved 7-0. - F.3 (Almosta Farm Athletics): Denied 6-1 after extensive debate; a motion to approve failed 3-4. The board majority found the location inappropriate for the proposed indoor/outdoor recreation use despite community need. - F.4 (ACG BBQ restaurant): Approved 7-0 with conditions including enhanced buffering and 10:30 AM–9:30 PM hours. - F.5 (Matthew Spero rezoning): Approved 7-0. - F.6 (Donald Thompson rezoning): Approved 7-0. - Staff Item I.1: Status report on Live Local Act projects accepted; no new applications filed. Key Outcomes - Approved (all unanimous 7-0 unless noted): Consent Agenda, all vacation petitions (C.1–C.4), all Public Hearing Land Use items (E.1–E.7), F.2, F.4, F.5, F.6, Live Local Act report. - Denied: - F.1 (RZ-PD 25-0383): Motion to deny carried 7-0. - F.3 (RZ-PD 26-0213): Motion to approve failed 3-4 (Commissioner Cameron Cepeda, Hagan in favor; Boles, Miller, Cohen, Wostal opposed). Motion to deny carried 6-1 (Commissioner Cameron Cepeda opposed). - Continued: All items in Section A (A.1–A.8) to June 9 or July 21, 2026. - Amended Conditions: E4 (Keel Farms) – Asphalt/paving requirements removed from transportation conditions per board directive.

The Hillsborough County City County Planning Commission held its regular meeting on May 11, 2026, at 7:00 PM. The meeting included approval of minutes, public comment, several briefings on comprehensive plan amendments and land development code text amendments, an executive director's report, and a discussion on the establishment of structured public comment time limits. No action items were voted on. Consent Calendar - Approved minutes from the March 9, 2026 regular meeting and public hearings for Plant City plan amendments, unincorporated Hillsborough County plan amendments, and City of Tampa redistricting (motion by Commissioner Brown, second by Commissioner Lauk, carried unanimously). Public Comments & Testimony - Amanda Brown voiced strong opposition to any dismantling of the Urban Service Area (USA), referencing discussions at the April 15 BOCC meeting. She recommended six policy reforms including fair analysis of comp plan applications, proper notification, an expansion moratorium, better public access to planning commissioners, communication logs and conflict of interest protections, and better data analysis. She urged adherence to the existing comprehensive plan. Discussion Items - 3A: City of Temple Terrace LDC Text Amendment (Easements): Staff presented a publicly initiated amendment to Section 12-827 to clarify drainage easement maintenance responsibilities, access rights, and restrictions on permanent structures. No action taken. - 3B: PC CPA 26-01 (103 and 107 Johnson Road, Plant City): A small‑scale amendment to change 2.25 acres from Hillsborough County Residential One to Plant City Gateway District, pending annexation. Would allow an additional 30 dwelling units and increase non‑residential square footage by 9,801. No action taken. - 3C: PC CPA 26-02 (302 Sparkman Road, Plant City): A small‑scale amendment to change 33.9 acres from Residential One to Plant City Residential 6 and Residential 9, pending annexation. Would allow an additional 237 dwelling units and increase non‑residential square footage by 98,445. No action taken. - 3D: PC CPA 26-03 (South of Thonotosassa Road, Plant City): A small‑scale amendment to change 13.12 acres from Plant City Commercial and Residential 6 to entirely Commercial. Would increase non‑residential square footage by 43,725. No action taken. - 3E: City of Temple Terrace LDC Text Amendment (Recovery Residences): Staff presented amendments to Sections 12-40 and 12-81 to establish procedures for reasonable accommodation requests for certified recovery residences, aligning with Florida Statutes and federal fair housing protections. The proposal includes a 60‑day review deadline with deemed approved status if unmet. No action taken. - 3F: TT CPA 26-01 (Southeast Quadrant of Harney Road and US 301, Temple Terrace): A small‑scale amendment to change future land use from Hillsborough County Community Mixed Use 12 to Temple Terrace Community Mixed Use 12 (12 acres). No change in development potential (up to 146 dwelling units or 265,716 sq ft non‑residential). No action taken. - Executive Director’s Report: Melissa Zornita reported on the Planning Commission’s appearance before the BOCC regarding the urban service area letter (no action taken); ongoing public meetings for the I‑4 corridor urban expansion area and Riverview Community Plan update; a panel at the West Shore Alliance Development Forum; the status of the Tampa Comprehensive Plan update (awaiting Department of Commerce review); and a scheduled joint meeting with Temple Terrace City Council on August 17, 2026, from 4:00–5:30 PM. - Chair’s Business – Public Comment Time Limits: The commission discussed establishing structured public comment time limits. Commissioners expressed various views on capping total time per item, scaling individual time based on number of speakers, and ensuring equity. The consensus was to direct staff to bring back data on past public comment counts and a proposed scaling system (e.g., reducing from three minutes to two minutes if over a certain threshold). No formal motion was made. Key Outcomes - No action items were voted on; all briefings were informational. - The commission directed staff to research historical public comment volumes and return with a proposal for scaling time limits for public speakers on individual agenda items. - The next workshop meeting was scheduled to begin at 3:00 PM, and the regular meeting adjourned at 3:16 PM.