The Planning Commission met on May 11, 2026, to conduct public hearings for both the City of Tampa and Hillsborough County comprehensive plan amendments. Four map amendment items were considered, involving changes to future land use designations. Staff presented findings, applicants made cases, and the public had the opportunity to comment. The Commission voted on each item, forwarding recommendations to the respective governing bodies. Tampa Public Hearing Item 2A: TACPA 26-01 – 1201 North Henderson Avenue (Map amendment from CMU 35 to UMU 60) - Staff Presentation: Quinn (staff) presented a request to change the future land use from CMU 35 (medium density residential/commercial at 35 units/acre or 2.0 FAR) to Urban Mixed Use 60 (up to 60 units/acre or 3.25 FAR). The site is within the Central Park Urban Village, a CRA, and near transit. Staff noted no agency objections and recommended consistency, citing support for compact city form, housing supply, and transit proximity. - Applicant Presentation: Megan Smith (Gardner Brewer Hudson) supported the staff presentation, emphasizing the site's location as a nucleus of growing neighborhoods and its underutilized status. She argued the increased density would incentivize redevelopment. - Public Comment: None. - Commission Discussion: No questions or debate. Commissioner Lauk moved to find consistent, seconded by Commissioner Kona. The motion carried unanimously. Item 2B: TACPA 26-02 – 1701 East 2nd Avenue (Map amendment from Light Industrial to UMU 60) - Staff Presentation: Megan McCarthy (staff) presented a 0.39-acre site proposed to change from Light Industrial to Urban Mixed Use 60. The site is in the Ybor City Local Historic District and over 72% in the Coastal High Hazard Area. Staff found the amendment consistent with policies promoting mixed-use development and noted the industrial designation is unlikely to yield employment uses due to lot size. No agency objections. - Applicant Presentation: Alex Shaler (Gardner Brewer Hudson) explained the parcel was omitted from a prior 2024 amendment due to pending acquisition. The site is currently a parking lot, trending toward mixed-use in the area. He argued UMU 60 is appropriate given the transit emphasis corridor and proximity to the Ybor City Urban Village. - Public Comment: None. - Commission Discussion: Commissioner Kona moved to find consistent, seconded by Commissioner Kugler. The motion passed 7-1, with Commissioner Joseph dissenting. Hillsborough County Public Hearing Item 2A: HCCPA 26-07 – Northwest of Hillsborough Avenue and George Road (Map amendment from Residential-6 and Office Commercial-20 to Light Industrial Plan) - Staff Presentation: Alexis Myers (staff) recommended inconsistency. The 6.7-acre site is in the Town & Country Community Plan, near single-family homes. The proposed Light Industrial Plan (LIP) would allow up to 155,835 sq ft of non-residential uses, but staff argued it would disrupt the intended progression of land use intensities, fail to provide a gradual transition, and be incompatible with established residential communities. Staff cited Future Land Use objectives 3.1, 3.1.2, 3.1.3, and 4.4. - Applicant Presentation: Gina Grimes (Bradley Aaron Bolton Cummings) argued for consistency. She stated the site is unsuitable for residential due to proximity to Tampa International Airport (1,700 linear feet), location in Coastal High Hazard Area and Evacuation Zone A, and market failure to attract residential after five years. She noted the companion PD (to be heard in June) would require substantial buffers (50-100 feet), a buffer wall, landscaping, and retention. Traffic analysis showed 1,600 fewer daily trips than the adopted FLU. She cited policies FLU 2.23 and CM 3.1.14 regarding airport protection and coastal high hazard incentives. - Public Comment: None. - Commission Discussion: Extensive debate. Commissioner Lauk questioned linear footage to nearest residential property line (50-foot buffer plus drainage parcels). Commissioner Bowt raised concerns about noise and the proximity to residential. Commissioner Lauk noted that LIP requires a PD process, providing a second review for compatibility. Commissioner Kugler noted the site's long market duration as a sign of unsuitability for residential. Commissioner Orton asked about flood elevation and potential flooding. Staff acknowledged no ideal land use category that both removes residential and is less intense than LIP. Motion to find consistent, citing FLU Policy 2.23 and CM Policy 3.1.14, was made by Commissioner Goleman and seconded. The motion passed 7-1, with Commissioner Bowden dissenting. Item 2B: HCCPA 26-10 – Southeast of Kingsway Road and Tenota Sassa Road (Map amendment from Agricultural Rural 1-5 and Residential-1 to Residential-2) - Staff Presentation: Lilliann Lanihan (staff) recommended inconsistency. The 24.22-acre site is in the Rural Area and the Tenota Sassa Community Plan. Proposed Residential-2 (2 units/acre) would allow up to 48 units versus 16 under current designations. Staff argued it violates Rural Area objectives (FLU 1.2.1, 1.2.2) as the nearest suburban enclave is 0.9 miles away. It is incompatible with surrounding agricultural and large-lot uses and inconsistent with community plan goals for rural character and minimum 1-acre lots. - Applicant Presentation: Isabel Albert (Holland & Knight) argued the request is to consolidate the split FLU to a uniform Residential-2 to allow clustering and flexibility due to new stormwater regulations. Despite the higher category, they plan to maintain a one-to-one density (24 units) with half-acre lots, keeping development compatible. She noted existing mixed uses in the area and that the site fronts Lake Tenota Sassa but no development is proposed along the lake. The applicant cited policies FLU 3.1, 3.2, 4.4, and 4.4.7, arguing consistency. - Public Comment: Robert Alvis, adjacent resident at 11907 [address], spoke in opposition, stating the area is agricultural with no subdivisions, and the proposal is a variation on a previously defeated plan. He urged denial. - Applicant Rebuttal: William Malloy clarified that they are seeking R2 only to cluster lots, with actual density remaining one-to-one, and that stormwater ponds will benefit the lake. He noted the required road improvement to a pocket of R6. - Commission Discussion: Commissioner Kugler was impressed with staff's presentation. Commissioner Sink found the density inconsistent with the area's character (7-8 units on similar adjacent property). Commissioner Bowden considered the zoning argument irrelevant as it cannot be used. Planning Commission staff emphasized the Tenota Sassa Community Plan's clear requirement for 1-acre minimum lots in residential areas. Motion to find inconsistent by Commissioner Kona, seconded, passed unanimously. Public Comments & Testimony - Robert Alvis (adjacent resident to HCCPA 26-10) expressed strong opposition, stating the area is agricultural and a subdivision does not belong. He said the proposal is a variation on a previously defeated plan and urged the Commission to deny the amendment. Key Outcomes - TACPA 26-01 (1201 N Henderson Ave): Motion to find consistent with the Tampa Comprehensive Plan – passed unanimously. - TACPA 26-02 (1701 E 2nd Ave): Motion to find consistent – passed 7-1 (Commissioner Joseph dissenting). - HCCPA 26-07 (Hillsborough Ave & George Rd): Motion to find consistent based on FLU Policy 2.23 and CM Policy 3.1.14 – passed 7-1 (Commissioner Bowden dissenting). - HCCPA 26-10 (Kingsway Rd & Tenota Sassa Rd): Motion to find inconsistent with the Hillsborough County Comprehensive Plan – passed unanimously. The Hillsborough County public hearing adjourned at 7:26 PM.
Public Meetings - Hillsborough County, Florida
Public Meetings - Hillsborough County, FloridaThis was a regular meeting of the Hart Board of Directors (Hillsborough County, Florida). The meeting included public comment, approval of minutes, adoption of a revised substance abuse policy, consent agenda approval, a CEO report, and a board counsel update. Note: The transcript states the meeting date as May 4, 2026, but the provided timestamp indicates May 6, 2026. This summary uses the date given in the instruction. Consent Calendar - Approved the consent agenda (items 5A-5C) as recommended by the Finance and Audit Committee (April 20, 2026). Motion carried unanimously. Public Comments & Testimony - David Smith (former employee) spoke about his termination, alleging miscommunication, contradictory evidence, excessive discipline (stacking of infractions), and lack of due process. He asked for a fair review of the evidence and process. - Mr. Green (speaker, no first name given) supported Smith, claiming Hart uses administrative policy and the union contract (CBA) to circumvent fair process and target employees. He urged the board to review the case. Discussion Items - Approval of Minutes (April 6, 2026): Approved unanimously. - Adoption of Board Policy 430.02 (Substance Abuse Program Policy): Board counsel Jeff Gibson introduced the item. HR Director Audrey Evans presented revisions to address Federal Transit Administration audit findings, ensuring compliance with 49 CFR parts 40 and 655. Key changes include clear prohibited behaviors (BAC limit of 0.04), standardized testing categories, expanded refusal-to-test definitions, stronger reporting, zero tolerance enforcement, and audit-ready documentation. No financial impact. Approved unanimously. - CEO Report (Mr. Drainville): - Introduced new Director of Procurement Daniel Marty (returning to Hart after previous service). - Submitted two community project funding requests (total $4.8M) for paratransit fleet replacement, supported by Congresswoman Castor and Congressman Lee. - Received GFOA Distinguished Budget Presentation Award for FY2026 budget. - Executed FTA certifications and insurance for FY2026. - Implemented CAD/AVR system for real-time bus tracking and communication. - Hart’s Transit Development Plan (TDP) annual update approved by Florida District 7. - Launched Sunflower Program to support passengers with hidden disabilities (training for employees). - Board Counsel Report (Jeff Gibson): - Update on TCO streetcar renaming issue: Director requested a 30-day update. Gibson reported positive discussions with TICO but no joint business plan yet. TICO asked Hart for a business plan, but Hart cannot proceed without the streetcar operator at the table. Key Outcomes - Approved minutes of the April 6, 2026 regular meeting. - Adopted revised Board Policy 430.02 (Substance Abuse Program Policy) effective immediately. - Approved the consent agenda (items 5A-5C). - Received CEO report and board counsel report; no further action taken. - No old or new business; meeting adjourned.
The Hillsborough County Board of County Commissioners held its regular meeting on May 6, 2026, at 9:00 a.m. at the County Center. The meeting included a presentation of the Ellsworth G. Simmons Good Government Award to Sheriff Chad Chronister, a proclamation declaring May 6, 2026 as the 20th Annual Delta Day, public comments, and action on multiple consent and regular agenda items. Key actions included approval of budget amendments for CDBG-DR programs, a first public hearing on expanding the county seat, scheduling a public hearing on solid waste rate increases, and directives on water infrastructure, legislative impacts, and a swim safety program expansion. Consent Calendar - Approved unanimously (7-0): The consent agenda, which included routine approvals for affordable housing, capital programs, environmental lands, county attorney settlements, economic development incentives, engineering and operations contracts, environmental services agreements, facilities management modifications, fleet surplus, health care services modifications, budget reports, procurement awards, solid waste change orders, water resources amendments, and clerk and board appointment items. One item (A-8) was deferred to a future date. Public Comments & Testimony - Colleen Crook (President, Sunset Manor HOA) requested the county take over the subdivision’s privately managed water system, citing repair costs exceeding $150,000 and no available grants for private systems. She noted county water may not be available until 2029–2031. - Karen Giroche opposed the Tampa Bay Rays stadium deal, citing TSA concerns about missing appraisals, unclear costs, and potential misuse of CIT funds. She urged the board to stop the project or put it to a public vote. - Denise Herndon opposed taxpayer funding for the stadium and an African American Arts & Cultural Center, and questioned the solid waste fee increase and the county seat expansion. - Myosha Powell echoed concerns about the stadium deal, emphasizing the lack of cost details for HCC relocation and the need for responsible budgeting. - Donnie Rutherford (Sunset Manor resident, retired Air Force) described the burden of recurring well repairs and urged immediate county water service. - Benjamin Diabold (Lemoyne Disaster) contested the board’s March 6 decision to exclude his firm from the CDBG-DR housing construction manager awards, alleging the record did not support the rationale used. - Shagrette Doss raised concerns about alleged misconduct by attorneys and a judge in a veterans’ VA benefits case, asking the board to investigate. - Tom Cobert warned about federal cuts to NOAA and FEMA, urging the county to prepare for reduced federal disaster assistance. - Alan Barens suggested reducing recycling collection to twice a month to cut costs, and asked for earlier library opening hours. - John King urged the board not to rush the stadium deal, advised against using CIT funds, and suggested alternative funding like tourist development taxes. Discussion Items - B-1 & B-2 – CDBG-DR Budget Amendments: The board approved two budget amendments appropriating $95,070,000 for seven Phase 3 infrastructure projects (drainage, culvert replacements, pump stations, etc.) and $208,400,496 for the Single-Family Housing Program (expected to assist 1,000 homeowners impacted by Hurricanes Helene and Milton). Staff projected first reimbursements by early July 2026 and contractor deployment by mid-to-late summer. Approved 7-0. - D-1 – County Seat Expansion (First Public Hearing): The board held the first of two required public hearings on a resolution to expand the county seat beyond Tampa to include all of Hillsborough County. No action was taken. Public comment was received: Denise Herndon questioned the purpose and potential unintended consequences; Karen Giroche spoke in support. Second hearing scheduled for May 20, 2026. - B-3 – Solid Waste Assessment Public Hearing: Staff presented a recommended 4.3% rate increase ($22 annually per dwelling unit, comprising $12.09 for collection and $9.91 for disposal) to address CPI-based contract costs and system maintenance. The board voted 6-1 to schedule the public hearing for June 3, 2026 (Commissioner Miller dissenting). Commissioner Wostal noted the county provides waste collection outside the urban service area, questioning the cost implications. - G-1 – Sunset Manor Water System: Staff reported on the 21-home subdivision’s aging private well system requiring $150,000 in repairs. The county has no policy to acquire HOA-owned systems, and connection to county water (planned for 2029) would cost residents $6,000 each. No grants were identified; a state revolving loan may be possible. The board voted 7-0 to receive the report and direct staff to hold a community meeting with residents, assist in identifying funding options, and authorize future connection subject to fees. - F-1 – SB 686 Agricultural Enclave Legislation: Commissioner Miller requested a report from the County Attorney and Development Services on the impact of newly enacted state legislation (SB 686) on local land use, zoning, and development review. Approved 7-0. - F-2 – Rename Health Care Advisory Board: Commissioner Myers’ motion to rename the board the “John S. Curran, M.D. Health Care Advisory Board” was approved 7-0. - F-3 – HART Bus Stop Relocation: Chair Hagan raised concerns about a bus stop moved 200 feet without proper permits, affecting a small business. The board voted 7-0 to direct staff to review whether HART followed required procedures and explore a win-win solution. - G-2 – Swim Safety Initiative Expansion: Staff reported that the program has taught nearly 16,000 children to swim since 2015, with a progression rate of 95% in 2025. Chair Hagan moved to expand the program to Boys & Girls Clubs and summer programs at an additional $51,000, funded from FY 26 budget, with implementation targeted for summer 2026. Approved 7-0. Key Outcomes - Consent Agenda approved 7-0. - B-1 and B-2 (CDBG-DR budget amendments) approved 7-0. - D-1 (County seat expansion) – first hearing held; no action; second hearing set for May 20, 2026. - B-3 (Solid waste assessment public hearing) – scheduled for June 3, 2026; vote 6-1. - G-1 (Sunset Manor) – report received; staff directed to hold community meeting, explore funding options, and authorize future connection; motion passed 7-0. - F-1 (SB 686 report) – approved 7-0. - F-2 (Health Care Advisory Board renaming) – approved 7-0. - F-3 (HART bus stop) – staff directed to review process; motion passed 7-0. - G-2 (Swim safety expansion) – $51,000 approved for expansion; motion passed 7-0. - Future discussion: Commissioner Cohen requested staff explore converting county-owned property on Sheldon Road near Rocky Creek into a public green space/park.
The Hillsborough Transportation Planning Organization (TPO) held a special meeting on May 5, 2026, at 9:00 AM (local time) to receive a presentation from Waymo on autonomous vehicle expansion and to discuss and vote on a crucial action item regarding the proposed regional MPO merger with Pinellas and Pasco counties. The meeting included public comment, a detailed status report from Waymo, and extensive deliberation on apportionment scenarios for the merged board. Consent Calendar - Minutes Approval: The minutes from the December 2, 2025 meeting were approved unanimously via voice vote with no discussion or corrections. Public Comments & Testimony - Hong Mai (Professional engineer, address provided): Expressed concerns about a 25-member voting board for the regional MPO, arguing it would slow decision-making, reduce accountability, and increase politicization of technical choices. He proposed creating a 5- or 6-member executive leadership committee to guide the governing board, citing examples from other MPOs like Volusia/Flagler. - Bill Roberts (Hillsborough County resident): Spoke in strong support of regionalism, urging the board to think regionally and create a representative MPO. He emphasized the importance of including Port Tampa Bay and Hillsborough Aviation Authority as permanent voting members, and cautioned against repeating the failures of the TBARTA experience. Discussion Items Waymo Autonomous Vehicle Expansion Status Report - John Tupps (Waymo Government Affairs) presented remotely, detailing Waymo's operations: 500,000 fully autonomous trips weekly (up 2.5x year-over-year), 4 million autonomous miles weekly, and operations in 11 markets including Miami and Orlando. He described the technology (Jaguar I-Pace with 29 cameras, 6 radar, 5 LIDAR sensors) and highlighted safety data: 92% fewer serious injury crashes compared to human drivers. In Tampa, mapping is underway with human safety specialists; no public launch timeline was given. Board members asked about manual override, citation liability, cost competitiveness (stated as within a few dollars of Uber/Lyft), wait times, teen accounts (Waymo Teen available in Phoenix for ages 14-17), service area (planned initial 40-60 sq miles around downtown Tampa, surface streets only), speed adherence (follows posted limits), insurance coverage, and inclement weather performance (LIDAR/radar handle rain, fleet can be deflected). Waymo also announced a pothole data-sharing initiative with Waze and emphasized economic benefits including jobs (mechanics, dispatchers, etc.) and tourism. Regional MPO Apportionment Update and Discussion (Action Item) - Dr. Johnny Wong (Executive Director) recapped the 2.5-year merger study process, noting that the original apportionment plan (25 voting members, Port & Airport off-top, 23 population-based seats) was supported by Hillsborough TPO and the Tri-County TMA, but Ford Pinellas MPO recently declined to act and instead proposed changes. Three options were presented: 1. Original plan (25 seats: 2 off-top for Port/Airport, 23 population-based: Hillsborough 11, Pinellas 8, Pasco 4) with a majority voting provision requiring approval from a majority of each county's delegation for key documents. 2. Pinellas proposal (eliminate off-top seats, allocate all 25 by population; Port/Airport seats would come from Hillsborough's allocation). 3. TMA alternative (keep Port/Airport off-top, Hillsborough donates 1 population seat to Pasco, resulting in Hillsborough 10, Pinellas 8, Pasco 5). - Board members expressed varying positions: Commissioner Cohen prioritized Port/Airport having voting seats but was flexible; Mayor Kilton preferred option 3 to avoid a supermajority; Commissioner Slater urged keeping focus on the regional goal; Councilmember Hertak advocated for including a transit seat (rotating among HART, PSTA, GoPasco) off-top. Commissioner Myers supported moving forward. Board member King offered a substitute motion to include transit agencies as voting members (altering allocations to Hillsborough 13, Pinellas 7, Pasco 5), which failed 2-9 (only King and Clendennan in favor). Key Outcomes - Substitute Motion Failed: Motion by Board Member King (seconded by Councilmember Clendennan) to include transit agencies as voting members, adjusting seat counts, failed with 2 ayes (King, Clendennan) and 9 nays. - Original Motion Passed: Motion by Commissioner Cohen (seconded by Mayor Kilton) to adopt Option 3: 25-member board with Port Tampa Bay and Hillsborough Aviation Authority as voting members off the top; remaining 23 seats allocated by population; Hillsborough County to donate one of its population-based seats to Pasco County (resulting in Hillsborough 10, Pinellas 8, Pasco 5). Passed with a majority (nays: King, Hertak, Clendennan). - Phase Two Authorized: Staff directed to proceed with Phase Two of the merger study, including drafting the interlocal agreement, bylaws, staffing plan, and transition plan. The apportionment details (sub-allocation within Hillsborough County) will be discussed later in summer/fall 2026. - Next Steps: The TPO will communicate this counter-proposal to Ford Pinellas and Pasco MPOs. The next regular TPO meeting is scheduled for May 13, 2026, at 10:00 AM, where priority projects will be considered.
The Tampa Bay Water Board held a budget workshop and regular meeting on April 29, 2026, to discuss the proposed FY2027 operating budget, capital improvement program, ongoing drought conditions, and several action items including water treatment projects and contracts. All votes were unanimous. Consent Calendar - The consent agenda was approved unanimously with no items pulled. Proclamations & Awards - The board unanimously declared April as Water Conservation Month, citing the severe drought and the importance of rain shutoff devices. - Presented the 2025 Best of the Region Community Waterwise Award to Michelle Burt and David Culp for their drought-tolerant, 77-variety landscape in Pinellas County. A photo was taken with the winners. Public Comments & Testimony - David Ballard Geddis Jr. (Palm Harbor) criticized water management, alleging deliberate mismanagement, and opposed plans to inject reclaimed water into the aquifer and use reclaimed water as potable supply. He questioned the role of Walt Disney and government motives. - Mark Cloufo (Largo) called the water conservation awards a "joke," criticized the lack of pollinator-friendly plants in the awarded landscape, highlighted a record drought and climate change, and pointed to energy waste from the building's lights and vehicles. Budget Workshop – Proposed FY2027 Operating & Capital Budget - CFO Christina Sacket presented the proposed budget, highlighting a uniform water rate of $2.66 per thousand gallons (up $0.02 from FY2026), a variable rate of $0.62 per thousand gallons, and projected demand of 212.84 million gallons per day (MGD). Total costs are $223.8 million, with $4 million drawn from rate stabilization funds to offset rate increases. Net revenue required from water sales is $206.6 million. - Key cost drivers: Variable costs (+$1.4M), personnel (+$1.1M) including four new positions (IT network engineer, one mechanical technician, two trainees), professional services (+$3.1M) largely due to demand management rebate funding ($1.64M), and debt service (41% of total costs). Three recent bond refundings saved $2.4M annually. - 10-year Capital Improvement Program: 91 projects totaling $1.697 billion. Future debt issuances expected $292M in 2026 and $301M in 2028, largely for the South Hillsborough Well Field and PFAS/TOC treatment projects. - Board Questions: Commissioner Rakers asked about performance-based merit (averaging 2%), the technician trainee program (discussions with AMSkills ongoing), and bond interest rates (forecast 5%). Commissioner Wastel requested a detailed breakdown of professional services and noted concerns about rising PFAS costs, but praised the lean staffing. General Manager’s Report - Drought Update (Warren Hogg): The region remains in extreme drought under modified Phase 3 restrictions. March water deliveries were 15 MGD below forecast due to conservation. The consolidated well fields exceeded their 90 MGD permit limit (92.49 MGD in March); the 12-month average may approach 100 MGD. The reservoir is one-third full (5.2 billion gallons) and managed to last until early July. A recent rain event harvested 300 million gallons from the Alafia River. - Legislative/Federal: SCADA improvement project ($1M) in House budget; surface water treatment plant expansion ($2M) in Senate proposal. No action on federal funding. - Other: Performance management audit recommendations to be presented in May. A board item in May for completing the remaining two desalination RO trains. Tampa Bay Water named a 2026 Top Workplace by Tampa Bay Times. Extensive media outreach on conservation. Board attended Earth Day with Girl Scouts. - Key Takeaways: Keep reservoir above 1.5 billion gallons by July; balance getting under 90 MGD permit limit by October with refilling reservoir. El Niño pattern expected, which may bring cooler, wetter winter. Action Items (Unanimously Approved) 1. Tampa Bay Waterwise Program – Cooperative Funding Agreement: Approved (motion/second) agreement with Southwest Florida Water Management District for up to $528,000 in reimbursement for program costs. The program aims to save 3.8 MGD by 2030; cumulative savings to date are 1.1 MGD. 2. Water Quality Treatment Recommendations (PFAS and TOC): Approved the approach to design PFAS reduction treatment at three locations (surface water treatment plant, Brandon Urban Dispersed Wells sites 5 & 7) and TOC reduction at two well fields (Eldridge Wild, South Pasco), with estimated capital costs of $240M. Design will proceed with board contract approval at later stages. EPA compliance deadline is April 2029 but subject to litigation; construction will wait for regulatory certainty. 3. Veolia Contract Amendment – Pilot Facility Design: Approved $1.83 million for design of interim and permanent pilot facilities for PFAS and TOC treatment at the surface water treatment plant, funded from PFAS litigation settlement funds. 4. Morris Bridge Well Field Improvements – Construction Contract: Awarded contract to Southeast Drilling Services for $16.3 million (including allowance) to retire five wells, replace pumps/motors, and donate three well houses to Flatwoods Park. Savings achieved via value engineering and $1M EPA grant. 5. Crossbar Ranch Well Field Transmission Main – Utility Conflict Resolution: Awarded contract to JDS Pipe Incorporated for $6.2 million to relocate a 60-inch main due to FDOT road widening. FDOT will reimburse $4 million. Presentation – City of St. Petersburg Water Resources - John Palanjar (retiring March 2027) delivered a creative, people-focused presentation highlighting the individuals behind St. Pete’s water system: treatment, distribution, compliance, wastewater, and reclaimed water teams. Featured staff videos on boil water preparedness, laboratory testing, and a female chief plant operator. The presentation emphasized collaboration and regional partnership. Board members thanked him for his service. Receive and File - Items were received and filed by unanimous vote. Attorney Client Session and Settlement Approval - The board entered a private attorney client session (60 minutes) under Florida Statute 286.011(8) to discuss the case Polk Regional Water Cooperative vs. Southwest Florida Water Management District and Tampa Bay Water. After the session, the board voted unanimously to approve the settlement.
The Hillsborough County Zoning Hearing Master (ZHM) convened on April 27, 2026, at 6:00 PM, presided over by Hearing Officer Susan Finch. The meeting addressed a wide range of rezoning (RZ) and major modification (MM) applications, including continuances, withdrawals, and substantive hearings. The Hearing Officer will file recommendations by May 18, 2026; final decisions will be made by the Board of County Commissioners (BOCC) at its June 9, 2026 Land Use Meeting (unless otherwise noted). Withdrawals and Continuances - Withdrawn: RZ-STD 26-0290 (Wimauma Commercial, LLC), RZ-STD 26-0481 (Leaders Companies, LLC), RZ-STD 26-0548 (Melva Rodriguez). - Continued to May 26, 2026: RZ-STD 25-1026, MM 25-1261, MM 26-0045, MM 26-0062 (by applicant), RZ-PD 26-0095, RZ-PD 26-0217 (by applicant), RZ-PD 26-0303 (by applicant), RZ-PD 26-0329 (by applicant), RZ-PD 26-0338, MM 26-0340, RZ-PD 26-0339 (by staff), RZ-PD 26-0363, RZ-PD 26-0422, RZ-PD 26-0426, RZ-PD 26-0433, RZ-PD 26-0437. - Continued to June 22, 2026: MM 26-0063 (by applicant), RZ-PD 26-0270. - Continued to July 20, 2026: RZ-PD 26-0237, RZ-PD 26-0281. Public Comments & Testimony Public testimony was heard on each of the following applications. Positions are summarized below per case. Discussion Items C.1 – RZ-STD 26-0310 (David Wright / TSP Companies, Inc.) – Request to rezone 0.34 acres from RSC-6 to CN-R at NE corner of E Martin Luther King Blvd & Watson Rd. Applicant agreed with staff. No public testimony. Staff and Planning Commission found the request consistent and compatible. Result: Heard and pending recommendation. C.2 – RZ-STD 26-0541 (Mark Bentley) – Request to rezone 2.3 acres from ASC-1 to M-R at 6106 Hartford St. Applicant argued the rezoning aligns with the LI future land use and existing industrial pattern. Opponent: Susan Swift (representing Levi Equine Holdings) opposed the M-R district, requesting CI or PD with a 50-foot type C buffer due to noise and visual impacts on a horse stable to the north. The applicant rebutted that noise is regulated by code and that the required 30-foot type C buffer is sufficient. Result: Heard and pending recommendation. C.3 – RZ-STD 26-0609 (El Rancho Food Truck, LLC) – Request to rezone 1.06 acres from BPO to CG at 4332 W Waters Ave. No opposition. Staff and Planning Commission found the request consistent with the commercial corridor. Result: Heard and pending recommendation. D.1 – RZ-PD 25-1061 (Todd Pressman / Pressman & Assoc., Inc.) – Request to rezone 15.6 acres from PD (05-1783) and RSC-2 MH to a new PD for a 74-space luxury RV resort on Symmes Rd. Access via TICO easement. No public testimony. Staff and Planning Commission found the resort compatible with surrounding mobile home and single-family uses. Result: Heard and pending recommendation. D.2 – MM 25-1415 (Todd Pressman) – Major modification to PD (00-0533) at 2122 & 2134 S 78th St to allow 25 multifamily units, 5,000 sq ft of restricted commercial, and a 100 sq ft leasing office. The current car wash use (abutting residential) will be removed. Applicant requested variations to reduce buffers and setbacks. No opposition. Staff supported the variations. Result: Heard and pending recommendation. D.3 – MM 26-0215 (Florida Conference Association of Seventh-day Adventists) – Major modification to PD (18-0296) at 5585 E County Line Rd to expand school from 650 to 1,100 students (including 250 daycare) and increase building area to 135,000 sq ft. Opponent: Samuel Berkman (resident) opposed due to lack of pedestrian improvements (sidewalks, crossing) along County Line Rd, citing pedestrian crashes and code requirements. Staff responded that the developer is only required to install sidewalk along project frontage; off-site gaps are not the developer’s responsibility. The applicant agreed to provide a sidewalk along frontage. Result: Heard and pending recommendation. D.4 – RZ-PD 26-0328 (Okoye Morgan / Rock Solid Construction) – Request to rezone 0.51 acres from CN to PD for six townhomes at 5600 & 5602 E Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd. No opposition. Staff found the residential use less intense than commercial. Result: Heard and pending recommendation. D.5 – RZ-PD 26-0349 (Hill Ward Henderson) – Request to rezone 638.8 acres (adding 13.1 acres) to a new PD (Council Growers) in Wimauma. No increase in density. Includes modifications to road layout and phasing. No opposition. Result: Heard and pending recommendation. D.6 – RZ-PD 26-0431 (PSS, LLC) – Request to rezone 2.25 acres from PD (20-0102) and RDC-12 to a new PD for 16 multifamily units and 3,500 sq ft of office at 3814 Lemon Ave. The site is encumbered by access easements from adjacent retail development. Applicant requested a variation to place a sidewalk within a buffer. No opposition. Staff supported the variation. Result: Heard and pending recommendation. D.7 – MM 26-0432 (Suncoast Community Health Centers, Inc) – Major modification to PD (21-0701) at 10710 Walker Rd to allow up to 17,650 sq ft of business professional office (including up to 10,000 sq ft medical office). No opposition. Result: Heard and pending recommendation. D.8 – RZ-PD 26-0436 (Mosaic Fertilizer, LLC) – Request to rezone 1,412.41 acres (including 127 new acres) to a new PD to extend the existing phosphogypsum stack (E stack) westward for 16 additional years of storage. The companion comprehensive plan amendment seeks to reclassify Burden and Sunken Islands to Natural Preservation. Proponents: Marley Talbott-Jones (Progress Village resident, civic council VP) and Chris Oakes (Mosaic employee) spoke in support, citing Mosaic’s community engagement, safety record, and economic importance. Opponents: Teresa Corden and another resident opposed, citing environmental risks (e.g., Piney Point, sinkholes), radioactive waste, and the need for sustainable alternatives. The applicant’s team addressed regulations, mitigation (including conservation easement on 347 acres and Archie Creek restoration), and the visual management plan (18 monitoring points). Staff and Planning Commission found the proposal consistent with conditions. Result: Heard and pending recommendation, with a note that the companion CPA date is to be determined. D.9 – MM 26-0441 (Riverview Montessori School at Rivercrest, LLC) – Major modification to PD (00-0047) at 11520 & 11560 Ramble Creek Dr to allow up to 130 children (80 daycare, 50 elementary school) within an existing building. No opposition. The applicant clarified that the original approval did not specify a student limit; the new option provides clarity. Result: Heard and pending recommendation. Key Outcomes - All 13 applications heard (C.1–C.3, D.1–D.9) were heard and pending recommendation to the BOCC Land Use Meeting on June 9, 2026 (except D.8, which has a companion CPA meeting date to be determined). - 3 applications were withdrawn (RZ-STD 26-0290, 26-0481, 26-0548). - 19 applications were continued to various future ZHM hearings (primarily May 26, 2026). - The Hearing Officer will file recommendations by May 18, 2026. Parties of Record may request additional evidence by May 28, 2026.
The Board of County Commissioners held a budget workshop on April 22, 2026, from 1:30 PM to 3:00 PM to receive an overview of the fiscal year 2026 adopted budget and discuss the outlook for FY 2027 through FY 2031. Kevin Brickey, Director of Management and Budget, presented the budget overview, highlighting the county’s AAA credit rating, guiding principles, and new state transparency legislation. No public comment was taken, and no votes were cast, as this was a workshop. The discussion focused on the baseline proforma, potential property tax reform, millage swaps, transportation funding, and efforts to retain county employees. Discussion Items - Budget Overview & Guiding Principles: Kevin Brickey outlined the county’s structurally balanced budget approach, prioritizing public safety, maintaining reserves between 20%–25%, and investing in employees. The FY 26 total adopted budget is $12.038 billion, with $4.144 billion in operating funds. The countywide general fund operating millage is 5.4608 mills ($1,638 on a $350,000 home) and the unincorporated area general fund millage is 4.6163 mills ($1,385 on a $350,000 home). - New State Legislation: Effective FY 28, the Local Government Financial Transparency and Accountability Act will require the county to hold a budget reduction workshop at least 14 days before final adoption, identify a potential 10% reduction, and increase public notice periods and online posting requirements. - Countywide & Unincorporated General Funds: 56% of the countywide general fund ($1.606 billion) goes to constitutional officers and outside agencies. 66% of the unincorporated area general fund ($900 million) funds public safety (Fire Rescue and Sheriff patrol). - Staffing & Reserves: Since FY 07, county administrator positions have decreased by 326 (4.9%) while population grew 32%. Fire Rescue added 393 positions (41.9%). Excluding Fire Rescue, positions are down 719 (12.7%). Combined general fund reserves are 23.5% of expenditures (countywide 25.3%, unincorporated 20.6%). - Transportation Funding: New transportation investments in FY 26 total $137.1 million from general funds and Community Investment Tax (CIT), including $35 million for resurfacing, $32.6 million for intersection improvements, $20.3 million for sidewalks, and $12.5 million each for Lithia Pinecrest and Van Dyke improvements. The CIT renewal (approved July 2024) identified $1.337 billion in transportation projects over 15 years. Additionally, $208 million in road resurfacing projects from the invalidated Transportation Surtax lawsuit are being completed. - Proforma & Property Tax Reform Scenarios: The baseline proforma (FY 27–31) shows the countywide general fund in surplus and the unincorporated fund in deficit. A proposed 0.1 millage swap (countywide to unincorporated) would shore up the unincorporated fund. Two property tax reform scenarios were presented: a $200,000 additional homestead exemption (HB 209) would result in an annual loss of $217 million countywide and $143 million in the unincorporated fund beginning FY 28. A $50,000 additional exemption would cause an annual loss of $79 million countywide and $49 million unincorporated. Any referendum would require 60% voter approval and affect FY 28. - Board Questions & Discussion: - Commissioner Bowles asked whether the proforma included the planned millage swap (it does not) and whether public safety carve-outs in tax reform bills would affect the numbers (not directly, but reductions would fall disproportionately on non-public safety areas). He also questioned the use of FY 07 as a baseline rather than an earlier date; staff explained it highlights the Great Recession dip. - Commissioner Myers asked which services would be cut if property tax reform passes; County Administrator Bonnie Wise responded that if public safety is protected, cuts would fall on parks, transportation, human services, etc. She also inquired about CIT revenue projections—estimated at roughly $200 million in the first year (10 months), with the county receiving 72%—and about the meaning of “investing in county employees,” which includes competitive wages and benefits to retain trained staff. - Commissioner Wistel noted flat growth in property and sales taxes, supported focusing growth funds on one-time uses, and requested timely discussion on bonding for the Lithia Pinecrest project. Key Outcomes - The Board received the FY 27 budget overview and will consider the recommended budget at the regular meeting on July 15, 2026. - The budget reconciliation public hearing (Truth in Millage) is scheduled for July 29, 2026. - Final public hearings are set for September 10, 2026 (tentative budget and millages) and September 24, 2026 (final adoption). - Additional workshops may be scheduled upon Board request. - Staff will continue planning for a third millage swap and prepare for potential property tax reform impacts on FY 28.
The Hillsborough County Board of County Commissioners held its quarterly awards and recognition ceremony on April 22, 2026, honoring employees and volunteers for outstanding contributions to the community. The ceremony included proclamations, individual awards, and recognition of volunteer teams, highlighting achievements in social services, transportation, communications, and emergency preparedness. Proclamation: Community Action Month - Commissioner Cohen presented a proclamation declaring May 2026 as Community Action Month in Hillsborough County. The proclamation recognized the Hillsborough County Community Action Board (CAB) for its role in guiding Community Services Block Grant funds and programs that assist residents facing economic distress. The CAB is comprised of representatives from the Board of County Commissioners and the cities of Tampa, Plant City, and Temple Terrace. - Mr. Quita, a representative of the CAB, accepted the proclamation and thanked the board and staff. He noted that during the 2025 grant year, the Education Empowerment program assisted over 60 eligible students with academic goals, including tuition, books, GED preparation, and scholarships. He also highlighted an increase in residents seeking crisis intervention services for eviction, foreclosure, and transportation barriers. Award: New Voice in Transportation Award - Leslie McNeil, Manager of Operations for Sunshine Line, received the 2025 New Voice in Transportation Award from the University of South Florida Center for Urban Transportation Research. A commissioner praised her leadership, citing: - Aggressive recruitment and retention strategies bringing the team to 95% driver capacity. - A 23% increase in trips, totaling over 530,000 door-to-door and bus trips in 2024. - Client enrollment rising by 24%. - On-time performance maintained at 93.4%. - Leadership during three hurricanes, including coordinating evacuation transportation for vulnerable populations. Award: American Graphic Design Award - Commissioner Cameron Cepeda recognized Michael Galenus (Visual Design and Brand Identity Manager) and Julissa Vasquez (Computer Graphics Designer) from the Communications and Digital Media department (a third team member, David Williams, was unable to attend). Their team produced a 2025-2026 season booklet for the New Tampa Performing Arts Center, which won a national award from Graphic Design USA's 62nd American Graphic Design Awards program. Out of over 6,000 entries, fewer than 10% were honored. The booklet was praised for its aesthetics and ability to inform residents. Award: RACES Field Day Recognition - Commissioner Bowles presented awards to members of Hillsborough County's Radio Amateur Civil Emergency Services (RACES) volunteer team: Joe Flack (President, Kings Point Amateur Radio Club), Skip Argo (ARES RACES Coordinator), Bill Williams (ARES RACES Lead Member), and Fire Inspector Myesha Johnson. The teams participated in the American Radio Relay League's 24-hour field day exercise, operating under simulated emergency conditions. - The County Core RACES team placed first in the state and third nationally out of 2,500 stations in the F (EOC) class. - The Kings Point Amateur Radio Club team placed second in the state and twelfth nationally. - A volunteer speaker noted that ham radio remains vital for backup communications, especially during hurricanes like Milton, when cell phone systems were down for up to two weeks. Key Outcomes - All recognitions were accepted with appreciation. The ceremony concluded with a call to continue recognizing employees and volunteers in future quarters. No formal votes or policy decisions were made.
The Public Safety Coordinating Council (PSCC) Executive Council convened on Friday, April 17, 2026, at 8:30 AM in the County Center, 26th floor. Chair Susan Lopez called the meeting to order, followed by the Pledge of Allegiance and roll call. A quorum was present. The meeting adjourned at approximately 9:30 AM. Consent Calendar - Approved the minutes of the September 19, 2025 meeting (motion by Nick Bates, second by Mark Proctor, unanimous). Public Comments & Testimony - William Allen, founder of New Chapter Life Coaching (a for-profit organization), presented his life coaching services for individuals on probation, parole, and reentry. He noted that funding is an issue because his program is self-pay, but he offers scholarships through crowdfunding. He requested partnerships with stakeholders and nonprofits in Hillsborough County to sponsor scholarships for participants. He provided a business and funding plan for review. Members suggested he reach out to traditional local providers such as Gabriel Ministries, Ready for Work Program, and substance abuse/mental health providers. Discussion Items - Mobile Probation Unit Update (Rob Parkinson): The contract with the Corrections Foundation has been approved by the board, and the vehicle order has been placed. The bus will be upgraded to a diesel engine configuration per FDC specifications for longer useful life. Timeline: bus shell and vehicle components are built separately, combined, and shipped November 15, 2026, to Florida; final delivery planned for January 10, 2027. A grant extension from FDLE was approved yesterday to accommodate the revised timeline, with a buffer for supply chain issues. Multiple community organizations have expressed interest in partnering to provide social services (healthcare, substance abuse, mental health, job placement) when the bus is on location. Only one vehicle will be available, so locations must be prioritized. - Agenda Items for May 15, 2026 Full Council Meeting: Rob Parkinson's mobile probation unit update was requested to be placed on the full council agenda. No other items were proposed. Key Outcomes - Unanimous approval of the September 19, 2025 meeting minutes. - Grant extension for the mobile probation unit approved by FDLE (yesterday, April 16, 2026). - Mobile probation unit timeline: bus shipped by November 15, 2026; final delivery January 10, 2027. - Next meeting: Full Council Meeting on May 15, 2026.
The Hillsborough County Board of County Commissioners held a workshop on April 16, 2026, from 1:30 PM to 3:00 PM to receive updates on negotiations with the Tampa Bay Rays regarding a proposed $2.3 billion, 31,000-seat ballpark and a 7.6 million-square-foot mixed-use Stadium District on the Hillsborough Community College Dale Mabry Campus. The workshop included presentations from AECOM on economic and fiscal impact analysis, a legal opinion from bond counsel on Community Investment Tax (CIT) usage, and a staff overview of public funding options and open deal points. No formal votes were taken. Presentation by AECOM (Dillon Gilman, Senior Analyst) - AECOM presented an independent analysis estimating total supportable development in the Stadium District at 7.6 million square feet over 30 years (2029-2058), including 5.9 million square feet of market-driven ancillary development and 1.7 million square feet of planned "Other Uses." - 30-year gross fiscal impacts from "Confirmed Available" sources (including ad valorem taxes for the City and County, state and county sales taxes, tourism development tax, and a proposed 8% admissions surcharge on ticket sales within the district with a minimum ticket price threshold and maximum fee per ticket) were estimated at $2.8 billion (revised from $2.2 billion in an earlier version due to a corrected sales tax calculation). - Net collections from Confirmed Available sources (available for project funding after accounting for existing commitments) were estimated at $1.4 billion, with Hillsborough County collecting $923 million (66%) and the City of Tampa collecting $482 million (33%). - AECOM estimated Phase 1 assessed values at $1.4 billion in 2034, and total assessed values for the Stadium District (excluding the stadium and Hillsborough Community College) at $4.8 billion in 2058. - Direct economic impacts were estimated at $63 billion in output, $19.8 billion in wage earnings, and 7,400 jobs (30-year annual average). Adding indirect impacts brings total output to $75.5 billion, earnings to $24.7 billion, and average annual jobs to 9,760. - AECOM noted that detailed site plans were not provided, requiring assumptions about development type and intensity. A preliminary parking analysis was shared, but critical size and location details were missing. - AECOM's analysis found significant differences from RCLCO's (the Rays' consultant) estimates. AECOM's gross collections from Confirmed Available sources were $2.8 billion, while RCLCO's were $6.05 billion—a difference of $3.81 billion. AECOM stated RCLCO's implied taxable sales ($38.9 billion) exceed total direct output for the 30-year period, suggesting the RCLCO figure likely includes indirect activity. - AECOM's report stated that its scope of work did not involve a full market and feasibility study for the "Other Uses" concepts (Lifestyle Fitness, Immersive Sports, Live Entertainment Venue), and revenue estimates relied on benchmark facilities completed before recent venue announcements in the local market. - In response to Commissioner Wilson's questions: - AECOM confirmed that detailed site plans were not provided, and that the Stadium District's ability to capture 5% of citywide development was an estimate based on available data. - AECOM confirmed that their analysis assumed 100% market-rate multifamily based on feedback from the Rays, and that if affordable housing were included, it would negatively impact taxability. - AECOM confirmed that their attendance analysis estimates the Rays would average 20,500 paid attendance per game over the first three years after moving to a new stadium, placing them in the bottom third of MLB attendance. This is based on a 10-33% initial boost that typically reverts to pre-new stadium levels after three years, based on comparable teams (Miami Marlins, Minnesota Twins, Washington Nationals). - AECOM acknowledged a formula error in the original report that double-counted Community Development District (CDD) collections from Other Uses, reducing the 30-year CDD estimate from $136 million to $26 million for Other Uses. - AECOM stated that the report does not recommend specific financing options and is not meant to establish financing for the project. Legal Opinion on CIT Usage (County Attorney Julia Mandell) - County Attorney Mandell presented an outside legal opinion from Bryant Miller Olive (BMO), the county's bond counsel for 25 years, on the permissibility of using Community Investment Tax (CIT) funds for a new ballpark. - BMO's opinion concluded that a publicly-owned ballpark leased or licensed to a professional baseball team can reasonably be characterized as a "recreational facility" and therefore a "public facility" under the infrastructure surtax statute (Section 212.055(2), Fla. Stat.), qualifying for CIT funding. - BMO further opined that since a motion to prohibit CIT use for a new sports stadium was withdrawn without a vote during the April 17, 2024 ordinance adoption, and neither the ordinance nor the ballot question contained such an express prohibition, the limitation does not apply. - The opinion also stated that CIT proceeds could be expended on a facility constructed on property initially owned by a governmental entity (like Hillsborough Community College) and subsequently conveyed to the county. - Mandell noted that the initial CIT project list approved in July 2024 did not include a ballpark, but the resolution can be amended following a noticed public hearing. - Mandell stated that she would pursue an additional outside legal opinion from an election law expert regarding voter intent, after concerns were raised by Commissioner Walthall. - Commissioner Walthall expressed concern that county staff may face subpoenas regarding how the CIT was marketed to the public, noting that the City of Tampa's chief of staff had advertised that no new facilities would be funded by the CIT. Staff Presentation on Public Funding Options (Deputy County Administrator Greg Horwedel & Chief Financial Administrator Tom Fessler) - Greg Horwedel stated that the Rays' initial request for local public funding was $1.15 billion, which has been reduced to $1.001 billion due to reclassification of some sources from public to private (ticket surcharge, construction fund interest, and Florida Sports Development Program funding). - The board's guiding principles have been: do not jeopardize the county's three "AAA" credit ratings; minimize development risk (public funds should not be committed until private financing is secured, public bonds are validated, and legal issues are resolved); and no public funding for items without a public benefit. - The funding options presented total approximately $1.001 billion from county and city sources, with a $75 million shortfall (93% of the Rays' request). - Community Investment Tax (CIT): The option proposes raising the annual growth rate assumption from 3% to 3.7%, which would generate approximately $336 million in bond proceeds. Staff rejected the Rays' requested 4% assumption because it would require taxable bonds, reducing proceeds by $100 million. A "make whole" guarantee from the Rays is required to protect other CIT projects if revenue underperforms. - Tourist Development Tax (TDT) – 6th Cent: This option totals $268 million, including $228 million from 35-year bonds and $40 million from reserve cash. Staff noted that the 6th Cent currently funds Visit Tampa Bay, the Cultural Assets Program, and the Tampa Convention Center. - Community Redevelopment Area (CRA) Tax Increment Financing: $170 million. - Reserves: Staff identified up to $132 million in unrestricted reserves (including State Shared Revenue, Economic Development, and Capital Project reserves), but noted this would reduce budget flexibility. - CDBG Disaster Recovery: $30 million, contingent on HUD approval for stormwater improvements in Drew Park. - Additional funding options under discussion (not yet agreed upon) include Opportunity Zone Tax Credits, New Market Tax Credits, a Community Development District (CDD), Special Assessment District, and state transportation improvements. - Open deal points requiring further negotiation include: - Bond tax status (taxable vs. tax-exempt) - Bond validation and legal challenge resolution - Form and surety for "make whole" project guarantee - Land ownership and impact on ad valorem tax revenue - Verification of financial capacity of Rays ownership group - Timing of public fund expenditures - Value engineering of the ballpark - Ownership of the stadium after the lease term ends - Responsibility for stadium capital expenditures/maintenance - Parking facilities and revenue allocation - Relocation of Tax Collector facility - Impact on other sports facilities (Lightning, Buccaneers, Yankees) - Staff stated that a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) cannot be finalized until numerous open issues are resolved, and the timeline is uncertain. Staff pushed back on a May 6, 2026 deadline. Board Discussion - Commissioner Hagan: Emphasized the value of partnerships with existing sports teams (Lightning, Buccaneers, Yankees) and stated that commitments to them have not been reduced. Noted the Drew Park CRA generated only $28 million over 22 years, compared to the projected $907 million in property tax revenue over 30 years from the Stadium District. Asked staff to continue working on remaining deal points ahead of May 6, but recognized the need for team concessions. - Commissioner Wilson: Questioned AECOM on missing documentation, the gap between AECOM and RCLCO estimates, and the impact of affordable housing on the analysis. Voiced concern that the county would front-load taxpayer money with no significant team investment in the initial phase. - Commissioner Walthall: Suggested a TDT rebate model similar to the Tampa Bay Lightning agreement, which he calculated could provide $738 million over 35 years. Stated that the Rays have not yet substantiated their financial capacity. Expressed concern about parking impacts on West Tampa neighborhoods. - Commissioner Miller: Asked about the $20 billion gap between RCLCO and AECOM economic impact estimates. Noted traffic concerns from constituents and questioned the effectiveness of proposed state transportation funding focused on pedestrian improvements. - Commissioner Cohen: Clarified that CIT funds being discussed for the ballpark come from a $545 million "Community Facilities" subcategory and do not affect transportation, public safety, or other CIT projects. Stressed the need for transparent Community Benefits Agreements, a traffic analysis, resolution of the Tax Collector office relocation, and protection of other sports teams' interests. Expressed hope for a yes vote but only if the deal is right for taxpayers. - Commissioner Myers: Expressed hope that the $75 million shortfall can be resolved and that constituent services promised under the CIT will be preserved. - Commissioner Cameron Cepeda: Stated opposition to any burden on taxpayers and concern about existing traffic congestion on Dale Mabry. - Commissioner Bowles: Focused on risk-reward balance and the need for durable, long-term fiscal returns to fund core county priorities like fire stations. Key Outcomes - No formal votes were taken. The board provided direction for staff to continue negotiations. - Staff will pursue a second outside legal opinion on voter intent regarding CIT use. - Staff identified the need to resolve significant open issues, including the form of the "make whole" guarantee, bond tax status, land ownership, and verification of the Rays' financial capacity, before an MOU can be drafted. - The board's guiding principles (no risk to AAA credit rating, no public funds before private financing is secured, no funding for non-public benefit items) remain in effect. - Staff will continue discussions with the Rays on funding options, potentially including a reimbursement-based TDT model and a revised CIT growth rate of 3.7%.