Public Meetings - Johns Creek, Georgia

The Johns Creek City Council met on Monday, September 14, 2026, at 7:10 PM at 11360 Lakefield Drive. The meeting included approval of minutes, consent items, quarterly scout recognition, public comments on stormwater and budget, adoption of the FY2027 budget, two zoning matters, and appointments. The meeting adjourned after approximately 3.5 hours. Consent Calendar - Minutes (August 24, 2026): Approved unanimously. - Agenda: Approved as amended (removed Item G.4, amended agreement with Carothers and Mitchell, LLC for legal services). - Consent Agenda Items (G.1–G.3): Approved 6-1. Included ordinances amending the FY26 budget (O2026-09-16) and the city's budget policy (O2026-09-17), and an intergovernmental agreement with Fulton County for the Nesbit Ferry Road at Colony Club Drive Roundabout Project (G.3). Councilmember Coughlin voted no citing concerns with the budget policy amendment. Presentations - Quarterly Scout Recognition: Four Eagle Scouts were recognized for their service projects: a tile pathway at the Johns Creek Art Center, refurbished outdoor classroom at Elkins Pointe Middle School, shelving units at a temple, and tables/signboards at a temple. Public Comments & Testimony - Rob Simon (resident): Expressed concern that stormwater funding increases are insufficient given long-term issues; urged accelerating evaluation of runoff sources. Noted revenues appear flat (1.6% growth) while personnel costs (50-60% of budget) grow exponentially. Praised council for holding the budget at $83M but warned of future tax pressures. - Sophia Lee (resident, 5720 Soundset Maple Drive): Stated her basement flooding cost over $55,000 (nearly her annual teacher salary) due to city stormwater project blockage of an 18-inch pipe. Requested fair resolution, documentation of the Seven Oaks stormwater project, and procedures for residents facing similar issues. - Anvar Gaswell (resident, on behalf of Medlock Bridge HOA): Presented a petition requesting the city evaluate upstream stormwater drainage serving Medlock Bridge, identify sediment sources, and collaborate on mitigation. Emphasized proactive approach rather than repetitive dredging. - Bob Stevens (resident, 185 Winford Close): Spoke in favor of the FY2027 budget during the public hearing, praising the council's fiscal management, accrual funds, and conservative budgeting. Discussion Items - FY2027 Budget (M.1): Finance Director Hora presented a balanced $83.2 million general fund budget with no tax increase. Key features: 293 full-time positions (net +2), 3.3% merit step increase for employees, 2.99% COLA, $47.1M in personnel costs, new stormwater grant program for a second year, new pond dredging grant program, continued funding for capital projects and accruals. Council held extensive debate: some members (Aramelli, Skinner, Coughlin) opposed citing priorities (e.g., funding a recreation center over stormwater/safety projects; not funding State Bridge/141 intersection lighting). Mayor and others argued the budget is fiscally responsible, sets aside accruals, and allows future debates on capital items. Passed 5-2 (Coughlin and Skinner opposed). - Rezoning RZ-26-0001 (M.2): Request to rezone 11180 Medlock Bridge Road (Johns Creek United Methodist Church) from O-I to CUP for 48 single-family detached homes on 21.647 acres (density 2.2 units/acre) with concurrent variance for existing parking within a 25-foot landscape strip. Staff and Planning Commission recommended approval. Applicant (Hansel Holdings) and church pastor expressed need for stewardship of underutilized ball fields. No opposition. Council unanimously approved. - Rezoning RZ-26-0002 (M.3): Request to rezone 6975 McGinnis Ferry Road from C-1 to C-2 with a special use permit for an outdoor dog run at Puppy Haven daycare/boarding, plus three variances: reduce 100-ft building setback (existing fence 42.92 ft), reduce 200-ft setback from residential zoning (actual distance to nearest residence 246 ft), and reduce parking from 69 to 40 spaces. Staff recommended denial citing noise and odor concerns; Planning Commission recommended approval with conditions (eight-foot masonry wall, max six dogs, landscaping). Public comment only in favor. Council debate focused on sound mitigation, hours of use, and enforceability. Motion by Councilmember DiBiassi to approve with modified conditions: eliminate prohibited nail salon condition, replace masonry wall with sound abatement fence (eight-foot tall opaque), limit outdoor run hours to 10 AM – 5 PM, maintain max six dogs at a time, adjust conditions accordingly. Approved 6-1. - Service Delivery Strategy (M.4): Resolution authorizing mayor to execute the 10-year service delivery strategy with Fulton County and municipalities. Unanimously approved. - Appointment of City Attorney (M.5): Resolution to appoint David Davidson as interim city attorney. Unanimously approved. - Appointment to Arts, Culture, and Entertainment Committee (M.6): Resolution to appoint Mina Dyson to the committee. Unanimously approved. Dyson was present. Key Outcomes - FY2027 budget adopted (5-2). - Rezoning for 48-lot subdivision at Medlock Bridge Road approved unanimously. - Rezoning for Puppy Haven outdoor dog run approved with modified conditions (6-1). - Service Delivery Strategy resolution adopted. - Interim city attorney appointed. - Mina Dyson appointed to Arts, Culture, and Entertainment Committee. - Public comment cards and petitions noted; staff will follow up on stormwater issues.

The Johns Creek City Council met for a work session at 5:01 p.m. on September 14, 2026, at 11360 Lakefield Drive. The mayor reported no remarks, and no strategic priorities were presented. The council discussed the 2027 meeting calendar, the 2027 renewal of employee health and other benefits, landscaping at the Medlock Bridge pedestrian tunnel, and Town Center monument signage. A routine non-discussion item, the Service Delivery Strategy Resolution with SDS Form 4 Certification, was listed but not discussed. The meeting concluded with an executive session for land, legal, and personnel matters. Consent Calendar - 2027 Meeting Calendar: Council reached consensus on date changes and asked staff to bring the calendar back on the consent calendar. - Annual Renewal of Employee Health and Other Benefits: Council agreed to advance staff's renewal recommendation, including a $6.6 million not-to-exceed authorization, to the consent agenda. - Service Delivery Strategy Resolution and SDS Form 4 Certification were listed as routine non-discussion business and were not discussed. Discussion Items 2027 Meeting Calendar - Staff presented a draft based on the 2026 calendar: meetings every three weeks, shifting to every two weeks during budget season, with accommodations for holidays and school breaks. The June meeting was left open as either a regular meeting or a possible mini-retreat. - Council moved the February 1 meeting to February 8, adjusted March dates to March 1 and March 22, and agreed to decide the June format at the January retreat. Council also planned to discuss retreat details in January. Annual Renewal of Employee Health and Other Benefits - Director Papu presented the 2027 renewal recommendation of approximately $6.6 million, compared with the $7.5 million anticipated in the proposed FY27 budget. - Medical: Cigna came in at a 4 percent increase, far below the assumed 16 percent. Staff attributed the lower rate to wellness investments and preventive care and negotiated a 100 percent surplus return for 2027, up from 50 percent in the current plan year. - Dental: Cigna's renewal was 31 percent; Guardian offered a self-funded plan at 24 percent. Staff recommended switching to the Guardian self-funded dental plan for lower cost, more plan control, and as a low-risk step toward possible future self-funded medical coverage. - Vision: no cost increase. Basic life came in at 17 percent, short-term disability at 9 percent, and long-term disability had no increase. - The HRA introduced in 2026 is being used by employees, and its 2 percent renewal increase was due mainly to headcount. - Councilmembers praised the result, asked about maintaining the roughly 80/20 cost share, and discussed using surplus funds and the 100 percent surplus return as seed money toward a future self-funded medical plan. GLP-1 drug coverage was confirmed as already included through the plan's formulary rider, with the HRA helping with out-of-pocket costs. - No formal vote was taken; the item was directed to the consent agenda as a $6.6 million not-to-exceed item. Landscaping and Tree Replanting Policy Implementation - Pedestrian Tunnel - Director O'Connor reported that the council approved the roadway landscaping and tree replanting policy on August 24, 2026, and asked for direction on three potential additional landscape areas on the west side of the Medlock Bridge pedestrian tunnel. - Funding options included the previously authorized tunnel contingency or TSPLOST II revenues assigned to the landscape/streetscape bucket. Rough staff estimates for the enhanced planting were about $65,000 to $75,000, and about $400,000 remained in the tunnel contingency, though invoices were not final. - Several council members expressed support for more shade trees, including full-sized oaks in areas one and two, and some suggested crepe myrtles, boxwoods, or ornamental plantings in area three. Others said the tunnel area already looks good and wanted to preserve TSPLOST funds for other priorities such as the boardwalk and other projects. - Staff said they would synthesize the council's direction and, after final consensus, develop a layout and send the plan out for installation bids to complete planting in the fall. Monument Signage - Town Center - City Manager Grear continued the previous work session discussion on the first Town Center monument sign. Staff reviewed the Medley sign design: painted neutral brick base, painted aluminum dark teal elements, and white channel letters. - Council discussed the gray option C color versus blue, and three locations along Medlock Bridge: north of Johns Creek Parkway, near the pedestrian tunnel, and at East Johns Crossing. - Council reached consensus on the gray/option C sign and on placing it on Medlock Bridge at Johns Creek Parkway, with design work allowing appropriate setback and scale so it would not be lost in the terrain and would preserve future right-of-way options. Some members preferred a more prominent or larger sign, and staff agreed to prepare additional renderings. - A council member said they did not want more than one sign and wanted the funding to come from tourism product development dollars. - Staff also recapped earlier archway marker concepts at the pedestrian tunnel; road-spanning arches were previously eliminated because of high cost, and side markers were estimated at $400,000 to $500,000 each, with the topic available for future discussion. Key Outcomes - The 2027 meeting calendar dates were revised to February 8, March 1, and March 22; the June format was deferred to the January retreat. - The employee benefits renewal was directed to the consent agenda with a $6.6 million not-to-exceed authorization and guidance to keep employee cost share near 80/20 while building reserves toward self-funded options. - For pedestrian tunnel landscaping, no formal vote was taken; staff were expected to incorporate council comments, refine costs, and return for fall installation, with funds kept within allowed TSPLOST/tunnel sources. - For Town Center monument signage, consensus was for a gray option C sign on Medlock Bridge at Johns Creek Parkway, with additional renderings and right-of-way/setback considerations to follow. - After the work session, the council moved into executive session for land, legal, and personnel matters. Upon returning, the council reported handling four real estate items, one personnel item, and one legal item, then adjourned.

On September 3, 2026, at 7:00 PM, the City of Johns Creek held a public participation meeting in City Hall Council Chambers at 11360 Lakefield Drive for land use petition RZ-26-0003, located at 5700 Abbotts Bridge Road. The applicant, Eric Johansson, speaking on behalf of property owner Aztec Eagle Properties, presented a proposal to rezone the property from AG-1 to R-4 to develop seven detached single-family homes. The meeting included an applicant presentation followed by a Q&A session; the live stream was ended before the candid Q&A portion. City staff reminded attendees that this was the applicant's meeting and that project-related questions should be directed to the applicant, while city code questions could be directed to the city. Applicant Presentation - Eric Johansson presented for the applicant and property owner, Aztec Eagle Properties. He stated that owner Danny Rojas purchased the property for lot development, not for the existing house, and that Rojas is in the stone business, not homebuilding. - The property is currently zoned AG-1. The applicant proposed R-4 zoning, describing it as consistent with nearby neighborhoods: Abbotts Walk is R-4 and Surrey Park is R-3. - The maximum density under R-4 is two units per acre; the proposal is 1.7 units per acre. The plan includes seven lots with no requested variances for lot sizes or setbacks. - The applicant stated homes would be in the million-dollar price point and up, and that the eventual builder would be required to primarily use stone and masonry products to match the area. - A 40-foot required landscape strip along Abbotts Bridge Road is included. The proposed entrance would be a full-access entrance, coordinated with GDOT, placed on the left side of the site to avoid a future raised landscape median in the roadway. - Wetlands on the site would be preserved except for normal grading allowed under a nationwide permit, described as 10% or less of the acreage, approximately a tenth of an acre. A raised boardwalk is proposed instead of paved or invasive construction through the wetlands. - The applicant said the stream buffer along Johns Creek would be observed, including the 25-foot state buffer, an additional 25-foot city buffer, and the impervious setback. Only backyard grades would extend into the impervious setback area. - Sewer service would connect to the adjacent Abbotts Walk community through an easement of less than 200 square feet. The applicant said he had been in contact with Southern Property Management and Richard Lewis about the connection, and that Lewis had also met property owner Danny Rojas. Public water would be brought in from Abbotts Bridge Road. - The site plan includes a cul-de-sac meeting city standards, coordination with the fire marshal, and an above-ground detention pond so that no drainage goes into the creek. - A trip generation study using ITE data for single-family lots estimated 87 trips for the seven-lot neighborhood. - Lots would be 75 to 85 feet wide, accommodating houses roughly 50 to 60 feet wide after side setbacks. Garages would be at least two-car, likely three-car, and turned so they do not face the road directly. - Houses backing up to Abbotts Bridge Road would be buffered by the landscape strip and a wall or fence. Some lots would back up to the creek, which the applicant described as an amenity and a buffer between neighborhoods. - The applicant stated the near-term intention is to obtain zoning and development entitlement, then sell lots to a builder who would construct homes consistent with the area. Q&A - After the presentation, the city closed the live stream and opened the floor for direct questions from the public to the applicant. The transcript available does not include substantive public questions or applicant answers; it ends shortly after the Q&A portion begins with an unclear remark: "What's the shutter?" Key Outcomes - No votes, motions, or city decisions were made during this meeting; it was an applicant-led public participation meeting. - The applicant indicated next steps would be completing the zoning and entitlement process, working with GDOT on the entrance, and ultimately selling the lots to a builder.

The Johns Creek Planning Commission met on Tuesday, September 1, 2026, at 7:00 PM at City Hall Council Chambers. The Commission reviewed two land use petitions: a rezoning and variance for a 48-lot single-family subdivision on the Johns Creek United Methodist Church campus, and a rezoning, special use permit, and variances for an outdoor dog run at an existing pet care facility. Both items were approved with conditions. Consent Calendar - Approved the meeting minutes from June 2, 2026, unanimously (6-0). Public Comments & Testimony - RZ-26-0001 & VC-26-0001 (Church Residential Development): Several church representatives and members spoke in support, highlighting the church's community services and the need for revenue to expand programs. No opposition was voiced. - RZ-26-0002 & SUP-26-0001 (Puppy Haven Outdoor Dog Run): One resident from the adjacent Kempston Place subdivision spoke in opposition, citing concerns about noise, odor, and the precedent of granting variances. No other public comments were made. Discussion Items RZ-26-0001 & VC-26-0001 – Residential Subdivision on Church Property - Petition: Handsel Holdings, LLC requested rezoning the 21.647-acre site from O-1 (Office-Institutional) to CUP (Community Unit Plan) for a 48-lot single-family detached subdivision at 2.2 units per acre, plus a variance (VC-26-0001) to allow existing church parking within the required 25-foot landscape strip along Bell Road. - Staff Recommendation: Approval with conditions. - Applicant Presentation: Alex Brock (Smith Gambrell Russell) presented, noting the church's underutilized ball fields would be developed, density is lower than the comp plan's 3 units/acre, and the development would integrate with church amenities (soccer field, playground). The variance maintains existing conditions. - Commission Questions: Commissioners asked about HOA, gated access (gate 90 feet from Bell Road with ample stacking), school bus stops, lot orientation, traffic impacts at Bell Road/Medlock Bridge intersection (Commissioner Horton expressed concerns about left-turn backups; staff agreed to relay to Public Works), and the side-yard design (zero-lot-line with 10-foot side yard on one side). The church pastor and vision committee chair spoke about community benefits. - Outcome: Approved 6-0 with staff conditions. RZ-26-0002 & SUP-26-0001 with Variances – Puppy Haven Outdoor Dog Run - Petition: Creek Doggy Development, LLC requested rezoning from C-1 (Conditional) to C-2, a special use permit for an animal care facility with an outdoor dog run, and three concurrent variances: - VC-26-0002: Reduce required 100-foot setback from property lines for building and dog run (closest point 42.92 feet). - VC-26-0003: Reduce required 200-foot setback from single-family residential uses. - VC-26-0004: Reduce required parking from 69 to 40 spaces (existing condition). - Staff Recommendation: Denial, citing incompatibility with adjacent residential uses, potential noise/odor impacts, and failure to demonstrate hardship. - Applicant Presentation: Steven Jones (attorney) and Michael Dermer (Puppy Haven executive) argued the 800 sq ft fenced area is solely for dogs to relieve themselves (not play), waste would be picked up immediately, and the use is common at other facilities. They noted the closest residential dwelling is 250 feet away, and the other variances are for existing conditions. The parking variance is needed to match the as-built site. - Commission Questions: Commissioners explored operational details (maximum dogs at a time 6, no structural changes to building, no extra trips), noise mitigation (opaque fence), and existing compliance. Staff clarified that leash walks are already permitted, and the outdoor area was previously represented as for employee use only. Commissioner Horton noted the challenge of enforcement. - Outcome: Approved 5-1 with staff conditions plus two additional conditions: 1. A maximum of six dogs allowed in the outdoor area at any one time. 2. The existing fence must be replaced with an 8-foot minimum height, 8-inch thick CMU (concrete masonry unit) wall with exterior finish matching the building, fully grouted, and landscaping (evergreen shrubs/trees) installed along the outside of the wall. Key Outcomes - RZ-26-0001 & VC-26-0001: Approved 6-0 (recommendation to City Council for approval with staff conditions). - RZ-26-0002, SUP-26-0001, and concurrent variances (VC-26-0002, VC-26-0003, VC-26-0004): Approved 5-1 (recommendation to City Council for approval with staff and additional commission conditions).

The Johns Creek City Council met at 11360 Lakefield Drive in Johns Creek, Georgia, on Monday, August 24, 2026. The agenda listed a 7:00 p.m. start; the transcript records the call to order at 7:12 p.m. All six council members were present, establishing a quorum. The council approved prior meeting minutes, the meeting agenda, a three-item consent agenda, and a new roadway landscaping and tree replanting policy. Stormwater drainage, erosion, flooding, and lake conditions dominated public comment. Consent Calendar - Approved the August 10, 2026 work session summary and council meeting minutes. - Approved the meeting agenda as presented. - Approved the consent agenda, which included: (1) the Multi-Modal Policy; (2) a contract with Michael Baker International, Inc. for $2,467,671 for the Old Alabama Bridge Replacement Project; and (3) a contract amendment with Thomas & Hutton for Chattahoochee Greenway Engineering. Agenda materials listed the Thomas & Hutton amount as $616,000, while the mayor orally stated $116,000. - During discussion, Councilmember Coughlin said the consent items support quality of life through intra-city mobility, TSPLOST-funded bridge safety, and the greenway's value to the parks system; Councilmember Tunkey agreed. Public Comments & Testimony - Robert Simon (Seven Oaks resident) described severe stormwater runoff and creek erosion, presented a petition of 75 resident names, said at least 140 properties are directly affected, noted that homeowners have spent thousands of dollars on gabion walls, riprap, and drainage that push water downstream, and asked the city to make stormwater remediation a continuing, funded priority. - Sophie Lee (Seven Oaks resident) said her basement flooded in early July while her family was on vacation, that the flooding was directly triggered by the city's stormwater project, and that she faces more than $55,000 in mitigation and restoration costs plus damaged personal property. She asked council members to imagine the impact on their own homes and families. - Jean Veenman (Seven Oaks resident), continuing Sophie Lee's comments, said the city's insurance denied the claim based on the allegation that the drainage pipe was an illicit connection to the city line. She asked the city to help reach a fair resolution and to explore creating a stormwater assistance fund or reopening the stormwater emergency grant program. She also raised concerns about undocumented connections and project quality in Seven Oaks. - Salem Aziz (Medlock Bridge resident) said the subdivision lake is deteriorating because construction debris and waste from outside the subdivision are entering it, and he asked the city to consider creating blockage and appropriating funds in the upcoming budget for lake safety and improvement. - Jackie DePio (Medlock Bridge resident) described massive culverts on her lakefront property, rising silt, and the risk of culvert blockage, called the situation a stormwater infrastructure problem, and supported ongoing remediation. - Richie Puri (Seven Oaks resident, Seven Oaks board member, and CEO of a private equity-backed $100 million company headquartered in Johns Creek) said older neighborhoods' infrastructure is not designed for current stormwater flows, offered a public-private partnership to address access and easement challenges, and recommended an engineering assessment, a budget, and a three-to-five-year phased plan. - A new Seven Oaks resident said a large 12-to-15-foot stormwater trench behind his home is dangerous and supported city action. - An unnamed resident said the city was trying to buy an unbuildable property for $1 million and asked that those funds instead be used for stormwater solutions. - During the second public comment period, Richie Puri returned to ask how residents can contribute to the upcoming budget cycle and to urge a larger infrastructure focus. Travis Elkins, a new resident whose wife works at Emory Johns Creek, said he has a city stormwater grant that has made little progress, and noted that landscaping along road projects can help mitigate stormwater before it reaches neighborhoods. Reports & Presentations - City Manager Greer presented the July 2026 Manager's Monthly Report and the FY2026 July Monthly Financial Report. Highlights included emergency preemption devices installed on all frontline fire apparatus, the Boardwalk at Town Center being named Public Investment Project of the Year by the Georgia Downtown Association, private investment interest in Town Center including Boston Scientific and the Medley, the America 250 celebration, and park improvements including parking expansion at Collie Creek and turf installation at OC Parks Langfield. - Mayor Bradbury announced the Johns Creek Patriot Day ceremony on Friday, September 11, 2026, at 8:30 a.m. at the Newtown Park amphitheater, coordinated with the Rotary Club of Johns Creek, and the second budget hearing on Monday, September 14, 2026. - Staff announced that city offices will be closed Monday, September 7, 2026, for Labor Day, and that the next work session and council meeting will be September 14, 2026, at 5:00 p.m. and 7:00 p.m. Discussion Items - Roadway Landscaping and Tree Replanting Policy (M.1): Director O'Connor presented the policy, organized into purpose, policy goals, and a three-phase implementation process. The phased approach is intended to identify design, easement acquisition, and construction costs throughout project development and give the mayor and council funding decision points. He recommended adoption. - Councilmember D.B. moved to approve the policy, and Councilmember Skinner seconded the motion. - Councilmember Coughlin opposed the policy, arguing it would add time and cost to transportation projects and introduce a subjective council role into aesthetics; he said he prioritizes safety and mobility. - Councilmember Skinner supported the policy as a way to fund landscaping up front and maintain Johns Creek's quality of life. Councilmember Tunkey said road projects should be both functional and beautiful. Councilmember Aramelli supported the early council check-in and the preservation of the community's pastoral feel. Another council member expressed concern about adding government process when it may not be needed, but said they would still support the policy. - The policy was approved on a voice vote, with one stated dissent from Councilmember Coughlin. Mayor's Comments - Mayor Bradbury acknowledged that nearly everyone at the meeting was connected to stormwater concerns. He said the city's grant program is trying to thread a very fine legal needle, that he knows of no other city in Georgia trying a similar approach, and that the city is moving forward within the constraints of the program. Executive Session - A motion to enter executive session was made by Councilmember Aramelli, seconded, and approved. Before entering, Councilmember Aramelli mentioned that the city established a stormwater utility fee around 2020-21, has been triaging stormwater issues, and will provide a broader stormwater update during the budget cycle. The mayor ruled the comments not germane to the executive session motion, and the council then adjourned to executive session. Key Outcomes - Approved the August 10, 2026 work session summary and council meeting minutes. - Approved the meeting agenda. - Approved all three consent agenda items, including the Multi-Modal Policy, the Old Alabama Bridge Replacement contract, and the Chattahoochee Greenway Engineering contract amendment. - Adopted the Roadway Landscaping and Tree Replanting Policy on a voice vote, with one stated dissenting vote. - Approved a motion to enter executive session and adjourned to it.

The Johns Creek City Council held a work session on August 24, 2026, at 5:02 PM to discuss the FY 2027 proposed budget (third of three budget discussions), a proposed amendment to the budget policy for year-end surplus allocation, and the monument signage for the Town Center. Council members reviewed capital project priorities, debated surplus allocation mechanisms, and provided direction on monument design, location, and color scheme. Discussion: FY 2027 Budget and Capital Projects Council members expressed their updated positions on a variety of capital projects and enhancements. Key points: - Senior Services: Councilmember Larry proposed $100,000 for a senior center, potentially using the fire station next to Newtown Park. Other members supported the goal but preferred using the Newtown Park clubhouse after its renovation (expected within 30-60 days). City Manager noted no additional funding needed for expanded senior programming at the clubhouse. - Stormwater Programs: Councilmembers were split on the stormwater pond dredging ($500,000) and grant program ($500,000). Several members supported placing these items on hold for further policy discussion with the end-of-year surplus. - Comprehensive Plan Update: There was broad support for funding the comp plan update, but disagreements on whether to fund it in FY27 or from surplus. Councilmember Aaron Ross Powell supported it only via budget reconciliation in FY26. Councilmember Chris supported funding in FY27. Consensus to bid the work with ad alternates. - Fire Station 61 Engineering: Staff recommended using unspent contingency from Fire Station 63 to fund engineering, with consensus to proceed via a subsequent budget amendment. - Communications Survey: Councilmember Larry requested $50,000 for surveys; others suggested using existing funds or cheaper options like SurveyUSA poll ($3,500). No consensus to add to FY27 budget. - Macedonia Gazebo: Councilmember Larry suggested $75,000; discussion led to deferring to surplus consideration due to pending decisions on the property. - Other Items: Council members had differing views on items like the stormwater grant coordinator, cloud hosting, vehicles, tether drone, tennis lighting, and police officers. Many were either postponed or allocated to surplus. Councilmember Coughlin expressed frustration with the lack of consensus on a unified CIP and suggested passing the budget as presented with an asterisk on stormwater items for future work sessions. Discussion: Budget Policy Amendment Staff proposed a revision to the budget policy for allocating year-end surplus. Currently, the surplus is distributed across four categories: unassigned fund balance (60%), infrastructure maintenance accrual (15%), capital projects (15%), and property tax stabilization (10%). Two alternatives were presented: allocate 100% to capital projects fund, or 100% to unassigned fund balance. Councilmember Aaron Ross Powell supported capital projects fund to maintain discipline with the CIP. Councilmember Bob supported unassigned fund balance for clarity, but wanted accruals filled first. Councilmember Chris supported unassigned fund balance for flexibility. Councilmember Stacey initially supported capital projects but later agreed to unassigned fund balance. Councilmember Larry supported unassigned fund balance. Councilmember Coughlin wanted to keep the current policy but noted the lack of adherence. After debate, Councilmember Iranley became the fourth vote for unassigned fund balance, achieving consensus. Discussion: Monument Signage for Town Center Mayor Andrew Grey presented monument sign options for the Town Center, funded with tourism product development dollars. Council gave direction on location and color scheme. - Location: After discussion, consensus was reached for Medlock Bridge at East John's Crossing (secondary sign location). Councilmember Aaron Ross Powell supported this to keep the area near the tunnel clear for a future larger monument. Councilmember Stacey preferred McGuinness at Johns Creek Parkway but yielded to consensus. Councilmember Bob wanted the sign moved north to view the South Pond but did not gain support. - Color Scheme: Consensus on Option C (various gray tones paired with a navy blue sign). Some members preferred all gray (Option A) or blue (Option B), but Option C was chosen as a compromise. - Design: Councilmember Bob expressed dissatisfaction with the current concept and wanted to revisit the design. Staff will work on further refinements. Key Outcomes - Budget Policy Amendment: Consensus to direct 100% of the general fund year-end surplus to unassigned fund balance. Staff will bring a policy amendment for a vote at the next council meeting. - Capital Projects: No formal vote on specific projects; council agreed to pass the budget as presented, with stormwater items (dredging, grant program, coordinator) to be discussed in a future work session with the end-of-year surplus. - Monument Signage: Council directed staff to proceed with a monument sign at Medlock Bridge at East John's Crossing, using Option C color scheme (gray tones with navy blue). Staff will refine design and bring back final details. - FY 2027 Budget: Staff will update the budget workbook to reflect feedback and prepare the ordinance for adoption on September 14, 2026. - Fire Station 61 Engineering: Consensus to use unspent contingency from Fire Station 63 to fund engineering, via a budget amendment. - Senior Services: City Manager will report back within 30-45 days with a plan for expanding senior programming using the renovated clubhouse. - Executive Session: Council adjourned to executive session to discuss legal and land matters.

The Johns Creek Board of Zoning Appeals met on Tuesday, August 18, 2026, at 7:00 p.m. in City Hall Council Chambers, 11360 Lakefield Drive, Johns Creek, Georgia. The Board unanimously approved the July 21, 2026 minutes and three variance requests, including one case deferred from the previous meeting. Staff presentations, public testimony, board questions, and staff recommendations preceded each vote. Meeting Opening and Approval of Minutes - The meeting was called to order and the Board took up approval of the July 21, 2026 minutes. - Mr. Stainer moved to approve the minutes as submitted; the motion was seconded and passed by unanimous voice vote. Old Business: V-26-0008 – 145 East Meadows Court - This case was deferred from the July 21, 2026 meeting so the applicant could explore alternative designs and reduce impacts on the adjacent property at 155 East Meadows Court. - The 0.507-acre corner lot is zoned R-4A (Single-Family Dwelling District). Required setbacks include a 35-foot front yard, 7-foot interior side, 20-foot corner side, and 25-foot rear yard. The existing house sits diagonally on the lot, with the front of the home set back 50 feet from the front property line and 78 feet from the front corner. - The applicant originally proposed a 14-foot rear setback encroachment. The revised plan reduced the garage encroachment to 12.5 linear feet and the pool house to 11 linear feet, with total encroachment area reduced from 672 square feet to 565 square feet. The plan added dense evergreen plantings along the rear property line with a minimum planting height of 10 feet. - John Stanforth, the resident and applicant at 145 East Meadows Court, thanked the Board for the deferral, stated that he had compromised with Ron and Debbie Bailey, and said most evergreens would be planted at 12 feet, with some at 10 feet. - Ron Bailey, neighbor at 155 East Meadows Court, said he and his wife had opposed the request previously but thanked the Board for allowing the parties to work out a compromise. No opposition was heard. - Staff recommended approval with conditions limiting the encroachments, requiring permits and inspections, requiring an as-built survey, and requiring evergreen trees at least 10 feet tall at planting along the rear property line. - Mr. Stainer moved to approve the case as submitted by staff; the motion was seconded and passed unanimously. New Business: V-26-0010 – 160 Morton Manor Court - Staff presented the request by the Morton Reserve Homeowner Association to construct a 450-square-foot community pavilion within the required 100-foot setback from adjoining property lines on the 0.507-acre Community Unit Plan District-zoned common recreation area. The property is bounded by single-family residential properties to the north and east, AG1 agricultural/floodplain areas to the south and southeast, and Morton Manor Court to the west. It is already developed with two tennis courts, a swimming pool, a community building, and parking. - The HOA representative, whose name was not identified in the transcript, argued that the irregular property configuration and existing recreation layout made the full 100-foot setback impractical, that the pavilion had strong homeowner support, and that it would provide a shaded gathering place for residents and their guests only, not for commercial rentals or public events. - In opposition, Joseph Zazor, who lives across from the proposed pavilion and identified himself as the original owner, said he was not against the pavilion but wanted to protect the quiet character of his home. Elise Gifford of Cameron Forest, a Johns Creek resident for 37 years, said she had experienced flooding since Morton Reserve was built and a cinder block wall was constructed on the Johnscreek tributary, and she was concerned about further flood risk. Mary Lynn Sobel, who lives next to Ms. Gifford, also raised flooding and debris concerns and mentioned fireworks noise in the neighborhood. - In rebuttal, the HOA representative said the pavilion would be close to existing amenities, would follow posted hours coinciding with pool hours, and was intended only for residents, including HOA annual meetings. The representative said flooding issues were longstanding and not related to the pavilion and that fireworks noise is governed by city ordinance. - Board questions covered the pavilion’s use, pool hours from 8:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m., the fact that no trees would be removed, the open beam-over-concrete-pad construction, ceiling fans requiring electrical service, drainage, and compliance with city runoff requirements during permitting. - Staff clarified that the opposing homeowners’ properties were about 250 and 270 feet from the proposed pavilion on the other side of the creek; part of their properties lies in the floodplain; the pavilion site is already cleared and is not in the floodplain; and the building permit process would address any applicable runoff-reduction obligations, including the city’s 4,000-square-foot threshold. - Staff recommended approval with three conditions: locating the pavilion at least 94 feet from the north property line, 7.5 feet from the west property line, and 2.5 feet from the south property line; obtaining a building permit; and submitting an as-built survey before final inspection. - The Board approved V-26-0010 as recommended by staff; the motion received multiple seconds and passed unanimously. New Business: V-26-0011 – 410 Crepe Myrtle Terrace - GP Hardscape, representing the homeowners at 410 Crepe Myrtle Terrace, requested a variance to encroach into the 75-foot stream buffer, consisting of a 50-foot undisturbed buffer plus a 25-foot impervious surface setback, to construct a swimming pool and retaining wall on this 0.414-acre R-4A lot in Seven Oaks. - The lot was platted by Fulton County in 1998 with a 100-year floodplain along the rear property line. The city’s current stream buffer regulations cover approximately 50 percent of the property, limiting usable rear yard area. - The presentation described the encroachment as 21.5 feet into the 75-foot buffer. However, the staff condition read aloud later set the cap at 25 linear feet of encroachment; the transcript is internally inconsistent on this point. - The proposal would create approximately 1,325 square feet of new impervious surface within the buffer and would avoid the 50-foot undisturbed buffer. The applicant proposed a 1,504-square-foot planting area with two large trees, four small trees, 22 shrubs, and 88 ground cover plants. - Braulio Galvea of GP Hardscape, representing the homeowners, cited the combined effect of the stream buffer and steep topography as the hardship. He said roughly half of the rear yard was affected and that moving the pool toward the house would not resolve grade, drainage, access, setback, or retaining-wall requirements. The design was, in his view, the minimum reasonable intrusion. - No additional members of the public came forward to speak in support or opposition. - Board questions addressed the purpose of the retaining wall. The applicant explained that the property drops roughly 13 to 15 feet from the house toward the creek, and the redesigned retaining wall is needed to create a level pool area without entering the 50-foot undisturbed buffer. The wall would be six feet tall with a safety fence, and engineering would be submitted with the building permit. - Staff recommended approval with two conditions: first, that the development shall not exceed the encroachment and impervious surface amounts shown on the site plan, specifically 1,325 square feet of impervious surface associated with the swimming pool and retaining wall within the stream buffer; and second, that a vegetative planting plan be submitted with the building permit and installed before the final site inspection. - The Board approved V-26-0011 as presented by staff; the motion was seconded and passed unanimously. Departmental Updates - Staff reported no formal departmental update. The Board noted that the next meeting and case deadline is September 15, 2026, and that three cases had been received for that cycle. Key Outcomes - Approved the July 21, 2026 meeting minutes unanimously. - Approved V-26-0008 (145 East Meadows Court) with staff conditions, allowing a reduced garage and pool house encroachment into the 25-foot rear setback. - Approved V-26-0010 (160 Morton Manor Court) with staff conditions, allowing the HOA to construct a 450-square-foot community pavilion within the required 100-foot setback. - Approved V-26-0011 (410 Crepe Myrtle Terrace) with staff conditions, allowing a swimming pool and retaining wall within the 75-foot stream buffer. - Adjourned by unanimous voice vote after a motion and second.

The Johns Creek Arts, Cultural, and Entertainment (ACE) Committee met on August 13, 2026, at 6:30 PM at 11360 Lakefield Drive. The meeting included a city update, approval of minutes, a recap of the America 250 event, and a detailed discussion on the draft Public Art Master Plan. The committee provided feedback on the plan and identified community partners for further input. Consent Calendar - Approval of Minutes (June 11, 2026): The committee unanimously approved the minutes from the June 11, 2026 meeting via a motion by Matthew Wroten, seconded by Azure Duan. Public Comments & Testimony - No public comments were made. Reports & Presentations - City Update (Amanda Bock): - Highlighted the success of the America 250 event on July 3, 2026, with live performances and fireworks. - Announced upcoming events: Patriot Day Commemoration (Sept 11), Summer Concerts (Sept 12, Oct 3), Pup-a-Palooza (Sept 19), Arts on the Boardwalk (Sept 26), and Adaptive Movie Night (Oct 9). - Reported that City Council renamed the Newtown Amphitheater to "Founders Amphitheater" based on the committee's prior recommendation; new signage expected in about 60 days (late September 2026). - Reminded members of the Board Appreciation Dinner on September 22, 2026 at City Hall. Discussion Items - America 250 Recap: - Staff observations: Attendance of approximately 15,000 people; popular activities included face painting, photo booths, and food trucks; high on-site demand for the Parade of Stars youth activity. - Attendee sentiment (from social media): Overwhelmingly positive, with praise for fireworks, the new Boardwalk location, and live entertainment. - Areas for improvement: Food truck logistics and options, traffic congestion when exiting parking lots, and wind stability issues with the Mount Rushmore photo booth. - Committee feedback: Members expressed high satisfaction. Suggestions included adding 2–3 more food trucks, increasing the number of shields made (only 50 were available, turning away children), and better utilizing the parking lot for fireworks viewing (e.g., sectioning off part for guests). - Public Art Master Plan Discussion: - Staff presented the draft 2026 Public Art Master Plan, a framework to establish a long-term vision for public art, moving beyond project-by-project approaches. - Committee initial reactions: Positive, described the document as "awesome" and "comprehensive." - Key discussion points: 1. Community partners for input: Members suggested reaching out to the Chamber of Commerce (business development perspective) and Keep North Fulton Beautiful (environmental perspective). 2. Missing concepts: Member Braynard raised "contextual compatibility" – ensuring new public art does not alter the meaning or dynamic of existing art on public property. Staff noted that on private property, the city does not regulate art choices. 3. Material preferences: Braynard suggested promoting timeless materials (stone, metal, glass) and discouraging plastic, acrylic, resin, fiberglass, or untreated wood. Staff agreed to workshop wording to allow color use (e.g., resin) while encouraging durable materials. 4. Future of public art (3–5 years): Members envisioned timeless, objective beauty; interactive art for children (e.g., hands-on at Cauley Creek); unity art promoting inclusivity; cohesion and avoidance of clutter; using earth and landscaping as art; spreading installations across the city to avoid density in one area. Member Green expressed support for more JC Paws dog statues. - Clarifications: The 1% for Art program has not been formally used yet, but developers like Menley have integrated art into their projects voluntarily. Direct commissioning process includes ACE chair on selection committee but not full committee review. Key Outcomes - America 250 Event: No formal action; committee feedback documented for future events. - Public Art Master Plan: Staff will incorporate committee feedback, reach out to identified community partners (Chamber of Commerce, Keep North Fulton Beautiful), and continue refining the draft. The plan will be brought back to the committee for further input. - No other business was discussed, and the meeting adjourned at 6:56 PM.

The Johns Creek City Council convened at 7:07 PM on Monday, August 10, 2026, at City Hall. The meeting included approvals of minutes, consent agenda, presentations, public comments on stormwater and budget transparency, and announcements. Consent Calendar - Approval of Minutes: The council unanimously approved the July 27, 2026 Work Session Summary and Council Meeting Minutes. - Approval of Agenda: The meeting agenda was approved as presented. - Consent Agenda Items: - Approved an agreement with the Georgia Department of Transportation for maintenance of the pedestrian tunnel crossing under Medlock Bridge Road (SR141). - Approved a development agreement with Toll Southeast LP Company for Rogers Circle Roadway and Operational Improvements (Embry Farms). Public Comments & Testimony - Archie Dishman (10635 Arlington Point, Johns Creek): Questioned the lack of reconciliation of TSPLOST 1, 2, and proposed TSPLOST 3 in the FY2027 budget. Requested an appendix detailing completed projects, budgets, and fund usage. City manager noted that on page 112 of the budget package there is a high-level summary of TSPLOST 1 and details on TSPLOST 2. Staff offered to follow up with additional information. - Anwar Guaswala (representing Medlock Bridge subdivision): Described critical stormwater drainage issues in Medlock Bridge Lake. Stated that the watershed increased from 85 acres (1993) to 460 acres, with sediment inflow of approximately 1,100 cubic yards per year. The HOA spent nearly $1 million on engineering and maintenance. Asked the city to recognize this as a regional problem and consider a partnership or grant; emphasized that 80% of the watershed originates outside the subdivision. - Robert Simon (self-identified; spoke during first public comment): Requested the council make stormwater runoff a higher priority, noting that original development approvals lacked adequate setbacks and infrastructure. - Candidate for House District 51 (spoke during second public comment): Introduced himself and expressed interest in meeting with council members to discuss serving the district. Presentations - Recognition of the Johns Creek Aquatic Team (JCATS): Swimmers received certificates of recognition. The team achieved 39 top-eight finishes and three state champions at the Georgia state meet. Parents, coaches, and staff were thanked. - Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA) Distinguished Budget Presentation Award for FY2026: Finance Director Harpreet Hora was honored. The award recognizes the city's budget as a policy document, financial plan, operations guide, and communication tool, meeting 14 mandatory criteria. Key Outcomes - All consent agenda items were approved unanimously. - The city acknowledged the stormwater concerns and committed to follow-up with residents regarding available budget data. - No action was taken on the Medlock Bridge drainage issue; the matter was referred to staff for further evaluation. Announcements - Upcoming meetings: - Arts, Culture, and Entertainment Committee: Thursday, August 13, 2026, at 6:30 PM. - Board of Zoning Appeals: Tuesday, August 18, 2026, at 7:00 PM. - Recreation and Parks Advisory Committee: Wednesday, August 19, 2026, at 6:30 PM. - Next City Council meeting: Monday, August 24, 2026 (work session at 5:00 PM, council meeting at 7:00 PM). Adjournment The meeting adjourned at approximately 7:50 PM following a motion by Councilmember Aramelli, seconded by Councilmember Coughlin, with unanimous approval.