Public Meetings - Joplin, Missouri

The Joplin City Council held an informal meeting on October 5, 2026, at 5:15 PM to receive the semi-annual insurance update from the city's insurance consultant, Siegel. The presentation, led by Kim Wixham and supported by city staff, projected a modest deficit and a below-average premium increase for 2027, highlighting strong claims experience and effective management. Discussion Items - Health Insurance Renewal Outlook: Kim Wixham reported that the city is projecting a small deficit of $56,900 (0.7% from budget) for the end of 2026. Based on three years of claims data, a 5.7% increase in medical and prescription drug costs is projected for 2027. This is significantly lower than the 10–15% increases typical for Siegel's other clients. The presentation noted that general trend assumptions are 8% for medical and 12% for prescription drugs, but the city's experience has been more favorable. - Plan Design Changes: Following previous approval, the city is implementing a new high deductible health plan (HDHP) with a health savings account, equivalent in cost and contributions to the existing PPO plan. The city will continue to pay 100% of employee-only premiums for both plans and 75% for family coverage. Dental premiums will increase 7% (pennies per pay period), while vision, life, and AD&D premiums remain unchanged. Stop loss insurance renewal is pending, with a 15% increase anticipated. - Historical Performance: The city has beaten general trend projections in 10 out of the last 13 years and in each of the last five years. Wellness initiatives and competitive bidding have helped keep costs down. - High Cost Claimants: The presentation reviewed high-cost claims through July 2026. Prescription drug claimants are a particular concern due to recurrent costs. Seven high-cost drug claimants were noted, with conditions like maintenance medications. - Prescription Rebate Risk: In response to a question from Councilwoman Price about the potential loss of prescription rebates (about 35% of drug costs), Ms. Wixham explained that legislative changes could shift rebates to point-of-sale pricing, which would need to be managed to maintain net savings. - Question on Rate Drivers: Councilman Cowles asked why the city's increase is so much lower than the industry average. Ms. Wixham attributed it to consistently good claims experience over the past three years, and Ms. Haas added that the competitive bid process and local provider discounts also contribute. Key Outcomes - The council received the insurance update and asked clarifying questions. No formal action was taken; the presentation was informational. - Open enrollment for employees is scheduled for November 2026, with informational guides to be distributed. - The stop loss insurance renewal will be presented for approval at the first council meeting in November. The informal session adjourned at approximately 5:50 PM, with the regular meeting to reconvene at 6:00 PM.

The Joplin Board of Appeals met on September 25, 2026, to review numerous properties deemed dangerous or in need of rehabilitation. The board heard updates from property owners and city inspectors, extended several cases to the next meeting, and conducted dangerous building hearings for two properties, ordering demolition for both. Consent Calendar - August Meeting Minutes: Approved unanimously by motion of Mr. Windsor, seconded by Mr. Duncan. Discussion Items Continued Properties (all extended to October 23, 2026 for progress report and possible demolition hearing unless noted) - 714 East Hill (Item 3121): Owner Nancy Awedo reported she changed electricians and is waiting on a plumber. The board extended the case to October 23. - 2402 South Alabama (Item 3141): City inspector noted the property is near completion with a final inspection scheduled. The board extended the case. - 723 South Roosevelt (Item 3142): Owner not present; no contact since last meeting; permit expires April 2026. The board extended the case. - 712 East Pool (Item 3144): Initially tabled to the end of the agenda for a demolition hearing. Later, the board held a dangerous building hearing and ordered demolition. - 929 South Roosevelt (Item 3149): Owner plans to demolish; city waiting on gas company sign-off. The board extended the case. - 614 South Moffitt (Item 3152): Owner Osama present; had health issues; working on permits; carport repaired. The board extended the case. - 210 North Oak (Item 3158): Owner David Williams; waiting on permits; work done without permit; confident in renovation. The board extended the case. - 12 South Patterson (Item 3162): Owner Josh Stiffler present for first time; had not yet obtained bids; property in severe disrepair. The board initially set this for a dangerous building hearing. - 906 East Furnace (Item 3163): Owner Michael Wuhan living in house with family; repairs ongoing; inspection scheduled October 5. The board extended the case and requested an update from the inspection. - 915 West 2nd (Item 3164): No contact; owner out of state; publication not complete. The board extended the case. - 3022 East 9th (Item 3165): No response; ownership changed; letters returned. The board extended the case. - 222 South Jackson (Item 3166): Owner present; cleaning up after fire; waiting on bids. The board extended the case and ordered a stop work order. - 805 South Connor (Item 3167): Owner present; property under contract; closing by October 12. The board extended the case. - 2627 South Grand (Item 3168): Owner living in part of property; fire damage; support from churches. The board extended the case. - 320 South Wall (Item 3169): Representative Lee Porter; need to replace fire escape; new contractor coming. The board extended the case with a request for weekly updates. - 1620 South Iowa (Item 3154): Owner's representative; waiting on demolition permit; grass overgrown. The board extended the case; Mrs. Harrington voted nay. Dangerous Building Hearings - 12 South Patterson (Item 3162): After testimony from city inspector Shelley Dolison and owner Josh Stiffler, the board voted to declare the property a dangerous building and order demolition, but with a stay until the October 23 meeting. Owner must present a clear plan for either demolition or rehabilitation. - 712 East Pool (Item 3144): After testimony from inspector Spence Jackson, the board declared the property a dangerous building and ordered demolition, including outbuildings. Public Comments & Testimony - Multiple property owners and representatives gave updates on their properties, including explanations for delays (health issues, contractor problems, waiting on utilities, financial constraints). - A Spanish translator assisted for one owner. Key Outcomes - All continued properties were extended to the October 23, 2026 meeting for progress reports and possible demolition hearings. - 12 South Patterson: Ordered demolished with a 30-day stay; owner to present plan by October 23. - 712 East Pool: Ordered demolished. - 222 South Jackson: Stop work order placed. - Board members Wicklin and Brown left before the dangerous building hearings; noted in minutes. - Informal request made for a Spanish translator and improved sound system for future meetings.

The Joplin City Council convened a special meeting at 5:00 PM on September 23, 2026, which immediately adjourned to a closed session to discuss employee matters. Following the closed session, the Council held the second budget work session to review "Issues and Options" for the FY2027 budget and provide direction to staff for the October 19th budget adoption. The council discussed and voted on several financial items, including funding requests from the Chamber of Commerce and Downtown Joplin Alliance, the spending plan for the new police and fire sales tax, facility security improvements, and a travel policy for council members. Discussion Items - Chamber of Commerce & MoCAN Partnership Request (Issue 1): Chamber CEO Betsy Mentz, along with Brendan Dungan and Amy Kaufman, presented a request for a 5% funding increase from $312,000 to $353,850. They highlighted economic development metrics for the region, including 166 business retention visits and a pipeline of 25 coded opportunities. Council members Cortez, Moran, and Bard praised the presentation and the return on investment, with several members stating their full support for the increase. Council member Cortez called it "one of the best" presentations for an "ask" he had seen. - Downtown Joplin Alliance Contract Renewal (Issue 2): Lori from the Downtown Joplin Alliance (DJA) requested a renewal of the public service agreement for three years at $75,000 annually, up from $50,000, with a cost of living adjustment in subsequent years. She discussed DJA's work on historic preservation, business support, and events, noting over $80 million in private investment downtown in the last five years. Council members discussed challenges facing downtown, including homelessness and vacant large buildings. Council member Cows pressed for concrete assistance for businesses struggling with safety issues, while Council member Jackson inquired about strategies for large empty spaces and a potential downtown CID. Council member DeTar emphasized the importance of a vibrant downtown for economic development. - Consultant Spending Review (Issue 3): Staff presented a summary of consultant expenditures totaling $1.5 to $2 million annually. Council member Moran questioned whether the city could hire more in-house staff rather than using consultants. City Manager Edwards explained that consultants provide specialized teams and flexibility, and that the high spending is partially tied to successful grant acquisition (ARPA, Bipartisan Infrastructure Law). The council agreed to consider a future work session on analyzing internal staffing economies of scale relative to consultant costs. - Police and Fire Sales Tax Spending Plan (Issue 4): A major portion of the meeting focused on the spending plan for the new half-cent sales tax. Leslie Haas presented a plan that prioritized wage adjustments, followed by phasing in additional personnel (9 officers, 6 firefighters through 2031), new apparatus (ladder truck, rescue truck), and the replacement of Fire Station 3. A significant debate ensued regarding the timeline for hiring compared to capital expenditures. Council members Price and Jackson argued that the promise to voters focused on immediate staffing and public safety, criticizing the phased approach that delays full hiring until 2031. Council member Cows stated that "people matter over stuff" and prioritizing capital over staffing was a concern. Council member Cortez and City Manager Edwards provided historical context, noting that recruitment is a long-term challenge and that the pay-as-you-go model prevents unsustainable debt. The council acknowledged that the chiefs were consulted on the priority list. The plan was approved 8-1. - Council Travel Policy and Budget (Issue 5): Staff recommended increasing the travel and conference budget from $2,000 to $18,000 ($2,000 per member). Council member Cows praised the benefits of conferences for professional development and regional collaboration. Council member Price raised a point about the lack of mileage reimbursement when council members drive personal vehicles instead of a city van. The council approved the budget increase and directed staff to explore a policy for mileage reimbursement with prior approval. - Facility Security Improvements (Issue 6): Staff presented three high-priority facility upgrades: the Health Department storefront counters ($150k), moving the police community office from the basement to the first floor of City Hall ($650k), and enclosing Human Resources for privacy ($400k). City Manager Edwards recommended funding all three through a one-time use of fund balance (Option 3), arguing that costs would only increase if delayed. Council member Koppel suggested prioritizing the police relocation and HR roof over council chamber security improvements. Council member Cortez pushed to finally address the HR roof after years of requests. The motion to approve Option 3 passed unanimously. - Golf and Pool Discounted Fees (Issue 7): Staff proposed offering free green fees on the second Tuesday of each month for veterans and twilight free golf on weekdays for city employees, as well as 50% discounts on pool season passes for both groups. The measure was approved unanimously. Key Outcomes - Approved: Chamber of Commerce & MoCAN funding request ($353,850). (Vote: 9-0) - Approved: Downtown Joplin Alliance three-year contract renewal ($75,000/year). (Vote: 8-1) - Approved: Police and Fire Sales Tax spending plan as presented, directing staff to prepare ordinances for the October 19th adoption. (Vote: 8-1) - Approved: City Council travel budget increase to $18,000, with direction to explore mileage reimbursement policy. (Vote: 9-0) - Approved: Facility security improvements (Health Dept counter, Police office relocation, HR roof), funded by one-time general fund balance (Option 3). (Vote: 9-0) - Approved: Golf and pool discounted fees for veterans and city employees. (Vote: 9-0) - Direction Given: Staff to prepare a future work session analyzing internal staffing capacity versus consultant spending.

The Joplin City Council held a special meeting on September 22, 2026, to discuss a proposed change in air service from Chicago to Houston, honor retiring IT Director Mark Morris, approve an expedited ordinance for sewer easement condemnation, and conduct a budget work session for fiscal year 2027. The meeting began at 6:00 PM in the fifth floor council chamber. Consent Calendar - The council finalized and approved the consent agenda unanimously (8-0). Presentations - Discussion of Change of Air Service (Jeremy, Airport Manager): Jeremy presented two options: (1) Accept a new Chicago schedule with a 5:00 AM departure from Joplin and a 7:40 AM return from Chicago starting December 1, 2026, which reduces connecting flight opportunities; (2) Request a switch to Houston with a 7:40 AM departure from Joplin and a noon return from Houston, improving connectivity. The current Essential Air Service (EAS) contract expires at year-end and will be rebid. SkyWest, the carrier, prefers Houston to maintain ridership. Council members expressed consensus for Houston, with Mr. Moran and Mr. Bard voicing support. The city manager will draft a letter requesting the change. Resolutions - Resolution 2026-018 – Recognition of Mark Morris: Mark Morris retired after 25 years as Director of Information Technology. The resolution recognized his service, especially during the city’s cyber attack. Mr. Morris spoke briefly, thanking God, his family, and his team. The resolution was approved 8-0. Ordinances - Council Bill 2026-146 (Expedited) – Easement Condemnation for 10 Cup Parallel Force Main Sewer Project: The ordinance authorizes condemnation proceedings for permanent and temporary easements from Richard and Danita Bruder after unsuccessful good-faith negotiations. The project will install a second 30-inch force main to increase pumping capacity. The bill was approved on an expedited basis, 7-1 (Mr. Cortez opposed), with one absent (Mr. Ditar excused). Budget Work Session - City Manager Nick Edwards opened with a call to prioritize existing promises and projects, highlighting that many voter-approved projects are 10-15 years old. He urged council to be intentional about new requests. - Finance Director Leslie presented an overview of the FY2027 budget as a balanced operating budget with focus on sustaining current services. Key points: general fund budget of $278 FTEs, public safety is the largest expenditure; unrestricted fund balance remains healthy; a regional dispatch study is proposed ($100,000) to explore interoperability and efficiency. - Departmental Presentations: Each department outlined 2026 accomplishments and 2027 key initiatives. Notable items: - Police Department: Authorized 115 sworn officers, currently 21 short but with six in pipeline; aims for zero vacancies by year-end. Key initiatives: expand CRU program, enhance peer support, increase traffic enforcement with revived motorcycle unit. - Fire Department: Record 9,980 calls in 2025; five vacancies with five new hires starting Oct 5. Initiatives: community paramedicine program, new staffing schedule to reduce overtime (30,000 hours in 2025), station upgrades. - Parks and Recreation: At Cunningham Pool, the aging big blue water slide will be removed due to safety and cost concerns. Council requested exploring replacement options, including private partnerships. Other initiatives: paint Schifferdecker pool, overlay softball complex parking lot. - Information Technology: Lane Starchman named Assistant IT Director; focus on cybersecurity (RavenAI contract), GIS expansion, and transitioning after Mark Morris’ retirement. - City Manager’s Office: Initiate a new citizen-based five-year strategic planning process, continue annexation efforts, and implement Proposition Action plans. - Council Discussion: Mr. Moran praised the budget document and emphasized focusing on voter-approved projects. Mr. Jackson expressed concern about maintaining existing amenities like the pool slide. Key Outcomes - Consensus to request change of air service from Chicago to Houston; city manager will draft letter. - Resolution 2026-018 approved (8-0). - Council Bill 2026-146 approved on expedited basis (7-1, 1 absent). - Council directed city manager to explore options for replacing the Cunningham Pool slide. - Budget work session to continue the following evening (Sept. 23) with issues and options discussion.

The Joplin Planning and Zoning Commission met on September 14, 2026, at 10:00:00 UTC per the meeting record. The chair opened the public hearing by reading the hearing procedures, which included accepting into evidence the city's 2012 Comprehensive Plan, the Joplin Development Code (Appendix 29A of the Municipal Code), related design guides and regulations, staff recommendations, and all other written evidence. The commission voted unanimously to approve two rezoning requests for new single-family homes. Both approved cases are scheduled to be presented to the Joplin City Council on Monday, October 5, 2026. Consent Calendar - Motion to excuse Ms. Clue Michael (absent): made by Mr. Spruce, seconded by Mrs. Harrison. All in favor; motion carried. - Motion to approve the minutes from the previous meeting: made by Mrs. Harrison, seconded by Mr. Spruce. All in favor; motion carried. Public Comments & Testimony - Case 029-26: The applicant, identified as "Bow and Grinnegar" of 906 Grand Avenue, spoke in favor of the rezoning. They stated the rezoning application came after they had already applied to build a new single-family home without knowing the property's zoning district. - Case 030-26: Oscar Sarseno of Shuber Mitchell, 2030 Mia Faith Place, Joplin, spoke in favor of the application, describing the proposed 1,050-square-foot home as great for a first-time buyer or an empty nester. - No members of the audience testified in favor of or against either case. Discussion Items - Case 029-26: City staff presenter Tyler said the block has a mixed character, with single-family homes to the north and south and R3 zoning on the west half of the block. Staff recommended R3 because it is the infill zoning district for 50-foot lots, permits single-family use by right, and keeps the new home compatible with the neighborhood; the same use would also be allowed under R1. When a commissioner asked about the two neighboring C1 lots, staff explained the block had previously been rezoned for commercial development that never materialized; those existing homes are legally non-conforming and would need to be rezoned only if demolished and rebuilt. - Case 030-26: Staff explained the property is a 50-foot-wide corner lot on a block where all other lots are zoned R2. Although the future land use plan anticipated commercial uses along Broadway, that redevelopment never occurred on some blocks, and the small lot size severely limits commercial development. Staff therefore recommended R2 to be consistent with the rest of the block. Sarseno confirmed the applicant intends to build a single-family home on the lot. Key Outcomes - Case 029-26: Approved unanimously. Motion by Mr. Spruce, seconded by Mr. Skinsel (also recorded as "Skinzel" in the transcript). All in favor; motion carried. - Case 030-26: Approved unanimously. Motion by Ms. Harrison, seconded by Mr. Skinsel. All in favor; motion carried. - Adjournment: Motion made by Mr. Spruce, seconded by Mrs. Harrison. All in favor; motion carried. Note: No agenda or minutes were available in the source material, so this summary is based solely on the meeting transcript. The transcript includes minor audio-quality issues and inconsistent spellings of some commissioner names (e.g., Skinsel/Skinzel, Harrison/Harrington).

The Joplin City Council held a regular meeting on September 8, 2026, addressing international tourism reports, a new medical transportation reimbursement program, a special use permit for a villa community, creation of an ad hoc art commission, adoption of a hazard mitigation plan, several ordinances, and the annual CVB grant funding allocations for FY2027. Council also discussed an infill development initiative and other new business items. Presentations - CBB International Guest Report (Mr. Tuttle): Presented data on international visitors using Visa credit cards. In 2025, Joplin recorded 40,193 international visitors who spent $5,751,000. This was a decline from 2024 (down 330,366 visitors and $366,000 in spending), while the state of Missouri experienced a $10 million drop. The guest book for January 2026 showed 3,443 entries, including 665 international visitors. Canadian visits fell nearly 70% compared to the same period in 2024 (54 vs. 87). The Route 66 centennial (2025-2027) is expected to boost future numbers. - Mo Health Net Non-Emergency Medical Transportation (Mr. Johnson): Staff presented a feasibility study for the City to participate in the Missouri Health Net MTM program, which would reimburse MAPS transit for eligible medical rides. Conservative estimates projected annual reimbursements of approximately $104,000, with a new supervisor position costing $83,000 (half reimbursable by FTA), resulting in a net positive impact of $21,000. The program would require a 2-month rollout after a signed contract. Council members expressed support, with Mr. Moran and Ms. Price emphasizing the program's benefits for healthcare access and cost recovery. The city manager directed staff to package the proposal for implementation. Public Hearings - Resolution 2026-015 (Special Use Permit for Row Houses): The applicant, O'Reilly Development, proposed a 29-unit villa community (23 one-bedroom, 6 two-bedroom) at Wildwood Ranch Parkway and John Duffy Drive. The project targets residents aged 55+ and includes a clubhouse, walking trail, and connection to the existing Wildwood Senior community. No public testimony was offered in opposition. The resolution was approved 9-0. Public Comments & Testimony - Council Bill 2026-616 (CVB Grants): Five individuals spoke: - Joshua Booth opposed taxpayer funding for JOMO Pride Fest, arguing that hotel tax dollars should not subsidize a controversial event and that supporters should fund it privately. He emphasized he was not asking to cancel the event. - Ron Birch (Founder/Chair of JOMO Pride) supported the grant, noting growth from 1,000 attendees and 10 tracked room nights in 2018 to over 3,300 attendees and 80 room nights in 2026. He stated that 100% of grant funds are reinvested into the festival and that no funds are used for private venue performances. - John Garrison expressed support for the grant, praising the welcoming atmosphere of Pride Fest and urging council approval. - Dante Shackles argued that denying funding based on animus would violate the Equal Protection Clause and cited legal precedents. He thanked council for their support. - New Business – Citizen Request (Christopher Swanton): Mr. Swanton spoke critically of the city's priorities, alleging idolatry and moral issues, and referenced the Spiva Park statues. He did not request specific council action. Discussion Items - Resolution 2026-016 (Ad Hoc Community Art Commission): Staff proposed a 5-member commission to advise on art in roundabouts and public spaces. Council amended the resolution to include 6 members, adding Shelby Allen, Margie Moss, and Ann Leach to the three proposed names. The amended resolution passed 9-0. - Resolution 2026-017 (Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan): Adopted a FEMA-required plan updated every five years to maintain eligibility for disaster recovery grants. Approved 9-0. - Ordinances (Expedited): - Council Bill 2026-354: Demolition of a dangerous building at 226 S. Walnut Ave. Lowest bid $7,000. Approved 9-0. - Council Bill 2026-619: Roof replacement and renovation of parks maintenance facility (tornado damage) for $468,814.51. City deductible of $100,000 from self-insurance fund. Approved 9-0. - First Reading Ordinances: - Council Bill 2026-519: Simplified business license fees to enable online renewals, including a new $1,000 fee for data centers. Effective Jan 1, 2027. Approved on first reading 9-0. - Council Bill 2026-520: Added a $300 fee per utility cut to recover inspection and administration costs. Effective Jan 1, 2027. Approved on first reading 9-0. - Council Bill 2026-616 (CVB Grant Allocations FY2027): The CVB Advisory Board recommended $163,300 in grants from a $180,000 budget to 16 events/organizations (e.g., MoCan Dragway $10,700, JOMO Pride Fest $12,700, Four State Trucks $25,000). Council debated the scoring process and tracking of hotel room nights. Mr. Moran abstained due to a conflict of interest. The bill passed on first reading 8-1. - New Business – Residential Infill Development Initiative (Mr. Bard): Proposed 31 code changes to encourage infill construction, including allowing front-facing garages in certain areas. Council discussed prioritizing this alongside other staff projects. Direction given to add to the priority list. - Other New Business (Mr. Koppel): Raised concerns about bike lane signage, food truck regulations (distance from brick-and-mortar restaurants), and consistent enforcement of sidewalk use rules. Staff will add to the priority list. Key Outcomes - Approved: Resolution 2026-015 (Special Use Permit) – 9-0. - Approved: Resolution 2026-016 (Art Commission, as amended) – 9-0. - Approved: Resolution 2026-017 (Hazard Mitigation Plan) – 9-0. - Approved: Council Bill 2026-354 (Demolition) – 9-0. - Approved: Council Bill 2026-619 (Parks facility repairs) – 9-0. - Passed on First Reading: Council Bills 2026-519, 2026-520, and 2026-616. - Directed: Staff to proceed with Mo Health Net MTM program implementation. - Directed: Add infill development initiative, bike lane signage, food truck regulations, and sidewalk enforcement consistency to the city's priority list for future action. - Closed Session: Council voted 9-0 to enter closed session to discuss personnel matters.

On September 8, 2026, the Joplin City Council held an informal session to discuss two staff items: the annual rollover of purchase-order encumbrances and proposed changes to the city's promotion policy. No agenda or minutes were available; this summary is based on the meeting transcript. Rolled Encumbrances and Purchase Orders - City staff explained that encumbrances and purchase orders are the same concept: legally binding commitments for goods and services that may cross fiscal years and help prevent overspending. - Under the city charter and budget ordinance, appropriations lapse at the end of the budget year unless spent or lawfully encumbered; both allow purchase orders to be rolled over. - When a valid PO is rolled, the adopted budget increases by the PO amount while the same amount is recorded as a commitment, so there is no bottom-line effect. Example: a $500,000 line item with a $100,000 rolled PO shows a $600,000 budget and a $100,000 commitment, leaving a $500,000 bottom line. - Because the budget is adopted in mid-October and departments continue issuing POs through the end of the fiscal year, staff brings a November resolution listing the valid encumbrances rolled. - Reasons for rolling POs include goods ordered but not yet delivered, valid continuing commitments, long lead times/back orders/supply-chain delays, construction/project timing, multi-year contracts, capital projects, grants, and special revenue programs. Rolling preserves the commitment, improves financial reporting and audit trails, and prevents committed funds from being used elsewhere. - For FY2025 to FY2026, the city rolled encumbrances across all funds totaling $50,744,631. The updated outstanding total was given as $21,932,870 (transcribed as '21,932,87'). - Staff said all remaining rolled 2025 items would close at fiscal year end except the fire-truck purchase order if the truck was still incomplete; fire trucks take about three years to build. Items not complete by fiscal year end should be re-budgeted for FY2027. Closing a rolled encumbrance reduces both the budget and the commitment, with no bottom-line effect. - Councilmember Cowles asked about rebudgeting amounts and requested more project detail; staff said departments track rebudgeting separately and the new encumbrance list would come in November 2026. Councilmember Price asked about 2024 PO dates; staff clarified the FY2025 fiscal year ran November 1, 2024 through October 31, 2025. Promotion Policy - Staff presenter Mr. Edwards reviewed the council's follow-up discussion on the promotion policy. The proposed change, first raised in August, would increase the promotion pay adjustment from 10% to 15% when an employee moves from a non-exempt to an exempt position and loses overtime eligibility. - The adopted ordinance also included language requiring promoted supervisors to be paid more than the employees they supervise; it was originally intended for exempt positions, but the council asked about broader application. - Staff identified current pay inversions mainly in police corporal and fire captain ranks: seven police corporals earn less than police officers they supervise, costing about $71,000 to bring them to step 12; ten fire captains earn less than driver engineers, costing about $55,000. The combined immediate cost was about $126,000, with ongoing costs hard to quantify. Applying the rule would effectively remove steps for police corporal and fire captain positions. - Staff presented five options: (1) rescind the promotion policy; (2) strike the sentence requiring supervisors to be paid more than direct subordinates; (3) make a one-time adjustment; (4) remove 'exempt' and/or place a cap on the adjustment; or (5) make no changes. - Councilmember Koppel strongly supported the 15% non-exempt-to-exempt bump but opposed applying the supervisor-pay rule unevenly. He wanted any rule to apply consistently from top to bottom, noted other positions where pay inversions could occur, and defended the value of seniority. - Councilmember DeTar said the rule would not prevent future inversions because a newer promotee can still be paid less than a long-serving subordinate; he favored option two as the most straightforward. - Staff recommended option two, saying it would preserve the 15% adjustment and avoid harm. Staff called option three problematic and costly, a cap potentially error-prone, and option five unfair to lower-level supervisors. - At Councilmember Koppel's suggestion, the council heard from department representatives. Fire Chief Nemo said option two was cleanest; option three might require opening the contract, and pay-scale changes create ripple effects. He suggested longevity pay might better reward experience. Ms. Haas, speaking for general employees, also supported option two as fairest from top to bottom and said the other options would cause unintended consequences. - Councilmember Jackson asked about newer promotees leapfrogging experienced employees; staff acknowledged the tension and said no city has completely solved this issue. Key Outcomes - The council reached consensus on option two: remove the requirement that a promoted supervisor be paid more than a direct subordinate, while keeping the 15% pay adjustment for non-exempt-to-exempt promotions. - Councilmember DeTar moved to direct staff to bring option two back at the next formal meeting; Councilmember Koppel seconded. The motion passed with six votes in favor. - No formal action was taken on the encumbrance rollover; it was informational. Staff will return in November 2026 with the new list of valid encumbrances to roll into FY2027.

The Board of Appeals met on August 28, 2026, to review progress on multiple properties under compliance orders, extend permits, and conduct a dangerous building hearing. The meeting included roll call, approval of amended minutes, and updates on 18 properties. Key actions included permit extensions, continuations for progress reports, and an order of demolition for one property. Consent Calendar - Roll Call & Excusals: Members Mr. Brown and Mr. Duncan were excused due to a family emergency and absence, respectively, by motion of Mrs. Harrington and Mr. Wicklin, carried unanimously. - Minutes Approval: The minutes from the previous meeting were approved as amended to correct Mr. Kissinger's name omission and standardize spelling of "nay." Motion carried. Public Comments & Testimony - Item 3142 (723 South Roosevelt): The property owner arrived after the board had already voted to continue the item. He explained that recent hot weather (110°F) had slowed progress but that he had completed sheathing and was working on interior floors. He requested leniency, and the board noted the vote had already been taken. - Item 3167 (805 South Connor): The owner (recently divorced, new owner of the property) explained that a fire in November 2025, lack of insurance, and other rental obligations had prevented repairs. She had listed the property for sale. The board had already voted to continue the item to September 25, 2026, and encouraged her to work with staff. Discussion Items - Item 3104 (3104 East 15th Street): The owner reported near completion (sheetrocking, structure done). Staff noted the permit was issued three years ago and had expired; only final inspections and permanent electric service inspection remained. The board extended the permit to December 31, 2026, and requested a progress report at the December meeting. - Item 3117 (1248 South Roosevelt): The owner (Brian Vlanagan) reported electrical rough-in done, concrete removed, HVAC work ongoing, and need for city-assigned addresses. The board continued the item to the November/December meeting. - Item 3120 (530 East 7th Street): Demolition was complete, with bricks cleaned up. The remaining basement section was being closed up. The board released the property from the agenda, with staff to verify closure. - Item 3121 (714 East Hill): The owner reported siding and window work, with framing inspection passed after re-wrapping. Electricians were still needed. The board continued to September 25, 2026, for progress report and possible demolition hearing. - Item 3134 (2705 South Virginia): The owner (present) reported cleaning brush, beginning demolition, dealing with vagrants, and planning to secure with lights, cameras, and steel doors. Timeline: completion by December 1. The board continued to the December meeting. - Item 3141 (2402 South Alabama): Owner out of town; plans to resume work next week. The board continued to September 25, 2026. - Item 3144 (712 East Pool): A prospective buyer had not yet met on-site due to travel. The back addition needs removal and rebuilding. Continued to September 25, 2026, with a potential demolition hearing. - Item 3149 (929 South Roosevelt): Waiting on utility sign-off (Spire gas) to pull demolition permit. Continued to September 25, 2026. - Item 3152 (614 South Moffitt): Owner out of hospital, plans to get permit. Property condition worsening (open windows, porch unstable). Continued to September 25, 2026, with warning of demolition order. - Item 3158 (210 North Oak): Project manager got permit this morning, but work had stalled. Board warned of dangerous building designation if no progress. Continued to September 25, 2026. - Item 3161 (3020 East 10th Street): Garage demolished, windows installed, siding to start. Continued to December meeting. - Item 3162 (12 South Patterson): No response from owner (10-4 Properties) for over a year. Property has collapsed ceilings, compromised roof. Set for dangerous building hearing at September 25, 2026. - Item 3163 (906 East Furnace): Owner living in unsafe conditions (14 people, no functioning kitchen/bathroom). Work started, but ramp dangerous. Continued to September 25, 2026. - Item 3164 (915 East Second Street): Unsecured, no response, near North Middle School. Continued to September 25, 2026, with order to secure property. - Item 3165 (3022 East Ninth Street): New owner (Chris Christian) had consultation in April, but no permit. Roof activity observed. Continued to September 25, 2026. - Item 3166 (222 South Jackson): No contact since fire; unsecured second-story door. Continued to September 25, 2026. - Item 3167 (805 South Connor): Owner spoke (see Public Comments). Fire damage, no insurance. Continued to September 25, 2026. Dangerous Building Hearing (Item 3160 - 1621 West Second Street) - Presentation: Assistant City Attorney Andrea Knobloch presented evidence. Lead Dangerous Building Inspector Shelley Dolison testified that the property had compromised roof, windows, debris, holes in siding, a collapsing shed, 50-gallon drums, boats, and overgrowth. The owner (Dennis Consulver) is deceased. No contact received; notices sent to the property and published in the Joplin Globe for four consecutive weeks in August 2026. The property met dangerous building criteria under Joplin Code Chapter 26, Section 612, subsections 4 (exterior wall defects), 10 (unsafe egress), 11 (fire hazard), 14 (unsanitary/unfit for habitation), and 18 (public nuisance). - Decision: The board voted unanimously to declare the property a dangerous building and order demolition, including outbuildings. Key Outcomes - Permit Extension: Item 3104 permit extended to December 31, 2026, with a December progress report. - Release from Agenda: Item 3120 released due to completed demolition. - Continued for Progress Report: Items 3117, 3121, 3134, 3141, 3142, 3144, 3149, 3152, 3158, 3161, 3163, 3164, 3165, 3166, 3167 were continued to the September 25, 2026 meeting (or later for 3117, 3134, 3161). - Demolition Order: Item 3160 ordered demolished. - Dangerous Building Hearing Set: Item 3162 set for dangerous building hearing at September 25, 2026. - Closed Session: The board moved into closed session after the public hearing.

The Joplin City Council held a special meeting on August 24, 2026, at 6:00 p.m. in Council Chambers. The meeting included public hearings on the FY2027 proposed budget and the property tax rate, discussion and final action on amended data center standards, and a closed session. Key decisions included adoption of the property tax levy, reversion of data center residential setbacks to 300 feet, and passage of the data center ordinance. Routine Actions - Approval of absence: A motion to approve Councilmember Cortez's absence passed 8–0. Public Comments & Testimony - Rebecca Collins (Director, Joplin Sustainable Technology Alliance) spoke in favor of the amended data center standards. She emphasized that distance buffers alone are insufficient for noise control and urged adoption of strict performance metrics, including decibel limits. She also called for a future public transparency dashboard for real-time monitoring of air, water, and noise. - Maurice Philson expressed a lack of confidence in federal, state, and local government, citing concerns about the federal deficit and a personal experience that eroded his trust. Discussion Items - FY2027 Proposed Budget (presented by Leslie Haas, City Accountant): The total proposed budget is $170.8 million, a decrease of $14.4 million from FY2026. The general fund (the main discretionary operating fund) comprises about 25% of the budget. Sales tax is the primary revenue source, with a budgeted 2% increase for FY2027. Key highlights include $51.4 million in capital expenditures, a 2% inflation adjustment for employees, step increases, and increased pension contribution rates. The budget draws on reserves for one-time Proposition Action expenditures. A five-year model projects negative fund balances in 2028 and 2029 if current trends continue. Councilmember Jackson inquired about franchise taxes (not collected from fiber optic providers) and fluctuations in police department funding; Councilmember Cows asked about the biggest financial risk (revenue growth outpacing expenditures). - Property Tax Rate for 2026–2027 (presented by city staff): The proposed levy is 40.92 cents per $100 assessed valuation (city portion 17.1 cents, library portion 23.82 cents – unchanged from the prior year). Assessed valuations increased by 1.6% to $831.2 million, with new construction adding $10.6 million. The tax on a $100,000 home amounts to $77.75. No public comments were made. - Data Center Standards (Amended Council Bill 2026-271): The council discussed the appropriate setback for data centers when adjacent to residential, church, daycare, or park uses. The ordinance had been amended at a prior meeting to increase the setback from 300 to 600 feet. Councilmember Bard moved to revert to the 300-foot setback, arguing that the 21 specific performance standards already provide sufficient protection. Councilmember Cows proposed a tiered approach (300 ft for residential/sensitive uses, 100 ft for commercial, M2 setbacks for industrial), but the motion to revert to 300 feet was approved. Councilmember Koppel and others debated the impact on a specific property near a railroad easement, but the majority favored a uniform 300-foot setback for residential and similar uses. Key Outcomes - Property Tax Levy Ordinance (Council Bill 2026-516): Approved on an expedited basis (8–0). The rate remains unchanged at 40.92 cents per $100 assessed valuation. - Data Center Ordinance (Amended Council Bill 2026-271): A motion to amend Section 4 (residential setback) back to 300 feet passed 8–0. The re-amended ordinance was then adopted on final reading (8–0). - Closed Session: A motion to enter closed session under state law for legal matters passed 8–0. The meeting adjourned at the end of closed session.