Public Meetings - Merced, California

On July 27, 2026, the Merced Parks and Recreation Commission convened at 1:15 PM UTC (evening local time) to elect a chair, receive a quarterly report from the Boys and Girls Club of Merced County, and review a comprehensive draft master plan for parks and recreation. The meeting concluded with the unanimous approval of a special study session for August 20, 2026, to delve deeper into the strategic action plans. Election of Chair - The commission elected John Carlos as chair via a unanimous electronic vote (4-0). The motion was made by Commissioner Marissa Kay Lewis and seconded by Commissioner April Holloway. Public Comments & Testimony - No members of the public offered non-agendized comments. Jessica Melgoza from the Boys and Girls Club of Merced County spoke during the public comment portion of her agenda item, providing details on the fourth quarter report. Discussion Items - Quarterly Report from Boys and Girls Club of Merced County - Jessica Melgoza presented the fourth quarter report for the after-school program and summer camps at McCombs Youth Center. Key statistics: 348 total hours of operation (188 after-school, 160 camps), 1,184 total contact hours (serving 142 members, 215 at the youth center). The program served 27 preschool-age (0-5), 178 school-age (6-17), and 8 young adults (18-24). Staffing included 27 paid staff, 15 interns, and 7 volunteers. The club charges a $20 annual membership fee and $75 per week for camps. Transportation was identified as the most significant barrier to participation; enrollment increased during summer due to district-provided transport. Capacity constraints were noted: operational capacity is roughly 100 children, while fire code allows up to 270. The club launched a workforce readiness cohort, with a graduation ceremony scheduled for July 29, 2026 at 6 PM at McCombs Center. - Parks and Recreation Master Plan Presentation - Christopher Jensen, Parks and Community Services Director, presented a draft master plan funded by a $150,000 grant from Central Valley Opportunity Fund. The plan, developed with consulting firms 110% and KTUA, involved over 500 community engagements and 1,392 comments. Four overarching pillars were identified: Infrastructure & Maintenance, Community Connection, Safety & Inclusion, and Resources & Stewardship. A top-ten capital improvement wish list was shared, including replacement of the McNamara Park turf field ($1.4–1.6 million), completion of the Merced Regional Sports Complex ($5 million), development of Bellevue Ranch parks, improvements to Applegate Park (parking, sidewalk, ADA access), relocation of Boys and Girls Club to Alfarada Park, and construction of an indoor facility at the sports complex (estimated $50 million). Jensen noted that a park ranger program and crime prevention through design are being explored. The presentation was informational, with no action taken that evening. Key Outcomes - The commission unanimously approved (4-0) a motion to set a special study session for August 20, 2026, at 5:30 PM to review the 35 strategic action plans (15 high priority) in detail. The session will be held at the Sam Pipes room in City Hall and will be open to the public. Commissioners requested confirmation on whether the meeting must comply with SB 707 regarding remote public comment; staff will verify with the city attorney. - No formal motion to adjourn was required; the meeting adjourned by consensus after a vote.

The Merced City Council met on Monday, July 20, 2026, in the City Council Chamber at the Merced Civic Center, beginning with a 4:00 PM study session, a 5:00 PM closed session, and a regular meeting at 6:00 PM. The council considered a proposed Joint Powers Authority (JPA) to finance Virginia Smith Trust (VST) infrastructure, adopted the housing element update and several action items, and made numerous board and commission appointments. The meeting was briefly paused from approximately 7:07 PM to 7:19 PM due to a Brown Act technical disruption affecting remote public participation; remote speakers were allowed to comment before action on the affected item. Study Session: Joint Powers Authority (JPA) for Virginia Smith Trust (VST) Infrastructure Financing - City Manager McBride and Dr. Steve Tejan (Merced County Superintendent of Schools and Virginia Smith Trust Executive Director) introduced Adam Bauer, President/CEO of Fieldman, to present a concept for a JPA between the City and the Merced County Board of Education to form Community Facilities Districts (CFDs) and eventually issue tax-exempt bonds for infrastructure. Bauer noted his firm handles about 50% of CFD transactions in California. - The proposal would proceed in phases: (1) form the JPA; (2) form a CFD (resolution of intention, public hearing within 30–60 days, ordinance); (3) sell bonds only after sufficient development occurs (typically 3–5 years; bond rates around 5.5% or less versus developer borrowing costs of 12–15%). - Tier 1 funding priorities: charter school and transportation facilities. Tier 2: sewer, water, and treatment plant improvements. Sensitivity analysis: at a 1.5% effective tax rate, about $46.5 million could be funded ($37M Tier 1, $9.5M Tier 2) with $49 million unfunded; at 1.6%, $66.5 million funded and $29 million unfunded; at 1.7%, $86.6 million funded and $9.1 million unfunded. Staff identified 1.7% as the likely maximum for the area. - Councilmember Smith asked whether a JPA is required (it is, for the Office of Education to participate), whether adjoining landowners could benefit (yes, if formation documents are broad), and raised concerns about long-term JPA stability based on his school board experience. He expressed support for exploring the idea if longevity and fairness concerns are addressed. - Public comment: Greg Opinski, an adjacent property owner west of Lake Road, asked whether this was a Mello-Roos structure and urged that any such financing be done fairly so no single developer gets a leg up. Dr. Tejan responded that VST has invested heavily in planning and wants fairness, including financial participation in shared improvements. - The item was information only; no vote was taken. City Manager McBride indicated staff would finalize draft documents for future council consideration. Closed Session - The council convened in closed session for anticipated litigation (one potential case, Gov. Code § 54956.9(d)(2)) and a City Manager performance evaluation (Gov. Code § 54957). No reportable action was announced. Public Comments & Testimony - Karthique Prasad (representing Congressman Adam Gray) reported on federal activity, including amendments to the FY27 National Defense Authorization Act to streamline naturalization for military personnel and veterans, the Family Act, and letters opposing the administration's decision not to renew the USMCA and supporting $15 billion in specialty crop relief. - Aggie Freeman (Merced PD Canine Association) invited the community to the inaugural "Pause on Patrol Fun Run and Dog Walk" on October 17 at 9:00 AM at Lake Yosemite to fund retired K-9 health care, noting 40–50 registrations so far. - Vincent Tremel proposed a "historical Merced Gold Belt Transportation Landing Hub" connecting high-speed rail travelers to Mariposa and Yosemite via stagecoach/private transport. - Cindy Ramos (District 5 resident) asked for contacts regarding the city's "Let's Talk Merced" flyer, citing concerns about a $1.3 million shortfall and ending federal fire grants. - Arturo Martinez Jr. raised public health concerns about cyclosporiasis (more than 1,600 confirmed CDC cases across 34 states since May 1, with over 5,100 additional cases under review) and HHS workforce reductions from approximately 82,000 to 62,000 employees, asking the council to consider a future resolution or letter on food safety surveillance. - Marcus Ariano (Treehouse Tutoring board chair) reported on the Loft Family Literacy Program, a six-month, 15-family pilot, and requested continuation or parent cafes. - Multiple speakers from Faith in the Valley and the Community Alliance for a Sustainable Economy (Lyria Rodriguez, Angela Matthews, Corey Crowson, Ingrid Brostrom) urged keeping the high-speed rail station downtown as required by SB 198, warning that the revised south/southwest plan would cut Merced as a connector and skip a stop in Sacramento. Brostrom cited UC Merced Labor Center survey data: only a quarter of residents were fully aware of the HSR project; over 60% would likely use it; 78% wanted retail and 78% wanted restaurants near the station; 64% ranked pedestrian walking paths as very important; 67% wanted tourism and local business activity as a benefit. Consent Calendar - The council approved the consent calendar (J.2, J.3, J.5–J.11, J.13, J.14) with J.4 and J.12 pulled for separate discussion. Approvals included resolutions of intent to vacate street/easement portions (Canal Street, approximately 14,328 square feet; and 400 West 7th Street, approximately 1,145 square feet), setting public hearings for August 17, 2026; equipment purchases (Vermeer brush chipper $98,030.10; Vermeer stump grinder $90,739.59; two Peterbilt 520 refuse trucks $892,186.92; Altec AT40-G aerial truck $262,081.90; Schwarze A9 street sweeper $499,926.05); landscape maintenance agreements (Central Valley Lawnscapes $413,530.48; Brightview $195,416.36; Green Horizon $343,521.36); Alliant property/boiler insurance renewal of $1,308,544.63 (a -2.83% premium decrease); and Arconas airport terminal furniture for $183,479.40 plus 10% contingency (not to exceed $201,828.00). - J.4 (SB 244 Analysis): Pulled by Councilmember Zhang, who asked about water service language for unincorporated communities and whether goals and implementation measures were included. Senior Planner Leah Brown responded that the analysis is an update consistent with the land use element. Approved (Resolution 2026-45 and Categorical Exemption 15306) with Councilmember Zhang voting no. - J.12 (Technology Disaster Recovery MOU with Tulare): IT Director Jet Bennyhoff explained the reciprocal disaster recovery partnership (Tulare is 99.9 miles away, close to the roughly 100-mile rule of thumb) with no current funding appropriation. Approved unanimously. Public Hearing: Housing Element Update and Zoning Ordinance Amendment (K.1) - Senior Planner Leah Brown presented the sixth-cycle multi-jurisdictional housing element. Merced's Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) is 10,517 units—about 5,000 more than the previous cycle. Income categories for a family of four in Merced County: very low = $41,000 per year or less; low = $65,000 or less; moderate = $98,000 or less; above moderate = over $98,000. The city received HCD's "golden ticket" compliance letter on March 17, 2026, contingent on completing the required rezones. - The proposed zoning ordinance amendment (Ordinance 2594) would add state-required language: by-right approval for multifamily development in which 20% or more of units are affordable to lower-income households, minimum density of 20 units per acre and maximum density of at least 24 units per acre on rezoned sites, and related requirements. - Public comment: Ashley Marie Suarez (Leadership Counsel and Public Interest Law Project) argued the city should adopt the zoning amendment before the housing element and requested tenant protections, relocation assistance, and expanded affordable housing programs. Daisy Ramos shared personal experience of homelessness after raising concerns about her former housing conditions and asked for stronger oversight, transparency, and tenant protections. - The council adopted Resolution 2026-44 (General Plan Amendment 24-06) and introduced Ordinance 2594, with Councilmember Zhang voting no. Action Items - L.1 Opportunity Zone 2.0: Staff requested approval to submit census tract 06047001801 to the Governor's Office of Business and Economic Development by the July 20, 11:59 PM deadline (moved up from July 25). Only about 25% of identified tracts will be designated. Councilmember Smith said he now supports the tract after meeting with staff, citing the Lake Road corridor and developments between Yosemite and UC Merced struggling to find financial footing. Approved with Councilmember Zhang voting no. - L.2 Speed Study Addendum: City Engineer Darrell Jordan reported that JLB Traffic Engineering recommended keeping existing speed limits unchanged on North Bear Creek Drive (M Street to G Street), Mansionette Drive (Yosemite Avenue to Mercy Avenue), and Olive Avenue (R Street to M Street) after further study. Approved unanimously. - L.3 RSTP Exchange Funds: The council selected the R Street (Olive to Northwood) Project (CP220050) for the FY 2025-26 Regional Surface Transportation Program exchange claim of $1,374,632, adopting Resolution 2026-41. The project adds a secondary left-turn lane, multi-use path, bike lanes, storm drainage, and road resurfacing. Approved unanimously. - L.4 M Street/M Street Circle Improvements: City Surveyor Joe Cardoza presented a $114,125.00 Public Facilities Impact Fee credit/reimbursement agreement with Stonefield Home, Inc. for restriping M Street Circle to a one-way, two-lane configuration and removing stop signs. Councilmembers DuPont and Smith recused themselves (Stonefield is a client of their firm, though not their client personally). Councilmember Zhang expressed pedestrian safety concerns about crossing two lanes of traffic in the circle; the council approved with direction for Zhang to work with the city engineer on potential enhancements. Approved with DuPont and Smith recused. - L.5 Food Truck Moratorium: Staff presented an urgency ordinance establishing a temporary moratorium on new approvals for food trucks in fixed locations. Statistics presented: 36 food truck entitlements approved (28 single-use, 8 multi-use); 18 of 34 locations concentrated within a 2.5-mile radius near downtown; only 3 permitted locations north of 24th Street within a 10-mile radius; and 3–4 new applications currently in the queue. Councilmembers Harris, DuPont, and Smith raised concerns about restricting trade, lack of demonstrated urgency, and Planning Commission procedure (the matter originated from Planning Commission comments rather than an agendized item; City Attorney Cornwall noted Charter Section 708 allows recommendations but acknowledged the process was imperfect). Public commenter Curtis Thomas urged denial, calling the sites "vacant asphalt" and citing free-market principles. A motion to deny the urgency ordinance (Harris, seconded by Zhang) passed unanimously. The council also discussed creating a formal pathway for boards and commissions to refer items to the council, potentially via the ethics and governance committee. - L.6 2026-2036 Parks, Recreation, and Open Space (PROS) Master Plan: Director Christopher Jensen presented the plan developed from 12 community focus groups, more than 500 individual engagements, and nearly 1,400 community comments. It establishes four pillars (infrastructure and maintenance; connected community; safety and inclusion; resource stewardship), 35 strategic actions, and 15 high-priority actions. Councilmember Smith raised concerns about language that appeared to expand Parks and Rec into human services and public health roles; Chief Stanfield described a potential civilian park ranger/community outreach program. Councilmember Zhang requested more detail on park standards (restrooms, water stations, lighting, trash bins) and community gardens. Public commenter Crystal Ramos (Youth Leadership Institute, Youth United program manager) called for standardized park amenities and ongoing maintenance. The council voted unanimously to table the plan for 60 days for language clarification, further Parks Commission review, and a possible study session. Business Items & Appointments - M.1 Community Funding Ad-Hoc Committee: The council adopted Resolution 2026-46 creating a three-member ad hoc committee (with an October 30, 2026 sunset) to review and score the 14 nonprofit proposals received for the $30,000 FY 26/27 community funding allocation. Appointed: Councilmember Smith, Mayor Pro Tem Boyle, and Mayor Serrato. Approved unanimously. - M.2 Arts and Culture Advisory Commission: Appointed Elizabeth Wolfrey (District 1), Noelle Chandler (District 5), and Christopher Carter (District 6), after Tommy Tran withdrew. Approved unanimously. - M.3 Building and Housing Board of Appeals: The agenda listed one seat; staff noted a second professional-qualified seat had no applicants. The council voted to keep recruitment open rather than appoint from the current applicant pool. Approved unanimously. - M.4 Recreation and Parks Commission (District 4): Appointed Marcus Ariano. Approved unanimously. - M.5 Regional Airport Authority (2 seats): Only one applicant, Amos Munford, was appointed; the other seat remains unfilled. Approved unanimously. - M.6 Tax Transparency Commission (District 4): Directed staff to continue recruitment. Approved unanimously. - M.7 Planning Commission District 2: The council voted unanimously to reconsider the July 6, 2026 appointment and then unanimously to keep the seat open for additional applicants. - M.8 Future Agenda Requests: Councilmember Harris requested a September 8 discussion of residential parking structure (carport) standards; City Manager McBride noted common setback and code issues and permit thresholds for smaller structures. Councilmember Smith requested an update on standing committee implementation; staff committed to prioritizing public safety and ethics/governance committees within about three weeks. - M.9 Council Comments: Councilmembers noted community events, including General Van Pae Park, the Golden Valley High School "Cardinal Regime" marching band's Rose Parade fundraising, the Central Valley Training Center talent show, and downtown concerts. Key Outcomes - Information only: VST JPA/CFD financing concept (no vote; staff to finalize draft documents). - Adopted Resolution 2026-45 (SB 244 Analysis) — passed with Councilmember Zhang voting no. - Adopted Resolution 2026-44 and introduced Ordinance 2594 (Housing Element/RHNA) — passed with Councilmember Zhang voting no. - Approved Opportunity Zone 2.0 submission for census tract 06047001801 — passed with Councilmember Zhang voting no. - Approved speed study addendum, RSTP claim Resolution 2026-41, and M Street agreement ($114,125.00) — the latter with Councilmembers DuPont and Smith recused. - Denied the food truck urgency ordinance/moratorium unanimously. - Tabled the PROS Master Plan for 60 days unanimously. - Created the Community Funding Ad-Hoc Committee and made appointments (Arts & Culture, Recreation & Parks, Regional Airport Authority); continued recruitment for the Building and Housing Board of Appeals, Tax Transparency Commission, and Planning Commission District 2. - Adjourned in memory of former city employees Dave Tucker and Mike Wegley.

The Arts and Culture Advisory Commission met on July 16, 2026 at 4:00 PM in the City Council Chamber. The commission discussed and voted on several proposed art projects from the subcommittee, ultimately approving a reduced allocation for a 250th anniversary mural and tabling all other funding decisions to a future meeting. Public Comments & Testimony - One public speaker, Nick, commented on the mural locations, expressing concern that an M Street bridge mural could distract drivers and noted that utility box wraps in Modesto have not aged well. Discussion Items - 250th Anniversary Mural (Item E.1): Staff proposed two locations: the M Street bridge (Veterans Boulevard) and the Public Works Corp Yard on V Street. The total budget for murals was $20,000. Commissioners discussed visibility, equitable distribution of art, and the need to commemorate the 250th birthday of the United States within the calendar year. Some commissioners favored the Corp Yard to beautify an underserved industrial area; others preferred M Street for higher traffic visibility. No clear staff preference was expressed. - Utility Box Beautification Program: Staff recommended transitioning from hand-painted boxes to professionally applied vinyl wraps, costing $500–$2,000 per box, with an $8,000 allocation request. Discussion included durability, maintenance, artist opportunities, and the need to preserve existing painted murals digitally. - Stephen Leonard Park Splash Pad Art: A $10,000 allocation was proposed for a mural or art installation at the splash pad at Stephen Leonard Park. Commissioners noted this could be deferred to spring 2027. - Bob Hart Square Performances: Staff requested $8,000 to support 16 community events (line dancing, swing dancing, karaoke, local musicians) at $500 each. Discussion expanded to possibly funding performances at Applegate Park Moat as well, including support for Shakespeare in the Park. - Total Budget Context: The commission has $58,000 to allocate for the fiscal year. Several commissioners expressed concern that mural projects consume a disproportionate share of funding compared to other art forms. Councilmember Harris noted the success of Bob Hart Square events and suggested pursuing corporate sponsorships. - Future Agenda Items: Commissioner Colton requested a subcommittee meeting before the next regular meeting. Councilmember Harris proposed exploring a Renaissance fair at Applegate Park. Key Outcomes - Motion Approved (unanimous): Vice Chair Dennis moved, and Commissioner Comarter seconded, to allocate up to $15,000 for the 250th anniversary commemorative mural, leaving the location choice (M Street bridge or Public Works Corp Yard) to the selected artist. All other proposed allocations (utility box wraps, splash pad art, Bob Hart Square performances) were tabled for further subcommittee discussion and a future commission meeting. - Action Items Deferred: The utility box beautification program ($8,000), splash pad art ($10,000), and Bob Hart Square performances ($8,000) were not voted on and will be reconsidered at the next meeting after subcommittee review. - Next Steps: The subcommittee will meet before the next regular commission meeting to refine recommendations. Commissioners noted the possibility of requesting additional funds from City Council during the mid-year budget cycle.

The Merced City Council met on Monday, July 6, 2026, at 6:00 PM in the City Council Chamber. The meeting included a closed session at 5:00 PM, regular session with consent calendar, two public hearings, action items, and business items. Key decisions included adopting updated fines for repeat housing code violators, approving new parks and recreation fees, authorizing outreach on High-Speed Rail, and making appointments to multiple commissions. The meeting adjourned at approximately 10:30 PM. Consent Calendar - Approved the consent calendar as a block, with items I-4 (Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory minutes), I-5 (bulletproof vests), I-6 (emergency response drone systems), and I-17 (Public Works parts and supplies) pulled for separate consideration. - I-5 and I-6 were approved together: purchase of bulletproof vests from Angel Armor not-to-exceed $61,830.40 (grant-funded) and a 4-year agreement with Motorola Solutions for BRINC drone systems not-to-exceed $479,993.99 (opioid settlement funds). Councilmember Zhang voted no on both. - I-4 (Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory minutes) was received and filed unanimously. - I-17 was approved with recusals: Councilmembers Smith and DuPont recused from sub-items L (Central Valley Trucking), DuPont from AQ (McAuley Motors) and BN (Schoettler Tire). The remaining sub-items were approved. Sub-items L, AQ, and BN were voted on separately with recusals; all passed. - Other consent items (I-1 through I-16, minus pulled items) were approved unanimously. Public Comments & Testimony - Public Comment (non-agenda): Vincent Hamill proposed a public-private partnership for transit services (Stagecoach Private Transport). Megan Aponte invited the community to the inaugural Paws on Patrol Fun Run on October 17, 2026, at Lake Yosemite to support K-9 units. Supervisor Josh Pedroso thanked the city for downtown improvements and mentioned a bear naming announcement. - Public Hearing J1: Ashley Marie Suarez (in person) and Daisy Rommel Sacosta (remote) spoke in strong support of increased fines for repeat housing code violators. Suarez highlighted findings from public records requests showing recurring violations and long resolution times. - Public Hearing J2: No public speakers. - Action Item K1 (Opportunity Zones): No public speakers. - Business Item L1 (High-Speed Rail): No public speakers. - Business Item L2 (Bicycle Safety): Joe Brucea spoke in favor of school-based bike safety education programs and referenced other cities’ models. - Commission Appointments: Miranda Griswold spoke in support of her application to the Arts and Culture Commission. Discussion Items Public Hearing J1: Repeat Housing Code Violator Fines - City Attorney Craig Cornwell presented a proposed resolution updating the administrative citation schedule to include a $1,000 fine for placement on the repeat violator list and a $500 daily fine for uncured violations. He compared penalties from Fresno, Sacramento, Berkeley, and Long Beach. - Council discussion focused on the daily fine amount and the standard for abatement. Councilmember Smith proposed raising the daily fine to $1,000 after 30 days of non-compliance and changing the abatement standard from "good faith efforts" to "reasonably diligent efforts under the circumstances." - Councilmember Zhang moved to set the daily fine at $1,000 from the start, with the standard of "reasonably diligent efforts." The motion was seconded and passed unanimously (5-0). Resolution 2026-40 was adopted. Public Hearing J2: Parks and Community Services Fee Schedule - Parks Director Chris Jensen presented proposed fees for Bob Hart Square (block rate: $150/hr for 1-2 hrs, $125/hr for 3-6 hrs, $100/hr for 7+ hrs; additional Canal Street overflow space at 25% of base rate), Fahrens Park Disc Golf Course (tournament fees: $200/1-day, $350/2-day, $400/3-day), and Merced Regional Sports Complex (CP42) (field rental, pickleball, parking fees, etc.). - Council asked about restroom requirements, calendar availability, and lighting hours. No public comments were received. - A motion to adopt Resolution 2026-39 passed unanimously. Action Item K1: Opportunity Zone 2.0 Census Tracts - Economic Development Manager Amanda Williams proposed submitting four census tracts for state consideration: 06047001801 (Northeast Merced), 06047001301 and 06047001302 (Downtown West and East), and 06047001603 (South Merced). - Council debated the merits, particularly for Northeast Merced. Councilmember DuPont requested more data on existing opportunity zone impacts. Councilmember Smith expressed concern about diverting investment from needier areas. - Councilmember Harris moved to approve three tracts (Downtown East, Downtown West, South Merced) and table the Northeast tract for two weeks. The motion passed unanimously. Business Item L1: High-Speed Rail Outreach - Deputy City Manager Frank Quintero provided a detailed update on the past 12 months of HSR activities, including the potential station relocation from downtown to Southeast Merced (Mission Avenue/Highway 99), loss of ACE and Amtrak service, and the 2026 business plan. - Council discussed the need for community engagement. Councilmember DuPont called for HSR CEO Ian Choudry to attend the August 3 council meeting and for HSR to hold town halls. - A motion to authorize creation of an Engage Merced module and pursue additional outreach (media briefings, op-eds, social media) and to work with HSR on town halls passed unanimously. Business Item L2: Bicycle Safety - Mayor Serratto, Mayor Pro Tem Boyle, and Councilmember DuPont raised concerns about ride-outs, e-bike safety, and street takeovers. Police Chief Stanfield offered to bring recommendations to the Public Safety Subcommittee. - Councilmember Zhang advocated for infrastructure improvements and referred the item to the Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee. Council voted 4-1 (Zhang opposed) to send the matter to the Public Safety Committee. Commission Appointments (Items L3-L10) - Arts & Culture Advisory Commission: District 1 and District 5 tabled to July 20; Bree Wolf appointed to District 2; Tommy Tran appointed to District 6; ex-officio members Anna Browning and Anahita Furuton appointed (Councilmember Harris as council ex-officio). - Bicycle & Pedestrian Advisory Commission: Dina Gonzalez reappointed to District 2; District 5 and 6 tabled; Craig Hamlin appointed as ex-officio; second ex-officio tabled. - Personnel Board: Alberto Escobedo appointed. - Planning Commission: Abel Menessis appointed to District 2; Anthony Gonzalez reappointed to District 5. - Recreation & Parks Commission: Amanda Estrada appointed to District 1; John Carlos appointed to District 3; District 4 tabled; Christopher Carter appointed to District 6. - Regional Airport Authority: Delvina Johnson reappointed; two vacancies tabled. - Tax Transparency Commission: Tabled due to no applicants. - Building & Housing Board of Appeals: Emily Souza appointed; second seat tabled. Key Outcomes - Resolution 2026-40 adopted: Updated administrative citation schedule for repeat housing code violators. Fines: $1,000 for listing; $1,000 per day after cure period expires; standard for abatement: "reasonably diligent efforts under the circumstances." (Unanimous) - Resolution 2026-39 adopted: New fee schedules for Bob Hart Square, Merced Open Air Theater, Fahrens Park Disc Golf Course, and Merced Regional Sports Complex (CP42). (Unanimous) - Opportunity Zone 2.0: Approved submission of three census tracts (Downtown East, Downtown West, South Merced) to GoBiz. Northeast tract tabled to July 20 meeting. (Unanimous) - High-Speed Rail Outreach: Authorized creation of an Engage Merced module and comprehensive outreach plan; directed staff to work with HSR on town halls. (Unanimous) - Bicycle Safety: Referred to Public Safety Subcommittee for recommendations. (4-1) - Appointments: See Discussion Items above for specific appointments. - Future Agenda Items: Councilmember Zhang requested discussion on changing commission meeting times (set for September 21). Mayor requested flood control update (set for September 7).

The Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Commission met on Tuesday, June 23, 2026, at 4:00 PM in the City Council Chamber, Merced Civic Center, 678 W. 18th Street. Chairperson Maraz presided; the Pledge of Allegiance was led by Commissioner Thomas. Roll call showed Commissioners Martinez, Ewing, Shu, Kaiser Grant, Chambers, and Chairperson Maraz present; Commissioner Gonzalez absent/excused; Ex-Officio Commissioner Thomas present; Watkins, Sandoval, and Harmelin absent. City staff included Senior Planner Leah, Recording Secretary Vicky, Chief Deputy City Attorney Rhonda Lucas, and Public Information Officer Jennifer Flack. The meeting ran past 6:30 PM and included a short break. Consent Calendar - Both consent items were removed for discussion. E1 (minutes of Feb. 25, 2025, Aug. 26, 2025, and Oct. 28, 2025) initially failed on a 3–3 vote after Commissioners Kaiser Grant and Martinez raised concerns about the minutes being too sparse and containing a corrected typo that listed commissioners who were not on the commission as absent. After Deputy City Attorney Lucas explained that Merced minutes are action-items-only by city policy and that reconsideration was available, the commission voted to reconsider and then approved the three sets of minutes. - E2 (Review of Items of Interest) was approved as a legitimate record/list of past commissioner requests for future agenda items. Public Comments & Testimony - Joe Brucia expressed support for adding bicycle safety laws and riding etiquette to school curriculum. He cited Fresno Bee reports of e-bike accidents about once every two weeks, the recent death of a Pollard High School student in an e-bike crash, and urged the commission, bicycle coalition, or police chief to initiate talks with school district curriculum leaders. - Gina Coolie, speaking for Strong Towns Merced, expressed full support for a public tracking tool of commissioners' requests for future agendas, requested the BPAC submit a work-product template, and recommended making the tracking tool a recurring agenda item. She also agreed with Mr. Brucia. Discussion Items F1: Roles and Responsibilities of the BPAC - Senior Planner Leah reviewed Merced Municipal Code 2.52.010. The BPAC is an advisory body to the City Council on bicycling, pedestrian activity, active transportation, and mobility needs of elderly and disabled residents. It has seven voting members (six district representatives and one at-large; a vacancy was noted), at least two members from recognized bicycle organizations, and up to four non-voting ex-officio members. Meetings are held every two months during business hours; a meeting is canceled if there is no quorum; staff emails attendance confirmations; agenda direction comes from City Council and staff. - Commissioner Chambers asked how to change the ordinance; Deputy City Attorney Lucas explained the commission would need to advise the Council through a resolution, and ordinance amendments require noticed public hearings, a first reading, a second reading, and a delayed effective date. - Commissioners Thomas and Kaiser Grant raised concerns about canceled meetings, including a December 2025 cancellation attributed to lack of quorum despite a scheduled Brown Act presentation. They said half of last year's meetings were canceled and asked for better processes. Staff acknowledged staffing and agenda limitations. - Legal guidance was given on Brown Act compliance: no serial emails or group discussion outside agendized meetings; individual commissioner-to-staff emails are allowed; emailing all commissioners together could create a Brown Act violation. F2: CARB Grant — Connect South Merced Safety and Mobility Planning Project - Staff reported that the City Council recently adopted a resolution accepting the California Air Resources Board (CARB) Community Planning and Capacity Building Grant, a little over $400,000, with no required general fund match. Over two years, the grant will support community engagement and strategic transportation planning in South Merced (areas south of Highway 99), focusing on pedestrian safety, bicycle connectivity, public transit access, and transportation barriers. - Outreach will be conducted with community partners Valley Onward and Lao Family, including promotoras who can communicate with Hmong and Hispanic residents. The grant will fund a full-time administrative assistant. The main deliverable is a mobility/active-transportation plan; reports and deliverables will be public. Staff stated the grant is strategic-planning only, so it cannot fund interventions such as temporary flexi-post installations. - The project is intended to strengthen Merced's future application for Transformative Climate Communities (TCC) planning and implementation funding. A prior 2023 TCC planning grant application was unsuccessful. - Commissioner Chambers asked about the removal of the 16th Street crosswalk in front of Bob Hart Square and wanted the process for crosswalk removal/installation reviewed by the commission. Staff said community outreach for the grant can gather such input and that progress reports could return to the BPAC. - Commissioner Shu expressed concern that the previous ATP grant added many HAWK systems on two-lane roads despite the Local Road Safety Plan identifying other, often cheaper, safety treatments. She urged the city to layer the Local Road Safety Plan into the CARB outreach and not let plans sit on the shelf. Staff said they are using prior studies, the Local Road Safety Plan, and community input to guide decisions. - Commissioner Martinez confirmed the item was informational only, praised promotoras' cultural competence, and expressed strong support for investment in South Merced. Business: Future Agenda Requests and Commissioner Comments - During G1, Commissioner Kaiser Grant asked to revisit the Strong Towns Merced tracking tool and bicycle-education etiquette. Commissioner Thomas reported on a conversation with Merced PD Lt. Haygood: school resource officers are doubling as bike patrols this summer, Merced PD is exploring grant funding for bicycle education, and council members Smith and DuPont have the issue on their radar. Thomas also recommended $30 traffic-grade signs and separated bike/pedestrian designs for future multi-use paths. - Commissioner Martinez requested a future action item/resolution to ask the City Council to amend the ordinance so meetings move to 6 p.m., meet more frequently, and possibly redirect the disbanded traffic committee's role to BPAC. Deputy City Attorney Lucas explained the proper agendized process, ordinance timelines, and Brown Act email limitations. - Commissioner Chambers requested a future item on the process for removing/installing crosswalks. Commissioner Shu proposed a future agenda item to discuss and prioritize the interest list; staff suggested commissioners mark up copies and return them. - Commissioner Thomas requested an open-ended action item to request changes to the ordinance defining BPAC, rather than piecemeal changes. Commissioner Martinez asked for an item on keeping meetings within the one-hour/business-hours guideline and on how to prioritize the 20+ item list. - During G2, Commissioner Kaiser Grant said it was her final meeting after 15 years; Commissioner Ewing said Merced PD will visit his bike shop to film e-bike class educational content; Commissioner Martinez encouraged community members to apply for open seats; Commissioner Chambers thanked staff and praised the value of young people riding bikes. Key Outcomes - Approved the Feb. 25, Aug. 26, and Oct. 28, 2025 minutes after an initial 3–3 failure and a successful motion to reconsider. - Approved the Review of Items of Interest as a record of past commissioner requests. - Commissioners requested future agenda items including: a resolution asking the City Council to amend Ordinance 2.52 to move meetings to 6 p.m., meet more frequently, and potentially give BPAC the role of the disbanded traffic committee; a review of the crosswalk removal/installation process; an open-ended action item requesting changes to the ordinance defining BPAC; and a process for prioritizing the 20+ item interest list. - Staff was asked to share the Strong Towns Merced tracking-tool template and to prepare onboarding materials for new commissioners. - Commissioner Kaiser Grant announced that this was her final BPAC meeting after 15 years as a founding member and urged commissioners to verify their appointment terms. Commissioner Ewing reported that Merced PD will work with his bike shop on e-bike class educational content. Commissioner Martinez encouraged community members to apply for open commission seats. - With no further business, the commission adjourned.

The Recreation & Parks Commission of the City of Merced convened on Monday, June 22, 2026, at 5:30 PM in the City Council Chamber, Merced Civic Center, 678 W. 18th Street, Merced, CA 95340. The agenda included public comment, a consent calendar, and one business item (F.1) consisting of department updates presented for information only. No meeting minutes or transcript were available when this summary was prepared, so the details of discussion, public testimony, and any votes cannot be confirmed from the record. Note on timing discrepancy: The agenda lists the meeting start at 5:30 PM, while the provided record timestamp is 2026-06-22 13:45:00+00:00, which does not match the local agenda time. The agenda time is used in this summary. Consent Calendar - The agenda provided for adoption of the Consent Calendar by a single Commission motion, with any Member, individual, or organization permitted to request removal of an item for separate consideration and a separate vote. No specific consent items are listed in the available agenda, and no minutes or transcript confirm which items, if any, were approved. Public Comments & Testimony - No public comment content is available in the record. The agenda allotted 3 minutes per speaker for matters not listed on the agenda and noted that speakers on agenda items would be called during discussion of that item. Discussion Items - F.1 (Item 26-562) – Parks and Community Services Department Updates: The Director was scheduled to provide updates on departmental activities from the previous month. The stated recommendation was information only, requiring no action. No details of the presentation, Commissioner comments, or requests to add future items are available due to the absence of minutes and transcript. Key Outcomes - No votes or formal actions are documented. The sole business item was informational, and no decisions, directives, or referrals can be identified from the available record. - The agenda also included Commission Comments and a Request to Add Future Item portion, but any outcomes from these items were not recorded in the materials provided.

On June 17, 2026, at 6:00 PM, the City of Merced Planning Commission convened in the City Council Chamber at 678 W. 18th Street, Merced, CA. Present were Chairperson Gonzalez and Commissioners Bugh, Swiggard, Ochoa, and Greggins; Commissioner Smith was absent excused. A quorum was present. The Commission approved the consent calendar, held a public hearing on the Sixth Cycle Housing Element package, pulled a minor modification item at staff request, and received an update on upcoming items. Consent Calendar - The Commission approved the consent calendar, including the Planning Commission minutes of June 3, 2026, on a motion by Commissioner Ochoa seconded by Commissioner Greggins. Public Comments & Testimony - No general public comment speakers were present at the beginning of the meeting. - For the Housing Element hearing, staff noted that two emailed comments had been submitted and posted. Ashley Maria Suarez, speaking on behalf of the Leadership Counsel and the Public Interest Law Project, urged the Commission to reject the current draft and recommend denial unless further revisions were made. She said the plan meets only minimum statutory requirements and should be strengthened now with tenant protections and fair-housing measures. Her requested changes included increasing in-lieu fees, increasing the number of affordable units required to be built with market-rate housing, extending those requirements to infill development, adding a tenant relocation assistance program, and establishing eviction-defense and eviction-protection programs. She also argued that the SB 244 analysis had little public input and had not been revised since 2024, and asked that it be returned for public review before adoption. Discussion Items - Item E.1, Housing Element and related actions: Senior Planner Leah Brown presented the staff recommendation to adopt Resolution 4181, recommending that the City Council adopt General Plan Amendment 24-06 (the Merced Multijurisdictional Housing Element and Appendix G), Zoning Ordinance Amendment 26-0001 (RHNA rezone language), Environmental Review 26-0068, and the SB 244 Analysis. - Brown described the state-required eight-year Housing Element cycle and explained that the City of Merced’s Regional Housing Needs Allocation is 10,517 units, almost 5,000 more than the prior cycle; staff later stated the increase was about 4,900 units. - Income categories were presented as very low (30 to 50 percent of area median income), low (50 to 80 percent), moderate (80 to 120 percent), and above moderate (120 percent or more). For a Merced County family of four, the approximate thresholds were $41,000 or less, $65,000 or less, $98,000 or less, and above $98,000, respectively. - The sixth-cycle planning period runs from January 31, 2024 through January 31, 2032, and the city is currently out of compliance. Staff described five public drafts; after a technical advice meeting, HCD’s March 17, 2026 letter, described by staff as the so-called golden ticket email, said the revised draft met statutory requirements, but substantial compliance also required completing the necessary rezones and adopting and submitting the Housing Element. - The Commission previously recommended rezones for 27 parcels in February 2025, and the City Council adopted Ordinance 2577 in April 2025. The proposed zoning text includes by-right multifamily development when at least 20 percent of units are affordable to lower-income households, meaning approval without discretionary review; a minimum of 16 units per site; a minimum density of 20 units per acre; a maximum density of at least 24 units per acre; and mixed-use floor-area requirements. - The SB 244 analysis identifies six disadvantaged unincorporated communities in or near South Merced and reviews their service conditions. Staff stressed it is only an analysis and does not promise annexation or funding. - Environmental Review 26-0068 was found statutorily exempt from CEQA under CEQA Guidelines Section 15162; future development on rezoned RHNA sites will require separate CEQA review. - During commission discussion, Chairperson Gonzalez noted the earlier outreach to owners of rezoned parcels, saying most owners were in favor because rezoning could add property value; a park parcel was dropped after a staff error. Staff also explained that the Merced County Association of Governments distributes the state-assigned regional target among local jurisdictions, and Merced received the largest share because it is the largest city in the county. - Commissioner Greggins asked about the 20 percent affordable by-right provision, and staff confirmed that such a project would not require discretionary approval from the Planning Commission or City Council. - In response to a question about what rejection would mean, staff said the Commission’s denial recommendation would go to the City Council, and the City Council would need to give specific direction before additional programs could be incorporated and returned to HCD. - Item E.2, Minor Modification 26-0008 and Environmental Review 26-0061: Planner Kayla advised that the item was being pulled at staff request; no vote was needed and no action was taken. - Items F.1 and F.2, upcoming agenda items and calendar: The Planning Manager reported that the next substantive item would be a presentation to the Commission on the General Plan Update mission statement on August 5, 2026, giving the Commission a chance to help shape it before it goes to the City Council. The meeting calendar through August 2026 was reviewed. Key Outcomes - The Commission adopted Resolution 4181, recommending that the City Council adopt General Plan Amendment 24-06, Zoning Ordinance Amendment 26-0001, Environmental Review 26-0068, and the SB 244 Analysis. The motion was made by Commissioner Ochoa and seconded by Chairperson Gonzalez; the Chair announced the motion was adopted. - Item E.2 was pulled at staff request, with no action taken. - The Planning Commission’s next noted substantive discussion is the General Plan Update mission statement on August 5, 2026; the calendar also lists Planning Commission meetings on July 8 and July 22, 2026.

The Merced City Council held a regular meeting on June 15, 2026, at 6:00 PM following a closed session at 5:00 PM. The six-hour meeting included a special presentation on new meeting procedures under SB 707, a consent calendar with several items pulled for public comment, six public hearings, and multiple action items. Key highlights included the adoption of the FY 2026-27 budget, approval of a self-storage facility over neighborhood opposition, adoption of the 2025 Urban Water Management Plan, and approval of a $499,725.60 CARB grant for South Merced planning. The meeting adjourned at 10:32 PM. Consent Calendar - I-1 through I-11: Routine items approved unanimously except I-8 (legal services amendments) and I-10 (repeat housing code violators program) were pulled for separate consideration. - I-4: Resolution 2026-32 adopted (General Municipal Election for three council seats on November 3, 2026). - I-11: Resolution 2026-33 adopted (FEMA Assistance to Firefighters Grant application for $500,000 with 10% city match). Public Comments & Testimony - I-8 (Legal Services Amendments): Gloria Sandoval (District 3) expressed concern over escalating legal contracts, noting increases from $25,000 to $260,000 for one firm. City Attorney Craig Cornwell explained the contracts were funded from existing vacant positions and did not require additional budget. - I-10 (Repeat Housing Code Violators): Multiple speakers, including Latanya Richard and Ashley Marie Suarez, urged adoption with clear 30-day repair timelines and six-week reinspection clauses. A tenant (Ms. Worth) shared a case of being evicted after reporting code violations. - J-1 (Self-Storage Facility): Six speakers opposed the project, citing inadequate landscaping, heat island effects, and incompatibility with the neighborhood. Robert and Carol Danuzo presented evidence of 300 signatures against the project. Applicant Todd Bender argued the design exceeded code requirements and included enhanced landscaping. - J-6 (Budget): Latanya Richard, Ashley Marie Suarez, and others requested $250,000 for a tenant relocation assistance program and $500,000 for an eviction prevention pilot program, funded from the general fund or affordable housing reserves. - K-3 (CARB Grant): Jean Okui urged a 60-day delay to include input from the Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee and questioned the selection of Valley Onward and Merced Lao Family as community partners. Discussion Items - F.1: Assistant City Clerk Jennifer Parsley presented upcoming changes under SB 707 (effective July 1, 2026), including two-way teleconference participation and online registration. Council discussed procedures for public comment and consent calendar speaker registration. - J-1: The council debated the self-storage project (1380 E. Yosemite Ave, 500 storage units). Councilmember Smith provided a detailed legal analysis, stating the council acts in a quasi-judicial capacity and must base decisions on record criteria. Councilmember Zhang opposed, citing lack of pedestrian-friendly design. The motion to approve passed 4-1 (Zhang dissenting; DuPont and Tao recused). - J-2: The 2025 Urban Water Management Plan and Water Shortage Contingency Plan were presented. Water Manager Johnny Baptista answered questions about water loss (21.1 in 2023) and aquifer health, noting significant progress toward the 2028 water loss standard. The plan was adopted unanimously. - J-3: Maintenance districts budgets for FY 2026-27 were approved. Staff noted seven underfunded districts, some requiring reduced services. Council directed staff to target future ballot measures with community meetings and phased approaches. - J-4: AB 2561 report on vacancies showed 8.9% overall vacancy rate (512 full-time employees) with no group exceeding 20%. Public hearing held with no additional comment. - J-5: Continued public hearing for parks fee schedule to July 6, 2026, approved unanimously. - J-6: Finance Officer Venus Red reports presented the final budget ($461.5 million total, $69.2 million general fund). The budget was balanced using $733,682 from the general fund reserve and $582,608 from Trust 115 (pension). Council rejected amendments for additional arts funding ($29,500) and tenant programs, but staff will revisit arts funding mid-year. Budget adopted 6-1 (Zhang dissenting). - K-1: Supplemental appropriation of $100,000 from Economic Development Opportunity fund for TSA security equipment at the airport terminal replacement project, approved unanimously. - K-2: Authorized community mailers and digital outreach (AdMail $46,994.53; Division D $42,217.50) to close the loop on public input, approved 6-1 (Zhang dissenting). - K-3: Accepted $499,725.60 CARB grant for Connect South Merced Safety and Mobility Planning Project. Council debated selection of community partners; staff explained they were chosen based on capacity, not a competitive process. Approved 6-1 (Zhang dissenting). - K-4: Approved five-year lease of Stephen Leonard Youth Center to Merced Community College (with option to extend five more years) per Recreation & Parks Commission recommendation. Approved 6-1 (Zhang dissenting). - K-5: Approved Change Order No. 4 for Community Park 42 ($1,107,754.63) to add a fifth soccer field, pickleball court amenities, restroom, and ADA improvements. Staff confirmed this is the final change order due to exhausted funds. Approved unanimously. - L.1: Report on Arts and Culture Advisory Commission's selection of the metal "Canal Street Blossom" public art piece for Bob Hart Square arch, by sculptor Eddie McGonya. Expected installation by December 31, 2026. Key Outcomes - Budget Adopted: Resolution 2026-35 (City Council), PFA 2026-01 (Public Financing Authority), PA 2026-01 (Parking Authority), SA 2026-01 (Successor Agency) all adopted, appropriating $461.5 million for FY 2026-27. - Self-Storage Facility Approved: Site Plan Review Permit 26-0018, Minor Use Permit 26-0030, and Environmental Review 26-0050 approved for 1380 E. Yosemite Ave (5 storage buildings, office, 500 units). - Urban Water Management Plans Adopted: Resolution 2026-36 (UWMP) and Resolution 2026-37 (WSCP) adopted; to be submitted to Department of Water Resources within 30 days. - Repeat Housing Code Violators Program Approved: Ordinance 2591 adding Chapter 8.53 to Municipal Code, with fines and penalties resolution to be presented at next meeting. - CARB Grant Accepted: Resolution 2026-34 authorized acceptance of $499,725.60 for South Merced planning; staff to return for authorization of an administrative analyst position. - Maintenance Districts: Resolution 2026-28 adopted; staff directed to conduct targeted community meetings for underfunded districts and consider phased rate increases. - Stephen Leonard Youth Center Leased: Five-year lease with Merced Community College approved; college will operate teen/adult education, workforce development, and College for Kids programs. - Election Called: Resolution 2026-32 calls for General Municipal Election on November 3, 2026, for three council seats by district, consolidated with county election. - Committee Membership: Councilmember DuPont and Tao recused from J-1 vote due to conflicts of interest (client of DuPont's law firm and DuPont's role as a planning commissioner, respectively). - Meeting Adjournment: Adjourned in memory of former Councilmember Don Bergman (Marine veteran, chamber president) and real estate agent Dan Gallagher.

The Personnel Board of Merced, California, convened at 12:00 PM on June 8, 2026. The meeting included roll call (three members present, one absent), approval of the consent calendar, a monthly HR report, a discussion of job description qualification language, and an update on a recruitment. No public comments were received. The meeting adjourned after routine approvals and dialogue. Consent Calendar - The board unanimously approved the consent calendar without discussion. No items were pulled for separate consideration. Discussion Items - Monthly HR Report: Christopher, a staff member, presented the recruitment and hiring statistics for May 2026. Key data included: nine recruitments closed (e.g., account clerk, assistant planner, dispatcher, tree trimmer, etc.), eight new hires (five full-time: two admin assistants, two custodians, one park worker; three temporary: temp safety coordinator, temp pool manager, temp recreation leader), and four full-time separations (one probationary release of a refuse operator, two resignations of a fire engineer and an IT systems technician, and one termination of a sewer storm drain worker). Total city workforce reported as 591 employees (509 full-time, 82 temporary). The board voted unanimously to accept and approve the report. - Discussion on Job Description Language: A board member raised a concern about the qualification phrase "can learn your job within a short period of time" used in several job descriptions (cyber security, software analyst, associate planner, senior accountant, assistant accountant, and tree trimmer). The member asked why an assigned timetable was not included, noting that supervisors should know an average learning period. Christopher explained that all new city employees are on a 12-month probationary period (18 months for public safety), with evaluations at six months and one year. Departments can extend probation up to six months for credential requirements. He also noted that the Personnel Rules and Regulations (established around 1996) are currently undergoing legal review to modernize them. The board member expressed satisfaction with the explanation. - Recruitment Update: A board member asked about the senior accountant assigned to payroll recruitment, noting it had closed and been reposted. Christopher confirmed that the recruitment was unable to establish an employment list (at least three qualified candidates), so it had reopened. The finance department is reviewing applications for a second round of recruitment. Key Outcomes - Consent Calendar – Approved unanimously. - Monthly HR Report – Approved unanimously with a motion and second, all in favor. - Discussion on Qualifications – No formal action taken; the board received clarification and expressed satisfaction. - Recruitment Update – Noted ongoing efforts; no vote required. - Adjournment – The meeting was adjourned by unanimous consent after no further business.