Public Meetings - Oakland, California

The Rules and Legislation Committee met on Tuesday, May 7, 2026, at 10:32 AM. Councilmember Ramachandran chaired the meeting. Members present: Councilmember Brown, Councilmember Fife, and Councilmember Ramachandran. Council President Jenkins was excused and participating remotely but was not present in the queue. The meeting covered approval of minutes, scheduling of outstanding committee items, new scheduling items, review of draft agendas, and a discussion item on proposed charter amendments to the police commission. Consent Calendar - Item 1: Approval of Draft Minutes (April 23, 2026) – Approved unanimously (3 ayes, 1 excused). - Item 2: Termination of Scheduling Outstanding Committee Items (Pending List) – Approved unanimously (3 ayes, 1 excused) after public comment. - Item 4: Review of Draft Agendas and Pending Lists – Approved as amended (3 ayes, 1 excused). An amendment removed item 8 from the Community and Economic Development (CED) pending list. Public Comments & Testimony - Blair Beekman (on item 2) expressed concern that the previous civilian police oversight was working well and that current charter amendment changes risk disrupting that balance. - Rajni Mandal (on item 3.22) raised a process concern about the Community Violence Reduction Plan, noting the plan will guide over $45 million per year in public safety spending and that council cannot amend the final version. She urged careful review. - Kevin Daly (on item 3.9 and 3.4) welcomed the charter amendment (3.9) but noted missing details, and requested that settlement reports (3.4) specify the dangerous condition and location. - Kathy Leonard (on item 2.1 and open forum) supported renaming 40th Avenue to Gary Payton Way, citing his achievements, and urged preservation of police commission independence. - Multiple speakers (on item 5) opposed the proposed charter amendments to the police commission, arguing they weaken civilian oversight, concentrate power, and threaten transparency. Speakers included Rajni Mandal, Millie Cleveland, Kevin Daly, Pamela Drake, Kathy Leonard, David McGuinness, and others. Millie Cleveland questioned whether the proposal serves the police union’s interests. Pamela Drake called the police commission a regulatory body that should remain independent. - Laura Lai Bosserman (via Zoom) stated the proposal is an attack on independence and noted the police union’s influence on some council members. Discussion Items - Item 5: Charter Amendment Resolution (Section 604) – Police Commission, Inspector General, and Police Chief Appointment – Councilmember Houston presented proposals to (1) simplify police commissioner appointments (one per council member plus mayor, no alternates), (2) move Inspector General appointment to the city auditor, and (3) streamline police chief appointment to match other department heads. He cited dysfunction in the current selection panel and the need for a permanent police chief. He later moved to place the item on the pending list, stating he did not believe he had the votes and to allow a public signature campaign. Councilmember Fife asked critical questions about power imbalances, quorum without alternates, and why the proposal contradicts the city auditor’s recommendations. She argued that removing oversight would make the city less safe. Councilmember Brown seconded the motion to place on the pending list. The motion passed (3 ayes, 1 excused). Key Outcomes - All consent and scheduling items (Items 1, 2, 3 as amended, and 4 as amended) were approved unanimously (3-0, Jenkins excused). - Item 5 was moved to the Rules Committee pending list with no specific date, effectively delaying action. The motion passed 3-0. - The meeting was adjourned in memory of former Councilmember and Police Commissioner Wilson Riles Jr., who recently passed away. Councilmembers Ramachandran and Fife paid tribute.

The Oakland City Council convened on Tuesday, May 5, 2026, at 3:35 PM in a concurrent meeting of the Oakland Redevelopment Successor Agency and the City Council. The meeting covered a public hearing on a major tree‑removal violation, several non‑consent items including police technology contracts and a camp infrastructure project, and a large consent calendar. After multiple roll‑call votes and extensive public comment, the council adopted staff recommendations on most items, with notable dissents on the Cellebrite and Peregrine contracts. Consent Calendar - Minutes approval (6.0): Draft minutes from March 3, March 16, and April 14, 2026, were approved. - Emergency declarations (6.1‑6.3): Resolutions renewing local emergencies for the AIDS epidemic, medical cannabis access, and homelessness were adopted. - Sale of fire boat (6.4): Authorized sale of the Sea Wolf to Azul Marine Group for $25,000. - Community Policing Advisory Board reappointments (6.5): Confirmed reappointments of Nancy Sidebotham and Colleen Brown. - Illegal dumping enforcement (6.6): Final passage of ordinance increasing penalties and requiring license plates on waste‑transport vehicles. - Hoover Library property purchase (6.7): Final passage authorizing acquisition of 3105 San Pablo Ave for $3,495,000, using Measure KK funds. - Salary ordinance amendments (6.8): Final passage adding classifications (excluding parking administrator) and adjusting salaries. - Tyrone Carney Park license agreement (6.9): Final passage for a two‑year license with five one‑year options, $0 fee, for maintenance and workforce training. - Homelessness Strategic Action Plan (6.10): Informational report received and filed. - LLAD initiation (6.11): Resolution to begin FY 2026‑27 assessment process. - MacArthur Transit Village certificate of completion (6.12): Accepted public improvements. - Floodplain management ordinance (6.13): First reading of new O.M.C. Chapter 15.80; second reading scheduled for May 19. - Easement at 260 Oak Street (6.14): First reading for purchase of a $255,000 easement. - Fire Station 29 contract amendment (6.15): Increased contract with K2A Architects to $2,500,000. - Museum of Jazz & Art exclusive negotiation agreement (6.16): Adopted as corrected (date changed to June 6, 2023). - Surplus land declaration (6.17): Declared four city‑owned parcels surplus and prioritized affordable housing offers. - Resilience Hub grant (6.18): Authorized $25,000 grant to Oakland Parks & Recreation Foundation for outreach. - Library agreements with Piedmont (6.19) and Emeryville (6.20): Approved service contracts for $1,082,955 and $459,827 respectively. - OPRF grants acceptance (6.21): Authorized accepting up to $10,000,000 in monetary grants and $10,000,000 in goods/in‑kind through 2036. - Summer youth employment program grants (6.22): Awarded 21 grants totaling $3,192,811.60 for 2026‑2028. - OPD Federal Task Force annual reports (6.23): Informational report received and filed. - Ceasefire‑Lifeline contracts (6.24): Amended contract with University of Pennsylvania ($200,000 added) and awarded $150,000 grant to Faith in Action East Bay. - Feather River Camp contract (6.25): Moved to non‑consent, see Discussion Items. - Three lawsuit settlements (6.26‑6.28): Authorized settlements of $512,500 (dangerous condition), $695,000 (breach of contract/property damage), and $130,000 (dangerous condition). - Ramiro G. Hernandez street renaming (6.29): Adopted commemorative renaming. - Municipal Clerks Week (6.30): Declared May 3‑9, 2026 as Municipal Clerks Week. Public Comments & Testimony - Item 4.1 (Tree violation): 20 speakers. Most supported full enforcement of the $915,135.40 fine, citing environmental justice, wildfire risk, and the need to uphold city law. A few speakers urged a reduced penalty, noting the property owner’s attempt to comply and the outdated ordinance. Representatives from CAL FIRE (Rachel O’Leary) and Oakland Parks & Recreation Foundation (Mandelin Kadera Redmond, Dr. Arash Danesade, Emma Murfrey) emphasized the irreplaceable value of mature trees and the precedent set by non‑enforcement. - Item 5.1 (Rule 33): 4 speakers. Some expressed distrust that the rule would be used to limit public participation, while others requested clarification on the one‑hour technology disruption provision. - Item 5.2 (Cooperative purchase agreements): 3 speakers. Concerns raised about lack of performance evaluations and insufficient local business participation. - Item 5.3 (Cellebrite): 21 speakers. Nearly all opposed, citing human rights abuses by the Israeli‑based company, lack of competitive bidding, insufficient data on crime‑solving effectiveness, and risks to privacy and sanctuary city principles. - Item 5.4 (Peregrine Technologies): 21 speakers. Nearly all opposed, arguing the Palantir‑affiliated platform enables predictive policing, racial profiling, and data sharing with ICE; many urged the council to reject the no‑bid contract. - Item 6.25 (Feather River Camp): 13 speakers. Supporters highlighted the camp’s 100‑year history, youth development benefits, and need for infrastructure repairs. Opponents questioned the cost, equity of access (noting District 7’s 2.99% participation), and the financial viability of the camp. - Open Forum: 8 speakers addressed police commission appointments, Measure E, and alleged misconduct by council members. Discussion Items - Item 4.1 – Protected Tree Violation: Public hearing on removal of 38 protected trees at assessor parcel 48H‑7672‑18. Staff recommended a $915,135.40 penalty and lien. Property owner Matthew Bernard argued he acted in good faith after city guidance. Council debated for the third time. Councilmember Ramachandran moved to adopt staff recommendation; Councilmember Brown offered an alternative (Option 1 at $624,771.55). A motion to reconsider staff recommendation passed 5‑3, and then the staff recommendation was adopted 5‑3 (Ayes: Gallo, Ramachandran, Unger, Wang, Jenkins; Noes: Brown, Fife, Houston). - Item 5.1 – Rule 33 on Hybrid Meetings: Adopted 6‑0‑2 (Houston and Jenkins absent). - Item 5.2 – Cooperative Purchase Agreements for Public Works: Approved 8‑0 after discussion of fleet crisis and local business inclusion. - Item 6.25 – Feather River Camp Septic and Water System Replacement: Urgency finding passed 8‑0; resolution approved 8‑0. Councilmember Houston raised equity concerns; staff committed to outreach to increase District 7 participation. - Item 5.3 – OPD Cellebrite Contract: Adopted 6‑2 (Ayes: Brown, Gallo, Houston, Unger, Wang, Jenkins; Noes: Fife, Ramachandran). Councilmember Fife requested future reports on vendor alternatives, independent legal analysis, and data linking extractions to crime clearance. - Item 5.4 – Peregrine Technologies Contract: Adopted 7‑1 (Ayes: Brown, Gallo, Houston, Ramachandran, Unger, Wang, Jenkins; No: Fife). OPD stated the platform enables regional data‑sharing and offers better audit controls than Crime Tracer. Key Outcomes - Tree violation penalty: Council adopted staff recommendation full penalty ($915,135.40) and lien, with 5‑3 vote after reconsideration. - Rule 33: Resolution amending Council Rules of Procedure to add Rule 33 for hybrid meetings and technological disruptions, adopted 6‑0‑2. - Public Works contracts: Approved 33 cooperative agreements up to $16,815,000, with move to RFP process noted. - Cellebrite contract: Approved $140,000, one‑year agreement for forensic extraction devices; OPD to report back on vendor alternatives and usage data. - Peregrine contract: Approved $1,024,000, three‑year agreement for law enforcement records search platform; OPD to provide annual reports. - Feather River Camp: Approved $523,938.09 construction contract for septic and water system replacement; staff committed to improving district equity. - Consent calendar: Approved 7‑0‑1 (Gallo excused) including 30 items with corrections to item 6.16.

The Rules & Legislation Committee convened at 10:31 AM on April 30, 2026, with all four members present (Council President Jenkins, Councilmembers Brown, Fife, and Ramachandran). The meeting addressed scheduling of multiple items for future City Council and committee agendas, including several title changes, Rule 24 urgency findings, and dais requests. The meeting adjourned at 11:18 AM. Public Comments & Testimony - Rajni Mandal (District 4) spoke on determination of outstanding committee items, strongly supporting charter reform for the Police Commission, arguing that current overlapping authority and unclear accountability are structural problems. - Kevin Daly spoke on item 3.7 (AB 1837 video imaging) noting privacy concerns are minimal as data is deleted after 15 days, and urged checking with privacy groups. - Miguel LaRosa (Oakland resident) criticized overuse of Rule 24 for items that should have been planned earlier, but supported items 3.3 (illegal dumping), 3.5 (fire equipment), and 3.6 (SCBA units), and requested more detailed written informational reports. - Blair Beekman spoke on several items: supported illegal dumping plan (3.3) with community input and non-punitive approaches; supported AB 1837 (3.7) as earlier; thanked Councilmember Wang for SB 1095 (3.4) on data privacy; and spoke on item 3.15 (police oversight report) with more comments expected later. - Carmen Salazar (via interpreter) raised concerns about high parking fines and fees, noting that fines can escalate from $64–$84 to $200–$300 with additional fees, with no income consideration, and requested a review of the fee schedule. - Rajni Mandal (Open Forum) spoke about Police Commission governance issues, citing a 2020 audit showing non-compliance with charter requirements, refusal to follow city attorney guidance, and lack of coordination with federal compliance efforts, arguing charter reform is necessary. - Blair Beekman (Open Forum) urged Council to address the war in Iran and to promote peace dialogue involving Israel, while acknowledging Oakland’s role in modeling peaceful practices. Discussion Items - Approval of Draft Minutes (April 16, 2026) – Approved unanimously (4-0). - Determination of Schedule of Outstanding Committee Items – Approved as presented (4-0). - New Scheduling Items (Item 3): The committee processed 15 sub-items, including title changes, Rule 24 urgency findings, and scheduling dates. Key actions: - Item 3.1 (Ramiro G. Hernandez Street Renaming): Rule 24 urgency finding noted; scheduled to May 5 City Council consent. - Item 3.2 (FY 2026-27 Tax & Revenue Anticipation Notes): Scheduled to May 12 Finance & Management Committee. - Item 3.3 (Illegal Dumping Expenditure Plan): Title change accepted; scheduled to May 12 Public Works & Transportation Committee. - Item 3.4 (Support of SB 1095): Rescheduled from May 12 Public Safety to May 14 Rules & Legislation Committee per Councilmember Wang’s office. - Item 3.5 (LN Curtis Firefighter Equipment Purchase): Title change accepted (extension option corrected to $500,000/yr); scheduled to May 12 Public Safety Committee. - Item 3.6 (Bauer Compressors SCBA Units): Title change accepted; scheduled to May 12 Public Safety. - Item 3.7 (Support AB 1837 Video Imaging): Rule 24 accepted; Councilmember Brown added as co-sponsor; scheduled to May 19 City Council consent. - Item 3.8 (Condemning the War on Iran): Rule 24 presented; committee placed item on Rules Pending List – No Date Specific, pending consultation with federal offices. - Item 3.9 (Former Councilmember Kalb Reimbursement): Rule 24 accepted; scheduled to May 19 City Council consent. (Note: Agenda states May 19, but minutes indicate May 12 – discrepancy unresolved.) - Item 3.10 (Investment Policy & Delegation): Scheduled to May 26 Finance & Management. - Item 3.11 (Cash Management Report): Scheduled to May 26 Finance & Management. - Item 3.12 (Performance Audit of Illegal Dumping): Scheduled to May 26 Public Works & Transportation. - Item 3.13 (OPD PMAM False Alarm Reduction Contract): Scheduled to May 26 Public Safety. - Item 3.14 (Special Revenue Collection Project): Scheduled to September 22 Finance & Management. - Item 3.15 (Informational Report re Ordinance 13873): Title change accepted; scheduled to September 22 Public Safety. - Dais Scheduling Requests (Council President Jenkins): - Recognized Municipal Clerks Week (May 3-9, 2026) with a resolution; Rule 24 urgency noted; scheduled to May 5 City Council consent. - Proposed an ordinance amending Vacant Property Tax (Chapter 4.56) to create a temporary three-year exemption for parcels east of High Street; scheduled to May 26 Finance & Management. - Review of Draft Agendas (Item 4): - For May 5 City Council: Title change and urgency finding accepted for Feather River Camp septic/drinking water replacement (Item 6.25); total amount $523,938.09. - Mayor’s appointment of Doug Wong to Police Commission (Item 5.5) was withdrawn at Mayor’s request. - Public speaker Kevin Daly criticized parking reorg changes promised to wait for budget but advancing; Blair Beekman urged faster phase-out of Peregrine/Cellbrite data collection and more public reporting. Key Outcomes - All agenda items and dais requests were approved as amended by unanimous votes (4-0), except item 3.8 placed on pending list with no date. - Several items received title changes and urgency findings; those are reflected in scheduling. - Council President Jenkins will consult with federal offices on the best way to express opposition to the war in Iran before bringing item 3.8 back for scheduling. - The next Rules & Legislation Committee meeting is scheduled for May 7, 2026 (pending lists review).

Meeting convened at 10:34 AM and adjourned at 12:10 PM. The committee processed a large agenda of scheduling items for future City Council and committee meetings, including resolutions supporting state legislation, contract awards, settlements, and land use matters. A quorum of the City Council was present after 10:39 AM, leading to an adjournment to a special meeting of the full Council for the remainder of the agenda. Key discussion focused on a proposed charter amendment to reform civilian oversight of the Oakland Police Department and the Mayor's appointment of Doug Wong to the Police Commission. Consent Calendar - Items 3.1–3.8 (resolutions supporting state bills SB 1313, AB 1821, SB 1314, AB 1738, SB 1230, AB 2310, SB 417, and AB 2351) were approved with an urgency finding and scheduled for the May 19, 2026 City Council consent agenda. Co-sponsors were added for several bills. - Item 3.9 (Feather River Camp septic and water system replacement) approved with a title change and a Rule 24 urgency, scheduled for May 5, 2026 on consent, total amount not to exceed $523,938.09. - Items 3.10–3.12 (three lawsuit settlements: Andrew Marshall-Buselt $512,500; Vima Harrison 1, LLC $695,000; Kenneth Sanchez $130,000) approved with Rule 24, scheduled for May 5, 2026 on consent. - Numerous items from the April 21 special committee meetings were ratified and forwarded to the May 5, 2026 council agenda: LLAD initiation (3.27), MacArthur Transit Village certificate (3.33), easement at 260 Oak Street (3.34), floodplain management ordinance (3.35), Fire Station 29 design contract amendment (3.37), Museum of Jazz & Art negotiation agreement (3.39), surplus land declaration (3.40), resilience hub grant (3.41), library agreements with Piedmont ($1,082,955) and Emeryville ($459,827), Oakland Parks and Recreation Foundation grants up to $10,000,000 (3.45), Mayor's Summer Youth Employment Program grants totaling $3,192,811.60 (3.46), OPD Federal Task Force 2025 annual reports (3.50), and Ceasefire-Lifeline contracts with University of Pennsylvania and Faith in Action East Bay (3.52). - Informational reports were received and filed: BAC recommendations on RETT revenue (3.28), budget process (3.29), and parcel tax measure (3.30), salary survey results (3.31), special revenue collection project (3.32), L/SLBE certification update (3.47), NSA update (3.51), and audit of police oversight agencies (3.53). - Item 3.44 (customized goods and apparel contract) was withdrawn and rescheduled to the Life Enrichment Committee pending list. - Items 3.14 (LLAD intention), 3.15 (Illegal Dumping Expenditure Plan, $1,100,000), 3.16 (General Plan Update study session), 3.17 (DigitalLIFT literacy MOU, $67,500), 3.18 (PATH CITED program award, $1,351,113.75 plus $675,556.75 local match), 3.19 (Bauer Compressors agreement, up to $1,000,000 over five years), 3.20 (Ceasefire-Lifeline grant to Community Initiatives, $100,000), 3.23 (Oakland Housing Authority update), 3.24 (2026-2031 Local Hazard Mitigation Plan), 3.25 (Prompt Payment Policy report), and 3.26 (OMC 9.08.260 report) were scheduled to respective future committee agendas. Public Comments & Testimony - Seven speakers addressed the committee on item 3 (new scheduling items). - Millie Cleveland (Coalition for Police Accountability) opposed item 3.13, stating the proposed charter amendment would weaken civilian oversight by eliminating community role in selection of police commissioners and chiefs, contrary to the City Auditor's recommendations. - Pamela Drake (Wellstone Club, Block by Block Organizing Network) called the amendment Orwellian and urged stopping it. - Kevin Daly supported AB 1821 (public records response) but noted difficulties with record release; expressed skepticism on item 3.13. - Twan supported item 3.13, arguing the current selection process is broken and public safety needs improvement. - Jose Dorado commented on multiple items: supported illegal dumping enforcement (3.5, 3.6, 3.15), criticized Feather River Camp costs, opposed the $40 million parcel tax, and urged letting police use technology like Cellebrite. - Blair Beekman (via Zoom) praised Oakland's social services approach, supported litter-related items, and urged creative solutions for unhoused issues. - On item S5 (Police Commission appointment): - Kevin Daly expressed concern that the NSA compliance must continue and urged consideration of all nominees. - Jose Dorado supported Doug Wong. - Blair Beekman reminded of the role of the Police Advisory Board and urged forward movement. - During Open Forum, Jose Dorado alleged bullying by the Unity Council, and Blair Beekman urged improved community engagement on trash and police vendor processes. Discussion Items - Item 3.13 – Charter Amendment for OPD Oversight: Councilmember Houston introduced a resolution to place a measure on the November 3, 2026 ballot. He stated it aims to improve, not dismantle, civilian oversight by simplifying police commissioner appointments, strengthening the Inspector General's independence, and streamlining police chief selection. Public speakers opposed the measure. The item was scheduled for the May 7, 2026 Rules Committee without a vote. - Item 3.36 – Cooperative Purchase Agreements: Initially forwarded on non-consent due to a 3-1 committee vote (Councilmember Houston voting no). After discussion, Councilmember Houston requested it be moved to consent but then reversed, returning it to non-consent for further discussion at council. - Items 3.48 and 3.49 – OPD Technology Contracts: Cellebrite ($140,000) and Peregrine Technologies ($1,024,000) were sent to council on non-consent per Councilmember Fife's request. - Item S5 – Appointment of Doug Wong to Police Commission: An urgency finding was approved (4–0) due to recent resignations. Councilmember Fife pressed Wong on constitutional policing; he did not give a definitive answer. Councilmember Ramachandran highlighted his decades of public service. The committee voted to send the appointment to the May 5, 2026 City Council on non-consent (4–0), with Council President Jenkins noting scheduling constraints. Key Outcomes - Approved scheduling of over 30 items for future meetings, with multiple amendments to sponsors and titles. - Item 3.3 (smoke shops) co-sponsors changed to Councilmembers Fife, Wong, Houston, and Ramachandran (Jenkins removed). - Item 3.15 (illegal dumping) added Councilmembers Fife, Wong, Houston, and Brown as co-sponsors. - Item 3.22 (Affordable Housing Month) moved from ceremonial to consent. - Items 3.36, 3.48, and 3.49 set for non-consent on May 5, 2026. - Item S5 forwarded to council on non-consent; urgency finding approved. - Two items removed from Life Enrichment Committee pending list: repeal of 2020 encampment policy and contract for customized goods and apparel. - FLSA overtime report rescheduled to June 23, 2026; parking reorganization rescheduled to June 16, 2026. - The meeting adjourned at 12:10 PM.

The Zoning Update Committee (ZUC) of Oakland met on April 23, 2026, for a study session on the 2025 Housing Element Annual Progress Report (APR). The meeting began approximately 30 minutes late due to a scheduling error. Commissioners present: Chair Aaron and Commissioner Rank. Commissioner Sandoval was absent. The APR assesses the city's progress in meeting its Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) of 26,251 units for the sixth cycle and implementing housing programs. Staff from the Planning and Building Department and the Housing and Community Development Department (HCD) presented the report. Discussion Items The study session focused on the 2025 APR, which covers housing production, affordability, and implementation of the housing action plan. Key points included: - Housing Production: Over the first three years of the cycle, only 14% of the total RHNA has been permitted. In 2025, 1,071 units were proposed, 1,944 entitled, 712 permitted, and 1,391 completed. Permitted units declined 31% from 2024. - Affordable Housing: In 2025, more deed-restricted affordable units were permitted than market-rate units—a trend continuing from 2023. Affordable units: 870 proposed, 1,283 entitled, 602 permitted, 791 completed. HCD focuses exclusively on households earning at or below 80% of Area Median Income (AMI). - Market Rate: Market-rate production underperformed, with only 9% of RHNA permitted at moderate and above-moderate levels. High construction costs and interest rates were cited as barriers. - ADUs: Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs) showed relative stability: 244 entitled, 192 permitted, 183 completed in 2025. ADU production declined but less sharply than multifamily. ADUs are reported using a regional affordability ratio (30% very low, 30% low, 30% moderate, 10% above moderate). - Funding: Measure U bond funding has been instrumental for affordable housing, with over 1,000 affordable homes expected to receive permits in early 2026. HCD is deepening partnerships with Alameda County (Measure W) and the Bay Area Housing Finance Authority. - Pipeline: Staff noted a significant number of entitled projects that may convert to permits as funding becomes available. Few requests were received under AB 130 (CEQA exemption) and SB 423 (streamlining). - S13 Zones: Anecdotal evidence shows some projects built in S13 zones, but exact numbers were not provided; staff will include a map in the planning commission report. - Impact Fees: A five-year impact fee update is required by state law; an informational report will go to council in first quarter 2027. - Moderate-Income Units: No deed-restricted moderate-income units were permitted in 2025. Staff are analyzing moderate-income and market-rate rents and vacancies; a report will be presented to the planning commission in fall 2026. - High-Resource Areas: Staff will provide an analysis of units by TCAC area and council district. Key Outcomes - The ZUC received the 2025 APR as a study session; no formal action was taken. - The APR will be presented to the full Planning Commission on May 20, 2026, to the Community and Economic Development Committee on May 26, 2026, and to City Council on June 2, 2026. - Staff committed to providing additional data (S13 zones map, moderate-income analysis, TCAC area breakdown) at future meetings. - The meeting was adjourned at 4:23 p.m.

The Special Public Works and Transportation Committee met on Tuesday, April 21, 2026 at 11:30 AM in the City Council Chamber. Chair Zac Unger presided, with Councilmembers Noel Gallo, Charlene Wang, and Ken Houston (excused initially, present at 11:37 AM) in attendance. The committee considered seven agenda items, including infrastructure certificates, easement purchases, floodplain management, cooperative purchasing agreements, a fire station design contract amendment, and a stormwater trash reduction report. The meeting adjourned at 1:11 PM. Consent Calendar - Item 3 – MacArthur Transit Village Phase One Certificate of Completion: Unanimously approved and forwarded to the May 5, 2026 City Council on consent (4-0). - Item 4 – Easement at 260 Oak Street: Unanimously approved and forwarded to the May 5, 2026 City Council on consent (4-0). - Item 5 – Floodplain Management Ordinance: Unanimously approved and forwarded to the May 5, 2026 City Council on consent (4-0). - Item 7 – Fire Station 29 Contract Amendment: Unanimously approved and forwarded to the May 5, 2026 City Council on consent (4-0). Public Comments & Testimony - Mr. Sada (spoke on multiple items): Expressed concern about 70 trees slated for removal by BART in West Oakland for a housing development, questioned who permitted the cuts. Also noted traffic lights at Keller and Mountain and College/Canyon Road have been installed but not turned on for years. On the cooperative purchase agreement, argued that bypassing solicitation reduces cost comparisons and noted 16 of 33 contracts have expired and that vendors have unspent balances. On floodplain management, stated that 37.1% of West Oakland properties face flood risk and that the report fails to cover inner-city areas where poor, Black, and Latino residents live. On stormwater trash, raised the issue of human waste from homeless encampments entering drains and urged a culture of responsibility. During open forum, highlighted a case of 23 trees cut without public works intervention, a $900,000 fine, and alleged racial disparity in enforcement. - Zach Thayer (spoke on multiple items): Provided technical comments on infrastructure bond ETFs, polynomial ranges for capital allocation, and flood modeling. Questioned the modeling of catastrophic flooding and referenced TARP bailouts. Expressed frustration with the city's management and allocation of capital. Also criticized the lack of diesel mechanic training programs. - Kevin Daly (spoke on items 4, 5, and 8): Supported the Oak Street easement project for safer cycling access to Amtrak. Asked how FEMA accounts for climate change in flood risk, and questioned future development in floodplains. Noted that some storm drains have wide bar grates that allow trash and pose safety hazards. - Councilmember Noel Gallo (during discussion): Emphasized the need for proper data on fee collection and questioned the long timeline of the MacArthur Transit Village project (started 2006, revised 2017). Expressed frustration over the lack of vehicles and mechanics to achieve a clean city, pointing to trucks sitting at the Coliseum yard. Urged moving beyond policy to providing tools. - Councilmember Ken Houston (during discussion): Asked about the location of vendors in the cooperative purchase agreement, noting only three of 33 are Oakland-based. Expressed concern about hazardous waste (needles, batteries) in storm drains and requested data on items collected. Voted against Item 6. Discussion Items - Item 2 – Determination of Schedule of Outstanding Committee Items: Unanimously approved the pending list as presented (3-0 with Houston excused). - Item 3 – MacArthur Transit Village Certificate of Completion: Staff explained the ministerial approval for 900 housing units (including 90 affordable) on a former parking lot. Councilmember Gallo questioned the 20-year timeline and five-stage development process. Councilmember Wang clarified the purpose of the Unconditional Certificate of Completion (UCC). The fiscal impact was covered by $400,000 in developer fees deposited into cost-recovery fund 2415. - Item 4 – Easement at 260 Oak Street: Staff described the Embarcadero West Rail Safety project to improve a railroad crossing. The $255,000 acquisition is funded by CalSTA AB 128 grant funds. Councilmember Wong asked how the price was determined; staff confirmed an appraisal was conducted. Councilmember Gallo asked about railroad owner contributions; staff responded that the expense is covered by the grant. - Item 5 – Floodplain Management Ordinance: Staff explained the FEMA-required update to maintain National Flood Insurance Program participation. Non-compliance by May 26, 2026 could result in suspension, loss of flood insurance access, and ineligibility for federal disaster assistance. City Attorney Brian Mullery showed FEMA flood hazard maps, highlighting Saucel Creek, Jack London Square, Brooklyn Basin, and Estuary Park as high-risk areas. Councilmember Houston asked if the ordinance addresses drainage; staff clarified it is for catastrophic flooding, not routine drainage. - Item 6 – Cooperative Purchase Agreements: Staff presented 33 contracts totaling $16,815,000 for equipment, fuel, and maintenance services. The Bureau of Maintenance reported a vehicle availability crisis: 12 of 13 sewer flusher trucks unavailable, street sweepers at 50% availability, and no spare fire apparatus. Vacancies in mechanic positions force outsourcing costing 50–150% more. Councilmember Gallo criticized the lack of tools and personnel. Councilmember Wong questioned the billable labor rate and hiring delays. Councilmember Houston noted only three Oakland-based vendors. Staff confirmed they are moving to an RFP model to increase local participation. Voting: 3-1 (Houston opposed), forwarded to City Council on non-consent. - Item 7 – Fire Station 29 Design Contract Amendment: Staff requested a $700,000 increase (from $1.8M to $2.5M) for K2A – Mary McGrath Associated Architects due to additional scope: utility relocation, environmental clearance, community engagement (six sessions, 16 advisory meetings), a state-mandated broadband fiber hut colocation, 2026 building code redesign, and easement conflicts. Design is at 65%. Councilmember Gallo suggested using design-build methods to limit change orders. Unanimously approved. - Item 8 – Stormwater Trash Load Reduction Report: Staff reported the city achieved 100% trash reduction last fiscal year but now stands at 79.3% due to stricter permit regulations eliminating credits for product bans, volunteer cleanups, and illegal dumping abatement. They expect to reach 85.1% by year-end and have until December 2030 to reach 100% compliance. Challenges include maintaining hundreds of trash capture devices and adapting to future regulations. Councilmember Gallo lamented the decline of Lake Merritt and urged renewed cleanup efforts. Councilmember Wong noted district two areas in high trash generation zones and asked about trash clogging drains. Councilmember Houston asked about hazardous waste characterization. Staff noted they do not characterize individual cleanup events but track volume. Received and filed uniformly. Key Outcomes - All items were approved or received, with the following votes: - Items 2–5, 7, 8: Unanimous (4-0 or 3-0 with Houston excused). - Item 6 (Cooperative Purchase Agreements): Approved 3-1 (Houston opposed), forwarded to City Council on non-consent. - The committee forwarded items 3, 4, 5, and 7 to the May 5, 2026 City Council on consent (item 6 on non-consent). - The floodplain management ordinance requires adoption by May 26, 2026, with two readings on May 5 and May 19. - The stormwater trash report was received and filed; staff will continue working toward the 2030 compliance deadline. - Staff announced upcoming presentations on a vehicle spending plan for illegal dumping and a storm drainage master plan update in June 2026.

The Oakland City Council's Special Finance & Management Committee met on Tuesday, April 21, 2026, at 9:00 AM in City Council Chamber. The meeting, chaired by Councilmember Janani Ramachandran, covered eight agenda items including the initiation of the annual Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District process, multiple reports from the Budget Advisory Commission (BAC) on fiscal policy, budget process, and a proposed parcel tax, a salary survey for positions under $25/hour, and an update on the Special Revenue Collection Project. All votes were unanimous (4-0) in favor of staff recommendations. Public Comments & Testimony - Item 2 (Schedule of Outstanding Items): A speaker (unidentified) noted that council policy directives would be published on the city administrator's website this week. - Item 3 (LLAD Initiation): A speaker (Mss. Olabala) expressed opposition, arguing that property tax burdens fall unfairly on property owners and that the city's equity claims are not fulfilled, citing poor park maintenance and a tree falling on their car. They urged the council to evaluate the actual distribution of services. - Items 4-6 (BAC Reports – RETT, Budget Process, Parcel Tax): Two public speakers commented. Kevin Daly urged the city to monitor state legislation on a vehicle miles traveled tax as gasoline tax revenues decline, and to consider a network tax on rideshare and autonomous vehicles. David Boatwright praised the BAC's detailed work and strongly supported continued district budget forums with more resident interaction. Mss. Olabala raised concerns about selective question handling at public meetings and criticized the proposed Measure E as a union-backed initiative that should require a higher voter threshold (66%) rather than 50%+1. They also questioned the definition of "resident" and petition practices. - Item 7 (Salary Survey): Kevin Daly, co-chair of the Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Commission, highlighted challenges for firefighter trainees due to low pay and urged retention incentives (e.g., residency incentives, language pay). Mss. Olabala called for greater transparency on overtime costs and argued that it is unfair that city workers earn less than fast-food wages. - Item 8 (Revenue Collection Project): David Boatwright questioned the effectiveness of postcards in getting voluntary compliance. Mss. Olabala listed multiple unenforced revenue opportunities (occupancy rules, illegal vendors, front license plates, fire inspection fees). Kevin Daly noted improvements needed in the business tax website and urged collection of fire inspection fees, citing unresolved violations. - Open Forum: Speakers raised issues about spending priorities ("Democracy Dollars" program), parking enforcement call center hours, and the need for grant post-audits. Discussion Items - Item 2 – Determination of Schedule of Outstanding Committee Items: Unanimously accepted as presented. - Item 3 – FY 2026-27 Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District (LLAD) Initiation: Staff (Jose Segura) explained that this is the first of three steps required annually under Proposition 218. The assessment rates have not increased since 1993, and the district generates roughly $19 million annually for street lighting, parks, and landscaping. Councilmember Wong raised concerns about deteriorating street lighting services and long repair times, noting that there is only one lighting engineer. Staff clarified that the LLAD funds both lighting and landscape services but that costs have eroded over time. Councilmember Brown asked about the timeline for the engineer's report; staff confirmed it would be brought back on May 12, 2026. The item was forwarded to the May 5, 2026 City Council consent agenda. - Items 4, 5, 6 – Budget Advisory Commission Reports (Joint Presentation): BAC member Ben presented on three reports: - Item 4 – Redefining Excess Real Estate Transfer Tax (RETT) Revenue: He recommended amending the Consolidated Fiscal Policy (CFP) to define excess RETT as any amount over $70 million (adjusted for inflation), replacing the current 15% of general purpose funds threshold, which has only been exceeded in 4 of the last 15 years. The change would help stabilize revenue and replenish reserves. Councilmember Unger asked about flexibility; Finance Director Bradley noted that changing the CFP requires an ordinance and that they plan to bring a comprehensive update in October 2026, also noting the risk of a statewide initiative that could limit RETT revenue. - Item 5 – Budget Process Assessment: BAC member Larissa reported improved community engagement, including pre-mayoral-budget informational forums and town halls, but recommended earlier engagement, default interpretation, multiple town halls per district, direct dialogue with councilmembers, and clearer follow-up on resident input. She noted that the budget's approval three weeks early was celebrated but also led some residents to feel they missed their window for input. - Item 6 – Proposed $40 Million Parcel Tax for June 2026: Though the city is no longer pursuing the measure, BAC recommended progressive tiering (e.g., based on square footage or number of units), independent oversight, alignment with civic engagement, and exemptions for ADUs to encourage housing. They also suggested evaluating existing earmarked funds (e.g., Children's Fund, library parcel taxes) for efficiency and potentially going back to voters to adjust allocations. Councilmembers discussed how parcel taxes affect renters and the feasibility of square-footage-based structures. All three informal reports were received and filed unanimously. - Item 7 – Salary Survey Results for Classifications Under $25/Hour: Staff (Jamie Pritchett) presented data on 39 active classifications with a minimum step below $25/hour, covering 898 employees (42 full-time, 854 temporary/part-time). 72% of these classifications have a maximum step at or above $25/hour. Market comparisons showed mixed results: some roles are competitive (e.g., lifeguards, recreation leaders), but others (e.g., Head Start instructors, firefighter trainees) pay far below living wage. Councilmembers Brown and Wong expressed strong support for raising wages to at least $25/hour, noting that many positions serve critical community needs. Councilmember Wong questioned the low pay for firefighter/paramedic trainees ($19-$23/hour) vs. peer cities ($44-$60/hour); staff explained that Oakland's trainees are non-sworn until after academy, so comparisons may not be apples-to-apples. The report was received and filed. - Item 8 – Special Revenue Collection Project: Staff (Nicole Welch) reported progress on collecting unpaid business taxes, including placing $1.58 million in liens against 2,269 property accounts in January 2026, sending 75,000 postcards to landlords, and conducting field enforcement with partner agencies. Rental registrations tripled from 288 to 900 in the past fiscal year. Councilmember Ramachandran noted that a follow-up report would be requested for fall 2026, with an updated title and new co-sponsorship reflecting current councilmembers rather than former Councilmember Kaplan. Councilmember Wang requested data on additional revenue collected directly from enforcement efforts. The report was received and filed. Key Outcomes - Item 2: Adopted (4-0) determination of schedule of outstanding committee items. - Item 3: Approved (4-0) to forward resolution to the May 5, 2026 City Council consent agenda, initiating the LLAD assessment process. - Items 4, 5, 6: Each received and filed (4-0) as informational reports. The BAC’s recommendations will be considered during the CFP revision process expected in October 2026. - Item 7: Received and filed (4-0). Councilmembers expressed intent to pursue wage increases for low-paid classifications through collective bargaining and future budget cycles. - Item 8: Received and filed (4-0). A new item will be scheduled for fall 2026 to report further progress on revenue collection. - Open Forum: No formal action taken.

The Oakland City Council Public Safety Committee convened a special meeting on Tuesday, April 21, 2026, at 6:15 PM in the City Council Chamber (3rd Floor, City Hall). Chairperson Charlene Wang presided. The meeting ran until 8:32 PM and covered eight agenda items, including contracts for law enforcement technology, violence prevention funding, police oversight audits, and updates on the Negotiated Settlement Agreement (NSA). The committee voted on each action item, forwarding most to the May 5, 2026 City Council meeting on either the consent or non-consent calendar. Determination of Schedule of Outstanding Committee Items (Item 2) - The committee voted unanimously (4–0) to accept the schedule of outstanding committee items as submitted. One public speaker, Sada Olawala, raised concerns about racial profiling, data on citations and warnings, truancy stops, and the absence of Dr. Everhart’s NSA-related work from the report. Ceasefire‑Lifeline Contracts (Item 7) - The Department of Violence Prevention (DVP) sought approval for a $200,000 amendment to an existing contract with the University of Pennsylvania (total now not to exceed $639,952) for a qualitative evaluation of the Ceasefire‑Lifeline strategy, and a new $150,000 grant agreement with Faith in Action East Bay for one year (July 1, 2026 – June 30, 2027) to support custom notifications and call‑ins. - One public speaker (Sada Olawala) questioned Faith in Action’s qualifications, the validity of linking homicide reductions solely to Ceasefire, and the lack of detail on police enforcement under the strategy. - Councilmember Ken Houston requested a biannual informational report on the contracts, including data and scope of work outcomes. The committee approved (4–0) the staff recommendation and forwarded the item to the May 5 City Council consent agenda with the request for biannual reporting. Negotiated Settlement Agreement (NSA) Update (Item 6) - Deputy Chief Lisa Osmus reported that OPD is now in compliance with Task 5 (investigation quality) and making progress on Task 2 (180‑day investigation timelines) and Task 45 (discipline equity). The 12th sustainability report showed 80% compliance on class‑one cases in Q3 2025. A qualitative study and perception survey are underway to address disparities found in 2024 data, where white officers were less likely to receive sustained findings than Black or Hispanic officers. Preliminary 2025 data showed no statistically significant disparities. - Two public speakers spoke: Millie Cleveland (Coalition for Police Accountability) urged full funding and independence for the Inspector General; Sada Olawala argued that racial disparities persist at every level. - The committee voted unanimously (4–0) to receive and file the informational report. Audit of Oakland Police Oversight Agencies (Item 8) - City Auditor Michael C. Houston presented an audit of the Police Commission, Community Police Review Agency (CPRA), and Office of the Inspector General (OIG). Key findings: only 26 of 43 select charter and municipal code requirements were met; vacancies, frozen positions, and leadership turnover hinder operations; the OIG has only one audit manager despite a mandate to audit 52 NSA tasks; and conflicts exist between the charter and municipal code regarding hiring/firing of the CPRA director and IG. Two recommendations were made: (1) the City Attorney should analyze resource needs, and (2) the City Council should resolve charter/code conflicts and strengthen independence. - Four public speakers (including Millie Cleveland, Madeline Stacy, Sada Olawala, and Rashida Granage) generally supported the audit and stressed the need for adequate resources, while Sada Olawala questioned why the Privacy Commission was not audited. - Councilmember Houston indicated he would pursue charter changes; Councilmember Fife suggested amending the enabling ordinance as a less burdensome route. The committee voted unanimously (4–0) to receive and file the report. OPD Cellebrite Technology (Item 3) - The committee considered a resolution to authorize a one‑year, $140,000 professional services agreement with Cellebrite Inc. for forensic extraction devices, waiving competitive solicitation. Staff stated that over 700 phones were extracted in 2025 (33% Android) and that Cellebrite is the only reliable tool for Android phones. The 2024 Cellebrite Annual Report was also accepted. - Two public speakers: Madeline Stacy objected to contracting with an Israeli‑based company with a history of abuse and urged a competitive RFP; Sada Olawala supported providing police with all available tools and criticized the Privacy Commission’s role. - Councilmember Fife voiced conscientious objection, citing ethical concerns about Israeli technology used against civilians. Councilmember Brown and Houston supported the contract for its investigative value, especially in homicides and human trafficking. The committee approved (3–1, with Fife voting no) and forwarded the item to the May 5 City Council agenda on non‑consent. Peregrine Technologies Contract (Item 4) - OPD requested a three‑year, $1,024,000 agreement with Peregrine Technologies for a law enforcement records search platform (Crime Tracer replacement), waiving competitive solicitation. Staff emphasized that Peregrine provides full audit trails, opt‑in data sharing, and continued access to regional data as neighboring agencies migrate to the platform. - Two public speakers: Sada Olawala criticized prioritizing data safety over operational efficiency; Madeline Stacy raised concerns about Peregrine’s ties to Palantir, predictive policing, and potential data sharing with federal immigration enforcement. - Councilmember Fife again opposed, warning of historical precedents where surveillance technology was used against activists. Councilmember Wang noted staff shortages necessitate technology and cited a 21% crime reduction in Atlanta using Peregrine. The committee approved (3–1, Fife no) and forwarded on non‑consent. OPD Federal Taskforce 2025 Annual Reports (Item 5) - Captain Jeff Samok presented annual reports from federal task forces (U.S. Marshals, Secret Service, FBI, ATF, DEA) that had previously been reviewed by the Privacy Commission. The Privacy Commission noted that future reports will be more uniform and concise. - One public speaker (Sada Olawala) emphasized that the Privacy Commission’s oversight protects sanctuary city policies and undocumented immigrants; she opposed policies she believed limit federal cooperation. - The committee voted unanimously (4–0) to receive and forward the item to the May 5 City Council consent agenda. Open Forum - One speaker addressed the meeting during open forum, reiterating concerns about sanctuary policies and expired visas enabling criminal activity. Key Outcomes - Ceasefire‑Lifeline Contracts – Approved (4–0) and forwarded to City Council on consent with a request for biannual reports. - NSA Update – Received and filed (4–0). - Audit of Police Oversight Agencies – Received and filed (4–0). - Cellebrite Technology – Approved (3–1) and forwarded on non‑consent. - Peregrine Technologies Contract – Approved (3–1) and forwarded on non‑consent. - OPD Federal Taskforce Reports – Received and forwarded on consent (4–0). - Councilmember Houston and Councilmember Fife each indicated they would pursue separate actions: Houston via charter changes, Fife via enabling ordinance amendments to address audit recommendations.

The Oakland City Council Special Life Enrichment Committee met on April 21, 2026, from 4:02 PM to 6:11 PM, chaired by Councilmember Carroll Fife. The committee considered eight agenda items, including library service agreements, a contract withdrawal, grant acceptances, and an informational report on local business certification. All four committee members were present: Gallo, Fife, Wang, and Houston (arrived at 4:07 PM). The committee voted unanimously on all items, forwarding several to the May 5, 2026 City Council meeting. Determination of Schedule of Outstanding Committee Items (Item 2) - The committee voted to withdraw Item 5 (Contract for Customized Goods and Apparel) from the agenda and place it on the Life Enrichment Committee pending list with no date specific. Staff cited the need to allow Oakland-based vendors to compete. The motion passed 4-0. Library Agreement with City of Piedmont (Item 3) - Staff Presentation: Director Jamie Turbach reported that the City of Piedmont has not had a formal contract since 2008, paying $350,471 annually without increases. The new agreement would receive $1,082,955 over three years (FY2025-2028), a 3% increase. Piedmont residents have used Oakland libraries for 108 years due to reciprocity. - Public Comment: One speaker criticized the lack of a contract since 2011, arguing that Piedmont pays less than Oakland residents who pay library parcel taxes (Measure Q and D). The speaker said the proposed amount is still too low. - Discussion: Councilmember Wang noted that inflation-adjusted the 2008 payment would be $540,000 today. Turbach explained that without a contract, Piedmont could still access libraries via state reciprocity and pay nothing. The formula has Piedmont paying more per capita than Oakland, but Emeryville pays less. The committee approved and forwarded to the May 5 City Council consent agenda, 4-0. Library Agreement with City of Emeryville (Item 4) - Staff Presentation: Director Turbach presented a three-year contract for $459,827 (FY2026-2029), with 5% annual escalation. Emeryville has had a contract, unlike Piedmont. - Public Comment: One speaker noted disparities: Emeryville paid $10/resident vs. Piedmont's $33/resident in 2011, and the current proposal still seems unfair to Oakland taxpayers. - Discussion: Turbach explained that Emeryville previously contributed through senior services, allowing a lower rate. Councilmember Wang asked about applying fines to Piedmont/Emeryville residents; staff said they could look into it. The committee approved and forwarded to May 5 City Council consent agenda, 4-0. Contract for Customized Goods and Apparel (Item 5 - Withdrawn) - Although withdrawn, the committee took public comments. Two speakers spoke: one questioned the solicitation process and lack of detail on usage; another raised concerns about the Oakland vendor process. The item remains on the pending list. Acceptance of Oakland Parks and Recreation Foundation Grants (Item 6) - Staff Presentation: Assistant Director Sarah Herbert requested authorization to accept up to $10 million in monetary grants and up to $10 million in goods/in-kind services through June 2036. The foundation supports scholarships, playgrounds, and supplies. - Public Comment: Two speakers spoke. One expressed frustration about Measure bond funds not being used for homeless as promised. Another asked about donor control over how funds are spent, and noted that the staff report did not include a required racial equity impact analysis. - Discussion: Staff clarified that donors can designate purposes, but the city can refuse donations. The department focuses on equity in allocating scholarships. The committee approved and forwarded to May 5 City Council consent agenda, 4-0. Mayor's Summer Youth Employment Program and OFCY Summer Program Grants (Item 7) - Staff Presentation: Robin Love and Robin Levinson presented 21 grants totaling over $3.1 million for summer 2026 and 2027. The program will serve 505 youth annually through the Mayor's Summer Youth Employment Program (100 hours paid work experience, financial literacy) and about 1,600 additional youth through OFCY summer programs. Awardees include nine agencies for the Mayor's program and 12 across four OFCY strategies. The program emphasizes career pathways in healthcare, tech, construction, and hospitality. - Public Comment: Four speakers spoke in support, including a youth participant who highlighted the benefits of summer programs. One speaker requested more focus on specific skills (healthcare, tech, trades) and geographic coverage (noting 94601 zip code missing). Another asked about the age range (14-21) and September end date. - Discussion: Councilmember Wang praised the report. Staff addressed questions: the program serves up to age 21 per charter; September allows for reporting. The mayor's office noted a May 14 business event to host youth. The committee approved and forwarded to May 5 City Council consent agenda, 4-0. L/SLBE Certification and Road Map Update (Item 8) - Staff Presentation: Director Emeline Espia presented an informational report on the impact of Ordinance 13825, which amended L/SLBE certification requirements. Key data: application volume steady, 62% recertifications, 38% new certifications. All racial/ethnic groups saw numerical increases. However, no contract award data has been produced in 25 years; the city is implementing B2G system to track awards. A draft roadmap was co-developed with community stakeholders, identifying five early action areas (oversight, waivers, payment, capacity building, forecasting). City Administrator Johnson gave preliminary direction to halt SLBE waivers. - Public Comment: 11 speakers, representing coalition members (Oakland African American Chamber of Commerce, East Bay Rental Housing Association, Construction Resource Center, etc.), urged immediate action. Key demands: eliminate waivers, increase local participation goals to 50%, enforce prompt payment (15 days), track contract awards, and establish a shared working document. Speakers noted that certification does not mean contracts: Black-owned firms are 27% of certified construction vendors but receive a fraction of dollars. They called for 30-day actions on oversight, transparency, and compliance. - Discussion: Councilmember Houston highlighted the long history of ordinance amendments and need for implementation. Deputy City Administrator Navarro confirmed halting waivers, with official communication expected by end of week. Councilmember Wong asked about federal DBE program alignment; staff explained that federal DBE activities are on pause due to new interim rule. The committee voted to receive and file the report, 4-0. Open Forum - Two speakers addressed issues: one criticized a policy prohibiting volunteers from assisting seniors with bus steps, calling it a violation of ADA; another requested internships for youth in health fields. Key Outcomes - All four action items (Items 3, 4, 6, 7) were approved and forwarded to the May 5, 2026 City Council meeting, likely on the consent agenda. - Item 5 was withdrawn and placed on the pending list. - Item 8 was received and filed. - The committee directed staff to provide updates on the waiver halt and continued work on the L/SLBE roadmap.