Public Meetings - Redwood City, California

The Redwood City City Council met on November 28, 2022, in a hybrid format. The meeting included a state grant presentation for a new downtown park, action on the consent calendar, a detailed discussion and vote on the creation of a Transit District (amending the Downtown Precise Plan and General Plan), extension of a temporary moratorium on new firearm/ammunition retail sales, adoption of building, fire, and reach codes, and appointments to the Transportation Advisory Committee. Consent Calendar - The council approved the consent calendar (items 7A-7D, 7G, 7I-7K) unanimously, with a roll call vote. Items 7E, 7F, and 7H were pulled for separate discussion. - Item 7A: Construction contract amendment for 2021 pavement overlay. - Item 7B: Stop sign modifications on Vera Avenue. - Item 7C: Agreement with Nancy K. Bowl, Inc. for police behavioral health services (required 5/7 vote; passed). - Item 7D: Multiple purchase agreements for the new veterans memorial building/senior center ($986,684). - Item 7G: Allocation of one-time funds to restore four frozen police officer positions, one frozen fire training captain position, and temporary policy/administration support. - Item 7I and 7J: Approval of minutes from November 14, 2022 meetings. - Item 7K: Approval of claims and checks. Public Comments & Testimony - Consent/Pulled Items: Chris Roble urged pulling 7E and 7F, advocating for delaying gas-powered vehicle purchases and considering electric alternatives. Taylor Pope supported the Vera Avenue stop sign modifications (7B). Clara Jackal (resident, police advisory committee member) urged studying unarmed security ambassador programs as an alternative to additional armed officers (7G). Rona Gundrum supported the street sweeper but agreed on truck concerns, and suggested light rail for Harborview. Adrian Brandt supported Vera Avenue modifications, citing the Idaho stop law. - Transit District (9A): 17 speakers total. Strong support from Dylan Finch, Phil Boxley, Leora Tandwatko Ross (EMB Action/Peninsula for Everyone), Matt Regan (Bay Area Council), Aaron Hazis (Carpenters Union Local 217), Kalisha Webster (Housing Choices), Alicia Pierman (Housing Action Coalition), Jason Baker (Silicon Valley Leadership Group), Greg Garcia (Downtown Business Group), Dahlia Chasman (Caltrain), Adina Levin (Friends of Caltrain), Taylor Pope (resident), Ken Chan (Housing Leadership Council), Carlos Valdez (resident), Greg Greenway (Chamber San Mateo County). Supporters highlighted housing, transit-oriented development, greenhouse gas reductions, economic vitality, and Caltrain expansion. Opposition/concerns: James Phillips and Stephanie Hernandez (Perry Street Studios residents) worried about displacement and affordability. Jim Wrecker asked to delay vote citing missing post-COVID ridership data and concerns about a raised track dividing downtown. - Firearm Moratorium (9B): 5 speakers all supported extension. Natalie Pinto (Roosevelt neighborhood resident) cited proximity to schools and foot traffic. Rona Gundrum urged pushback against a threatened lawsuit. Adrian Brandt supported the moratorium as a land-use study. Barbara Valley (Roosevelt Neighborhood Association chair) requested in-person community engagement. Taylor Pope expressed gratitude for thoughtful consideration. - Building Codes (9C): One speaker (Pluto KZ) expressed concerns about water main upgrade costs for sprinkler requirements in hills/Redwood Shores and park impact fees. Discussion Items Transit District (9A) - Staff (Sue Xline, Lindy Chan) presented the proposed amendments to create a 16.6-acre Transit District within the Downtown Precise Plan (DTPP) to allow redevelopment of Sequoia Station and the Caltrain transit center. Key features: up to 1,100 residential units (with up to 343 affordable), 1.23 million sq ft of office, open space (Hamilton Green), protected bike lanes, lowered parking maximums, and accommodations for a future four-track elevated Caltrain station. A Subsequent Environmental Impact Report (SEIR) was certified; significant unavoidable impacts for air quality and climate change were acknowledged, with a statement of overriding considerations. Councilmember G recused himself (remote conflict). Council discussed housing vs. office balance, grade separation concerns, retail viability, and pedestrian/bicycle connectivity. Several councilmembers expressed support after assurances on Perry Street Apartments (not in district) and the need for ongoing community input. Three resolutions were adopted: certifying the SEIR, adopting General Plan amendments, and adopting DTPP amendments. Vote: 6-0 (Councilmember G recused). Firearm Moratorium Extension (9B) - Assistant City Manager Michelle Poche Flaherty presented the staff recommendation to extend the 45-day urgency ordinance for up to 10.5 months to study zoning regulations for new firearm/ammunition retail sales. The current moratorium expires December 8, 2022. Staff outlined complex land-use issues (maps showing permissive vs. restrictive zoning approaches) and committed to community engagement. Council members emphasized equity (not pushing undesirable uses to low-income areas) and land-use framing. Unanimous vote to extend. Building, Fire, and Reach Codes (9C) - Building Official Christina McTaggart and Fire Marshal Gareth Harris presented amendments: moving the 50% sprinkler rule from building to fire code, defining thresholds for existing buildings; reach codes removing all exceptions except technical/feasibility for new construction; and increased rebate outreach. Council discussed water main upgrade costs (separate from sprinkler requirements) and agreed to a friendly amendment to have staff report back to the Board of Building Review and then to Council in one year on implementation impacts, especially for single-family homeowners. Unanimous vote with amendment. Transportation Advisory Committee Appointments - Four applicants: James Biddle, Talia Perlman, Taylor Pope, Alan Thrasher. Voting: Talia Perlman received 7 votes (assigned to term ending May 31, 2025); Taylor Pope received 6 votes (assigned to term ending June 30, 2023). Appointed unanimously. Matters of Council Interest - Vice Mayor Reddy reported on her participation in the Congestion Management and Environmental Quality Committee and highlighted equity work in CCAG (City/County Association of Governments). Mayor Hale reported on the Governance Subcommittee meeting (Nov 21) which did not recommend free parking passes for board/commission members at this time, discussed a leadership rotation policy, and received a state legislative update. Also announced the downtown tree lighting (Dec 3) and Hometown Holidays (Dec 10), and the county's cold weather protocol for shelter. Key Outcomes - Consent Calendar: Approved except pulled items; 7E (Ford trucks, $275,036) and 7F (street sweeper, $359,878) passed unanimously; 7H (Harbor View development agreement/rezoning) passed 5-2 (Councilmembers Howard and Vice Mayor Reddy opposed). - Transit District (9A): Three resolutions adopted 6-0, establishing the Transit District, amending the General Plan and Downtown Precise Plan, and certifying the SEIR (with statement of overriding considerations). - Firearm Moratorium (9B): Unanimously extended for up to 10.5 months (until approximately mid-October 2023) to study zoning regulations. - Building/Fire/Reach Codes (9C): Unanimously adopted with an amendment requiring a review by the Board of Building Review within one year and a report to Council. - TAC Appointments: Talia Perlman and Taylor Pope appointed. - Closed Session: No reportable action on labor negotiations.

The Redwood City Planning Commission met on November 15, 2022, at 6:00 PM to approve prior meeting minutes, consider two public hearing items (a historic landmark addition and a new research and development building), and adopt the 2023 regular meeting schedule. Commissioners Hunter and Chu recused themselves from the second public hearing item. All votes and decisions were based on staff recommendations. Consent Calendar - Approval of Minutes: The Commission approved the draft minutes from September 20, 2022 (4-2, Commissioners Espinoza and Koch abstaining), October 4, 2022 (4-2, same abstentions), and October 25, 2022 Special Meeting (6-0). No other consent items were on the agenda. Public Comments & Testimony - Item 5B (2966 Bay Road, et al.): - Mike Morris (in-person speaker) voiced opposition, stating the project is unhealthy, dangerous, too large for the area, and would exacerbate traffic. He argued the city should build more housing instead of office buildings. - Roxanne Dragan (remote speaker) expressed concern about potential glare from the building's glass and asked for clarification on glass type. The applicant (Paul Ferro) responded that the glass is clear, not reflective, and that trees and overhangs would mitigate glare. Discussion Items - 5A. 970 Edgewood Road – Historic Landmark Addition: - Staff (Assistant Planner Dotson) presented a request for a 778-sq-ft one-story addition and interior remodel to a designated historic landmark (built 1958). The project was found non-detrimental to historic character. - Applicant Susan Raymond confirmed materials (rough-cut redwood siding, clear anodized windows, extended flat roof) would match existing. - No public comments. Commission discussion was brief; motion to approve passed 6-0. - 5B. 2966 Bay Road, 891 2nd Avenue, and a portion of 867 2nd Avenue – R&D Building: - Staff (Associate Planner Garcia) described a 30,765-sq-ft, three-story research and development building with ground-floor parking (55 spaces), a tentative parcel map to combine parcels, and site improvements. The site is zoned Industrial Restricted; research and development is a permitted use. - Applicant Ian Barth (Bauen Capital) noted the project is in a federal Opportunity Zone and that existing tenants (auto service and restaurant) are either closing or unable to pay rent. Paul Ferro (Form4 Architecture) presented the contemporary design with glass facade, green screen trellis, and landscaping. - Commissioner questions focused on: three extra parking spaces (55 vs. 52 required), bike parking (7 spaces, indoor bike room), tree species and placement, glare/bird safety, glazing type, fire access, rooftop PV readiness, and pedestrian paseo lighting. - Public hearing included opposition and a glare inquiry. - Commission discussion: Commissioners Sturken and Koch proposed removing the three extra parking spaces and replacing them with additional bicycle parking to reduce car dependency. Vice Chair Crnogorac requested largest allowable trees. The Assistant City Attorney suggested a condition of approval. - Motion passed 4-0 (Chair Hunter and Commissioner Chu recused) to approve Resolution 22-11 with an added condition removing the three extra parking spaces and replacing them with bicycle parking. - 6. Staff Report – Adoption of 2023 Regular Meeting Schedule: - Staff (Principal Planner Chan) presented the proposed 2023 schedule, with reduced meetings in summer months. Commissioners discussed November dates: November 7 (election day) and November 21 (week of Thanksgiving). - Motion by Commissioner Espinoza, seconded by Commissioner Chu, to approve the schedule with an amendment moving the November 21 meeting to November 14. Passed 6-0. Key Outcomes - Resolution 22-10 (970 Edgewood Road): Approved 6-0. Permit AP2022-021 granted, CEQA exemption determined. - Resolution 22-11 (2966 Bay Road): Approved 4-0 (Hunter and Chu recused), with an amended condition to remove three extra parking spaces and replace with additional bicycle parking. - Resolution 22-12 (2023 Meeting Schedule): Approved 6-0, with the November 21 meeting date moved to November 14. - Meeting adjourned at 7:10 PM. Next regular meeting scheduled for December 6, 2022.

The Redwood City Planning Commission held a regular meeting on November 15, 2022, at 6:00 PM in the Council Chambers and via Zoom. The commission considered three main agenda items: approval of minutes from prior meetings, two public hearing items (a historic landmark addition and a research and development building with parcel map), and adoption of the 2023 regular meeting schedule. All votes were unanimous. Consent Calendar - No items were listed on the consent calendar. Public Comments & Testimony - No public comments were recorded or reported in the staff materials for this meeting. The public hearing notices were properly published, but no oral or written comments were received prior to the meeting. Discussion Items - Approval of Minutes: The commission approved the draft minutes from September 20, 2022, October 4, 2022, and October 25, 2022 (special meeting). The votes were taken by roll call and passed unanimously (6-0 or 7-0 as applicable). - Item 5.A – 970 Edgewood Road: The commission considered a permit for a 778-square-foot one-story addition and interior remodel to a designated historic landmark (the Raymond and Nita Spangler House, built 1959). The Historic Resources Advisory Committee (HRAC) had recommended approval on October 13, 2022. The project is categorically exempt from CEQA (Class 1). Staff found the work compatible with the historic structure, preserving character-defining features. The commission approved the permit (Resolution 22-10) unanimously. - Item 5.B – 2966 Bay Road, 891 2nd Avenue, and a portion of 867 2nd Avenue: The commission reviewed an architectural permit for a 30,795-square-foot, three-story research and development building and a tentative parcel map to combine three lots into a 35,690-square-foot parcel. The site is zoned Industrial Restricted (IR). The project includes 55 parking spaces, landscaping, and streetscape improvements. The Subdivision Committee had recommended approval on October 12, 2022. The project is categorically exempt under CEQA Guidelines Sections 15332 (Infill) and 15305 (Minor Alterations). Staff concluded the design meets all architectural permit criteria and will not negatively impact the surrounding area. The commission approved the permit and parcel map (Resolution 22-11) unanimously. - Item 6.A – 2023 Regular Meeting Schedule: The commission adopted a resolution setting the 2023 regular meeting schedule, generally holding meetings on the first and third Tuesdays at 6:00 PM, with provisions for special meetings. The schedule includes adjustments for holidays. The activity is not subject to CEQA. The resolution (22-12) was adopted unanimously. Key Outcomes - Approved Minutes: Minutes from September 20, 2022, October 4, 2022, and October 25, 2022, were approved unanimously. - Approved Permit AP2022-021: The commission approved the 778 sq. ft. addition and interior remodel at 970 Edgewood Road, subject to conditions of approval (Resolution 22-10). - Approved Architectural Permit AP2021-031 and Tentative Parcel Map TM2022-009: The commission approved the 30,795 sq. ft. R&D building and lot combination at 2966 Bay Road, 891 2nd Avenue, and a portion of 867 2nd Avenue, subject to conditions of approval (Resolution 22-11). - Adopted 2023 Meeting Schedule: The commission adopted the 2023 regular meeting schedule (Resolution 22-12).

The City Council held a hybrid meeting on November 14, 2022, at 6:00 PM. The meeting featured proclamations, a consent calendar, a major public hearing on the Harbor View development project (item 7A), a public health goal report, and a Mills Act historic preservation agreement. After lengthy discussion, the council approved the Harbor View project in a series of 5-2 votes, with Councilmember Howard and Vice Mayor Reddy dissenting. Presentations & Proclamations - Recognizing SAMCEDA for community grant programs during COVID-19; CEO Roseanne Faust accepted. - Proclamation for United Against Hate Week (Nov 13-19); joined by Sequoia Union High School District trustees and community partners. Consent Calendar - Approved 20 routine items (6A-6Q, 6S-6T) unanimously, excluding item 6E (speed hump project) which was voted separately (4-0, with recusals). - Items included: civilian oversight letter (6C), agreement for homeless outreach (6J), and others. Public Comments & Testimony - General public comment: Speakers addressed gun buyback, civilian oversight of sheriff, artificial turf concerns (multiple youth speakers from BayCAT), wood smoke pollution, and support for speed humps. - Harbor View (item 7A): 15 speakers total (12 in-person, 3 virtual). - In favor: Sister Christina Heltsley (St. Francis Center), Michael Pierce, Hugo Torres, Melissa Sandoval, Diana Kamal, Kathy Baird, Fernanda De Velasco, Laura Garcia, Florence Ortiz, Alana Ballon, Lily Milton, and union representative John Medina. They emphasized the historic community benefits, particularly 64 units of extremely low-income housing, and the positive impact on the community. - Opposed: Chris Roble and Chris Johnson (virtual) argued the project would exacerbate traffic, housing imbalance, and environmental impacts. Greg Greenway (Seaport Industrial Association) highlighted long-term trade-offs for port industrial land and transportation. - Public Health Goal Report (7B): No public comments. - Mills Act (7C): No public comments. Discussion Items - Harbor View Project (7A): Staff and applicant presented the 27-acre redevelopment at 320-350 Blomquist Street and 15/30 Stein am Rhein Court. The project reduced from 1.144 million sq ft to 765,150 sq ft, four buildings (7, 6, 6 stories plus amenities), 2,551 parking spaces, 40% open space. Proposed general plan amendment from industrial to commercial office/professional technology, zoning change to commercial park, development agreement with community benefits valued at over $65 million. Benefits included: $8M+ annual property tax revenue, $12M for transit, $14M for parks and children/youth, $39M for low-income housing (including 64 ELI units at St. Francis Center, $2.5M to city housing fund). Planning commission recommended approval 5-1 after certifying EIR with statement of overriding considerations for unavoidable traffic and air quality impacts. - Council discussion: Councilmember Espinosa Garnica expressed support despite unmitigated impacts, noting existing zoning would allow similar development. Councilmember G stressed the difference between community benefits and mandatory fees. Councilmember Howard opposed due to jobs-housing imbalance, sea level rise, and reliance on auto-oriented transit. Vice Mayor Reddy opposed citing insufficient housing benefits. Councilmember Martinez and Mayor Hale supported, highlighting the historic ELI housing and park funding. - Public Health Goal Report (7B): Presentation on water quality, lead sampling, and corrosion control. All regulatory standards met. No council action required; public hearing held. - Mills Act Historic Preservation (7C): Resolution approving historic landmark designation and 10-year Mills Act contract for 2312 Hopkins Avenue. Unanimously approved (6-0, Vice Mayor Reddy recused). Key Outcomes - Harbor View Project: Approved in five consecutive votes (each 5-2, with Howard and Reddy opposed): 1. Certified Final EIR and adopted statement of overriding considerations. 2. Approved general plan amendment to commercial office/professional technology. 3. Approved zoning map amendment to commercial park. 4. Introduced ordinance approving development agreement. 5. Approved vesting tentative map and architectural permit. - Mills Act: Adopted resolution designating 2312 Hopkins Avenue as historic landmark and approved 10-year preservation contract. - Consent Calendar: Approved as noted, with item 6E (speed humps) approved 4-0. - Council Matters: Reports from subcommittees; city manager announced new homelessness website (redwoodcity.org/homelessness) and upcoming community meetings on federal fund priorities and solid waste rates.

Date: November 14, 2022 Meeting Type: Special Meeting (Closed Session and TAC interviews) Closed Session: No reportable action taken. Consent Calendar - No consent calendar items were presented. Public Comments & Testimony - No public comments were made on the Transportation Advisory Committee interviews. Discussion Items - Transportation Advisory Committee Interviews: The City Council interviewed applicants for two vacant seats on the Transportation Advisory Committee (TAC): one partial term expiring June 30, 2023, and one full term expiring May 31, 2025. Four applicants were considered: Alan Thrasher (in-person), Talia Perlman (via Zoom), Taylor Pope (via Zoom), and one applicant who was unable to attend and requested consideration based on their application. - Alan Thrasher: Stated he has over 20 years of marketing and strategic planning experience, a passion for transportation, and a desire to give back to the community. He expressed interest in Vision Zero and other city initiatives. - Talia Perlman: Resident of District 7 for over a decade. Expressed support for safe, realistic transportation options and highlighted her experience in public health. She praised the Vera Bicycle Boulevard project and emphasized the need for more non-driving transportation options. - Taylor Pope: Resident of West Roosevelt neighborhood. Active with the Silicon Valley Bicycle Coalition and regular attendee of TAC and council meetings. He expressed strong support for the Redwood City Walk Bike Thrive Plan, particularly goals to eliminate traffic fatalities by 2030 and reach 50% non-automotive mode share by 2040. He also emphasized the importance of the transit district grade separation and the 101/Woodside Interchange project. - The fourth applicant did not appear but was noted as having applied. Key Outcomes - No appointments were made at this meeting. The Mayor announced that the council would vote on the appointments at the next regular city council meeting on November 28, 2022. - The special meeting was adjourned following the interviews, and the regular meeting immediately commenced.

On November 1, 2022, at 6:00 PM, the Redwood City Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider the Harbor View project at 320–350 Blomquist Street and 30 Stein Am Court. The applicant, Jay Paul Company, requested a general plan amendment, zoning map amendment, development agreement, vesting tentative map, and architectural permit to develop a 765,000‑square‑foot office complex, a 35,000‑square‑foot employee amenities building, and 2,591 parking spaces on a 27‑acre former Malibu Raceway site. The project would also preserve 64 existing housing units as extremely low‑income (ELI) units operated by St. Francis Center (19 currently occupied, 45 available within 90 days). Staff recommended certification of the Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) and approval of the entitlements, citing a $65 million community benefits package—the largest in Redwood City history. The Commission took public testimony, deliberated, and voted to recommend project approval to the City Council. Consent Calendar - No items were on the consent calendar. Public Comments & Testimony - In‑person speakers (all supporting the project): - Hugo Torres (St. Francis Center) urged approval, stating “something is better than nothing” and that 64 units would help families on the waiting list. - Miriam Toscano shared her struggle to find affordable housing and how St. Francis Center helped her family. - Diana Caamal described how St. Francis Center supported her education and housing; she supported the project. - Imelda Arroyo asked for more low‑income housing in the city. - Alma C. Gongora (St. Francis Center employee) recounted how the Center provided her family with stable housing and her children’s education; she supported the project. - Perla Pimentel (St. Francis Center community manager) said she receives daily calls from people needing housing; the project would help many families. - Adelina Cortez, a single mother of six, said St. Francis Center helped her find housing and that many families need similar support. - Carolina Velasquez, a college graduate who lived in St. Francis Center housing, urged approval to keep low‑income families in the Bay Area. - Virtual speakers: - Iliana Garcia (PAL Community Health Director) supported the project, especially the $13 million for new park fields and youth sports. - Chris Robell opposed the project, arguing the large increase in office space would worsen the jobs/housing imbalance and create more traffic; he called for a commercial office moratorium. - Florence Ortiz (Redwood City Education Foundation) supported the project, stating property taxes would provide much‑needed funding for local schools. - Gita Dev (Sustainable Land Use Committee, Sierra Club) agreed with Robell, noting the site is designated light/heavy industrial and that office use would generate far more traffic than industrial use. - Sister Christina Heltsley (Executive Director, St. Francis Center) supported the project, calling the ELI housing a “generous gift” that would help the most vulnerable. - Gail Raabe (Citizens Committee to Complete the Refuge) thanked staff for recommending deletion of problematic language in mitigation measure BIO 3A regarding bird‑safe building requirements. - Kris Johnson opposed the project, citing increased office space, traffic, sea level rise vulnerabilities, worsening jobs/housing imbalance, and an affordable housing deficit according to the city’s 2015 commercial impact study. - Dennis Symanski stated 64 units of housing are insufficient and expressed concern about traffic and sea level rise. Discussion Items - Staff Presentations: Community Development & Transportation Director Mark Muenzer and Contract Principal Planner Curtis Banks presented the project summary, site plan, general plan amendment, zoning map amendment, environmental review, and staff recommendation. The applicant team (Janette D’Elia, Tom Gilman, etc.) presented the reduced proposal (765,000 sq ft office, 35,000 sq ft amenities, 2,591 parking spaces) and a community benefits package valued at over $65 million, the largest in city history. - Commissioner Questions & Debate: Commissioners asked about the 64 existing ELI units (19 occupied, 45 available immediately), whether they count toward RHNA (likely not), the relationship between VMT and level of service impacts, sea level rise adaptation (site raised for end‑of‑century projections), tenant protections (existing tenants can remain indefinitely; units become deed‑restricted only upon voluntary move‑out), parking requirements, and the jobs/housing imbalance. Commissioner Koch emphasized the transportation demand management plan and existing transit options. Vice Chair Crnogorac expressed concern about parking requirements and the lack of high‑quality transit near the site; he noted the project would increase the number of employees by about 400 over existing zoning. Commissioner Chu argued for abundant housing to address the imbalance and suggested pricing parking to discourage driving. Commissioner Sturken highlighted the preservation of 64 permanently affordable ELI homes and the need for funds to complete the Woodside/101 interchange. Chair Hunter questioned trip generation inconsistencies and requested bird‑safe lighting; the applicant confirmed sensor‑based lighting to reduce bird strikes. Key Outcomes 1. Environmental Impact Report (EIR) Certification: Motion (Chu/Espinoza) to recommend that the City Council certify the Final EIR, adopt all required findings and a Statement of Overriding Considerations (citing community benefits), and adopt the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, with a modification to mitigation measure BIO 3A making bird‑safe building requirements mandatory. Passed 6‑0 on a roll‑call vote (Commissioner Bondonno absent; Espinoza and Koch initially abstained on minutes but voted on this item). 2. Project Approvals Recommendation: Motion (Espinoza/Sturken) to recommend City Council approval of the General Plan Amendment, Zoning Map Amendment, Development Agreement, Vesting Tentative Map, and Architectural Permit, subject to combining conditions of approval 53 and 79 and a minor revision to condition 80. Passed 5‑1 (Vice Chair Crnogorac opposed) on a roll‑call vote. 3. Follow‑up: Staff will correct Exhibit C of the Development Agreement (missing last three community benefits) before forwarding to the City Council, which is scheduled to hear the item on November 14, 2022.

The Redwood City Planning Commission held a regular meeting on November 1, 2022, at 6:00 PM. The primary agenda item was a public hearing to consider a recommendation to the City Council regarding the Harbor View development project. The commission reviewed a staff report, heard public testimony, and voted to recommend certification of the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) and approval of the project, including a General Plan Amendment, Zoning Map Amendment, Development Agreement, Vesting Tentative Map, and Architectural Permit. Consent Calendar - No items were listed on the consent calendar. Public Comments & Testimony - Public comments were taken at the beginning of the meeting on items not on the agenda (no speakers recorded in provided materials) and again during the public hearing on the Harbor View project. No public speakers from the hearing are documented in the agenda or staff report. Discussion Items - Harbor View Project (Item 5.A.) – The commission considered a request by the Jay Paul Company to develop a 765,150 square foot office complex, a 35,000 square foot employee amenities building, and 2,591 parking spaces on a 27.08-acre site at 320-350 Blomquist Street and 30 Stein Am Court. The project required a General Plan Amendment (from Industrial-Light/Industrial-Port to Commercial-Office Professional/Technology), a Zoning Map Amendment (to Commercial Park), a Development Agreement, a Vesting Tentative Map, and an Architectural Permit. The Final EIR identified significant unavoidable transportation impacts but found that mitigation measures would reduce other impacts to less-than-significant levels. The applicant proposed a community benefits package valued at approximately $65.65 million, including 64 deed-restricted extremely low-income housing units, $13 million for parks and recreation, $6.5 million for bridge improvements, and contributions to education, childcare, and other programs. Staff recommended approval. The Architectural Advisory Committee had previously recommended the design. Key Outcomes - The Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 22-08, recommending that the City Council certify the Final Environmental Impact Report, adopt CEQA findings, a Statement of Overriding Considerations, and a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. - The Commission adopted Resolution No. 22-09, recommending that the City Council approve the General Plan Amendment, Zoning Map Amendment, Development Agreement, Vesting Tentative Map, and Architectural Permit for the Harbor View Project, subject to conditions. - The meeting adjourned at an unspecified time. The next regular meeting was scheduled for November 15, 2022.

The Redwood City Planning Commission held a special meeting on October 25, 2022, at 6:00 PM in the City Council Chambers, 1017 Middlefield Road, Redwood City, CA, with virtual participation via Zoom. The purpose was to consider a formal recommendation on the Redwood City Transit District Downtown Precise Plan (DTPP) Amendments and the Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report (SEIR). All seven commissioners were present. The meeting adjourned at 7:33 PM. Consent Calendar - There were no consent calendar items, and no minutes were approved. Public Comments & Testimony - Daniel Parovati, owner of 21 Duane Street, spoke during non-agenda public comment. He stated that his project had been delayed for two years by historical review, despite two reports from the city planning historian finding the property not historical, and requested a hearing on the property's historical status. During the public hearing on the transit district, all public speakers expressed support for the plan, including: - James Clifford supported the plan but noted the lack of east-west transit and recommended a feasibility study on restoring the 1970s bus system. - Dylan Finch strongly supported the amendments and the focus on transit, density, and walkability, and supported extending the car-free street on Broadway and removing parking minimums. - Sean Reese, field representative for NorCal Carpenters Union Local 217, supported the plan, noting it could create up to 1,100 housing units, roughly 300 affordable units, and complete more than 22% of Redwood City's housing expectation through 2031. - Elan Scheinman supported the plan but expressed concern about filling office space and suggested designing some space for future conversion to housing; he also called for protected bike lanes from the transit district to the Bay Trail. - Matt Regan, Senior Vice President of Public Policy at the Bay Area Council, supported the plan, stating that it would help stop residents from moving to carbon-producing states; he cited that 40,000 Californians leave for Texas each year and that per-capita greenhouse gas emissions rise from 9 tons in California to 27 tons in Texas. - Dahlia Chazan, Deputy Chief of Planning at Caltrain, supported the DTPP amendments and SEIR, noting that Lowe Enterprises had partnered with Caltrain to dedicate land needed for grade separation and expansion from two tracks to four; she cited the 2040 service vision reducing 110 metric tons of GHG emissions daily and taking nearly a million vehicle miles off Bay Area roads. - Kalisha Webster, Senior Housing Advocate at Housing Choices, supported the plan for residents with developmental disabilities and noted Redwood City needs about 6,800 new homes under its housing element. - Greg Greenway, on behalf of the Chamber of San Mateo County, supported the plan. - Ali Sapirman, on behalf of the Housing Action Coalition, supported the plan, highlighting up to 1,100 homes and more than 300 affordable units. - Ken Chan, Senior Organizer at Housing Leadership Council of San Mateo County, supported the plan and noted 20% affordability through the Sequoia Station proposal. - Larisa Ocanada, on behalf of San Mateo County Economic Development Association (SAMCEDA), supported the plan. - Vince Rocha, Vice President of Housing and Community Development at Silicon Valley Leadership Group, supported the plan. - Adrian Brandt supported the plan and suggested a mode filter at Franklin and Hamilton to allow emergency and service vehicles while preventing cut-through traffic. - Malek Jelassi, on behalf of Greenbelt Alliance, supported the plan as climate-smart development. Discussion Items - Principal Planner Lindy Chan presented the transit district proposal, key amendments, environmental analysis, and next steps. The proposed transit district totals 16.6 acres and includes the Sequoia Station shopping center, Caltrain-owned transit center, and the Perry Parcel. The amendments would allow 1.23 million square feet of office and 1,100 residential units, with up to 343 affordable units, while the SEIR studied 1.63 million square feet of office and 1,100 residential units. - Staff proposed the 'Reduced Office Alternative' as the preferred land-use mix, with 1.23 million square feet of office and 1,100 residential units. Staff noted that a January 2020 City Council financial feasibility study found a more housing-intensive mix would be difficult to pencil out. - Staff corrected the staff report: the environmentally superior alternative is the reduced development alternative, not the reduced office alternative. - The draft SEIR comment period ran from May 6 to June 21, 2022; the final SEIR was released October 14, 2022. Significant and unavoidable impacts remain for air quality and climate change/resources, requiring a statement of overriding considerations. - Proposed circulation changes include removing a new lane parallel to the tracks, replacing Hamilton as a 100-foot grand connector with a 60-foot city street, requiring Class IV protected bike lanes on El Camino Real, James, and Brewster Streets, and requiring a HAWK beacon at El Camino Real and Hamilton. - Franklin Street would remain open to vehicles as a bike boulevard, with possible future project-level evaluation of a street closure. Several commissioners expressed interest in closing Franklin to private vehicles, while staff and Vice Chair Crnogorac raised concerns about circulation, fire access, and drive-by pharmacy access. - Parking ratios would be updated: vehicle minimums eliminated, vehicle maximums lowered, and bicycle parking ratios increased and tied to density, consistent with AB 2097 and MTC transit-oriented communities policy. - Commissioner questions addressed the absence of existing residential units in the district, VMT and bike-trip calculations, the choice of the reduced office alternative, Franklin Street circulation, Broadway track crossing geometry, Reach code timing, and bus operations under the tracks. Key Outcomes - The Planning Commission voted 7-0 to adopt Resolution 22-06, recommending that the City Council certify the Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report for the Redwood City Transit District DTPP Amendments (SCH No. 2021080554), adopt CEQA findings of fact, a statement of overriding considerations, and the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. - The Planning Commission voted 7-0 to adopt Resolution 22-07, recommending that the City Council approve the General Plan Mixed Use – Downtown designation amendments and DTPP amendments to add a Transit District, using the 'Reduced Office Alternative' as described in the Final SEIR. - The City Council was scheduled to review and act on the amendments and SEIR on November 28, 2022, pending the Commission's recommendation. Matters of Commission Interest - Staff reported that on October 24, 2022, the City Council adopted an urgency ordinance imposing a moratorium on firearms retail sales and directed staff to study potential regulations on retail establishments selling firearms and ammunition. - Staff noted upcoming meetings: a regular Planning Commission meeting on November 1, 2022, and a November 15, 2022 meeting with projects at 2966 Bay Road and 970 Edgewood. Adjournment - The meeting adjourned at 7:33 PM to reconvene at the next regular Planning Commission meeting on November 1, 2022, at 6:00 PM.

On October 25, 2022, at 6:00 PM, the Redwood City Planning Commission held a special meeting to consider and make a recommendation on the proposed Transit District Amendments to the General Plan and Downtown Precise Plan (DTPP), as well as the certification of a Subsequent Environmental Impact Report (SEIR) for the project. The meeting included a public hearing and culminated in unanimous votes recommending City Council approval. Public Comments & Testimony - Steven Russell (Pacifica, CA) submitted an email expressing strong support for creating the Transit District, citing the need for housing near transit (up to 1,100 homes, over 20% affordable), expanded Caltrain service, improved bike/pedestrian infrastructure, and economic vitality. - Megan Conn (Redwood City, CA) also submitted an email in support, echoing similar benefits and urging the Commission to approve the amendments. - Jason Newblanc (Redwood City Arts Commission) submitted a letter advocating for the inclusion of residential and parking structure valuations in the city's Art in Public Places ordinance within the Transit District, to ensure public art is integrated into new development. - Caltrain (Dahlia Chazan, Deputy Chief of Planning) submitted a letter of strong support, emphasizing the project's role in enabling a four-track station and transit-oriented development. - SamTrans (Christy Wegener, Planning Director) submitted a letter of support, highlighting the importance of the Redwood City Transit Center as a regional hub and the benefits of a new transit center and housing. - No in-person or virtual verbal comments were recorded; the public record indicates comments were submitted in writing prior to the meeting. Discussion Items - Staff Presentation: Principal Planner Lindy Chan presented the Transit District Amendments, which would create a 16.6-acre Transit District within the DTPP area, focused on transit-oriented development near the Caltrain station. The proposed changes included: - Development capacity: up to 1,100 housing units (including up to 343 affordable units), 1.23 million sq ft of office (the Reduced Office Alternative), 100,000 sq ft retail, and 200 lodging rooms. - Elimination of vehicle parking minimums, increased bicycle parking ratios. - Circulation improvements: reconfiguration of Hamilton and Franklin streets, protected bike lanes, pedestrian safety enhancements. - Design flexibility: adding Contemporary architecture to the permitted styles, modifying minimum building heights to support retail. - Process: City Council would become the final approval authority for large projects in the district. - Environmental Review: The SEIR identified significant and unavoidable impacts from air quality and climate change, but concluded that the project's benefits—including reduced vehicle miles traveled, transit-oriented growth, and affordable housing—outweighed those impacts. The Reduced Office Alternative (1.23 million sq ft of office instead of 1.63 million) was identified as the environmentally superior alternative. - Commission Discussion: Commissioners expressed support for the Transit District, noting its alignment with city goals for housing, transportation, and sustainability. They discussed the need to ensure robust community benefits, including affordable housing and public art. The Commission acknowledged the SEIR findings and the Statement of Overriding Considerations. Key Outcomes - The Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 22-06, which recommends that the City Council certify the Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report (SEIR), adopt the Statement of Overriding Considerations, and approve the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. The vote was unanimous (5-0, with all five commissioners present). - The Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 22-07, which recommends that the City Council approve the Transit District Amendments to the General Plan and DTPP, specifically the Reduced Office Alternative (1.23 million sq ft office cap, 1,100 housing units). The vote was unanimous. - The official recommendation will be forwarded to the City Council, which is tentatively scheduled to consider the project on November 28, 2022. - The Commission directed staff to consider including public art requirements for residential and parking structures in the Transit District, reflecting testimony from Jason Newblanc. Next Steps: The City Council will hold a public hearing on November 28, 2022, to make the final decision on the Transit District Amendments and SEIR certification.