Public Meetings - San Leandro, California

The Facilities & Transportation Committee of the San Leandro City Council met on February 20, 2026, to receive informational presentations and updates on two major active transportation projects: the East Bay Greenway Multimodal Project and the Hesperian Boulevard Bike Lane Gap Closure Project. No public comments were received on any items. The meeting concluded with committee member comments and an announcement of the upcoming appointment of Councilmember Simon to the committee. Discussion Items East Bay Greenway Multimodal Project (Item 3A) - Presented by Matt Bomberg, Principal Transportation Engineer with the Alameda County Transportation Commission (Alameda CTC), along with city senior engineer Nicole Castellino. - The East Bay Greenway is a proposed 16-mile regional active transportation corridor connecting Lake Merritt BART to South Hayward BART through Oakland, San Leandro, unincorporated county, and Hayward. The San Leandro portions are in final design, with construction anticipated to begin in spring 2027 (San Leandro Boulevard package) and winter 2027 (East 14th Street/Caltrans package). - Within San Leandro, the project includes two construction packages: (1) San Leandro Boulevard from the Oakland city limit to East 14th Street, and (2) East 14th Street (State Route 185) from San Leandro Boulevard to Bayfair Drive. - Features include protected bike lanes (mostly one-way, with a two-way bikeway on the west side of San Leandro Boulevard near Sempre Verde Park), enhanced pedestrian crossings, new bus stops, bioswales, placemaking elements, and new street lighting. - Councilmember Bolt raised concerns about: lighting adequacy for 24/7 use (staff responded that photometric studies are being used to fill gaps and brighten lights); the two-way bikeway design and potential for cars encroaching (staff noted the two-way section is in an area with no driveways and would be designed to prevent vehicle access); sidewalk gaps south of BART (project will close them); loss of on-street parking on the west side of East 14th Street (parking occupancy studies indicated sufficient supply on side streets); and the project's funding gap (Alameda CTC plans to use Measure BB funds if other grants are not secured). Construction duration is estimated at 290 working days for the San Leandro package and 200 for the East 14th package, partially concurrent. Hesperian Boulevard Bike Lane Gap Closure Project (Item 3B) - Presented by Assistant Engineer Iman Fazi, with design input from Cade of W Trans, and traffic analysis from DKS Associates. - The project covers 0.4 miles on Hesperian Boulevard from 150th Avenue to Bayfair Drive. Scope includes lane reconfiguration, Class IV protected bike lanes, accessible curb ramps, a pedestrian hybrid beacon (PHB) at Grace Street, and signal and striping improvements. - Two design alternatives are being considered for the intersection of Hesperian and Fairmont: Alternative 1 (buffered bike lane between right turn and through lanes) and Alternative 2 (sidewalk-level bike lane with protected intersection elements). Both include bike boxes and signal upgrades. - A traffic study (November 2025) showed that vehicle delays would remain within acceptable limits. On the overall corridor, northbound arterial level of service (LOS) is projected to improve from F to E with signal timing mitigations. At the Hesperian/150th intersection, LOS would worsen from B to C due to added pedestrian/bicycle features, but that remains within the city's acceptable standard (LOS D for most areas, LOS E in priority development areas). - Design cost is estimated at $850,000 (funded through an Alameda CTC grant of $225,000, an MTC grant of $100,000, and city funds of $525,000). Construction cost is estimated at $5.2 million, with grant applications planned. Final design is expected by December 2026. - Committee members asked about: the LOS change from F to E (clarified as an improvement from existing conditions); funding certainty (construction funding not yet secured); the width and safety of bike lane entry points (staff noted minimum 4-foot width, but target 6 feet to balance bike comfort and deterring cars; the city has already purchased a mini street sweeper for protected lanes); and collision history (staff will provide the high-injury network heat map). Councilmember Bolt expressed support for the protected intersection design (Alternative 2) while noting concerns about cars driving into the bike lane. The mayor raised concerns about the triangle area near Hesperian/150th and advocated for a traffic circle. Key Outcomes - No formal votes or decisions were taken; both items were informational updates. - Staff will incorporate committee feedback as they advance design and present to the Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee (BPAC) in March or April 2026. - Next steps for East Bay Greenway: final design completion summer 2026 (San Leandro package) and fall 2026 (East 14th package), with construction starting spring 2027. - Next steps for Hesperian project: final design by December 2026; bid award and construction dependent on securing construction funding. - The mayor announced the intention to formally appoint Councilmember Simon to the Facilities & Transportation Committee.

The San Leandro Arts, Culture & Library Commission met on December 16, 2025, starting at 6:33 p.m. The commission approved prior minutes, discussed a new project planning tool to guide low-/no-cost commission work in 2026, and reviewed/approved a FY 2026 grants program budget split (grants vs. administrative costs). The meeting included limited public testimony and ended with commissioner remarks recognizing former Commissioner Cassidy’s contributions and noting an upcoming appointment to fill a vacant seat. Attendance / Quorum - Roll call indicated 5 commissioners present (quorum met). - Present (as called): Chair Scotland, Vice Chair Miller, Commissioners Alvarez, Guillory, Ridsdale. - Noted by roll call as not present/unclear in transcript: Commissioners Acevedo, Smith, Velasquez. Consent Calendar - Approved minutes from October 21, 2025 (motion and second; approved by voice vote, no opposition stated). Public Comments & Testimony - General public comment (Item 5): None. - Item 6A (Project Planning): - A member of the public suggested a library-based “artist of the month” concept, proposing a poster/display near the library entrance to feature an artist, noting high foot traffic and that a similar idea reportedly did not gain traction with the San Leandro Times. - Item 7A (FY26 Grants Program): - A member of the public said they were attending to learn the process and timeline and expressed interest in applying. They described an “Art for All” voucher concept (referencing England/Europe), suggesting that a $5,000 grant could fund 50 vouchers to help low-income community members obtain art while supporting local artists, noting that artists may be earning far less than minimum wage for their work. Discussion Items - Item 6A — Commission Project Planning (Planning Tool / Homework for January) - Chair Scotland framed the discussion around limited funds and asked what the commission should do beyond grants and prior programming, emphasizing project ideas that can be done with little/no budget. - Staff (Bill) explained the planning document is adapted from a library program planning tool to help structure proposed projects, including effort, cost, communications, and success metrics. - Commission direction: Commissioners were asked to develop at least one project idea and bring it to the January meeting, using the planning template as fully as possible (ideas need not be “ready to roll,” but should be thought through). - The planning document was noted as posted on Meeting Central for public viewing, and the January agenda item will be agendized as an action item to encourage public participation. - Item 7A — Fiscal Year 2026 Arts & Culture Grants Program (Guideline/Application Updates + Budget Allocation) - Staff reported the Grants Committee updated draft guidelines and two applications (individual and nonprofit), incorporating: - Clearer definitions for requested documents (e.g., 501(c)(3) documentation) and links to authoritative sources (e.g., IRS). - Review and updates by the City Attorney. - A planned shift to Microsoft Forms for online submission (including attachments and signatures) to reduce incomplete applications and avoid PDF form issues experienced previously (especially budget sections). - Grants Committee discussion emphasized balancing clarity vs. simplicity, noting that added definitions can increase length; the committee aimed for a balance, leaning toward usability. Key Outcomes - FY26 Grants program budget allocation specified (Item 7A): - Motion approved to subdivide the previously allocated $30,000 grants-program total into: - $27,500 for grant awards - $2,500 for administrative costs (including translation into Spanish and Chinese, publicity/communications costs such as ad placement/boosting, and minor costs for a grantee/applicant mixer). - Vote: Approved by voice vote (ayes, no opposition stated). - Grant closeout timeline reminder (Commission Reports): - Staff stated FY 2025 grants period ends 12/31/2025; seven grantees were mentioned. - Grantees to receive a reminder email and are required to submit a final report due January 16, 2026. - Funding recap provided during commissioner comments: - Total current fiscal year allocation stated as $50,000: - $30,000 for the grants program (now specified as $27,500 awards / $2,500 admin) - $20,000 allocated for a comedy program. Commissioner Comments / Other Notes - Commissioners acknowledged former Commissioner Cassidy’s contributions; the Chair stated Cassidy had passed away (and noted this was a major loss to the commission and community). Another commissioner added that the school district also recognized Cassidy’s work with the San Leandro Unified School District. - A vacant commission seat was discussed: - The Chair described interviewing five candidates provided by the Mayor; the Mayor selected one candidate (described as “amazing,” not named in the meeting). - Staff described the appointment process as a council nomination followed by a consideration period and then a City Council vote (exact timeframe not specified in the transcript). Adjournment - Meeting adjourned by motion and second, approved by voice vote. - The Chair stated adjournment time as “7 or 6 p.m.” (transcript contains this ambiguity).

Note: The transcript indicates the meeting occurred on January 20, 2026, but the provided date for this summary is February 11, 2026. This discrepancy is noted per accuracy rules. The Arts, Culture, and Library Commission convened on the recorded date to discuss project planning for the upcoming year, review ongoing grants, and receive updates. The meeting included roll call (five members present, quorum met), approval of previous minutes, and a brief staff report. Consent Calendar - Approved the minutes of December 16, 2025, by unanimous voice vote. Public Comments & Testimony - No public comments were made. Discussion Items - Library Staff Report: The library director announced the upcoming ribbon cutting for the Stephen Taylor Sanctity of Life Pavilion on January 24, 2026, at Marina Park (14001 Wicks Boulevard), with an RSVP requested. - Arts, Culture, and Library Commission Project Planning (Item 7A): Commissioners brainstormed potential projects that require minimal or no funding for the 2026-2027 cycle. Ideas included: - An art show for past grant recipients or open to all artists, focused on display and networking (Commissioner Terry). - Latinx reading and journaling workshops for middle and high school youth, leveraging community connections and volunteer authors (Commissioner Acevedo). - A group bike ride (“Tour de Bibliothèque”) between all library branches, in partnership with the Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Commission, to promote active transportation and library awareness (Commissioner Velasquez). - A map of art locations and Little Free Libraries, a sidewalk chalk day for community beautification, a poetry program with poems on library receipts or bus stops, and a reader’s theater book club for all ages (multiple commissioners). - A memorial plaque or citywide Fred Korematsu Day to honor the San Leandro resident and Supreme Court case figure (Commissioner Ridsdale). - Quality of Life Priority Alignment: Discussion ensued on how these projects could serve as deliverables under the city’s Quality of Life priority, with library staff noting that new deliverables will be established in March. - Grants Committee Report: All current grantees submitted final reports; review by the Grants Committee is pending. The next grant cycle opens February 3, 2026, with an applicant mixer scheduled for February 5, 2026, at 6:00 PM in the CARP room. Key Outcomes - Commissioners agreed to form a subcommittee to prioritize and refine the proposed project ideas. A follow-up meeting will be scheduled for the February meeting to rank ideas and begin logistical brainstorming. - The Grants Committee will evaluate final reports via correspondence and support the upcoming grant cycle publicity. - Commissioner comments included updates on the As Needed Bakery opening in the library café (expected mid-February) and mention of the Good2Go app for local food deals. - The meeting adjourned at 7:22 PM.

The San Leandro City Council met on February 3, 2026 (note: the transcript and agenda indicate the meeting was held on Monday, February 2, 2026, but the user-provided date is used here). The council approved the second reading of the Residential Rent Stabilization Ordinance after extensive public testimony, adopted a resolution calling for a June 2026 special election on district-based elections, received a progress update on the Project Elevate ERP modernization, and recognized Black History Month. Recognitions & Awards - Black History Month Proclamation: Mayor Gonzalez proclaimed February 2026 as Black History Month. Tatiana, owner of DC Dance Center and a longtime resident, accepted the proclamation and spoke about her work empowering youth through inclusive arts education. Consent Calendar - The consent calendar included items on rent registry software (Item 5A), pedestrian beacon improvements (5B), commission appointments (5D), and other routine approvals. Public comment was heard from Mike McGuire (comparing software costs to other city expenditures), Alvaro Ramos (opposing hawk beacons), Douglas Spalding (supporting the registry and commission appointments), Willow (gratitude for a crosswalk at Arbor and Dutton), and Rachel Radin (supporting hawk lights). The council voted unanimously to approve the consent calendar. Public Comments & Testimony General Public Comment (Non‑Agenda Items) - Several speakers spoke in support of Councilmember Fred Simon, who is the subject of an investigation report. Karen Silva, Nancy Raffalof, and Ginny Madsen praised his character and criticized the investigation as biased and costly ($135,000). Lawrence Abbott urged fairness and criticized political targeting. - Douglas Spaulding praised San Leandro Hospital and the Stephen Taylor Sanctity of Life Park dedication. Melissa Wong highlighted factual errors in the investigation report, noting the investigator failed to interview a key facilitator. - Ed Hernandez requested a review of residency requirements for a council member whose primary residence was sold, citing California Government Code. Public Comment on Rent Stabilization Ordinance (Item 10A) Over 20 speakers and several online commenters addressed the ordinance. Positions included: - Support for the ordinance: Douglas Spalding, Jim Prola, Alvaro Ramos, Mimi Dean, Evelyn Olivera, Jenny Madsen, Emily Rich, Jimmy Kelly, Craig Williams, Rob Rich, Carol Haberkoss, Chris Longoria, Lawrence Abbott, Kaylee Figueroa, Kathleen Parsons, and others argued that rent control is necessary to protect tenants, especially seniors and low-income residents, from excessive increases. They noted that landlords benefit from tax deductions and that the ordinance is moderate compared to state law. - Opposition or concerns: Gordon Galvin, Eva Poon, John Sullivan, Athena Stanford, Kate Halfon, Anthony Adesi, Jennifer Rizzo (California Apartment Association), David Stark (Bay East Association of Realtors), Bill Espinola, Tuan Ngo, Vanessa, and Tyler Gonzalez argued that the 65% CPI cap (or 3%) is too restrictive, will discourage maintenance and investment, harm small “mom and pop” landlords, and reduce housing supply. Some requested a 5% cap or flat CPI, and elimination of the 65% formula. Concerns were raised about the lack of capital improvement pass‑throughs and the impact on aging housing stock. - A few speakers (e.g., Anthony Adesi, Vanessa) asked the council to table the ordinance for further study. Public Comment on District Elections (Item 10C) - Douglas Spalding spoke in support of the charter amendment for district‑based elections, calling it a matter of equity. Discussion Items - Rent Stabilization Ordinance (Item 10A, Second Reading): Development Director Tom Liao summarized the outreach efforts since 2023. Councillmember Aguilar asked the city attorney whether removing the CPI formula would require a new first reading (affirmed). Mayor Gonzalez then explained his opposition, stating the ordinance is too extreme (65% of CPI, no banking, no capital pass‑throughs), lacks data on rent increases for existing tenants, and may constitute a regulatory taking. He proposed income‑testing or a 5% cap with a registry. Councilmember Bowen emphasized the importance of education, language access, and a one‑year review. The motion carried 6‑1 (Mayor Gonzalez voting no). - Project Elevate ERP Update (Item 10B): CIO Michael Siner presented the city’s multi‑year effort to modernize HR, payroll, and finance systems (Workday). Key points: implementation began October 2024, on track for July 2026 “operational transition.” Payroll testing is in parallel run, aiming for near‑100% accuracy. The council approved a $98,800 amendment to the Barry Dunn contract for oversight through December 2026, fully within the existing $3.3M remaining budget. Unanimous vote. - Special Municipal Election for District Elections (Item 10C): Acting City Clerk Sarah Bunting presented a resolution to place a charter amendment on the June 2, 2026 ballot, transitioning council elections to district‑based representation beginning November 2026. Estimated cost $500,000, already budgeted. Unanimous vote. - Councilmember Submissions (Item 11): Councilmember Simon submitted two items for the March 7, 2026 council retreat: (1) a policy prohibiting the accuser from voting on the accused in ethics/discipline processes; (2) enhancements to the Stephen Taylor Sanctity of Life Pavilion, including stage street art and signage. Key Outcomes - Rent Stabilization Ordinance passed on second reading (6‑1); takes effect January 1, 2027. The ordinance caps rent increases at 65% of CPI or 3%, whichever is lower, with exemptions for small landlords (duplex, ADUs, etc.) and new construction. Staff will provide outreach and a one‑year review. - Project Elevate continues with council approval of the consultant amendment. Go‑live target July 2026. - District Elections will be on the June 2, 2026 ballot; if approved, first district‑based council election in November 2026. - Council Retreat will include the two items proposed by Councilmember Simon. - The council also recognized Black History Month and heard updates on ICE enforcement concerns, the Stephen Taylor park, and upcoming railroad crossing work.

The Finance Committee meeting scheduled for January 29, 2026 was canceled due to lack of a quorum. The committee chair apologized to staff and leadership who attended, noting that the committee had planned to review performance metrics and the Workday project. A rescheduled meeting will be announced.

The Senior Commission convened on January 15, 2026, at 10:02 AM, with Chair Watkinson presiding, six commissioners present, and two excused absences. The meeting covered updates on senior services, a detailed presentation on the FlexRide Paratransit assessment, approval of prior meeting minutes, progress on the Age-Friendly Action Plan, and planning for a future lunch with Supervisor Lena Tam. Key actions included unanimous approval of the November 2025 draft minutes and discussion of program improvements. Consent Calendar - Approval of Draft Minutes (November 20, 2025): Motion to approve carried unanimously (6-0), with Commissioners Shalini and Lopez-Nacario excused. The agenda no longer required separate approval. City Staff Reports & Announcements - Vacant Commission Seat (District 5): No applications received yet; outreach will continue via monthly calendars and social media. - Homeless Point-in-Time Count (January 22, 2026): Currently 47 volunteers secured; goal is 54 to cover all census tracts. Volunteers are still needed. - Housing Support Contract: Human Services executed a contract with Bay Area Community Services to provide modest rental assistance and support services to at least 70 extremely low-income households, funded through California HCD. Launch expected by April 1, 2026, for an 18-month program. - Senior Services Update (Liliana Gray): Highlights included a Thanksgiving luncheon serving over 180 attendees (partnered with Spectrum), a Senior Expo with 100 attendees (sponsored by Kaiser), holiday bingo with 40-50 participants, and a new Soul Line Dancing class (Tues/Thurs 1-2pm, $10 drop-in or $80 session). Day trips resumed (e.g., Filoli with 15 attendees) and outreach with Downtown San Leandro Ambassadors. Commissioners thanked staff for their work. Public Comments & Testimony - Jacqueline Scoggins (Serenity Funeral Planning Consultants): Announced a free 8-week series "Peace of Heart, Peace of Mind" starting Thursday, January 22, 2026 (6-7:30pm) at the San Leandro Library, covering end-of-life preparation. Also hosts a third-Friday gathering for ages 55+ at Zenti Bistro. Asked to be a resource for seniors. - Guy Wu: Stated he had no comments. - Darlene Evans (later in meeting): Raised concerns about liquor licenses near schools and the need for better enforcement, referencing specific distances and locations. Discussion Items FlexRide Paratransit Program Assessment Update (Presentation by Mike King, Pear Street Consulting) Mike King presented findings from a recently completed assessment of the FlexRide shuttle service, conducted as part of the Age-Friendly Action Plan (Priority 5: Transportation). Assessment Methodology: Reviewed program documents, analyzed ridership data from TripShot and driver logs, surveyed eligible residents (174 responses), conducted five focus groups, interviewed other transit providers (LYNX, HOP, AC Transit), and performed ride-alongs. Key Findings: - Ridership data quality was inconsistent; city-reported figures to ACTC show a slight increase over the last two fiscal years. - Survey respondents (mix of ages 50+ and people with disabilities) identified top destinations: Kaiser Hospital, Costco, downtown San Leandro, San Leandro BART, Main Library, and the Senior Community Center. - Barriers to usage: inflexible loops taking up to one hour, long waits at stops, lack of seating/shelter, drivers skipping stops due to time pressure, and limited awareness of the service. Focus groups at Fargo Senior Center led to 10-15 new sign-ups. - Disability certification through East Bay Paratransit (requiring an in-person interview in Oakland) was a significant obstacle. Preliminary Recommendations: - Redesign routes to shorter loops (4-5 stops, 30 minutes), focusing on senior residential facilities (Broadmoor Plaza, Fargo, Mission Bay, etc.) and key destinations (grocery, hospital, library, senior center). - Expand service from three days (Mon/Tue/Thu) to five days (add Wed/Fri) to match appointment and program schedules. - Improve data collection via TripShot (driver training). - Add semi-seats and canopies at stops where feasible. - Create a simpler disability certification process (e.g., signed form from a trusted professional, as done by HOP). - Enhance promotion through outreach to senior housing, community partners, and transit apps. Commissioner Comments and Questions: - Commissioner Peña asked about the East Bay Paratransit certification; clarified it applies to riders with disabilities under 50. - Commissioner Michael-Cady questioned why the service isn't open to the general public; Pedro answered that funding (Measure BB) is specifically for seniors and people with disabilities, and the limited capacity and unique safety/comfort needs justify the eligibility criteria. - Commissioner Brennan noted a geographic imbalance in current loops (most destinations on north loop, leaving a large southern gap) and suggested four smaller loops. He also proposed approaching Kaiser for funding given its high demand as a destination. - Commissioner Camillo observed that shuttles often run nearly empty and asked whether medical-only trips could be separated. - Commissioner Dillon discussed Costco (questioned its practicality for grocery shopping) vs. Walmart (more senior-friendly), and suggested having San Leandro Hospital assist with disability certifications. She advocated for including seating at stops and recommended that drivers always stop at every stop (a contract requirement already). - Commissioner Brennan raised the idea of using existing ID/driver's license readers instead of issuing a separate FlexRide membership card, and suggested clearer signage on the bus. - Staff noted that regular meetings with MV Transportation address complaints about skipped stops, and that shaded seating already exists at Kaiser. Age-Friendly Initiative Update (Action Item 7A – Pedro Naranjo) Pedro provided a progress report on the Age-Friendly Action Plan (approved July 15, 2024). Implementation Status: - Most projects are initiated; a chart showing which are completed, ongoing, or targeted for future years was presented. Commissioner Michael-Cady requested separating "ongoing" and "completed" columns for clarity. - Priority 1 (Plan Sustainability): San Leandro participates in the Alameda County Age-Friendly Communities Council. Recent meetings included presentations on older adult data and Medicare Advantage plans. The second annual Senior Expo and outreach at "It's a Wonderful Night" (Dec 5) reached 75 people for senior services and 40 for Ride Care. - Priority 3 (Personal Protection): A safe routes to senior center initiative will begin in spring with technical assistance from California Walks. Emergency evacuation planning: a stakeholder meeting (including MV Transportation, fire, police) is set for February. Libby Besman's tabling events (every other month) averaged 30 participants per event; topics of interest included heat safety, earthquake preparedness, and winter readiness. A presentation from the Transportation and Engineering Division is scheduled for the February commission meeting. - Priority 4 (Health & Wellness): Healthy Brain Initiative online trainings concluded with 28 unduplicated participants (avg age 71, mostly women). In-person options are being explored. The library received a grant for memory kits; a coordination session at the senior center is planned. A senior food delivery pilot program launched February 4, 2026 (contracted with Vietnamese American Community Center), currently enrolling eligible homebound seniors. - Priority 5 (Transportation): Ride Care program has 17 enrolled riders, one volunteer driver, and has completed 2 trips. Senior day trips continue (next: Chabot Space & Science Center on Jan 23, fully enrolled with waiting list). - Priority 6 (Social Connection): Outreach to men for day trips is showing results (4 men enrolled in the Chabot trip). Commissioner Comments: - Commissioner Michael-Cady noted the senior services coalition draft plan and offered to share it. - Commissioner Brennan requested that the Engineering and Transportation division address pavement condition and sidewalk repair plans at their February presentation. - Commissioner Camillo requested attention to the broken monitor at the entrance and asked for beautification of the bulletin board. Lunch with Seniors Discussion (Action Item 7B) Pedro reported that Supervisor Lena Tam is interested in attending a lunch with seniors. May 21, 2026 (after the regularly scheduled commission meeting) was proposed. The commission agreed to proceed, pending the supervisor's availability, and planned to spread out among tables to mingle. Key Outcomes - Approval of November 2025 Meeting Minutes: Approved unanimously (6-0). - FlexRide Assessment Next Steps: Final report due February 25, 2026; recommendations to be incorporated into the FY26-27 contract with MV Transportation starting July 1, 2026. Staff will hold an internal visioning session soon. - Lunch with Supervisor Tam: Tentatively scheduled for May 21, 2026, pending confirmation. Commissioners will participate and mingle with seniors. - Communication to Transportation Division: Commissioner Brennan's request to address pavement/sidewalk quality will be forwarded for the February presentation. - Monitor and Bulletin Board: Staff will investigate fixing the broken monitor and improving the appearance of the bulletin board. - Meeting Adjourned: at 12:08 PM.

The San Leandro City Council met in open session beginning at 7:01 PM and adjourned at 10:46 PM. Major actions included: approval of the Consent Calendar; wide-ranging public comment; creation of two mayor-led ad hoc committees (one related to Robustelli v. City of San Leandro litigation and one related to the shoreline bankruptcy matter); and two separate discipline items (under San Leandro Administrative Code Chapter 1.13) addressing potential discipline of Councilmember Victor Aguilar and Councilmember Fred Simon based on an Oct. 27, 2025 third-party investigation report. Attendance & Procedural Notes - Roll call indicated all members present; Councilmember Azevedo participated remotely under Gov. Code §54953.8.3(a)(1) citing caregiving for a parent as “just cause,” and stated no other adult (18+) was present in the room. Closed Session Report - On Item 3B (Conference with Real Property Negotiators), Council approved a limited disclosure about closed session. Vote: all “yes,” with Councilmember Simon absent for that vote. Staff indicated more information would be provided “in the coming days.” Consent Calendar - Approved unanimously (motion Aguilar; second Vice Mayor Rivera/Viveros Walton). Public comment focused on infrastructure needs and a Marina Community Center repair. - Public testimony referenced a Marina Community Center wall repair costing over $300,000. Public Comments & Testimony - General (non-agenda) public comment (Item 7): - Leo T. West criticized City spending on lobbying and urged the City to reconsider sanctuary policies; made several political statements. - Emily Grego (President/CEO, San Leandro Chamber of Commerce) invited Council/community to “Best of San Leandro” on Jan. 29 at the Speedway (Bayfair) and stated there was an “astounding number of votes” for nominees. - Melissa Wong urged formation of a resident budget task force with members from each of the six districts plus a mayoral pick, citing a structural deficit and concern about time between existing finance committee meetings (she cited 60–70 days between meetings). - Douglas Spaulding supported the concept of a budget task force and promoted upcoming events, including a Jan. 24 ribbon cutting at the Marina for Stephen Taylor’s memorial park. - Mimi Dean urged protection of Skywest Open Space (Hayward; 126 acres), describing it as the East Bay’s 1 overwintering site for western monarch butterflies and habitat for western pond turtle; asked for support of a petition. Discussion Items Ad Hoc Committee: Robustelli v. City of San Leandro Litigation (Item 10A) - Council created a mayor-led ad hoc committee to focus on the litigation. - Membership approved: Mayor Gonzalez and Councilmember Bolt. - Public comment: Douglas Spaulding expressed concern about transparency and trust in ad hoc processes. - Vote: Unanimous “yes” (with Councilmember Azevedo voting “aye” when polled). Ad Hoc Committee: Shoreline Bankruptcy (Item 10B) - Council created a second ad hoc committee related to the shoreline bankruptcy matter. - Membership approved: Mayor Gonzalez and Vice Mayor Rivera/Viveros Walton. - Councilmember Bolt recused himself from this item. - Public comment: Douglas Spaulding recommended broader expertise/participation (including a possible citizen task force on shoreline development). - Vote: 6–0 (Bolt recused). Discipline Matter: Councilmember Victor Aguilar (Item 10C) City Attorney Rich Piroda summarized the process and alleged violations under Admin. Code 1.13, noting: - Complaint/request submitted by Vice Mayor Bowen on Oct. 24, 2025. - Council scheduled consideration after curing a Brown Act issue from a Nov. 3, 2025 meeting. - Council previously waived attorney-client privilege (Jan. 5, 2026) as to an investigation report relied upon by Bowen. - Findings presented as applicable to Aguilar included: (1) retaliation against Bowen following a Nov. 18, 2024 censure vote; (2) abusive conduct and alleged reputational harm after Bowen reported being physically violated by a mutual acquaintance; and (3) differential treatment reflecting gender bias toward Bowen, other female councilmembers, and a female employee. Public testimony (highlights): - Multiple speakers urged censure and emphasized that behavior described in the report constituted retaliation/bullying and gender-biased conduct. - Other speakers criticized the report as selective, repetitive, assumption-based, and politically biased, with several citing the reported investigation cost (over $130,000 was stated by one speaker). - Some speakers called for restorative or mediation approaches rather than punitive discipline. Council actions and votes (Aguilar): 1) Adopt/accept findings of report (as facts) regarding Aguilar - Vote: 4–3 (Yes: Mayor Gonzalez, Vice Mayor Rivera/Viveros Walton, Bowen, Bolt; No: Simon, Aguilar, Azevedo). 2) Determine whether discipline should be imposed - Vote: 5–1, with Aguilar ineligible/excluded from voting (Yes: Simon, Bolt, Gonzalez, Bowen, Rivera/Viveros Walton; No: Azevedo). 3) Select discipline short of censure - Motion evolved to focus on Statement of Disapproval and Admonition (letter of reprimand language was removed in favor of a resolution format). - Vote (statement of disapproval + admonition, with expectation of corrective behavior and encouragement of training): 4–2, Aguilar excluded (Yes: Gonzalez, Rivera/Viveros Walton, Bolt, Bowen; No: Simon, Azevedo). - Council recessed and returned at 9:12 PM. Discipline Matter: Councilmember Fred Simon (Item 10D) City Attorney presented findings applicable to Simon from the same Oct. 27, 2025 report, including: - Retaliation against Bowen after Nov. 18, 2024 censure vote. - Comments that allegedly derailed Council’s consideration of Bowen’s priorities at the April 2024 planning session. - Differential treatment reflecting gender bias toward Bowen, other female councilmembers, and a female employee. Public testimony (highlights): - Some speakers urged discipline and emphasized the process had taken about a year, urging Council to stop relitigating the report. - Several speakers again questioned the report’s accuracy and completeness. - Tiffany Treese (retired city employee) asked Council to remove her name and references to her from the posted report, stating she was not contacted and alleging inaccurate statements about her. - Jeff Duritz (representing 265 city employees) said the report’s assertion that there was “no credible reason” for opposing certain appointments was not accurate, and stated he had relayed employee/union concerns to multiple councilmembers. - Bella Comello and Mimi Dean spoke positively about Simon’s character and urged conflict resolution/restorative justice. Council actions and votes (Simon): 1) Accept findings of report regarding Simon - Vote: 4–3 (Yes: Gonzalez, Bolt, Bowen, Rivera/Viveros Walton; No: Simon, Aguilar, Azevedo). 2) Determine whether discipline should be imposed - Vote: 4–2, with Simon excluded/ineligible to vote (Yes: Gonzalez, Bolt, Bowen, Rivera/Viveros Walton; No: Aguilar, Azevedo). 3) Select discipline short of censure - Motion: Statement of Disapproval and Admonition (Bowen stated she would refrain from requesting censure). - Vote: 4–2, with Simon excluded (Yes: Bolt, Gonzalez, Bowen, Rivera/Viveros Walton; No: Aguilar, Azevedo). Referrals (Item 11) - Councilmember Bowen requested: - Expansion of the downtown Art Walk to include historical points of interest, including a proposed educational QR-code component for the location where Fred T. Korematsu was arrested. - Inclusion of additional revenue options in the already-approved revenue measure survey, explicitly listing a vacancy tax and potential “sin taxes” (alcohol, tobacco, cannabis, e-cigarettes, firearms, ammunition, as applicable). Councilmember Reports (Item 12) - Councilmember Aguilar reported on the Jan. 14 meeting of the Alameda County Mosquito Abatement District (introduced a new Alameda trustee; officer elections; pay scale update) and reminded residents to tip out standing water. - Vice Mayor Rivera/Viveros Walton: - Reflected on the Jan. 10 memorial for former Mayor Stephen Cassidy. - Outlined 2026 priorities, including rent stabilization implementation, fiscal responsibility with equity, economic/innovation growth, and Lake Chabot Road progress. - Councilmember Bowen: - Reported attending a Korematsu exhibit at the library. - Reported travel to Washington, D.C. for NLC leadership discussions, emphasizing immigration-related concerns and “Know Your Rights” trainings. - Encouraged donations to the San Leandro Food Pantry. - Councilmember Bolt: - Reported attending a Bay Area Legislative Caucus event. - Noted MLK event observations and thanked staff. - Announced the Stephen Taylor memorial ribbon cutting at the Marina on Saturday at 10:00 AM. - Councilmember Simon highlighted the MLK youth oratorical event. - Mayor Gonzalez highlighted: - Meals on Wheels (stated 2,000 meals/week) and volunteer needs. - Bay shoreline/climate resilience work (dredging material as beneficial for levees/marsh restoration). - City economic development outreach (biomed-sector meeting in San Francisco). - Shoreline bankruptcy progress noted from a public hearing held that day. Key Outcomes - Consent Calendar approved unanimously (includes Marina Community Center repair item discussed in testimony). - Closed session limited disclosure authorized (all yes; Simon absent for that vote). - Ad hoc committees created: - Robustelli litigation ad hoc: Mayor Gonzalez + Councilmember Bolt; unanimous. - Shoreline bankruptcy ad hoc: Mayor Gonzalez + Vice Mayor Rivera/Viveros Walton; 6–0 (Bolt recused). - Councilmember Aguilar discipline (short of censure): - Findings accepted 4–3. - Discipline authorized 5–1 (Aguilar excluded). - Statement of disapproval + admonition approved 4–2 (Aguilar excluded). - Councilmember Simon discipline (short of censure): - Findings accepted 4–3. - Discipline authorized 4–2 (Simon excluded). - Statement of disapproval + admonition approved 4–2 (Simon excluded). - Meeting extended twice to complete agenda: first to 10:30 PM, later to 10:45 PM.

The Facilities & Transportation Committee met on Thursday, January 8 starting at 4:00 PM and adjourned at approximately 4:33–4:34 PM. The committee received an information-only presentation from Public Works staff on San Leandro’s streetlight system, including system types, ownership/utility coordination, maintenance workload and costs, common service requests, and the high costs and tradeoffs involved in making lighting improvements. Attendance - Council Member Esedillo: Present - Council Member Fults: Absent - Mayor Gonzalez: Present Discussion Items - Streetlight System Overview (information item) - Presenter: Nicole Castellino (Public Works Department) provided an overview of streetlight purposes and typologies in San Leandro: - Street lighting only (primarily illuminates vehicle travel lanes; sidewalks not effectively lit) - Street + pedestrian lighting (two luminaires—one for roadway, one for sidewalk/parking strip—used in high pedestrian areas) - Pedestrian lighting only (uncommon; focuses on sidewalk/parking strip; reduces light trespass) - Intersection/safety lighting (targets conflict points; typically on metered electricity; different standards than typical streetlights) - System components and reporting: Staff emphasized each pole has a unique pole number, and providing the pole number helps respond to issues. - Lighting technology: - High-pressure sodium (HPS): orange/yellow light; poorer color visibility; 15,000–20,000 hours lifespan. - LED (transition began in 2014): whiter light; better visibility; directional; 50,000 hours lifespan. - Electrical feed types: underground (cleaner appearance but more susceptible to wire theft) vs. overhead (more common in older neighborhoods; impacts other utilities if struck). - Photocell explanation: John Angel (Public Works Traffic Supervisor) explained the photocell turns lights off when the sun comes up and on when the sun goes down. - Existing conditions / system statistics: - San Leandro Public Works owns and operates 5,348 streetlights; Caltrans has 87. - Pole types (city system): 2,950 wood poles shared with other utilities; 1,763 metal/standard poles; 395 decorative poles; 89 combination poles (street + pedestrian); 13 concrete poles. - Typical streetlight spacing on major roads (examples provided): - Bancroft Ave: 100–150 ft - E 14th St: 100–125 ft - San Leandro Blvd: 110–200 ft - Davis St: 150–200 ft - Residential: 300 ft max - Residential spacing follows a 1969 internal city design policy: lights installed on every other pole, about 300 feet between lights. - Referenced guidance (not mandatory): - Federal Highway Administration (1978): 150–250 ft (vehicle safety focus) - American National Standards Institute: 158–300 ft (visibility/uniformity focus) - Global Designing Cities Initiative: 80–150 ft (pedestrian comfort/placemaking focus) - Maintenance funding and workload (John Angel): - Public Works annual maintenance budget: $1.5 million. - 40% devoted to streetlights (maintenance/repairs/replacements/knockdowns) - 60% devoted to traffic signals - Staffing (traffic section): two electricians/traffic control technicians plus a maintenance supervisor; staff share responsibilities across signals and streetlights. - Typical service request volume: 100–150 requests per year, including lights out, “too dark” complaints, knockdowns, and vandalism/copper theft. - Knockdowns: staff noted 12–15 per year (often reported by police). - Improvement options and rough costs (staff estimates): - Extend luminaire arm: $2,600 (may create uneven lighting / bright spots) - Install brighter luminaire: $2,000 (may increase glare, light trespass, and energy use) - Add new luminaire to a wood pole: $10,000 (requires significant utility coordination; not all poles can accept more load) - Install new metal streetlight: $25,000 (high upfront cost; construction impacts; ongoing operations/maintenance; right-of-way constraints) Public Comments & Testimony - No public comments were received on the streetlight item. Key Outcomes - No votes or formal actions were taken; the streetlight presentation was explicitly described as for information only. - Staff reported the city has fewer than five high-pressure sodium lights remaining, with the rest converted to LED. - Committee discussion highlighted: - Concerns about dark crosswalks/intersections (particularly an intersection referenced by a committee member) and the safety implications. - The challenge of prioritizing lighting upgrades citywide within existing budgets and infrastructure constraints. - Tradeoffs and costs of anti-theft measures (e.g., locking covers and other deterrents), which staff described as costly at scale. - Staff encouragement that residents with concerns about dark sidewalks may consider private lighting (e.g., motion lights), especially since many streetlights are designed primarily to illuminate the roadway. - Meeting adjourned at approximately 4:33–4:34 PM.

The San Leandro City Council met on January 12, 2026, beginning at 7:03 PM. The meeting included (1) a presentation and feedback session on the City’s 2026 federal and state legislative platforms, (2) a high-participation public hearing and Council action on the first reading of a residential rent stabilization ordinance, and (3) adoption of a Brown Act-related administrative code update regarding closed session recordkeeping. Council Member Azevedo was absent. Consent Calendar - Approved unanimously (6-0) with Council Member Azevedo absent. No public comments were received on the consent calendar. Announcements - City Manager reported that Governor Newsom highlighted San Leandro in the State of the State, citing Fuse Energy and a $10 million CalCompetes tax credit supporting planned investment and hiring related to fusion energy R&D. - Mayor clarified that a newspaper headline suggesting the Council “voted to put a tax on the ballot” was inaccurate; the Council only authorized staff to explore feasibility and has not decided to place a measure on a future ballot. - Closed Session: City Attorney reported no reportable action, but direction was provided to staff. Public Comments & Testimony Legislative platform item (Zoom) - Douglas Spaulding asked what the $1 million federal earmark referenced in the presentation would specifically fund at the shoreline. - Alvaro Ramos urged consideration of state-level actions to counter federal policy, including an idea that California should withhold taxes from the federal government; he criticized federal spending priorities and urged attention to impacts on local governments. - Marga Lacabe criticized meeting procedure when another speaker was cut off for attempting off-topic comment; urged the City to avoid Brown Act violations, to stop allegedly facilitating ICE access to data, and to stop using Twitter/X. - In-person (Mr. West) voiced pro-enforcement views on immigration and federal workforce reductions; the Mayor cautioned about decorum. Rent stabilization ordinance (large in-person turnout plus Zoom) - The City Clerk reported 38 in-person speaker cards at the start of the hearing and multiple Zoom speakers (hands later capped at those raised at a designated time). - Many housing providers/property managers/industry groups opposed the ordinance as drafted, arguing it would: - Create a costly new bureaucracy during a City budget strain; - Discourage investment and reduce housing supply; - Lead to deferred maintenance due to rising insurance/utility/contractor costs; - Penalize “mom-and-pop” and senior housing providers. - Multiple speakers advocated alternatives such as a flat 5% cap, banking of unused rent increases, capital improvement pass-throughs, and/or exemptions for small providers. - Several speakers cited cost increases (examples given by speakers included insurance up 38%, insurance up 80%, PG&E up 46%, trash/recycling up 50%, water up 60%). - Many renters/tenant advocates supported the ordinance, emphasizing: - Displacement risk and rent increases outpacing fixed incomes; - Seniors and working households living paycheck-to-paycheck; - A belief that state protections and the City’s prior rent review process were insufficient or underutilized. - One supporter cited a past City presentation that median rents increased 82% since 2010, compared to CPI increasing 44% (as attributed by the speaker). - Several commenters raised concerns about outreach/notice, with both renters and landlords stating they learned of the hearing late. Discussion Items 2026 Federal & State Legislative Platforms (Presentation; feedback only) Speakers/Staff: Deputy City Manager Eric Engelbart; federal advocate Jen Covino (Covino Smith & Simon); state advocate Nicolo De Luca (Townsend Public Affairs). Federal update highlights (as presented): - Federal landscape described under the Trump/Vance administration, including implementation of the “One Big Beautiful Bill Act” and executive orders affecting grants, energy, DEI-related initiatives, and immigration enforcement. - Covino cautioned about federal grant risk due to updated federal guidance and a cited provision allowing termination for convenience (referencing CFR 200.340). - Congressional margins described as very slim; appropriations status included a continuing resolution expiring Jan. 30. - Covino reported a second “minibus” including Interior/Environment with a $1 million earmark for San Leandro (sponsored by Congresswoman Simon) for shoreline-related infrastructure. - Discrepancy noted: a Zoom commenter criticized Covino’s geographic description of Rep. LaMalfa’s district (commenter stated it is not Southern California). State update highlights (as presented): - De Luca described the 2025 session as highly active: 2,700 bills introduced; 917 passed the Legislature; 794 chaptered; 123 vetoed (stated 13% veto rate). - Budget context (as presented): prior projections of an $18 billion deficit vs. a current $2 billion deficit. - Key bills cited: - SB 79 (Wiener): transit-oriented development rules near high-quality transit; noted a cleanup bill SB 677. - SB 707 (Durazo): Brown Act modernization; De Luca said concerns were mitigated through amendments and extensions. - Council feedback resulted in direction to adjust platform language, including adding “protect funding” language for existing programs, expanding immigration-related advocacy language, and adding local-control monitoring topics. Council direction/consensus (no formal vote): - Council generally indicated consensus to incorporate suggested edits and return later for formal adoption. 6A — First Reading Ordinance: Residential Rent Stabilization (San Leandro Municipal Code Chapter 4-46) Presenter: Community Development Director Tom Liao. Key ordinance elements (as presented): - Establishes residential rent stabilization with annual increases capped at the lower of 3% or 65% of CPI, with base rent year July 1, 2025. - Implementation/effective date for rent cap increases: January 1, 2027 (to allow staffing, outreach, and coordination with the rent registry). - Exemptions described (based on state law and local policy), including: - Single-family rentals (Costa-Hawkins); - Units that can be sold separately (e.g., condos/townhomes); - New construction after Feb. 1, 1995; - ADUs, owner-occupied duplex (“golden duplex”), short-term rentals, deed-restricted affordable housing, transitional/emergency housing, shared-room rentals; and mobilehomes (covered under separate ordinance). - Rent registry referenced as complementary; staff indicated registry vendor contract would likely return Feb. 2 (updated from an earlier expectation). - Staff described a transition period between July 1, 2025 and Jan. 1, 2027 where AB 1482 remains relevant; staff provided an example modeling using a $2,000 starting rent. Council deliberation: - Vice Mayor Viveros-Walton proposed a compromise change to remove the CPI component and adopt a flat 3% cap for clarity; the City Attorney advised that removing the CPI language would likely require a new first reading (not a simple clerical change). - Council Member Bolt strongly supported keeping the ordinance as drafted for first reading and emphasized tenant pressure and housing stability. - Council Member Aguilar supported proceeding with the ordinance as drafted and rejected recall/referendum threats. - Council Member Simon supported the ordinance as drafted, noting both tenant hardship and landlord costs, while emphasizing the importance of fair-return processes. - Council Member Bowen expressed concern about durability/balance and requested robust implementation evaluation metrics and stakeholder engagement; she indicated support for the Vice Mayor’s “flat 3%” approach. - Mayor Gonzalez stated the ordinance combined the “tightest” provisions from multiple cities and did not reflect balance; he indicated he would vote no (and provide a fuller explanation at second reading). 6B — Resolution: Administrative Code Update for Closed Session Recordkeeping (Brown Act compliance) Presenter: City Attorney Richard Pio Rota. - Adopted a resolution (required by the Brown Act) to designate the City Clerk or City Attorney to attend closed sessions and keep a confidential minute book recording topics and decisions. - The policy allows (but does not require) that the confidential minutes include an audio/video recording; staff stated recordings would be retained for 10 years, while minutes would be retained permanently. - Public comment (Zoom) suggested the measure could improve transparency and accountability, and encouraged a restorative process among Council members. - The Mayor attempted a substitute motion to refer to Rules Committee for further policy discussion but withdrew it due to lack of a second; the Mayor then voted no on the resolution as drafted. Key Outcomes - Consent Calendar approved 6-0 (Azevedo absent). - Legislative platforms: received presentation and public/council feedback; staff directed to return with revised platforms for future adoption. - Item 6A (Rent Stabilization Ordinance, first reading): - Approved on first reading, 5-1 (Mayor Gonzalez no; Azevedo absent). - Council discussed—but did not adopt at this meeting—a proposal to remove CPI and set a flat 3% cap; legal advice indicated such a change would require a new first reading. - Item 6B (Closed session minute-book resolution): - Adopted 4-1 (Mayor Gonzalez no; Azevedo absent; Bowen absent at vote). - Meeting time management: Council recessed at 9:10 PM and returned at 9:20 PM; later extended meeting end time first to 11:00 PM, then to 11:15 PM. - Adjourned at 11:10 PM (per transcript).