Browse by city
Date range
Search help

Search titles, summaries, topics and stored transcripts together. Keywords may match separately; put the whole query in double quotes for a phrase. Matching follows word analysis, so punctuation is not exact. Both dates are included. Documents are not searched.

SHOWING 171–173 ENTRIES
171
DEC 17, 2020 · SHORELINE, WASHINGTON · PLANNING COMMISSION
Shoreline Planning Commission Meeting – December 17, 2020

The Shoreline Planning Commission met on December 17, 2020, at 3:00 PM to conduct a public hearing on the Community Renewal Area (CRA) sign code update and to discuss the Housing Action Plan follow-up. The commission voted unanimously to approve the sign code update as recommended by staff, forwarding it to the city council for consideration in the first quarter of 2021. The study session on the Housing Action Plan included additional research on short-term rentals, displacement concerns, and affordable housing strategies. Consent Calendar - Approval of the agenda as presented. - Approval of the minutes from the previous meeting. Public Comments & Testimony - No general public comments were made. - No public testimony was offered during the public hearing on the CRA sign code update. Discussion Items - Community Renewal Area Sign Code Update: Staff presented a summary of prior discussions and proposed changes. Key elements included: - Monument signs: number based on street frontage length (1, 2, or 3 signs per parcel). - Spacing: at least 100 feet apart on the same property, 50 feet from adjacent property signs. - Pylon signs: maximum height of 35 feet, retaining the existing four signs (two per large parcel). - Wall signs: incentives for public entrances and design features on blank walls. - Brand identity: tenants may use characteristic fonts in a common color, with center identity emphasized. - Existing signs fully amortized, so removal can be required without compensation. - Commissioners clarified that the Merlong 10-acre parcel could accommodate two pylon signs spaced 100 feet apart, and existing signs were already compliant. - Housing Action Plan Follow-up: Staff reported on short-term rentals: 170 units citywide (less than 1% of 23,000 housing units), down 24% from a peak of 217 in Q3 2018. Commissioners discussed: - Concerns about displacement and lack of regulation for short-term rentals. - Potential actions: enforcement of business license requirements, state registration (HB 1798), and public outreach. - Commissioner Callahan emphasized the risk of increased short-term rentals leading to housing loss. - Commissioner Mallow noted short-term rentals serve purposes like remodeling and exploring the area, and suggested hearing from Economic Development Manager Nate Daum. - Commissioner Galusca raised the need for multi-bedroom rental units (beyond studios and one-bedrooms) and the gap between median income ($113,000) and minimum wage ($12/hour). - Commissioner Wamashonge advocated for public-private partnerships to fund affordable housing targeting 0–30% area median income (AMI). - Staff noted that the housing element will be updated after regional policy guidance and that an issue paper on 185th Street station area development is forthcoming. Key Outcomes - Motion to approve the CRA sign code update as written in staff report attachment A (moved by Commissioner Wamashonge, seconded by Commissioner Callahan). The motion passed unanimously. - The recommendation will be forwarded to the city council for consideration in the first quarter of 2021. - The next Planning Commission meeting on January 7, 2021, is canceled. The next meeting will be January 21, 2021, for further Housing Action Plan discussion and prioritization of toolkit items. - The commission noted ongoing litigation on the BSRE project (Boeing/Shoreline Redevelopment), awaiting a decision from the Snohomish County hearing examiner.

SIGNAGE REGULATION 30% · AFFORDABLE HOUSING 26% · SHORT TERM RENTALS 16% · PROCEDURAL 15%
172
DEC 3, 2020 · SHORELINE, WASHINGTON · PLANNING COMMISSION
Shoreline City Council Meeting - December 3, 2020

The provided transcript for this meeting is unintelligible, consisting of garbled speech recognition output with no coherent discussion, agenda items, or decisions. No meaningful information can be extracted from the source material. Consent Calendar - No content available due to poor transcription. Public Comments & Testimony - None identifiable; transcript does not contain clear public statements. Discussion Items - The transcript contains nonsensical phrases and no discernible topics or proposals. Key Outcomes - No votes, decisions, or next steps can be determined from the source. Note: This summary is based solely on the provided raw transcription, which appears corrupted or of extremely low quality.

PROCEDURAL 84% · STRATEGIC PLANNING 9% · TECHNOLOGY AND INNOVATION 7%
173
NOV 19, 2020 · SHORELINE, WASHINGTON · PLANNING COMMISSION
Shoreline Washington City Meeting on Signage Regulations - November 19, 2020

This meeting, held on November 19, 2020, focused on proposed changes to local sign regulations, including monument signs, size restrictions, color consistency, and placement. The discussion was technical and often unclear due to poor audio quality. No formal public comments or votes were identifiable from the transcript. Discussion Items - The main discussion centered on sign regulations, with repeated references to monument signs, existing signs, size limits (e.g., 35 feet), and color consistency. Participants discussed whether to allow larger signs on entrances and sides, and whether to maintain uniform color schemes. - One speaker mentioned an "existing cloud sign" and noted that monument signs are not placed exactly on property lines. There was debate about whether to permit more flexibility in sign sizes and locations. - The transcript includes fragmented exchanges about "two four sensors" and "seeds for the tools," but the context is unclear. Key Outcomes - No clear decisions, motions, or votes were recorded in the available transcript. The discussion appeared to be ongoing, with a suggestion to move forward with some unspecified approach. The meeting ended without a definitive resolution being noted.

SIGNAGE REGULATION 53% · PROCEDURAL 26% · MISCELLANEOUS 18% · TECHNOLOGY AND INNOVATION 3%
← PREVIOUS
01…1718
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING INDEXUPDATED DAILY · openpublica.com