Public Meetings - Alameda, California

The City of Alameda and AC Transit held a joint ILC hybrid meeting to discuss transit service updates, performance metrics, and ongoing projects. Key topics included on-time performance improvements, the upcoming realign service changes, updates on the free bus pass pilot program, Park Street transit signal priority project, Oakland Alameda Access Project, and ridership data analysis. Public Comments & Testimony - Charlie Cameron, a resident, expressed frustration with outdated signage for Route 19 at Fruitvale BART, citing it as a reason for decreased ridership. He inquired about the new Route 19 termination, connections to water taxis, and the release date for new system maps and schedules. - Christy Cannon, a volunteer with Community Action for Sustainable Alameda, suggested promoting bus routes that access regional parks to encourage equitable outdoor recreation. Discussion Items - On-time Performance: Will Wong presented on efforts to manage on-time performance, including a dedicated field team and an incentive pay pilot program. Staff reported that the pilot has improved service reliability to 98-99% and on-time performance to 78-80% on most routes, citing it as a cost-effective way to reduce overtime and missed runs. - Realign Service Changes: Crystal Wayne outlined service changes effective August 10, 2025. Key changes include extending Line 19 to Alameda Point, renumbering Line 21 to 31, and discontinuing Line OX while maintaining Line W for Bay Farm. No changes were made to Line 51A due to strong community feedback. Staff highlighted that changes were data-driven and equity-focused, with outreach ongoing. - Free Bus Pass Pilot Program: Lisa Foster updated on the program for low-income older adults and people with disabilities. The program has been extended through July 2027, and enrollment renewal is underway with a deadline of August 15, 2025, aiming to clear the waitlist by fall. - Park Street TSP and Signal Optimization: Casey Bruno reported that the design project is on schedule, with final design completion targeted for December 2025 and construction expected in spring 2026. - Oakland Alameda Access Project: Krista Wayne discussed ongoing coordination for the project, which may involve lane closures starting in November 2025. Staff are monitoring potential impacts and considering bus-only lane extensions in Oakland to mitigate delays. - Ridership and Complaints: Crystal Wayne presented performance data for March to June 2025. Ridership remained consistent, but Lines OX and 19 had low productivity. Most complaints were related to no-shows and pass-ups on Line 51A. Discussions included a request to index complaints by ridership for better analysis and clarification on canceled trip data by division. Key Outcomes - Realign service changes will launch on August 10, 2025, with new maps and schedules available online and in print. - The free bus pass pilot program was extended through July 2027, with enrollment renewal due by August 15, 2025. - Staff will explore indexing customer complaints by ridership to better understand issues, as requested by committee members. - The next meeting is scheduled for October 16, 2025, but may be rescheduled due to a member's absence.

The Alameda Planning Board met to review a major housing development proposal, the 2433 Mariner Square Loop Project, which consists of an 8-story, 356-unit residential building. The board focused its discussion on design review, parking, traffic impacts, and community concerns, ultimately approving the project with several added conditions. Public comments reflected a mix of support for addressing the housing crisis and concerns about the building's scale and neighborhood impacts. Consent Calendar - Approved the draft meeting minutes for June 9, 2025 (Agenda Item 4B). - Tabled approval of minutes for other dates due to lack of a quorum for those meetings (Items 4A & 4C). Public Comments & Testimony - Eric Texa (Blue Rise Ventures): Expressed support, citing synergies between high-density housing and his nearby employment center. - Matt Regan (Bay Area Council): Stated strong support for the project as needed housing consistent with zoning and state standards. - Mitch Ball: Expressed support for the housing but suggested potentially reducing parking to add more units. - Marina Spasman (neighbor): Asked about demolition plans and dust/noise mitigation, as she lives adjacent to the site. - Sharon Hackle, Lindy, Yale Herrero, Dana (neighbors): Raised concerns about the building's height (8 stories), traffic, noise, loss of privacy, and impacts on existing small businesses. They requested a shorter building, relocation of the parking entrance, noise restrictions for the rooftop deck, and measures to buffer the adjacent residential community. - Speakers in Support (Regan, Ball, Texa): Argued the project is necessary to address the regional housing crisis and is well-located near transit and jobs. Discussion Items - Project Presentation (Staff & Applicant): Staff planner Steve Buckley presented the design review application for a 356-unit building with 54 affordable units, consistent with the Housing Element. The applicant team (Steven Seary, Ian Murphy, Colin Bly) detailed the design, sustainability features, community benefits, and efforts to preserve existing redwood trees. - Board Questions & Deliberations: - Parking & Transportation: Members discussed the unbundled parking strategy (0.8 spaces/unit on-site, with overflow on a Caltrans lot), the Trip Reduction Manual (TDM) plan (2-9% trip reduction), and the proximity to transit. The board clarified that reducing project density or requiring more parking is largely preempted by state law (Housing Accountability Act). - Design & Compatibility: Questions focused on building articulation, materials, interior corridors, noise mitigation for units near parking, and the treatment of the west facade. The board affirmed its purview was limited to objective design standards, which the project met. - Conditions of Approval: Staff walked through revisions to the draft conditions, primarily involving lot mergers, easements, and specific street improvements. Board members proposed additional conditions during discussion. - CEQA Exemption: Staff explained the project qualified for a CEQA Class 32 infill exemption and a separate exemption for design review. The board confirmed it could, but was not required to, make the Class 32 finding. - Neighborhood Mitigation: In response to public comments, board members discussed potential conditions to address construction impacts and neighborhood compatibility. Key Outcomes - Motion & Vote: A motion was made by Board Member Hom, and seconded by Board Member Wang, to approve the Design Review application, adopting both the CEQA Class 32 infill exemption and the design review exemption, with the staff-recommended conditions plus several additions. - Vote Result: The motion passed unanimously (Ayes: Hom, Ruiz, Ariza, Wang, Cisneros). - Added Conditions of Approval: The board directed staff to incorporate the following into the project's conditions: 1. Provide window washing for adjacent buildings (Symmetry complex) during construction. 2. Implement a vector control plan during demolition. 3. Work with the adjacent homeowners association (HOA) to explore planting additional buffer trees along the property line. 4. Install sun shades on the south-facing facade. 5. Ensure the tree protection plan complies with the project arborist's report. 6. Explore using larger tree specimens along the west facade. - Other Business: The board requested future briefings on recent changes to state CEQA law (AB 130) and a potential review of the city's ADU ordinance application process. - Next Meeting: The board is scheduled to reconvene in mid-September 2025.

The Public Arts Commission convened to review a draft request for qualifications (RFQ) for physical public art installations at Washington Park, focusing on artist selection criteria, panel composition, and project budgeting. Staff provided updates on cultural programming grants and events, and a commissioner raised a conflict of interest concern. Consent Calendar - Unanimously approved the draft meeting minutes from June 30, 2025. Public Comments & Testimony - Rachel Campos-Duvivier from Radium Presents thanked the commission for cultural programming grants and promoted Circus Bella performances scheduled for July 26 at Radium Runway. Discussion Items - RFQ for Washington Park Public Art: Commissioners and staff discussed the draft RFQ in detail. Key feedback included: - Commissioners expressed support for lowering the minimum professional experience requirement for artists from five to three years to encourage broader participation. - Commissioners recommended changing the portfolio submission requirement from up to ten pieces to a minimum of five. - Commissioners proposed increasing Public Arts Commission representation on the review panel from one to two members. - Commissioners suggested adding stipends for shortlisted artists, potentially increasing the total budget from $250,000 to $260,000. - Commissioners advised adjusting the project timeline to allow more time for fabrication and installation, with suggestions to extend activities into early 2027. - Commissioners requested improved site maps in the RFQ, including aerial and ground-level views for clarity. - Commissioners discussed local preference points for artists living or working in Alameda, but no consensus was reached on a scoring system. - Staff outlined the budget, with $200,000 allocated for the artwork and $50,000 for site preparation, permits, plaques, and contingency. - Staff explained the review panel composition, which may include members from the Public Arts Commission, Recreation and Parks Commission, city staff, neighborhood residents, and regional art administrators. - Staff Communications: Jackie Kalia announced a collaborative application for a California Arts Council grant to designate Alameda Point as a cultural district and highlighted upcoming cultural events funded by grants, including Circus Bella and Plain Air Paint Out. - Conflict of Interest Inquiry: A commissioner inquired about the permissibility of applying for the RFQ as an artist, citing his spouse's art practice. Staff agreed to consult the city attorney for guidance on recusal procedures. Key Outcomes - Approved the June 30 meeting minutes. - Directed staff to incorporate commissioner feedback into the RFQ draft for future distribution. - Noted the conflict of interest question for follow-up with the city attorney.

The Alameda Historical Advisory Board convened on July 17, 2025, to consider a Certificate of Approval for the demolition of the fire-damaged building at 802 Buena Vista Avenue. The primary discussion centered on the property's loss of historic integrity, the findings required for demolition approval, and ensuring a strong historic record. The board also provided feedback on the design of the proposed replacement structure. Consent Calendar - Approved the draft minutes from the previous meeting without comment. Public Comments & Testimony - Christopher Buckley (Alameda Architectural Preservation Society): Provided detailed design recommendations for the proposed new building to better incorporate salvaged historic elements. His 12-point list included retaining porch rafter tails and original fieldstone column bases, ensuring appropriate window types and alignments, and correcting the resolution's language regarding historic criteria. Discussion Items - Staff Presentation: Planning staff Tristan Swear presented the item, outlining the legal criteria for demolition: the structure no longer meets the criteria for a historic monument, or has become a detriment to the community that cannot be readily cured. Staff concluded the 1908 craftsman building, severely damaged in a 2022 fire, had lost its historic integrity and structural soundness (red-tagged). The recommendation was to approve the demolition, remove the property from the Historic Building Study List, and proceed with design review for the new structure. - Board Deliberation: - Board Member Biffin raised extensive questions about the historic evaluation's completeness. He argued the DPR (Documentation of Primary Record) form and historic memorandum had weaknesses, including a lack of interior access during assessment, insufficient research on the Strang Brothers builders, and an unclear analysis of the property's potential significance within the Mastic Park subdivision. He advocated for strengthening the final historic record. - Board Member Bevan and Chair Hernandez sought clarification on the 30% demolition threshold trigger and the process for removing a property from the study list. - Both Biffin and Hernandez expressed appreciation that the applicant's revised design aimed to incorporate salvageable historic features, viewing it as a positive step towards contextual harmony. - The board discussed the wording of the resolution's findings, aiming to make them more precise and less definitive where evidence was limited (e.g., regarding the Strang Brothers' significance). Key Outcomes - Motion and Vote: A motion was made and seconded to approve the Certificate of Approval and the draft resolution with amendments to findings 1-4 for greater accuracy and neutrality. The motion passed unanimously (Aye: Biffin, Bevan, Hernandez). - Directives: - Staff was directed to finalize the resolution with the discussed amendments and ensure the language accurately reflects the board's intent. - The board strongly encouraged staff and the consultant to consider enhancing the final DPR record based on the substantive comments made during the meeting. - Design suggestions from the public and board were noted for consideration during the subsequent staff-level design review process. - Future Agenda Items: The board requested future informational items, including an educational session on the city's definition of historic resources and an update on base reuse and development activities at Alameda Point.

This regular meeting of the Alameda City Council on July 15, 2025, began with a closed session at 5:00 PM and the public session at 7:00 PM. The council approved a consent calendar with numerous routine items, heard public comments, voted on a transient occupancy tax sharing agreement to support a World Cup team training camp, and directed staff to explore options for an ordinance banning mylar balloons. Consent Calendar - The consent calendar included 20 items (5-A through 5-U, and 5-W; item 5-V was pulled and will return in September). Items 5-A (minutes) were initially pulled for clarification but then re-approved. The council approved the consent calendar unanimously after a public announcement of salary increases for the city attorney (6.41% equity increase) and city manager (11.25% equity increase), effective July 13, 2025. Public Comments & Testimony - Brian Kennedy criticized the city for posting proclamations on Facebook that he claimed supported illegal immigration and a U.S. senator he described as a "race hustler." He urged the council to stop making the city a laughingstock. - Margaret Fago (President, Frank Bette Center for the Arts) invited the council and public to the center's 20th anniversary Plenair Paint Out event, featuring 40 artists from across the country. - Christopher Sewald (Roots investor) spoke in support of the TOT agreement, citing positive past experiences with the America's Cup and soccer fields in Alameda. - Kathy Weber (Executive Director, Downtown Alameda) expressed strong support for the TOT agreement, calling it a strategic investment that would place Alameda on a global stage. - Madeline Sadek (President & CEO, Alameda Chamber and Economic Alliance) voiced strong support for the TOT agreement, emphasizing the tourism boost and global visibility. - Ron Mooney (President, Downtown Alameda Business Association) fully supported the proposal, noting the excitement a visiting national team would bring. - Maria Henderson (AC Transit) announced the new AC Transit Realign bus service network effective August 10, 2025, and urged the community to check for route changes. Discussion Items - Item 7-A: Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) Sharing Agreement with Oakland Roots & Soul – Dwayne Dalman (Economic Development Division Manager) presented the staff recommendation to authorize the city manager to negotiate a TOT sharing agreement not to exceed $150,000 to support a World Cup team base camp at the Roots & Soul training facility during the 2026 FIFA Men's World Cup. The agreement would be funded from incremental TOT revenue generated by expected increases in hotel and short-term rental occupancy (historical baseline: 77% hotel, 58% short-term rental in June). A team base camp is projected to bring 60,000–80,000 tourists and 30,000 hotel nights. Lindsay Barrens (President, Oakland Roots & Soul) provided additional context, noting the facility's 15-year lease and the need for public funding to cover FIFA-related costs. All public speakers supported the proposal. Council members expressed enthusiasm, citing community benefits and regional collaboration. The resolution was approved unanimously. - Item 10-A: Council Referral – Mylar Balloon Prohibition – Councilmember Jensen introduced a referral to direct staff to draft an ordinance prohibiting the sale and distribution of mylar balloons. She cited 54 documented service interruptions due to mylar balloons over the past five years, affecting over 17,000 Alameda residents, plus environmental harm. Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft advocated for a public education campaign first and questioned enforcement. Councilmember Daysog wanted input from businesses. City Manager Ott noted staff was already working on several other ordinances (affordable housing, short-term rentals, food vendors) and could bring back options. An amendment was adopted to direct staff to return with options for an ordinance (e.g., banning helium or outright sale) rather than drafting an ordinance immediately. The motion passed 4-1, with Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft dissenting. Key Outcomes - Unanimous approval (5-0) of the consent calendar, including items 5-J and 5-K (contract amendments for city attorney and city manager with salary increases). - Unanimous approval (5-0) of Resolution authorizing the city manager to negotiate and execute a TOT sharing agreement with Oakland Roots & Soul for up to $150,000 for the 2026 World Cup team base camp. - Approved council referral (4-1) directing staff to return with options for an ordinance prohibiting the sale and distribution of mylar balloons in Alameda, to be considered after other pending ordinances; public education and park rule updates were not included in the motion. - The meeting was adjourned in memory of Donna Vaughn, co-founder of the Friends of the Alameda Library.

The regularly scheduled Planning Board meeting for July 14, 2025, was canceled. No agenda items were discussed, no public testimony was taken, and no decisions were made.

The Alameda Recreation and Park Commission met on Thursday, July 10, 2025, at 7:00 PM in the City Hall Council Chambers. The meeting featured a presentation on the progress of The Road Home 5-Year Plan to prevent and respond to homelessness, and a workshop to review and comment on a concept for a surf pool at Enterprise Park. Commissioners heard public comments, discussed agenda items, and took action on minutes. Consent Calendar - 5-A – Approved the minutes of the June 12, 2025 regular meeting by a unanimous roll-call vote (4-0). Public Comments & Testimony Non-Agenda Public Comment: None. 6-A – The Road Home Homelessness Plan: No public comment. 6-B – Surf Pool at Enterprise Park: Twelve speakers offered comments: - Catherine Chang (owner of Live Simply Surf Shop) – In support, sharing a personal story of how surfing helped her heal after her husband’s death; emphasized the surf pool’s potential as an inclusive community space. - Cami Richards (Alameda Community Sailing Center) – Supportive but raised concerns about protecting existing businesses on the site, and praised potential infrastructure benefits (water, electricity). - Richard Bangart – Opposed to leasing city land; argued the developer should purchase property elsewhere and that a master plan for Enterprise Park should come first. - Irene Dieter – Opposed to locating a private commercial facility in a public park; called the site the “wrong spot” and urged selling land to the developer rather than leasing. - Peter Decock – In support, citing surfing’s benefits for health, disability inclusion, and environmental education. - Rick Lewis – Opposed, preferring a natural habitat and pedestrian-oriented space over a commercial venue. - Marjorie Powell (member of Friends of the Alameda Wildlife Refuge) – Opposed to privatizing park land; urged the city to explore other locations at Alameda Point. - David Mick (President of Power Engineering Construction) – In support, noting the project would activate an underutilized area and align with the city’s vision. - Ken Robles – In support but emphasized the need for a master plan; also suggested adding sand volleyball courts. - Amelia McDonald (resident, swim coach) – In support, highlighting surfing’s accessibility and the demand for a safe learning environment. - Ruth Abbey – Opposed to private use of public land; suggested the surf park be located across the street and that a master plan be funded separately. Discussion Items 6-A – The Road Home 5-Year Plan Presentation Scott Means (President, Social Service Human Relations Board), Michelle Buckholz, and Mark Sinclair (Dignity Village resident) presented updates. Key points: - Since 2021, 226 affordable housing units have been completed, with 1,300 more in development. - 81 temporary/emergency shelter beds added; a guaranteed basic income pilot (Rise Up) serves 150 low-income individuals. - Alameda Care Team now permanent, operating 24/7 for mental health crises. - Point-in-time count (Jan 2024) found two-thirds of unhoused are unsheltered; African Americans disproportionately affected (31% of homeless vs. 7% of general population). - Mark Sinclair shared personal experience and advocated for more life-skills programs (NA/AA) and job training. - Commissioners asked about employment programs, point-of-contact for residents, and support after housing placement. Staff noted limited after-care funding and a recent federal program elimination. - No action was taken; the presentation was informational. 6-B – Surf Pool Workshop William Duncanson (Neptune Beach Surf Club) presented a concept to lease 5.5 acres at Enterprise Park to build a surf pool with ancillary amenities (restaurant, renovated building, improved parking and bike/ped access). The developer proposes to fund a park master plan and improve park infrastructure. Key points from discussion: - 72% of 1,200+ survey respondents supported the concept; 64% expressed interest in learning to surf. - Projected opening: early 2029, contingent on approvals. - Construction cost estimated “north of $50 million”; no city capital contribution required. - Commissioners questioned local demand, traffic impacts, and risks if the business fails. The developer stated detailed studies would occur if an Exclusive Negotiating Agreement (ENA) is pursued. - Staff noted that without this project, Enterprise Park improvements would not be possible for 4–6 years due to resource constraints. Key Outcomes - Minutes approved unanimously (4-0). - Road Home presentation: No action; commissioners thanked presenters and requested follow-up on volunteer opportunities. - Surf Pool workshop: No decision was made. Commissioners expressed general interest in further exploration, with emphasis on robust community engagement, a master-planning process, and a strong community benefits agreement. Chair Radis summarized that the discussion would inform potential next steps (e.g., ENA) but no formal motion was taken. - Next meeting: Scheduled for September 11, 2025.

The Alameda Golf Commission held a regular meeting on July 9, 2025, at 12:30 PM. Commissioners present included Jones, Tom, Saran, and Kahn (Commissioner Boris absent due to a last-minute conflict). The meeting covered public comment, commissioner communications, approval of previous minutes, a director's report with updates on parks and recreation, and discussion of Greenway Golf's rate structure and allegations regarding resident fees. Public Comments & Testimony - Mr. Poochie (speaking as a resident and golf club member) expressed strong opposition to a proposal by Greenway Golf that would require Alameda residents to pay the non-resident fee of $89 (plus tax) to maintain early morning tee times (8 a.m. or 10 a.m.) for tournaments on weekends. He stated that this treatment is "unbearable" for many golf club members and urged the commission to address the issue in the future. Commissioner Communications - Commissioner Jones proposed moving the September regular meeting to October 28, 2025 (the last Tuesday of the month) and cancelling the September meeting entirely. The commission agreed. - Commissioner Jones also confirmed that Commissioner Downing is no longer on the commission and requested that the city begin the process to find a replacement. Discussion Items - Approval of Minutes: The minutes from the special meeting of May 21, 2025, were approved unanimously. - Greenway Golf Report: No representative from Greenway Golf was present to deliver their report. - Director's Report (Recreation and Park Director Long): - Upcoming community events: Rhythmics Rising Sea (July 12 at Shoreline Park), Apollo 11 splashdown anniversary (July 19 at USS Hornet), Alameda Walk Series, Starlight Movies in the Park, and more. - June classes and camps had over 1,200 enrollments; fall registration is open. - The 57th annual Sand Castle and Sculpture Contest had nearly 500 participants and over 100 entries, drawing about 2,000 people. - The 48th annual 4th of July parade was hosted by ARPD. - Parks updates: New pickleball courts at Lidecker, shoreline path erosion repairs, 10 trees planted at Main Street Linear Park, and Estuary Park phase II (5-acre extension) going out to bid in late July. - Rate Structure Decision: City Manager reached an agreement with Greenway Golf. The commission's requests were rejected; Greenway's proposed rates for the North Course ($64 for residents, $46 for seniors) were approved by the city. The South Course resident rates will remain unchanged for an extended period. - Allegation of Resident Fee Increases: Commissioner Tong raised an allegation that Greenway Golf is attempting to charge Alameda residents non-resident rates for early morning tee times. The director confirmed he would investigate by contacting Greenway's general manager and cross-referencing with the current lease. Findings will be shared via email and made part of the public record. Key Outcomes - Vote: Unanimous approval of the May 21, 2025, meeting minutes. - Decision: The September 9, 2025, regular meeting is cancelled; the next regular meeting will be on October 28, 2025. - Decision: The City Manager approved Greenway Golf's proposed rate structure for the North Course ($64 resident, $46 senior); South Course rates remain unchanged. - Referral: Director Long will investigate the allegation that Greenway Golf is charging Alameda residents non-resident fees for early morning tee times and will report back to the commission. - Adjournment: The meeting was adjourned by motion.

The Commission on Persons with Disabilities met on July 9, 2025 at 6:30 PM via hybrid format at City Hall. The meeting included an informational overview of the city's Residential Rehabilitation Program, the first annual update on the ADA Transition Plan, and adoption of revised commission bylaws. Commissioners also welcomed a new member and discussed community engagement. Consent Calendar - Minutes Approval: The commission approved minutes from June 5, 2024, January 22, 2025, March 12, 2025, and May 14, 2025. Commissioner Lyons abstained from the first three sets (as she was not present) and voted only on the May 14, 2025 minutes. The three commissioners present for the earlier meetings voted to approve them; four commissioners approved the May minutes. All minutes were approved. Public Comments & Testimony - Carol Gottstein (new Mastic Board member) stated she had seen a flyer for the Residential Rehabilitation Program at Dine and Connect but noted it has not appeared in Mastic publications or on Mastic's website, and the social services specialist may not be actively promoting it. - A member of the public (mentioned earlier in transcript as having attended Dine and Connect) expressed surprise the program was not widely publicized at Mastic or elsewhere. Discussion Items - Residential Rehabilitation Program Overview (Info Item): Grecia Manayan, Program Manager in Housing and Human Services, presented two federally funded (CDBG) programs: the Minor Home Modification Grant (up to $5,000) and the Housing Rehabilitation Loan (up to $15,000). The programs are for safety, accessibility, and mobility improvements for owner-occupied homes, prioritizing seniors and individuals with disabilities. Eligibility is limited to low- and moderate-income households (80% of area median income). Since launching a few months ago, zero applications have been received. The program administrator (Rebuilding Together East Bay Network) has conducted outreach at the food bank, Dine and Connect, and Mastic Senior Center, but the application is not available online. Commissioners suggested posting the application online, distributing flyers through the commission's newsletter, and engaging first responders, hospitals, the library, and the Alameda Post. The commission offered to share the program in its newsletter and through nonprofit networks. - ADA Transition Plan Annual Update: Lillian Jewell, ADA Coordinator, presented the first annual update since the plan's adoption in June 2024. Highlights included: - Community Engagement: Monthly newsletter "Accessibility in Alameda" launched April 2025 with nearly 300 new subscribers (total over 2,000; 30% open rate). Invited community to share ADA impact stories for the 35th anniversary. - Departmental Engagement: Quarterly interdepartmental Accessibility Review Team meetings; collaboration with Recreation and Parks, Library, IT, Planning/Building/Transportation, and Code Enforcement on accessibility improvements. - Physical Site Improvements: Of 58 assessed city-owned facilities, work is progressing in phases through FY2032-33. Notable updates: - Mastic Senior Center: 131 of 423 barriers already addressed (door force, signage, etc.). Architectural design firm contracted; construction RFP expected in FY25-26. - Veterans Memorial Building: Bathroom made single-user ADA compliant; auditorium floors refinished. Design phase for kitchen/dining room on ground floor. - City Hall: Signage and stair treads updated; comprehensive design assessment being solicited. - Washington Park: 160 of 546 barriers addressed (bathroom fixtures, pipe insulation). Recreation center renovation starts FY25-26. - Harbor Bay Ferry Terminal: Design complete for accessible parking and shuttle stop upgrades; City Council to consider construction contract July 15, 2025. - Civic Center Parking Garage: Design in progress; Council to consider construction contract September 2025. - Infrastructure Improvements: Sidewalk Repair Program (funded by Measure B/BB) has two components: 1. Saw grinding: Over 10,000 tripping hazards removed citywide ($1 million investment; nearly 2 miles of sidewalks repaired). Initial focus on city sites and high-pedestrian streets (Park, Webster); next phase targets socially vulnerable neighborhoods. 2. Property Owner Pilot Program (launched January 2025): 221 property owners notified; over 130 participated (7 hired own contractor); 19 applied for financial hardship (city covers 25-100% of costs). Invoiced over $150,000; received $76,000 in payments (9,000 sq ft of sidewalk). City pays labor; property owners pay supplies. If tree roots cause damage, city may cover costs. - Program Improvements: Reasonable accommodation and grievance procedures publicly posted; HR added workplace violence policy; effective communication initiatives (translation, ASL, event planning guides); standardized practices for job descriptions and documents. - What's Next (FY25-26): Continue sidewalk program, complete Phase I building projects (some Phase II deferred due to funding), emergency preparedness plans with Fire Department, further website accessibility improvements. - Commission Bylaws Review: Commissioners reviewed redline edits reflecting prior discussion. Key change: reduction from 9 to 7 members. A revised purpose statement was added (consistent with council-established language). Motion to adopt the new bylaws passed unanimously. Key Outcomes - Bylaws Adopted: The revised bylaws (reducing commission to 7 members and updating purpose statement) were approved by unanimous vote. - Vice Chair Election Deferred: A vice chair will be elected at the next meeting; chair/vice chair elections will return to January rotation. - Upcoming Actions: - City Council to consider construction contract for Harbor Bay Ferry Terminal on July 15, 2025. - City Council to consider construction contract for Civic Center Parking Garage in September 2025. - ADA coordinator will follow up on sharing previous survey responses about accessibility with East Bay Regional Parks District for their 10-year plan. - The commission will include the Residential Rehabilitation Program information in its newsletter and explore outreach through additional city departments. - Commission Communications: Welcomed new Commissioner Julie Lyons (healthcare background, disability advocate). Commended outgoing Commissioner Roloff (via plaque). Discussed CERT program evacuation concerns, ADA 35th anniversary activities (banners on Webster, Central, Park streets; newsletter stories invited). Lillian Jewell noted upcoming events: Disability Pride rally July 11, 2025 at CIL campus in Berkeley; MTC Community Advisory Council application deadline July 14, 2025; East Bay Regional Parks District survey for 10-year plan.