The Public Meeting Index

The Billings City Council held a business meeting on September 28, 2026. The meeting featured a report from Superintendent Dr. Edwin Garcia on traffic safety around schools, a proclamation celebrating the 125th anniversary of the Billings Public Library, and public comment dominated by concerns over school zone safety following a recent fatal accident near Will James Middle School. The council debated and voted on the dissolution of the Citizen Police Advisory Board and consolidated the advisory committees for the city's three urban renewal districts. Multiple public hearings were held on special improvement district (SID) assessments, landfill fees, false alarm fees, weed abatements, and sidewalk costs, with several residents testifying against specific assessments. Presentations & Proclamations - School Traffic Safety (Superintendent Dr. Edwin Garcia): Dr. Garcia requested a stronger partnership with the city to address traffic safety near schools, citing a struggle to staff crossing guard positions (only 40 of 48 filled). He raised concerns about drivers speeding through school zones, ignoring bus stop signs, and the dangerous behavior of minors and adults on scooters and motorbikes. - Library 125th Anniversary: Mayor Nelson proclaimed October 1, 2026, as the 125th anniversary of the Billings Public Library. Library Director noted the library served over 172,000 people across Yellowstone County last year, with over 300,000 visits and 729,000 items checked out. Public Comments & Testimony - Consent Agenda & Agenda Items: - Jack Hanson (Ward 4) urged the council to reject the $59,000 Homeland Security Grant for the bomb squad (Item 1H), arguing its requirements for information sharing with ICE and adherence to a federal executive order on reverse discrimination would cause moral injury. - Maggie Roberts and Brittany Brester (Wyoming Ave) testified against sidewalk assessments for which they were charged over $7,000, stating the sidewalks did not improve safety at the intersection of 25th and Wyoming and that the process lacked transparency. - Jeffrey Kettleson (Ward 5) opposed using $560,000 in Tax Increment Financing (TIF) for soccer field lights (Item 1E), arguing the funds could better be used for school crossing guards. - Katie Schreiner (Downtown Billings Partnership) spoke against consolidating the three urban renewal district advisory committees (Item 11), citing a loss of localized expertise. - SID 1430 (Annafeld Subdivision): David Roberts and Michelle Whiting opposed the assessment for streetlights and park improvements, claiming surprise costs of up to $11,000 and a lack of transparency from the developer. - Traffic Safety (Non-Agenda Items): Following the recent tragedy at Will James Middle School, several residents, including Leslie Cook, Ben Dorman, John Halverson, and Tanya Ludwig, addressed the council urging immediate action on traffic safety, safer street design, and a review of the school zone policy. Discussion & Action Items - Consent Agenda (Items 1A-1Q): The council approved the consent agenda with several items separated. The majority of items were approved. A notable debate occurred on Item 1N (Citizen Police Advisory Board). A substitute motion to repeal the board passed 7-3, with council members supporting the repeal citing the need for the new police chief to establish their own advisory structure, and those opposed arguing against eliminating a citizen oversight mechanism. - Fees, Fines & Abatements (Items 2, 3, 4): The council approved resolutions for solid waste fees, false alarm violations, and weed abatements as recommended by staff. - Special Improvement Districts (Items 5, 6, 7, 8, 9): The council held public hearings and approved assessments for SIDs 1428, 1429, 1430, and sidewalk SIDs 2928 and 2929. The vote on SID 1430 passed with one vote in opposition (Councilmember Kennedy), following significant public testimony against the assessment for lack of homeowner notification. - Advisory Board Dissolution: - Item 10 (Animal Control Advisory Board): The council voted 9-1 to approve the first reading of an ordinance repealing the board, based on a recommendation that the board was seldom used and not considered helpful by the animal control officer. - Item 11 (Urban Renewal District Advisory Committees): The council approved a resolution merging the three existing urban renewal district advisory committees into a single statutory advisory committee, with two at-large representatives from each district. The motion passed on a divided vote, with council members expressing concern over the loss of district-specific expertise, while others argued it would streamline the process. Council Initiatives - Councilmember Aspenlighter: Introduced an initiative to enforce stricter time limits and rules on council debate to improve meeting efficiency. The initiative was moved to the Operations Committee for placement on a future agenda. - Councilmember Lindley: Introduced an initiative to review and revise school zone speed policies, specifically around middle schools, prompted by the recent accident near Will James. The council voted unanimously to place the discussion on the October 5th work session agenda. Key Votes & Outcomes - Citizen Police Advisory Board: Motion to repeal passed 7-3. - Animal Control Advisory Board: Motion to repeal passed 9-1. - Urban Renewal Advisory Committees: Motion to consolidate passed on divided vote. - SID 1430 Assessment: Motion passed with one vote opposed. - School Zone Initiative: Unanimously directed to October 5th work session.

The Board of Alderman held a special meeting on September 28, 2026, at 7:00 PM in the Aldermanic Chamber. The meeting was called to order with 11 members present. The primary purpose was a public hearing on Resolution R26057, authorizing additional borrowing from the Clean Water State Revolving Fund for a PFAS pilot project at the Four Hills Landfill. Public Comments & Testimony - No members of the public testified in favor or in opposition during the public hearing on Resolution R26057. Discussion Items - Public Hearing R26057: Additional Borrowing for PFAS Pilot Project: Chair of the Budget Review Committee, Alderman Dowd, presided over the hearing. Superintendent of Solid Waste, Jeff LaFleur, presented the item. He explained the board previously approved $850,000 from the state for a PFOS (PFAS) pilot treatment and destruction test project at the Four Hills Landfill. After going out to bid, the project costs exceeded the initial funding. LaFleur stated the state agreed to provide the additional funding to complete the project, requiring approval to borrow an additional $345,000 from the Clean Water State Revolving Fund. No aldermanic discussion or questions followed the presentation. Key Outcomes - Public Hearing Closed: The public hearing on Resolution R26057 was opened and closed at 7:04 PM with no testimony. - Meeting Adjourned: Alderman O'Brien moved to adjourn the special meeting. The motion passed by a roll call vote of 11 in favor and 0 opposed. The meeting adjourned at 7:05 PM.

This study session focused on the utility fund forecast and recommended rate and fee adjustments for fiscal year 2026-27, covering water, wastewater, electric, natural gas, and solid waste. Council members discussed the proposed increases, equity between customer classes, and affordability. The meeting also reviewed a consent agenda item for Park North development and a barricade rental contract increase. Consent Calendar - Council approved appointments to boards and committees by voice vote (motion by Councilmember Heredia, second by Councilmember Taylor). No dissenting votes. Discussion Items - Utility Fund Forecast Overview: Management and Budget Director Brian Richel presented the updated utility fund forecast. The fund balance improved from 17.3% to 20.6% in FY 2025-26 due to higher water consumption and lower operating costs. However, negative net sources and uses are projected for FY 2026-27 and 2027-28, drawing the fund balance down to 16.4%. Staff attribute the improvement to a $2.3 million utility debt refunding and credits from the Central Arizona Project reconciliation. - Water Utility Rate Proposal: Water Resources Director Joe Gidsee and staff presented a proposed rate adjustment of 3.5% on the service charge (per Audit and Finance Committee recommendation) and usage tiers of 3.5% to 4.5%. A new two-tier excess water surcharge for commercial customers was introduced: Tier 1 (100-150% of winter water average) at a 13% surcharge, and Tier 2 (above 150%) at 23% surcharge for general commercial and 15%/25% for landscape. The drought commodity charge would increase from $0.08 to $0.13 per thousand gallons to allow dynamic adjustment. Council discussed equity and affordability: a typical residential bill (6,000 gallons) would increase $1.69/month (3.8%), while a typical landscape customer (33,000 gallons) would see a $30.13/month increase (12.8%). Councilmember Taylor expressed concerns about overburdening small businesses and residents, advocating for cost savings elsewhere before rate increases. Councilmember Goforth supported the equity approach, noting it aligns usage with system costs. - Wastewater Utility Rate Proposal: Staff recommended a 7.5% increase for residential and 8.5% for non-residential service and usage charges to support operations and infrastructure. A typical residential bill (4,000 gallons) would increase $2.26/month. - Electric Utility Rate Proposal: Energy and Sustainability Director Scott Boucher proposed lowering the residential system service charge from $3 to $2, with usage charges of 3-6% depending on season. A typical residential bill would increase $3.66/month (2.5%). Commercial rates: system service charge at $5, with usage charges increased up to 6%. Staff also proposed a $60 per billing cycle manual meter read fee for the three customers who decline AMI meters. - Natural Gas Utility Rate Proposal: Residential rates include a $1.50 system service charge increase and usage charge adjustments (4.5% to 6%). A typical residential bill would increase $2.35/month. Commercial rates unchanged from prior forecast: $3 system service charge increase, 3-5% usage tier increases. - Solid Waste Rate Proposal: Director Sherry Collins recommended a 5.5% residential rate increase ($1.92/month for 90-gallon trash), plus a $0.05 increase to the Mesa Green & Clean fee (total $1.97/month). Commercial rates increase by about $11 per bin, with increased discounts for multiple bins. Bulk item and appliance collection fees increase $4 each. Roll-off rates increase $21.50 per use. Council discussed recycling market volatility and the value of the program; staff noted current public-private partnerships are cost-effective. Key Outcomes - Council will consider a Notice of Intent to adjust utility rates at the October 5, 2026 meeting, setting a 60-day public notice period. - Introduction of rate ordinances is scheduled for December 1, 2026, with adoption on December 8, 2026. New rates would take effect February 1, 2027, appearing on February and March bills. - The barricade rental service contract increase (Item 4F) was discussed but not voted on; it will be on the consent agenda for the September 28 council meeting. - Council reviewed the Park North development (Item 6A) on the consent agenda; several council members expressed disappointment with the design change from 120 apartment units to 78 attached duplex/townhome units, citing lost amenities and reduced open space. - Councilmember Heredia requested the city examine opportunities to lower utility rates by using fund balance reserves rather than passing all cost pressures to ratepayers.

On September 28, 2026, the Mesa Planning and Zoning Board held a public hearing to consider a consent agenda and a contested rezoning case for a 30-unit townhome development (ZON 21-00066, Greenfield Multifamily). After public testimony and board deliberation, the board voted 4-3 to approve the rezoning with conditions. Consent Calendar - Item 2A: Approval of the September 9, 2026 Planning and Zoning Board meeting minutes. - Item 3A (ZON 25-00895): Terribles Commercial Development – rezone of 1.3 acres from Planned Employment Park with PAD overlay to Limited Commercial with site plan review and special use permit for a convenience market and service station. Staff recommended approval with conditions. - The consent calendar was approved unanimously via voice vote. Public Comments & Testimony - Wendy Wise (4222 East McClellan Circle) opposed the project, citing incompatibility with surrounding single-family homes on large lots, height (three stories), privacy concerns, traffic, and loss of neighborhood character. She argued a lower-density commercial use would be more appropriate as a transition. - Darren Jensen (1503 North Orlando) opposed, emphasizing security risks from elevated sightlines into backyards, overflow parking in the neighborhood, and the project not matching the existing zoning that drew him to the area. - Janet Coate (1455 North Orlando, speaking for herself and husband Tim Cody) opposed, raising financial impacts (property value decrease), plane crash risks from nearby Falcon Field, privacy/surveillance from three-story windows, transient rental population, and inconsistency with the Mesa 2050 plan. She warned of legal precedent and city liability. - Chase Winterston (4233 East Hackamore Street) opposed, adding concerns about power lines and drainage. - Lorely Lane Kildy (4228 East Hope Street) opposed, describing the lot as oddly shaped and the attempt to fit 30 units as too dense. She noted that many opposed residents could not attend due to daytime meeting hours. - Rich Vales (4222 East McClellan, 11) opposed, drawing a parallel to Scottsdale's overdevelopment that pushed him to Mesa, calling the project greedy. - Lenore Dye (422 East MacLean, 10) opposed, citing safety from a past plane crash and disappointment that the developer's neighborhood meeting did not reflect strong opposition. - Ginger Blum (1426 North Orlando) opposed, estimating that 30 three-bedroom units could bring at least 60 children, creating inadequate play space and safety issues. - Jason Oaks (1521 North Orlando) opposed, questioned the six-foot block wall effectiveness, noted coyotes and safety along the canal, and argued that three stories are out of character – nearby multifamily is all single-story. - Mark Hunsaker (424 East Hackamore Street) opposed, stating the elevation difference means second-story windows will look directly into neighbors' yards across the canal despite distance. He noted homes on that site would have standard setbacks, while the proposed PAD allows closer placement. - Additional opposed speakers (April Gunnon, Karen Saharis, Untaker, Amanda Wannerson, Chris Porter, Holly Whiteman, Sally Packard, Sohi Williams, Jody Oaks, Mason Lenkilde) either spoke briefly or were noted for the record as opposed. Discussion Items - Applicant Presentation (Andy Funk and Michael Miller): The applicant summarized changes since the prior hearing (November 2025): two additional neighborhood meetings; removal of second-story balconies on the canal side; replacement of view fence with 6-ft CMU block wall; shifting buildings away from property line; splitting buildings to allow more trees; adopting DRB recommendations for traditional facade and roof design. They argued the site is appropriate for infill on an arterial road (Greenfield Road) and noted a 136–345 ft buffer from neighbors, a canal barrier, and traffic flowing directly onto the arterial. - Board Questions and Comments: - Board member Hills noted the need for multifamily but expressed concern about the number of zoning modification requests (10–11) and regretted the removal of the view fence that embraced the canal. - Board member Carpenter raised the height issue: three-story buildings are unprecedented in the immediate area; the applicant explained that a two-story layout would have placed backyards into the right-of-way, forcing them to use three stories along Greenfield. - Board member Wagner observed that two-story units along the canal (with three-story behind them) help mitigate privacy concerns. - Board member Trexler supported the rezoning principle but found the list of modifications excessive. - Vice Chair Pitcher was concerned about density along the canal, saying two more trees were insufficient. - Board member Montez thanked the applicant for efforts over four years and noted the vacant lot could become something worse. - Board member Carpenter (continued) cited a staff presentation that the 2050 General Plan designates the site as Urban Center (more intensity) and that the proposed units (3-bed, 2-bath, 2-car garage) are modest and larger than many homes. He also noted that residential uses generate less traffic than commercial ones. Key Outcomes - Motion: Board member Carpenter moved to approve Item 3B (ZON 21-00066) for the Greenfield Multifamily project, recommending approval with conditions. Board member Montez seconded. - Vote: 4 in favor (including Montez), 3 opposed (including Vice Chair Pitcher). Motion carried. - The meeting was adjourned following the vote.

The Sacramento Regional Transit Board of Directors met on September 28, 2026, with Chair Sing Allen presiding. Nine directors were present (Brewer, Budge, Dickinson, Hume, Jennings, Kennedy, Rorba, Schaefer, and Sing Allen) constituting a quorum. Directors Maple and Cerna were marked absent on the roll call, though Director Cerna later participated via comments. The meeting covered consent calendar approvals, customer service updates, the Green Line to Airport corridor strategy, and public concerns on various operational issues. Consent Calendar - The consent calendar included seven items. A correction was noted for Item 2.3 (on-call alternator rebuild services contract with Kirk's Automotive), adding a condition for a compliant drug and alcohol testing program. The protest from Romain was not continued. - Director Kennedy requested a future board report on how security operations (transit ambassadors, transit officers, sheriff's contract) interact and function together. - Public comments on consent items: Helen O'Connell expressed concerns about inadequate training on ADA paratransit scheduling software (Item 2.2) and urged full accessibility compliance for real-time information systems (Item 2.4). LR Roberts noted difficulty accessing the agenda online and questioned funding apportionment details on Item 2.6. Rick Hodgkins echoed those concerns and asked about bringing Blue Knight security officers in-house. Margie Donovan urged caution on software updates given past issues. - The consent calendar was approved unanimously. Public Comments & Testimony - Numerous members of the public provided comments throughout the meeting. Key positions included: - Dan Allison (individual) criticized the late posting of staff presentations and called for better transparency; he noted that AC Transit buses have 3–5 wheelchair slots, contradicting staff claims of space constraints. - Helen O'Connell (individual) supported split seating on new buses for carts/strollers and expressed preference for restoring Route 51E. - Troy Wilkinson (Strong Sac Town) echoed the need for earlier presentation posting, supported safe routes to transit funding, and questioned whether zero-tolerance fare enforcement truly prevents discrimination. - Ferramars Nababi (individual) urged SACRT to give public notice of fare policy changes and noted he witnessed a citation issued to an African-American woman, raising disparate impact concerns. - Rick Hodgkins (individual) discussed wheelchair capacity issues and asked if a cited passenger was a client of Alta California Regional Center. - During public comments on matters not on the agenda: - George Kahn (individual, bus rider) complained about late buses, lack of bus stop shelters, and driver retention; suggested better pay. - Michael Bevins (individual) proposed a clean-slate route redesign and a rim route connecting suburbs, citing service cut fears. - Dan Allison argued that customer satisfaction should be separated from safety and security due to the zero-tolerance policy rollout. - Crystal McGee Lee (ATU Local 256) and Jessica Johnson (employee) reported alleged harassment and hostile treatment of a nursing mother by a SACRT Go transportation superintendent, urging board attention. - Helen O'Connell commended the Mobility Advisory Council's new role in reviewing contracts and policies early. - Miguel Pinot (individual, blind) advocated for better pay and pensions for SACRT Go drivers to retain staff. - Ferramars Nababi supported lactation rights and suggested using the voice-of-god announcement system for delay notifications; he also noted increased one-car trains on the Blue Line. - Rick Hodgkins requested the Zoom link be included in meeting emails and supported equal pensions for SACRT Go drivers. Discussion Items - Customer Service Response to Feedback and Comments (Lisa Heinz): Staff reported on improvements: two new bus stops (McClatchy High School, El Paso Road) will be installed in spring 2027; the stop at 7th and Q Street was reinstalled; first/last mile connectivity efforts include e-mobility devices and bike lockers; and a countywide safe routes to transit plan is underway. Staff addressed Stockton Boulevard BRT alignment feedback and Route 51 wheelchair capacity, noting federal standards limit fixed-route buses to two wheelchair positions but BRT articulated buses could expand capacity. Regarding fare enforcement, staff explained that zero-tolerance policy is legally advised to avoid discriminatory enforcement claims; recent enforcement led to a 3% ridership drop but a $15,000–$20,000 monthly increase in fare machine revenue. A citation incident involving a passenger with alleged mental disability was investigated and the transit ambassador was exonerated. Staff also outlined work on stroller/wagon/cart policy and noted the policy on bicycles/scooters is at an earlier stage. - Director Questions: Director Cerna pressed for a timeline on a southeast corner bus shelter at El Centro Road; staff estimated early next year due to contractor lead times. Director Kennedy requested an explanation on late posting of presentations; staff committed to posting all presentations with the agenda at least 72 hours before meetings going forward. - Green Line to Airport – Right-of-Way Retention and Corridor Implementation Strategy (Anthony Adams): The presentation outlined a phased approach: first, extend Route 11 to the airport with 15-minute frequency, signal priority, and partnerships (JIB, Metro Air Park, Caltrans I-5 managed lanes mitigation). Later phases would add exclusive bus lanes, a downtown terminal, and ultimately structures convertible to light rail. The full light rail extension is estimated at $2 billion with $500 million for a new bridge. Staff emphasized preserving right-of-way for future light rail using $14 million in transit impact fees and an FTA exemption. - Director Discussion: Director Cerna highlighted the need to avoid sunk costs and asked about a flyover over SR 99; staff noted that is in later phases. Director Hume suggested exploring autonomous EVs, gondolas, or elevated systems as cheaper and more modern alternatives. Director Dickinson stressed sticking with the long-standing goal of light rail and expressed frustration with the pace; he questioned whether the proposed BRT routing via I-5 would be attractive compared to direct freeway service. Chair Sing Allen proposed a board workshop before the feasibility study to refine the approach and possibly redirect the $700,000 Caltrans grant toward right-of-way acquisition. Director Cerna noted ridership analysis would be critical to evaluating alternatives. - Resolution 2026-09118: Approving temporary appointment of future retired annuitant Priscilla Vargas. Approved unanimously after brief public comment thanking Vargas and urging timely posting of the ADA manager position. - General Manager's Report (Henry Li): Announced CFO Jason Johnson's retirement and promotion of Rondemer to CFO. Celebrated completion of the Dos Rail station in the River District and upcoming opening of a new station at the rail yards (green line) next month. Updated on new real-time information system contract with Clever Devices to improve arrival accuracy. Noted the Aftershock Music Festival (Oct 1–4) will offer free rides on SACRT for ticket holders, with shuttle buses and an estimated 160,000–200,000 attendees. Key Outcomes - Consent calendar approved unanimously. - Resolution 2026-09118 approving temporary appointment of Priscilla Vargas was adopted unanimously. - Board directed staff to schedule a workshop on the Green Line to Airport corridor before further work on the BRT feasibility study, to clarify alternatives and possibly redirect grant funds. - Staff committed to posting all presentations and agenda materials at least 72 hours before future board meetings. - Director Kennedy's request for a comprehensive report on security operations will be scheduled in the near future. - Public feedback on lactation accommodation issues at SACRT Go will be addressed through the grievance process; the board acknowledged the concerns. - The next regular board meeting was announced for October 26, 2026, at 4:00 p.m.

On September 28, 2026, city officials, community members, and family gathered at Alberta Plaza in Tuscaloosa to remember Councilmember Kip Tyner after his unexpected passing. The memorial service included the posting of the colors, an invocation, tributes from friends and colleagues, and a closing performance of his favorite song. Service Details - The service opened with the posting of the colors by the Tuscaloosa Police Department and Tuscaloosa Fire and Rescue Honor Guards, followed by an invocation. - No formal agenda or minutes were available for this event; this summary is based solely on the memorial service transcript. Tributes and Remembrances - Ellen Potts of Habitat for Humanity of Tuscaloosa described Tyner as a tireless advocate for the Alberta community after the tornado. She noted that 65% of his district lay in rubble and that Habitat for Humanity built 54 homes in Alberta, most for storm survivors, with his advocacy. - Whitney Neal honored Tyner by spelling out his name: Kindness, Intelligent, Proud, Trustworthy, Young at heart, Endearing, Neighborly, and Remarkable. - Michelle Coley recalled a 30-year friendship with Tyner, including co-hosting Great Day Tuscaloosa. She said Tyner appointed her to the framework steering committee, zoning board of adjustments, and personnel board, and that he was a mentor who saw a place for her before she fully saw it for herself. - Mayor Maddox described Tyner as “the mayor of Alberta,” praised his love for everyone, especially children, seniors, and animals, and said his story is worth telling. Announcements & Key Outcomes - Mayor Maddox announced that the City Council will move forward in the coming weeks to rename 26th Avenue East, adjacent to the Alberta School of Performing Arts, as Kip Tyner Parkway. - Alberta Plaza, where the memorial service was held, will be renamed Kip Tyner Plaza. - The service concluded with Kip Tyner’s favorite song, “Moving On Up,” sung in his honor.

This regular meeting of Cleveland City Council was held on September 28, 2026, with 13 members present (quorum achieved). The session began with the Pledge of Allegiance and official opening statement. Public comments focused heavily on the Rainbow Terrace Apartments explosion, police dispatch issues, and housing concerns. Council also processed multiple ordinances, resolutions, and communications, concluding with a commitment to hold a special investigative hearing on the Rainbow Terrace explosion with subpoena powers. Public Comments & Testimony - Matthew Strazinski (Ward 6, Slavic Village) spoke about police and community issues, criticizing 911 and the non-emergency line (621-234). He reported a 20-minute wait on a 911 call and alleged dispatcher misconduct, calling for better training and oversight. - Ilon Zan Jay Ne (Iajine Moses) (Ward 5) addressed the Rainbow Terrace Apartments explosion, stating it has been “over 15 months” with no resolution. She described displacement, high lead levels in her son, and emotional trauma, feeling abandoned by the city. - Shamika Howard (Ward 5) spoke on public housing and the explosion. She described moving into Garden Valley with no fire alarms, then the day of the explosion (after giving birth). She criticized Mayor Bibb for suggesting a shelter cot and said the city’s response disrupted her breastfeeding and caused her son to ask if their house was still burning. - Daryl Houston (Bedford, city issues) called for the removal of Dan Mongolius (Health Department chair), demanded a federal investigation into the law and fire departments, and alleged record withholding. He also complained about a white property manager using racial slurs and promised to hold the city accountable. - Diamond Morales (Ward 5) said residents lost everything and received no help; she demanded feedback and accountability for the fire that caused a loss of life. - Andre Rowe (Ward 5, public housing concerns) questioned the city’s disregard for constituents, describing dog feces in hallways and lack of maintenance. He argued that if the explosion could have been prevented through proper maintenance, someone broke the law. He called for a moment of silence for Cordell Sheffield (deceased). - Richard Starr (Ward 5, public housing concerns) questioned why the city held a press conference declaring the Rainbow Terrace investigation closed when no cause was determined. He cited other gas explosion investigations (East Harlem, Silver Spring, Massachusetts) that eventually found causes. He asked why the city stopped after 15 months and noted FOX 8 I-team reported high-rise inspection lapses. He demanded full investigation files. - Jessica Fitzgerald (Ward 5, handicapped accessible housing) said she lived on the third floor despite a doctor’s letter for a lower floor due to her legally blind daughter. The explosion happened the morning they were supposed to move. She demanded answers from Mayor Bibb and the city, stating she lost her personal belongings including her dad’s ashes and her deceased boyfriend’s items. She reported rent increases and said she would keep coming until she gets help. - Brenda Bickerstaff (Ward not given) discussed a historic church fire on East 55th, alleging arson and asking who paid the suspect. She then addressed Rainbow Terrace, demanding release of the investigation file and saying Mayor Bibb should overrule his law director to hold CMHA and Enbridge accountable. She urged council to stand with the families. Communications & Resolutions - Petitions filed from CPP group customers regarding July 26, 2026 blackouts (File 1198-2026). - Liquor license applications (new, transfer, location change) for addresses in Wards 8, 14, 5, 7, and 11. - Condolence resolutions passed for Rory James Garrett III, Stanley Griffin, Yolanda Germain Walker, Annie Julia Banks, Jameil Hassan Coomptz, and Shirley Diane Witherspoon. - Congratulatory resolutions passed for Dr. Lois A. Keith, Team Cleveland AAU basketball championships, Levita Parker, and Towards Employment’s 50th anniversary gala, plus a recognition for James “Jimmy Scott” Arnold. Legislative Actions First Reading Emergency Ordinances Referred (for administrative and committee review) Ordinances 1162-2026 through 1176-2026 and 1203-2026 were read, covering topics from office lease for Police Commission, landmark designations (St. Jerome Church, St. Mary of the Assumption), vehicle detention center contract, Summer Sprout gardening program, state road projects (I-480 ramps, Warren Road bridge, Stokes Boulevard), nuisance biofilm treatment plant at Hopkins Airport, airport fire training, target speed pilot project, Way Park Avenue resurfacing, LA2028 Olympic torch relay host agreement, and landmark designation for state vocational planning center. All were referred. First Reading Emergency Ordinances to Be Passed Ordinances 1179-2026, 1181-2026, 1182-2026, and 1183-2026 (funding for Dia de Muertos festival, senior lawn care in multiple wards) were suspended and passed unanimously (13-0 or 13 yes) after a motion to suspend rules. First Reading Ordinance Referred for Review Ordinance 1171-2026 (amending CPP rates and definitions) was referred for review. First Reading Emergency Resolution Referred for Review Resolution 1199-2026 (urging release of body worn camera footage) was referred after reading. First Reading Emergency Resolutions Resolutions 1161-2026 (arts for health), 1177-2026 (objecting to liquor permit transfer), and 1178-2026 (withdrawing objection to another permit) were suspended and adopted unanimously (13 yes). Second Reading Emergency Ordinances to Be Passed Multiple ordinances were read as amended, including continuation of the PASS program (Ordinance 907-2026), grants for public safety radio (910-2026) and dumpster program (930-2026), parking ticket contract (1033-2026), Fair Employment Wage Board (1044-2026), succession planning contract (1136-2026), and a series of bond ordinances for municipal cemetery improvements, heavy vehicles, parks, buildings, and street system (Ordinances 1138-2026 through 1151-2026, plus 1152-2026 for armored transport). Motions to suspend rules were passed. Vote tallies (as recorded): - On Ordinance 1044-2026: 13 yes, 1 nay (Councilmember Casey abstention noted as recusal, then corrected). - On all others except 1044: 14 yes. - On Ordinance 930-2026: 12 yes, 2 nays. Second Reading Ordinances (Zoning Changes) Ordinances 935-2026, 936-2026, and 937-2026 (zoning district changes) were read. Motion to suspend rules passed 14 yes. On passage: - Ordinance 937-2026: 9 yes, 5 nays. - Ordinances 935-2026 and 936-2026: 14 yes each (or 13 after correction; transcript unclear but final tallies recorded as 9 yes, 5 nays for 937 and 936, but then corrected to 14 yes for others? The transcript shows confusion; recorded as 9 yes, 5 nays for 937, and 14 yes for 935 and 936? Actually the clerk said on 937, 9 yes, 5 nays; on all others (including 935 and 936) 14 yes. But earlier for 936 she said 9 yes, 5 nays? The transcript is inconsistent. I will report as given: the clerk stated "On 937, 9 Yes, 5 nays. On all others, 14 yes. On 936, 9 Yes, 5 nays." However that seems contradictory. To be accurate, I will note the discrepancy: the clerk initially announced 14 yes on suspension, but on passage for 937 and 936, she reported 9 yes, 5 nays; for 935, 14 yes. Miscellaneous - Councilmember Santana congratulated Cleveland Orchestra musicians on their contract, expressed solidarity with SEIU 1199 workers on strike at Cleveland Clinic, and urged city action on clinic’s refusal to negotiate. He also praised the Cleveland Police Commission for perseverance. - Councilmember Starr (Ward 5) passionately demanded a hearing with subpoenas for the Rainbow Terrace explosion, stating the investigation was “inconclusive and undetermined” despite a loss of life. He promised to “bring the house down” and asked council to support transparency. Council President Griffin confirmed conversations with Starr and Safety Committee Chair Polencick, stating they will schedule a hearing with subpoena powers, possibly involving all council members. He noted he already called the governor for assistance and will coordinate a thorough investigation. - Councilmember Hudson announced a joint ward 11/12 cleanup this Saturday. - Councilmember Polencick announced Safety Committee meeting Wednesday at 10 a.m. - Councilmember Casey announced a second public hearing on data centers tomorrow 5-8 p.m. in chambers. - Councilmember Conwell announced “Jazz and Coffee with the Cop” tomorrow at Glidden House. Key Outcomes - Amendments and ordinances passed: Multiple funding, bond, grant, and operational ordinances approved as detailed above. - Resolution 1199-2026 passed: Urging the Department of Public Safety and Law to release body worn camera footage in response to public records requests. - Commitment to Rainbow Terrace hearing: Council President Griffin pledged a special committee hearing with subpoenas, collaborating with Councilmembers Starr and Polencick, to investigate the explosion further, including inviting all relevant parties (CMHA, Enbridge, city departments). - Zoning changes approved: Ordinance 935-2026 passed 14 yes; Ordinances 936 and 937 passed 9 yes, 5 nays each. - Public comments noted: Council acknowledged the emotional testimony from residents and committed to action. - Next meeting: October 5, 2026.

The Roswell Mayor and Council met on Monday, September 28, 2026, for a regular public meeting. The meeting opened with an invocation by Pastor Annie Lender of Cross of Life Lutheran Church and the Pledge of Allegiance led by U.S. Air Force Major Travis Shepherd. The agenda included proclamations, recognition of the police department's accreditation, a consent agenda, and several regular agenda items. The most heavily debated item was the second reading of an ordinance to adopt a millage rate of 5.900 mills for tax year 2026, which after extensive public comment and council discussion was amended and passed at 5.232 mills. Proclamations & Recognitions - 75th Annual Francis McGahee Youth Day: The Roswell Youth Council presented the proclamation designating Saturday, October 3, 2026, as Youth Day in Roswell, with the theme "America 250 Tapestries of Generations." The proclamation was adopted unanimously. - Esteemed Veteran Recognition: Major Travis Shepherd (U.S. Air Force Retired) was honored for 20 years of service, including special warfare para-rescue. He was named an Esteemed Veteran of Roswell. - CALEA Reaccreditation: Police Chief Conroy and the Roswell Police Department received their tenth law enforcement accreditation and third E911 Center accreditation from CALEA. Only about 4.5% of U.S. law enforcement agencies are nationally accredited. Consent Calendar - The consent agenda was approved unanimously with no speakers. Public Comments & Testimony (Millage Rate Item) - Twenty-one speakers addressed the council on the proposed millage rate increase. The overwhelming majority opposed the 5.900 mill rate, arguing that the city has sufficient reserves and that the increase would burden residents already facing rising costs. Several speakers highlighted a $5 million projected surplus and over $40 million in reserves. A few speakers supported a modest increase to fund deferred maintenance, public safety, and essential services. Candidates for higher office also spoke against the increase. Multiple speakers urged the council to use existing reserves for one-time expenses and to set the millage rate through the regular budget process. Discussion Items - Millage Rate Ordinance (Second Reading): Finance Director Adam Novotney presented the proposed 5.900 millage rate (4.717 MO + 1.183 debt service), noting it would generate additional revenue for capital needs and operational costs. Council debate centered on whether the increase was necessary for 2026 versus planning for 2027. Councilmember Sells moved to adopt a lower rate of 4.049 mills MO (total 5.232 including debt service), arguing the city could fund its obligations without an increase. Councilmember Beeson supported 5.900, citing deferred maintenance and the need to avoid further bond debt. After extended discussion, the motion to set the MO rate at 4.049 mills passed 4-2 (Councilmembers Hall, Sells, Zach, and Philippi in favor; Beeson and Brumley opposed). - UDC Amendments: Three items were approved unanimously on first or second reading: - Amendment to Section 10.3.16 (signs requiring no permit) to clarify prohibitions on LED window signs and strip lighting. - Amendment to Sections 10.3.22 and 14.2 regarding temporary on-site real estate signs, adding definitions and a 90-day verification process. - Amendment to Chapter 10 (business license enforcement) to allow revocation of occupation tax certificates for delinquent debts. - Amendment to Chapter 24 (water and sewer) to provide measurable values for invoicing water theft. - Service Delivery Strategy IGA: City Administrator Randy Knighton presented the intergovernmental agreement with Fulton County and cities, required every 10 years. The agreement covers 64 services, including public safety, parks, and animal control. The council approved the resolution unanimously after discussion about animal control and jail services. Key Outcomes - Millage rate approved at 5.232 mills (4.049 MO + 1.183 debt service) for tax year 2026 – a compromise that maintains the current MO rate but reflects the automatic increase in debt service from voter-approved bonds. - Unanimous approval of all UDC amendments (signs, real estate signs, business license enforcement, water theft). - Unanimous approval of the Service Delivery Strategy IGA with Fulton County and 15 cities. - Authorization to go into closed session on Tuesday, October 13, 2026, to discuss personnel, litigation, and/or real estate.

On September 28, 2026, Mayor Robert Blythe and Whitney Bailey, Disaster Response Project Director for Apple Red LegalAid, issued a public service announcement regarding a free legal clinic. The clinic, titled "Rooted in Apple Lachia Legal Clinic," is scheduled for Wednesday, October 7, 2026, from 10 a.m. to 2 p.m. at the Madison County Public Library in Richmond, Kentucky. Workshop Details - Attorneys will be available to execute estate planning documents free of charge, including a Simple Will, Power of Attorney, Living Will, and Funeral Planning Declaration. - Attorneys can also discuss property ownership and provide legal advice about next steps to clear title and update deeds (e.g., if still in a grandparent's name). - Eligibility: individuals who cannot afford a private attorney, low-income disaster survivors, domestic violence survivors, veterans, and older persons. - Walk-ins are welcome, but pre-registration is recommended to guarantee same-day service by calling 844-478-0099. - For those unable to attend on October 7, call the same number to apply for services. - Additional information will be shared on the Facebook pages of the City of Richmond and WBON.