The Public Meeting Index

This meeting focused on the adoption of smart loading zone technology in Miami, with a presentation on its benefits including road safety, time and fuel savings, support for local businesses, and improved traffic flow. The speaker noted that Miami is the third major U.S. city to implement this technology. Discussion Items - The speaker explained that Paho (likely a reference to potholes or standing water) is basically formed from sitting water, though the context remained unclear. - Miami was identified as the third major city in the United States to adopt smart loading zone technology, which will enhance safety for drivers and pedestrians, save time and fuel, assist local businesses with deliveries, and maintain traffic flow. - The technology will also support the city of Miami's trolley system, as mentioned by the speaker ("Ayuda to make sure the system of trolleys of the city of Miami"). Key Outcomes - No formal votes or decisions were recorded in the transcript. The presentation appears to be informational, outlining the adoption of smart loading zones to improve urban mobility and logistics.

The Las Vegas city recommendation committee (referred to in the transcript as the "recommended committee") met on September 14, 2026, to consider two municipal code amendments proposed by Seth T. Floyd, Executive Director of Community Development. Both bills were approved by the committee and are scheduled for adoption by the Las Vegas City Council on October 7, 2026. No public testimony was offered during either public hearing or during the citizen participation period. Public Hearings & Citizen Participation - Two public hearings, one for each bill, were opened and closed with no public comments. - The citizen participation period at the end of the meeting also drew no speakers. Discussion Items Bill 2026-32 — Amendments to LVMC Title 19 (General Plan, "By Right," and Lighting Standards) - Presented by committee staff member Peter on behalf of sponsor Seth T. Floyd. - The bill assigns the term "general plan" the meaning of "master plan" as used in NRS Chapter 278, aligning city code with state law. - Replaces the term "by right" with "permitted use," which more accurately describes uses identified in Title 19 as allowed within a particular zoning district without additional review by the city. - Resolves a conflict between lighting standards for commercial and industrial districts and residential adjacency standards. - After the public hearing was closed with no comments, a motion to approve was made and seconded; the committee voted and the bill passed. Bill 2026-33 — Amendments to LVMC Chapter 6.02 (Civil Fine Escalation) - Presented by Darcy Addleby-Heard, Business Licensing Manager, on behalf of sponsor Seth T. Floyd. - The amendment clarifies how civil fines escalate when a business fails to respond to a notice of violation: - A business has 30 days to respond to the notice of violation. - If no response is received, a penalty equal to the original fine is assessed (doubling the original fine), and a notice of delinquency is issued providing an additional 15 calendar days to pay. - If payment is still not received, a second penalty equal to the original fine is assessed (tripling the original fine). - Ms. Addleby-Heard stated the bill does not change existing practice; it only clarifies the progression of fines. - In response to a question from the committee chair about whether the prior ambiguity had created legal exposure, Ms. Addleby-Heard said the language had been interpreted several different ways even within the city's own division, and the City Attorney's office provided a third interpretation, prompting the clarification. She noted there had been no pushback from businesses that paid fines. - The public hearing was closed with no comments; a motion to approve was made and seconded; the committee voted and the bill passed. Key Outcomes - Approved Bill 2026-32, forwarding it to the October 7, 2026 Las Vegas City Council meeting for adoption. - Approved Bill 2026-33, forwarding it to the October 7, 2026 Las Vegas City Council meeting for adoption. - The meeting was adjourned after the citizen participation period closed. Note: The transcript contains minor inconsistencies in bill numbering (e.g., "226-32" for the first bill and "2026-3" for the second); the references used here reflect the bill numbers as finalized during the meeting (2026-32 and 2026-33).

Syracuse Common Council Meeting - September 14, 2026\n\nThe Syracuse Common Council held its regular meeting on September 14, 2026, at 4:55 PM. The meeting began with an invocation by Father Jean Dollinger and a roll call, followed by the approval of the minutes from August 24th. The Council handled a public hearing, a petition, committee reports, communications, and adopted numerous resolutions, including several ceremonial recognitions and legislative items. Most items were passed unanimously.\n\n Consent Calendar\n- Approval of the minutes of August 24th (unanimous).\n- Items 9A and 9B (introduced by Councilor Williams) adopted unanimously.\n- Items 14 through 24 (introduced by Councilor Majok) adopted unanimously.\n- Items 25 through 30 (introduced by Councilor Aaron Wright) adopted unanimously. Councilor Williams recognized the late Gloria Sage during discussion of item 25.\n- Items 31 through 36 (introduced by Councilor Moore via Councilor Hudson) adopted unanimously.\n- Items 37 through 39 (introduced by Councilor Williams) adopted unanimously.\n- Item 40 (introduced by Councilor Jones Rousser) adopted unanimously.\n- Item 41 (introduced by Councilors Monto and Jones Rousser) adopted unanimously.\n- Items 42 and 43 (introduced by Councilor Monto) adopted unanimously.\n- Items 46 and 48 (introduced by Councilor Monto) adopted unanimously.\n- Item 49 (introduced by Councilors Monto and Williams) – a resolution urging adoption of state legislation limiting use of license plate reader data – adopted unanimously after brief discussion.\n- Item 50 – a resolution recognizing Jubilee Homes of Syracuse on its 40th anniversary (introduced by Councilor Abraham) – adopted unanimously.\n- Item 51 – a resolution recognizing September 2026 as Suicide Prevention Awareness Month in Syracuse (introduced by Councilor Nave) – adopted unanimously.\n- Item 13 – a resolution to name a portion of Park Street as \"Brother Marcus Way\" in honor of Mark Cass (initially withdrawn, later brought back by motion) – adopted unanimously after testimony.\n\n Public Comments & Testimony\n- Petition: A petition from Joseph Tallalino with 36 signatures opposing the use of offices at 1115 East Coblin Street was presented by Councilor (name not given).\n- Suicide Prevention Awareness Month: Isabel Petito, a volunteer for the American Foundation for Suicide Prevention and member of the planning committee for the local Out of the Darkness walk, thanked the Council for the resolution. She noted that suicide affects many families in Syracuse and that prevention is possible through education, advocacy, and support.\n- Honoring Mark Cass: Dr. Yusuf Soule spoke in support of the resolution to name Park Street after Mark Cass. He described Cass as a person who was present for the community, from pre-K children to elders. Councilor Majok also highlighted Cass's legacy and introduced two young people, Asina Adam and Hussein Yarrow, who were uplifted by Cass's work at the North Side Learning Center.\n\n Discussion Items\n- Public Hearing: A public hearing was held on a local law enacting Section 421-F of the New York State Real Property Tax Law, authorizing a partial exemption for capital improvements to residential real properties. No public comments were made, and the hearing was declared closed.\n- Committee Report: The Charters Committee met on September 11th regarding charter changes with a capital improvement plan.\n- Communications: The auditor submitted an analysis of the Syracuse University PILOT agreement with the city, and Lions Energy Group acknowledged terms and conditions of an ordinance.\n- Item 49 (License Plate Reader Data): Councilor Williams explained that the resolution supports state legislation limiting the use of license plate reader data to specific law enforcement purposes such as locating stolen vehicles, missing persons, or vehicles with outstanding felony warrants, and for traffic enforcement and toll collection. The bill is being carried in the Assembly and Senate.\n- Item 51 (Suicide Prevention Month): Councilor Nave read the resolution and shared personal statistics: people with Tourette syndrome are roughly four times more likely to die by suicide; gay, lesbian, and bisexual adults face a suicide risk six times greater than heterosexual adults; and 37% of gay/lesbian youth seriously consider suicide.\n- Item 13 (Street Naming): Councilor Majok moved to bring back the item after initial withdrawal. Testimony from Dr. Yusuf Soule and Councilor Majok emphasized Mark Cass's impact on the North Side community and the North Side Learning Center. The installation of the street sign is scheduled for two weeks from the meeting date.\n\n Key Outcomes\n- Public Hearing Closed: No action taken on the 421-F local law; hearing closed.\n- Petition Received: Petition opposing office use at 1115 East Coblin Street was received and referred (no further action noted).\n- Unanimous Votes: All resolutions and items (except those held or withdrawn) were adopted by unanimous voice votes.\n- Items Held: Item 11 and 12 were introduced and tabled; Item 44, 45, and 47 were held. Item 45 will be subject to a committee meeting on September 21, 2026 at 5:30 PM. Item 13 was initially withdrawn but later brought back and adopted.\n- Next Steps: Street naming installation for Brother Marcus Way to occur in two weeks. Committee meeting on Item 45 scheduled.\n- Adjournment: The meeting was adjourned by motion.

Meeting Summary No agenda, minutes, or transcript were provided for this meeting. Therefore, no discussion items, public comments, or decisions can be summarized.

(The transcript references a meeting date of September 10, 2026; the provided date for this summary is September 14, 2026.) The Sacramento Transportation Authority (STA) board met to consider several transportation funding and planning items, including a feasibility study for the Green Line Bus Rapid Transit (BRT), an SB1 grant application for the Grant Line Road Safety Improvement Project, and the introduction of an annual awards program. Board members also received reports on regional prioritization and subcommittee activities. All votes were unanimous. Consent Calendar - The consent items were approved by unanimous vote with no public comments or requests to pull items. Public Comments & Testimony - Joshua Arce, Executive Director of the California Alliance for Jobs (a labor and business coalition representing 70,000 workers and 2,000 employers), introduced his organization and expressed general support for the STA's work. He later commented on two agenda items: - On the Green Line BRT/Light Rail study, he reported that a June 2026 poll of Sacramento city residents found nearly 70% favorable opinion of light rail to the airport, with only 18% unfavorable. He urged keeping light rail as an option while advancing BRT. - On the Grant Line Road project, he shared poll results showing 82% support among county residents outside the city, with only 8% opposed. He further stated that two-thirds of respondents would support a revenue measure to help fund the Southeast Connector. Discussion Items - Item 5: Green Line Bus Rapid Transit Feasibility Study – Kevin Schroeder (Senior Planner, SAC RT) presented a study funded by $200,000 from STA and $500,000 from a Caltrans grant. The Green Line (also called the DNA line) is an 11.2-mile planned light-rail corridor from downtown Sacramento to the airport, with 14 stations and 7.5 miles of dedicated right-of-way (irrevocable offers of dedication, IODs). Many IODs expire in 2029. The study will examine implementing Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) as an incremental step that does not preclude future light rail. Four initial BRT packages cost about $300 million; more expensive packages (5-7) could achieve 80-96% rollover to eventual light rail. The SAC RT board is expected to consider a locally preferred alternative in 2027. - Board discussion: Director Talamantes expressed strong support for light rail but welcomed BRT as an interim step to protect IODs and improve transit. Director Kennedy favored BRT as more cost-effective and flexible, noting light rail is a 150-year-old technology. Director C. Allen (also SAC RT chair) emphasized a balanced approach given funding constraints. Director Busey noted the connection to the SAC 5 managed lanes project, which would improve BRT travel time reliability. - Vote: Unanimous approval to authorize the executive director to execute the allocation and expenditure contract. - Item 6: SB1 Cycle 5 Local Partnership Program – Grant Line Road Safety Improvement Project – Derek Minima (Capitol Southeast Connector JPA) presented a request for $25 million in state competitive grant funds for a complete reconstruction of Grant Line Road (a two-lane farm road on the eastern edge of the county, serving Rancho Cordova and unincorporated areas). The project includes a center median, shoulders, lighting, a Class I bike trail, and will address head-on collisions and run-off-road crashes. The project already has a $25 million federal grant (RAISE), which will serve as the required 1:1 match. Design is at 90%, right-of-way acquisition is active, and construction could begin in 2027 if awarded. Measure A has allocated $4.9 million plus additional mitigation funds for this project. - Board discussion: Director Pulapati shared a personal story of a severe accident on Grant Line Road and stressed safety. Directors Single, Rodriguez, and Hume all voiced strong support, noting the project’s regional importance and safety benefits. Director Busey added that the project aligns with Measure A guiding principles of leveraging outside funds. - Vote: Unanimous approval to nominate the project for the SB1 grant. - Item 7: Introduction of Annual Awards Program – STA staff proposed a “Measure A Transportation Awards Program” with five categories: Measure A Leveraging Award, Partnership Award, Transportation Leadership Award (elected officials), Transportation Championship Award (staff), and Community Recognition Award. The Independent Taxpayer Oversight Committee (ITOC) would recommend winners; current STA board members are ineligible. The timeline calls for nominations in late September, ITOC review in October, and awards in November alongside the annual audit. Board members expressed general support, and staff took silence as concurrence. - Item 8: Executive Director’s Report – Director Busey reported: - Four community listening sessions on transportation priorities were completed in June–August 2026; results will come to the board. - SACOG’s SB1 regional project prioritization effort ranked STA’s US 50 Multimodal Corridor Connections project as the 1 priority for the Solutions for Congested Corridors program, and the Placer Sacramento Gateway project as 2. For the Trade Corridor Enhancement Program, STA’s project was also 1. - Two federal grant applications were submitted: one for the Harvest Quarter Improvement Partnership (Twin Cities Road) and one for the Stockton Boulevard Safety and Transit Enhancement Project (Stockton BRT). Decisions expected November–December 2026. - STA will be a co‑applicant (with no financial contribution) on a Sustainable Transportation Planning Grant with SACOG to advance vehicle miles traveled (VMT) mitigation strategy and potentially fund transit and active transportation. - Item 9: Comments and Reports from Authority Members – - CARTA report: Director Talamantes noted that the Yolo 80 managed lanes are expected to open in late 2026 with a free introductory period. - Transportation Funding Subcommittee: The chair invited new members to express interest; existing members include Yara, Gera, Dickinson, Cerna, Desmond, and possibly others. - STA Role in Region Subcommittee: Director Hume reported that they are taking a “wait and see” approach regarding VMT banks and regional transportation funding decisions; a September–October update meeting is planned. Key Outcomes - Green Line BRT Study: Unanimously approved; contract authorized. The study will proceed, preserving IODs and considering BRT without precluding light rail. - SB1 Grant Nomination for Grant Line Road: Unanimously approved; project will compete statewide for $25 million. - Annual Awards Program: Concept approved with implementation details (categories, ITOC review, November ceremony) to proceed. - No action taken on closed session items; nothing to report. (Meeting adjourned after closed session.)

The Zoning Board of Howard County met on September 14, 2026, to review and discuss proposed changes to the Rules of Procedure for the Zoning Board and the Zoning Board Hearing Examiner. The meeting was held in a hybrid format, immediately following the 10 AM Council Monthly Meeting. Discussion Items - Role of Zoning Counsel: The Board clarified that the Zoning Counsel's role is not to advise the Board during hearings but to produce evidence and testimony supporting the existing comprehensive zoning, as per County Code Title 16, Subtitle 1000, Section B. This clarification arose from previous cases where confusion occurred about the Zoning Counsel's advisory role. - Scheduling and Administrative Meetings: The Board discussed changing the default process: instead of requiring an administrative meeting to send cases to the Hearing Examiner, cases would automatically go to the Hearing Examiner unless a specific number of Board members request an administrative meeting to keep the case. This would eliminate unnecessary five-minute administrative meetings. - Filing Deadlines and Exception Period: The Board considered shortening the time to file exceptions from 20 to 10 business days to streamline the process. - New Evidence During Exceptions: A key discussion focused on proposed rule section 2.405 C5, which would restrict introducing new evidence during exceptions. The Board debated whether to adopt a strict rule (no new evidence unless a party had no prior opportunity) or maintain the current permissive standard. Key Outcomes - No final votes were taken on the proposed rule changes during this meeting. - The Board scheduled a virtual meeting for Wednesday, September 16, 2026, at 9:00 AM to finalize and vote on the proposed rule language. - The public hearing on the proposed rules is set for October 19, 2026. - The Board directed staff to clean up the language regarding administrative meetings and conforming legislation to be ready by Thursday, September 17, 2026, for legislative submission. - The Board did not reach consensus on Section 2.405 C5 (new evidence during exceptions) and agreed to continue discussion at the Wednesday meeting. Note: These discussions are part of ongoing efforts to refine procedures following the first year of the new zoning process, with several changes requiring both rule amendments and legislative action.

The Historic and Architectural Preservation Board of the City of Venice, Florida, convened on Monday, September 14, 2026, at 11:15 AM in Council Chambers. The meeting appears to have been primarily an equipment and agenda testing session: the agenda included a note for "equipment testing," and the transcript shows staff moving through agenda items without substantive discussion. No public testimony, board discussion, or staff recommendations were recorded, and the meeting adjourned with no further business. Meeting Conduct - Call to order and roll call were completed. - The board proceeded through audience participation, approval of minutes, new business, public hearing, board discussion, and staff comments. - One motion passed during the approval-of-minutes portion, though the transcript does not specify the exact motion. - Agenda item 26-0737, listed under New Business as "Test File 3," was referred to as "Test file" in the transcript; no presentation or discussion followed. - No members of the public provided comments. - An unidentified speaker noted technical difficulties with closed captioning ("Audits not giving me a closed captioning option to turn on") and a pop-up appeared during the meeting. Key Outcomes - The meeting was adjourned with no further business. - No substantive decisions, recommendations, or public testimony occurred; the session appears to have been a test of the meeting system and agenda format.

Note on date discrepancy: The provided instruction gives the meeting date as September 14, 2026, but the agenda and transcript indicate the meeting occurred on September 9, 2026. Additionally, the agenda lists a start time of 8:00 AM, while the transcript repeatedly refers to "Good evening," suggesting a possible evening session. This summary follows the source materials for content. The Everett City Council met on September 9, 2026, in City Council Chambers. The meeting included roll call, pledge of allegiance, land acknowledgment, and mayor’s comments. Key topics covered approval of minutes, public comments on transit, arena management, and a proposed outdoor events center, consent items, a budget amendment, a public hearing on land division procedures, and final readings on eminent domain, sewer improvements, and utility district jurisdiction. Consent Calendar - Approved minutes of September 2, 2026 (unanimous). - Adopted Resolution authorizing claims of $2,675,239.69 (August 22–28, 2026). - Adopted Resolution authorizing payroll claims of $6,217,235.10 (period ending August 22, 2026). - Adopted Resolution authorizing electronic transfer claims of $12,244,710.60 (July 1–31, 2026). - Authorized mayor to approve PSA amendment for Nancy Locke not to exceed $160,000 total compensation. - Adopted Resolution closing Special Improvement Project “Water Pollution Control Facility Combined Conveyance Improvements” Fund 336, Program 032. - Authorized mayor to sign Sewer Services Agreement with Mukilteo Water & Wastewater District. - Adopted Resolution closing Special Improvement Project “Lift Station 15” Fund 336, Program 041. - Awarded approximately $700,000 annually to Fire Protection, Inc. for fire alarm and sprinkler services via King County contract. Public Comments & Testimony - Dustin Graves (Everett resident) expressed concern about the Oak View Group’s management of Angel of the Winds Arena and alleged conflicts of interest among PFD board members also involved in the new arena project. He stated that the skating club had been "barred from reasonable club activities" and that the city’s response had been inadequate. Mayor Franklin and City Attorney Lacey Offitt responded that the concerns were unfounded, stating there is no conflict of interest and that the city has no oversight authority over the PFD. - Gina Moore (Spokane resident) requested the council adopt a proclamation for Bone Marrow Awareness Day and support the National Marrow Donor Program; she was directed to share her sample proclamation with staff. - Danny Anderson (Everett, District 3) urged the council to vote no on the merger of Everett Transit with Community Transit, citing the personal service and community relationships provided by Everett Transit drivers. - Annie Lyman (Everett, District 3) questioned the cost increase for the stadium project from $80 million to $120 million, the use of eminent domain before funding secured, lack of public input, and absence of firm contracts with sports teams. - William Perrent (Silver Lake area) thanked the council for new green paint on bike lanes and requested additional directional signage. - Holly James (Everett, Northwest Neighborhood) asked about a contingency plan for the stadium, cost overruns, the impact on the 2027 budget, and the lack of public benefits from the project. She noted she had not received responses to emailed questions. - Steve Oz (Everett) recounted the history of a transit sales tax initiative that was changed from his original wording after passage; he urged the council to vote no on a proposed 0.6% sales tax increase because citizens had no direct vote. - June Schober (Everett, District 3) thanked the council for ensuring paratransit services remain unchanged under the transit consolidation. Discussion Items - Budget Amendment (CB 2608-49, 1st Reading): Finance Director Chris Godwin presented the second budget amendment of 2026, which includes grant reappropriations, increased revenue from a 6% utility tax approved earlier in 2026, and additional maintenance and operations funding for public works. The net effect on general fund balance is positive, while non-general government funds will see a draw on fund balance. The third and final reading is set for September 23, 2026. - Land Division Procedures (CB 2608-48, Public Hearing): The public hearing included comments from Dave Gardner (Chicago Title) supporting unit lot subdivisions to enable fee-simple homeownership (especially for FHA/VA buyers), Russell Joe (Master Builders) supporting lot splits for increased density and fee-simple ownership, and Gordy Lindstrom (Everett resident and broker) urging explicit language in the code for second land divisions. The council closed the hearing and will take final action after Department of Commerce review, expected on October 14, 2026. - Eminent Domain for Outdoor Events Center (CB 2608-44, 3rd Reading): Councilmember Weir asked about the necessity of eminent domain. Scott Patison responded that a property (known as "26") was recently determined to be in the building footprint, so this ordinance adds it to previously approved acquisitions. Negotiations have just begun; eminent domain is a precaution due to the lengthy process (14–15 months). The ordinance passed unanimously. Key Outcomes - Consent items (8 items): Approved unanimously. - CB 2608-47 (41st Street to Rucker Avenue Corridor Phase 2): Second reading held; third and final reading scheduled for September 16, 2026. - CB 2608-49 (Budget Amendment 2): First reading held; third and final reading scheduled for September 23, 2026. - CB 2608-48 (Land Division Procedures): Public hearing closed; final vote scheduled for October 14, 2026 after Department of Commerce review. - CB 2608-44 (Eminent domain for Outdoor Events Center): Passed unanimously (5-0). - CB 2608-45 (Port Gardner Storage Facility Bond Street Combined Sewer Improvements): Passed unanimously. - CB 2608-46 (Assume jurisdiction over Mukilteo Water & Wastewater District responsibilities): Passed unanimously. - Councilmember Ryan requested formal oversight parameters and a community benefit agreement for the Outdoor Events Center, and suggested adding an independent city ombudsman. - Councilmember Weir noted vacancies on the Cultural Arts Commission and encouraged public involvement in boards and commissions.

Note: The agenda and transcript list the meeting date as September 9, 2026 at 5:00 PM; the date above is used per instruction. The Parks & Built Environment Committee of the Everett City Council convened to receive a briefing from Snohomish County PUD on the proposed Everett to Delta 115 kV transmission line, primarily along the Broadway corridor. Committee members also discussed upcoming agenda items for future meetings. Snohomish PUD Briefing - Aziz Hawk (PUD project engineer) and Kelly Singletary (PUD public education program coordinator) presented the project’s background, schedule, route selection, design, and beautification plans. - The 115 kV line is required due to forecasted load growth and new NERC reliability standards, and will support two new substations in the downtown Everett area. - Six routes were considered; after public input including two open houses (January 2024 and May 2025), the Broadway route was selected to avoid residential areas. The line runs approximately 3–3.5 miles from the Everett substation near the transit center to the Delta switching station north of Everett. - Design: Steel poles 80–100 ft tall with 18-ft davit arms carrying conductors over the roadway to preserve vertical development. Poles will be powder-coated steel blue (selected via public poll). About 6 of 40 poles will receive vinyl wraps at the base, with a call to artists prioritizing Snohomish County artists planned for Q1 2027. - Construction targets summer 2027, with nighttime work (9 PM–5 AM) to minimize business disruption. Pole foundations are 5 ft diameter; single lane closures expected, one pole at a time. - The PUD is coordinating with Community Transit’s Swift Gold Line and Sound Transit to avoid conflicts with bus stops and infrastructure. An existing transmission line in an alley between 25th and 13th will be removed once the new line is energized. - Councilmember Rhyne inquired about the city’s permitting role (administrative), pole placement (95% on east side of Broadway), potential for street lighting (structurally feasible), and construction impacts (night work). Councilmember Zarlingo asked about noise (115 kV lines are quiet; only a failing hardware may buzz). Councilmember Burbano asked about outreach to neighborhood associations (Northwest, Riverside, Delta met), beautification lighting (none initially; suggested adding lights if needed), and whether private businesses could sponsor wraps (open to discussion). Councilmember Weir (District 1) asked about nighttime noise (2 days per foundation, localized) and noted business concerns about future development height; Aziz confirmed the davit arm design preserves clearance above buildings. Future Agenda Topics - The committee reviewed pending items including: Climate Action Plan Update (Q4), Vision for Safe Streets (Q4), Housing Topics, Downtown Storefronts Listening Session, Condo Construction and Reform Issues, Everett Mall Way Pedestrian Safety, CPTED Policy Development, PROS Plan Update, Alcohol Impact Areas Policy Discussion, Park Safety Recommendations, and Bond Street Project Briefing. - Councilmember Burbano requested adding Everett Mall Way pedestrian safety and an update on the Everett Mall development to future agendas. Councilmembers Rhyne and Zarlingo agreed, and suggested folding the pedestrian safety item into the Vision for Safe Streets discussion. Key Outcomes - The committee received the PUD briefing and will continue coordination with city staff and the PUD. - Staff were directed to add Everett Mall Way pedestrian safety and an Everett Mall development update to the list of future agenda items. - No formal votes were taken. The meeting adjourned at 5:43 PM.