Public Meetings - Brunswick, Maine

The Town Council held a workshop on the FY27 budget and capital improvement program, receiving presentations from the School Department, Western Maine Transportation (Brunswick Link), and the Town Manager. Discussions centered on the school budget's 6.03% expenditure increase and 2.89% tax impact, the transit system's 27% ridership increase and funding request, and the town's overall 5.52% proposed tax rate increase. Councilors debated potential reductions to reach a 4% target, with no formal votes taken. Public Comments & Testimony - Jennifer Navarro (Brunswick resident) stated that the state found Brunswick's comprehensive plan inconsistent with the Growth Management Act, missing seven required elements. She argued the budget and CIP are being shaped by a plan that is not yet certified and requested removal of the Thomas Point Road connector from the CIP, which crosses her property. She asked for full public disclosure of state comments and a response matrix. Town Manager noted the state gave 24 months to address issues and that the connector is in the “not recommended” section of the CIP. Discussion Items - School Department Budget (FY27) - Superintendent Potenziano presented a $61,188,127 budget, a 6.03% increase over FY26, with a 2.89% tax impact. Reductions totaled $1,986,000, including 8 full-time equivalent positions (e.g., administrative assistants, custodian, ESOL ed techs, teacher, tech support). Key drivers: wages (29.2% of $3.4M increase), benefits (26.7%, health insurance up 8.72%), unforeseen special education costs ($819,000), and contracted services. The school board voted unanimously to adopt. - School Board Chair Beth Bison and Vice Chair Elizabeth Stokoloff provided context: 17 FTE positions cut over three years, $5.5M baseline increase before reductions, 85% of the 6% increase due to salaries, benefits, and special ed. They noted state funding bill LD 226 passed the House (122-23) and could bring $1.4M in FY28, with smaller bridge funding possible this year. - Questions from Council covered bus procurement (use of AI routing software, BusWright), breakdown of wage increase (2.97% overall), special ed cost reimbursement (EFS-214 report submitted, potential 48% state share for high-cost placements), and the tier-three reduction ($164,000 in facility projects not recommended). Superintendent stated any further reductions would impact personnel and programming. - Councilor Harris noted a radio report of possible $250,000+ state revenue for Brunswick this year; Superintendent was unaware but would follow up. - Western Maine Transportation (Brunswick Link) - Craig Zurhurst reported ridership up 27% in calendar 2025 (32,068 fixed-route boardings, 2,674 ADA boardings). Free fares through June 30 ($35,000 town investment) are driving use. The service operates 11 daily runs with two buses, 32 stops. Requested $311,056.58 but accepted the budgeted amount (5% increase over last year) due to fuel and cost concerns. Urged continuation of free fares because of matching funds ($75,000 total value). - Discussion included weekend service expansion (funding-limited), future capacity needs, and connection to the Blue Line (shared expenses). Councilor Ellis questioned the $10 subsidy per ride; Zurhurst explained all public transit is subsidized and highlighted economic and social benefits. - Town Manager Presentation - Manager Henzy reviewed the six new positions in her proposed budget (IT systems administrator, town clerk records/FoA clerk, code enforcement officer, coastal resources technician, two firefighters starting Jan 1, admin assistant increase), total salary $327,000 and benefits $160,000. Full-year cost would be $627,000. - Displayed tax burden breakdown: single-family homes (60% of tax burden, median value $423,000, median FY25 tax bill $5,592). At the proposed 5.52% increase, the median tax bill would rise $309. - Provided a chart: to reach a 4% overall tax increase (from 5.52%), $962,330 in reductions or new revenue would be needed (proportionally: school 58.2%, town 38%, county 3.8%). - Council Budget Target Discussion - Councilors expressed positions: Wilson and Weems favored 4% or less; Ellis favored up to 4.5% because of county pressures; Ecker hoped creative solutions could close the gap; Anderson noted the challenge of balancing services and taxpayer burden. The public hearing on April 27 will allow official target setting. Key Outcomes - No votes taken; the workshop was informational. - Council directed the Town Manager to provide more detail on annualized costs of new positions and the impact of different tax increase scenarios. - The School Department budget and WM Transportation request will be considered in future workshops and the April 27 public hearing. - A follow-up on potential state revenue (LD 226 and bridge funding) will be pursued. - Town Manager will coordinate with planner Erdman to brief Council on the comprehensive plan state finding. - Upcoming schedule: Police/IT/Library (Apr 23), Public Hearing (Apr 27), Planning & Development (Apr 29), final adoption goal May 11.

The Town Council held an official meeting to set a public hearing on the proposed 2026-27 municipal budget and capital improvement program, followed by a workshop with presentations from the Brunswick Downtown Association and the Parks and Recreation Department. The council discussed the budget, tax impact, and future workshops. Official Meeting: Setting the Public Hearing - The council voted unanimously (7-0, with two councilors absent) to set a public hearing for Monday, April 27, 2026, on the 2026-27 municipal budget and the 2027-2031 Capital Improvement Program (CIP). - Town Manager Hensey presented the proposed budget, which assumes a 1% valuation increase and results in an estimated 5.52% impact on the tax rate. The property tax increase is 6.58%, but the tax rate increase is 5.52% due to rounding and the valuation growth. - The manager noted that the budget combines county, municipal, and school components, and the school board passed its budget the previous night. The county assessment is $2,407,770 plus a sixth-month adjustment of $156,447 for the transition from calendar to fiscal year. - The first year of the CIP includes projects funded from general fund balance ($1.2 million proposed, down from $2.5 million last year) and TIF revenues. Notable projects: Richards Culvert replacement ($450,000), Noble Street design ($100,000), Brunswick High School window replacement ($465,000), water source heat pump replacements ($205,000), and various TIF-funded projects including Federal/Mason/Water intersection ($25,000 additional match), Riverwalk design ($35,000), Brunswick Landing Perimeter Trail ($154,000), Cook's Corner revitalization ($200,000), and fire engine replacement (to be bonded). - Councilor Ecker challenged the council to find $960,000 in savings to reduce the tax rate increase to 4%, noting that a majority of council had previously expressed interest in that target. Workshop: Brunswick Downtown Association Presentation - Executive Director Riley presented the BDA's annual update, highlighting their role as a nationally accredited Main Street program managing the visitor center (50,000 annual visitors), membership (nearly 300 members), events (Second Friday, Music on the Mall, Outdoor Arts Festival, Community Barbecue, Magic on Main auction, holiday lighting, etc.), and marketing efforts (new website, 1 million social media views, 55% newsletter open rate). - The BDA requested $110,000 for the upcoming fiscal year, a $5,000 increase from the prior year, to offset rising operational costs. The town funding represents about one-third of the BDA's total revenue, with sponsorship being the largest source. The increase is described as a sustainability request, not expansion. - Councilors expressed appreciation for the BDA's work and noted the importance of the downtown association for placemaking. Councilor Williams encouraged individual memberships and suggested a potential collaboration with the Pejepscot Portage Mapping Project. Workshop: Parks and Recreation Department Presentation - Director Tom Farrell presented the department's budget and activities. The department has 17 full-time employees, 3 regular part-time, 149 seasonal employees, and 70 independent contractors. In the past year, they delivered 120 programs with 76,321 participants, the largest number ever. - The recreation special revenue fund took in $863,000 in revenues and spent $814,000, leaving a net of $48,793. The fund is used for one-time capital investments. - The department maintains over 2,550 acres of land and 60+ facilities. Recent projects include the field house roof replacement ($388,800 from facility reserve), parking lot resurfacing at the recreation center ($200,000 estimated), and the upcoming relocation to 2 Columbus (8.5 acres, to be used for maintenance operations). - The Mark's development continues with phase one projects: pickleball courts, skate park, playground, and this summer two basketball courts with lighting. The Mary Meeting Park project is adding interpretive signage (five panels installed in two weeks, five more planned). The perimeter trail at Brunswick Landing received a $250,000 Maine Trails Bond grant, with bidding expected in 30-45 days and construction in fall 2026/spring 2027. - Other projects include the Riverwalk (design phase), Anniversary Park improvements (three new pedestrian entrances, amphitheater), and the Androscoggin Kennebec (A-K) Trail feasibility study (kickoff May 2, 2026). The Lower Road Rail Corridor trail project is on hold due to an undisclosed rail operator agreement. - The Settle-Meyer property acquisition (providing 2,000-3,000 feet of riverfront access) is $70,000 short of funding; the department is seeking sources and may consider recreation impact fees if no alternative is found. - The Parks & Rec budget request is a 7.8% increase over last year, with no additional full-time employees requested. The increase is driven by contractual obligations and the addition of 2 Columbus. Key Outcomes - The council unanimously voted to set a public hearing for April 27, 2026, on the municipal budget and CIP. - The council will continue budget workshops: next Monday (April 14) with the school department and Brunswick Link, then Thursday, April 23, and additional meetings as needed. The public hearing is April 27, and adoption is targeted for May 11, 2026. - Councilor Ecker urged the council to find $960,000 in savings to achieve a 4% tax rate increase. - The BDA and Parks & Rec presentations were received for informational purposes; no votes were taken on their budgets. - Councilors may submit questions for the school department to the chair by Friday, April 10, to allow preparation for the Monday workshop.

The Brunswick Town Council met on April 6, 2026, starting at approximately 6:55 PM after an executive session. The meeting included presentations, public comments, a public hearing, consideration of several ordinances and resolutions, and unanimous approvals on most items. Key topics included the Midcoast Athletic and Recreation Complex (MARC) phase, bridge naming, Pride Festival, landscape preservation, tree fund, subdivision regulations, and a rural subdivision moratorium extension. Consent Calendar - Approvals included routine items such as a proclamation for Poem in Your Pocket Day and acceptance of a resident's offer to paint rainbow crosswalks for the third consecutive year. Public Comments & Testimony - Donna Cheo (Brunswick Area Indivisible) expressed gratitude for council members' representation and supported the right to sit during the Pledge of Allegiance. She also noted a website issue with email links. - Sean Hogan (Brunswick resident) reiterated his objection to a councilor remaining seated for the Pledge behind the dais, arguing it is disrespectful and unethical. He called for the council to address the matter. - Marika Geyson (Brunswick resident) reminded the council of the 1943 Supreme Court ruling that standing and reciting the Pledge is not required, and supported council members' constitutional rights. - MARC Project Public Comments: Several residents spoke in favor of the MARC phase (basketball courts, lighting), highlighting benefits for youth, community, mental health, and economic development. Speakers included Josh Bankett (Maine Skateboard Association), Sterling Martinez (student), Alan Mulnar (coach), Bob Gray (educator/skateboarder), Camille Slay (parent), Larissa Darcy (community member), Toby McGrath (parent/coach), and Marika Geyson (Brunswick resident). All supported the project. - Bridge Naming Public Comments: Mike Lyne (DAC co-chair) provided history of the committee's work. Alison Harris (Androscoggin Riverwalk Alliance) supported the name Pajebscot Falls Bridge. Representative Poppy Arford expressed pride in the community's work. Faith Barnes requested educational plaques about Wabanaki history on both ends of the bridge. Discussion Items - Midcoast Athletic and Recreation Complex (MARC) Phase 1, Tier 1C: The council considered an ordinance authorizing construction of two basketball courts, sports lighting for basketball, skate park, and pickleball courts, up to $1,200,000. Director Sally Costello and Parks & Rec Director Tom Farrell presented updated costs ($1,003,211) from bids coming in under budget, with no taxpayer funds needed. Annual operating cost for lighting estimated at $2,500. The project is funded by grants, impact fees, Bowdoin College capital, and donations. Council members discussed contingencies and fund usage priority. - Bridge Naming Resolution: The council adopted a resolution endorsing the name 'Pajebscot Falls Bridge' for the new connection between Brunswick and Topsham, recommended by the Design Advisory Committee. The name honors the area's Native American history. - Pride Festival: The council approved the annual Pride Festival scheduled for June 13, 2026, including a waiver of the $500 fee for for-profit vendors and permission for two to three additional food trucks on Park Row. The clerk noted input from existing vendors favoring non-conflicting food options. - Landscape Preservation Zoning Amendments (Item 33): Principal Planner Dielman presented amendments requiring preservation of 30% of existing trees over 10 inches DBH within 30 feet of property perimeters, and a five-year development review ineligibility for land cleared before development approval. A tree fund companion ordinance was introduced. The council set a public hearing for April 21, 2026, after discussion including concerns about impacts on developers in areas without public utilities (Councillor Peralt) and alignment with the Climate Action Plan (Councillor Teamy). - Tree Fund Ordinance (Item 32): The council set a public hearing for April 21, 2026, to establish a tree fund to accept developer contributions where landscape preservation cannot be met on-site. The fee structure (per inch diameter) was questioned by Councillor Teamy regarding replacement cost equivalency. - Subdivision, Open Space, and Conservation Development Amendments (Item 34): The council set a public hearing for April 21, 2026, for amendments requiring 60% conservation land in rural subdivisions without changing density calculations. Councillors raised concerns about overlapping regulations and potential tax base impacts. - Rural Subdivision Moratorium Extension (Item 35): The council changed the public hearing date to May 4, 2026 (from April 21) to consider a six-month extension of the moratorium originally adopted December 1, 2025. Staff cited the need for additional time to complete ongoing ordinance updates. The vote was 8-1 (Councillor Ecker opposed). - Sidewalk Vendor Licenses (Item 37): The council approved nine licenses for prepared food sales on public sidewalks for summer 2026, noting that some new restaurants missed the application deadline and future outreach will improve. - Region 10 Referendum (Item 38): The council countersigned a warrant to place a Region 10 technical education bond referendum on the June election ballot, with no cost to the town. - Appointments (Item 39): The council approved appointments to the Bike/Ped Committee, Davis Fund Committee, Shellfish Committee, Sustainability Committee, and Trust Fund Advisory Committee. Key Outcomes - MARC Ordinance Adoption: Passed unanimously (8-0) to authorize construction up to $1,200,000 with funding from grants, impact fees, and donations. A motion to prioritize spending from recreation impact fees before Bowdoin College capital failed 4-3 (Chair voted no to avoid tie). - Bridge Naming Resolution: Passed unanimously (9-0) to endorse 'Pajebscot Falls Bridge' and forward to the Maine State Legislature. - Pride Festival Approval: Passed unanimously (9-0) with fee waiver and additional food trucks. - Public Hearings Set (April 21, 2026): Landscape preservation amendments (Item 33) and tree fund (Item 32) were set unanimously. Subdivision amendments (Item 34) were set unanimously. - Moratorium Extension Public Hearing: Set for May 4, 2026, passed 8-1. - Sidewalk Vendor Licenses and Region 10 Referendum: Both passed unanimously. - Consent Agenda: Approved unanimously.

The Town Council held a budget workshop on March 30, 2026, to review the Town Clerk's and Economic & Community Development (ECD) department budgets, and to receive presentations from the Town Manager on governmental fund structures and potential budget adjustments. Councillors discussed the proposed new positions, revenue trends, and the need to balance service demands with affordability for residents. Public Comments & Testimony - Carol O'Donnell, a resident and chair of the Housing Committee, expressed strong support for the proposed records management specialist in the Town Clerk's office, citing the heavy workload from new ordinances. She opposed adding a fee to the rental registry and warned against using one-time funds to cover ongoing expenses. - Jennifer Navarro, a resident, questioned the necessity of the Economic & Community Development position given high property taxes. She noted that many residents, including her family, are struggling and may be forced to leave Brunswick, and argued that the town lacks amenities commensurate with tax burdens. Discussion Items 1. Town Clerk's Department Budget - The Town Clerk presented a proposed budget of $745,636, an increase of $158,000 from the prior year, driven primarily by a requested records management specialist position (salary $65,000). The position would handle Freedom of Access (FOIA) requests across departments, including redaction of body-worn camera footage from the Police Department, and support the new rental registry program. - The Clerk reported over 16,000 registered voters, a growing absentee ballot trend (e.g., 4,200 absentee of 10,000 voters in November 2025), and upcoming elections in June (including a semi-open primary) and November. FOIA requests have surged, with the Police Department estimating 10 hours per week on FOIA alone. The rental registry has been implemented but lacks administrative support; the Clerk used interns for initial mailings. - Councillors discussed the scarcity of FOIA revenue ($25/hour after two free hours) relative to staff costs, and the potential impact of federal voter ID legislation. Councilor Hicks and Ellis examined the possibility of rental registry fees and the position's utility across departments. Clerk emphasized the neutral role of the Town Clerk's office as the FOIA officer. 2. Economic & Community Development Department Budget - Director Sally Costello presented a budget of $338,000, primarily salaries for herself and Project Manager Chrissy Adamowitz. She distinguished between economic development (business, wealth generation) and community development (social infrastructure, equity). - The department staffs several committees, manages projects like Cooks Corner revitalization (including a pedestrian hybrid beacon, trail, and curb cuts), the MARC project (basketball/pickleball courts), Hawthorne School adaptive reuse, and the Blueberry Fields cooperative (a $5 million funding request). The department also works on policy (inclusionary zoning, mobile home park ordinance, rental registry) and grant writing (four grants submitted recently). - Councillors asked about strategic planning alignment and the criteria for prioritizing projects. Director Costello explained that many initiatives are long-standing (e.g., Cooks Corner) or arise from community needs. Councilor Hicks requested that the regional MCOG economic development strategy be posted on the town website. 3. Town Manager Presentations on Governmental Funds and Budget Adjustments - Governmental Funds Overview: Town Manager Henzi presented an explanation of the general fund, special revenue funds, capital project funds, and proprietary funds. Total governmental fund expenditures in FY24-25 were $111.9 million, of which the general fund was 79%. Revenues: property taxes (59%), intergovernmental (state revenue sharing) 11%, excise tax (11%), and other. Education consistently accounts for over 50% of expenditures. Charts showed that expenditures have grown at an annualized 4.5% over 20 years, while revenues have grown 4.72%. The current year faces a drop in state revenue sharing, contributing to a projected tax impact of 3.94% under the Manager's preliminary budget after $994,000 in cuts. - Budget Adjustment Tiers: To achieve lower tax impacts, the Manager proposed five tiers of additional cuts. The tiers reduced the expenditure increase from 5.82% (preliminary) to as low as 2.9% and the tax impact from 3.94% to 1.78%. Cuts included delaying hires (e.g., firefighters, records manager), reducing sidewalk and climate action reserves, and reducing social services. The Manager stated she does not recommend the deepest tiers, but will present a middle-ground recommendation in the combined budget. - Councillors debated the appropriate target: Councilor Weems and Hicks advocated for a 4% tax impact maximum, citing affordability concerns. Councilor Ellis noted the historical median tax increase is about 3.84% and the proposed 6-7% would be among the highest in 16 years. Councilor Teemey emphasized the need to balance austerity with maintaining essential services. Councilor Wilson expressed that she would not vote for anything over 4%. Several councillors stressed the importance of the clerk's records position and code enforcement to implement previously passed ordinances. Key Outcomes - No formal votes or decisions were taken; the meeting was a workshop to gather input. - The Town Manager will incorporate councilors' feedback and present a combined recommended budget (including the school board's adopted budget) at the April 9 meeting, where a public hearing will be set. - Councilors will email additional priorities to the Manager before that meeting. - The Manager confirmed she will adjust her recommendation based on new valuation growth data expected by early April. - The majority of councillors indicated a target of a 4% or lower property tax increase, with some flexibility depending on service needs.

The Brunswick Planning Board met on March 24, 2026, to review a major development application for a shellfish processing facility and to hold public hearings on two proposed zoning text amendments: one on landscape preservation and one on subdivisions, open space, and conservation development. All three items were approved unanimously after discussion and public comment. Major Development Review – Shellfish Processing Facility (0 Mirror Point Road) - The board considered a revised site development plan for a shellfish processing facility. The applicant, Joe from Sight Lines, presented revisions addressing prior concerns: stormwater management (porous pavement system, five-year maintenance agreement), septic design (added advanced treatment system per state feedback), removal of a six-foot overhang on the elevation, lighting programmed to turn off between 8 p.m. and 7 a.m., revised erosion control, and a general permit for eagle take disturbance (eagle nest destroyed by windstorm). A foundation drain was added. Two parking spaces were lost to accommodate the septic field. - Board members (Chris, Alison, Kelly, Laura, Rob) expressed satisfaction with the revisions. Chris discussed pervious asphalt sourcing (Crooker or Shaw Brothers) and asked for on-site supervision during construction. Rob inquired about the septic treatment system (aeration). No public comments were offered. - The board approved an administrative adjustment of 4.1% to the maximum allowable impervious surface coverage, finding it consistent with surrounding development and that adverse impacts would be mitigated. - The board approved a waiver of Section 4.5.4D3 of the zoning ordinance to allow peak post-development runoff rates to exceed existing rates at analysis point one, as the applicant is authorized by the town. - The board approved the major development review application with conditions referencing the findings, plans, and comments. All votes were unanimous. Public Hearing: Zoning Text Amendment – Landscape Preservation (Case 2526) - Jimmy Dealman presented proposed amendments to add land clearing into development review thresholds, requiring a landscape preservation permit for clearing two or more acres in growth districts or five or more acres in rural districts. Standards include preserving 30% of trees within 30 feet of each property line for development, and replanting 450 trees per acre within five years for non-development clearing. A tree fund would be established. - Board discussion raised several issues: definitions of land clearing vs. timber harvest, enforcement challenges (drone monitoring, per-acre per-day fines), integration with the wildlife habitat block district, the 30-foot buffer as a “beauty strip,” and the need for an exemption for habitat management. Kelly noted the 14-day notification period may be tight given four-day workweeks. Rob questioned how tree fund fines would be allocated. Staff acknowledged the concerns and planned to summarize them for the town council. - Public comments: Patty Dudding questioned the threshold (5 acres in rural areas) and suggested lowering it. Steve Weems (Town Councilor, District 7) emphasized the intent: real timber harvests remain under state jurisdiction with only a notice requirement, while development-driven clearing requires full plan review before any cutting. - The board voted unanimously to find the amendments consistent with the comprehensive plan and forward them with comments to the town council. Public Hearing: Zoning Text Amendment – Subdivisions, Open Space, and Conservation Development (Case 2610) - Jimmy Dealman presented amendments to increase required conservation land in rural districts from 45% to 60% (RF, RR) and from 50% to 70% (RP1, RP2, RN), and to require 200 square feet of usable open space per dwelling unit for all subdivisions in growth districts. The term “open space development” is replaced with “conservation development” for clarity. Pre-application meetings would be required. - Board discussion: Kelly raised concerns about enforcement of conservation easements via homeowners associations (often dysfunctional) and the differential treatment of subdivisions (by number of lots) that may not be subject to the standards. Rob pointed out an outdated reference to a 2008 comp plan. Bill welcomed the changes as long overdue and asked about potential unintended consequences (pushing developers to avoid subdivision review). Chris asked about accessory dwelling units and open space requirements; staff confirmed they would be included. Laura questioned the scientific basis for the increased percentages (staff cited a reasonable increase without formal analysis). Public comment: Greg O’Donnell welcomed wetland exclusion from net site area; Sandy praised the alignment with the comp plan but questioned enforcement capacity; Amy Preston sought clarity on conservation vs. open space and the balance between clustered development and tree preservation. - The board voted unanimously to find the amendments consistent with the comprehensive plan and forward them to the town council. Key Outcomes - Shellfish Processing Facility: Approved administrative adjustment (4.1% impervious increase), stormwater waiver, and major development review (all unanimous). - Landscape Preservation Amendment: Recommended to council as consistent with comp plan (unanimous). - Subdivisions, Open Space, and Conservation Development Amendment: Recommended to council as consistent with comp plan (unanimous). - Next Steps: Staff will forward recommendations and comments to the town council for final adoption.

The Brunswick Town Council held a budget and capital improvement program (CIP) workshop on March 23, 2026. Presentations were delivered by the Public Works Department, Engineering Department, and the Town Manager, covering departmental budgets, CIP projects, TIF financing, and overall municipal budget trends. The council discussed significant fiscal challenges, including declining non-property tax revenues and increased county costs, and set an informal, non-binding goal of approximately 4% overall tax rate impact. Public Comments & Testimony - Jennifer Navarro, Brunswick resident: Criticized the structural budget deficit, arguing that the use of TIF funds for general fund support weakens transparency and accountability. She warned that reliance on property tax increases as a backstop without structural reform will lead to escalating tax burdens and declining service value, and questioned the limiting principle for future tax increases. Discussion Items - Public Works Department (Director Larry Leighton): Presented operations including 150 miles of road, 40 miles of sidewalk, and 2,700 catch basins. The proposed FY27 budget shows a 5.88% increase over FY26, driven by wages, benefits, fuel, and de-icing materials. A key proposal is to reorganize the central garage into a Fleet Management Department, without adding new positions, to improve maintenance across all departments. Challenges include staff retention (most employees have less than five years of service), aging infrastructure, and rising construction costs. A new sidewalk machine is planned for purchase as part of the equipment reserve. - Engineering Department (Town Engineer Trey Cruz): Highlighted a 4% budget increase primarily for professional services. CIP projects include Richard's Culvert replacement (construction funding needed), Sparwell Road culvert replacement and road realignment ($1M bond expected), and Noble Street reconstruction concept. Road maintenance: the town averages 5.3 miles paved per year versus a target of 7.4 miles. Proposed paving for FY26 totals 7.6 miles, including Main Street mill and fill (bids opening this week). - Town Manager (TIF Presentation): Explained Tax Increment Financing (TIF) mechanisms under state statute, the five TIF districts, and the tax shift benefits (higher state aid to education, revenue sharing, lower county tax). The TIF budget shows $5.6M in revenues and $6.7M in expenditures, with the difference drawn from balances. Proposed transfers of $1.5M to the general fund were discussed, along with the trade-offs between capturing revenue in TIFs versus supporting the general fund. Councilors debated the balance of TIF use and its impact on the tax rate. - Town Manager (Budget Trends Presentation): The preliminary budget shows a 3.94% tax impact before county adjustments. Non-property tax revenues are declining, and the county tax increased by $103K (0.61% additional impact). Expenditures are up 5.82%, with public safety the largest driver. The manager made $972K in adjustments, including reducing the paving reserve by $200K and funding four new firefighter positions for half a year. The council discussed setting a target for the overall tax rate increase and the need for structural changes. - Council Discussion: Councilors expressed concern about the impact on fixed-income residents and the need to balance service demands with affordability. A majority supported an informal, non-binding target of a maximum 4% overall tax rate increase (including town, school, and county, net of new valuation). Councilor Weems suggested that achieving this would require approximately $1.3M in cuts or revenue increases on the municipal side and $1.5M on the school side. The council acknowledged the school department is still in its budget process and will provide formal feedback after the school board approves its budget. Key Outcomes - The council informally agreed to target a maximum overall tax rate increase of approximately 4% (including town, school, and county, net of new valuation). This guidance was non-binding and meant to shape the budget development process. - The town manager will develop a sequenced priority plan to achieve this target, with recommendations for cuts or revenue increases on the municipal side. - The meeting concluded with public comment and adjournment.

The Brunswick Town Council held a regular meeting on March 16, 2026, covering a range of topics including public comments on taxes, PFAS contamination, and flag etiquette, as well as discussions on the budget, mobile home park regulations, and several votes. Consent Calendar - Approved consent agenda items unanimously. Public Comments & Testimony - Jim Truzani (Brunswick resident) asked about the number of ongoing legal actions against the town and total legal costs over the last three years, specifically mentioning a $7 million claim against the police department. - Chris Teal (resident, taxpayer, voter) expressed frustration with council members not standing for the Pledge of Allegiance, criticized the proposed 9.7% tax increase, and questioned the use of TIF funds. - Brenda Day (Durham Road resident) requested the council not approve the school and town budget increases, citing a combined 9.4% tax increase, and asked all councilors to stand for the Pledge. - Ralph Keyes (Brunswick resident) urged caution regarding PFAS contamination on Brunswick Landing, calling for public health advisories and signage. - Sean Hogan (Navy veteran) criticized councilors for sitting during the Pledge and raised concerns about the impact of housing development on public safety, schools, and infrastructure. - Carolyn Eklund (Tedford Housing president) expressed support for the budget and the town's funding of nonprofits. - Kathy Thompson (Brunswick resident, lifelong) noted that taxes forced her family to move and called for action to help the elderly. - Derek Elwell (Brunswick resident) criticized the school system for not offering the Pledge of Allegiance, high taxes, and alleged prioritization of illegal immigrants over legal residents. - Jennifer Navarro (veteran wife, Brunswick resident) called the flag-protesting disrespectful, objected to a political event on the town calendar, and raised concerns about the Cook's Corner intersection and Tedford Housing's solar panels. - Christine Foster (Brunswick Landing resident) highlighted PFAS in soil piles from construction and called for proper testing. - Heather Neering (Brunswick resident) argued that protesting the flag on government property is inappropriate and asked councilors to stand for the Pledge. - Joel Wagner (Brunswick Landing resident) thanked the town for new development review requirements, but urged dedicated staff for Brunswick Landing issues, possibly funded by TIF revenue. Discussion Items - Manager's Report: The town manager reported that revenue sharing is down $700,000 year-to-date due to lower state income/sales tax receipts, and expenditures are on track except for high winter costs. Budget workshops are scheduled; the school board will adopt its budget on April 8, and the council will receive the full budget on April 9. - RAB Meeting Report (Councilor Page): Discussed PFAS contamination, soil piles, and the need for greater oversight of construction on Brunswick Landing. Dr. Page noted that major contaminants have been remediated, but PFAS remains a concern due to its recent addition to the Superfund list. - Town Manager's Follow-up on Brunswick Landing: Detailed new procedures: DEP will require third-party inspectors at construction sites, soil piles must be covered impermeably, and the town will implement a GIS layer showing land use controls. The town received a 2026 Special Achievement in GIS award. - Mobile Home Park Study Update (Director Costello): Staff is drafting a mobile home ordinance beyond rent stabilization, including tenant councils and property management standards. The goal is to bring a proposal to council before the moratorium ends on May 16, 2026. - Trust Fund Advisory Committee Report (Chair DJ Shaughnessy): Recommended 5% distributions from 15 endowed funds, totaling $55,242.83. The funds are managed conservatively with low-cost investments. - Flixbus Bus Stop Request: Representative Noelia Calcano presented a proposal for a bus stop at Station Avenue for a New York City to Orono route. The stop would be 10-15 minutes, twice daily, seven days a week. Council discussed negotiation terms and potential monthly payments. - Bunganock Bridge Grant Application: The assistant town manager requested authorization to apply for a Maine Infrastructure Adaptation Fund grant (up to $3M) for a bridge replacement. The project is designed to transfer maintenance to the state. Local match would be 5% ($100,000). Key Outcomes - Continued Public Hearing: Unanimously voted to continue the public hearing for item 25 (Mark Grant) to April 6, 2026. (9-0) - Chicken Ordinance Amendment: Adopted unanimously to comply with state law allowing chickens inside homes. (9-0) - Trust Fund Disbursements: Approved $55,242.83 in disbursements as recommended by the Trust Fund Advisory Committee. (9-0) - Flixbus Bus Stop: Passed a motion to authorize the town manager and assistant town manager to negotiate an agreement for a bus stop. (9-0) - Bunganock Bridge Grant Application: Approved applying for a Maine Infrastructure Adaptation Fund grant. (9-0) - Consent Agenda: Approved unanimously. (9-0) - Adjournment: Motion carried unanimously.

The Brunswick Planning Board met on March 10, 2026, to consider three major development applications and elect officers. The board heard public testimony, deliberated on detailed technical and environmental concerns, and took action on each item, including approving a sketch plan for a 93-unit subdivision after extensive public comment. Consent Calendar - The board unanimously concurred with staff that the application materials for Cases 2546, 2560, and 2523 were complete, allowing substantive review to proceed. Public Comments & Testimony - Case 2523 – Woodside Road Subdivision: Numerous residents from Arrowhead Drive, Meredith Drive, Woodside Road, and neighboring areas spoke in opposition to the proposed 93-unit development, citing concerns about: - Traffic safety and congestion on Woodside Road and Arrowhead Drive, especially during peak hours and farmers market season. - Stormwater runoff and flooding impacts on adjacent properties, given the site's low-lying nature and proximity to Mare Brook (an urban impaired stream). - Destruction of community character, arguing that the density and apartment buildings are incompatible with the existing quiet, rural neighborhood. - Loss of dark skies and light pollution. - Potential blasting impacts from ledge removal. - The interconnection between the new development and Arrowhead Drive, which many residents urged the board to waive to preserve neighborhood character. - Several residents emphasized that the developer's only benefit from the interconnection is increased density, and that pedestrian/bicycle connections would be sufficient. - A state representative (Poppy Arford) noted the challenge of controlling speed in neighborhoods that become cut-through routes. - A resident of Woodside Road described dangerous traffic conditions, including near-misses and speeding. - Case 2546 – Shellfish Processing Building: No public comments were offered. - Case 2560 – Molnlycke Healthcare Expansion: No public comments were offered. Discussion Items - Case 2546 – Wet Storage Shellfish Processing Building (3-story, 4,725 sq ft on Muir Point Road): The applicant presented plans for a facility with 11 parking spaces, pervious pavement, and a private well/septic system. Board members raised concerns: - Chris Baldwin questioned the 25% impervious surface credit for the pervious pavement, which is not in the ordinance and is lined with an impermeable liner, making it functionally impervious. Without the credit, the project exceeds density limits. - Chris also noted discrepancies in the stormwater modeling (outlet control structure not modeled correctly) and foundation drain discharge that may impact the bluff. - Kelly Matton requested the stormwater management inspection and maintenance plan be referenced in findings. - Steve Walker asked about an eagle nest (now gone) and the need to notify U.S. Fish and Wildlife. - Allison Harris asked about lighting, suggesting motion sensors/dimmers to minimize light pollution. - Staff recommended a condition for a maintenance agreement for the pervious pavement. - Case 2560 – Molnlycke Healthcare Expansion (78,000 sq ft addition at 192 Admiral Fitch Ave): The applicant detailed the need for expansion due to 8% annual growth, doubling capacity to cover 10 years of US demand. The site is partially on MIRA land with a lease; the expansion parcel was recently purchased outright. Key discussion points: - Ownership clarification: existing building is owned by Brunswick Landing MHC LLC (MIRA subsidiary), expansion land owned by Molnlycke. - Stormwater: A waiver was requested to allow peak runoff rates to exceed existing levels at two design points, contingent on MIRA's authorization. A preliminary letter from MIRA was submitted just before the meeting. - Soil and groundwater management: Contaminated soil will be stockpiled on MIRA land across Pelican Street and transported to a landfill in Norwich, CT, under a Navy agreement. PFAS-contaminated groundwater will be treated via the Navy's existing system. - Traffic: The new design routes truck traffic away from pedestrian-heavy Gorzovsky Way. - Board members praised the thorough soil handling plan and recommended a pre-construction meeting with the contractor and a third-party inspector. - Chris Baldwin expressed disappointment that stormwater treatment only meets the minimum 60% standard for an urban impaired stream, but acknowledged site constraints. - Case 2523 – Woodside Road Subdivision (93 units: 45 single-family lots + 6 multifamily buildings with 8 units each, on 24.6 acres): The applicant presented a revised sketch plan that reduces density from earlier concepts and fits within the GR4 zone (6 units/acre). Key discussion points: - The development requires a road connection to Arrowhead Drive to avoid a dead-end exceeding 1,500 feet; the board and staff support interconnection for planning and emergency access, but many residents oppose it. - Traffic: A full traffic study is needed, including summer and Saturday peak periods (farmers market). - Stormwater: The site is in the impaired Mare Brook watershed; board members urged low-impact development techniques and a salt reduction plan. - Wetlands/vernal pools: The delineation was done before logging, but board members noted that cutting may affect hydrology; they want the Army Corps and DEP permits. - Buffers: No-cut buffers along streams are proposed, but enforcement is a concern; some lots include jurisdictional wetlands that may be filled. - Architecture: The multifamily building renderings were considered acceptable but could be improved with more dynamic colors to avoid the "Brunswick look." - Affordable housing: 15% of apartment units will be affordable, integrated throughout the buildings. - Phasing: The board noted that the entire road must be built first to provide utilities and meet dead-end length limits; the developer will likely bulk-sell single-family lots. - Kelly Matton and others asked about homeowner association responsibilities for stormwater and road maintenance. Key Outcomes - Case 2546 (Shellfish Building): Motion to table the application to March 24, 2026, passed unanimously (all members present). The applicant is to provide detailed septic design, correct stormwater modeling, foundation drain plans, and address the pervious pavement credit issue. - Case 2560 (Molnlycke Healthcare): - The board unanimously approved a waiver of Section 4.5.4 D3 to allow peak post-development runoff rates to exceed existing rates at two design points, subject to MIRA authorization. - The board then unanimously approved the major development review final plan application with nine conditions, including: 1. Referencing the findings of fact and plans. 2. Updated site plan showing building height meets new GM7 requirements (effective March 19, 2026). 3. DEP Site Law permit before building permit. 4. MIRA authorization for increased peak flow rates. 5. Approval of off-site soil stockpiling and equipment laydown areas. 6. Pre-construction meeting to the satisfaction of the town engineer. - Case 2523 (Woodside Road Subdivision): The board unanimously approved the sketch plan application, noting that approval does not guarantee final approval and that further detailed studies (traffic, stormwater, wetlands, geotechnical) are required. - Election of Officers: Bill Dana was elected Chair, and Rob Burgess was elected Vice Chair, both by unanimous vote.

The Brunswick Town Council convened on March 2, 2026, at 5:00 PM to address a range of items including a public hearing on a CDBG grant for sewer lines to Blueberry Fields Cooperative, adoption of zoning text amendments for off-premises signage, a presentation of the mobile home housing study, setting public hearings for the MARK project and chicken ordinance amendments, approving food vendor licenses, making appointments to town boards, and considering earmark applications. The meeting lasted over three hours with unanimous votes on most items. Consent Calendar - Special Amusement License Renewals: Approved for Brickyard Hollow Brewing Company and Lamont Hall Block. Motion by Councillor Wilson, second by Councillor Ecker. Vote: unanimous. - Item C: Maine Service Centers Coalition Resolution: Tabled until the next meeting after discussion about the organization's 501(c)(6) status and potential advocacy positions. Motion to table by Councillor Teamy, second by Councillor Wilson. Vote: unanimous. Public Comments & Testimony - Chris Teal (Brunswick resident and taxpayer): Expressed strong opposition to rising school taxes (citing a 54-55% increase since 2014 while student enrollment flatlined) and criticized the school administration's performance. Also objected to the town's potential $194,000 contribution to Green Mars (Wilbur Woods project), calling it "almost criminal" given that residents were previously told they had no standing in the matter. - Janet Fournier (former board president, Blueberry Fields Co-op): Spoke in favor of the CDBG grant application, detailing the cooperative's proactive efforts to address aging septic systems and their work with consultants, the EPA, and the town since early 2025. Highlighted that many residents are elderly on fixed incomes and that the cooperative has $500,000 in reserves for the project. - Chris Teal (again, on CDBG item): Questioned total project cost ($7.1 million) and potential taxpayer exposure for the shortfall, noting the town's prior $800,000 support for the cooperative. - Jennifer Navarro (Zoom): Opposed the CDBG application, arguing the council has a fiduciary duty to fully disclose long-term financial exposure, system capacity impacts, and the layered match requirements across multiple funding streams. Expressed concern about existing sewer backups at Bay Bridge and lack of full lifecycle analysis. - Representative Poppy Arford (Zoom): Spoke in favor, stating the benefit far outweighs the effort, and offered to organize a letter of support from the legislative delegation. - Carolina Cantu (EPA, via Zoom): Expressed gratitude for the town's support of the Closing America's Wastewater Access Gap initiative and offered information for other communities seeking EPA technical assistance. Discussion Items - Item 17: CDBG Grant Application for Blueberry Fields Sewer Lines – Chrissy Adamowitz (Economic Development Project Manager) presented the proposal to apply for a $1 million CDBG public infrastructure grant (25% match required, total project $7.1 million). The grant would help connect 300+ residents to sewer, addressing failing septics. The town would act as pass-through; match funding would come from other grants, loans, and cooperative reserves. The grant timeline: funding available in 2028, applications only in even years. Council questions focused on readiness, capacity (Brunswick Sewer District confirmed capacity), and match details. Council voted unanimously to approve the application. - Item 18: Zoning Text Amendments for Off-Premises Business Directory Signage – Principal Planner Dialman presented the amendment allowing such signage at development entrances serving 3+ businesses, with conditions. Planning Board found it consistent with the comprehensive plan on February 10. Council voted unanimously to adopt, suspending rules for same-night vote. - Item 19: Mobile Home Housing Study – Economic Development Director Sally Costello introduced the consultant report. Tom Siegel (Core Market Advisors) and Regan LaRochelle (LaRochelle Consulting) presented findings: survey of 204 residents (17% response rate) across three parks (Bay Bridge, Maplewood Manor, Blueberry Fields). Key findings: 63% of Bay Bridge respondents spend 30% of income on housing; 78% report rent increases made it difficult to pay bills; fee complexity (per-adult fees, pet fees, meter charges) adds burden; 42% of Bay Bridge residents want to move but face mobility constraints. Base lot rent increases (5-6% annually) are similar to apartment market, but total costs are higher due to fees. Park ownership includes institutional investors (Sun Communities, Legacy). Council discussion highlighted consumer protection and potential need for regulation beyond rent stabilization. No action taken; further discussion with housing committee and state anticipated. - Item 20: Setting Public Hearing for MARK Phase 1 Tier 1C – Director Costello outlined the $1.165 million project (two basketball courts, sports lighting at existing pickleball & basketball courts, with contingency). Funding sources: $500,000 LWCF grant, $200,000 from Bowdoin unrestricted capital, $109,000 Musco Lighting Grant, up to $200,000 from Recreation Impact Fees, plus stakeholder contributions and private donations. Parks & Rec Commission unanimously recommended. Council voted unanimously to set a public hearing for March 16, 2026. - Item 21: Setting Public Hearing for Chicken Ordinance Amendments – Town Clerk explained the need to comply with state LD 1655, which prohibits communities from restricting chicken ownership. The amendment removes certain local restrictions to align with state law. Council set a public hearing for March 16, 2026, with unanimous vote. - Item 22: Food Vendor Licenses on Town Mall – Approved five applicants (Busy Buns, Talk of the Town, Wrappers, Cheese of the Day, Little Lesha) for prepared food sales, and the Brunswick Farmers Market Association. All met requirements. Unanimous vote. - Item 23: Appointments to Town Boards and Committees – Appointments Committee (chaired by Councillor Anderson) recommended: Abby King to Social Services Committee (balance of term to Dec 2028); Michelle Dolly and Robert Crane to Zoning Board of Appeals (balance to Nov 2028); Lisa Tromble to Shellfish Committee (non-licenseholder, balance to May 2029). Council approved unanimously. - Item 24: Earmark Applications for Congressional Directed Spending – Chrissy Adamowitz requested authority to apply for earmarks for two projects: Blueberry Fields sewer project (up to $5 million, 20% match) and MARK Phase 1 Tier 1D (up to $5.5 million for turf field, tennis courts, etc.). Council approved unanimously, noting the Friday deadline for Rep. Pingree's office. Key Outcomes - Item 17 Passed (unanimous): Approved CDBG application for Blueberry Fields sewer lines. - Item 18 Passed (unanimous): Adopted zoning text amendments for off-premises directory signage. - Item 19: No vote; report received for further deliberation. - Item 20 Passed (unanimous): Set public hearing for MARK Phase 1 Tier 1C on March 16, 2026. - Item 21 Passed (unanimous): Set public hearing for chicken ordinance amendments on March 16, 2026. - Item 22 Passed (unanimous): Approved food vendor licenses. - Item 23 Passed (unanimous): Approved appointments to boards and committees. - Item 24 Passed (unanimous): Approved earmark applications. - Consent Agenda: First two items approved; third item (Maine Service Centers Coalition) tabled to March 16, 2026. - The meeting adjourned around 8:15 PM.