Public Meetings - Carson City, Nevada

The Utility Finance Oversight Committee met on April 2, 2026, at 10:00 AM. The meeting was called to order with a quorum present. The committee elected officers, reviewed and approved tentative fiscal year 2027 budgets for the wastewater, water, and stormwater utility funds, and received a presentation on utility personnel, projects, and planning. Election of Officers - Ron Connect was nominated and unanimously elected as Chair for the 2027 meetings (and subsequent meetings in 2026). Cynthia Terchek was nominated and unanimously re-elected as Vice Chair. The outgoing Chair noted that the committee rotates chairs every two years, and he had served for two years. Discussion Items - Tentative Fiscal Year 2027 Wastewater Fund Budget - Jamie Stevenson (Accounting Manager) presented the budget, which includes a 2.9% CPI-based rate increase (CPI-U for West urban area, December 2025). Salaries and benefits increase by $246,792 due to contractual increases, benefit rate hikes, and anticipated promotions. Supplemental requests include $200,000 for chemicals and a $31,500 reduction for mosquito control (reallocated across multiple funds). Capital spending planned at $6,246,000 for lift station reconstruction and pipeline replacement. The budget meets all financial policy requirements. - Committee member Ron Connect praised the modest 2.88% revenue increase, calling it the best in years, and suggested rates could decline in real terms over time, comparing to competitive sectors. He expressed hope for future presentations showing real cost adjustments. Vice Chair Cynthia Terchek disagreed, stating rates should never go down or negative, as utilities are monopolies. Discussion also covered revenue forecasting methods, customer growth (1% annually), and how CPI increases meet financial metrics. - Action: Motion to acknowledge compliance and recommend Board approval passed unanimously. - Tentative Fiscal Year 2027 Water Fund Budget - Presented by Jamie Stevenson. Includes 2.9% CPI rate increase. Salaries and benefits up $290,513; supplemental requests of $50,000 for water purchase (commodity cost increase) and $300,000 for professional services (system analysis and master planning). Capital spending planned at $4,640,000, primarily waterline replacement. Operating reserve target 60–90 days; policy goals met. - Ron Connect commended the budget and noted that salary increases should align with inflation. Cynthia Terchek cautioned against losing employees to other agencies (e.g., TMWA) and emphasized retaining human capital. Member Johns asked about benefits as percentage of salaries (63%) and retirement/health insurance costs; Stevenson reported a 10% health insurance increase and no new PERS increases yet. - Action: Motion to acknowledge compliance and recommend Board approval passed unanimously. - Tentative Fiscal Year 2027 Stormwater Utility Fund Budget - Presented by Jamie Stevenson. Includes 2.9% CPI rate increase. Salaries and benefits up $46,613; supplemental of $35,000 for mosquito control (reallocation from wastewater). Capital spending planned at $1,925,000 for citywide stormwater improvements. Operating reserve target 45 days; policy goals met. - Discussion included an update on the Bowers Lane stormwater project (design underway in 2026) and the William Street utility work coordination. Amanda Singleton (Stormwater Manager) provided details. Darren Schultz (Public Works Director) explained the new equitable cost allocation for mosquito control across city funds. Committee members expressed support for the approach. - Action: Motion to acknowledge compliance and recommend Board approval passed unanimously. - Presentation: Personnel, Projects, and Planning – Carson City Utilities - Andy Hummel (Utility Manager) presented an overview of all three utility funds. Key points: water and wastewater budgets $20M each; stormwater $3M. Staff of 41 in utility division. Water system has 350 miles of pipe, 16 pressure zones, 21 active wells, and 60 pressure reducing stations. Wastewater system: 320 miles of collection pipe, 5 lift stations, one treatment plant (permitted 6.9 MGD, current flow 5.5 MGD). Reuse system uses all treated effluent for irrigation. Capital projects include the Quill water treatment plant rebuild (50% complete, $23M contract), tank rehabs, and the William Street pipeline replacement. Water resource portfolio includes 18,000 acre-feet of rights; current production 10,000 acre-feet. Well investigations using USGS dye testing are underway to address iron bacteria (Well 44) and uranium (Well 10) issues. - Committee members asked about the Bowers Lane project tie-in with Highway 50, the status of the inactive arsenic treatment plant, the intertie with Douglas County (water rights owned by Carson City, good working relationship), and surface water/groundwater percentages. Hummel noted that before Quill went offline, surface water was 25% of supply; during downtime they rely more on groundwater and river induction wells. - No action taken; informational item. Key Outcomes - Tentative Wastewater Fund Budget FY2027 – Approved unanimously (motion by Connect, seconded). - Tentative Water Fund Budget FY2027 – Approved unanimously (motion by Connect, seconded). - Tentative Stormwater Utility Fund Budget FY2027 – Approved unanimously (motion by Connect, seconded). - Officers Elected – Ron Connect (Chair), Cynthia Terchek (Vice Chair) for the 2026–2027 term. - Next Steps – The three budgets will be forwarded to the Board of Supervisors for final approval. The committee will continue to monitor utility financial policies and capital projects.

On March 31, 2026, at 1:30 PM, the Carson City Administrative Hearing Examiner convened in Conference Room A of the Community Development Department to conduct a public hearing on a single action item: an application for an administrative permit (LU 2026-0023) to allow construction of a 518-square-foot attached accessory dwelling unit (ADU) on property zoned Single Family One Acre at 12 Woodstock Circle. Public Comments & Testimony - A neighbor (name unclear from transcript, possibly "Clarify") expressed interest in the height of the proposed structure and was informed by the Hearing Examiner that the ADU would be single-story at 20.5 feet. The neighbor also asked about the overall home size; the Hearing Examiner clarified that only the ADU requires the administrative permit, while the primary residence (2,413 square feet) is allowed by code. The total square footage for the home and ADU is 2,931, with an additional 588-square-foot garage. - Anthony Carlosco asked for clarification on which part of the floor plan represented the ADU and received confirmation that the ADU is located at the rear of the structure. Discussion Items - Application LU 2026-0023: The applicant's representative, Christopher Maltz of Parkville Engineering (representing SBM Architecture, LLC), confirmed he had reviewed the staff report and agreed with the conditions of approval. The Hearing Examiner noted that the ADU requires an administrative permit due to the zoning district, while the single-family home does not. No changes to the staff report were made. Key Outcomes - The Hearing Examiner approved the administrative permit (LU 2026-0023) based on the findings and subject to the conditions of approval contained in the staff report. No public opposition was recorded. The meeting was adjourned following final public comment.

Overview The Nevada Commission for the Reconstruction of the VNT Railway convened on March 25, 2026, at 9:00 AM. The meeting was called to order by Chair Mitchell, with Vice Chair Peterson, Treasurer Cruz, and Secretary Hicks present, establishing a quorum. The meeting adjourned at 9:35 AM after unanimous approval of all agenda items, including budget approvals, fund allocations, and a five-year contract for track maintenance services. No public comments were made during the meeting. Consent Calendar - Approval of Minutes (February 25, 2026): Motion to approve passed unanimously. - Statement of Accounts Payable (January 1–31, 2026): Motion to approve checks as presented passed unanimously. - Adjusted FY2026 Budget Report (period ending January 2026): The agenda title contained a typographical error ("2526"), which was clarified as a scrivener's error with no legal impact. Motion to approve the budget report passed unanimously. Discussion Items - Item 8: Allocation of $100,000 from Story County Rail Fund for Historic Structures Report (V&C Freight Depot Project): Jennifer McCain presented the request, noting that the previously allocated $1.9 million for roof repairs was not spent. The $100,000 will fund a historic structures report to guide future work. Discussion clarified that unspent allocations do not automatically roll forward; annual approval is required. Motion to approve the allocation passed unanimously. - Item 9: Proposed FY2027 Tentative Budget: Sherry Bailey presented the budget, highlighting increased revenue from expanded events (Father's Day weekend, Toast of the Canyon, Polar Express), estimated $32,000 in interest income (assuming 4% return on $800,000), increased advertising budget (including $10,000 for new collateral), and additional funds for depot upgrades and handicap access. The budget projects a surplus of approximately $14,000 excluding depreciation. Motion to approve the tentative budget passed unanimously. - Item 10: Reallocation of Unexpended FY2026 Funds ($650,000) to FY2027 for Track Improvement Projects: The commission requested approval from the Story County Board of Commissioners to roll forward $650,000 from the VNT Rail Fund for stabilizing the Overman embankment. This project was identified as the top capital priority. Motion to approve the request passed unanimously. - Item 11: Contract FY26-CO02 with Chris Freder, DBA Battleborne Rail (Track Maintenance Services): After a brief recess, the commission considered a five-year contract at an annual amount of $128,972.50, totaling $644,862.50. Chris Freder reported progress on safety concerns, ditch control, and increased maintenance due to a new rock quarry (expected to run 50–60 trucks per hour). The contract includes a rate increase. Motion to approve the contract and authorize the chair to execute it passed unanimously. Non-Action Reports - Marketing Update (Maria): Proposed media day on May 17 or 24, 2026 (diesel train); spring family ticket giveaway; influencer outreach; and a $400 per month advertising budget for general season campaigns. Additional budget may be available starting July 2026. - Executive Assistant Update (Sherry Bailey): Presented billboard artwork for Mother's Day and the season; reported general season ticket sales (started March 16, 2026) on par with last year; working on signage and rack cards with Carson City. Key Outcomes - All motions passed unanimously with no dissenting votes. - Approved: Minutes, accounts payable, adjusted budget report, $100,000 historic structures report allocation, FY2027 tentative budget, $650,000 track improvement fund request, and five-year contract with Chris Freder. - Next meeting tentatively scheduled for April 15, 2026, at 1:00 PM. Public Comments No public comments were received at any point during the meeting.

The Carson City Planning Commission met on March 25, 2026, at 11:00 AM to consider several land use applications, including special use permits, a tentative subdivision map, a right-of-way abandonment, a zone change, and a proposed ordinance regulating short-term rentals. The meeting also included a discussion on parking requirements in redevelopment area one. The commission approved most items and continued others for further review. Consent Calendar - Approval of Minutes of February 25, 2026: Corrected to reflect Commissioner Preston's no vote on item 6. Approved unanimously. Public Comments - Danny French: Commented on several items, including concerns about landscaping, tree diversity, and the institutional look of the state mail building. Also opposed the short-term rental ordinance without further discussion. - Bart Carrillo: Opposed opening short-term rentals citywide, citing potential neighborhood disruption and a recent court decision upholding current code. Requested to submit written comments. - Garrett Gordon (Board of Realtors): Suggested modifications to the short-term rental ordinance, including tiered permits, 30-minute response/60-minute on-site, insurance requirements, and clarifying event vs. party. - Terry Workington: Supported the ordinance but requested lower fees, a 30-minute response/60-minute on-site, and better definition of occupancy. - Tammy Workington: Supported the ordinance with similar suggestions. Discussion Items 6A. LU2026-0043 – Special Use Permit for Accessory Structure (1230 Clearview Ave) - Applicant requested a 2,400 sq ft metal storage shed. Two existing sheds (48 sq ft and 168 sq ft) to remain; two others (240 sq ft and 48 sq ft) to be removed. Total accessory square footage after removal: 2,616 sq ft. Staff recommended approval. Commissioner Pizell suggested condition requiring removal of specified sheds prior to building permit. Commissioner Preston noted inconsistency in site plan. Applicant confirmed removal of the two sheds highlighted in yellow. Commissioner De Christopher asked about neighbor notification. No public comment. Motion to approve with conditions passed unanimously. 6B. LU2026-0022 – Special Use Permit for Storage Containers (Nevada National Guard, 1070 E West St) - Application from code violation. Five metal storage containers already on site. Staff recommended approval with condition 7 (compliance with development standards) and 45-day requirement to add slats to fence. Applicant requested 90-day extension due to funding constraints. Commission amended to 90 days. Motion approved unanimously. 6C. LU2026-0026 – Special Use Permit for State Mail Services Building (700 E 5th St) - Proposed 13,112 sq ft building with 41 parking spaces. Applicant committed to non-fruiting crab apple trees and larger evergreens. Discussion on architecture consistency with adjacent state buildings and landscaping. Added condition 7: applicant shall demonstrate consistent landscape standard along Roop Street between the property south of Fifth Street and the subject property, to the satisfaction of the director. One public comment from Greg Novak included in late material. Public comment from Danny French raised concerns about tree diversity and institutional look. Motion to approve with additional condition passed unanimously. 6D. SUB2026-0029 – Tentative Map for Condominium Hangars (Carson City Airport) - Request for new tentative map for 4 hangar condos (larger than previous phases) on airport property. Staff recommended approval. Discussion on need for CC&Rs. Commissioner Borders argued CCRs are necessary; attorney suggested condition requiring CC&Rs if applicable. Applicant confirmed lease agreement covers rules. Commissioner Preston clarified that the airport owns the land and the hangars are condos. Public comment from Danny French questioned complexity. Motion to recommend approval to Board of Supervisors passed unanimously. 6E. LU2026-0030 – Special Use Permit Amendment (Frank Laporte Construction, 556 Airport Road) - Request to convert office space to watchman's quarters, increase height of Building C from 10.5 ft to 15.67 ft, and increase fence height from 6 ft to 8 ft. Applicant explained changes to accommodate larger RVs/boats. Staff recommended approval. No public comment. Motion to approve passed unanimously. 6F. Right-of-Way Abandonment (Executive Point Way and Commerce Way) - Abandon 2,903 sq ft of knuckle at intersection to accommodate future development by St. Teresa of Avila. Staff recommended approval. Commissioner Cron asked about traffic control and historical reason for knuckle. Fire department reviewed. No public comment. Motion to recommend to board passed unanimously. 6G. ZA2026-0027 – Zone Change from Limited Industrial to Public (St. Teresa of Avila, 3000 N Lampa Lane) - Consistent with master plan amendment. Staff recommended approval. No public comment. Motion to recommend to board passed unanimously. 6H. Continued to May 27, 2026 – Special Use Permit for St. Teresa's Project - Applicant requested continuation to May 27, 2026. Motion passed unanimously. 6I. ZA2026-0045 – Short-Term Rental Ordinance - Extensive discussion. Director Hope Sullivan presented proposed standards: administrative permit, no events, quiet hours, occupancy limits (2 per bedroom), 30-minute response, fire pit restrictions, etc. Commission debated: daytime/nighttime occupancy, parking, enforcement, minimum age 25, corporate ownership, tiered permits, response times, and zoning districts allowed. Many commissioners felt more work needed. Motion to continue to April 29, 2026 meeting passed unanimously. 6J. Initiation of Zoning Code Amendment for Parking in Redevelopment Area One - Director Sullivan recommended initiating a code amendment to eliminate on-site parking requirements for non-residential uses on parcels ≤1/3 acre in redevelopment area one, currently improved with a building. Commission discussed and voted to direct staff to prepare the amendment. Motion passed unanimously. Key Outcomes - Approved: 6A, 6B, 6C, 6E, 6F, 6G (all with conditions as noted). - Recommended to Board: 6D (tentative map), 6F (abandonment), 6G (zone change). - Continued: 6H to May 27, 2026; 6I to April 29, 2026 for further work on short-term rental ordinance. - Directed Staff: 6J to initiate parking amendment for redevelopment area one. - Building Division: Noted that the building division came in-house on February 13, 2026. Year-to-date valuations: $37 million; 54 housing starts (all detached) in Q1.

This meeting consisted of a budget workshop starting at 1:30 PM and a regular board meeting beginning at 6:00 PM. The workshop covered the general fund, summer school fund, and gifts and donations fund. The regular meeting included a trustee appointment, presentations on advanced placement, alternate standards, elementary school programs, and a recess policy discussion. Public comment was dominated by opposition to proposed cuts to school social workers. Consent Calendar - The board unanimously approved the consent agenda after pulling item 13 (authorization of layoff notices due to reduction in force) because the superintendent was absent. Public Comments & Testimony - Dozens of community members, students, teachers, and social workers spoke against the potential elimination of all 12 school social worker positions. Many described personal experiences of students who relied on social workers for crisis support, mental health, and basic needs. Multiple speakers noted that social workers are the only mental health professionals at elementary schools and that contractors cannot replace the trust built with full-time staff. - Several speakers cited statistics: 45% of Nevada teens felt hopeless for two weeks or more, 22% seriously considered suicide (2021 Youth Risk Behavior Survey). Social workers reported active caseloads of 60–177 students each, with many providing tier-two preventative interventions. - A few speakers supported keeping recess at 45 minutes daily, arguing it is essential for social-emotional learning and academic focus. One teacher defended the current recess structure, noting that withholding a small portion for academic or behavioral reasons can be reasonable. - One speaker raised concerns about paraprofessional cuts, stating that student literacy is at risk without intervention support. Discussion Items - Budget Workshop (1:30 PM): - Summer School Fund: $205,000 budgeted ($131,000 salary/benefits, $73,800 supplies). Fund had been idle because ESSER funds covered summer school in prior years. One trustee questioned whether students should pay tuition for credit recovery. Staff noted that past tuition only covered a small fraction of costs. - Gifts and Donations Fund: $328,000 budgeted, mostly for supplies. Funds are restricted to donor wishes. The district does not aggressively seek donations due to limited staff. - General Fund: $98.9 million in total resources, $86.3 million budgeted, leaving a $12.6 million ending fund balance. Salary and benefits account for $65 million (85% of expenditures). The district has a structural deficit of about $3.5 million, and at current spending, the fund balance would reach zero in 3.75 years. The board discussed the need to reduce transfers out, especially to the special education fund ($9.2 million). - Regular Meeting (6:00 PM): - Appointment of Trustee: Two candidates interviewed for the District 5 vacancy. The board voted unanimously to appoint Tina Saduki, effective April 14, 2026. - AP Program Update: Carson High School has seen a 47% increase in unique test-takers (from 412 to 753) and a pass rate of 73% in 2025, up from 55% in 2021. Students earned over $500,000 in college credits. The Carson City Schools Foundation provides $25,000 annually to reduce test fees. The district plans to expand AP offerings, including cybersecurity and business. - Alternate Standards Program (ASP): Serves about 120 students with significant cognitive disabilities. Key initiatives include the Next Step transition program (ages 18–22), community partnerships, and a micro-enterprise coffee cart at Carson High. The Project Achieve grant (ending this year) supports teacher training. - Elementary School Programs: Principals from all six elementary schools presented highlights, including CKLA literacy curriculum, MTSS Diamond Awards (Seeliger and Mark Twain), house systems, STEM certification, and family engagement programs. - Recess Policy Discussion: First reading of revised Policy 260 was deferred. The current policy mandates three 15-minute recesses daily (45 minutes total). The proposed revision gives principals more scheduling flexibility but maintains daily recess. Staff emphasized that recess is a tier-one MTSS intervention and should not be used punitively. The board will submit edits via email; the policy will return for discussion. Key Outcomes - The board voted unanimously to appoint Tina Saduki to the District 5 trustee vacancy. - The board received public comment and will consider input on the recess policy revision before the next reading. - Future agenda items requested: presentation on the Jump Start program and a presentation from the city on growth and development as it relates to schools. - The board pulled agenda item 13 (possible layoff authorization) due to the superintendent's absence; it will be rescheduled.

The Carson City Culture and Tourism Authority Board of Directors held a special meeting on Friday, March 20, 2026, at 11:30 AM in the Robert Bob Kroll Boardroom at the Carson City Community Center. The board unanimously approved a contract for the design, engineering, fabrication, illumination, transport, and installation of a 69-foot-tall sculpture railroad spike, titled "Driven," to be placed at the Railroad Museum. Discussion Items - The board discussed and considered Contract No. CTA 2627-01 for the design, engineering, fabrication, illumination, transport, and installation of a 69-foot-tall sculpture railroad spike, titled "Driven, Monument to Connection," in the amount of $197,687, covering the period from March 10, 2026, to December 31, 2026. Staff reported that foundation and engineering costs are estimated between $30,000 and $70,000; the Fiscal Year 2027 budget will include the high-end estimate of $70,000 due to unknowns. The final payment of $37,687 to Mr. Johnson is due upon completion and installation, as specified in Section 3.3.4 of the contract. Public Comments & Testimony - Rob Fuller (613 East Spear Street, Carson City) stated that he and his wife are working to open a new bookstore in the former Hannafin's antique store location, sharing the space with Tiger Rose Vinyl Records. He inquired about resources, grants, and assistance available through Carson City for minority-owned or woman-owned businesses (his wife owns the bookstore). Board members directed him to Garrett Leapier (staff) and Hope Sullivan, the city's Community and Economic Development Director, for guidance. - Eric Brooks (public comment) noted that the official title of the sculpture is "Driven, Monument to Connection" and requested that it be referred to primarily as a sculpture rather than a spike. Key Outcomes - The board voted unanimously (4 ayes, 0 nays) to approve Contract No. CTA 2627-01 with the terms described above. The motion carried.

This meeting of the Carson City Board of Supervisors included detailed discussion and public testimony on a proposed public-private partnership (with the Hop and May Adams Foundation) to build a new city hall downtown. The board voted 4–1 to direct the city manager to proceed with due diligence and negotiations on the proposal. The meeting also included employee service awards, adoption of consent items, approval of a utility ratepayer assistance ordinance, and approval of a Master Plan text amendment regarding downtown character areas. Consent Calendar - Approved the minutes of the February 19, 2026 meeting unanimously. - Approved the consent agenda (items 8A, 9A [Resolution 2026-R-7], 9B, 9C, 11A, 11B, 12A, 12B, 13A) as presented. - Item 10A (Resolution 2026-R-8) was removed from consent and discussed separately; adopted 4–1, with Supervisor White dissenting. - Approved the 2027–2031 Airport Capital Improvement Plan and authorized the airport manager to submit FAA grant applications (unanimous). Public Comments & Testimony In Opposition to the New City Hall Proposal (Item 18A): - Mark Costa (resident) urged the board to vote against authorizing continued work on a new city hall, citing a $36 million price tag, $2.3 million annual interest, total repayment near $70 million over 30 years, budget warnings (personnel costs approaching 70% of budget), concern about using redevelopment funds for a government building, and staff time being diverted. - Jennifer Varivi (resident) requested the board clarify how they will represent the public, noting many residents oppose the project and that alternate ideas deserve good faith discussion. - Kathleen Beasley (resident) argued the proposal uses redevelopment funds to bypass competitive bidding, buy land without free market, and sell current city hall without competitive offers. She also raised concerns about lack of transparency and a conflict of interest between the city manager and Tom Metcalfe. - Richard Chang (resident) opposed the proposal, noting total repayment could approach $70 million with interest, that the city’s growth does not justify the scale, and that public trust is eroding. - Doreen Gerlani Mack (third-generation resident) spoke for strengthening downtown with a city hall as a central hub, but emphasized need for public meetings, smart parking solutions, and accessibility. - Cheryl Rookwood (resident) opposed the public-private partnership, citing cheaper alternatives like Ormsby House and Kmart building, and called the expense irresponsible given economic uncertainty. - Heather (resident) criticized the board for prioritizing developers over residents, called the project a “want not a need,” and urged a ballot vote. - Sandra Owens (resident) questioned why a tens-of-millions project is not on the ballot, and called for transparency. - Leanne Saruman (native resident) said the item was brought to a vote too quickly without a single public hearing, and that the process excludes ordinary residents. - Danny (name not fully given) raised concerns about cost, growth management, and lack of clarity, and urged more discussion. - Tony Thompson (homeowner) called the $70 million price tag unconscionable and urged a more fiscally responsible approach. - Tom Metcalfe (developer representative) clarified that city hall would be built under a CMAR or design-bid-build process for best value, and that he has worked with city staff over two years. - Dan Leck (resident) opposed the project, arguing the effective rent ($4.35/sq ft/month triple net) is excessive, and that the proposal would harm existing commercial buildings. - Connie Salerno (resident) requested that structural reports and due diligence on alternatives be made public. - Mary Sonata (resident) opposed the plan, stating roads are deteriorating and the city should not spend on a “grandiose new city hall.” In Support of the New City Hall Proposal: - Jeff Sudich (CEO, Nevada Builders Alliance) expressed strong support for a downtown city hall, citing civic identity, accessibility, efficiency, and economic growth. He represented 116 member businesses. - Garrett LePier (lifelong resident and downtown property owner) supported the project as a good use of leverage, for secure elections, and as the start of a new chapter. - Donna Anderson (resident, board member of Muscle Powered) favored the project, stating the city needs a new city hall and should look like the capital. - Collette Bureau (37-year real estate agent) urged the board to move forward, noting the location is outstanding and comparing it to past successful downtown redevelopment. - Jed Block (62-year resident, business owner) supported the project, criticizing lack of decorum in opposition and noting that renovations on old buildings are unpredictable. - Kara Falatar (estimator, Martin Harris Construction) cited examples where retrofits cost more than new construction, and that NRS 338 requires competitive bidding. - Rod Butler (resident) used a car analogy to argue that retrofitting old buildings is a money pit and urged moving forward with new construction. Other Comments: - Mark Costa (also spoke on a different item) asked the board to vote against authorizing continued work on the new city hall (see opposition). - Sheriff Furlong endorsed suicide prevention training on March 30, 2026, at the Sheriff’s Office, and commended a news article on the topic. - Pedro Gonzalez (Pastor, Victory Outreach) expressed desire to move his church to Carson City, citing work with at-risk youth and recovery. Discussion Items 18A – Direction to City Manager on Due Diligence for New City Hall: - City Manager Glenn Martell clarified there is no preset deal to sell current city hall; any project will follow NRS prevailing wage and competitive bidding requirements. The proposal meets strategic goals of centralized services, investment in infrastructure, and confidence in downtown. - Stephanie Hicks (Deputy City Manager) provided background: since 2015, the board has considered city space needs; the board directed in 2022 that city hall remain downtown. The new city hall would be a civic anchor consistent with the master plan. - Robert Nellis (Asset Services Manager) presented a comparison table of eight facilities, noting that other options lacked required square footage, had unknown deferred maintenance, could not meet timelines, or required moves the city cannot afford. - Sherry Russell (CFO) stated the preliminary estimate is $36 million, with total interest over 30 years potentially near $64 million (not $70 million as claimed by some commenters). Funding would come from extraordinary maintenance funds, redevelopment funds, and general fund as redevelopment districts sunset (2031/2034). No new taxes are expected. She emphasized the city will own the land and building at the end. - Supervisor White insisted on competitive bidding; staff confirmed the developer has agreed to city oversight of bid openings. She also stressed that sale proceeds of existing city hall should go toward the project. - Supervisor Horton asked staff to explain off-ramps (prepayment options) that allow the city to bond and buy out the lease early, reducing interest costs. - Supervisor Shuty raised concerns about “need vs. want”; City Manager Martell argued the growth requires investment and that money will be spent regardless. - Supervisor Giomi moved the final motion, which directed the city manager to proceed with negotiations with the Hop and May Adams Foundation, return with a detailed agreement, and did not explicitly include a competitive bidding requirement (though it was discussed). 16A – Master Plan Text Amendment for Lompa Ranch North Specific Plan: - Heather Ferris (staff) presented amendments to Condition 57B to remove a full public right-of-way requirement and instead require access, as full public access was not feasible due to private property constraints. - Supervisor Giomi clarified the language ensures emergency access; staff confirmed. Approved unanimously. 16B – Master Plan Text Amendment for Policy 6.3b (Downtown Character Areas): - Staff recommended stripping the phrase “while it is not under the city’s jurisdiction” and adding language to clarify the city does have zoning jurisdiction (per NRS 278.580) over state properties, except for uses existing before April 23, 1971. - Kathleen Beasley questioned why staff did not follow the Planning Commission's recommended language stating the city has jurisdiction; staff explained the additional language was removed for consistency with a prior action removing the state office complex from the downtown character area. Approved unanimously. 17A – Utility Ratepayer Assistance Program (Second Reading): - Ordinance 2026-6 (corrected from 2026-7) revising provisions of the utility ratepayer assistance program. Approved unanimously. Key Outcomes - Item 18A: City Manager directed to proceed with due diligence and negotiations with the Hop and May Adams Foundation for a new city hall downtown. Vote: 4–1 (Supervisor White opposed). The direction includes returning to the board with a detailed agreement. Competitive bidding and oversight by city staff was discussed and agreed by the developer. - Consent Calendar: Unanimous approval. - Item 10A: Resolution 2026-R-8 adopted 4–1 (White opposed). - Item 16A & 16B: Master Plan text amendments approved unanimously. - Item 17A: Ordinance 2026-6 adopted unanimously. - Employee Service Awards: Recognized for 5, 10, 15, and 20 years of service. - Public Comments recorded both strong opposition and support for the city hall proposal. - No public hearing on city hall was scheduled; the board decision was made during this meeting.

The Carson City Airport Authority met on March 18, 2026, at 1:30 PM. All members were present, establishing a quorum. The meeting included approval of minutes, reports from the airport engineer and manager, approval of the preliminary FY2026-2027 budget, and discussion of a pay increase for the airport manager, which was tabled for further research. Consent Calendar - The minutes of the previous meeting were approved unanimously. - The consent agenda, including routine items, was approved unanimously. Airport Engineer's Report - Brian reported on the RSA drainage and improvements project: 60% plans submitted to FAA, proceeding towards 90% with bid opening targeted for May. - The main apron rehab project and airport-funded pavement maintenance project are out to bid, advertised via nGem. - The capital improvement plan (ACIP) was reviewed with FAA ADO and will go to the Board of Supervisors for formal approval the next day. Public Comments - No members of the public were present or provided comments. Discussion Items - Preliminary FY2026-2027 Budget Approval: Airport Manager Corey Jenkins and Treasurer Jim Sutton presented the budget. Jim Sutton noted thorough review of line items, revenue generation plans, and overall positive outlook. Steve Takis clarified the statutory requirement is to file by April 18, but early approval is preferred. No public comment. The board voted unanimously to approve the preliminary budget for submission to the Nevada Department of Taxation. - Pay Increase for Airport Manager: Steve Takis presented a performance review and salary comparison data, indicating Corey Jenkins is paid below market rate for similar airports. All board members expressed strong support for Corey Jenkins, praising his performance, dedication, and the airport's growth under his leadership. Several members advocated for a substantial increase to achieve parity with comparable airports, noting he is paid approximately $40,000 less than managers at airports like Sedona. Chairman Pulitz proposed tabling the vote to gather more detailed comparator data and ensure a fiscally responsible decision. The board agreed to table the vote until the next meeting, with the chairman and Treasurer Sutton to research further. Airport Manager's Report - Corey Jenkins reported from Washington, D.C., where he attended a legal issues conference. He addressed the FAA administrator about the airport's nighttime approval challenges and received advice from former FAA COO Terrell Bristol, including contacts at the FAA Western Pacific Region. - He engaged with congressional representatives about high-elevation airport issues and potential funding for runway extension and maintenance, including community development grants. - Locally, staff completed mowing of previously unaddressed areas to reduce wildlife attractants. Staff completed herbicide applicator training and Morgan completed the basic ASOS school. - Fuel sales are trending up, supporting increased jet and turboprop activity. Developer interest for hangar projects is moving past discussion into submissions. Key Outcomes - The preliminary FY2026-2027 budget was approved unanimously for submission to the Nevada Department of Taxation. - The consideration of a pay increase for Airport Manager Corey Jenkins was tabled to the next meeting to allow for more detailed salary comparison research. - The airport manager's conference attendance was noted as a valuable investment for networking and project advocacy.

Note: The meeting transcript indicates the date as March 11, 2026; however the provided meeting timestamp is March 17, 2026. This summary uses the provided date as instructed. The Carson City Advisory Board to Manage Wildlife (CAB) met on March 17, 2026, in the Bonanza Room. The meeting was called to order at 5:34 p.m. with four members present. The board approved prior meeting minutes, discussed updates on urban wildlife, and voted on several consent agenda items related to appeals and proposed regulations. Consent Calendar - Minutes Approval (Items 5A & 5B): The board approved minutes from September 22, 2025, and January 22, 2026, by a 4-0 vote after discussing that members not present at those meetings could still vote after reviewing the minutes. - Consent Agenda (Items 9A–F, K, N–P): Approved unanimously without discussion. Item 9I (originally 9H on the NDOW agenda) was pulled from the Nevada Wildlife Commission agenda, and the board voted 4-0 to take no action on it. Public Comments & Testimony - Item 8E (Mountain Lion/Bear Predation): Board member relayed public comment from Gene Green, who could not attend in person. Mr. Green expressed that mountain lion and bear predation on deer and feral horses is a problem in other states and urged the board not to support regulations that would prevent predation on horses. The chair noted this was for discussion only and no action could be taken. Discussion Items - Urban Wildlife Report (2025): The board received the 2025 urban wildlife report, noting that calls for service have decreased, possibly due to increased education and public cohabitation. The chair will present the report to the Board of Supervisors with an updated PowerPoint. The report includes three years of data; future plans include mapping calls by ward for targeted outreach. An outreach event at a garden center on deer-resistant plants and wildlife coexistence was successful. - Commission Regulation 517 – Automatic Range Finding Scopes (Item 9L): The board discussed whether to support a proposed regulation to ban devices that automatically adjust turrets for range and wind. Arguments for the ban included fairness and preventing unethical long-range shots; arguments against said the technology promotes ethical kills. The board voted 3-1 not to support the ban, with the majority favoring the technology as an ethical tool. (One member dissented on fair chase grounds.) - Thermal Imaging Equipment (Item 9M): The board discussed a proposed regulation prohibiting possession or use of thermal imaging devices during big game seasons in four specific units. Members expressed concern that the rule was redundant (existing law already prohibits thermal for big game), was limited to certain areas, and did not exclude non‑regulated predators (e.g., coyotes). The board voted 4-0 not to support as written but to support an amendment applying the prohibition statewide and excluding non‑regulated wildlife. - Appeal of Daniel King (Item 9G): Mr. King’s sub‑guide license was revoked after a trail camera violation (six demerit points). The board voted 4-0 to support upholding the revocation, citing that guides must follow the law. - Appeal of Tyler Hubbard (Item 9H): Mr. Hubbard’s license was revoked due to an outstanding arrest warrant in Lincoln County. The board voted 4-0 to support upholding the revocation, noting he had multiple opportunities to resolve the warrant. - Migratory Game Bird Seasons (Item 9J): The board voted 4-0 to approve the proposed 2026‑2027 seasons as written, including the later October 17 start date. One member expressed disappointment that swan permits were opened to non‑residents. - Attendance at Upcoming Commission Meetings: Members discussed who would attend the March 13–14 meeting in Boulder City and the May 8–9 meeting in Reno. The chair will attend the March meeting; May attendance to be confirmed later. Key Outcomes - Vote on 9G (King revocation): 4-0 in favor of upholding revocation. - Vote on 9H (Hubbard revocation): 4-0 in favor of upholding revocation. - Vote on 9J (Migratory bird seasons): 4-0 approved as written. - Vote on 9L (Auto range finding scopes): 3-1 against supporting the ban (i.e., in favor of allowing the technology). - Vote on 9M (Thermal imaging): 4-0 to not support as written, but to support an amended version applying statewide and excluding non‑regulated wildlife. - Future Agenda Items: No new items were proposed. The meeting adjourned at approximately 6:31 p.m.