Public Meetings - Claremont, New Hampshire

The Claremont City Council met on Wednesday, April 22, 2026, at 6:30 PM. The meeting included agenda changes, approval of prior minutes, city manager reports, a lengthy first-reading discussion of a new motor vehicle racetrack licensing ordinance, a structural engineering study of the Claremont Visitor Center, budget transparency memos, and committee reports. The meeting was notable for extensive public comment on the proposed racetrack ordinance, with neighbors expressing noise concerns and supporters urging the council not to restrict the track's operations. Agenda Changes & Minutes - Councillor O'Hearn requested removal of new business items E and F due to incorrect packet numbers; items were pushed to the May 13, 2026 meeting. - Minutes from April 8, 2026 were approved as amended (one correction on page six changing "Assistant Mayor Matto" to "Mayor Gerard”). Councillor Hemingway noted his recusal on page five appointments; that change was agreed to. Community & Manager's Report - City Manager Bates announced several community items: Claremont Opera House seeking board members (contact by April 27), Turning Point Network's 20th annual Stepping Up to Violence 5K on May 2, DPW spring cleanup May 4–8 (leaf bags due May 7 at 7 a.m.), and the 8th annual Parks & Rec scholarship golf tournament seeking donations. - Manager Bates awarded congratulations: DPW Assistant Director Ted Wadley received the NH/New England APWA State Award for Public Works Supervisor of the Year; Fire Chief Jim Chamberlain was voted to represent NH at the New England Division (two-year term starting October). - New business development specialist Dylan Bastion, a Claremont resident, was welcomed and starts the following Monday. - North and Main project update: planting, driveway prep, and paving prep this week; curbing, milling, guardrails, and first wearing layer next week; final pavement and driveway aprons in two weeks; paving expected complete by May 5, weather dependent. Water main work is delayed due to pipe supply chain issues; replacement may occur September/October. - Claremont Police awarded $84,000 Victims of Crime Act grant from NH DOJ to continue the ACERT program; Chief Wilmont will present for acceptance on May 13. - Catch basin updates: basin by Legion parking lot raised to grade, awaiting paving; basin at North and Grandview being worked on. - City Hall repairs underway by Valley Restoration; Opera House balcony plaster and railing repairs complete by May 15. - Councillor Blosky reported an eroding catch basin near Broad Street Park that had been previously reported; Manager Bates said she would look into it. - Councillor Claw asked about Washington Street manhole cover repairs; Manager Bates stated it's on the spring checklist. - Councillor Grant asked about Broad Street Park tree planting; Manager Bates confirmed no issues and noted the planting plan will come before council on May 13. - Councillor Kaloski asked about tire day (Bates will check), programming fees (tied to upcoming Parks & Rec discussion), council tour (van scheduling issue), street line striping before the alumni parade (second Saturday in June), and North and Main core sampling. Bates said core samples found no additional ledge; replacement water main can go over ledge with insulation and is included in change orders. Public Comments & Testimony - Dr. Misty Hook (Ward 3), a family psychologist and resident of two years, said noise from the racetrack is audible miles away, and cited public health effects of noise on children, including anxiety and behavior problems. She asked the council to address noise mitigation. - Abby Clark (Ward 3) said she lives four miles away and hears the track constantly, including at 9:45 p.m.; she does not want the track to go away but wants communication and a healthy community. - Lane Lantis (Ward 2, McGee Automotive) expressed support for the track operator, noting short tracks are closing nationwide and that restrictions could hurt the business; he urged the council not to make things harder. - Tyler Lescort (Ward 3) has raced at the track for 25 years and supported keeping it open and flexible; he noted the racing community's family connections and asked the council to work with the operator. - Derek Ferrand (Ward 3), a small business owner, grew up near the track and called it a true regional asset that draws visitors and supports other businesses. He expressed hope the ordinance is not a pretext to restrict or kill the track. - Greg Adams (Ward 3), a resident of almost a year, supported compromise but voiced concern about expanded use. He said he does not want to kill the track but wants to prevent significant increases in noise or activity. - Jonathan Hayden (Ward 3) asked for decibel limits to be included in the license and warned that setting the maximum at 75 events would likely lead to an increase over the current 60–65 average. - Julia Louni (Ward 2), a new resident and farmer, supported the track as part of Claremont culture but asked that noise levels stay near the status quo and that schedules be published ahead of time so neighbors can plan; she opposed multiple nights per week all season. - Chuck Eggbert (Ward 3), a 44-year resident, said the track historically ran one race per week (about 12 days/year) and has grown to an unsustainable number of days (“83 days last year” per his calendar). He objected to proposed Wednesday practice hours (3–8 p.m., up from 5–7:30) and to non-event daytime testing counting as something other than racing. - Melissa Cole (Ward 3), a resident since 2017 who lives six miles away, said she can hear the announcers and engines; she asked that noise stay at the track for those who choose to attend. - Jason Seaman (Ward 3), a resident of 30 years, said noise has gotten louder and runs until late; he asked for reasonable end times, noted the town's existing noise variance rules, and questioned the grandfathered status given substantial changes over the years. Discussion Items - Ordinance 644: Licensing Board Authorization for Motor Vehicle Races (First Reading) — This was the dominant item. Mayor Gerard disclosed that his father's company works for the racetrack; he asked council whether to recuse, and the council indicated he could participate. - Police Chief Wilmont presented the draft ordinance prepared by Drummond Woodsum, citing NH RSA 3141-A. The purpose, he said, is not to expand or restrict operations but to establish guidelines for operation, including definitions, operating season, maximum events, hours of operation, special exceptions, rain dates, inspections, insurance, violations/penalties, and appeals. - Councillor Greenrose noted an inconsistency in the draft: the total number of operation days was written as “60” in words but “75” numerically; Chief Wilmont confirmed it should be 75. - Councillor Cogswell asked when the licensing board makes its decision to help the track plan its year; Chief Wilmont pointed to section 852 (one-year license term, consistent with RSA 3141-A and historical practice). Councillor Cogswell also raised noise limits, citing NASCAR's 92–95 decibel standard at 100 feet, and suggested adding language for future-proofing. - Councillor O'Hearn asked who chairs the licensing board (Chief Wilmont) and about the fine amounts (draft idea only). He also questioned the appeal pathway going through the city manager when the council appoints the board. - Councillor Irish noted the track has existed since 1947 with no paper trail before that, and he praised the ordinance's purpose statement: “operation of a motor vehicle racetrack in a manner that protects public health safety and welfare while allowing for reasonable and predictable operations.” He suggested adding a requirement that the posted schedule become part of the license. - Councillor Kaloski raised concerns about the licensing board acting as its own investigating authority and about insurance/indemnification requirements (“$20 million” referenced as excessive). He suggested the planning/code enforcement office handle inspections and that a "city official" receive complaints. He also asked for copies of site plan approvals and the campground approval conditions to understand allowable uses. - Councillor Hemingway asked the track operator (Mike Parks) about the 75-event maximum; Parks said that would work. Hemingway also asked about noise buffering; Parks noted the campground tree-cutting was approved by the city and that noise mitigation would be a “monumental financial investment.” - Mike Parks, operator of Claremont Motorsports Park, stated he has had city approval for everything since 2019; emphasized the track pays NASCAR $20,000/year for affiliation; read from a city letter listing grandfathered legal uses (racetrack, car shows, live music, mud bogs, demolition derbies, food/vendors, beer garden, go-kart racing, camping, tech inspection, practice days). He provided event numbers: 2022 — 64 events; 2023 — 60; 2024 — 65; 2025 — 64; 2026 — 27 on schedule to date. He said it costs $15,000–$18,000 just to open gates on a Friday night. He expressed frustration that neighbors buy homes near a track that predates zoning, and noted the racetrack's community efforts (donating 50/50 raffles to school sports and a youth baseball team; moving its 4th of July event to avoid conflict). He said the Saturday practice hours in the draft (starting at 3 p.m.) are too tight and need adjustment. - Councillor Cogswell asked for five years of schedules as a guide; Parks agreed to provide them. - Councillor Irish suggested a middle ground of roughly 65 racing events plus up to 75 total events (including non-racing events like car shows). Parks noted rainouts (4–7 per year) reduce actual race counts. - Councillor Cogswell noted the city can measure noise and that only two tracks in New England lack community noise measurement; he supported equipment for the licensing board. - After public comment, Chief Wilmont sought council guidance to take to the licensing board. Councillor Kaloski said the process was confusing and proposed a special meeting with the operator to avoid re-litigating the ordinance. Councillor Irish praised the open dialogue and said the process, while messy, was productive. - Visitor Center Engineering Study Presentation — Manager Bates presented SGH Engineering's structural assessment of the Claremont Visitor Center. No serious structural danger was found; issues include a settling slab, significant brick cracks, roof tie-ins, a granite windowsill resting on a gutter, and an elevator shaft separating from the building. Bates noted none of the proposed fixes would level the slab; option one (cosmetic repairs, $200k–$300k) would buy a year of monitoring while the city decides long-term strategy. She recommended against spending $1–2 million on a 20-year-old building on uncompacted fill. - Randy Rhodes of MW Soil (soils engineer) testified that the building was placed on uncompacted fill (ashes, coal, bottles, bricks), causing settlement over time; most settling likely occurred early, but the elevator shaft (built in 2007, lacking pins) is still separating. He endorsed monitoring for a year at minimal cost. - Councillor Hemingway asked about monitoring costs ($5,000 range) and expressed reluctance to spend repair money on a building still settling. Councillor Moe noted the building has a municipal tax value of $58,000 and opposed major investment. Councillor Kaloski asked about alternative slab-raising methods, questioned the lack of direct SGH engineer availability, and recommended setting aside budget for potential repair rather than letting the building decay. Councillor Irish noted the building was built with an $800,000 EPA grant (another councilor recalled $508,000); he opposed the $2 million repair price tag and recommended moving staff and exploring future use of the valuable site. - Councillor Greenrose asked about settlement totals (2.5–3.5 inches at the southwest corner) and the elevator shaft risk. Councillor Cogswell raised flooding/seismic concerns; Rhodes said flooding risk is low unless a line breaks. Several councilors supported monitoring and moving staff. Manager Bates said she would look into alternative staff housing options (including CDA space), winterization costs, and future grant possibilities. Councillor Hemingway noted the building was originally intended as a visitor center but became offices due to funding shortfalls. - Sullivan Street Sidewalk Funding — Manager Bates reported the bid was awarded and the project will be funded from the downtown TIF district budget by over-spending the downtown improvements line and drawing from the marketing line; no budget change or fund transfer needed. No questions were raised. - Main Street Downtown Strategy CDBG Grant Phase One Additional Funding — Manager Bates reported the council directed staff to find funds in the planning department budget; payment will come from the downtown development line under the Planning & Development (416) budget, covered by underspent pay and FICA lines due to vacancies. No questions were raised. Committee Reports - Councillor O'Hearn (Tolles Smith): Neighbors had trees trimmed over the property; exploring a snow/yard equipment purchase. - Councillor Cogswell: CCTV committee did not meet; EPA grant committee lacked a quorum; conservation commission is preparing a letter of support for tree planting at Broad Street Park (planting plan will come to council on May 13). - Councillor Greenrose: Historic committee cancelled (third time in a row); Energy committee continues reviewing community power options, with a final presentation from the Sullivan County program operator next meeting; recommendations will come to council, and the service provider may present to the council. He also mentioned the conservation commission's trash pickup at the boat launch and along Jarvis Hill Road. - Planning Board: West Central's new office building on Broad Street (site of the Moose and adjacent lot) was approved. - Councillor Kaloski (Heritage Days): June 9 event planning continues; noted the exhibit is at the visitor center. - Councillor Moe (CDA): Meeting tomorrow at the visitor center; nothing since last meeting; next month's meting cancelled. - Councillor Irish (CARE): Paused until after budget cycle. Airport committee may not meet Monday. Key Outcomes - Approved April 8, 2026 minutes as amended (motion by Assistant Mayor Matto, second by Councillor Greenrose; unanimous voice vote). - Removed new business items E and F; moved to May 13, 2026 meeting. - Ordinance 644 (motor vehicle racetrack licensing ordinance): No vote was taken. The council took the ordinance as a first-reading discussion; it will be revised by the licensing board with input from council comments and public comment. Council directed that all email comments be sent to the city manager's office for compilation. The licensing board will meet publicly to deliberate a revised draft for a future first reading. - Visitor Center: Council consensus leaned toward minimal immediate spending (only urgent safety fixes such as the granite windowsill), a $5,000/year monitoring program (with gauges and periodic surveys), and exploring relocation of staff and long-term options for the site. Manager Bates will report back on staff housing options, winterization costs, and potential grants. - Council requested relevant noise ordinance sections be circulated to the council for review, and Manager Bates noted the city's noise ordinances need updating. - Councillor Kaloski requested a copy of the campground site plan approval conditions; Manager Bates noted there is no single comprehensive site plan decision due to the site's history, but staff will locate the campground-related approval. - Councillor Greenrose requested the energy committee's community power service provider present to the council when recommendations are made; Councillor Irish agreed. - Councillor Greenrose asked about the feasibility of hosting a styrofoam recycling collection at the Claremont transfer station; Manager Bates indicated a discussion with DPW and the transfer station contractor is needed. - Councillor O'Hearn raised the TIF advisory board quorum issue (2 of 5 members present) and the need for new members; recruitment will continue, with suggestions to seek business owners in the TIF district and makerspace users. - Councillor Kaloski asked about AED maintenance in city buildings; the fire department checks them. - Councillor Kaloski raised issues with the new opera house elevator; Manager Bates said the maintenance supervisor is actively working with the elevator company to resolve them.

The Claremont Planning Board held a public hearing and voted on a site plan application for the proposed West Central Behavioral Health Center at 203 and 209 Broad Street. The meeting also included approval of previous minutes and a discussion on the Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) process. Consent Calendar - Minutes of March 9, 2026: Motion to approve passed unanimously by voice vote. Public Comments & Testimony - Dana Wood (Breck Avenue resident): Expressed concern about preserving existing trees along the property line, citing their role in providing a sound and visual buffer. Requested that trees not be removed during construction. - Smith Pratt (Breck Avenue resident): Questioned fence placement relative to property line and trees. Raised concerns about dumpster and propane tank locations. - Dave Demag (abutter at 132-39): Objected to the placement of dumpsters near his property line due to potential odor and impact on backyard use. Suggested moving them closer to the building. - Gene Allen (abutter at 16 Bond Street): Raised multiple concerns including lighting intrusion into bedroom windows, traffic from trash trucks, property value impact, and lack of prior neighbor outreach. Also asked about job creation, tax revenue (given nonprofit status), and the hours of operation for the mobile crisis unit (stated as possibly extending to 11 p.m.). Requested verification that the lighting would match the low levels described. - Multiple residents: Repeatedly emphasized the importance of preserving the existing tree line along the west and south borders for privacy and noise reduction. Discussion Items - Project Presentation: Robert Duvell (TF Moran) and Todd French (West Central Behavioral Health) presented the proposal. The 32,490 sq. ft. facility will include office space, a mobile crisis unit (walk-in hours up to 11 p.m.), and administrative functions. No overnight beds or 24/7 residential use. Features include 111 parking spaces, stormwater management (reducing runoff), low-level parking lot lighting (2 foot-candles, dimming to 0.2 after hours), and a 6-foot vinyl fence on three sides. - Board Questions: Members asked about tree preservation (applicant agreed to save trees where possible, possibly moving the fence), lighting hours (applicant stated lights would dim to security level after building closes, but no specific hour set because mobile crisis staff may return late), dumpster and propane tank locations (no alternative dumpster site feasible), and setback of building from property lines. - Fence Height Debate: Some board members proposed 8-foot fence for better screening, but others argued 6-foot is more attractive and less institutional. Architect Jonathan Hawley recommended flagging trees pre-construction and jogging the fence instead of raising height. Chair and majority favored 6-foot fence, with condition to preserve trees via walk-through. - Tree Preservation Condition: After discussion, the board agreed to condition: before tree removal, a representative of the applicant (landscape architect or contractor) and the city planner (Austin) will walk the property to tag and preserve as many trees as practical. Neighbors may be notified of the walk-through. - Lighting Condition: The board decided to rely on the existing lighting plan (which includes photometric levels) and record testimony about hours of dimming, without adding a separate condition, trusting the city planner to enforce compliance. - CIP Discussion: Planning staff reported that the CIP process cannot be completed before the May 2nd budget deadline due to scheduling conflicts and loss of the former planning director. Recommended restarting in August for the next budget cycle. Board agreed and asked for an updated list of completed CIP items for reference. Key Outcomes - Motion to Approve Site Plan (PL 2026-0003): Unanimously passed (voice vote) subject to conditions: 1. Substantial conformance with submitted plans and public testimony. 2. No work until all permits and compliance statements are submitted. 3. Failure to comply constitutes a zoning violation. 4. Two Mylar copies of final plan to be recorded within 6 months. 5. Development cannot commence until plan recorded. 6. Plan valid for 2 years. Additionally, a condition requiring pre-construction walk-through for tree preservation (applicant representative and city planner) was included in the motion. - CIP: Deferred to August 2026; staff to provide an update on completed projects from the current CIP.

The Claremont City Council met on April 8, 2026, at 7:00 PM. The meeting covered a range of topics including routine approvals, public comments, proclamations, appointments, fee schedule adjustments, a fire apparatus lease purchase, multiple grant resolutions, and discussions on the city website and downtown strategy. Several resolutions were approved, while one major funding request for the North and Main Street project failed. Consent Calendar - Minutes of March 13, 17, and 25, 2026 were approved, with a correction to the March 17 date (Tuesday, not Wednesday). - Agenda changes: Resolution 2026-47 (additional audit funding) and items E and F were removed from the agenda. Proclamation - The council adopted a proclamation honoring Michael Grace for 21 years of service as City Library director, effective April 17, 2026. Public Comments & Testimony - Ernest Montenegro (Ward 1) presented a portrait of former City Manager Guy Sandigate (2001–2016) as a gift to the city, requesting it be hung in the council chamber. He highlighted Sandigate's accomplishments including the Mill Project, Common Man complex, bridge, industrial park, makerspace, parking garage, track, and community center. - Charlene Lovett (Ward 2) promoted the annual Earth Day litter cleanup organized by the Rotary Club, inviting participation from April 18–26. She noted 57 bags collected last year and mentioned two events on May 2nd (walk and breakfast). Appointments to Boards and Committees - Aaron Groff Greenrose reappointed to Conservation Committee alternate seat A2 (exp. March 31, 2029). - Gary Dickman reappointed to Conservation Committee seat 5 (exp. March 31, 2029). - Bruce Calenda reappointed to Planning Board seat 5 (exp. March 31, 2029). - Maxine J. Gannell DeFrance reappointed to Planning Board seat 6 (exp. March 31, 2029). - Jill Chastony reappointed to Historic District Commission seat 3 (exp. March 31, 2029). - Wayne Hemingway reappointed to Zoning Board seat 4 (exp. March 31, 2029). - Michael You reappointed to Zoning Board seat 5 (exp. March 31, 2029). - Councillor Kaloski noted quorum issues on several boards and encouraged public to apply. Discussion Items Fiscal Year 2026 Fee Schedule Adjustment - Public hearing held. Proposed changes: lane line rental fees at community center pool ($15/lane/hour for swim lessons, $10 for swim team) and bulk water sales fee ($7.80 per 100 cubic feet plus $150 daily connection fee). Councillor Kaloski argued to reduce the connection fee to $100 to match Lebanon, which was accepted. The Arrowhead Lodge reservation fee will be removed due to existing operating agreements. The schedule, including the $100 fee amendment, was approved unanimously. Fiscal Year 2027 Fee Schedule - Police Chief Wilmot proposed changes: elimination of flat fees, removal of firearm sales permit fee (law repealed), removal of pre-employment polygraph fee, removal of restitution collection fee, increase in cruiser for outside details ($15/hour with 4-hour minimum), and graduated false alarm billing (third false alarm $50, subsequent $100). The health inspection fee increases were postponed pending a new chief building inspector. The council approved the police fee changes unanimously. Resolution 2026-39: North and Main Street Additional Funding - Project engineer Brian Colburn explained the need for $59,400 additional city funding (20% of $297,000 change order) due to heavier pavement, a third construction season, and fuel/asphalt volatility. The resolution proposed using unassigned fund balance. After debate, the resolution failed 5-4 (Councillors O'Hearn, Lamoges, Hemingway, and Mayor Gerard opposed; Councillors Cogswell, Greenrose, Assistant Mayor Mattau, Kaloski, and Irish in favor). Staff was directed to find alternative funding from planning department vacancies or other sources. Resolution 2026-42: Green Stormwater Infrastructure Grant - No-cost grant from National Fish and Wildlife Foundation via Upper Valley Lake Sunapee Regional Planning Commission for shovel-ready design at Park Avenue site. The council approved unanimously. Resolution 2026-45: Fire Apparatus Lease Purchase - Chief Chamberlain presented the need for a new fire engine (E1 apparatus) at $948,364, with a 36-month lead time. Treasurer Parks presented three financing options. After discussion, the council approved a modified version of Option 1: purchase/lease authorization with funding mechanism to be determined at a future date, including a non-appropriation clause. The vote was unanimous (9-0). Resolution 2026-46: CRDC Asbestos Mitigation Grant - $31,740 grant for asbestos abatement at 56 Opera House Square, no match required. Unanimously approved. Website Discussion - City Manager Bates announced plans to develop a new city website, as the current provider is a single individual with poor service. A project manager will develop a timeline including council, department, and public input. Target implementation around January 2027. The old "Millie" chatbot will be discontinued. Council expressed support for a user-friendly, ADA-compliant, searchable site. Main Street Strategy Development Project Discussion - Discussion revealed a tangled grant history: a $50,000 grant for downtown strategy had $23–24k remaining, but a $44,000 contract was awarded and not executed. A second phase $465,000 congressional directed spending (CDA side) requires phase one completion. The council agreed to bring back a resolution for $20,000 to complete phase one, using alternative funding sources (planning vacancies, downtown accounts). The importance of not jeopardizing federal relationships was emphasized. Key Outcomes - Approved FY26 fee schedule with $100 bulk water connection fee (unanimous). - Approved FY27 police fee schedule changes (unanimous). - Failed Resolution 2026-39 for North and Main Street additional funding (5-4). Staff directed to find alternative funding. - Approved Resolution 2026-42 (Green Stormwater Infrastructure Grant) unanimously. - Approved Resolution 2026-45 (Fire Apparatus) with funding mechanism to be determined, unanimously. - Approved Resolution 2026-46 (CRDC Asbestos Grant) unanimously. - City Manager to develop website project plan with target January 2027. - City Manager to bring resolution for $20,000 to complete Main Street phase one grant. - Portrait of Guy Sandigate accepted as gift; location for display to be determined. - Councillor Kaloski offered to donate four lights for the Soldiers' Monument flagpole; a local electrician offered free installation.

The Claremont Zoning Board of Adjustment met on April 6, 2026, to continue a public hearing on an application by the Randy Lewis Trust for a variance to place a manufactured home at 95 Old Church Road (Parcel 93-16). The board heard public comments, deliberated on the variance criteria, and ultimately voted to deny the application, citing insufficient demonstration of unnecessary hardship and special conditions unique to the property. Consent Calendar - The board unanimously approved the minutes from the March 2, 2026 meeting (motion, second, all in favor). Public Comments & Testimony - Norma Lemoji (abutter at 81 Church Road) opposed the variance. She argued that the proposed structure is a HUD-code manufactured home (double-wide trailer), not a modular or stick-built home, and is not permitted in the R1 district. She stated that introducing a manufactured home would reduce property values, could become a rental, and that the hardship must be tied to the land, not the owner's preference or finances. She noted nearby properties have a combined assessed value of over $2.2 million and the lot is buildable. - Kelly Schulbard (neighbor) also opposed the variance. He argued the application does not meet the legal standard for a variance, as the hardship is not unique to the land, not self-created, and not shared by others in the district. He expressed confusion over whether the unit would be occupied by the applicant or used as a rental, and stated that granting the variance would undermine zoning integrity. - Austin Scott (applicant's representative) argued in favor of the variance. He noted the lot abuts a district that allows manufactured homes, the placement would not be out of character for the neighborhood (which consists mostly of single-story ranch homes), and the lot was previously blighted and has been cleaned up. He cited New Hampshire RSA 674:32, which provides a presumption for reasonable siting of manufactured homes. He corrected the square footage from 1,344 to 1,280 per the submitted plans. Discussion Items - Variance Application (Case ZO 2026-000001): The board reviewed the applicant's request for a variance from Section 22-206 of the zoning ordinance to allow a manufactured home on a 49,658 square foot lot in the R1 district. Board members questioned the hardship requirement, noting that there are no special conditions preventing a stick-built home on the lot. A board member stated that the spirit of the ordinance is to protect property values, and that manufactured homes typically depreciate. The board deliberated the five variance criteria (public interest, spirit of ordinance, property values, substantial justice, and unnecessary hardship) and concluded that the hardship standard was not met. Key Outcomes - Motion to Deny: A motion was made to deny the variance (Case ZO 2026-000001) on the grounds that the applicant failed to demonstrate special conditions on the property that would create unnecessary hardship, and that the variance was not justified. The motion was seconded and passed unanimously (all in favor). - The meeting adjourned with no other business.

The Claremont City Council met on Wednesday, March 25, 2026, at 7:00 PM (estimated) to conduct routine business, consider three resolutions, receive community updates, and hear citizen comments. All votes were unanimous unless noted. Consent Calendar - Approved the minutes of the March 11, 2026, council meeting as presented (motion by Assistant Mayor Mattow, seconded by Councilor Lamoges). - Removed agenda item D (FY2027 fee schedule) from the evening’s agenda and rescheduled it to the April 8, 2026, meeting. Public Comments & Testimony - Candace Crawford (Ward 2) – Newly elected school board chair provided an update on school district finances: the February budget-to-actual report showed a current balance of approximately $4 million, which will be reconciled after the audit. A $4 million loan from Claremont Savings Bank will be paid off April 15, 2026. Stated that a forensic audit contract has been signed and a separate law firm hired due to a perceived conflict of interest. Legal costs for Right-to-Know requests totaled over $12,400 in the past month. Announced school reconfiguration: Disnard School (K–2), Maple Avenue (3–5). - Judith Coster (Ward 2) – Reintroduced “A Better Claremont” (ABC), a citizen group opposing Acuity Management’s proposal to site a construction and demolition debris facility in Claremont. Urged council and public to oppose the project, noting that the Department of Environmental Services (DES) denied the permit in May 2025, but Acuity appealed and the Department of Justice accepted the appeal. A pre-hearing conference was scheduled for March 25, 2026. - Reb McKenzie (Ward 2) – Read an ABC press release detailing concerns: Acuity seeks to import up to 500 tons of toxic C&D debris per day (approximately 3,000 tons per week) to a site near Meadow Brook, Industrial Boulevard, and residential neighborhoods. The DES denial was supported by hundreds at a March 2025 public hearing. ABC urged residents and officials to oppose the appeal. Discussion Items - Resolution 2026-38 – Drinking Water Infrastructure Project Application – Director Gleason presented a request to apply for a $1.8 million Drinking Water State Revolving Fund loan from DES, with 40% loan forgiveness ($720,000). The loan will fund completion of the Clay Hill Water Project Phase 2 and preventive maintenance on the Bible Hill and Moody Hill water storage tanks. Estimated repayment: $120,500/year (10-year), $92,500/year (15-year), or $77,000/year (20-year), with no tax impact—only water users. The resolution was read by Councilor Lamoges, seconded by Assistant Mayor Mattow. After a public hearing with no comment, it passed unanimously via roll call. - Resolution 2026-40 – City Hall Repair Funding – Ms. Parks presented a more detailed list of critical repairs at 58 Opera House Square (City Hall), totaling $136,650 from the general fund balance with no tax impact. Repairs include: main brownstone entrance stairs ($15,200), Opera House balcony rear aisle ceilings ($55,500), balcony railing ($25,000), masonry chimney ($15,650), alley gutter and front roof corner ($15,800), generator repair/upgrade ($5,000), and roof AC unit repair ($4,500). The resolution was read by Councilor Hemingway, seconded by Councilor Greenrose. No public comment; passed unanimously. - Resolution 2026-41 – Safe Streets for All (SS4A) Adoption – Ms. Parks presented a resolution to adopt Vision Zero principles and the Safe Systems Approach, committing to a goal of zero traffic fatalities and serious injuries by 2030. The resolution cites 3 fatal and 26 serious injury crashes among 1,417 total crashes in Claremont (2019–2023). Councilor Cogswell read the resolution, seconded by Assistant Mayor Mattow. Councilor Hemingway asked whether adoption obligates the city to specific projects like roundabouts; Ms. Parks confirmed it does not—it is a policy commitment. No public comment; passed unanimously. Committee Reports - Councilor O’Hearn – Tulsome Committee met but had no noteworthy items. - Councilor Cogswell – EPA committee lacked quorum; encouraged citizens to join. CCTV committee discussed programming and options. Conservation Commission discussed tree planting at Broad Street Park; noted free Styrofoam processing at Lebanon High School on April 11, 2026, and a tree ID walk on June 13, 2026. - Councilor Greenrose – Historic District Committee meeting canceled. Energy Advisory Committee reviewed its charter, discussed due diligence on consulting groups for community power, and reported multiple offers for group net metering (e.g., a 20-year lock-in rate from CURSARG Energy); more analysis needed before recommendations to council. - Assistant Mayor Mattow – Planning Board meeting was canceled. - Councilor Lamoges – CDA (Community Development Authority) meets March 26 at 7:30 AM. - Councilor Hemingway – ZBA does not meet until early April. - Councilor Irish – Procurement committee viewed a two‑hour demonstration of the OpenGov software module for contract management; recommended a three-year contract for transparency and efficiency, noting potential cost savings. Key Outcomes - Item D (FY2027 fee schedule) removed from agenda and moved to April 8, 2026. - Resolution 2026-38 (drinking water loan application) – Adopted unanimously (8 yes votes). Authorizes city manager to submit final application for $1.8 million SRF loan. - Resolution 2026-40 (city hall repairs) – Adopted unanimously (8 yes votes). Appropriates $136,650 from fund balance for critical repairs. - Resolution 2026-41 (Safe Streets for All adoption) – Adopted unanimously (8 yes votes). Commits city to Vision Zero with goal of eliminating traffic fatalities by 2030. - Meeting adjourned (motion by Councilor O’Hearn, seconded by Councilor Lamoges) at approximately 8:30 PM.

This special joint meeting between the Claremont City Council and the Claremont Development Authority (CDA) was held on March 17, 2026, to discuss the CDA's role, financial health, ongoing projects, and proposed structural and bylaw changes. The meeting included a presentation from the CDA board, a financial overview, discussion of the 56 Opera House Square roof project, and a non-public session for lease and acquisition matters. No public comment was taken. CDA Presentation - Andy LaFrenier, CDA chair, provided an overview of the CDA's history, legal basis (RSA 162G), and its role as a tool for economic development. He emphasized that the CDA does not replace the city's economic development office but provides additional bandwidth for real estate, financing, and long-term projects. - Key projects highlighted included: Ashley's Landing (value grew from $700,000 to $1.9 million, 30 employees), Farwell building (valued at $550,000), 21 Water Street project (value over $10 million, 100+ jobs at peak), 329 River Road (value increased to $359,000), Brown block (created seven apartments, multiple businesses), North Country Smokehouse (62,000 sq ft facility), and Jewel trucking (24,000 sq ft). These projects have generated over $600,000 in annual tax revenue. - Current projects include the New Hampshire Solar Gardens Greenhouse (20-acre solar-powered greenhouse), 56 Opera House Square (WCCMA project), and a newly awarded $465,000 federal grant for the Claremont Small Business Center. - Councilor Cogswell noted that the CDA's goal is economic revitalization, not profit maximization, and that fiscal sustainability is the measure of success. - Councilor Kaloski raised concerns about the use of the city's single tax ID number, arguing it limits funding opportunities and puts the city at risk. He requested a separate tax ID for the CDA. Financial Overview - Martha Mackey, CDA financial chair, presented the CDA's financial picture. The CDA projected a net income of about $5,000 for the year but a negative cash flow of $12,400 due to principal payments on loans. Ending unrestricted funds were estimated at $32,000. - The Farwell block was projected to break even, with a potential positive of $15,000 annually if a vacant unit is filled. The 56 Opera House Square project is break-even with tenant paying property taxes, loan payments, and half of elevator expenses. - As of the meeting, the checking account balance was $36,886. The PDP account (savings) held $53,687 in USA grant funds untouched since 2011, plus $18,000 in unrestricted funds and $3,200 reserved for loan losses. - Councilor Kaloski requested a copy of the financials. Councilor Greenrose asked about marketing of available spaces; LaFrenier acknowledged the need for better marketing and potential use of a real estate agency. 56 Opera House Square Roof Project - The roof project is nearly complete, with only asbestos remediation remaining. The CDA received a $31,740 grant from the CRDC Brownfields program (no match required) to cover the remediation. The council must formally accept the grant. - Councilor Kaloski asked whether accepting this grant would affect other CRDC funding for Claremont; City Manager Nancy Bates agreed to investigate before the council vote. - Councilor Greenrose confirmed the grant fully covers the asbestos remediation (pipe wrap in the ceiling). Structure & Bylaws Discussion - The council and CDA discussed the need to clarify the ordinance regarding the CDA's authority to enter into leases and land deals versus the requirement for council approval. LaFrenier noted this ambiguity was inherited from the old ordinance. - Councilor Cogswell emphasized the need for clear procedures for leases, especially when grants are delayed, to ensure the CDA remains solvent. He cited RSA 162-G requirements for lease terms. - Councilor Kaloski proposed researching and establishing a separate tax ID number for the CDA, and including a first right of refusal for the city in the bylaws. He also raised concerns about tracking staff time used for CDA work, as individual board member requests can burden staff. - Councilor Greenrose asked about the obligation of the city when using a shared EIN; City Manager Bates confirmed that the shared EIN likely obligates the city. Councilor Cogswell noted that other municipalities require separate tax IDs. - Gary Merchant suggested consulting the New Hampshire Municipal Association for legal opinions on compliance with RSA 162-G and the tax ID issue, but City Manager Bates clarified that NHMA does not review contracts or bylaws—that would require the city attorney. - City Manager Bates highlighted the burden on staff, especially with the current vacancy in the economic development director position. She noted the bylaws require the CDA to reimburse the city for staff time, but doing so would put the CDA in the red. She called for a balance. - Councilor Cogswell proposed forming an ad hoc committee to improve operating procedures, but LaFrenier suggested that standard operating procedures (directing inquiries through the economic development director) would help reduce staff burden. Key Outcomes - No votes were taken on substantive matters; the meeting was primarily informational and discussion-based. - The council will consider accepting the $31,740 CRDC Brownfields grant for asbestos remediation at a future meeting after City Manager Bates confirms no impact on other Claremont funding. - The council and CDA agreed to continue discussions on clarifying bylaws, establishing a separate tax ID, and improving staff time tracking and reimbursement procedures. - The council voted unanimously to enter non-public session (RSA 91-A:3, II, d) to discuss leases and acquisitions, and later voted to seal the minutes of that session. - The meeting was adjourned by unanimous consent.

The Claremont City Council met on Wednesday, March 11, 2026, at City Hall. The meeting covered consent items, appointments, public comments, several resolutions, a Safe Streets for All presentation, a fitness equipment discussion, and a City Hall repairs update. Key votes and decisions were made on funding grants, equipment leases, park improvements, and budget transfers. Consent Calendar - Approval of Minutes: The minutes from February 25, 2026, were approved unanimously (Councilor O'Hearn motion, seconded by Councilor Lemoge; Mayor Gerard recused himself as he was absent at that meeting). - City Manager's Report: - Celebrate Claremont: Planning for July 3rd event (1-5 PM) and a Saturday morning family event; seeking volunteers and businesses. - Visitor Center: Preliminary engineer report found no structural damage but significant brickwork and interior finish damage; options to be presented to council. Building is safe. - Facility Tour: Planned for a Saturday coinciding with budget hearing; stops include Whitewater Dam, wastewater plant, DPW, fire and police departments. - Eversource Abatement: Appeal denied; abatement of $100,000 will be issued, returning funds to fund balance. Public Comments & Testimony - Elizabeth Graham (Ward 1): Invited the public to a March 25th event featuring Duncan Watson, author and retired Keene DPW employee, speaking about recycling and trash. - Heather Irish (Ward 3): Addressed the need for volunteers for summer events; applications available via QR code or at the rec center. Noted that insufficient volunteers cause some events to be scaled back. Appointments - Claremont Community Television Board: Zachary Haynes appointed to seat 4 (expires May 31, 2026). Unanimous. - EPA Multi-Purpose Grant Steering Committee: Greg Adams appointed to seat 4 (expires Dec 31, 2026). Unanimous. - Fiske Free Library Board of Trustees: Annette Dauphines appointed to seat 4 (expires Sep 30, 2028). Councilor Koloski raised a residency concern; the mailing address is in Lebanon but the street address is on Centennial Street in Claremont. Appointment approved unanimously. - Claremont Parks and Rec Commission – Seat 5 (At-Large): Three applicants: Tina Bergeron, Ken Burke (current alternate), and Gary Dickerman. Via ranked vote, Ken Burke was selected (7 votes). - Parks and Rec – Seat 7 (Alternate): Heather Irish appointed (expires May 31, 2027); Councilor Irish abstained. - Parks and Rec – Alternate Seat 3: Gary Dickerman appointed. - Parks and Rec – Alternate Seat 4: Tina Bergeron appointed. Discussion Items - Safe Streets for All Presentation (Dave Derrick, AECOM): - Presentation on a countywide safety action plan for Sullivan County, including Claremont. - Key statistics: 37% of county crashes occur in Claremont; 28% of injury crashes in Claremont. A High Injury Network was developed; 20-25% of the county network is in Claremont. - Six of 18 priority locations identified countywide are in Claremont: Washington Street Corridor, North Street, Elm Street, and others. Many locations already have city-initiated safety improvements. - Countermeasures include commercial corridor improvements, intersection upgrades, pedestrian crossings, and rumble strips. - A Vision Zero resolution is needed to apply for implementation grants (80/20 split, 20% local match). The city has until mid-June to apply for funding. - Council discussion: Councilor Greenrose noted behavioral issues (speeding, cell phone use) may not be fully addressed by engineering; Derrick cited education and enforcement. Councilor Cogswell asked about transit and grant reporting requirements. Councilor Irish highlighted turning and U-turn issues on Washington Street and expressed interest in roundabouts or barriers. Councilor Koloski asked about life expectancy of improvements and maintenance costs. - City Manager Bates suggested presenting a resolution to council to target reduction of fatalities and serious injuries. - CSBC Fitness Equipment Replacement Discussion (Director Martin): - Proposal to replace 11 pieces of cardiovascular equipment (Cybex arc trainers, seated ellipticals, Expresso bikes) that are out of warranty and costly to repair. Equipment dates from 2019. - Service calls cost $180/hour; monitor replacements cost $2,500-3,500. Some models no longer supported. - The fitness center serves 1,300 membership units plus daily users. A capital reserve fund holds $300,000. - Council comments: Councilor Lemoge suggested considering a Jacob’s Ladder unit for differentiation. Councilor Koloski emphasized warranty periods and soliciting member input. Councilor Irish supported replacing equipment and noted the fund was established for this purpose. Councilor Cogswell asked for usage data in hours/days rather than minutes and highlighted long-term value. City Manager Bates noted a broader conversation about the community center is coming. - Director Martin will bring back an RFP with options: outright purchase, lease-to-own, or rolling lease. The council directed to include member feedback and explore resale of old equipment via Municibid. - City Hall Repairs Discussion (City Manager Bates): - Critical repairs identified for 58 Opera House Square: front entrance steps ($15,200), balcony ceiling plaster ($55,000 – safety issue), two masonry chimneys, alleyway gutter and insulation ($15,800). Total critical: $101,650. - Additional items: Copper dome coating (1/4-1/3 the cost of replacement at $1.2M), weather vane reattachment, clock face restoration (only one original), balcony railing for safety. - Council consensus to move forward with immediate water infiltration and safety repairs using fund balance; longer-term items to be explored via grants (e.g., NH Land and Community Heritage Investment Program). Councilor Irish stressed avoiding deferred maintenance that led to the Goodwin CC loss. Councilor Koloski asked about grant conditions. Councilor Cogswell suggested applying for historic preservation grants. Councilor Irish requested preserving the original clock mechanics if possible. - City Manager will bring a resolution for the critical repairs. - Naming City Property Contest: Plan to have children name two new DPW plow trucks as part of Celebrate Claremont/250th anniversary. Magnetic decals will be used. Councilor Koloski noted the city’s naming policy must be followed; City Manager confirmed. Councilor Cogswell jokingly suggested “Plowey McPlowface”. Unanimous support to proceed. Key Outcomes - Resolution 2026-34 (Wastewater Facility Study Grant): Passed unanimously (9-0). Accepts $100,000 Clean Water State Revolving Fund loan with full forgiveness, no match required. - Resolution 2026-35 (DPW Vehicle Lift Lease-Purchase): Passed unanimously (9-0) with an amendment correcting the first annual payment to $11,473.62 (four-year lease at 5.7% interest). - License Agreement for Map Lot 152-7: Authorized a two-year agricultural use license for Gary LeClair on a 71-acre city-owned parcel east of River Road. Passed unanimously. - Resolution 2026-36 (Moody Park Dog Park Walkway): Passed 8-1 (Councilor Hemingway opposed) to transfer $6,121.91 from the dog park trust fund for a concrete walkway and water fountain pad. The fund will be closed after transfer. - Resolution 2026-37 (Primex Workers' Comp Budget Transfers): Passed unanimously (9-0). Authorizes transfers between department budgets to account for rate increases; overall invoice ($215,365) is under the budgeted $217,154. - City Hall Repairs: Council directed the City Manager to prepare a resolution for immediate critical repairs using fund balance. Longer-term items to be explored with grants. - Fitness Equipment: Director Martin will return with an RFP including various purchase/lease options and member input. Council emphasized warranty, life-cycle costs, and differentiation from competitors. - Safe Streets for All: The City Manager will present a Vision Zero resolution to council to enable future grant applications. - Naming Contest: Council approved proceeding with a public contest to name two DPW trucks, subject to the city’s naming policy. - Future Agenda Items: Councilor Koloski suggested planting a tree in the former tank location outside City Hall. Councilor O'Hearn asked about Burr construction timing on Main Street and pothole filling responsibility on North Street.

The Claremont Planning Board convened on March 9, 2026, for a regular meeting. Key agenda items included updates on the Master Plan, representation on the Upper Valley Regional Planning Commission, and the status of the Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) committee. Consent Calendar - The board unanimously approved the minutes from the February 23, 2026 meeting. Discussion Items Master Plan Update Planning Director Austin reported progress on forming a steering committee, drafting bylaws, researching options for an education chapter, and consulting with regional planners and potential consultants. Board discussion covered meeting logistics, broadcasting meetings, and whether to create a standalone education chapter. Member Richards expressed support for televising meetings to increase public awareness, while Member Nicholas cautioned that televising could reduce in-person participation and strain CCTV resources. The board agreed to consider recording meetings or using the CCTV studio. Austin recommended folding the education chapter into another chapter to avoid an additional subcommittee. The timeline for launching the steering committee is within the next few weeks. Upper Valley Regional Planning Commission Representation Austin requested to serve as an alternate for the vacant third seat on the Upper Valley Regional Planning Commission. Although he is not a Claremont resident, he confirmed with the commission that he could serve as an alternate. Board members discussed residency requirements and expressed support. A motion to recommend Austin to the City Council as an alternate was seconded and passed unanimously. The board also encouraged finding a third full commissioner from the community. Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) Committee Status Member Nick raised concerns that the CIP process has not started, with budget deadlines approximately five weeks away. He noted that department heads may have prepared materials but that the board had not yet established updated ranking criteria. Nick offered to coordinate and lead the CIP effort, with Austin focusing on the Master Plan. The board agreed to have Nick take the lead to restart the CIP process. Key Outcomes - Unanimous approval of the February 23, 2026 meeting minutes. - Motion passed to recommend Austin as an alternate for the Upper Valley Regional Planning Commission (all in favor). - Direction given to Member Nick to spearhead the CIP committee work. - No further business; the meeting adjourned.

The Claremont Board of Adjustment met on Monday, March 2, 2026, at 10:00 AM. The board handled three main items: a request for rehearing of a supportive housing trust decision (denied), a variance application to place a manufactured home on a lot in an R1 district (tabled to the next meeting), and two related applications for a planned residential development on Washington Street involving a density variance and a special exception (both approved). Public Comments & Testimony - Item B (95 Old Church Road): Multiple residents spoke in opposition to the variance. Norma Lamosh (Ward 2) argued that the variance would not be consistent with the spirit of the ordinance, that the lot is a desirable building site, and that granting it would set a harmful precedent. Kelly Schill (3 Ellis Lane) stated that a variance requires a hardship from the land itself, not personal financial hardship, and that granting it would diminish property values and create inequity. Cheryl Aiken (86 Old Church Road) expressed concern about decreased property values when she sells her home. Nancy Fowler, an abutter, stated she is against the variance because a mobile home does not fit the character of the neighborhood. No public comments were made on Item C (Washington Street development). Discussion Items - Item A – Request for Rehearing (Broad Street Supportive Housing Trust): The board considered whether to grant a rehearing. Staff confirmed the motion was filed on time and the appellant has standing as an aggrieved party. The board discussed whether any technical error occurred or new information was available; members found no error or new information. A motion to deny the rehearing was made and seconded, and all members voted in favor (unanimous). The original decision remains in effect. - Item B – Variance Request (95 Old Church Road, Randy Lewis Trustee): The applicant sought a variance to allow a manufactured home (double-wide, 1,344 sq ft) on a vacant 1.14-acre lot in an R1 district where such homes are not permitted. The attorney argued that the lot abuts an AR district where manufactured homes are allowed, that modern manufactured homes are aesthetically compatible, and that the cost of stick-built construction makes the lot undevelopable. Board members questioned the roof pitch, foundation, and overall design, noting that no site plan or product specifications were provided. After public testimony opposed the variance, the board voted to continue the matter to the next meeting (April 6, 2026) to allow the applicant to submit a site map, manufacturer’s brochure, and details on roof pitch, siding, and location on the lot. The motion was made and seconded, and all voted in favor. - Item C – Variance for Density and Special Exception (492 Washington Street, Gilberto Alexio Filho): The applicant proposed a planned residential development with 79 units: 68 multifamily apartments, 10 townhouse units (in five duplex buildings), and retaining the existing single-family home. The lot is 18.18 acres in the RR2 district. The variance requested increased density from 30,000 sq ft per unit to 10,000 sq ft per unit (one unit per 10,000 sq ft), matching the density approved for a similar project in 2016. The special exception was required under Section 22-188. Presentations from VHB (Rich Whitehouse) and a traffic engineer (Christine Triarchis) covered site design, wetland impacts, stormwater, and traffic analysis. The traffic study projected 38–45 new peak-hour trips, with the intersection operating at level of service A or B through 2037. The conservation commission gave informal support. No public comments were heard. The board discussed the criteria and found the project consistent with public interest, spirit of the ordinance, and no adverse impacts. A motion to approve the variance with conditions (including that all permits be obtained and work commence within two years) was made and seconded; all voted in favor. A motion to approve the special exception with similar conditions was made and seconded; all voted in favor. Key Outcomes - Item A (Rehearing): Denied. The board decided not to rehear the Broad Street supportive housing trust decision. The original decision stands. - Item B (95 Old Church Road): Tabled. The board continued the hearing to April 6, 2026, to allow the applicant to provide additional details on the manufactured home’s design, roof pitch, siding, and site plan. - Item C (492 Washington Street): Both the variance (ZB 2026-0002) and the special exception (ZB 2026-0003) were approved. The variance allows a maximum residential density of one unit per 10,000 square feet. The special exception permits a planned residential development of 79 units. Both approvals are subject to conditions: applicant must obtain all necessary permits (including site plan approval from the Planning Board), no work until permits are submitted and approved, and approvals are valid for two years from the date of final approval. Failure to comply constitutes a violation of the zoning ordinance.