Public Meetings - Edmonds, Washington

The Edmonds Hearing Examiner held a public hearing on January 14, 2026, to consider a preliminary plat application (PLN2025-0061) for a six-unit lot subdivision at 7103 210th St. SW. The meeting was a continuation from a previous session due to technical difficulties that prevented some members of the public from accessing the hearing. The hearing covered a staff presentation, applicant comments, and no public testimony. The Examiner indicated he would issue a decision within two weeks. Public Comments & Testimony - No members of the public provided oral testimony during the hearing. Two written comments were received during the earlier comment period: one from Snowput (power utility) and one from an unidentified member of the public. The Examiner noted that if additional written comments were received after the hearing, they would be considered before the decision. Discussion Items - Staff Presentation: Tristan Sewell presented the application. The proposal is for a unit lot subdivision of a previously approved six-unit townhouse development on a 0.25-acre lot zoned RM 1.5. Building permits were issued in March 2025, and construction is underway. Staff confirmed compliance with zoning, comprehensive plan, and environmental review (SEPA determination of non-significance, critical areas waiver). No floodplain issues. Staff recommended approval with standard conditions for final plat recording. - Examiner's Inquiry: The Examiner raised a concern about safe walking conditions to school, a requirement under state subdivision statutes. He noted that the project is small and likely no additional off-site improvements are needed, but he considered adding a condition to review the issue. - Applicant Comments: Christine Dickinson (Chadwick & Winters) represented the applicant. She stated that the application complies with all applicable standards and supports community growth. Vlad B. confirmed that sidewalk improvements are being made on the south side of the property and that there is continuous sidewalk to the high school (approximately half a mile away). - Examiner's Remarks: The Examiner commented on the unit lot subdivision process, noting that it is a result of state legislation to promote middle housing, but the public hearing can be misleading because most approvals are already in place. He indicated the decision would be a straightforward approval with conditions. Key Outcomes - Decision: The Examiner will issue a written decision within two weeks. Based on the discussion, the decision is expected to approve the preliminary plat with standard conditions, possibly including a condition regarding safe walking routes to school. - No votes were taken; the hearing was closed.

The Edmonds City Council met in regular session on January 13, 2026, at 6:00 PM. Key actions included a proclamation for Martin Luther King Jr. Day, an update on annexation discussions with Esperance, and approval of a one-tenth of one percent sales tax increase for the Transportation Benefit District (TBD) to fund street and sidewalk maintenance. The tax passed 5–2 after a failed motion to postpone indefinitely. Presentations - Proclamation of Martin Luther King Jr. Day (Mayor's Office): Mayor Rosen read a proclamation designating January 19, 2026, as Martin Luther King Jr. Day. Donnie Griffin, President of Lift Every Voice Legacy, spoke about the importance of the day and thanked Steve Shelton for his support in bringing the celebration to Edmonds. Shelton urged community members to attend the January 19 event at the Edmonds Waterfront Center (9:30 AM – noon). - Mayor's Finance Update – Esperance Annexation: Mayor Rosen reported that discussions with Esperance regarding potential annexation have resumed. The city has requested detailed data (crime stats, infrastructure condition, debt, permits) to evaluate fiscal impacts. If pursued, a timeline for annexation could be 2027, with possible state tax incentives to offset costs. A milestone schedule will be shared with the community. Consent Calendar - Approved unanimously: Committee A meeting minutes (January 6, 2026), regular meeting minutes (January 6, 2026), payroll and benefit checks (12/16/2025–12/31/2025), job order contracts for Public Safety Building gutter replacement, professional services agreements for Highway 99 Revitalization Stages 3 and 4, extension of appointment for Acting Officers (HR Director and City Administrator), Washington Traffic Safety Commission interagency agreement, Progressive Animal Welfare Society (PAWS) contract for kenneling services, limited staff services agreement for clinical oversight of social worker, Council confirmation of appointment of Sean Leiser to the Architectural Design Board, and PROTEC17 MOU for 2026 wages. Public Comments & Testimony - No members of the public signed up to speak during audience comments, either in person or via Zoom. Discussion Items - Resolution Appointing a Representative to the Community Transit Board Selection Process: Councilmember Olson motioned to appoint Councilmember Payne as Edmonds' representative. Councilmember Payne highlighted her four years as an alternate on the Community Transit board and expressed support. The motion passed unanimously. - Transportation Benefit District Sales Tax (Ordinance): Acting City Administrator Todd Tatum and Public Works Director Andy Rayum presented a proposal to add a 0.1% sales tax (raising the city's cumulative rate to 10.7%) for 10 years, projected to generate $660,000 in 2026 and approximately $1 million annually thereafter. Funds would be restricted to street and sidewalk maintenance, staffing three positions, reinstating the trip hazard program, enabling ADA ramp replacements (1,400–1,500 needed citywide), and reducing a $400,000 transfer from the general fund. A motion to approve was made by Councilmember Nan. - Supporters (Councilmembers Nan, Payne, Chen, Olson, Eck): Argued the tax is a sustainable, targeted revenue source for core infrastructure; 92% of residents rated streets as very or extremely important; it relieves general fund stress; delays worsen deferred maintenance and legal obligations (e.g., stormwater permit). Noted that neighboring cities (Mukilteo, Mill Creek, Lynnwood) are at 10.6% and may also raise rates, making Edmonds only temporarily the highest. - Opponents (Councilmembers Barnett and Dash): Called for a comprehensive, holistic approach to all taxes with performance metrics and clearer public communication. Expressed concern about tax fatigue, harm to local businesses (highest sales tax in state), and potential revenue loss if sales decline. Council President Dash moved to postpone the item indefinitely, arguing the piecemeal approach and rapid succession of tax increases (utility tax in prior meeting, levy lid lift failure) stressed constituents. - Motion to Postpone Indefinitely: Debated; failed 2–5 (Barnett and Dash in favor; others opposed). - After the motion failed, the main motion was approved 5–2 (Nan, Payne, Chen, Olson, Eck in favor; Barnett and Dash opposed). Key Outcomes - Community Transit Board Representative: Approved appointment of Councilmember Payne unanimously. - Transportation Benefit District Sales Tax: Ordinance approved (5–2). The 0.1% sales tax will take effect, bringing the city's total sales tax to 10.7%. Funds are restricted to transportation improvements per RCW 36.73. Staff will track metrics including pavement condition index, ADA ramp installations, trip hazard claims, and resident satisfaction surveys. - Consent Agenda: All items approved as presented. - Executive Session: Council convened for 60 minutes to discuss pending/potential litigation per RCW 42.30.110(1)(i), extended to 8:20 PM. Reconvened at 8:20 PM for council comments and adjournment. - Council Comments: Included updates on upcoming events (Lynnwood Wastewater Treatment Plant informational meetings, Chamber of Commerce Morning Buzz, Hummingbird Hill Park cleanup) and a correction of meeting date. Councilmember Chen reported on Port of Edmonds commission election. Adjournment The meeting was adjourned at 8:26 PM.

A special meeting of the Edmonds City Council was held on January 13, 2026, at 5:30 PM (local time) to interview a single candidate for the builder position on the Architectural Design Board (ADB). The meeting lasted approximately 15 minutes, after which the council adjourned to reconvene at 6:00 PM for the regular meeting. Discussion Items Interview of Sean Leiser for the ADB Builder Position The mayor introduced the candidate, Sean Leiser, who has lived in Edmonds for the first 20 years of his life, attended local schools, and has 30 years of experience in construction and development, with 26 years running his own company. He works on a variety of projects including single-family homes, multifamily, townhomes, apartments, and car dealerships. His business and investment properties are located in Edmonds, and he lives in nearby Richmond Beach. The mayor noted that the builder position is the only ADB position exempt from the Edmonds residency requirement, a decision previously made by the council. Councilmembers asked questions covering several topics: - Councilmember Payne asked about the biggest challenge in developing multifamily housing in Edmonds. Leiser cited time as the primary hurdle, noting that review times and additional layers of review (e.g., safety plans in Lynnwood) increase costs and delays. - Councilmember (unnamed) asked about preserving design aesthetics while building missing middle housing. Leiser responded that design is controlled by code, and the ADB can implement existing codes, but broader recommendations would require council direction. - Council President Dodge asked about the value of the ADB. Leiser stated that the ADB ensures aesthetic quality, prevents cost-cutting on non-street-facing sides, and can regulate product quality, though additional code enforcement would be needed. - Councilmember Nan asked about the role of the ADB after state-mandated changes to administrative design review, and whether objective design standards (like Leavenworth’s) could be applied to different Edmonds neighborhoods. Leiser thought it possible but noted that implementing such standards would likely be a council decision, and Edmonds’ neighborhoods have less distinct character than a place like Leavenworth. - Councilmember Chan asked about tree protection and environmental design. Leiser said he is not against trees but noted that increasing density sometimes requires sacrificing trees; he supports preserving existing trees when feasible. - Councilmember Wilson informed Leiser about a new planning board member, John Justin, who is presenting at the Edmonds Chamber of Commerce the next morning, and suggested they connect. She also mentioned the city’s new co-living code as a potential answer to affordability, and asked Leiser to keep it in mind even though it is not directly related to the ADB. Leiser expressed willingness to serve and appreciation for the opportunity to volunteer. Key Outcomes - No formal vote was taken during the special meeting. The mayor stated that the approval of the candidate for the ADB position would be part of the regular council meeting at 6:00 PM, implying the appointment will be considered then. - The council adjourned the special meeting at approximately 5:45 PM, to reconvene at 6:00 PM for the regular meeting.

Committee A met on January 6, 2026, from 3:00 to 3:55 p.m. virtually via Zoom and in the City Council Conference Room. Councilmembers reviewed seven staff presentations and, with no objections, forwarded all items to the next City Council consent agenda for formal approval. Discussion Items - Job Order Contracts (JOC) Update – Public Safety Building Gutter and Downspout Replacement: Facilities Manager Tom Sullivan explained the city's JOC purchasing method, which uses three pre-selected prime contractors and is administered by Gordian. The project would replace 25-plus-year-old failing steel gutters and downspouts at the Public Safety Building. Sullivan said winter ice from the failing system was a safety issue and valued the work at just over $45,000. The committee forwarded the contract to the consent agenda. - Extension of Acting Officer Appointments – HR Director and City Administrator: Staff requested a six-month extension of the temporary appointments, or until the positions are filled, because recruitments are ongoing. For the HR Director search, Prothman conducted a nationwide recruitment that received about 51 applicants and was narrowing the pool to 10–12 candidates after pre-screening interviews. The City Administrator search was conducted in-house and applications were under review. Staff confirmed the interim appointees are at-will and could be replaced before the extension deadline if permanent hires are selected. - Highway 99 Revitalization Project – Stage 3 Urban Design Elements PSA: Transportation staff presented the HBB professional services agreement for urban design elements on Stage 3 (244th to 238th). HBB was selected over AECOM through statements of qualifications and interviews. The scope includes site inventory, up to four conceptual alternatives, public outreach, and design development. Stage 3 is state-funded; staff noted $16.5 million in Connecting Washington funds and no current city funding. Construction is targeted to start in early 2028. Councilmembers raised maintenance and lifecycle-cost concerns, asking for low-maintenance and hardscape options. Councilmember Erica Barnett urged a flexible approach to Highway 99 as a future commercial district and asked about shared-use paths; staff replied that WSDOT standards largely set the corridor's cross-section with separate bike lanes. The committee forwarded the item to the consent agenda. - Highway 99 Revitalization Project – Stage 4 Urban Design Elements PSA: Staff presented the same HBB agreement for Stage 4 (220th to 224th). It will use state and federal funds, and staff said work must proceed to meet federal spending deadlines. The item was also forwarded to the consent agenda. - Washington Traffic Safety Commission Interagency Agreement: Police Chief Dawkins requested approval to participate in Target Zero Task Force reimbursable traffic emphasis operations, including holiday DUI, distracted driving, Click It or Ticket, and summer DUI emphasis. The Washington Traffic Safety Commission reimburses straight-time and overtime costs. The committee forwarded the agreement to the consent agenda. - PAWS Contract for Animal Kenneling Services: Chief Dawkins presented the Progressive Animal Welfare Society (PAWS) contract for kenneling animals taken into police custody. He said PAWS is the closest facility and has been used by the city for at least 10 years. The committee forwarded the contract to the consent agenda. - Limited Staff Services Agreement – Clinical Oversight for Social Worker: Chief Dawkins requested approval for grant-funded clinical oversight for the police social worker. Oversight costs $97 per hour, estimated at $388 per month for one hour per week, and is covered by the grant. The grant currently funds the social worker 30 hours per week through June 2027, with additional grant funding expected to expand the position to full time. The committee forwarded the item to the consent agenda. Key Outcomes - No formal roll-call vote was taken; the chair asked for objections on each item and none were raised. - All seven agenda items were forwarded to the next City Council consent agenda for approval. - Staff said updated Highway 99 contract costs and the selected structural consultant's name would be included when the stage 3 and 4 agreements go before the City Council. - The meeting was adjourned at 3:55 p.m.

The Edmonds City Council held its first regular meeting of 2026 on Tuesday, January 6, 2026, from 6:00 PM to 9:23 PM in the Council Chambers. The meeting included the swearing-in of new and returning councilmembers, a resolution of appreciation for outgoing Council President Neil Tibbott, a finance update from the Mayor, presentations and public hearings on transportation impact fees and the critical areas ordinance, and the election of the 2026 Council President and President Pro Tem. Key actions included approval of a transportation impact fee increase effective July 1, 2026, and adoption of the critical areas ordinance with a modified approach to the Deer Creek Springs aquifer wellhead protection area that defers the prohibition on shallow UIC wells pending a PFAS study. Consent Calendar - Approved unanimously: Approval of regular meeting minutes (December 9, 2025) and special meeting minutes (December 16, 2025). - Approval of claim checks, wire payments, payroll and benefit checks, direct deposit and wire payments. - New updates and revisions to the Rules of Procedure. - MHFR – Social Worker Grant Amendment. Public Comments & Testimony - Marcy Lahmer (representing Boys & Girls Clubs of Snohomish County) expressed concern that the proposed 250% increase in transportation impact fees (approximately $300,000 additional cost) would significantly impact the schedule for replacing the Edmonds Boys & Girls Club building. She noted the club is replacing an existing building, not changing use or traffic. - Bill Krepik (Woodway resident) urged the council to elect a council president who respects the supermajority of taxpayers who voted against Proposition 1, endorsing Councilmember Dutch for her consistency in good governance principles. Public Hearing on Transportation Benefit District Sales Tax - Heidi (Edmonds resident) opposed the proposed 0.1% sales tax increase, noting the city's sales tax rate is already 10.6% and that other taxes and utility rates are rising. She suggested state funding for highways 99, 104, and 524 instead of taxing residents. Public Hearing on Critical Areas Ordinance Periodic Update - John Brock (Woodway, Edmonds Environmental Council board) urged the council to adopt the CAO as presented in November (option 2), arguing that best available science supports prohibiting shallow UIC wells in the Deer Creek CARA to prevent PFAS contamination. He stated the city attorney's claim that such science is missing is incorrect. - Diana Mish (Edmonds resident) urged adoption of the November 25th draft ordinance to protect the drinking water aquifer, citing Washington State law prioritizing health over land uses. - Bill Westgard (Edmonds) expressed concern about aquifer contamination. - Bob Banson (General Manager, Olympic View Water and Sewer District) stated that infiltrating urban stormwater is not necessary for aquifer recharge and that PFAS contamination risk is significant. He argued that prohibiting UICs does not stop development, only requires alternative stormwater infrastructure. - Pete Adams (Edmonds resident) supported option 2, noting that the upcoming PFAS study will not provide new peer-reviewed science and that prevention is key. - Dana Twite (Edmonds resident, first council meeting) urged protecting the aquifer, citing cancer risks. She also requested that city officials define acronyms and introduce the student representative to make meetings more welcoming. - Several other residents (Margie Feelers, Gayla Schumach, and others) spoke in support of protecting the aquifer and adopting the stricter ordinance. Discussion Items Oath of Office Ceremony - Newly elected Councilmember Erica Barnett (Position 3) was sworn in by County Councilmember Megan Dunn. Returning Councilmembers Chris Eck and Will Chen were also sworn in. Resolution of Appreciation to Neil Tibbott - Councilmembers read a resolution honoring Neil Tibbott for his service as Council President in 2025. Tibbott offered advice to the new council, urging them to use legislative authority to set policy and budgets, leave administration to the mayor, and elevate their leadership. Mayor's Finance Update - Mayor Rosen reported that 2025 sales tax revenue was $5,500 lower than 2024, contrary to earlier projections of an uptick. The city is implementing a new financial software system, with the HR and utility billing modules expected to take up to a year to go live. Transportation Impact Fees (TIF) – Presentation - Staff and consultants from Transport Group presented the proposed update to transportation impact fees, which would increase the fee per trip from $5,530 to $9,262 (about 67% increase). The fee for a single-family home would rise from $6,200 to approximately $8,600. The presentation covered the methodology, including a 20-year project list (nearly 90 projects, $560 million total cost), with $112 million in TIF-eligible costs. The proposed fees bring Edmonds in line with peer cities like Bothell ($12,140), Shoreline ($11,000), and Redmond ($10,000). Public Hearing on Transportation Benefit District Sales Tax - The hearing was held on the proposed 0.1% sales tax increase to fund street maintenance and sidewalk improvements. The city attorney noted that if approved, the tax could take effect April 1, 2026, and would generate an estimated $660,000 in 2026. The council action on this item was postponed to the January 13, 2026 meeting. Public Hearing and Council Business on Critical Areas Ordinance (CAO) Periodic Update - Staff presented options for the Deer Creek Springs CARA, including Option 2 (adopt the CAO with the original language that prohibits shallow UIC wells in the CARA) and Option 3 (staff recommendation: defer CARA changes until a PFAS study is complete). After extensive discussion, the council eventually adopted Option 2 with an amendment to replace the word "again" with "if necessary" in the provision for future updates based on the study. Selection of 2026 Council President and Council President Pro Tem - Council President: Councilmember Michelle Dutch was elected with 4 votes (majority). Nominees: Councilmember Dutch (nominated by Councilmember Chen) and Councilmember Jenna Nand (nominated by Councilmember Payne). - Council President Pro Tem: Councilmember Jenna Nand was elected with a majority vote. Nominees: Councilmember Nand (nominated by Councilmember Payne), Councilmember Chris Eck (nominated by Councilmember Olson), and Councilmember Will Chen (nominated by Councilmember Dutch). Council Business – Transportation Impact Fees – Action - A motion to adopt the fees as presented but effective July 1, 2026, passed 5-2 (Eck, Chen, Dutch, Payne, Nand in favor; Barnett, Olson opposed). Amendments to phase in the increase over three years (in thirds, either every eight months or annually) were defeated. Council Comments - Councilmembers expressed gratitude, welcomed new members, and addressed community concerns. Councilmember Eck condemned hate speech and attacks on local businesses owned by people of color. Councilmember Chen warned about robberies targeting Asian elders. Councilmember Barnett shared her commitment to listening and collaboration. Councilmember Olson urged an end to divisive language and defended the council's thorough work. Councilmember Nand acknowledged the significance of the date (January 6) and denounced hateful language directed at her, emphasizing the city's values of inclusion. Key Outcomes - Agenda approved with amendments: TIF presentation kept as agenda item, discussion moved to council business; TBD council action moved to January 13, 2026. - Consent agenda approved unanimously. - Council President elected: Councilmember Michelle Dutch. - Council President Pro Tem elected: Councilmember Jenna Nand. - Transportation Impact Fees adopted: The new fee schedule will take effect July 1, 2026 (vote 5-2). - Critical Areas Ordinance adopted: The council adopted the CAO with Option 2 for the CARA, prohibiting shallow UIC wells in the Deer Creek Springs wellhead area, with the modification that the provision will be reviewed "if necessary" following the completion of a PFAS study (vote 4-3). - Transportation Benefit District Sales Tax: Public hearing held; council action scheduled for January 13, 2026.

The Edmonds City Council held a special meeting on December 16, 2025, its last scheduled meeting of the year. The council addressed a critical areas ordinance update, a transportation benefit district sales tax proposal, and the adoption of mid-biennial budget modifications amid public concerns over fund usage, tax increases, and fiscal transparency. All council members and the mayor were present. Consent Calendar - Approved the agenda (unanimous). - Approved the consent agenda (unanimous), which included meeting minutes from December 2, 2025, and 2026 board/commission reappointments. Public Comments & Testimony Approximately 20 members of the public testified. Key themes included: - Tree Fund and Marsh Fund: Several speakers (Georgina, Arlene Williams, Pete Adams, Pam Cowler, Teresa Hutchison, Kathleen Sears, Jane O'Dell, Karen Barnes, and others) urged the council not to divert restricted funds (tree fund, marsh fund) to support the Yost Pool or park operations. They emphasized that tree fund dollars from fee-in-lieu payments must be used for tree planting or acquiring/preserving wooded areas—not for other purposes. They cited statutory restrictions and argued that using these funds would violate public trust and worsen infrastructure maintenance. - Critical Areas Ordinance (CAO): John Brock (Edmonds Environmental Council), Ron Eber, Joe Scordino, and others strongly supported the draft CAO but objected to the city attorney’s substitution of flawed language in the Critical Aquifer Recharge Area (CARA) section. They argued the new version allows PFAS-contaminated stormwater infiltration, contrary to best available science, and urged the council to restore protective language. - Tax Increases and Fiscal Management: Several residents (Teresa Hutchison, Glenda Cral, Kim Bear Augustavo, Mary Jane, Anne Christensen, Mark Mercado, Gayla Schumach, Bill Krepik) expressed opposition to further tax increases (levy lid lift, utility tax, sales tax) following the November defeat of Proposition 1 (59% opposed). They called for a citizen financial advisory committee, better transparency, and spending analysis. - Yost Pool: Community members (Kathleen Sears, Karen Barnes, Mark Mercado) advocated for preserving the pool but without redirecting tree/marsh funds; they suggested community fundraising or alternative revenue sources. - Parks and Environment: Multiple speakers highlighted that trees and marshes are public safety infrastructure, requiring maintenance and replacement, and that further cuts to parks would harm the community. Discussion Items 84th Avenue Street Vacation - Resolution setting public hearing date: The council unanimously approved a resolution setting a public hearing for January 27, 2026, on vacation of a portion of 84th Avenue West near Highway 99. Critical Areas Ordinance Periodic Update (AMD2025-0001) - Debate on CARA section: The administration proposed retaining existing language allowing shallow underground injection control (UIC) wells, citing a pending PFAS study (from a settlement with Edmonds Environmental Council) and legal risks (nexus/proportionality). The city attorney and engineering staff argued that prohibiting shallow UICs could harm aquifer recharge and lead to costly litigation. Several council members (Olson, Eck, Dash, Nand) supported restoring the more protective public-hearing draft based on precautionary principles, while Councilmember Nand's motion to adopt the staff version died for lack of a second. - Outcome: Councilmember Olson moved to schedule a public hearing on January 6, 2026, with all options (including the staff version, protective version, moratorium, etc.) presented in the packet. This motion passed unanimously (7-0). 4th Quarter 2025 ERP Update - Presentation by IT Director: The ERP implementation for the financial system is on schedule to go live January 5, 2026. Phase 1 (financial) is under budget by $242,000; Phase 2 (HR) and Phase 3 (utility billing) are upcoming. Staff training was conducted in early December. Transportation Benefit District (TBD) Sales Tax - Proposal: The TBD board (council) considered a 0.1% sales tax (maximum 0.3% but councilmatic authority only for 0.1%) to fund transportation improvements. Estimated revenue: $660,000 in 2026 if started April 1, about $1 million annually thereafter. Funds would go to the street fund, not the general fund. The public works director noted that the street crew is critically understaffed (4 people for 157 lane miles) and that the tax would allow hiring two FTE concrete crew/members and restore maintenance. - Council concerns: Some members noted this would make Edmonds the highest sales tax in the state (10.7%), potentially harming local businesses. Councilmember Dash asked for a holistic discussion including other potential taxes. - Outcome: The council voted unanimously (7-0) to place the draft ordinance on the January 6, 2026 agenda for a public hearing and potential action. Ordinance Adopting 2025-2026 Mid-Biennial Budget Modification - Extensive deliberation: The budget modification had been developed over prior weeks, with major cuts and adjustments. Key points: - Police department: Modified budget reduced by $1.5M (6-1 vote). Councilmember Olson attempted to add $275,000 from parks for two patrol officers but failed due to lack of a second. - Parks and Recreation: $320,000 reduction; included $83,500 from non-city sources (Cascade Swim Club) for Yost Pool operating costs. An amendment to reduce the Cascade contribution to $53,500 failed (3-4). The original parks reduction passed unanimously. - Public Works: $155,656 reduction passed unanimously. - Community Services/Economic Development: $171,287 and $232,273 reductions passed unanimously; shifted arts/culture salary to municipal arts fund (unsustainable). - Municipal Courts: $353,019 addition for automated enforcement, interpreter fees, and a case manager (grant-funded) passed unanimously. - Non-departmental: Debate over assumption of $400,000 from TBD. An amendment to remove the TBD assumption passed 4-3. The non-departmental budget (now $1,449,230 increase) passed unanimously as amended. A subsequent amendment to delay the internal service fund transfer to cover the loss failed 2-5. - Material changes to non-general funds: Amendment passed 5-2. Overall, the budget modifications reduced the general fund ending balance and assumed continued general fund transfers to the street fund. - Final budget ordinance: Approved 5-2 after incorporating exhibit C changes (adding $400,000 in general fund expenditures, reducing ending fund balance accordingly). Key Outcomes - Critical Areas Ordinance: Public hearing set for January 6, 2026, with all options included in the packet. - 84th Ave Street Vacation: Public hearing set for January 27, 2026. - Transportation Benefit District Sales Tax: Public hearing and potential action on January 6, 2026. - Mid-Biennial Budget Modification: Adopted 5-2 with amendments, including removal of the TBD assumption and restoration of a $400,000 general fund transfer to the street fund. - Audience comments received on tree fund, marsh fund, and overall budget concerns; no formal action taken on those comments. - Council expressed gratitude to staff and community and wished for a peaceful holiday season. Note: The meeting was extended multiple times, adjourning at approximately 10:58 PM.

Date: December 16, 2025 Time: 2:00 PM Location: Brackett Room, City Hall – 3rd Floor, 121 5th Ave N, Edmonds, WA (hybrid meeting) Case: Appeal by Richard Redelfs of a Notice of Violation for Unpermitted Tree Removal (File COD2025-0070) Presiding: Hearing Examiner Discussion Items - City’s Presentation: The city, represented by Development Director Mike Clugston and staff member Ted Corey, presented its case. The city became aware of a tree cutting at 7115 15th St SW in June 2025. The tree was protected under Interim Ordinance 4389, which prohibits removal of landmark trees (≥30 inches diameter) without a permit. The city’s code enforcement officer investigated, issued an order to correct, and later contracted with arborist Holly Ioso (Tree Solutions Inc.) who determined the tree was not a nuisance or hazard. The city issued a Notice of Violation with a total penalty of $102,245, comprising $94,200 appraised value of the tree, $1,500 investigation/administration, $3,000 appraisal cost, and $3,545 replanting plan implementation. The city argued the fine was calculated under ECDC 23.10.100 and that no flexibility existed to reduce it. - Appellant’s Case: Appellant Richard Redelfs, represented by counsel (Mr. Tinksted), testified. He purchased the property in March 2025, intending to renovate and move in with his family. He described the tree as a large Douglas fir (60 ft tall, 30–33 inches diameter per his estimate) that was partly dead, leaning toward the house, with a large root already cut (due to foundation concerns). He hired a tree service (MVP Tree) in March 2025; the contractor assured him no city permit was needed (the city’s interim ordinance took effect April 29, 2025). The tree was removed in early June 2025. Redelfs later learned of the ordinance. He argued: (1) the fine exceeds the statutory maximum of $5,000 for a city ordinance violation under RCW 35.22.280 (first class city) or similar optional municipal code statute; (2) the city’s arborist overestimated the tree’s diameter (47.7 inches) by not following code requirements to compare with similar trees in similar conditions; his own measurements of remaining Douglas firs on the property suggested a diameter at breast height of 30–32 inches, possibly under the 30-inch threshold; (3) the city double-counted the replanting cost ($3,545) as both an additional cost and part of the appraised value; (4) the city did not provide receipts for staff time or appraisal costs; (5) the city’s website’s tree removal table (for single-family properties not subdividable) states “No permit required” with no reference to the interim ordinance, so he had no notice. - Cross-Examination by City: The city questioned Redelfs about discrepancies in tree diameter estimates (city arborist 47.7 inches, appellant’s arborist 33 inches, both over 30 inches). Redelfs acknowledged his own measurements suggested the tree could be under 30 inches, but the city’s arborist’s report was not based on the code’s required comparison method. - Hearing Examiner’s Observations: The hearing examiner noted that the fine factors under ECDC 23.10.100 C2 appear flexible (e.g., economic benefit), but culpability is not explicitly listed. He suggested the appellant might have a strong equitable argument given safety motivations. He expressed skepticism about the $5,000 statutory limit argument, noting many cities impose far higher fines for tree removal, but left the issue open for briefing. Key Outcomes - No Final Decision Rendered: The hearing was not concluded. The hearing examiner set a briefing schedule for a summary judgment motion on the statutory fine limit issue: - Appellant’s motion due: January 13, 2026 - City’s response due: January 27, 2026 - Appellant’s reply due: January 30, 2026 - The hearing examiner will issue a decision after receiving the reply. - Cross-Examination of City Arborist: The hearing examiner offered to schedule a Zoom session for cross-examination of the city’s arborist (Holly Ioso) if the summary judgment motion does not resolve the case. The appellant may decide later. - Potential Additional Briefing: The hearing examiner invited the parties to also address the issue of his authority to modify the fine based on equitable considerations or the discretionary factors in the tree code, noting that the city’s calculation appeared to omit the economic benefit factor. - Admitted Exhibits: The city’s agenda packet (Exhibits A–J, staff report), the appellant’s notice of appeal, a document titled “Large Trees Remaining on the Property Measurements Taken December 16, 2025,” and a printout of the city’s tree removal webpage were admitted into evidence.

The Edmonds Hearing Examiner held a hybrid meeting on December 15, 2025, to consider two land use applications: a conditional use permit for a covered play structure at Edmonds Elementary and a preliminary conservation subdivision for Madrona Manor. Both hearings included staff presentations, applicant testimony, public comments, and will result in written decisions to be issued within the next few weeks. Public Hearing: PLN2024-0083 – Edmonds Elementary Covered Play Structure - Staff (Rose Haas) recommended approval of a conditional use permit to increase the height of an accessory covered play structure from the LDR zone’s 15-foot limit to 23 feet. The structure, approximately 5,984 square feet, will be built on an existing paved play area and is consistent with the comprehensive plan and zoning code. - Applicant (Cami Anderson, Shocky Planning Group) stated the project is the final play shed from the 2021 levy, bringing equity to all elementary schools. She confirmed the district concurs with staff’s recommended conditions. - One written public comment from an adjacent property owner raised concerns about height and views, but no oral testimony was offered. - Hearing Examiner Phil Albrex noted the project appears straightforward and likely to be approved, with a decision expected within two weeks. Public Hearing: PLN2025-0003 – Madrona Manor Preliminary Conservation Subdivision - Staff recommended approval of a seven-lot preliminary subdivision (down from the initial eight-lot proposal due to acreage discrepancies). The project involves combining three lots into seven, with conservation design preserving critical slopes, trees, and stormwater infiltration. A sidewalk will be installed along 232nd Street. - Applicant (Sherry Anderson, Village Life Homes) agreed to proceed with seven lots and highlighted clustering, tree retention (over 50%), and multiple infiltration galleries for stormwater management. Civil engineer Tom Abbott (Solid Ground Engineering) confirmed full compliance with the stormwater manual and no off-site discharge. - Public comments: Three community members spoke or submitted questions: - Chris Burgess (adjacent neighbor) asked about tree protection, traffic speed on 232nd, and requested a copy of the landscape plan. - Joanne Noel (adjacent neighbor) raised concerns about existing stormwater flooding, fencing between properties, and utility line impacts. Staff and applicant noted that stormwater will be fully infiltrated on site and that sewer/water connections are on 232nd, not affecting her lines. - Dave A (virtual participant) asked about lot dimensions and stormwater direction; engineer clarified all runoff is infiltrated on site. - Hearing Examiner emphasized that the stormwater manual requires no increase in off-site flows and that the city’s tree retention standards are robust. He encouraged the applicant to stay after the hearing for additional neighbor questions. Key Outcomes - Both hearings were concluded with the record closed. Written decisions will be issued within 10 business days (by end of December 2025). - For the play structure: the examiner indicated likely approval. - For the subdivision: approval of a seven-lot plat is expected, subject to conditions including civil improvements, tree protection, and stormwater compliance.

The Edmonds Planning Board met in hybrid session on 2025-12-11 (source timestamp 09:45:00+00:00; the agenda and transcript identify the meeting as December 10, 2025 at 7:00 PM in the Brackett Room, Edmonds City Hall). Outgoing Chair Lee read the land acknowledgement. The board approved amended minutes, adopted the updated Planning Board handbook, elected 2026 officers, and reviewed the 2026 work plan. No administrative reports, public hearings, or public comments were held. Consent Calendar & Routine Approvals - Agenda: A motion to approve the agenda as read was seconded and passed unanimously. - Minutes: The November 12, 2025 draft minutes were approved unanimously as amended by corrections submitted by Judy Gladstone. Public Comments & Testimony - No public comments were offered in person or online. - No public hearings were held. Planning Board Handbook Review (Unfinished Business) - Planning staff member Mike Clugston presented a revised draft handbook incorporating prior board discussion, including redline/strikeout changes and a new appendix-five template for council recommendation memos. - Judy Gladstone offered editorial and substantive revisions. The board agreed to changes such as setting a goal that agenda packets take no more than two hours to review, allowing board members to contact the chair or staff with suggested agenda topics, removing 'audio' from meeting-note recording language, clarifying that the board determines who prepares and reviews recommendation memos, and deleting confusing quorum wording while retaining the code citation for future code cleanup. - Isabel Jones proposed an added sentence clarifying that board members should make every effort to be knowledgeable about agenda packet contents before meetings. - The board approved the handbook as revised by Gladstone and Jones; the motion carried unanimously. Election of 2026 Board Chair and Vice Chair (New Business) - Chair: Judy Gladstone nominated Lauren Golembiewski. No other nominations were made. Golembiewski accepted and was elected chair by unanimous voice vote. - Vice Chair: John Milke was nominated for vice chair, supported by Nick Maxwell and others, and elected by unanimous voice vote. Extended Agenda: 2026 Work Plan Preview - Mike Clugston said an urban forest planner and a planning manager are expected to join by late 2025 or early January, increasing staff capacity for code work. - The tree code update is expected to be the first major topic of 2026. The landmark tree ordinance expires at the end of April; an interim extension is likely, with completion targeted around the middle or third quarter of 2026. - House Bill 1757 requires an update for existing uses in residential buildings. Zoning-related elements will likely come to the planning board beginning at the first January meeting. - Staff plan to make non-substantive cleanup edits to the middle housing and design review chapters to align cross-references and correct incongruities. - The January 14 Parks and Recreation annual report may be shifted so staff can address budget and levy effects. - A larger unified development code rewrite is planned over about two years—the first major reorganization since 1980, with some code dating to 1955. Lot splits and child care siting must be addressed by mid-2027. - For the Critical Areas Ordinance update, the Deer Creek/CARA language will be held back until PFAS/stormwater science is available; the rest of the CAO update will move forward. - A board retreat is planned for January 28, with city attorney attendance for open meetings training. A quarterly report to the city council will be submitted for the council's first January meeting. Board Member Comments and New Member Introduction - John Jesson, the new alternate member, introduced himself as an architect with about 40 years of experience who worked in Chicago, Washington, D.C., and Bethesda. He described prior work on historic preservation and form-based code and said he wants to contribute to Edmonds as his forever home. - Board members thanked outgoing Chair Lee for leadership and organization, outgoing Vice Chair John Milke for behind-the-scenes work, and planning staff for managing a demanding code year. They praised the board's respectful and productive working climate. Key Outcomes - Agenda approved unanimously. - November 12, 2025 minutes approved unanimously as amended. - Planning Board handbook approved unanimously with revisions. - Lauren Golembiewski elected Chair for 2026. - John Milke elected Vice Chair for 2026. - 2026 priorities previewed: tree code, House Bill 1757 implementation, middle housing and design review cleanup, parks report, unified development code planning, CAO/CARA sequencing, and staff hiring.