Public Meetings - Edmonds, Washington

The Edmonds City Council held its regular meeting on April 28, 2026, at 6:00 PM. The meeting included presentations from the Prosecutor's Office and the Public Defender's Association, audience comments regarding the Lynnwood wastewater treatment plant, and council business items including adoption of the Safety Action Plan and an update on the Public Safety Sales Tax. Several items were approved on the consent agenda, and a presentation on the Perrinville flow reduction study was moved to consent. Consent Calendar - Approved City Council and committee meeting minutes from April 14 and 21, 2026. - Approved payroll and benefit checks, direct deposits, and wire payments for April 1–15, 2026. - Approved claim checks and wire payments for April 15 and 22, 2026. - Approved the Interlocal Agreement with Community Transit for Highway 99 Revitalization Project Stage 3 (second reading). - Approved Supplemental Agreement 4 for Highway 99 Revitalization Project Stage 3 (second reading). - Approved increasing Administrative Assistants from 1.4 to 2.0 FTEs (second reading). - Approved City Hall Roof Replacement Job Order Contract (second reading). Public Comments & Testimony - Tim Amon (CAPE – Citizen Alliance to Protect Edmonds) spoke about the City of Lynnwood's plan to expand the wastewater treatment plant within Edmonds, citing potential costs of $300 million and impacts on nearby properties. He invited council members to a tour of Charlotte's Garden on May 20, 2026, to view the affected area. He also noted their motion to appeal a determination of non-significance was dismissed by Lynnwood's hearing examiner. - Unnamed resident living across from the wastewater treatment plant asked who is responsible for maintaining city-owned properties acquired for the project, noting overgrown grass and requesting guidance on mowing. Discussion Items - Prosecutor's Office 2025 Annual Report (First Reading): City Prosecutor Aaron Walls reported clearing the Blake marijuana conviction backlog, revamping community court with case managers and resources (primarily serving homeless participants), and addressing firearm seizures. Challenges include increasing public defender caseload standards and the new Lynnwood jail contract. Councilmember Nan inquired about walk-in office hours for victims; Walls agreed to explore feasibility. Councilmember Olson asked how more public defenders increase prosecutor workload; Walls explained it leads to more motions and discovery requests. - Public Defender's Office 2025 Annual Report (First Reading): Executive Director Kathleen Kyle and Supervisor Dustin Drangis presented. Key data: median theft in 80 open cases was under $37; two stores drive most theft prosecutions. 46% of 2024 cases were in warrant status. They recommended pre-prosecution diversion (e.g., Law Enforcement Assisted Diversion) for low-level shoplifting. Challenges include implementing national workload standards (10-year forecast provided), the Lynnwood jail transition affecting vertical representation, and disability justice training. Councilmembers discussed reducing caseload through prevention (e.g., store security practices) and partnerships with retailers and food banks. - Perrinville Flow Reduction Study Amendment (First Reading): City Engineer Mike Delilah presented an amendment to continue the 2015 study, funded 85% by a Department of Ecology grant (15% local match split 50/50 with Lynnwood). The scope includes geotechnical investigations for top 10 potential sites. Council moved to forward the item to the consent agenda; motion passed unanimously. - Adoption of Safety Action Plan (Second Reading): Bertrand House presented the plan, developed over the past year with stakeholder input. It identifies 11 priority projects (e.g., citywide signalized intersection improvements, Highway 99 segments, 76th Avenue corridor, SR 104 adaptive system). The goal is to eliminate traffic fatalities and serious injuries by 2040, with a 50% reduction by 2035. Adopting the plan makes the city eligible for federal SS4A grants; the next grant application deadline is May 26, 2026. Councilmember Olson noted missed needs (e.g., crosswalk at Ferndale Village, 84th Avenue safety). The plan was adopted unanimously. - Update on Public Safety Sales Tax: Chief Dawkins reported that the city has collected $209,913.22 from February to April 2026. The city received conditional approval but must align with six policy areas (e.g., immigration, use of force, firearms relinquishment) by June 30, 2026, to maintain compliance. No penalties are currently owed. The chief expressed confidence in meeting the deadline. A separate $100 million state grant for staffing is available once compliance is achieved. Key Outcomes - The amendment to the Professional Services Agreement for the Perrinville Flow Reduction Study Update was moved to the consent agenda and approved unanimously. - The Safety Action Plan was adopted unanimously, enabling the city to apply for federal SS4A grants before the May 26, 2026 deadline. - The Public Safety Sales Tax update was received; the police department is working toward compliance by June 30, 2026, with no immediate financial impact anticipated. - Council comments included updates on SNOCOM 911's radio replacement bonding (likely $30 million starting 2035, with potential city assessment increase of $5,000), the Lynnwood wastewater treatment plant tour invitation, the Highway 99 Phase 3 gateway design survey, and the city's reconvened emergency management collaboration with 30 organizations.

Note: The agenda lists the meeting date as April 22, 2026, but the provided transcript and user instruction indicate the meeting occurred on April 23, 2026. This summary uses the April 23 date as specified. The Edmonds Planning Board held a regular hybrid meeting on April 23, 2026, at 7:00 PM in the Brackett Room, City Hall, to discuss the 2026 Tree Code Update (Project AMD2026-0001). The board approved previous meeting minutes, heard public testimony, and deliberated on three code framework approaches for regulating tree removals on improved (non-development) properties. Key decisions included prohibiting removal of healthy landmark trees and requiring replacements for all significant tree removals. Consent Calendar - Approval of Minutes (April 8, 2026): The board approved the minutes with modifications: strikeout of a sentence about Seaview zoning, correcting "dual accessory dwelling unit" to "detached accessory dwelling unit," and correcting the name of the new board member from John Milky to John Jesson. The motion passed 3-0-1 (three yes, one abstention from Steven Lee). Public Comments & Testimony - Kathleen Sears (Edmonds resident): Urged a conservative tree removal allowance (one tree per 12 months) and questioned the statement that administrative time for homeowner tree removals should be avoided. She also asked the board to reconsider whether nuisance tree removals should require replacements. - Kyle McIntyre (Edmonds resident): Cited Seattle's 2023 tree ordinance, noting that most canopy loss occurs on residential properties and that Seattle now limits removal of trees 12 inches or greater and requires replacement even for hazard trees. - Karen Barnes (Edmonds resident, 14 years): Advocated for a strong, enforceable tree code addressing private property, noting that neighboring cities (Seattle, Shoreline, Lynnwood, Kirkland) have more comprehensive codes. She emphasized the need to protect canopy under the Growth Management Act. - Laura Hine (Edmonds resident): Opposed any removal of healthy landmark trees, argued that replacements should be required for all removals, and shared a personal anecdote about a tree illegally removed in Kirkland to illustrate the need for enforcement. - Deborah Ashland (online, Edmonds resident): Supported restricting landmark tree removals (except for hazards), recommended quantity-based replacements by tree size, a minimum 35% existing tree threshold per site, and a frequency limit of three removals per 36 months. She also provided a memo with detailed calculations. Discussion Items - 2026 Tree Code Update, Project AMD2026-0001: Staff planner Deb presented three code framework approaches for regulating tree removals not associated with development: 1. Clearing and Grading Permit Approach: A permit allowing a maximum number of tree removals at once (e.g., 6 or 10 trees). 2. Tree Removal Allowance Approach: An over-the-counter allowance (e.g., 1-2 trees per 12 months) with no permit or fee for the allowance; exceeding the allowance triggers a permit. 3. Tree Density Credit Threshold Approach: A points-based system based on trunk diameter, where a minimum number of credits must be maintained on the lot; removals below the threshold require replanting. The board discussed the pros and cons of each approach, using a hypothetical scenario of the "Smith family" with a 7,500 sq ft lot and five trees. Members expressed concerns about the complexity and arbitrariness of the tree density credit approach and agreed to focus on the tree removal allowance approach. They also considered a hybrid model where a low allowance (e.g., one tree per year) could be exceeded via a permit with replacement requirements. - Definition of Landmark Trees: The board revisited the size threshold, with previous discussion leaning toward 24 inches minimum diameter and a species list. This remained under consideration for future refinement. Key Outcomes - Motion to Prohibit Healthy Landmark Tree Removals: John Milky moved, and Lauren Golembiwski seconded, to prohibit removal of healthy landmark trees unless they meet hazard or nuisance criteria. The motion passed with one nay (1-0? The transcript indicates one nay, but the exact tally is not recorded; the motion carried). - Motion to Require Replacements for All Significant Tree Removals: A motion (mover not specified) to require replacement trees for every significant tree removed was seconded and passed unanimously. (Significant trees were defined as those between 6 inches and the landmark threshold, though the 6-inch threshold was later debated; the board leaned toward a 12-inch minimum for replacement triggers but did not finalize.) - Direction for Draft Code: The board directed staff to develop draft code based on a tree removal allowance approach with a base allowance of one significant tree per 12 months, with a permit process for exceeding that allowance (subject to replacement requirements and a fee). The allowance number and replacement ratios will be refined in future meetings. The board also indicated that landmark trees should not be removable under any allowance. - Next Steps: The board will shift to discussing tree regulations for development properties at the next meeting, building on existing code. The interim ordinance protecting landmark trees (approved by City Council) remains in effect until October 2026. Adjournment The meeting was extended by 15 minutes and adjourned at 9:12 PM.

The Edmonds City Council Parks and Public Works (PPW) Committee met on April 22, 2026 (the agenda is dated April 21, 2026, at 3:00 PM; the provided timestamp states the meeting occurred on April 22, 2026, at 20:30 UTC). Chair Vivian Olsen, Councilmember Chris Eck, and Council President Michelle attended, with Council President Michelle serving as ex officio member. Facilities Manager Tom Sullivan and Transportation Engineer Bertrand presented. The committee discussed the first-quarter Job Order Contracting report, the City Hall roof replacement, the Safety Action Plan, and two Highway 99 Revitalization supplemental agreements; all items were recommended for full council action. The transcript indicates the meeting was called to order at 3:00 PM and adjourned at 3:56 PM. Job Order Contracting (JOC) Quarterly Report - Tom Sullivan presented the 2026 first-quarter JOC report, the first such report to the committee. He explained the legislature authorized JOC in 2019 and the city amended its purchasing policy in 2022-2023 to allow it. - About 50 projects were assessed for JOC suitability; 25-30 were viable, and 26 price proposals had been initiated. The program supports nine or ten departments/divisions and is being used to spend bond funds and address deferred maintenance. - Asked by Councilmember Eck about quality compared with low-bid contracting, Sullivan said JOC projects rarely produce change orders unless the city initiates them; prime contractors are selected through an RFP with pre-negotiated rates, may perform only 10% of the work, and the rest is subcontracted using the RS Means price book. - Chair Olsen praised the report, and the committee agreed to refer it to the full council as a receive-for-filing item. City Hall Roof Replacement – Job Order Contract - Sullivan said the City Hall roof is at least 26 years old, near the end of a 30-year lifespan, and replacement is recommended three to five years early because of the building's critical role and available funding. - His initial estimate was $300,000; the JOC price proposal came in at $189,600. The roof is technically complex partly because about 20 HVAC units are located on it. - Olsen said she had considered deferring the work, but expected construction price increases of 16% per year and fuel/trip/delivery surcharges made early replacement the right choice. Eck agreed. - The committee agreed to place the contract on a future consent agenda for mayor approval. Adoption of the Safety Action Plan - Transportation Engineer Bertrand presented the draft Safety Action Plan, developed with federal Safe Streets for All funding as part of a joint application with other agencies. The plan's Vision Zero goal is to eliminate traffic fatalities and serious injuries by 2040, with an interim 50% reduction by 2035 and formal progress revalidation every five years. - The plan used data analysis of the high-injury network, vulnerable road user high-injury network, corridor risk factors, equity metrics, points of interest, and public outreach. Outreach included farmers markets, an open house, and festivals during summer 2025. - Eleven projects were identified, including citywide signalized intersection improvements, downtown core unsignalized intersections, Highway 99 corridor projects, 76th, 228th, 100th, 220th, Puget Drive, 9th/Main, and SR 104 adaptive signal improvements. Bertrand said the projects are not prioritized and are eligible for upcoming Safe Streets for All grants. - Olsen expressed strong support, saying bikes and people deserve to share the road and that grants reduce the burden on city funds. She raised concerns about 84th, noting the 25 mph speed limit is not observed and pedestrians are close to traffic; she asked staff to advocate for Snohomish County to include the Esperance portion in its safety plan and asked whether the Edmonds portion could be added. - Bertrand responded that 84th was reviewed, but most of the corridor is in Esperance, speeds are low, and there is no serious-injury crash corridor in the Edmonds portion; the county is working on its own safety action plan, and he will follow up. - The committee agreed the plan should go to the full council as a presentation rather than as a consent item, so the city can apply for Safe Streets for All funding by the May 26 deadline. Supplemental Agreement 4 – Highway 99 Revitalization Project, Stage 3 - Bertrand presented a fourth supplemental agreement for Stage 3. New work includes preparing pedestrian crossing memos at three locations where pedestrian crossings are not allowed, and adding utility service connections from the joint utility trench/vaults to private property for PUD and communication lines. - Design is at about 30% and nearing 60%; the consultant fee proposal is still being negotiated. The project has no local funding, with costs covered by Connecting Washington and Move Ahead funds. - The committee agreed to forward the agreement to the full council consent agenda. Supplemental Agreement 1 – Highway 99 Revitalization Project, Stage 4 - The first supplemental agreement for Stage 4 includes complete streets and bike lane elements, stormwater design reports, WSDOT design analysis, driveway regrading, environmental site assessments, cultural resources work, right-of-way services, structural work on the tunnel under 220th for a second westbound left-turn lane, and underground utility/service connection work. - Fee proposals are still being negotiated. Funding sources include Connecting Washington, Move Ahead funds, a federal design/right-of-way grant, and traffic impact fees. - Olsen asked about impacts to businesses and whether alternatives had been explored. Bertrand said sidewalks would typically widen from 7 to 16 feet with planter, sidewalk, and bike lane, but would taper where buildings are close. An open house was scheduled for Thursday; there had been some pushback but generally positive feedback, and right-of-way discussions with property owners would intensify after the 60% design submittal. - Council President Michelle asked about the Dragon Tire Casino parking lot redesign. Bertrand explained that the second westbound left-turn lane at 220th requires widening on the north side because the building prevents widening to the south; retaining wall removal and parking/driveway redesign are needed, and the work connects to the Interurban Trail. - The committee agreed to forward the agreement to the full council consent agenda. Key Outcomes - The committee unanimously recommended: the Q1 JOC report be received/filed by the full council; the City Hall roof replacement, Stage 3 Supplement 4, and Stage 4 Supplement 1 go to the full council consent agenda; and the Safety Action Plan be presented to the full council for approval. - The Safety Action Plan approval is time-sensitive because Safe Streets for All grant applications are due May 26, 2026. - No formal roll-call votes were taken; decisions were by committee consensus.

Note on date discrepancy: The agenda lists the meeting as April 21, 2026 at 2:40 PM, but the instruction for this summary specifies the meeting took place on April 22, 2026 at 20:00 UTC. The transcript references "today" and the meeting was adjourned at 2:49 PM, consistent with a late April date. This summary uses the provided date of April 22, 2026. This special meeting was convened to conduct a second reading and vote on Interim Ordinance No. 4389, which extends by six months an existing interim regulation prohibiting the removal of certain landmark trees (greater than 30 inches in diameter) in Edmonds. The meeting lasted approximately nine minutes, from 2:40 PM to 2:49 PM, with a full quorum present. Unanimous approval was given after brief discussion. Consent Calendar - No consent calendar items were presented. Public Comments & Testimony - No public comments were received during this meeting. Staff noted that a public hearing was held the previous week (April 14, 2026) where a few comments supported extending the landmark tree ordinance. Discussion Items - Interim Ordinance No. 4389 – Six-Month Extension (Second Reading): - Mike Cluxton (Planning and Development Department) presented the request. He explained that work on the permanent tree code update began slowly due to staffing and budget constraints but has accelerated since January 2026 when Deb Powers returned. Staff expects to complete the permanent code update by early October 2026, after review by the Planning Board and Tree Board, and then bring it to the City Council in summer 2026. - Staff recommended extending the existing interim ordinance for six months to continue protections for landmark trees (≥30 inches diameter) during the code update. - Councilmember Payne made a motion to approve the extension, noting the ordinance was originally adopted near Earth Day and that this action occurred a week before the deadline. - Councilmember Holson supported the extension but requested that staff provide a thorough legal analysis of takings laws as they relate to landmark tree protections, either with the final code proposal or earlier. - Councilmember Chen supported the extension as a necessary measure due to staff shortages, though he stated that moratoriums are generally not a good method of governance. - Council President and other members echoed support, emphasizing the importance of getting the permanent code right and thanking the community and staff. - Councilmember Nand initially had a question about notice to property owners but withdrew it after recalling previous answers. Key Outcomes - Vote on Interim Ordinance No. 4389 extension: Unanimously approved (all ayes, no nays). The ordinance extends the landmark tree moratorium for an additional six months, continuing the prohibition on removal of landmark trees larger than 30 inches in diameter. - Directives: Councilmember Holson’s request for a takings law analysis was acknowledged by staff, who committed to working with the city attorney to provide that information before or with the final permanent code proposal. - Next steps: Staff will continue work on the permanent tree code update, with completion targeted for early October 2026. The permanent code will go through Planning Board, Tree Board, and then City Council review.

Note: The agenda listed the meeting date as April 21, 2026, but the provided timestamp and instruction specify April 22, 2026. This summary follows the instructed date. The Edmonds City Council Finance Committee met on April 22, 2026, to discuss three agenda items: updates to the financial reporting policy, review of the February 2026 monthly financial report, and a proposal to establish a Fiscal Sustainability Task Force with consultant support. The meeting included presentations from Finance Director Go, Council President Dutch, and Mayor Rosen. No formal votes were taken; instead, the committee provided direction for further staff work. Discussion Items 1. Financial Policy – Financial Reporting Second Reading Finance Director Go presented a revised approach to financial reporting, emphasizing a distinction between financial reporting (actual results, transparency, accountability) and forward-looking analysis (planning, forecasting, policy decisions). He noted the current 40-page monthly reports are burdensome and that many cities have minimal reporting policies. The goal is to streamline reports to focus on high-level financial health indicators, capital project progress, and significant variances. Councilmembers expressed support for the direction, with several noting the importance of tracking trends, biennial comparisons, and insightful analysis rather than raw data. Director Go will revise the policy based on committee feedback and return with a proposal; feedback from council members should be consolidated through Council President Dutch to avoid conflicting input. 2. February 2026 Monthly Financial Report – First Reading Director Go presented the February 2026 financial report, covering month 2 of the biennium (month 14 overall). Highlights included: - Fund balance declined but is recovering as revenues pick up; expected to be down $17M by end of biennium due to capital projects. - Interest income stabilizing at 3.7%, down from previous 5%. - Labor costs under budget by 2% citywide (1.2% in general fund); under budget by 5.8% biennially ($5.1M citywide, $2.8M general fund), indicating vacancies. - Revenues close to budget (0.2% under), expenditures 2.2% below budget for city; general fund exceeding budget by 1.3% primarily due to a large insurance payment. - Sales tax revenue up nearly 10% ($180,000), surprising given prior flat trends; attributed possibly to higher costs and increased utility sales tax. - Real estate excise tax slowed. Councilmembers discussed the need to track the temporary utility tax increase separately and to monitor fuel cost impacts. The new biennial reporting format was praised for showing cumulative performance. No action was taken; the report was accepted as information. 3. Fiscal Sustainability Task Force – First Reading Council President Dutch and Mayor Rosen presented a proposal to hire Baker Tilly (cost <$150,000) to: - Develop a 10-year financial forecast - Identify and evaluate budget strategies (expenditure controls, service delivery alternatives, revenue enhancements, reductions) - Facilitate a community-based fiscal sustainability task force (10–20 members, application process) to review strategies and provide recommendations - Follow GFOA (Government Finance Officers Association) best practices Mayor Rosen also announced a pro bono engagement with Forum Consulting (150 hours) to support strategic planning, focusing initially on economic development. This work will include interviews with directors, establish a baseline, and create an economic development roadmap, with updates expected by September 2026. Councilmembers raised questions about integration of parallel workstreams, cost of staff time, and the value of a third-party forecast vs. internal capacity. Concerns were expressed about the $150,000 cost and the need for the task force to be aware of previously vetted budget strategies. Support was voiced for community engagement and the long-term focus. No formal vote was taken; the committee directed staff to proceed with developing a contract with Baker Tilly and to continue the Forum Consulting engagement. Key Outcomes - The financial reporting policy will be revised by Director Go based on committee feedback; council feedback will be consolidated through Council President Dutch. - The February 2026 financial report was received as information; no formal action required. - The committee supported moving forward with the Baker Tilly Fiscal Sustainability Task Force proposal and the pro bono Forum Consulting strategic planning work. Staff will develop a contract for Baker Tilly and continue coordination with Forum Consulting.

The committee met on April 22, 2026, from 4:30 PM to 5:18 PM to discuss three agenda items: a request to increase administrative assistant FTEs, a briefing on unlicensed food vendors, and a workplan briefing for the potential Esperance annexation. A fourth item (supplemental agreement for the Highway 99 revitalization project) was listed but not discussed. No public comment period was held. Discussion Items 1. Request to Increase Administrative Assistants from 1.4 to 2.0 FTEs - Mike Luxon (Planning and Development Services) presented the request, noting that current administrative support (1.4 FTEs) is insufficient due to the loss of on-call support and increased cross-training demands. The proposal would increase a 0.9 FTE position to 1.0 and a 0.5 FTE position to 1.0, adding 0.6 FTE. - For 2026, the cost increase ($57,000) would be covered by salary savings from two vacant senior planner positions ($98,000 in savings for the first four months). Going forward, the funding would need to come from the general fund. - Councilmembers Susan, Michelle, and Vivian asked about sustainability, fee revenue, and the timeline for filling the vacant senior planner positions. Luxon confirmed that one senior planner will start May 1, 2026, and recruitment for the second is underway. He also noted that recently increased permit fees and anticipated development (e.g., middle housing, accessory dwelling units) may generate additional revenue. 2. Unlicensed Food Vendors - Brad Shipley (Planning and Development Services) briefed the committee on the growing issue of unlicensed food vendors (pop-up tents selling food without permits or health safeguards). He noted that the city’s code enforcement officer has been participating in a Snohomish County health district task force; in 2025, there were over 800 complaints countywide. Enforcement is difficult because violations occur after hours. - Councilmembers Susan, Michelle, Vivian, and Jenna discussed the need for a balanced approach: regulating and enforcing against unsafe vendors while also providing a pathway to licensure for aspiring entrepreneurs. Everett’s recently passed ordinance was cited as a good model. The committee expressed interest in having draft language brought back for consideration. - Shipley indicated he could prepare a draft ordinance within a couple of months, incorporating enforcement authority for police/fire and potential pilot projects on private property. 3. Potential Esperance Annexation Workplan Briefing - Mike Luxon and Brad Shipley presented a draft timeline and workplan for annexing the Esperance area (Edmonds’ urban growth area). The goal is to complete the annexation by July 1, 2027, to qualify for a sales tax credit that sunsets in 2028. Consultant BERK has been engaged to perform a fiscal analysis, due June 30, 2026, which will evaluate costs, revenues, and impacts on residents. - Councilmembers discussed community engagement. Jim recommended door-to-door flyers; Luxon noted that an organized Esperance neighborhood group is already canvassing. The committee supported a transparent process, including a city webpage and town hall meetings, but agreed to wait for the fiscal analysis before broader outreach. Key Outcomes - Administrative Assistants: The committee reached consensus to forward the request to increase FTEs to the April 28, 2026 consent agenda. - Unlicensed Food Vendors: The committee directed staff to develop a draft ordinance within approximately two months, considering both enforcement and licensure pathways. - Esperance Annexation: The committee took no formal vote but acknowledged the workplan and agreed to await the fiscal analysis before taking further steps. Note: The meeting agenda listed the date as April 21, 2026, but the user instructed to use April 22, 2026; this summary reflects the user’s directive.

Note: The agenda and transcript indicate the meeting was held on April 8, 2026, while the provided timestamp states April 17, 2026. This summary uses the latter date for the title but reflects the actual meeting date in the body. The meeting covered approvals of previous minutes, a detailed discussion on middle housing code amendments in the LDR zone (frontage types and building orientation), and a new business item regarding the 2026 Comprehensive Plan Docket for Westgate parcel zoning corrections. No decisions were made on the major discussion items, and the board deferred action on the zoning changes pending further information. Consent Calendar - Approval of Minutes (March 25, 2026): The board approved the minutes with edits as read aloud, including corrections to Nick's absence (changed to excused) and clarifications on tree code discussions regarding nuisance vs. hazard trees and regulation of significant trees. The motion passed unanimously. Public Comments & Testimony - No members of the public spoke, either in person or online. Discussion Items - Middle Housing Code Amendments in LDR Zone (Frontage Types & Building Orientation): Staff presented a detailed overview of frontage types (porch projecting, porch engaged, dooryard, common entry, stoop) and building orientation issues, highlighting known code discrepancies such as the lack of a street hierarchy for determining primary frontage when a lot faces multiple streets. The board debated the appropriate level of regulation, balancing walkability, traffic safety, neighborhood character, and homeowner preferences. Several members supported creating a street-priority map or frontage zones keyed to street classifications and distance from the street, rather than a one-size-fits-all rule. Staff noted that no decisions were needed that night; the topic will return for further discussion and eventual recommendation. - 2026 Comprehensive Plan Docket (Westgate Parcel Zoning Correction): Staff presented a mapping error that left four parcels (including Taco Bell and a vacant lot) without a permanent zoning designation, currently under interim BP (Planned Business) zoning. Two options were discussed: leaving the parcels as BP (matching interim zoning) or amending the Comprehensive Plan to include them in the NCH (Neighborhood Center Hub) designation, which allows taller buildings and smaller setbacks. The board deferred a decision to a future meeting to review additional comparison data between the two zoning options. Key Outcomes - Minutes approved as amended. - No action on the middle housing code amendments; staff will bring revised proposals incorporating the board’s input on street hierarchy and frontage zones. - No decision on the Westgate parcel zoning; staff will provide a detailed comparison table of BP vs. NCH zoning impacts. - Resignation: Board member Isabel Jones announced her resignation due to increased work commitments, effective immediately. - Upcoming meetings: The board will focus on tree code discussions over the next several months, starting with the next meeting on May 13, 2026 (staff will be absent).

The Edmonds City Council convened on April 14, 2026, at 6:00 PM. The meeting featured a proclamation for Earth Day 2026, a public hearing on extending the interim landmark tree ordinance (Interim Ordinance No. 4389) for six months, and approval of the consent agenda. The Public Defender’s annual report was moved to a later agenda item and subsequently tabled due to the presenter’s absence. Council members also delivered comments on national, local, and youth-related topics. Presentations - Earth Day 2026 Proclamation: Mayor Rosen proclaimed April 22, 2026, as Earth Day in Edmonds. Bill Derry (President of Pilchuck Audubon Society and member of Edmonds Marsh Estuary Advocates) accepted the proclamation, acknowledging the many environmental volunteers in the community. - Public Defender’s Office Annual Report: Originally scheduled under presentations, the item was moved to Council Business (10.1) via amendment, then tabled because the public defender could not be reached. - Mayor’s Finance Update: Mayor Rosen indicated no prepared update. Consent Calendar All items on the consent agenda were approved unanimously. Key items included: - Approval of meeting minutes (April 7 and April 8, 2026). - PSA for Phase 14 Sewer Replacement and Rehabilitation Project. - Reclassification of HR Assistant to HR Analyst. - Restructuring of Wastewater Treatment Plant positions (unfund 2 operators, add 3 supervisors). - Approval of claim checks. - Update to Downtown Business Improvement District (BID) By-Laws. - Legal Assessment Committee Proposed Work Plan (first reading). - Budget Amendment April 2026 (second reading), which includes $660,000 from the Transportation Benefit District tax, dedicated to the street fund. Received for Filing Items filed without discussion: Claim for Damages (Jean Holtrop and Theresa Hollis), written public comments, and a Tree Code Update Progress Report. Public Hearing: Interim Ordinance No. 4389 – Six-Month Extension Staff (Deb, Planning and Development) explained that the interim ordinance, which temporarily restricts removal of landmark trees (≥30 inches trunk diameter), was adopted in April 2025 in response to the removal of “Big Red” sequoia. It expires at the end of April 2026. The proposed extension would allow continued protection through October 2026 while the city completes a permanent tree code update. Public Testimony (all speakers supported the extension): - Margie Fields (Edmonds): Urged the council to continue protecting landmark trees. - Pam Tower (Edmonds): Wearing a “Big Red” t-shirt, emphasized the need for time to craft a strong, defensible tree code that aligns with the Climate Action Plan, Urban Forest Management Plan, and Comprehensive Plan. - Kyle McIntyre (Edmonds, virtual): Expressed strong support for extending protections, citing the city’s pride in being a protector of nature. - Arlene Williams (Edmonds, virtual): Encouraged the council to balance development with canopy protection and allow careful decision-making. - Finesse Tupper (Edmonds, virtual): Supported tree protection but criticized the slow progress and lack of a definition for “landmark tree” in the current code. Urged the council to protect both trees and citizens. Council Discussion: - Councilmember Chen asked about next steps and timeline. Staff outlined a revised work plan: planning board meetings through spring, tree board and stakeholder input, public hearing in July, recommendation to council in August, and adoption anticipated by October 6, 2026. - Councilmember Eck noted that the delay was partly due to the key staff position being vacant for nine months of the original 12‑month ordinance period. Staff confirmed that the nine‑month gap limited work until a tree code specialist was hired in January 2025 (the year 2025 was stated but likely 2026 context; the delay is accurate as described). - Councilmember Barnett acknowledged the need to balance canopy goals with property owner flexibility, referencing public testimony. No vote was taken on the ordinance extension during this meeting; it was a public hearing with council questions. Council Business Item 10.1 (Public Defender’s Annual Report) was tabled by unanimous consent due to the presenter’s absence. Council Comments - Councilmember Nand: Delivered a statement opposing President Trump’s military operations in Iran, citing the War Powers Act and the 60‑day deadline of April 29, 2026. Mentioned casualties including 15 U.S. service members and called on Congress to act. - Councilmember Payne: Thanked environmental groups, especially the Pilchuck Audubon and marsh advocates, for their role in securing a $675,000 grant for marsh restoration studies, and noted Bill Derry’s birthday on Earth Day. - Councilmember Olson: Promoted a weed‑pulling volunteer event at Pine Ridge Park on April 25 from 10 AM to 12 PM (registration via Sound Salmon Solutions). Reminded that federal tax filing deadline is April 15. - Council President Dutch: Thanked public hearing speakers and the community for supporting the marsh and Earth Day. - Councilmember Barnett: Highlighted the $660,000 budget amendment for transportation and the tree code progress report; stressed the need for practical, balanced code. - Councilmember Chen: Thanked volunteers for keeping the city clean and beautiful. - Councilmember Eck: Praised Edmonds’ strong environmental advocacy community and reiterated the importance of canopy and landmark tree protection. - Student Representative Leo: Shared resources from Friends of Youth, including shelter services (Youth Haven for under 18, Willow Youth Services Center for 18–24) and a 24/7 crisis hotline (Safe Place). Key Outcomes - The consent agenda was approved unanimously. - The Public Defender’s report was tabled. - The public hearing on the landmark tree ordinance extension was held; no vote was taken. The council will consider the extension at a future meeting. - Council comments included opposition to the Iran war, community event announcements, and youth resource sharing. The meeting adjourned at 6:35 PM.

Note: The agenda and transcript list the meeting date as April 8, 2026 at 3:00 PM, but the provided instruction indicates the meeting took place on April 9, 2026 at 6:00 PM UTC. The summary below reflects the discussions from the April 8 agenda. The Edmonds City Council held a study session to review Robert's Rules of Order and discuss a proposal for a regular informal community engagement event called "Coffee with Council." Council members Chen, Nan, Payne, Olsen, and others participated. Staff presentations were given by Luke (City Clerk's Office) and Councilmember Vivian. Discussion Items Robert's Rules of Order Presentation - Luke presented a 15-minute overview focused on motions, including main motions, subsidiary motions (amendments, postpone), and bring-back motions (reconsider, take from table). - Key points emphasized: motions must be clear and include no commentary; seconds should be simple (e.g., "I second"); amendments must be relevant and cannot replace the main motion; and council rules can override Robert's Rules (e.g., withdrawal of a motion after second requires council consent). - Councilmembers asked questions about motions to call the question (no second required, not debatable), the acronym RONR (Robert's Rules of Order Newly Revised), and the practice of two readings for agenda items. Luke clarified that only ordinances require two readings per council rules, though many items receive two touches as a preference. - Councilmember Vivian reinforced the need for clear motions and proper amendment procedures. Councilmember Chen asked about the Z-Cup engineering contract that had only one reading; Council President noted it was a time-sensitive, non-ordinance item. Proposal for Coffee with Council - Councilmember Vivian introduced the proposal, noting that Edmonds Civic Roundtable previously held similar events and that Kenmore has a successful model. The goal is to provide informal, subquorum engagement opportunities for residents beyond the three-minute public comment period. - Councilmembers discussed frequency (monthly vs. quarterly), locations (downtown, Highway 99, north end), times (weekday mornings, evenings, Saturdays), and logistics. Concerns about "pay-to-play" perception if held at private businesses were raised by Councilmember Jenna, who suggested using city-owned property for ADA accessibility and neutrality. - Councilmember Susan proposed twice-yearly events with a quorum to focus on major topics, while others favored monthly pilot with rotating times and locations. Councilmember Erica suggested a one-year pilot with clear success metrics (e.g., attendance, topics discussed) and a voluntary tracker. - Consensus emerged to proceed as a pilot program: monthly, with subquorum (2-3 council members), rotating between morning and evening times, taking August and December off, and evaluating after one year. Councilmember Vivian will draft a written proposal for council input. Key Outcomes - No formal votes were taken. The study session was informational. - Council agreed to move forward with a pilot Coffee with Council program based on the discussion. Councilmember Vivian will prepare a written proposal reflecting the group's input (monthly, rotating times/locations, subquorum, pilot with evaluation). - For Robert's Rules, the presentation served as a training and reference for future meetings; no action was required.