Public Meetings - Gulfport, Mississippi

The Gulfport City Council held a workshop on February 26, 2026, to address public questions and concerns regarding the 287G agreement between the Gulfport Police Department and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). The meeting was called by Mayor after a previous council meeting where AI-generated photos of ICE vehicles in front of the library circulated without basis. The mayor stated the focus would be on facts about Gulfport, not speculation, and emphasized decorum. Police Chief presented a timeline and details of the agreement, followed by public comment and council discussion. No decisions were made as the workshop was informational. Public Comments & Testimony - Courtney Perkopis (15th Avenue South) expressed hope the council would listen and act, noting the meeting was not live-streamed and requested confirmation of recording. - Noah Peretz (12th Avenue South, Stetson Law student) urged council to renege on the agreement, arguing immigration enforcement is federal and that the agreement erodes trust and diverts resources. - Richard Freed (56th Street South) criticized the agreement's signing and urged a decision that makes residents proud. - Maria Augusto (South Pasadena) cited whistleblower testimony about deficient ICE training and argued supporting 287G makes the city complicit in unlawful actions. - Matthew Gelvin (15th Avenue South) questioned the definition of sanctuary city and whether the attorney general's threat was binding; expressed concern about discrepancy between official parameters and reality. - Casey McCormick (55th Street South) expressed full confidence in Gulfport police and supported the agreement, noting zero enforcement actions and arguing it provides necessary tools. - Christa Fairbrother (2521 52nd Street South) questioned why opting out would automatically make Gulfport a sanctuary city and asked about other municipalities' experiences. - Ellen Briggs (27th Avenue South) opposed the agreement, citing fear of state overreach. - Kate Basin (St. Petersburg) shared experience as a state inspector, emphasized that losing trust in law enforcement harms public safety, and hoped council would oppose. - Karen Goldberg (45th Street, marina district) supported 287G as the lesser of two evils, stating inevitability. - Frankie (41st Avenue North, St. Pete) noted the task force model is the harshest of three options, that the agreement is not mandatory, and that it erodes community trust. - Gina Buscemi (56th Street South) questioned what would change if the agreement were revoked, noting zero arrests under it, and argued the city should not attract trouble. - Leo Gonzalez (Tampa, Tampa Bay Immigrant Solidarity Network) stated the agreement is not mandatory, cited Sheriff Gauthier's threats, and argued it erodes trust; asked council to cancel. - Lauren Stern (55th Street South) addressed the AI photo and public comment blitz, stating they brought many people to get answers; argued the council was permitting complicity by allowing the agreement to stand without public debate. - Amy Costa (28th Avenue South) expressed belief in Chief Rand and the police but argued complicity with an agency committing atrocities is not acceptable; urged council to stand for people without voice. - Chris Oro (South Pasadena) spoke against the agreement, citing atrocities by ICE and urging courage to do the right thing. - Rachel Dale (Seminole) noted the Supreme Court allowed racial profiling by ICE, which could deter patrons and workers from local businesses. - Laura Lee Wanger (Gray Street South) shared an anecdote illustrating disparate treatment based on skin color and opposed participation. - Eliza Sydney (Jersey Avenue) raised health impacts, including children not attending school, and urged council to see the broader effects. - A St. Pete resident (grandmother present) expressed shame at the agreement being signed behind closed doors and argued it endangers public safety by deterring immigrants from reporting crime. - Robert Combs (56th Street South) supported 287G, arguing it only affects those breaking the law, keeps policing local, and protects the elderly community. - Mason Morvet (27th Avenue South) questioned the voluntary nature given Key West's experience and the threat from the attorney general. - Town Shores resident called for thorough analysis of the agreement, identification of citizens' rights, and what the city will do to protect those rights; noted the city manager signed without council input. - E-comments: Three written comments were read, all opposing 287G: Isabel Sousa cited contradiction with inclusion, Jeannette Sells cited budget strain post-hurricanes, and Connie Takic argued ICE training is deficient. Discussion Items - Chief's Presentation: Chief explained the timeline and key events. She stated the governor wants compliance with state statute (Florida Statute 908.104 and 908.107), and that sanctuary policies are prohibited (908.103). She noted all 10 Pinellas County police departments plus the sheriff signed. ICE prioritizes criminal illegals, public safety threats, repeat removals, and those with final deportation orders. Under the task force model, local officers with 287G authority operate under ICE direction remotely; ICE will not command Gulfport police. Seven of 33 sworn officers have completed 40 hours of online training (no cost, on duty, no overtime). Pinellas County agencies agreed on criteria: no racial profiling, immigration inquiries only when individual has committed a criminal violation or is a public safety threat. To date (February 26, 2026), the department has processed zero individuals. She referenced Key West, which initially voted to void the agreement, received a letter from the attorney general calling that a sanctuary policy, and then reinstated the agreement. - City Attorney Clarifications: The city attorney explained that Florida Statute 908 requires local agencies to use best efforts to support federal immigration enforcement. He stated the 287G agreement is not mandatory for municipalities without jails, but the Key West incident shows state officials are tracking local actions and threatening removal. He clarified that a sanctuary city is defined by policies that impede cooperation with ICE, and that the attorney general's threat was credible but untested in court. - Council Questions: Council members asked about costs (no direct costs incurred; officers trained during duty hours; no reimbursement sought), training details, the definition of sanctuary city, options for alternative models (none identified), liability (federal ICE bears its own liability), and whether other councils debated (only Largo known). Vice Mayor asked about the cost of 40 hours per officer – city manager did not provide the figure, disappointing the Vice Mayor. Vice Mayor also raised concerns about warrantless entry powers and racial profiling; the chief and attorney noted Florida law prohibits profiling and that officers must follow state law. Council Member Shaw asked about reimbursement of $7,500 per officer and $100,000 for vehicles – chief clarified that would only apply if officers were assigned to a physical task force, which is not happening. The mayor stated the workshop was to answer questions and resolve fear; she expressed confidence in the police and argued the agreement keeps Gulfport safer by preventing ICE from coming into town. She stated the council was not elected to fight state and national issues. Key Outcomes - No decisions or votes were taken; the workshop was informational only. - The mayor indicated she does not plan to make the 287G agreement an agenda item for future council action, stating the workshop's purpose was to answer public comments and resolve fear. - The city attorney offered to provide a memo on citizens' constitutional rights if requested. - The meeting adjourned without further action.

The Gulfport City Council met on February 17, 2026, at 11:00 AM (evening session) to discuss a range of topics including a presentation on a living shorelines grant, public comments on the Lions Club lease and ICE workshop, and votes on ordinances and resolutions. Key outcomes included support for a grant application for a hybrid living shoreline at Veterans Park, passage of ordinances on certified recovery residences and residential lighting, approval of the summer recreation program fee schedule, and a decision to table the Lions Club lease payout pending clarification from the appraiser. Consent Calendar - Approved meeting minutes from February 3 and February 5, 2026 (unanimous). Public Comments & Testimony - Priscilla Kidder (Gulfport resident, 40+ years) presented on hybrid living shorelines for Veterans Park. She requested council support to apply for a Tampa Bay Environmental Restoration Fund (TBERF) grant. She noted the grant requires a 1:1 match (in-kind goods/services acceptable) and that Tampa Bay Watch can provide volunteer labor (oyster domes, grasses). The project would be 180 linear feet, with a 12-month design/permitting phase, 4-month implementation, and 12-month monitoring. Estimated grant range: $25,000–$250,000. Council expressed strong support. - Lauren Stern (55th St) supported the living shoreline and later commented on the Lions Club lease, questioning the payout amount and contract terms. - Amy Costa (28th Ave S) reminded about the “For the Love of Gulfport” event on March 1, 2026, from 11 AM to 4 PM at Trolley Market Square. - Courtney Prokopis (15th Ave S) requested data ahead of the upcoming workshop on the 287G mandate (ICE agreement), including number of sworn officers, top call types, and capacity to participate. She argued the agreement exceeds city manager authority and urged council to evaluate whether it serves constituents. - Wolfgang Dininger (Beachway Park, Gulfport Grassroots) reported on February 14 cleanup: 26 volunteers, 101 lbs of trash. Next cleanup March 14 (Clam Bayou). Noted increase in cigarette butts on beach despite smoking ban; requested more enforcement. - Richard Freed (e-comment) submitted a musical advert used to recruit DHS/ICE employees; criticized Lions Club lease payout as “extortion.” - Deborah Schubs (e-comment) demanded legal opinion on missing date on Lincoln Cemetery annex petition. - Sean Simpson (e-comment, business owner) opposed proposed one-way streets on 29th Ave S, citing impact on nine businesses. - Jennifer Donch (Premier Drive) urged removing examples of permissible lighting (e.g., uplighting for flags) from the nuisance ordinance before final passage. - Bixler (Lions Club President) defended the building’s condition and remediation; argued appraisal assumptions were correct. - Lauren Stern (second comment) noted errors in appraisal (building age, flood depth, comps) and questioned city manager’s failure to correct. - Town Shores resident urged council to spend taxpayer money carefully and correct flawed assumptions before paying $227,500. - Amy Costa (second comment) questioned paying for a building the Lions Club no longer wants; supported redoing appraisal with correct info. - Kathy (Lions Club) explained funds go to community; building was sanitized, passed health inspections; membership decline led to lease non-renewal. Discussion Items - Presentation on Living Shorelines: Priscilla Kidder detailed benefits: erosion control, water filtration (one oyster filters 50 gallons/day), stormwater runoff mitigation. Project would use oyster domes, bags, and shore grasses (Spartina). Grant deadline March 25, 2026. Council consensus to support application. - City Manager Report – Permitting Update: 59 homeowner permit applications received; 20 issued; 5 awaiting payment; 34 pending review/other status. Commercial permits in review: Gulf Shores condominium, 2832 Beach Blvd restaurant, 2901 Beach Blvd storage, PYCC fitness center. Councilmember Early noted lack of turnaround time data and asked for faster concierge service. - Council Reports: - Councilmember Early: Pink Flamingo Tour March 7; Lincoln Cemetery cleanup April 25. - Vice Mayor Thanos: Tree City USA award; attended Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council (needs replacement); Sierra Club webinar on solar/rebates; Pinellas County $813M hurricane recovery funds (up to $50,000/homeowner); Wood Ibis fish deaths due to cold water; requested subject matter experts for upcoming 287G workshop. - Councilmember Shaw: Legislative update from Tallahassee – discussed local business tax, sovereign immunity (liability cap increase), post-disaster land use regulations (SB 840), property tax proposals (HB 213/203/209) that could reduce city revenue by up to one-third; reminded of “Adopt a Drain” program. - Mayor Love: Updated on Ford Pinellas meetings – merger of three planning councils likely; bicycle safety/trail continuity; urged residents to apply for People First recovery funds (caseworkers at library Feb 17, 19, 20). Criticized entrance sign at Tangerine and 49th as unwelcoming; promised improvements. - Ordinances: - 7a – Certified Recovery Residences (second reading): Establishes procedures compliant with state law. Passed unanimously (5-0). - 7b – Residential Lighting Nuisance (second reading): Declares excessive lighting a nuisance; further specifics (lumens, height) to be developed within 60 days. Passed unanimously after debate. - Resolutions: - 8a – Summer Recreation Program Fees: No increase; fee based on number of weeks (10 weeks this year). Passed unanimously. - 8b – Potable Water Insert Valves (58th Street Project): Authorizes contract with Colt Services LLC. Passed unanimously. - 8c – Gulfport Lions Club Lease Payout: Resolution to approve $455,000 payout (50% of appraised value) for building on city-owned land. Extensive debate over appraisal accuracy: building age (1950 vs 1971), flood depth (1 ft vs 28 inches), remediation evidence, and choice of comps. Council voted to table the resolution to allow the appraiser to clarify assumptions, particularly construction date and depreciation. To be revisited at March 3, 2026 meeting. - New Business: - Councilmember Early proposed a dog run at Tom Linson Park in Ward 4; feasibility study ongoing. - Councilmember Shaw requested invitation for Gulfport Young Families Council to present on childcare at meetings; consensus obtained. Key Outcomes - Living Shorelines Grant: Council directed staff to proceed with grant application for Veterans Park, with city support. Match will be in-kind through Tampa Bay Watch and volunteer hours. - Ordinances: Both 2026-01 (certified recovery residences) and 2026-02 (residential lighting nuisance) passed 5-0 on second reading. - Summer Program Fees: Approved without increase; $0 cost to participants due to sliding scale and scholarships. - Water Valve Contract: Approved for 58th Street project. - Lions Club Lease Payout: Tabled (5-0) to ask appraiser to verify construction date and depreciation; city manager to report back by March 3, 2026. - Dog Run: Councilmember Early to return with proposal details. - Young Families Council: Invited to present at a future meeting; date to be set.

This special meeting of the Gulfport City Council was held on February 5, 2026, to provide neutral explanations of the ten charter amendment questions that will appear on the upcoming ballot. City Clerk Carico walked through each question, clarifying the meaning of a "yes" or "no" vote. Council members and the public were permitted to ask clarifying questions, but the meeting was not a debate or a forum for expressing voting recommendations. The meeting began with a roll call, noting Councilmember Jackson was excused. Ballot Question 1: Limiting Leases of City-Owned Property to Five Years - Explanation: Currently, leases can be up to 30 years. A "yes" vote would reduce the maximum term to five years. A "no" vote leaves the 30-year maximum unchanged. - Public Comments: - Lenny Gukenheimer (5213 Dillet Ave S) expressed concern that a five-year limit would discourage yacht clubs from investing in capital improvements (e.g., buildings, equipment) and questioned how the city would then maintain those properties. - Another speaker (name not given) asked whether the five-year term would allow lessees to recover capital investments; the city manager responded that such details would be negotiated in the lease (e.g., buyout clauses). - Lee Nell (2157 29th Ave) asked where the idea came from; Mayor Love explained it emerged from the Charter Review Committee, which was composed of residents. Ballot Question 2: Leases Required at Fair Market Value - Explanation: A "yes" vote would require all leases of city-owned real property to be based on fair market value as determined by a licensed appraiser. A "no" vote keeps the charter unchanged (no such requirement). - Public Comments: - One speaker asked what the fair market value might be for the two current leases (Gulfport Yacht Club and Boca Siega Yacht Club); city staff noted appraisals would occur at renewal time. - Jonathan McCoachy argued that fair market value is "fatally flawed" because the unique waterfront properties cannot be compared to standard commercial rentals, and usage restrictions affect value. - Mary questioned how fair market value could be determined when the properties cannot be sold or redeveloped, and when the current buildings may be non-conforming. Vice Mayor Thanos responded that the appraisal would be based on the rental cost of the facility as-is. - Lauren asked about the list of affected properties; it was confirmed that only the two yacht clubs currently have leases, but the rule would apply to any future city property lease. - Jennifer (Don’t Premier Dr) clarified that single-use rentals (e.g., renting the casino for an event) would not be affected; only long-term leases are covered. - Amy asked if the city could negotiate below fair market value; it was stated that fair market value is a minimum, but other terms can be negotiated. - Council Clarification: The requirement would apply only if the charter amendment passes; council still has discretion over which properties to lease. Ballot Question 3: Council Term Length (Three-Year Terms) - Explanation: Currently council members serve two-year terms. A "yes" vote changes to three-year terms. A "no" vote keeps two-year terms. - Clarification: The change would not affect the current election for wards 1 and 3; those elected would still serve two-year terms until the charter is officially amended. - Origin: Mayor Love noted the Charter Review Committee recommended this because many other cities have longer terms, allowing better continuity. Ballot Question 4: Term Limits for Council and Mayor - Explanation: Currently no term limits. A "yes" vote would limit council members and the mayor to three consecutive terms. A "no" vote leaves no limit. - No public questions. Ballot Question 5: Waiting Period After Term Limits - Explanation: A "yes" vote would require a council member who has served three consecutive terms to wait two years before qualifying for the same office, unless no other candidate qualifies. - No public questions. Ballot Question 6: Remove Criminal Misdemeanor Language - Explanation: Currently, the charter makes it a second-degree misdemeanor for a council member to direct staff or request appointment/removal of an employee. A "yes" vote removes that language. A "no" vote keeps it. - Public Comment: Jennifer Webb asked how this aligns with state statute. City Manager O’Reilly explained that the removal simply deletes the charter provision; the state statute would still govern criminal prosecution, but the charter would no longer require a conviction for internal actions. Ballot Question 7: Vacancy and Forfeiture of Office - Explanation: A "yes" vote would add forfeiture of office (by majority vote of remaining council members) as a reason for a vacancy, alongside death, resignation, or removal. A "no" vote leaves current vacancy provisions unchanged. - Discussion: Council members noted potential conflict with other questions; it was acknowledged that if Question 7 passes but Question 9 (magistrate hearing) fails, the council could still create procedures in their policies. Ballot Question 8: Criteria for Forfeiture - Explanation: A "yes" vote would establish specific criteria for forfeiture: lack of qualifications (e.g., moving out of ward), conviction of a crime involving moral turpitude, or failure to attend three consecutive regular meetings or four meetings in 12 months. A "no" vote leaves no such provisions. - Discussion: Councilmember Early clarified that "lack of qualifications" includes residency requirements. Excused absences, as voted by council, would still be allowed—the provision does not remove the council’s ability to excuse absences. Ballot Question 9: Removal from Office via Magistrate Hearing - Explanation: A "yes" vote would allow removal of a council member for intentional, willful, flagrant, or continuous violations of the charter or adopted rules, after an independent magistrate hearing. A "no" vote leaves no removal provision for those violations. - Discussion: Councilmembers raised concerns about potential conflicts with Question 6 and 7. City Attorney Evans noted that if conflicting provisions pass, the council would need to reconcile them later. The magistrate would be a retained attorney meeting state qualifications. Ballot Question 10: Charter Review Every Five Years - Explanation: Currently, a full charter review is required every 10 years. A "yes" vote changes that to every five years. A "no" vote keeps the 10-year cycle. - Clarification: Council can still convene a review committee at any time, even under the 10-year requirement. If passed, the next required review would be in 2030 (five years after the 2025 review). Public Comments & Testimony - Jonathan McCoachy argued that the focus on financial benefit (as expressed by a Charter Review Committee member) is misplaced; a city’s success is measured by quality of life, environment, and opportunities, not quarterly profits. - Mary (previous speaker) reiterated that non-profits like the yacht clubs provide social benefits (free youth sailing, Sea Scouts) that would be lost if lease terms or costs become unfavorable. - Laura Oldaney (9th Ave S) urged consideration of fiscal pragmatism: the city lost casino revenue from the hurricane and faces potential property tax cuts from the state; the yacht club and marina are important revenue sources, so changes should be weighed carefully. - Another speaker corrected the misconception that current leases are $1/year; she noted they are now $2,000 per month. Key Outcomes - No votes were taken; the meeting was purely informational. - The city clerk reminded the public of upcoming election deadlines: voter registration deadline February 9, mail ballot request deadline February 26. Ballots have already been mailed; residents should re-request if their prior request expired in 2024. - Council members emphasized that they cannot advocate for any position; voters will decide on the ten questions.

The Gulfport City Council met on Tuesday, February 3, 2026, at 6:00 p.m. to discuss a downtown traffic, parking, and speed limit proposal; consider several ordinances and resolutions; and hear public comments on a range of topics including ICE cooperation, city inclusivity, and charter review referendums. The meeting included a proclamation, a presentation from the Mayor, and council actions on lighting regulations, advisory committees, and an inclusivity resolution. Proclamation - National 211 Day: Mayor Karen Love proclaimed February 11, 2026, as National 211 Day in Gulfport, recognizing the role of 211 services in providing referrals and support. Councilmember Jackson presented the proclamation to representatives from First Contact. Presentation: Downtown Traffic Flow, Parking, and Speed Limits - Mayor Love presented an unscientific but extensive plan developed over 10–12 years of community input. Key proposals: - Convert several downtown streets to one‑way: 54th St. southbound, 56th St. northbound; 29th and 31st Avenues eastbound; 30th and Dalette Avenues westbound; Shore Blvd. from 54th to Beach Blvd. one‑way. - Reconfigure parking by using angled parking, adding handicap and golf cart spaces, and opening 253 resident‑only restricted spots on side streets west of Beach Blvd. to all users. - Reduce speed limits on Beach, Shore, 54th, and 56th to 20 mph. - Add four new 15‑minute parking spots at 29th Ave., Dillette Ave., Essex Ave., and near Neptune’s/Tommy’s. - Councilmember Jackson suggested implementing small pieces quickly (e.g., speed study, bike racks, golf cart parking) to gain early wins. - Council reached consensus to hold a public workshop on March 26, 2026, to present the full plan and gather community input. Public Comments & Testimony - Jennifer Donch (Premier Dr. S.) urged the council to schedule regular workshops on non‑council meeting weeks to allow deeper discussion and more public comment. - Charlotte Downey submitted an open letter asking the council to affirm that police officers are not required to participate in ICE actions that violate civil or constitutional rights; she noted a 287(g) agreement exists. - Mr. Lee (no address given) expressed frustration over alleged city inaction on discrimination complaints, stating he had been “weaponized against” and accused the council of being “phony white people”; he referenced a deposition and said his business had not been allowed to open. - Lewis Stevens (Kingdom Changer Church) introduced himself as the pastor of a new church behind Boca Ciega High School and offered partnership with the city for a daycare and youth center. - Laura Oldaney (9th Ave. S.) asked the council to ensure that future agreements like the ICE 287(g) document are not signed without resident awareness and council discussion. - Eileen (Tangerine Ave. S.) reported on the Senior Center Foundation’s successful casino night and upcoming events (comedy show, Leslie Smith show) to fund renovations. - Jennifer Webb (17th Ave. S.) announced upcoming Merchant Chamber events: Mademoiselle Paris ribbon cutting (Feb. 5), Fine Arts Festival (Feb. 14–15), monthly art exhibit (Feb. 21), Pink Flamingo tour of homes (Feb. 28). - Amy Costa (28th Ave. S.) noted that the “For the Love of Gulfport” event was rescheduled to March 1 due to weather, and promoted a concert at Wonder Works on Feb. 12. - Kate (no address) expressed gratitude for the upcoming ICE workshop and invited all to a One City Chorus concert on Feb. 22. - Wolfgang Dininger (Beachway Park 6th Pl. S.) announced Lincoln Cemetery cleanup (Feb. 7, 8–10 a.m.) and Gulfport Grassroots’ Beyond the Beach cleanup (Feb. 14, 9–11 a.m.). - Beth Birkabine (56th St.) and Dilly Jacoby (49th St. S.) both expressed concerns about two upcoming charter review referendums regarding leases and fair market value, fearing they could harm long‑standing non‑profit tenants. They requested more public information before the Feb. 5 workshop. - E‑comments (two public): Deborah Schufs accused the mayor of withholding public records; Margaret Tober asked about delinquent marina accounts and incorrect utility invoicing. Council Comments & Reports - Councilmember Burley: Reported on the Fusion 49th meeting – Safe Streets program beginning with short‑term projects (LED conversion, trail enhancements, intersection improvements) and no immediate speed reductions. - Councilmember Early: Updated on the Gulfport Environmental Team’s tree‑measuring initiative, aiming to inventory public trees by May; residents invited to volunteer. Also requested permit data from the city manager (deferred to next meeting). - Councilmember Shaw: Visited the senior center (104th birthday celebration). Reported senior interest in the 5.67‑acre property, requests for GEMS/looper transportation to council meetings, a bocce ball court sign, status of the Lions Club building appraisal, and updates on mooring balls. City Manager responded: bocce court signs will be ordered; senior center expansion presentation on March 3; appraisal on Feb. 17 agenda. - Mayor Love: Recapped trip to Tallahassee: multiple tax bills under consideration, SB 840 (easing storm‑related permitting restrictions) gaining support. Reported that Diston Elementary School is likely to close at year‑end, with more closures possible in 2027. Announced a February 26 workshop (4 p.m.) dedicated to ICE issues. Clarified that the Feb. 5 charter review workshop is informational, not advocacy. Requested and received consensus to allow Priscilla Kidder to present a living‑shoreline grant proposal at the Feb. 17 meeting. Consent Calendar - Meeting Minutes from January 20, 2026, approved unanimously. Discussion Items - Ordinance 2026‑02 (First Reading) – Residential Lighting Nuisance: Amends Chapter 12 to classify certain outdoor lighting as a nuisance. Debate focused on vagueness of terms (“safety purposes,” “reasonable lighting”). Councilmember Early and Jackson expressed concerns that the ordinance does not address intensity or height; City Manager explained this is a first step, with a more detailed ordinance (settings lumens, wattage, height) to follow. After public comment (including concerns about light pollution and HOA feel), the ordinance passed 3–2 (Early, Jackson dissenting). - Resolution 2026‑06 – Sunsetting Senior Citizens Advisory Committee: Unanimously approved (5‑0). The committee will be reconstituted under rules that allow private discussions, similar to the former Teen Council. - Resolution 2026‑07 – Affirming Commitment as an All‑Inclusive City: Councilmember Shaw and the city attorney crafted the resolution to reaffirm the Human Rights Ordinance and acknowledge past history. Public comment objected to the term “all‑inclusive” (should be “inclusive”) and called for tangible displays (signs, doors). Council amended the title and text by striking “all‑” (motion approved). The resolution passed 4–1, with Vice Mayor Thanos dissenting. Key Outcomes - Downtown Plan: Consensus to hold a public workshop on March 26, 2026 to gather input on the Mayor’s one‑way street, parking, and speed reduction proposals. - Lighting Ordinance: Passed first reading (3‑2). City attorney to prepare a more detailed second ordinance addressing brightness and height. - Senior Advisory Committee: Sunset and reconstitution approved unanimously. - Inclusivity Resolution: Adopted with amendment (4–1); staff instructed to correct language to “inclusive city.” - Future Agenda Items: Councilmember Shaw’s requests to discuss senior transportation (GEMS/looper) and Tangerine Avenue one‑way survey were added to a future agenda by consensus. - Upcoming Workshops: February 5 (charter review), February 26 (ICE/287(g)), March 26 (downtown plan).

The meeting opened with a special presentation honoring Francine Winton for 34 years of volunteer leadership with Operation Santa. The council then heard from Cheryl Holzbacher of the Homeless Leadership Alliance on the state of homelessness in Pinellas County, followed by a bike safety video from Police Chief Mary Farron. The majority of the evening was devoted to public comments and discussion on the city’s 287G agreement with ICE, which had been signed administratively without council review. The council also addressed a variety of consent items, an ordinance on certified recovery residences, a conditional use application for a church, and discussion items on lighting, e-bikes, and an inclusivity resolution. Consent Calendar - Consent items (6A–6C): Approved (with one vote opposed after initial roll call, later described as unanimous). Items included approval of meeting minutes (January 6, 2026), resolution authorizing purchase of AMI gateway equipment from Neptune Technology Group, and resolution authorizing a contract with Kern’s Communications for AMI pole installation. Public Comments & Testimony - 287G Agreement with ICE: Numerous residents spoke in opposition to the agreement, urging the council to rescind it. Speakers expressed concern that the agreement undermines trust in local police, could lead to racial profiling, and diverts city resources. Several noted that the agreement was signed without public input or council vote. One speaker (Amy Trippy) requested a workshop to review the agreement. Others cited the murder of Renee Good as an example of ICE violence. A few speakers also raised concerns about the constitutionality of the agreement. - GABBER Newspaper Funding: Several residents urged the council to maintain full advertising funding for the local independent newspaper, the GABBER, rather than directing funds to a glossy out‑of‑state publication (Gulfport Living). They argued that the GABBER is essential for local democracy and community information. - Lincoln Cemetery & Sundown History: Mary Winstead and others spoke about Gulfport’s history as a “sundown town” and called on the council to acknowledge that history. A speaker also raised concerns about the annexation deed for Lincoln Cemetery not being dated. - Other Comments: Donovan Nickel provided updates on e‑bike legislation and safety studies. Scott Lindy (Merchants Chamber) promoted upcoming events (Fine Arts Festival, Pink Flamingo Home Tour). Wolfgang Diringer reported on cleanup efforts (242 lbs of trash collected on January 10). Several speakers supported the church conditional use, while one (Linda Bailey) opposed it, citing parking and zoning issues. Discussion Items - Lighting Ordinance (Draft): Council discussed a draft nuisance lighting ordinance. Members expressed concerns about subjective language (e.g., “aesthetically pleasing”) and wanted to address light intensity and height. Consensus was to proceed with a narrower nuisance ordinance (prohibiting light shining onto adjacent properties and rights‑of‑way) and to develop a more comprehensive lighting ordinance later covering illumination, wattage, and height. - E‑Bike Ordinance: The council voted to table the e‑bike ordinance pending state legislation (House Bill 4243) that may preempt local rules. - Inclusivity Resolution: The council reviewed a resolution reaffirming the city’s commitment to non‑discrimination and inclusion. Members agreed to add language acknowledging the city’s history of discrimination (including as a sundown town). Councilmember Shaw proposed two specific clauses; the group favored: “Recognizes the importance of acknowledging our history, including moments when discrimination or exclusion occurred as an essential step in strengthening trust, healing, and building a more just and welcoming community.” Staff was directed to incorporate that language. - Mayor’s Discussion – Downtown Planning: Mayor Love summarized past community meetings (Gulfport 2050, etc.) and previewed a future presentation on parking and traffic flow changes in the downtown area. Key Outcomes - Approved: Resolution 2026‑04 (FEMA Community Disaster Loan authorization – $5 million line of credit) – unanimous. - Approved: Ordinance 2026‑01 (first reading, certified recovery residences) – unanimous. - Approved: Resolution 2026‑05 (conditional use for church at 54th St) – 4‑1 (Vice Mayor Thanos opposed). - Direction to Staff: - Revise lighting ordinance to focus on nuisance provisions; later develop comprehensive ordinance. - Table e‑bike ordinance pending state action. - Add historical acknowledgement language to inclusivity resolution. - Workshop Planned: Council agreed to schedule a workshop/forum on the 287G agreement and ICE cooperation, gathering additional documentation and community input. A date will be set within the next month. - No Action: The 287G agreement remains in place; the council did not take a vote to rescind it. - Note: City Manager and Police Chief clarified that the 287G agreement was signed administratively in February 2025 per governor’s directive. Seven officers completed 40 hours of online training at no cost to the city. The city has not had any ICE interactions or arrests under the agreement.

City Council convened a workshop on January 8, 2026, to gather public input regarding the future redevelopment of the former Lions Club and Coast Guard station properties in the Gulfport marina district. The meeting was explicitly non-decisional; Mayor and Council members adopted the role of active listeners to shape the upcoming process as the buildings, which contain asbestos and storm damage, are scheduled for demolition in January. The city noted that while a living shoreline project was paused during storms, it remains under control pending a submerged land lease. The session focused on balancing the unique needs of yacht clubs, boat launching, flood mitigation, and public access without commercialization. Consent Calendar - No consent calendar items were discussed or voted upon, as the Mayor and Council clarified that no votes or binding decisions would occur during this workshop session. Public Comments & Testimony - Beth Birkabine (BCYC): Expressed support for retaining the small boat launch area for youth sailing programs. She stated that the beach-style launch is essential for small boats that cannot use hoists, noting that BCYC members have historically maintained and funded this area. She urged the city to formally recognize shared access for BCYC and Gulfport Yacht Club. - Christine Crosby: Stated full support for preserving the launch area as a unique spot for teaching children to sail, highlighting personal experiences with grandchildren learning at the site. - Chuck: Expressed support for keeping the area for marine use only and preserving the beach launch. He voiced opposition to introducing vehicular traffic or developments that would cause congestion, citing the narrow infrastructure and environmental concerns in the adjacent mangroves. - Paula Duby: Expressed support for opening the beach to the general public for non-motorized small boats (sailboats, kayaks, paddleboards) while maintaining caution regarding power boat safety due to the area's role as a "hurricane hole" and birthing area for manatees. - Judy Kuhn: Expressed support for retaining the boat launch and advocated for redesigning the parking lot and former building site with salt-tolerant native plants and permeable surfaces to mitigate flooding in the flood zone. - Guy O'Connor (BCYC representative): Expressed support for the city to formally recognize and guarantee shared access for BCYC and Gulfport Yacht Club, including limited on-site storage. He supported expansion of the dry storage lot as an income stream but discouraged significant new paving or motorized infrastructure. - Jonathan McCoachy: Expressed support for a marine-focused, low-impact green space. He proposed forming a Marine Advisory Committee and suggested exploring educational partnerships (e.g., Tampa Bay Watch, USF). He expressed openness to adding restrooms but opposed heavy commercialization. - John Hogan: Expressed support for a small bar and grill to serve transient boaters and neighbors, arguing it would be a revenue generator with manageable parking, suggesting it could coexist with the small boat launch. - Joel Hine (Boca Siega Yacht Club): Expressed support for the maintenance of access for small boats by partnering with sailing clubs. He argued that membership-based programs are responsible managers who carry liability and ensure safety, comparing them to community centers. - Bob Fechner (Gulfport Yacht Club): Expressed support for retaining access for small boat launches (catamarans, monohulls) for club racing and regattas. He emphasized the affordability of the club and the necessity of the launch area for launching boats that cannot use docks. - Fred Fortis: Expressed support for preserving the unique status of the area for hand-launching catamarans, distinguishing it from large sailboat and power boat docks. He expressed concern that full public development would increase city costs and security issues. - Kimberly McAllenis: Expressed support for environmental impact mitigation and public access, emphasizing the need to prioritize safety given recent hurricane devastation. She noted that the area serves as a critical habitat for wildlife. - Albert Risenberg: Expressed support for opening the space to the general public rather than keeping it exclusive to yacht clubs. He advocated for a park-like setting with permeable surfaces and opposed construction that would require high elevation due to flood zones. - Paula (Resident): Expressed support for a marine council and public small craft access. She voiced strong opposition to a restaurant or grill due to existing traffic congestion on Delevio Way, stating commercial traffic would be devastating to her neighborhood. - Karen Schwartz: Expressed support for a low-impact, permeable design with no permanent buildings, suggesting the use of portable restrooms and food trucks instead to minimize storm risk and traffic. - Lenny Gokenheimer: Expressed support for portable, elevated restrooms and a council to manage the area. He advocated for a balance between access and rule enforcement. - Debra Atkins: Expressed opposition to commercialization like a Ferris wheel, pool, or dock park. She voiced support for a public launch but emphasized environmental impact and traffic concerns, particularly from boater vehicles. - Lauren Stern (Gulf Park Coastline Coalition): Expressed support for depaving, rewilding, and designating the area as a wildlife release site. She advocated for trailer-style portable restrooms. - Julie Jacoby: Expressed support for allowing yacht clubs to utilize the beach for launches while acknowledging the need for parking and security. She expressed opposition to a restaurant and concerns about increasing traffic. - Margaret Tober (Written): Proposed demolition of the building to create either a living shoreline or selling the property. - Brian Durr (Written): Expressed support for a dog beach, public park, and kayak storage. He opposed an amphitheater, hotel, or commercial property, and opposed selling the land. He suggested covered picnic pavilions and a dog beach on the Lions Club site. - General Consensus Points: Multiple speakers supported a Marine Advisory Committee, opposed heavy commercialization (hotel, mall, Ferris wheel), and advocated for permeable surfaces or green infrastructure to manage flooding and preserve wildlife habitat. Discussion Items - Building Demolition & Timeline: The Mayor confirmed the Lions Club lease expired and the Coast Guard station is also being demolished due to asbestos and flood damage. Demolition is planned for January once market value appraisals are delivered to finalize the buyout. - Marina Lease & Permits: The Vice Mayor and Council discussed the process for the South Basin lease. The City Manager indicated that the process is delayed by the need for submerged land leases and federal permitting, which are taking longer due to resource constraints, but the project is moving forward. - Restrooms & Amenities: Council members discussed various restroom solutions ranging from permanent structures to elevated mobile trailers or portable units. The Mayor noted existing plumbing infrastructure but prioritized cost-effectiveness. The concept of food trucks was raised as an alternative to building a permanent bar and grill to avoid flooding construction costs. - Marine Advisory Committee: Several council members and residents proposed forming a Marine Advisory Committee to guide the development. The Mayor advised that if the group is public, it must comply with Sunshine Laws, and suggested consulting with the City Attorney to determine the appropriate structure. - Flood Mitigation & Green Infrastructure: Strong discussion centered on using the redevelopment to mitigate flooding through the planting of salt-tolerant natives (mangroves, palmetto) and replacing asphalt with permeable surfaces. The area's role as a "hurricane hole" for manatees was highlighted as a conservation priority. - Commercialization: The Mayor and Councilmembers noted that local businesses do not want competition and expressed skepticism regarding a new bar and grill or hotel. The consensus leaned heavily toward a passive park and small boat access rather than intensive commercial use. Key Outcomes - No Vote Taken: The Mayor and Council explicitly stated that no votes or decisions were made regarding the property's future use; the meeting was strictly for gathering input. - Next Steps: The Council plans to receive the final appraisal for the Lions Club buyout and will return to council to clarify the issue. The South Basin lease bid is scheduled to go out within the next two weeks. - Demolition Order: The council confirmed that both the Lions Club and Coast Guard buildings are to be demolished, with work likely commencing in January. - Consensus Identified: The Vice Mayor noted a high degree of consensus (estimated at 75-85%) among residents for a low-impact, publicly accessible small boat launch area with minimal paving and no major commercial buildings.

The planning and zoning board convened on January 7, 2026, to address a quasi-judicial conditional use application for a new church use on a subdivided property and a legislative state-mandated ordinance for certified recovery residences. The board heard testimony regarding parking adequacies and property history for the church application, as well as potential density and compliance issues for recovery facilities. After deliberation, the board recommended approval of the church application with specific conditions regarding parking and shared use agreements, and unanimously recommended the adoption of the recovery residence ordinance with provisions for site plan review. Consent Calendar - Board unanimously moved to approve the minutes from the June 4, 2025 meeting, with a single correction changing the meeting name from "regular meeting" to "planning and zoning committee." - Board unanimously moved to excuse Alternate Board Member Bixler from the proceedings. Public Comments & Testimony - Bailey (Concerned Resident): Expressed strong opposition to the church application. Bailey argued that the 90-foot wide parcel provides insufficient parking (approx. 10 spots) to meet the code requirements for a church with 45 seats (requiring 15 spots) or an educational use (requiring 20+ spots). Bailey stated that the historical "grandfathering" of parking is insufficient given the recent subdivision and the potential for simultaneous or overlapping use with the neighboring school, creating a traffic safety hazard. - David Kohler (Resident, Property Backer Neighbor): Expressed opposition to the application. Kohler requested clarification on the scope of activities allowed for a "church," specifically regarding non-spiritual events like weddings. He voiced concern that designating the property solely as a church might be a mechanism used by developers to bypass restrictions on event spaces that the neighborhood opposed. He stated he is "against it" because he needs assurance that the use will remain strictly spiritual and not evolve into a broader event complex that would increase parking demands and noise. Discussion Items Application C25-02: Quick Shaft USA LLC (Vision Disciples of Ministry) - City Staff Presentation: Presented history of the 1958 church use, its transition to a preschool, and the 2024 property subdivision. Staff noted the building is exempt from new parking requirements due to its pre-1985 construction but acknowledged the applicant must satisfy competency for a parking solution. The proposed use involves religious services and training with an occupancy of 45 seats. - Board Deliberation on Church Use: - Board members expressed support for the historical continuity of the site as a church, noting neighbors were aware of the use when purchasing homes. - Significant concerns were raised regarding the lack of on-site parking (currently fenced off) and the potential conflict with the adjacent Sunflower School. Members questioned whether the applicant could be restricted from expanding hours or adding event uses that would exceed parking capacity. - It was noted that the applicant was absent from the meeting, preventing direct answers regarding parking logistics and operational hours. - Board members discussed the feasibility of a "shared use" or "parking agreement" with Sunflower School to allow non-conflicting use of lots, or the maximization of any available on-site space. - The board decided to recommend approval subject to resolving these parking and operational clarity issues before City Council. Recommendations included requiring a defined parking plan (whether through site improvements or shared agreements) and ensuring operational hours do not conflict with the school. Proposed Ordinance: Certified Recovery Residences (Section 22-6S14) - City Staff Presentation: Explained that this is a state-mandated ordinance requiring the city to allow certified recovery residences in all zoning districts, provided they meet existing land development code standards (setbacks, coverage, fire code). Staff noted the lack of specific state guidance on density, defining four levels of care, and the need to create a new administrative application process for sites and conditions. - Board Deliberation on Recovery Residences: - Board members expressed concerns regarding potential high-density occupancy in single-family homes and the lack of clear occupancy limits or parking standards in the state mandate. - Members supported the implementation of the ordinance but stressed the need to ensure compliance with fire codes and local zoning regulations through a rigorous site plan review process involving the Fire Department. - Discussed the potential for for-profit entities driving the placement of these facilities and the impact on property values (referencing a neighbor in St. Pete whose property tax increased significantly after building an ADU). - The board noted that while they cannot prohibit the use, they must ensure reasonable conditions are attached to prevent nuisance or safety hazards. Other Business - The board discussed the complexities of calculating residential density, specifically the interaction between land use categories, zoning districts, and the high-hazard flood zones, noting the difficulty in determining submerged land area for city size calculations. - Reminder issued regarding the deadline (July 1) for filing financial disclosure forms (Form 1) for Board Members to avoid fines. Key Outcomes - Application C25-02: Moved to approve the conditional use application for Vision Disciples of Ministry subject to conditions requiring: (1) a defined plan for sufficient parking (including potential shared use agreements with Sunflower School or site improvements) and (2) confirmation that operating hours will not conflict with the adjacent school. The recommendation includes a directive for the applicant to address these specific concerns at the City Council hearing scheduled for January 20, 2026. - Vote Count: Motion passed unanimously (5 Yes, 0 No). - Ordinance Recommendation: Moved to approve the proposed ordinance amending Section 22-6S14 for Certified Recovery Residences, with a recommendation that the City Council require a site plan approval process involving the Fire Department to ensure compliance with occupancy and parking standards. No vote tally recorded as it was a recommendation passed without objection. - Next Steps: The church application is recommended for City Council consideration on January 20 at 6:00 PM, with board concerns explicitly noted for the applicant to address. City staff are to develop an application process for certified recovery residences based on the board's input. Board Members are reminded to complete Form 1 by July 1.

The City of Gulfport held its first meeting of 2026, featuring the Holiday Decor awards presentation, reports from the Senior Advisory Committee, and a detailed review of the city's three-year vulnerability assessment alongside a watershed management plan update. The council also addressed public comments regarding resiliency strategies, discussed potential rezoning for affordable housing, and recognized local community efforts including the Operation Santa program and recent grant awards. Consent Calendar - Ratification of meeting minutes from December 2nd and December 16th, 2025 (unanimous). - Resolution 2026-01 passed authorizing the City Manager to enter an interlocal agreement with the City of St. Petersburg for intersection improvements along the 49th Street corridor, funded in part by the federal Safe Streets Program grant ($800,000 awarded, with Gulfport budgeting $500,000 for a $1.25M total project). Public Comments & Testimony - Dean Hay (Gulfport Environmental Team) announced the team's launch and the upcoming first volunteer tree inventory training on January 17th; he expressed support for community-enhanced natural balance projects. - Laura Oldaney expressed concern regarding the speed and reality of climate projections, requesting a community reckoning with 2040 maps specifically rather than jumping to 2100 scenarios; she questioned the viability of renovating existing coastal assets like the casino and recreation center under rising sea levels. - Bob (resident) expressed support for the presentation's data but raised concerns about the timeline for grants, noting the need for temporary emergency measures like rental pumps to address immediate flooding risks in the southwest low-line area during the transition period. Discussion Items Senior Advisory Committee Report: - Karen Schwartz and Brad Brunner highlighted the success of the "Discover Gulfport" walking trail system, noting the launch of the Red and Yellow trails, the addition of signage, and community engagement. Brad expressed full support for the project's accessibility and noted the involvement of multiple city departments and the Senior Center staff in its execution. - The committee formally requested that the council consider allowing Resolution 92-12 to sunset, citing difficulties in maintaining a quorum, complications regarding Sunshine Law compliance, and a desire for more efficient collaboration. City Council expressed interest in reviewing the pros and cons with the City Attorney. - Vice Mayor Thanos suggested collaborating with the Florida League of Cities to feature the trail system as a model for other municipalities; Councilmember Jackson and the Chair expressed support for utilizing grants for future enhancements like QR codes and physical brochures. Vulnerability Assessment & Watershed Management (Advanced Engineering): - Justin Keller and Cody Stewart presented findings from the 3-year vulnerability assessment, distinguishing it from the Watershed Management Plan (WMP) by emphasizing the VA's focus on extreme long-term scenarios (2040–2100) versus the WMP's immediate stormwater readiness. - Cody Stewart presented exposure analysis indicating worst-case sea level rise (2100 Intermediate High) could impact up to 32% of the city, with storm surge scenarios potentially covering 73% of the area if no action is taken; he expressed support for using the "C-Score" methodology to prioritize assets based on submersibility, essentiality, and amplitude rather than just flood depth. - Justin Keller clarified that while stormwater pump stations are not currently recommended as primary fixes due to uncontrolled upstream runoff, they remain an option for future adaptation strategies if upstream controls are first implemented; he expressed support for maintaining compliance with FDEP to secure future implementation grants. - Council members (Shaw, Early, Love) questioned the necessity of a new study given the current WMP data, the timeline for grant implementation (likely 2028 for projects), and the potential for the study to include fire and wind risks, which the engineers confirmed are not the focus of this specific state-mandated study. Affordable Housing & Rezoning Discussion: - Vice Mayor Thanos proposed rezoning all R1 zones to R2 to facilitate the construction of duplexes and triplexes, expressing support for increasing affordable housing stock by allowing density on existing lots regardless of size, provided setbacks and height are met; she noted that many existing smaller duplexes are currently non-conforming. - Mayor Love and Councilmembers Shaw and Early raised concerns, expressing opposition to prioritizing this rezoning over the more immediate implementation of Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs). They argued that the proposal lacks clear resident demand, could increase staff workload without guaranteed affordability without additional regulatory steps, and might face community resistance regarding neighborhood character. - The council agreed to defer the rezoning initiative until further consensus is reached, prioritizing the completion of the ADU ordinance process. Sunset City Statement: - Councilmember Shaw requested that the city issue a formal statement or apology acknowledging Gulfport's history as a "sundown city," arguing that acknowledging past systemic exclusion is necessary for healing. Conversely, Councilmembers Jackson, Early, and Mayor Love expressed reservations, stating the current Human Rights Ordinance already serves as a strong declaration of welcome and that an apology might imply an institutional endorsement of past behaviors that the council did not codify at the time. - The council agreed to ask the City Attorney to draft a statement that acknowledges the historical context of excluded practices while affirming the city's current and future commitment to diversity and inclusion, to be reviewed individually before a final vote. Key Outcomes - Grant Awards Confirmed: City Manager Nichols reported the successful awarding of an $800,000 federal grant for the 49th Street Corridor safety improvements and a perfect score (100) for the city's NFIP compliance regarding elevation certification. - Operation Santa Recognition: Chief Farron reported the program serviced 352 children from 152 families; Council unanimously recommended Francine Whitten for the "Spirit of Gulfport" Award. - Permit Fee Waiver Inquiry: Council asked City Staff to investigate the potential for waiving permit fees for homeowners (specifically homesteaded properties) who are demolishing and rebuilding post-disaster and had not responded to initial outreach by the June 1st cutoff; Staff will analyze the financial impact on the permit contractor and return with criteria. - Upcoming Events: Council approved a town hall for January 17th at the Neighborhood Center (tree inventory), waived fees for the League of Women Voters candidate forum on January 29th, and announced a town hall on February 17th regarding the Marina (formerly Lions Club) property. - Next Steps: City Attorney to draft the sundown history statement; Staff to provide a list of active demolition permits to inform the fee waiver discussion; Staff to continue developing the ADU ordinance as the primary housing strategy; Council to schedule a future discussion on the R1 to R2 rezoning proposal.

The Gulfport City Council convened on December 16, 2025, for a holiday-season meeting marked by the passing of former Councilmember Michael Frodovich. The session featured a significant state grant award for stormwater mitigation, extensive public testimony regarding business signage, homelessness, and the de-annexation of Lincoln Cemetery, and strategic discussions on traffic safety, zoning changes, and tree inventory technology. The Council unanimously approved resolutions for the potable water storm mitigation project, municipal telephone system upgrades, and a new street sweeping contract with the City of St. Petersburg. Key outcomes included directing staff to research potential density increases in residential zones and establishing a timeline for a public forum with stakeholders regarding the cemetery dispute. Consent Calendar - Disaster Debris Removal: Unanimously approved Resolution 2025-106 (authorizing an interlocal agreement for disaster debris collection) and Resolution 2025-107 (designating collection responsibilities within Pinellas County). Councilmember Shaw requested these items be removed from the consent calendar for open discussion, which was agreed upon. (Note: These items were subsequently voted on as Discussion Items). - Telephone System Upgrade: The Council removed Resolution 2025-104 (authorizing the agreement with TeleVoo IPS for municipal telephone upgrades) from the consent calendar for further discussion before voting on it later in the meeting. - Street Sweeping: The Council removed Resolution 2025-105 (authorizing an agreement with the City of St. Petersburg for street sweeping) from the consent calendar for a request from Councilmember Shaw for a presentation on scheduling and procedures. (Note: This item was subsequently voted on as a Discussion Item). Public Comments & Testimony - Amy Costa (Midtown Business Collective): Expressed strong support for small businesses and requested an open discussion regarding changes to the advertising and signage ordinance. She noted that current ordinances prevent small businesses with cottage-style facades from displaying visible signage, hindering visibility for downtown shoppers. - Unnamed Veteran (Homeless): Expressed opposition to the prioritization of ordinance enforcement over environmental cleanliness and the treatment of the homeless. He detailed grievances regarding overfilled ashtrays and disarray at Beachway Park. He strongly opposed what he perceived as micromanagement and coercion of the homeless population, asserting his dignity as a 20-year decorated veteran. - Carrie Nelson (Ward 3, Stetson area): Expressed full support for recent community events, specifically the Santa Rampage Parade, and praised the ongoing roadway improvements in Ward 3. She wished the city a happy holiday season. - Mary Henrahan (League of Women Voters): Requested city support (facility use and volunteer coordination) to host a nonpartisan candidate forum by the League of Women Voters during the upcoming municipal election season to ensure a fair and peaceful election. - Julie Armstrong (Private Resident): Reported that she had organized a recurring quarterly art exhibit in the council chambers via a partnership with the City Clerk's office. She announced the first theme would be "dogs" and plans to launch a social media campaign in mid-January. - Wolfgang Dininger (Beachway Park/Gulfport Grassroots): Provided statistics on the "Beyond the Beach" cleanup (2,105 lbs of trash collected this year) and announced upcoming events, including a joint cleanup with Eckerd College and a new "Swap and Drop" event in April. He expressed optimism regarding the continued partnership with the environmental group. - Courtney Prokopis (Private Resident): Urged the Council to support a resolution seeking consent for the de-annexation of Lincoln Cemetery. She framed the de-annexation as a moral imperative and a necessary step for accountability and reconciliation regarding historical actions by the City of St. Petersburg. - Lenny Gukenheimer (Private Resident): Requested an update on the status of the City Charter review and referendum questions. - Lauren Sternward (Private Resident): Expressed full support for the de-annexation of the cemetery, echoing the sentiments of previous speakers regarding the wishes of the ancestors and descendants. - Bob Canning (Private Resident): Highlighted concerns regarding property tax increases for caregivers, citing a specific case where taxes jumped from $1,100 to $11,800 after a grandmother's death, and sought clarification on how the city handles such tax burdens. Discussion Items - State Funding Presentation: State Representative Linda Cheney presented a check for $1.3 million for the Gulfport Potable Water Proactive Storm Mitigation Project. She praised the legislative battle to secure funding amidst a $107.4 billion state budget with significant veto threats. She also announced a proposed $3 million appropriation for road safety/flooding and a $2.5 million appropriation for the senior center for the upcoming fiscal year. - Lincoln Cemetery De-annexation: The Council discussed the request to de-annex Lincoln Cemetery, which St. Petersburg has already resolved to support. The City Attorney noted the conflict regarding who initiated the request, citing a private conversation with Pastor Williams (owner) who stated he had not yet requested de-annexation. Vice Mayor Thanos and Councilmember Shaw expressed concern that the City of Gulfport is being used as political fodder for St. Petersburg's internal affairs. The consensus was supportive of initiating a direct meeting with Pastor Williams and Mayor Welch to clarify the owner's desire and the legal process before taking further action. - Telephone System Upgrade (Resolution 2025-104): City Staff presented the upgrade to a cloud-based VoIP system (TeleVoo IPS) to replace the aging physical server. City Manager O'Reilly supported the move as a necessary infrastructure update to maintain reliability during power outages and to eliminate legacy lines that will be discontinued by the state provider by March 2026. Councilmember Early expressed concern about the reliance on a single pre-approved vendor but acknowledged the qualifications-based procurement process. - Street Sweeper Contract (Resolution 2025-105): City Manager O'Reilly presented the new contract with the City of St. Petersburg, which offers a $1,300 monthly cost saving and includes parking lot sweeping. Councilmember Shaw expressed concern about scheduling and requested assurance that the City of St. Petersburg would coordinate with police to ensure residents are notified and cars are moved, as well as a commitment to sweeping on sanitation days. - Property Tax Transparency: Mayor Love presented a new website section explaining property tax breakdowns and a calculator tool. He praised the staff for translating complex tax bills into accessible information. - SB 180 and Land Development: Mayor Love requested staff to draft an ordinance to address light pollution and increase permeable coverage requirements from 20% to 25%. Councilmember Shaw supported the initiative and recommended that Planning and Zoning review the changes. - Zoning and Density: Mayor Love proposed having the Planning and Zoning Board research changing all R1 and R1A zones to allow duplexes or triplexes (R2/R3) to increase density, particularly in non-flood zones. Councilmember Early expressed strong opposition to moving forward with this research without more time for council deliberation, fearing it would waste staff time prematurely. Vice Mayor Thanos and Councilmember Shaw agreed to allow staff to research the implications and costs, with the understanding that no immediate action would be taken. - Tree Inventory: Councilmember Shaw proposed a consensus to purchase volunteer tree inventory software (costing $4,500/year) from a vendor identified by the tree committee. Vice Mayor Thanos and Councilmember Early supported the purchase, requesting the software be budgeted from the existing tree budget. - Sundown Town Resolution: Councilmember Shaw requested a public apology acknowledging Gulfport's history as a suspected sundown town. The City Manager clarified that while there is no official documentation proving the city was an official sundown town, he supported the concept of issuing a resolution stating that everyone is welcome now, suggesting a resolution be drafted for future consideration. Key Outcomes - Approval of $1.3 Million Grant: The Council unanimously approved Resolution 2025-108 to accept the Florida DEP grant for the Gulfport Potable Water Proactive Storm Mitigation Project. The project involves converting a dead-end water system in Town Shores to a looped system, with engineering costs deducted from the grant. - Approval of Engineering Contract: The Council unanimously approved Resolution 2025-109 authorizing Advanced Engineering to complete the design and permitting for the Town Shores water project. - Adoption of New Telephone System: The Council unanimously approved Resolution 2025-104 to enter into an agreement with TeleVoo IPS for municipal telephone system upgrades. The implementation is expected to take approximately three months. - Adoption of Street Sweeping Contract: The Council unanimously approved Resolution 2025-105 to contract the City of St. Petersburg for monthly curb street and parking lot sweeping, effective immediately. - E-Comment Policy: The Council directed the City Clerk to read only public comments from e-comment submissions where the commentator has identified themselves. They granted a two-meeting grace period for the public to adjust to the identification requirement before it becomes mandatory. - Ballot Ordering: The City Clerk conducted the lottery for the March 10, 2026, municipal election ballot order: Jennifer Dodge (Ward 1, 1st), Joe Gunther (Ward 1, 2nd); Jennifer Webb (Ward 3, 1st), Carrie Nelson (Ward 3, 2nd). - Charter Review: The Council agreed to hold a workshop on February 5th to review the charter referendum questions for the March ballot. - Future Direction: The Council directed staff to research the feasibility of light pollution ordinances, permeability changes, and zoning density increases (R1/R1A to R2/R3). They also directed staff to schedule a meeting with Pastor Williams regarding the Lincoln Cemetery de-annexation.