Public Meetings - Loudoun County, Virginia

The Finance, Government Operations, and Economic Development Committee (FGOEDC) of the Loudoun County Board of Supervisors met on October 14, 2025, to discuss economic development, capital projects, property tax methodology, affordable housing loans, a space strategy for the government center, budget development items, and healthcare services at the adult detention center. Several action items were approved on consent, and multiple votes were taken on affordable housing loan applications and a major facility relocation decision. Consent Calendar - Items 12, 13, 14, 15, and 20 were added to the consent agenda and approved unanimously (4-0-1, with Supervisor Umstadt off the dais): - Item 12: Proposed repeal of Chapter 888 (Real Estate Tax Classification for Surviving Spouses of Certain Persons Killed in the Line of Duty). - Item 13: Proposed amendments to Chapter 878 (Transient Occupancy Tax). - Item 14: Design endorsement for Arcola Quarters for the Enslaved (Dulles District). - Item 15: Design endorsement for Courts Complex Phase IV Renovation (Leesburg). - Item 20: Village of St. Louis Deferred Forgivable Loan Program (Little River District). - Other items on the consent agenda (e.g., Contract awards, bylaw amendments, Chapter 888 repeal, etc.) were approved without separate discussion. Discussion Items - Monthly Department of Economic Development Report (Item 1): Buddy Rizer reported on the economic impacts of the federal government shutdown, noting a modest but broad economic disruption. Virginia is one of the most affected states. Loudoun's unemployment rate ticked up to 3.6% in August, matching the state average. The “Launch Loudoun” program has engaged over 2,250 businesses. EDA Chair Angela Wilson updated on strategic priorities including entrepreneurship and affordable housing. Supervisor Randall expressed concern about the unemployment increase, noting it does not yet reflect recent buyouts and shutdown impacts. Rizer also highlighted a new “Loudoun Possible” section in the monthly report featuring success stories like Dyne Electric. - Quarterly Capital Improvement Projects Report (Items 2): Sherene Dorazio and Ernie Brown presented progress on 167 active CIP projects valued at $3.8 billion. Highlights included completion of the Sterling Recycling Center, the River Bend Stream restoration, and progress on the Crisis Receiving Center. 130 electric vehicle charging ports are now operational countywide, with 82 more planned. - Personal Property Tax Rates and Assessment Methodology (Items 4 & 5): Robert Wertz presented proposed changes for Tax Year 2026, including shifting to market-based valuations for vehicles, boats, and equipment. The methodology for new automobiles will change from 100% of cost to 95% of MSRP. Data center equipment depreciation schedules will be extended from 5 to 6 years, starting at 60% of cost. The changes will increase revenue for some classes (e.g., heavy equipment and machinery/tools) and decrease for others. Committee members expressed concern about the impact on small businesses, especially trucking companies facing potential doubling of assessed values. Wertz noted a communications plan will be developed. The item is slated for the November 6 Board of Supervisors meeting. - Affordable Multifamily Housing Loan Applications (Items 16-19): Four applications were considered: - Moorefield Station Apartments (Item 16): Staff recommended approval of a $19.3 million loan at 2% simple interest for 40 years to support 249 affordable units (30-70% AMI). Approved 4-0-1. - Stone Ridge Towns (Item 17): Staff recommended denial due to low leverage ratio, insufficient deeply affordable units, and lack of on-site services. The committee voted to not approve the $1.08 million loan (4-0-1). - Overlook at Broadlands Apartments (Item 18): Staff recommended denial (score 67.86 vs. 75 threshold). Committee voted not to approve the $6.9 million loan (4-0-1). - Village at Clear Springs Apartments (Item 19): Despite a high staff score (86.86), the leverage ratio (1:0.73) was deemed too low. The committee voted 3-1-1 to not approve but to waive the application deadline to allow resubmission under the new attainable housing program. - Space Strategy Update – Leesburg Government Center (Item 21): Staff presented two options: Option 1 (remain in Leesburg at the Government Support Center campus) and Option 2 (relocate east near a Metro station). The committee voted 4-0-1 to pursue Option 2, directing staff to develop partnership options for a 300,000-400,000 sq ft government center east of Leesburg, with costs and timing to be included in a future CIP. - FY 2027 Budget Development Items (Items 22-24): Presentations were given on service levels for Animal Services, Economic Development, and General Services; transmittal of town capital project requests totaling $90 million; and service models for healthcare and psychiatry at the Adult Detention Center. No votes were taken, but guidance was provided. Key Outcomes - Consent Agenda approved (4-0-1). - Moorefield Station Apartments loan recommended for approval (4-0-1). - Stone Ridge Towns loan recommended for denial (4-0-1). - Overlook at Broadlands Apartments loan recommended for denial (4-0-1). - Village at Clear Springs Apartments loan recommended for denial but with a waiver to resubmit (3-1-1; Supervisor Laterno opposed, Supervisor Umstadt absent). - Government Center relocation to east near Metro directed (4-0-1). - Personal property tax methodology changes to be presented to full Board in November. - Budget development items received as informational; staff will continue preparations for FY 2027.

Note: The agenda and transcript consistently refer to this meeting as October 2, 2025, creating a discrepancy with the user-provided date of October 9, 2025. The summary below follows the actual content of the meeting as recorded on October 2. The Facility Standards Manual Public Review Committee (FSM PRC) met to discuss updates to recent DOAM amendments, continued work on floodplain amendments to FSM Chapters 5 and 8, and an update on the 10-year private road reserve fund. Consent Calendar - The committee approved the minutes of the September 11, 2025 meeting as amended, changing the phrase "whether there isn't an internal" to "interim procedure." The motion passed unanimously. Discussion Items - DOAM-2025-0002 Update: Staff reported that the package—including the fourth zoning warrant to rewrite interim standards tech memos (chapters 7 and 8), the chapter 6 preliminary soils review timeline change from 30 to 60 days, and January Stormwater Manager handbook updates (chapter 5)—went before the Planning Commission, which recommended approval. The item is scheduled for the November 12 Board of Supervisors public hearing. Committee members noted healthy debates on level spreaders and C factors, with consensus ultimately reached. - Floodplain Amendments (FSM Chapter 8 and Guidance): The committee reviewed proposed edits to Chapter 8 regarding how floodplain boundaries are shown on construction plans. Discussion centered on whether to require floodplain depiction on all plan sheets or consolidate onto specific sheets (existing conditions, grading, erosion sediment control, tree conservation/landscape, and reforestation plans). The committee decided to delete note A21 (requiring floodplain on all sheets) and instead add reforestation plans to the list in note A10, cross-referencing subsection 7.305. Staff will revise accordingly. - On broader floodplain guidance for Chapter 5, staff provided background: floodways were mapped in 1985, but in 2001 the county chose to treat all floodplains as floodways, leading to a no-rise requirement. After a 2014 FEMA audit, the zoning ordinance was revised. The Board of Supervisors declined to remap floodways in 2023. The committee debated the applicability of FEMA's 2023 floodway guidance, given that county maps do not show designated floodways. Some members (e.g., Megan) argued that minor projects like storm outfall channels should not require a full hydraulic study (Type 2), and that staff should have discretion to accept narrative no-rise certifications. Others preferred a specific list of examples. Staff indicated they will consider committee input and may produce a scenarios table to clarify when different analysis levels are needed. - 10-Year Private Road Reserve Fund Update: Staff presented a revised approach moving away from a specific dollar amount. Three scenarios were outlined: 1) Existing HOA with funded reserve – a confirmation letter from the HOA suffices; 2) New development without HOA – a letter from the developer acknowledging the requirement and committing to fund the HOA and reserve studies; 3) Small developments without HOA (e.g., two-lot subdivisions) – a letter from the owner committing to maintenance. This interim approach will be supported by a template letter and a technical memorandum, while longer-term updates to covenants are pursued via a "quick fix" zoning ordinance amendment. The committee discussed enforceability, successor liability, and the county's role in HOA disputes. Key Outcomes - The September 11, 2025 minutes were approved as amended. - Staff will implement the Chapter 8 edits to remove note A21 and add reforestation plans to the list of sheets requiring floodplain depiction. - Staff will consider committee feedback on floodplain guidance and may produce a scenarios table to clarify when Type 1 vs. Type 2 analyses are needed. - The 10-year private road reserve fund approach will shift to letters of acknowledgement; a template and technical memorandum will be developed. The committee will continue refining this approach. - Next committee meetings: October 16, 2025 (Sycolin Road) and November 6, 2025 (Dulles Room).

On October 9, 2025, the Loudoun County Planning Commission held a work session focused on the West Belmont rezoning application. After staff and applicant presentations and extensive commissioner discussion, the Commission voted to send the application to another work session rather than forward it to the Board of Supervisors with a recommendation. The Commission also approved prior minutes, received disclosures, and reviewed an October 28, 2025 public hearing item. Call to Order, Minutes, and Disclosures - The Commission approved the September 11, 2025 work session minutes on a 7-0-1 vote. Commissioner Frank abstained because he was not present; Commissioner Banks was absent. - Several commissioners disclosed meetings about West Belmont with the applicant team, Supervisor Turner’s office, and representatives of the existing Belmont Green community. One commissioner also disclosed a meeting about Valley Commerce Center. Work Session Item: LEGI-2024-0018, West Belmont / ZMAP-2024-0003 - Staff presenter Alison Burton (the agenda identifies the project manager as Allison Britain) reviewed the 27.36-acre site on the southeast side of Belmont Ridge Road, southwest side of Portsmouth Boulevard, bisected by Winkle Drive in the Ashburn District. The property is zoned PD-H3, is part of the Belmont Green community, and is located in suburban neighborhood and suburban mixed-use place types. - The applicant seeks to rezone from commercial to residential with a commercial zoning district for up to 318 residential units and 11,000 square feet of commercial uses across seven land bays. Staff noted changes since the July public hearing: density reduced from 361 to 318 units; elimination of the proposed LITEC affordable multifamily attached building; increased multifamily stacked units and decreased single-family attached units; roughly one additional acre of open space; a larger 2,500-square-foot community building; two EV charging stations; a construction management plan; and a signal warrant study for Portsmouth Boulevard/Nightwatch Street. Staff also noted a correction to the staff report’s reference to that intersection. Staff reported the application proposes 43 total affordable housing units, four more than the zoning ordinance requires. - Staff raised considerations for the Commission: unit sizes, affordable unit quantity, and housing type diversity relative to the suburban compact neighborhood place type; open space quality because about half of the proposed open space is landscape buffering; the community building’s usability and potential cost; crosswalk connectivity between land bays; the traffic signal study and a potential cash contribution; and a fire/rescue contribution of approximately $3,080 for the non-residential square footage. - Applicant counsel Colleen Gillis of Curata Partners, with TAPCO Properties and the project team, said they had responded to community and commissioner feedback. Highlights included commitments to smaller unit sizes: at least half of single-family attached units under 1,950 square feet, at least 20% of all units under 1,900 square feet, at least 75% under 2,200 square feet, and later an added commitment of 25 single-family attached units under 1,700 square feet. The applicant also committed to no construction traffic through Belmont Green, street-tree preservation along Portsmouth and Winkle, road improvements near Belmont Station Elementary School, and a study of the Winkle Drive/Portsmouth Boulevard intersection with signal installation if warranted. - On open space, the applicant said the proposal meets the zoning ordinance’s 15% requirement and reaches 19% if buffers and screening areas are included. The applicant argued the suburban compact neighborhood place type calls for 10% open space and that areas around the community building can count as civic space. Staff had referenced a 15% General Plan open-space expectation for the site and noted the civic-space percentage varies by place type. Commissioners questioned the usability of narrow landscaped strips and asked for additional trails, seating, pollinator plantings, or similar activation. - Parking was discussed at length. The applicant stated 852 spaces are required under the 2023 zoning ordinance and 940 spaces are provided, counting garages at half credit per the ordinance. They said each land bay independently meets its parking requirement and that they would work to memorialize parking commitments in the proffers. Commissioner Combs and others pressed for a clear commitment because bedroom counts were not yet final. - Commissioner positions varied. Commissioner Combs praised the application and moved to recommend approval. Commissioner Frank opposed because of the loss of townhomes to stacked condos, eliminated setbacks/buffers between commercial and residential, street-connectivity changes, and loss of civic space from the original Belmont Green approval. Commissioner Motoretti wanted one more work session to improve open-space programming. Commissioner Jasper preferred incremental refinement. Commissioner Barnes opposed due to lack of designated rear yards and the dumpster location. Commissioner Miller supported the application, called it a good infill project, and defended LITEC affordability as serving households earning about 60% of area median income, approximately $98,000 for a single person. Commissioner Myers made a substitute motion to send the item to a future work session, and it carried. - Commissioner Myers also criticized universal design proffers such as front-load washers and dryers, lever door handles, bathroom blocking, outlet heights, and smart thermostats as beyond the proper scope of proffers. Staff clarified that universal design is not required by the county and is raised as a recommendation rather than an outstanding issue. Briefing of October 28, 2025, Public Hearing Items - Staff briefed the Commission on a comprehensive plan amendment (CPAM) related to electrical infrastructure. The proposed amendments would strengthen county policies on the location and design of high-voltage transmission corridors, encourage co-location and expansion of existing easements, prioritize commercial/industrial areas over rural/residential areas, support undergrounding, and clarify policies to influence State Corporation Commission decisions. - Asked whether the CPAM has “teeth,” staff responded that it is a guide that providers and state/federal agencies must consider, but the county does not have final authority over transmission line siting. Administrative Items and Updates - Staff noted returning work session items for November 13, 2025: Valley Commerce Center, Quantum Park, and West Belmont. The November 20, 2025 public hearing is expected to include Commonwealth Center Motor Club and an AFD item. - Commissioner Myers raised concerns about delays in the “Happy Paw” matter and asked for a briefing on zoning enforcement policies while violations remain pending. Staff said they would arrange a briefing. Key Outcomes - Approved the September 11, 2025 work session minutes by a 7-0-1 vote. - Commissioner Combs moved to recommend approval subject to a list of revisions; before that motion was voted on, Commissioner Myers’ substitute motion to send the West Belmont application to a future work session was approved 8-0-1, with Commissioner Banks absent. The item is expected to return in November. - The Commission directed the applicant and staff to incorporate the commitments discussed, including unit-size reductions; 25 townhome units under 1,700 square feet; memorialized parking allocations; additional crosswalks; activated open space/amenities around the community building; fire/rescue contributions for residential and non-residential uses; optional sprinklers with educational material; school-hour construction traffic restrictions; dumpster relocation/screening; and broader community access to the community building.

The Loudoun County Board of Supervisors held its regular business meeting on October 7, 2025, at 5:30 p.m. in Leesburg, Virginia. The meeting included approval of the consent agenda, ceremonial resolutions, a closed session, board comments, and public testimony. The meeting was chaired by Chair Randall, with Vice Chair Turner and Supervisor Kirschner absent. The board approved multiple proclamations and resolutions, deferred a controversial substation item, and heard extensive public comments on anti-Semitism and the October 7th anniversary. Consent Calendar - The consent agenda was approved unanimously (5-0, with all absent male members noted). Items included: - Proclamation recognizing Hispanic Heritage Month (Sep 15 – Oct 15, 2025) - Resolution recognizing September 18, 2025 as Find the Good Day - Proclamation declaring October 2025 as Fire Prevention Month - Resolution commemorating the opening of the NVAR Loudoun Member Experience Center - Proclamation recognizing October 2025 as Breast Cancer Awareness Month - Proclamation recognizing Diwali Holiday 2025 - Proclamation recognizing the 250th Anniversary of the United States Navy - Resolution of Commendation for INOVA Loudoun Hospital’s Level II Trauma Center designation - Proclamation recognizing November 4–11 as Operation Green Light for Veterans - Resolution of Commendation for the 150th Anniversary of Sterling United Methodist Church - Proposed rewrite of Chapter 838 (Swimming Pool and Water Recreation Facilities) – countywide - Revised 2025-2026 Joint Board of Supervisors and School Board Committee Work Plan - Appointments confirmations and administrative items report - Supervisor Glass provided context on the joint committee work plan, including updates on the LCPS Transition Center, MOU with Sheriff’s Office, and substance abuse prevention efforts. - Chair Randall highlighted Operation Green Light for Veterans, noting Loudoun County has 10% veterans population and higher rates of suicide, homelessness, and mental health issues. Public Comments & Testimony - Clerk of the Court Gary Clemens urged residents to complete juror questionnaires online within two weeks for the 2026 jury term. He noted Loudoun County uses a one-trial-or-one-day system. - Wendy Golden (Jewish resident) criticized Chair Randall for not condemning anti-Semitic rhetoric in the boardroom, contrasting with her swift condemnation of Charlie Kirk. She demanded equal protection for Jewish community. - Ms. Wodowski condemned Democrat Jay Jones’s violent comments toward Republican Todd Gilbert and his family, and again called for Chair Randall to condemn anti-Semitic speech. - Barbara Wasserman thanked Supervisor Umstattd for support, and asked for a rule change limiting public comments to agenda items to stop hate speech. - Gary Katz accused Chair Randall of hypocrisy for condemning Charlie Kirk but not anti-Jewish rhetoric, suggesting indifference or disdain towards the Jewish community. - Shane Crow (Upvote Virginia) spoke in favor of ranked-choice voting, citing its successful use in a Fairfax County firehouse primary. - Said Cobesi (adjacent property owner) expressed opposition to the deferred Magnolia Rose project, alleging that the Baker family removed a shared border fence without consultation. - Brenda Grootman (Jewish resident) reported personal anti-Semitic incidents: a neighbor yelling at her for displaying an Israeli flag, an Uber denial, and anti-Semitic posters left near her home on October 7th anniversary. - Stephen Grootman described anti-Semitic harassment including a child shouting “Free Palestine,” a lawn sign ripped, and a keffiyeh left on his lawn. He displayed a poster found near his sukkah (temporary hut for Sukkot) and criticized the board for silence. - Robert Griffin criticized the board for not demanding Jay Jones withdraw from the attorney general race, and attacked Democrats on parental rights and gender identity issues. Discussion Items - Deferral of Tuscarora Landbay 3 Substation (LEGI-2024-0043, SPEX-2024-0059 & SPEX-2024-0060): The applicant requested an indefinite deferral, which Chair Randall granted without a board vote, citing a solid reason. The item was removed from the agenda. - Chair Randall’s Organizational Updates: She reported attending Leadership Greater Washington opening ceremony (Sep 18), MOVE Business Conference (Oct 1, 800+ attendees), NACOS Full Steering Committee meeting (discussed Medicaid/SNAP concerns, rural hospital closures, evidence-based health information), and appeared on Kojo Nnamdi’s Politics Hour (Oct 3) discussing federal shutdown impacts on 63,000+ federal employees/contractors in Loudoun. - Voice for a Cause: Chair Randall highlighted Lasagna Love, a nonprofit delivering homemade lasagnas to neighbors in need. Since its founding in March 2020, it has delivered over 530,000 lasagnas, impacting 2.3 million people, with 80,000+ volunteers across 50 states and three other countries. Local Loudoun partners include Salvation Army, Mobile Hope, Loudoun Abused Women’s Shelter, and One Hope Ministries. - County Administrator’s Comments: Tim Hemstreet reported: - Loudoun County received a VDOT project management excellence award for the North Star Boulevard project (Evergreen Mills Road to Route 50). - The 2025 Loudoun Farm Tour is October 18-19 with 40+ farm stops. - The county is seeking nominations for the Big Tree Registry (loudoun.gov/bigtree). - Board Comments: - Supervisor Letourneau (via proxy) congratulated local preservation award winners. He noted that LCPS proposed removing two public charter schools (Middleburg Community Charter School and Hillsborough Charter Academy) from CIP/CAPP funding, which would jeopardize their sustainability. He also promoted the Loudoun Farm Tour. - Supervisor Umstattd disclosed conversations about the Tuscarora substation. She noted the Leesburg Halloween parade is October 30 (not Halloween). She condemned anti-Semitism, referencing the October 7th anniversary and citing a New York Times editorial on anti-Zionism and anti-Semitism, and criticized the phrase “bad night to the Zionists” used at board meetings. - Supervisor Glass disclosed meetings on the Concord site plan. She reported on regional meetings (NVRC, NVTA, NACO) and noted that since January 2025, the DMV region has shed federal jobs faster than the nation, with unemployment rising. She urged residents in need to contact nonprofits. - Supervisor Saines disclosed discussions on the Concord Industrial Park application. He promoted Sterling Volunteer Fire Company open house (Oct 11) and a Hispanic Heritage Month celebration (Oct 11, 1-6 p.m.) at Sterling Community Center. He reminded residents to check fire detectors and unplug chargers due to a spike in electrical fires. - Supervisor Briskman expressed concern about Loudoun County Sheriff’s Office 287(g) agreement with ICE, stating 140 detainees since end of August, and criticized lack of transparency. She noted the LCSO significant incident report has been replaced by a dashboard that no longer includes traffic stop demographics. She reported on gun violence statistics: 11,412 total gun deaths, 329 mass shootings in 2025, including 178 children under 12 and 787 ages 12-17. - Chair Randall condemned the recent private text messages from Jay Jones (candidate for Attorney General) as “harmful, reckless, and wrong,” and associated herself with Speaker Don Scott’s statement. She also condemned death threats against Supervisor Gary Higgins. She expressed pride in U.S. military officers who remained silent during a political speech at Quantico. She noted the 250th Navy anniversary and the October 7th anniversary. - Closed Session: The board entered closed session at approximately 5:20 p.m. pursuant to Virginia Code §2.2-3711.A.7 to consult with legal counsel about actual or probable litigation pertaining to a construction project. The motion passed 5-0 (with the chair noting the vote count). The board reconvened and affirmed the closed session was conducted properly. - Nominations: Supervisor Glass nominated Bashir Amadi for the Board of Building Code Appeals and Tal Hassin Shaik for the Community Services Board. Supervisor Briskman nominated Wayne H. Smith for the Board of Building Code Appeals, Nitisha Stith for the Housing Choice Voucher Resident Advisory Board, and Kimberly Mayo for the Fiscal Impact Committee (replacing Matt Durham who rolled off after six years). Key Outcomes - The consent agenda was approved unanimously (5-0). - The Tuscarora Landbay 3 Substation was deferred indefinitely at the applicant’s request without a board vote. - The board entered closed session and later affirmed its proceedings. - All ceremonial resolutions (R-1 through R-10) were approved and presented. - The board will consider nominations for various boards and commissions at a future meeting. - Chair Randall committed to continuing to highlight community needs, including federal worker impacts and support for veterans and Jewish community members.

The Zoning Ordinance Committee (ZOC) met on October 1, 2025, to review staff updates on several zoning ordinance amendments and to conduct a detailed discussion on the Western Loudoun Rural Uses and Standards (WLRUS) project. The committee approved the September 3, 2025 action report with corrections, elected officers, and received updates on the floodplain ordinance, data center standards, and zoning rewrite adjustments. The majority of the meeting was devoted to reviewing draft text for WLRUS, with extensive committee and stakeholder input, but no final votes were taken on the draft language. Consent Calendar - Approval of Action Report for September 3, 2025: The committee approved the action report with corrections, including correcting a typo ("risk cod" to "R S C R") and fixing speaker names (Trinity Mills, not Bells; Avis Renshaw, not Crenshaw). Discussion Items - Floodplain Ordinance Update (Project Managers: Melanie Mason & Maggie Auer): Staff reported that draft language for uses and structures accessory will be presented at the November 5, 2025 ZOC meeting. The committee noted that the floodplain discussion may be time-consuming and suggested limiting discussion time. - CPAM-2025-0001/ZOAM-2024-0001 – Data Center Standards & Locations, Phase 2: The project plan remains on track; staff expects to bring language to ZOC and then to the Board of Supervisors in May 2026 and Planning Commission in July 2026. - ZOAM-2025-0001 – Zoning Ordinance Rewrite Adjustments 1: The timeline has shifted; draft language is now expected to be presented to the Board of Supervisors in June 2026, allowing more time for coordination with WLRUS and floodplain updates. The committee discussed that the phase one window for new regulations is closed, but the fire marshal's office has proposed additional language on battery storage facilities, which will be considered for phase two. - Western Loudoun/Rural Uses and Standards (WLRUS) – Project Update (Project Managers: Brian Wilson & Dave Schniegenberg): The project is in its second phase (ZOC review) while stakeholder input meetings continue. Staff presented draft text for multiple sections based on direction from the TLUC (Transportation and Land Use Committee). Key sections discussed included: - Section 1.03.03 Nonconforming Structures: Added language allowing replacement or reconstruction of legally established non-conforming agricultural structures within two years, same footprint, and exclusive use for bona fide agricultural production. Committee members raised concerns about the structure of the list and whether the new language inadvertently limited existing rights; staff agreed to review the ordering. - Sections 2.04.01 and 2.04.02 (AR-1 and AR-2): Added clarifying language that land subject to conservation easements may be included in the originating tract for principal, subordinate, and cluster subdivision options, and that easement land will not count toward additional density. Unit yield within an easement will be honored in cluster subdivisions. - Section 4.02.06 Dormitory, Seasonal Labor: Revised minimum size from 200 to 100 square feet per seasonal laborer to align with federal code. Discussion included the need for shared spaces and temporary structures; the committee reserved judgment pending further TLUC direction on farm labor housing. - Section 4.02.10 Guest Farm or Ranch: New use-specific standards created, allowing private parties but not temporary special events. The use must be located on an agricultural operation. Committee members noted that this hybrid use fills a gap between short-term rentals and bed and breakfasts. - Section 4.05.16 Recreation: Reorganized into three types (indoor, outdoor active, major recreation) to address the previous broad range from sports courts to amusement parks. The committee noted that major recreation remains a special exception in AR districts and that further revisions will come. - Sections 4.08.03 and 4.08.04 Agricultural Support Uses: Equine uses (livery stable, equestrian event facility) were pulled out into standalone sections. The committee discussed the need for consistency across uses, especially regarding noise regulations and the use of Chapter 7 standards. - Section 4.08.06 Stable, Livery: Expanded standards include minimum 5-acre lot size (unless a conservation farm plan is approved), 60-foot setback from lot lines, and owner/lessee maintenance requirements. Stakeholders (LCEA, equine alliance) raised concerns about the 5-acre minimum and the 2-acre-per-horse pasture requirement; the committee agreed to strike the 2-acre language and reconsider the 5-acre minimum. - Section 4.08.10 Equestrian Event Facility: Added accessory food sales and clarified owner/lessee operation. Discussion centered on minimum lot size (25 acres), maximum attendees (200 base plus 2 per acre over 25), and lighting standards. The committee noted that the 25-acre minimum and attendee formula may be too restrictive for large events (e.g., Morven Park) and that event standards should be consistent across different uses. Lighting for outdoor arenas was debated; a 35-foot maximum was suggested for non-parking areas, with specific time limits for arena lights. - Section 4.08.12 Agricultural Processing: New standards include 2,500 square foot aggregate limit for structures (with safety incentives for larger structures), cold storage as accessory use, and a requirement that at least 75% of products used for processing must be derived from on-site agricultural operations or operations within an abutting county (or multiple parcels within Loudoun County). Committee members questioned the 2,500 square foot figure, noting it is too small for many existing barns; staff agreed to seek stakeholder feedback and consider accommodating existing structures. The distinction between processing and manufacturing was discussed, particularly for farm wineries and breweries. - Section 4.08.16 Agritourism: Discussion deferred to a future meeting, as it overlaps with cultural tourism and lodging uses. - Chapter 12 Definitions: Minor revisions and additions to align with the draft text. The committee will continue definitions review. Key Outcomes - Election of Officers: Michael Cabretti was elected Chair, and [second candidate] was elected Vice Chair for the upcoming term, approved by voice vote. - WLRUS Draft Text: The committee did not endorse the draft text; it will be brought back for further discussion at the November 5, 2025 meeting, with additional TLUC direction on outstanding items (e.g., lodging, food trucks, agritourism, and farm labor housing). - Next Steps: The committee will continue WLRUS review in November, along with the floodplain ordinance update. Staff will provide revised language on several sections based on committee and stakeholder input, and will circulate the project timeline and draft materials earlier to allow more preparation time.

The Transportation and Land Use Committee (TLUC) held a special meeting on September 30, 2025, to receive stakeholder input on proposed amendments to the Mountainside Overlay District (MOD) and signage regulations in Western Loudoun County. The meeting featured staff presentations, invited stakeholder comments from business, residential, and conservation sectors, and a committee-of-the-whole discussion on five key topics. No votes were taken; staff will return to a future TLUC meeting for direction on drafting ordinance language. Public Comments & Testimony - Business Sector (Vineyards/Wineries) – Tremaine Hatch, Steve Bazo, and Todd Hinkle urged the committee to allow greater flexibility in the MOD to support vineyard and winery operations. They argued that prime vineyard land lies within the MOD and that current regulations are cost-prohibitive and hinder expansion, which is essential for farm viability and world-class wine production. Hatch noted that his family farm cannot subdivide forested land for residences without a costly special exception. - Residential Sector – Casey Chapman stressed the need for balanced regulations that allow property owners to use their land without over-regulation, advocating for flexibility and a tiered review process. Bonnie Mattingley emphasized preserving the mountain's scenic beauty, dark skies, and water resources, opposing new uses that compromise MOD protections. Donnie Walker pointed to burdensome permitting for small structures (e.g., sheds, chicken coops) and argued for administrative flexibility, particularly for small lots, and for simpler grading permits. - Agricultural/Conservation Sector – Peter Weeks (Friends of the Blue Ridge Mountains) opposed weakening MOD protections, citing the value of forest canopy and clean water, and urged no new commercial uses in the MOD. Robert Wilbur (Soil and Water Conservation District) highlighted the importance of protecting steep slopes and sensitive soils, cautioning against loopholes for agricultural exemptions that could lead to excessive clearing. Scott Sieberger, a resident near a commercial establishment, described negative impacts from clearing and traffic, advocating for stronger enforcement of MOD protections. - Planning Commission Representatives – Rob and Eve Jasper called for balancing economic opportunity with stewardship, warning against over-concentration on vineyards similar to data centers. Mark Miller raised concerns about the Euclidean zoning system and suggested considering form-based zoning for greater flexibility. He noted that the sign ordinance was extensively developed and should be given time to work before significant changes. Discussion Items - Topic 1: Regulatory Standards, Flexibility, and Development Costs in the MOD – Staff presented the current prescriptive standards and asked whether greater flexibility should be allowed based on use type (residential vs. commercial) and whether a tiered review process (e.g., administrative approvals, minor special exceptions) could be implemented. Many stakeholders supported a tiered approach for small-scale, low-impact projects. Supervisor Kirchner emphasized the need to support farm businesses to prevent conversion to residential development. Chair Randall and Vice Chair Turner noted that several of the proposed considerations were administrative in nature, not lowering standards. - Topic 2: Mountainside Feature Protection (Spring and Ridge Setbacks) – The committee discussed the 300-foot spring feature setback (established in the General Plan and aligned with the Zoning Ordinance Rewrite). Conservation representatives argued the setback is appropriate for protecting water recharge and sensitive soils. Business and residential stakeholders questioned the basis for the increase from 100 feet, citing no known issues. Some suggested a case-by-case review process. Staff noted that the 300 feet came from the General Plan to align with the Risper requirement. No consensus was reached; staff will research the basis. - Topic 3: Tree Cover Clearing and Land Disturbance – Staff presented complex tables limiting tree clearing to 15–25% of forested area depending on slope and sensitivity. Many stakeholders supported simplifying the criteria and clarifying exemptions. Several questioned the 30% forest retention requirement for non-residential uses. Conservation representatives opposed offset systems, noting that replanting cannot quickly replace mature tree functions. Mr. Walker raised concerns about small lots where drain fields might exceed tree clearing limits. Staff noted that the 5,000 sq ft threshold for grading permits is being considered for minor disturbances. - Topic 4: Sign Size, Number, and Illumination – Staff asked whether the current sign regulations, adopted in 2023, are working or need adjustment. Most stakeholders (planning commission, business, residential) agreed that the sign ordinance has not generated significant issues and should be left alone. Mr. Hinkle raised a specific problem: off-premise signs on easements are prohibited, preventing vineyard access signs. Vice Chair Turner suggested a lease arrangement might solve the property issue. Staff clarified that murals on barns are considered signs but do not count against the allotted square footage. - Topic 5: Separation of Sign Categories for Residential vs. Nonresidential Uses – Staff proposed considering whether signs should be regulated by use (residential versus commercial) rather than by zoning district. Planning Commissioner Miller argued that within villages, consistent signage standards are preferred to maintain character. Stakeholders indicated no strong demand for change. Key Outcomes - No formal decisions or votes were taken during the meeting. - Staff will compile stakeholder input and present a summary at a future regular TLUC meeting. - The committee will hold three follow-up directional meetings: December 17, 2025 (food service, MOD, signage); January 2026 (farm wineries, limited distilleries, bed and breakfast); and a third after the eighth stakeholder input session (miscellaneous items). - Staff will provide additional information on the reasoning behind the 300-foot spring setback and will research the feasibility of a tiered review process for MOD activities. - The committee acknowledged the need to balance environmental protection with economic viability of farm operations, and will continue discussions on flexibility and administrative streamlining.

The Loudoun County Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA) held a public hearing on September 25, 2025, at 6:00 PM in the Board Room of the Government Center in Leesburg, Virginia. The board considered two public hearing items: a variance for a storage shed and a sign development plan for Cascades Marketplace, both of which were approved unanimously. The meeting also included administrative reports and discussion of future meeting dates. Public Comments & Testimony No members of the public spoke during the hearing for either agenda item. Discussion Items Variance for Storage Shed (BOZA-2025-0004) – 14676 Waterford Woods Court, Leesburg - Staff presenter Ryan Reid explained the history: the property was purchased in 2019, and a previous variance (BOZA-2025-0001) was approved in April 2025 but the approved shed location fell within the Mountainside Overlay District sensitive area, requiring tree removal. An alternative location in the “somewhat sensitive” area was identified, necessitating a new variance. - Applicant Patrick Hurley testified that the need for the new variance arose from a setback issue with the septic drain field discovered two days before the prior hearing, forcing relocation into a wooded area. He incurred additional costs and worked with staff to resolve the matter. - The board questioned staff and confirmed that the hardship was not self-created, the variance would not be detrimental to adjacent properties, the condition is not general or recurring, the relief is not available through other mechanisms, and the variance is not contrary to the zoning ordinance purpose. - The public hearing was closed, and a motion to approve was made by Mr. Gray, seconded, and passed unanimously. Cascades Marketplace Sign Development Plan (LEGI-2024-0009 / ZMOD-2024-0005) - Staff presenter Jacob Hambrick noted the item was continued from the July 24, 2025 meeting to allow the applicant to address concerns about the number, size, and scale of signs, temporary sign durations, and the percentage of construction fence signage. - Applicant representative Morgan Hadlock presented revisions: the number of electric vehicle (EV) charging station signs with advertising was reduced from 30 to 20, and the total area reduced from 2,520 to 1,680 square feet. For temporary construction fence signage, language was added that only 15% of the fence area may contain content (the rest being background color), and content must be property-related. Temporary window signage will also be property-related and remain until vacant spaces are occupied. - The applicant provided a memo comparing signage at similar developments (One Loudoun and Cascades Overlook) to contextualize the request. - Board members asked clarifying questions about the location and duration of temporary fencing, the net change in pole signs (from by-right maximum of 2 to proposed 45 per pad site, but noted many replace existing signs), and the scope of the sign plan as a maximum allowance. - Staff confirmed the application meets the seven approval criteria in Section 1011.03D of the zoning ordinance. The board closed the public hearing. A motion to approve subject to conditions was made by Mr. Gray, seconded, and passed unanimously. Administrative Reports - The Zoning Administrator noted that the next meeting will include an appeal (Appeal 2025-0004 for a special event permit). - Assistant County Attorney Hugh Green reported on a request to consider amending the BZA bylaws to require that sign plan hearings be decided within two meetings. After review, the County Attorney’s Office recommended against such an amendment because the board already has authority to continue hearings. The board agreed that expectations can be managed through staff communication rather than bylaw changes. - Mr. Green also informed the board that the annual reaffirmation of the remote participation policy will be brought forward soon, with template-based bylaw revisions that are largely unchanged. - The board discussed scheduling for the October 23, 2025 meeting. Member Clark will be unavailable; the board considered moving to October 22, but that date conflicts with the Transportation Land Use Committee meeting and the boardroom may not be available. The board will circulate an email to find an alternative date or ensure a quorum with alternates. Key Outcomes - Storage Shed Variance (BOZA-2025-0004): Approved unanimously (5-0) with findings that the variance criteria are satisfied. - Cascades Marketplace Sign Development Plan (LEGI-2024-0009 / ZMOD-2024-0005): Approved unanimously (5-0) subject to the conditions of approval in attachments to the staff report. - Bylaw Amendment: No amendment will be pursued; the board will rely on existing authority to continue hearings. - Future Meetings: Staff will circulate proposed date adjustments for October and subsequent meetings to accommodate member availability.

Note: The agenda for this meeting was dated September 22, 2025, but the provided source material indicates the meeting took place on September 24, 2025. This summary uses the September 24 date as instructed. The Loudoun County Communications Commission met to discuss bylaws updates, the commission's future role, and to review a step-by-step approach for modifying its scope. The commission voted to adopt a two-term limit for commissioners, and approved a motion to draft a survey of the Board of Supervisors and other county leadership to inform a conversation about the commission's viability. Consent Calendar - Approved the July 28, 2025 meeting minutes without objection. - Approved the agenda as presented. Public Comments & Testimony - No members of the public were present or signed up for comment. Discussion Items - Bylaws Updates: The commission discussed three changes required by the county's updated advisory body bylaws template (July 2025): (1) whether to limit consecutive terms for commissioners, (2) whether to limit consecutive terms for the chair and vice chair, and (3) adding language clarifying that the representative from Loudoun County Public Schools is appointed internally. After debate, a motion was adopted to set a two-term (8-year) limit for commissioners and no specific limit for chair/vice chair positions. The motion passed with ayes; one commissioner (Smith) abstained. - Franchisee Topics: Neither Comcast nor Verizon representatives attended, so no discussion occurred. - Step-by-Step Approach to Modifying the Commission's Role: Commissioner Tom Solitario presented an outline for redefining the commission's purpose. The outline included steps such as defining a mission, reviewing county strategic plans, conducting interviews with board members and county staff, and drafting a new charter. Extensive discussion ensued about whether the commission has outlived its usefulness, whether to conduct a survey before approaching the board, and whether to recommend closure. Several commissioners expressed that the commission may be a "solution in search of a problem" and that the board's needs are already met through other channels. The possibility of forming a broader technology-focused commission was raised but not advanced. - Survey Proposal: A motion was made and seconded to create a short survey (approximately 5 questions) for the Board of Supervisors and other county leadership to identify gaps in communications and technology advice. The survey would inform a letter to the Finance Committee to request a discussion on the commission's future. The motion passed with 5 in favor, 0 opposed, and 1 abstention (Commissioner Smith). Key Outcomes - Term Limits Adopted: The commission will amend its bylaws to limit commissioners to two consecutive terms (8 years). Chair and vice chair terms remain unlimited. This change will be formalized in the updated bylaws template. - Survey and Outreach: An action item (266) was created for Commissioner Tom Solitario to draft a survey, circulate it for feedback, and aim to present results at the next meeting. The survey will be used to inform a letter to the Finance Committee about the commission's viability. - Next Steps: The next commission meeting is scheduled for October 27, 2025. Commissioner Solitario will lead the survey drafting with input from other commissioners via email.

The Loudoun County Planning Commission held a public hearing on September 23, 2025, at the Loudoun County Government Center. The meeting included the review and adoption of minutes, disclosures, and public hearings on seven legislative applications and one administrative item. The Commission voted on each item, forwarding recommendations to the Board of Supervisors. Consent Calendar - Approval of July 29, 2025, PCPH Draft Minutes: The minutes were approved unanimously (7-0-2, with Commissioners Banks and Jasper absent). Disclosures - Commissioners disclosed meetings and communications related to several applications, including the Commonwealth Center Motor Club, Cochran Tech, Auto World Substation, Pantovic Property Rezoning, and Cleremont Farm Pond Renovation. Commissioner Combs and Commissioner Frank recused themselves from specific items due to conflicts of interest. Public Comments & Testimony - Cochran Tech: Emily Johnson (Piedmont Environmental Council) expressed concerns about environmental impacts and questioned the energy storage proposal. Abdallah Alkwala (resident) described noise and dust issues from existing industrial operations and opposed further development. - Pantovic Property Rezoning: Emily Johnson (Piedmont Environmental Council) opposed the rezoning, arguing it conflicts with the comprehensive plan and harms Briarfield Estates residents. A resident of Briarfield Estates submitted written comments. - Commonwealth Center Motor Club: No public speakers. - Franklin Park West: Samantha Wall (Round Hill resident) noted lack of neighborhood notification and requested privacy buffers. Another resident raised concerns about bike trails, parking, and property boundaries. - Other items: No public testimony. Discussion Items 1. LEGI-2025-0008: Interim Additions to Agricultural and Forestal Districts (Catoctin, Little River) - Staff presented four parcels totaling 40.71 acres for addition to existing AFDs. The Agricultural District Advisory Committee recommended approval. The Commission unanimously recommended approval to the Board of Supervisors (7-0-2). 2. DOAM-2025-0002: Facilities Standards Manual Amendments (Countywide) - Amendments to implement the Virginia Stormwater Management Handbook, extend preliminary soils review timeline from 30 to 60 days, and adopt updated technical standards. Staff and the FSM Public Review Committee supported the changes. The Commission recommended approval (7-0-2). 3. LEGI-2024-0037: Cochran Tech (Leesburg) - Proposal to rezone 17.52 acres from JLMA3 to IP for data center and energy storage uses. The applicant committed to prohibiting lithium-based batteries, using graphene technology, and providing road improvements. Staff raised concerns about building height (70 feet vs. 48-foot general plan guidance) and suggested additional conditions. The Commission recommended approval to the Board of Supervisors (7-0-2). 4. LEGI-2024-0026: Pantovic Property Rezoning (Little River) - Rezoning 4.4 acres from CR1 to IP, expanding development area to include Evergreen Meadows parcel. Staff cited inconsistency with the suburban neighborhood place type and incomplete traffic analysis. The applicant agreed to proffer out several intensive uses except flex industrial. The Commission recommended approval (5-2, with Commissioners Motoretti and Frank opposed; Banks and Jasper absent). 5. LEGI-2024-0016: Commonwealth Center Motor Club (Broad Run) - Proposal for a high-end car club on a 5.49-acre site, including a restaurant, event space, and car storage. The applicant sought to modify a setback to accommodate a drive aisle, which required a ZCPA amendment. Staff supported Option A but not Option B without further review. The Commission voted to continue the item to the November 20, 2025, public hearing for consideration of the ZCPA (6-0-2-1, with Commissioner Combs recused; Commissioners Banks, Miller, and Jasper absent). 6. LEGI-2023-0014: Franklin Park West (Catoctin) - Rezoning and special exception to expand Franklin Park westward, adding 130 acres of passive recreation, trails, and pavilions. Staff supported the proposal. The Commission recommended approval, including a friendly amendment to hold an outreach meeting with adjacent neighbors (7-0-2). 7. LEGI-2024-0020: Cleremont Farm Pond Renovation (Little River) - Four special exceptions to renovate existing farm ponds, including expansion from 5.3 to 9 acres and improvements for agricultural use. Staff found the proposal consistent with rural policies. The Commission recommended approval (6-0-2-1, with Commissioner Combs recused; Banks and Jasper absent). 8. LEGI-2024-0031: Auto World Substation (Sterling) - Rezoning and special exceptions for a Dominion Energy substation on a 2.5-acre site. Staff recommended conditions for screening and pollinator habitat. The applicant agreed to work on conditions. The Commission approved the commission permit and forwarded the application to the Board of Supervisors with a recommendation of approval (7-0-2). Key Outcomes - Approved (recommended to BOS): AFD additions, FSM amendments, Cochran Tech, Pantovic Property Rezoning (5-2), Franklin Park West, Cleremont Farm Pond Renovation, Auto World Substation. - Continued: Commonwealth Center Motor Club to November 20, 2025, public hearing for ZCPA consideration. - Recusals: Commissioner Combs recused from Commonwealth Center Motor Club and Cleremont Farm Pond Renovation; Commissioner Frank recused from Commonwealth Center Motor Club. - Absences: Commissioners Banks and Jasper were absent for all votes. The meeting adjourned after the final vote.