Public Meetings - Loudoun County, Virginia

The Loudoun County Board of Supervisors convened on Tuesday, May 5, 2026, at 9:00 a.m. for a business meeting that lasted into the evening, addressing a full agenda including ceremonial proclamations, a significant incident report from the Combined Fire-Rescue System, a human rights ordinance, equestrian trail use at Banshee Reeks Nature Preserve, transportation studies, and a rent supplement initiative. The meeting featured extensive public comments and multiple votes, deferring a closed session to a later date. Consent Calendar - Approved unanimously: proclamations for Lyme Disease Awareness Month (May 2026), Correctional Officers Week (May 3–9, 2026), Police Week and Peace Officers Memorial Day (May 10–16, 2026), Emergency Medical Services Week (May 17–23, 2026), Historic Preservation Month (May 2026), Bike to Work Day (May 15, 2026), and Professional Municipal Clerks Week (May 3–9, 2026). Also approved: resolution to commend the Knit and Crochet Group of Cascades Senior Center, appointments, administrative items, zoning of certain properties under the 1972 Zoning Ordinance, the Ashburn Metro Station Area Transportation Safety Study response, and an extension of an invasive species grant until May 31, 2026. Public Comments & Testimony - Phil Daly (Lincoln resident): Urged the board not to expand equestrian trails at Banshee Reeks, citing safety concerns with children on shared trails and noting past trail misuse at Blue Ridge Center. - Brendan Donahue (Friends of Banshee Reeks): Opposed the proposed 8.3 miles of equestrian access, arguing it shifts the preserve's passive-use mission and directly impacts protected areas like Goose Creek buffers. Cited lack of emergency response planning and risk management. - Rosemary Zapata: Shared her family's reliance on ARPA-funded rental assistance, which helped catch up on rent and expenses after a health problem. Urged support for a new rent supplement program. - Kelly Fultman (Loudoun Equine Alliance): Supported the 8.3 miles of equestrian trails but raised concerns about Woodgrove Road widening, which she said would create a de facto bypass with increased speeds. Also noted horses need event hours from 7 a.m. to 10 p.m. - Emily Johnson (Piedmont Environmental Council): Thanked the board for Historic Preservation Month and Bike to Work Day proclamations, supported the Ashburn Metro safety study and Safe Streets Loudoun, but expressed concern about rural road widening on Route 9 without clear definition of "modest widening." - Bill Hatch: Spoke about the rural economy, noting a severe freeze that caused 70–100% fruit crop losses. Criticized proposed tree canopy increases in the mountainside overlay district as harmful to agricultural economic development. - James Russell: Advocated for the rent supplement program, calling cost of living in Loudoun "absurdly high" and citing displacement of immigrant neighbors. Also urged the board to address the genocide in Palestine. - Samariko Lopez: Represented 75 displaced families from Lisbon Mobile Home Park; noted his family now pays five times more for rent, forcing them to work double or triple shifts and reducing time with children. - Alejandro Hernandez: Asked the board to view rental assistance as an investment in the county's future, noting she has lived in Loudoun for 15 years and struggles with affordability despite working multiple jobs. - Tomasa Valencia (New Virginia Majority): Described how ARPA rental assistance helped her family pay high rent, medicine, and food costs. Urged the board to vote for the program. - Tracy Endo (on behalf of Veronica Gonzalez): Read Veronica's story of being displaced from Leesburg Mobile Home Park; her rent increased from $620 to $1,638 per month, forcing her mother-in-law to move to Winchester. Asked for a local housing voucher program. - Kim Fulmer: Expressed fear about Amazon data centers in the George Washington University neighborhood, noting residents considered selling their homes. Asked for information on chances of stopping the project. - Shane Crow (UPA Virginia): Reported that ranked-choice voting legislation in Virginia now has no sunset, removing the 2027 deadline for local adoption. Encouraged the board to consider using ranked-choice voting. - Emily Houston (Rural Roads Committee): Supported Old Waterford Road scenic byway designation and noted the value of performance-based design in corridor studies. Praised context-sensitive widening on Route 50. Discussion Items - Significant Incident Report (Q3 FY2026) – Fire-Rescue: The combined system responded to 10,323 incidents (71% EMS, 29% fire-related). Notable incidents included an outdoor gas leak (Jan 5), a fire at Potomac Falls Health and Rehab (Jan 8) sending three to hospitals and one to a burn center, and a $15 million fire at Cuisine Solutions (March 9) caused by a propane torch. Lithium-ion batteries are an increasing hazard. 70 of 86 Silver Ridge report recommendations completed or in progress. Ground Hill Fire Station opens May 14; Philomont Fire Station groundbreaking May 13. Chief James Williams and newly promoted Assistant Chief Micah Kiger presented. - Animal Services Report: Cases of animal neglect and cruelty continue. The department handles over 400 calls per month. Director urged early reporting and warned against feeding wildlife to avoid habituation. - Human Rights Ordinance (Item 6): Staff recommended directing a draft ordinance. Currently Loudoun is the only one of four regional comparators (Arlington, Fairfax, Prince William, Alexandria) without a human rights program. Virginia Code §15.2-965 permits such ordinances. Staff will develop options including commission structure, enforcement authority, complaint process, and fiscal impact. After discussion, the board voted 6–2 (Supervisors Laterno and Kirshner opposed; Turner absent) to direct staff to draft an ordinance. - Limited Rent Supplement Program (Item 11, BMI Supervisors Briskman and Saines): Proposed directing staff to evaluate a county-funded short-term rent supplement program for cost-burdened renters (0–50% AMI, up to 24 months). Chair Randall emphasized the program could prevent homelessness at lower cost than emergency services. Supervisor Umstead offered two friendly amendments (no minimum income requirement and citizen preference), both rejected (first failed 5–3−1, second failed 6–3–?). The main motion passed 6–3 (Supervisors Laterno, Kirshner, Umstead opposed; Turner absent). Implementation options due for FY2028 budget. - Banshee Reeks Equestrian Use (Item 3): Approved 8.3 miles of equestrian trails on existing paths (expanded from 4 miles). The Virginia Outdoors Foundation found the proposal consistent with the conservation easement. Trails will be widened to accommodate multi-use. Chair Randall expressed confidence in the equestrian community's environmental stewardship. Motion passed 8–0−1 (Turner absent). - Safe Streets Loudoun (Item 7): Adopted the Local Roadway Safety Action Plan, funded by a $464,000 federal grant with $116,000 county match. Included recommendations for speed cameras in school zones and enforcement pull-offs. Motion passed 8–0. - Route 50 Safety and Operational Study (Item 8): Supervisor DeCrony moved to send to the Transportation and Land Use Committee (TLUC) for further review. Passed 8–0. The second part of the motion (regarding future corridor studies) was tabled. - Western Loudoun North-South Rural Roads Corridor Study (Item 9): Endorsed short-term improvements (signage, striping, vegetation clearing) and directed long-term items to future budgets. Total estimated cost $33 million. Sheriff enforcement pull-offs were included. Motion passed 8–1 (Supervisor DeCrony opposed; Turner absent). - Old Waterford Road Scenic Byway (Item 12): Adopted a resolution supporting designation as a Virginia State Scenic Byway. The road provides access to the Waterford Historic District. Motion passed 8–0. - Motion to Reconsider – Cochrane Tech (Data Center) Application: Supervisor Kirshner moved to reconsider the April 21 denial. After debate, the board voted 6–1–1 (Supervisor Crony abstained; Turner absent) to remand the application to the Planning Commission for a public hearing on July 23, 2026, to allow evaluation of substantial changes (new end user, revised site plan, new proffers). Chair Randall urged all applicants to bring their best applications initially. Key Outcomes - Human Rights Ordinance: Directed staff to draft an ordinance with fiscal analysis and scalability options. Vote: 6–2. - Limited Rent Supplement Program: Directed staff to evaluate and return with implementation options for FY2028. Vote: 6–3. - Banshee Reeks Equestrian Trails: Approved 8.3 miles of equestrian use. Vote: 8–0. - Safe Streets Loudoun Plan: Adopted action plan and resolution. Vote: 8–0. - Route 50 Study: Sent to TLUC for further review. Vote: 8–0. - Western Loudoun Corridor Study: Endorsed with direction to forward improvements to budget process. Vote: 8–1. - Old Waterford Road Scenic Byway: Resolution adopted. Vote: 8–0. - Cochrane Tech Reconsideration: Approved to remand to Planning Commission for July 23 hearing. Vote: 6–1–1. - Closed Session: Two closed session motions were approved (Greenway tolls and Mars to Golden litigation) but the actual closed session was deferred to May 13, 2026, due to exhaustion. One motion from closed session passed 8–0: approve county participation in opposition to Dulles Greenway toll increase before the State Corporation Commission.

This special meeting focused on providing direction to staff for amending zoning ordinances for Western Loudoun. Chair Randall emphasized that this was a mid-process step ("coming out of halftime") and not a final decision; the package will proceed to the Zoning Ordinance Committee (ZOC) through December 2026, then to the Planning Commission with a public hearing in spring 2027, and final Board adoption targeted for December 2027. Staff presentations covered legal authority to regulate ABC uses, spring feature setbacks, tiny homes, hours of operation, and private party/event limitations. Consent Calendar - The Board passed a block of recommendations (items 7, 9, 12, 13, 14, 15, 17, 18, 19, 21, 24, 25, 30, 31, 33, 35, 36, 38–49, 52, and 55) that had unanimous support from staff, the business community, and conservation groups. The motion passed 8–1 (with one absent). Public Comments & Testimony - Mark Miller (Planning Commissioner, Catoctin District): Asked that the ROIA be as least prescriptive as possible to allow ZOC and Planning Commission flexibility. - Amy Hinkle (Loudoun Wineries & Wine Growers Association / Lost Creek Winery): Stressed the economic importance of wineries (57 wineries, 1,000+ acres, 1 million visitors annually, $50M revenue) and that events are essential for survival. - John Carey (Paris, VA resident): Urged limiting commercial development and events in the Blue Ridge until a groundwater study is completed, citing threats to Paris's water supply from a proposed resort. - Uzma Rasheed (Loudoun Soil & Water Conservation District): Expressed concerns about loopholes being exploited to avoid zoning compliance and asked for continued partnership with county staff. - Delegate John McCullough: Introduced himself and shared his experience with B&B permitting, urging balance between conservation and business. - Peter DeLisa (868 Estate Vineyards): Opposed capping events (motion 20), stating events are essential for farm viability and that issues of noise/traffic should be handled through enforcement. - Nancy DeLisa (868 Estate Vineyards): Highlighted charitable giving from events (nearly $200,000 raised) and argued that restrictions would harm nonprofits. - Tolga Baki (Hillsborough Winery & Brewery): Supported motion 20, arguing events are key to selling products and that overly aggressive rules would hurt good actors. - Mary Hypes (resident/Loudoun agribusiness employee): Emphasized that capping events harms students, nonprofits, and community fabric. - Tia Ehrman (PEC): Supported a tiered system for events and cited other Virginia counties' limits on attendees and frequency. - Steve Bozo (Bazoo Family Vineyards): Opposed limiting events, stating 92% of revenue comes from on-site sales and that there has been no substantial impact on public safety. - Todd Hinkle (Lost Creek Winery): Opposed motions 3–6 and 11, arguing they limit viticulture in MOD areas; noted MOD areas provided frost protection. - Mike Borgang (veteran, brewery employee): Opposed limiting events, sharing how the brewery gave him purpose and community. - Nate Walsh (Walsh Family Wine): Stated that events are the difference between staying in business and foreclosure, citing crop losses from frost and drought. - Gregory Steuben (brewery employee): Opposed capping events, noting community gatherings like sports team celebrations. - Lacey Hoover (Stone Tower Winery): Asked the Board to protect the viability of farm wineries by supporting TLUC recommendations. - Jennifer Brough (Brough Vineyards): Argued that proposed motions conflict with the Comprehensive Plan's support for rural economy and hospitality uses. - Brittany Rogan (resident and brewery owner): Described negative impacts from a neighboring high-intensity operation and urged intensity limits, not just event caps. - Bob Rupey (October One Vineyard): Praised long-term bipartisan support for wine growing and asked for continued reasonable regulations. - Others: Several speakers from the conservation side (Friends of Blue Ridge Mountains, Loudoun Wildlife Conservancy, etc.) urged strengthening MOD protections, maintaining 300-foot spring setbacks, and requiring minor special exceptions for non-residential activities in the MOD. Discussion Items - Hours of Operation (Items 23, 34, 50): Chair Randall proposed Monday–Thursday 8 a.m.–11 p.m., Friday–Saturday 7 a.m.–midnight, Sunday 9 a.m.–9 p.m., with four annual extended Sunday hours. The motion failed 4–4. Supervisor Kirshner then moved an amendment with Sunday 8 a.m.–10 p.m. (including DeCrony's Monday–Thursday 8–10 p.m. friendly), which passed 5–3 (Chair Randall opposed). - Private Parties and Events (Item 20): Supervisor Kirshner moved to adopt the TLUC recommendation allowing unlimited private parties/events for farm wineries, limited breweries, and limited distilleries consistent with ABC laws, with enforcement of noise, parking, and lighting. The motion passed 5–3 after a tie-breaking vote by Ms. Glass. A friendly addition to have ZOC and Planning Commission consider water use was accepted. Staff had recommended omitting Item 20 in favor of other standards (Items 22 and 32). - Use-Specific Standards (Item 32): Supervisor DeCrony moved to develop a consistent framework for use-specific standards for all ABC uses (setbacks, hours, noise, lighting, road access, etc.). Motion passed 7–1 (Kirshner opposed). - Spring Feature Protection Setback (Item 5): Supervisor DeCrony moved to revise the setback to 100 feet outside the Mountainside Overlay District (MOD) and 300 feet inside the MOD. Motion passed 7–1 (Laterno opposed). - Other Actions: The Board passed numerous other items, including: exploring minor exceptions for non-residential activities in MOD (failed 5–3), establishing a 50-foot buffer yard for ABC uses (failed 5–3), and approving the final resolution of intent to amend with all changes made (passed 8–0). Key Outcomes - Direction to Staff: Staff will draft zoning text based on the Board's decisions, with ZOC review through December 2026, followed by Planning Commission public hearing (spring 2027) and Board final adoption (December 2027). - Hours of Operation (approved as Kirshner motion): Monday–Thursday 8 a.m.–10 p.m., Friday–Saturday 7 a.m.–midnight, Sunday 8 a.m.–10 p.m. (non-public equestrian activities excepted). - Private Events: Unlimited events for farm wineries, limited breweries, and limited distilleries allowed as accessory uses, with ABC law limits and enforcement of noise, parking, and lighting. Water use will be examined by ZOC and Planning Commission. - Use-Specific Standards: Staff to develop tiered standards for ABC uses covering dimensions, setbacks, scale, hours, noise, lighting, road access, etc. - Spring Setbacks: 100-foot setback outside MOD, 300-foot setback inside MOD. - Non-Conforming Uses: The Board gave global direction that existing uses will not be rendered non-conforming by new standards; staff will ensure this throughout. - Proactive Zoning Compliance: Items 1 and 2 (proactive zoning) were deferred to June 2, 2026 meeting; an inventory of non-residential uses and compliance review will be discussed then.

The Loudoun County Communications Commission met on April 27, 2026, at 7:10 PM in the Dulles Room of the Loudoun County Government Center. The Commission approved a modified agenda, adopted updated bylaws with unlimited term limits, and advanced the 2026 annual report with a new slide proposing expanded scope. Discussions included the VATI broadband project status and next meeting date. Consent Calendar - The agenda was adopted as modified after striking the reference to previously approved term limits (as those had not been discussed in previous meetings). - The minutes from March 23, 2026, were approved unanimously. Public Comments & Testimony - No members of the public signed up for comment. Discussion Items - Approval of Commission Bylaws: The Commission reviewed proposed changes to align with the July 2025 board-approved template. Key discussion centered on term limits. Commissioner noted that staff had inserted "two consecutive terms" in Articles III and IV, but other advisory commissions (e.g., Youth, Transit) had used "unlimited." A motion was made and seconded to adopt the bylaws as amended to change both references to "unlimited." The motion passed unanimously. - Annual Report Update: Commissioner Ron presented a draft of the 2026 annual report presentation. Discussion focused on whether to expand the Commission’s scope or wind it down. Commissioner Tom circulated a document outlining five potential expansion areas: broadband for economic development, smart community infrastructure, remote work/telehealth, distance learning, cross-commission collaboration, and a five-year communications plan. The Commission agreed to add these as a backup slide. A motion to approve the draft report deck with amendments (allowing Jason and Ron to make non-substantive cleanup edits) passed unanimously. - Franchisee Topics: No items were raised by staff regarding Comcast or Verizon. - VATI (Virginia Telecommunications Initiative) Update: Staff reported that as of February 2026, the broadband project had completed 42% of fiber mileage and passed 7% of locations. An extension request is anticipated due to VDOT permitting challenges. Commissioner Kennedy noted community frustration and asked how to reassure residents; staff said they would provide a more substantial update. - Action Items: Action item 268 (review slide presentation) was closed unanimously. Items 249 and 254 remain open with no update on Verizon. Key Outcomes - Unanimous approval of the commission bylaws with unlimited term limits. - Unanimous approval of the 2026 annual report presentation deck as amended, with final cleanup delegated to the chair and secretary. - Next meeting moved from May 25, 2026 (Memorial Day) to May 18, 2026, with the Dulles Room reserved. - Staff will prepare an update on the VATI project for distribution to commissioners and communities.

The Loudoun County Planning Commission held a public hearing on April 28, 2026, beginning at approximately 11:00 AM (agenda time) and continuing into the evening. The commission addressed two major zoning and special exception applications, deferred a third, and handled administrative items including the 2025 annual report and updates to the department work plan. Consent Calendar - Minutes Approval: The commission unanimously approved the March 24, 2026, public hearing and work session minutes with a vote of 7-0-2 (Commissioner Banks absent; Commissioner Frank noted as present but not voting). Public Comments & Testimony - South Riding Intergenerational Community: Multiple residents from the Ridings at Blue Springs neighborhood spoke in opposition to the proposed density of 450 units (250 multifamily + 200 senior living) on the 19.4-acre parcel, arguing it is incompatible with the adjacent CR1-zoned single-family homes. Speakers requested deferral until density is significantly reduced, traffic and safety issues are addressed, and stronger buffers are provided. Specific concerns included: 450 units on 11 buildable acres yielding 41 units per acre vs. 1 unit per acre in the neighborhood; traffic congestion at Tall Cedars Parkway/Route 50 and Eastgate View Drive; inadequate setback reduction from 110 feet (2015 approval) to 50 feet proposed; stormwater runoff and soil saturation issues; and the need for a 150-foot planted transition zone. Some speakers supported retaining only the originally approved 233-unit senior living facility. The Ridings at Blue Springs HOA president and several board members requested a deferral. - Dulles South Community Park: Residents from Willowsford and adjacent areas spoke about lighting, buffering, and traffic concerns. Tom Toma (Willowsford resident) highlighted lack of trees at the southwest pinch point and requested a redo of the traffic study to account for recent school expansions and road projects. Leah Macchiarolo (Willowsford Conservancy Vice Chair) requested dark-sky compliant fixtures, enhanced buffers, and an updated traffic analysis. Frank Blackstone (Willowsford HOA president) noted the principal of Lightridge High School still has safety concerns and requested a community meeting before finalizing. All speakers expressed general support for the park but urged modifications. Discussion Items - South Riding Intergenerational Community (LEGI-2023-0106): Staff presented outstanding issues including density exceeding the new SCN place type maximum of 12 units/acre (proposed 17.7 units/acre), building height (requesting 55 feet vs. 50-foot limit), traffic safety at bus shelter location, environmental mitigation (reforestation and LID type), and inconsistencies in proffers (restaurant not permitted in SCN16). Applicant (John McGranahan, attorney) explained the evolution from the 2015 approval (233 senior units) to the current intergenerational concept, emphasizing the need for critical mass to create synergy. They agreed to a work session. Commissioners expressed concerns about density compatibility, traffic impacts (especially left turns and U-turns), stormwater management, and the need for intentional intergenerational programming rather than just adjacent rental units. The commission voted 8-0-1 to forward the application to a future work session for resolution of outstanding issues. - Dulles South Community Park (LEGI-2024-0008): Staff and applicant (Taryn Buck, DTCI) presented the proposal for a 34.43-acre regional park (community park per master plan) with two lighted rectangular fields, a cricket field, street hockey rink, playground, picnic pavilions, and shared-use paths. The site is adjacent to Lightridge High School and two elementary schools. Staff found the proposal consistent with the General Plan and recommended approval with conditions. Key discussion points: lighting pole heights (105 feet for cricket, 80-90 feet for rectangular, 50 feet for hockey), dark-sky compliance, buffering at the southwest pinch point (type B buffer vs. requested type C), traffic study adequacy (community argued it misses recent growth and intersection changes), and coordination with school principals. Commissioners noted the county's need for athletic fields and praised the design but agreed to a work session to address specific concerns. Motion to forward to work session passed 8-0-1. - Administrative Items: - The 2025 Planning Commission Annual Report was approved after amending language to clarify that the commission seeks input before the Board of Supervisors adopts project plans and resolutions of intent for CPAMs and ZOAMs. Vote 8-0-1. - The 2026 Planning Commission meeting schedule was noted, including the addition of a joint Board-Supervisors and Planning Commission special business meeting on June 30, 2026, at 5 PM. - Updates from the Department of Planning and Zoning Work Plan: New ZOAMs added for kennel standards, implementation of state laws regarding by-right affordable housing on religious/nonprofit properties (limited by water/sewer proximity and five-year ownership requirement), cannabis retail sales, and updates to the land development application fee schedule. Commissioners discussed potential impacts of the affordable housing legislation and the ambiguous status of cannabis legislation. Key Outcomes - South Riding Intergenerational Community: Forwarded to a future planning commission work session for further discussion on density, traffic, stormwater, and compatibility. Vote: 8-0-1. - Dulles South Community Park: Forwarded to a planning commission work session for further discussion on lighting, buffering, traffic, and school coordination. Vote: 8-0-1. - 2025 Planning Commission Annual Report: Approved with language amendment to clarify request for early input on CPAM and ZOAM scopes. Vote: 8-0-1. - Meeting Schedule: Addition of June 30, 2026, joint meeting noted; no formal vote required. - North Springs Behavioral Healthcare: Deferred from the agenda by staff; no public comment received.

This meeting of the Facility Standards Manual Public Review Committee (FSM PRC) focused on proposed amendments to archaeology requirements, including lot size thresholds, cemetery depiction on plats, and related provisions. The committee also discussed forming a work group for gated community standards. Consent Calendar - The committee approved the minutes from the April 9, 2026 meeting with corrections for spelling errors (archaeology, amendments). Public Comments & Testimony - No public comments were made. Discussion Items Archaeology Amendments - Cluster Lot Threshold: Initially, the proposal defined cluster lots as four acres or less (based on zoning). After discussion, the committee agreed to change the threshold to all residential lots two acres or less, with full phase one archaeological survey required for those lots. Lots over two acres only require testing within limits of disturbance. The rationale was that two acres balances cost and the ability to carry testing for denser subdivisions. - Historic Structures: Defined as structures greater than 50 years of age (National Park Service standard). Documentation for such structures includes a building plan (exterior walls) and photographs of interior spaces if accessible. The committee clarified that this documentation is for recordation, not necessarily for significance determination. - Maps: Changed "historic maps" to "19th and 20th century maps and aerial photographs" to clarify the source. - Cemetery Depiction on Plats: Extensive debate centered on whether to require showing cemeteries (from GIS data) on easement plats, vacation plats, and dedication plats. The final compromise: for easement plats, cemeteries within 50 feet of the proposed easement must be shown if no easement exists; for vacation plats, cemeteries do not need to be depicted if only vacation of easements is proposed. For SBBD (base density division) plats, cemeteries on the property within 50 feet of the property line must be shown if no cemetery easement exists. The committee also agreed to apply similar language to other plat types (8103.7 and 8103.8). - Grading Permits: After discussion, the committee decided to leave the existing grading permit language unchanged, as the current wording (cemeteries and buffers) was deemed sufficient. - Forest Management Plans: The committee agreed to add location of known cemeteries on the property within 50 feet of the property line, using GIS data. - Other Sections: The committee noted that similar changes would be applied to sections 8106 (site plans/CPAPs) and 8107 (existing conditions plans). Gated Communities Work Group - The committee was informed of the Board's direction to develop standards for gated residential communities. A director's work group will be formed, requiring two members from this committee and recommendations for traffic consultants. Members were encouraged to provide names at the next meeting. Key Outcomes - Vote: The committee voted to approve the archaeology amendments as modified (with one member abstaining). The approved draft will undergo agency referral and then return for final consideration. - Next Steps: - Staff will circulate a final draft of the archaeology amendments. - The next meeting is scheduled for May 7, 2026 (all-virtual). - Members interested in serving on the gated communities work group or nominating traffic consultants should contact the staff by the next meeting.

The Loudoun County Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA) held a public hearing on April 23, 2026, at 6:00 PM. The board considered an amendment to the Aventon Moorefield Station sign development plan to allow 24-hour illumination for most signs, and addressed a request to continue an appeal concerning a property in Hamilton. Discussion Items – Aventon Moorefield Station Sign Development Plan Amendment (LEGI-2025-0055) Staff presented the proposal to modify a condition of approval that previously limited illuminated sign hours to the establishment's hours of operations or 9 PM, whichever is earlier. The amendment would permit 24-hour illumination for seven signs: the monument sign, address sign, parking garage entry/exit signs, mailroom/package room signs, and a projecting sign until 9:30 PM. The leasing office sign would remain illuminated only during business hours. Staff noted that no changes to the number, size, or design of signs were requested, and all illuminated signs must comply with the zoning ordinance's light and glare standards (0.25 foot candles at lot line). Staff supported approval subject to the amended conditions of approval. Board members asked questions about the term "substantial conformance" used in the conditions. Deputy Zoning Administrator Polk explained the definition from the zoning ordinance, and Chair Forbes clarified its purpose to avoid litigation over minor deviations. Another board member asked why the original condition (9 PM restriction) was imposed and why it needed to change. The applicant's representative, Mark Coletta, Senior Managing Director of Aventon, stated that the condition was part of the applicant's original proposal to expedite production, but now that the building is occupied (30% leased), 24-hour illumination is needed for wayfinding, safety, first responders, and residents returning from the metro or airport. He noted no complaints about lighting and that the signs are no brighter than nearby sconces or streetlights. Board members expressed support, noting that illuminated signs aid emergency services and are common in similar developments. The board voted unanimously to approve the amendment. Discussion Items – Appeal of ZCOR-2025-0417 – 39071 East Colonial Highway, Hamilton (APPL-2026-0001) The appellant's representative, Jennifer Cleary, had requested a continuance because she was flying in from Albuquerque and could not find other appellants to attend. The county staff and the Hamilton Safety Center (the subject of the appeal) agreed to the continuance. The board discussed the process, with some members expressing discomfort with last-minute continuances and concerns about neighbor notification. A motion was made to continue the hearing to the next BZA meeting on May 28, 2026, with the requirement of readvertising and renotification of adjoining landowners by certified mail. The motion passed unanimously. Key Outcomes - The BZA approved the Aventon Moorefield Station Sign Development Plan Amendment (LEGI-2025-0055) with amended conditions of approval, effective immediately. The vote was unanimous. - The BZA continued the appeal for 39071 East Colonial Highway, Hamilton (APPL-2026-0001) to May 28, 2026, with full readvertising and renotification. The vote was unanimous. Administrative Reports - The Assistant County Attorney reported no items. - The Zoning Administrator noted that the May 28, 2026 docket will include the continued appeal, another sign development plan, and another appeal. The meeting adjourned.

The Loudoun County Board of Supervisors Transportation and Land Use Committee met on April 22, 2026, at 10:00 AM. The committee adopted two consent agenda items and discussed the Algonkian Parkway Multimodal Feasibility Study (Concept C). A motion to not pursue further evaluation of long-term improvements but to implement elements already in the Sidewalk and Trail Program (STP) and Intersection Improvement Program (IIP) passed 4-0-1. Consent Calendar - Advisory Plans Examiner Board Bylaws Amendment – Approved. - Facilities Standards Manual Public Review Committee Bylaws Amendments – Approved. Motion by Supervisor Kirshner, seconded by an unidentified member, passed 4-0-1. Discussion Items - Algonkian Parkway Multimodal Feasibility Study – Concept C (Algonkian District) - Staff recommended no further evaluation of Concept C, noting that the 6.7-mile corridor would cost an estimated $105 million (about $15 million per mile). Over half of the trail segments are on privately owned HOA property. Nineteen missing trail segments exist; none rank above 232 in the STP prioritization. One intersection (Algonkian & Cascades Parkway) is now a Rank 5 in the IIP. A 0.8-mile segment lies in Fairfax County. Staff proposed implementing the short- and mid-term safety improvements (estimated at $7.9 million) through the STP and IIP prioritization process, and retaining remaining corridor pieces in the CIP as Projects Identified for Future Development (PIFD) for tracking. - Vice Chair Turner expressed support for moving corridor improvements into the STP and IIP, emphasizing that this aligns prioritization. Chair Randall agreed, noting the high cost and that focusing on missing segments without trail is preferable to widening existing substandard HOA trails. Supervisor Brisman (district supervisor) advocated for keeping the full Concept C in the CIP’s future years to allow proffer negotiations, grant applications (especially for the Fairfax County segment), and connectivity with the planned Route 7 shared-use path. She highlighted that CTP designation already calls for 10-foot-wide multi-use trails but that most existing trails are narrower and private. - Chair TeKrony moved to recommend that the Board of Supervisors not pursue further evaluation of long-term improvements under Concept C and instead implement Concept C elements already in the STP and IIP using current prioritization processes. The motion did not include the second part of staff’s recommendation (retaining the remainder in PIFD). Vice Chair Turner seconded. Key Outcomes - Motion passed 4-0-1 (Chair TeKrony, Vice Chair Turner, and Supervisors Kirshner and Randall voted aye; Supervisor Brisman opposed). The committee will recommend that the full Board of Supervisors adopt the first part of staff’s recommendation: no further evaluation of Concept C long-term improvements, and implementation of the short- and mid-term safety improvements and the missing trail segments through the STP and IIP prioritization. The remaining corridor components (including the Fairfax County segment) will not be placed in the CIP’s PIFD at this time. - Supervisor Brisman noted disappointment that the second part was not included, as it would have enabled future proffer negotiations and grant opportunities for cross-county projects.

Loudoun County Board of Supervisors Business Meeting – April 21, 2026\n\nThe Loudoun County Board of Supervisors convened on April 21, 2026, for a lengthy business meeting covering consent agenda approvals, proclamations, public input on multiple land use and community issues, and key votes on development projects and zoning amendments. The meeting lasted approximately six hours, including a public input session and closed sessions.\n\n Consent Calendar\n- Approvals of six ceremonial proclamations and resolutions (Arab American Heritage Month, End Alexander Disease Day, Earth Week, Falcons Landing 30th Anniversary, Ashburn Presbyterian Church Sesquicentennial, Arbor Day).\n- Contract renewals and awards for road construction support, playground systems, adult crisis stabilization center provider, stormwater engineering, Evergreen Mills Road utility relocation, traffic calming, natural gas supply increase, and Goose Creek Trailhead Park design endorsement.\n- Conceptual interchange design endorsement at US 50/Loudoun County Parkway.\n- Board of Equalization bylaw amendments, various annual reports (Animal Advisory, Disability Services, Community Policy and Management, Community Services Board), Waterford Mill waterwheel addition, bond issuances, and Joint Board/School Board committee items.\n- Administrative items and response to board member initiative on demolition dust mitigation.\n- All items approved unanimously (6-0-3 with three members absent or late).\n\n Public Comments & Testimony\n- West Park Disc Golf: Multiple residents opposed the disc golf course, citing noise (chain noise demonstrated), parking lot proximity, and character change. Supporters highlighted demand and community benefits. \n- West Belmont (Item 10): Residents expressed traffic safety concerns, especially near schools, and opposed use of private roads for access. \n- Cannabis Zoning: A speaker (Brian Turner) from Landstone Conservancy requested careful regulation to address public safety issues with vape shops. \n- Winemakers/Zerschmead family: Urged support for TLUC recommendations on hours for ABC businesses and opposed restrictive public assembly limits on farms. \n- Other: Comments on segregated schools study, rural historic villages, data center impacts, floodplain recreation, and youth advisory board proposal.\n\n Discussion Items\n- Study of Segregated Schools (I-3): Staff presented findings documenting disparities and resilience. Discussion included historical context of bond delays, resolution opposing integration, and next steps for a task force. Supervisors praised the work.\n- Runway 30 Aviation Noise Mitigation (I-2): Update on FAA review; regional project group affirmations received; implementation could take up to five years; short-term recommendations discussed.\n- 2026 Environmental Excellence Awards: Ceremony recognizing six categories: Business (338 Net Zero), Community Group (Educational Climate Solutions), Educator (Lori Stone), Government Program (Stormwater Team), Student (Arna Katarki), and Posthumous (Darrell Schwall for environmental education).\n- West Park Improvements Design Endorsement: Debate over disc golf, parking, and screening. Motion passed 8-0-1 with amendments for 100-foot setback, enhanced buffers, and staff research on quieter baskets.\n- Active Recreation in Major Floodplain (Item 2a): Adopted staff’s Option 1 to prohibit active recreation in major floodplains, consistent with comp plan. Passed 7-1-1.\n- Cannabis Zoning ROIA (Item 12): Board approved resolution of intent to amend ordinances to address state cannabis legislation, with discussion on 1,000-foot distance from schools, governor’s amendments, and local authority. Passed 7-0-2.\n- NOVEC Substation (Item 8): Deferred to May 19 after discussion on GIS alternatives; motion passed 8-0-1.\n- Cochran Tech Data Center (Item 9): Motion to defer failed 4-4; denied on grounds of location and insufficient mitigation. Passed 7-1-1.\n- West Belmont (Item 10): Approved 7-1-1 despite concerns about open space and school costs.\n- DPZ Work Plan Update: Staff presented new zoning amendments (cannabis, religious/nonprofit housing, kennel standards, fee review). Approved unanimously.\n- Closed Session Matters: Authorized $4 million grant to LAWS for a domestic violence shelter (passed 8-0-1) and discussed property acquisitions.\n\n Key Outcomes\n- Approved: Consent calendar, environmental awards, West Park design (with amendments), active recreation floodplain policy, cannabis ROIA, DPZ work plan, and LAWS grant.\n- Denied: Cochran Tech data cener (7-1-1).\n- Deferred: NOVEC substation (to May 19), Cochran Tech deferred motion failed.\n- Votes: Most items passed with strong majorities; several had one or no opposing votes.\n- Next Steps: Staff to research quiet disc golf baskets, develop cannabis ordinance amendments, continue segregated schools task force procurement, and pursue FAA discussions on noise mitigation.

The Facility Standards Manual Public Review Committee met on April 15, 2026, to discuss a proposed code modification regarding the width of fire apparatus access roads (inclusive vs. exclusive of shoulders) and to review updated archaeology survey requirements. No members were present remotely, and all disclosed their membership in affected groups. Consent Calendar - The minutes from the March 19, 2026, meeting were approved. - Administrative items: Staff requested comments by the end of the following day on draft forms (tech memo, proper condition status update, and performance guarantee release certification) to be discussed at the May 7 meeting. Discussion Items Fire Marshal's Office Shoulder Code Modification - Chief Micah Kiger, Dan Irley, and Lee Stormer from the Fire Marshal's Office presented a concern about the current blanket modification in the FSM that interprets the 20-foot minimum roadway width as inclusive of shoulders, which is less restrictive than the state fire code (which requires 20 feet exclusive of shoulders). - Staff showed photographs of gravel shoulders that were poorly maintained: grass overgrowth, erosion, rutting, and loss of compaction, effectively reducing the drivable width below 20 feet. Fire apparatus (e.g., 80,000-pound ladder trucks) require a full 20 feet of stable surface for emergency operations and passing, especially in rural areas with tanker shuttle operations. - The Fire Marshal proposed removing the blanket modification and instead evaluating individual modification requests on a case-by-case basis, considering factors such as sprinkler systems, upgraded construction, or greater building setbacks. - Committee members discussed alternatives: paving the shoulders (which the Fire Marshal indicated would provide the needed 20 feet of pavement), and clarifying in the FSM that if shoulders are paved, they can count toward the 20-foot width. The Fire Marshal expressed willingness to accept that as long as the surface is paved and maintainable. - The committee noted that the issue primarily affects new construction, not existing roads, and that VDOT is responsible for maintaining most affected public streets. The discussion also touched on private driveways, gravel roads for rural businesses, and the challenge of enforcing maintenance after road acceptance. - A committee member asked about codifying that paved shoulders count as part of the 20 feet; the Fire Marshal agreed that 20 feet of pavement is the key requirement. The committee will work on new language for the FSM. Archaeology Survey Requirements - Steve and Heidi presented a revised proposal for Phase One archaeological surveys, responding to previous feedback. The new approach focuses on: - Testing proposed areas of ground disturbance (as done currently). - Testing the entirety of cluster lots (due to their small size) and recording standing structures on the entire property. - Conducting archaeological testing around standing structures (both existing and historically mapped) to capture information before potential demolition. - Discussion included clarifying definitions: "historic" for maps (e.g., USGS from the 1800s) and structures (greater than 50 years old), and replacing "recordation" with "documentation" to avoid confusion with land records. - The committee considered whether to limit the testing to cluster lots under a certain size (e.g., two acres) rather than all cluster lots. They debated whether "historic" should be defined in the FSM or by reference to the zoning ordinance. - The methods section for reconnaissance surveys was reorganized to include maps, photographs, and checking the cemetery/burial grounds database, with special cases for telecom, utilities, and previously developed properties. - The committee also reviewed changes to Chapter 8, including updates to terminology ("cultural resources survey") and requiring known cemeteries and cemetery buffers to be shown on certain plats and easement plats. There was discussion about whether to include vacation plats and the burden of requiring off-site surveys for minor easements. - A member opposed adding cemetery information to easement plats, arguing plats should only convey rights, not physical features. A compromise was suggested to place such information on an exhibit instead. Key Outcomes - The committee will develop revised FSM language for the shoulder width modification, likely requiring 20 feet of pavement (including paved shoulders) for new fire apparatus access roads, and removing the current blanket inclusive-of-shoulders provision. Individual modifications will be considered case-by-case. - For archaeology, the committee will continue refining the language: define "historic" for maps and structures, limit cluster lot testing to lots under a certain acreage, and decide whether cemetery information is required on easement plats or only on exhibits. A note was made to define "historic" in the FSM. - Next meetings are scheduled for April 16, 2026 (Dulles Room) and May 7, 2026 (Dulles Room). --- Note: The meeting date is listed as April 15, 2026, per the user-provided date, although the transcript and agenda indicate April 9, 2026. This discrepancy is noted for accuracy.