Public Meetings - Monterey, California

The Architectural Review Committee (ARC) of Monterey, California, met on June 4, 2025, at 3:50 PM PDT. The committee approved consent items, continued a sign permit application, and approved a conversion of an office building into 70 studio apartments at 60 Garden Court. Consent Calendar - Approved the minutes of the previous meeting. - Approved the project at 104 Tide Avenue, which had been presented at the prior meeting. - Both items were approved unanimously after no public comment. Public Comments & Testimony - No public comments were made on the consent agenda or general public comment. - Evan Dayton, Government Affairs Liaison for the Monterey Peninsula Chamber of Commerce, spoke in support of the 60 Garden Court project, noting the need for housing and urging approval. Discussion Items - Upper Ragsdale Sign Permit Application: Staff requested a continuation to June 18, 2025, due to the need for additional analysis on sign calculations. The committee voted unanimously to continue the item. - 60 Garden Court (ARP 24-0211 and ART 24-0261): Consideration of an architectural review and tree removal permit to convert an existing vacant office building into 70 studio apartments. The project is proposed in two phases (47 units in Phase 1, 23 in Phase 2) due to water allocation constraints. Exterior modifications include new siding, windows, balconies, a trash enclosure, and tree removal (three pines) with replacement (six oaks). The project complies with the city's inclusionary ordinance (20% affordable units) and utilizes a density bonus concession to waive shared open space requirements. The committee discussed unit diversity, water availability, and design details (colors, window framing). The applicant (Paul Davis Partnership) noted that other projects in the Garden Road corridor provide unit diversity. Key Outcomes - Consent Agenda: Approved unanimously. - Upper Ragsdale Sign Permit: Continued to the June 18, 2025 ARC meeting. Motion carried unanimously. - 60 Garden Court: Approved with conditions of approval. Motion carried unanimously. The decision is appealable to the Planning Commission within 10 days. - The next ARC meeting is scheduled for June 18, 2025, with items including the continued Upper Ragsdale sign permit and a new item at 3 Cl of this to drive.

At a regular meeting beginning at 3:51 PM UTC (8:51 AM Pacific), the council addressed a full agenda including a Pride Month proclamation, public comments, sewer service charges, continuation of a Native American apology resolution, debate on rainbow crosswalks, adoption of the FY2025‑2026 operating budget and capital improvement plan, and guidance for the Neighborhood and Community Improvement Program (NCIP). The meeting also included a special session at 4:00 PM and an evening session that continued into closed session. Proclamation – LGBTQ+ Pride Month - Mayor Williamson read a proclamation recognizing June 2025 as Pride Month in support of the LGBTQ+ community. Public speakers included supporters from Monterey Peninsula Pride and several residents who asked for equal recognition of veterans, environmentalists, and other groups. The proclamation was received by representatives of Monterey Peninsula Pride. Public Comments & Testimony - General public comments (non‑agendized) included: Nina Beattie criticized CalFire tree clearing and warned of the Navy’s Hawaii California Testing and Training Program, urging the council to ask the Coastal Commission to object; Lorna Moffitt opposed eucalyptus removal and herbicide use, citing invasive‑species pseudoscience; Brian Rosen called for peace, nonviolence, and protection of trees and animals; Stephanie voiced support for the Pride proclamation and encouraged recognition of other groups. Consent Calendar - Items 2‑6 (routine approvals) were passed unanimously on a roll‑call vote. Discussion Items - Sewer Service Charges (Item 7): Public hearing to continue placing sewer fees on the property tax roll. Staff confirmed current rates were previously approved; no protests were received. Council approved moving forward (5‑0). - Native American Apology Resolution (Item 9): Council continued the item to June 17, 2025, to allow further collaboration between staff and tribal leader Rudy Rosales. Public speakers supported the apology but urged deeper recognition of historical harms. Tribal Chairwoman Louise Miranda Ramirez also spoke. The continuation was approved unanimously. - Rainbow Crosswalks (Item 8): After extensive public comment (over 143 emails in favor, 94 opposed, and numerous in‑person and Zoom speakers), Mayor Williamson moved to approve a rainbow crosswalk at the mouth of Alvarado Street (option 2), contingent on private funding and staff approval of design consistent with standards. Councilmember Smith opposed, citing safety concerns and fiscal responsibility. Councilmember Rash supported, noting the updated crosswalk policy now allows future proposals as government speech. The motion passed 4‑1 (Smith dissenting). Offers of private funding and volunteer painting were noted. - FY2025‑2026 Operating Budget (Item 13): Staff presented a $120 million general fund budget with a projected $10 million deficit, closed through salary savings, reserve adjustments, and restructuring. Six new positions were added (net 5.25 FTE). Council approved the budget with an amendment to add $50,000 to the special event support program (down from $100,000) and administrative corrections to salary schedules. A motion by Councilmember Smith to reduce rental assistance from $250,000 to $200,000 failed for lack of a second. The budget passed 5‑0. - Capital Improvement Plan (Item 14): Staff presented a five‑year CIP with $21.9 million in appropriations for FY2025‑2026, funded primarily by Measure S and other restricted sources. General fund contributions are limited to $850,000 from facility reserves. Council approved the plan and authorized reappropriation of $11,295,940 from closed projects. Vote 5‑0. - NCIP Guidance (Item 15): Staff requested council guidance on priorities for the 2025‑2026 NCIP cycle. Proposed projects included Wharf 2 repairs ($1.65M), citywide restroom remodels ($800K), retaining wall repairs ($250K), ADA improvements ($300K), undergrounding utility credits ($1M), El Estero Park Center improvements ($1M), and Schultz Park Center improvements ($250K). Councilmembers provided feedback supporting most projects, with some caution on Wharf 2 and the Montecito Avenue tenant improvement (pending legal review). Formal guidance was adopted on a roll‑call vote with abstentions for potential conflicts (Councilmembers Barber and Smith recused from specific parks). Key Outcomes - Pride Month Proclamation – Issued and received. - Sewer Fee on Tax Roll – Continued for FY2025‑2026; no protests. - Native American Apology Resolution – Continued to June 17, 2025. - Rainbow Crosswalk – Approved (4‑1) at Alvarado and Pearl, contingent on private funding and staff‑approved design. - FY2025‑2026 Budget – Adopted (5‑0) with $50,000 added for special event support. - Five‑Year CIP – Approved (5‑0) with $11.3 million reappropriated. - NCIP Guidance – Council provided priorities; projects to be vetted by the NCIP committee and returned for final approval in April 2026.

On Wednesday, May 28, 2025, at approximately 3:50 PM, the Monterey City Council convened a study session and special meeting. The primary agenda item was receiving a presentation and approving the 2025–26 City Council Action Item Schedule, a comprehensive list of 174 initiatives across eight priority areas. The council also considered a governance policy for boards and commissions but tabled it due to time constraints. Public comments were heard on both items. Consent Calendar - No consent calendar items were listed on the agenda. Public Comments & Testimony - Marel Larmoud (43-year resident) urged the council to prioritize an indoor smoking ban in multi-unit residential buildings, citing health and fire safety concerns and noting that neighboring cities have already enacted such ordinances. - Jeff Whitmoyer (15-year resident) questioned why the Pride flag was not yet flown in June, pointing out that the city's 2022 ordinance mandates its display during that month. - Another resident commended the council for the transparent process of publishing timelines and recommended not allocating staff resources to water-related policy until more is known about the cease-and-desist order CDO status. - Esther (via Zoom) praised city staff as "the envy of neighboring cities" and urged the public to appreciate the council's and staff's efforts, especially given the budget challenges. - Diane Coward (via Zoom) thanked the Community Development Department for excellent customer service. - For the governance policy item, speakers expressed concerns: - Elizabeth Yanish (33-year resident) supported the proposed changes, emphasizing transparency and community engagement. - Mike Saveron (55-year resident, Chair of Museums and Cultural Arts Commission) warned against reducing commission numbers, noting a lack of communication between council and commissions. - Rainy Kimsey (Vice Chair of Museums and Cultural Arts Commission) argued that consolidating commissions would reduce expertise and resources, pointing to the valuable volunteer service of commissioners. - Shelly (via Zoom) objected to giving neighborhood associations preferential treatment in NCIP appointments and limiting the candidate pool. - Lori Mazuka (via Zoom) expressed frustration with long meetings and disrespect for public time, asking that written comments be forwarded to future meetings. - Chelsea Lenowska (via Zoom) echoed scheduling concerns and requested that future meetings not be overloaded. - Kevin (crematory operator for Keystone America/SCI) requested a minimum 10-year lease extension to install a new, more environmentally friendly crematory at the Monterey Cemetery, noting that the current unit is aging and requires costly repairs. He offered free funeral services for police officers and firefighters killed in the line of duty. Discussion Items 2025–26 City Council Action Item Schedule - Assistant City Manager Nat presented the schedule, developed from council goal-setting workshops held on January 21 and March 4, 2025. The schedule organizes 174 initiatives by eight priority areas: community engagement & transparency, public safety, fiscal stewardship, housing & homelessness services, economic development, quality workforce, infrastructure, and affordable housing/water sources. - Councilmembers provided extensive feedback and requested additions or adjustments: - Mayor Williamson requested a soft launch for the city website redesign to allow public feedback before the official launch; staff agreed. - Councilmember Rash requested a study session on the tree ordinance prior to drafting, to gather community input, especially regarding fire safety. He also asked to move up discussions on public art policy, governance (including term limits), and a volunteer program. The mayor cautioned against adding staff workload given the city's structural deficit (approximately $10 million). - Councilmember Smith supported reevaluating Measure G's renewal and exploring a vacancy tax. - Councilmember Garcia asked about the timeline for the residential parking program and whether community input would be sought again; staff confirmed yes. - Councilmember Barber inquired about staff capacity for housing element deadlines and water allocation planning; Kim Cole (Community Development Director) reported that 62% of 53 housing element programs have been initiated, but some deadlines may need to be renegotiated with HCD. She noted that the team handles 300–350 permits annually with only four planners, and recent state mandates have increased workloads. - Councilmember Smith noted the importance of the Highway 68/Skyline Forest safety study; staff confirmed a meeting with Caltrans and budget for a consultant study after July 1. - Staff acknowledged all feedback and stated they would update the schedule accordingly. The council voted unanimously to approve the schedule as a "living document" with the understanding that staff would incorporate input and bring back revisions. Governance Policy on Boards and Commissions (Continued/Tabled) - The council was scheduled to discuss updating the governance policy for board and commission appointments. Due to time constraints, Mayor Williamson made a motion to table the item to a future date. The motion passed unanimously. Public comment was taken as noted above. The council did not set a specific date but committed to scheduling it as soon as possible. Closed Session Items - The council held closed session to discuss real property negotiations for items 3 and 4: 1 Old Golf Course Road and the crematorium lease at Monterey Cemetery. Public comment was taken from Kevin (see above). The closed session lasted approximately 10–20 minutes. No report-out was provided in the transcript. Key Outcomes - Unanimous approval (5-0) of the 2025–26 City Council Action Item Schedule as a living document, with staff to incorporate council feedback and return with revisions. - Unanimous decision (5-0) to table the discussion on city council governance policy for boards and commissions to a future meeting; no specific date set, but staff will coordinate scheduling. - Staff will add requested items to the action item schedule, including a smoking ban policy, tree ordinance study session, public art policy discussion, volunteer program exploration, and water availability policy (timeline to be determined). - The city will continue to address its structural deficit, with a budget proposal for FY 2025–26 to be presented at the next council meeting (likely week of June 2). - The city was recognized with an American Planning Association Northern California Chapter award for excellence in planning for its housing element. - The council did not take formal action on the crematorium lease extension; closed session negotiations were held.

The Monterey Planning Commission met on May 27, 2025, from approximately 3:53 PM to 5:34 PM. Commissioners approved consent calendar items, heard public comments, and deliberated on a major use permit for 456 Lighthouse Avenue. The commission adopted a negative declaration for the project but continued the use permit to June 10, 2025, to address parking concerns. A separate item on an SB 9 ordinance was also continued. Consent Calendar - Approved: The minutes from the May 13, 2025, meeting were approved unanimously via roll call (Chair Bluth, Vice Chair Silva, Commissioners Brassfield, Dawson, Latasa all voting yes). Public Comments & Testimony - Remote Caller (ending in 902): Expressed opposition to the potential consolidation of the Planning Commission and the Architectural Review Commission (ARC), stating it would restrict input and is not a good use of city resources. Urged the commission to oppose the consolidation. Discussion Items - 456 Lighthouse Avenue – Assembly Major Use and Amplified Music Permit (UP 2307) - Staff Presentation (Christy Sabdo, Principal Planner): The applicant originally proposed 12 events per year (max 314 people) but reduced to 6 events (3 events with max 250 people, 3 events with max 175 people). Events would be private, car-related, invitation-only, held indoors with occasional outdoor aspects. Noise study found compliance with city standards. Parking is not required under the Lighthouse Specific Plan, but staff recommended denial of the use permit due to potential detrimental impacts on surrounding neighborhood from parking demand (only 20 on-site spaces, max 30 with valet). Staff recommended approving the negative declaration (no significant environmental impacts) but denying the use permit because it could not meet Finding 2 (would not be detrimental). - Commissioner Questions: Commissioners asked about parking alternatives (e.g., nearby garages, shuttles), the role of parking in CEQA, and whether conditions could mitigate impacts. Staff noted parking is not a CEQA issue but can be considered for the use permit. - Applicant Presentation (Sam Pitnick and Steve Kittrell): The applicant highlighted the reduction from 12 to 6 events, emphasized that not all attendees drive (estimated 70 cars per 250-person event), and proposed a one-year trial period with conditions including the ability for the city to revoke the permit if issues arise. They expressed willingness to explore parking arrangements with nearby garages or shuttle services. - Public Testimony: - Carl Outs (property owner on Lighthouse Ave): Opposed the project, stating it would create parking impacts on a narrow street and conflict with the Specific Plan’s intent to preserve parking for residents and businesses. - Anonymous Speaker (past president, New Monterey Business Association): Supported the project, noting the events are well-organized, bring business to the area, and that noise is expected in a business district. - Commission Deliberation: Commissioners generally supported the project concept but struggled with Finding 2 due to parking. They discussed potential mitigations, including tiered parking plans based on event size, use of city garages, and shuttle buses. Staff suggested a parking target of 80–88 spaces (based on a comparable restaurant use ratio). The commission agreed to continue the use permit to the June 10, 2025, meeting to allow the applicant to develop a specific parking plan. - California Senate Bill 9 Ordinance (Chapters 33 and 38 of City Code) - Staff requested a continuance to June 10, 2025, to finalize the draft ordinance. No formal presentation. Commissioners noted the item’s potential impact on ARC workload. Key Outcomes - Negative Declaration (ER 240018): Adopted unanimously (5-0) for the 456 Lighthouse Avenue project. - Use Permit (UP 2307): Continued to the June 10, 2025, planning commission meeting for further discussion on parking mitigations. - SB 9 Ordinance: Continued to the June 10, 2025, meeting. - Next Steps: Staff and applicant will work on a parking plan addressing the 80–88 space benchmark, potentially using tiered solutions based on event size.

The Monterey City Council held a special meeting on May 23, 2025, to receive a presentation on the draft Local Road Safety Plan and to consider a resolution authorizing rainbow crosswalks at three locations. The meeting included extensive public testimony and council deliberation. The road safety plan was received for future adoption, while the rainbow crosswalk resolution was continued to a later meeting after a 3-1 vote. Public Comments & Testimony Local Road Safety Plan: - One in-person speaker raised concerns about congestion on the Highway 1 off-ramp near the hospital. - Dr. Ri Chang, a bike commuter, urged stronger bicycle infrastructure, stating that “class three bikeways are not improvements” and advocated for protected bike lanes. - Marianne expressed concerns about safety on Jefferson and Franklin streets. Rainbow Crosswalks: - Over 50 individuals spoke or submitted comments. Supporters emphasized the symbolic importance for LGBTQ visibility, citing a CDC report that 41% of LGBTQ youth have considered suicide and stating that the crosswalk could save lives. Monterey Peninsula Pride offered to contribute up to $3,000 towards installation. - Opponents cited concerns about taxpayer funding, safety distractions, and the lack of a broader process for community input. Several speakers recommended private fundraising and more thorough engagement with affected businesses and neighbors. The process was criticized as rushed. - District 5 County Supervisor Kate Daniels and MPUSD Superintendent PK Diffenbaugh spoke in favor, noting the positive impact on students and community morale. Discussion Items Local Road Safety Plan (LRSP): - Staff presented the draft plan, funded by a $200,000 federal grant. The plan analyzed over 2,000 collisions (2018–2023), with six fatalities and 36 serious injuries. Emphasis areas included vulnerable road users, signal violations, intersection crashes, and speeding. - Council discussed data sources, coordination with Caltrans, and the role of education and enforcement. The plan is intended to position the city for future safety funding. - The presentation was informational; the plan will return for adoption in July 2025. Rainbow Crosswalks: - Three locations were proposed: Lighthouse & Reside (near site of past anti-LGBTQ violence), Alvarado & Pearl (starting point of Pride parade), and Pacific & Masson (near City Hall flag raising). - Cost estimates ranged from $2,000 (paint, in-house) to $15,000 (thermoplastic, contracted). Maintenance would require periodic refresh every 3–5 years. - Council members were divided. Councilmember Garcia strongly supported the crosswalks, calling them “a message of inclusion” and noting his experience with discrimination. Councilmember Rash raised questions about ADA compliance and the city’s crosswalk policy, urging more community input. Councilmember Smith opposed using streets for symbolic art, citing safety and the risk of opening the door to other group requests. - The Council voted 3-1 to continue the item to the regular June 17 meeting to allow outreach to business districts and further policy discussion. The crosswalk design meets federal MUTCD guidelines by maintaining standard white lines and contrast for visibility. Key Outcomes - Local Road Safety Plan: Received; final adoption scheduled for July 2025. - Rainbow Crosswalk Resolution: Continued to June 17, 2025 (regular council meeting) to facilitate additional public outreach and potential private funding. The motion passed 3-1. - Closed Session Items: Tabled due to time constraints.

Date: May 22, 2025 | Time: 3:50 PM – 5:36 PM | Location: Monterey Public Library (Zoom hybrid) The Library Board of Trustees met to welcome new Assistant Library Director Melissa, discuss the fiscal year budget outlook, review the NCIP facility proposal, and approve the consent agenda. The meeting also addressed rescheduling the June meeting and reviewed advocacy efforts for capital improvements. Consent Calendar - Approved (5-0): The consent agenda as amended, including: - Minutes from prior meeting (with a correction to remove an unclear trustee comment). - Policy revision for item 6: corrected the billing timeline from 35 to 49 days after due date to align with current practice. - Routine financial and administrative reports. - Item 3 was pulled from the consent agenda for discussion and accepted as a report without a formal vote. Public Comments & Testimony No members of the public were present. Discussion Items Introduction of Assistant Library Director The board welcomed Melissa, who joined the library on May 16, 2025. She previously served as branch manager at the Marina Library for six years and is a Monterey resident. Trustees introduced themselves and shared their backgrounds. Melissa noted she sees a need to bridge library and museum projects and support the facility improvements already underway. Library Advocacy & NCIP Facility Proposal Director Brian presented potential projects for the upcoming Neighborhood Community Improvement Program (NCIP) cycle, with a July deadline. Proposed focus areas included: - ADA compliance upgrades (elevator audible signals, guide wire replacement, entryway improvements). - Restroom renovations (cost estimates between $65,500 and $100,000). - Dumbwaiter installation to improve accessibility for staff moving materials between floors. - Window upgrades (single-pane to dual-pane) for energy efficiency and UV protection. - Battery backup or generator for community resilience (use as a cooling/charging center during emergencies). - After-hours community room access through door and alarm panel updates. Trustee Moreau reported that NCIP committee representatives were supportive of the library as a "community resiliency center" and liked the combination of ADA, resilience, and archival preservation. The board discussed aligning these ideas with the city's broader capital improvement plans. Director Brian also updated the board on the May 20 city council meeting where the library was mentioned in the context of a potential bond measure and the need to prioritize facilities. City Council Updates and Budget Outlook Brian noted council discussion included a rough estimate of $48 million for a new library building, a possible sales tax or TOT increase, and questions about reducing library operating days to lower costs. Trustees expressed concern about any reduction in service days and emphasized the need to advocate for adequate funding. Rescheduling of June Meeting Due to multiple trustee conflicts, the board voted to cancel the regular June 26 meeting and reschedule it to July 7, 2025, at 4:00 PM at the Monterey Public Library. This ensures all trustees can attend. The July 7 agenda will include the election of new chair and vice chair. Key Outcomes - Consent agenda approved with technical correction to policy item 6. - NCIP proposal development: Director Brian and trustees de Lormier and Moreau will draft a proposal emphasizing ADA improvements, restroom upgrades, and community resilience features; a draft is expected by the July meeting. - Meeting rescheduled: June 26 meeting moved to July 7, 2025, 4:00 PM at the library. - New assistant director introduced and will begin orientation. - Cafe vendor approved by city council (May 20); health permit timeline is pending, with hopes to open by summer.

The Architectural Review Committee (ARC) met on May 21, 2025, to consider several items including window replacements, sign permits, an accessory dwelling unit proposal, and a balcony expansion. The meeting was held in the City Council chamber and via Zoom. The committee reordered the agenda to address items efficiently. Public Comments & Testimony - Bob Jansen, a neighbor on Watson Street, expressed concerns about the proposed ADUs at 384 Larkin Street, stating they would block 90% of his view and create privacy and noise issues. He suggested a flat roof design to mitigate impacts. - Molly Erickson, representing client Carol Erickson, argued that the ADU project at 384 Larkin Street is inconsistent with the Old Town Neighborhood Area Plan, citing the open carports, cantilevered second story, and other design elements. She urged the committee to require modifications. - The property owner of 1099 Del Monte Avenue spoke in support of the sign permit, stating the existing sign is entirely on private property and that lowering it to eight feet with a solid base would create a safety hazard for pedestrians and cyclists exiting the driveway. Discussion Items 487 Foam Street – Window Replacement - The applicant proposed color repair and replacement of up to 59 exterior sliding glass balcony doors and windows, changing the color from red/orange to dark bronze. Staff recommended approval, finding the project appropriate and consistent with guidelines. The committee unanimously approved the architectural review permit (ARP 240168). 2102 North Fremont Street – Sign Permit - The applicant requested a freestanding sign and wall signs for the El Castel Motel. Staff recommended approval with a condition to remove sign number four, as it would detract from architectural features. The committee approved the sign permit (SI240226) with the condition and standard conditions. 384 Larkin Street – Two ADUs Over Carport - The applicant sought an architectural review permit for two second-story accessory dwelling units above a carport, requiring a height exception (proposed height 23 feet 10 inches; maximum allowed 18 feet, up to 20 feet with matching roof pitch). Staff recommended approval with conditions, including matching siding color. - Public comments: Bob Jansen and Molly Erickson raised concerns about view impairment, privacy, and consistency with the Old Town plan. The applicant’s architect, Paul Davis, offered to lower the structure by 12 to 18 inches to improve views. - The committee discussed lowering the roof ridge by 12 inches while maintaining the roof pitch, to mitigate visual impacts. The applicant agreed. The committee voted 4-0 to approve the permit (ARP 230048) with conditions: lower the roof ridge by a minimum of 12 inches, match siding color to the primary dwelling, and standard conditions. 1099 Del Monte Avenue – Sign Face Replacement - The applicant requested replacement of sign faces on an existing non-conforming pole-mounted sign. Staff recommended denial because the sign does not meet current sign guidelines (height 11.8 feet, visible poles, no full-width base) and its location may be in the city right-of-way; a survey was not provided. The property owner argued safety concerns if the sign is lowered. - The committee discussed the need for a survey to determine the sign’s location relative to the right-of-way and a traffic engineering review of safety impacts. The committee voted to continue the item to a future date pending receipt of a survey and traffic review. 104 Tide Avenue – Balcony Expansion - The applicant requested a permit amendment for a side-yard setback variation to expand a second-story balcony that had already been constructed beyond the approved permit. The variation was minimal (0.2 feet). Staff recommended approval, noting no neighbor objections and minimal privacy impacts. The committee approved the permit amendment (PA 250033). Key Outcomes - 487 Foam Street: Approved (ARP 240168). - 2102 North Fremont Street: Approved (SI240226) with condition to remove sign 4. - 384 Larkin Street: Approved (ARP 230048) with condition to lower roof ridge by 12 inches and match siding color. - 1099 Del Monte Avenue: Continued to a future date pending survey and traffic engineering review. - 104 Tide Avenue: Approved (PA 250033) for setback variation. All decisions are appealable to the Planning Commission within 10 days. Forms are available online and in the planning office.

The Monterey City Council met on May 20, 2025, in an afternoon and evening session. The meeting included presentations honoring retiring Parks and Recreation Director Karen Larson and celebrating National Public Works Week, followed by a lengthy consent calendar, public comments, and major discussions on infrastructure financing options and the future of the Old Capital site park plan. The council also received a report on job vacancies under AB 2561 and considered several professional services agreements. Presentations - Recognition of Karen Larson (Parks & Recreation Director): The council, city staff, and public celebrated Karen Larson's 39 years of service. City Manager Hans Usler highlighted her career from part-time seasonal employee to director. Council members praised her kindness, professionalism, and impact on the community. A street sign and proclamation were presented. Public commenters (Wendy Brickman, Kelly Violini, Tom) offered thanks. - National Public Works Week 2025: The council proclaimed May 18–24, 2025, as National Public Works Week. Public Works Director Andrea Arnie and staff presented a video tribute and overview of divisions (engineering, fleet, streets, utilities, harbor, parking). Public commenters (Wendy Brickman, Kelly Violini) commended the department. Consent Calendar - Items 6, 7, 9, 10, 11, and 13 were pulled for separate discussion. All other consent items were approved unanimously. Public Comments & Testimony - General Public Comment (Afternoon session): - Wendy Brickman (North Fremont Business District, Fisherman's Wharf Association): Strongly supported Embark Monterey's request for a 180-day extension on their retail cannabis permit, citing their diligent progress and community partnerships. - Kelly Violini (Monterey County Fair, North Fremont Business District): Also supported Embark's extension, noting the need for investment in the North Fremont corridor. - Devin Wardlow (Vice President, Embark): Requested an extension, detailing eight months of engagement with city staff on relocation. He argued that the city's changed direction warranted additional time, and they had submitted a zoning clearance for a new location. - Taryn (local resident, Monterey Bay Aquarium staff): Urged a citywide initiative to reduce plastic waste, modeled on a successful Australian study. - Nina Beattie: Raised multiple concerns: (1) opposed Army burn at Fort Ord superfund site; (2) criticized PG&E's plan to restart Moss Landing battery facility; (3) called for a resolution to stop funding Israel's actions in Gaza; (4) opposed marijuana stores in Monterey. - Public Comment on Specific Items: - Item 6 (Fire Hazard Zones): Nina Beattie questioned the need for additional restrictions beyond state mandates. - Item 7 (Council Compensation): Nina Beattie urged a no vote. - Item 9 (Wireless Engineering - CTC): Nina Beattie alleged CTC has bias and conflict of interest due to building wireless networks. - Item 10 (Wireless Planning - Rincon): Nina Beattie criticized Rincon's errors and bias, urging in-house processing. - Item 11 (On-call Planning Services): Nina Beattie questioned the $9 million total cap and vetting of firms; Laura Pratt (GEM) criticized outsourcing and suggested using AI and in-house staff. - Item 13 (Building Inspection Services): Nina Beattie questioned the need for outsourcing. - Item 18 (AB 2561 Vacancy Report): Laura Pratt (Vice Chair, GEM) presented a detailed critique: the city has 31 vacant GEM positions, some for years; internal promotions have declined to 13% of recruitments; the city uses contractors for work employees could do. She called for filling vacancies, especially via internal promotions. - Item 25 (Infrastructure Financing): Laurie (NCIP) opposed repurposing NCIP funds for debt service, supported increasing TOT instead. Kurt Tipton (NCIP, downtown) supported raising TOT and opposed cutting NCIP. Tom (public) suggested removing self-funding items from the discussion and exploring NCIP-backed debt financing. Corey Madden (Monterey Museum of Art) advocated for infrastructure on Calle Principal. Keith Rootsaert (Giant Kelp Restoration Project) linked kelp restoration to tourism and climate resilience. - Item 26 (Old Capital Site): Two public commenters supported the preferred concept (hiking trails, preserve). One speaker (Daniel) claimed there is a water well on the property. Another (Esther) noted the housing discussion was previously raised, but deed restrictions limit use. Discussion Items - Item 6: Fire Hazard Severity Zones – First reading to adopt state-mandated maps. Councilmember Smith asked about city's additional requirements (lot-line rule). Division Chief Justin Cooper explained the city is adopting state maps as-is, with minor clarification. Unanimously approved. - Item 7: Council Compensation Increase – Second reading. Councilmembers Smith and Garcia opposed, citing timing and budget concerns. Councilmember Barber argued that the increase (effective 2027) ensures diverse representation and keeps pace with inflation. Passed 4-2 (Smith and Garcia opposed). - Items 9 & 10: Wireless Facility Services – Both contracts (CTC Media for engineering, $200k; Rincon for planning, $200k) were approved after public comment. Councilmember Barber noted concerns about outsourcing but acknowledged need for specialized expertise. City Manager Usler clarified that contracts are use-based and costs are passed to applicants. - Item 11: On-call Planning Services – Nine firms, each up to $1 million (total $9 million cap). Councilmember Smith pulled to clarify that the cap is not a budget; costs are reimbursed. Approved unanimously after discussion of outsourcing vs. in-house capacity. - Item 13: Building Inspection Services – Contract with CSG, Four Leaf, etc. (up to $500k each). Approved unanimously. Hans Usler noted difficulty recruiting plan checkers. - Item 18: AB 2561 Vacancy Report – Presented by HR Director Brett Neal. Citywide vacancy rates ranged from 0% to 17.54% (Management Employees). None over 20%. Recruitment and retention efforts were outlined. GEM union presentation criticized slow hiring and lack of internal promotions. Council asked for future reports to include breakdown of promotions vs. new hires. No formal action; report received. - Item 19: BID Assessments – Annual levy for Cannery Row, New Monterey, and North Fremont Business Improvement Districts. No protests. Unanimously approved. - Item 20: Crosswalk Policy – Presented by Engineering Assistant Marissa (with help from Beth). Policy standardizes evaluation of crosswalks. Council discussed AB 413 parking restrictions, ADA compliance, and community requests. Motion to adopt staff recommendation passed unanimously. - Item 25: Infrastructure Financing Options – Major presentation by Finance Director Rafaela and City Manager Usler. Identified $105 million in needs over 1-5 years, $234 million over 6-30 years, and a $10 million structural deficit. Options included: internal (sell assets, repurpose NCIP, parking revenue), external (grants, bonds, tax measures). Council discussed priorities: public safety facility, library, roads, ADA, wharves. Consensus to pursue community outreach, polling, and a phased approach. Council asked for inventory of assets, cost estimates for remodeling vs. new builds, and analysis of a 0.375% sales tax increase. No formal vote; direction to staff. - Item 26: Old Capital Site Park Plan – Presentation by Parks & Rec staff and BFS Landscape Architects. Preferred concept: preserve as open space with hiking trails, limited parking, ADA access, and interpretive elements. Estimated cost $12 million. Councilmember Williamson expressed desire to explore housing potential but was informed of deed restrictions limiting use to parkland. Councilmember Barber supported phased approach. Motion to accept staff recommendation (preferred concept) passed unanimously. Key Outcomes - Appointments/Recognitions: Karen Larson recognized; Public Works Week proclaimed. - Approved Consent Items (except those pulled): All routine items passed. - Item 6 (Fire Hazard Zones): Unanimously approved (first reading). - Item 7 (Council Compensation): Approved 4-2 (effective Jan 1, 2027). - Items 9, 10, 11, 13 (Contracts): All approved unanimously. - Item 18 (Vacancy Report): Received; council requested future reports include promotion breakdown. - Item 19 (BID Assessments): Approved unanimously. - Item 20 (Crosswalk Policy): Approved unanimously. - Item 25 (Infrastructure Financing): Council provided direction to staff to develop a comprehensive funding strategy, including community outreach, polling, and analysis of tax measures, asset sales, and NCIP restructuring. Staff to return with a roadmap in October/November 2025. - Item 26 (Old Capital Site): Council approved the preferred concept plan (master plan) for preservation as open space with hiking trails. No immediate funding commitment; phased implementation expected. - Closed Session: Items 21 (crematorium) and 22 (Regency Monterey) continued to May 23 special meeting. Items 23 (labor negotiations) and 24 (litigation) received confidential direction.

The Monterey Zoning Administrator, Levi Hill, convened a public hearing on May 15, 2025. The agenda included approval of the April 17, 2025 meeting minutes and consideration of two use permit applications: a retaining wall at 469 Toyon Drive and a motor vehicle rental use at 791 Foam Street. Discussion Items - Approval of April 17, 2025 Meeting Minutes: The minutes were approved as submitted without any edits or public comment. - 469 Toyon Drive – Retaining Wall Over 6 Feet (UP240044): Applicant Jack Camp of Central Coast Civil and Structural Engineering, on behalf of owner Larry Burkett, requested a use permit for a retaining wall exceeding six feet in height. Staff presented the project as CEQA exempt (Class 3) and recommended approval, finding the wall consistent with the R1 zoning and not detrimental to public safety. The wall would stabilize a hillside and was designed by a licensed engineer. Contractor Dustin Lilly spoke in support, describing a severe hillside slip that damaged the property, which the owner attributes to drainage changes from upstream permitted projects. He noted the owner had applied for FEMA assistance and that the cost and process had been detrimental to the elderly homeowner and his wife, who has dementia. No public comment was received. The Zoning Administrator approved the permit with conditions. - 791 Foam Street – Motor Vehicle Sales and Rental (UP250061): Applicant Alistair Clements, representing business owner Adam Foster, sought a use permit for a retail sales major / motor vehicle rental use in a mixed-use neighborhood under the Planned Community Lighthouse Specific Plan (PCLH). Staff recommended approval, noting no additional parking is required under the specific plan. The use would store small rental vehicles in a gated rear lot and operate with one to two staff per shift. The police department had no objections. Alistair Clements described the business as similar to Go Car Tours, providing recreational opportunities for tourists and locals. Adam Foster spoke via Zoom in support, thanking the committee. No public comment was received. The Zoning Administrator approved the permit with conditions. Key Outcomes - Approved the April 17, 2025 meeting minutes as submitted. - Approved Use Permit UP240044 for the retaining wall at 469 Toyon Drive with conditions. - Approved Use Permit UP250061 for motor vehicle rental at 791 Foam Street with conditions. - Decisions are appealable to the Planning Commission within 10 days.