Public Meetings - Nampa, Idaho

Note on date discrepancy: The transcript begins with the chair stating "February twenty-fourth, twenty twenty-six," while the provided meeting date is 2026-02-25 00:58:32+00:00. This summary uses the provided date as instructed. The Nampa Planning and Zoning Commission met on February 25, 2026, at 6:00 PM. The meeting included a director's report on recent city council actions, approval of a consent agenda (with one item removed), and public hearings on four items: a conditional use permit for a nail salon, a conditional use permit for a tire and auto repair shop, an annexation and preliminary plat for a subdivision, and a zoning map amendment for a mobile auto repair business. All four items were approved. Consent Calendar - Director's Report: Rodney Ashby reported that the city council approved the following items on which the commission had previously recommended approval: Middlebury North 4 subdivision final plat (13 single-family detached units, four common lots); annexation and zoning for Cherry Lane right-of-way (East Ranch subdivision); a variance for a freestanding sign at the Hawaii Center (northwest of Lake Lowell Avenue and Twelfth Avenue Road); and a denial of annexation and zoning for Orchard Acres (five yes, three no on traffic, train proximity, schools, and multifamily concerns). - Item Removal: The commission voted unanimously to remove the subdivision final plat approval for Middlebury South 1 (50 single-family lots, seven common lots) from the consent agenda entirely, at the applicant's request. The item was removed from the agenda. - Amended Consent Agenda Approved: The amended consent agenda was approved unanimously. Public Comments & Testimony - Item 3-1 (Grace Beauty Co.): No public testimony was offered. - Item 3-2 (Budget Tires): Christy Butler, a member of the public, commented on the building's paint and noted that the applicant's current location has similar traffic access issues. - Item 3-3 (Hudson Yards): No public testimony was offered. - Item 3-4 (Rezoning for mobile auto repair): No public testimony was offered. Discussion Items - Item 3-1 – Conditional Use Permit for Grace Beauty Co. (Nail Salon): Applicant Desiree Vasquez described the salon as a family-oriented, calm environment. Staff planner Damien Snodgrass noted this was the first application under the new form-based code for the Central Historic district. The building is existing, so only certain form-based requirements apply (e.g., 30-foot required occupied space from the façade). A neighboring business submitted a late comment about ventilation; staff noted that the building department will require proper ventilation per code at the time of tenant improvement. Commissioners discussed that the market should determine business saturation and that competition is healthy. The applicant agreed to the conditions. Approved unanimously. - Item 3-2 – Conditional Use Permit for Budget Tires (Auto Repair): Applicant Javier Gonzalez explained the business will sell new and used tires and perform light auto repair, serving about 1,000–1,500 vehicles per year. Staff noted that the site requires parking improvements, a fence for tire storage, and fire mitigation. Access on 11th Avenue is under Idaho Transportation Department (ITD) jurisdiction; a condition requires ITD review. Commissioner concerns about potential access restrictions were addressed, but staff noted the city cannot override ITD. Approved unanimously. - Item 3-3 – Annexation, Zoning to RS7, and Preliminary Plat for Hudson Yards: Applicant Bonnie Leighton proposed 59 single-family residential lots on 21.51 acres, with 34.22% open space, a basketball court, and walking trails. Density is 2.74 dwelling units per acre (low end of medium density). The project will be developed in two phases. Staff reported that water, sewer, and pressurized irrigation will connect to the adjacent New York Landing subdivision. The police department recommended funding for 0.02 additional officers and 0.17 firefighters. The commission praised the infill and open space. Approved unanimously. - Item 3-4 – Zoning Map Amendment from RS6 to BC (Mobile Auto Repair): Applicant Lenin Caballero, representing the property owners, requested rezoning to allow a mobile auto repair business with on-site storage of tools and parts but no repair work on site. Staff noted that home occupation does not permit this use, and the BC zone allows the intended uses. Commissioners expressed concern about creating a spot zone of BC in a residential area, but noted the property is adjacent to industrial uses and the comprehensive plan allows commercial stretching. The applicant agreed to conditions. Approved unanimously. Key Outcomes - Item 3-1 (Grace Beauty Co.): Motion to approve as presented with recommended conditions and proposed findings. Passed unanimously. The CUP becomes effective 15 calendar days after written decision, pending appeal. - Item 3-2 (Budget Tires): Motion to approve as presented with recommended conditions and proposed findings. Passed unanimously. Effective 15 days after written decision, pending appeal. - Item 3-3 (Hudson Yards): Motion to recommend approval of annexation, zoning to RS7, and preliminary plat as presented. Passed unanimously. The recommendation will go to city council. - Item 3-4 (Rezoning to BC): Motion to recommend approval of the zoning map amendment with all recommended conditions and proposed findings. Passed unanimously. The recommendation will go to city council. - Adjournment: The meeting was adjourned unanimously after the regular agenda.

This joint workshop brought together the city councils of Nampa and Caldwell with Valley Regional Transit (VRT) leadership to discuss transit services in Canyon County. VRT CEO Elaine Clegg and Chief Development Officer Stephen Hunt presented an overview of recent service improvements, ridership trends, funding challenges, and future plans. No decisions were made; the session was informational and aimed at fostering dialogue between the two cities as they consider the role of transit in their communities. VRT Presentation Highlights - VRT has increased Canyon County ridership by 17% over two years, nearly reaching a three-year target of 20%. - Service hours have declined 6% while population grew 15%, resulting in nearly a 20% drop in service hours per capita. - Route 42 (serving Nampa-Caldwell corridor) was redesigned to run hourly all day, leading to significant ridership gains. - Route 40 (Caldwell to Boise via freeway) was combined from two underperforming routes and now offers all-day service. - Route 45 (Nampa to Boise State via CWI) saw the largest percentage increase in ridership. - On-demand service lost some riders as more people shifted to improved fixed routes, but unmet demand remains due to limited seats. - VRT is testing commingling of paratransit and on-demand services to increase seat availability; in three weeks, the seat gap dropped from 13% to 6%. - A new vanpool program will launch in spring 2026 for trips within Canyon County and to western counties, with no local cost to cities. - VRT is exploring supplemental event services for downtown Caldwell, the Ford Idaho Center, and other venues. - Federal funds cover about 50% of VRT's budget; Idaho is the only state without dedicated transit funding. - The 2030 census may reclassify the area as a large urban area, reducing federal matching rates. Discussion Items - Council members asked for detailed ridership data on Routes 40 and 42, specifically boardings originating in Nampa and Caldwell versus elsewhere. - Council member Bills noted Nampa currently bears about 66% of Canyon County's transit costs and expressed concern that Nampa cannot continue to be the sole carrier of such services. - Council member Stoddick questioned the county's relatively low contribution compared to cities and suggested the county should contribute more. - Council member Stoddick also raised concerns about VRT's past investment in electric buses, calling them unreliable, and expressed support for compressed natural gas (CNG) buses instead. - Council member Reynolds asked about transitioning from a system used primarily by those who need transit to one that people want to use, citing convenience and traffic mitigation. - Council member Griffin noted budget pressures on Nampa (e.g., shelter cost increases, infrastructure failures) and questioned the return on investment given low per-route ridership. He requested average daily ridership data for Routes 40 and 42 originating in Nampa and Caldwell. - Council member Griffin also expressed willingness to support placing a transit levy on the ballot if VRT proposes one, emphasizing giving voters the choice. - Mayor of Caldwell asked about the threshold for federal funding changes and when costs might shift. - Council member Register asked about the Canyon County Rides to Wellness service and its regional versus local ridership. Key Outcomes - No votes were taken; the workshop was informational with no action items. - VRT committed to providing additional ridership data to both councils, specifically daily boardings on Routes 40 and 42 by municipality of origin. - VRT will share video testimonials from Canyon County Transit Day as follow-up. - Council member Griffin indicated support for a future transit levy measure if placed on a May primary or general election ballot. - Both councils acknowledged the need to evaluate transit funding collaboratively, especially given state-imposed revenue restrictions and shared growth challenges.

The Nampa City Council held a regular meeting on February 17, 2026, starting at 5:01 PM. The meeting covered consent items, staff reports, several public hearings, and new business. The most significant action was the denial of the Orchard Acres master plan community annexation and zoning request. Consent Calendar - Approved the consent agenda as published unanimously. Public Comments & Testimony - Caldwell Veterans Council (CVC) Presentation: Terry Harrell (past chairman) highlighted CVC services including emergency assistance, transportation, and burial honors. Councilman Rodriguez noted the importance of veterans services and potential partnership. No public comment on non-agenda items. - Orchard Acres Public Hearing: Over 20 residents testified, primarily opposing the project due to traffic congestion, emergency response times, water infrastructure, density, and impacts on farming. Many expressed support for property rights but opposed the specific proposal. The owners of the farm, Terry and Kathy Hendrickson, explained they could no longer farm due to residential encroachment and liability. Discussion Items - Staff Communications: Andy Zimmerman recognized Jordan Trevino for receiving the Southwest Idaho Operator of the Year award. Daniel Badger presented the FEMA floodplain update, reducing flood risk for 980 properties along Indian Creek, saving residents on insurance costs. - Chief of Staff Updates: Clay Long announced upcoming council liaison assignments, and two new task forces (waste-to-energy and animal welfare). - Planning and Zoning Report: Rodney Ashby reported on subdivisions, pre-annexation, and a continued Sagewood subdivision due to pump station issues. - Health Care Reserve: Discussion on establishing a $500,000 reserve for potential high claims. Approved 6-0. - ARPA Fund Reclassification: Transfer of $248,794 from Sherman Fire Flow projects to cover ARPA obligations. Approved 6-0. - Orchard Acres Master Plan: Applicant Bonnie Leighton presented a 276-acre mixed-use development with 1,413 units, commercial space, and traffic mitigations. Public testimony raised concerns about traffic, fire response, school capacity, and water. The Planning and Zoning Commission had recommended denial. Council debate centered on density, fire station commitments, and infrastructure. A motion to approve failed 2-4 (Bills, Reynolds in favor; Scog, Rodriguez, Griffin, Jingula opposed). A motion to deny passed 4-2 (Scog, Rodriguez, Griffin, Jingula in favor; Bills, Reynolds opposed). Key Outcomes - Bylaws and Code of Conduct: Both adopted unanimously. - Appointments: Confirmed to Fort Island Center CWI board (Mayor, Councilmembers Jingula and Reynolds). - Health Care Reserve: Approved $500,000 reserve for health trust. - Orchard Acres Denied: The annexation and zoning request was denied due to concerns about compatibility with surrounding areas and public interest in traffic safety and emergency response. - Trailhead Contract: Awarded to Granite Excavation for $734,442 for the Matthew Peltzer Trailhead. Council requested signage honoring Peltzer, which staff indicated could be funded within existing budgets. - Other Contracts: Approved design services agreement with Idaho Power ($1,164) for lift station upgrade, sewer reimbursement agreement with Wilde LLC, and bid to Idaho Gradient Trucking for street conversion. - Executive Session: Motion passed to enter executive session for real property, legal consultation, and labor contract matters.

Note: The meeting transcript begins with the date February 10, 2026, but the provided timestamp indicates February 11, 2026. This summary uses the given timestamp date. The Nampa Planning and Zoning Commission met on February 11, 2026, at 6:00 PM. The meeting included the swearing-in of a new commissioner, approval of consent agenda items, a continuance, and approval of two major items: an amended preliminary plat for Reflections Edge subdivision and a pre-annexation/pre-zoning for a commercial property. No public comments were received for either item. Consent Calendar - Approved the consent agenda (motion by Garner, second by Keyhoe, all in favor). - The consent agenda included a report from the February 2 City Council meeting, which noted approval of a final plat for Millwood Pines subdivision, variances for maximum lot size and landscape buffer measurement, a vacation of easement, and a zoning map amendment. Discussion Items Item 3-1: Preliminary Plat Approval for Amended Portion of Reflections Edge Subdivision (RS4/RS6 Zoning) - Applicant: Scott Curtis, KB Homes, with representatives from Kimley Horn (Wendy Shreve, Nicolet Wilmat). - Project: Amendment to the preliminary plat for phases 5-7 of Reflections Edge, located near Happy Valley Road and Bigwood River Drive. The amendment reduces the number of residential lots by 14 (from 160 to 146), increases common lots by 2 (to 24), and adjusts the layout to accommodate wetlands along Indian Creek. The project includes a pedestrian crossing over Indian Creek, coordinated with the neighboring Chisholm Estates development, with a cost-sharing agreement. - Staff Report (Candice Fry): The 52.30-acre site provides 8.90 acres of qualified open space (17%, exceeding the 15% minimum). Department comments addressed engineering, fire access, code compliance violations (weeds/Dupree), and a request from Parks and Rec for 20 feet along Indian Creek for a pathway. No public comments were received. Recommended conditions included a modified condition 9 regarding the crossing. - Commissioner Discussion: Questions focused on the removal of previous commercial areas near the creek (explained as not part of this plat) and the pedestrian crossing commitment. - Outcome: Motion to approve with recommended conditions and findings, including the modified condition 9. Motion by Daffer, second by Garner, carried unanimously. Item 3-2: Pre-Annexation and Pre-Zoning to BC (Community Business) Zoning District at 0 Highway 2026 - Applicant: Jeff Hatch, Hatch Design Architecture, representing Moxie Investments LLC. - Project: Pre-annexation of a 1.84-acre lot at the northwest corner of Highway 2026 and N. Franklin Boulevard. The applicant plans a 22,000-square-foot building for a screen-printing shop serving the agricultural industry, plus a caretaker dwelling within the building. The site will use a septic system and well until city utilities become available. The development agreement includes conditions to follow Nampa's BC zoning codes. - Staff Report (Doug Critschfield): The property is located about 0.5 miles from current city limits, within the impact area. The comprehensive plan designates the area as commercial and agribusiness. Printing/publishing is a permitted use in BC zoning. Correspondence from Highway District 4 addressed access concerns; the applicant will work with ITD and the highway district. No public comments were received. Staff recommended approval based on four criteria. - Commissioner Discussion: Questions addressed the nature of the caretaker unit (for owner/operator housing) and whether the agribusiness designation would protect the use upon future annexation. Staff confirmed the pre-annexation agreement locks in the use. - Outcome: Motion to recommend approval of the pre-annexation, rezoning to BC, and development agreement with all proposed conditions and findings. Motion by Garner, second by Turner, carried unanimously. Key Outcomes - Item 3-3 (Sagewood Subdivision): Continuance to March 10, 2026, approved (motion by Copeland, second by Garner, all in favor). - Item 3-1: Approved (motion by Daffer, second by Garner, carried). - Item 3-2: Approved (motion by Garner, second by Turner, carried). - The meeting adjourned at an unspecified time (motion by Copeland, second by Morgan, carried). New Commissioner - Helmut Fien was welcomed as a new commission member, appointed to the seat representing the impact zone outside city limits.

The Nampa City Council met on February 2, 2026, at 5:00 PM to conduct city business. The meeting included the approval of consent agenda items, a fiber optic license agreement, a pool services contract, staff recognitions, police department promotions, facility updates, planning and zoning reports, and several public hearings. Key decisions included approval of variance requests and a controversial zoning map amendment for a property with shared septic drain field. Consent Calendar - The consent agenda was approved as amended, with items 15B and 15E pulled for separate discussion. Public Comments & Testimony - No members of the public signed up to speak during public forum or testified on any of the public hearing items. Only the applicants addressed the council during their respective hearings. Discussion Items - 15B – Forge Fiber 37 LLC License Agreement: Council expressed concerns about fiber provider construction practices and damage to private property. Staff explained that state statute limits city authority to deny access but that contract language has been updated to require reasonable care, nuisance mitigation, and advanced notice to property owners. The agreement was approved unanimously via roll call. - 15E – Lakeview Water Park Pool Services Agreement: Councilmember Reynolds raised concerns about the lack of in-house expertise to inspect pool work and requested a third-party inspection. A motion to approve the contract subject to hiring an independent inspection agency (not-to-exceed $5,000) passed unanimously. - Staff Reports & Recognitions: - Crystal Craig, Director of Transportation, presented Road Scholar and Roadmaster awards to city employees. Statistics for 2025: 156 classes taught, 2,904 attendees, 156 Road Scholars, 91 Roadmasters. - Abel Silva (Airport Operations Tech Lead) and Steve Collins (PowerPlus electrician) were recognized for their quick response to a hangar fire at Nampa Municipal Airport on January 9, 2026, at approximately 7:46 AM. Their actions limited damage to one hangar side; two aircraft sustained damage. Fire was extinguished by 8:18 AM. - Police Chief Huff reported over 20 internal transfers and promotions in the past month, with 8-10 more expected. Captain Angel Calderon was promoted to operations captain, succeeding retiring Captain Brad Daniels (retirement April 2026). Lieutenant Rob Wiggins was promoted to backfill Calderon’s previous role. - Chief of Staff Clay Long updated on facility relocation: approximately 20 facilities staff will move to the IH2C building (library northwest side), and Idaho Hispanic Foundation will move downstairs to manage rentals. Estimated $25,000 for cubicles, to be funded within existing budget. A facilities condition assessment for 19 buildings will begin soon. - Planning & Zoning Report: - Millwood Pines subdivision final plat – recommended for approval, to council March 16. - Reynolds development annexation and zoning at 2102 South Midland Boulevard – recommended unanimously, to council March 16. - Highline Estates annexation, zoning, and preliminary plat (355 single-family units, 33 common lots, 1 commercial lot on 93 acres) – recommended 7-1, to council April 20. - Comprehensive plan update: Phase 2 underway with seven vision elements and steering committee. Council members assigned to focus groups; Council Reynolds volunteered for “Connected and Accessible.” - New Business Action Items: - Appointment of Councilmember Natalie Jangula to Nampa Development Corporation – approved. - Appointment of Dietrich Morgan to Airport Commission – approved. - Appointment of Ted Jones to Board of Appraisers – approved. - Appointment of Helmut Fiend to Planning & Zoning Commission (area of impact seat) – approved. - Purchase of 50 electric golf carts for parks – approved. - Task order with David Evans for Midland Boulevard/Greenhurst Road roundabout design – approved enthusiastically. - Grant application to Idaho Transportation Department for Northside Corridor Community Connectivity and Safety Improvements ($25 million, zero match) – approved. - Public Hearings: - 8.1 – Variance for Lot Size (Terry Ivey): Applicant requested variance to replace existing modular home on a 17,195 sq ft lot in RS6 zone (max 12,000). Staff confirmed variance criteria were met; approved unanimously. - 8.2 – Variance for Landscape Buffer (Brian Lari): Applicant sought to measure required 20-foot landscape buffer from back of sidewalk instead of property line due to narrow lot and irrigation easements on Highway 55. Staff noted similar variances granted nearby. Approved unanimously. - 8.3 – Zoning Map Amendment from RA to RS6 (Dylan Snively / Denise Smith): Applicant proposed rezoning to split a 17,000+ sq ft lot to allow a second single-family home. Key concerns centered on shared drain field for two septic tanks, potential future complications, and lack of landscaping on existing property. After extensive discussion and presentation of a site plan showing primary and replacement drain fields, the motion to approve with existing conditions passed 4-2 (Councilmembers Reynolds and Jangula opposed). - 8.4 – Vacation of Public Utility Easement (Jake Standerwick): Vacating approximately 1,262 sq ft easement per state code. Approved unanimously. - Unfinished Business: - First reading of ordinance for annexation and zoning to RS6 for 7 acres at 11281 Moss Lane – passed under suspension of rules unanimously. Key Outcomes - Consent agenda approved as amended. - Forge Fiber 37 license agreement approved. - Lakeview Water Park contract approved subject to third-party inspection. - Multiple board and commission appointments approved. - Zoning map amendment for 602 Chicago Street approved 4-2. - All other public hearing items approved unanimously. - Grant application authorized for $25 million Northside Corridor project.

The Nampa Planning and Zoning Commission held a regular meeting on January 28, 2026, beginning at 6:00 PM. The meeting included a consent calendar, a continuance request, a public hearing and decision on an annexation and zoning request for a small residential property, and a major public hearing and decision on a large annexation, zoning, and preliminary plat for a proposed subdivision. Commissioner Turner was welcomed back. The commission heard extensive public testimony and approved two of three action items, with one item continued. Consent Calendar - Approved the consent agenda, which included updates from City Council: approval of Ridgeview North 1, Swainson's Hawk Arbor 1, and Grand Central; approval of a variance for a home near West Flamingo Avenue and North Middleton Road; and approval of Shadow Creek annexation/zoning with a condition reducing units from 12 to 8. The consent agenda was moved by Commissioner Garner, seconded by Commissioner Keyhoe, and passed unanimously. Public Comments & Testimony - On Item 3-1 (Reynolds annexation): One public speaker, Jill Hallows (603 West Crimson Loop), expressed concern about the proposed density of 20 units, stating it was unbalanced for the neighborhood and would worsen traffic at the Greenhurst/Midland intersection. She preferred lower density such as duplexes, but appreciated the discussion of reducing density. - On Item 3-3 (High Line Estates): Multiple speakers raised concerns about traffic, infrastructure, school capacity, and property values. Key speakers: - Robert Montclair (19721 Madison Road) questioned the population projections and noted that Nampa's population is 4.8% below projections, arguing the area already has many approved but unbuilt homes. - Bo Bonds (880 East Drinkard Lane) provided school capacity numbers (Ridgeview High at 1702 of 1800 capacity) and noted 3,600 homes and 3,200 apartment/townhouse units already approved in the area. He asked the commission to deny the project. - Shelley Montclair (19721 Madison Road) described daily traffic hazards on Madison Road, including near-misses and a fatality, and urged caution. - Stacey Driscoll (8249 East Drinkard Lane) agreed with infrastructure concerns. - Jim Blake (19593 Madison Road) noted that a similar proposal was rejected five years ago due to lack of infrastructure, and that the same issues persist. He also raised concerns about water supply and loss of agricultural land. - Tom Hartley (19225 North Franklin) criticized police presence and suggested increasing impact fees to cover costs. - Will Spite (7981 Timberline Drive) asked for a roundabout at Linden and Franklin and urged letting approved projects be built before adding more. - John Wong (825 East Drinkard Lane) described dangerous left turns onto 2026 and said the ITD corridor is behind schedule. - David Steis (18285 North Tree Line) concurred about traffic and said the project is not needed yet. - Jonas Parsons (10473 Baker Lake Street), a Ridgeview High student, supported a denser, more walkable community with commercial uses to reduce car trips and improve safety. - Mark Albright (1829 North Tree Line Avenue) echoed traffic concerns and said the project should wait until 2026 is complete. - Ruben Assamendi (23032 Highway 2026), a fourth-generation farmer, noted that farming in the area is no longer feasible due to traffic and development pressure, and supported the project as a transition. Discussion Items - Item 3-2: Hudson Yard Subdivision (Continuance) – The applicant, represented by Bonnie Late Leighton, requested a continuance to February 24, 2026, due to conditions and requirements from city engineering that they were unaware of. The commission opened the public hearing, then voted to continue the item to February 24, 2026. Motion by Commissioner Kirkman, seconded by Commissioner Copeland, passed unanimously. - Item 3-1: Annexation and Zoning to RD for 2102 South Midland Boulevard (Jennifer Reynolds) – The applicant requested annexation into the city and zoning to RD (two-family residential) to allow future subdivision into six lots for townhouses. An initial confusion about the zone (R6 vs. RD) was resolved: the application was advertised as RD, which is the correct zone for the proposed duplexes and four-plexes. Staff presented findings that the property is enclaved, conforms to the comprehensive plan, and conditions include right-of-way dedication, frontage improvements, and coordination with irrigation districts. Public testimony was limited to one speaker. The commission discussed density, noting that the concept plans for 16 units would not be feasible due to lot size constraints; the maximum likely is 12 units (based on 8 dwelling units per acre). The commission approved the annexation and zoning to RD with the recommended conditions. Motion by Commissioner Kirkman, seconded by Commissioner Keyhoe, passed unanimously. - Item 3-3: Annexation and Zoning to RS4, RS6, and BC, and Preliminary Plat for High Line Estates Subdivision – The applicant, Connor Lindstrom (KM Engineering), proposed 355 single-family lots, 33 common lots, and one commercial lot on about 93.75 acres near Franklin Boulevard, Linden Road, and Madison Road. The property is within the Highway 2026 Specific Area Plan. Staff findings indicated the project meets the comprehensive plan, provides 16% open space, and triggers traffic improvements including turn lanes at Linden and Franklin. The floodplain study and canal rerouting are required. Public testimony was heavily opposed due to traffic, school capacity, and infrastructure concerns. The commission debated the timing, noting that while the project meets code, many approved developments in the area have not yet built out. Some commissioners expressed reluctance due to traffic, but others noted that the farmer is unable to continue farming and that development is necessary to fund infrastructure. The commission voted to approve the annexation, zoning, and preliminary plat with all conditions in the staff report. Motion by Commissioner Morgan, seconded by Commissioner Keyhoe. The vote was 6-1 (Commissioner Kirkman opposed). Key Outcomes - Consent agenda approved unanimously. - Item 3-2 (Hudson Yard) continued to February 24, 2026, by unanimous vote. - Item 3-1 (Reynolds annexation) approved unanimously to RD zoning with conditions. - Item 3-3 (High Line Estates) approved (6-1) with conditions: annexation to RS4, RS6, and BC zoning; preliminary plat for 355 lots, 33 common lots, 1 commercial lot; all staff conditions including traffic improvements, flood study, right-of-way dedication, and development agreement. Commissioner Kirkman voted no. - The meeting adjourned at approximately 8:30 PM.

The Nampa City Council met on January 20, 2026, at 6:00 PM (with a brief recess) to address routine approvals, a land swap discussion with the Nampa School District, a public hearing on an annexation and zoning request, and several budget reallocations. The meeting opened with prayer and the Pledge of Allegiance, followed by roll call (5 present, 1 absent – Councilman Reynolds, who gave advance notice). Consent Calendar - Approved the consent agenda, which included routine approvals and reappointments (e.g., Tom Turner reappointed to P&Z). Public Comments & Testimony - Lizette Soto (503 S. Daven Creek Loop) expressed concerns about inconsistent speed limit signage near City Hall, citing examples of abrupt changes and suggesting better signage in the business district. She submitted exhibits to staff. - Brian Pearson (17754 Polar Away) opposed a rock quarry operation (off Euclid Road) he described as a quarry, citing noise, vibration, light, and dust impacts on nearby homes. He argued the use violated the development agreement and asked for better buffers. Staff noted the matter is under review. - Melissa Robinson (155th Street North, Unit 210) delivered a prepared statement on the state of Nampa’s economy, highlighting low unemployment (3.2%), a 7.5% decrease in unemployment insurance taxes, and the need for strategic investments in workforce training, downtown revitalization, and infrastructure. Discussion Items - Land Swap with Nampa School District (Discussion Only) – Mayor and Council explored a potential property exchange: the city would transfer Rodeo Park and Stampede Park (approximately 43 acres) to the school district in exchange for the district’s 43 acres at Airport Road and Robinson Road for a future soccer complex. Parks Director Cody Swander and school district representatives Courtney Stoffer and Will Barber presented the concept. Council discussed deed restrictions, density, parking, access, and the need for a soccer facility given the 10-year timeline for the CWI soccer fields. No formal action was taken; the item will return for further consideration. - Budget Reallocation for Emergency Culvert Replacement (Item 5.2) – Approved $250,000 reallocation from the streets contingency ($600,000 balance) for an emergency Elijah Drain culvert replacement at Pine and Lincoln. Task order with Ardura for $89,707 signed. Public Works clarified the funds are shifted from the annual stormwater project, not a net increase. - Change Order for Knife River (Item 5.1) – Approved $122,088.95 change order for the Phyllis Canal project. - Task Order for Purdue Sewer Trunk (Item 5.3) – Approved $521,000 task order with Coler Associates, within the FY26 budget. - Irrigation Replacement Contract (Item 5.4) – Approved $739,761 contract with La Riviera Inc. for annual irrigation replacement, as budgeted. Key Outcomes - Public Hearing Item 8.1 (Prescott Lane development) – Opened and continued to March 16, 2026, at the applicant’s request. - Variance Approval (Item 8.2) – Approved a variance to maximize lot size in an RS6 zone for a property at 11373 W. Flamingo Avenue, allowing demolition and rebuild. Conditions include frontage improvements and an easement for shared driveway access. - Annexation and Zoning (Item 8.3 – South Creek Subdivision) – After extensive public testimony (12 speakers, with opposition citing density, parking, and compatibility), the Council approved the annexation and zoning to RS4 with conditions: maximum of 8 single-family units, alignment of western lot lines with adjacent properties, and 4 additional off-street parking spaces. The vote was 4-1 (Councilman Rodriguez opposed). The preliminary plat will go to the Planning and Zoning Commission. - Unfinished Business (Items 9.1 and 9.2) – Approved a comprehensive plan amendment for parcels on Florida Avenue and Iowa Avenue (industrial designation) and authorized the vacation of a utility easement on Jody Avenue. - Executive Session – Council convened into executive session under Idaho Code for legal updates on pending matters and an operational policy memo. Note: The meeting was recorded and transcribed; the summary reflects the proceedings as captured in the transcript. The timestamp provided (2026-01-20 23:58:27+00:00) aligns with the meeting date used in the title.

The Nampa City Council convened on January 15, 2026, for a workshop addressing legal foundations of city government, internal operations, and proposed governance documents. The meeting began with a prayer and pledge, followed by roll call confirming all six council members present. The mayor proposed swapping agenda items 1.5 (code of conduct) and 1.4 (discussion on rules of decorum) to allow the code of conduct discussion to occur first; no objections were raised. Discussion Items Legal Training on Roles, Powers, and Responsibilities City Attorney Preston delivered a comprehensive presentation on the separation of powers at the local level, covering the legislative, executive, and quasi-judicial roles of the council and mayor. He emphasized that Idaho is a Dillon's Rule state, meaning cities derive authority from the state, and highlighted the council's police power, land use authority, budget approval, and appointment confirmation powers. Key points included: - The council's legislative hat includes adopting ordinances, zoning, and setting fees; the fiscal hat includes budget and property tax levy; the judicial hat (quasi-judicial) applies to land use decisions like CUPs and variances. - The mayor's executive powers include supervising employees, enforcing laws, declaring emergencies (up to 7 days), vetoing ordinances (subject to council override), and breaking tie votes except where majority required (e.g., confirming appointments, entering executive session). - Conflict of interest rules: mandatory recusal for economic interests within the second degree of relationship; disclosure does not cure the conflict. Ex parte communications are prohibited in quasi-judicial matters; if they occur, they must be fully disclosed on the record. - Executive session requires a two-thirds council vote and is limited to specific statutory categories; no final decisions may be made in executive session. The council holds the attorney-client privilege. Internal Operations and Organizational Structure Chief of Staff Clay Long reviewed the city's organizational structure, noting 811 employees (650 full-time, 161 part-time) across 35 departments and divisions. He highlighted the five operational functions: internal services, public safety, community enrichment, development services, and public works. He encouraged council members to direct department inquiries through the mayor's office and to bring budget ideas during the upcoming workshop process. Boards and Commissions - Venue Management Commission: Following the transfer of the Ford Idaho Center to the College of Western Idaho, the commission's purpose was questioned. Council members expressed support for dissolving the venue management commission and creating a Civic Center advisory commission to oversee the Nampa Civic Center. Councilman Bills suggested a downsized committee with community input. The mayor noted existing zombie commissions (e.g., Civic Center Auxiliary) and directed staff to review and clean up ordinances. - Animal Advisory Council: A proposal to establish an advisory council for animal services was discussed. The city currently pays approximately $458,000 per year for animal control services through a contract with the county. The new provider (Copper Quail Haven) is expected to begin operations by April 1, 2026, with a monthly cost of about $40,000. Council members expressed interest in creating an advisory council to recommend code changes and contract oversight. Councilman Rodriguez indicated interest in serving on the council. The mayor committed to bringing a formal proposal forward. - Council Liaison Assignments: Council members were asked to email their preferences for board/commission liaison roles to the mayor's office. Code of Conduct Discussion The council debated a proposed code of conduct (bylaws) document. Key points of contention: - Councilman Griffin proposed changing "unexcused" absences to "unnotified" and recommended removing language requiring mayoral approval for remote participation, suggesting instead that council members simply notify the mayor. He also suggested changing "shall" to "should" in the duty to report violations (Section 204). - Councilwoman Scog raised concerns about the code being used punitively, especially regarding titles, remote participation, and reporting violations. She opposed the mandatory reporting requirement and preferred a "may" or "process" approach. - Councilman Bills supported softening the language to reflect courtesy rather than mandates, and suggested renaming Section 204 to "Process to Report Violations." - Councilman Reynolds advocated for a 24-hour notice for absences and emphasized the importance of decorum for public perception. - Councilman Rodriguez raised concerns about staffing and family security when texting during meetings, but acknowledged the need for transparency. - The mayor stressed the importance of video participation for quasi-judicial public hearings, in contrast to general legislative items. - There was discussion about sunsetting the code after each election cycle vs. keeping it permanent with amendment provisions. No consensus was reached on that point. Key Outcomes - The code of conduct discussion did not result in a vote; the mayor directed staff to incorporate the feedback (softened language, 24-hour notice, removal of mandatory reporting, and clarification on remote participation requirements) and bring a revised draft for formal action at a future meeting. - The venue management commission will be considered for dissolution, with a new Civic Center advisory commission to be proposed. Staff will review existing zombie commissions and bring recommendations. - An animal advisory council will be formally proposed for council consideration, with a future agenda item to establish its structure and purpose. - Council members were reminded to submit their liaison preferences by email to the mayor's office. - The meeting was adjourned shortly after 9:15 a.m. without a formal vote on any item.

On January 15, 2026, the Treasure Valley Partnership (TVP) held its first regional town hall at Nampa City Hall, bringing together mayors from 17 cities and county commissioners from Ada, Canyon, and Owyhee counties. The meeting focused on the financial strain on local governments caused by state-imposed property tax limits (notably House Bill 389), the inability of growth to pay for itself, and the resulting impacts on public safety, infrastructure, and quality of life. Over 10 attendees were present in person, with additional participants online. The panel was led by TVP Chairman Trevor Chadwick (Mayor of Star) and included Mayor Rick Hogaboom (Nampa, host), Commissioner Zach Brooks (Canyon County), Mayor Joe Steer (Kuna), Mayor Eric Phillips (Caldwell), Mayor Brad Pike (Eagle), Mayor Bill Jacobs (Garden City), Mayor Robert Simonson (Meridian), and Mayor Lauren McLean (Boise). Public Comments & Testimony - Leanne (resident): Questioned the use of ARPA funds, suggesting they may have been used for non-essential projects. Panelists responded that ARPA funds were used for one-time capital expenses (e.g., ladder trucks, police stations, sewer infrastructure) and not for ongoing staffing, and that those funds have now been obligated and will be expended by 2026. - Buzz Bookamp (Caldwell Rural Fire Commissioner): Expressed strong opposition to HB 389, calling it a “terrible debacle” that harms fire districts by reducing levy rates and restricting impact fees. He advocated for impact fees for school districts and criticized the difficulty of passing bonds and levies due to the 66.67% supermajority requirement. He also noted that residential property pays 70–75% of property taxes while commercial properties receive a “free ride.” - Bob (resident): Raised concerns about safety on the greenbelt due to motorized two-wheelers (e-bikes, scooters) traveling at high speeds. He urged better enforcement and clearer regulations. Mayor McLean (Boise) noted that Boise has lowered speed limits and is pursuing changes in vehicle classification, but acknowledged enforcement is limited by funding for police. Mayor Pike (Eagle) offered to collaborate on solutions. - Brian (resident): Criticized the lack of coordination between cities, counties, highway districts, and school districts in approving development, citing gridlock on I-84 and school overcrowding (e.g., Valley View School District). He asked if the TVP could facilitate interagency coordination. Commissioners noted that Idaho’s land-use laws limit the ability to deny development that meets criteria, and that cities and counties have different legal obligations. - Jim Hollis (Caldwell resident): Highlighted the decline of Caldwell’s schools (Valley View School District falling from top 60 to 140 in state rankings) and the difficulty of passing school levies. He mentioned forming a citizen group, Team Caldwell, to advocate for change. He also expressed frustration with large developers shifting responsibility for school funding to levies. - David Taney (resident): Praised the TVP’s collaborative approach but asked what specific legislative priorities the group has. Panelists answered that the current focus is on three pillars: tax policy, public safety, and infrastructure. They noted that cities are “Dillon’s Rule” entities and must seek legislative authority to change funding mechanisms. - Elderly male resident (Caldwell area): Shared a personal story about his late wife’s disability and his daughter’s anxiety, which requires walking long distances due to lack of sidewalks and accessible shopping centers near Monarch and Ustick. He criticized the lack of pedestrian infrastructure despite fatalities and called for more commercial development within walking distance. Mayor Phillips (Caldwell) offered to meet with him offline to discuss zoning and planning. - Nancy (Boise resident): Asked what active conversations are occurring in the legislature about limiting development. Panelists responded that the legislature is very pro-property rights and is considering a proposal that would allow property owners to subdivide single-family homes into two to four units without city approval, which could further strain infrastructure. They emphasized that such changes are beyond local control and would require legislative action. Discussion Items - Opening Remarks and Purpose: Mayor Chadwick explained that the TVP represents three counties and 17 cities with about 800,000 residents. The goal is to ensure growth pays for growth, protect quality of life, and maintain public safety. He noted that many small cities (165 of 197) have fewer than 5,000 people and are disproportionately affected by HB 389. - Tax Policy (Mayor Hogaboom): Detailed the history of Idaho’s property tax system, including the 3% annual budget growth cap and the changes made by HB 389. Key points: - New construction is now valued at only 90% of its actual increment, reducing revenue from growth. - An additional hard cap of 5% on new construction revenue means cities with growth above 5% (e.g., Star) face a total maximum increase of 8% (3% base + 5% new construction), but actual service costs rise faster. - Expiring urban renewal districts return only 80 cents on the dollar to the city under HB 389. - The homeowner’s exemption was raised from $100,000 to $125,000, but the circuit breaker was means-tested. - Foregone capacity (unused levy authority) can now only be added to the base at 1% per year, with the rest usable only for one-time capital. - Public Safety (Mayor Chadwick): Used Star as an example: population grew from 11,000 (2020 census) to 23,000, but property tax levy is only $2 million (on a $4.5 billion valuation), capped at 8% growth ($160,000). As a result, a new fire station sits unstaffed because a levy failed four times (58% in favor, but 66.67% required). 100% of property tax goes to police, but that covers only half of the police budget. He noted that 15 public safety levies were on the ballot statewide in November 2025, and only two passed. - Infrastructure: Growth strains sewer, water, and road infrastructure. The state restricts funding for non-motorized projects, making it difficult to add sidewalks. Impact fees are tied to a 10-year capital plan and cannot fund ongoing operations. The reduction in ongoing revenue from HB 389 forces cities to downgrade future service levels, which in turn limits the impact fees they can collect. - Legislative Advocacy: The TVP is working on a bill to amend HB 389. They urged citizens to sign up at treasurevalleypartnership.org to receive calls to action, emphasizing that personal letters to legislators are more effective than form letters. Key Outcomes - Call to Action: Citizens were encouraged to provide their contact information at treasurevalleypartnership.org to be notified when legislative action is needed on HB 389 reform. - Future Meetings: The TVP plans to hold similar town halls in Ada County to reach a broader audience, accommodating scheduling conflicts (e.g., Ada County had a public hearing that night). - Legislative Priority: The TVP is focusing on three pillars: tax policy (especially HB 389 adjustments), public safety funding, and infrastructure investment. They are preparing a bill to address the 90% new construction valuation and the 5% cap. - Continued Collaboration: Panelists acknowledged the need for interagency coordination but noted legal constraints. They committed to working with fire districts, school districts, and citizen groups like Team Caldwell to amplify regional advocacy.