Public Meetings - Queen Creek, Arizona

This summary is based on the meeting transcript; agenda and minutes were not available. The Queen Creek Planning Commission met in an afternoon work session on October 29, 2026, to review community outreach findings and draft goals and policies for the town’s General Plan update. Principal Planner Les Johnson and Robbie Aaron of Michael Baker International led the discussion. No formal votes were taken. Discussion Items - General Plan Update Outreach Summary: Les Johnson reported that the town is well into the General Plan update outreach/engagement stage. Outreach so far has included two community workshops, citizen focus group meetings, presentations to boards and commissions, social media, a project website with virtual activities, and attendance at public events. Johnson summarized community feedback: residents are proud of Queen Creek’s people, public events, parks and open spaces, trail system, schools, agritainment areas, and small-town feel. Desired future priorities include protecting rural/agricultural areas, improving road safety and congestion, completing the trail loop system, supporting small/local businesses, expanding public facilities such as the post office and library, promoting office development, and creating more gathering places. - Commissioner Feedback on What Feels Accurate: Commissioner Baldwin identified road work and traffic as the issue that resonates most, noting construction affects Queen Creek residents even when it occurs outside town limits. Another commissioner praised Queen Creek schools based on her children’s experiences. Several commissioners highlighted the small-town feel and the trail system, with suggestions for better trail signage, bike lane connections, e-bike parking, and bike racks near downtown. One commissioner mentioned the farmers market as a popular small-business and community amenity. Commissioner Borders, drawing on school district experience, suggested weekly social media quick facts and virtual town halls to broaden public engagement. Commissioner Hale raised concerns about water prices essentially doubling and the resulting impact on park maintenance budgets; staff responded that future park design may use less turf in passive areas while preserving active-use fields. - Commissioner Feedback on What Is Missing: Commissioners said communication about town projects and the General Plan website could be more accessible because many residents rely on social media. A commissioner noted the town already posts information but it is not always easy for residents to find. Another commissioner said the town should counter lingering misconceptions about Queen Creek water shortages; Les Johnson responded that water is sufficient for planned growth and that the town is working to communicate that message. Staff also mentioned an undeveloped 40-50 acre passive park site north of the Olive Mill and a 30-acre park site across the street. - Commissioner Priorities: Commissioner Baldwin said transportation and traffic are the most important issues to address so development is not limited by congestion concerns. Another commissioner observed that the draft plan includes a diverse housing portfolio, but community opposition sometimes makes it hard to realize housing options for different income levels and life stages. Commissioners expressed support for maintaining the small-town feel through events, parks, and connected community experiences while accommodating growth. - Draft Goals and Policies Review: Robbie Aaron walked through the draft goals and policies, organized under four themes aligned with the Town Council’s strategic plan: Quality Lifestyle, Superior Infrastructure, Secure Future, and Safe Community/Effective Government. All state-required General Plan elements are folded under these themes. He reviewed goals covering community identity, balanced residential and non-residential land uses, employment diversity, regional coordination, housing diversity, growth areas, agritainment, trails and outdoor recreation, economic development, redevelopment, and neighborhood preservation. Aaron noted that housing is a new state-required element and that the plan addresses housing for all income levels and life stages. On infrastructure, he described alignment with the recently adopted transportation master plan, limited mention of transit because the community is not currently seeking it, expansion of parks and recreation, water conservation and reclaimed water, energy resiliency, and infrastructure financing. He also outlined public safety coordination with police and fire departments and hazard mitigation. An implementation action matrix with short-, mid-, and long-term actions and an annual reporting process will accompany the plan. - Next Steps: Johnson announced the next community workshop is scheduled for December 14. The draft General Plan is expected to be completed in December, followed by a 60-day review period. Public hearings before the Planning Commission and Town Council are expected in spring. Commissioners can continue submitting comments to staff, and virtual engagement remains open on the project website. Key Outcomes - No formal motions, resolutions, or votes were taken; the session was for discussion and feedback. - Commissioner comments on roads/trails, parks, housing, water messaging, and communication will be considered in the draft General Plan. - The next community workshop is scheduled for December 14, 2026. - The draft General Plan is expected in December 2026, with a 60-day review period and spring public hearings to follow.

The Planning & Zoning Commission held a work study session on October 28, 2026, to discuss the Queen Creek General Plan update. Principal Planner Les Johnson and consultant Robbie Aaron of Michael Baker International presented community outreach findings and draft goals and policies. No formal action or votes were taken. The agenda listed the meeting at 4:00 PM at Community Chambers, 20727 E. Civic Parkway; the timestamp associated with the source was 12:15 UTC, and no minutes were available. General Plan Update – Community Outreach Findings - Les Johnson reported on ongoing outreach, including a project website, social media, two community workshops, citizen focus groups, public events, and presentations to town committees and commissions. - Staff-reported community feedback highlighted pride in Queen Creek's people, public events, parks and open space, trails, schools, gathering areas, and small-town feel. Residents reportedly want continued investment in gathering places, rural land uses, road safety and congestion relief, connectivity, parks and the trail loop, unique destinations, local and small businesses, public facilities, office development, and 'third place' gathering opportunities. - Commissioner Baldwin identified road work and traffic as the feedback that resonated most with her, noting road concerns affect residents daily and asking how the town communicates upcoming road projects. - Several commissioners praised schools, parks, trails, and the small-town feel. One commissioner asked for better trail signage and bike parking for e-bikes, especially near downtown. - Commissioner Borders suggested engagement tactics used by the school district, including weekly social-media quick facts and virtual town halls, and noted the General Plan website was not well known even among engaged residents. - A commissioner mentioned the farmers market as a valued small-business and community gathering draw and hoped it would continue near the heart of Queen Creek. - Commissioner Hale raised the perception that Queen Creek has water problems. Staff responded that the town has sufficient water to serve build-out and that the issue is resource stewardship and regional water management, not a shortage. - Commissioner Hale also asked whether rising water costs would affect park maintenance and the small-town feel; she noted water costs have essentially doubled. Staff said active-use fields will remain, but passive turf areas may shift to more water-conscious or drought-tolerant designs, and park acreage overall is not expected to change dramatically. - Staff noted the town's parks master plan update is upcoming, with large undeveloped park areas including roughly 40-50 acres north of the Olive Mill and about 30 acres across the street to the east. - Commissioners said transportation and traffic remain critical to sustaining growth and supported housing diversification for different income levels and life stages, while acknowledging community resistance to some housing change. General Plan Update – Draft Goals and Policies - Robbie Aaron presented draft goals and policies organized under four themes aligned with the Town Council strategic plan: Quality Lifestyle, Superior Infrastructure, Secure Future, and Safe Community Effective Government. - Quality Lifestyle goals address preserving community identity, balanced residential and non-residential growth, economic diversity, regional coordination with Gilbert/Mesa/Santan Valley, housing variety, growth areas, economic development, agritainment, trails, parks and open space, redevelopment, and neighborhood preservation. - A commissioner asked about cultural destinations such as arts, museums, and theaters. Aaron responded that public outreach, including the youth advisory council, expressed interest in museums and a large concert venue, and that partnerships such as library art exhibits could help. - Superior Infrastructure goals focus on a connected transportation system aligned with the adopted transportation master plan, alternative mobility options, the 11-mile loop trail, regional transportation partnerships, signal technology, comprehensive parks, and recreation facilities. Aaron noted transit is not currently a community priority but must be addressed per state law. - Secure Future goals address water portfolio and stewardship, conservation, reclaimed water, energy resources, efficiency, and resiliency. - Safe Community Effective Government goals cover infrastructure planning, development cost and fair share, police and fire services, municipal services, wastewater, and hazard mitigation. - Aaron explained the plan includes an implementation action matrix with short-, mid-, and long-range timeframes and an annual reporting process to track implementation. Next Steps - Staff said virtual engagement activities remain available on the General Plan webpage. - The next community workshop was announced for December 14, 2026. - The draft General Plan is expected to be completed in December 2026, followed by a 60-day review period. - Hearings before the Planning & Zoning Commission and Town Council are planned for spring 2027. - The commission was told comments on the draft goals and policies remain welcome until the plan advances to Council. Key Outcomes - No motions, votes, or formal decisions were made; the session was informational and advisory. - Commissioner feedback on outreach, transportation, housing, trails, parks, water perception, and small-town identity will inform continued General Plan drafting. - The work study session was adjourned after staff and consultant presentations and commission discussion.

The Queen Creek Town Council held a regular meeting on October 21, 2026, beginning with a closed executive session. The primary focus of the public session was a detailed discussion on proposed changes to water delivery and wastewater utility rates, accompanied by extensive public comment regarding the financial impact on residents, particularly those on septic systems. The council also received updates from the Parks and Recreation Advisory Committee and the Mayor's Teen Advisory Committee and unanimously approved the consent agenda. Consent Calendar - Approved the minutes from the September 29 and October 7, 2026 meetings. - Approved expenditures and purchases, including $151,876 for Kimley-Horn ITS fiber network design services and $97,726 for Carahsoft software subscriptions. - Accepted a $60,000 grant from the Arizona Governor's Office of Highway Safety for DUI/Impaired Driving Enforcement. - Accepted a $111,660 grant for Selective Traffic Enforcement (STEP). - Approved a renewed Data Access/Exchange Agreement with ADOT for the Police Department's access to crash records. - Approved Amendment No. 1 to the IGA with Maricopa County for the Sheriff's Office Basic Training Academy, increasing the registration fee from $750 to $1,500 per recruit. - Approved an IGA with the City of Chandler for Back Up Ambulance Services. - Approved an IGA with participating cities and towns for Transportation Mutual Aid. - Approved the creation of CIP project WW106 for MSB sewer line replacement and a change order of $220,046. Public Comments & Testimony - David Waddell and Christine Williams expressed strong opposition to the proposed water resource fee, stating it would be highly punitive for residents with large lots and septic systems. They urged the council to consider requiring HOAs to allow water-wise landscaping, citing Scottsdale's ordinance prohibiting mandatory turf requirements. They calculated the fee could exceed their entire property tax bill by year five. - Jessica Keester, a 30-year Queen Creek resident and teacher, expressed concern that the rate increases would be detrimental to neighbors on fixed incomes and felt the proposed fee structure for septic users was punitive, as sewer connection was never an option for her neighborhood. - Doreen Connor, a retired nurse on a fixed income from Rancho Hardines, demanded a clear breakdown of the proposed $40 monthly fee for septic tank users. She argued residents with septic are charged a significantly higher per-gallon rate ($3.007) compared to those connected to the sewer system ($1.85), representing a 66% higher rate, and feels retroactively punished for having a septic system when no sewer connection is available. - Heather Fernandz criticized the confusing communication from the town regarding the $40 fee, having received conflicting information from different town representatives. She stated her strong opposition to the fee. Discussion Items - Water Utility Outreach Update: Communications Director Constance Wilson provided an update on public outreach regarding the proposed water rates. She clarified that the controversial $40 fee is not a new town-wide assessment for septic customers, but an existing charge affecting approximately 64 accounts in the Queen Creek Ranchettes and Terra Ranch subdivisions tied to older sewer infrastructure agreements. Staff is reviewing potential updates to the online rate calculator, which has only been used by 145 out of 40,000 accounts. - Water Delivery and Wastewater Rate Presentation: A consultant presented a comprehensive analysis. Key proposals included: - Water Delivery: No major increases were needed; slight reductions for some residential customers (e.g., a bill dropping from $39.44 to $36.08 for 10,000 gallons) were proposed to partially offset the new Water Resource Fee. The tiered rate structure would be maintained with modest adjustments. - Wastewater: No changes were recommended to single-family residential wastewater rates. Adjustments were proposed for commercial and multifamily accounts to align rates with the cost of service. - The combined impact of the Water Resource Fee and proposed delivery adjustments for an average single-family home using 10,000 gallons was estimated at a net increase of approximately $15 per month. - Council Discussion: Councilmembers emphasized the rate structure aims to ensure growth pays for growth and fairly distributes costs. Councilmember Brown highlighted the legal constraints imposed by the Arizona Department of Water Resources (ADWR), stating the town cannot receive credits for water used by septic systems, which drives a portion of the need for new water supplies. The agenda item regarding the CAGRD reimbursement program was postponed to the November 4th meeting. Key Outcomes - Consent Agenda: Unanimously approved by the Town Council. - Water/Wastewater Rates: No formal votes were taken. The discussion was intended for council direction and public education ahead of a potential vote on the Water Resource Fee at the November 18th meeting, and on other rate adjustments at the November 4th meeting. - Staff Direction: Council directed staff to improve communication regarding the specific legal and financial constraints (ADWR regulations) that necessitate the fee structure, and to continue refining the online calculator and public outreach efforts. - Next Steps: The discussion on the CAGRD reimbursement program was deferred to the next meeting. The council is scheduled to discuss water rate adjustments further on November 4th.

The Queen Creek Planning & Zoning Commission met October 14, 2026, at 6:00 PM in Community Chambers, 20727 E. Civic Parkway, for a regular session followed by a work study session. Commissioners Baldwin and Hale were absent; a quorum was present. The Commission approved the consent agenda, both public hearing items (The Union PAD Rezone and the Circle K fuel station/car wash), and two comprehensive sign plan requests, then received updates on planning activity, the Town's water strategy, the economic development strategic plan, and the 2028 General Plan. Consent Calendar - The September 9, 2026 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting minutes were approved by a single motion. Public Comments & Testimony - No members of the public addressed the Commission during the opening comment period on non-agenda items. - Union PAD Rezone (P25-0095): Staff distributed three opposition emails received for the record; two included addresses and one did not. The comments cited concerns about traffic and growth, and one leaned toward equestrian-style development. No speaker cards were submitted for the public hearing. - Circle K (P25-0159/P25-0160): The applicant's required neighborhood meeting on August 24, 2026, had no attendees, and staff received no public comments. No speaker cards were submitted for the public hearing. Public Hearing: Union PAD Rezone (P25-0095) - Staff (Planning Manager Erik Swanson) described the approximately 25-acre site at the southwest corner of Queen Creek and Ellsworth roads, which has a lengthy zoning history tied to the former Queen Creek Station plans (2012/2018) and the Acero PAD rezoning (2020/2021), which capped the triangular parcel at 500 residential units; Acero developed 474–476 units. The request focuses on Parcel A: 250 multifamily units maximum (about 226 more than the 24 units carried over from the prior entitlement), a 70-foot height cap (90 feet is allowed in the MU PAD district), and roughly five stories. Parcels B, C, and D are commercial by right; multifamily has been removed from Parcel D via a condition of approval. Parcels B and C have approved site plans; Parcel D (hotel or medical office) and the multifamily component would require subsequent site plan approvals. - Applicant Brennan Ray (Ray Law Firm, for Creation Equity) stated the project is fully consistent with the General Plan and requested a recommendation for approval. He cited the site's physical constraints (railroad elevation, Ellsworth Road underpass, flood control channel) and the urban land-use designation's requirement for walkable, integrated mixed-use development. Jagger Everett (Creation Equity) reported on the nearby Switchyard project: site and shell construction finishing within two weeks, first tenants (Postino and Via Med Spa) opening by the end of October, 12 tenants signed (8 opening within six months), delivery at 82% pre-leased, northern pad construction starting at the end of October (30% pre-leased), five sit-down restaurant tenants, and an executed lease with a specialty organic grocer (name under NDA). He said on-site multifamily is important for sustaining seven-day restaurant operations. - Traffic improvements: A new southbound deceleration lane into the development, 425 feet of additional northbound queuing at Queen Creek Road, and 625 feet of queuing at Walnut Road, which the applicant said will benefit adjacent commercial properties. The applicant also discussed working with the town to acquire flood control district property for parking and a multi-use trail. - Commissioner positions: Vice Chair Ballard clarified for the record that the project is capped at 250 units, not 500, and asked about housing demand; the applicant cited a statewide housing deficit (270,000–300,000 units as reported) and demand for urban-style rental housing. Commissioner Bordis asked whether traffic infrastructure would precede multifamily; the applicant confirmed off-site improvements will be built at the outset. Chair Gillette praised the development team and said the town is 'doing it right,' while emphasizing the need to be sensitive to long-term residents; he earlier noted he is 'an advocate for location' and sees this site as appropriate for five stories within approved limits. - The Commission closed the hearing and voted to approve the rezone; the motion passed with four votes in favor. Public Hearing: Circle K Fuel Station and Car Wash (P25-0159/P25-0160) - Planner Nathan Warren presented the Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan request for a fuel service station, convenience store, and car wash at the southwest corner of Germann and Meridian roads. The project covers approximately 2.7 acres of a 9.6-acre C2 commercial site (about 1.5 acres for the convenience store and fueling area, and 1.2 acres for the car wash), with seven fueling stations, three car wash lanes feeding a pay kiosk, and an exit onto Meridian. The convenience store would operate 24 hours; the car wash roughly 7 a.m. to 7:30 p.m. The C2 designation permits these uses by right but requires a CUP for fuel sales and in-use vehicle services. Staff found no concerns under the CUP analysis criteria. - Applicant Brennan Ray (for Circle K) emphasized water conservation: an advanced velocity water reclamation system reuses approximately 81% of water, with about 19% fresh water drawn from the town, and discharge is treated to meet town standards. He stated all nine CUP criteria are met and requested approval. No public comment was received; the Commission approved both cases. Final Action: The Union at Ellsworth Comprehensive Sign Plan (P26-0061) - Erik Swanson presented the comprehensive sign plan for The Union mixed-use development (southwest corner of Ellsworth and Queen Creek roads), requested by Steven Johnson (Imperial Signs). Three 8-foot center-ID signs and single-tenant monument signs comply with the sign code; requested deviations include a 16-foot multi-tenant monument sign exceeding standard height and minimal square-footage deviations for internal wayfinding signs. Staff compared the height to Costco's 20-foot monument signs and The Vineyard's 18-foot signs. The Commission approved the plan. Final Action: QC District Comprehensive Sign Plan Amendment (P26-0123) - Principal Planner Les Johnson presented the request by Chelsea United Group (Homewood Suites owner) to amend the QC District Comprehensive Sign Plan to add a monument sign for the Homewood Suites hotel under construction at the southwest corner of Ellsworth and Rittenhouse roads. The proposed sign is approximately 6 feet tall, located just east of the existing driveway on Rittenhouse, with a stone veneer base matching the hotel and only the letters illuminated. One deviation is requested from the standard 300-foot separation between monument signs; staff found the smaller sign acceptable given its size. The Commission approved the amendment. Administrative Items and Staff Farewell - Staff reported September 2026 planning activity: 47 single-family permits issued, down 43% from the prior year; two residential design reviews approved (Madero West Estates and Fulton Homes at Barney Farms); Jordy Farms North Preliminary Plat approved (northwest corner of Queen Creek and Crisman roads); and the LG ES Comprehensive Sign Plan approved. - Chair Gillette announced that the meeting was Erik Swanson's last regular commission meeting; Swanson will complete eight years with the town at the end of October and is departing for Maricopa County, with one remaining meeting (October 28) scheduled for the General Plan workshop. Work Study: Town's Water Strategy Update - Assistant Town Manager Shea Joachim (identified as 'Shay Yocham' in parts of the transcript) reported that the Town Council approved a notice of intent on September 16, 2026, starting a 60-day public education period for the water rate-setting process. Adoption is scheduled for November 18, 2026; capacity fees would be effective December 21, water resource fees effective January 27, 2027, and new rates would first appear on March 2027 bills. - The 'water self-sufficiency' strategy rests on a reliable water source and local control. The town's application to become a designated water provider (requiring proof of a 100-year supply) is pending with the Arizona Department of Water Resources (ADWR). The town's system is predominantly groundwater (about 50 wells), with every drop pumped requiring replenishment; the town currently relies on the Central Arizona Groundwater Replenishment District (CAGRD). - Replenishment source: Harquahala Valley (about 25 minutes west of the Palo Verde nuclear plant), with approximately 8.2 million acre-feet of groundwater, of which the town has purchased 1.7 million acre-feet (roughly the capacity of a full Roosevelt Lake). Water would be pumped to the CAP Canal and delivered to a recharge facility. Colorado River water is about 10% of the portfolio, which staff described as a manageable level of exposure. - Water resource fee: Staff estimates the average water-only customer would pay about $40 per month and a combined water/sewer account about $16 per month; a 10,000-gallon-per-month user would pay somewhat less. A 40% credit applies to customers with town sewer service (up to 90% for industrial), and the fee would phase in over about six years, subject to annual council review. Estimates do not account for CAGRD fee savings that would leave customers' property tax bills after designation. An online calculator is available on the town's website. - Updates since September: The council approved an intergovernmental agreement with the Queen Creek Irrigation District (QCID) to transfer the town's irrigation assets and about 550 irrigation customers (of roughly 42,000 accounts); 17 of 19 subdivisions are already in QCID territory, and transferred irrigation service would not be subject to the water resource fee. For approximately 5,500 septic customers, staff proposed a 4% incidental recharge credit, with a commitment to study whether ADWR will approve a higher credit (neighboring communities have received 6–7%). - Other fees: The water capacity fee would rise from about $2,500 to about $4,500 per dwelling unit; a new water resource capacity fee is proposed at $10,000 per dwelling unit for water-only accounts and $6,000 for combined accounts; the solid waste fee would increase $3.78 per month (second-lowest in the valley); tier 1 and tier 2 water rates (under 20,000 gallons per month) would decrease, and tier 3 would increase. - Asked about residents' fears of running out of water, Joachim said: 'We're not running out of water'; the strategy is about reliability and local control, and the aquifer beneath Queen Creek is robust. He also explained that CAGRD is only required to prove 20-year supplies, compared with the town's 100-year standard. Upcoming outreach: October 20 public meeting, October 21 Santan Valley Council presentation, October 27 irrigation follow-up, and a pancake breakfast booth. Work Study: Economic Development Strategic Plan Update - Economic Development Director Doreen Cott presented the updated strategy adopted by council in May 2026, replacing the 2021 plan and developed with consultant Civic Soul and extensive stakeholder engagement (staff, council, the Economic Development Commission, utilities, the chamber, GPEC, and the Arizona Commerce Authority). Context includes LG Energy Solution's investment (described as one of the largest projects in North America), strong industrial interest, residential expansion, agritourism identity, and over 200,000 square feet of downtown development underway. - The plan has five goals: (1) compete for investment (building on LG and the State Route 24 corridor/state trust land); (2) infrastructure that unlocks opportunity; (3) a downtown that comes alive; (4) destination Queen Creek (including Horseshoe Park equestrian events); and (5) maintaining momentum with community partners. The town's new slogan is 'Queen Creek is the place to be,' and a 1-, 3-, and 5-year action plan accompanies the strategy. Cott had no update on the Box Canyon project when asked by a commissioner. Work Study: 2028 General Plan Update - Although the agenda listed Sarah Clark, Principal Planner, as the presenter, Principal Planner Les Johnson delivered the update. The town is in the 'enrich' stage of the General Plan update, with outreach including mobile studios, study sessions, a citizen focus group, two community workshops (a third is scheduled for December 14), and virtual engagement activities on the town's website. - Community feedback: Residents value the people, public events, parks/open space/trails, schools, agritourism, and small-town feel. They want continued agritourism and rural land uses, road safety and congestion relief, connectivity (including the 11-mile trail loop), unique destinations, support for local restaurants and businesses, expanded public facilities (post office and library capacity), local office development, and 'third places' to gather. - Commission assignments: Commissioners were asked to respond to three questions (what feels most accurate in the feedback, what is missing, and what is most important to each commissioner), to review draft goals and strategies before the October 28 special workshop, to ask five people each to submit comments via the General Plan website, and to scan a QR code for the General Plan web page. - Timeline: The 60-day review period begins in December 2026; public hearings are expected in spring 2027 (March–April); voter ratification is targeted for the November 2027 ballot. Key Outcomes - Consent agenda approved (September 9, 2026 minutes). - P25-0095 (Union PAD Rezone): approved with four votes in favor; recommended to the Town Council. - P25-0159/P25-0160 (Circle K CUP and Site Plan): approved. - P26-0061 (The Union at Ellsworth Comprehensive Sign Plan): approved. - P26-0123 (QC District Comprehensive Sign Plan Amendment, Homewood Suites monument sign): approved. - Work study items were informational only; no formal action was taken. Staff will return to council on November 18 for water fee adoption, and the Commission has General Plan homework due before the October 28 workshop.

The Queen Creek Town Council met on October 8, 2026 at 7:15 PM. The meeting included ceremonial proclamations, approval of consent agendas, a public hearing on the Summerwell Residence rezoning and site plan, approval of an intergovernmental agreement with the Queen Creek Irrigation District, and a discussion on utility rate proposals. Consent Calendar - The Consent Agenda was approved unanimously (5-0), with one council member unable to vote due to technical issues. - The Public Hearing Consent Agenda was also approved unanimously (5-0). Public Comments & Testimony - Summerwell Residence Project: Six community members provided testimony during the public hearing. - Joe Klonick: Expressed opposition, citing prior council opposition, the General Plan, water security, and precedent. - Victoria Obenauer: Opposed the project, citing traffic, existing rentals, need for commercial space like therapist offices, and water supply concerns. - Liz Robinson: Spoke in support as a business owner and Cortina resident, noting improved security and potential economic benefit. - Brett Crosby: Supported the project, stating the site has been vacant for years and that residential use is preferable to an empty lot, with less traffic than commercial. - Tony Cosson: Expressed opposition via speaker card. Discussion Items - Summerwell Residence Project (Public Hearing): Principal Planner Les Johnson presented the proposal for a rezone from C-2 (commercial) to MDR (medium-density residential) with a PAD overlay. The 16.8-acre site near Power and Germaine Roads would include 150 rental units (102 single-family, 48 duplex), a clubhouse, pool, dog park, linear park, private streets, and 427 parking spaces. Staff reported 85 public comments (59 opposed, 26 in support). The Planning Commission recommended approval 6-0. Applicant representative Brennan Ray argued that commercial development has not materialized due to market conditions and private deed restrictions, and that residential use would generate 90% less traffic. He requested approval. - Council discussion revealed divided views: Councilmembers Brown and Mayor Wheatley opposed, citing the General Plan, water concerns, and the buyer’s knowledge of existing zoning. Councilmembers Benning, Martinot, and Vice Mayor McClure expressed varying degrees of support, emphasizing improved design, lower density than prior proposals, and property rights. Councilmember Benning noted personal struggle but leaned favorable. - Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA) with Queen Creek Irrigation District (QCID): Assistant Town Manager Shay Yoakum outlined a plan to transfer the town’s irrigation assets to QCID. The IGA initiates a 12-month good faith negotiation process for the transfer. Scott McCarty explained that flood irrigation customers would be temporarily exempted from the proposed water resource fee, with the town covering an estimated $1.4 million annual cost from its operating budget during the transition. Council members expressed support. - Utility Rate Discussion (Presentation Only): The council received a comprehensive presentation covering proposed water capacity fees, a new water resource capacity fee, and solid waste rates. Topics included a septic credit study, multi-year rate projections, and the need for a solid waste rate increase (first in 13 years, from $16.22 to $20.00 per month). No action was taken; remaining items were postponed to the October 21, 2026 meeting. Key Outcomes - Summerwell Residence Rezoning and Site Plan: Motion to approve failed 3-2 (2 in favor, 3 opposed). The project was not approved. - IGA with Queen Creek Irrigation District: Approved unanimously (5-0). Staff will proceed with negotiations. - Water and Solid Waste Utility Rates: Discussion continued; next steps scheduled for the October 21 meeting. Note: The meeting opened with proclamations for the East Valley Young Marines, Domestic Violence Awareness Month, and Hispanic Heritage Month.

The Queen Creek Town Council met on October 7, 2026, for its regular meeting. The council approved routine consent items, held public hearings on a liquor license, an annexation/rezone, the Summerwell Residences residential project, and an irrigation-service transfer agreement, and received a detailed utility-rate study presentation. Most routine items passed 5–0; the Summerwell rezoning failed 3–2. Ceremonial Matters - The council issued proclamations for Red Ribbon Week, Domestic Violence Awareness Month, and Hispanic Heritage Month. Representatives of the East Valley Young Marines, victim advocate Danielle Cottonwood and Queen Creek Police Department members, and Hispanic Heritage performers accepted the proclamations. Committee Reports - Council members did not comment on the committee report slide. Consent Calendar - Approved 5–0, with one remote councilmember not recorded due to connection issues: minutes from the September 16, 2026 special and regular meetings; the Parks and Recreation Advisory Committee FY 2026/2027 Work Plan; FY 26-27 carry-forward budget reallocations totaling $106,298,519, consisting of $73,463,581 for open contracts and purchase orders and $32,834,938 for previously authorized project budgets; the Maricopa Association of Governments project agreement for the Hawes Road: Rittenhouse Road to Jude Drive project; Resolution 1680-26 declaring intent to seek bond reimbursement for up to $277,815,981 in capital expenditures; and Resolution 1684-26 authorizing acquisition of property for the Sierra Vista Waterline Project, including through gift, purchase, or eminent domain if necessary. Public Hearing Consent Agenda - Approved 5–0: a Series 12 restaurant liquor license for Rosati’s Pizza at 25166 S Ellsworth Road, B101; Ordinance 897-26 annexing approximately 31,000 square feet (0.72 acres) north of Ellsworth and Happy roads; and Ordinance 898-26 rezoning that property from RU-43/R1-43 to C-1 with site plan approval for the Carder Development Parking Lot Expansion. No public comments were offered. Public Comments & Testimony - General public comment had no speakers. - Summerwell Residences public hearing speakers: - Joe Klonick (18585 E Raven Drive, Cortina) opposed the rezone, saying the same land-use change had previously been withdrawn twice and council members had earlier opposed residential zoning for this property. He argued the General Plan should be honored, commercial opportunity would be lost permanently, and added residential demand would burden roads, services, and water. - Victoria Obenauer (18646 E Siegel Drive) opposed, citing traffic congestion, an oversupply of rentals in the area, unmet demand for commercial and office space such as therapist co-working space, and concerns about the 100-year water supply. - Liz Robinson (18618 S 186th Way), a business owner and resident, supported the project, saying the residential layout with rear yards would improve security for her business compared with the earlier apartment proposal and would bring customers and town revenue. - Brett Crosby (1916 E Macaw Drive), a Cortina resident, supported the project, saying the vacant lot had not attracted commercial development and the rental homes would meet demand. He also urged the town to push Germain Road through to Sossaman and said online opposition included misinformation. Discussion Items Summerwell Residences Rezone (Ordinance 896-26) and Site Plan - Principal Planner Les Johnson presented the request to rezone approximately 16.8 acres from C-2 (General Commercial) to MDR/PAD and approve a site plan for 150 rental units consisting of 102 single-family detached units and 48 duplex units, plus a clubhouse, pool, dog park, linear park, private streets, and 427 parking spaces. He reported that a neighborhood meeting was held on August 26 with six residents, the Planning Commission recommended approval 6–0 on September 9, and 85 public comments had been received, with 59 opposed and 26 in support; more than half of the comments lacked verifiable addresses. - Applicant representative Brennan Ray spoke on behalf of Graystar. He noted the site had previously been proposed for 340 apartments, while the current proposal was 150 residences in 126 buildings. He described outreach including 251 mailed letters and 80 emails, and argued that commercial development had not proved viable, that a private 2003 Power Ranch Marketplace/Home Depot agreement restricts certain commercial uses, and that the residential use would generate about 90% less traffic than commercial development. He also estimated that future residents would spend $3–3.25 million annually in the local area. - Council discussion: Councilmember Benning called the project a major improvement but acknowledged the volume of opposing resident comments. Councilmember Martinell supported the project, citing property rights and the long-vacant site. Vice Mayor McClure supported it, citing lower traffic, 40% open space, and private property rights. Councilmember Brown opposed, saying he had opposed the same rezone two years earlier and that the project did not clearly exceed the General Plan land-use designation. Mayor Wheatley expressed mixed views, mentioning the need for the Germain/Sossaman connection and concerns about water costs and the ongoing General Plan update. - Councilmember Benning asked staff to follow up with resident Brett Crosby about supporting the town’s Arizona Corporation Commission application regarding the Sossaman and Germain crossing. - A motion to approve failed 3–2, with Councilmember Padilla not voting. Final Action: IGA with Queen Creek Irrigation District - Assistant Town Manager Shay Yoakum presented Resolution 1685-26, an intergovernmental agreement to begin negotiations to transfer all town irrigation assets and service to the Queen Creek Irrigation District. The town has about 500 irrigation customers using about 1,400 acre-feet per year. QCID infrastructure already covers 17 of the 19 subdivisions served by the town, with Orchard Ranchettes and Pegasus outside QCID’s boundary. The transfer would take about 12 months and would require a future final agreement for council approval. - Deputy Town Manager and CFO Scott McCarty said that, if the IGA is approved, flood-irrigation customers would be exempt from the proposed water resource fee during the transition, costing about $1.4 million in the first year, paid from the town’s operating budget so other customers would not pay more. Potable water use would still be subject to the fee. - The council approved Resolution 1685-26 5–0. No public comments were offered. Utility Rate Discussion: Water Delivery, Wastewater, and Solid Waste - Staff and consultants presented a continuation of the utility rate process. A public hearing and vote are scheduled for November 18, 2026, following required notice steps on October 19 and October 29. - On the proposed new water resource fee, staff explained a septic-system recharge credit. The town expects to receive approximately 200 acre-feet of incidental recharge credit initially, worth about $200,000 per year, equating to roughly $40 per year per septic account, or about $60 if the credit is raised from 4% to 6%. Year-six estimates were about $140 and $210 per account. The town is seeking a consultant study to try to increase the credit. - Staff answered common questions: new growth would pay its fair share through capacity fees and monthly fees; the wastewater credit is 40% for single-family homes, 80% for multifamily, and a percentage for commercial based on measured return flows; 40-year debt was used because 100-year debt is not practical; multi-year rates are indicative, starting at about $23 million per year and rising toward about $60 million per year in year six; and the rate structure is designed to avoid cross-subsidization. - DTA consultant Kuda Wikuey presented the updated water delivery capacity fee. The 10-year infrastructure plan totals $186 million, with about 90% attributable to growth. After carve-outs, cash balances, and financing carry costs, the proposed fee is $4,591 per ERU, about a 90% increase. Multifamily would pay 25% of the single-family fee, and larger commercial meters would be charged based on the greater of meter capacity ratio or project-specific water use. - Stantec’s Andy Burnham presented the new water resource capacity fee. It is designed to recover growth’s share of securing a 100-year water supply. Based on about 20,000 new ERUs and 270,000 additional acre-feet, the estimated cost is about $170 million. The fee would recover 50% of that cost, with the remainder from monthly water resource fees. Proposed fees included about $10,000 for a water-only single-family account, about $6,000 for a combined water/wastewater account, and multifamily set at 25% of the single-family fee, with an 80% credit for combined accounts. Developers who bring their own water could be recognized. - Ramona Simpson presented solid waste services: the current monthly rate is $16.22 for about 28,000 households and 63,000 carts, with a 23% diversion rate and many included services. The last solid waste rate increase was in 2013. A proposed FY27 adjustment of about $3.78 per month would bring the rate to about $20.00. Cart replacement, reserve contributions, customer service, and support costs were included in the analysis; the recommended reserve target is three months of operations and maintenance expenses. - Council members asked questions about growth-related projects and Box Canyon water improvements. No vote was taken; staff proposed deferring the final two discussion items to the October 21, 2026 council meeting. Key Outcomes - Consent Calendar and Public Hearing Consent Agenda approved 5–0. - Summerwell Residences Rezone and Site Plan failed 3–2. - Resolution 1685-26, the IGA with the Queen Creek Irrigation District, was approved 5–0. - Utility rate discussions continued without a vote; additional rate items were deferred to October 21, 2026, with the required public hearing scheduled for November 18, 2026. - The meeting was adjourned after council direction to defer the remaining items.

The Queen Creek Town Council held its regular meeting on October 7, 2026, at 6:30 PM in Community Chambers, 20727 E Civic Parkway. The agenda included ceremonial proclamations, consent agenda items, public hearings, a final action on an intergovernmental agreement, and a discussion of utility rates. No transcript or minutes were provided with the source material; this summary is based solely on the amended agenda. Ceremonial Matters - Proclamations were scheduled for Red Ribbon Week, Domestic Violence Awareness Month, and Hispanic Heritage Month. Committee Reports - Council summary reports were scheduled for meetings and conferences attended, including Mesa Gateway Airport, MAG, East Valley Partnership, and CAG. Consent Calendar - Approval of minutes from the September 16, 2026 Special Meeting and Regular Meeting. - Parks and Recreation Advisory Committee (PRAC) FY 2026/2027 Work Plan. - FY 26-27 carry-forward budget reallocations: $73,463,581 for contracts and purchase orders issued but not yet complete, and $32,834,938 of remaining project budgets previously authorized but not yet committed or under contract, totaling $106,298,519 from Contingency. - Project agreement with Maricopa Association of Governments (MAG) for reimbursements for the Hawes Road: Rittenhouse Road to Jude Drive project. - Resolution 1680-26 declaring official intent to be reimbursed from future bond issues for capital expenditures relating to utilities, roadways, and other capital improvements, with a total not to exceed $277,815,981. - Resolution 1684-26 declaring a need and necessity and public purpose for acquiring real and/or personal property along Sierra Vista Drive and Hashknife Draw Road, in Section 3, Township 3 South Range 7 East, for the Sierra Vista Waterline Project (CIP Project WA298), authorizing acquisition through gift, purchase, or eminent domain, and authorizing necessary budget adjustments and funding transfers. Public Hearing Consent Agenda - New Series 12 Restaurant Liquor License application by Heather Renee Kroll for Rosati's Pizza, located at 25166 S Ellsworth Road, B101. - Ordinance 897-26: Carder Development Parking Lot Expansion annexation (P26-0080) of approximately 31,000 square feet (0.72 acres), located north of the northwest corner of Ellsworth and Happy roads. - Ordinance 898-26: Carder Development Parking Lot Expansion rezone (P26-0081) and site plan (P26-0082), requested by Chris Webb of Rose Law Group, to rezone approximately 31,000 square feet (0.72 acres) from RU-43/R1-43 (Maricopa County/Town equivalent) to C-1 (Light Commercial). Public Hearing - Ordinance 896-26: Summerwell Residences Rezone (P26-0058) and Site Plan (P26-0059), requested by Brennan Ray of Ray Law Firm, to rezone approximately 16.8 acres from C-2 (General Commercial) to MDR/PAD (Medium Density Residential/Planned Area Development), along with site plan approval for a residential community of 150 single-family detached and attached rental units, a community clubhouse, and associated amenities, located approximately 300 feet east of the northeast corner of Germann and Power roads. Final Action - Resolution 1685-26 approving and authorizing execution of an Intergovernmental Agreement between the Town of Queen Creek and the Queen Creek Irrigation District related to the transfer of residential irrigation service to the District, delegating authority to the Town Manager, Town Clerk, and Town Attorney, and declaring an emergency. Items for Discussion - Discussion and direction regarding Water Delivery, Wastewater, and Solid Waste Utility Rates. Key Outcomes - No votes, decisions, or public comments were recorded in the available agenda-only source material. Action items listed above were presented for consideration, with the utility rates item scheduled for discussion and direction.

The Queen Creek Town Council held a special meeting on September 17, 2026 (note: the agenda and transcript list the meeting as September 16, 2026, creating a date discrepancy) at 5:30 PM in the Community Chambers. The sole purpose was to vote on whether to adjourn to executive session to discuss four legal and contractual matters related to water resources and a pending lawsuit. Following roll call, a motion was made and seconded, and the council voted unanimously to proceed into executive session. Executive Session Authorization - Councilmember Benning moved to adjourn to executive session, seconded by Vice Mayor McClure. The motion carried unanimously with all six council members present voting in favor: Vice Mayor McClure, Councilmember Benning, Councilmember Martinow, Mayor Wheatley, Councilmember Brown, and Councilmember Padilla. (Councilmember Olafant was listed in roll call but not recorded as voting; the transcript indicates a quorum was present.) - The executive session was authorized to discuss the following items under A.R.S. § 38-431.03(A)(3), (4) & (7): - Item A: The Town's Harquahala Valley groundwater acquisition, delivery, and infrastructure strategies, including long-term financing, capital cost recovery, debt service agreements, and related utility rates, fees, and charges. - Item B: The Town's irrigation water service obligations, delivery, and infrastructure strategies, including long-term financing, capital cost recovery, debt service agreements, and related utility rates and fees. - Item C: Sentry Storage LLC v. Town of Queen Creek (Case No. CV2026-006413) – discussion with legal counsel. - Item D: The Town's water service obligations, including existing and potential contracts, infrastructure, and real property. Key Outcomes - The council unanimously voted (6-0) to adjourn to executive session immediately following the special meeting. No other business was conducted. The public portion of the meeting was then adjourned.