The Saco City Council met on March 10, 2026 (meeting began March 9th at 6:30 p.m. and continued into March 10th) to address a range of issues including a special performance by the Twin City Theater Academy, public comments on sidewalk conditions and mobile home park rent increases, a vote to repeal the emergency moratorium on Blue Haven Park lot rent increases, and a discussion on potential rent stabilization ordinances for mobile home parks. The council also approved minutes, received administrative updates, and held an executive session on legal and real estate matters. Consent Calendar - Approval of the minutes from March 2, 2026, passed unanimously 6-0. Public Comments & Testimony - Trinity Miller (24 Garfield Street) expressed concerns about unsafe sidewalk snow removal, forcing pedestrians to walk in roadways. She requested the city use sand instead of salt. - Reverend Robert Henry (24 Pheasant Road) thanked the council for supporting residents in the rent increase dispute, noting that residents' voices have made a difference. - Rodney Champagne (17 Clayton Drive, Blue Haven community) spoke about the need for rent stabilization protections in manufactured home communities, citing steep lot rent increases that outpace wage growth. He noted that Blue Haven's majority owner is a California-based nonprofit and urged the council to schedule a workshop on rent stabilization. - Sarah Gardner (17 Pinehaven Street) read a statement on behalf of her husband Gary and also spoke personally. She argued that the final agreement with Blue Haven ownership offers only short-term relief and requires residents to surrender rights, with no long-term rent protections beyond 2026. She urged passage of a rent stabilization ordinance. - Lisa DeRocher (18 Pine Haven Street) supported keeping the emergency moratorium and called for a rent stabilization ordinance, noting that residents were coerced into signing agreements. - Hope Lambert (14 Pheasant Road) described her lot rent increasing from $35 in January 2025 to an additional $145 in December 2025, a 37.5% increase. She expressed uncertainty about the agreement and its implications for those who did not sign. - Barb Thomas (2 Meserve Circle) requested a citywide rent stabilization ordinance linked to property maintenance, with financial audit powers for arbitrators and a ban on gag orders. She cited the Old Orchard Beach 5% cap model and LD 1723. - Sarah Belander (5 Sparrow Drive, formerly 31 Pheasant Road) reiterated concerns about out-of-state ownership extracting revenue without reinvesting locally, and urged the council to adopt protections. - Karen James (60 Pheasant Road) stated she signed the agreement under pressure, as the alternative was a rent increase to $660. She supported a workshop for rent stabilization. - Kathy Dobbins (28 Meserve Circle) described her role as an advocate, helping residents with basic needs like heating costs and repairs. She noted that residents are afraid to speak out and asked the council to keep the moratorium or adopt real measures. - Richard Bryant (attorney for Blue Haven owner) supported rescinding the moratorium, stating that 173 households (80% of affected residents) signed the mediated agreement. He presented additional concessions: extension of the rescission date, full March credit, extending benefits to all residents, and agreement to engage in discussions for sale of the park. He argued that the agreement is binding and provides protections. - Phil Hatch (19 Evergreen Drive, former councilor) commented on two executive session items: the Lucia Kimball Deering Trust governance and the construction loan agreement for the ecology school. He urged the council to implement recommendations from the Citizens' Grievance Committee and to terminate the construction loan agreement due to TESS's failure to meet contractual obligations. Discussion Items - Repeal of Emergency Ordinance for Temporary Moratorium on Blue Haven Park Lot Rent Increase: Councilor Johnston moved to repeal the ordinance, effective March 9, 2026. Councilors debated the merits: Councilor Doyle opposed repeal, arguing the emergency is community-wide and that the moratorium should remain until policy decisions are made; Councilor Gale expressed conflict, noting the mediation process was flawed and residents had little choice; Councilor Johnston supported repeal, stating the moratorium achieved its purpose of facilitating mediation and that 80% of residents signed the agreement. Councilor Hewitt, Edwards, and Ronan also spoke, with Ronan noting the need to address immediate needs and broader policy separately. The motion passed 4-2 (Edwards: yes, Doyle: no, Annan: yes, Gale: no, Hewitt: yes, Johnston: yes). - Review of Mobile Home Park Lot Rent Stabilization Ordinance Options: Deputy Director Cole Prescott presented a sampling of ordinances from Old Orchard Beach, Waterville, and Westbrook, with a focus on Westbrook's long-standing model. Councilors discussed preferences for a workshop format and specific models: Councilor Johnston requested a workshop to understand the structure and burden on staff; Councilor Doyle favored Old Orchard Beach's concise model; Councilor Edwards wanted real-world examples and enforcement mechanisms; Councilor Gale preferred Waterville's straightforward language. The council agreed to schedule a workshop, with the city administrator noting that April may be difficult due to budget presentations. No formal vote was taken. Key Outcomes - The council voted 4-2 to repeal the emergency ordinance imposing a temporary moratorium on Blue Haven Park lot rent increases, effective March 9, 2026. The repeal was based on the mediated agreement between the owner and 173 residents (80% of affected households), which includes binding contractual protections through January 2028, a full March credit, and extension of benefits to all residents. - The council will schedule a workshop to explore mobile home park lot rent stabilization ordinance options, using models from Westbrook, Old Orchard Beach, and Waterville as starting points. The workshop will include input from both mobile home park owners in the city. - The council entered executive session at 8:05 p.m. to discuss real estate, economic development, legal matters, and commercial abatements, and exited at 10:00 p.m. with no further action reported. - Administrative updates included lifeguard recruitment, the Saco Bay Symposium on March 23, the Harborfest Artwork Design Contest, and recognition of facilities maintenance staff who completed over 2,000 work orders in the past year.
Public Meetings - Saco, Maine
Public Meetings - Saco, MaineThe Sacco Planning Board convened on Tuesday, March 3, 2026, at 6:00 PM. The meeting covered three major agenda items: a completeness review for a zoning map amendment on Flag Pond Road, a continued completeness review for an 18-lot subdivision on Easy Street, and a continued public hearing and preliminary approval for a 25-unit condominium development at 42 Ferry Road. The board also heard public comments on non-agenda items and general planning updates. Public Comments & Testimony - Flag Pond Road Rezoning (Item 6A): Two residents from the McKenzie Preserve HOA spoke during the public comment period. Paul Santabor (21 Tabby Way) expressed concern about a potential 200-condo development, citing traffic and safety issues at the Flag Pond Road/I-95 overpass. He urged thoughtful development and involvement in the process. Wes Clark (8 Tabby Way) recommended rezoning to Low Density Residential (LDR) instead of the requested Portland Road District, questioning the meaning of "multi-use" as a zoning category. - 42 Ferry Road (Item 6C): During the continued public hearing, abutters raised concerns about stormwater, flooding, wetlands, the historic Seal Rock Spring, and density. Maggie Mondack (29B Old Orchard Road) argued that the stormwater model ignores existing flooding and called for a hydrogeologic study, wider buffers, and a 25 mph speed zone with a signalized crossing. Georgia Bell (29A Old Orchard Road) questioned the adequacy of stormwater standards for 100-year events and noted discrepancies in groundwater test results. Andrew Mondack (29 Old Orchard Road) requested a more robust margin of safety, a green buffer corridor, and reduced density. David Rewinkle (32 Ferry Road) urged the board to investigate the spring location at his property, citing historical evidence, and expressed concerns about concentrated stormwater overflow and parking counts. Discussion Items - Flag Pond Road Rezoning - Completeness Review (Item 6A): Applicant Drew Gagnum (Coral Palmer) presented a petition to rezone two parcels (totaling 60 acres) from Industrial to Portland Road District, citing environmental constraints, connectivity, and consistency with the comprehensive plan. The applicant emphasized no solidified development plans but indicated potential for mixed-use. Board members questioned compatibility with adjacent industrial land, wetlands, and access. The board found the application complete (6-0) and scheduled a public hearing for April 7, 2026. - Easy Street Subdivision - Completeness Review (Item 6B): Applicant Austin Fagan (BH2M) proposed an 18-lot single-family subdivision accessible via Mary's Way in Old Orchard Beach. The project includes a loop road, public water, private septic, and one wetland impact. Several items were missing from the packet, including financial and technical capacity, HOA documents, landscaping details, and archaeological review. Board members noted incomplete information and concerns about maintenance and jurisdictional coordination. The board voted 6-0 to continue the completeness review to April 7, 2026, and scheduled a site walk on March 18, 2026, with invitation to the Conservation Commission. - 42 Ferry Road - Continued Public Hearing and Preliminary Approval (Item 6C): Applicant Craig (Acorn Engineering) presented updated plans addressing landscaping and traffic. The board discussed two options for pedestrian connectivity: a sidewalk to Pine Ridge Road with an all-way stop versus a longer sidewalk to Old Orchard Road. Board consensus favored the Pine Ridge option due to feasibility. The board also deliberated on the location of Seal Rock Spring, with abutters advocating for further study and city staff deferring to existing surveys and zoning maps. After closing the public hearing (5-1), the board granted a waiver for internal landscaping (6-0), found the proposed open space sufficient (6-0), adopted findings of fact and conditions of approval (5-0-1), and granted preliminary subdivision, site plan, and conditional use approval (5-0-1). Key Outcomes - Flag Pond Road Rezoning: Application found complete (6-0). Public hearing scheduled for April 7, 2026. - Easy Street Subdivision: Completeness review continued to April 7, 2026. Site walk scheduled for March 18, 2026 at 8:00 AM. - 42 Ferry Road Condominiums: Public hearing closed (5-1). Preliminary approval granted (5-0-1, with Jeff Rusho abstaining). Key conditions include updated tree survey, financial capacity letter, and design and installation of a sidewalk connection from the site to the intersection of Pine Ridge Road and Ferry Road, including a crosswalk and an all-way stop or alternative approved by DOT and city staff. - Meeting Extended: The board approved extending the meeting to 9:30 PM to complete business. - Planning Department Update: Planner Charles Tuttleman introduced a new memo format and requested board feedback. Jeff Rusho requested a report on housing permit data.
The Saco City Council met on March 2, 2026, at 6:30 PM to discuss the Portland Road Route 1 road diet, public testimony on the Blue Haven mobile home park moratorium, a proposed repeal of that moratorium, and a zoning map amendment for Flag Pond Road. The council voted 7-0 to approve minutes and a consent item, and after extensive debate, voted 6-1 to place the moratorium repeal on the March 9, 2026 agenda. Consent Calendar - Approved minutes of February 2, 2026 and February 9, 2026 (7-0). - Approved massage therapist license application for Leah Hardy (7-0). Public Comments & Testimony - Sarah Johns Gardner (17 Pine Haven Street) urged the council to keep the moratorium, alleging the mediated agreement process was inconsistent, opaque, and coercive. She stated residents received different versions of materials, critical pages were missing, and signatures were collected under pressure. She asked the council to move toward a transparent rent stabilization ordinance. - Lisa DeRoscher (18 Pine Haven Street) asked what mechanisms would remain to protect residents if the moratorium were lifted, emphasizing the need for fairness and transparency. - Sarah Belanger (5 Sparrow Drive; formerly of Blue Haven) expressed full support for maintaining the moratorium and drafting a rent stabilization ordinance. She noted many residents live on fixed incomes and cannot absorb sudden rent increases, arguing mobile home parks were never intended as high-yield investments. - Barb Thomas (Two Meserve Circle, Blue Haven) provided a packet detailing the formation of the Blue Haven Resident Cooperative, aiming to transition the park to resident ownership. She described the cooperative as a tool to protect against displacement and predatory rent increases. - An anonymous resident (statement read by a speaker who declined to identify the resident due to fear) described pressure to sign agreements, confusion over rent credits, and fear of retaliation. - Donna Stevens (32 Pinehaven Street) asked the council to maintain the moratorium and pursue formal rent stabilization, noting that out-of-state equity firms are undermining housing stability. - Rodney Champagne (17 Clayton Drive, Blue Haven Residents Committee) stated residents are increasingly afraid to speak publicly due to fear of retaliation. He described the mediated process as inconsistent and lacking transparency, and asked the council to investigate residents' concerns. - Richard Bryant (attorney for Blue Haven MHP LLC) presented a letter stating that the owner has signed agreements with 170 of 251 households (60%), and 78% of affected households. He offered additional concessions: credits to offset the March rent increase for all affected households (not just signers), and a commitment to discuss selling the park to residents. He argued the mediated agreement eliminates the need for the moratorium. Discussion Items - Portland Road Route 1 Road Diet Update: Deputy Administrator Prescott and Director Moore reported that the Maine DOT provided 12 comments on the road diet analysis and cannot support permanent implementation without a demonstration project. A demonstration project was deemed unfeasible due to cost and contractor constraints. The project will be referred back to the Traffic Safety Committee. The existing four-lane configuration will remain unchanged. - Repeal of Emergency Moratorium on Mobile Home Park Lot Rent Increases: Councilor Johnston moved to repeal the emergency ordinance, arguing the mediated agreement resolved the emergency because a majority of residents supported it. Councilors Doyle, Edwards, Gale, and Hewitt expressed concerns about the late‑arriving letter from the owner's attorney, the lack of a legally binding contract, and residents' fear of coercion. The council suspended rules to allow the owner's attorney, committee representatives, and others to speak. After extensive debate, Councilor Johnston withdrew his motion and instead moved to place the repeal on the March 9, 2026 agenda. The motion passed 6-1 (Councilor Doyle dissenting). - Zoning Map Amendment Petition (BAAS Holding Company): Director Tettelman presented a petition to rezone two parcels (approx. 60 acres) on Flag Pond Road from Industrial (I) to Portland Road (PR) to allow mixed-use development. The applicant's engineer, Drew Dagnan, cited environmental constraints, utility infrastructure, and alignment with the comprehensive plan. Councilors Doyle and Johnston noted the city's need to preserve industrial land for tax base and expressed concerns about precedent. The item will be reviewed by the Planning Board before returning to council. Key Outcomes - Minutes approved (7-0). - Consent item approved (7-0). - Moratorium repeal: Original motion withdrawn; new motion to place on March 9, 2026 agenda passed 6-1. - Road diet: Will be discussed at Traffic Safety Committee; no immediate changes. - Zoning amendment: Referred to Planning Board for public hearing and recommendation. - Administrative updates: Road weight restrictions effective March 2; homestead exemption deadline April 1; budget process begins March 16. - Council comments: Councilor Doyle requested a legal opinion on the seasonal rental ordinance; City Administrator Pelletier reported a meeting scheduled with the attorney. Next meeting: March 9, 2026, with the moratorium repeal item on the agenda.
The Saco Planning Board met on Tuesday, February 24, 2026, at 7:43 PM (adjournment) to review several development applications and discuss legislative updates. The agenda included a sketch plan for an elderly housing development at 1015 US One, a site plan for converting office space to residential at 100 Main Street, a preliminary subdivision for 986 Portland Road Phase 1, and a request to table the Phase 2 application. The board also discussed the implications of LD 1829, a state housing law. All votes were 7-0 unless otherwise noted. Consent Calendar - Approval of Minutes (February 17, 2026): The board adopted the draft meeting minutes as edited, with a correction to strike "public water" from a description of lot connections. Motion by Jeff, second by Jim; passed 7-0. Public Comments & Testimony - No members of the public spoke during the public comment period or during the public hearings. Discussion Items 1. Sketch Plan – 1015 US One (Elderly Housing) - Applicant: Rob McSorley, Sebago TechNet, representing 1015 US One Inc. - Proposal: A sketch plan for 84 elderly housing units in three-story buildings on a site combining 1015 and 1017 Portland Road. The plan includes a future connection to Dom Marie Drive (though not agreed upon), a pedestrian connection to Blue Haven Motor Court, and a gravity-fed sewer stub-out. The site currently has a non-conforming building. - Board Questions & Comments: - Jeff asked about dumpster location, parking, and the north entrance from Route 1. The applicant noted a second dumpster would be added and that turning movements for fire apparatus would be analyzed. - Jim raised concerns about multiple LLC ownership, mailbox locations, and parking adequacy. The applicant confirmed a joint LLC would be formed and parking would be approximately 1.5 spaces per unit. - Joyce requested buffering along the north (commercial) side; the applicant proposed a fence and hedge. - Chris noted the need for large caliper trees for buffering, improved pedestrian pathways, and additional accessible parking spaces. - Jeff expressed support for infill but concern about losing commercial zone; he suggested including the Blue Haven parcel in the future to create a unified elderly community. - No formal vote: The sketch plan was presented for preliminary feedback; the applicant will address comments in a future detailed application. 2. 100 Main Street – Office-to-Residential Conversion (Site Plan) - Applicant: Drew Ulawski, Haley Ward, for 100 Main LLC. - Proposal: Convert vacant second-floor office space (former call center) into six one-bedroom apartments (approx. 500 sq ft each) within Building 3 of the Saco Island development. No exterior changes. Parking provided in shared lot; traffic and water capacity deemed adequate. - Staff Clarification: Staff noted the application is solely a site plan, not a subdivision or conditional use, due to vested rights under a prior master development plan. - Waiver Requests: The applicant requested waivers from many site plan checklist items (e.g., lighting plan, traffic analysis, utility plan) due to no exterior changes. Board discussion: - Jeff questioned the waiver for lighting if any exterior changes exist; applicant confirmed none. - Jeff also requested a more detailed financial capacity statement and a traffic peer review given the new Route 1 traffic pattern. - Catherine asked about trash disposal; existing dumpster will be used. - Joyce noted previous similar approvals and supported waivers. - Vote: Motion by Jim, second by Joyce to find the application complete and grant waivers as requested, with additional items for clarity (lighting, financial capacity, traffic review). Passed 7-0. - Public Hearing Scheduled: March 17, 2026. Motion by Jim, second by Jeff; passed 7-0. 3. 986 Portland Road Phase 1 – Preliminary Subdivision and Site Plan - Applicant: Jeff Amos, Tier 9 Consultants, for Cloverleaf Development LLC. - Proposal: A three-lot subdivision and private right-of-way (hammerhead turnaround) within the Portland Road zoning district. This is Phase 1 of a larger project; Phase 2 involves a separate application. The plan includes a 224-foot private road from Portland Road, stormwater drainage to an existing gravel wetland, and a road/easement maintenance agreement. - Wetland Issues: The applicant responded to third-party wetland review comments by increasing a stream setback from 75 to 100 feet. DEP and Army Corps permits are in place. Staff confirmed the wetland delineation is accurate. - Board Questions: Jim asked about stormwater management for the hammerhead; applicant confirmed drainage to the existing pond. Jeff noted missing documents (road/easement declaration, financial capacity) but later confirmed they were submitted and reviewed on screen. - Vote: Motion by Jeff, second by Joyce to find the application complete. Passed 7-0. - Public Hearing: Opened and continued to March 17, 2026, to allow staff time for peer review. Motion by Jeff, second by Jim; passed 7-0. The board also requested staff draft findings of fact and conditions of approval. 4. 986 Portland Road Phase 2 – Request to Table - The applicant requested to table the Phase 2 application indefinitely to address comprehensive comments. No formal review had occurred. - Vote: Motion by Jim, second by Jeff to continue review to a future meeting as determined by the city planner. Passed 7-0. 5. LD 1829 Discussion - Catherine asked about training on LD 1829, a state housing law with a July 1, 2026 implementation deadline for municipalities. Staff indicated that ordinance changes are being developed by the long-range planning committee and will come to the board for review. The current ordinance remains in effect. Jeff expressed concern about jurisdictional restrictions, and Councilor Nate Johnson noted the city is awaiting final rules. The board agreed to communicate with the public to avoid misconceptions. Key Outcomes - The board approved the minutes from February 17, 2026, with edits. - The sketch plan for 1015 US One received preliminary feedback; no formal action taken. - The application for 100 Main Street was found complete, waivers granted, and a public hearing scheduled for March 17, 2026. - The application for 986 Portland Road Phase 1 was found complete, public hearing opened and continued to March 17, 2026. - The Phase 2 application for 986 Portland Road was tabled indefinitely. - The board discussed LD 1829 and will await further guidance from staff and council.
The Saco Planning Board met on February 17, 2026, to consider several subdivision and site plan applications, including public hearings on 321 Lincoln Street, 352 North Street, 63 Watson Mill Road, and 83 Jenkins Road. The board approved minutes, granted approvals, and continued hearings. The meeting was extended past 9 PM and adjourned at 9:23 PM. Consent Calendar - Approval of February 3, 2026 meeting minutes as amended (struck a sentence) passed 6–0–1 (Carrie Lynn abstained). - Approval of January 21, 2026 site walk notes for 83 Jenkins Road with edit ("Boothby Lane" corrected) passed 6–0–1 (Carrie Lynn abstained). Public Comments & Testimony - Kelly Archer (185 Bradley Street) commented on the importance of a full board and deferred road-specific comments to the 83 Jenkins Road hearing. - Mike Eon (59 Boom Road) spoke on 321 Lincoln Street, emphasizing the need for sidewalk connectivity to Skyline Drive and Applewood, and offered an easement for a future trail. - Kelly Archer again spoke on 321 Lincoln Street, arguing the traffic study is outdated and insufficient, citing construction and lack of current data. - On 83 Jenkins Road: Frank Freeman (90 Jenkins Road) expressed concerns about sidewalk safety on Jenkins Road; Stephon Ormantis (90 Jenkins Road) raised concerns about water table depletion and lack of community green space; Norma Grenier (81 Rear Jenkins Road) detailed multiple concerns including water runoff, bridge aesthetics, well water, wildlife loss, property taxes, and requested denial. Discussion Items - 321 Lincoln Street (Big Ledge LLC): Continued public hearing for a 94-lot residential subdivision. Applicant reported DPW comments addressed and sidewalk plan meeting standards. Public hearing closed 5–2. Board approved a waiver for Sparrow Lane to be a public street (7–0). Adopted findings of fact with amendment on traffic fact Q (6–1). Adopted conditions of approval (6–1). Motion to grant preliminary subdivision, site plan, and slave approval passed 6–1 (Jeff opposed). - 352 North Street (Northeast Hospitality Holdings LLC): Site plan revision for a 130-room hotel. Applicant explained a clerical error in recording documents was being corrected. Public hearing opened and closed (7–0). Adopted findings of fact and conditions of approval (7–0). Granted site plan revision (7–0). - 63 Watson Mill Road (VCJ Properties): Final subdivision for 4 lots. Application found complete (7–0). Public hearing scheduled for March 17, 2026. - 83 Jenkins Road (Blueberry Realty LLC): Preliminary subdivision and site plan for 8 townhome lots. Applicant detailed redesign due to DPW comments; missing HOA documents and updated financial capacity. Board found application complete (7–0) after discussion. Public hearing opened; residents expressed concerns. Board voted to continue public hearing to April 7, 2026 (7–0) and continue application review to April 7, 2026 (7–0), with staff to obtain DPW input on water service distance, sidewalk modifications, and bridge aesthetics. Key Outcomes - 321 Lincoln Street: Preliminary approval granted with conditions; waiver for Sparrow Lane approved. - 352 North Street: Site plan revision approved. - 63 Watson Mill Road: Application complete; public hearing set for March 17, 2026. - 83 Jenkins Road: Application complete; continued to April 7, 2026 for applicant to address outstanding items (HOA documents, financial capacity, peer review responses, architectural elevations) and staff to provide additional DPW feedback.
The Saco City Council met on Monday, February 9, 2026, at 6:30 p.m. with all six councilors present. The meeting focused on extending the temporary emergency moratorium on mobile home park rent increases, receiving updates on the mediated agreement between Blue Haven Mobile Home Park and its residents, and approving several policies, including an electric vehicle charging pilot, a recreational vehicle ordinance amendment, and a memorandum of understanding with the University of New England for a wave gauge installation. All votes were unanimous. Consent Calendar - Confirmed the mayor's reappointment of Andrew Bracey to the Historic Preservation Commission and Melissa Field to the Conservation Commission (passed 6-0). Public Comments & Testimony - Sarah Giles Gardner (17 Pine Street, Blue Haven resident) described her experience during the January 26 mediation, stating she felt misled, pressured to sign an incomplete agreement, and that her disability-related needs were ignored. She requested the council put a strong, enforceable ordinance in place to protect residents from rent increases and predatory practices. - Lisa DeRozers (18 Pine Haven Street) asked the council to keep the emergency ordinance in place and make rent stabilization retroactive, noting that Waterville and Biddeford have passed similar measures. - Linda Daniels (31 Pheasant Road, Blue Haven) thanked the council for their support, described her partner's disability and fixed income, and stated that a $145 monthly rent increase would be unaffordable. - Hope Lambert (14 Pleasant Row, Blue Haven) explained she did not sign the mediated agreement due to unclear language, a mismatch between the summary and the agreement, and a provision that appeared to allow a rent increase on or after January 1, 2027. She requested the council extend the moratorium and work toward rent stabilization. - Richard Bryant (attorney for Blue Haven MHP LLC) updated the council on the mediated agreement, clarifying that the August rent increase notice was on hold due to the moratorium. He stated that the agreement includes a series of credits to lower and stretch out the increase, and that three conditions must be met by March 1: 51% of households signing the agreement, the moratorium being rescinded, and no other municipal or state law blocking implementation. He noted the committee's attorney had achieved a substantial number of signatures. - Brian LaRoche (19 Reserve Circle) provided an update on state-level mobile home park initiatives, including the governor's supplemental budget (funding for oversight moved to Maine Office of Community Affairs, a new assistant attorney general for housing, and a pilot program for park financing), Pine Tree Legal's new full-time fellow for mobile home issues, and a potential rewrite of mobile home statutes by the housing and economic development committee. - John Veid (1 Gallant Drive, Blue Haven) voiced support for the residents' committee, expressed concern about the $145 monthly increase and the hurry to sign an agreement, and questioned the logic of a rebate that could be taken back. Discussion Items - Action Item A – Emergency Moratorium Extension (Councillor Johnston): Motion to enact a third temporary emergency moratorium on mobile home park lot rental increases, effective until April 10, 2026. Councillor Johnston noted the residents and Blue Haven LLC had not yet reached the 51% signature threshold. Councillor Doyle supported the extension, adding that the city should consider a broader rent stabilization ordinance. Councillor Gale also supported the extension but noted underlying issues need long-term solutions. The motion passed 6-0. - Action Item B – Electric Vehicle Charging Pilot Policy (Councillor Onan): Adopted a one-year pilot policy for EV charging at the Saco Community Center, starting July 1, 2026, with a fee schedule to be brought forward in the FY2027 budget. Passed 6-0. - Action Item C – Recreational Vehicle Ordinance Amendment (Councillor Edwards): Final reading of amendments to Chapter 169, allowing temporary RV occupancy for up to 14 days with conditions (electrical system, zoning compliance, solid waste plan). Councillor Johnston noted that enforcement should allow a learning curve for residents. Passed 6-0. - Action Item D – Memorandum of Understanding with University of New England for Wave Gauge (Councillor Onan): Approved an MOU for wave gauge installation to study wave action, particularly at Camp Ellis. Councillors Doyle and Johnston highlighted the value of the data for future coastal projects. Passed 6-0. Key Outcomes - Emergency Moratorium Extended: The council voted 6-0 to extend the temporary moratorium on mobile home park lot rental increases until April 10, 2026, with the possibility of revisiting on February 23 if the mediated agreement is finalized. - EV Charging Pilot Policy Adopted: Approved for one year beginning July 1, 2026; fee schedule to be developed in FY2027 budget. - RV Ordinance Amendment Approved: Final reading passed 6-0, allowing temporary RV use in residential areas under specific conditions. - UNE Wave Gauge MOU Approved: Partnership with University of New England for wave monitoring at Camp Ellis passed 6-0. - Next Meetings: Scheduled for February 23 and March 2, 2026; City Hall closed on February 16 for President's Day.
The Saco Planning Board convened on February 3, 2026, at 22:57 (originally scheduled earlier) to review the January 20 meeting minutes, hear public comments, and conduct a public hearing on a request from Ecology Education Inc. (the applicant) to amend Condition of Approval 9 for the 184 Simpson Road site plan. The amendment sought to extend the construction deadline for a left-turn lane from November 1, 2025, to June 3, 2027. After extensive discussion and public testimony, the board denied the extension by a 4-1-1 vote, citing failure to comply with the construction loan agreement and insufficient technical capacity. The meeting also addressed updates to public hearing guidelines and rescheduling of two other applications. Consent Calendar - Approval of January 20, 2026 Minutes: The board voted 5-0-1 (Chris abstained due to absence) to approve the minutes as presented. Public Comments & Testimony - Chris (Ward 1 Councilor): Expressed concern that his emailed suggestions about the SOP were not addressed at the previous meeting. He advocated for formal inclusion of a public comment segment during application completeness reviews, arguing that the current process limits public input to written letters or a short public comment period, which distracts from other agenda items. - Kelly Archer (185 Bradley St.): Asserted that the 2018 site plan approval and related contracts (BPI, construction loan agreement) are null and void due to multiple breaches. She argued the application should be before the city council, not the planning board, and urged denial of the extension, stating the applicant has failed to perform for eight years. - Inga Brown (161 Simpson Rd.): Corrected what she called misstatements by the applicant about the traffic study and payment timeline. She emphasized that the construction loan agreement required completion by October 2025, with delays only permissible during construction—not during design. She provided a council memorandum showing the applicant had not paid Sebago Technics, causing delays, and urged the board to table the matter or send it to council. - Deb Hilton (143 Simpson Rd., CPA): Presented detailed financial analysis showing Ecology Education Inc. has received going concern opinions in 2023 and 2024, with operating losses of $245,000 (2022), $818,000 (2023), and $1.1 million (2024). She argued the entity is cash insolvent, and the project cost estimate of $924,000 is outdated and too low because it assumed one permanent easement instead of nine. She concluded the board should deny the extension due to lack of financial and technical capacity. Discussion Items - 184 Simpson Road – Ecology Education Inc. Extension Request: The board considered the applicant’s request to amend Condition 9 (left-turn lane) to extend the deadline to June 3, 2027. The applicant’s attorney, Peter Van Hemmel, argued the condition’s language only requires the applicant to "work with" the city and MDOT, and the school has met its obligations. He warned that if the extension is denied, the city must refund the $308,000 deposit and release the mortgage, which would benefit the school. - Board Member Jeff moved to deny, citing the applicant’s failure to meet deadlines in the construction loan agreement (e.g., not paying Sebago Technics for nearly a year, causing delays). He noted the BPI deadlines may be jeopardized, potentially leaving the city liable for the full project cost. - Board Member Jim argued the board should focus solely on whether good cause exists for the extension, not on contract disputes better left to council. He favored approval. - Chairman summarized two avenues: (1) close the hearing and vote, or (2) table for more information on easements, construction contracts, and a firm schedule. - Public Hearing Procedure: After public comment and a second round of testimony, the board voted 6-0 to close the public hearing. The board then discussed and approved findings of fact for the denial, citing failure to comply with the construction loan agreement and insufficient technical capacity to meet the BPI schedule. - SOP Update: Planning staff indicated they need more time to research best practices for public hearing guidelines and will present a draft at the February 17 or 24 meeting. Key Outcomes - Denial of Extension (184 Simpson Road): Motion by Jeff, seconded by Joyce, to deny the site plan amendment to extend Condition 9. The vote was 4-1-1 (Jeff, Joyce, Catherine, Chair in favor; Jim opposed; Chris abstained). The board adopted findings of fact (5-1, Jim dissenting) stating the applicant failed to comply with the construction loan agreement dated May 24, 2024, and lacked sufficient technical capacity to satisfy the BPI construction completion deadline of June 3, 2027. - Rescheduling of Remaining Agenda Items: Items 321 Lincoln Street and 352 North Street were moved to the February 17, 2026 meeting as items 6A and 6B, following workshop items. The February 17 meeting will begin at 5:30 p.m. (30 minutes early) to accommodate the additional workload. Motion passed 6-0. - Meeting Extension: The board voted 6-0 to continue the meeting past 9:00 p.m. to finalize findings of fact and reschedule items.
The Saco City Council met on Monday, February 2, 2026, at 6:30 p.m. to discuss a range of topics including recognition of the Thornton Academy football team, updates on the purchasing policy, public concerns over a proposed road diet on Route 1, the status of mediated rent negotiations at Blue Haven Mobile Home Park, and financial concerns regarding the Ecology School. The meeting also included the swearing-in of new Ward 3 Councilor William P. Doyle. Consent Calendar - Approval of the minutes from December 15, 2025, January 5, 2026, and January 12, 2026 passed 6-0. - Consent items included certification of election results, confirmation of several mayoral appointments to boards and commissions, the council schedule for April–June 2026, and a combined massage therapist and establishment license. These passed 6-0. Public Comments & Testimony - Richard Bryant (attorney for Blue Haven MHP LLC): Reported that a mediation between the park owners and a resident committee on January 26, 2026, was successful. A memorandum of agreement would implement the December 1 rent increase with monthly credits over an extended period, contingent on 51% of households signing and the city council rescinding the current moratorium by the February 23 meeting. - Bud Hurst (business owner): Expressed opposition to the proposed reduction of Route 1 from four lanes to one lane each way with a center turn lane and bike lanes. He argued that construction would cause summer traffic problems, that left turns into businesses would become difficult and dangerous, and that bike lanes are unnecessary given the nearby Eastern Trail. - Kevin Cormier (Funtown owner): Strongly opposed the road diet, stating that traffic count studies underestimate actual volumes and that the only solution is to add a fifth turning lane, as Scarborough did. He warned that reduced lanes would cripple businesses during the 10-week summer season and noted his family's 70-year business history and significant tax contribution. - Hope Lambert (14 Pheasant Road, volunteer with Blue Haven committee): Raised concerns about the mediation, stating the resident committee has not received proof of ownership or identification of all parties with at least 20% interest in the park, and requested additional time on the rent-freeze moratorium to obtain this information. - Deb Lombard (Portland Road resident, sixth-generation): Stated she received no notice of the Route 1 project despite living there for 102 years. She argued that the road diet would worsen congestion during turnpike accidents and that the Eastern Trail already provides a safe bicycle route. - Inga Brown (161 Simpson Road): Submitted documents alleging that the Ecology School's construction loan agreement (signed May 2024, with completion by October 2025) and the Business Partnership Initiative (BPI) are in breach. She argued that the school is mischaracterizing delays and urged the council to review the contracts. - Deb Hilton (143 Simpson Road, CPA): Presented detailed financial concerns about the Ecology School (TESS), citing operating losses in three of the last five years, a $1.1 million loss in 2024, negative cash flows, $12.3 million in debt ($8.4 million in default with USDA), and only $70,000 in operating cash. She stated that TESS has breached construction agreements and that the city risks taxpayer funds. - Unidentified speaker (regarding Deering Trust): Questioned the city's executive session practices, the handling of trust finances, and the lack of public disclosures, calling for a forensic audit and removal of trustees. - Gary Prolman (743 Portland Road, attorney): Read condensed written statements from several Route 1 business owners (Seacoast RV, Shed Happens, Jack automotive dealerships, Wagon Wheel Motel, Seesaw Restaurant) all voicing strong opposition to the road diet. Common themes: no public notice was received, the change would harm businesses, impede large trucks, and create safety hazards, and the Eastern Trail already serves bicyclists. He noted the lack of notice and requested that future meetings include all affected property owners. Discussion Items - Purchasing Policy Update (Greg LaRue): Presented a preliminary overview of a revised purchasing policy. Key changes include raising department head informal bidding authority to $10,000, requiring a sole-source justification form with a conflict-of-interest certification, adding alternative project delivery methods (construction manager at-risk, design-build), and expanding cooperative purchasing and online bid platforms. The formal redline version will be presented in a few weeks to a month. Councilor Gale asked whether a "best value" criterion could be added to ensure the lowest bid is not always selected; Mr. LaRue responded that evaluation criteria are already part of the RFP process. - Route 1 Road Diet (raised in public comments and council discussion): Many speakers opposed the proposed reduction from four lanes to one lane each way with a center turn lane and bike lanes. Councilor Johnston noted that the plan is actually three lanes (with a center turn lane), not two, and acknowledged a lack of outreach to businesses. The council agreed to verify the notice list and improve future communication. The traffic safety committee is also developing standard operating procedures for traffic calming devices. - Blue Haven Mobile Home Park Mediation: Richard Bryant reported a successful mediation and outlined conditions for a final agreement. Hope Lambert raised concerns about lack of ownership documentation. Councilor Doyle requested an update on the moratorium extension, which will be on the agenda for February 9. - Ecology School Financial Concerns: Inga Brown and Deb Hilton presented evidence of contract breaches and financial instability, urging the council to review the situation. - General Discussion: Councilor Johnston thanked volunteers for appointments, recognized DPW for snow removal, and requested an update on board vacancies. Councilor Doyle thanked voters and called for consideration of a citywide rent stabilization ordinance. Key Outcomes - Public Hearings Closed: The public hearing on Chapter 169 (recreational vehicles) was closed 7-0; the final reading is scheduled for February 9, 2026. - Special Entertainment Permit Approved: The renewal for Saco Eagles 3792 was approved 7-0. - New Councilor Sworn In: William P. Doyle was sworn in as Ward 3 Councilor, restoring the council to full membership. - Next Steps: The Route 1 road diet notice list will be reviewed. The Blue Haven moratorium extension will be on the February 9 agenda. The purchasing policy redline will be presented in a few weeks. The council will consider a rent stabilization ordinance in the future.
This meeting of the Saco Planning Board included the approval of prior meeting minutes, a public comment period, a completeness review for a three-lot subdivision at 986 Portland Road, a continued public hearing for a 25-unit condominium project at 42 Ferry Road, and the tabling of several other items due to the late hour. The board also discussed scheduling challenges and agreed to a special meeting on February 24, 2026, to address the growing application backlog. Consent Calendar - Approved minutes from December 16, 2025, January 6, 2026, and January 13, 2026. The January 13 minutes were approved 4-0 with one abstention (Vice Chair Clark abstained due to absence). The other two sets were approved 5-0. Public Comments & Testimony - Greg Polk (10 Mineta Drive, Saco) spoke during the public comment period about a development (referred to as Waterfalls Drive, Park North, or Cascade Falls) that has not yet applied for final approval. He cited city code §188-910 regarding the applicant's responsibility for snow plowing until street acceptance, and requested that the board consider the situation when the application comes before them. Discussion Items - Item 6A: 986 Portland Road – Clover Leaf Development LLC – Preliminary subdivision and site plan review for a three-lot subdivision and a 320-foot private way. The applicant explained that the amendment is needed to separate phase one (120 apartments already built), future phase two (126 units), and a commercial lot for financing purposes. Board members raised concerns about incomplete items including financial and technical capacity, stormwater drainage, homeowners association documents, utility easements, and wetland permitting flagged by the peer reviewer (Normando Associates). The board voted to continue the completeness review and schedule a public hearing for February 17, 2026 (5-0). - Item 6B: 42 Ferry Road – Big Ledge LLC – Continued public hearing for a preliminary subdivision, site plan, and conditional use to build 25 single-family condominium units. The applicant presented updated stormwater calculations, addressed the location of Seal Rock Spring (citing two Dow & Coulomb surveys), and discussed the man-made pond. Public testimony from abutters raised concerns about the spring's true location, stormwater runoff concentration, flooding risk, traffic safety, sidewalk connectivity, and the Conservation Commission's vague report. Board members deliberated on the spring location, stormwater treatment, pedestrian safety, and buffering. The board voted 5-0 to continue the public hearing to March 3, 2026, and directed staff to gather input from the Conservation Commission, police chief, and traffic safety committee, and to draft findings of fact and conditions of approval. - Item 6C: 184 Simpson Road – Ecology Education – Continued public hearing. Due to time constraints (meeting had a hard stop at 9:45 PM), the board decided to table this item to the next meeting (February 3, 2026) without opening the hearing. Motion passed 5-0. - Item 6D: 352 North Street – Tabled to February 3, 2026, pending legal review from the city attorney. The board noted the complexity of the pump station issue and the need for legal input. Motion passed 5-0. Key Outcomes - Minutes approved (various dates). - 986 Portland Road: Completeness review continued to February 17, 2026; public hearing scheduled for same date. - 42 Ferry Road: Public hearing continued to March 3, 2026; staff to gather additional reports and draft findings. - 184 Simpson Road: Tabled to February 3, 2026. - 352 North Street: Tabled to February 3, 2026, pending legal review. - Special Meeting: The board agreed to hold a special meeting on February 24, 2026, at 6:00 PM to address the application backlog. - Administrative: Reminder of a site walk at 483 Jenkins Road on January 21, 2026, at 8:00 AM; FOIA training reminder for new members.
The Saco Planning Board convened on Tuesday, January 13, 2026, at 5:30 PM (the meeting was called to order at 5:30 PM, though the transcript later notes a 5:30 start time that will be corrected). The board received a detailed staff presentation on the Site Location of Development (SLODA) review process delegated to the city, discussed proposed changes to the board’s Standard Operating Procedures (SOP), and handled routine administrative items. Consent Calendar - No consent calendar items were presented. Public Comments & Testimony - No members of the public spoke during the designated public comment period. Discussion Items - Site Location of Development (SLODA) Presentation: Staff members Emily Cole Prescott (Deputy City Administrator), Adam Bliss (City Engineer), Charles Tettleman (City Planner), and Lauren Forte (Assistant City Planner) provided an overview of the SLODA process. Key points included: - SLODA review is triggered when a project involves three or more acres of “structure” as defined by Maine DEP (including driveways and other impervious areas). - The city has delegated review authority for projects up to approximately 10 acres; larger projects are handled by the state. - SLODA standards are similar to local site plan review, with additional reporting requirements through the Maine Enterprise Licensing System (MELS). - Adam Bliss explained stormwater management requirements under Chapter 500, including water quality treatment (one inch of runoff from developed areas), erosion control, and the importance of maintenance access easements (typically 15 feet each side of pipe centerline). - Board members Jeff Brochou and Jim Mollier raised questions about buffer setbacks, tree preservation, financial capacity standards, and the enforceability of deed-restricted buffers. Staff acknowledged that clear “no cut” areas on plans and deed restrictions help with compliance. - The board discussed the need to strengthen language in staff memos regarding access easements and to ensure that applicant responses to staff comments are substantive. - Review of Planning Board Standard Operating Procedures (SOP): Chair Matt Provencel initiated a discussion on the SOP, focusing on late submission procedures and after-the-fact packets. Board members and staff debated timing and mechanisms for handling public comment and applicant materials received shortly before meetings. Key proposals included: - Adding an agenda item to address after-the-fact packets early in each meeting. - Establishing a 3 PM Monday cutoff (day before the Tuesday meeting) for all late submissions (public comment, applicant materials, staff updates) to give staff time to digitize and distribute materials and allow board members to review them before the meeting. - Allowing the board to vote to extend public comment time beyond the standard eight minutes (five plus three) when a speaker provides substantial, substantive information. This would be done via a motion to suspend the rules, as is customary under Robert’s Rules. - Correcting the SOP to reflect the actual 5:30 PM meeting start time (the document still listed 5:30, but the meeting this evening began at that time; the correction is administrative). - Staff noted that a formal SOP revision would be brought to the board for adoption at a future meeting (likely February 3 or 17). - Other Items: Board member Catherine Pelini suggested requiring pre-application meetings or sketch plan reviews for certain projects. Charles Tettleman supported standardizing early engagement (staff, PDRC, or board workshops) to identify issues before applications are submitted. The board also acknowledged the January 12 joint meeting with the city council regarding new state statutes. Key Outcomes - The board agreed in principle to revise the SOP to include an agenda item for after-the-fact packets, a 3 PM Monday submission cutoff, and a board vote mechanism to extend public comment time. Staff will draft language for formal adoption. - The board will continue discussions on pre-application requirements as part of the ongoing ordinance and SOP work. - Upcoming meetings: January 20 (regular meeting) and a site walk on January 14 at 8 AM at 83 Jenkins Road / Booth Bay Road area. - The meeting adjourned at 8:08 PM.