Public Meetings - San Francisco, California

The Budget and Appropriation Committee, chaired by Supervisor Connie Chan, met on June 25, 2026 at 6:00 PM to finalize the city's budget for fiscal years 2026-27 and 2027-28. The committee addressed outstanding budget and legislative analyst recommendations, adopted administrative provisions, and voted on technical adjustments before approving the budget package. The meeting included multiple recesses to finalize agreements with city departments. Consent Calendar - Administrative Provisions Amendment: The committee unanimously (5-0) adopted an amendment to the annual appropriation ordinance (AAO) to allow the city to make set-aside reserve deposits from both fiscal years 2025-26 and 2026-27. - Item 18 (Materials Testing Contract): The committee voted 5-0 to table this resolution, with the understanding that the Department of Public Works will restore the positions in-house. Public Comments & Testimony - No public comment was taken at the outset, as the requirement was satisfied the previous day. However, the committee later acknowledged that public comment was inadvertently omitted for Item 18 and subsequently re-voted on that item after ensuring public comment had been provided. Discussion Items - Department Agreements: Chair Chan announced agreements with several departments on budget and legislative analyst recommendations: - Department of Public Works: Rejected recommendations 1, 2, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 15, 16, 17 (partial rejection of recommendation 3 per Supervisor Sauter). Also rejected recommendation 14. - Office of the Sheriff's Inspector General: Accepted recommendation 1 (and city administrator recommendations 12 and 13). - Public Defender: Rejected recommendations 1, 2, 3, 4. - Human Services Agency: Rejected recommendations 7, 8, 9. - Department of Public Health: Rejected recommendations 18, 19, 21, 22 (later also rejected recommendation 20). - Academy of Sciences: Accepted recommendations 1 through 6—placing 50% of first-year funding and full second-year funding on reserve. - Department of Homelessness and Supportive Housing: Rejected recommendations 5, 6, 7, 8 (current year recommendation 1) and placed those amounts on reserve pending submission of capital and fleet management plans. - Technical Adjustments: Budget Director Sophia Kittler presented a third round of technical adjustments, including corrections to expenditures, revenues, and positions across multiple departments. These adjustments increased the FY27 budget by $348,273, the FY28 budget by $268,273, with a net general fund cost of $194,446 over two years. - Final Remarks: Several supervisors expressed gratitude to Chair Chan, the mayor's budget office, the controller, committee staff, and advocates for their collaboration. They highlighted the restoration of $20 million in essential services and funding for vulnerable communities, while acknowledging ongoing challenges from potential federal cuts. Key Outcomes - Motion to Amend Administrative Provisions: Passed 5-0 (Chan, Dorsey, Sauter, Walton, Mandelman). - Motion to Table Item 18: Passed 5-0. - Final Motion: The committee approved items 2 and 3 (AAO and ASO) as amended, incorporating the mayor's technical adjustments (rounds 1-4), the transfer function letter, and the committee's final changes documented in the Board of Supervisors Budget Spending Plan. The controller was authorized to make implementing adjustments. The budget was referred to the full Board of Supervisors for July 14, 2026, with a recommendation. Motion passed 5-0. - Recess and Reconvening: The committee recessed twice to finalize agreements, reconvening at noon and again at 3:00 PM and 5:51 PM. The meeting was adjourned after the final vote.

On June 24, 2026, the Budget and Appropriations Committee (Chair Connie Chan, Vice Chair Matt Dorsey, Members Shamon Walton, Danny Sauter, and President Rafael Mandelman) convened a public hearing to receive testimony on the mayor's proposed budget for fiscal years 2026-2027 and 2027-2028. The meeting, which began at 6:15 p.m. and ran without a lunch break, heard over 200 speakers over approximately seven hours. The chair opened by announcing the committee's rejection of several Budget and Legislative Analyst (BLA) policy recommendations, agreed with the respective departments, and then opened the floor for public comment. Consent Calendar - No consent calendar items were addressed; the meeting focused entirely on public comment and procedural motions. Public Comments & Testimony Public comment was dominated by opposition to proposed cuts and pleas for restoration of funding. Key themes and speakers included: - Youth Programs: Numerous youth and supporters urged restoration of cuts to Chinatown Alleyway Tours (CATS), SF YouthWorks, and Free City College cash grants. Maggie Lee, Grace Lee, Tony, and others described how CATS built leadership, job readiness, and cultural pride. Youth commissioners (e.g., Evelyn Conboy, Harper Fort Gang) highlighted that YouthWorks serves 400 interns annually and that a proposed cut would reduce this to 80, disproportionately impacting low-income youth (90% of participants from households earning <$50,000/year). - SRO Housing & Long-Term Subsidies: Dozens of Chinese-speaking residents (e.g., Che Hua Wu, Chen Mei Chao, Singyun Chan) asked for long-term rental subsidies for families living in single-room occupancy (SRO) units. They described overcrowding, health impacts, and the insufficiency of short-term (2–5 year) assistance, citing a federal study that 42% of short-term subsidy recipients return to homelessness. - Immigrant Services: Speakers from the Immigrant Parent Voting Collaborative, Chinese for Affirmative Action, Arab Resource and Organizing Center, and SF Immigrant Legal and Education Network requested maintaining $500,000 over two years for voting outreach and $1.64 million for legal services and rapid response, arguing these are critical amid increased ICE enforcement. - HIV/AIDS & Harm Reduction: Susan Englander and others vehemently opposed cuts to AIDS funding and harm reduction services, warning of increased overdoses and infections. - Workforce & Workers' Rights: Representatives from Mission Hiring Hall, La Raza Community Resource Center, Chinese Progressive Association, and the Workers' Rights Community Collaborative (WRCC) asked for restoration of year-two funding (approximately $780,000 for Filipino services, $339,000 for Service Connection Emergency Fund, and continued support for domestic worker coalitions). - Seniors & Disabilities: Multiple speakers demanded preservation of senior services (e.g., Coalition on Homelessness, Senior and Disability Action) and the Dignity Fund, noting that a $4.5 million cut represents only 0.028% of the city budget but devastates vulnerable residents. - Arts & Culture: Artists and cultural workers opposed cuts to the San Francisco Arts Commission Gallery, Chinatown Media and Arts Collaborative (CMAC), and Hungry Ghosts Festival, citing economic and community benefits. - Public Defender & Jury Access: Matt Sosna, Alma Wheeler, and others urged funding the Be the Jury program ($300,000) and increasing the Public Defender's office budget, which is only 60% of the DA's budget and faces caseload increases of 68% in misdemeanors and 52% in felonies since 2019. - Environment & Transit: Youth commissioners requested full funding for SF Environment (including a clean transportation program manager) and for Muni service, noting 60% of SFUSD ninth graders use Muni daily. - Police Budget Critiques: Several speakers argued the city should redirect funds from police overtime (e.g., $900,000 for new police cars) and surveillance programs (e.g., Flock Safety) to social services. Discussion Items Chair Chan announced the committee's rejection of specific BLA policy recommendations, as agreed with departments: - San Francisco Public Utilities Commission: Rejected recommendations for Water Enterprise (10, 11, 12), Hetch Hetchy (10, 11, 12, 13), Public Utilities Bureau (11), and Wastewater Enterprise (7). - Treasurer and Tax Collector: Rejected recommendations 5, 6, 7, 8. - City Administrator: Rejected recommendations 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 10, 11, and partially rejected recommendation 9 (Moscone facility fee reduced from $7.5M to $6.5M, with a corresponding change to General City Responsibilities Recommendation 2). - Mayor's Office of Housing and Community Development (MOHCD): Rejected recommendation 5 (agreeing with MOHCD). Key Outcomes - The committee voted unanimously (5-0) to recess the meeting and carry items 1–3, 18, 23, and 24 to the June 25, 2026 meeting at 10:00 a.m.. - No final budget decisions were made; the hearing was solely for public input. - The chair expressed gratitude to the public and acknowledged the many speakers who took time off work. Next Step: The committee will reconvene on June 25, 2026 to deliberate and potentially vote on the budget proposals.

The Port Commission of San Francisco met on June 23, 2026, at 5:45 PM (according to the scheduled start time) and adjourned at 5:05 PM (per the transcript, which suggests a possible discrepancy in recorded times). The meeting was called to order by President Gail Gilman with all commissioners present. The sole actions taken were approval of prior minutes and entry into executive session. Consent Calendar - The commission unanimously approved the minutes from the June 9, 2026, Port Commission meeting. A motion was made, seconded, and carried by all present. Public Comments & Testimony - No public comments were offered either in the room or by telephone for either the executive session agenda item or for any other matter. Discussion Items - The commission held two executive session items: (1) Public employee appointment discussion, and (2) Conference with legal counsel regarding anticipated litigation. No public discussion or deliberation occurred on these items beyond the motion to enter executive session. Key Outcomes - The commission voted unanimously to approve the June 9, 2026, meeting minutes. - The commission voted unanimously to enter executive session for the two listed topics. - Following executive session, the commission voted unanimously to adjourn the meeting at 5:05 PM.

The San Francisco Board of Supervisors held its regular meeting on June 23, 2026, with 10 members present (Supervisor Fielder was excused). The meeting included adoption of consent items, multiple recognitions and commendations, public testimony, and approval of several resolutions and ordinances. Consent Calendar - Excusal of Supervisor Fielder: Motion approved without objection. - Approval of May 19, 2026 Meeting Minutes: Approved 10–0 after public comment. - Unfinished Business (Items 1–2): Interim budget and salary ordinances for fiscal years 2026–2028 – passed finally on 10–0 vote. - Item 3: Ordinance prohibiting uncertified lithium‑ion batteries – finally passed without objection. - Item 4: Ordinance making non‑substantive changes to Transportation, Administrative, and Fire Codes – finally passed without objection. - New Business (Items 5–7, 9–11): Resolutions and motions on lease agreements, legislative analyst COLA, commemorative street naming, domestic violence fund (amended), appointments to behavioral health council and entertainment commission, and authorization to solicit donations for homeless services – all approved without objection (Item 8 was amended then passed). Public Comments & Testimony - Aisha McCain urged the Board to implement recommendations from a civil grand jury report on oversight failures related to her brother’s death. - Tori called for landmark designation of the Ella Hill Hutch Community Center, citing lack of transparency and the need to protect Black history in San Francisco. - Leah McGeever questioned transparency and reporting on behested payment waivers, listing multiple recent authorizations for fundraising. - Richard S. T. Peterson complained about an apparent attempt to disbar him, alleging deep‑seated corruption. - Tiso Carenas (Teamsters Local 853) and Nicholas Currett (Coors Boycott Commemoration Committee) expressed support for Supervisor Chan’s resolution commemorating the Coors boycott and its historic labor‑LGBTQ coalition. - Steven Torres (Castro LGBTQ Cultural District) supported the Coors boycott resolution, emphasizing the importance of coalition building. - Every Morgan alleged fraud, conspiracy, and corruption involving the City Attorney’s Office, Department of Human Resources, and Airport Commission. - Eileen Bogan thanked Vice President Catherine Moore for her work on coastal zone issues. - Unnamed speakers criticized the Board for inattention to employee trauma, whistleblower programs, and the new Inspector General’s lack of public reporting procedures. Recognitions & Commendations - Catherine Moore: Recognized for 20 years of service on the Planning Commission. The Board adopted a resolution (Item 15) commending her, with several supervisors praising her integrity, institutional knowledge, and community‑centered approach. Commissioner Moore delivered remarks reflecting on her tenure. - Mary Cervantes: Honored on her 100th birthday. Resolution adopted (Item 14). Her daughter Ann Cervantes spoke. - Patty Lee: Recognized for 49 years of service at the San Francisco Public Defender’s Office. Public Defender Mano Raju and supervisors praised her holistic defense work and advocacy for youth. Lee gave remarks calling for continued investment in pretrial diversion. - Shang Chi Chen: Recognized for opening the Out Museum in Chinatown and for her volunteer work. - Amos Lim: Honored for his advocacy with Out for Immigration, Chinese for Affirmative Action, and LGBTQ+ immigrant rights. He spoke about finding his political voice in San Francisco. - Cliffs Variety: Recognized for the store’s 90th anniversary and its history as a Castro neighborhood institution. Owner Terry Aston Bennett and employee Martha Sullivan accepted the commendation. Key Outcomes - Items 1–2 (Budget Ordinances): Passed finally on 10–0 vote. - Items 3–7, 9–11: All approved without objection. - Item 8 (Domestic Violence Fund): Amended to remove reference to “filing of any certificate of marriage” then passed on first reading without objection. - Items 14–15 (Resolutions for Mary Cervantes and Catherine Moore): Adopted on 10–0 vote. - New Business Introductions: Supervisor Wong introduced a resolution opposing disability benefit cuts in the proposed Take Care of America’s Veterans Act, a hearing request on Taraval Station staffing, and a hearing on the city’s street tree maintenance program. Supervisor Chan introduced a resolution commemorating the Coors boycott. Several in‑memoriam resolutions were submitted. - Adjournment: In memory of John V. Juicy, Jeanette Etheridge, Naga Gowri Devi Koka, and Julie Driscoll Farah.

The San Francisco Public Utilities Commission (SFPUC) held a regular meeting on June 23, 2026, from 9:30 AM to 3:45 PM. The meeting included a land acknowledgment, approval of minutes, public comment, several key presentations and discussions, and votes on multiple items. Notable events included the announcement of General Manager Dennis Herrera’s retirement, the presentation of the Clean Power SF 2026 Integrated Resource Plan, adoption of the 2025 Urban Water Management Plan, and approval of contracts and grant programs. Consent Calendar - Item 3: Approval of Minutes – The minutes of June 9, 2026, were approved unanimously (4-0, with Commissioner Jamdar excused). - Item 7: Consent Calendar (7A–7E) – Items were approved unanimously (4-0). During public comment, Douglas Benton of Sierra Mountain Construction protested the award of contract for HH 1019, arguing that the low bidders did not meet experience requirements. Staff responded that the protest had been reviewed and found without merit. The commission proceeded to approve the consent calendar. Public Comments & Testimony Public comments were received at multiple points during the meeting: - Francisco de Costa (general public comment) criticized SFPUC for lack of standards and accused the commission of lying and retaliation. - Peter Drackmeyer, Policy Director for Yosemite Rivers Alliance, discussed salmon runs on the Tuolumne River and urged support for the Bay-Delta Water Quality Control Plan over voluntary agreements. - A former commercial fisherman commented on the salmon decline and invited commissioners to see spawning grounds. - Denise Louie (Center for Biological Diversity) criticized the PUC’s obstruction of the 2018 Bay-Delta plan, stating that Delta Smelt have gone extinct. - Eileen Boken and David Schramm (multiple commenters on Urban Water Management Plan) opposed adoption, citing overestimates of demand, the eight-and-a-half-year design drought, and insufficient environmental protection. - Charlene Woodcock and Mary Butterwick commented on water management and the need to preserve Delta ecosystems. - Denise Louie (again) and others also spoke on the Urban Water Management Plan, urging more realistic projections. Discussion Item: Clean Power SF 2026 Integrated Resource Plan (Item 5A) Firaso Buslene, acting manager for Power Enterprise Resource Planning, presented the 2026 Integrated Resource Plan (IRP). The plan evaluates three portfolios: 1. 100% Renewable Portfolio – $91 per MWh, adding 1,220 MW of new resources. 2. 90% Time Coincidence by 2030 Portfolio – $121 per MWh, requiring 2,580 MW. 3. 90% Time Coincidence by 2035 Portfolio – $113 per MWh, requiring 2,300 MW. The CPUC’s demand forecast is 36% higher for 2030 and 63% higher for 2035 compared to the 2022 IRP, driven by data centers (40%) and electrification (60%). Staff noted that the 100% renewable portfolio aligns best with current financial plans. Commissioners asked about data center requirements, storage, and geothermal resources. The commission will vote on adoption on July 14, 2026. General Manager’s Retirement Announcement General Manager Dennis Herrera announced his retirement effective December 2026. He stated that after 25 years of city service (5 at PUC), he felt it was time to leave. Commissioners expressed gratitude for his leadership in restoring trust, advancing PGE municipalization, and managing the agency. Commissioner Stacy suggested a transition process with the Mayor’s office and Department of Human Resources. Bay Area Water Supply and Conservation Agency (BAWSCA) Report (Item 6) Tom Smegel reported on regional resilience planning, including interagency cooperation for emergencies such as wildfires, floods, and infrastructure failures. He highlighted a recent water quality emergency in Mountain View where SFPUC assisted. Discussion Item: 2025 Urban Water Management Plan Adoption (Item 8) Jennifer Lee presented the 2025 Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP). The plan includes the 2025 Water Shortage Contingency Plan and the Affordable Housing Development Water Service Priority Policy. Staff received 31 comments (9 written, 3 verbal at CAC, 19 at public hearing). Issues raised included water affordability, population projections, design drought length (8.5 years), and opposition to the Bay-Delta Plan. Staff responded that demand projections come from the Planning Department and that the UWMP is not a capital planning or rate-setting document. After extensive public comment, the commission approved the plan 4-0, with Commissioner Stacy noting the document’s role as a state compliance tool that uses mandatory projections. Approval of Contracts and Grant Programs - Item 9: Environmental Review Services Contracts (PRO 0333) – Five contracts (up to $15 million each, total $75 million) for CEQA/NEPA, permitting, and construction compliance, was approved unanimously. The presenter, Karen Fry, announced this was her last meeting after 19 years. - Item 10: Treasure Island Wastewater Treatment Plant Duration Increase – A 275-day extension (no cost increase) was approved to address equipment procurement and commissioning delays. - Item 11: Urban Watershed Stewardship Grant Program – Two tracks (infrastructure up to $250,000, stewardship up to $75,000) were approved, with funding of $400,000 (first cycle) and $600,000 (second cycle). The program is being brought in-house. Key Outcomes - Minutes of June 9, 2026 approved. - Consent Calendar (Items 7A–7E) approved. - Clean Power SF IRP – presentation received; vote scheduled for July 14, 2026. - General Manager Retirement announced; transition planning to begin. - 2025 Urban Water Management Plan adopted (4-0, Commissioner Jamdar excused). - Environmental Services Contracts awarded (4-0). - Treasure Island WWTP schedule increase approved (4-0). - Urban Watershed Stewardship Grant Program established (4-0). - Closed Session – The commission asserted attorney-client privilege and later voted not to disclose the discussion. - Meeting adjourned at 3:45 PM.

The Budget and Appropriations Committee, chaired by Supervisor Connie Chan, reconvened its recessed hearing from June 18, 2026 to continue reviewing the Mayor's proposed budget for fiscal years 2026-2027 and 2027-2028. The committee heard from the Budget and Legislative Analyst (BLA) and multiple city departments on areas of disagreement regarding recommended reductions and policy proposals. No general public comment was taken; it was deferred to June 24, 2026. Agreements Reached - The BLA and the following departments reached full or partial agreement on fiscal recommendations: Mayor's Office (fiscal only), Department of Homelessness and Supportive Housing (fiscal only), Department of Public Health (fiscal only), Human Services Agency (fiscal only), City Administrator (items 1, 2, 5), and Department of Public Works (all except item 3). The committee accepted these agreements as of this meeting. Discussion Items Mayor's Office - BLA Recommendation (Policy): Delete seven vacant positions (Mayor 5–11) in the Mayor's Office, most unfilled for months or years. The BLA noted that several positions are grant-supported or off-budget, yielding no general fund savings. - Department Position: Sophia Kittler (Mayor's Office) argued the positions are essential for place-based strategies (e.g., Hope SF), budget analysis, and flexible hiring. Managerial titles are not always supervisory; most positions are individual contributors. Filling is underway or planned. - Committee: Supervisor Dorsey expressed support for adequately funding the Mayor's Office under a strong-mayor system. The committee accepted the fiscal recommendations but did not rule on the policy items; they remain undecided. Department of Homelessness and Supportive Housing (HSH) - BLA Recommendation (Policy): Delete four vacant manager positions (HOM5–8) totaling $1,071,044 in FY26-27, citing extended vacancies and the Board's priorities to reduce management growth. - BLA Recommendation (Current Year): Take $4.4 million in one-time savings from an interim housing expansion program on reserve, as the department submitted a late request to reprogram funds for community ambassador services. - Department Position: Director Shireen McSpadden argued the managers are critical for planning, legislative coordination, and procurement. The $4.4 million would fund ambassador services to support the Good Neighbor Policy in SOMA and Tenderloin. HSH already faces a 29 FTE reduction over two years. - Committee: Supervisor Dorsey strongly supported keeping positions and funding ambassador services. Supervisor Sauter asked about the proportion of managers among the 29 FTEs reduced. Chair Chan questioned the attrition rate and the prolonged vacancy of the positions. No final decision; item carried to June 24. Department of Public Health (DPH) - BLA Recommendation (Policy): Delete 23 vacant manager positions (DPH18–22) across the department, noting some vacancies exceeding two years. Total savings of $7.28 million in FY26-27 ($6.4 million general fund). - Department Position: Director Daniel Tsai stated DPH already eliminated 19 manager positions (40% of vacant managers) and cut 130+ FTEs overall. Remaining vacancies are essential for revenue generation, regulatory compliance, and avoiding layoffs. The department has a low 6.7% turnover rate, but budgeted attrition is 10%. - Committee: Vice Chair Dorsey acknowledged the cuts already made and supported retaining the positions. Supervisor Sauter appreciated the detailed breakdown. Chair Chan questioned the need for a director of public affairs position. No decision; carried to June 24. Human Services Agency (HSA) - BLA Recommendations (Fiscal): HSA7 – Reduce salary budget by $1.5 million to reflect hiring delays for 154 new FTEs responding to federal HR1 eligibility changes. HSA8 – Designate 149 of the 154 new positions as temporary (limited-term) rather than permanent. - BLA Recommendation (Policy): Delete four vacant manager positions (HSA9) totaling $1.06 million in FY26-27, three directly tied to HR1 implementation. - Department Position: Director Trent Rhorer argued HR1 creates an immediate and sustained workload increase; the department already built in hiring delays and needs permanent staff to recruit effectively. The four managers are critical for training, workforce development, foster care payments, and overseeing eligibility work. HSA has only 4% manager positions versus citywide averages. - Committee: Chair Chan expressed caution about adding staff given federal uncertainty and suggested potential reserve for some positions. Supervisor Dorsey asked about drug testing reduction (agreed item). Item carried to June 24. Public Defender's Office - BLA Recommendation (Fiscal): Adjust attrition savings upward by $56,954 due to expected hiring delays for two clerical positions. - BLA Recommendation (Policy): Deny conversion of four attorney, three paralegal, and one legal process clerk positions from temporary to permanent (PDR2–4), totaling $2.14 million in FY26-27. - Department Position: Public Defender Mano Raju stated the attrition target is already too high (7.08%) and caused a recent supplemental request. The positions are currently filled and essential to manage high caseloads (129 cases per attorney) and the Clean Slate program (1,500 new clients, 400+ backlog). - Committee: No specific ruling; carried to June 24. Sheriff's Office - BLA Recommendations (Fiscal): Five recommendations totaling $848,442 in FY26-27 and $957,568 in FY27-28, including cuts to communication supplies, software licensing, building maintenance, elimination of two fingerprint technician positions, and an increase in attrition savings. - BLA Recommendation (Policy): Place $3.3 million (half) of the Reset Center contract on reserve in FY26-27 and all $5.3 million in FY27-28, pending performance data. - Department Position: Sheriff Miyamoto and CFO Patrick presented data on overtime management and the Reset Center's early success (753 individuals processed, 27% connected to care). They argued the cuts would hamper operations and that the performance-based portion of the contract (approximately $793,000 in FY26-27 and $625,000 in FY27-28) should be the only reserve. - Committee: Vice Chair Dorsey proposed reserving only the performance-based incentive portion to preserve continuity while maintaining oversight. Chair Chan noted this would require a hearing for release. Item carried to June 24. Police Department - BLA Recommendations (Fiscal): Ten recommendations totaling $1.3 million ($910,000 one-time, $368,000 ongoing), including cuts to hazmat abatement, attrition savings, training, vehicles, and overtime. - BLA Recommendation (Policy): Delete three vacant manager positions (POL8–10) totaling $936,249 ongoing. - Department Position: CFO Kimmy Wu argued the cuts would undermine operational readiness, noted that 16 IT positions were already eliminated, and emphasized the need for vehicle replacement to reduce rising maintenance costs. - Committee: Chair Chan proposed placing the fiscal recommendations on reserve and requiring the department to return with a long-term facility and fleet plan, citing Proposition A bond funds and deferred maintenance. No decision; carried to June 24. California Academy of Sciences - BLA Recommendation: Place 50% of five line items (professional services, salary for engineers) and 25% of building improvements on reserve in FY26-27, and 100% in FY27-28, pending a performance and management audit. - Department Position: Interim Executive Director Amber Mace opposed the reserve, stating the funding is already tightly controlled and essential for animal safety and union salaries. The Academy has 200 million in endowment but faces a structural deficit. - Committee: Chair Chan supported the reserve, noting it mirrors the approach taken with the San Francisco Zoo. President Mandelman confirmed the audit could begin by July and a report could come by November. The committee did not overrule; item carried to June 24. Key Outcomes - Agreed Items Accepted: The committee accepted the BLA fiscal recommendations for Mayor's Office (1-4, CY), HSH (1-4), DPH (1-17), HSA (1-6, CY1), City Administrator (1,2,5), and Department of Public Works (all except item 3). These will be incorporated into the committee's budget report. - Motion to Carry Remaining Items: Chair Chan moved, and Vice Chair Dorsey seconded, to carry undecided items (Agenda Items 1–3, 18, 23–24) to the committee's June 24, 2026 meeting at 10:00 a.m. The motion passed unanimously (5–0). - Public Comment: Scheduled for June 24, 2026, beginning at 10:00 a.m., limited to one minute per speaker.

The Rules Committee of the San Francisco Board of Supervisors met on June 22, 2026, at approximately 10:00 AM (17:15 UTC) to consider four major items: a resolution authorizing the Department of Homelessness and Supportive Housing to solicit private donations, a charter amendment to expand the Housing Trust Fund, a charter amendment to establish a municipal finance corporation and public bank, and a comprehensive charter reform measure. The meeting was chaired by Supervisor Shimon Walton, with Vice Chair Stephen Sherrill, President Mandelman, and Supervisor Melgar present. Public comment was taken on each item, with speakers overwhelmingly supporting the housing and public bank measures. Item 1: Resolution to Solicit Donations for Homeless Services - Discussion: Director Emily Cohen of the Department of Homelessness and Supportive Housing presented the request for a sixth waiver of the behested payment ordinance, allowing department leadership to solicit philanthropic resources to augment the homeless response system. She noted past successes with partners like Crankstart and the Schwab Foundation. - Public Comment: No members of the public spoke on this item. - Key Outcome: The committee voted unanimously to forward the resolution to the full Board of Supervisors as a committee report. Item 2: Charter Amendment to Expand the Housing Trust Fund - Discussion: Supervisor Melgar introduced the charter amendment to gradually increase the Housing Trust Fund from its current $51 million annual appropriation to $125 million annually, using 20% of the city's annual property tax growth starting in fiscal year 2029. The fund would be extended through 2058 and include fiscal guardrails: a freeze during deficits over $250 million and a temporary reduction of up to 10% during recessions. Director Dan Adams of the Mayor's Office of Housing and Community Development and Jacob Bintliff of OEWD presented details, emphasizing that local funds leverage state and federal resources and that the city faces a funding cliff in 2–3 years without new sources. Supervisor Melgar offered amendments to align down payment assistance eligibility with 200% of AMI and make clerical fixes. - Public Comments & Testimony: Over 30 speakers testified, nearly all in strong support. Speakers included representatives from Self-Help for the Elderly, Council of Community Housing Organizations, PODER, Mission Economic Development Agency, Chinatown Community Development Center, TNDC, Mercy Housing, Housing Accelerator Fund, San Francisco Community Land Trust, and many residents sharing personal stories of living in SROs and struggling to afford housing. Several speakers called the measure a "floor, not a ceiling" and noted the city needs $2 billion per year for affordable housing. One speaker (Griffin Lee of Connected SF) opposed, arguing more money alone won't solve the crisis. - Key Outcome: The committee voted unanimously to adopt the amendments and continue the item to the June 29, 2026 Rules Committee meeting for final action. Item 3: Charter Amendment to Establish a Municipal Finance Corporation and Public Bank - Discussion: Charlie Siamas (Legislative Aide to Supervisor Chen) and Carlito Samurai (LAFCO) presented the charter amendment, which would authorize the creation of a Municipal Finance Corporation (MFC) and eventually a public bank. The MFC would be a non-depository financial institution that partners with credit unions and CDFIs to fill market gaps in affordable housing, small business, and climate resilience lending. The amendment codifies governance structures developed over years by the Reinvestment Working Group, with staggered appointments and safeguards to prevent co-mingling with city funds. The MFC is projected to become profitable by year three, requiring $26 million in initial capitalization (not provided by this amendment). Supervisor Mahmood expressed strong support, citing the need for capital access for small businesses and unbanked communities. - Public Comments & Testimony: Approximately 15 speakers testified, all in support. Speakers included representatives from PODER, HOME, San Francisco Community Land Trust, San Francisco Public Bank Coalition, 350 San Francisco, and residents. They highlighted the bank's potential to finance affordable housing, support small businesses, and fund climate action. One speaker (Griffin Lee of Connected SF) opposed, arguing City Hall should focus on other priorities and that the bank is unnecessary. - Key Outcome: The committee voted unanimously to forward the charter amendment to the full Board of Supervisors with a recommendation. Item 4: Comprehensive Charter Reform Amendment - Discussion: President Mandelman presented a wide-ranging charter amendment that includes modernization and cleanup (e.g., updating the law library bookbinder position), departmental pain points (e.g., updating Muni service standards to include wait assessments), and recommendations from the Commission Streamlining Task Force (e.g., eliminating the Streets and Sanitation Commission, moving advisory bodies to administrative code). He offered several amendments, including restoring a mayor/board split for the Homeless Oversight Commission, giving the task force flexibility in staffing, and authorizing the board to rename departments. The measure is intended to make the charter more usable and efficient. - Public Comments & Testimony: One speaker (Griffin Lee of Connected SF) spoke in support, calling it a good step to reduce bureaucracy. - Key Outcome: The committee voted unanimously to adopt the amendments and continue the item to the June 29, 2026 Rules Committee meeting. Key Outcomes - Item 1: Forwarded to full board as committee report (unanimous). - Item 2: Amended and continued to June 29, 2026 (unanimous). - Item 3: Forwarded to full board with recommendation (unanimous). - Item 4: Amended and continued to June 29, 2026 (unanimous). - All items are expected to appear on the Board of Supervisors' agenda of June 30, 2026, unless otherwise stated.

The San Francisco Planning Commission met on Thursday, June 18, 2026, at approximately 1:15 PM (the agenda indicated a start time of 8:15 PM UTC, but the meeting began in the afternoon local time). The commission considered several items, including an ordinance to allow relocation of liquor establishments in the Bayview, a major package of changes to the Inclusionary Affordable Housing Program and development impact fees, a conditional use for a demolition and mixed-use project on San Bruno Avenue, and a modification to reduce bicycle parking at St. Ignatius College Preparatory. The meeting included extensive public testimony and resulted in votes on all items. Consent Calendar - The commission unanimously approved the draft minutes for the May 21 and May 28, 2026 hearings (6-0). Public Comments & Testimony - General Public Comment: George Shudish raised concerns about permit applications for tenant demolition projects. Diane Oshima thanked Vice President Moore for her 20 years of service on the commission. Shannon Way attempted to speak on the inclusionary housing item but was redirected to the relevant agenda item. - Item 6 – Liquor Establishments: No public comment was offered. - Item 7 – Inclusionary Housing: Over 20 speakers addressed the commission. Supporters included representatives from the Housing Accelerator Fund, SPUR, Mercy Housing, the Housing Action Coalition, and the Building Trades, who argued that the current requirements are infeasible and that the companion Housing Trust Fund amendment will provide more reliable affordable housing funding. Opponents included members of the American Indian Cultural District, Senior and Disability Action, SomCAN, and individual advocates, who argued that reducing inclusionary requirements and impact fees would harm vulnerable communities, eliminate a key affordable housing tool, and that the Housing Trust Fund is not guaranteed. Several speakers noted that the TAC process was not unanimous and that the data does not show that reducing requirements will spur development. Calvin Welch and others emphasized that market rate housing production is not responding to previous reductions. - Item 8 – 2785 San Bruno Avenue: Several neighbors and community organizations (including the San Francisco Community Empowerment Center) opposed the demolition, stating that the existing units are rent-controlled and that the applicant provided false information in the initial application. The project sponsor’s attorney acknowledged the error and noted that the revised project includes two rent-controlled replacement units. The adjacent property owner, Dr. Mike Kowong, provided testimony about prior tenancy. - Item 9 – St. Ignatius Bicycle Parking: Alice Duzdiker of Outer Sunset Neighbors spoke in support of the compromise reached with the school, agreeing to 70 Class 1 spaces instead of 20, while encouraging continued work on mode shift. Discussion Items - Item 6 – Relocation and Re-establishment of Liquor Establishments (Case No. 2026-002046PCA): Planning staff presented an ordinance introduced by Supervisor Walton to allow bars with pre-2003 ABC licenses to re-establish after closures of up to 10 years and relocate within the Third Street Alcohol Restricted Use District (RUD). Staff recommended approval with a modification to conditionally permit all bars in the RUD instead of the narrow criteria, but the supervisor did not support the broader approach. Commissioner Moore expressed concern about weakening the RUD and the lack of a complaint process. The commission voted 4-2 to adopt the recommendation of approval with staff modifications. - Item 7 – Inclusionary Affordable Housing Program and Development Impact Fees (Case Nos. 2026-003786PCA and CRV): Staff presented a comprehensive ordinance to lower the inclusionary requirement from 12% to 5% for projects with 25 or more units, remove the middle-income tier, reduce Article 4 impact fees by 67%, and expand the Housing Trust Fund via a November ballot measure. The TAC reported that no level of inclusionary housing is currently feasible due to high construction and financing costs. Staff recommended approval with three modifications (including correcting typos and preserving a conditional use authorization in the North of Market SUD). The commission also considered a resolution delegating authority to the planning director to administratively approve modifications to inclusionary conditions. Commissioners Williams and Moore voted against, citing concerns about the loss of affordable housing, the lack of a guaranteed funding source, and the dismantling of protections in priority equity areas. The motion passed 4-2. - Item 8 – 2785 San Bruno Avenue (Case No. 2025-007500CUA): The project proposed demolishing a single-family home and an unauthorized unit to construct a three-story mixed-use building with three dwelling units (two rent-controlled) and ground-floor commercial. Staff noted that the initial application misrepresented the number of units but that the corrected project meets planning code requirements. Commissioner Braun, Szwed, and others supported the project, noting it would increase housing and provide rent-controlled units. Commissioner Moore added a motion to approve, which passed unanimously 6-0. - Item 9 – 2001 37th Avenue (St. Ignatius College Preparatory) (Case No. 2022-012254CUA): The school requested a modification to reduce required Class 1 bicycle parking from 120 to 70 spaces, citing low current bike commute rates and space constraints. After community outreach, the school agreed to 70 spaces (plus 30 Class 2 spaces), and staff recommended approval. Commissioner Szwed proposed a monitoring condition requiring the school to report on bike parking usage in six months and one year. The motion passed unanimously 6-0. Key Outcomes - Item 6: Approved with staff modifications (4-2). The ordinance will proceed to the Board of Supervisors. - Item 7: Approved the planning code amendments and delegation of authority (4-2). The ordinance will be heard by the Government Audit and Oversight Committee on July 2, 2026, with a goal of reaching the Board of Supervisors before the August recess. - Item 8: Approved with conditions (6-0). The project will replace two unprotected units with two rent-controlled units and one market-rate unit. - Item 9: Approved with conditions including a monitoring report on bike parking usage (6-0).

The Government Audit and Oversight Committee of the San Francisco Board of Supervisors met on June 18, 2026, at approximately 11:15 AM PDT. The meeting was chaired by Supervisor Steven Sherrill, with Vice Chair Bilal Mahmood and Board President Raphael Mandelman present. The committee considered five agenda items, including a large code cleanup ordinance, an update to the Fair Chance Ordinance, an annual police equipment report, a downtown benefit district ballot resolution, and a hearing on city vacancies. Additionally, four settlement items were approved en bloc. Public Comments & Testimony - Item 2 (Fair Chance Ordinance): Carla Gomez Artiaga, co-director of the Transgender District, registered support for the ordinance, noting that one in three transgender individuals face employment discrimination and the importance of protecting against criminalization for health care and expression. - Item 4 (Downtown Community Benefit District): Robbie Silver, executive director of the Downtown SF Partnership, spoke in support, highlighting that the petition drive garnered 43% support (exceeding the required 30%) and that the Port Commission had unanimously approved participation. He encouraged forwarding the resolution to the full board. - No public comment was offered on Items 1, 3, 5, or 6-9. Discussion Items - Item 1: Reporting Requirements Cleanup Ordinance – President Mandelman presented the ordinance, originally drafted by the City Attorney’s office, which eliminates over 100 outdated or duplicative reporting requirements from numerous municipal codes. Andrea Bruss (City Attorney’s office) summarized five categories of changes: deletion of obsolete programs, one-time reports, outdated requirements, modifications (e.g., frequency changes), and minor cleanup. Charlie Sciamas (Supervisor Chen’s office) raised concerns about eliminating land use and housing reports, but noted collaborative amendments were crafted. Clerk of the Board Angela Calvio cautioned against combining 195 changes into a 357-page document, arguing it hinders public review. She announced a future policy requiring such omnibus legislation to be broken into digestible companion ordinances. Mandelman defended the batching approach as necessary to encourage code cleanup. The committee accepted amendments from Mandelman (e.g., keeping sexual harassment reporting) and Sherrill (restoring three planning department reports: jobs-housing fit, short-term rentals, and housing inventory). The ordinance was forwarded to the full board with a positive recommendation. Vote: 2-0. - Item 2: Fair Chance Ordinance Amendments – Vice Chair Mahmood introduced legislation to prevent employers and affordable housing providers from using out-of-state convictions for conduct lawful in California (abortion-related care, gender-affirming care, drag performances) in hiring or housing decisions. The amendments also strengthen penalties and due process. Director Mowgli Tibeno (Human Rights Commission) and Mahmood spoke in support, noting the ordinance responds to rising criminalization in other states and that San Francisco has seen an influx of people fleeing anti-LGBTQ+ laws. Over 400,000 transgender Americans have relocated since the 2024 election. The committee forwarded the ordinance to the full board with a positive recommendation. Vote: 2-0. - Item 3: SFPD Equipment Policy Annual Report (AB 481) – Carl Nasida and Captain Matt Mason presented the 2025 annual report detailing use of military-style equipment including throwbots, MRAPs, command vehicles, drones, and less-lethal munitions. Drone deployments totaled 1,122 times. Costs ranged from $1,445 for throwbots to $562,513 for drones (funded by donations). One officer-involved shooting involved a fully automatic rifle and is under investigation. No public complaints were reported. The committee forwarded the resolution to the full board with a positive recommendation. Vote: 2-0. - Item 4: Downtown Community Benefit District Renewal/Expansion Ballot – Jackie Hazelwood (OEWD) presented a resolution authorizing the mayor to cast affirmative ballots on behalf of the city for 16 parcels (total assessment $63,985, or 0.58% of the district). The district renewal includes the Embarcadero Plaza park area. The committee forwarded the resolution to the full board with a positive recommendation. Vote: 2-0. - Item 5: Vacancy, Recruitment, and Retention Hearing (AB 2561) – Gigi Whitley (DHR) presented the annual report showing a citywide vacancy rate of 4.3% (1,484 vacant FTEs) as of May 1, 2026, down from a pandemic high of 14.2%. She noted a 2.1% rate for on-budget positions. Chair Sherrill and Vice Chair Mahmood expressed confusion about the presentation of vacancy data with attrition applied, particularly regarding the Police Department’s 480 unfilled sworn officer positions being reported as 258.9 after attrition. Sherrill questioned the report’s usefulness for policy and public communication. Whitley committed to presenting data both ways in future reports. The committee voted to continue the hearing to the July 2, 2026 meeting for further clarification. Vote: 2-0. - Items 6-9: Settlement Resolutions and Ordinances – These four items (unlitigated claims and lawsuits) were grouped. No public comment. The committee forwarded all to the full board with a positive recommendation. Vote: 2-0. Key Outcomes - Item 1: Approved amendments and forwarded ordinance to full board (2-0). - Item 2: Forwarded ordinance to full board with positive recommendation (2-0). - Item 3: Forwarded resolution to full board with positive recommendation (2-0). - Item 4: Forwarded resolution to full board with positive recommendation (2-0). - Item 5: Hearing continued to July 2, 2026 meeting (2-0). City departments directed to provide clearer vacancy data. - Items 6-9: Forwarded to full board en bloc with positive recommendation (2-0).