Public Meetings - San Francisco, California

The Budget and Finance Committee, chaired by Supervisor Connie Chan and joined by Vice Chair Matt Dorsey and Member Danny Souter, met on April 15, 2026 to review six agenda items. The committee voted unanimously to recommend all items to the full Board of Supervisors, with items two and three approved without recommendation (by consent) and item four amended before referral. Consent Calendar - No consent calendar was noted. Public Comments & Testimony - No members of the public spoke on any of the six items. Discussion Items Item 1: Resolution Authorizing Acceptance of State Funds for Voting System Replacement - Presenter: John Ernst, Director of Elections - Details: The Department of Elections requested approval to accept and expend up to $416,431.10 from the California Secretary of State to reimburse costs for voting system replacement (lease payments to vendor) for July 1, 2025 through August 31, 2026. The city must provide matching funds of $138,810.37; existing lease payments exceed this amount, so no additional city expenditure is needed. - Discussion: Chair Chan asked about election security and federal interference. Director Ernst stated the department is focused on the June election, meets with the Department of Emergency Management, and works with the FBI and DOJ; he does not expect security issues. He described robust transparency measures including livestreaming ballot handling, internal cameras on servers, and in-person observation. Chair Chan and Vice Chair Dorsey expressed strong appreciation for the department's work and transparency. Items 2 & 3: Resolutions Establishing Appropriations Limits for FY 2025-2026 - Presenter: Michael Bitten (Controller’s Office) and Bridget Katz (Office of Public Finance) - Details: The Gann limit (Article XIII B of California Constitution) limits the amount of tax proceeds the city can collect. Item 2 sets the city’s appropriations limit at approximately $14.6 billion, based on a 0.39% population decline, 6.44% per capita personal income growth, and voter-approved increases (Prop M, passed 2024, exempts business taxes from limit for four years). Actual tax proceeds subject to the limit are $5.5 billion, leaving $9 billion under the limit. Item 3 sets the limit for special tax districts and infrastructure financing districts at the amounts listed (combined adjustment factor of 6.02% for FY 25-26). Budget Legislative Analyst Nick Menard recommended approval, noting spending in both categories is well under the limits. - Chair Chan noted that further hearings on debt policy, fee waivers, and related issues will occur later in April and early May. Item 4: Ordinance Extending Delegation of Authority for Green Infrastructure Grant Program - Presenter: Willis Logsden, Senior Watershed Planner, SFPUC; Jeremy Spitz presented clerical amendments. - Details: The ordinance extends through July 1, 2031 the authority for the SFPUC General Manager to enter into grant agreements under the Green Infrastructure Grant Program, with terms up to 20 years after project completion. The program provides funding to large property owners to build green infrastructure (rain gardens, green roofs, permeable pavement) that captures stormwater to reduce pressure on the combined sewer system. Since 2019, $30 million has been awarded to 29 projects. The program aims to capture 1 billion gallons of stormwater by 2050. The committee accepted clerical amendments (adjusting ordinance numbers, adding “July 31st” as annual review date, etc.) and recommended approval of the amended ordinance. Chair Chan praised the program’s benefits in her district (Lafayette and Alamo schools). Member Souter asked about geographic distribution; staff acknowledged the half-acre minimum may limit projects in dense areas and noted other grant programs exist for smaller sites. Item 5: Resolution Approving Contract for Hetch Hetchy Water and Power NERC Compliance Support - Presenter: Adam Ozerkowitz, Division Manager, Hetch Hetchy Water and Power, SFPUC - Details: The resolution authorizes a five-year contract (May 2026 – May 2031) with Archer Energy Solutions LLC for up to $11.6 million to provide compliance and audit support for the North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC), Western Electricity Coordinating Council, California ISO, and CPUC. Hetch Hetchy operates components of the bulk electrical system (four powerhouses, transmission lines, substations) and must meet 56 reliability standards. Budget Legislative Analyst Nick Menard noted the contract may be undersized given historical spending of $2.3 million/year and inflation; SFPUC staff acknowledged the risk but noted internal hiring may reduce contract dependence. Chair Chan flagged potential need for a supplemental appropriation in the final year. The committee recommended approval. Item 6: Resolution Approving Agreement on Caltrain Pension Obligations - Presenter: Jesse Kaler, Director of Strategy, San Francisco County Transportation Authority - Details: The resolution approves an agreement among the three Caltrain member agencies (San Francisco, San Mateo County Transit District, and Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority) to backstop Caltrain’s pension obligations to CalPERS if Caltrain were dissolved or its contract terminated. This is required for Caltrain to enter a separate contract with CalPERS, giving it greater oversight of employees. Caltrain’s assets ($4.36 billion) vastly exceed its unfunded pension liability ($15.7 million as of 2023), making the risk extremely low. Budget Legislative Analyst Nick Menard noted Caltrain’s ridership is down 38% from pre-COVID and net income negative, but a pending regional sales tax measure could cover all expenses for 14 years. Chair Chan supported the agreement, calling it a necessary regional risk-sharing step. The committee recommended approval. Key Outcomes - Item 1: Passed 3-0, referred to full board with recommendation. - Items 2 & 3: Passed 3-0, referred to full board with recommendation. - Item 4: Clerical amendments accepted; amended ordinance passed 3-0, referred to full board with recommendation. - Item 5: Passed 3-0, referred to full board with recommendation. - Item 6: Passed 3-0, referred to full board with recommendation. - All items are scheduled to appear on the Board of Supervisors’ agenda of April 21, 2026 unless otherwise stated.

The Budget and Appropriations Committee, chaired by Supervisor Connie Chan, held a hearing on April 15, 2026, to examine the proposed budget's impact on programs serving older adults. The meeting heard presentations from the Mayor's Budget Office (MBO), the Mayor's Office of Housing and Community Development (MOHCD), and the Department of Disability and Aging Services (DAS). Public comment included strong opposition to proposed cuts. The committee heard that the city's two-year deficit is estimated at approximately $642.8 million (corrected from earlier $1 billion figure), and that departments were directed to identify $400 million in ongoing general fund reductions. Consent Calendar - No consent calendar items were present. Public Comments & Testimony - Over 40 speakers provided public comment, representing dignity fund coalition, community-based organizations (CBOs), seniors, and disability advocates. Speakers overwhelmingly opposed the proposed cuts, arguing they would increase isolation, worsen health outcomes, and shift costs to emergency services. - Key points from public comment: - Fiona Hindley (Dignity Fund Coalition) noted that the seven service areas experiencing cuts are precisely those identified as growing needs in the dignity fund needs assessment. - Eric Greenfrost (Senior & Disability Action) described the cuts as a choice, not a necessity, and urged using reserves and taxing wealthy individuals and corporations. - Jenny Belway (San Francisco Village) stated that every dollar spent on prevention returns up to $14 in avoided costs and that cutting prevention increases costs to hospitals and nursing facilities. - Multiple speakers highlighted that isolation is as harmful as smoking 15 cigarettes per day. - Speakers from Next Village, Bernal Heights Neighborhood Center, Booker T. Washington Community Service Center, and others described the direct impact of cuts on seniors, including loss of meals, social connection, and housing stability services. - Several speakers criticized the city for cutting services while not raising taxes or using reserves. Discussion Items 1. Mayor's Budget Office (MBO) Presentation – Budget Director Sophia Kittler provided a table setting on the dignity fund and the budget process. She noted that the city is facing a two-year deficit of about $642.8 million (corrected from earlier $1 billion figure) and that departments were instructed to find $400 million in ongoing cuts. She described the dignity fund baseline suspension in fiscal years 21, 24, and 26, and that current proposed funding for DAS is around $78 million, above charter mandate. 2. Mayor's Office of Housing and Community Development (MOHCD) Presentation – Sheila Nicolopoulos, Director of Policy, outlined proposed cuts of $8.5 million in ongoing general fund reductions, including elimination of the Community-Based Services portfolio (69 grants), digital equity programs (fiber to housing and digital skills training), and community facility capital improvements. She stated that 46% of clients served by the community-based services portfolio (3,600 of 7,900 clients) are older adults. 3. Department of Disability and Aging Services (DAS) Presentation – Executive Director Kelly Deerman and Deputy Director Cindy Kaufman presented proposed reductions of $2.9 million in discretionary funding. They described using criteria to protect core services (e.g., case management, meals, community centers) while reducing or eliminating non-core programs such as community center extensions, neighborhood-based programs, digital literacy, video doorbells, and senior escort. They noted that the cuts potentially impact up to 2,400 program enrollments if clients do not transition to other services. They emphasized that no cuts were proposed to caregiver support, housing support, or nutrition. Key Outcomes - The hearing was heard and filed on a motion by Supervisor Souter, seconded by Supervisor Walton, with a unanimous vote (4 ayes, with Supervisor Mandelman excused). - Supervisors Chan, Souter, and Walton acknowledged the difficulty of the budget situation and expressed interest in exploring alternative revenue sources and preventing disproportionate impacts on vulnerable populations. - The committee committed to continued partnership with departments and CBOs to find creative solutions during the budget process. - No specific directives or votes on proposals were taken; the hearing served as a listening session.

The Port Commission met on April 14, 2026, at 11:15 AM. The meeting included approval of minutes, public comments, reports from the Acting Executive Director and Government Affairs Manager, and informational presentations on naming a plaza after Alioto's restaurant and installing additional temporary public art as part of the Big Art Loop. The commission also discussed new business items. Consent Calendar - Approval of Minutes (March 10, 2026): Unanimously approved. - Resolution 26-19 (Naming Policy): Adopted on consent, authorizing the naming of port facilities through recognition and commemoration of people, places, and events. Public Comments & Testimony - Items Not on Agenda: Reverend Charles Grace, a 70-year San Francisco native and vendor near the baseball park, reported being forced to move from Pier 48 on opening day despite having a permit. He alleged harassment by port security and the Giants, including an arrest on trademark charges that were dismissed. He requested the commission's support. Acting Director Martin directed staff to meet with Reverend Grace to review the port's permitting process. - Item 8A (Alioto's Plaza): Public comment included Gina von Esmark (great-granddaughter of Nunzio Alioto) expressing pride and support for the naming. Mark Johnson, who submitted the nomination with 67 signatures, spoke in favor. A remote caller, Greg Champot, a 30-year North Beach resident, also supported the naming. - Item 8B (Big Art Loop): No public comment offered. Executive Director's Report (Michael Martin) - Contract Open House: Ninth annual event held at Pier 27, aimed at connecting contractors (including LBEs) with port capital projects. - Volunteer Cleanup Events: Maintenance division organized volunteer beautification at Crane Cove Park, aligning with Mayor Lurie's One City Day on July 11. - SF Opera at Building 12: Bohem out of the Box event pivoted indoors to Pier 70 Building 12 due to weather, showcasing arts and culture. - Giants Opening Day: Visitation at waterfront restaurants and South Beach Harbor managed smoothly. - Fisherman's Wharf Update: Phase 1 improvements nearing completion (smokehouse, plaza, inner lagoon). Stakeholder engagement for long-term seismic and flood resilience project launched; public meeting scheduled for April 30 at Pier 1. - SF Climate Week (April 21-24): Port co-hosting events, including an exhibit at Pier 1 and Port Powerhouse West with West Coast ports. - Write-off Report: Two accounts recommended for write-off per Resolution 22-11; 30-day review period. - Staff Departure: Deputy Director of Maritime Andre Coleman leaving; Dominic Moreno appointed acting deputy director. Government Affairs Report (Boris Delapine) - Washington, D.C. Advocacy (February & March): Trips with CMAC and AAPA to advance the Waterfront Flood Study, meet with congressional offices, and advocate for reauthorization of surface transportation bill (expires Sept 30), increased PIDP funding (seeking $10M for Pier 45 west apron), and inclusion of cruise operations in PIDP eligibility. Also tracking WERDA 2026 and President's Maritime Action Plan ($70B). - Sacramento Advocacy (Ports Day, February): Met with State Senator Scott Weiner, Assemblymembers Stephanie and Haney. Advocated for $1 billion clean transportation infrastructure (long shot), submitted $10M CEC grant for Pier 80 charging infrastructure. - Hosted Delegations: Army Corps of Engineers, EPA Clean Ports, Maritime Administration, and state freight infrastructure team. - Commissioner Comments: Commissioners praised the reports, discussed water taxi signage, crab season scheduling, volunteer outreach, and the need for local attraction. Commissioner Adams emphasized unity among California ports. Vice President Englum highlighted the need for inspiration and perspiration across the organization. Discussion Items - Item 8A: Naming of Fisherman's Wharf Plaza as Alioto's Plaza - Presentation by Deputy Director David Beaupre and nominator Mark Johnson. History of Alioto family: Nunzio Alioto immigrated from Sicily in 1897, founded Alioto's No. 9 fish stall in 1925, which became a landmark restaurant. Nomination received 67 signatures. Policy requires 90-day waiting period after commission approval. Commissioners expressed strong support, with comments on honoring immigrant history, preserving legacy, and potential for educational and philanthropic sustainability. President Gilman directed staff to conduct due diligence on any potential controversies. - Item 8B: Big Art Loop Temporary Public Art Installations - Presentation by Amy Cohen (Business Generation Manager), Meredith Winner (Building 180 CEO), and Julie Flynn (Street Plans Collaborative). Eleven pieces already installed since October 2025. Four new sites proposed: Pier 9 (Barnacle or Measure of Air), Pier 28 (hand gestures or red popsicle), South Beach Harbor (honey bear or Updraft), Bayview Gateway (Neural or another). Art is temporary (1-2 years), funded by Sebranti Foundation, produced by Building 180. Also presented waterfront walk branding and wayfinding initiatives. Commissioners asked about artist diversity, maintenance, and long-term vision. Noted positive impact on local businesses, and that artists include local and BIPOC creators. No action taken; informational only. Key Outcomes - Consent Calendar Approved: Resolution 26-19 adopted. - Alioto's Plaza Naming: Commission expressed support for the naming; staff to conduct due diligence and return with an action item in 90 days (July 2026). - Big Art Loop: Informational only; no vote required. Staff and Building 180 to continue feasibility studies and permitting, aiming for installation June–August 2026. - New Business: Commissioner Gilman requested an informational presentation on private fireworks shows at Pier 27 and public noticing. Other items included water taxi signage, port restaurant opportunities, crab season schedule, and waterfront resilience funding updates. Staff to return with reports in coming months. - Meeting Adjourned: At 5:06 PM.

The San Francisco Board of Supervisors held its regular meeting on April 14, 2026, beginning at 2:00 PM. The meeting included a special appearance by Mayor Daniel Lurie to discuss the city's budget deficit and proposed layoffs, approval of routine consent items, action on several ordinances and resolutions, and commendations for public safety personnel and community organizations. The board also introduced new business, including resolutions on sexual assault awareness, a public bank charter amendment, and support for state legislation. Consent Calendar - Items 2 through 7 were approved as a consent agenda (unanimous voice vote). These included routine ordinances and resolutions. Public Comments & Testimony - One speaker, Leah McGeeber, read from Guy Debord's "Society of the Spectacle," criticizing the mayor's budget narrative as subjugation to the economy. - Jim McAfee inquired about the status of the Inspector General's Office policies and procedures. - Virginia Taylor, from Safe and Sound, thanked the board for supporting Child Abuse Prevention Awareness Month. - A speaker criticized the board for a 5-5 tie on a planning matter and urged action regarding the vacant District 9 seat, expressing support for Supervisor Fielder's public bank proposal. Discussion Items - Mayoral Appearance on Budget Deficit (2:00 PM Special Order): Mayor Daniel Lurie addressed the board, stating that despite a $300 million reduction in the structural deficit last year, the city faces a $1 billion deficit over five years due to federal and state cuts. He noted that HR 1 could cost over $300 million annually and threaten MediCal and SNAP for tens of thousands, and that proposed federal budget cuts would eliminate homelessness funding for over 2,200 households. He emphasized the need to avoid one-time fixes and to protect core services. Supervisor Chen asked why the mayor is pursuing $100 million in cuts to city workers given a 30% deficit reduction projection, a $120 million Airbnb settlement, and potential new revenue. Mayor Lurie responded that the recovery is fragile, the structural deficit is still large, and the one-time settlement will be spread over three years to avoid a fiscal cliff. Chen asked about the urgency of mid-year cuts before the board reviews the updated budget. The mayor reiterated that delaying would force deeper cuts later. - Item 9 – Airport Surveillance Technology Policy: The board considered an ordinance to approve the airport's surveillance policy for transportation network company virtual queue technology. Supervisor Walton questioned a one-week continuance requested by Lyft, arguing it prioritized a single company over the public. The motion to continue passed 9-1 (Walton opposed). - Item 33 – Fire Code Technical Advisory Council: Supervisor Walton voiced objections to a supervisor serving on the advisory council, calling it a conflict of interest and a bad precedent. He voted no. The ordinance passed on first reading 9-1 (Walton opposed). Key Outcomes - Mayor's Budget Presentation: The board heard the mayor's budget outlook, but no formal vote was taken. Supervisor Chen indicated she would continue to scrutinize the proposed cuts. - Item 9 (Airport Surveillance) Continued: The item was continued for one week to allow the airport to discuss concerns with Lyft. - Item 33 (Fire Code Advisory Council): Passed on first reading (9-1) over Supervisor Walton's objection. - Items 8 and 10-32 Approved: Included contract amendments, climate action goals, landmark designations, grants, and a commemorative street naming. All passed unanimously or without objection. - New Business Introduced: - Supervisor Sauter introduced four new entertainment zones in District 3. - Supervisors Cheryl and Melgar introduced a resolution recognizing April 2026 as National Sexual Assault Awareness and Prevention Month. - Supervisor Wong introduced a resolution honoring the late Vicha Ratanapakti and reaffirming elder safety commitments. - Supervisor Chen introduced a hearing request on homelessness and supportive housing budget cuts, and a charter amendment to create a San Francisco Municipal Financial Corporation and Public Bank. - Supervisor Mahmood introduced a resolution supporting Assembly Bill 1836 to expand the state nonprofit security grant program to cover outdoor events. - President Mandelman introduced a resolution to adjourn in memory of attorney Helene Wenzel. - Adoption Without Committee Reference: Items 38, 40, 41, 42, 43, and 44 were adopted; items 36, 37, and 39 were pulled or sent to committee. Item 36 (National Crime Victims' Rights Week) was adopted after Supervisor Dorsey's remarks. Item 39 (support for federal revitalizing downtowns act) was amended and adopted. - Commendations: The board recognized Commander Amy Hurwitz of the SFPD, North Beach Citizens (25th anniversary), and DEM dispatchers Karen Colindres and Zoila Lechuga.

The San Francisco Public Utilities Commission (SFPUC) held a regular meeting on April 14, 2026, addressing a range of topics including approval of minutes, a public hearing on a new state-mandated turf irrigation ban, extensive discussion of the draft 2025 Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP), water supply assessments for two development projects, a bond refunding, and a contract amendment for the emergency firefighting water system. The meeting began with a land acknowledgment and roll call confirming a quorum. Consent Calendar - Item 3: Approval of minutes from March 24, 2026 – passed unanimously. - Item 6: Consent calendar comprising six items, including expansion of the point-of-sale EV incentive program (Item 6C) and a contract closeout (Item 6F). Approved unanimously after staff clarified that the $4.2 million for 6C includes $3.3 million in direct customer incentives. Public Comments & Testimony - General Public Comment (Item 4): - Francisco de Costa criticized the Commission for lack of standards, alleging that reservoirs have not been maintained, sludge contaminates drinking water, and the budget has grown from $6 billion to nearly $15 billion. He stated that he had presented this to the Inspector General. - Eileen Boken (Coalition for San Francisco Neighborhoods) showed an image of the Pacific Palisades fire aftermath, warning that without adequate infrastructure, San Francisco could face similar devastation. - Judy Lee (San Francisco Chinese Chamber of Commerce) expressed strong opposition to proposed rate increases of over 12% annually, beginning as early as July. She stated that small businesses, especially restaurants and retail, already face rising costs and urged phased increases, expanded financial assistance, and greater transparency. - Peter Dreckmayer (Yosemite Rivers Alliance) raised concerns about earlier runoff due to climate change, the design drought (8.5 years, 72% more severe than the worst drought on record and 19 times less likely to occur), and inflated demand projections. He questioned spending on alternative water supply planning and the lack of transparency regarding legal fees. Discussion Items - Item 7: Adoption of Rules Restricting Potable Water for Non-Functional Turf (AB 1572) - Presentation: Julie Ortiz, water conservation section manager, presented the new permanent ban on using drinking water to irrigate non-functional decorative grass on public and commercial properties, as required by California AB 1572 (signed in 2023). Compliance phases begin in 2027 for public properties, 2028 for commercial, and 2029 for large HOA common areas. The SFPUC does not anticipate extensive non-functional turf within its retail service area. Public comment included support and concerns about implementation on SFPUC-owned pipeline easements. - Item 8: Draft 2025 Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP) – Presentation and Discussion - Presentation: Jennifer Lee, project manager, detailed the state-mandated plan, which must be updated every five years and submitted by July 1, 2026. The plan includes three demand scenarios based on different population and job projections. The UWMP scenario (using Planning Department projections) shows retail water demand rising to 73.4 million gallons per day (mgd) by 2050, while combined retail and wholesale demand is projected at 215 mgd. Per capita usage is expected to decrease to 60 gallons per day (19% decrease from today). Local supplies (groundwater and recycled water) will grow from 3.5% to 9% of retail demands by 2050. The public comment period runs until April 20, 2026, with adoption scheduled for the June meeting. - Commissioner Questions: Commissioner Stacy clarified that the UWMP represents an “outside envelope” of potential demand, not a binding planning document, and that the two additional demand scenarios are not required by state law. Commissioner Thurlow asked about variability in wholesale customer projections; staff noted that each customer prepares its own projections and plans are updated every five years. - Public Testimony (in-person and remote, 3 minutes each): Many speakers opposed the plan as drafted, citing consistently inflated demand projections, the use of an 8.5-year design drought (with a return period of once in 8,000 years), and the negative impacts on Tuolumne River flows, Bay-Delta ecosystem, and rates. Key speakers included: - Tom Smeagle (BAWSCA) supported adoption, noting that BAWSCA coordinated demand assumptions and that failure to adopt would disqualify SFPUC from state grants. - Eileen Boken opposed the plan due to outdated population projections and inflated design drought. - Lane Fajou (Sierra Club California) stated that SFPUC has overestimated demand by 45-50% over 15-year horizons, driving unnecessary capital spending and rate increases (projected wholesale rate hikes rising from 1% to 7% annually). He argued that opposition to the Bay-Delta plan is based on flawed projections. - Mary Butterwick, George Cattlemel, Christina Bertie, Mark Shahinian, Dr. Jacuzzi, and numerous remote callers (Judith Kirk, Alex Barrett, Hillary Hugg, David Schramm, Ann Schneider, Martin Gothberg, Les Kishler, Peter Dreckmayer, Julianne Frizzell) echoed concerns about the design drought, overprojection, ratepayer burden, ecosystem collapse, and requested a workshop or independent audit. Several noted that the SFPUC has never been required to provide a probability analysis for the design drought. - Commission Response: President Arce thanked participants and noted the process will continue with a formal adoption vote in June. - Item 9: Water Supply Assessment for 536 Mission Street - Approved unanimously. The assessment is a CEQA tool to ensure the project’s water demand fits within SFPUC projections. - Item 10: Revised Water Supply Assessment for the Flower Project (Brannan Street area) - Approved unanimously. The project was originally assessed in 2018; this revision accounts for post-pandemic changes. - Item 11: Authorization to Issue Bonds to Refund 2015 Power Revenue Bonds - Approved unanimously. CFO Sklarov presented a plan to refund up to $30 million in 2015 Power Revenue Bonds (Series A) with 2026 bonds, generating over $400,000 in annual debt service savings. The refinancing is possible because the 2015 bonds became callable in late 2025. - Item 12: Amendment No. 1 to Contract for Emergency Firefighting Water System (PEFS) and Water Distribution System (LAMP) - Approved unanimously. The amendment adds $5 million (a 62% increase from the original $8 million) with no extension of the 8-year contract term. The additional funds are needed due to upgraded seismic design criteria (from 975-year to 2,475-year return period) and geotechnical findings. Vice President Leverone questioned seismic resilience; staff confirmed use of earthquake-resistant ductile iron pipe. Public comment from Eileen Boken opposed the modification as a “novel concept” not yet tested. Key Outcomes - Unanimous approvals: - Minutes of March 24, 2026 (Item 3) - Consent Calendar (Item 6) - New rules restricting potable water for non-functional turf (Item 7) - Water supply assessments for 536 Mission Street and the Flower Project (Items 9 & 10) - Bond refunding authority (Item 11) - Amendment to PEFS/LAMP contract (Item 12) - No action taken on Item 8 (UWMP): Public comment period continues through April 20, 2026; final adoption scheduled for the June 2026 meeting. Commissioners committed to reviewing comments and holding a workshop if needed. - Closed session: The Commission asserted attorney-client privilege and reported that it recommends Board approval of the item discussed.

The San Francisco Board of Supervisors Rules Committee met on April 13, 2026, chaired by Supervisor Shimon Watson, joined by Vice Chair Stephen Sherrow and President Rafael Mandelman. The committee addressed a resolution on police commission oversight, an ordinance on hotel cleaning standards, and an appointment. Public Comments & Testimony - Item 2 (Hotel Cleaning Standards Ordinance): Cynthia Gomez (Unite Here Local 2) expressed strong support for the amendments, stating they are necessary to enforce existing healthy building standards and support tourism recovery. Alex Bashin (Hotel Council of San Francisco) strongly opposed the ordinance, arguing hotels are already exceptionally clean and the legislation would harm the industry's recovery. Discussion Items - Item 1 (Police Commission Oversight Resolution): Chair Walton introduced the resolution affirming independent civilian oversight. He proposed forwarding it without recommendation to the full board. President Mandelman agreed with the principle of independent oversight but objected to specific language opposing the mayor's hiring and firing authority over the police chief, citing ongoing charter reform. He introduced amendments over Chair Walton's objection. - Item 2 (Hotel Health Code Ordinance): The author requested a continuance. After public comment, the committee voted to continue the item. - Item 3 (LAFCo Appointment): The committee recommended the appointment of Supervisor Cheyenne Chen as an alternate member to the Local Agency Formation Commission. Key Outcomes - Item 1: President Mandelman's amendments were adopted on a 2–1 vote (Vice Chair Sherrow and President Mandelman in favor, Chair Walton opposed). The amended resolution was forwarded to the full Board of Supervisors with a recommendation (3–0). - Item 2: The ordinance was continued to the call of the chair (3–0). - Item 3: The appointment was forwarded to the full board for consideration (3–0).

The Land Use and Transportation Committee of the San Francisco Board of Supervisors met on April 13, 2026, chaired by Supervisor Mirna Melgar, with Vice Chair Cheyenne Chen and Supervisor Bilal Mahmud. The committee considered three agenda items: a zoning amendment for the One Oak Street project, a curbside electric vehicle charging program, and an ordinance implementing state Senate Bill 79 (transit-oriented development). The meeting included public comment and votes on each item. Public Comments & Testimony - Item 1 (One Oak): Multiple union representatives (Building Trades, Carpenters, Painters, Teamsters, Iron Workers, Plumbers, Electrical) spoke in strong support, emphasizing job creation, union labor, and the need to move forward with a project that has been in the pipeline for years. One resident spoke in favor, citing good transit access. Speaker Rudy Gonzalez highlighted the symbolic importance for mid-market revitalization. - Item 2 (EV Charging): Mark Gleason (Teamsters) spoke in support of the program and the amendment to discourage commercial fleet charging. - Item 3 (SB 79): Two speakers: Zach Weisenberger (Young Community Developers) supported the ordinance, arguing it protects industrial employment hubs and prevents inequitable development patterns. A second speaker (representing a neighborhood association) opposed the permanent exemptions for SOMA, calling them "preservation of blight" and urging removal of Section 3 to allow mixed-income housing near transit. Discussion Items - Item 1: One Oak Street Height Amendment – Madison Tam (Supervisor Dorsey's office) presented the project: 541 units, podium height increase from 120 to 140 feet, no change to the 400-foot tower. The planning commission recommended approval 5-1. Supervisor Melgar noted the loss of a beloved donut shop and urged relocation assistance. She expressed support for the project. The committee voted unanimously to send the ordinance to the full board with a positive recommendation. - Item 2: Curbside EV Charging Program – Kate Torrin and Broderick Paulo (SFMTA) presented the proposed permanent program, building on a pilot. The program would allow SFMTA to issue permits for curbside chargers, waiving DPW encroachment permits. Two amendments were proposed: one from SFMTA (administrative penalties for violations) and one from President Mandelman's office (urge SFMTA to discourage commercial fleet charging). The committee voted to accept both amendments and continue the item to April 20, 2026. - Item 3: SB 79 Transit-Oriented Development Ordinance – Sarah Richardson and Josh Switzky (Planning) presented the ordinance to adopt an alternative plan, permanently exclude industrial employment hubs, and temporarily exempt low-resource census tracts. The planning commission recommended approval with a typographical fix. Supervisor Melgar noted the prior discussion during the family zoning plan. Supervisor Mahmud raised questions about minimum compliance and industrial hub exemptions. Supervisor Chen expressed support. The committee voted to amend the ordinance (fix clerical error, update parcel tables), duplicate the file, and continue the original file to April 20, 2026, and the duplicated file to the call of the chair. Key Outcomes - Item 1: Motion to send to full board with positive recommendation (3-0). - Item 2: Motion to amend (both amendments) and continue to April 20, 2026 (3-0). - Item 3: Multiple motions: - Amend to fix clerical error and parcel tables (3-0). - Duplicate the file and amend duplicate to include a finding referencing HCD consultation (3-0). - Continue duplicated file as amended to call of the chair (3-0). - Continue original file as amended to April 20, 2026 (3-0).

The Public Safety and Neighborhood Services Committee of the San Francisco Board of Supervisors met on Thursday, April 9, 2026, at 9:15 AM (presumed) to consider four agenda items: a resolution condemning ICE actions and reaffirming sanctuary city policies, two liquor license transfers (for Taza Diamore Cafe and BARC 77), and an ordinance on mandatory spay/neuter of dogs. The meeting included testimony from law enforcement officials, applicants, and members of the public. Item 4: Resolution Condemning ICE Action and Reaffirming Sanctuary City Policies - Discussion: Chair Matt Dorsey introduced the resolution (sponsored by Supervisor Connie Chan, who was absent) responding to a reported ICE incident at San Francisco International Airport on March 22, 2026. Dorsey emphasized the need to speak with one voice while avoiding unlawful obstruction of federal authority. He noted a factual dispute in the resolution regarding SFPD’s role. - SFPD Chief Derek Liu testified that SFPD fully supports sanctuary city policies and did not coordinate with ICE. He explained that officers responded to a 911 call for a well-being check at Terminal 3 around 10 PM, observed a crowd, and later identified plainclothes ICE agents and uniformed CBP officers. SFPD did not assist, detain, or handcuff anyone; the lieutenant verbally advised ICE that SFPD would not participate. Uniformed officers seen escorting the detained person were CBP, not SFPD. - District Attorney Brooke Jenkins expressed support for the resolution’s premise but objected to language mischaracterizing SFPD’s actions as assisting ICE. She stated she was the first prosecutor nationally to promise prosecution of ICE for any law violations in San Francisco. She urged the board to focus on ICE’s conduct and not undermine public trust in local law enforcement. - Sheriff Miyamoto reaffirmed commitment to sanctuary city policies and noted that under Section 12H/I, his office may only notify ICE for individuals with serious violent felony records. He requested language tweaks to clarify law enforcement’s commitment. - Public Comments: Two speakers (Tom Yankowski and Pete Cronowitz) supported stronger operational plans against ICE, citing examples from Denver and Los Angeles. Jerry Garber urged better communication. All supported the resolution’s intent but called for more action. - Outcome: Chair Dorsey made a motion to continue the item to the April 23, 2026, committee meeting to allow further refinement of language, including an amendment to replace the disputed phrase with accurate wording. The motion passed 3–0 (Wong, Mahmood, Dorsey aye). Item 1: Liquor License Transfer for Taza Diamore Cafe (700 Fourth Street) - Discussion: Officer Brandon Erickson from SFPD’s ABC liaison unit presented a PCN report for a Type 21 off-sale license. There were zero letters of protest or support. The location is in a low-crime area (plot 288) but a high-concentration area (census tract 607.03). AOU recommended approval with nine conditions, including hours limited to 11 AM–7 PM, no exterior alcohol advertising, and no single-serving containers under 3.4 oz. The applicant (spokesperson) said they have operated a cafe at the Caltrain station for 23 years and are expanding next door to serve beer, wine, and liquor primarily for train passengers, along with Mitchell’s Ice Cream and Go Hill Pizza. - Public Comment: None. - Outcome: Chair Dorsey moved to direct the clerk to prepare a resolution finding that the license serves public convenience or necessity. The motion passed 3–0. Item 2: Liquor License Transfer for BARC 77 (77 Cambon Drive) - Discussion: Officer Erickson presented a PCN report for a Type 48 on-sale license. There was one letter of protest and zero letters of support. The location is in a high-crime area (plot 999) but a low-concentration area (census tract 332.03). AOU recommended approval with four conditions, including noise control and litter maintenance. The applicant’s representative described plans for a sports bar with security measures, ID scanners, and community engagement. A property manager expressed support, noting the area lacks a gathering place. Opposing public speakers (Patrick Kelly, Rebecca Shannon) cited past noise and crime issues from previous bar operations and demanded enforceable security. - Public Comment: Two speakers in support, two in opposition. Supporters cited community need and the owner’s investment. Opponents pointed to ongoing noise, partying, and lack of security enforcement. - Outcome: Chair Dorsey moved to direct the clerk to prepare a resolution finding that the license serves public convenience or necessity, expressing confidence that the proprietor will address neighborhood concerns. The motion passed 3–0. Item 3: Ordinance on Mandatory Spay/Neuter of Dogs - Discussion: Chair Dorsey proposed continuing the item for up to one year to allow a data-driven analysis with UC Davis. He announced an immediate expanded partnership between SF Animal Care & Control (ACC) and the SF SPCA, including: SPCA increasing transfers from ACC to at least 300 dogs/year; ACC and SPCA partnering with UC Davis to study shelter data; and quarterly progress meetings. Dorsey noted the goal is to reduce euthanasia. He also stated that the city administrator will report back in six months, potentially in a public hearing. - Public Comments: Dr. Richard Vollier (professor emeritus, UC Davis) recommended mandatory microchipping instead of spay/neuter and noted that mandatory spay laws generally don’t work. Barbara Link Smith (American Kennel Club) offered to assist. - Outcome: Chair Dorsey moved to continue the item to the call of the chair (up to one year). The motion passed 2–0 (Wong excused). Key Outcomes - Item 4: Continued to April 23, 2026, for language revisions. Motion passed 3–0. - Item 1: Approved. Motion passed 3–0. - Item 2: Approved. Motion passed 3–0. - Item 3: Continued to the call of the chair for up to one year. Motion passed 2–0 (Supervisor Wong excused).

The Budget and Finance Committee of the San Francisco Board of Supervisors met on April 8, 2026, at City Hall. The meeting was chaired by Supervisor Connie Chang, with Vice Chair Matt Dorsey and Member Danny Souter present. The committee considered seven resolutions authorizing contracts and grants, and held a hearing on denial of health care by Blue Shield. All seven resolutions were approved and referred to the full Board of Supervisors. The hearing was continued to the call of the chair. Resolutions Approved (Items 1-7) - Item 1: Resolution approving modification to an airport security services contract with Covenant Aviation Security LLC, increasing the contract amount by $10.5 million to a total not-to-exceed $20.3 million and extending the term through June 30, 2028. The contract provides non-passenger security screening at SFO. Approved unanimously. - Item 2: Resolution authorizing Clean Power SF to participate in the Willow Rock Long Duration Storage Project via California Community Power (CC Power). The 20-year agreement, beginning July 2030, has a total not-to-exceed cost of $75.9 million ($3.8 million per year) for an 11.5 MW share of a compressed-air energy storage facility. Approved unanimously. - Item 3: Resolution authorizing the Department of Technology to enter into a third amendment with Mythics LLC for Oracle products and cloud solutions. The amendment increases the contract by approximately $34.6 million to a total not-to-exceed $94.6 million, and extends the term through November 30, 2028. The negotiated price increases are 4% for on-premise software and 5% for cloud products, below market increases of 8-10%. Approved unanimously. - Item 4: Resolution retroactively authorizing the Department of Public Health to accept a $7.9 million grant from the California Board of State and Community Corrections for Proposition 47 Cohort 5. The grant funds withdrawal management, residential, and step-down services for justice-involved individuals with co-occurring substance use and mental health needs, including 10 detox beds and 18 residential beds at Salvation Army Harbor Lights, and 15 step-down beds at Health Right 360. A $2 million city match is required. Approved unanimously. - Item 5: Resolution retroactively authorizing the Public Defender's Office to accept an $850,000 grant from the Office of the State Public Defender for its post-conviction unit (Freedom Project). The grant funds two senior social worker positions to support resentencing and re-entry services for individuals serving long prison sentences. Since 2020, the unit has brought home 105 individuals. Approved unanimously. - Item 6: Resolution authorizing the Mayor's Office of Housing and Community Development to jointly apply with 629 Post LLC and Swords to Plowshares Veterans Rights Organization for a Home Key Plus grant of $15.8 million from the California Department of Housing and Community Development. The grant will rehabilitate 629 Post Street (Sheldon Hotel) into 63 units of permanent supportive housing for unhoused and formerly unhoused veterans, including seismic upgrades and ADA improvements. Construction is anticipated to begin November 2026. Approved unanimously. - Item 7: Resolution retroactively authorizing the City Attorney's Office to accept a $600,000 grant from the California Department of Industrial Relations for the Workers' Rights Enforcement Grant Program. The grant funds enforcement of state labor laws and combating wage theft. In the current grant period, the office has secured over $5 million in restitution for workers. Approved unanimously. Hearing on Denial of Health Care by Blue Shield (Item 8) The committee held a hearing concerning denials of health care, including cancer care, for San Francisco workers, retirees, and their families by Blue Shield of California. The hearing included presentations from the San Francisco Health Service System (SFHSS), Protect Our Benefits, and Blue Shield, followed by public testimony. Public Comments & Testimony - Fred Sanchez (President, Protect Our Benefits): Described multiple cases of delayed or denied care, including a retired firefighter with lung cancer whose treatment was delayed four days despite urgency. He called for streamlined processes and direct meetings with Blue Shield. - Helen Horvath (retired firefighter paramedic): Testified that her husband Ken Jones, a retired firefighter with stage IV metastatic lung cancer, was denied treatment prescribed by his oncologist at UCSF. The denial forced them to switch to straight Medicare; they incurred $50,000 in out-of-pocket costs covered by GoFundMe. - Teresa Palmer (retired city employee, geriatrician): Reported denial of pain medications after knee replacement surgery, jeopardizing rehabilitation. - Miriam Pengal (retired police lieutenant): Described repeated denials for a knee replacement revision, requiring numerous appeals and phone calls. - Tim O'Brien (Secretary Treasurer, Retired Firefighters and Spouses Association): Cited a case of delayed approval for osteoporosis injections for a cancer survivor. - Mindy Talmage (retired firefighter): Criticized Medicare Advantage plans for requiring prior authorization and urged the city to offer original Medicare. - Adam Wood (VP, San Francisco Firefighters Cancer Prevention Foundation): Noted that cancer is the number one cause of work-related death for firefighters and that denials delay critical treatment. - Juanita Stockwell (retired police officer): Described repeated denials for knee injections for Irene Braun, a retired officer, and urged the committee to track denial rates. - Ken Jones (retired firefighter): Stated that treatment delays from Blue Shield will shorten his life. - Herbert Weiner (retired social worker): Reported premature discharge from a skilled nursing facility despite medical instability. Blue Shield Presentation - Tim Leib (SVP, Commercial Markets) and Dr. Kay Judge (Chief Medical Officer) presented. They acknowledged gaps in phone support and prior authorization processes. They announced that effective January 2026, Blue Shield implemented proactive peer-to-peer outreach for oncology denials, where a board-certified oncologist contacts the treating physician before any denial. They also committed to improving customer service and agreed to meet with Protect Our Benefits. Discussion and Directives - Chair Chang expressed disappointment that SFHSS's presentation focused on legal limitations rather than solutions. She directed SFHSS to: - Track claim response times and denial rates across all health plan vendors. - Require vendors to categorize denials as administrative or care-related, and provide data with an affidavit. - Develop mechanisms to track members whose claims are denied and who do not receive care. - Chair requested Blue Shield to provide a dedicated hotline for retirees facing denials at the point of care. - The hearing was continued to the call of the chair, with expectations of a follow-up in May or June. Key Outcomes - All seven resolutions (Items 1-7) were approved unanimously and referred to the full Board of Supervisors, expected on April 14, 2026. - The hearing on Blue Shield denials (Item 8) was continued to the call of the chair. - Blue Shield committed to meeting with Protect Our Benefits by the end of April 2026 to establish a streamlined process for retirees. - SFHSS will work on providing requested data on denial rates, response times, and resolution categories for all health plan vendors.