Public Meetings - Stamford, Connecticut

On January 26, 2026, the committee, chaired by Glenn Price and joined by Representative Hughes, met to discuss three major items: opting into the Connecticut Municipal Development Authority (CMDA) and approving phased demolitions for Roxbury School and West Hill High School. The meeting included public comment, discussion, and votes on all three items. Consent Calendar - No consent calendar items were present. Public Comments & Testimony - Dave Adams opposed the CMDA, arguing that gap funding increases developer profit without lowering rents, and that past housing supply increases have failed to create affordable housing and have led to gentrification. - Christopher Dawson supported the CMDA, stating it would help Stamford stimulate transit-oriented development and address the housing crisis, noting $60 million in capital authorization and $30 million more next fiscal year. - Megan Catrell, a former Board of Representatives member, expressed caution, stating that past programs like tax increment financing and opportunity zones did not create affordable housing and have facilitated gentrification. She emphasized the need for housing that prioritizes municipal workers. - Michael Moore (President of Stamford Downtown) advocated for CMDA membership, highlighting the potential for investment near the Stamford Transportation Center to grow the grand list and promote mass transit. - Gina Calabrisi opposed CMDA, noting Stamford has already added thousands of transit-oriented housing units downtown, leading to gentrification, and questioned the need for state incentives for developers. She called for more single-family homes and starter homes. - Paula Waldman opposed CMDA, raising concerns about loss of local control, transparency, and mission creep, and urged that strong opt-out provisions and public input be required. - Junyun Lim supported CMDA, stating that as a downtown resident without a car, he values housing options near the train station and sees CMDA guidance as valuable. Discussion Items - CMDA Resolution (LU32.001): Representative Finkel noted that the municipality retains full autonomy over any CMDA suggestions. Representative Fields asked whether the partnership would deliver affordable units and address infrastructure needs. David Corus (CMDA) responded that CMDA works within local regulations and can fund infrastructure, but has no affordability requirement; priorities are set by the municipality through a memorandum of agreement. Representative Boudreau clarified that projects must exhaust traditional capitalization options before using CMDA funds. Director Kagan stated that an initial priority is transit-oriented development and housing, and that the city's existing policy would result in additional affordable housing. Representative Terry Adams questioned whether CMDA would incentivize specific housing types (workforce, senior) and whether affordability requirements would be tied to funding; Corus noted that CMDA does not have its own affordability requirements but would prioritize projects with more affordable units if the city directs it. - Roxbury School Demolition (LU32.002): Catherine Lobalbo (Director of School Construction) presented a phased demolition plan for Roxbury School to allow the school to remain operational during construction of a new K-3 school. The project, which began in 2022 with a 60% state-funded grant, includes site enabling in summer 2026, construction in 2026-2028, and eventual demolition of the existing building. No questions were asked by committee members. - West Hill High School Demolition (LU32.003): Catherine Lobalbo presented a phased demolition plan for West Hill High School, noting the project is ahead of Roxbury and bids are awaited. Construction is set to begin in April 2026. Representative Camparelli inquired about plans for a potential new entrance/exit on Long Ridge Road to alleviate congestion. Lobalbo noted that the traffic department is advocating for that connection, but it requires state approval. Key Outcomes - CMDA Resolution (LU32.001): Approved by a roll call vote of 8-0-0 (8 yes, 0 no, 0 abstentions). - Roxbury School Demolition (LU32.002): Approved by a roll call vote of 8-0-0 (8 yes, 0 no, 0 abstentions). - West Hill High School Demolition (LU32.003): Approved by a roll call vote of 8-0-0 (8 yes, 0 no, 0 abstentions). - The meeting was adjourned at 8:09 p.m. on January 26, 2026.

The Fiscal Committee of the Stamford Board of Representatives convened on Monday, January 26, 2026, at 7:03 PM. Chaired by Representative Andrew Zachary in his first meeting as chair, the committee reviewed 18 agenda items, including several late submissions. The meeting adjourned at 7:52 PM. Consent Calendar - Youth Services Microgrant (Item 8, F32.032): $5,000 appropriation from a transportation microgrant to purchase bicycles and helmets for the Pathfinders Adventure Camp. Approved 9-0. - CT DOT Agreement (Item 9, F32.033): Resolution authorizing the mayor to sign an agreement with the Connecticut Department of Transportation. Approved 9-0. - Summer Youth Employment Program (Item 10, F32.034): $61,364.46 appropriation for seasonal salaries and FICA costs through state and federal grants. Approved 9-0. - DCF Youth Employment Grant (Item 11, F32.035): Resolution authorizing the mayor to sign an agreement with the Connecticut Department of Children and Families. Approved 9-0. - Broad Street Traffic Signals (Item 12, F32.036): $125,000 capital appropriation for traffic signal upgrades at 130 Broad Street, fully funded by the developer. Approved 9-0. - Town Clerk Historical Maps (Item 13, F32.037): $36,825 grant appropriation for compliance shelving for historical maps. Approved 8-0-1 (Representative Graham abstained). - Stamford High School Roofing & Solar (Item 14, F32.038): Resolution related to a non-priority solar voltaic installation and partial re-roofing grant application. Approved 9-0. - Community Wi-Fi Grant (Item 15, F32.039): Resolution authorizing the mayor to sign agreements for the CENECT Connect Community Wi-Fi grant program for Latin Wider and Cove Island Park. Approved 8-0-1 (Representative Graham abstained). - DOJ COPS Agreement (Item 17, F32.041): Resolution authorizing the mayor to enter into agreements with the U.S. Department of Justice for the COPS Hiring Program. Approved 9-0. Discussion Items Police Department Staffing and COPS Hiring Grant (Items 16, 18) The committee suspended its rules to take Items 16 and 18 out of order as they were related late submissions. - F32.040 (Item 16): An additional appropriation of $190,755 from a federal COPS Hiring Grant to fund five new police officers for the final five months of fiscal year 2026. The grant requires a city match and the hired officers must remain employed through September 2028. - F32.042 (Item 18): An additional appropriation of $286,756 from the Police operating budget to increase the budgeted officer positions from 217 to 222, raising the total sworn force from 287 to 292. - Testimony and Deliberation: Director of Grants Anita Carpenter and Chief of Police Shaw presented the items. Chief Shaw stated the department is fully staffed and the five new positions were originally tabled in the FY25-26 budget. He expressed that these positions are needed to fill gaps in the patrol division created by new departmental initiatives. - Representative De La Cruz asked if candidates had been identified. Chief Shaw confirmed the applicant list is active and candidates are undergoing background checks, with a target presentation to the Police Commission in early March. - Representative LePine asked for clarification on the grant requirement that officers remain employed through September 2028. Chief Shaw confirmed the condition applies to the specific hired officer, but noted the mayor's administration is focused on growing the force. - Representative Morrison clarified the position count totals for the record. - Both items were approved unanimously by a voice vote of 9-0. Perlane Lane Area Stormwater and Roadway Improvements (Items 1, 2) - F32.004 (Item 1): An additional appropriation of $2 million for the city's portion of the Perlane Lane sewer project. The funds cover stormwater infrastructure, catch basins, paving, and shared costs, representing approximately 15% of the total project cost, with 85% being WPCA sanitary sewer costs. - F32.005 (Item 2): A resolution amending the capital budget to authorize $2 million in general obligation bonds to meet the appropriation. - Testimony and Deliberation: WPCA Executive Director Sabrina Brink and Supervising Engineer Ann Brown presented. They detailed the completed work and remaining work. Remaining work includes two pump stations, service laterals on High Ridge Road, and 60 feet of force main. Completion is scheduled for June 2026. - Representative Weinberg, representing District 20 where the project is located, asked whether the appropriation would trigger additional cost-sharing for property owners. Director Brink confirmed the $2 million is strictly for city-coded costs and is excluded from the sanitary sewer cost-sharing arrangement. - Both items were approved unanimously by voice votes of 9-0. Employee Compensation Pay Plan Adjustment (Item 3) - F32.012 (Item 3): An additional appropriation of $53,438 for Employee Benefits to fund a pay plan adjustment. - Testimony and Deliberation: Bill McGuire from Finance and Bridget Fox from the Mayor's Office presented. Fox explained the adjustment was based on a compensation study commissioned by the mayor a year ago and conducted by former HR Director Al Cava. The study went through the Personnel Commission, Board of Finance, and Personnel Committee. - Approved unanimously 9-0. Utility Paving and Street Resurfacing Funding Swap (Items 4, 5, 6, 7) The committee considered a set of four interlocking items to correct the funding sources for two paving projects. The net-zero transfer moves bond funds to the Utility Paving project and LOSIP grant funds to the Street Patch and Resurfacing project. - Item 4 (F32.028): Rejection of capital project closeouts. - Item 5 (F32.029): Additional appropriation of $1,223,801.59 for Utility Paving. - Item 6 (F32.030): Additional appropriation of $1,223,801.59 for Street Patch and Resurfacing. - Item 7 (F32.031): Resolution amending the capital budget. - Testimony and Deliberation: Anthony Romano from the Office of Policy Management explained the swap was necessary because the Utility Paving project was not procured in accordance with state or federal requirements and thus cannot use the grant funds. The Street Patch project qualifies for grant funding. - Representative LePine asked if the change was neutral without penalty. Romano confirmed it is a net-zero change requiring committee approval. - Representative Weinberg asked for further details on the procurement ineligibility; Romano clarified it was related to the specific procurement method. - Representative Morrison provided procedural guidance on the rejection vote. - All four items were approved unanimously. Key Outcomes - Police Force Expansion Approved: Authorized $477,511 in combined funding to hire 5 new police officers under the COPS grant and increase the sworn force to 292. (Vote: 9-0) - Perlane Lane Infrastructure Funded: Approved $2 million in city funds and bonding for stormwater and roadway improvements. (Vote: 9-0) - Compensation Study Implemented: Approved $53,438 to fund pay plan adjustments based on a citywide study. (Vote: 9-0) - Paving Grant Corrected: Approved a $1,223,801.59 net-zero funding swap between city accounts to satisfy grant eligibility. (Vote: 9-0) - Miscellaneous Items Approved: Numerous grants and resolutions were approved for youth services, summer employment, traffic signals, historical maps, school roofing/solar, and community Wi-Fi. - Meeting Adjourned: The meeting was adjourned at 7:52 PM.

The Operations, Parks and Recreation committee of the Stamford Board of Representatives met on January 22, 2026 at 7:01 PM to review two agenda items. The primary discussion focused on the Eversource Underground Cable Modernization Project (UCMP), a major utility upgrade to replace aging transmission lines between the Glenbrook and Cedar Heights substations. The committee also heard a resolution to adjust building permit fees for large commercial projects. Chair Representative Sanford presided. A quorum was declared with Representatives Sanford, Bradford, Didalow, Finkel, Gardner, and Zachery present; Representatives Beckham and Silas were excused. Later in the meeting, Representative Zachary and Beckham joined, as well as non-committee members Representatives Morrison, Worse, Adams, and Walson. Discussion Items - OPR 32.001 – Eversource Cable Modernization Project Review Representative Didalow introduced the item, noting the project is a five-mile underground transmission line connecting the Glenbrook and Cedar Heights substations. The need arises from two 115 kV lines built in 1968 using oil-filled cable technology that is no longer supportable. The replacement uses solid cross-linked polyethylene (XLPE) cable. Construction began in December 2025 and is expected to continue through Q2 2028. Key impacts include installation of 26 large vaults (approximately 20 feet by 8 feet each) along the route, which follows streets including Duke Drive, Cedar Heights Road, High Ridge Road, Vine Road, Newfield Avenue, Strawberry Hill Avenue, Colonial Road, Pilgrim Walk, Hope Street, Schofield Avenue, Glenbrook Road, Windell Place, and Hamilton Avenue. The vaults require multi-week excavations, with two to five vaults installed concurrently. Luke Buttonweisser, city transportation planner, described traffic management plans including restrictions on work hours (starting after 9 AM, ending before 3–4 PM), summer scheduling for school zones, and coordination with emergency services. City Engineer Lewis Casolo noted that 46 excavation permits have been issued so far for testing and design work. Monthly coordination meetings are being held. Eversource representatives Glenn McDonald, Stephanie Berrios, Eric Barber, and Carlos Almiron, along with contractor Brendan Parker of United Civil, presented. They highlighted community outreach efforts including door-to-door notifications, mailed letters in English and Spanish, public information sessions, a project hotline, and a bilingual project website. Lessons learned from Danbury and Hartford projects were also discussed, including winter work restrictions and proactive community communication. - OPR 32.002 – Building Permit Fee Resolution on Commercial Projects Representative Budreau introduced a resolution to reduce building permit fees for commercial projects over $1.3 million from the current rate of $35.26 per $1,000 of construction cost to $25.26 per $1,000. The representative stated Stamford's current fee is the highest among peer cities, comparing to Norwalk ($20.26), Waterbury ($25.26), Hartford ($30.26), Bridgeport (same), and New Rochelle (approximately $17.00). The argument was that high fees increase rents for businesses and tenants, and that reducing fees is a straightforward step within the Board's authority. Public Comments & Testimony - No public comments or testimony were recorded. Key Outcomes - Eversource Project: No formal vote was taken. The committee received the presentation with appreciation and encouraged continued community outreach. The committee agreed to share the Eversource presentation and hotline information with constituents and board members. - Building Permit Fee Resolution: The committee took the matter under advisement. No vote was taken on the resolution during this meeting. The committee then approved a motion to enter executive session to discuss pending administrative claims and litigation. The motion was made and seconded, with a vote required to proceed.

The Personnel Committee of the Stamford Board of Representatives met on January 20, 2026, at 7:02 PM (hybrid format) to consider four agenda items. The committee unanimously approved an employment contract for the Assistant Chief of Police, a Clerk of the Works II contract, a third-party workers' compensation administration contract, and a revised pay plan based on a compensation study. Chair Carl Weinberg presided. All votes were 6-0. Discussion Items P32.004 – Employment Contract for Assistant Chief of Police Silas Red - Presentation: Dr. Paula Russell (HR Director) outlined a two-year initial term with a two-year extension option; annual salary at Grade 6 Step 4 ($173,529); participation in the police pension plan (not the defined contribution plan); city vehicle provided; and required exclusive employment with limited outside activities. - Discussion: - Rep. Pollock asked about differences from the prior contract; Dr. Russell noted only date, term length, and salary changed, and the employee was satisfied after negotiations. - Chair Weinberg clarified that the assistant chief cannot receive both the police pension and the defined contribution plan. - Rep. Pavia confirmed there are two assistant chiefs, and this is the second contract; the previous one was three years plus a two-year extension, while the new one is two years plus a two-year extension. - Outcome: Motion by Rep. Pollock, seconded by Rep. Pavia. Vote: 6-0 in favor. P32.006 – Clerk of the Works II Contract with Michael Cepeda - Presentation: Lou Castleow (City Engineer) explained that clerks of the works support capital projects as field inspectors and documenters. Rosemary Frager (HR) noted that City Ordinance 1082 excludes Clerk of the Works I and II from medical benefits; they are eligible for overtime over 40 hours/week with approval, and are paid from capital project budgets. The candidate, Michael Cepeda, holds a B.S. in mechanical engineering and has construction management experience; his rate is $46.23/hour. - Discussion: - Rep. Gross asked about the difference between Clerk I and II (experience level) and the rationale for excluding benefits (rooted in ordinance, historically attracting retirees with own coverage). - Rep. Taylor Cruz expressed concern that the benefit exclusion might impede recruitment, but Frager reported 65 applications for a recent posting, indicating strong interest. - Rep. Pavia asked about work hours (full-time, flexible) and workers' compensation coverage (covered by city policy). - Outcome: Motion to approve, vote: 6-0. P32.007 – Workers' Compensation Claims Administration Contract with Corvell Enterprise Claims - Presentation: David Pilva (Risk Management) presented a three-year contract with two one-year extension options for third-party administration of workers' comp claims for the city and Board of Education. Annual fees: Year 1 – $326,740; Year 2 – $321,092; Year 3 – $332,330. A $99,000 cap allows Corvell to begin services January 1, 2026, pending full board approval. Corvell was selected from four respondents due to competitive pricing and a mobile app. The city averages 500 claims/year with $8 million in payouts. - Discussion: - Rep. Pollock asked about the TPA role and the app’s benefit. - Rep. Taylor Cruz requested comparative municipal data; Pilva said Corvell can provide it. - Rep. Sallas asked about permanent disability handling; Pilva explained state formulas and legal representation. - Rep. Gross asked about claim denial rates (vast majority accepted) and reason for switching from PMA (cost and technology). - Ex-officio Rep. Morrison inquired about satisfaction with the prior TPA; Pilva confirmed confidence in Corvell’s fairness. - Chair Weinberg asked about transition challenges (familiarity with city) – mitigation steps include meetings with departments and sharing job descriptions. - Rep. Walston asked about local office (none; claims by phone/app) and start date (already started under the cap). - Outcome: Motion by Rep. Gross, seconded by Rep. Pollock. Vote: 6-0. P32.005 – Revised Pay Plan Based on Compensation Study - Presentation: Al Cava (consultant) presented a study commissioned in January 2025. The pay plan (last updated 2008) required biennial reviews. The study found Stamford’s pay plan salaries at the 33rd percentile of the municipal market, and severe internal compression: department heads earn only about 1% more than their direct reports. He recommended two 4% increases to the salary schedule on April 1, 2026 and April 1, 2027 for all full-time pay plan employees (excluding Clerk of the Works) to target the 75th percentile and address compression. The Personnel Commission and Board of Finance had already approved. - Discussion: - Chair Weinberg questioned using maximums of peer ranges rather than midpoints or actuals; Cava defended consistency and noted all Stamford pay plan employees are at maximums. - Chair Weinberg also asked about not applying a multiplier for Stamford’s broader job scopes; Cava acknowledged the idea but believed the 8% adjustment is reasonable. - Rep. Gross asked about percentile calculation; Cava explained. - Rep. Pollock supported the study, citing Stamford’s size and diversity needing competitive pay. - Chair Weinberg and others discussed potential erosion from union increases (MAA 3% vs. pay plan 2.2%) but agreed the two 4% steps provide needed headroom. Biennial reviews are recommended. - Outcome: Motion to approve, seconded. Vote: 6-0. Key Outcomes - All four agenda items were approved unanimously (6-0). - The Assistant Chief of Police contract is effective upon signing. - The Clerk of the Works II contract for Michael Cepeda is approved. - The Corvell workers’ compensation contract commenced January 1, 2026 under a $99,000 cap, with full implementation following Board of Representatives approval. - The pay plan will be revised with 4% increases on April 1, 2026 and April 1, 2027.

The Transportation Committee held its first meeting of the year on January 20, 2026, at approximately 12:30 PM UTC. The sole agenda item was the approval of a contract with Sightstream LLC to operate automated traffic enforcement safety devices (speed cameras) for the City of Stamford. Luke Buttonweiser, Transportation Planner, presented a detailed overview of the process, vendor selection, and terms of the contract. The committee voted unanimously to approve the contract. Presentation by Luke Buttonweiser - The speed camera program is authorized under Chapter 231, Article 13 of the Stamford Code of Ordinances, approved by the Board of Representatives in April 2024. - All net revenues from fines must be used for roadway and safety improvements in Stamford; funds cannot go into the general fund. - Vehicle owners (not drivers) will be ticketed for exceeding the posted speed limit by 10 mph or more. The first violation fine is $50, subsequent fines are $75, plus a $15 processing fee. - All camera locations must be approved by the Board of Representatives. - Each violation must be reviewed and approved by a City of Stamford employee before a citation is issued. - The program is managed by the Transportation, Traffic and Parking Department, not the police department. - Violations will not affect insurance or add points to a driver’s license; they are treated like parking tickets. - 14 approved camera locations (one in each direction at seven schools): Cloonan Middle School, Springdale Elementary School, Dolan and Toquam, Stamford High School, Stark School, KT Murphy, and Strawberry Hill School. - Locations were selected based on student walking percentages, crash history, presence on the Vision Zero high-injury network, and speeding issues (85th percentile speed exceeding the posted limit by 6 mph or more). - The RFP was issued approximately one year ago. Five proposals were received; three finalists were interviewed and tested with real-world deployment on Strawberry Hill Avenue. - Sightstream LLC was selected as the vendor. - The contract is for three years with three one-year extension options (maximum six years). The City is not required to return to the Board for extensions. - Fees: $1,500/month per camera installed on existing infrastructure; $2,000/month per camera requiring new infrastructure. Estimated base annual cost: approximately $336,000. - Per-paid-citation fee: first 50,000 citations = $15 each; next 50,000 = $12.50 each; subsequent = $10 each. Fees apply only to paid citations. - A 30-day warning period will be in effect when cameras are activated, with only warning tickets issued. - Signage (“Speed Limit Photo Enforced†and “Photo Enforcedâ€) will be posted. A public education campaign via social media and collaboration with Board Representatives is planned. Camera locations will be posted on Waze and Google Maps. - Cameras will operate 24/7, 365 days a year, because schools are used beyond school hours for after-school activities, sports, and community events. The decision was influenced by the death of a 16-year-old Stamford High School student hit by a car on Strawberry Hill Avenue while crossing to take the SAT. - The Board of Representatives approves only locations; changes to operating hours would not require new Board approval, but any new camera locations would need Board and Connecticut Department of Transportation (CTDOT) approval. Committee Questions and Discussion - Representative Weathers asked about citation challenge procedures, 24/7 operation, and speed thresholds. Luke confirmed challenges are handled through the vendor's portal but reviewed by a City employee; cameras operate 24/7; and citations trigger at 10 mph over the 25 mph school zone limit (35 mph). - Representative Pollicia asked whether the fee structure (scaling per citation) violated Connecticut General Statute prohibiting vendor fees from being contingent on the number of citations issued or paid. Luke responded that the City Attorney confirmed the agreement is compliant with state law. - Representative Gilbride expressed excitement about the program, noting constituent concerns about safety at Strawberry Hill Schools. She asked about the timeline: Luke estimated cameras operational before the 2026 school year (about six months). She also asked about public awareness efforts. - Vice Chair Stone attempted to ask a question about potential changes to 24/7 operation; Chair Weirs clarified that the question was about whether hours could be changed. Luke responded that the City has authority to change hours, but location changes require Board and CTDOT approval. Rep. Pollicia clarified that the current vote is only for the contract; any changes to operating times would be separate. Vote - Motion to approve the contract (T32.001) was made and seconded. - Voice vote: All committee members (8 present) voted in favor. No votes or abstentions. - The motion passed 8-0. Adjournment - The meeting adjourned after the vote.

Note: The meeting transcript indicates the hearing was called to order on Tuesday, January 13, 2026, at 6:39 p.m., but the assigned date for this summary is January 14, 2026. This discrepancy is noted. The Stamford Planning Board held a public hearing to receive comments on the recommended capital budget for fiscal year 2026-27 and the capital plan for 2027-2033. No votes or formal actions were taken; the hearing was solely for public input and board discussion. The board heard testimony from residents, representatives of nonprofit organizations, and city commissioners, focusing primarily on funding for specific projects and overall budget constraints. Written Comments Read into Record - Letter from Tony Supas, President of Dolphin Cove Association (regarding Bokushi Park): Urged funding to complete the park renovation, which was master-planned in 2017 but remains unfinished. The association represents 104 homes near the park. (Read by board member Ravi.) - Letter from the Parks and Recreation Commission (dated January 12, 2025, authored by Chair Melanie Hollis and others): Requested full funding for three items: (1) CP001281 – Rosa Hartman Park Trail System Renovation, citing lack of accessibility and overgrown trails; (2) Cove Island Park (CP400006) – tennis and basketball court improvements, noting previous funding reductions; (3) an overall needs assessment for city fields (CP001254) that includes a centrally located public indoor pool to address drowning risks and provide affordable swim lessons. The letter cited CDC drowning statistics. (Read by board member Ravi.) Public Comments & Testimony - John Gottlieb (Ripleam Corporation/Charter Oak Communities): Introduced the affordable housing request for Stamford Manor, noting the mayor requested $3 million but the board had reduced it to $2.5 million in an earlier draft, with the intent to allocate $2 million to the Stamford Manor project. - Tyra Wallace (Property Manager, Stamford Manor): Described the 215-unit building serving 80% elderly and 20% disabled residents, including those from shelters. Requested full funding for upgrades: heating, fire alarm, electrical, brickwork, accessibility, lighting, laundry, community rooms. She highlighted the building's age and need for safety and energy efficiency. - Maria Medina (Resident, Stamford Manor): (Testimony read by Tyra Wallace) – Stated she has lived there 26 years and requested new flooring, cabinets, windows, doors, appliances, plumbing, lighting, and repairs to community room and parking lot. - Wayne Escavelle (Resident, Stamford Manor): Asked for parking lot repairs, better lighting, plumbing, electrical, and overall upgrades including appliances, window frames, toilets, and exterior improvements. - Virgil de la Cruz (Board of Representatives, District 2): Advocated for completion of Bokushi Park, noting eight years of delays and $14 million allocated to other park projects while his constituents wait. He sent a copy of the master plan and a letter to the mayor. He emphasized equitable treatment. - Greg Huge (Waterside resident): Supported Mr. de la Cruz’s comments and expressed frustration about the tennis courts remaining accessible while the basketball court was dismantled and not replaced. He urged prioritizing basketball court reconstruction. - Melanie Hollis (Parks and Recreation Commission Chair): Noted that a grant has been received for the Hatchfield capital request (previously recommended for $2 million), so that funding can be reallocated. She asked the board to reconsider full funding for Cove Island Park and Rosa Hartman Park projects. - Christy Carroll (Davenport Point resident): Supported completing phase two of Bokushi Park, noting that phase one was finished. She asked for prioritization of funding. - Gene Moore (resident near Bokushi Park): Supported completing Bokushi Park and also requested funding for the Stamford Lighthouse Project, a 501(c)(3) restoration of a historic landmark on 10 acres, which would include educational programs and oyster beds. The requested amount is a small portion of total needs but would be a meaningful city commitment. - Zach Bradley (Davenport Point resident): Criticized the lack of progress at Bokushi Park, claiming $4 million spent with only a paved entrance. He cited unsafe conditions (homicides, drug use) and suggested a financial audit. He urged that the project be addressed this year or legal action may be taken. Discussion Items - Budget Overview and Safe Debt Limit: Staff member Jennifer provided context: total requests exceed $100 million, but the board is advised to target a $35 million safe debt limit (not including grants or self-funded agencies like WPCA). The Board of Finance is expected to set the limit at $35 million in February. The board discussed that this limit includes Board of Education projects. - Project Prioritization: Board member Robbie suggested allocating at least nominal funds to the Stamford Lighthouse Project and Avon Theater to allow them to start, rather than zero funding. The board noted the need to balance within the $35 million limit. - Bokushi Park Funding: The project (CP3159) is under the Engineering Department, currently in design phase. A 50% matching grant from the National Park Service is available, requiring city allocation of the remaining 50% for completion targeted in 2027. The board noted that no specific funding line appears in this year’s parks budget; staff clarified it is listed under engineering (page 62). - Parks Department Revisions: Following testimony, board members agreed to consult with the Parks and Recreation Department about adjusting their prioritized list given the new grant for Hatchfield and the public testimony. They aim to identify potential reductions to accommodate other requests. Key Outcomes - No votes or formal decisions were taken at this hearing; it was solely for receiving public input. - Next steps: The board will reconvene at its next regular meeting on January 27, 2026 (date mentioned by chair) to review revisions to the draft capital budget based on testimony and additional clarifying information from departments. - Board members were encouraged to send specific questions to departments before that meeting to gather more data. - Public comments and written letters will be included in the official record for the budget process. - The board intends to draft a transmittal letter to the mayor after the January 27 meeting.

The 30th Board of Representatives Steering Committee convened on January 12, 2026, at 7:01 p.m. to address committee reports, procedural motions, and scheduling. The meeting began with a roll call confirming a quorum and an announcement that Representatives Maureen Pollack and Stephanie Sylvestri will now hold full voting privileges due to committee consolidation. The primary agenda focused on reviewing the appointment schedules, fiscal proposals, legislative items, and personnel updates across various standing committees, alongside procedural votes regarding late submissions and item placement. Consent Calendar - No specific consent calendar items were explicitly segregated; routine motions to place committee items on upcoming agendas were handled through standard deliberation and voting processes. Public Comments & Testimony - No formal public testimony or comments from members of the public were recorded during this steering committee meeting, as the session focused on internal committee logistics and board procedures. Discussion Items - Late Submission Procedure (Late Submission S32.001): The committee debated whether to take up a late submission regarding conflicts between Board of Representatives (BOR) and DCC meeting schedules. Representative McEwen moved to consider the item. During the roll call, Representative Adams, Representative Bouchard, Representative McKewin, and Representative Shaw voted in favor, while Representatives Gardner, Hughes, Johnson, Morrison, Price, Samford, Shore, Sivestri, Weinberg, Weirs, and Zachary voted against. Representative Walston was noted as online but did not cast a vote in the record. The motion to take up the item failed (4 Yes, 11 No). Representative McEwen later clarified that the board is still getting its footing and deadlines may need flexibility. - Appointments Committee (Items A32.003–A32.010): Representative Shore presented eight appointments, including candidates for the Stanford Golf Authority, Zoning Board of Appeals, and Police Commission. The committee moved to place all eight items on the appointment agenda. - Fiscal Committee (Items F32.004, F32.005, F32.012, F32.028, F32.029, F32.030, F32.034, F32.039): Chair Zachary presented eight items totaling significant appropriations and bond authorizations, including $2.3 million for Perma Lane stormwater infrastructure, $1.2 million for utility paving, and grants for solar installations and Wi-Fi connectivity. The committee voted to place these items on the fiscal committee agenda. - Legislative and Rules Committee (Items LR32.004, LR32.005, LR32.009, LR32.010, LR32.011): Chair McEwen moved four standard items and a fifth item (LR32.011) regarding a review of the revised "Tree Ordinance" (Order 1320). Representative Camporelli clarified that the Tree Ordinance item was submitted on time but administratively omitted, rather than being a late submission. The motion to consider the Tree Ordinance review passed unanimously (15.5 Yes, 0 No). Representatives Gardner and Weinberg clarified that the ordinance is not heavily reworked and the meeting will serve as a process report/briefing rather than a final vote on substantive changes. - Personnel Committee (Items P32.004, P32.006, P32.009, P32.005): Chair Weinberg presented four items, including contracts for an Assistant Chief of Police, a Clerk of Works, and workers' compensation administration. The committee amended the language of Item P32.005 (Pay Plan Compensation Study) based on an email from the HR Director before voting to place all four items on the agenda. - Land Use, Redevelopment, and Urban Redevelopment Committee (Items LU32.001–LU32.003): Co-Chair Price presented three items regarding a Municipal Development Authority opt-in and recommendations for demolishing city-owned properties at 751 West Hill Road (Roxbury School) and 125 Roxbury Road (West Hill High School). Representative Walston raised a point of order regarding the specific address, correcting 75 West Hill Road to 751 West Hill Road. - Operations, Parks, and Recreation Committee (Item OPR32.001, Item 032.001): Chair Sanford moved two items: a review of the Eversource cable modernization project and a resolution regarding building permit fees for commercial projects exceeding $1 million. Chair Sanford requested that the Eversource item be renumbered to go first on the agenda to accommodate expected high visitor attendance. - Public Safety and Health Committee: Chair Bouchard reported that due to a procedural error, no agenda items were submitted. Representative Morrison agreed that a meeting cannot procedurally proceed without an agenda. Consequently, the Public Safety and Health Committee meeting for January was cancelled. - Community Development, Housing, Education, Social Services, State, and Commerce (CHESS) Committee: Co-Chair Pollack presented one item (CHESS32.002), an overview of city housing initiatives. Chair Pollack noted a scheduling conflict with the Legislative and Rules Committee (both meeting January 27th) and elected to hold the CHESS meeting in the Republican Caucus Room instead of the Democratic Caucus Room. - Transportation Committee: Chair Weirs presented one item (T32.001), approving a contract with Site Stream LLC for automated traffic enforcement devices. Key Outcomes - Voting Privileges: Representatives Maureen Pollack and Stephanie Sylvestri were confirmed to have full voting rights on the steering committee. - Procedural Vote Failure: The motion to take up a late submission regarding meeting schedule conflicts (S32.001) failed by a vote of 4 to 11. - Agenda Placements: The committee unanimously approved placing committee proposals for Appointments, Fiscal, Legislative/Rules, Personnel, Land Use, Operations, CHESS, and Transportation onto their respective upcoming agendas. - Meeting Cancellation: The January 29th Public Safety and Health Committee meeting was cancelled due to lack of agenda items. - Scheduling Clarifications: - The CHESS Committee meeting on January 27th will utilize the Republican Caucus Room to avoid conflict with the Legislative and Rules Committee. - Representative Walston raised concerns about concurrent committee meetings (CHESS and L&R) on the same evening, noting the difficulty of attending both. The President clarified this was an administrative oversight for the current month; future dates will be coordinated to avoid conflicts, potentially utilizing the third Monday/Tuesday schedule. - Adjournment: The meeting was adjourned at 7:50 p.m.

The City Council convened on January 6, 2026, to address committee reports, rule changes regarding committee structure, and collective bargaining negotiations. The meeting featured significant debate on merging three committees into a single entity and voting on the rejection of a tentative contract between the Board of Education and the Stamford Administrative Unit (SAU). A total of 32 representatives voted in favor of the committee merger amendment, while the vote on the SAU contract resulted in 31 votes to not reject (approve) the deal, despite a narrow vote count on the amendment. Consent Calendar - LR 32.003 Approved: The Council approved LR 32.003 as amended by the committee via voice vote. - Operations Committee Consents: Items 032.003 (amendment to Fuss and O'Neill drainage agreement) and 032.004 (sole-source contract for road maintenance equipment) were moved to consent and approved unanimously. - Minutes Approval: Minutes from the December 1st organizational meeting and the December 6th orientation meeting were approved. Public Comments & Testimony - Representative Walston: Expressed strong opposition to combining the Housing, Community Development, and Social Services committee with other groups. She argued that the Housing Committee requires "laser focused attention" and that merging it would "water down" its effectiveness. She stated she could foresee the arrangement failing within three to four months and emphasized that the committee's scope includes issues beyond just housing. Discussion Items - Committee Merger (LR 32.002): - Representative Weinberg (Proponent): Moved to amend and originally proposed merging the Education, State and Commerce, and Housing/Community Development/Social Services committees. He argued the Education committee had a "very narrow scope" and often acted as a "shadow board of education," while the State and Commerce committee was "completely unnecessary" as it met fewer than five times in two and a half years. He posited that combining them would allow the Housing committee to maintain its critical focus. - Representative Sanford (Proponent): Expressed support for combining State and Commerce with Housing, citing the "housing crisis" as a "statewide issue" intertwined with state policy implementation. He agreed that combining the committees made the most sense. - Representative Pollack (Proponent): Stated she was "willing to give it a shot" as a co-chair, acknowledging the merits of the proposal. She committed to bringing the issue forward if the combined committee proved unmanageable, arguing that separating them would defeat the purpose. - Representative Walston (Opponent): Voted against the merger. She argued that the Housing Committee was not just about housing and that adding other committees would make it difficult for citizens to engage. She stated, "I don't think we need to mix any any kind of committee for this" and felt the current structure served the needs of representatives and property managers better. - Representative Delacruz (SAU Contract): Opposed supporting the tentative collective bargaining agreement for the Stamford Administrative Unit (SAU). She highlighted that salary levels were "at or above the median" for other districts and that the third-year increase of 3.5% was too high. She argued that statements on record did not support the notion that the contract would help attraction or retention and cited concerns about underfunded pension obligations. - Representative Gross (SAU Contract): Opposed rejecting the SAU contract. He noted that the Council is not a party to the negotiations and emphasized the need to retain current administrators against "aggressive competition" from other districts paying higher salaries. - Representative Walston (SAU Contract): Agreed with Representative Delacruz, stating she would vote to reject the contract because "high salary is not good" and citing past failures associated with high salaries. - Chair Weinberg (SAU Contract): Expressed support for the tentative agreement (voting not to reject). He cited the additional cost of $146,000 over three years as "de minimis" (less than 0.5% of the budget context) and argued that the risk of retention problems outweighed the minimal savings from arbitration. Key Outcomes - Committee Merger Amendment Passed: The amendment to merge the Education, State and Commerce, and Housing/Community Development/Social Services committees passed with 32 ayes and 6 nays. The combined committee was renamed "Community Development, Housing, Education, Social Services, State and Commerce" with the acronym "CHES" (pronounced "chess"), though Representative Walston expressed a preference for "Housing" to be listed first. - LR 32.003 Approved: The rule regarding the committee structure was approved as amended. - SAU Contract Vote: The motion to reject the tentative collective bargaining agreement for the Stamford Administrative Unit (SAU) was defeated (rejected). - Vote Tally: 2 Yes (to reject), 31 No (to approve), 2 Abstentions. - Result: The contract remains in place and is approved by the Council. - LUC 32.001 Recommitted: The item to opt into the Connecticut Municipal Development Authority (CMDA) was recommitted to the steering committee for a future public hearing. - Adjournment: The meeting was adjourned at 12:24 a.m. Committee Reports (No Action Taken) - Land Use/Urban Redevelopment: Recommended recommitting the CMDA item to steering. - Public Safety and Health: Received a satisfactory overview of the office by Lou Deribus. - Parks and Recreation, Education, Housing/Community Development, Transportation, State and Commerce: No meetings held; no reports filed.

The Stanford Board of Representatives convened to consider three major agenda items involving veto overrides of ordinances passed by the 31st Board, alongside routine committee reports. The primary discussions centered on a new comprehensive tree ordinance and a ban on pet store sales, both vetoed by Mayor Simmons. While many representatives expressed strong support for the moral and environmental principles behind the ordinances, a significant portion of the board, supported by legal counsel and analysis cited by the Majority Leader, prioritized adherence to state preemption laws and fiscal responsibility regarding potential litigation costs for taxpayers. Procedural discussions regarding the timing of the tree ordinance vote and the restructuring of standing committees also occurred before the board concluded its business without overriding any vetoes. Consent Calendar - Approved F32.001 through F32.025, including appropriations for vehicle replacements, stormwater infrastructure, solar projects, and port security grants. - Approved LR32.006 regarding lobbying services for Sustainable Strategies Inc. - Referred LR32.004 and LR32.005 to the Steering Committee (failed to pass as consent). - Approved LR32.001 regarding rules of order amendments for Operations, Parks, and Recreation (passed as amended). - Failed to recommit LR32.001 to committee; voted to approve the committee's recommendation to merge Operations and Parks & Recreation oversight committees. Public Comments & Testimony - Tree Ordinance Supporters: Over 100 emails and public testimony highlighted the need for tree equity, referencing data showing South, West, and East sides of Stanford have residents living 11 years less on average due to lack of trees. Testimony emphasized that trees combat global warming, reduce the urban heat island effect, and align with the 2035 Comprehensive Plan and the city's green infrastructure executive order. - Pet Store Ban Supporters: Attendees held signs and spoke passionately about animal cruelty in puppy mills, stating that these operations prioritize profit over welfare. Testimony included personal stories of losing rescued dogs to poor conditions and arguments that the vote was a moral imperative regardless of legal risks. - Legal Concerns: Public and Board members voiced concern about the financial risk to taxpayers from potential lawsuits if the city passes ordinances they believe are preempted by state law. Some speakers noted that while legal opinions exist, the city could become the test case for municipal authority in these areas. Discussion Items - Tree Ordinance Override (Ordinance 1320): - Support: Representatives Camporelli and Delacruz argued the ordinance was the result of three years of work, extensive public input, and alignment with the city's Comprehensive Plan. They emphasized that the ordinance addresses environmental justice, noting that poorer neighborhoods suffer most from heat and pollution. - Opposition/Concern: Representatives Weinberg, Hughes, Goldberg, and Majority Leader Morrison opposed the override, arguing the ordinance is "over-engineered" (Goldberg) or creates unnecessary burdens on housing development (Hughes). Legal concerns were raised regarding the Tree Commission's power to designate "legacy trees" and the requirement for public hearings on all removal proposals. - Procedural Motion: Representative Weathers moved to postpone the vote to the next meeting to allow for further deliberation; Representative McEwan and others clarified that a motion to postpone does not allow for amendments to the ordinance text, only a simple up-or-down vote on the current version at a future date. The motion to postpone failed (2 yes, 36 no, 1 abstention). - Pet Store/Vetoes (Ordinance 1321): - Support: Representatives Camporelli, Pavia, and McEwen argued the city has the authority to ban puppy mills and that delaying action allows animal cruelty to continue. They cited external legal opinions offering pro bono defense and compared the situation to past legal victories (e.g., Lifetime Fitness). - Opposition/Concern: Representatives Weinberg, Finkel, Goldberg, Morrison, and Didalo opposed the override, citing Corporation Counsel's opinion that the city lacks the authority to ban pet sales due to state preemption regarding licensing. They argued the city should not gamble with taxpayer money on a potential lawsuit that could have undefined financial costs, suggesting instead to push for state-level legislation. - Committee Restructuring (LR32.001): - Debate: A proposal to merge the Operations Committee and Parks & Recreation Committee into a single committee was introduced to improve efficiency. Proponents (Representatives Sanford, Goldberg) argued it aligns board oversight with administrative reporting structures and reduces meeting time. - Counter-Arguments: Opponents (Representatives Adams, Graham) argued that combining the committees would create bottlenecks if one administrator was absent and that the volume of items would be unmanageable. A motion to recommit the item to committee failed (9 yes, 28 no, 1 abstention). Key Outcomes - Tree Ordinance Veto Override: FAILED (3 YES, 33 NO, 1 PASS). The board upheld the Mayor's veto. - Pet Store Ban Veto Override: FAILED (16 YES, 20 NO, 1 PASS). The board upheld the Mayor's veto. - Ordinance 1326 and 1325 Veto: No action was taken, effectively upholding the Mayor's vetoes by default. - Committee Reorganization: The board approved the amendment to merge Operations and Parks & Recreation oversight committees under the Legislative and Rules Committee (LR32.001) as reported out by committee. - Next Steps: The Tree Ordinance and Pet Store Ban may be reintroduced by the board or administration in future sessions. The new merged committee structure is set to begin oversight duties.