Public Meetings - Stamford, Connecticut

This meeting, convened by President Shaw at 7:02 PM on Monday, February 9th, 2026 per the transcript, involved the scheduling of standing committee meetings and the placement of items on February 2026 committee agendas. The meeting date specified by the agenda system is February 10, 2026, creating a discrepancy with the transcript's stated date. The meeting adjourned at 7:56 PM. Consent Calendar - No separate consent calendar was presented; all items were moved individually or in groups by committee chairs. Public Comments & Testimony - No public comments or testimony were taken during this procedural meeting. Discussion Items - Appointments Committee (Co-Chair Shore): Moved nine appointments to the agenda, including reappointments to the Golf Commission, Zoning Board of Appeals, Board of Ethics, Zoning Board, and the Zoning Board Alternate. The motion carried unanimously. - Fiscal Committee (Chair Morrison): Presented ten items for the agenda, including: - F32.043: $50,945 for law department wage settlements. - F32.044: $650,000 for snow removal salt. - F32.045 and F32.047: Additional appropriation of $144,686,112 for the West Hill High School Replacement Project (total project budget $446 million; 80% state-funded, 20% city-funded via bonding). - Several grants and corresponding resolutions. - Discussion included questions about the funding breakdown and project scope. The motion carried unanimously. - Legislative and Rules Committee (Chair McEwen): Moved four items to the agenda: an ordinance on private road acceptance, a prototype lease for the Lathan Wider Community Center, an agreement with Corvell Enterprise Claims Inc., and an amendment to board rules on personal attacks. Items LR32.011 (tree ordinance) and LR32.014 (AI biometric technology) were placed on the pending agenda after discussion. Motion carried. - Personnel Committee (Chair Weinberg): Moved P32.008 (rejection item for assistant corporation counsel union settlement) and P32.003 (review of classification systems) from pending to the February 17 meeting agenda. Motion carried. - Land Use and Urban Redevelopment Committee (Co-Chair Hughes): Moved LU32.004 (acceptance of North Ridge Road) and, after debate, added LU32.005 (review of owner-occupied home rehabilitation assistance program) upon request by Representative Adams. The latter was initially intended for pending but moved to the agenda after discussion. Motion carried. - Operations, Parks and Recreation Committee (Chair Sanford): Moved OPR32.002 (building permit fees on commercial projects over $1M) and OPR32.003 (excavation permits ordinance) to the agenda. Items OPR32.004 (swimming priority update) and OPR32.005 (zoning city-owned park properties) were placed on pending. Representative Delacruz advocated for the swimming item, citing drowning prevention, but Chair Sanford stated there was no funding or action possible. Motion carried. - Public Safety and Health Committee (Chair Bouchard): Moved two review items to the agenda: an overview of the Stamford Department of Health and Human Services and an overview of the Stamford Emergency Communication Center. Motion carried. - Community Development, Housing, Education, Social Services and State & Commerce Committee (CHESS): No items were submitted. A conflict was noted regarding meeting date (agenda shows February 17, but calendar shows February 24); staff will correct. - Transportation Committee (Chair Wirth): Because the item was submitted late, a two-thirds roll call vote was taken to consider T32.002 (overview of Transportation, Traffic and Parking Department). The vote was unanimous (all present voted yes). The item was then moved to the agenda and carried. - Approval of Minutes: A motion was made and seconded to place the approval of the February 2, 2026 regular board meeting minutes on the next agenda. Carried. Key Outcomes - All moved agenda items were approved for placement on their respective committee agendas without opposition. - The West Hill High School Replacement Project appropriation of $144,686,112 (with $36,171,528 in city bonds) was advanced to the Fiscal Committee meeting on February 23. - The tree ordinance and AI biometric technology ordinance were placed on the legislative pending agenda. - The swimming priority review and the zoning of city-owned parks were placed on the operations pending agenda. - The transportation department overview was added to the Transportation Committee agenda for February 17.

The Stamford Zoning Board held a regular meeting on February 10, 2026, at 6:30 PM via Zoom. The board approved a general development plan for a bathhouse (application 225-375) with conditions, discussed multiple outstanding items for future meetings, and addressed the continuation of a contentious application (225-48) related to Palmer Hill. The meeting also covered updates on engineering reports, comment deadlines from various city agencies, and the status of other pending projects.

Note on date: The transcript indicates the meeting was held on February 9, 2026, but the instruction specifies the date as February 10, 2026. This summary uses the provided date; the discrepancy is noted. The Stamford Zoning Board met on February 10, 2026, at 6:37 PM (via Zoom) to hear four public hearing applications. Chair David Stein presided. The meeting adjourned after 11:00 PM without taking any final votes on the applications; all items were either closed pending further information or continued to a later date. Public Comments & Testimony - Application 225-37 (Bath House): - Supporters: Cody Heisinger (181 Brookdale Road) spoke in favor of the wellness concept and design; Marie Roca (100 Tressor Boulevard) supported the health-oriented use and dismissed associations with brothels. - Opponents: Barry Michelson (Idlewood Drive) argued the use is non-conforming and cited historical concerns; Sue Halpern (30 Elmcroft Road) raised noise from rooftop pool/bar; John DeRosa (62 Elmcroft Road) opposed design and clientele; Vinny Montemuro (256 Washington Boulevard) requested a noise study; Michael Falvey (256 Washington) questioned the need for a special permit due to alcohol and pool; Dave Adams (Clipper Road) felt the location inappropriate; Matt Kruchkewitz (256 Washington) alleged undisclosed cryptocurrency mining and water discharge issues; Aaron Williams (256 Washington) voiced noise concerns; Monica Twal (37 Hanrahan Street) condemned the moral impact; Salvatore Zarella (waterside) questioned the adult-only nature and alcohol. - Application 225-39 (Mosque): - Supporters: Regina Begum (Strawberry Hill) cited local attendance and carpooling; Jamal Ahmed (Stanford) mentioned staggered prayers to reduce traffic; Furkan Ahmed (210 Fifth Street) noted multiple mosques spread the load; Farhan Memon (CAIR-CT chair) referenced RLUIPA provisions; Mustafa Ahmed (14 Howard Avenue) clarified the mosque does not replace the Exit 6 site. - No opposition speakers were recorded; Monica Twal attempted to speak but was cut off for religious references. - Application 225-46 (St. John Towers): - Supporters: Brittany Lawrence (Washington Boulevard area) asked questions about affordability and vouchers; Michael Moore (president of Stamford Downtown) expressed support for affordable housing and pedestrian connectivity; Marie Roca (100 Tressor Boulevard) endorsed the project as an upgrade. - Opponents: Monica Twal (37 Hanrahan Street) criticized architecture and traffic impacts; Sue Halpern (30 Elmcroft Road) worried about delivery truck congestion and relocation of current tenants. - Application 225-48 (Daycare): - Opponents: Attorney Phil Pierce (representing the 77 Havemeyer condominium association) raised concerns about inadequate traffic and drainage studies, and insufficient legal access rights. He requested denial without prejudice. The association provided peer reviews from Simco Engineering and Tig & Bond. Discussion Items - 225-37 (Bath House): - Applicant (Attorney Lisa Feinberg) presented revised facades with increased window transparency (17% to 42% on Washington Boulevard, 3% to 44% on north), added landscape buffer on west, and offered weeping juniper rooftop plantings. Co-founder Travis Talmadge explained Bitcoin miners are used as pool heaters (not a data center) and emphasized no noise issues at their Williamsburg location. Applicant agreed to condition requiring a noise study and compliance with noise ordinance. - Board members (Bill Morris, Rosanne McManus, Jerry Bozak) praised the improvements. Chair David Stein asked about music; applicant confirmed low-decibel background music only. Board discussed conditions for rooftop planting plan. - 225-39 (Mosque): - Applicant (Peter Sakora) showed revised site plan with 29 parking spaces (10% over code) and valet for 44 spaces, plus a light map indicating no off-site light pollution. He noted the mosque will serve about 115 individuals, with staggered prayer times to manage peak parking. - Board members expressed concerns about parking during high holidays and congestion on Lockwood Avenue. Applicant committed to exploring off-site parking and implementing parking management strategies with quarterly reporting for first year. Board accepted a condition for a future planting plan. - 225-46 (St. John Towers): - Applicant (Raymond Mazio, Redness & Mead) presented an all-affordable 305-unit building (12 stories) with 306 parking spaces (93 off-site in Atlantic Station garage), new pedestrian through-block connection, and extensive landscaping. Public amenity space includes indoor/outdoor courtyards and playground. - Board members discussed parking assignment (unassigned), delivery access (loading area on east side), relocation of current tenants (less than 50% occupancy; priority return for eligible tenants), and need for separate Transportation Demand Management Plan (TDMP) and Parking Management Plan (PMP). The board requested revisions to landscaping plans with native species and street tree calculations. - Project developers (Heritage Housing) confirmed all units are LIHTC-eligible (30% to 80% AMI), with 31 units at 30% AMI, 120 at 50%, and 123 at 60%. No project-based vouchers; voucher holders welcome. No supportive services planned for lowest-income units. - 225-48 (Daycare): - Applicant (Rick Redness, Redness & Mead) presented plans for a 220-child daycare facility, with adaptive reuse of existing building. He highlighted drainage improvements (29% peak flow reduction in a 25-year storm) and traffic impacts (19 cars in PM peak hour). He expressed frustration that the neighborhood association's peer reviews were submitted late and without prior coordination. - Lead attorney for the opposition (Phil Pierce) argued the project fails site plan standards due to inadequate traffic analysis (understated trips, improper pass-by credits), drainage deficiencies (undermodeled), and insufficient legal access rights under the private deed covenant. The board did not discuss details and continued the hearing to the next meeting. Key Outcomes - No final approvals were granted for any of the four applications. - 225-37 (Bath House): Public hearing closed; board indicated favorable reception but deferred vote pending final conditions (noise study, planting plan). - 225-39 (Mosque): Public hearing closed; board requested updated parking management plan and separate TDMP before vote. - 225-46 (St. John Towers): Public hearing closed; board required separate TDMP and PMP, revised landscaping plans, and awaited WPCA comments before scheduling a vote. - 225-48 (Daycare): Public hearing opened but immediately continued to the next meeting (date not specified) to allow review of newly submitted opposition materials and additional traffic/drainage analyses. Next steps: Staff and applicants will provide additional documentation; the board will resume hearings on pending items at a future meeting.

The Stamford Planning Board convened on February 4, 2026, for its regular meeting (originally scheduled for January 27 and rescheduled). The board approved minutes, finalized a $49.9 million capital budget recommendation, authorized a supplemental appropriation for the West Hill High School replacement project, and acted on two subdivisions and several zoning board referrals. The meeting lasted approximately three hours. Consent Calendar - Minutes of December 22, 2025: Approved unanimously (members present: Jennifer, Jeremy, Ravi, Chet). - Minutes of January 13, 2026 (Capital Budget Public Hearing): Approved unanimously (members present: Jennifer, Jeremy, Ravi, Bill, Chet). Public Comments & Testimony - Mary Lou Rinaldi (volunteer, neighbor of Our Lady of Grace Preschool) spoke in support of the school’s special permit and variance application. She noted the school maintains a waiting list of 40–50 children annually and that the proposed interior renovations would address a community need for quality daycare in Stamford. Discussion Items - Capital Budget Review & Recommendation: Chair Jennifer presented a revised draft capital budget incorporating feedback from city departments and the January 13 public hearing. The board is guided to a safe debt limit of $35 million for city bonding, but recommended a total project list of $68,710,050, with $49,935,050 in city bonds, using five priority tiers. Key changes included increasing funding for Board of Education projects (e.g., AITE, Newfield Fresh Air, Ripple WAM HVAC) to secure state matching, and adjusting for Hatchfield Park after receipt of a $2 million grant. The board decided not to fund the Avon Theater and Stamford Harbor Lighthouse projects (tier 5) this year, but planned to include out-year projections in the transmittal letter. Members discussed the need to balance affordability with departmental long-term plans, particularly given upcoming large expenses for Westhill High School. A motion to approve the budget recommendation passed unanimously. - West Hill High School Replacement – Supplemental Capital Project (CP 1471): Katherine (BOE), Director Kinun, and Adam Levitis (Colliers) presented. The total project budget is $446 million, with 80% state reimbursement; local share is $36 million (5% retainage). The request increases prior authorization to align with state legislation passed in summer 2025. Construction is out to bid (bids open February 11), with groundbreaking targeted for April 13, 2026. The board questioned contingencies and the difference between total project budget ($446M) and estimated construction GMP ($400M). The board approved the $144,686,112 supplemental authorization unanimously. - Subdivision 4056 – 6 Sanford Lane (Giuliano Denino): Attorney Joseph Capalbo presented a two-lot subdivision on a 0.586-acre corner lot (R10 zone). The existing structure will be demolished; both resulting lots will be conforming with access from Sanford Lane and Newfield Avenue. Discussion focused on a traffic department recommendation to rebuild the sidewalk along Newfield Avenue to city standards. The board debated requiring a concrete sidewalk vs. maintaining existing asphalt, and considered a fee-in-lieu option. Ultimately, the board voted unanimously to approve as-is with the city's recommendation, leaving further discussions to the applicant and city. - Subdivision 4060 – 34 Conandrias Drive (Lucas and Georgia Conandreas): Dr. Lucas Conandreas proposed subdividing a 3.23-acre parcel to build a home for his son. City departments (EPB and Engineering) addressed neighbor concerns about stormwater runoff by requiring enhanced erosion control and drainage plans. The board approved the subdivision unanimously, including EPB's conditions. - ZBA Referral – St. John Urban Development Corp., 109 Tressor Blvd (Special Permit): Ray Masio (Redniss & Mead) presented a 305-unit all-affordable apartment building (two towers) with two levels of parking. The board had previously recommended approval of the general development plan in June 2025. The current special permit request is for an alternative public amenity design: a 10-foot-wide through-block pedestrian connection (instead of the required 20 ft width and 12 ft height) plus a fee-in-lieu fallback. The board discussed the narrowness and height constraints under the building, but acknowledged the project's value as affordable housing. A motion to approve the special permit carried 3-0-1 (Ravi abstained). - ZBA Referral – 75 West Broad Street (Hui Hua Enterprises): Ray Masio presented a proposal to reconstruct two existing nonconforming buildings (Matthews Bakery and laundromat) into one unified building with two residential units (down from three) and improved streetscape. Variances sought include setbacks, building coverage, floor area, parking (3 spaces vs. 12 required), and parking setback. Board members praised the design and noted consistency with the Comprehensive Plan. Approved unanimously. - ZBA Referral – Our Lady of Grace Preschool, 2627 Glenbrook Road: Dan Chappell (Carmody Torrance) presented a special permit and variance application to convert an adjacent single-family home into two preschool classrooms. Variances include parking location, landscape buffer, and bicycle parking (zero spaces requested). The board supported the proposal but added a condition to formalize indoor bicycle storage in the basement if demand arises. Approved unanimously. - ZBA Referral – 88 Maltby Avenue (Philip and Janice Spadaro): The applicants seek variances for front setback (19.6 ft vs. 40 ft required) and front street center setback (27.5 ft vs. 65 ft) to demolish and rebuild a single-family home on a corner lot. Approved unanimously. Key Outcomes - Capital Budget Recommendation: Approved (unanimous) a capital budget totaling $68,710,050, with $49,935,050 in city bonds, to be transmitted to the mayor with priority tiers and explanatory letter. - West Hill High School: Supplemental authorization of $144,686,112 approved unanimously, raising total project authorization to $446 million (80% state reimbursement). Bids opening February 11; GMP expected mid-March; construction start April 13. - Subdivision 4056 (Sanford Lane): Approved unanimously with traffic department's sidewalk recommendation noted; applicant to continue discussions with city. - Subdivision 4060 (Conandrias Drive): Approved unanimously with EPB conditions including enhanced erosion control and stormwater management. - St. John Urban Development (109 Tressor): Special permit for alternate public amenity space approved 3-0-1 (Ravi abstained). - 75 West Broad Street Variances: Approved unanimously. - Our Lady of Grace Special Permit & Variances: Approved unanimously with condition for indoor bicycle parking if needed. - 88 Maltby Avenue Variances: Approved unanimously. Note: The meeting date is recorded as February 4, 2026 per the meeting request, though the transcript refers to "February 3rd regular meeting." This discrepancy is noted.

The Board of Representatives met on Monday, February 2, 2026, at 7:35 PM in a hybrid format. The meeting opened with an invocation, roll call (36 members present, quorum established), moments of silence, and community announcements. The public comment period featured four speakers addressing proposed amendments to board rules on public comment, a call for charter revision to promote housing development, and a request for bicycle safety equipment for students. The board then considered reports from standing committees, with significant debate and multiple amendments to items LR 32.005 and LR 32.010 regarding public comment rules, and a resolution urging a state ban on pet store sales of dogs, cats, and rabbits. Numerous consent agenda items were approved, and the meeting adjourned at 9:00 PM. Consent Calendar - Appointments Committee: Approved all eight appointments/reappointments (Golf Authority, Zoning Board of Appeals, alternates, Police Commission) by voice vote. - Fiscal Committee: Approved items 1–3 and 5–18 by voice vote (items 1–3: appropriations for stormwater improvements, capital budget, operating employees; items 5–18: various grants, agreements, and budget amendments). Item 4 (F32.028, rejection of capital project closeout recommendations) was taken separately: the board voted unanimously (one abstention) against the rejection, meaning the closeouts were effectively approved. - Legislative and Rules Committee: Approved LR 32.004 (ordinance allowing city to accept right-of-way by two-thirds petition) by voice vote. - Personnel Committee: Approved four items: employment contract for Assistant Chief of Police (P32.004), contract for Clerk of the Works (P32.006), workers compensation claims administration contract (P32.007), and revised pay plan (P32.005) — all by voice vote (noted abstentions on items two, three, and four). - Land Use and Urban Redevelopment Committee: Approved three items by voice vote: opting into the Connecticut Municipal Development Authority (L32.001), demolition of structures at 751 West Hill Road (L32.002), and donation of 125 Black Rock Road (L32.003). - Transportation Committee: Approved contract with Mainstream RLC for automated traffic enforcement (T32.001) by voice vote. - Minutes: Approved the January 5, 2026 regular meeting minutes by voice vote. Public Comments & Testimony - Kieran Edmondson (Water Sign neighborhood resident): Urged the board to purchase helmets and bicycles for Stamford public school students attending summer adventure camp, emphasizing safety and the importance of outdoor activities. He referenced item 32.032 (not on this agenda but mentioned) as a potential funding source. - Gina Calabries: Opposed proposed rules (LR 32.005 and 32.010) requiring speakers to sign up ahead of time and restricting “personal attacks,” calling them anti-democratic and potentially unconstitutional. She questioned whether the board had consulted corporation counsel and warned that such restrictions would suppress constituent voices. - Dave Adams (Glenbrook resident): Echoed opposition, arguing that considering both LR 32.005 and 32.010 simultaneously violated legislative process due to overlapping language. He criticized the “personal attack” provision as vague and warned it could stifle legitimate criticism, referencing past incidents. He also expressed frustration that the board was not listening to public opinion on speed cameras. - Arthur Gaskin (downtown resident): Encouraged the board to initiate a charter revision committee to enshrine pro-housing policies. He argued that election data over eight years shows public support for housing development, and proposed giving the board power to approve land use projects when average housing costs in a neighborhood exceed 30% of median income. He criticized the mayor for inaction and urged the board to lead. Discussion Items - LR 32.005 – Amendment to Board Rules on Public Comment: Rep. Weinberg proposed amendments: changing the sign-up deadline from 4:00 PM to 6:00 PM, allowing speakers to optionally provide city/town of residence and board district “if known,” and enabling the president to allow unregistered speakers if time remains and they were unaware or unable to meet the sign-up requirement. A floor amendment (by Rep. Adams?) modified the last clause to “was either unaware of and could not meet the sign-up requirement.” After debate, the Weinberg amendments passed 31–5 (roll call). The amended LR 32.005 then passed 31 in favor, 2 opposed, 3 abstentions. - LR 32.010 – Another Board Rules Amendment: Motion to suspend rules to consider out of order passed. A motion to divide the question (separating the “personal attacks will be considered disruptive conduct” subsection from the rest) was approved by voice vote with one abstention. The main body of the rule (excluding the personal attack clause) was then approved with one abstention. The personal attack subsection was recommitted to the Steering Committee by a vote of 34–2. - LR 32.009 – Resolution Urging State Ban on Pet Store Sales: Rep. Weinberg moved to amend the resolution’s language to read “urging the Connecticut General Assembly to enact a state wide ban on the sale of dogs, cats, rabbits or other animals.” The amendment passed by voice vote. The amended resolution then passed unanimously by voice vote. Reps. Collar and Cullen were thanked for their work. - LR 32.011 – Comprehensive Tree Ordinance: The committee recommended this item to the Steering Committee for a public hearing; the board approved that recommendation by voice vote. Key Outcomes - All consent agenda items were approved as listed. - Item F32.028 (rejection of capital project closeouts) failed; the board’s vote effectively approved the closeouts. - LR 32.005 passed as amended (31–2–3). - LR 32.010: the main portion was approved; the personal attack subsection was recommitted to Steering (34–2). - LR 32.009 passed as amended. - LR 32.011 recommended to Steering. - The public comment period lasted approximately 30 minutes with four speakers. - Meeting adjourned at 9:00 PM.

Date: January 28, 2026 (starting at approximately 7:25 PM) Purpose: Interview and vote on appointments to the Stanford Golf Authority, Zoning Board of Appeals, and Police Commission. Discussion Items Stanford Golf Authority Appointment - Angelo Rapegno was interviewed for a term expiring December 1, 2028. He shared insights on golf course operations and expressed support for the city's golf programs. No questions from the board raised concerns; the tone was supportive. Zoning Board of Appeals Appointments - Alan Ben Zakin (regular member) and Ernest Maharasso (alternate) were interviewed. Both candidates discussed their backgrounds and commitment to fair zoning decisions. No substantive questions or objections were raised. Police Commission Appointments (Five Candidates) All candidates interviewed for terms expiring December 1, 2029: 1. Mary Fidely (new appointment) – Former Board of Representatives member (30 years). Expressed strong support for increasing police staffing, community policing, and the Behavioral Health Unit. She emphasized fairness, transparency, and following proper processes when handling citizen complaints. Her father was a Stamford police officer. She stated she would advocate for additional funding if needed. 2. Carlo Leon (reappointment) – Served one year on the commission. Praised the professionalism of the police department and the use of technology (drones, cameras). Supported expanding the Behavioral Health Unit and increasing officer numbers. Addressed privacy concerns about drones, stating the commission oversees proper use. 3. Roberto Aviero (reappointment) – Served four years. Highlighted community engagement, including his involvement after a fatal accident on Washington Boulevard in 2022, which helped cancel a planned protest. He emphasized following policies and procedures for drone and surveillance use. Expressed support for technology but would review costs. 4. Rodney Bass (reappointment) – Former school principal and PAL executive director. Emphasized homegrown officers, the importance of school resource officers, and community policing with physical substations. He advised redirecting citizen complaints to proper channels. He supported expanding the police force and the academy. 5. Michael Fidel (reappointment) – Current commission chair (4 years). Discussed drone program (launched from dispatch, three drones), heat sensing, and real-time response. Addressed facial recognition and AI – the department does not currently use them beyond common tools. He stressed that new units (drones, behavioral health) pull officers from patrol, necessitating more hires. He noted the police force is under 300 officers, down from over 300 years ago, despite city growth. Board of Representatives Discussion (Post-Interviews) - Representative Weathers proposed a board tour of the police department to see all units (drones, K9, bomb, etc.) after her personal visit with her son. She also raised concerns about lack of enforcement of city ordinances (e.g., trucks on lawns) and suggested patrol officers could issue citations. Representative Morrison supported the tour and suggested the Public Safety Committee take up enforcement issues. Representative Pavia praised all candidates and expressed support for the nominations. Key Outcomes - All appointments were approved unanimously by voice vote (8-0-0, as counted by the chair). No opposed or abstentions recorded. - Appointments approved: - Stanford Golf Authority: Angelo Rapegno (term to 2028) - Zoning Board of Appeals: Alan Ben Zakin (regular), Ernest Maharasso (alternate) - Police Commission: Mary Fidely (new), Carlo Leon (reappointment), Roberto Aviero (reappointment), Rodney Bass (reappointment), Michael Fidel (reappointment) – all terms to December 1, 2029. - The board will hold a formal vote on these recommendations at the next full Board of Representatives meeting (Monday, date not specified). - Discussion acknowledged the need for future tours of the police department and further review of ordinance enforcement. Meeting adjourned.

The Appointments Committee of the Stamford City Council met on January 28, 2026, at 6:33 PM to interview candidates for the Stanford Golf Authority and the Zoning Board of Appeals. Co-Chair Gardner called the meeting to order with a quorum present. The committee interviewed three applicants and will vote as a group later that evening before forwarding recommendations to the full board on the following Monday. Stanford Golf Authority Appointment - Applicant (identified as Mr. Rapigno in the transcript) expressed strong interest in serving on the Stanford Golf Authority, specifically for Sterling Farms, where he worked as a teenager. He currently serves on the E. Gaynor Brennan board but is stepping aside. - He identified the primary area for improvement as the tee time reservation system, describing the software as dated and not user-friendly, and advocated for modernization including contactless payment options to attract younger golfers. - He acknowledged the challenge of balancing demand, noting Sterling Farms is a highly rated municipal course with significant out-of-town play. He suggested potentially limiting out-of-town tee times or increasing their fees, but recognized the financial benefit of non-resident revenue. - He emphasized patience and the slower pace of government decision-making, learned from his service on the E. Gaynor Brennan board. - Committee members questioned him about the software issue, pricing balance, and the responsibilities of a public course versus a private club. Zoning Board of Appeals Appointment (Alan Venzinkin) - Alan Venzinkin, a first-time applicant, stated his motivation to make government more efficient and responsive. He has a background in physics and technology, and founded a successful remote startup in Stamford. - He read the city's master plan and zoning guidelines, and expressed comfort with the zoning board of appeals' role in granting variances based on hardships. - He emphasized logical, data-driven decision-making and the ability to balance business, personal, and community interests. He noted the opportunity to repurpose empty corporate buildings for residential use. - Committee members asked about his qualifications and approach to difficult decisions with competing merits. Zoning Board of Appeals Alternate Reappointment (Ernest Manrosso) - Ernest Manrosso, an alternate since 2003, reapplied to continue in that role. He purposely chose the alternate position to maintain flexibility while attending meetings regularly once a month. - He described the board as one of Stanford's best, making decisions apolitically based on zoning hardships. He noted the emotional nature of many hearings, from both homeowners and corporate entities represented by law firms. - He explained his approach to balancing competing interests, particularly between homeowners and neighbors, by considering all presentations independently and not setting precedents. - Committee members praised his experience and conflict-resolution skills, and he expressed continued satisfaction with his service. Key Outcomes - The committee will vote on all three appointments later that evening. Recommendations will be forwarded to the full board for a vote on the following Monday. - No public comments or objections were made during the meeting.

This meeting of the Community Development, Housing, Education, Social Services, and State and Commerce (CHESS) Committee was held on January 27, 2026, to receive a broad overview of the City of Stamford’s housing services and planning functions. Presenters included Sharona Cowan, Housing Services Director, and Emily Gordon, Housing Planner. The committee discussed affordable housing terminology, the Fair Rent Commission, the Below Market Rate (BMR) program, and the Affordable Housing Trust Fund. No votes were taken; the meeting was informational. Discussion Items Housing Services Overview (Sharona Cowan) - Sharona Cowan, an employee of the city for 19 years and Housing Services Director for nearly two years, presented on her department’s work within the Department of Health and Human Services. She clarified key terms: affordable housing (priced at about 30% of income), income-based housing (e.g., Section 8, LIHTC), Area Median Income (AMI) (based on the WestCOG region, which includes 18 municipalities from Bethel to Wilton), and cost burden (paying more than 30% of income, with extreme cost burden at 50%). - Cowan outlined four main content areas: housing literacy, landlord engagement, the Fair Rent program, and landlord-tenant complaints. She noted that the Fair Rent Commission, required for municipalities over 15,000 residents, has been active since the 1970s. The process for a complaint involves intake, attempt at mediation, and if unresolved, a hearing before the five-member commission, whose decisions can be appealed to superior court. She also discussed a landlord survey with low response, but interest in compliance support, resources, and loss mitigation. She introduced a QR code for filing complaints (housing code violations, landlord-tenant inquiries, or Fair Rent complaints) directly to the health department. - In response to questions, Cowan explained that she is staff to the Fair Rent Commission, which is appointed by the mayor and approved by the Appointments Committee. She also noted that her department primarily handles landlord-tenant matters but can refer homeowners with mortgage or insurance issues to appropriate agencies. She confirmed that the department does not manage mortgage servicing or tax payment disputes, but may provide referrals. Housing Planning and Below Market Rate Program (Emily Gordon) - Emily Gordon, Housing Planner in the Land Use Bureau, presented on the city’s affordable housing planning, requirements, and funding. She emphasized that affordability is relative and that not all affordable housing is deed restricted; naturally occurring affordable housing exists in older or less updated units. She reviewed three recent plans: the 2022 Housing Affordability Plan (first in 20 years), the 2025 Comprehensive Plan, and the 2025 Needs-Based Housing Assessment (completed with Data Haven). Key takeaways: housing affordability is a major issue; Stamford outperforms other Connecticut communities in housing production and affordable housing; the BMR program is a national example; and calls to action include more funding, expanded staffing, and zoning reforms to address segregation. - The Needs-Based Housing Assessment found that 78% of the city’s 14,000 low-income renter households are cost burdened, and affordable units are mismatched with residents’ needs, with a shortage of deeply affordable units. - Gordon explained the BMR program, a 25-year-old inclusionary zoning policy requiring 10%–14% of units in new developments with 10+ units to be affordable (deed restricted for the life of the building). Rents are capped at 30% of gross household income at 50% of AMI (the standard for about 90% of units). For a four-person household in the Stamford-Norwalk area, the AMI was $180,000, so 50% AMI = $90,000, with a one-bedroom rent around $1,550 (after utility allowance). She noted that the AMI geography changed to WestCOG, lowering the AMI, and the city has frozen the BMR program’s AMI at last year’s level to protect current tenants. - Gordon listed examples of BMR units in new buildings: 777 Summer Street (The Julius) has 37 BMR units out of 376; 84 West Park Place (conversion) has 3 BMR units; The Lafayette has 17 BMR units due to replacement of existing market-rate affordable housing. She discussed that waitlists are managed by each building, typically first-come, first-served after an initial lottery. The city does not manage applications but provides a list of buildings and contacts on its website. - In response to questions, Gordon clarified that the BMR program primarily serves renters; only about 90 homeownership units exist. She noted that the average tenure of BMR renters is about four years, with some staying over a decade. Over-income departures are rare. She also compared Stamford’s program to other cities: Stamford’s requirement (10-14%) is high, its affordability level (50% AMI) is low, and its affordability period (life of building) is longer than most. - Gordon also discussed the Affordable Housing Trust Fund, funded by payments in lieu of BMR units and developer fees. She noted that developers can now opt to pay a fee without a special permit. Key Outcomes - No formal votes or decisions were taken. The committee received the presentations as informational. - Committee members expressed appreciation for the overview and indicated they would follow up with specific constituent concerns via email or direct contact with presenters. - The presentations will be shared with the committee following the meeting (as indicated by the chair). - The committee acknowledged the need for additional staffing and resources for housing services and planning, as noted by both presenters. - The next steps may include more detailed reviews of specific topics in future meetings.

Note: The meeting transcript states the date as January 26, 2026, but the user instruction specifies the meeting took place on January 27, 2026. This summary proceeds using January 27, 2026, per instruction. Chair David Stein called the meeting to order at 6:33 p.m. by Zoom. Roll call established the presence of board members Bill Morris, Roseanne McManus, Jerry Bozak, and staff member Vanita Matter. The board announced that applications for 1150 Summer Street (daycare center) were continued to the March 9, 2026 meeting. Two main applications were heard: a site plan for a bathhouse (application 225-37) and a special permit for a mosque (application 225-39). Both were continued to the February 9, 2026 meeting after extensive discussion and public testimony. Public Comments & Testimony Bathhouse Application (225-37): - Catena Rizzo (256 Washington Boulevard): Expressed aesthetic concerns, describing the proposed building as “utilitarian” and “khaki pants of buildings”; questioned the choice of facade materials. - Sue Halpern (30 Alm Croft Road): Opposed the bathhouse, citing health risks from steam and shared air, lack of input from the Director of Health, and dangers of alcohol combined with saunas. - Elizabeth McCauley (18 Walter Wheeler Drive): Represented Holy Name of Jesus Church (325 Washington Boulevard); opposed the bathhouse, calling it an “adults-only physical culture establishment” too close to the church and suggested the site be used for green space. She noted the congregation had long used the parking lot for overflow. - Ted Potsey (White Plains, NY): Supported the bathhouse as an alcohol‑free social and wellness venue; suggested a mural to break up blank walls. - Rizarda Kusowitz (256 Washington Boulevard): Opposed, raising multiple concerns: noise from rooftop pool and bar (proposed hours 7 a.m. to midnight), mechanical equipment noise, lighting and sound pollution affecting bedrooms, the loading dock location, and traffic study adequacy for 240 lockers. She requested written responses to emailed questions. - Gina Calabries (300 Seaside Avenue): Opposed, arguing the use is an “adult physical culture establishment” under zoning regulations, not a gymnasium; questioned the classification and noted poor hygiene records at other Bath House locations. - Paula Waldman (110 Old North Stamford Road): Opposed, stating the transfer of 34,000 sq ft of commercial floor area to a surface parking lot would increase density and missed an opportunity for green space, stormwater management, and community benefit. - Monica Twal (37 Hanrohan Street): Vocally opposed, calling the building “a cell block of cement” and the use a “whorehouse” and “disgrace”; questioned the 16 security cameras and the lighting plan. - Jose Aguilar (355 Atlantic Street): Supported, describing himself as a typical user of such facilities; said he currently spends leisure money in New York and would welcome the bathhouse. - Michael Salvi (256 Washington Boulevard): Representing 18 condominium units 145 feet away; opposed due to noise, exhaust fumes, pool drainage chemicals, construction impacts, and a potential retaining wall. He requested answers to a submitted letter. - Dave Adams (Glenbrook Road): Opposed the bathhouse, arguing the use is misclassified as an adult physical culture establishment and that similar facilities in Stamford do not offer massages/body rubs; suggested other locations. - Tim Maloney (Greenwich, CT): Supported, citing positive experiences at Bath House in Manhattan and describing the facility as a healthy social alternative to bars. - Aaron Williams (256 Washington Boulevard): Opposed, echoing concerns about noise and the loading dock. Mosque Application (225-39): - Dave Adams (Glenbrook): Supported the mosque, but expressed concern about traffic on narrow Lockwood Avenue. - Farhan Memon (Norwalk, CT): Supported as a community leader; stated the mosque would meet all zoning requirements and that off‑site venues would be used for major holidays. He referenced a prior legal settlement in Norwalk as a caution about equal treatment. - Monica Twal (37 Hanrohan Street): Opposed, citing past illegal gatherings at another mosque and traffic congestion; questioned the Arabic name and expressed distrust. - Chamal Ahmed (75 E. Lane Drive, Stamford): Supported, vouching for the community’s commitment to follow rules and contribute positively. Discussion Items Bathhouse Application (225-37): - Design Concerns: Chair Stein and board members expressed that the proposed building features “large expanses of blank walls” on the north, south, and west facades, contrary to SRDS design criteria (Section 5 HH6) which require transparent ground‑floor glass, avoidance of blank walls, and sensitivity to the neighborhood. The west (parking lot) wall was highlighted as particularly problematic. Architect Eugene Kolberg and attorney Lisa Feinberg argued the regulations are guidelines, not hard rules, and that the building uses textured brick, stone, and change in materials to meet the criteria. The board requested a calculation of glass percentage on each facade. - Lighting & Security: The applicant presented an updated photometric plan showing maximum 5 foot‑candles in parking areas and zero spillover at property lines. Sixteen exterior cameras (24/7 monitoring) were shown on a plan; the west side has fewer cameras but coverage was defended. - Use Classification: Board member Jerry Bozak questioned whether the bathhouse qualifies as a “gymnasium/physical cultural establishment” given the inclusion of massage services and a rooftop bar. Staff Vanita Matter noted that adult uses are separately defined and that this use does not fit those definitions; the gymnasium definition is not formally adopted but has been applied consistently for similar facilities. Attorney Feinberg insisted the use is a permitted physical culture establishment, not an adult use. - Board Action: The board voted to continue the application to February 9, 2026, requesting: a glass‑percentage breakdown, additional landscape/design ideas to break up the west wall, and confirmation that the west wall will have the multicolor paneling shown in reference photos. The applicant agreed to supply these items. Mosque Application (225-39): - Parking & Traffic: Architect Peter Socora explained the building will have 104 worshipper seats, resulting in a requirement of 26 parking spaces (1 per 4 seats) – all provided on‑site. The previous social club had a variance for 32 non‑compliant spaces. The new layout provides 26 code‑compliant spaces, plus motorcycle/bicycle parking. The entrance is on Lockwood Avenue, exit on Lillian Street. Weekday prayers draw fewer than 20 people; Friday prayers about 80‑100; major holidays use off‑site venues. A van will assist those needing rides. - Staff & Board Comments: Staff requested a landscape plan, lighting plan, and parking management plan. The board requested a rendering of the front community space and confirmation that a wrought‑iron fence will surround the property. Board member Jerry Bozak raised concerns about overflow parking during holidays, similar to other houses of worship. The applicant agreed to provide a parking management plan addressing peak times. - Discrepancy with TTP: The board noted that a January 21 letter from the applicant to the Transportation, Traffic & Parking Department (TTP) had not yet received a final response. The applicant has a meeting scheduled on Thursday to resolve remaining issues. - Board Action: Continued to February 9, 2026, with requirements: revised landscape plan, lighting plan, parking management plan, rendering of community space, wrought‑iron fence details, and incorporation of staff‑requested changes. Key Outcomes - Bathhouse Application (225-37): Continued to February 9, 2026. Applicant to provide: (a) percentage of glass on each facade; (b) additional landscape/design treatments for the west wall; (c) rendering showing multicolor paneling on west wall. Board signaled that meeting design guidelines remains a concern but held the application open. - Mosque Application (225-39): Continued to February 9, 2026. Applicant to provide: landscape plan (including native/non‑invasive species), lighting plan, parking management plan (addressing peak holiday overflow), front‑community space rendering, wrought‑iron fence specifications, and updated elevations per staff report. TTP feedback is pending a meeting on Thursday. - 1150 Summer Street Applications (225-43 & 225-44): Continued to March 9, 2026. No new discussion. - Minutes of January 5, 2026: Approved unanimously.