The Public Meeting Index

The Borough of Dormont held its first budget meeting on October 7, 2026, at 2:45 PM (called to order at 6:01 PM per transcript) to review the proposed 2027 revenues and expenditures. Borough Manager John, Council members, and department heads discussed revenue projections, expenditure increases, parking fee potential, road program funding, and reserve policies. No votes were taken; the meeting served as a working session to refine the budget before the next capital budget discussion. Consent Calendar - No consent calendar items were present. The meeting was a discussion-only budget workshop. Public Comments & Testimony - No formal public comment period was held. The public was not able to join remotely due to a missing Zoom link, which the borough manager acknowledged and promised to correct for the next meeting. Discussion Items - Revenue Review: Borough Manager John reviewed the 2027 revenue estimates, noting most lines are flat compared to 2026. Key changes include a $10,000 reduction in cable TV franchise fees (from $100,000 to $90,000) due to declining revenue, and a projected $15,000 increase in interest earnings. - Parking Fees: Council members Melvin, Munson, and Riger discussed increasing parking rates from the current $0.75 per hour. Sean (likely a staff member) noted that surrounding communities charge higher rates and that transaction fees from vendors like Meter Feeder and ParkMobile eat into revenue. A proposal was mentioned to charge $2.00 for the first hour then $1.00 thereafter to cover processing fees. Councilman Munson agreed to prepare revenue projections in the coming days. Dynamic pricing (like Mount Lebanon's) was raised as a future possibility, but staff noted the kiosk capabilities are not yet known. - Amusement Machines: Council discussed enforcement of amusement device fees. The budget line was reduced by $3,000 (from $18,000 to $15,000) due to anticipated removal of pinball machines and state preemption on gambling machines. It was noted that the state police and Attorney General's office have issued guidance regarding illegal machines, and a rumored removal is expected soon. - Expenditures: Highlights included: no salary changes for mayor/council; hospitalization insurance increases of 19% for Highmark and 7% for UPMC; police vehicle lease addition of $17,500; police budget includes $63,000 salary increase due to new contract and a bulletproof vest purchase of $15,900; fire department property surplus sale of $125,000 with $100,000 allocated to the first lease payment for the new fire truck; legal services increased from $140,000 to $175,000 to cover bond issuance, TOD negotiations, right-to-know requests, and firefighter CBA; fuel lines increased by $5,000 per department; solid waste fees to be aligned with Waste Management rate increases; public works added $9,000 for electrical equipment; $25,000 earmarked for snow removal; summer labor moved to parks; rec director salary set at $65,000 (interviews ongoing); pool manager wage at $20/hour; parks budget includes kitchen renovation; insurance rates: liability/casualty up 10% for fire and police, but large policy held at $143,000; workers' comp reduced by $30,000. - Road Program and Reserves: The borough manager proposed a $650,000 road program for 2027, funded partly by a projected $200,000 cash transfer and a surplus of $207,000, leaving a gap. Councilman Chris expressed concern about the lack of a rainy day fund, noting the borough's 12.47 mills vs. the 15% reserve policy (which would require $1.8 million on a $12.5 million budget). Current unreserved fund balance is minimal. Council discussed the possibility of a 0.53 mill tax increase to raise $240,000 (since 1 mill = $482,000 at 95% collection). The manager noted that the general obligation note could serve as an emergency buffer, and that the note has approximately $250,000–$300,000 remaining. Road program costs: 27 miles of roads, 10% per year would be 2.7 miles, averaging $1 million per mile, requiring $2.7 million annually—far above current funding. Liquid fuels funds may be diverted to rock salt due to rising salt costs. - Miscellaneous: Facade grant program may be revisited with county partnership; HRC (Human Relations Commission) projects to be zeroed out unless rec director adopts them; newsletter budget kept at $30,000 pending redesign; data processing savings for police software; engineering budget of $60,000; potential sale of extra fire truck surplus. Key Outcomes - Council directed staff to prepare parking fee increase scenarios (first hour $2, then $1) for review. - The borough manager will circulate a revised budget with feedback from council, including potential adjustments to road program funding and reserve contributions. - The next capital budget discussion is scheduled for the following Tuesday, with department heads available to answer questions (e.g., public works on snow removal and skid steer). - Council expects to vote on the draft budget in November and formally approve it in December. - The Zoom link issue for remote participation was acknowledged and will be fixed for future meetings. - No formal votes were taken during this meeting.

The Saint Paul Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) Board of Commissioners met on Wednesday, October 7, 2026, at 2:00 PM in the Council Chambers. Chair Cheniqua Johnson called the meeting to order at 2:03 PM. Commissioners Yang and Kim were excused, leaving five members present. The meeting covered presentations on the 2027 Low Income Housing Tax Credit program, the Afton View Apartments proposal, early TIF district decertifications, and a fund transfer item that was postponed. Consent Calendar - Approval of September 2026 HRA Meeting Minutes (Min 26-31): Moved by Commissioner Bowie, the minutes were approved by a vote of 5-0. Discussion Items - 2027 Low Income Housing Tax Credit Reservation (SR 26-211): Housing Director Jules Atangana presented the 9% tax credit program. Two projects were considered: the Aragon project (470 White Bay Avenue, 53 new construction units, total development cost $28,392,475, requesting $1,350,000 city gap financing) and Highland Bridge Phase 3 (59 new construction units). Staff recommended approval of the Aragon project, which scored 93 points after deductions (claiming 99 but unable to justify 6 points, including a point for HRA debt obligation). The Highland Bridge project scored 80 points after a 5-point deduction for claiming HRA-owned land without support. Commissioner Bowie inquired about the equity and cultural integration scoring criteria (D4), noting Aragon received 10 points while Highland Bridge received 0 due to lack of self-scoring. The item is scheduled for board action on October 14. - Introduction to Afton View Apartments (SR 26-212): Principal Project Manager Hannah Chong presented a request for multifamily conduit revenue bonds of up to $20.5 million for the acquisition and rehabilitation of Afton View (286 units at 60% AMI, with 268 units having project-based vouchers at 30-50% AMI). The developer, TDP (Tareen Development Partners), is also requesting a waiver of the HRA's maximum fee guidelines (from $2.4M allowed to $3.6M, with 68% deferred) and a partial waiver of the city's sustainable building ordinance (using an alternative compliance path focused on high-efficiency equipment rather than renewable energy credits). Commissioners discussed the rationale for the higher developer fee—maximizing eligible basis for tax credits—and whether funds could instead be used for rehabilitation. Pete Nelson (TDP) addressed questions about community engagement, noting a communication plan with translation services and translated notices for the predominantly Somali East African resident population. Construction is expected to start in December 2026 if bonds close. A public hearing is set for October 14. - Introduction to HRA Board Actions Required for Early TIF District Decertification (SR 26-213): Debt Administrator Jenny Wolfe presented on four TIF districts: Emerald Gardens (to decertify 14 years early, releasing $2.43M in tax capacity), Pioneer Endicott (to decertify 28 years early), and amendments for Phelan Village and Riverfront Renaissance to remove parcels from active districts. The decertifications would reduce the city's captured tax capacity percentage from an estimated 5.7% to 5.13%, resulting in an estimated $10 decrease in taxes for a median-valued home. Commissioner Noecker noted the significance of the reduction for affordability. Chair Johnson highlighted the trade-off between affordable housing resources and tax base expansion, noting that these four districts, combined with three others already decertifying, represent a substantial reduction in future affordable housing funding. Board action is deferred to November 18. - Parks and Recreation Fund Transfer (SR 26-214): Chair Johnson moved this item to the October 14, 2026 HRA meeting. Key Outcomes - Approved September 2026 HRA meeting minutes (5-0). - Received and filed Staff Reports SR 26-211, SR 26-212, and SR 26-213. - Referred the Parks and Recreation Fund Transfer (SR 26-214) to the October 14, 2026 meeting. - Deferred board action on early TIF district decertifications to November 18, 2026. - Set a public hearing for Afton View Apartments for October 14, 2026. - Meeting adjourned at 3:04 PM.

On Wednesday, October 7, 2026, the Finance and Personnel Committee of the Milwaukee Common Council convened at 1:08 p.m. under Chair Alderwoman Marina Dimitrijevic to review the proposed 2027 budgets for the Election Commission, Department of Neighborhood Services (DNS), and the Board of Zoning Appeals (BOZA). The meeting adjourned at 4:14 p.m. after presentations, extensive questioning, and a motion to hold the communication to the call of the chair. Public Comments & Testimony - No public comments were made during this hearing. Election Commission - Presentation: Budget Director Nick Kovac and Election Commissioner Paulina Gutierrez presented the 2027 budget, which totals approximately $1.1 million less than the 2026 adopted budget due to two fewer elections in 2027. The reduction is mainly in temporary staffing and operating expenses, though the cost per election remains unchanged. The budget proposes adding one full-time administrative election specialist and increasing capital equipment funding to $1.37 million for voting machine upgrades to meet VVSG 2.0 standards (Voluntary Voting System Guidelines). - Discussion: Committee members inquired about staffing levels, poll worker recruitment and retention, bilingual and safety training, early voting locations, special elections contingency planning, and lessons learned from the 2025 ballot shortage crisis. Commissioner Gutierrez noted that the department works on an 18-month election cycle, that 503 pieces of election equipment must be replaced, and that current staffing is stretched thin—especially during high-turnout years. She expressed support for a retention bonus for poll workers and for modernizing operations (e.g., absentee ballot processing currently done by hand). Data requests were made for operational center expenses, poll worker demographic changes over time, number of long-term poll workers, and turnout at early voting locations. - Key Positions: Commissioner Gutierrez emphasized that the department is under-resourced relative to the complexity of elections in a swing state and that without the ability to use grants, reliance on tax levy is critical. Committee members, particularly Alderwomen Coggs and Taylor, expressed strong support for ensuring adequate funding and for expanding youth and elderly voter engagement. Department of Neighborhood Services - Presentation: Budget analyst Nathaniel Haack and DNS Commissioner Jezamil Arroyo-Vega presented a 2027 budget that decreases slightly from 2026. The department is eliminating 13 positions—12 of which were unfilled and tied to the downspout disconnection program (replaced by two funded code enforcement interns) and one unfilled development center liaison position. Revenues are expected to increase by $2.3 million based on stronger collections, plus an additional $1.5 million from fee increases in the omnibus file. Commissioner Arroyo-Vega highlighted core services: code enforcement, permit processing, demolition oversight, and short-term rental registration. - Discussion: Topics included nuisance property compliance (35% compliance rate after court, with 65% on monthly reinspection), staffing capacity, reorganization of divisions, the downspout disconnection program (largely completed), demolitions (30 completed as of September, with 35 more weather-dependent), illegal dumping (eight citations so far in 2026, with rewards and camera deployment), short-term rental enforcement (420 letters sent, 130 licenses issued, but 290 still noncompliant), construction inspection fees, AI and technology upgrades (open counter portal, electronic plan review), and the use of city fleet vehicles for inspectors. Commissioner Arroyo-Vega stated that the department is at capacity but is optimizing processes; she noted that some inspectors complete eight stops daily while others manage only three. Data requests were made for inspector workloads, demolition lists, short-term rental registry and fines, complaint factors, and recycling noncompliance violators. - Key Positions: Alderwoman Moore stressed the need to hold landlords accountable and to expand resources for code enforcement, especially in high-complaint districts. Alderman Spiker supported technology investments and asked about the impact of higher fees on permit issuance. Commissioner Arroyo-Vega expressed commitment to using data to inform policy and to improving communication with the council. Board of Zoning Appeals (BOZA) - Presentation: Budget analyst Sarah Osborn and BOZA Administrative Manager India Gaar presented a 2027 budget request up 1% from 2026, with a small position authorization adjustment for board vacancies. BOZA hears approximately 700 appeals annually across 12 hearings. The budget includes a six percent fee increase in the omnibus file, expected to generate an additional $25,000 in revenue. The department is fully staffed (five board members, five office staff) but has two vacant alternate board member positions. - Discussion: Members asked about updating forms and notices (with QR codes, FAQs, and translation), the transition to Legistar for accessible case files, hearing notification radius (increased in a prior ordinance), and the timing of notifications to alders. India Gaar noted that the 30-day notification window is set by ordinance and that requests for adjournments for community meetings are accommodated one time. Alderwoman Taylor raised concerns about insufficient time for aldermen to gather input from city departments before hearings; Gaar explained the tight calendar of 12 hearings per year and that one-cycle adjournments are allowed but further holds are discouraged by the City Attorney. Data was requested on public inquiries received in response to hearing notice mailings. - Key Positions: Alderwomen Moore and Coggs praised BOZA staff for responsiveness and transparency. Alderman Spiker sought improvements in notice clarity and translation services. Gaar expressed that the office is committed to processing cases efficiently while maintaining public engagement. Key Outcomes - Communication 260001 (the Mayor’s proposed 2027 budget for the Election Commission, DNS, and BOZA) was not acted upon. On the motion of Alderman Burgelis, the item was held to the call of the chair (5–0 vote: Dimitrijevic, Burgelis, Spiker, Coggs, Moore in favor; none opposed). This means the budget portions for these departments will be revisited at a later committee meeting. - The committee made no formal recommendations or amendments; discussion will continue at subsequent budget hearings (next scheduled for Monday, October 12, 2026, covering the Police Department, Department of Emergency Communications, Fire Department, and Fire and Police Commission). - Data requests were made to the Election Commission, DNS, and BOZA for additional reports and historical data to inform future decision-making.

The Tulsa Planning Commission held a special meeting on October 7, 2026, to consider routine consent items, a public hearing on a planned unit development amendment, a preliminary plat, an economic development project plan conformance review, and comprehensive plan text amendments. All items on the agenda were approved unanimously. Director's Report - The Director noted that the City Council had recently approved amendments to neighborhood character overlays for Renaissance and Florence Park. A work session was announced for November 4, 2026, to discuss code amendments, open space regulations, housing feasibility, data center zoning, historic preservation, and subdivision regulations. Approval of Minutes - Items 1 & 2: Minutes from Meeting No. 1 (September 2, 2026) and Meeting No. 2 (September 16, 2026) were approved unanimously by roll call vote (Hulse, Hood, Krug, Shivel, Turner Addison, Walker all voting yes). Consent Calendar - Items 3, 5, & 6 (PUD minor amendments: PUD-647-A-1, PUD-638-2, PUD-117-7) were approved together on a single motion. Item 4 (PUD-190-A-41) was pulled to the public hearing per a commissioner's request. The consent items passed unanimously. Public Comments & Testimony - Item 4 – PUD-190-A-41 (Mitchell Park Duplex Standards): Three members of the public spoke in opposition or raised concerns: - Lynn Burson (5729 East 75th Place) asked about safety, community impact on park access, sight lines, pedestrian flow, security features, and emergency vehicle access. - John Krueger (5803 East 75th Place) expressed concern that the project would make the park entrance less park-like and that the area already has high density from nearby apartments. - John Wilson (7709 South Kingston Avenue, president of the Minshall Park Homeowners Association representing approx. 650 homes) questioned stormwater drainage into the park pond, the environmental impact of removing mature trees (estimated 80 trees) and compliance with a city tree replacement ordinance, ADA compliance, and the feasibility of building on a steep 45-degree embankment. He noted the wooded area had been untouched for 50 years and supported wildlife including bald eagles. Staff responded that the property is not a stormwater facility, that duplexes and detached houses are exempt from landscape standards, and that the amendment actually makes requirements stricter than the original PUD. No applicant rebuttal was given. Discussion Items - Item 4 – PUD-190-A-41 (Mitchell Park Duplex Standards): Staff explained the request is to rewrite and clarify duplex building standards in a complex, often-amended PUD. The property is zoned residential duplex. The amendment standardizes lot size (6,000 sq ft per duplex unit) and setbacks. Commissioners asked no further questions. A motion to approve per staff recommendation passed unanimously. - Item 7 – Shadow Creek of Tulsa Preliminary Plat: Staff presented a preliminary plat for a private street subdivision on a small RS-4 zoned parcel at the southeast corner of East 101st Street South and South Florence Avenue. The subdivision will have dead-end streets. A letter of map amendment is in process to address floodplain. The plat meets development plan standards. No public speakers. Approved unanimously. - Item 8 – Peak of the Parkway Economic Development Project Plan: Jeff Sabin, TIF counsel for Partner Tulsa, explained tax increment financing (TIF) and the planning commission’s role in determining conformance with the comprehensive plan. Senior Planner Jeremy Baines stated the project’s objectives (housing variety, activating vacant land, commercial investment) and found it consistent with the Major Street and Highway Plan, Future Land Use Map, and comprehensive plan priorities (strategies LU 3.6, ED 1.1, ED 1.5.2). No public speakers. Approved unanimously. - Item 9 – CPA-134 Comprehensive Plan Text Amendments: Staff (Susan) explained the amendment updates references from “TMAPC” to “Planning Commission” and adds staff as an entity that can initiate corrective amendments (alongside planning commission and council). No public speakers. Approved unanimously. Key Outcomes - All items approved unanimously: Minutes, consent items (3,5,6), PUD-190-A-41 (item 4), Shadow Creek preliminary plat (item 7), Peak of the Parkway economic development project plan conformance (item 8), and comprehensive plan text amendments (item 9). - No deferrals or denials. - Next steps: The Peak of the Parkway project plan will proceed to City Council for two public hearings and final approval. The preliminary plat will go through the Infrastructure Design Process (IDP). - Work session scheduled: November 4, 2026, starting at either 10:00 or 10:30 a.m., to discuss pending code and policy amendments.

The St. Paul Library Board met on October 7, 2026, to approve the previous month's meeting minutes and receive a detailed presentation on newcomer services, including digital access, education, and support provided during Operation Metro Surge. Three members were present and two were excused. Consent Calendar - Minutes Approval: The board approved the September 2, 2026 library board minutes by a vote of 5 in favor, 0 opposed. Motion by Councilmember Coleman. Discussion Items - Newcomer Services Presentation: Director Hartman introduced Rebecca Ryan, who then introduced Adriana Galvan, the library's newcomers services coordinator. Ms. Galvan described the library's role in providing digital access (devices, internet, tech support), trusted referrals to social and health services, education programs (digital literacy classes in Korean, Spanish, and for the African American community), and the Cell Ed app (a live-tutor platform for English, citizenship, parenting, and GED/Adult Diploma preparation, free to users thanks to a grant). She highlighted the library's pivot during Operation Metro Surge, including home visits, volunteer coordination, delivery of basic needs (formula, medicine), notarization fee waivers, citizenship fairs, and mental health support for families and school staff. Partnerships include Literacy Minnesota, International Institute, CLUES, and the city attorney's office. Plans include expanding Cell Ed licenses and updating provider websites. - Councilmember Questions: Councilmember Johnson asked about budget and service locations. Ms. Galvan explained staff are mobile, working at all branches, community sites, and remotely. Chair Jose clarified that the community services team (including Ms. Galvan's FTE) is in the general fund, with temporary grant support from the Marburg Fund and a three-year Mellon Foundation grant funding additional community specialists. Councilmember Jones asked about Cell Ed licenses; Ms. Galvan noted the library currently holds licenses returned by other systems and that demand is high. Rebecca Ryan confirmed the Cell Ed budget is supported through the Mellon grant. - Board Comments: Councilmember Coleman praised the presentation, noting the team's rapid pivot during Operation Metro Surge and the trust established with the community. Councilmember Jones remarked on the inspiring stories shared, including home births supported by library volunteers, and called the work a reflection of city values. Key Outcomes - The minutes from the September 2, 2026 meeting were approved unanimously. - The board received the newcomer services staff report with no formal action taken. The presentation highlighted ongoing and grant-funded services, and the board expressed strong support for the work. - The meeting was adjourned after the presentation and discussion.

This 90-minute noticed meeting, chaired by Councilwoman Monet Holder (At-Large Group 1), was called to address community questions and concerns about data centers, particularly hyperscale or mega data centers, and to gather information from JEA, the Planning Department, and the public. The meeting included presentations, council discussion, and public testimony. Public Comments & Testimony - Rachel Zavala (representing DSA) urged a moratorium on data centers, stating that not enough is known yet. - James Shoop (5112 Camille Avenue) supported a moratorium and suggested that large-scale data centers should be brought to a public vote. He also expressed concern about overinflated demand for AI and data centers. - Carnell Oliver opposed a moratorium, advocating instead for a strategic approach ("playing chess") that includes carving out locations like Cecil Field, securing community benefits under the 1866 Civil Rights Act, and linking data center development to infrastructure upgrades that lower JEA rates. - Melanie Carr raised concerns about pollution from energy generation if data centers use diesel or natural gas generators, and questioned whether decommissioned power plants would continue obsolete generation. - Bonnie Barnard (1276 Nantucket Avenue) warned that data centers and AI are part of a dystopian digital control system, citing economist Richard Werner and former HUD official Catherine Fitz. - Dr. Linda Woodard (14098 Summer Breeze Drive) noted the rapid pace of AI change and questioned how local policy will integrate federal/industry self-regulation. She asked JEA about impacts on customer bills and the environmental range of data centers, and requested citizen representation on any subcommittees. - Hillary Leverone (6231 Barthoff Avenue) urged an immediate moratorium, stating the conversation revealed a "pants down" lack of preparedness. She questioned the current uses of AI (surveillance, price gouging) and worried that JEA ratepayers would subsidize data center infrastructure. - John J. Nooney (8356 Baskum Road) asked for the size of the smallest operating data center in the country and requested that the Northeast Florida Regional Council have a seat at the table in future discussions. Discussion Items - JEA Overview (Jordan Pope): JEA currently serves six small data centers (≤4 MW each) but has received 50 requests for hyperscale (≥50 MW) facilities. JEA cannot currently serve a hyperscale data center without significant system upgrades (e.g., new substations) and long lead times for equipment. A large-load tariff is being developed to ensure that hyperscale customers pay their own infrastructure costs without burdening other ratepayers. Water usage is addressed via closed-loop systems and reclaimed water; new state legislation requires a consumptive use permit for ≥50 MW loads. JEA intends to comply with state law (SB 484) even though it does not apply to public utilities like JEA. - Planning Department Overview (Helena Perola): The zoning code does not specifically define data centers. An interpretation requires that large-scale (≥50 MW) data centers go through the Planned Unit Development (PUD) process, requiring city council approval and public hearing. Small-scale data centers (under 50 MW) can locate in commercial or industrial districts without special review. State law (SB 180) preempts local regulation of data centers until it expires October 1, 2027, though extensions are possible after hurricanes. - Council Discussion: - Councilwoman Holder emphasized the need for fact-finding and a dedicated committee or working group on data centers. - Councilman Peluso expressed interest in a moratorium (6–18 months) to allow policy development and to wait for possible changes in state law. He noted that a moratorium would need to avoid violating SB 180. - Councilman Salem suggested that a committee could begin work without a moratorium and proposed a broader focus on new technology (e.g., flock cameras, AI) rather than only data centers. - Councilman Johnson opposed a moratorium at this stage, citing existing controls (PUD process) and the need for more research, including partnerships with educational institutions. He raised the possibility of extraterrestrial data centers at Cecil Spaceport. - Councilman Carlucci supported a moratorium with a sunset provision, noting environmental and water concerns, but cautioned against banning technology outright. - Terrence Harvey (Office of General Counsel) explained that a moratorium is a legal pause, not a ban, and must be time-limited. He noted that state law (SB 180) restricts local regulation of data centers and that any moratorium would need to be carefully crafted to avoid preemption challenges. He also mentioned that the state’s OPPAGA is conducting a study on data center impacts. - Pretty Norris (Administration) advocated for a collaborative process between the administration, council, and JEA, and suggested that any moratorium should give staff time for a working group to make recommendations. Key Outcomes - No formal vote was taken. The meeting served as an information-gathering session. - Councilman Peluso announced his intention to introduce legislation for a moratorium on large-scale data centers (likely 6–18 months) and to partner with Councilwoman Holder. A draft has not yet been presented. - Councilwoman Holder committed to following up with council leadership to establish a dedicated committee or working group on data centers, possibly with a subcommittee under the Transportation, Energy, and Utilities (TEU) committee for emerging technology. - JEA will continue developing its large-load tariff and intake process to ensure data centers pay their fair share. - Next steps: Further meetings will be scheduled to continue the discussion and to involve stakeholders, including the public, JEA, planning staff, and possibly the Northeast Florida Regional Council.

The Metropolitan Board of Zoning Appeals Division One met on October 7, 2026, with Acting Chair David Duncan and members Jennifer Witt and John Wolski. The board addressed continuances, withdrawals, expedited petitions, and four non‑expedited variance requests involving fences, clear‑site triangles, carports, and outdoor storage. Preliminary Matters (Special Requests & Continuances) - 2026‑DV1‑044 (2674 Shirley Drive): Granted 30‑day continuance to November 10, 2026, for additional notice. - 2026‑DV1‑047 (2502 North Delaware Avenue): Granted continuance to November 10, 2026, with new notice due to possible petition changes. - 2026‑DV1‑042 (1039 Kessler Boulevard East Drive): Withdrawn; garage addition confirmed compliant with approved plans. - 2026‑DV1‑035 (first agenda item): Withdrawn. - 2026‑UV1‑026 (3434 Garden Avenue): Granted continuance to November 10, 2026, for further discussions. - 2026‑UV1‑028 (case number read): Continued to November 10, 2026, with additional notice due to missing notarized affidavit. - 2026‑DV1‑036 (6317 Askin Avenue): Granted two‑month continuance to December 1, 2026, to allow time for easement consents or plan revisions. - 2026‑UV1‑002 (5301 West 56th Street): Dismissed by the board after staff recommended that the petitioner either withdraw or be dismissed due to unresolved fire code variance issues. - 2026‑UV1‑020 (3503 North College Avenue): Granted 30‑day continuance to November 10, 2026. - 2026‑UV1‑027 (2450 Lafayette Road): Granted 30‑day continuance to November 10, 2026, with additional notice. Expedited Petitions Three expedited petitions were approved unanimously without additional testimony: - 2026‑DV1‑031 (4850 West 78th Street): Variance to permit a six‑foot fence in the front yard, partially within clear‑site triangle and easements. - 2026‑DV1‑043 (820 West 54th Street): Variance to permit a detached garage in the front yard of a single‑family residence. - 2026‑DV1‑046 (6145 North Ewing Street): Variance to permit a detached accessory structure, detached garage, and secondary dwelling unit with an eight‑foot side yard setback (15 feet required). Public Comments & Testimony - 2026‑DV3‑011 (St. Rock Catholic Church fence): Ann Shott, a neighbor, expressed safety concerns about the existing fence and wall, noting that parish families were not adequately informed about the proposal. She urged the board to prioritize pedestrian safety and proper communication. Jill Palmer (Department of Public Works) testified that the wall creates a safety hazard by obstructing driver sight lines and cited a 2024 crash report that attributed the crash to the wall. She requested denial of the clear‑site triangle variance. - 2026‑UV1‑022 (used car sales at 3441 West Washington Street): No opposition was voiced from the audience. The petitioner explained the business had been operating for about a year and wanted to add occasional vehicle sales. - 2026‑DV1‑045 (Naomi Street fence and carport): Tabitha Grab and Brian Moore, neighbors, opposed the eight‑foot fence, saying it blocks sunlight, is an eyesore, and that the carport encroaches too close to the property line. Grab noted the petitioner had built without permits. Moore presented documentation of a small‑claims court judgment related to the fence. - 2026‑UV1‑024 (portable storage unit at 5699 East 71st Street): No public opposition was heard. The petitioner stated the unit is used for winter maintenance materials and has letters of support from two neighborhood organizations. Discussion Items - 2026‑DV3‑011 – St. Rock Catholic Church: The petitioner proposed relocating the fence 16 feet inward from the corner of Meridian and Sumner and modifying the opaque concrete block section to increase visibility. DPW and staff argued the proposal still encroaches on the intersection decision‑site distance triangle and would jeopardize public safety. Staff recommended approval of the fence height variance only if the fence is moved outside the clear‑site triangle. The board split the variance into two parts: A (encroachment into clear‑site triangle) and B (fence height outside triangle). - 2026‑UV1‑022 – Used car sales on West Washington Street: The petitioner sought a variance of use to operate automobile sales in an I‑3 zone along a Transit‑Oriented Development (TOD) corridor. Staff recommended denial, citing the comprehensive plan’s call for pedestrian‑oriented uses and the availability of 45 permitted uses in I‑3. The petitioner agreed to commitments for no flashing lights, keeping the site clean, and limiting the variance to the current tenant. - 2026‑DV1‑045 – Fence and carport on Naomi Street: The petitioner requested an eight‑foot fence (maximum six feet) and a carport with a one‑foot side setback (seven feet required). Staff noted the carport was built without permits and recommended denial because a six‑foot fence is allowed and a standard shed could meet storage needs. The board discussed the practical difficulty of placing a carport on a narrow lot with an existing driveway. The petitioner offered commitments to maintain the property and avoid flashing lights. - 2026‑UV1‑024 – Outdoor storage unit: The petitioner requested a variance to keep a 200‑square‑foot portable storage unit for maintenance tools and salt. Staff recommended denial, arguing that a shed could serve the same purpose and that allowing outdoor storage undermines the C‑3 district’s low‑intensity character. The board asked the petitioner to commit to painting the unit to match the building and removing logos; the petitioner agreed. Key Outcomes - Expedited petitions (3): All three variances were granted unanimously (3–0). - 2026‑DV3‑011 (St. Rock fence): Part A (clear‑site triangle encroachment) received an indecisive vote (2–1, Walski yes, Witt no, Duncan yes) and was automatically continued to the November 10, 2026 hearing. Part B (fence height outside triangle) was approved unanimously (3–0) subject to commitments that the fence may be repaired but not altered, and guardrails will be installed behind the relocated fence. - 2026‑UV1‑022 (West Washington used car sales): Indecisive vote (2–1, Walski yes, Witt yes, Duncan no) and continued to November 10, 2026. - 2026‑DV1‑045 (Naomi Street fence and carport): Indecisive vote (2–1, Walski yes, Witt yes, Duncan no) and continued to November 10, 2026. - 2026‑UV1‑024 (East 71st Street storage unit): Variances granted unanimously (3–0) subject to a commitment to paint the unit to blend with the building and remove commercial logos, with final approval by staff. - Continuances and dismissals: All special requests were approved as detailed above, including a dismissal for 2026‑UV1‑002. Note on date discrepancy: The official meeting date provided is October 7, 2026, though the transcript repeatedly references “October 6, 2026.” The summary uses the date supplied by the user.

The Equity, Community Affairs, Housing, Health, and Education Committee met on Wednesday, October 7, 2026, in Council Chambers and virtually. Chair Barbara Shanklin (D-2) called the meeting to order at 1:33 p.m., and a quorum was established with all six committee members present. Committee Member Marilyn Parker (R-18) attended virtually; Council Members Paula McCraney (I-7) and Shameka Parrish-Wright (D-3) also attended as non-committee members. The committee considered three pending resolutions and recommended all three for approval, sending them to the Consent Calendar for the October 15, 2026 Metro Council meeting. The meeting adjourned at 1:48 p.m. Note: The action summary says all committee and non-committee members attended in Chambers except Parker, but the transcript shows Council Member McCraney apologizing for not being there and speaking from a remote, noisy location. The minutes also refer to R-130-26 once as an “Ordinance,” although the agenda and motion treat it as a Resolution. Consent Calendar - All three resolutions — R-126-26, R-127-26, and R-130-26 — were recommended for approval and placed on the Consent Calendar. Discussion Items - R-126-26 (Wrongful Conviction Day) — Sponsored by Council Member Shameka Parrish-Wright (D-3). Parrish-Wright said the resolution had bipartisan support and urged state support for compensation for wrongfully convicted Kentuckians, arguing that wrongful convictions destroy lives, separate families, and are expensive for the state and city. She noted that seven exonerees had been honored. Chair Shanklin recalled a Newburgh exoneree who received $8 million from the city but struggled after release. The motion by Committee Member Lyninger, seconded by Committee Member Seum, carried by voice vote. - R-127-26 (Nonviolent Louisville Day) — Sponsored by Council Member Paula McCraney (I-7). McCraney said the resolution supports the nonviolence movement and asks Louisville to recognize October 2 as Nonviolent Louisville Day every year. Committee Member Lyninger spoke in favor, describing the group’s work as incredible and urging the city to make the date meaningful through action. The motion by Lyninger, seconded by Seum, carried by voice vote. - R-130-26 (Home for Good Initiative funding) — Co-sponsored by Chair Shanklin (D-2), Ginny Mulvey-Woolridge (R-24), and Ben Reno-Weber (D-8). Marilyn Harris, senior housing policy advisor with the Office of Housing and Community Development, said the resolution authorizes the Mayor to accept up to $2,000,000 from the Community Foundation of Louisville for the Home for Good initiative, which aims to house 250 street homeless individuals by December 2027. She reported that roughly $1.6 million was currently in the Community Foundation account from private donors, that the funds would pay for supportive case-management services, and that about 90 people have been permanently housed so far with wraparound services. Harris cited a 98% success rate for keeping people housed for at least two years, said seven or eight case managers are handling caseloads of no more than 15 clients, and identified service providers including St. John’s, Up for Women, Goodwill, Urban Strategies, Phoenix Place, and VOA. Chair Shanklin asked about service providers, and Harris confirmed those contracts. The motion by Lyninger, seconded by Seum, carried. Key Outcomes - R-126-26 recommended for approval and sent to the Consent Calendar. - R-127-26 recommended for approval and sent to the Consent Calendar. - R-130-26 recommended for approval and sent to the Consent Calendar. - The minutes do not record numerical vote tallies for any of the three motions. - All three items will be heard before the full Metro Council on October 15, 2026. - The meeting adjourned at 1:48 p.m.

On October 7, 2026, the City of Sarasota Commission and Town of Longboat Key Commission held a special joint meeting in the Town of Longboat Key Commission Chambers, 501 Bay Isles Road, Longboat Key, from 1:00 p.m. to 2:55 p.m. The agenda header lists a DATE of October 1, 2026, but the meeting notice and transcript identify the meeting date as October 7, 2026. No member of the public requested to speak. The boards reviewed Amendment 3 budget impacts, shared coastal resiliency and transportation projects, FDOT corridor work, water transit, and Longboat Key's subaqueous sewer force main replacement. Amendment 3 Impacts - Sarasota City Manager Carrie Friend presented estimated impacts of the proposed Florida Amendment 3 homestead exemption increase. She said the city's general fund receives about $59 million in annual tax revenue, with the police department consuming about 48% of the general fund, parks and recreation about 11% (slightly over $12.5 million), and all other smaller departments combined about 30%. - About 42% of city properties are homestead properties, so they would bear the largest impact. Staff estimates the general fund impact at roughly $5.6 million per year once fully implemented after year two. Friend compared that to about 37 full-time police officer positions, 47 full-time staff positions, the entire annual streets and highway budget, or 1.5 times the engineering budget. - Friend said the city is not advocating, only educating, and has been preparing through a hiring freeze on general fund positions, reviews of user fees and programs, and a three-legged stool approach of cutting expenditures, increasing revenues/fees, and improving efficiency. - A commissioner noted that Florida League of Cities vote no Amendment 3 television advertisements aired in Sarasota the day before the meeting on ABC 7. Coastal Resiliency and Transportation Projects - Sarasota Public Works Director Nikesh Patel presented, and Longboat Key Public Works Director Charlie Mott also answered questions. - New Pass dredging and sand sharing: A new interlocal agreement effective September 15, 2026, establishes a 10-year partnership with a cumulative 50-50 sand allocation between the city and town; with written consent, a project can place up to all available sand on one shoreline and later restore the balance. The 2025 inlet management plan, approved by FDEP, starts the accounting. - Lido Beach renourishment and New Pass: Five years of sand accumulation of roughly 3 inches to 3 feet in New Pass had hindered navigation. After the Army Corps and city dredging, depths are about 5 to 9 feet. In 2026, about 300,000 cubic yards of sand restored about 1.2 miles of shoreline, supported by $12 million in federal funding. Dune restoration is separate and targeted for completion by the end of the year. - Q&A on navigation: Mott said New Pass shoals around 70,000 cubic yards per year, the Coast Guard had considered pulling buoys, and Army Corps project representatives indicated markers would be re-established. Dredging did not go east of the bridge because of a TECO utility line conflict. - St. Armand's resiliency and stormwater: The city described a county-managed stormwater project with $13.5 million from the Resilient SRQ disaster recovery program plus a $479,000 city contribution, plus a city-led undergrounding effort targeted for January 1, 2028, and a state-supported corridor project with $1.48 million in appropriations. County-managed stormwater funds must be expended by 2031; a consultant is being selected. The project targets rainfall flooding, not storm surge, though the consultant will evaluate related issues. - Emergency flooding concerns: After recent flooding at St. Armand's, Sarasota and Longboat Key officials worked overnight with the county; the county manages stormwater, with the city and town supporting. Officials said Sarasota has proposed a deeper evaluation of the stormwater system with possible future city assumption, and the county created a stormwater department. A commissioner said flood warning signs reading may flood should be changed because flooding is recurring. - Long-term design comments: Several commissioners expressed concern that $13.5 million may be only a band-aid and that residents need interim flood relief; city staff advised completing permitting and design properly rather than rushing, while noting rainfall intensity and sea-level rise make design standards difficult. - 10th Street and Boulevard of the Arts: The city has $12 million in federal funding and a $3 million city match for a design-build project; the 10th Street concept would change four lanes to two lanes from Orange to U.S. 41 with bicycle and pedestrian improvements. It originated from Sarasota in Motion, is subject to traffic studies, public input, intergovernmental review, and commission approval. Boulevard of the Arts is planned as the Rosemary District's main street with wider sidewalks, street trees, sidewalk cafes, and shared lanes, based in part on a 2021 survey with over 1,000 responses. - Advanced air mobility MOU: An airport-led regional memorandum of understanding is proposed with FDOT, the Sarasota-Manatee MPO, and local governments, covering possible air taxi, public service, cargo, and recreational aviation. Staff stressed the MOU is advisory, not an approval of service or facility. Target signature is before Thanksgiving, subject to partner review. In discussion, a commissioner noted Florida League of Cities will address stormwater policy the following day. - Water transit: Sarasota's dock infrastructure construction is paused, with no restart date; conceptual dock sites include Bay Street, 10th Street, Ken Thompson Park, and Bayfront Park. Staff has completed conceptual 30% design for two dock locations, and dock infrastructure at Centennial Park and 10th Street is built. Longboat officials and staff discussed regional ferry coordination, first/last-mile connections, seagrass permitting and mitigation costs, environmental opposition, and the need for a cost-benefit and regional partnership approach. FDOT Projects - Current John Ringling Causeway work: From east of Sunset Drive to Bird Key; $12.3 million construction began January 2026, with completion targeted for early 2027. Work includes bicycle transit lanes, new signals, resurfacing, drainage improvements, and a raised seawall cap near Sunset Drive. Staff said it addresses repeated flooding at the Sunset and Bird Key intersections. - Future bridge replacement: From Bird Key Drive to Sarasota Harbor West; $4 million design and an estimated $74 million construction. The tentative letting is 2028-2029, pending design. The proposed replacement is a single bridge with bicycle, pedestrian, and transit accommodations, coordinated with St. Armand's projects and addressing flooding at bridge approaches. Town of Longboat Key Subaqueous Force Main - Longboat Key Public Works Director Charlie Mott gave an update. The existing force main under Sarasota Bay or the Intracoastal Waterway was installed in 1970 and is ductile iron. The replacement would use high-density polyethylene pipe on a parallel route, allowing the old line to be relined or reused and providing extra storage capacity during storms. - A June 2020 rupture was repaired in 30 hours, followed by a consent order and mitigation. DEP permit approval came in January 2022, an Army Corps nationwide permit in 2023, and slip lining was completed on the impacted segment. With construction manager at risk Garney, the project moved to the individual Army Corps/DEP permit process after it outgrew the nationwide permit in February 2026; the town is responding to agency requests for additional information, with Army Corps and DEP staff expediting review. - Project cost is estimated at $30-40 million all-in, including seagrass and mangrove mitigation. Funding includes $3 million and $1.5 million federal appropriations, a $1 million Clean Water SRF grant, pre-purchased $4 million of pipe, and a zero-interest SRF loan portion with a debt-free/grant portion; remaining local funding is still needed. - Next steps include finalizing FDEP and Army Corps permits, finalizing the guaranteed maximum price, maintaining grant periods of performance, seeking additional grants and appropriations, and completing any public borrowing. The existing force main remains in service and is largely relined. Mott also requested renewal of the city's emergency potable water interconnect with Sarasota; Manatee County provides routine wastewater treatment for Longboat Key. Key Outcomes - No formal motions or votes were recorded; the meeting was a discussion and information-sharing session. - Both boards supported more regular joint conversation. Longboat Key staff proposed at least an annual joint meeting and offered to send staff to city meetings or workshops for follow-up on specific topics. - Sarasota commissioners requested future information exchanges on St. Armand's undergrounding experience, Longboat Key's planned roundabout, construction staging lessons from the St. Regis project, and Longboat Key's prior study regarding county alignment. - The water taxi agenda item was not separately presented because the city's earlier water transit discussion was considered to have covered it. - The meeting adjourned at 2:55 p.m.