The Public Meeting Index

The New York City Council’s Committee on Criminal Justice, chaired by Councilmember Selvena N. Brooks-Powers, met on September 23, 2026, at 9:30 AM at 250 Broadway. The committee voted on Proposed Introduction No. 246-A, a bill requiring the Department of Correction to inform incarcerated individuals about funds remaining in their commissary accounts upon release and to establish procedures for returning those funds. Six members were present, one was absent. Discussion Items - Chair Brooks-Powers explained that Int. No. 246-A, sponsored by Councilmember Crystal Hudson, would require the Department of Correction to provide written information about institutional funds before release, allow individuals to receive funds in cash, by check, or via a preloaded debit card (after a specified implementation period), prohibit any fees for returning funds, and establish procedures for transferring funds when an individual is transferred to another facility. The chair noted that ensuring access to these funds is critical for individuals transitioning back into the community and addressing immediate expenses. Key Outcomes - Vote on Int. No. 246-A: A motion to approve the introduction was passed by roll call with 6 affirmative votes (Brooks-Powers, Brewer, Cabán, Morano, Narcisse, and Salaam) and 0 negative votes. Councilmember Feliz was absent. The bill was therefore approved by the committee.

The Las Cruces Planning and Zoning Commission met on September 22, 2026 at 6:00 PM. The meeting included public testimony on the Crown Dancer Subdivision preliminary plat, approval of two preliminary plats, and discussion of future meeting schedules. Both agenda items were approved unanimously. Public Comments & Testimony - Residents of Gilmer Way (Ruben Reyes, Melvin Lueras, Vanessa Tavares Corral, Marcella Reyes) expressed concerns about the proposed connection of their cul-de-sac to Valley Drive as part of the Crown Dancer Subdivision. They cited safety risks for children playing, increased traffic, and potential cut-through traffic from nearby Mayfield High School events. They questioned the necessity of the connection and requested alternative access. Discussion Items Item 7.1 – Crown Dancer Subdivision Preliminary Plat - Staff (Adam O'Coah) presented a proposal for 38 residential lots on 9.84 acres zoned NH3S, with access via Valley Drive and an extension of Gilmer Way. The second access is required by fire code for subdivisions over 30 units. Staff recommended approval, noting compliance with code and DRC approval. - Applicant's engineer (Marty Piller) stated the lot sizes (minimum 47 feet wide) were based on builder preferences. He noted that the fire code requires two access points and the narrow frontage on Valley Drive prevents a second access there. - Commissioner Thurston suggested traffic calming measures on the connecting street to deter speeding. Staff noted that a Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) would determine final design. - Public testimony opposed the cul-de-sac connection. - The motion to approve passed unanimously (5-0). Item 7.2 – Lot 1 Pueblo de la Salameda Subdivision Replat 2 Preliminary Plat - Staff (Vincent Bonegas) presented a proposal to create seven commercial lots on 7.68 acres zoned CRS, located near North Rise Drive and Rinconada Boulevard. The plat includes right-of-way tracts for turn lanes and road improvements. Staff recommended approval, with DRC recommending approval after a minor note correction. - Commissioners questioned the necessity of additional turn lanes and the internal access easement design. Commissioner Thurston raised concerns about future connectivity to western parcels. Applicant Josh Skarsgard explained that a 24-foot access easement exists along the west property line to provide future access. - No public comments were received. - The motion to approve passed unanimously (5-0). Other Business - Commissioner Thurston discussed concerns about the new lighting code increasing costs for developers and asked if the commission could waive it for this project. Staff clarified that lighting design falls under DRC purview. - Chair Downs announced that the November and December meetings will be moved to the third Tuesday due to holidays. Key Outcomes - Approved Crown Dancer Subdivision preliminary plat (5-0). - Approved Lot 1 Pueblo de la Salameda Subdivision replat 2 preliminary plat (5-0). - Meeting adjourned at 7:08 PM.

Mayor Holman presided over the joint meeting on September 22, 2026. Councilmember Bloggett was absent. The meeting opened with roll call, the Pledge of Allegiance, and acknowledgment of five proclamations. Proclamations and Recognitions - Declared October 2026 as Domestic Violence Awareness Month. A speaker from the Women's Resource Center stated that one in three women and one in six men are impacted by domestic violence, and that Oklahoma ranks number one in the nation for women assaulted or victimized by intimate partners. Mayor Holman thanked the center and mentioned making a personal contribution. - Declared October 2026 as Pedestrian Safety Month, citing the city's partnership with the regional transit provider (transcribed as "Imbark") on route improvements and a state-of-the-art transit center. - Declared October 2026 as Community Planning Month. Staff noted Brook Street is separated into four or five disconnected sections as an example of planning challenges. - Declared October 2026 as National Bullying Prevention Month. - Declared the week of September 28–October 2, 2026 as Finance and Accounting Appreciation Week. Staff noted more than 1,200 vendor payments are processed each month and described the finance department as helping find solutions, identifying options, and protecting public resources. The formal proclamation text reads "October 28th, 2026 to October 2nd, 2026," conflicting with the September start date listed in the agenda. Consent Calendar - Motion to place items 6–33 on the consent docket passed unanimously. - Item 31, highlighted by Councilmember Kirby, creates an ad hoc public safety committee; interested residents were encouraged to attend the public meetings, and additional members could be called later if vacancies occur. Public Comments & Testimony - Councilmember Kirby reported on the Oklahoma Municipal League conference attended with Councilmember Grant and City Manager Pyle, which alternates between Oklahoma City and Tulsa. Kirby observed that Oklahoma is the only state where cities operate almost entirely on sales tax revenue, and that communities statewide—including a small town about an hour from Norman—face shared challenges such as homelessness, though many lack Norman's economic development. Kirby also highlighted a water-field award for a city employee (named "Carrie") connected to Lake Thunderbird, the drinking water source for Norman, Midwest City, and Del City. - A speaker addressing Ward 4 expressed support for investing in public art and wiring Main Street for sound so pedestrians always hear music, and promoted the Dennis McNett "One Day Gone the Next" event on October 9 at 7 p.m. - A speaker cited public sentiment about turnpike interchanges: about 83 percent of people said the interchanges are not needed, while 69 percent said they would have liked to see them without disrupting anyone's life. - A speaker mentioned CPAR as a mechanism the city and state do not currently use, and offered assistance if needed. - Councilmember Kirby reminded residents that the committee addressing public transit and street construction (the "PSST" committee) meets the fourth Tuesday of the month at 5 p.m., is livestreamed on YouTube, and is open in person; Councilmember Gansbury will take over as chair. Discussion Items - Item 35 — Ordinance 2627-3 (rezoning 404 East Sims from C2 General Commercial to R3 residential): An assistant city attorney presented an amendment to Section 36-201 of the city code, the section establishing where off-premises signs may be placed without special approval. A 2002 amendment was correctly implemented, but an error was discovered around the city's code recodification; the proposed amendment re-inserts bright-line language. No public objections were raised during the pre-development meeting. Council questions addressed whether new signs could still come through a special-permit process and whether the ordinance would carry a 30-day waiting period before taking effect. - Residential lighting: Discussion addressed the city's residential lighting ordinance, its enforcement feasibility, and the relationship between commercial lighting rules and homeowners' associations. Key Outcomes - Proclamations acknowledged and approved. - Consent docket items 6–33 approved unanimously. - The vote outcome on item 35 was not captured in the available transcript; discussion and public comment were heard. Discrepancy Notes - The finance week proclamation contains an apparent date error ("October 28th" instead of September 28). - The transit partner is transcribed as "Imbark" (presumably EMBARK). - The roll call lists no councilmember named Gansbury in the transcribed segment, yet the transcript references Councilmember Gansbury later in the meeting.

The Honolulu City Council Committee on Energy, Environment and Sustainability convened on Tuesday, September 22, 2026, in a hybrid meeting held in the Council Chamber and remotely by interactive conference technology pursuant to Section 92-3.7, Hawaii Revised Statutes. Committee Chair Wire presided, joined by Councilmember Tolba and Vice Chair Dos Santos Tam in the chamber, with Councilmember Tupola participating remotely by video conference. The committee took up three agenda items: an informational briefing on the Oahu Climate Action Plan update, Resolution 26208 accepting a gift of travel expenses, and an informational briefing on the city's electrification of transportation initiatives. Public Comments & Testimony - One member of the public testified on the Climate Action Plan update, expressing strong support for the thoughtfulness with which the effort was conducted. The speaker, who was educated in science including climate science at the University of Hawaii, noted the document is very and properly heavy in mitigation efforts; the testimony concluded before the speaker could elaborate further on adaptation. - No members of the public registered or offered remote or in-person testimony on Resolution 26208 or the electrification of transportation briefing. Discussion Items Informational Briefing: Oahu Climate Action Plan Update (Office of Climate Change, Sustainability and Resiliency - CCSR) - CCSR presented the Climate Action Plan update, identifying 26 priority actions to implement over the next five years and outlining the foundation, methodologies, and analysis supporting the recommended strategies. CCSR recommended that if the city continues reducing emissions today, it can help limit the severity and cost of conditions Oahu must face while adapting to tomorrow, including lowering household costs, reducing city operation fees and costs, and improving clean air. - CCSR noted a smaller handful of the actions are no longer relevant and that robust priorities need to move forward, with regular updates to the council so adjustments can be made through bills, resolutions, and committee conversations. Two of the 26 actions were highlighted as climate mitigation strategies that pair good information with municipal action for the next five years while paying attention to community needs. - Vice Chair Dos Santos Tam referenced the five major action areas, with the fifth being waste, and asked about agency leads and co-partners, whether a table listing these existed in the plan, and the annual reporting timeline. CCSR confirmed it will provide reports on both the first and updated Climate Action Plans simultaneously, due by the end of April each year, and will come to the council early before that due date to show data progress. - Councilmember Tupola asked which of the 26 priority actions have departmental buy-in, noting it would be useful to know which ones other departments support so the council could come behind them with support and funding. CCSR acknowledged bi-monthly coordinated meetings with departments, resource constraints including staffing, and the need to connect on CCSR meeting participation, where 28 people representing different agencies discuss topics in depth. CCSR committed to being relentless in ensuring plans and policies move forward across departments, not only through CCSR. - Councilmember Tupola referenced the YNE readiness review, a partnership being conducted in collaboration with the University of Hawaii at Manoa and the SOIST school, and asked about a point person. CCSR clarified it is part of the steering committee and project team rather than the lead agency. - Discussion addressed the city's climate resiliency fund: CCSR noted current limitations on eligible uses of CRF funds, including whether grant making and support for infrastructure are allowed, and that Proposal 224, if it advances from the Charter Commission, would authorize CCSR to help move the climate resiliency fund through grant funding. The council is still considering which ballot question would be referenced for next steps. - Staffing was discussed, including the lack of any full-time or grant-funded staff for the zero waste program, the Oahu Good Food Program position being in process, and whether the One Water position discussed in the prior budget cycle would be contemplated in the upcoming proposed budget or require a conversation next year. CCSR noted the city has been using conventional procurement and purchasing mechanisms such as RFPs and RFQ's to manage procurement law and BFS rules. Resolution 26208 - Gift of Travel Expenses for Indigenous People's Climate Change Working Group - CCSR presented Resolution 26208, accepting a gift of travel-related expenses valued at $1,304.04 to the city from the Haskell Foundation for a representative from the Office of Climate Change, Sustainability and Resiliency to attend the Indigenous People's Climate Change Working Group in-person workshop from September 22 to 25 in Kansas City, Missouri. A CCSR staff member participates in the working group on behalf of CCSR and was invited to the in-person convening. - No committee questions were raised, no public testimony was offered in person or online, and testimony was closed with no additional discussion. Informational Briefing: City Electrification of Transportation Initiatives (CCSR) - CCSR presented the briefing as part of National Drive Electric Month, which was described as the last two months of September and first two weeks of October, with the presentation available online as Mayor's Message 120-2026. CCSR coordinates initiatives across the city, including under the city's energy savings performance contract led by the Department of Design and Construction (DDC). - CCSR developed internal tools tied to the city's annual sustainability report that allow departments to see which vehicles they use, past usage, and estimated future usage so they are comfortable purchasing an EV that meets their needs. The city prefers to have chargers in place before purchasing vehicles because departments are risk-averse and have expressed concerns about both initial capital costs and operating costs, including the risk of losing funds if not encumbered in time. - The city installed six public chargers and piloted two EVs with a range of 60 miles. In 2020 and 2021, additional chargers were installed under the energy savings performance contract and other CIP projects, such as the bus-ready line at Middle Street. - Last year, over 50,000 vehicles were registered on Oahu, with fewer than two charging ports available for every hundred vehicles. HICO estimates the city will need more than 2,000 public chargers by 2030 to support demand. Encouraging public transit was highlighted as one way to decrease the number of chargers needed. - The city's public charging network will double in size and add seven new locations in the coming months and years. The fleet modernization working group, established by the mayor's renewable fleet policy, has supported these efforts. The city is exploring migrating to different vendors for charger management software so it is not tied to only one vendor, with the software used to manage the network, control power, track usage, and potentially collect revenue. - Councilmember Tupola asked about roles and whether the city is prioritizing EVs or having discussions about other alternative fuels. Discussion also addressed the resiliency fund's usefulness for action items, with CCSR noting the federal agency review occurred in August and approvals on the EPA's part had already occurred. Key Outcomes - The committee received and discussed the informational briefings on the Oahu Climate Action Plan update and the city's electrification of transportation initiatives. - Resolution 26208 was taken up with no committee questions and no public testimony; no opposition was raised, and the committee proceeded to the next agenda item. - CCSR committed to providing reports on both the first and updated Climate Action Plans by the end of April annually and to appearing before the council early with progress data. - CCSR agreed to connect with Councilmember Tupola regarding CCSR meeting attendance and to identify which priority actions have departmental support, along with accompanying funding needs for proposed policies. - No formal roll-call votes were captured in the available transcript; the meeting was adjourned after discussion concluded on all three agenda items.

The Manhattan City Commission met on September 22, 2026, for a work session covering three major agenda items: an update on the Fort Riley Safe Passage ride-share program, the proposed historic designation of Sunset Cemetery, and a detailed presentation of the Edge 3.0 development project with its associated public financing mechanisms. The meeting included significant public comment on the cemetery and Edge 3.0 items. Commissioners provided direction to staff on the cemetery and discussed next steps for Edge 3.0. Fort Riley Safe Passage Program Update - Jared Trumblan of the Flint Hills Metropolitan Planning Organization presented an update on the ride-share program aimed at reducing impaired driving by Fort Riley soldiers. The program uses Lyft vouchers: eligible soldiers receive two $30 vouchers per month. Hours are currently Thursday 5 p.m. through Monday 6 a.m., but will reduce to Thursday–Saturday evenings 5 p.m. to 5 a.m. starting October 1. - Ridership data: From May through August 2026, 2,400 rides were taken, averaging 804 per month and nearly 200 per weekend. Total ride costs were $64,500, of which $55,974 (86%) was covered by vouchers; 64% of rides were entirely covered by the $30 voucher. In September, ridership surged to 448 rides in two weeks (more than double the weekly average) due to football games and a holiday. - The program ran out of money temporarily and has been paused until the new federal fiscal year begins October 1. For fiscal year 2027, funding will be $250,000, up from $100,000 for the current five-month pilot. Over 6,400 soldiers have signed up. The program is currently available to soldiers captain and below; Fort Riley has specifically requested to include younger officers. The MPO may adjust eligibility downward if funds run short. - No public comment was taken on this item. Commissioners thanked Jared and expressed hope that DUI data will show a reduction. Sunset Cemetery Historic Designation - Senior Planner Ben Schmeel presented recommendations from multiple city boards regarding nominating Sunset Cemetery to the State and/or National Register of Historic Places. Background: A 2017–2018 survey of the Sunset area (including zoo, cemetery, Girl Scout Park) recommended a historic district. The Historic Resources Board later recommended a smaller district including only the cemetery, the Sexton's house, and the Landmark Water Tower (already individually listed). The Parks and Recreation Advisory Board and Cemetery Board initially postponed until cemetery improvements were made, but the Parks Board later recommended moving forward with nomination while quieting the title of the Sexton's house; the Cemetery Board recommended excluding the Sexton's house. - Effects of designation: eligibility for state historic trust fund grants ($100,000 competitive, 20% match) and tax credits (for buildings only, require sale to private entity). Properties become subject to preservation review for permits, ground-disturbing projects, and certain improvements. City-owned properties have a lower threshold for review. Burials would not be affected. - Quieting the title of the Sexton's house would require a court process likely taking a year or more. Multiple descendants of the original donors may have an interest. If the city is not the sole owner, objecting owners could block the nomination. - Commissioner Morrison raised concerns about liability and maintenance obligations (e.g., mausoleum roof, fallen headstones) and recommended resolving the title issue before proceeding with any designation. Commissioner Fox argued that the city already owns the cemetery and designation adds no new obligations; he supported moving forward immediately. Commissioner Vaughn asked about the advantage of listing and noted the cemetery board wanted improvements done first. Commissioner McColla sought to include the cemetery now and address the Sexton's house later. - Public comment: Multiple speakers urged inclusion of the Sexton's house in the nomination. Mick Charney detailed the historical significance of the cemetery, its landscaping styles, and the Sexton's house as part of a cohesive story. Kathy Joletowski criticized the rush and accused some commissioners of not valuing preservation. Linda Glasgow questioned the accuracy of a former city attorney's memo and offered her own research. Donna Shankamlin emphasized the house as early workforce housing. Colleen argued the city clearly owns the house and should include it. Mel reminded the commission of the city's certified local government responsibilities. Rex suggested listing could increase the property's value if sold. - Staff recommended: move forward with nominating the cemetery (excluding Sexton's house) and begin quieting the title for the Sexton's house simultaneously. Commissioners gave direction to proceed with the nomination of the cemetery and the Landmark Water Tower, and to start the quiet title action for the Sexton's house, with the possibility of adding it to the district later. The commission noted that two separate nominations (cemetery and house) could proceed simultaneously to isolate any title issues. Edge 3.0 Project and Financing Mechanisms - Greg Willems (K-State Foundation CEO), Trent Armbrust, and Greg Lorenz presented the Edge 3.0 development, a $304 million multi-project initiative adjacent to K-State. The project includes already-completed elements (Ag Innovation Center, Billbury Family Events Center, indoor track facility) and planned components (Edge Tech facility, BIVAP biomanufacturing, and Champions Gate with hotel, condos, restaurants). - The K-State Next Gen strategic plan aims for 30,000 students and learners by 2030 (currently 21,350 on campus). Greg Willems clarified that only about 23,000 are expected to be physical students; the rest are online learners. - Public financing tools requested: STAR bonds (incremental state sales tax, estimated net proceeds $21.2 million over 20 years; $7.5 million in sales tax not captured flows to city, $3.15 million to county), Tax Increment Financing (TIF) on 15.5 acres in Champions Gate (estimated $11.2 million total, with 80% to developer and 20% to city), and a Community Improvement District (CID) (1% sales tax, net present value $13 million). Total public financing assistance is 17% of the capital stack, lower than comparable Kansas projects (KU Gateway at 27%, others at 34%+). - Projected impacts (from independent consultants): 262 permanent jobs, $9 million annual payroll; 95,000–100,000+ visitors annually, 60–70% from over 100 miles; total visitor spending $24–$28 million per year; over 20 years, $58.2 million in direct city benefit and $82 million combined city/county/school district benefit. The STAR bond study concluded the project would not harm other STAR bond districts or local businesses. - Commissioners raised concerns: Commissioner McCullough questioned the feasibility of 30,000 students given demographic trends, the need for a hotel (140–160 rooms) given current 62% occupancy, and the fact that much of the $304 million investment is already spent on completed facilities. Commissioner Morrison wanted a detailed development agreement before a vote and expressed skepticism about the 80/20 TIF split, noting city investments in North Campus Corridor (over $65 million). Commissioner Fox supported the project but suggested a more balanced TIF split (50-50 or 60-40). - Public comment: Greg McKinley opposed the TIF part, arguing it funds condos/hotels/restaurants under the guise of research; he said property tax abatement shifts costs to other taxpayers. Gary Olz compared to past TIF districts and noted city bears costs for services. Darren Solden (Chamber of Commerce) supported the project for economic growth. Matt McCrane spoke in favor of private investment and new visitors. - City staff (Jason Hilgers) presented the North Campus Corridor financial summary, showing total costs over $65 million funded by GO bonds ($52.3 million), athletics, city-university funds, state grants, and sales tax revenues. Approximately $20 million of those costs are eligible for TIF reimbursement. Staff noted the economic development sales tax (2023) is not captured by STAR bonds and was not included in projections. Key Outcomes - Fort Riley Safe Passage: No action required; informational only. - Sunset Cemetery: The commission directed staff to: - Begin the process of quieting the title for the Sexton's house. - Proceed with nominating the Sunset Cemetery and the Landmark Water Tower to the historic register, excluding the Sexton's house until the title is resolved. - Consider pursuing two separate nominations (cemetery and house) to allow the cemetery nomination to move forward without delay. - Edge 3.0: Commissioners gave general feedback but no formal vote. City staff and the K-State Foundation were directed to continue negotiations on a development agreement, including further discussion of the TIF split and performance metrics. A public hearing was set for November 17, 2026, with a resolution to set the hearing date to be considered on October 6, 2026. Commissioner Morrison indicated he would move to continue the matter if an agreement is not ready by November.

The Fairmont City Council held its regular meeting on Tuesday, September 22, 2026, at 7 p.m. The meeting opened with a prayer led by Marcella Yarmachuk, the Pledge of Allegiance by Deputy Mayor Rice, and a proclamation for Constitution Week (September 17–23) presented by Beth Nigemeyer of the Daughters of the American Revolution. Proclamation and Opening Ceremonies - Proclamation for Constitution Week read by Mayor Ballard, recognizing the 239th anniversary of the U.S. Constitution. - Beth Nigemeyer (DAR) highlighted the history of Constitution Week and invited council to participate in next year's Bells Across America celebration. Approval of Minutes - Minutes from the regular meeting of September 8, 2026, were approved unanimously by voice vote. Public Hearings - Postponement of a public hearing: A motion to postpone a public hearing on an unspecified ordinance indefinitely passed 8–1 (Councilmember Weber opposed). - Ordinance to approve current replacement pages to the Fairmont City Code: No speakers; adopted unanimously by roll call (all yes). - Ordinance approving interlocal agreement with Marion County Commission for 2025 Burn Justice Assistance Grant (JAG) award: No speakers; adopted unanimously by roll call. Announcements & Reports - Councilmember Moran (Unsheltered Task Force): Reported that since August 7, 2026, 28 individuals have been housed and 23 IDs paid for. A food pantry distribution was scheduled for the following day. - Councilmember Soule: Noted a productive September, including ribbon cuttings at parks, business re-establishments, Team Fairmont mini grants, and comprehensive plan sessions. - Councilmember McDaniel: Announced asphalt work beginning on the connector. - City Manager Travis Blosser: Reported on the reopening of Key Bar America (manufacturing facility), Rotary Club Mini Park renovation, progress at Windmill Park, Sallyfield estates drainage improvements, downtown sidewalk project (expected completion before early voting Oct 21), and WVU Medicine Fairmont Medical Center's return of surgical services (a $27M investment, with a planned $70M hospital wing). He also noted ongoing work at Windmill Park with minor electrical issues and potential subsidence near field one. Citizens' Petitions - Shauna Santee (903 Sylvan Ave): Opposed the proposed Republic Services contract extension with an 11.2% rate increase (from $21.66 to $24.09 per unit). She argued the city had two years to negotiate a new contract but failed, placing residents at a disadvantage. She urged council to vote no on setting the public hearing and to absorb the cost increase instead of passing it to residents. She also noted that other communities offer discounts for seniors. - Aaron Hamler (Granttown): Urged cancellation of the flock camera contract, citing 37 documented abuses nationwide (including stalking and felony charges). He called for a closed-circuit TV alternative and criticized the city manager's response as disrespectful. He also questioned the $800,000 expenditure on park amenities (concession stands, seating, lighting, ADA walkways) and suggested the funds could better serve the unhoused. He criticized a photo op with Congressman Riley Moore, accusing him of supporting genocide. The mayor interrupted, stating he was only signed up to speak about flock cameras. Discussion Items - Republic Services Contract Extension: The city clerk read the synopsis of the ordinance authorizing a first amendment to the contract, extending it to March 31, 2027, with a monthly charge of $24.09 per unit (an 11.2% increase from the current $21.66). City Manager Blosser explained that the extension was necessary to allow time for a new RFP/RFQ process, which would include substantive changes (e.g., allowing trash to go to out-of-state landfills, removing the requirement for a local office). He acknowledged the delay was his responsibility and that bringing sanitation in-house was not feasible due to equipment and personnel costs. Councilmember Weber expressed concern about the lack of competition and the burden on seniors on fixed incomes (noting the 3.8% COLA increase for Social Security). Councilmember Soule wished the RFP had been released sooner but supported the extension to seek competitive bids. A voice vote set the public hearing for October 13, 2026; nays were heard but the motion passed. - Knights of Pythias Building Demolition: An ordinance to approve a right-of-entry and payment agreement with the Marion County Board of Education for demolition at 1573 Mary Lou Retton Drive was introduced. A public hearing was set for October 13, 2026, by unanimous voice vote. - Feast of Seven Fishes Festival: A resolution endorsing the annual festival (December 11–12, 2026) sponsored by Main Street Fairmont was adopted unanimously by roll call. - Reappointment to Building Commission: Jonathan France was reappointed to the Fairmont Building Commission for a five-year term ending October 31, 2031, approved unanimously by roll call. Key Outcomes - Public hearing postponed indefinitely (8–1 vote). - Adopted current replacement pages to city code (unanimous). - Adopted interlocal agreement with Marion County for JAG grant (unanimous). - Set public hearing for Knights of Pythias demolition ordinance for October 13, 2026. - Set public hearing for Republic Services contract extension with 11.2% rate increase for October 13, 2026; passed over opposition. - Adopted resolution endorsing Feast of Seven Fishes Festival (unanimous). - Approved reappointment of Jonathan France to Building Commission (unanimous). - Meeting adjourned.

The Cobb County Board of Commissioners held its regular meeting on September 22, 2026, addressing proclamations, public comments, consent agenda approval (with opposition to microtransit items), a sheriff's compensation adjustment, multiple transportation and facilities contracts, and commissioner announcements. Presentations & Proclamations - National Day of Remembrance for Homicide Victims – Designated September 25, 2026, honoring the 411 murders in Georgia and 25 homicides in Cobb County in 2025. - Small Business Opportunity Week (September 21–25, 2026) – Recognized the 1.2 million small businesses in Georgia employing 1.7 million people. Accepted by Adrian Carr, founder of Ascent Communications. - Cool Kids Committee Incorporated – Celebrated 10 years of youth empowerment, including turning an abandoned concession stand into a youth center in Austell in 2023. - Center for Family Resources – 40th Anniversary of Thanks for Giving Food Drive – Served over 60,000 families, distributed over 3,000 lbs of food, engaged over 10,000 volunteers. Recognized Jerry Barr (30+ years) and CEO Melanie Keegan. - Girl Scout Gold Award – Lane's Serenity Garden – Created a garden at Police Precinct Five for officers to decompress, funded through community donations. Public Comments & Testimony - Jamie Moore (District 3): Detailed school zone signage non-compliance at Tritt Elementary, including a 139-foot sign placement error and missing signs. Reported no response from Cobb DOT after 50 days. - Taylor Arnold (District 4): Opposed Flock ALPRs and social media monitoring tools, citing surveillance abuse, lack of prevention funding, and legal risks. Asked for audit and halt. - Joel Becker: Presented FBI data showing murders rising from 497 (2019) to 730 (2024), argued Flock ineffective. Shared maps showing camera coverage and military access (U.S. Park Police, Air Force). Cited 9.8/10 National Vulnerability Database risk score. - Bob Kenny (MTO4): Supported proposed data center at Delk and I-75, claiming 98% water recycling and that data centers reduce utility costs. Urged board to rely on facts. - Sabrina Mao (East Cobb): Criticized SPLOST spending on roundabouts, empty buses, and a new library. Advocated government live within means. - Virginia Choit: Opposed microtransit on consent agenda, citing state moratorium and that over 60% voted no on MSPLOST. Called SPLOST a 'slush fund' and criticized Lower Roswell project. - Denny Wilson (District 4): Expressed concerns about Mableton cityhood increasing taxes for seniors, asked for park compensation details, and requested county disclosure of past contributions. - Larry Savage (Columns Drive): Requested a new bridge over Soap Creek due to three-time flooding. Noted 35-square-mile drainage area and inadequate bridge. Argued county has sufficient funds. - Donald Barth: Commended community events (Kiwanas 9/11 tribute, Dr. McMorris's award). Criticized microtransit as vote-buying and urged transparency. - Susie Clark: Opposed Flock cameras, analogized to phone tracking but noted inability to opt out. Appreciated board's respectful listening compared to school board. - Craig Harfoot: Criticized SPLOST taxes on food and utilities, economic warnings, AI software purchase, and library land purchase. Advocated paper records over digital hacking risks. - Flora Tommy (District 4): Impassioned plea for transit ADA improvements – noted lack of pedestrian crossings for wheelchair users. Cited 30% senior population and her own disability. Called microtransit essential. Consent Calendar - Approved as revised (added workers' compensation settlement). Motion carried 5-0, with Commissioners Burrell and Gambrel noting opposition to microtransit items (7, 8, 9, 10). Discussion Items - Sheriff's Office Compensation Adjustment (Item 20): Authorized salary of $215,000 for Chief Deputy and $210,000 for Assistant Chief Deputy per HB 1588 (unanimous legislative passage). Funding from eliminating a position, resulting in $1,600 savings. Sheriff stated future salary adjustment for himself would come to board later. Passed 4-1 (Commissioner Gambrel opposed), with Commissioner Sheffield supporting due to budget-neutral approach. - Transportation Items (21-28): All approved 5-0. - 21: Transit ops renewal with Transdev Services Inc., $32,911,911 (Oct 2026–Sep 2027). - 22: Drainage repairs on Clinton Drive, $132,449.40. - 23: Active Transportation Plan with Gresham Smith, $424,244. - 24: Lost Mountain Road intersection improvements, $1,297,960.37. - 25: Collins Road bridge replacement, $2,069,517.88. - 26: GDOT agreement for Johnson Ferry/Shallowford intersection, $25,000 oversight fee. - 27: Design-build for same intersection, $2,317,038. - 28: Engineering design for King Springs Road Sidewalk, $71,930. - Support Services: GovAI Enterprise Software license (5-year, $747,127.95) approved 5-0, partially funded by 2022 SPLOST. - Facilities Management (29-33): All approved 5-0. - 29: Roofing materials for Public Safety Training Center, $1,857,344.30 + $92,861 contingency. - 30: Magistrate court restroom renovations, $212,434.98. - 31: Roof replacement contract (S. Edwards LLC), $1,033,690 + $51,684.50 contingency. - 32: Parking lot resurfacing at Driver Services in Kennesaw, $70,834. - 33: HVAC replacement at Marietta Cobb Art Museum, $148,728. - Appointment: Marlon Longacre to Region 1 Behavioral Health and Development Disabilities Planning Board (replacing Mary Lou Pagno), approved 5-0. Key Outcomes - Sheriff's compensation adjustment approved 4-1; future sheriff salary request anticipated. - All consent and regular agenda items passed with noted opposition on microtransit. - Proclamations presented and accepted. - Commissioners announced upcoming events: Fixed Georgia Pets Paw and Pickleball Classic (Sept 26), Make-A-Wish 5K (Oct 3), Fish with Your Commissioner Fishing Rodeo (Oct 10), Community Housing Forum (Sept 30), and West Nile virus prevention video.

The Cranston City Council held a regular meeting on September 22, 2026, beginning with a brief special session for safety services and licensing, followed by the main council meeting. The council recognized several Little League champions, approved resolutions honoring Italian heritage and Hispanic Heritage Month, heard public comments on a proposed pool ordinance and ongoing Oakland Avenue flooding, and discussed issues with Waste Management services. Several committee reports and ordinance amendments were adopted, while one ordinance was continued to the October 19 meeting due to a drafting error. Consent Calendar - Approval of Minutes: The minutes of the June 15, 2026 regular city council meeting were approved unanimously. - Claims Committee: Reported no new claims as of September 14, 2026. - Safety Services and License Committee: Reported nothing new as of September 14, 2026. - Finance Committee: Real estate tax abatements and tangible tax abatement were approved unanimously. - Public Works Committee: Approved a permit for work within the Rhode Island State Farm Cemetery with a plan dated January 21, 2025. Public Comments & Testimony - Drake Patton (684 Native Avenue, online): Opposed the resolution to permanently fly the Italian flag at Etre Park, calling it insulting to non-Italian taxpayers. He also criticized the proposed pool ordinance as overbroad, poorly drafted, and a two-year project based on only two documented pool rentals. He argued it could inadvertently restrict home daycares, church fundraisers, farms, and farmers markets. - Jess Salter (6 Vaughn Lane, online): Expressed confusion over the pool ordinance's wording, noting that phrases like "including but not limited to" and the term "space" are ambiguous and could make the ordinance a citywide prohibition on compensated use of outdoor property for assemblies, not just pool rentals. She suggested simpler language targeting short-term rental of residential swimming pools. - Kimberly Bagosian (45 Mount View Drive, in chambers): Reported on Oakland Avenue flooding, noting that flashing warning lights were not operating during a recent storm, and requested a solution. - Robert Luzi (22 Waterfall Way, in chambers): Described his car being totaled after driving through floodwater on Oakland Avenue when warning lights were not flashing. He criticized the lack of response from police and fire, and urged the council to address the flooding hazard. - Written testimony from Anthony Melillo and Joshua (last name not provided) was entered into the record unanimously. Discussion Items - Italian Flag Resolution: Sponsored by Councilman Banano and others, this resolution authorizes the permanent flying of the official flag of the Republic of Italy at Etre Park in Knightsville. Councilman Banano noted the park is named after the Italian town of Etri and that an Italian flag had flown there for about 50 years before being removed during park renovations. Multiple council members expressed support, and the resolution was approved unanimously with all council members added as co-sponsors. - Hispanic Heritage Month Resolution: Sponsored by Councilman Anduhar and others, this resolution celebrates Hispanic Heritage Month (September 15 – October 15, 2026). Councilman Anduhar highlighted the contributions of the Hispanic community in Cranston. The resolution was approved unanimously with all council members added as co-sponsors. - Ordinance Committee Report: - One ordinance (relating to a yield sign) was continued to the October 19 meeting due to an incorrect call letter. Councilman Bonano noted a pattern where the traffic engineer changes recommendations after proposals are made. - Three traffic/parking ordinances (Ordinance 81703, 81704, 81705) were approved unanimously: yield sign installation, one-hour parking restrictions, and no parking/two-hour parking restrictions. - Oakland Avenue Flooding Update: Councilman Ritz requested an update after a recent storm. The Director explained the flooding is a city-state problem, with water from Oakland Avenue (a state road) overwhelming Wilbur Avenue. A meeting with the acting DOT director is scheduled for September 23, 2026. No quick fix is expected; long-term solutions like raising the road or underground storage would cost millions. Councilwoman Graziano recommended applying for EPA 319 non-point source grants and suggested underground storage and infiltration basins. The council agreed to keep this item on for the October communications. - Waste Management Update: Councilman Ritz reported that a meeting with Waste Management was suggested as a smaller group. The Director noted that local Waste Management staff are responsive but that the national call center is a major source of customer frustration. Issues include stolen or damaged bins, lack of replacement lids, and a citywide bin shortage (bins are 14 years old, past their 10-year lifecycle). New bins (about 1,000 each of blue and gray) are on order and expected in the second or third week of October. Council members expressed frustration over rodent problems, uncollected recycling, and lack of customer service. Councilman Banano called for more proactive oversight and accountability in the contract. Key Outcomes - The resolution to permanently fly the Italian flag at Etre Park was approved unanimously. - The resolution celebrating Hispanic Heritage Month was approved unanimously. - Real estate tax abatements and tangible tax abatement were approved unanimously. - Public Works permit for the Rhode Island State Farm Cemetery was approved. - Three traffic/parking ordinances were approved unanimously; one ordinance was continued to October 19, 2026. - Written testimony from two individuals was entered into the record unanimously. - The council will follow up on Oakland Avenue flooding with a meeting scheduled with DOT on September 23, 2026, and will explore grant opportunities. - A smaller meeting with Waste Management will be arranged to address customer service and bin replacement issues. - All new business items were referred to respective subcommittees unanimously.

The Norman City Council held a special meeting on Tuesday, September 22, 2026, to continue discussion of a proposed immigration resolution and to adjourn into executive session for pending legal matters. Council members debated the resolution's scope, the role of the Norman Human Rights Commission, and whether the language could imply that unlawful residence is acceptable in Norman. No final vote was taken on the resolution. Discussion Items Immigration Resolution (Continued Discussion) - The council reviewed a revised draft of the immigration resolution, updated after the last oversight committee meeting. The revision centers on six website-information provisions: contact information for local and regional consulates; literacy, English-language, and other educational resources; information on civil rights protections; available government and nonprofit resources (primarily links to third-party entities); accurate information about city policies and correction of inaccurate media or social media information; and information on reporting crimes to the police consistent with AFICO law and policy. A council member expressed support for the revised version. - Councilmember Steele asked about the workflow for complaints submitted to the Norman Human Rights Commission (HRC). City Attorney Rick said the HRC lacks the EEOC's resources, investigators, and subpoena power. Since the human rights ordinance was revised, only one complaint had been submitted — a transgender man upset at being called "sir" at Walmart — which was dropped after the complainant stopped responding. The HRC can refer cases to the city attorney's office or advise complainants about federal agencies, but the city attorney said there is limited utility. Steele noted that someone filing with the HRC instead of the EEOC could miss the EEOC's 300-day filing deadline. It was noted that the HRC will present to the oversight committee in November. - Councilmember Bruce said he needed time to read the draft and expressed concern that the resolution could give unlawful residents a "false sense of security" and "cross the line" if it implies or encourages unlawful residence or makes Norman more attractive to unlawful residents. He explained that a sanctuary city designation would involve declining ICE detainer requests that ask jails to hold individuals for up to 48 additional hours, but Norman cannot make that choice because it does not control the county jail. He argued that the longer someone remains unlawfully in the U.S., the harder it becomes to obtain lawful permanent residence or citizenship, and the city should not do that person a disservice by implying otherwise. - City Attorney Rick responded that the resolution addresses fear among both undocumented and documented immigrants — including naturalized citizens who have been detained — about reporting crimes, and it directs people to resources rather than providing legal advice. He said residents and community groups had asked about the issue and that Councilmember Grant had been working on the resolution for more than a year, probably two years. He acknowledged that a person arrested by Norman police for another offense and taken to the county jail would have their immigration status checked. - Bruce asked whether city officials had met directly with immigrant community groups. The city attorney said he was aware of concerns from people he knows but had not met with specific groups he could name; another council member said they had spoken with groups they could name. - Councilmember Gansburg said she would not vote yes unless the provision on the process for submitting complaints to the Norman Human Rights Commission (section 17, section three) is removed, arguing that volunteer commissioners are not trained for that role and other state and federal agencies are better suited. Councilmember Steele expressed a similar concern but was open to keeping the HRC reference with an added "and/or the appropriate resource" phrase. Councilmember Grant, the resolution's author, said she was open to adding the EEOC. - A council member read the HRC's charter duties (NCC 2-337) and bylaws, noting complaints must currently be filed with the city clerk's office, then sent to legal, with the HRC participating in the process. They suggested rewording the resolution to follow the existing bylaws so the HRC does not bear procedural liability. - Councilmember Dixon said the title could be misleading by suggesting sanctuary-city status. He said he is comfortable telling crime victims and witnesses that it is safe to call Norman police, because immigration enforcement is a federal function, Norman police do not arrest people for immigration status, and the city does not operate a jail. He said he understood the concerns raised by Councilmembers Bruce, Grant, Gansburg, Kirby, and Steele. - Bruce questioned why the resolution identifies a particular community for a public-safety message that applies to citizens, legal permanent residents, and unlawful residents alike. The city attorney said the focus came from direction given by the council and the oversight committee. - An alternative resolution was circulated focusing on the rule of law, public safety, and the equal dignity of all persons. Grant said she does not support the alternative because it lacks the historical context and facts of the original and believes the original has the support to move forward. The mayor supported language stating that nothing in the resolution encourages, facilitates, or endorses violations of federal immigration law, recognizing the value of lawful immigration, and encouraging Congress to act on pathways to citizenship. Grant suggested simple language: "Norman is not a sanctuary city, nor does it have the ability to be one." - Councilmember JC said he generally supports the resolution as written because it addresses all residents and does not imply that unlawful residence is acceptable, but agreed that explicit sanctuary-city language would help. - The city attorney agreed to include the original draft, the revised draft, and the alternative in council packets for the next meeting. A further discussion with council comments incorporated was anticipated; the HRC is scheduled to appear before the oversight committee in November. Executive Session - The council voted unanimously (all in favor, none opposed) to adjourn the special meeting and convene into executive session, as authorized by Oklahoma statutes, to discuss: a pending investigation claim regarding the Young Family Athletics Center; a continued discussion of a pending action filed in Cleveland County District Court styled City of Norman v. Jeffrey and Chris Kristen Ars; and a pending action styled State of Oklahoma ex rel. Department of Transportation v. City of Norman. Key Outcomes - No vote was taken on the immigration resolution; discussion will continue at a future council meeting with revised drafts reflecting council comments. - The council unanimously approved adjourning into executive session for the pending claims and litigation listed above.