Public Meetings - Hillsborough County, Florida

The Board of County Commissioners held the second of two required public hearings to consider a text amendment to the Land Development Code (LDC). The sole item was LDC 25-1126 regarding Wellhead and Surface Water Resource Protection, proposed by the Environmental Services Division. Staff presented the amendment, no public speakers were heard, and the board voted unanimously to adopt the ordinance. Discussion Items - LDC 25-1126 Wellhead and Surface Water Resource Protection: Israel Monsanto of Development Services introduced the amendment, explaining it consolidates regulations for map updates submitted under HC CPA 25-16, provides clarity to existing LDC language, and updates the review frequency to align with Tampa Bay Water’s Master Water Plan updates. The amendment also allows the county to review and propose WRPA or SWRPA designations between review cycles for future or additional drinking water sources. No significant changes were made since the first public hearing. Key Outcomes - Motion to adopt LDC 25-1126: Moved by Commissioner Whistle, seconded by Commissioner Cohen. The motion carried 6–0, approving the ordinance.

The Hillsborough County Board of County Commissioners convened on January 15, 2026, to hold public hearings on amendments to the Comprehensive Plan and the Land Development Code. All items on the agenda were approved unanimously by a 6-0 vote. Consent Calendar - Procedural Motion: Commissioner Cohen moved, seconded by Commissioner Bowles, to continue the public hearing in the absence of a scheduled member. The motion carried 6-0. - HCCPA 25-16 (Surface Water & Wellhead Protection Maps): Publicly initiated large-scale map amendment updating the surface water resource protection and wellhead resource protection maps. Approved 6-0. - HCCPA 25-17 (Fort Hamer Road Corridor Preservation): Privately initiated text and map amendment to add Fort Hamer Road to the Corridor Preservation Plan and add a policy to the mobility section. Approved 6-0. - HCCPA 25-19 (Urban Service Area Expansion): Small-scale map amendment expanding the Urban Service Area for 10.01 acres at 4950 Saffold Road. Approved 6-0. - HCCPA 25-20 (Future Land Use Change): Small-scale map amendment changing the future land use of 10.01 acres at 4950 Saffold Road from Agricultural Rural (1-5) to Residential-4. Approved 6-0. - LDC 25-126 (Wellhead & Surface Water Protection Code Updates): Land Development Code amendment updating regulations to align with the adopted map changes and provide review flexibility. Approved 6-0. Public Comments & Testimony - Pat Neal (Applicant, Neal Communities): Spoke in support of HCCPA 25-17. He stated his company builds about 27,000 homes mostly in Manatee and Sarasota Counties and hopes to plan a community around the proposed Fort Hamer Road extension, emphasizing its importance for connecting to Ruskin. - Greg Horwidell (Deputy County Administrator): Spoke in support of HCCPA 25-17. He noted that the county will initiate a separate amendment for a Fort Hamer/I-75 interchange in an upcoming cycle, praising the applicant's proactive planning and collaboration. - Cammy Corbett (Hill Ward and Henderson, representing the applicant): Spoke in support of HCCPA 25-19 and HCCPA 25-20. She stated the requests are straightforward add-ons to previously approved council zoning and do not increase the total dwelling unit count beyond what was already approved for the Planned Development. Discussion Items - Staff Reports and Deliberation: Planning Commission and Development Services staff presented each agenda item, detailing consistency with the Comprehensive Plan's goals, objectives, and policies. Key points included: - HCCPA 25-16: Staff (Diego Guerra) explained the updates to the surface water and wellhead protection maps reflect the latest available data and remove outdated zone designations. - HCCPA 25-17: Staff (Katrina Corcoran) described the proposed Fort Hamer Road alignment, agency comments regarding wildlife and wetlands, and the addition of a policy to enable concurrent infrastructure planning with urban expansion areas. - HCCPA 25-19 & HCCPA 25-20: Staff (Lillian Linahan and Alexis Myers) highlighted the 10.01-acre site's adjacency to the Urban Service Area, its consistency with the Wimauma Village Community Plan, and agency comments on utility capacity and school capacity. The residential density would increase from a maximum of 2 units under the current designation to 40 units under the proposed Residential-4 designation, though the applicant stated no additional units are sought. - LDC 25-126: Staff (Israel Monsanto) outlined the code updates that consolidate, clarify, and align wellhead and surface water protection regulations with the adopted map amendments. - Commissioner Wistel's Comments: During the discussion of HCCPA 25-17, Commissioner Wistel expressed strong support, citing the proposal as a rare example of advance road planning in the county. He contrasted it with decades-long backlogs of unimproved roads (e.g., Lithia-Pinecrest) and stated that this proactive model should be the standard moving forward. Key Outcomes - All six actions (1 procedural motion and 5 agenda items) were approved unanimously by a 6-0 vote. - Procedural Action: The board adjourned the Comprehensive Plan Amendment Public Hearing and opened the Land Development Code Amendment Public Hearing. - Upcoming Items: The Deputy County Administrator announced a publicly initiated county amendment for a Fort Hamer/I-75 interchange will be brought forward for consideration. The applicant for items HCCPA 25-19 and 25-20 stated a rezoning application is forthcoming. - Vote Recording: Items B1, B2, C1, C2, and LDC were all passed with individual motions, seconds, and 6-0 votes.

This workshop was held on January 14, 2026, to provide the Board of County Commissioners with a comprehensive overview of the Hillsborough County Health Care Plan (HCHCP), its history, financial status, and future considerations. No formal action was taken, but commissioners provided guidance and direction for potential changes. The fund balance has grown to an estimated $531 million, prompting discussion on how to best utilize or reduce it. Presentations & Provider Testimony - Kevin Wagner (Health Care Services Director) presented an overview of the plan's origins (1991), mission, eligibility (18-64, 0-175% FPL), enrollment (23,527 in FY25), and budget ($129M medical, $38M admin). He highlighted the plan's award-winning integrated care model and the need to address the large fund balance. He presented two scenarios: (1) expanding expenditures (trauma payments, capital outlay, step-down facility) and (2) reducing the sales tax (from 0.5% to 0.45% or 0.4%). - Sarah Dodds (BayCare Health System) described BayCare's role as a level II trauma center, treating 6,500 HCHCP patients over 26,000 encounters in three years. She emphasized the plan's impact on medication access and avoiding ER visits. - Joe Liney (IBIS Health Care) shared that behavioral health patients have shorter life expectancies and that HCHCP helps transition homeless and underserved populations into primary care, saving lives and reducing ER visits. - Sherry Hoback (Tampa Family Health Centers) noted that 54% of HCHCP members are served by Tampa Family, with 41,000 encounters per year. She highlighted cost efficiency ($463 per member per month vs. national average $1,214) and quality outcomes exceeding national benchmarks. - Steve Harris (Tampa General Hospital) stated TGH is the largest provider of hospital services for HCHCP, handling 800 inpatient discharges in FY25. He noted the Health Park specialty clinic operates at a $15M annual loss and is at capacity, and requested additional trauma funding. - Brad Herrmanns (Suncoast Community Health Centers) commended HCHCP for coordinating community health responses, integrating behavioral and primary care, and leading opioid and behavioral health initiatives. Discussion Items - Chair asked about the enrollment increase since 2023, which Kevin Wagner attributed to improved communication and technology, not solely economic factors. - Commissioner Wistel questioned whether local taxes could be used for charity care for undocumented individuals. Wagner confirmed no such expenditures occur (99.991% documentation compliance). Wistel also argued that membership has been flat (15,500) yet expenses doubled recently, and questioned the motivation for increasing expenditures. He cited a 1991 board resolution that the tax should be reviewed if federal programs like ACA provided coverage. He criticized a provider executive's high salary while asking for taxpayer funds. - Commissioner Cohen noted uncertainty (ACA subsidies, legislative property tax changes) and urged proceeding gingerly. He highlighted the fund balance growth is expected to stabilize, and suggested waiting for more information before making changes. - Commissioner Miller requested data on what percentage of provider programs are funded by HCHCP and emphasized the need for ample time to consider options. - Commissioner Bowles supported measured reduction of the tax and expanding services to those most in need. He questioned the categorization of food security under enhanced trauma programs and suggested hybrid options. He noted potential ACA subsidy expiration could affect 229,000 residents. - Commissioner Myers strongly defended the program, stating it is vital for her district's low-income residents. She called for better marketing of the plan and opposed criticism of provider salaries, focusing instead on the program's impact. - Chair concluded by thanking participants, agreeing to proceed gingerly, and suggesting exploring any additional opportunities to relieve the general revenue fund burden. Key Outcomes - No formal votes were taken; the workshop was informational. - Commissioners expressed interest in further analysis before any decisions. - Direction was given to explore potential hybrid models combining expenditure increases with a modest sales tax reduction. - Staff will provide additional data on provider dependency on HCHCP funding and the timeline for potential ACA subsidy changes. - Further board discussions will occur, with no immediate action planned.

The Hillsborough Transportation Planning Organization (TPO) Board met on January 14, 2026, at 10:00 a.m. The meeting covered adoption of safety performance targets, a prioritization process evaluation, status reports, and staff updates. Key actions included approving the 2026 safety targets, accepting short-term prioritization recommendations, and cancelling a February special meeting. Consent Calendar - Approved the December 10, 2025 meeting minutes. - Approved Consent Agenda items: Committee Appointments and the Community Transportation Coordinator (CTC) Redesignation Letter of Intent, as recommended by the Transportation Disadvantaged Coordinating Board. Public Comments & Testimony - Only Mr. Rick Fernandez (CAC Chair) was signed up for public comment; he deferred his time to the CAC report. - One advance public comment was received (Bob O’Malley via X) regarding a Brightline Station Area Studies survey. Committee Reports - CAC Report (Rick Fernandez): The Citizens Advisory Committee (CAC) met on January 7, 2026. They elected officers, recommended removal of members with extended absences, and voted unanimously to recommend the TPO Board not approve the 2026 safety performance targets, citing lack of context and transparency. They also requested that the high-injury network speed study be presented alongside the March Safety Effectiveness Report. The CAC noted its membership is underrepresented in key demographics and geographic areas. - TAC Report (Harmoni McGee): The Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) recommended approval of the 2026 safety and public transit agency safety plan targets. Clarification was provided that the requirement is for data-driven, realistic targets, not necessarily reductions. The TAC noted a 1% reduction on highway safety targets. Action Items 2026 Safety Performance Targets & Public Transit Agency Safety Plan (PTASP) Targets - Connor Trejos-MacDonald presented the required annual targets. Key data: - Fatalities are down; the TPO met its prior fatality and motorcycle fatality targets. A 1% reduction factor was applied to proposed 2026 targets. - Serious injuries also declined; the 2026 target for non-motorized serious injuries is no more than 228. - HART’s PTASP targets use a 10% increase factor for mean distance between major mechanical failures (target 9,700 miles). - Discussion: Councilmember Hurtak urged lower targets; HART staff agreed to revisit. Chair Ross criticized the process as lacking a clear link between targets and projects. Dr. Wong noted a safety effectiveness study is underway. Commissioner Boles suggested partnering on drone/blood delivery programs for trauma response. - Outcome: Motion by Councilmember Clendenin, seconded by Mayor Kilton, to approve the targets. Approved by voice vote with no audible opposition. TPO Prioritization Process Evaluation - Elizabeth Watkins presented short-term recommendations to improve project prioritization for the $25M annual federal fund allocation: 1. Screen projects for readiness to support delivery. 2. Reformat the priority list to show project status and next steps. 3. Designate “symbolic” projects that support discretionary grant applications. - Discussion: Councilmember Clendenin praised the effort but noted inherent bias in language. Commissioner Wostal questioned whether numerical ranking is necessary; Dr. Wong suggested ranking only fully ready projects. Commissioner Boles asked about discretionary grant partners (e.g., municipalities). - Outcome: Motion by Councilmember Clendenin, seconded by Commissioner Boles, to accept the short-term recommendations. Approved. Status Reports Traffic Signal Prioritization Study (Wade Reynolds) - Purpose: Develop a performance-based methodology to prioritize traffic signal upgrades across 1,200 signalized intersections. Criteria include structural condition, age, floodplain location, evacuation routes, and UPS capability. - Discussion: Board member Radhakrishnan asked about safety overlays (high-injury network); Reynolds confirmed CAC and TAC suggestions (additional points for high-injury network, pedestrian accessibility, volume-to-capacity ratio). Dr. Wong noted workaround strategies for generator daisy-chaining after hurricanes. Commissioner Boles suggested solar backup and referenced a prior county initiative. Mr. Slater recommended reviewing the Florida Policy Project report on signal system efficiency. - Outcome: Information only; formal approval expected at the February meeting. Plan Hillsborough 2025 Annual Report (Melissa Zornitta & Katrina Corcoran) - Highlights from the 2024–2029 Strategic Plan’s four pillars: - Integrated communities: Brightline survey, Plant City Sun Trail, Temple Terrace multimodal study, Tampa comprehensive plan update, Urban Expansion Areas study. - Partnerships: Gulf Coast Safe Streets Summit, Florida Greenways & Trails Summit, Plant City visioning survey (1,700 responses), FLIP program expansion. - Resilient environment: Traffic signal study, USA expansion model, Tampa comprehensive plan sections (recreation, solid waste, capital improvements), USF studio on environmentally sensitive areas. - Technology: Merger study discussions, federal/state certifications with positive reviews, TIP mapping tool updates, AI task force with standard operating procedures. - Discussion: Chair Ross asked about consistency of AI policies between the Planning Commission and Hillsborough County. Executive Director Zornitta responded that policies are initially aligned but will be revisited as the technology evolves. - Outcome: Received as information. Executive Director’s Report (Dr. Johnny Wong) - Meeting Calendar: A TPO special meeting scheduled for February 3, 2026, was cancelled due to lack of major updates. Motion by Member Joseph, seconded by Commissioner Wostal, to cancel – approved unanimously. - Upcoming: A League of Cities workshop on merger representation (early February) and a TMA meeting on February 13, 2026 (at THEA) to discuss 2–4 apportionment scenarios. - Legislative Updates (2026 Session): - HB 243: Redefines Class 3 e-bikes as electric motorcycles (opposed by TPO staff). - Crosswalk bill: New crosswalks in school zones or roads 35 mph require enhanced beacon systems (supported). - HB 804: $250 annual fee on EV registrations to offset gas tax loss. - TNC insurance bill: Would require higher liability coverage for Uber/Lyft drivers when passengers onboard. - HB 519: Allows golf carts to cross 5+ lane highways at signalized intersections where speed limit ≤35 mph. - TOD Act: Would mandate mixed-use zoning and restrict local zoning controls in designated transit-oriented development areas. - Waymo Update: Dr. Wong noted Waymo is in a data collection phase; a presentation from their Southeast Director of Operations is tentatively scheduled for the February 11 board meeting. Councilmember Carlson also mentioned interest in a Cyber taxi update. Key Outcomes - Approved: Minutes of December 10, 2025; Consent Agenda (Committee Appointments, CTC Redesignation Letter); 2026 Safety Performance Targets and PTASP Targets; TPO Prioritization Process short-term recommendations; cancellation of the February 3, 2026 special meeting. - Received & Filed: CAC and TAC committee reports; Traffic Signal Prioritization Study status; Plan Hillsborough 2025 Annual Report. - Next Steps: Staff will implement the prioritization process changes for the 2028–2032 Priority List; the Traffic Signal Prioritization Study will return for formal approval in February 2026; the safety effectiveness study will be presented in May 2026; staff will continue legislative tracking and merger study workshops.

The Hillsborough County Board of County Commissioners held its land use meeting on January 13, 2026, starting at 9:00 AM. All seven commissioners were present. The board handled over 20 agenda items, including seven continuances, three right-of-way vacations, eight minor modifications to planned developments, four rezonings, three community development district petitions, and two related rezoning/modification items. Most items were approved unanimously (7-0) with limited discussion, except for a few that drew public testimony or commissioner deliberation. Consent Calendar - The consent agenda was approved by a 7-0 vote, covering items B.2 through B.11: major modifications (MM 25-1242, 25-1243), rezonings (RZ-PD 25-1244, 25-1246; RZ-STD 25-1390), a bond release (Bullfrog Creek Wetland Mitigation Bank), and three plat/infrastructure acceptance items (Council Bay, Indigo Creek Phase 2, Lone Pine RV Park, Sanctuary at Citrus Park). - Item B.1 (MM 25-1081, SJB Ventures) was continued to the February 10, 2026 meeting at the applicant's request. Public Comments & Testimony - Item F.1 (Tegal Apollo Inc.) – Height opposition: Craig Major, an Apollo Beach resident, and expert witness Carlyanos opposed the requested increase from 50 to 60 feet, arguing it would be an eyesore and inconsistent with the Apollo Beach Community Plan's language discouraging heights over 50 feet in residentially zoned areas. They noted the site plan showed a 72-foot height and that previous commissions had denied similar increases. The applicant's representative, William Malloy, countered that the site is in an OC-20 future land use category (not residential) and that the change would eliminate a permitted 103-room hotel, replacing it with 52-54 condominium units. He also stated the 10-foot increase would achieve the desired aesthetic. - Item F.2 (CWH Management Inc.) – Traffic and safety concerns: Residents testified about existing traffic backups on Fern Hill Drive from a nearby school and worsening flooding. The applicant's transportation engineer stated traffic counts did not show backups and that the project would include a 10-foot multi-use path and sidewalk improvements. - Item G.1A/B (GHS MLK 11, LLC) – High View Road impacts: Opponents raised concerns about narrow roads, flooding, parking, and building height. The applicant detailed road improvements (10-foot lanes, turn lanes, sidewalks) and enhanced buffers. Commissioner Boles asked about Terry Lane connections and the waiver for a 10-foot lane instead of 11-foot with bike lane; the engineer explained the constrained right-of-way. - For other items, either no public testimony was given or only proponent statements were presented. Discussion Items - E.4 – University Square Mall modification (PRS 26-0012): Applicant Elise Batsel presented changes to combine blocks, add 367 multifamily units with enhanced pedestrian access, and revise conditions 5.23 (landscaping definition) and 9B (timing of a major transit stop with HART, now due by December 31, 2027 or concurrent with next redevelopment in blocks 10,11,14,15). Staff supported. Approved 7-0. - F.1 – Tegal Apollo height debate: Commissioner Wostal noted the site is in an OC-20 zone, not residentially zoned, so the 50-foot discouragement may not apply. He emphasized that a 103-room hotel is already permitted, and the proposal reduces intensity. Commissioner Cohen agreed. Commissioner Cameron Cepeda moved approval. Approved 7-0. - F.3 – GHS MLK 2 LLC (rezoning to CG(R) for grocery): Presented by Rebecca Kurt. The rezoning includes a trip cap, use restrictions, and a 20-foot Type B buffer. One opponent at the ZHM addressed High View Road, but no public testimony at the BOCC. Approved 7-0. - G.1A/B – GHS MLK 11 mixed-use PD: Detailed presentation on 14.99-acre site with 304 multifamily units and 27,000 sq ft commercial, using infill density bonus. Road improvements on High View include 10-foot lanes, turn lanes, and sidewalks. Transportation engineer Michael Yates stated trips are reduced from previous entitlements. Commissioner Boles discussed Terry Lane access. Approved 7-0. - Commissioner Wostal's Item: Wostal raised a case where a homeowner's improvement of an existing enclosed patio (under original roof line) triggered higher impact and mobility fees due to flat-rate tier brackets. He expressed concern about penalizing long-time residents for minor living area expansions. Commissioner Miller supported looking at this separately. The board unanimously directed staff to bring back suggestions for more equitable assessments. Key Outcomes - Continued to February 10, 2026: Items A.1–A.7 (Bassam Dammak, Latitude 27, DGPS Recycling, Bing Kearney, Mark Bentley, US Foods, PSS); B.1 (MM 25-1081); and staff report I.1 (Live Local Act status report accepted and due back on that date). - Continued to March 10, 2026: Item E.8 (Habitat for Humanity PRS 26-0179) at the applicant's request. - Approved unanimously (7-0): Consent items B.2–B.11; Vacation items C.1–C.3; Land use items E.1–E.7, E.9–E.11; Regular agenda items F.1–F.4; Related items G.1A and G.1B. - Commissioner Wostal's motion: Direct staff to study and propose amendments to the Hillsborough County Consolidated Impact Assessment Program and Mobility Fee Program ordinances to address impact and mobility fee assessments for minor increases in living area for existing residents. Motion carried 7-0.

The Hillsborough County City County Planning Commission held its regular meeting on January 12, 2026, at 2:00 PM. The meeting included the swearing-in of a new commissioner, approval of prior meeting minutes, a historic landmark designation vote, informational briefings on sign code, redistricting, and comprehensive plan amendments, the executive director's report, and committee reports. The meeting was adjourned at approximately 4:00 PM, with a public hearing scheduled for 5:30 PM. Consent Calendar - Approval of Minutes: The commission unanimously approved the minutes from the following meetings: November 10, 2025 (regular and City of Tampa Plan Amendments), December 8, 2025 (regular, City of Plant City Plan Amendments, and City of Temple Terrace Plan Amendments). Public Comments & Testimony - No public comments were submitted for the meeting. One individual (Elle Alfonso) signed up for the landmark designation item but did not appear. Discussion Items - Oath of Office for New Commissioner: Gerald Barry was sworn in as the new Planning Commission ex officio appointee representing MacDill Air Force Base, replacing former Commissioner Tony Rodriguez. A plaque of appreciation was also presented to former Commissioner Karen Crest for her service from April 2017 to November 2025. - Historic Landmark Designation – 6012 & 6014 Adina Street (Waimama Memorial Cemetery): Staff presented the landmark report for the 4.75-acre cemetery, dating to the early 1900s and located in a historically African American neighborhood. The cemetery meets multiple county landmark criteria, including being over 50 years old. The property is owned by the church but includes unmarked graves identified by ground-penetrating radar. The commission voted unanimously to find the request consistent with the comprehensive plan (motion by Commissioner Lauk, second by Commissioner Kugler). - Temple Terrace Land Development Code Amendment – Section 12-984 (Signs): Marissa Robinson from the City of Temple Terrace presented a proposed amendment to allow a second wall sign on corner lots meeting specific conditions. This was a briefing item; no action was taken. - City of Tampa Redistricting 2026: Yaser Gonzalez presented the redistricting process for the four single-member city council districts. Four alternatives were shared, with the goal of reducing population deviation from 8.36% to under 5%. Alternative 2 (moving one precinct) ranked highest in the online survey. The commission will hold a public hearing in February 2026 and a final vote in March 2026. No action was taken. - Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment – 3602 West Euclid Avenue (TACPA 25-18): Megan McCarthy presented a small-scale, privately initiated amendment to change the future land use from Residential-20 to Community Mixed Use-35 on a 0.29-acre site in South Tampa. This was a briefing item. - Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment – MOSI Site (TACPA 25-19): Quinn Steele presented a publicly initiated amendment to unify the future land use of the MOSI site (11.25 acres) from Light Industrial and Public Semi-Public to Public Semi-Public. This was a briefing item. - Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment – 11315 North 46th Street (TACPA 25-20): Emily Phelan presented a publicly initiated, regular-scale amendment (63 acres) to change the future land use from Light Industrial, Heavy Industrial, and Public Semi-Public to Urban Mixed Use-60 and Community Mixed Use-35. The applicant recently amended the request to include a CMU-35 parcel to address compatibility concerns with adjacent residential areas. This was a briefing item. - Executive Director’s Report: Melissa Zornita reported on meetings with county staff regarding the Causeway and 78th Street redevelopment, the finalization of the City of Tampa future land use update draft (to be released January 16), upcoming joint meeting with Plant City on January 26, and the scheduling of a planning commissioner retreat. She noted that four county plan amendments were moved to February to manage workload. - Committee Reports: A commissioner reported on the December 10 TPO board meeting, which included approval of the I-4 express lanes TIP amendment (with two dissenting votes) and a Brightline station area study. The next TPO meeting is January 13-14. The joint meeting with Plant City is scheduled for January 26. Key Outcomes - The commission unanimously approved the minutes from five prior meetings. - The commission voted unanimously to find the historic landmark designation for Waimama Memorial Cemetery consistent with the comprehensive plan. - No action was taken on briefing items (Temple Terrace sign code, Tampa redistricting, or plan amendments TACPA 25-18, 25-19, 25-20). These will return for formal public hearings at future meetings. - The executive director noted that the Tampa redistricting public hearing will be held on February 9, 2026, with a final vote on March 9, 2026. The City of Tampa future land use update draft will be released January 16, with public outreach on February 3 and 4. - The commission will hold a joint meeting with Plant City on January 26, 2026, from 3:00 PM to 4:30 PM at the Trinkle Center. - A planning commissioner retreat is being scheduled; commissioners were asked to respond to a poll via email.

The Hillsborough County Land Use Hearing Officer (LUHO), presided over by Hearing Officer Steve Luce, convened on January 12, 2026 at 9:00 AM at the County Center, 2nd Floor, to hear a variety of land use petitions including variances, a special use, and a site development variance request. The hearing addressed 14 individual cases, with four continued to a future date. Decisions on all heard cases are to be filed by February 3, 2026. Consent Calendar (Continuances and Withdrawals) - VAR 24-1128 (Rolando Santiago): Continued to February 9, 2026 LUHO. - SU-SCH 24-1335 (David Wright/TSP Companies, Inc.): Continued to February 9, 2026 LUHO. - VAR 25-1340 (Laritza Lopez): Continued to February 9, 2026 LUHO. - VAR 26-0227 (Matthew Remson): Continued to February 9, 2026 LUHO. Public Comments & Testimony - VAR 25-1359 (Magela Publes) – Accessory structure/fence variance: Two neighbors spoke in opposition, alleging unpermitted plumbing, concerns about the structure being used as a rental (Airbnb), and that the building resembles a tiny house rather than a shed. One opponent stated he visually observed a trench being dug and sewer pipe laid without inspection. The applicant (Magela Publes) rebutted that the plumbing was for an irrigation system, that electrical work was done by a licensed electrician, and that she needs the space as an office to care for her mother with Alzheimer's and to run her janitorial business. She denied any rental plans and noted that the structure was purchased from a reputable company, cost $11,000, and came with a wet seal meeting city codes. - VAR 26-0188 (Gregory LaChapelle & Sharon Gionata) – Solid roof screen enclosure variance: One neighbor (Denise Himes) spoke in strong opposition, citing concerns about loss of light, mold, hurricane debris impacting her home, fire hazards, drainage, noise, and property value decrease. She alleged collusion between the HOA, board, and applicants, and that she was not given proper notice or opportunity to be heard despite HOA rules requiring it. The applicant (Sharon Gionata) rebutted that the HOA process allowed public comment at board meetings, that other homes in the community have similar setups, and that the gutters will improve drainage. - VAR 25-1312 (Luisa I. Alonso) – Lot development standards variance: Scott Gonzalez, president of the Town and Country Parks Civic Association, spoke in opposition, alleging a long pattern of unpermitted construction on the property (including a detached ADU, filling a sinkhole, and multiple porch additions) and that the property may be subdivided into multiple apartments. He argued the variance would harm neighborhood character and requested denial. Discussion Items - VAR-WS 26-0149 (Eric & LaJoyce Houston) – Site development variance to encroach into a wetland setback: The applicants requested a 25-foot maximum encroachment into the 30-foot wetland conservation area setback to build a new single-family home. They argued that the house placement would actually prevent erosion into the wetland. Staff noted a wetland setback compensation plan was provided. No public comments. Hearing Officer held the record open pending determination. - VAR 25-1312 (Luisa I. Alonso) – Variance to lot development standards: Initially held in abeyance because the applicant was absent, the applicant later appeared. The request was to allow a front porch to extend to 8.2 feet from the property line, a 6.8-foot variance from the required 15-foot setback. Staff noted an open code compliance violation related to the porch. The applicant's representative stated they were only seeking the variance for the side porch, not addressing other issues raised. The civic association president opposed, alleging a history of unpermitted construction and potential subdivision of the property. Hearing Officer noted opposition comments were partially outside the scope of the variance hearing but were recorded. - VAR 25-1359 (Magela Publes) – Variance to fence and accessory structure requirements: The applicant requested an 11-foot variance to allow a 4-foot front yard setback for an accessory structure (shed), and a 2-foot variance to allow a 6-foot high fence in the front yard. Staff report was presented. Public testimony included both opposition and rebuttal (see Public Comments). Hearing Officer noted the record. - VAR 26-0018 (Eleazar Garza Zapata) – Variance to lot development standards for a front porch: The applicant requested a 5.5-foot variance to allow a front porch projection of 15.5 feet into the required 50-foot front yard in the AS-1 district. The applicant's neighbor testified that removing the porch would be costly and there is no safety hazard. No public opposition. Hearing Officer heard the case. - VAR 26-0083 (Kelly Gutierrez) – Variance to lot development standards and swimming pool requirements: The applicant requested multiple variances for a screen enclosure, covered patio, and to correct existing structures built with a pool installed before the home was purchased. Staff noted two covered areas on the north and south sides had been removed. The homeowner (Osmeel Martinez) testified that the screen enclosure was built for family safety and to protect from mosquitoes. No opposing testimony. Hearing Officer clarified that the roof overhang does not cover the entire rear yard and that the two covered walkways were removed. - VAR 26-0099 (Tiffney Lane) – Variance to minimum lot size by available utilities: The applicant requested a variance to reduce the minimum upland requirements for septic to split an existing parcel. The property currently has city water and the applicant received health department approval for septic. The variance would allow shifting a property line to enlarge a vacant lot from 4,750 sq ft to over 8,000 sq ft to build a single-family home. No public opposition. - VAR 26-0134 (Melva Rodriguez) – Variance to lot development standards: The applicant requested a 5.14-foot variance to the front yard setback (resulting in 19.86 feet) and a 4.68-foot variance to the side yard setback (resulting in 2.82 feet) for a laundry/storage area built prior to purchase. The applicant's representative stated the homeowner built based on an existing structure. No public comments. - VAR 26-0148 (Peter McConaghey) – Variance to landscaping and buffering requirements: The applicant requested a variance to allow a 6-foot high fence within a 30-foot rural scenic easement along W Knights Griffin Road for safety reasons. The applicant's representative (Todd Amoden) and client (Chris Torse) agreed to set the fence back 2 feet from the easement line and plant shrubs. No public comments. Staff provided an example photo of the proposed fence. - VAR 26-0176 (Kevin McNamara) – Variance to lot development standards: The applicant requested a 1-foot 2.25-inch variance to the front yard setback (resulting in 23 feet 7.75 inches) and an 11-foot variance to the rear yard setback (resulting in 14 feet) to rebuild a home damaged by Hurricane Helene in the same footprint, elevated 13-14 feet above street level. The house is currently uninhabitable due to mold and erosion. No public opposition. - VAR 26-0187 (Ramineni Gowtham Kumar) – Variance to accessory dwelling and accessory structure requirements: The applicant requested an 11-foot variance to side yard setback for an existing accessory dwelling (resulting in 4 feet) and a 9-foot variance for an existing accessory structure (resulting in 6 feet). The property was purchased in July 2024 with the structures already in place. No permits were found for the main house or the structures. Staff noted the accessory dwelling appeared on aerial imagery between 2014 and 2016, and the metal shed between 2017 and 2018. The applicant's co-owner stated they reached out to neighbors and none expressed concerns. No public opposition. - VAR 26-0188 (Gregory LaChapelle & Sharon Gionata) – Variance to lot development standards for a solid roof screen enclosure: The applicant requested a 3-foot variance to the side yard setback (resulting in 2 feet) to replace an existing screen enclosure with a solid roof lanai of the same size and footprint. The variance is associated with an active building permit. The applicant stated the HOA approved the project on October 17, 2025, and that the solid roof will improve stormwater control and storm protection. Public testimony included support from two neighbors and opposition from one neighbor (see Public Comments). - SU-AB 26-0225 (Maria Rodriguez) – Special use for 2-COP alcoholic beverage permit with separation waivers: The applicant requested a beer and wine permit for an existing restaurant (Esquina Sabrosa) at 2730 W Waters Ave. Staff recommended approval with waivers from distance requirements: 126 feet from residential (required 250 feet), 184 feet from Oak Grove United Methodist Church (required 500 feet), and 384 feet from Faith Baptist Church (required 500 feet), citing commercial character, physical buffers, and minimal impact. No public comments. Key Outcomes - All 14 cases were heard, with four continuances (VAR 24-1128, SU-SCH 24-1335, VAR 25-1340, VAR 26-0227) and 10 cases heard and left pending determination by the Hearing Officer. - Hearings for VAR 25-1312 and VAR 26-0083 were initially held in abeyance due to applicant absence; both applicants later appeared and were heard. - Final decisions on all heard applications will be filed on or before February 3, 2026. - The Hearing Officer accepted a conditional offer from the applicant in VAR 26-0148 to set back the fence 2 feet from the scenic easement line and plant shrubs, which will be considered in the decision. - No formal votes were taken; all decisions will be issued by written order.

The Planning Commission held a public hearing on January 12, 2026, starting at 10:30 AM and adjourning at 8:01 PM, to consider several privately initiated small-scale comprehensive plan map amendments for unincorporated Hillsborough County. The commission reviewed eight items, hearing staff presentations, applicant arguments, and public testimony. Votes were taken on each item, with most amendments receiving a finding of consistency or inconsistency based on the comprehensive plan’s goals, objectives, and policies. Public Comments & Testimony - Item 2C (HCCPA 25-30 – Ruskin) – Johnny Soap, the property owner, spoke in support of the amendment, stating he has operated on the site for seven years with zero complaints and has gathered petitions from neighbors supporting his continued use. - Item 2F (HCCPA 25-34 – Waters Avenue) – Pamela Conrad, a resident of River Oaks Estates, expressed concerns about increased traffic and fire rescue response times, noting difficulty exiting the neighborhood. She said she had no problem with residents staying but worried about additional impacts. - Item 2H (HCCPA 25-36 – County Road 579) – Cynthia Godwin Wilson, a resident of Buster Bean Drive, opposed the intensity of the proposed SMU-6 designation, citing noise, traffic, and environmental concerns. She stated she has lived in the area since 1972 and feels residents are being squeezed out. Barb Allen also spoke, questioning whether the rezoning would allow future sale of the property for more intensive uses and noting traffic congestion on Mango Road. Discussion Items - Item 2A (HCCPA 25-01 – 2002 West Highway 60) – Request to change from Residential-1 to Suburban Mixed Use-6 (SMU-6) on 9.5 acres in the rural area. Staff recommended inconsistency due to significant increase in density and intensity. Applicant argued the use is agriculturally supportive and the Board of County Commissioners remanded the request as SMU-6. Commissioners discussed the remand and agricultural policies. Motion to find consistent passed 6-2. - Item 2C (HCCPA 25-30 – 11th Avenue Southeast, Ruskin) – Request to change from SMU-6 to Office Commercial-20 on 4.7 acres at the end of a dead-end road. Staff found inconsistency due to compatibility and traffic concerns. Applicant argued the area is already intense and neighbors support the change. Commissioner discussion noted the existing right-of-way and potential for future road improvements. Motion to find inconsistent passed 7-1. - Item 2D (HCCPA 25-31 – 12780 Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard) – Request to change from Residential-1 to Light Industrial on 4.45 acres in the rural area. Staff recommended inconsistency, citing incompatibility with rural character. Applicant noted nearby industrial uses along MLK corridor and support from the Seffner-Mango Community Plan. Commissioner Lauk questioned whether the current land use is appropriate. Motion to find consistent passed 7-1. - Item 2E (HCCPA 25-33 – College Avenue and 18th Street Southeast, Ruskin) – Request to change from SMU-6 to Residential-12 on 19.53 acres. Staff found consistency, noting compatibility with the evolving corridor and protection of wetlands. Applicant highlighted need for multifamily housing near employment centers. Motion to find consistent passed unanimously. - Item 2F (HCCPA 25-34 – 8400 West Waters Avenue) – Request to change from Residential-9 to Residential-16 on 41.92 acres. Staff found consistency, citing the need to bring existing mobile home park into compliance and retain residents. Applicant explained the property’s history and that the change recognizes existing units. Public comment raised traffic and resource concerns. Motion to find consistent passed unanimously. - Item 2G (HCCPA 25-35 – 6210 County Road 579, Urban Service Area Expansion) – Request to expand the Urban Service Area on 34 acres. Staff found consistency, noting adjacency to existing USA and compatibility with the industrializing corridor. Applicant argued the expansion is a logical correction. Motion to find consistent passed unanimously. - Item 2H (HCCPA 25-36 – 6210 County Road 579, Land Use Change) – Request to change from Residential-4 to SMU-6 on 34 acres, associated with the USA expansion. Staff found consistency, citing appropriate transition and compatibility. Applicant noted the existing PD and community plan support. Public comments expressed concerns about traffic and noise. Motion to find consistent passed unanimously. - Item 2I (HCCPA 25-38 – 11017 East US Highway 92) – Request to change from Residential-9 to SMU-6 on 4.36 acres. Staff found consistency, noting the site is along a commercial corridor and the change aligns with the Seffner-Mango Community Plan. Applicant highlighted intensive surrounding uses. Motion to find consistent passed unanimously. Key Outcomes - Item 2A (HCCPA 25-01): Found consistent with the comprehensive plan (motion by Commissioner Kona, second by Commissioner Lincoln) – Vote: 6 ayes, 2 nays (Bowden, Kugler). - Item 2C (HCCPA 25-30): Found inconsistent with the comprehensive plan (motion by Commissioner Lincoln, second by Commissioner Bowden) – Vote: 7 ayes, 1 nay (Kona). - Item 2D (HCCPA 25-31): Found consistent with the comprehensive plan (motion by Commissioner Kona, second by Commissioner Lauk) – Vote: 7 ayes, 1 nay (Lincoln). - Item 2E (HCCPA 25-33): Found consistent with the comprehensive plan (motion by Commissioner Lauk, second by Commissioner Kugler) – Vote: unanimous. - Item 2F (HCCPA 25-34): Found consistent with the comprehensive plan (motion by Commissioner Kona, second by Commissioner Kugler) – Vote: unanimous. - Item 2G (HCCPA 25-35): Found consistent with the comprehensive plan (motion by Commissioner Lauk, second by Commissioner Kugler) – Vote: unanimous. - Item 2H (HCCPA 25-36): Found consistent with the comprehensive plan (motion by Commissioner Lincoln, second by Commissioner Bowden) – Vote: unanimous. - Item 2I (HCCPA 25-38): Found consistent with the comprehensive plan (motion by Commissioner Kona, second by Commissioner Kugler) – Vote: unanimous. All items will be forwarded to the Board of County Commissioners for final decision.

This meeting of the Hillsborough Area Regional Transit (HART) Board of Directors was called to order by board counsel Jeff Gibson. The board elected officers for 2026, appointed members to various committees and external boards, received the CEO's annual report highlighting record federal funding and operational improvements, and debated a performance-based merit increase for the CEO. Public comment featured several former and current employees alleging unfair termination and retaliation. A motion for an external investigation of HR and bus operations failed. Note: The transcript indicates the meeting occurred on January 5, 2026, but the provided metadata specifies January 8, 2026. This summary uses the metadata date. Public Comments & Testimony - John Green: Requested withdrawal of his resignation, claiming he should not have been terminated but retrained. - Asa (speaker): Criticized HART's policies as discriminatory, accused redlining of routes, and noted insufficient buses. - Shantel Simpson: Claimed false termination and retaliation; requested help from the board. - Letisha Jones (union president): Read an email from Tiara Leonard, a former paratransit operator, alleging wrongful termination despite FMLA approval for COVID-19. - Marilyn: Rider urging board to improve driver pay, benefits, and working conditions; called for board members to experience day-to-day operations. - Charles Loeb: Proposed new revenue sources (food trucks at transit centers, inside bus advertising, coordination with Brightline). - Joshua Trotman: Terminated R-Plus van driver; argued HART violated collective bargaining agreement regarding post-deposition timelines; requested reinstatement. Election of Officers and Committee Appointments - Chair: Director Schisler elected over Director Wolstell (7-5). - Vice Chair: Director Hartfield elected (unanimous). - Secretary: Director Myers elected (unanimous). - Litigation & Claims Committee: Director MacAlpatrick as member (unanimous). - ADA Accessibility Committee: Director Williams (member), Director Vieira (alternate). - Tampa Historic Streetcar Board: Directors Clendenin, Williams, Hartfield (members), Directors Schisler and Niebrick (alternates). - Transportation Planning Organization (TPO) Board: After a tie vote, Director Hartfield elected as member, Director King as alternate. - Transportation Disadvantaged Coordinating Board: Director Schisler (member), Director Myers (alternate). - Affordable Housing Advisory Board: Director Williams (member), Director Hartfield (alternate). - The chair appointed additional members to the Strategic Planning and External Relations Committee. Consent Calendar - Approved minutes from November 3, 2025. - Approved Resolution R2026-01-01 delegating contracting authority to CFO Brian Horn up to $500,000. CEO Report CEO Scott Drainville addressed concerns raised in previous public comments: - Leave and attendance: HART's sick leave accrual aligns with industry standards; no-pay status occurs when sick leave is exhausted. - Operator availability within national norms; detailed report to come. - Paratransit service reliability improved with purchase of 36 new SUVs and 14 cutaway vans. - Conflict-of-interest in hearing process: hearings follow CBA requirements; one grievance could not be resolved due to insufficient evidence. CEO Drainville then presented FY2025 achievements: - Record federal funding: $55M in two grants, total $72M including formula funds and tax credits. - Reserve balance $37.2M (125% of required 90-day reserves). - Operational savings: $552K fare card savings, $470K paratransit reforms. - Infrastructure: Phase 1 of heavy maintenance facility underway; CAD/AVL modernization; streetcar rebuild (Car 431). - Workforce: 120 new operators hired; paratransit overtime reduced 34%; ridership up 15%. - Safety: Liability claims reduced 68% vs. 10-year average; FTA SSO certifications achieved. - Employee survey scores high on safety, finance, and community value; on-time performance and attrition remain challenges. Board members commended the CEO and staff. CEO Performance Evaluation & Merit Increase - Board received 12 evaluations with average rating 4.8/5. - Contract allows merit increase (non-bargaining level, budgeted at 4%) plus up to 15% additional. - Commissioner Myers moved for a 5% merit increase. Debate ensued; some board members wanted data on peer CEO salaries before deciding. - Motion to call the question passed, and the underlying 5% motion passed 11-1. - A subsequent motion to direct staff to bring back data on CEO salaries at peer agencies, salary of direct reports, and revenue sources passed unanimously. Key Outcomes - Board officers elected for 2026: Chair Schisler, Vice Chair Hartfield, Secretary Myers. - Committee and external board members appointed as listed above. - Consent agenda items approved. - CEO merit increase of 5% approved; further consideration of additional increase deferred until next meeting pending data. - Motion for external investigation of HR and bus operations failed 10-2. - Meeting adjourned.