Public Meetings - Mesquite, Nevada

On Tuesday, April 7, 2026, the Mesquite City Council held a budget work session to review and discuss the proposed tentative FY 2026-2027 fund revenues, expenditures, and departmental budgets. The meeting included public comment, a presentation by Finance Director Bryce Anderson and Becca Schrupp, and extensive council discussion. The council did not take formal action on the budget but provided direction to staff to explore additional revenue sources and return with a revised proposal prior to the final budget submission deadline of June 1, 2026. Public Comments & Testimony - Rick McIntyre praised the council's appointments to the short-term rental committee and thanked staff for their work on the committee. - Brandon Grimes expressed concerns about a proposed truck stop (QT) near a waterway, citing potential contaminants, storm drainage, wildlife impacts, and roundabout issues for triple-trailer trucks. - Don Swanson (Coyote Willows resident) stated that neighbors are "definitely against" the truck stop due to concerns about roundabout congestion and semi-truck traffic. - Jennifer MacDeff (Sunset Greens resident) voiced strong opposition to the proposed QT truck stop, citing noise, exhaust pollution, potential crime, and negative impact on property values. She stated she would attend every meeting to oppose the proposal. - Tony Celeste, representing Quick Trips, introduced himself and offered to discuss the proposed application with residents outside the meeting. Discussion Items - Budget Overview: Bryce Anderson and Becca Schrupp presented the tentative FY 2026-2027 budget. Key points: - Projected C tax revenue: $14.9 million (increase of $115,942 over last year). - Projected property tax revenue: $7.6 million (increase of $487,012). - Total projected general fund revenues: $35.5 million, described as "fiscally conservative." - Current year (FY 2025-2026) projected surplus of $200,000; FY 2026-2027 shows a general fund deficit of $200,000 with revenues vs. expenses. - General fund balance: FY 2024-2025 ended at $4.6 million; projected to end FY 2025-2026 at $4.8 million; FY 2026-2027 projected at $4.6 million. - General fund expenses by function: public safety 52%, public works 11%, general government 17%, judicial 2%, health and sanitation 7%. - Staffing: proposed increase of 5 full-time equivalents, including 6 additional patrol officers funded by the "More Cops" fund (separate from general fund). - Capital projects included in the budget: airport project ($775,000 city share after FAA grant), canyon crest boulevard, Virgin River levy project, Casablanca traffic signal, John Deere Drive construction, HAWK signal at Bertha Howe and Falcon Ridge. - Projects not in the budget (total $9.9 million): new landfill design ($275,000), Pioneer Park field turf replacement ($3.65 million), MRED retaining wall replacement, Jensen Park playground ($200,000, to be moved to park fund), and two additional firefighter/EMTs. - Council Concerns: - Councilman Fielding noted the lack of funds for firefighter/EMTs to staff the new fire station and questioned the budget process. - Councilman Wallace warned that the city has not raised fees for decades and now faces a deficit; he advocated for raising sewer, garbage, and impact fees. - Councilman Ennis stated the budget shows the city is "basically broke" and emphasized prioritizing fire department staffing and police officers, even if it means deferring other projects. - Councilman Parish proposed considering a property tax increase (up to 8% ceiling, which could generate $900,000) and exploring other fees. - Councilwoman Gallo clarified that the "More Cops" fund is a permanent sales-tax source and can be used for police but not for fire or animal control (which requires POST-certified officers). - Councilwoman Fielding and others noted the need to raise fees and explore grants to avoid future deficits. Key Outcomes - No formal vote was taken on the tentative budget; the item remains for future action. - Council directed staff to: - Reassess the budget and identify additional revenue sources (e.g., fee increases, property tax increase, grants). - Explore funding options for priority items: staffing the new fire station, additional police officers (via the More Cops fund), and critical capital projects. - Provide a clearer breakdown of fund sources and long-term sustainability. - The tentative budget must be approved and sent to the Nevada Department of Taxation by April 15, 2026; final budget is due June 1, 2026.

The technical review meeting for the City of Musquete was held on Tuesday, April 7, 2026, starting at 10:45 AM. The council addressed two agenda additions for the next council meeting: approval of the tentative budget and authorization to settle an ongoing lawsuit. No public comments were received, and the meeting adjourned shortly thereafter. Public Comments & Testimony - No members of the public came forward to speak during either the initial public comment period or the final public comment period. Discussion Items - Councilman Ennis moved to add approval of the tentative budget to the next week's council meeting agenda. Councilwoman Galloway seconded the motion, and it passed unanimously. - Mr. Anderson, representing the city, reported on ongoing litigation with the former chief (Chesley vs. City Musquete). He provided language to add consideration of a settlement in the amount of 1,425,000 dollars to the next agenda. The settlement is contingent upon a fully executed settlement agreement, an order from the eighth judicial district court, and full payment by Travelers Insurance Company. Councilman Wallace moved to add the item, Councilwoman Fielding seconded, and the motion passed. - No other additions or subtractions to the agenda were proposed. Key Outcomes - The council voted unanimously to add approval of the tentative budget to the next council meeting. - The council voted unanimously to add consideration of the litigation settlement (case numbers A-23-87738-B, A-25-91767-W, and EEOC charge 87-2025-01055) to the next council meeting agenda. - The meeting was adjourned shortly after final public comments (none received), with a note that the next meeting (likely a work session) would begin at 2:45 PM.

The Mesquite Short-Term Rental (STR) Committee met on Thursday, April 2, 2026, at 2:00 PM to continue drafting recommendations for a revised STR ordinance (Title 2, Chapter 13). The meeting featured extensive public testimony, detailed discussion on each section of the proposed ordinance, and votes on multiple amendments. Key outcomes included a decision to leave spacing/distance requirements as a placeholder ('reserved for future use') rather than adopting a specific distance, and approval of numerous other sections with minor amendments. Consent Calendar - Unanimously approved the April 2, 2026 agenda and the minutes from the March 5, 2026 and March 17, 2026 meetings. Public Comments & Testimony - Greater Las Vegas Short-Term Rental Association (Jacqueline Flores): Warned committee members of potential personal liability under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 if the ordinance included provisions similar to Clark County’s (penalty escalation, distance restrictions, 60-minute response). Urged tabling the ordinance until federal litigation is resolved. - Resident (Corbin Van Ost): Dismissed the liability warning as intimidation; noted that government officials acting in good faith are generally immune. - Multiple residents (e.g., Loretta Corp, Clark Strong, David Gibink): Expressed support for spacing requirements, describing negative impacts on their neighborhoods from concentrated STRs (noise, parking, loss of community character). - Multiple residents (e.g., Michelle West, Colleen Gleadon, Amy Gardner): Opposed distancing, arguing that existing HOAs already limit STR locations, that spacing would severely reduce available rentals (maps showed only 35 possible locations if 660-foot rule applied), and that enforcement of current rules is the real issue. - Sandra (snowbird) and others: Advocated for enforcement over new restrictions; noted that property managers can resolve issues quickly. - Clark Strong: Challenged the recurring suggestion that opponents of STRs should move to an HOA, citing financial and lifestyle constraints. - Nick Alfonsetti: Proposed a “clearinghouse” system to put responsibility on licensees and streamline complaint resolution. - Jacqueline Flores (repeated on multiple sections): Raised constitutional concerns about warrantless inspections, certificate of occupancy requirements, and lack of neutral hearing officers for appeals. Discussion Items - Section 2-13-1 through 2-13-5 (Title, Purpose, Applicability, Definitions, License Requirements): Approved without changes after brief public questions. - Section 2-13-6 (Distancing): Most debated item. The subcommittee had split 2-1 against including distancing language. After extensive public comment and committee deliberation, a motion to retain the section as a placeholder (reserved for future use) passed. The chair noted the motion does not recommend a specific distance; the committee will wait for legal clarity from the Ninth Circuit and state action (AB 363) before further action. - Section 2-13-7 through 2-13-8 (Agency, Zoning Compliance): Approved with minor wording adjustments. - Section 2-13-9 (Application): Amended to remove subsection M (certificate of occupancy verification of distancing) after public comments noting inconsistency with the placeholder decision. Version as amended approved. - Section 2-13-10 through 2-13-11 (Fees, Room Tax): Approved as written. - Section 2-13-12 (Standard License Conditions): Amended to remove trailer-parking restrictions (deferring to existing city code), adjust trash pickup language to “no earlier than noon the day before pickup and removed the day after,” and change “overnight occupancy” to “maximum occupancy at all times, including guests.” Approved as amended. - Section 2-13-13 (Qualified Local Operator): Amended to change “resolved within 60 minutes” to “addressed within 60 minutes” to clarify that a response, not necessarily resolution, is required. Approved as amended. - Section 2-13-14 (Neighbor Information Notice): Amended to reduce the notification radius from 300 feet to 100 feet. Approved as amended. - Section 2-13-15 (Violations and Penalties): Amended to specify exact fines rather than “not to exceed $500.” Approved as amended. - Section 2-13-16 (Procedure for Penalties): Approved as drafted, with note that hearing timeline (15 days) aligns with existing city practice; public suggestion of longer time was not adopted. - Section 2-13-17 through 2-13-20 (Permits Not Exclusive, Penalty, Enforcement, Occupant Violations): Approved as written or with minor numbering updates. Key Outcomes - Motion passed (unanimous on most items; specific vote count not recorded): To recommend the revised Chapter 2-13 to the City Council with the following key amendments: - Distancing (Section 6) left as a placeholder (reserved). - Trash pickup: no earlier than noon day before pickup, removed day after. - Complaint response: addressed (not resolved) within 60 minutes. - Neighbor notification radius: reduced to 100 feet. - Fines: fixed amounts replacing “not to exceed” language. - The committee agreed that this will be its final meeting; the recommendation will be presented to the City Council at a future date. - No further meetings of the STR Committee are scheduled.

The Mesquite City Council held a special meeting on March 25, 2026, at 2:30 PM to consider Resolution R26-010, which expressed support for the development of the Switchpoint Desert Vista affordable housing project at 780 W. Old Mill Road and 773 W. Mesquite Blvd., and supported the issuance of tax-exempt private activity bonds. The meeting was called on short notice due to a pending pre-application deadline for bond allocations. After significant criticism from council and the public regarding the lack of information and poor communication, the council unanimously voted to table the resolution until proper outreach and documentation could be provided. Public Comments & Testimony - Opening public comment (non-agenda): No members of the public came forward. - Following council discussion, public comment included: - Barbara Ellis Stad: Expressed appreciation for the council's decision to table the item. - John Rosen: Criticized Switchpoint for poor communication, stating it created a negative image and would require extra effort to regain community trust. - Mary Gleason: Requested that when Switchpoint returns, they provide details on the target population (program details, not just physical layout) and support programs to reassure the community. - Jennifer MacDuff: Raised an unrelated traffic safety concern about the roundabout at the freeway off-ramp near Sunset Greens, requesting a stop sign; staff noted that roundabouts are managed by NDOT and will inquire. Discussion Items - Mayor Jess opened with an apology for the rushed meeting and short notice, explaining that a pre-application for the four percent tax-exempt bonds was due the next day and that time sensitivity drove the decision to call the special meeting. - Jeff Quayle (Chief Real Estate Officer, Friends of Switchpoint Inc.) explained that the project aims to provide workforce housing for earners between $50,000 and $80,000 (50–80% of Area Median Income), not a homeless shelter. He noted Switchpoint has built over 600 affordable housing units in Utah and that a deed restriction could ensure the site never becomes a shelter. - Council members (Wanless, Fielding, Innis, Gellan, Parish) unanimously expressed strong frustration: - Councilman Wanless: Stated this was the weakest information ever received; no renderings, floor plans, site plans, or funding details. He criticized the lack of outreach despite the project being known since February and suggested tabling the item to allow proper meetings. - Councilwoman Fielding: Supported affordable housing but opposed the rushed process. She sought confirmation that the project is not a homeless shelter and said she would hold Switchpoint to that commitment. - Councilman Innis: Noted that the March 13 tax credit deadline had passed and the next round is in June, questioning why the matter was rushed now. He also criticized the lack of communication, saying it torqued off residents and decision-makers. - Councilwoman Gellan: Called the timing suspicious, noting the land was purchased in September and that the lack of presentation felt like a bait-and-switch. - Councilman Parish: Attempted to make a motion to table before public comment, but the city attorney advised following normal procedure to allow public input. - Jeff Quayle apologized and agreed with the council's concerns, stating he was fine with tabling to allow proper meetings and a development agreement. Key Outcomes - Motion to Table: Councilman Wanless moved to table Resolution R26-010 until proper information, presentations, and public outreach are completed. Councilwoman Fielding seconded. - Vote: The motion passed unanimously (all council members present voted in favor). - No vote was taken on the resolution itself; it remains pending for a future meeting. - Next steps: Switchpoint will meet with council members individually and bring full project details (renderings, financials, deed restrictions) to a future meeting.

The Mesquite City Council held its regular meeting on Tuesday, March 24, 2026, at 5:00 PM in City Hall. The meeting covered routine approvals, discussion of a bicycle/scooter ordinance, a streetlight spacing request, and approval of alcohol sales at a music festival. A special meeting on a proposed affordable housing project (Switch Point) was announced for the following day, drawing criticism from the public for its 2:30 PM start time. Consent Calendar - Approval of Minutes and Agenda (Item 2.1): Approved the minutes from the February 10, 2026 Regular City Council Meeting, the March 3, 2026 Technical Review Meeting, and the March 24, 2026 agenda. - Approval of Bills and Purchase Orders (Item 2.2): Approved the notification of bills paid and purchase orders. - Vote: Motion passed unanimously (Councilmember Parrish moved, Wallace seconded; recorded ayes from Parrish, Fielding (via phone), Gallo, Ennis, Wallace; no nays). Public Comments & Testimony - Jean Watkins (resident) encouraged nominations for the Inspirational Women of Mesquite, Moapa Valley, and Arizona Strip awards, highlighting many local women and organizations. - Tom Olivetto (citizen) thanked the council for attending the grand opening of a new medical clinic for seniors/veterans and announced Vietnam Veterans Day events. - Art Kulibert (resident, 812 Los Padres Circle) shared his background as a former councilmember in Washington State, praised Mesquite’s infrastructure, and expressed support for responsible growth. - Mary Mathis (President, Mesquite Art Gallery) provided updates on upcoming exhibitions, the Spring Grand Bazaar, First Friday events, and an art appraisal event. - Ron Shackleford (resident) raised concerns about the proposed Friends of Switch Point affordable housing project, questioning whether it could become a homeless shelter. He cited 2025 Salvation Army records showing 102 homeless individuals in Mesquite, most with temporary shelter, and urged clear guarantees about the project’s future use. - Gary Hillgard (resident) criticized the 2:30 PM special meeting on Switch Point, arguing it disenfranchised working citizens. He referenced negative online reviews of Switch Point’s operations elsewhere and questioned whether the project would serve local homeless or import people from Las Vegas. - Clark Strong (resident, Santa Fe Vistas) expressed frustration with the short-term rental committee, arguing it lacks resident representation. He found an attendee’s comment that those opposed should “move to an HOA” offensive and urged the council to ensure community notification before the moratorium ends. - Doug (neighbor) reported ongoing code enforcement issues with a short-term rental near his property, stating the city issued a letter in November 2025 requiring removal of bunk beds, but the property still advertises them. - Diana McKenney (Southern Nevada Symphony Orchestra) invited the public to an April 25th concert with movie themes and promoted discount tickets at First Friday. Discussion Items - B26-001 – Bicycle, Electric Bicycle, and Electric Scooter Regulations (Item 5.3): City staff presented a revised ordinance. Key provisions included a helmet requirement for all riders, a 10 mph speed limit for e-bikes/e-scooters on sidewalks, and rules about riding near the right side of the roadway. The council debated sidewalk use (Councilmember Gallo opposed any wheeled vehicles on sidewalks), enforcement, and cell phone use. Public comment raised concerns about pedestrian safety, different e-bike classes, and the need for simpler rules. Councilmember Fielding asked that cell phone use be explicitly prohibited. Chief Fells requested more time to refine the ordinance. Motion to table passed unanimously. The item will return after further revision with Chief Fells and Mr. Anderson. - Non-Standard Streetlight Spacing – Elleve Subdivision (Item 6.1): Developer Dylan Jensen (Mesquite Land Partners) requested reduced streetlight spacing (some gaps up to 475 feet vs. standard 170 feet) within the Mesquite Vistas PUD, citing resident complaints about excessive light. City engineer Travis Anderson noted the HOA had no objection but deferred to the city. The council discussed safety and precedent. Councilmember Parrish proposed requiring illuminated address numbers and two garage lights that remain on all night via photocell; Jensen agreed. Motion to approve the non-standard spacing with those conditions passed (Councilmember Wanless moved, Gallo seconded; unanimous). - I-15 Country and Rock Music Festival Alcohol Sales (Item 6.2): Organizer Simon Kim presented a plan for the October 17, 2026 event at the Mesquite Sports and Events Complex (estimated 3,000 attendees, gates open noon – event ends 10 PM). Alcohol sales limited to beer, seltzers, and twisted tea (no hard liquor); no glass containers; 20 private security + 6 police officers; 2 EMTs; 45 restrooms. Public comment raised concerns about tailgating and cost of emergency services. Councilmember Gallo suggested cutting alcohol sales one hour early, but the organizer noted beer-only events rarely do so. Motion to approve passed (Councilmember Ennis moved, seconded; unanimous). Key Outcomes - Bicycle Ordinance: Tabled for further refinement; will return in approximately four weeks with additional input from Chief Fells and council. - Elleve Streetlight Spacing: Approved with condition that all homes have illuminated address numbers and two garage lights on photocell (on all night). - Alcohol Sales at Music Festival: Approved with conditions (beer/wine only, no glass, 6 police officers, 2 EMTs). - Consent Agenda: Approved all items. - Special Meeting on Switch Point: Announced for March 25, 2026 at 2:30 PM, sparking public criticism about accessibility. - Community Emergency Preparedness Guide: Chief Andrus announced the guide is available at City Hall and Fire Station 1, and staff are willing to present to HOAs. - Mayor’s Ethics Complaint: Mayor reported his ethics complaint was finalized on March 18 with an admonition requiring online training.

The Master Plan Committee met on March 19, 2026, to approve consent items and conduct a workshop on the Desert Falls property, a 500-acre city-owned parcel. After discussion, the committee voted to present a proposed development concept to the City Council for further action. Consent Calendar - 2.1 Approval of the February 23, 2026 Master Plan Committee Agenda – Approved unanimously. - 2.2 Approval of the January 26, 2026 Master Plan Committee Meeting Minutes – Approved unanimously. Public Comments & Testimony - A member of the public asked about the planned number of residents in the multifamily and workforce housing areas. Staff responded that no specific density limits are set; the concept is a guideline and developers will propose their own plans for review. Discussion Items - Workshop: Desert Falls (500-acre city-owned property) – Staff planner Simon presented a conceptual master plan for the site, including proposed land uses and zoning changes. Key elements: - Proposed Zoning Districts: CR2 Mixed Use (61 acres), Hospital Expansion (13 acres), Education (26 acres), Multifamily (71 acres), Hotel (20 acres), Parks & Resorts (approx. 160 acres), Workforce Housing (80 acres), Innovation & Research (49 acres). - Use Standards: Hotels should cluster near views and event spaces with shared parking; Parks & Resorts should include green spines linking dunes to commercial areas; Workforce Housing requires a mix of flex work units and mid-density apartments with grocery, gym, restaurants; Mixed-Use must have ground-floor retail/office and upper-floor residential; Education component could serve as a satellite training center for medical or tech facilities. - Transaction Structures: Staff presented three options for developer acquisition: - Option A: Performance lease with conditional conveyance (3–7 year lease, purchase option at pre-construction price). - Option B: Market sale with performance rebate (sell at market value, refund difference if improvements made). - Option C: Pre-construction price sale with mandatory public improvements (developer builds and donates public facilities like community centers, libraries, or emergency stations). - Committee Feedback: Members expressed strong interest in Options A and C, citing concerns about past developer performance. They discussed the potential to combine options and require upfront public improvements. The committee also inquired about water availability, hospital expansion (currently 25 beds, potential need for more), and the role of the school district. Staff noted that an RFP process will follow City Council approval, allowing developers to bid on parts or the whole parcel. The concept aims to attract organized development rather than random proposals. Key Outcomes - Motion and Vote: The committee unanimously (all in favor, with Lisa Onelass excused) approved a motion to present the Desert Falls concept to the City Council for their review and potential approval. The motion included a recommendation to incorporate the committee’s input, particularly emphasizing Options A and C. - Next Steps: Staff will refine the concept based on committee suggestions and present it to the City Council. If Council approves, an RFP will be issued for development proposals, including development agreement provisions for phasing, performance security, and public improvements. - Other: A question about the short-term rental committee’s impact on the master plan was addressed; staff clarified that short-term rentals are not treated as businesses in the master plan, so no conflict exists. Adjournment The meeting adjourned after public comments and a motion to adjourn, approved unanimously.

The Mesquite Short-Term Vacation Rental Subcommittee held a special meeting on March 19, 2026, to review and propose amendments to Title 2, Chapter 13 (Vacation Home Rentals) and consider alignment with AB 363. The subcommittee discussed merging elements of a proposed rewrite by member Dave Newfield with the existing code, addressing parking, occupancy, local contact requirements, penalties, and enforcement. Three subcommittee members (Vanessa, Dave, Sherry) were present along with city staff. Consent Calendar - Approved the March 17, 2026 subcommittee agenda by unanimous vote. Public Comments & Testimony - Doug Honshell (960 Santa Fe Drive) expressed concerns about the proposed rewrite, including parking enforcement, the 30-minute response time for local contacts, and lack of code enforcement. He supported provisions allowing photo/video evidence submission. - Colleen Cleaton noted that the city code already allows street parking for up to 24 hours, and that vehicles must be moved after that. - Public comment at end (multiple speakers) included continued discussion on landline requirements and the importance of neighbor-to-neighbor communication. Discussion Items - Review of Title 2, Chapter 13 and AB 363: The subcommittee conducted a line-by-line review of the existing code, incorporating elements from Dave Newfield's proposed rewrite and AB 363. Key decisions included: - Purpose & Intent: Added language about protecting neighborhood quality (from the rewrite). - Definitions: - Changed "vacation home rental" minimum stay from 27 to 28 days. - Replaced "authorization" with "license" throughout. - Added definition for "hosting platform". - Added definition for "qualified local operator" (instead of local contact person). - Removed need for separate "party" definition, as existing language on gatherings exceeding occupancy already covers it. - License Requirements: Added requirement for a valid certificate of occupancy prior to licensure. - Application: Removed landline requirement (subject to further review). Required proof of homeowners/liability insurance with no specific minimum (legal counsel will advise). - Occupancy: Set maximum occupancy based on number of bedrooms: studio/1-bedroom = 4 guests; 2-bedroom = 8; 3-bedroom = 10; 4-bedroom = 12; 5+ bedrooms = 16. Includes children. - Parking: Overnight parking limited to on-site designated spaces. Street parking not allowed for overnight guests. Trailers count as a vehicle. Further review of street parking legality was requested. - Local Contact Requirements: Required a notarized affidavit; must answer calls in a timely manner and resolve complaints within 60 minutes. - Neighbor Notification: Before initial license issuance, the operator must provide stamped, addressed envelopes for the city to mail notification cards to properties within 300 feet. - Violations & Penalties: First violation = warning; second violation = up to $1,000 fine; third violation = possible license revocation. Operating without a license may incur fines of $5,000–$10,000 per AB 363. - Enforcement: Encouraged direct contact with local operator first; if unresolved within 60 minutes or if complainant prefers, they may contact non-emergency police or use a city online reporting system. - Extension of Subcommittee Meeting Dates: The subcommittee voted not to extend further meetings; the next full committee meeting is scheduled for April 2, 2026. Key Outcomes - Staff (Jaselin) will compile all agreed-upon amendments into a draft of Title 2, Chapter 13 for review by subcommittee members before the April 2 committee meeting. - The subcommittee will not extend additional meetings; the April 2 meeting will be the next and potentially final gathering of the full short-term rental committee. - Unresolved items (e.g., spacing/distance limits, caps on licenses, grandfathering) were deferred to the April 2 committee discussion.

The Mesquite Redevelopment Agency met on Tuesday, March 17, 2026, at 2:46 PM to consider a consent agenda and a grant request for landscaping improvements. The meeting was brief, with no public comments received. Consent Calendar - Unanimously approved the Tuesday, January 20, 2026, Redevelopment Agency meeting minutes and the Tuesday, March 17, 2026, Redevelopment Agency meeting agenda. Motion by Councilwoman Fielding, seconded, passed unanimously. Discussion Items - Item 3.1 – RDA Grant Request for Landscaping Improvements - Staff presented a $17,873.25 grant request from B P Living Trust 2017 for property at 12 W. Mesquite Blvd. The project aims to convert outdated, water-intensive landscaping to desert landscaping, reducing water usage and maintenance costs. The property is in the central business district, qualifying for a 75% reimbursement. Three bids were submitted; the lowest was $23,831, resulting in a $17,873.25 reimbursement. - Councilman Wandless questioned why the reimbursement rate was 75% (central business district) when previous grants in the last three years were 50% (outside the district). Staff confirmed the boundary-based rate structure. - Councilwoman Fielding asked for examples of the 50% grants; staff mentioned Fixology and Danielle's. - Councilman Parrish asked about licensing of a bidder; staff confirmed Star One Landscaping is licensed. Key Outcomes - Motion to approve the $17,873.25 grant to B P Living Trust 2017, made by Councilwoman Fielding, seconded, and passed unanimously. - The meeting adjourned without further public comment.

The Mesquite City Council held a technical review meeting on Tuesday, March 17, 2026, at approximately 2:32 PM. The meeting opened without public comment and proceeded with a brief work session, including votes on an e-bike and e-scooter ordinance amendment and administrative additions. Opening Public Comment - No members of the public came forward; the segment was closed without testimony. Action Items - Councilman Wanless made a motion to introduce a bill amending the Mesquite Municipal Code to add e-bike and e-scooter regulations. The motion was seconded by Councilwoman Fielding. The motion passed unanimously (voice vote: all in favor). - Councilman Randy requested the addition of a presentation for the Interact Local Kids Group to the next council meeting, to issue a certificate of appreciation for their volunteer service (park cleanups, etc.). The request was accepted without a formal motion. Announcements - Councilman Wanless reminded attendees of the unveiling of the first iron cactus sculpture at City Hall at noon on Wednesday, March 18, 2026. Final Public Comment & Adjournment - No further public comment was received, and the meeting was adjourned.