Public Meetings - Monterey, California

The Board of Library Trustees met on Thursday, January 22, 2026, to receive updates from the Friends and Foundation, a presentation on new 24/7 book lockers, and to approve the consent agenda. The meeting included no public comments. Consent Calendar - The board approved the consent agenda by one motion, which included the approval of minutes from the December meeting and three informational reports. No items were pulled for separate discussion. Public Comments & Testimony - No members of the public were present to speak. Discussion Items - Friends and Foundation Update: Shannon Connor, president of the Monterey Friends and Foundation, and Allie, a fundraising consultant, reported on recent activities. Highlights included: - MC Gives campaign raised $85,000 (exceeding a $70,000 goal) with 208 donors, including an $11,000 stock gift. - A late summer appeal was sent in September 2025, yielding 25–30 returns. - Upcoming Chocolate and Wine event (February 2026) faces challenges with vendor commitments; the board was encouraged to donate wine and help with corporate outreach. - Fundraising priorities identified: electronic resources (e.g., Zip Books, language learning), a part-time makerspace staff position, elevated author talks at larger venues, and furniture/equipment improvements. - The Friends board is seeking 3–4 new members due to mid-year turnover. - A new fundraising model was adopted, including investment in a consultant position and benchmarking efforts. - Book Locker Presentation: Staff presented the new 24/7 hold pickup lockers, installed in August 2025 and officially launched on January 20, 2026. Key points: - Two locations: Montecito and Sports Center. - Bilingual marketing materials (English and Spanish) with QR codes. - Items are filled three days a week (Monday, Wednesday, Friday); returns are also accepted. - ADA accommodations available by flagging accounts for lower lockers. - Initial usage: 8–10 returns per site on the first day. - Not all items can be placed in lockers (e.g., Library of Things items). Key Outcomes - The consent agenda was approved unanimously. - The board discussed creating advocacy materials (a one-pager or bookmark) and coordinating with the Friends and Foundation on messaging. - Trustees recommended scheduling a meeting with the incoming city manager to advocate for the library. - Library Director (Brian) reported: - A new full-time bookmobile coordinator, Micah Whitaker, started this week. - The statewide "Every Story Counts" patron survey will run January 25–31, 2026. - The bookmobile will participate in the 4th of July parade; potential for additional events was noted. - The meeting adjourned at approximately 5:13 PM.

On January 12, 2026, a hearing was convened to determine whether a dog named Bingo is "vicious" under Monterey City Code and should be euthanized. The City of Monterey presented evidence alleging three unprovoked attacks on humans and multiple kills of domestic animals, seeking a ruling that Bingo is a dangerous threat to public safety. The property owner, Albert Labonte, defended the dog, asserting it was never unprovoked and that the city's evidence was insufficient or misrepresented. Consent Calendar - Not applicable; the meeting focused entirely on contested evidentiary hearings. Public Comments & Testimony - Leo Gomez (DA Investigator): Provided testimony that he was unprovokedly attacked by Bingo while serving a subpoena at 1001 Hellam Street on June 2, 2025. He sustained puncture wounds, lacerations, and bruising requiring six rabies injections. He expressed strong support for the city's position, stating the dog's behavior was unprovoked and the owners were hostile and irresponsible. - Officer Austin Luke (Monterey Police): Testified that while speaking to Labonte 10 feet away on June 11, 2025, Bingo lunged across the street without warning or growling, biting his thigh. He expressed full support for euthanization, noting the attack occurred during a non-confrontational, normal police interaction. - Lieutenant Jake Pinkas (Monterey Police): Submitted reports and testified regarding a notice of vicious dog status issued to Labonte on June 12, 2025, after two unprovoked human bites. He disclosed a previously unknown 2023 incident where Bingo killed a cat, noting the records system had hindered prior discovery of this report. - Officer Brendan Diaz (Monterey Police): Testified regarding an incident on December 31, 2025, where a neighbor's cat was found dead. He described lacerations on the cat, fur found at the scene, and a gate buckled outward. He opined it was possible for the dog to escape its property based on the home's layout. - Stephanie Dominguez (Neighbor): Treated as a witness for the City. She recounted her 11-year-old daughter hearing Labonte shouting "Bingo, come here" followed by a cat's death. She expressed deep fear for the safety of her children and other pets, supporting the view that the dog is a menace to the neighborhood. - Jack Cordier (Neighbor): Testified that an officer intervened in 2023 to stop Bingo from killing his cat, Gregory. He expressed full support for euthanizing the dog, calling it a "menace" and unsafe for the community. - Chief David Hober (Monterey Police): Expressed strong support for euthanization, stating that no lesser remedies (leash, muzzle) would adequately protect the community. He cited the history of unprovoked attacks on humans and animals, noting the dog is untrained, uncared for, and poses a severe threat. - Neighbors (General): The testimony collectively reflected a community position that Bingo is a danger, with residents expressing fear and describing the dog as having a history of aggressive and lethal behavior. Discussion Items - Definition of Vicious Dog: The City argued that under Monterey City Code Section 631H, Bingo qualifies as vicious due to unprovoked attacks inflicting severe injury (lacerations, bruising) on two separate humans within a 36-month period. - Nature of Attacks: - The City argued all attacks were unprovoked, even those involving Labonte's presence. - Albert Labonte argued that all biting incidents were provoked, stating he warned officers the dog is "not friendly" to uniformed personnel and that the dog was acting in self-defense or protecting him from perceived threats. - Labonte disputed the narrative regarding the death of the cat, suggesting it was more likely a raccoon or mountain lion, and claimed the cat was killed while the dog was on the roof. - Compliance with Remedies: The City argued that previous mandates to keep the dog leashed and muzzled failed to prevent the dog from escaping (reaching the cat's death scene) or biting officers. Labonte denied the dog left the property uncontrolled during the cat incident and maintained the dog was always on a leash. - Evidence Sufficiency: - The City presented photographic evidence of injuries, a deceased cat, and a buckled gate, alongside multiple eyewitness testimonies. - Labonte challenged the identification of the dog in the cat incident, the extent of the injuries described by police, and the claim that the dog acted unprovoked, characterizing the hearing as a "witch hunt." Key Outcomes - Hearing Status: The hearing concluded with both the City and the respondent presenting their cases and closing statements. - Decisions/Votes: No decision was reached during the session. The hearing officer stated a written decision determining whether Bingo is a vicious dog and whether it should be euthanized will be issued within 15 days. - Directives: The City petitioned for the humane euthanization of Bingo and a 36-month prohibition on Labonte owning any dogs, seeking to cover impounding and euthanization costs. - Next Steps: The hearing officer will review testimonials, exhibits (including photos of injuries and the deceased cat), and the written decision will be mailed to all parties by late January 2026. - Discrepancies Noted: A conflict exists regarding the dog's status at the time of the December 31st cat incident, with officers stating the dog likely escaped its property and Labonte maintaining the dog was contained and was actually howling for assistance from the roof.

The Monterey Planning Commission convened on December 23, 2025, with a quorum present (Chair Silva, Commissioners Freeman, Polly, and Stoker; Vice Chair Latasa, Commissioner Bluth, and Commissioner Palmer were absent). The meeting focused on routine consent calendar approvals, the first-ever architectural review involving a reasonable accommodation request for a residential elevator, and staff updates regarding the recent dissolution of the Architectural Review Committee (ARC). Consent Calendar - Approved the minutes from the October 28, 2025, meeting (Item 2) by unanimous vote. - Approved the minutes from the November 25, 2025, meeting (Item 3) by unanimous vote. Public Comments & Testimony - No members of the Chamber or remote viewers submitted public comments or testimony during the public comment period or regarding the specific project item. Discussion Items - 720 Terry Street (ARP 250247): Staff presented an application for a reasonable accommodation request and architectural review permit to install a residential elevator at an existing single-family dwelling. The project aims to address documented mobility impairments of the owners by adding a 30-square-foot elevator footprint. - Staff Position: Senior Planner Chris Schmidt recommended approval, noting the project complies with state and federal fair housing laws. Staff found that while the project exceeds side yard setback, floor area ratio, and story limit standards, it meets the criteria for a reasonable accommodation without imposing undue burden or changing the single-family use. - Applicant Position: Architect Eden Asturi confirmed the elevator addition remains within the existing roof overhang footprint and does not visually alter the setback line. - Commissioner Position: Commissioner Abbott questioned the frequency of using the reasonable accommodation code (Section 3830), confirming with staff that it is rarely utilized (only one or two instances in recent years) and clarifies that it supersedes the need for a variance. The Commissioner noted this approval serves as a potential precedent for homeowners wishing to age in place. - Commissioner Stoker: Expressed that the project is intriguing and serves as a neat example of accommodating residents in their homes via elevator. Key Outcomes - Motion to Approve: Commissioner Stoker moved to approve the 720 Terry Street application with the findings in the staff report; seconded by Commissioner Polly. - Vote Result: The motion carried with a 4-0 vote (Chair Silva, Commissioners Freeman, Polly, and Stoker all voted in favor). - Administrative Updates: - Confirmed the dissolution of the Architectural Review Committee (ARC) following a December 16 City Council ordinance, transferring its duties to the Planning Commission. - The elevator review proceeded directly to the Planning Commission as a result of this transfer, where it would previously have gone to the ARC. - Tentative agenda for January 13, 2025, will feature a six-month check-in for 456 Lighthouse Avenue. - The City Attorney will present a Brown Act update at the January 20, 2025, City Council meeting. - Adjournment: The meeting was adjourned with holiday wishes for the commissioners and staff.

The December 18, 2025 Zoning Administrator meeting was convened at 2:00 PM by Administrator Levi Hill to review minutes, address public comments, and consider a variance application for nighttime construction hours at the Apple Store in 240 Del Monte Center. The meeting proceeded with the approval of previous minutes and a unanimous decision to approve the specific construction variance request with modified conditions. Consent Calendar - The minutes from the October 16, 2025 zoning administrator meeting were reviewed; with no hands raised by the public or attendees, the minutes were approved as submitted. Public Comments & Testimony - Written Comment: One individual submitted a written comment (received via phone and email) expressing concern regarding transportation and potential negative impacts on the north side of the center, which is closer to residential properties. The commenter requested that construction staging and material transportation be restricted to the southern side of the mall complex, adjacent to the Apple Store. - Oral Testimony: No members of the public raised hands to speak during the public comment periods for either the consent calendar or the specific agenda item (V250263). Discussion Items - Application V250263 (240 Del Monte Center): - Staff Report: Senior Associate Planner Matthew Bugart presented a staff report recommending approval. The applicant, Eric Chang (owner AAT Del Monty LLC), requested a variance to work Monday through Sunday from 6:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m. (January 26, 2026, to April 26, 2026) to avoid disrupting business hours at the Apple Store (10:00 a.m.–9:00 p.m. or 10:00 a.m.–8:00 p.m.) and adjacent commercial uses. Staff noted the site is within a shopping complex (C2-SC zoning) and removed from residential uses. Staff recommended two conditions: staging/material transport on the southern side and a construction manager contact number availability. - Applicant Position: Eric Chang stated he had no questions and was available for follow-up regarding the staff report. - Administrator Analysis: Administrator Levi Hill agreed with the staff's findings that the variance is necessary to accommodate unique property factors (commercial location, business disruption risks, and mall complex benefits). The Administrator proposed modifications to the conditions to correct the requested hours from 6:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m., changing them to 9:00 p.m. to 6:00 a.m. (nighttime work) and removing a redundant condition regarding duration. Key Outcomes - Approval of V250263: The variance application for 240 Del Monte Center was approved with the following modified conditions of approval: - Construction hours shall be Monday through Sunday from 9:00 p.m. to 6:00 a.m. (in addition to standard city hours) from January 26, 2026, to April 26, 2026. - Staging areas and material transportation shall occur on the southern side of the center complex. - A construction manager's contact number must be provided and available during all construction hours. - Condition 5D was stricken as the approval is for a limited duration. - Appeal Rights: The decision is appealable to the Planning Commission within 10 days of the meeting. - Adjournment: The meeting was adjourned with no further business.

The Monterey City Council convened on December 16, 2025, for an afternoon session focused on community recognition, strategic planning for the Lower Presidio, budget deficit strategies, and upcoming lease renewals. Key items included a tribute to retiring Fire Chief Andrew Miller, a vote to support a study for a National Historic Park at the Lower Presidio, extensive deliberation on implementing First Responder EMS fees to address a $10 million deficit, and public comments regarding the Budget, Aquarium admissions, and parking fees. Consent Calendar - Approved unanimously to proceed with general budget and administrative items; no items were pulled from the consent agenda by council or staff. Public Comments & Testimony (General Agenda) - Nelson Bega: Expressed strong opposition to current city fees, specifically citing a $5,000 plan check fee, arguing that government fee structures contribute to high housing costs and that fees exceed the actual cost of work. - Tamil Ulver (Volunteer, Monterey Bay Aquarium): Expressed concern regarding the precedent and potential economic impact of taxing aquarium admission, emphasizing the institution's contribution to economic vitality and free programs for low-income visitors and schools. - Vince Ballastro (Surfside Enterprises): Expressed concern regarding city parking fees on Cannery Row and the financial pressure on businesses due to inflation and employee wage costs. - Ellen Martin (Executive Director, First Night Monterey): Expressed gratitude for over 30 years of city support for the New Year's Eve event, highlighting strong organic demand and international interest. - Tamil Ulver (Repeated Comment): Requested the city formally name the plaza area between the Fisherman's Wharf and Harbor Master's office, citing it as the First Plaza of the first state capital. - Demetrius Castros: Expressed support for addressing the $10 million deficit by suggesting a small tax on aquarium tickets (estimated to raise $4 million) and reducing interim staff costs rather than burdening property taxpayers. - Vince Ballastro (Closed Session Comment): Supported the lease renewal for Surfside Enterprises, noting their long-term partnership and recent building improvements. - Unnamed Speaker: Opposed the street vending permit enforcement, arguing that citations were issued on state property (Fisherman's Wharf) rather than city jurisdiction, and requested tickets be removed. Discussion Items - Retirement of Fire Chief Andrew Miller: - Mayor and City Manager Hans delivered tribute speeches honoring Chief Miller's 35 years of service, his two tenures as Fire Chief, and his role in fostering collaboration between Monterey, Pacific Grove, and Carmel. - Chief Miller accepted his retirement for December 30, 2025, expressing profound gratitude for the department's professionalism and the support of his wife, Carol. He presented the Mayor and Council with challenge coins symbolizing "honor the past and embrace the future." - Council members Barber, Garcia, and Smith offered speeches recognizing Miller's leadership, the security he provided, and his mentorship of current and future leaders, including Chief Pat Moore. - Public Commentors: Tamil Ulver and Esther Malcolm expressed community appreciation for Miller's organization and support; Patrick (incoming Chief Moore) thanked Miller for setting a high standard and for his mentorship since 1995. - Lower Presidio National Historic Park Study: - Staff presented a request to authorize the Mayor to support a House Resolution for a special resource study for the Lower Presidio. - Public Commentors: Bob Paulis and Alan Martin expressed strong support, highlighting the historical significance of the site for education and heritage. - An anonymous speaker expressed caution, suggesting the city should retain ownership of such properties rather than transition them to federal or state control. - Staff clarified the land is Army-owned and leased to the city; the current $10 million fee program; staff clarified the fee is for paramedic service only, not general response. - Council Appointments: - Council appointed or adjusted representatives for the Monterey Conference Center Advisory Board and the Monterey Peninsula Agency Governing Agency (AMBAG), including formalizing alternates and shifting roles for the Fairgrounds board. - First Responder Fee Program (Item 15): - Assistant Fire Chief Pat Moore presented two options to address the $10 million structural deficit: - Option One: Billing only insurance companies (low recovery rate of 1% unless Kaiser pays; no standard billing codes for paramedic treatment alone). - Option Two: Billing patients if insurance denies payment (higher recovery rate 42-45% but high administrative burden and public relations risk). - Council members Barber and Smith raised concerns that financial barriers could deter residents from calling 911, potentially causing fatal outcomes. They questioned the impact of health insurance instability and the ethics of charging patients during a healthcare crisis. - Council members Garcia and Smith expressed reluctance toward Option Two but supported further exploration of legislative paths (Option One) to require insurance payment. - The council directed staff to investigate a potential legislative path to mandate insurance payment for paramedic services (Option One) and to model compassionate relief provisions, delaying a final vote. Key Outcomes - Adopted: Unanimous support for the House Resolution letter to investigate the Lower Presidio as a National Historic Park. - Adopted: Unanimous approval of council appointments and alternates for outside agencies. - Deferred: No final vote taken on the First Responder Fee program; directed to staff to further research Option One (insurance billing) and legislative options for state-mandated insurance coverage, and to model compassionate relief brackets. - Recognition: Fire Chief Andrew Miller formally honored and presented with challenge coins; Chief Pat Moore recognized as the incoming leader. - Administrative: Closed session items scheduled for real property negotiations and legal council conferences.

The Monterey Public Library Board of Trustees convened to address budget allocation for the upcoming "MC Gives" funding cycle, provide updates on the shared library pattern agreement between Monterey, Pacific Grove, and Carmel libraries, and review the state library report. The board also initiated a project to develop a standardized advocacy "elevator speech" for trustees and staff. Significant discussion focused on prioritizing the Community Room upgrade for sound and safety improvements, navigating the logistical and financial implications of the new shared courier service, and clarifying discrepancies in the state statistical report regarding active user counts and Wi-Fi statistics. Consent Calendar - Trustee Morrell requested the removal of Item 4 (State Library Report) from the consent agenda to allow for specific clarification questions regarding data columns, registered user definitions, and operational errors. - The remaining Consent Agenda was approved with no objection. Public Comments & Testimony - Liberty Lane Residents/Community Members: One community member expressed appreciation for the "Canterbury Road Days" event, noting it was well-received and sparked significant engagement with the featured book. Discussion Items MC Gives Funding Allocation and Strategy - Trustee Moore: Proposed prioritizing the Community Room renovation to address acoustic issues (reverberation from hard surfaces) and to create a more visible, welcoming space for adult programs and community groups. He suggested installing acoustic panels and updating the entryway to feature plaques acknowledging donor support. - Trustee Silvera: Supported the Community Room upgrade as a priority, noting that nearly 100% of adult programs (including author talks and movie screenings) utilize the space. He emphasized the need for accessible sound systems that comply with accessibility standards, which would be enhanced by the current hardware limitations. - Library Director/Staff: Clarified that the Community Room's shared use (NCIP meetings, community groups) necessitates upgrades to improve audio quality for feature films and lectures, as current laptop speakers are insufficient. The board discussed the need to obtain quotes for the renovation to include in the MC Gives application. - Foundation Partnership: Staff noted that the Monterey Community Foundation (CFMC) has undergone leadership changes and selects 212 agencies out of 300 applicants. They advised aligning the library's proposal with foundation parameters, potentially emphasizing youth-focused outcomes as MC Gives prioritizes younger donors and youth benefits. Staff clarified that MC Gives funds generally do not support recurring staff costs unless strictly project-based (e.g., digitization). - Reporting Strategy: The board discussed presenting tangible improvements (e.g., sound system upgrades) and video examples in future applications to demonstrate the successful use of funds, thereby encouraging continued support for general improvements. Shared Library Pattern (Carmel Integration) - Status Update: The shared pattern agreement between Monterey, Pacific Grove, and Carmel libraries has been approved by all three city councils. The agreement is currently moving through signature collection by city managers. - Courier Service Logistics: The board discussed the expansion of the Pacific Library Partnership (PLP) courier service to include Carmel. The annual cost is projected to rise by approximately $1,000 (totaling $5,000-$6,000) due to Consumer Price Index increases, which will be split three ways among the partner libraries. - Operational Changes: Staff reported that weekly meetings are ongoing to harmonize internal procedures, including loan periods, patron types, and hold rules, to ensure consistency across the three systems. While electronic subscriptions remain individually managed (leading to unique collections like Carmel's "Canopy" movies), the physical book sharing and catalog access will be unified. - Patron Experience: It was noted that Carmel library patrons will likely utilize the Monterey locations due to parking availability in Carmel. The integration is expected to increase traffic and usage, particularly for residents commuting from the Carmel area. State Library Report Clarifications - Registered Users: Clarified that the "Registered Users" figure (18,000) refers to active users (cardholders with activity within the last three years), excluding cards dormant for longer periods despite a five-year shelf life. This aligns with California state-specific reporting guidelines. - Late Fines: Confirmed that while the report listed a charge for late fines, the library has since eliminated late fines, and the data reflects the prior reporting period or a transitional state. - Wireless Sessions: The report indicated a negative number (-1) for wireless sessions, which was attributed to a system migration from the previous network to Juniper. The library currently lacks access to the new data portal and is working with IT to retrieve and report this statistic moving forward. - Bookmobile Costs: Discussed the high operating cost per checkout (approx. $2/book) attributed to internal city charges for vehicle depreciation and maintenance. Staff emphasized the non-circulation value of the service, including outreach, PR, and accessibility to underserved neighborhoods, which justifies the expense despite lower checkout volumes compared to fixed branches. Key Outcomes - Project Priority Established: The Community Room acoustic and aesthetic renovation was identified as the primary candidate for the next MC Gives funding cycle. - Agenda Amendment: Item 4 of the Consent Agenda was successfully reclassified as a discussion item, allowing for immediate clarification of state reporting discrepancies. - Advocacy Draft Assigned: Trustees agreed to appoint a single trustee (Janie was suggested) to draft an "elevator speech" / advocacy cheat sheet. The draft is to be presented at the January meeting for review and refinement. - Timeline for NCIP Vote: Confirmed that the NCIP (Neighborhood Community Improvement Program) committee will vote on project funding next Wednesday, with the results to be formally presented to the City Council in January for adoption, likely in April. - Next Steps: Staff to work with the IT department to secure access to wireless session data; all three libraries to continue harmonizing loan rules and patron protocols ahead of the go-live date.

The Parks and Recreation Commission convened on December 10, 2025, to honor long-serving commissioner Ellen McEwen for 13 years of dedicated service. The majority of the evening consisted of comprehensive presentations from department leadership regarding operations from July through November 2025, facility improvements, technology modernization, and significant programmatic achievements in parks, recreation, and aquatics. A major focus was placed on the future of the Lower Presidio Historic Park and the potential transition of its management to secure public access beyond the current lease expiration. The meeting concluded with a moment of silence honoring the late Kay Russo. Consent Calendar - Unanimously approved the meeting minutes from July 9th and October 8th. Public Comments & Testimony - No public comments were received during the public comment segments for either the presentations or the Lower Presidio Historic Park item. - Commissioner Schmidt expressed strong support for the cemetery digitalization project, noting its value for genealogy research and its ability to share data with external sites like "Find a Grave." - Commissioner Ono expressed appreciation for recent park maintenance work near his residence and the cleanup efforts at Del Mani Beach, stating they were looking good. - Commissioner Reed praised the transformation of the Sports Center facilities, specifically the new pool and sauna, while expressing concern for staff who had maxed out their vacation hours. - Commissioner Bence welcomed Commissioner Julieta, expressed gratitude for community feedback regarding Camp Kinsabi, and urged the hiring committee to secure a permanent Director to replace the interim leadership. Discussion Items - Honor of Ellen McEwen: - Shannon (Manager) presented a tribute to Ellen McEwen for 13 years of service, highlighting her roles as Chair and Vice-Chair, her advocacy on NCIP committees, and her crucial support as a medical advisor during post-COVID program rebuilding. - Ellen McEwen expressed that Parks and Recreation is the "heart and soul" of the city, describing the department as the "lifeblood" that creates community. She expressed full support for the department and urged staff and commissioners to stay engaged with city council meetings. - Department Operations Report (July-Nov 2025): - Shannon reported on the first annual department report, the success of new academies (Monterey Way and First City), and facility improvements including the Hilltop Park Center seismic/termite repairs (Phase 1) and the El Estero Park Center playground installation. - Bill (Sports Center Director) shared that sports center memberships have recovered to 2019 levels, with revenue growing from $2.2M in 2023 to $4.5M in the prior year. He highlighted the success of the new cycling studio, the return of the Dia de los Muertos event (drawing 1,000 people), and the cost recovery rate reaching 80%. - Tice (Parks Operations) detailed vegetation management at Laguna Grande, sea lion management at the coast, and the success of the Tree Ordinance town halls, which received over 300 survey responses. - Nate (Recreation) reported record attendance for summer camps (exceeding fiscal year 2019 revenue and approaching 2019 attendance numbers) and high enrollment in winter programs. He outlined future recruitment challenges due to upcoming minimum wage increases and the need to balance staff capacity with high demand. - Intern Patrick Williams was acknowledged for his work digitizing the cemetery records, updating 600+ columbarium niches, and identifying historical figures from diverse backgrounds. - Lower Presidio Historic Park Status: - Shane (Parks Supervisor) presented the history of the 25.15-acre site, including its significance to the Ohlone Eshlin and Rumsen tribes and its history as El Castillo. - Shane stated that the U.S. Army has indicated a desire to terminate the current lease (ending 2046) or move to a market-rate lease, stating that the City must design a retaining wall for the Lighthouse curve or face lease termination. - Discussion: Commissioners and staff discussed the high cost (estimated $1.5M by Army, higher by staff analysis) and complexity (archaeological sensitivity, NEPA regulations) of the proposed wall. - Positions on Future Action: - Shane expressed a strong position in favor of seeking National Park Service designation (National Monument status) to secure public access in perpetuity. - Council Direction: The Commission noted the City Council's previous instruction to return in early-to-mid 2026 with a public outreach plan. - Recommendations: Staff proposed conducting a community survey, workshops involving the Historic Preservation and Museums commissions, and a charrette at the park site in February 2026. - Commissioner Schmidt questioned the timeline for potential National Park designation, noting it would take 3-4 years. Key Outcomes - Staffing: The Parks and Recreation Director position is currently open; the Interim City Manager (starting Jan 1, 2026) is overseeing the recruitment process for additional candidates. - Partnership Discussion: Commissioners questioned if the Boys and Girls Club remains willing to partner for the Monte Cito location, with staff to follow up. - Lower Presidio Park: The Commission agreed to support the upcoming public engagement process to determine the future of the park, with a target return to Council in early 2026. - Memorial: The meeting adjourned with a moment of silence in honor of Kay Russo, former Parks and Recreation Director. - Next Meeting: Scheduled for January 14, 2026.

On December 6, 2025, the Monterey City Council convened for a special meeting to consider a first reading of an ordinance dissolving the Architectural Review Committee (ARC) and transferring its duties to the Planning Commission. With four council members and the mayor present (Councilmember Smith absent), the meeting addressed public inquiries regarding the legality of the transfer and received public commentary on charter compliance. A secondary item regarding a closed session public employment appointment was also held following the main discussion. Consent Calendar - No items listed on the consent calendar were addressed during the open session. Public Comments & Testimony - Member of the public (unnamed, identified as "Ms. Foreman" in council response): Expressed strong opposition to the proposed ordinance, arguing it blocks a ballot measure from voters to amend Charter Section 8.1. The speaker contended that amending the VAF district via an ordinance to transfer ARC approvals violates the city charter, as charter provisions regarding development standards can only be amended by a majority vote of the people. They emphasized that the original 1986 Measure E was written specifically to prevent staff recommendations from overriding voter intent regarding the ARC and VAF district. - Councilmember Rash: Expressed a preference for clarification on the communication efforts made regarding the ARC dissolution, noting that the original ARC members had been reappointed to other commissions and questioning the status of remaining members. Discussion Items - Ordinance to Dissolve ARC and Transfer Duties: Staff presented a proposal to amend the Monterey City Code to dissolve the ARC and transfer its powers to the Planning Commission, a recommendation that had already received unanimous support from the Planning Commission in November. The staff explanation clarified that this action would not eliminate the role of architectural review but would change the body performing it to better streamline processes and reduce administrative support. - Legality of Transfer: Councilmember Rash and the City Attorney addressed concerns raised by the public regarding the charter. The City Attorney stated that the ARC was created by city ordinance in the 1940s, not by a popular vote, and that the charter reference ensures the functions remain intact. The Attorney argued that transferring these functions to the Planning Commission is essentially a "name change" that honors the charter's intent without altering development standards or requiring a vote of the people. - Communication Status: Councilmember Rash asked for confirmation on how many remaining ARC members existed if not reappointed. Staff confirmed that the ARC currently lacks a quorum as most members had been reappointed to other commissions. Key Outcomes - Motion to Approve First Reading: The City Council moved and seconded the approval of the first reading of the ordinance to dissolve the Architectural Review Committee and transfer its duties to the Planning Commission. - Vote Tally: The motion passed unanimously (all present members voted "aye"). - Closed Session: The Council adjourned to a closed session for a public employment appointment (unrepresented employee) and subsequently adjourned the meeting.

The Monterey Museums and Cultural Arts Commission convened on December 4, 2025, to address critical updates regarding the Lower Presidio Historic Park, the Colton Hall concert series, proposed fee schedule changes for museum services, and capital improvement projects funded by the Neighborhood Community Improvement Program (NCIP). The meeting focused heavily on the feasibility and historical preservation guidelines surrounding the Lighthouse Curve retaining wall and ADA compliance for the Pacific Biological Laboratories. Consent Calendar - Approved the minutes from the previous meeting as submitted without changes. - New commissioners acknowledged and abstained from the consent vote as required. Public Comments & Testimony - Representative from the Old Monterey Foundation: Expressed strong support for retaining consistent public access to the Lower Presidio Historic Park and highlighted the organization's contributions to improvements such as ADA walkways and benches. Stated that the Old Monterey Foundation represents the community's desire to keep the park open and accessible. - Commissioner Evans: Expressed significant concern that a proposed 20-25 foot retaining wall at Lighthouse Curve represents a solution "much worse than the problem" due to its scale and conflict with the Secretary of the Interior Standards for historic sites. Argued that extensive excavation required for such a wall could disturb archaeologically sensitive Indigenous remains and questioned the Army's initial pressure to proceed. - Commissioner Tokowski: Supported the view that the proposed wall is infeasible and advocated for exploring less invasive alternatives, such as sprayed soil (gunite) or natural netting and landscaping, to manage erosion without compromising the historic character of the site. - Commissioner Caldy: Expressed full support for generating revenue to offset costs but noted that proposed fees must account for wear and tear on historic floors and building structures, not just staff time. Emphasized the need to ensure fees are competitive with other municipalities and parks. Discussion Items - Lower Presidio Historic Park & Lighthouse Curve: Staff presented the history of the site as an Indigenous location, Mexican-era fort, and U.S. Army garrison. The Commission discussed a potential 20-25 foot retaining wall requested by the Army to stop soil sloughing on the hillside. Commissioners debated the high cost (estimated at $1.5 million to $5 million), the archaeological sensitivity of the site, and the appropriateness of the design under Secretary of the Interior standards. The staff and Commissioners explored alternative solutions like gopher management, natural landscaping, and a special resource study for National Park Service designation. Commissioner Turgeon volunteered to act as a liaison to attend future public workshops on behalf of the Commission. - Colton Hall Concert Series: Staff reported high attendance (over 60 people per session) despite limited seating. The series, shifted from evening to 4:00 PM to accommodate staff availability, was unanimously supported by Commissioners. Staff recommended continuing the 4:00 PM Saturday sessions through the spring. The Commission discussed rebranding the series without "Candlelight" in the title. - Master Fee Schedule Revisions: Staff proposed updates to the fee schedule for private tours, commercial filming, and special events to better recoup staff time and facility wear. Current fees ($60 for small tours, $50/hour for filming) were deemed by some commissioners to be too low to cover fully encumbered staff costs and maintenance. The Commission discussed creating tiered fees for private events (including weddings and ghost hunts) and potentially offering reduced rates for 501(c)(3) educational groups. The goal was to move toward a comprehensive fee schedule that reflects market rates for historic venues. - NCIP Projects Update: Staff reviewed several upcoming projects including Hartnell Creek Park Enhancements (Indigenous narrative space), Lighthouse Curve road improvements (removing sidewalk to install wall), Hilltop Park mural expansion, Colton Hall drainage improvements, and the Native American art installation. Commissioners noted that voting on projects is scheduled for December 17, with recommendations to Council in April. - Pacific Biological Laboratories (Ricketts Lab) ADA Access: Staff presented a 2019 accessibility study and a 2025 update recommending a modified rear entrance with a platform lift and outdoor restroom to avoid invasive interior modifications. The estimated cost of the full study recommendations is $1.8–$2.2 million, while the Western Flyer Foundation has offered $260,000 for initial staging. Commissioners raised concerns about the high costs, liability issues, the building's vulnerability to sea-level rise, and the risk of creating an incomplete ADA solution (e.g., accessible entry but non-compliant interior doorways). Virtual Reality tours were suggested as an immediate alternative for accessibility. Key Outcomes - Liaison Appointment: Commissioner Turgeon agreed to serve as the Commission's liaison for the upcoming public workshop regarding the Lower Presidio Historic Park. - Concert Series Continuation: The Commission endorsed the continuation of the Colton Hall concert series at 4:00 PM on Saturdays through the spring. - NCIP Participation: Staff will attend the NCIP voting session on December 17 to observe and prepare for future recommendations. - Pacific Biological Lab Strategy: The Commission agreed to support a phased approach to ADA compliance, prioritizing the adoption of the 2025 accessibility study (focusing on exterior/minimal impact solutions) and seeking to partner with the Western Flyer Foundation to utilize their grant for initial staging, while avoiding invasive interior renovation. - Fee Schedule Development: The Commission directed staff to research comparative fees and prepare a comprehensive fee schedule proposal for future Council review that addresses staff costs, facility maintenance, and potential educational discounts. Next Meeting: February 5, 2026.