Public Meetings - Monterey, California

The Monterey Planning Commission convened on November 25, 2025, to address several key agenda items including a commercial recreation use permit, a proposed zoning amendment for minimum housing density, and the dissolution of the Architectural Review Committee. The meeting also featured remarks from the Chair regarding the city's regulatory approach and introductions of three newly appointed commissioners. Consent Calendar - The Commission moved to continue the Consent Calendar to the next meeting due to a split vote (3 abstentions, 3 yes) on the original motion. The motion to continue was subsequently approved by a unanimous roll call vote (6-0). Public Comments & Testimony - Brad Slama: Expressed vehement opposition to minimum density requirements, arguing they restrict development options and limit project types to multifamily condos only. He requested that projects already in the application pipeline for three years be grandfathered in to avoid the loss of prior plan review work and to maintain realistic density levels (15-16 units/acre). - Matt Norris: Encouraged the Commission to consider proposed amendments to the density calculation language, specifically carving out scenic setbacks, utility easements (PGE, sewer), topography, and protected trees. He emphasized that water availability constraints, particularly regarding on-site wells and the current Coastal Development Ordinance (CDO), physically limit achievable density on specific sites to levels below the 20 units/acre mandate, and that developers seek to avoid extreme density bonuses that compromise neighborhood character. - Patrick Orosco: Complimented staff's efforts but highlighted that density standards are arbitrary and often conflict with existing site improvements like cell towers and highway setbacks. He argued that unit count is an inferior metric compared to bedroom count and warned that minimum density requirements could stifle housing production, citing similar pushback in San Jose and concerns regarding the Builder's Remedy. Discussion Items - Item 3: Use Permit UP-25-0128 (2555 Garden Road) - Staff Analysis: Proposed a commercial recreation and entertainment use in an existing 28,000 sq ft commercial building, with 90% of events for employees and 10% for third-party rentals. Hours are limited to evenings and weekends. Staff noted the project is consistent with the Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan and recommended approval with conditions regarding security, parking, and trash. - Applicant Response: James Boselka (Ability Ventures) and Charles Taupe (Owner) clarified that the space is for private corporate events (e.g., training, awards) with a kitchen for serving food. They explained that four to five vehicles are stored on-site for private viewing by event attendees in a fire-separated room, not as a public museum. Addressed parking concerns by noting that employee parking becomes available for events and that valet or shuttle services could be utilized if occupancy exceeds 106 spaces. - Commission Deliberation: Commissioners expressed support for the item, noting it is an appropriate use for the district. Concerns regarding plumbing code compliance were addressed as preliminary details for the building permit process. The water allocation issue was deferred to the building permit stage. - Item 4: Minimum Density Requirement Amendment (MF Overlay) - Background: Staff recommended amending the zoning code to establish a minimum density of 20 dwelling units per acre in the multifamily residential overlay district to comply with HCD's requirement under Government Code Section 65583.2H2. The amendment includes exceptions for conversion projects, phased developments, and recorded scenic easements. - Commission Debate: Commissioners discussed the conflict between state mandates and local water constraints. While staff emphasized that water availability is the primary driver limiting density, HCD rejected arguments for water-based carve-outs. Commissioners debated the feasibility of excluding setback areas (scenic easements) and utility easements from density calculations, with staff warning that adding too many exclusions could result in HCD rejection. Commissioners expressed concern about the impact on development viability and the potential for projects to be turned away if minimums cannot be met due to physical constraints. - Motion: Commissioner Freeman moved to continue the item, directing staff to work with HCD to explore phasing options (addressing water constraints), the recording of easements, and to advise applicants of SB 330 protections. The motion also included a directive to ensure projects currently in the pipeline are protected via SB 330 mechanisms. - Item 5: Dissolution of the Architectural Review Committee (ARC) - Staff Analysis: Recommended dissolving the ARC and transferring its powers and duties to the Planning Commission to streamline processes and reduce administrative costs, following a City Council directive. The Commission noted that the Planning Commission already reviews many items currently handled by the ARC, and that the transfer removes an appellate step. - Commission Deliberation: Commissioners expressed support for the consolidation, noting it would prevent the Commission from being burdened with mundane "ordinary improvements" (e.g., roof replacements) and allow for more items to be placed on the Consent Agenda. They discussed the potential to expand the list of items eligible for administrative review. Key Outcomes - UP-25-0128: Approved unanimously (6-0). The use permit to establish a commercial recreation and entertainment use at 2555 Garden Road was granted. - Minimum Density Amendment: Continued to a future meeting with a motion passed unanimously (6-0). Staff is directed to consult with HCD regarding phasing, easements, and SB 330 protections before bringing a revised proposal forward. - ARC Dissolution: Approved unanimously (6-0). The ordinance to dissolve the ARC and transfer its powers to the Planning Commission is recommended to the City Council. - Commissioner Introductions: Dave Stoker, Justin Polly, and Eric Palmer were welcomed as new members of the Commission. - Staff Update: The City Council overturned the Planning Commission's denial of a daycare use permit on November 19, 2025, and directed staff to initiate an ALUC permit override process.

The City Council of Monterey convened on November 18, 2025, for its afternoon and evening sessions to address routine administrative matters, board appointments, and critical water policy decisions. The afternoon session focused on appointing members to various boards and commissions, where a subcommittee's recommendations sparked significant debate regarding term limits, district representation, and the elevation of Planning Commission candidates. The evening session addressed urgent water allocation policies in light of the newly operational Pure Water Monterey expansion and a pending request to the State Water Resources Control Board to lift a long-standing development moratorium. Throughout the evening, public commenters expressed strong support for expanding water access to stimulate housing, while others raised serious concerns regarding water quality safety, the inclusion of desalination projects in advocacy letters, and the prioritization of affordable housing. Consent Calendar - Approved unanimously (5-0) without any items pulled from the agenda. Public Comments & Testimony - Business Licensing: Nick Jacob, owner of Hotel 1110, expressed strong dissatisfaction and opposed the Finance Department's practice of not providing timely notice for business license fees, describing the "wait for notice" approach as an unacceptable mindset where staff are not working for the public. He urged the Council to instruct the Finance Department to implement proactive email or mail notifications. - Community Engagement: Judy Henderson, a registered voter and former City Academy participant, expressed support for the Fire Chief's decision on dirty turnout treatment and thanked the City Academy team for providing transparent insights into city operations. - Board Appointments (Support for Taylor Deinhart): Multiple speakers, including Jane Sink, Ray Myers, Jeannie Ferrara, and Elizabeth Yannish, expressed full support for Taylor Deinhart's appointment to the Planning Commission. They highlighted her dual master's degrees, public health background, and the position that her diversity (being a woman in a male-dominated field) and "out of town" experience are beneficial assets. Jeannie Ferrara specifically advocated for her to bring a "female presence" to the board. - Board Appointments (Process Concerns): Pat Venza expressed concern and opposed the inconsistency in the selection process regarding applicants who had never attended a meeting prior to applying, arguing that experience with city governance should be a factor. Elizabeth Yannish expressed a desire for more transparency in the subcommittee's scoring and decision-making process. - Water Policy (Support for CDO Modification): Kevin Dayton (Chamber of Commerce) and Michael Balboa (Developer) expressed strong support for sending the letter to the State Water Board and supported the first-come, first-served water allocation policy to drive economic recovery and housing. - Water Policy (Opposition to Desalination & Safety): Nina Beattie expressed strong opposition to including the desalination plant in the support letter and opposed lifting the CDO moratorium. She argued that the Seaside Basin water is contaminated (containing toxins from the Fort Ord Superfund site) and is not safe for potable use, stating that the water supply is not viable. She expressed concern that the market will favor wealthy developers over affordable housing. - Water Policy (Prioritization Debate): Tom Reeves expressed the position that the city needs workforce housing rather than market-rate luxury homes and opposed the prioritization language that might favor larger projects over specific workforce needs. Laura Davis (Landwatch) expressed support for prioritizing infill and affordable housing and recommended a phased allocation approach. Discussion Items - Board of Commissions Appointments: - Councilmembers and staff discussed the subcommittee's recommendations, noting the city code restriction that members generally serve only on one body at a time, with exceptions for Measures P and S and the Appeals Board. - Discussion on Term Limits: Mayor Williamson clarified the position that the Council voted to adopt a 12-year term limit for boards and commissions, aligning with the ballot measure, and noted that this was a factor in the subcommittee's selection process to create space for new voices. - Debate on Planning Commission Appointments: Councilmember Smith expressed strong concern and opposed removing Mike Brassfield (District 4, 8 years experience) to appoint two new members from the Architectural Review Committee (ARC), arguing that experience should be valued. She voiced opposition to elevating Eric Palmer (2 years on ARC) over a long-serving planning commissioner, citing a lack of justification for removing an experienced member. - Debate on Taylor Deinhart: Councilmember Rash advocated for appointing Taylor Deinhart to the Planning Commission, arguing that her qualifications (dual master's degrees, research background) offer necessary balance and diversity. She proposed a friendly amendment to include her, but the motion maker declined the amendment, arguing that her skills were best utilized on the Neighborhood and Community Improvement Program (NCIP) committee, which has a larger budget ($6 million). - Final Vote on Appointments: The Council voted 3-2 to approve the subcommittee's recommendations. Councilmember Smith cast a "no" vote specifically regarding the Planning Commission appointments while voting "yes" on the other items, resulting in the overall motion passing. - Water Policy & State Letter Authorization: - Item 15 (Letter to State Water Board): Councilmember Garcia made a motion to approve the letter supporting the water district's application to lift the CDO condition, explicitly excluding any mention of the desalination plant. Councilmember Smith opposed this, advocating for the inclusion of the desalination plant in the letter as a long-term sustainable solution. The motion to exclude the desalination paragraph passed 3-2. - Item 14 (Water Allocation Policy): Staff presented a policy allowing water allocation from the new 141-acre-foot supply, to be activated only after the CDO is modified, with exceptions for "like-for-like" residential/commercial conversions under Dave Stolt's (Water District) interpretation. - Debate on Implementation: Dave Stolt testified that projects with no change in use (e.g., residential to residential) could potentially proceed immediately, though the City Manager expressed caution regarding the legal risk if the State eventually enforces the CDO. Public commenters urged the Council to open the water allocation broadly to all housing types without restrictive buckets to maximize development. - Final Vote on Policy: The Council voted to approve the staff recommendation to adopt the water policy as written. Councilmember Garcia voiced mixed feelings but supported the motion to move forward, while Councilmember Smith expressed support but noted concerns about the risk. The motion passed 3-2. Key Outcomes - Consent Calendar: Approved unanimously (5-0). - Board Appointments: The Council approved the slate of recommendations for the Building and Housing Appeals Board, Historic Preservation Commission, and others (3-2). The vote specifically excluded Councilmember Smith's support for the Planning Commission appointments due to objections regarding the removal of incumbent Mike Brassfield. - Interim City Manager Appointment: In closed session, the Council voted unanimously (4-0, with Councilmember Garcia absent) to appoint Lou Bauman as the Interim City Manager. - Water Policy Action: The Council authorized the sending of a letter to the State Water Resources Control Board supporting the modification of the CDO, but explicitly rejected the inclusion of language supporting the desalination project (3-2). The Council also adopted the new water allocation policy (Policy Item 14) which prioritizes affordable housing but remains open to other housing types and commercial redevelopment once the CDO is lifted. - Next Steps: The City will await the State Water Board's decision on the CDO modification (estimated 4-6 months) before issuing water permits for new meters, though staff may proceed with "like-for-like" conversions based on the new policy interpretation.

The Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) convened on November 13, 2025, to approve meeting minutes, discuss the 2025 Mills Act inspection cycle, and review upcoming events. The meeting featured a detailed presentation by Senior Associate Planner Matthew Buggert regarding the status of the Mills Act program, which includes 65 properties in the City of Monterey. Commissioners offered support for the program's restoration efforts while raising concerns about inconsistent maintenance plans, property owner awareness, and the need for program codification and stricter enforcement mechanisms. Consent Calendar - Minutes Approval: The commission voted to approve the minutes from the August 11th field trip and the October 9th meeting. Commissioner Pizel abstained from the vote for the August 11th field trip minutes and Commissioner Smith Corvello abstained from the October 9th minutes. - Annual Appointments: The commission confirmed the amendments regarding the appointments of the Chair and Vice Chair made on August 14th. - Public Comments on Consent Agenda: No members of the public attended chambers or joined remotely to comment on items not in the agenda during the initial public comment period. Public Comments & Testimony - Public Attendance: No members of the public were present in chambers or joined remotely during the general public comment period. - Staff Response to Public Query: Planner Matthew Buggert noted that while there was no public commentary during the meeting, a neighborhood meeting had recently occurred where homeowners expressed confusion regarding their contract responsibilities. Commissioners discussed the potential need for an informational meeting hosted by the city to clarify obligations uniformly. Discussion Items - Mills Act Inspection Report (2025 Cycle): - Presentation: Matthew Buggert presented the 2025 annual inspection report. He noted that 52 properties were inspected by the end of September, with 6 additional properties inspected in October. Six properties were marked as "no inspect" due to non-response over two cycles. - Outstanding Issues: Commissioners and staff discussed common outstanding tasks, including the replacement of aluminum windows with wood, repair of retaining walls, falling trim, and upgrading knob and tube electrical systems. Historic plaque installation remains a frequent outstanding item, though three properties were approved for plaque text this year. - Property Owner Awareness: Staff reported instances where new owners were unaware of the Mills Act contract running with the land, including cases involving divorce where one partner was unaware of the property's obligations. - Enforcement Concerns: Commissioners expressed concern regarding properties with vague maintenance plans (dates ranging from 5 to 25 years) and the lack of uniformity. Staff indicated that while they strive to be flexible, they are prepared to move toward contract termination or notice of non-renewal if owners show blatant disregard for the contract or refuse entry for inspections after multiple attempts. - Program Structure Review: Staff confirmed that the City Council recently paused discussion on eliminating the Mills Act due to fiscal analysis. However, there is a plan to bring forward program changes in early 2026 to codify the ordinance, establish stricter guardrails, require documentation/receipts for expenses, and differentiate between restorative work and general maintenance. Commissioner Barlow and others expressed support for these changes to ensure fairness and consistency. - Plaque Database: A commissioner suggested creating an online database of historic plaques to help identify properties; staff indicated no such tool currently exists but noted plans to systematically photograph plaques in future cycles. - Planning Updates: - Upcoming Meetings: No items are tentatively scheduled for the December 11th meeting. - Historical Events: Commissioners shared details on upcoming events, including Kenery Row Days (through Dec 1), Robert Louis Stevenson's birthday celebration (Nov 15), Tree Lighting at Colton Hall (Dec 3), "Christmas in the Adobe" (Dec 12-13), and the Carmel Inns Tour (Dec 7). Key Outcomes - Minutes Approved: The August 11 and October 9 minutes were officially approved with the noted abstentions. - Informational Report Received: The commission received the 2025 Mills Act inspection report without a formal motion to approve staff actions related to inspections, though the report served as the basis for future policy discussions. - Future Directives: - Staff is directed to prepare program changes, including codification and stricter enforcement protocols, for review by the commission in early 2026 to update the 2000-resolution Mills Act program. - The commission supports the idea of a public informational meeting to address owner confusion and considers the potential for an online plaque database. - Staff will continue to monitor properties for consecutive missed inspections, with a threshold of approximately three missed inspections potentially triggering termination proceedings.

The City Council convened for the final deliberations regarding appointments to various city boards, commissions, and committees following a three-day interview period for applicants. Vice Mayor Gino Garcia and Mayor Tyler Williamson led the session, evaluating candidates based on enthusiasm, relevant experience, and adherence to the city's new term limit policies. Public comments were heard from residents advocating for transparency, the importance of community representation on the NCIP, and general support for the new public interview process. The meeting concluded with the Council reaching consensus on specific candidates for each vacancy, with appointments to be finalized at the November 18th Council meeting. Consent Calendar - (No items listed; discussion focused on deliberative selections.) Public Comments & Testimony - Elizabeth Yannish: Expressed strong support for the new precedent of holding public interviews, stating that it validates the "partnership" between citizens and the city and requires "courage" to open governance to public view. She advocated for trusting the community process, especially for residents unable to attend at 8:30 a.m., to strengthen the "three-legged table" of city governance. - Tom Raleigh (President, Fisherman's Flats Homeowners and Residents Association): Expressed disappointment regarding previous lack of representation from the neighborhood on the Neighborhood Council Improvement Program (NCIP), noting that the current representative failed to report for two meetings and the former alternate resigned. He strongly supported the appointment of Diane Solomony as the new alternate, citing her 10+ years of residence and qualification, and urged for expedited appointment procedures to address a backlog of NCIP projects. He proposed that the previous appointment method for NCIP representatives worked effectively. - Aylin Phillip: Expressed support and gratitude for the opportunity to serve the community in the capacity of a museum and cultural board applicant, emphasizing her passion for Monterey. - Unidentified Zoom Caller (Tom): Expressed 100% support for the process, agreeing with Ms. Yannish that conducting meetings in public is a "positive step" that enhances transparency and allows the community to witness how civic work is conducted. Discussion Items - Process and Selection Criteria: Council members noted the high level of enthusiasm among applicants. Vice Mayor Garcia emphasized that enthusiasm is a primary driver for selection, while Mayor Williamson added a preference for creating space for "new voices" due to the term limit policy; specifically, he noted an incumbent (Mike Brassfield) has served 12 years and should not be reappointed to maintain consistency with city policy. - Discrepancy in Applicant Data: Staff noted an error regarding Julieta Garib's district assignment in the source material (corrected from District 3 to District 4), though this did not impact the Council's selection decision. - Board Selection Deliberations: - Historic Properties Commission (HPC): Both Council members selected Kathy Collum, Linda Rath, and Juan Rodriguez for the three available seats. - Measure S/Parks Committee (One Seat): Both Council members selected Thomas Bruno. - Monterey Cultural Arts Commission (MCAC): Both selected Maylin (Phillip) and Monique. A divergence occurred on the final seats; Vice Mayor Garcia selected Kathy (referring to a candidate who also applied for HPC) while Mayor Williamson selected Bill, citing term limits (Bill has served the maximum time). - Parks and Recreation Commission: Both selected Sydney Crampton and Julieta Garib for the two available seats. - Planning Commission: Both agreed on Eric Palmer and Dave Stoker. Mayor Williamson initially struggled with the third seat but, after clarifying that a preference exists for two architects on the commission (to maintain expertise during a merger with the Architectural Review Committee), agreed to select Gabe Sanders. Councilman Garcia clarified that Mike Brassfield, the incumbent, serves 12 years and will not be reappointed. - Neighborhood Council Improvement Program (NCIP) - Skyline: Both selected Taylor Deinhart. - NCIP - Del Monte Beach: Both selected George McNeely. - NCIP - Fisherman's Flats: Both selected Diane (Solomony). - NCIP - Deer Flats: Both selected David Overton. - NCIP - Oak Grove: Both selected Ilse. - NCIP - Glenwood Circle: Both selected Amanda Priest. - NCIP - Del Monte Grove/Laguna Grande: Both selected Joseph. Key Outcomes - Recommendations Made: The Council unanimously recommended the following candidates for appointment to the respective boards and commissions: - HPC: Kathy Collum, Linda Rath, Juan Rodriguez. - Measure S: Thomas Bruno. - MCAC: Maylin Phillip, Monique, Kathy (as per Vice Mayor's preference), and Bill (as per Mayor's preference; final decision pending term limit constraints). - Parks & Rec: Sydney Crampton, Julieta Garib. - Planning Commission: Eric Palmer, Dave Stoker, Gabe Sanders (Mike Brassfield declined due to term limits). - NCIP Seats: Taylor Deinhart (Skyline), George McNeely (Del Monte Beach), David Overton (Deer Flats), Ilse (Oak Grove), Amanda Priest (Glenwood Circle), Diane Solomony (Fisherman's Flats), Joseph (Del Monte Grove). - Next Steps: The Council confirmed that these recommendations will be presented for a formal vote at the November 18th City Council meeting. Staff expressed gratitude for the workload regarding the board/committee merger and the interview coordination.

The City of Monterey held a combined afternoon and evening council session on November 4, 2025, focusing on community recognitions, public input on budget and safety, and significant deliberations regarding firearms regulation, parking policy, and land use appeals. The meeting featured the presentation of military awards, a Native American Heritage Month proclamation, and extensive debate on a proposed residential parking program framework and a use permit appeal for a new daycare near the airport. Consent Calendar - Approved Unanimously: The consent agenda items (excluding pulled items 10 and 11) were approved. Mayor Williamson recused herself from voting on Item 7 (Larkin Park Swings) due to a financial conflict of interest regarding her personal residence proximity, though she remained in the room. Public Comments & Testimony - Brian Rosen: Expressed strong opposition to the military awards ceremony. He argued that the city should not be celebrating the military given current Department of War actions, citing alleged injustices against civilians and support for dictatorships. He urged the council to focus on resolving issues with ICE and protecting civil liberties instead. - Janice Russo: Spoke on behalf of local business owners on the 200 block of Ramona Avenue. She reported that the commercial block suffers from severe parking shortages and congestion, with delivery trucks double/triple parking. She also highlighted persistent issues including illegal dumping, drug paraphernalia, and vandalism, requesting time-based parking restrictions similar to nearby streets. - Noah Daniels: Representing Access Media Productions (AMP), he affirmed the organization's continued partnership with the city to ensure local government transparency and community media accessibility. - Mala Velasquez, LaShawn Coleman, Tiffany Quarrels, Chris, and Audra Walton: All represented the Coalition for a Just and Equitable California (or spoke as private citizens/Coalition members). They unanimously expressed full support for the implementation of California State Bill 515 (SB 515). They argued that disaggregating data on Black Americans descended from chattel slavery is essential to reveal visible disparities in housing, health, and income. They stated that current data "invisibility" excludes resources and that the Coalition is ready to assist the city in updating forms and data systems to meet the January 1, 2027 state deadline. - Gina: Expressed concern regarding the city's approach to the Non-Profit Incentive Program (NCIP), specifically the review of new projects against existing authorized ones. She suggested the city reframe its approach to make the program more workable and beneficial. - Colin Gallagher: Stated that SB 515 is a data collection initiative with no requirements for reparations. He noted that Proposition 209 remains in effect as a legal barrier to race-based preferences. He also advocated for the city council to meet individually with business owners before considering license revocations, noting that an item regarding licensing was on the agenda. - Audra Walton: Reiterated support for the Black American Freedmen community and emphasized the need to retain the existing population in Monterey County. She acknowledged the decline in population but viewed the bill as a tool to help those remaining stay and attract new residents. - Mr. Rosen (Second Appearance): Reiterated his position that the city does not need to celebrate the military, criticizing the administration for benefiting from the military-industrial complex while failing to address issues with ICE and domestic tyranny. - Mr. Vega: Expressed frustration regarding the city's structural deficit ($10 million upside down). He stated opposition to spending millions on the consent agenda and security camera replacements without addressing the deficit first. He argued that the city is unfairly burdening taxpayers with future tax increases (water, sewer, parking) while continuing to spend. He called for a budget review committee made of residents. - General Public Commenters (Evening Session): - Resident on 301 Ocean Ave: Opposed the firearms ordinance, calling neighborhood concerns about the LMB Firearms store baseless and fear-driven. She stated the store is not a risk and that residents have benefited from the store for years. - Rebecca Sumner (Applicant): Expressed deep concern that the ordinance would force her family's store at 301 Ocean to close within three years, arguing they followed all laws at the time and that moving to the Industrial zone is unsafe. - Cooper (Applicant): Stated that the current location is the only viable option and that the ordinance unfairly targets a lawful business due to political pressure, arguing it sets a dangerous precedent. - Laurie (Resident): Expressed support for the LMB Firearms owners, noting they followed all rules and should be allowed to operate without an arbitrary expiration date. - Resident on Ramona Ave: Reiterated the need for parking enforcement and time-based restrictions on Ramona Avenue to address business congestion and safety. - Resident on Kona/General: Expressed support for the event-based Kona parking program and suggested the city collect Transfer of Tax (TOT) on City-owned RV parks to offset costs. - Colin Gallagher (Evening): Reiterated opposition to SB 515 regarding reparations concerns and the city's deficit, while also commenting on the firearms ordinance as unconstitutional and anti-business. - Audra Walton (Evening): Complained about the "color of the sea" (brown/green with algae) but proposed that planting non-native Eucalyptus and Cypress trees is a viable solution, dismissing concerns about invasive species. - Parking Public Commenters: Various residents expressed concerns about the equity of the new parking program, specifically regarding Cannery Row (grandfathering issues), the 80% petition threshold, the impact on seniors and women without garages, and the financial burden of the city's deficit. Discussion Items - DLI Quarterly Awards: Mayor Williamson presented awards to Sergeant Paul Carnin, Lance Corporal Averroes Quinn, and Sergeant Leon Zak for their service and knowledge. A caller criticized the city for celebrating the military during the current administration; the Mayor defended the program as recognizing individual service members regardless of policy disagreements. - Native American Heritage Month: The council adopted a proclamation for November 2025. The Mayor noted the council's commitment to continuing work toward apologizing to local native tribes. - Storm Drain Utility Rate Study (Item 10): Staff presented an amendment to extend the scope of a storm drain master plan, increasing the cost by $11,000 (net increase) from the Storm Drain Utility Fund (CIP 2312), not the General Fund. Council asked for clarification that this does not impact the General Fund deficit. The item passed unanimously. - Security Camera Replacement (Item 11): Staff proposed replacing over 300 aging cameras (some up to 17 years old) with a cloud-based system. The project uses IT and contingency funds within the existing budget. A public commenter criticized the expenditure given the city's deficit; Councilmembers supported the project as essential for public safety. - Firearms Ordinance (Item 13): The council deliberated on an ordinance prohibiting new firearms and ammunition sales outside the Industrial (IR) zone, requiring a 600-foot buffer from schools and residential zones. A specific amendment was proposed to allow the existing store at 301 Ocean (LMB Firearms) to operate for five years before requiring a use permit or removal. Council members debated the fairness to the business versus the wishes of the neighborhood and public safety concerns. The Motion to approve the ordinance as amended (with the 5-year provision for LMB) failed, but the original motion to approve the ordinance passed unanimously. - Residential Parking Permit Program (Item 14): Staff presented a framework to transition the program from free to a fee-based system ($25/year, with low-income exemptions) and implement "permit by plate" technology. Key features include an 80% petition threshold for new zones, a 50% participation requirement to launch, and specific restrictions for Cannery Row (grandfathering existing permits only). Council debated the 80% threshold (with members suggesting 60-70%) and the equity of Cannery Row restrictions. A substitute motion was passed to approve the framework with the threshold adjusted to 70% and Cannery Row grandfathered permits subject to annual review. - Daycare Appeal (Item 17): The council deliberated an appeal to overturn the Planning Commission's denial of a use permit for a Montessori Daycare at 2400 Garden Road due to its location within the airport's "Zone 7" (vulnerable population restriction). Applicants and the City Attorney argued for an override based on parental choice, the lack of alternative sites, and the fact that the airport's concerns were overestimated. The council voted unanimously to overturn the Planning Commission's denial to allow the appeal to proceed to the Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC) for a potential final override by the council. - Signage Regulations (Item 18): The Mayor requested to agendize a discussion on updating city code regarding temporary non-commercial signs on private property, specifically addressing the practice of splitting large signs into multiple smaller ones to bypass size limits. Council members debated the urgency of the issue versus the city's budget deficits and other higher-priority agenda items. A consensus was reached to place the item on a future agenda for staff to draft a proposed ordinance amendment. Key Outcomes - Consent Agenda: Approved unanimously (Item 7 recused). - Firearms Ordinance: The council voted to approve the first reading of the ordinance restricting firearms sales to the Industrial zone with a 600-foot buffer. A specific provision was debated regarding the existing business at 301 Ocean. - Parking Program: The council approved the Residential Parking Permit Program framework with a modified petition threshold of 70% (instead of 80%) and a requirement for Cannery Row grandfathered permits to be reviewed annually. The fee structure ($25) and "permit by plate" transition were adopted. - Daycare Appeal: The council unanimously voted to overturn the Planning Commission's denial of the Montessori Daycare use permit, initiating the process for the City Council to potentially override the ALUC's decision (requiring a future 2/3 vote). - Signage: Council agreed to agendize a discussion on clarifying the temporary sign ordinance to prevent circumvention of size limits, with staff to draft a recommendation for a future meeting. - Adjournment: Meeting concluded with the appointment of Pet Moore as the new Fire Chief effective December 31st.

On October 28, 2025, the Monterey City Planning Commission convened to approve a residential expansion at 201 Hawthorne Street following staff presentation, applicant comments, and public inquiry. The commission also reviewed the Planning Office update regarding the Local Density Bonus ordinance, the upcoming November 25th meeting schedule, the dissolution of the Architectural Review Commission (ARC), and progress on the Local Coastal Program (LCP). Consent Calendar - Approval of the minutes from the previous meeting by roll call vote. Public Comments & Testimony - No members of the general public provided oral testimony during the public comment period or the public hearing for the specific agenda item. - Commissioner Freeman expressed concern regarding the lack of progress on the Garden Road Area Specific Plan, stating, "I really think that we need to keep on track on this," and questioning the timeline for the work plan to address new residential development. - Commissioner Dawson noted the upcoming City Council hearing on the nursery school appeal scheduled for November 4th and expressed positive observations regarding the concrete and steel progress at the Monterey Regional Airport terminal construction. - Commissioner Latasa voiced concern over unofficial reports that a Mercedes dealership is leaving Monterey, noting, "it's just gonna be a big hit on the budget," though acknowledging the property is privately held. Discussion Items - Item ARP 25-0111 (201 Hawthorne Street): Staff presented a recommendation to approve an expansion of a non-conforming single-family dwelling. The project involves adding approximately 16.77 square feet to the kitchen, enclosing part of the garage to create habitable space, and relocating utilities. The applicant calculated the expansion as a 4.2% increase of the existing habitable floor area. - Commissioner Bluth questioned the code's allowance for expanding non-conforming structures, asking for clarification on the "10% of existing habitable floor area" rule. Staff confirmed this specific code section allows the Planning Commission to approve expansions up to 10% provided the non-conformity is not increased beyond that limit and the number of dwelling units remains unchanged. Commissioner Bluth requested that even if the garage expansion were included in the calculation, the project would still be compliant. - Assistant Planning Manager Levi Hill clarified that the Architectural Review Commission (ARC) does not have jurisdiction over this specific type of expansion; the zoning code explicitly grants this authority to the Planning Commission. - Planning Office Update: - Staff reported that the expansion of the Local Density Bonus Ordinance was approved for first reading at the City Council meeting and will proceed to a second reading to become effective 30 days thereafter. - The Commission confirmed that the November 11th meeting is canceled due to Thanksgiving, with the next meeting scheduled for November 25th. - Tentative items for November 25th include a street abandonment project on Cedar Street, a use permit for 2023 North Fremont Street, and an action to dissolve the ARC (despite a joking remark about Commissioner Mike's retirement, staff clarified members serve for life). - Commissioner Dawson raised the Garden Road Area Specific Plan, noting it is a "major area of new residential development" and urging the city to maintain a deadline for the work plan to help manage discussions regarding airport noise sensitivities. - Staff confirmed that the review of the Local Coastal Program (LCP) is underway, with draft chapters for the Coastal Commission submission expected by the end of 2025, and plans to present chapters to the Planning Commission concurrently for feedback. Key Outcomes - Motion Passed: The Commission unanimously approved the Architectural Review Permit (ARP 25-0111) for the expansion of the non-conforming single-family dwelling at 201 Hawthorne Street following a roll call vote (Vice Chair Latassa, Commissioner Bluth, Commissioner Dawson, and Commissioner Freeman all voted "Yes"). - Appeal Deadline: The decision is appealable to the City Council within 10 days of the meeting. - Schedule Change: The Planning Commission meeting originally scheduled for November 11th has been cancelled; the next meeting is set for November 25th. - Future Agenda Items: The City Council was notified of the nursery school appeal hearing on November 4th.

The Monterey City Council convened on October 21, 2025, to address a $10 million structural budget deficit for the upcoming fiscal year, approve a local density bonus ordinance for 100% affordable housing, and discuss various infrastructure and operational items. The session featured significant public testimony regarding street vending ordinances, the impact of a new sales tax measure, and concerns over the utilization of Neighborhood Improvement Program (NCIP) funds. Following a brief afternoon session, the Council recessed for a closed session regarding real property negotiations and existing litigation before reconvening for the evening deficit discussion. A consensus was not reached on final deficit reduction strategies, with the Council directing staff to provide further data on position freezes and program cuts before making a decision in December or early 2026. Consent Calendar - Approval of Teleconference Participation: Councilmember Barber was approved to participate via teleconference following a roll call vote (5-0) after confirming accessibility and compliance with the Brown Act. - Consent Agenda Items: The consent calendar included various routine approvals, with Items 2 (First Reading of Building Codes), 3 (Tyler Technologies Contract), and 5 (Del Monte/Casa Verde Trail Contract Amendment) pulled for individual discussion and separate voting. - Approval: The remaining items on the Consent Calendar were approved by roll call vote (5-0). Public Comments & Testimony - Display Boat & Preservation: Kurt Chipton expressed strong opposition to the neglect of the historic display boat, urging the Council to establish an agenda item for protecting city properties of historic value. - Wharf Vendor Stress: Mary Nissim criticized the current vending ordinance for causing "dramatic loss in sales" and extreme financial stress for vendors, stating that no city study was conducted prior to its implementation. - Neighborhood Harassment: Jason Asmus requested city intervention regarding a neighbor allegedly utilizing city resources (towing, building inspections) to harass residents. - Vending Ordinance Litigation & Ex Parte Violations: A series of speakers argued that the city violated the ex parte rule regarding public records and communication with Councilmember Barber. One speaker presented evidence they alleged was an audio recording of a business owner offering a bribe to City Manager Hans Oosler to implement harsh vending enforcement, claiming the bribe was accepted as enforcement intensified after the offer. - Support for Vendors: Multiple speakers, including a 14-year-old representing vendors, George McNeely, and Jeff Swanson, expressed full support for sidewalk vending, describing the current ordinance as "illegal" and "unethical". They cited California SB 944 as protecting vendors from "economic gatekeeping" by established businesses. - NCIP Program Defense: Speakers including Karen Brown and members of the NCIP committee strongly opposed touching NCIP funds, describing the program as essential for community enhancement and defending it against claims of being a "piggy bank". - Budget & Spending Concerns: Rick Hoyer and others pointed to a "spending problem" rather than a revenue problem, citing a high percentage of six-figure salaries for city employees and the potential sale of city property. They urged the Council to freeze non-essential spending and eliminate the Economic Development Director position. - Aquarium Opposition: Nina Beattie opposed the Aquarium's practices (sonar, sea otter tracking) and urged the Council to negotiate a market-rate lease rather than granting a subsidized lease, calling the Aquarium's claims of poverty inconsistent with their $50 million boat purchase. - M1W Rate Study: Esther expressed gratitude for the City Academy and noted upcoming rate hikes from M1W. Discussion Items - Building Code Adoption (Item 2): Council approved the first reading of an ordinance adopting the 2025 California Building Standards Code and 2024 International Property Maintenance Code, including local amendments for wildfire safety and urban interface codes. Staff clarified that while the adoption is immediate, the code becomes effective on January 1, 2026. A second reading is scheduled in two weeks. - Enterprise Resource Planning System (Item 3): The Council voted to approve a $3.869 million contract with Tyler Technologies Inc. to replace the existing financial system by 2027. Staff confirmed the funding is reserved in the IT reserve and that two new in-house positions will be hired to manage the implementation for 2-3 years. - Del Monte/Casa Verde Recreation Trail (Item 5): The Council authorized a contract amendment extending SJ Construction Management's services by six months and increasing the cost by $161,660 to address delays caused by "Buy America" steel pole waiting periods, groundwater issues, and utility conflicts. The project is now estimated to be completed in December 2025. - Density Bonus Ordinance (Item 8): The Council voted unanimously (5-0) to advance the first reading of an ordinance establishing a 50% density bonus specifically for 100% affordable housing projects. Staff clarified this fills a gap in state law where 100% affordable projects currently do not receive the "bonus on bonus" available to projects with less than 100% affordability. Discussion included concerns about potential "ghettoization" and the need to balance density with community integration. - Council Travel Reimbursement (Item 9): In response to public concern regarding the city's financial status, Vice Mayor Garcia moved to table the adoption of the new council engagement and travel reimbursement policy to focus on the structural deficit. The motion passed (5-0). - Deficit Reduction Strategy (Evening Session): Staff presented three primary scenarios to address the $10 million deficit: (1) Freezing unfilled positions (approx. $2.2M-$3.1M savings); (2) Extracting $3M-$4M from non-started NCIP projects; and (3) Skipping the next fiscal year's NCIP allocation. Councilmembers debated the necessity of pausing recruitment for the Economic Development Director, eliminating the Rental Assistance program, and using reserves vs. NCIP funds. No final agreement was reached, as Councilmembers requested further data on specific position freezes and program impacts before making a decision.

The Finance and Engineering Committee convened to review unaudited financial reports, project expenditures, and infrastructure status updates for the 2024-2025 and current fiscal years. The committee discussed the allocation of Measure S funds, the city's street pavement conditions, and the strategy for the upcoming 2026 ballot renewal. Key discussions centered on budgetary prudence regarding intern wages, specific line-item expenditures, and the technical details of road rehabilitation projects. Consent Calendar - Approval of Minutes: The committee approved the correction of minutes from July 21, 2025, to reflect Rick Hoyer's absence during the roll call vote for that date. The motion to approve the minutes as corrected carried with six member presence/yes votes (Rick Aldinger, Justin Chang, Carol Trabalian, Rick Hoyer abstained on vote 1, but was present for the correction; all voted Yes on the corrected motion). Public Comments & Testimony - No public comments were received during the meeting. Discussion Items - Budgetary Controls & Intern Wages: - Rick Hoyer expressed concern regarding the payment of city interns at $21/hour despite the California minimum wage being $16.50, questioning the necessity of paying above minimum wage during a fiscal deficit. He emphasized the need to find savings, stating, "We're in a mode where we have a structural deficit, we have to save money." - Staff explained that intern rates are set in the salary schedule, not the Position Control List (PCL), and represent a competitive wage rate in the current market. Staff noted that while unpaid internships are rare, the role of interns is to offset hours that would otherwise be performed by full-time staff, representing a return on investment. - Carol Trabalian voiced skepticism about the value proposition of paying interns when the city is "broke," stating, "We can't afford to pay Cadillac when a Buick would work." She supported an attempt to lower costs where possible to offset other expenditures. - Expenditure Discrepancies: - Rick Hoyer questioned an $8.62 expenditure for a laptop adapter under the ADA account, expressing concern about using public tax funds for such a small item and suggesting it might be ineligible. - Staff member Andrew later clarified that the adapter was a piece of permanent equipment used by a field surveyor for ADA elevation work, not an intern personal expense. He stated that because the equipment remains with the city, the expenditure is eligible for review. - Storm Drain Permitting: - Rick Hoyer inquired about the status of the VS Baranza storm drain project after noticing small expenditures. An engineer explained that the project had been stalled for two years in permitting and land acquisition, but a design path was recently approved by the State Water Resources Control Board. - Street Rehabilitation & Technical Issues: - Engineering staff described upcoming full-depth reclamation (FDR) projects on North Fremont at the Seaside city limit, noting the high traffic index required for the design. - A discrepancy was raised regarding road limits on Aguajito and Monholland; city data shows a small segment, but county GIS data suggests a significantly longer segment that the city might be responsible for, requiring a surveyor to determine the exact boundary. - Staff reported that utility trench restoration for previous gas main failures on Munris and Van Buren remains incomplete, highlighting the challenges of coordinating with utility providers. - Measure S Renewal Strategy: - Rick Hoyer questioned the understanding that a 50% + 1 vote is sufficient for renewal, while the committee discussed if any change in language, including the duration of the tax, would necessitate a two-thirds vote. Staff stated their preliminary consultation with the City Attorney supports the 50% + 1 threshold only if the language is identical. Key Outcomes - Expenditure Reports Approved: - Unaunted expenditures for FY 24-25 (July 1, 2024 – June 30, 2025) were accepted unanimously. Total spend: $10.7M (Storm Drains: $634k, Sidewalks: $440k, Pavements: $6.2M, ADA: $3.1M). - Unaunted expenditures for Q1 FY 25-26 (July 1, 2025 – Sept 30, 2025) were accepted unanimously. Total spend: $499k (Storm Drains: $110k, Sidewalks: $109k, Pavements: $155k, ADA: $280k). - Periodic Reports Accepted: - Unaunted periodic reports for the full FY 24-25 (Revenue: $108M, Expenditures: $87M, Balance: $20M) were accepted. - Unaunted periodic reports for Q1 FY 25-26 (Revenue: $1.07M, Expenditures: $656k, Fund Balance Increase: $425k) were accepted. - Street Rehabilitation Report Accepted: The committee accepted the report on street rehabilitation, noting a current Pavement Condition Index (PCI) of 80 (91st percentile) and upcoming projects on North Fremont, Wave Street, and Cass Street. - Sales Tax Update Received: The Q1 2025 sales tax report was received. While the city saw a 1.7% decrease, Measure S showed a 0.2% increase, and Measure G a 0.4% increase. The graph in the report, originally labeled Q4 2024, was noted for confusion but accepted as presented. - 2026 Meeting Dates Established: The dates for the 2026 calendar were accepted unanimously: - January 26, 2026 - April 20, 2026 - July 20, 2026 - October 19, 2026 - Motion Carry Counts: - Minutes Approval (Corrected): 4 Yes (Rick Hoyer abstained on original vote, but motion carries on correction). - FY 24-25 Expenditures: 4 Yes (Rick Hoyer Abstain on original vote? No, roll call shows: Rick Aldinger Yes, Justin Chang Yes, Carol Trabalian Yes, Rick Hoyer Yes. Wait, roll call: "Rick Aldinger. Yes. Justin Chang? Yes. Carol Trabalian. Yes. Rick Hoyer. Yes." - All Yes). Correction: The roll call transcript for the motion shows all four voting Yes. - Q1 2025 Expenditures: 4 Yes. - Periodic Reports (FY 24-25 & Q1 2025): 4 Yes. - Street Rehab Report: 4 Yes. - Sales Tax Report: 4 Yes. - 2026 Dates: 4 Yes. - Next Steps: Staff will verify the 50% vs 2/3 vote requirement for the Measure S ballot language with the City Attorney. The city will proceed with planning for the 2026 ballot renewal without language changes to ensure majority vote eligibility. A surveyor will be engaged to resolve the Aguajito/Monholland boundary limit dispute. An intern wage rate review may be initiated to explore cost-saving opportunities. The $8.62 adapter charge will be retained as a legitimate equipment purchase pending final clarification.

The Zoning Administrator met on October 16, 2025, to consider a use permit application for a mixed-use conversion at 225 Canary Row. Senior Associate Planner Chris Schmidt presented a staff report recommending approval of the project for the conversion of existing office space into four residential units, contingent on specific conditions regarding parking and historic permits. Zoning Administrator Levi Hill reviewed the findings, received no public testimony, and subsequently approved the application. Discussion Items - Project Proposal (UP250131): Staff recommended approving the use permit for a mixed-use development at 225 Canary Row (Existing building, 3-story structure). The project involves converting the second and third floors of an existing commercial building into four residential units (Units A, B, C, and D), with Unit B being a two-story unit. - Project Attributes: The proposal includes 4 parking spaces reserved via a parking pass purchase from the Canary Row Garage, required storage, and in-unit laundry. Exterior modifications, including replacement windows near the recreation trail, will require a separate Architectural Review (historic) permit. - Staff Findings & Recommendations: The staff report affirmed that the use is consistent with the CR zoning district objectives, the Mixed-Use Neighborhood general plan designation, and does not pose a detriment to public health, safety, or welfare. - Zoning Administrator Review: Administrator Levi Hill reviewed the draft resolution and staff findings, confirming consistency with zoning ordinance objectives, land use regulations (including the submission of a residential parking plan), and the general plan, while noting the requirement for a parking agreement and historic permitting for exterior changes. Public Comments & Testimony - No members of the public were present in the chambers or joined remotely to provide testimony or express positions regarding the item. Key Outcomes - Approval: Zoning Administrator Levi Hill approved Use Permit Application UP250131 with conditions of approval. - Conditions: The approval is contingent upon: (1) execution of a parking agreement with the city, (2) compliance with the CR zoning district land use regulations, (3) consistency with the general plan and mixed-use neighborhood goals, (4) proof that the proposal will not be detrimental to public health, safety, welfare, or the general welfare of the city, and (5) obtaining an Architectural Review permit for exterior window replacements. - Appeal Notice: Decisions of the Zoning Administrator are appealable to the Planning Commission within 10 days of the meeting. - Adjournment: The meeting was adjourned with no further business.