Public Meetings - Newport, Rhode Island

The fourth meeting of Newport's Comprehensive Plan Advisory Committee took place on September 18, 2026, as the final session of a week-long engagement trip. The meeting focused on refining the draft vision statement and workshopping goals and proposed strategies in small breakout groups organized by topic area. Note: No agenda or meeting minutes were available for this meeting. The raw transcript contains long stretches of inaudible or unclear speech, side conversations, and technical difficulties, so portions of the discussion could not be reliably summarized. Discussion Items - Vision statement review: The facilitator reviewed prior feedback that the vision was "too long and too wordy" and noted the revised version added a preamble to ground the vision in today's challenges. The preamble reads in part that "Newport is a destination that draws visitors from around the world," but "for us, Newport is home, a quaint and close-knit island community" facing "real challenges that threaten life as we know it" over the next 20 years, and that "Newporters must work together today to guide needed change, deepen bonds between neighbors, and protect this beloved place." - Draft vision statement: The draft vision reads: "As a forward-thinking leader in resilience, sustainability, and connectivity, we will ensure that Newport is a community where people of all ages, backgrounds, and abilities can live, learn, work, thrive, and enjoy the waters that surround our island home." - Three through lines: The facilitator introduced three threads — people, salt water, and resilience — described as connecting to all 11 comprehensive plan topic areas. Resilience was framed broadly to include not only natural hazards and climate change but also a resilient housing system and economy. - Funding concerns: The question of funding was raised — specifically how much of the cost the city would bear, how much would fall on individual property owners, and what outside resources the city would need to access. The facilitator noted this had been a recurring theme in most of the week's focus groups. - Breakout group structure: Participants were assigned to groups based on their prior topic votes, with most receiving their first choice and some their second. Group A (nine people, the largest) addressed community frameworks: land use, economic development, and housing. Group B addressed vibrant and healthy communities: transportation, city services, and facilities. Group C addressed preserving heritage: open space, recreation, and historic and cultural resources. A fourth area, sustainable systems and services (energy, natural resources, natural hazards, and climate change), was also available, with the facilitator hoping participants would join. Each group was scheduled to spend about 30 minutes per topic, with about 20 minutes at the end to share findings across groups. - Feedback on the preamble: At least one participant expressed support for the call-to-action framing of the revised preamble, saying they preferred it "rather than just complaining about everything." Key Outcomes - No formal votes or binding decisions were identified in the transcript; the session was a working meeting to collect feedback on the vision statement, goals, and strategies. - The vision statement remains under revision, with participants invited to continue marking up the displayed text during the session. - Discussion outcomes from the breakout workshops were intended to inform the comprehensive plan as it moves toward drafting.

The Newport Planning Board met on September 18, 2026, at approximately 6:30 PM. All board members were present (a "full house," per the chair). The board unanimously approved the August 3, 2026 meeting minutes, unanimously continued two applications to October 5, 2026, and heard a staff presentation on the comprehensive plan open house results and the review timeline ahead. No public comments were made at the meeting; public feedback had been gathered through the earlier open house and online channels. Consent Calendar - Minutes: Motion to approve the August 3, 2026 meeting minutes passed unanimously (all in favor). - Continuances (unanimous): On the request of Jackson, representing both applicants, the board continued the following matters to the October 5, 2026 meeting because the applicant could not be available: - Plan 268 – 59 Washington Street, TAP 12 Lot 120 (unified development review for a minor subdivision). - Plan 2611 – 701 Bellevue Avenue, TAP 38 Lot 023, R-60 residential. Discussion Items - Reports of the Administrative Officer: Board members had reviewed the administrative matters; there were no questions or discussion. - Liaison Reports: One member had been away for the most recent meeting and could not report. The Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Commission liaison (Hayden/Aiden) was not present, and no board member is currently attending; the chair noted there would be future opportunities to serve as liaison. - Comprehensive Plan Open House and Review Timeline (presented by planning staffer Becky): - The open house drew 70+ attendees, plus 6 online comment submissions (2 by email, 4 through the online comment portal). - Activities included 12 engagement stations, a collaborative map on Broadway with a sign-in table staffed by a planning board volunteer, and 3 informational boards (also available online at Engage HQ as PDFs). - The team counted 2,650+ community touch points, with a plus sign added because some informal conversations and questions could not be measured. - The city had been told to aim for 400 surveys and not be disappointed with 200–400; the process more than doubled that target. - The consultant (Interface) prepared 10 key takeaways that framed the open house content. - In the "Newport Bucks" participatory budgeting exercise, the top-performing strategies (tied at 11 stars) included protecting and improving the harbor walk and its public access connections, followed by (tied at 10 stars) updating zoning to encourage housing units within existing buildings in keeping with local architectural character, and adopting zoning changes to encourage new housing unit production and preservation of existing units. - The strategy with the most bills (22 Newport Bucks) was to pilot micro-mobility programs such as bike share, golf carts, wayfinding signage, and bike safety education to encourage use of the Newport Access Hub and the Gateway Center. The strategy to create and preserve spaces for a diverse economy also drew many low-value bills. - 11 chapter stations allowed participants to place star stickers on preferred strategies. Other top goals included coordinating with Middletown and Portsmouth to share information, resources, and facilities to improve government efficiency, with additional ties in economic development and natural hazards/climate change. - The open house was the final large public engagement event. The project team is working with Interface to finalize the review schedule and order for the 2026–2027 planning board meetings, using a staggered, section-by-section draft review (3–4 chapters at a time) under Rhode Island General Law Title 45, Chapter 22.2. The final draft will be forwarded to the City Council with a positive recommendation. - Staff noted that collecting board comments section-by-section raises open meeting/quorum considerations: back-and-forth discussion in a non-public forum could violate quorum rules, and there are questions about whether feedback submitted to staff after a public hearing may be accepted. Board members may aggregate comments for staff, but the fine print of public hearing rules must be reviewed. - Board members offered informal reactions. One member stated they had expected people to be more negative and were surprised by the strong positive support for housing and by residents' sense of empowerment regarding zoning. Another appreciated that both dollar totals and number of bills were shown, because it indicates how strongly people felt about certain strategies. Multiple members praised Interface for being "dialed into Newport" and for exceeding expectations. - No formal analysis of the open house feedback has been completed yet; staff noted that different methods and venues (e.g., a Friday movie night event) produced different perspectives. Key Outcomes - Vote (unanimous): Approved the August 3, 2026 meeting minutes. - Vote (unanimous): Continued Plan 268 (59 Washington Street) and Plan 2611 (701 Bellevue Avenue) to the October 5, 2026 meeting. - No formal action was taken on the comprehensive plan. Staff will distribute the open house presentation PDFs to board members and will communicate the draft review order, format, and level of detail in the coming weeks.

The Newport Planning Board convened on September 18, 2026 at approximately 11:30 AM (the meeting concluded at 6:58 PM). The primary business was a certification of consistency with the Comprehensive Plan for a Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) application supporting the rehabilitation of Mumford Manor, a 34‑unit affordable housing complex for residents aged 62 and older. The board also received updates on demolitions, liaison reports, the Comprehensive Plan update process, and several transportation planning initiatives. Consent Calendar - Approval of Minutes: The board unanimously approved the minutes of the June 1, 2026 meeting. Motion carried without opposition. Discussion Items - Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) – Affordable Housing Round / Mumford Manor: Staff recommended a finding that the CDBG application is in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan. The application requests $750,000 from the Rhode Island Community Block Grant Program to rehabilitate Mumford Manor, a historic 1909 school building converted to 34 one‑bedroom affordable housing units for residents 62 and older (originally converted in 1982 by Church Community Housing Corporation). Stephanie Boko (representing the real estate development programming corporation, standing in for city CDBG administrator Bob Plain) answered questions. The funds will be used for utility upgrades, solar panel replacement, fire suppression system improvements, and other safety upgrades. Residents will not be displaced; existing vacancies and intra‑building relocation will be used during construction. The board voted to accept the staff report and then voted unanimously to find the project in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan. Administrative Actions - Demolitions: Two demolition permits were reported for information only: 46 East Bowery Street (demolish a 1.5‑story single‑family home to build a new single‑family home) and 194 Cogshaw (demolish a 2‑story single‑family home to build a new single‑family home). Both are one‑for‑one replacements. No board action required; no questions were raised. Liaison Reports - Tree and Open Space Commission: The commission continues its work on protecting trees and open space. Concern was noted about Newport’s relatively small tree canopy compared to comparable communities, highlighted in Comprehensive Plan data. Agitation about tree removal in development projects was mentioned. - Waterfront Commission: The commission has held two public hearings on Parate Park and will hold a third at the end of September. Feedback has been positive, but some public confusion remains; a public information campaign is being considered to explain the investment and benefits. - Energy and Environment Commission: The meeting was missed due to a time change, but minutes indicate discussions on the composting pilot, solar updates, and the theme plan update, aligning with Comprehensive Plan work. Comprehensive Plan Update - Focus Groups & Open House: Staff (Frederick and Sunny) reported that four second‑round focus groups (boiled down from 12–13 first‑round groups) were held at the library and Innovate Newport, with very good turnout and “real traction.” The consulting team (Interface) is now synthesizing feedback. An open house for the public is scheduled for August 27, 2026 at City Hall (starting at 5:30 PM, ending at 8 PM). If weather permits, the event will begin outside with ice cream or a Dels truck, then move into council chambers with informational stations by chapter. Planning board members are being asked to volunteer as “stewards” at stations based on their focus group participation or expertise; an RSVP and a pre‑workshop virtual session will be arranged. Advisory committee members (about 30 community members) will participate differently, sharing perspectives from their breakout groups. - Council Workshop: A workshop with the City Council revealed that long‑time council members felt past planning efforts had failed and asked how new strategies would differ. Board members stressed the need for creative, evidence‑based approaches and case examples, particularly for economic development alternatives to tourism and hotels. Staff indicated the upcoming advisory committee meeting will focus on such case studies. Bicycle & Pedestrian Advisory Commission / Transportation Updates - Safe Streets for All Grants: Newport is a beneficiary of two federal Safe Streets for All grants. A large $4 million island‑wide implementation grant (awarded last December) is being finalized; a five‑year completion clock will start once the agreement is signed. A second planning grant focuses on Third Street in front of the Navy Hospital, to augment the safety action plan and position the area for future funding. - One‑Way Street Study (Spring–Thames): Bowman Engineering was selected to study the system of narrow one‑way streets between Spring and Thames streets. The study will assess opportunities to adjust traffic patterns, add pedestrian and bike facilities, and address parking and safety issues (e.g., oversized trucks, sidewalk parking). A series of four public meetings is planned, with the first on August 18, 2026 (workshop style, with boards and engineers). - Federal Policy Concerns: A board member asked whether recent Office of Management and Budget (OMB) guidance requiring grant oversight by a political appointee could affect these grants, given potential policy misalignment. Staff reported no impact to date; the grants passed review prior to the new guidance. One project on Narragansett Avenue now requires that transit lanes not be narrowed, but otherwise the program is proceeding. Multiple board members noted the strength of the island‑wide coalition as a factor in the grants’ survival. Key Outcomes - CDBG Certification: The board found the Mumford Manor CDBG application ($750,000) to be in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan (unanimous vote). - Demolitions: Accepted for information; no action required. - Comprehensive Plan: The August 27 open house and a pre‑workshop for board members are confirmed. Staff will provide slides and materials ahead of time. - Transportation Studies: The safe streets agreements are being finalized; the one‑way street study public process begins August 18. - The meeting adjourned at 6:58 PM.

The Newport Department of Utilities held a public workshop on September 18, 2026, to present a proposed stormwater fee based on impervious area (hard surfaces) per parcel. The goal is to replace the current funding model—where stormwater costs are buried in the sewer rate and based on water consumption—with a dedicated fee that more equitably allocates costs among properties contributing runoff. The workshop included a presentation by Rob Schultz (General Manager/Chief Engineer, Department of Utilities) and Katie Cromwell (Vice President, RAF Tellis). Approximately 10,000 notices were mailed to property owners with estimated fee amounts. Public Comments & Testimony - Several residents expressed concerns about the accuracy of notices, particularly for condominium units. One attendee reported that their notice showed the entire parcel's impervious area (62,000 sq ft), resulting in an inflated fee. Schultz acknowledged that about 500 notices had this error and said corrections would be made. - A resident argued that stormwater costs should be funded through property taxes instead of a utility fee, calling the consultant process "ridiculous." - Multiple attendees questioned the fairness and precision of the impervious area yardstick. One stated, "I disagree that it is wrong," arguing that the system's runoff contributions vary. Schultz responded that while not perfect, the method is "dramatically better" than using water use. - A resident asked about credit for rain barrels and pervious surfaces; Schultz confirmed a credit program would allow up to 50% of the fee to be credited for on-site stormwater management features. - Another attendee noted that seasonal residents only pay stormwater costs during summer under the current system, but Schultz said the fee would apply year-round. Discussion Items - Funding Problem: Current sewer rates include stormwater costs, but water use is a poor measure of runoff. Properties with large paved areas but low water use pay little; high water users (e.g., restaurants) overpay. The proposal would separate stormwater and sewer costs. - Proposal Details: The stormwater fee would be based on impervious area (roofs, pavement, sidewalks, etc.). An Equivalent Residential Unit (ERU) is defined as 2,400 sq ft of impervious area. Residential properties fall into tiers: small (0.5 ERU for 400–1,500 sq ft), medium (1 ERU for 1,500–4,200 sq ft), large (2.2 ERU for 4,200–7,555 sq ft), and very large (measured ERU). Non-residential properties are charged per ERU based on measured impervious area. Rates: $15 per ERU per month (example). Sewer rates would decrease: fixed charge based on meter size (e.g., 5/8-inch meter from $28.15 to $28.00), volumetric rate from $25.97 to $19.00 per thousand gallons. - Bill Impact Examples: Residential with 3,000 gal/month and 1 ERU: increase $6.06/month. Seasonal (low usage): increase $4.39/month annualized. Non-residential (1.5-inch meter, 32,000 gal, 5 ERU): decrease $129.36/month. Non-residential (5/8-inch meter, 2,000 gal, 3 ERU): increase $30.91/month. - Overall Impacts: 62% of residential properties would see a decrease; 37% increase, with 90% of increases under $25/month. Non-residential: 58% increase, 40% stayed same. - Credit & Appeals Process: A credit program (up to 50% of fee) for on-site stormwater management (rain barrels, rain gardens, pervious pavers). An appeals process will allow property owners to challenge impervious area calculations. - Next Steps: An ordinance will be presented to the City Council in October 2026 to enable the stormwater utility structure (does not set rates). If passed, stakeholder group will develop credit program, account reconciliation, and billing system testing. Earliest possible implementation is July 1, 2027. The council will also consider a traditional flat sewer rate increase as an alternative pathway during the budget process. Key Outcomes - No votes were taken; the meeting was a workshop for public input. - The Department of Utilities will correct errors in notices for approximately 500 condo units. - An ordinance to authorize the stormwater utility structure is planned for council consideration in October 2026. - A public survey and email inbox (ratestudy@newportri.gov) remain open for feedback. Additional public workshops may be held.

The Newport City Council met on September 16, 2026, at 6:30 p.m. in Council Chambers at 43 Broadway. The meeting featured a proclamation honoring volunteer Liz Davis, approval of a consent calendar with numerous special event licenses and routine communications, reappointments to two city commissions, and action on several items from the City Manager, including a collective bargaining agreement withdrawal, a license agreement, a fencing contract, a dog park and landscaping MOU, two grant acceptances, and a comprehensive update to bicycle ordinances. The council also convened as the Board of License Commissioners to approve liquor licenses for upcoming special events. All votes were unanimous unless otherwise noted. Proclamation - The council recognized Liz Davis for her extensive volunteer work with unhoused residents and multiple nonprofit organizations. Hakeem Coggins (Executive Director, Newport Bridge) introduced her, and Councilor Jean Marie Napolitano read a proclamation. Liz Davis spoke about her commitment to service. Consent Calendar - Approved unanimously: Minutes from August 12 and August 26, 2026. - 14 special event licenses (from Newport Live, US Naval War College, Sail Newport, East Bay Recovery Center, Pell Center, Trinity Church, Elmwall Associates, Newport Contemporary Ballet, The Landing) approved. - Banner license for Audrain Concours Foundation approved. - Communication from CRMC regarding a public notice (received). - Communication from Waterfront Commission supporting the Perrotti Park Bulkhead Project (received and referred to administration). - Resignation from Energy and Environment Commission (received with regret). - Communication from Bob Meikle regarding a street name change (received and referred to administration). Entertainment Licenses (Public Hearing) - Daily Entertainment License for Broadway Partners, LLC d/b/a Tavern on Broadway (September 26, 2026, 1–11 p.m.) approved. - Annual Entertainment License (Class A indoor, noon–1 a.m. daily) for Tavern on Broadway approved after public hearing with no comments. Appointments - David Galvin reappointed to the Trust and Investment Commission for a five-year term expiring October 31, 2029. Councilor Carlin praised his service. - Alexander Donlan reappointed to the Waterfront Commission for a three-year term expiring October 28, 2029. Communications from the City Manager - Action Item 6672 (Collective Bargaining Agreement with AFSCME): Motion to withdraw approved, per suggestion of the union vice president. - Action Item 6673 (Scott’s Wharf License Agreement): 20-year license for a small city-owned parcel adjacent to the Smokehouse restaurant approved. - Action Item 6674 (Cliff Walk Replacement Fencing): Contract awarded to AEP Fence Services Inc. of Johnston, RI at a total cost of $22,800, budgeted. - Action Item 6675 (MOU for Dog Park and Pell Bridge Ramp Landscaping): Approved. Councilor Underwood-Segley suggested involving NACTAC students for benches; Maureen Cronin (Open Space Commission chair) noted plans for enhanced dog park amenities, tree replacement, and landscaping (shovels in ground within 30–45 days). Councilor Pinnock asked about dead trees; Cronin confirmed discussions with planning and Public Services. - Action Item 6676 (SS4A Grant Funds): Authorized acceptance of up to $6,015,225 in additional federal funds plus approximately $1.5 million in local match for a regional safe streets program (originally on consent calendar; approved). - Action Item 6677 (Explosive Detection Canine Grant): Accepted $137,000 federal grant (no match) for police canine program. - Action Item 6678 (Bicycle-Related Ordinances): Comprehensive update to bicycle ordinances approved after extensive discussion and public comment. Public Comments & Testimony (on bicycle ordinances) - Jim Fry (BPAC member) thanked the council and noted the ordinance update is a model for other communities; urged future e-bike work. - Betty Burray (Rhode Island Bicycle Coalition) praised the update as a model ordinance and expressed hope other municipalities would follow. - Bari Freeman (Executive Director, Bike Newport) emphasized the collaborative process with police and BPAC, and noted the ordinance is a comprehensive code update; she stated that e-bike regulation is a separate state-level effort. - Pete Rice (Third Ward resident) criticized the ordinance for not requiring daytime lights on bicycles, arguing visibility is the primary safety issue. - Emily and Ren Cairns (Ward 2 residents) voiced support for safer biking infrastructure for families. - Tara Zambratta (Chair, BPAC) arrived late and urged approval, noting the multi-year stakeholder effort. Discussion Items (on bicycle ordinances) - Councilor Carlin raised concerns that the prohibitions did not explicitly include Spring Street up to 40 Broadway in the General Business District, creating a potential enforcement gap. Deputy Chief Duffy and Chief agreed the intent was citywide and would ensure the final version includes all necessary areas. Councilor Carlin also highlighted the lack of local authority to fine e-bike riders due to state law, noting Representative Carson’s pending legislation to address e-bike regulation. Councilor Underwood-Segley echoed safety concerns, particularly regarding children on e-bikes without helmets. Councilor Smythe questioned enforcement methods; Chief Duffy described ongoing educational and enforcement efforts, including school programs. Councilors Pinnock and Smythe thanked BPAC and Bike Newport for their work. Key Outcomes - Consent calendar, entertainment licenses, and reappointments approved unanimously. - Action Item 6672 withdrawn unanimously. - Action Items 6673–6675, 6677–6678 approved unanimously (Action Item 6676 previously covered under consent calendar). - Council directed administration to ensure Spring Street is included in the bicycle ordinance’s prohibited areas in the final draft. - Meeting adjourned; council convened as Board of License Commissioners and approved consent calendar (Class F and F-1 liquor licenses for events) unanimously, then adjourned.

The Newport Historic District Commission met at 6:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers at 43 Broadway, Newport, Rhode Island. Members took up certificate-of-appropriateness extensions, a plan modification, summary approvals, and public hearings on residential additions, a garage-to-accessory-dwelling-unit conversion, and window/door replacement at a contributing property. Approval of Minutes - The commission approved the August 11, 2026 minutes with no amendments. Action Items - 75 Brenton LLC, 75 Brenton Road (Plat 43, Lot 24): approved an additional one-year extension for a previously approved pergola on the upper terrace. - 7 Red Cross Ave., LLC (Plat 26, Lot 44): approved a two-year extension of a previously approved Certificate of Appropriateness for a new detached structure. - John Vincze, 9 Cherry Street (Plat 12, Lot 033): approved a modification to a previously approved plan. The applicant said the original architect was no longer available and sought, among other changes, approval to use a composite-type product; the commission noted composite materials have been approved before on non-contributing buildings. Summary Approvals - Keith Fagan, 4 1/2 Kay Terrace (Plat 22, Lot 126): approved by summary approval for construction of a front porch, infill of the existing second-floor rear deck to create a bathroom, and rear mahogany work. - John Studer, 401 Bellevue Avenue, Unit 120 (Plat 35, Lot 275): approved as an abbreviated summary for a rear exterior staircase, with the condition that final materials be submitted to the planner for approval in line with commission guidelines. Public Hearings and Discussion Items - Plat 22, Lot 99 (contributing garage-to-accessory-dwelling-unit conversion): discussion focused on severely deteriorated wall studs and the loss of historic material. A commissioner objected that removing historic material would be gone forever and was not consistent with the standards the commission holds other applicants to. No decision is recorded in the transcript. - Nancy Flynn, 59 Bridge Street (Plat 16, Lot 57): the applicant presented two alternatives for a rear addition and submitted a report from Professor Honorado, an expert previously recognized by the commission. The applicant argued the addition was modest, was for a first-floor bedroom for aging in place, and met the certificate-of-appropriateness standard. Some commissioners said Alternative B changed the proportions and read as a new addition rather than an extension. A motion to approve Version B was made and approved. - Carbon View Limited LLC, 562 Bellevue Avenue (Plat 37, Lot 12): the applicant requested approval to replace doors and windows with in-kind custom wood windows with insulated impact-resistant glazing and simulated divided light, also responding to windborne-debris-protection requirements in the state building code. A commissioner noted that most or all of Newport is now in the relevant wind zone, so the commission needs clarity on how to apply the standard. Commissioners noted a disconnect between the evidentiary record and the applicant's statements; the chair said clear expert evidence that existing windows were beyond repair was needed, and energy efficiency was not a relevant factor. The application was continued so the applicant would appear at the beginning of the next hearing. Key Outcomes - Approved minutes of August 11, 2026. - Approved the 75 Brenton Road pergola extension. - Approved the 7 Red Cross Avenue two-year Certificate of Appropriateness extension. - Approved the 9 Cherry Street plan modification. - Approved summary approval for 4 1/2 Kay Terrace and abbreviated summary approval for 401 Bellevue Avenue with a materials condition. - Approved 59 Bridge Street, Version B. - Continued 562 Bellevue Avenue pending expert evidence on window repair/replacement. - The chair closed the meeting after stating that a matter raised during new or old business was not on the agenda. - The available transcript does not include individual roll-call vote tallies.

The Newport City Council held a workshop on September 1, 2026, to discuss potential ordinance changes regarding short-term rentals following Resolution 2025-88. Staff presented an overview of rental categories, registration data, enforcement efforts, parking variances, and proposed modifications. Public comments were heard from residents and business owners. No votes were taken; the workshop was informational and aimed at gathering input for future council action. Public Comments & Testimony - Mitch Edwards (representing Rhode Island Short Term Rental Association and Newport Property Rights Association) expressed concern that requiring one parking space per bedroom in commercial zones would effectively eliminate new short-term rentals. He noted existing properties would be grandfathered but prospective owners could be impacted. He supported a survey to gather data on guest vehicle usage. - Sarah Adams (owner of 9 Goodwin Street) objected to the parking requirement disparity between short-term and long-term rentals, stating her property has driveway space not counted under current rules. She argued that short-term rentals represent less than 2% of housing stock and that proposed changes would unfairly segregate streets and harm property values. She suggested differentiating between whole-house and room rentals at registration. - Shane Cooper (Barrington resident, frequent visitor) argued that the root issue is inadequate parking, not short-term rentals themselves. He urged the council to focus on creating more parking infrastructure (e.g., expanding Mary Street lot) rather than restricting rentals. He noted that tourism is vital to the city and that parking shortages cause congestion. - Olivia Nagel (553 Bellevue Avenue) questioned the discrepancy between 993 Airbnb advertisements and only 404 registered short-term rentals, clarifying that multiple ads per property and timeshare listings skew the numbers. She advocated for scaling registration fees (currently $1,000 for both a single guest house and a large hotel) and increasing penalties for repeat offenders. - Martin Fisk (owner at 8 Franklin Street) expressed uncertainty about grandfathering provisions—whether continuous registration is required and if rights transfer to new owners. He called for segmentation of registration fees based on business scale, questioned where the $1.5 million in collected fees has been spent, and raised the issue of “zombie houses” (wealthy owners leaving properties vacant for months) as a housing stock concern. - Lynn Sanzo (Spring Street resident) reported parking issues from short-term rental guests who leave cars for days with hang tags, impacting residents. She praised enforcement efforts but underscored that insufficient parking in neighborhoods bordering commercial districts is a long-standing problem. - Emily Hawley (119 Ruggles, registered voter) shared the story of an 83-year-old resident on John Street who cannot park near her home due to short-term rental vehicles, urging the council to prioritize resident needs. - Linda Stevenson (Dixon Street) supported stricter enforcement and scaling fees. She noted that short-term rentals generate trash, safety concerns, and loss of housing; she cited a murder near her home five years ago and conversions of commercial spaces (e.g., dry cleaner) into rentals. She advocated banning short-term rentals in limited business zones to preserve neighborhood fabric. - Linda Pereira (3 Goodwin Street, registered voter and property owner) testified that she rents her home to supplement income, that most guests are families attending weddings, and that parking issues are mainly caused by Salve Regina University students, not short-term guests. She called the focus on short-term rentals “discrimination” and urged a holistic parking solution. - Karen Pinelli (39 Toro Street) operates two short-term rentals in her building with on-site parking. She noted that many guests arrive without cars and that long-term rentals could generate more vehicles per unit. She opposed restrictions that would prevent her from converting her primary residence into a rental or that would limit her ability to sell the property with the same rights. - Casey Horton (Goodwin Street, Boston resident) cautioned against using weak data to justify restrictive ordinances, arguing that observed increases in short-term listings may reflect tech adoption rather than housing conversion. He urged the council to focus on zoning reform that permits multifamily housing as-of-right to address the housing crisis, rather than attacking short-term rentals. (Shortened due to time; council acknowledged receipt of his written comments.) Discussion Items - Staff Presentation: Nick Armor (Zoning Officer) and Drew Estebrook (Short-Term Rental Supervisor) presented an overview of rental types (long-term, seasonal, short-term categories), current zoning rules, registration data (404 total registered properties in 2026: 62 hotels, 8 timeshare properties, 240 guest houses, 94 home occupations), fee collections (from $269,000 in 2022 to $365,500 in 2026 to date), and enforcement statistics (84 citations in 2025, 41 in 2026 to date). They explained that parking variances for short-term rentals often require lease parking within half a mile, but the city does not monitor compliance. Proposed ordinance changes include: moving guest houses from by-right to special use permit in general business and waterfront business zones, requiring on-site parking for all bedrooms (eliminating parking credits and the ability to seek variances), and prohibiting conversion of ground-floor commercial space to guest house or manager units. Staff also raised the idea of scaling registration fees and improving enforcement (e.g., using default judgments and liens for non-payment). - Council Questions: Council members inquired about the discrepancy between state and local registration numbers (626 state vs. 397 city), the impact of uncounted long-term rentals and timeshares, the effectiveness of off-site parking leases, and the process for defaulting no-shows in municipal court. The city solicitor clarified that bench warrants are issued but that fines are limited to $1,000 under state law. Council also discussed the prohibition of owner-occupied short-term rentals in residential zones and the need for better enforcement coordination with the parking authority. - Parking & Compliance: Council expressed concern that short-term rental guests often park on residential streets despite lease agreements, and that the city lacks a monitoring system. The deputy city manager noted ongoing discussions with the parking superintendent to address double-dipping in commercial lots. Council suggested a survey of short-term rental operators to determine actual vehicle usage per rental. Key Outcomes - No formal votes or ordinance adoptions occurred; the workshop was for discussion and education. - Council directed staff to consider several potential actions: - Study the feasibility of scaling registration fees based on property size or rental type. - Explore improvements to enforcement, including stronger penalties for repeat offenders and mechanisms for default judgments or liens. - Investigate the impact of short-term rentals on parking and housing availability, potentially through a survey of operators and guests. - Review the proposed ordinance changes (banning parking credits, requiring on-site parking, special use permit requirement) for possible future introduction. - Coordinate with the parking authority to ensure that off-site leased parking is not double-counted and that guest parking passes are not issued to short-term rental properties. - Council members expressed varying positions: some supported tightening regulations (especially in limited business zones), while others emphasized the need for data-driven decisions and cautioned against harming existing businesses. - The workshop concluded with thanks to staff and participants; further council discussions are expected before any ordinance amendments are brought to a vote.

The Newport City Council met on August 26, 2026, in Council Chambers at 43 Broadway, Newport, Rhode Island, with a quorum present. Mayor Holder opened by acknowledging a tragic incident that morning and thanking Newport Police Chief Ryan Duffy, Harbor Master Steve Land, and public safety personnel, including Officer Jack Billings who was injured in the line of duty. The agenda included consent calendar approvals, resolutions, licenses, appointments, presentations on a unified parking system and fiber deployment, City Manager action items, and sewer ordinance amendments. The Council later adjourned as Council and convened as the Board of License Commissioners. Consent Calendar - Approved, in its entirety, the consent calendar, including the July 22, 2026 minutes; 11 special event permits (IYRS 47th Annual Newport Classic Yacht Regatta Awards Party, Sept. 6; Doris Duke Historic Preservation Awards, Sept. 11; Quasi una Fantasia, Sept. 12; Sail Newport Annual Fundraiser, Sept. 12; Incite: Insight Art Opening, Sept. 19; Newport String Project Pocket Concerts, Sept. 20; Back to School Book Bash, Sept. 23; Cardines Classic Volleyball Tournament, Sept. 27; Romanticism and Musical Poetry, Sept. 29; Elks Lodge Corvette Car Show, Oct. 3; and Bowen's Wharf Seafood Festival, Oct. 17-18, with Market Square street closure and food truck request); the Yachting Promotions Inc. banner license for the Newport International Boat Show; the Beach Commission communication on Easton's Beach; the R.I. DEM communication on Waites Wharf Marina Expansion water quality certification; and referral of the Waterfront Campus- Innovation Hub Zoning Amendments to the Planning Board. Public Comments & Testimony - Bob Plain, CDBG program manager at Church Community Housing, announced that the CDBG competitive round for non-housing uses opens September 8 and runs through November 10, 2026. He explained that CDBG is federal HUD funding flowing through the state and that applicants must show 51% of beneficiaries are at or below 80% of area median income, which in Newport is $74,950 per year. He said he had met with Renew Newport and the Newport Partnership for Families and urged eligible organizations to apply. Resolutions - Councilor Pinnock presented a resolution, co-sponsored by Councilor Smyth, directing the administration to designate John H. Chaffee Boulevard as a school zone within 300 feet of the EBCAP Newport Head Start Center and CCRI, improve signage, and evaluate a stop sign or other traffic controls at the Head Start circular drop-off area. The Council passed the resolution. Councilor Pinnock thanked Deputy City Manager and Standing City Manager Mike Carulo and Chief Duffy. - Councilor Ceglie presented a resolution, co-sponsored by Councilors Napolitano and Smyth, directing the city to explore the logistics, feasibility, and costs of improvements to Toppa Athletic Field, including stormwater management, sidewalks, and utility upgrades, coordinating with Salve Regina University and Newport Public Schools. The resolution noted the field serves more than 1,000 athletes and referenced the 2026 Park and Open Space Master Plan and Salve Regina's willingness to raise funds. It passed. The Council welcomed Salve Regina University President Dr. Kelly Armstrong. Licenses and Permits - Approved a temporary sidewalk café license for Newport Community School d/b/a Community Cookery, 18 Market Square, Sept. 17-20, 2026, during the Newport International Boat Show. - Approved a sidewalk café license renewal for Broadway Tavern, LTD d/b/a Tavern on Broadway, 16 Broadway. - Mayor Holder recused on the new entertainment license for Gardiner House, LP d/b/a Gardiner House, 24 Lee's Wharf, for indoor entertainment daily 11 a.m.-11 p.m. and outdoor entertainment Sunday-Thursday 11 a.m.-10 p.m. and 11 a.m.-11 p.m. on Fridays, Saturdays, and Sundays of holiday weekends; after a second public hearing with no comment, it was approved. - Approved a new entertainment license for Midtown Race Club LLC d/b/a Midtown Race Club, 255 Thames St., with indoor entertainment daily 11 a.m.-1 a.m. and outdoor entertainment until 11 p.m. Sunday-Thursday and until midnight on Fridays, Saturdays, and Sundays before holidays; second hearing, no comment, approved. - Approved an entertainment license expansion for 24 Memorial Opco LLC d/b/a Jo's American Bistro, 24 Memorial Blvd. West, expanding indoor entertainment hours on Saturdays and Sundays to 10 a.m.-10 p.m.; second hearing, no comment, approved. Appointments to Boards and Commissions - Approved Sophia Domingoes to the Juvenile Hearing Board for a three-year term expiring Aug. 26, 2029; reappointed Christopher Lewia to the Juvenile Hearing Board for a term expiring Nov. 1, 2028; and reappointed Robert (Bob) Conway to the Historic Cemetery Advisory Commission for a term expiring Oct. 14, 2029. Park Newport Unified Parking System - Superintendent of Parking Stathis Manousos presented Park Newport, a proposed unified branding and customer-service system for municipal parking. The plan would create one logo, a Park Newport website, a white-label mobile app, branded signage and uniforms, and a single public-facing platform for permits, ticket payments, appeals, maps, and rates. Manousos said there would be no direct tax cost because the parking fund is an enterprise fund and that the system would reduce congestion and improve revenue. Councilors questioned that framing, with Councilor Carlin arguing parking fund revenue is taxpayer money and asking what was wrong with the current system, where funds would be budgeted, and whether the new superintendent position was supposed to eliminate three prior positions. Administration said the position was a consolidation and no expenditures were reduced; Councilor Carlin noted the position added about $156,000 to the budget. Councilor Ceglie supported the plan, citing poor signage and the underused Gateway lot; Councilor Napolitano supported uniforms and suggested working with RIPTA on smaller buses; Councilor Smyth asked about accessible and handicapped-space information in the app. The Council took no formal vote. GoNetspeed Fiber Deployment Briefing - Heidi Mahoney of GoNetspeed reported that fiber internet service was available at approximately 525 Newport locations as of that day, with construction continuing in phases and most of the build expected by the end of 2026 and completion early next year. Residential plans start at 100 Mbps for $39.99 per month and go up to 6 Gbps, with Wi-Fi router and installation included. GoNetspeed is also providing free library connections, donating 10 connected devices, and discounting service for schools and municipal buildings. Mahoney also referenced approximately 4,621 locations in the build area. In response to questions, she said utility pole congestion is largely a pole-owner issue, the grant is CPF funding rather than BED Act funding, and there is no separate SSI/SSDI rate but the $39.99 plan and promotions are available. Brian Thorne of Rhode Island Commerce added that pricing is roughly 30-40% below competitors. The Council received the briefing without a formal vote. City Manager Action Items - Authorized the Newport Fire Department to pursue grants, philanthropic donations, and other private funding for restoration/reconstruction of the historic fire watch tower at Fire Station No. 5, limited to fundraising, planning, and preliminary design; future expenditures would require separate Council approval. - Approved a motion to withdraw Action Item 6669/26, which would have authorized acceptance of up to $4.9 million in additional FY-2025 FHWA Safe Streets and Roads for All (SS4A) grant funds. - Adopted the new Grant Award Acceptance & Authorization Policy, defining when Council authorization is required versus administrative acceptance of grant awards. - Awarded a $369,510 contract under RIMPA494A/MPA494B to DBVW Architects of Providence, with subconsultant Fuss & O'Neill, for Phase 3 schematic design of the Easton's Beach Resilience Plan, funded by the 2024 infrastructure and resilience general obligation bond. Director Teresa Crean explained Phase 2 produced the partial dune transformation option recommended by the Beach Commission; Phase 3 covers schematic design, permitting, and public engagement, with an extra $20,000 allowance for additional public engagement. She estimated parking would decline from roughly 800 to about 550 spaces under that option, with lost revenue not yet calculated. Councilor Carlin argued the Council should decide the preferred plan before spending more on consultants, noting total consultant costs were approaching $1.2 million. Councilors Napolitano and Pinnock supported moving forward. The motion passed with one councilor opposed. Ordinances (Second Readings) - On second reading, the Council approved amendments to Sections 13.08 (Sewer Service System), 13.10 (Industrial Pretreatment), and 13.12 (Sewer Service Charges) of the Codified Ordinances. In response to a question, staff said the amendments do not themselves increase sewer rates; they were prompted in part by a R.I. DEM violation, and any future rate change would go through the normal budget process. Board of License Commissioners - After adjourning as Council and convening as the Board of License Commissioners, the Board approved the consent calendar in its entirety: daily liquor licenses for International Tennis Hall of Fame's Induction Celebration (Aug. 28, 11 a.m.-4 p.m., and Aug. 29, 2-9 p.m.), Sail Newport's Annual Fundraiser (Sept. 12, 5:30-10:30 p.m.), Puddingstone Events' Quasi una Fantasia (Sept. 12, 7:30-9:30 p.m.) and Romanticism and Musical Poetry (Sept. 29, 7:30-9:30 p.m.), and Bowen's Wharf Company's Bowen's Wharf Seafood Festival (Oct. 17-18, 11 a.m.-6 p.m.) with related food truck/street closure request. Key Outcomes - Approved the consent calendar in its entirety. - Passed resolutions on Head Start traffic safety and Toppa Athletic Field improvements. - Approved all license applications and appointments as listed. - Received Park Newport and GoNetspeed briefings without formal votes. - Authorized Fire Watch Tower fundraising/planning; withdrew the SS4A grant acceptance item; adopted the Grant Award Acceptance & Authorization Policy; and awarded the Easton's Beach Phase 3 contract ($369,510) with one councilor opposed. - Adopted the three sewer ordinance amendments on second reading. - As the Board of License Commissioners, approved the daily liquor license consent calendar and adjourned.

This joint workshop of the Newport City Council and the Energy and Environment Commission (EEC) was held on August 25, 2026, at 6:30 PM in City Council Chambers. The purpose was to discuss the future of Hazard Road, a low-lying coastal road prone to flooding and adjacent to the ecologically sensitive Gooseneck Cove salt marsh. The city has received a $50,000 grant from the Rhode Island Infrastructure Bank (no municipal match required) to explore long-term resilience strategies, but no funds have been spent. The meeting included presentations on the history of the road and marsh, current challenges, and potential data collection methods. Public input was solicited through verbal comments, sticky notes, and maps. No decisions were made; the workshop was the first phase of public engagement. Public Comments & Testimony - Veronica Thomas (abutter): Noted water stagnation between small and larger marsh due to insufficient culverts, and observed speeding traffic on the road. She did not comment on frequency of flooding. - Barbara Chapman (abutter at Hazard and Ocean): Thanked staff and Save the Bay, highlighted that GPS navigation directs many vehicles (including large trucks and Ubers) onto Hazard Road, and urged preserving the fragile environment. Expressed desire to see the area enjoyed without driving through. - Reagan Siebold (frequent visitor): Expressed strong emotional attachment to the area, reported increasing trash and dumping from landscapers, opposed lighting due to wildlife concerns, and recommended against adding trash cans. - Tanner Jackson (attorney for Edith McBean, 75 Hazard Road): Raised concerns about litter and ticks in vegetation along the road, asking that data collection include monitoring of these issues. - Lori Love (former EEC member): Noted that most cars on the road are from out of state, suggested curtailing commercial traffic with weight restrictions, and advocated for mindful use of the area. - Paige Bronck (24 Weatherly Avenue): Recalled involvement in the 2009 restoration, described using the road by multiple modes, and stressed the importance of maintaining access for seniors and all users. Discussion Items - Presentation by City Staff: Teresa Creen (Director of Resilience), Hayden McDermott (City Planner), and Christina Truitt (Resilience Planner) presented the history of Hazard Road and Gooseneck Cove, including the 2009 $1.1 million restoration that raised the road and improved tidal flow. They noted that the road currently floods during king tides and is vulnerable to sea level rise (projected to be underwater at high tide with 1 foot of sea level rise by 2035-2040). The grant scope includes evaluating existing conditions, data collection, public engagement, and later concept design and alternatives analysis. No decisions have been made on road reconfiguration. - Councilor David Carlin (3rd Ward): Stated he had not received constituent complaints about flooding but had received many concerns about potential road closure, which he called “unnecessary.” He suggested the grant money could be better spent in other wards with real flooding issues. He requested the number of complaints about flooding in the last four years. - Councilor Gina Politano: Opposed closing the road, emphasized the need for a notification system when flooding occurs, and expressed concern about safety at night due to lack of lighting and guardrails. She also noted the risk to the high-pressure sewer line under the road. - Deputy City Manager Mike Carulo: Acknowledged that the initial abutter notification may have caused alarm, but reiterated that public safety is paramount. He stated that closing the road should not be an option unless absolutely necessary, and that the grant money could be returned if the council decides not to proceed. - EEC Members: Emily Conklin (Chair) asked about restoring tidal flow as a nature-based adaptation strategy; Wendley Ferguson (Save the Bay) explained that restoring tidal flow improves marsh health and resilience. Andy Bayork asked about the road’s requirement for emergency access; staff confirmed that three houses on the southern side have alternative routes that add 2–4 minutes. Avery Robertson asked whether fish and wildlife habitat restoration could be pursued without addressing the road; staff said it could be scoped separately. Key Outcomes - No decisions were made on the future of Hazard Road, road closure, or expenditure of the grant funds. - Next steps: The city will continue data collection, including potential installation of water level sensors and use of the My Coast app for photo documentation. Public input gathered at the workshop (via sticky notes and maps) will inform the next phases of the project. - Directives: Councilor Carlin requested a report on the number of flooding complaints received in the last four years. The city will consider developing a policy for closing the gates during predicted high tides and improving public notification. - Funding: The city has the option to request an amendment from the Rhode Island Infrastructure Bank to redirect the grant to other locations, or to return the funds entirely.